1: %\documentclass[12pt]{aastex}
2:
3: %----------------------
4: %--- ApJ submission ---
5: %----------------------
6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8:
9: %\input{mymargins.tex}
10: %
11:
12: %--------------------
13: %--- Emmulate ApJ ---
14: %--------------------
15: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
16: \usepackage{mathptmx}
17:
18: %\documentclass{aastex}
19: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,mathptmx}
20: %
21: % old:
22: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,times,mathptm}
23: %
24: %\topmargin=1.5cm % for use when printing on a letter size (USA)
25: %
26:
27: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
28: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
29: \def\ltorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$}\mkern-14mu
30: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
31:
32:
33: % \received{RECEIPT DATE}
34: % \revised{REVISION DATE}
35: % \accepted{ACCEPT DATE}
36: % \ccc{code}
37: % \cpright{type}{year}
38:
39: % \journalid{VOL}{JOURNAL DATE}
40: % \articleid{START PAGE}{END PAGE}
41: % \paperid{MANUSCRIPT ID}
42:
43: %\journalinfo{The Astrophysical Journal,
44: %14?: ??1--?20, 2003 Month, astro-ph/yymmnnn}
45: %\slugcomment{Received 2003 January 17; accepted 2003 March 29}
46:
47: \slugcomment{Draft of \today}
48:
49: \shorttitle{GRB~070201}
50:
51: \shortauthors{Ofek et al.}
52:
53:
54:
55: \begin{document}
56:
57: \title{GRB~070201: A possible Soft Gamma Ray Repeater in M31\footnote{Based on observations obtained with {\it XMM}-Newton, an ESA science mission with
58: instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and NASA}}
59: \author{
60: E.~O.~Ofek\altaffilmark{1},
61: M.~Muno\altaffilmark{1},
62: R.~Quimby\altaffilmark{1},
63: S.~R.~Kulkarni\altaffilmark{1},
64: H.~Stiele\altaffilmark{3},
65: W.~Pietsch\altaffilmark{3},
66: E.~Nakar\altaffilmark{1},
67: A.~Gal-Yam\altaffilmark{4},
68: A.~Rau\altaffilmark{1},
69: P.~B.~Cameron\altaffilmark{1},
70: S.~B.~Cenko\altaffilmark{1},
71: M.~M.~Kasliwal\altaffilmark{1},
72: D.~B.~Fox\altaffilmark{2},
73: %D.~A.~Frail\altaffilmark{2},
74: P.~Chandra\altaffilmark{5}$^{,}$\altaffilmark{6}
75: A.~K.~H.~Kong\altaffilmark{7}$^{,}$\altaffilmark{8}
76: and R.~Barnard\altaffilmark{9}
77: }
78: \altaffiltext{1}{Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA}
79: %\altaffiltext{2}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 0, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA}
80: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 525 Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA}
81: \altaffiltext{3}{Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstr. 1, D-85740 Garching, Germany}
82: \altaffiltext{4}{Physics Faculty, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel}
83: \altaffiltext{5}{Jansky Fellow, National Radio Astronomical Observatory}
84: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O.Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904}
85: \altaffiltext{7}{Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139}
86: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics and Institute of Astronomy, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan}
87: \altaffiltext{9}{The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK}
88:
89:
90:
91:
92: \begin{abstract}
93:
94: The gamma-ray burst (GRB) 070201 was a bright short-duration
95: hard-spectrum
96: GRB detected by the Inter-Planetary Network (IPN).
97: Its error quadrilateral, which has an area of $0.124$~deg$^{2}$,
98: intersects some prominent spiral arms of the nearby M31 (Andromeda) galaxy.
99: Given the properties of this GRB, along with the fact
100: that LIGO data argues against a compact binary merger origin
101: in M31, this GRB is an excellent candidate for an
102: extragalactic Soft Gamma-ray Repeater (SGR) giant flare,
103: with energy of $1.4\times10^{45}$~erg.
104: Analysis of ROTSE-IIIb visible light observations of M31,
105: taken $10.6$~hours after the burst
106: and covering 42\% of the GRB error region,
107: did not reveal any optical transient
108: down to a limiting magnitude of 17.1.
109: We inspected archival and proprietary
110: {\it XMM}-Newton X-ray observations of the intersection of
111: the GRB error quadrilateral and M31,
112: obtained about four weeks prior to the outburst, in order
113: to look for periodic variable X-ray sources.
114: No SGR or Anomalous X-ray Pulsar (AXP) candidates
115: (periods in range 1 to 20~s) were detected.
116: We discuss the possibility of detecting extragalactic SGRs/AXPs
117: by identifying their periodic X-ray light curves.
118: Our simulations suggest that the probability of detecting
119: the periodic X-ray signal of
120: one of the known Galactic SGRs/AXPs,
121: if placed in M31,
122: is about $10\%$ ($50\%$),
123: using 50~ks (2~Ms) {\it XMM}-Newton exposures.
124:
125:
126: \end{abstract}
127:
128:
129: \keywords{
130: gamma rays: bursts ---
131: pulsars: general ---
132: X-rays: individual: GRB~070201 ---
133: stars: neutron ---
134: galaxies: individual (M31)}
135:
136:
137: \section{Introduction}
138: \label{Introduction}
139:
140: Soon after the discovery of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs),
141: it was realized that some bursts are repeating.
142: The localization of these objects, called
143: Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters (SGRs), showed that they
144: are located in the local group
145: (Cline et al. 1980; Evans et al. 1980; Mazets \& Golenetskii 1981),
146: and their flare energy release ranges from
147: $\sim10^{39}$ to $10^{46}$~erg.
148:
149:
150: In quiescence, SGRs (and also the related
151: class of Anomalous X-ray Pulsars; AXPs)
152: are detected as faint X-ray sources
153: with luminosities in the range $\sim10^{33}$ to $10^{36}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
154: %
155: Their X-ray light curves
156: are modulated with periodicities of the order of 10~s,
157: and period derivatives of the order of $10^{-10}$~s~s$^{-1}$.
158: %
159: These properties suggest that SGRs are young neutron stars
160: with ultra-strong magnetic fields ($\gtorder10^{14}$~G).
161: %
162: Contrary to ``normal'' neutron stars (i.e., radio pulsars),
163: whose energy reservoir is rotational,
164: SGR's source of energy is most probably magnetic.
165: %
166: The basic properties of SGRs are well explained by the popular
167: magnetar model (Duncan \& Thompson 1992; Paczynski 1992).
168:
169:
170:
171: Known SGRs and AXPs are associated with star forming regions
172: (for a review see Gaensler et al. 2001).
173: Moreover, some of them may be associated
174: with supernova remnants
175: (Cline et al. 1982; Kulkarni \& Lingenfelter 1994;
176: Hurley et al. 1999;
177: Woods et al. 1999).
178: %
179: However, Levan et al. (2006) suggested a formation
180: channel for magnetars in old stellar populations.
181: %
182: %Therefore, the environment of SGRs can provide an
183: %important clue to their formation mechanism.
184:
185:
186: Unfortunately, only four SGRs are known to date, all in the
187: local group (see Woods \& Thompson 2006 for a recent review),
188: of which three reside in the Milky-Way and one in the
189: Large Magellanic Cloud.
190: %
191: The small number of known SGRs severely hinders our ability to study
192: their origin,
193: environments (e.g., Gaensler et al. 2001),
194: and rate of luminous flares
195: (Palmer et al. 2005; Popov \& Stern 2006; Ofek 2007a).
196:
197: However, the strongest SGR flares can be detected in nearby
198: galaxies (e.g., Duncan 2001; Eichler 2002).
199: %
200: Discovery of extragalactic SGRs is
201: an exciting possibility that will
202: enable us to enlarge the sample
203: of known objects in this class.
204: %
205: Unfortunately, extragalactic SGR flares have proven
206: hard to recognize, and their observed rate
207: of gamma-ray flares
208: is probably of the order of several percent
209: of the short-duration GRB observed rate
210: (e.g., Lazzati et al. 2005; Nakar et al. 2006; Ofek 2007a).
211: %
212: To date, only a small number of extragalactic SGR candidates
213: are known:
214: in M81 (Ofek et al. 2006; Frederiks et al. 2007b), in NGC\,6946 (Crider 2006),
215: and in M74 (Ofek 2007a).
216: Unfortunately, each of these candidates has been observed to flare only once.
217: Moreover, because of the limited positional accuracy
218: of most current gamma-ray telescopes,
219: they have astrometric uncertainties of
220: hundreds of square arcminutes or more.
221: This positional accuracy is too poor to allow environmental studies.
222: Furthermore,
223: given the relatively large positional uncertainty,
224: it is possible that some of these
225: candidates are due to a chance coincidence.
226:
227:
228: Discovery of extragalactic SGRs will increase our statistical sample
229: of such objects and
230: with accurate positions it will be possible to study
231: their environments.
232: In particular, it may reveal a new population of
233: SGRs that are not bound to star forming
234: regions (e.g., Levan et al. 2006).
235:
236:
237: \subsection{GRB~070201}
238: \label{GRB070201}
239:
240: In this paper we discuss an extragalactic
241: SGR giant flare candidate associated with the nearby galaxy M31.
242: %
243: At UTC 2007 Feb 1, 15:23:10.780, an intense short-hard GRB
244: with $\sim0.2\,$s duration was detected by the
245: Inter-Planetary Network (IPN; e.g. Hurley et al. 1999).
246: The burst was detected by Konus-{\it Wind},
247: {\it INTEGRAL}-SPI-ACS,
248: {\it Swift}-BAT\footnote{The burst was outside the BAT coded field of view. Therefore it was~not localized by {\it Swift}-BAT.}
249: (Golenetskii et al. 2007a),
250: and {\it Messenger},
251: while {\it Suzaku} and {\it RHESSI} were not able to observe the burst due to
252: Earth occultation, and {\it Odyssey} was not able to observe
253: it due to Mars occultation.
254: %
255: Early on, Perley \& Bloom (2007) noticed that the
256: preliminary IPN annulus crosses the Andromeda galaxy
257: (see also: Ofek 2007b; Golenetskii et al. 2007b).
258: %
259: Later on, with the analysis of the {\it Messenger}
260: data (Hurley et al. 2007), and re-analysis
261: of the data (Mazets et al. 2007),
262: the error region shrunk to a $0.124$~deg$^{2}$
263: quadrilateral that intersects the M31 galaxy.
264: %
265: \begin{figure}
266: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f1.eps}}
267: \caption{The Konus-{\it Wind} gamma-ray light curve of GRB\,070201 (solid heavy line),
268: compared with the light curve of the 2004 December 27 SGR giant flare
269: (dotted line), and the Konus-{\it Wind} light curve of GRB\,051103
270: (dashed-dotted line; Ofek et al. 2006; Frederiks et al. 2007b).
271: The light curve of the 2004 December 27 SGR giant flare is based
272: on a digitization of Figure~1 in Terasawa et al. (2005),
273: while the light curve of GRB~070201 is based on a digitization of
274: the 18-1160 keV-band light curve from the Konus-{\it Wind} website.
275: The fluxes of the different bursts are scaled such they will have the same
276: peak flux.
277: %\footnote{http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB070201\_T55390/}.
278: \label{GRB070201_LC}}
279: \end{figure}
280: %
281: %
282: \begin{figure*}
283: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=18cm]{f2_lr.eps}}
284: \caption{{\it GALEX} Near-UV image,
285: obtained on UTC 2003 September 5 (1940~s exposure),
286: of the region of the error quadrilateral
287: of GRB\,070201 intersecting
288: with M31. The solid red lines mark the
289: revised error quadrilateral (Mazets et al. 2007)
290: and the blue lines show the original error quadrilateral
291: (Hurley et al. 2007),
292: the red circles show the position of X-ray sources
293: detected during the 2007 {\it XMM} observations, the yellow boxes
294: mark the {\it XMM} X-ray sources detected in 2002,
295: the blue diamonds mark the position of X-ray sources
296: listed in the {\it ROSAT}-PSPC catalog of M31 (Supper et al. 2001), and the
297: the cyan crosses mark the position of known supernova (SN) remnants in M31
298: (Magnier et al. 1995).
299: The size of the markers (in arcsec) of the X-ray sources corresponds to
300: their flux ($F$) in the 0.2--10~keV band using the relation:
301: $10+10\times(15+log_{10}{F [{\rm erg}~{\rm s}^{-1}~{\rm cm}^{-2}]})$.
302: More than one symbol of the same type at
303: almost the same position corresponds to detection
304: of the same source in the overlap regions between images
305: taken during the same year.
306: The ROTSE-IIIb observations cover the entire error region south of
307: the yellow line.
308: \label{GALEX_X}}
309: \end{figure*}
310:
311:
312: The burst had the highest peak count rate of any
313: GRB observed by Konus-{\it Wind} in 12 years of operation
314: (excluding Galactic SGRs).
315: %
316: The GRB fluence in the Konus-{\it Wind} $20\,$keV--$1.2\,$MeV band was
317: $2.00_{-0.26}^{+0.10}\times10^{-5}\,$erg\,cm$^{-2}$,
318: and its peak flux on two-milliseconds time scale was
319: $1.61_{-0.50}^{+0.29}\times10^{-3}\,$erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$
320: ($90\%$~confidence; Mazets et al. 2007).
321: %
322: The light curve, shown in Figure~\ref{GRB070201_LC} (solid line; Mazets et al. 2007),
323: had a ``bumpy'' rise with a time scale of $20$~milliseconds
324: and two leading peaks with durations
325: of a few milliseconds, while
326: the decaying tail had a time scale of about $0.1\,$s
327: (see discussion in Mazets et al. 2007).
328: % (Fig.~\ref{GRB070201_LC}).
329:
330:
331: %The spectrum of the GRB
332: %is well fitted (in the $20\,$keV -- $1\,$MeV range)
333: %with a power law with exponential cutoff model (see \S\ref{Disc}).
334: %
335: Golenetskii et al. (2007b) and Mazets et al, (2007) found that
336: the spectrum of GRB\,070201 is well fitted by a power-law
337: with an exponential cutoff,
338: $dN/dE \sim E^{-\alpha}\exp{[-E(2-\alpha)/E_{p}]}$,
339: where $E$ is the energy.
340: They also found that,
341: in the first $64\,$milliseconds,
342: the best fit parameters
343: are $\alpha=0.52_{-0.15}^{+0.13}$, and $E_{p}=360_{-38}^{+44}\,$keV
344: ($90\%$ confidence; $\chi^{2}/dof=32/35$),
345: while the best fit parameters for the time integrated spectrum
346: are $\alpha=0.98_{-0.11}^{+0.10}$, and $E_{p}=296_{-32}^{+38}\,$keV
347: ($\chi^{2}/dof=40/40$).
348: %
349: Like GRB~070201,
350: the spectrum of the 2004 December 27
351: giant flare of SGR\,1806$-$20, at peak, is not consistent
352: with a black-body spectrum, but is well fitted by
353: a power-law with an exponential cutoff model,
354: with $\alpha=0.73_{-0.64}^{+0.47}$ ($\chi^{2}/dof=10.6/12$;
355: Frederiks et al. 2007a).
356:
357: Abbott et al. (2007b) analyzed the available
358: Laser Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Observatory
359: (LIGO; Abbott et al. 2007a) data,
360: collected within 180~s of the time of GRB~070201.
361: They did~not find any gravitational wave source
362: coincident with this GRB.
363: Using these observations they rule
364: out, at the $99\%$ confidence level, a compact binary
365: (i.e., black-holes or neutron stars) merger
366: origin for this GRB with progenitors
367: masses in the ranges:
368: $1~{\rm M}_{\odot} < M_{1} < 3~{\rm}_{\odot}$ and
369: $1~{\rm M}_{\odot} < M_{2} < 40~{\rm}_{\odot}$,
370: and with a distance below 3.5~Mpc.
371:
372:
373: In this paper, we present the case of GRB\,070201 as a possible SGR
374: giant flare in the nearby galaxy M31.
375: In \S\ref{Obs} we present
376: our search for a visible light transient associated with
377: this GRB.
378: We examine archival X-ray and UV
379: images of the IPN error quadrilateral (\S\ref{Archive}),
380: and we look for possible candidates for
381: pulsating X-ray sources that could be SGRs within
382: M31 (\S\ref{Xray}). In \S\ref{Sim} we quantify
383: the probability to detect X-ray pulsations of
384: an SGR or AXP in M31, and finally we discuss
385: the nature of GRB~070201 in \S\ref{Disc}.
386:
387: \section{Observations}
388: \label{Obs}
389:
390: Optical images of the Andromeda galaxy were obtained nightly by the
391: 0.45-m ROTSE-IIIb telescope as part of
392: the Texas Supernova Search (Quimby 2006).
393: Routine unfiltered images covering the GRB error quadrilateral
394: south of $\delta=+42^{h}08^{m}57^{s}$
395: (i.e., the southern $42\%$ of the error box, including the
396: intersection with the
397: spiral arms) were taken on
398: UTC 2007 Feb 02.0821, 10.6 hours after the GRB trigger.
399:
400: We preformed PSF-matched image subtraction of
401: the data using a modified version of the
402: Supernova Cosmology Project's search code (Perlmutter et al. 1999).
403: After subtracting off a reference template constructed from 37
404: ROTSE-IIIb images obtained between 2005
405: July and 2006 June, we find no new objects in the southern part of
406: the error box covered to a 5-$\sigma$
407: limiting magnitude of 17.15 (calibrated against the USNO-B1.0 R2 magnitude).
408: Assuming a distance to M31 of 770~kpc (e.g., Ribas et al. 2005),
409: and correcting for Galactic extinction in this direction
410: (Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis 1998; Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis 1989),
411: this corresponds to an absolute
412: magnitude limit of $-7.4$.
413:
414:
415: \section{Archival data}
416: \label{Archive}
417:
418:
419: The intersection region
420: of the error quadrilateral of GRB\,070201 with M31
421: has been observed by several facilities, including
422: {\it ROSAT}, {\it GALEX} and {\it XMM}-Newton.
423: {\it XMM} observed this field on several epochs,
424: listed in Table~\ref{Tab-ObsLog}.
425: Analysis of the 2002 {\it XMM}-Newton data
426: was presented in Pietsch, Freyberg, \& Haberl (2005).
427: %preformed as part of the
428: %{\it XMM}-Newton serendipitous source catalogue (Watson et al. 2003).
429: Interestingly, the last {\it XMM} observation of the field was obtained
430: about four weeks prior to the GRB trigger, as part of the
431: M31 {\it XMM}-Newton X-ray survey (Stiele et al. 2007).
432: %
433: Source extraction from the 2007 {\it XMM} images
434: is presented in \S\ref{Xray}, while a complete
435: catalog and analysis of the 2007 {\it XMM} M31 observations
436: will be presented in Stiele et al. (2008, in preparation).
437: %
438: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
439: \tablecolumns{5}
440: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
441: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
442: \tablewidth{0pt}
443: \tablecaption{Log of Newton-{\it XMM} observations}
444: \tablehead{
445: %\colhead{Filter} &
446: \colhead{Date} &
447: \colhead{Exp.} &
448: \colhead{R.A.} &
449: \colhead{Dec.} &
450: \colhead{PA} \\
451: %\colhead{} &
452: \colhead{} &
453: \colhead{ks} &
454: \colhead{deg} &
455: \colhead{deg} &
456: \colhead{deg}
457: }
458: \startdata
459: %GALEX & FUV & 2003-09-05 & 1.94 & & & \\
460: %GALEX & NUV & 2003-09-05 & 1.94 & & & \\
461: %%
462: %GALEX & FUV & 2003-10-09 & 4.19 & & & \\
463: %GALEX & NUV & 2003-10-09 & 4.19 & & & \\
464: %%
465: %GALEX & FUV & 2003-10-09 & 2.72 & & & \\
466: %GALEX & NUV & 2003-10-09 & 2.72 & & & \\
467: %%
468: %GALEX & FUV & 2004-09-27 & 3.26 & & & \\
469: %GALEX & NUV & 2004-09-27 & 3.26 & & & \\
470: %
471: 2002-01-26.7 & 4 & 11.33543 & $+$41.93236 & 237.28 \\
472: 2002-01-27.0 & 54 & 11.36929 & $+$41.92389 & 237.24 \\
473: % 2002-06-29.7 & 65 & & & \\
474: 2007-01-02.9 & 54 & 11.46008 & $+$41.51242 & 251.68 \\
475: 2007-01-04.2 & 52 & 11.23317 & $+$42.14294 & 250.50 \\
476: 2007-01-04.9 & 62 & 11.69142 & $+$41.88250 & 250.71 \\
477: 2007-01-06.2 & 55 & 11.36483 & $+$41.91969 & 249.36 \\
478: \enddata
479: \tablecomments{{L}ist of {\it XMM}-Newton observations of the error
480: quadrilateral of GRB~070201. PA is the position angle of the
481: {\it XMM}-Newton instruments.}
482: \label{Tab-ObsLog}
483: \end{deluxetable}
484:
485:
486:
487: In Figure~\ref{GALEX_X} we present the {\it GALEX} Near-UV image
488: of the region of the error quadrilateral intersecting
489: M31. In this Figure, we show: the
490: refined (red lines; Mazets et al. 2007)
491: and original (blue lines; Hurley et al. 2007)
492: IPN error quadrilateral;
493: the {\it ROSAT} PSPC sources (blue diamonds; Supper et al. 2001);
494: the {\it XMM} sources detected in 2002 (yellow boxes; Pietsch et al. 2005);
495: the {\it XMM} sources detected in 2007 (red circles);
496: and known and candidates SN remnants (Magnier et al. 1995).
497: The size of the markers of X-ray sources correspond to
498: their flux.
499: We note that there is some overlap between
500: the {\it XMM} observations.
501: Therefore, more than one symbol of the same type in
502: almost the same position corresponds to a detection
503: of the same source in the overlap regions between images
504: taken the same year.
505: The ROTSE-IIIb observations covers the error quadrilateral
506: south of the yellow line.
507:
508:
509: Several X-ray sources in the field of GRB\,070201
510: (Fig.~\ref{GALEX_X})
511: show long timescale variability
512: between 2002 and 2007.
513: Since several types of astrophysical X-ray sources
514: are known to vary,
515: this information by itself is not very constructive for
516: the identification of an SGR X-ray counterpart in this field.
517: %
518: However, an SGR or an AXP may reveal itself as a pulsating
519: X-ray source with periodicity around 10~s.
520: In the next section we describe a search for
521: such X-ray variable sources.
522: %
523: A thorough variability analysis of X-ray sources
524: in the entire M31 galaxy will be presented in
525: Stiele et al. (2008, in preparation).
526:
527:
528: \section{Search for short-period X-ray variable sources in the error quadrilateral}
529: \label{Xray}
530:
531: All known SGRs/AXPs exhibit X-ray pulsations
532: with periodicities in the range of 2~s to 12~s.
533: Therefore,
534: it may be possible to identify such objects in M31
535: by looking for X-ray variable sources with periods
536: in the range of $\sim$1 to 20~s.
537: %Unfortunately, as will be discussed in \S\ref{Sim},
538: %identifying such objects in M31 is challenging
539: %for current X-ray telescopes.
540: %However, since at least in two cases, the SGRs X-ray counterpart
541: %is known to brighten
542: %about a month before the gamma-ray flare
543: %(Woods et al. 2001; 2007; \S\ref{Sim}), and since the intersection of the
544: %IPN error quadrilateral with M31 was observed
545: %by XMM four weeks before the burst, we conducted
546: %a search for such a pulsating source.
547:
548: To look for such sources,
549: we inspected the pipeline-processed event files
550: of the four fields observed in 2007 (Table~\ref{Tab-ObsLog}),
551: and removed time intervals during which
552: particle events caused the event rate
553: in the detector to flare by more than two standard deviations
554: above the mean rate.
555: We then created images
556: of the 0.2--12~keV events, binned to $4$~arcsec resolution .
557: For the purpose of identifying point sources, standard data
558: selection was applied to make the images,
559: to remove events near the edges of
560: detector chips and bad pixels, and
561: to reject events that were likely to be cosmic rays (pattern $>4$
562: for the PN, and $>12$ for the MOS detectors).
563: We then generated matching exposure maps, and
564: we searched for point sources using the routine {\tt ewavelet},
565: separately for each detector.
566: We extracted events for each source from
567: the radius defined by {\tt ewavelet}, which was
568: $\approx15$~arcsec.
569: This radius contains about $50\%$ of the photons for each source.
570: The arrival times of the photons
571: were transformed to the solar system barycenter using the tool {\tt barycen}.
572: Finally, we searched for periodicities
573: in the extracted time tagged photons
574: using discrete fast
575: Fourier transforms.
576: The time series were padded so that the number of points
577: in the transforms were a power of 2.
578: This provides a frequency resolution slightly finer than
579: $1/t_{\rm exp}$, where $t_{\rm exp}$ is the exposure time.
580: The maximum frequency considered was the Nyquist frequency of
581: the 13.6~Hz PN detector sampling rate, and
582: the lowest frequency searched was $10^{-4}$~Hz.
583: We found no signals stronger than 19.15 times
584: the mean of the power-spectrum noise.
585: This cutoff power was selected,
586: such the
587: %We estimate that the
588: probability of a
589: single source to surpass this threshold,
590: in one or more of the $\sim10^{6}$ tested frequencies,
591: is about $\sim1\%$ (in the entire FFT-tested frequencies range).
592: %
593: Limiting ourself to the 1~s to 20~s periodicity range,
594: this limit corresponds to false alarm probability
595: of $\sim0.05\%$.
596: %
597: In total we search for periodicity among 149
598: X-ray sources, within the original error quadrilateral
599: (Hurley et al. 2007; blue lines in Fig.~\ref{GALEX_X})
600: which are listed in Table~\ref{Tab-src}.
601: %
602: We did~not find any periodic variable among the {\it XMM} X-ray
603: sources.
604: %
605: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
606: \tablecolumns{6}
607: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
608: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
609: \tablewidth{0pt}
610: \tablecaption{{L}ist of X-ray sources for which periodicity was searched}
611: \tablehead{
612: \colhead{Name} &
613: \colhead{RA (J2000)} &
614: \colhead{Dec (J2000)} &
615: \colhead{r\tablenotemark{a}} &
616: \colhead{Counts} &
617: \colhead{Obs/Det\tablenotemark{b}} \\
618: \colhead{} &
619: \colhead{deg} &
620: \colhead{deg} &
621: \colhead{$''$} &
622: \colhead{} &
623: \colhead{}
624: }
625: \startdata
626: 004603.5$+$414623 & 11.51444 & 41.77310 & 18.1 & 42274 & 201/PN \\
627: 004617.7$+$414258 & 11.57362 & 41.71622 & 29.5 & 24500 & 201/PN \\
628: 004618.7$+$414354 & 11.57812 & 41.73170 & 14.1 & 19633 & 201/PN \\
629: 004624.6$+$414414 & 11.60240 & 41.73723 & 18.3 & 22009 & 201/PN \\
630: 004625.6$+$414159 & 11.60687 & 41.69995 & 13.8 & 9300 & 201/PN \\
631: \enddata
632: \tablenotetext{a}{Aperture radius in which source counts were extracted.}
633: \tablenotetext{b}{{L}ast three digits of the {\it XMM} observation ID (starts with 0402561) followed by the detector name (M1, M2 or PN).}
634: \tablecomments{First five entries of the Table. The Table in its entirety is available via the electronic version.}
635: \label{Tab-src}
636: \end{deluxetable}
637: %
638: %
639: %A source that surpass this threshold,
640: %have a probability of $99\%$
641: %This threshold corresponds to
642: %confidence level
643: %of $99\%$ per all
644: %$\sim10^{6}$ tested frequencies.
645: %
646: %$99\%$ threshold of 38.3
647: %(normalized such that white noise has a mean power of 2)
648: %for a search of a single source.
649: %
650:
651:
652:
653:
654:
655: \section{Is it possible to detect the modulated X-ray emission of SGRs in M31?}
656: \label{Sim}
657:
658: %In quiescence, AXPs and SGRs are relatively faint X-ray sources.
659: The quiescence X-ray luminosity of known AXPs/SGRs ranges from
660: $10^{33}$ to $10^{36}$~erg~s$^{-1}$.
661: At the distance of M31 ($770$~kpc, e.g., Ribas et al. 2005),
662: these correspond to fluxes
663: of $10^{-17}$ to $10^{-14}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$
664: in the $2$--$10$~keV range.
665: %
666: Given these flux levels, we discuss here
667: the chances to detect the modulated X-ray light curves
668: of SGRs/AXPs in M31 as a function of
669: the flux of the X-ray source and its
670: light curve shape (i.e., the fraction of flux within
671: a pulse).
672: %
673: Specifically, we would like to answer the question:
674: what is the probability to detect an SGR or an AXP,
675: based on its periodic X-ray signal,
676: in the Andromeda galaxy? --
677: In order to answer this question we perform the
678: simulations described below.
679: %
680:
681: In our simulations we assumed a 75~ks exposure
682: with the {\it XMM}-Newton fully depleted PN CCD,
683: which roughly corresponds to a 50~ks integration
684: with all the European Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC) CCDs.
685: %
686: Our simulated time-tagged X-ray light curves consist
687: of the background expected for an {\it XMM} observation
688: and a periodic signal.
689: %
690: The periodic light curve consists of a non variable part
691: and photons clumped in periodic pulses.
692: In all the simulated photon-tagged light curves
693: the periodicity was set to exactly 10~s,
694: and the width of the periodic pulse
695: was $20\%$ of the period (i.e., 2~s).
696: We controlled the ``shape'' of the light curve by adjusting
697: the fraction of photons
698: within a pulse (hereafter 'pulse fraction').
699:
700:
701: We simulated light curves in a dense grid
702: of count rates and pulse fractions.
703: The counts rate were set to be between $10^{-4}$ to $5\times10^{-2}$
704: counts per sec (along 100 logarithmically spaced grid points),
705: and the pulse fractions in the range
706: $0.21$ to $0.81$ (61 linearly spaced grid points).
707: %
708: In each grid point we simulated 100 photon-tagged
709: light curves, and for each light curve
710: we calculated the power spectrum,
711: and checked if the 10~s period
712: signal is stronger than
713: 19.15 times
714: the mean of the power-spectrum noise.
715: We note that this threshold was used in the search for
716: X-ray variable sources described in \S\ref{Xray}.
717: %
718: Finally, in each grid point
719: we calculated the probability to recover
720: the periodic signal with a power exceeding that threshold,
721: which corresponds to false alarm probability of
722: about $1\%$.
723:
724: Figure~\ref{AXP_DetSim} presents the result of these
725: simulations.
726: The contours show the probability to detect
727: the X-ray periodicity with a
728: false alarm probability of $1\%$ per each source
729: (assuming that in each source $10^{6}$ independent
730: frequencies are tested),
731: as a function of the two free parameters.
732: The lower X-axis shows the observed count rate
733: (and the luminosity at the distance of M31,
734: on the upper X-axis),
735: and the Y-axis marks the fraction of energy
736: within a pulse whose width is $20\%$ of the period
737: of the light curve.
738: On the right-hand Y-axis we show the rms pulsed fraction,
739: $f_{rms}$, defined in Woods \& Thompson (2006; Table 14.2).
740:
741:
742: Next we compared these simulations
743: %(for the 50~ks observation)
744: with the actual
745: properties of known AXPs and SGRs.
746: For each one of the 11 AXPs and SGRs
747: listed in Woods \& Thompson (2006),
748: for which the luminosity and rms pulse fraction ($f_{rms}$)
749: are known, we calculated their count rates (or range
750: of count rates in case they are variable).
751: %
752: We converted the luminosity of the AXPs/SGRs to count rates using the
753: PIMMS web tool\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/toolkit/pimms.jsp},
754: and assumed a neutral Hydrogen column density of $10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$,
755: in the direction of M31 (Dickey \& Lockman 1990; Kalberla et al. 2005),
756: and that the distance to M31 is 770~kpc (e.g., Ribas et al. 2005).
757: Furthermore, we assumed that the X-ray spectrum of each SGR/AXP is described
758: only\footnote{Note that some of these objects have more complicated spectra.} by
759: a power-law and we adopted the measured power-law indices
760: for each one of these sources (Woods \& Thompson 2006).
761: %
762: The location of the known SGRs/AXPs in the pulse fraction
763: vs. X-ray luminosity (in the $2-10$~keV
764: range\footnote{The simulation assumes the observations are conducted
765: in the 0.2--10~keV band. For compatibility with
766: Woods \& Thompson (2006), we present the luminosity
767: in the $2-10$~keV band.}) space are presented in
768: Fig.~\ref{AXP_DetSim}
769: as circles (or lines to indicate a range).
770:
771:
772:
773:
774: The X-ray emission about one month
775: before and several months after an SGR giant flare
776: is known to be higher than ``normal''.
777: %
778: This may elevate the probability to detect
779: X-ray emission from extragalactic SGR giant flares
780: in the {\it XMM} M31 images taken four weeks prior to the burst.
781: %
782: For example, the X-ray flux of SGR~1900$+$14 was about
783: 1.5 times higher than normal, starting about one month prior
784: to the SGR giant flare of 1998 Aug 27,
785: and also for a year past the flare.
786: %
787: In the case of the
788: December 27, 2004 giant flare,
789: the X-ray emission from SGR~1806$-$20
790: was about two times brighter than
791: its typical quiescence emission about one month prior to the burst.
792: %
793: In Fig.~\ref{AXP_DetSim},
794: we mark the elevated X-ray luminosities of SGR~1806$-$20
795: and SGR~1900$+$14 by stars.
796:
797:
798: Based on this plot we estimate that
799: the probability to detect a pulsating
800: X-ray source associated with an AXP/SGR
801: in M31, using the 50~ks {\it XMM}-Newton image we analyzed,
802: is $\sim10\%$ (per SGR/AXP).
803: We note however, that for a 2~Ms exposure using {\it XMM},
804: the probability to detect an AXP/SGR in
805: M31 increases to $\sim50\%$.
806: %
807: \begin{figure}
808: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f3.eps}}
809: \caption{The probability (contours) to detect,
810: with $1\%$ false alarm probability,
811: each one of the Galactic AXPs/SGRs (in quiescent state)
812: if placed in the Andromeda
813: galaxy, as a function the source count rate
814: (lower X-axis) or luminosity (upper X-axis),
815: and the fraction of energy within
816: a $20\%$ (of period) width pulse (left Y-axis).
817: Translation of the energy within the pulse
818: to rms pulse fraction, $f_{rms}$
819: (for definition see Woods \& Thompson [2006; Table 14.2]), is shown
820: on the right-hand Y-axis.
821: The location of known AXPs/SGRs are shown
822: as circles or lines (if variable).
823: The simulations assume the {\it XMM}-PN is observing
824: the targets for 75~ks which is roughly
825: equivalent to the 50~ks {\it XMM} observations we analyzed.
826: The properties of the SGRs/AXPs
827: (i.e., luminosity range, spectral shape, and rms pulse fraction)
828: were adopted from Woods \& Thompson (2006).
829: To account for the observed elevated X-ray luminosity of SGRs
830: about one month prior to giant flares,
831: we increased the maximum quiescence luminosities
832: of SGR~1900$+$14 and SGR~1806$-$20 by 1.5 and 2, respectively
833: (Woods et al. 2001; 2007).
834: These elevated luminosities are marked as stars
835: in the Figure.
836: \label{AXP_DetSim}}
837: \end{figure}
838:
839:
840:
841:
842:
843:
844:
845: \section{Discussion}
846: \label{Disc}
847:
848: In the following we discuss the
849: energetics, spectral and temporal properties of GRB~070201 (\S\ref{disc-en}).
850: Given the properties of this event we discuss its nature in \S\ref{disc-nat}.
851:
852:
853:
854: \subsection{Energetics, spectrum and light curve}
855: \label{disc-en}
856:
857:
858: The IPN error quadrilateral of the bright
859: GRB\,070201 includes the outskirts of
860: the nearby (770~kpc)
861: galaxy M31.
862: %
863: If indeed GRB\,070201 has originated in M31,
864: the isotropic energy release from this burst,
865: $(1.41_{-0.18}^{+0.07})\times10^{45}$~erg,
866: is of the same order of magnitude as that emitted by SGR giant flares.
867: %
868: For comparison, the isotropic energy release of the 1979 March 5
869: SGR~0526$-$66 flare was $>6\times10^{44}\,$erg (Mazets et al. 1979), that
870: of the 1998 August 27 flare from SGR~1900$+$14
871: was $2\times10^{44}\,$erg
872: (Mazets et al. 1999),
873: while the energy release from the 2004 December 27
874: giant flare from SGR~1806$-$20 was as high as
875: $(1-4)\times10^{46}\,$erg
876: (Hurley et al. 2005; Palmer et al. 2005; Cameron et al. 2005).
877:
878:
879:
880: %--- Spectrum
881: In the context of the magnetar model for SGR giant flares
882: (Thompson \& Duncan 1995; 1996)
883: we expect the fireball to be optically
884: thick and therefore to produce a quasi-thermal spectrum.
885: %
886: %--- Radius
887: As discussed in \S\ref{GRB070201},
888: the gamma-ray spectrum
889: of GRB~070201 (Golenetskii et al. 2007b), at peak luminosity,
890: as well as that of the SGR~1806$-$20
891: 2004 Dec 27 giant flare (Frederiks et al. 2007a),
892: are not well described by a black-body spectrum.
893: However, this does not necessarily mean that
894: the spectrum of the burst is not a modified
895: thermal spectrum.
896: %
897: A simple consistency test for the SGR hypothesis
898: is to assume the spectrum is quasi-thermal;
899: we would then expect the black-body radius of the
900: emission region to be on the order of
901: the radius of a neutron star.
902: %
903: %Altough other spectral models do give better fits to the
904: %observational SGR giant flares data
905: %(e.g., Frederiks et al. 2007a), it is still constructive to
906: %check if the infereed emitting surface area is consistent with
907: %that expected from a neutron star.
908: %
909: %If the spectrum of GRB~070201 is a modified
910: %thermal spectrum, than it is possible to estimate
911: %the size of the emitting region.
912: %
913: By approximating the gamma-ray spectrum of
914: SGR flares by a black-body spectrum,
915: one can derive a rough black-body radius for the
916: bursting source.
917: %
918: GRB~070201 had a peak luminosity
919: (on a 2~ms time scale) of $1.14_{-0.35}^{+0.20}\times10^{47}$~erg~s$^{-1}$,
920: and a peak energy of the observed
921: gamma-ray spectrum that corresponds
922: to black-body temperature of $\sim1.6\times10^{9}$~K.
923: Using the distance of M31,
924: we find a black-body radius of $60\pm40\,$km.
925: This radius is roughly consistent with
926: the sizes derived for other SGR giant flares
927: (e.g., Hurley et al. 2005; Ofek et al. 2006).
928:
929:
930: The temporal behavior of the gamma-ray emission from GRB~070201
931: (Fig.~\ref{GRB070201_LC}; see also Mazets et al. 2007)
932: is somewhat different from that of the
933: 2004 December 27, SGR~1806$-$20 giant flare
934: (e.g., Hurley et al. 2005; Palmer et al. 2005; Terasawa et al. 2005).
935: In GRB~070201, the rise to maximum flux
936: is interrupted by two secondary peaks,
937: and the total rise time is somewhat longer
938: than in the case of the 2004 December 27 event.
939: Moreover, it seems that the light-curve of GRB~070201
940: is more variable than the typical SGR giant flare light curves.
941: Such variability is consistent with that seen in
942: the case of cosmological short-duration hard-spectrum GRBs
943: (e.g., Nakar \& Piran 2002; for a recent review see Nakar 2007).
944: %
945: However, our knowledge about SGR giant flare
946: light curves is based on a very small sample of events.
947:
948:
949:
950:
951: %--- Search for candidates
952: %--- X-ray sources
953:
954:
955: %Assuming that GRB\,070201 is related to M31, and using a
956: %distance modulus of $24.44$, and $A_R=0.17$ Galactic
957: %extinction (Schlegel et al. 1998),
958: %our null detection of any optical transients implies an upper limit of $XX$
959: %on the R-band absolute magnitude of an optical transient.
960:
961: %
962:
963:
964:
965:
966: %\subsection{Previous activity}
967: %\label{disc-prev}
968: %
969: %%--- Additional acticity
970: %We have searched for additional SGR activity
971: %from this region.
972: %We have found that the BATSE catalog
973: %(current online version\footnote{http://gammaray.msfc.nasa.gov/batse/grb/catalog/current/})
974: %contains 4 GRBs
975: %with $T_{90}$ duration smaller than 1~s,
976: %that their $1.5$-$\sigma$ error circle
977: %(including BATSE systematic error; Briggs et al. 1999)
978: %overlap with the center of the region
979: %defined by the intersection of the IPN
980: %error quadrilateral and M31.
981: %%
982: %In order to estimate an upper limit on
983: %the number of additional SGR flares
984: %that originated from this direction,
985: %we calculated the distribution of number of
986: %BATSE events with $T_{90}<1$~s
987: %that their $1.5$-$\sigma$ error region overlap
988: %a random position on the celestial sphere.
989: %%
990: %Using this distribution and the fact that
991: %there are 4 short-duration GRBs which their
992: %location is consistent with this region,
993: %we can calculate an upper limit on the
994: %rate of SGR events originated from this direction.
995: %...
996: %
997: %We find that the number of SGR-like flares associated with
998: %this direction is smaller than 5, at the $95\%$ confidence level.
999: %%
1000: %We note that BATSE had a $50\%$ to detect a $10^{43}$~erg flare
1001: %in M31.
1002: %%
1003: %However, we note that SGR activity is highly correlated
1004: %(Laros et al. 1987; Hurley et al. 1994; Cheng et al. 1996).
1005:
1006:
1007:
1008: \subsection{The nature of GRB~070201}
1009: \label{disc-nat}
1010:
1011:
1012: %--- Chance coincidence
1013: Given the short-duration of this GRB
1014: and its spatial association with M31,
1015: there is a possibility that this burst
1016: is an SGR flare in M31.
1017: %
1018: Estimating the probability for a chance coincidence
1019: is susceptible to the pitfalls of {\it a-posteriori} statistics.
1020: Keeping this in mind,
1021: a rough estimate of the chance coincidence probability
1022: is given by the sum of the area of M31 and the
1023: error quadrilateral of GRB\,070201
1024: (about $2$~deg$^{2}$), multiplied by the
1025: number of short-hard GRBs detected by Konus-{\it Wind}
1026: in the last 15\,yrs
1027: ($\sim30$; Ofek 2007a), and divided by the area of the
1028: celestial sphere.
1029: This rough chance coincidence probability is about $0.2\%$.
1030: Therefore, we suggest that the simplest explanation
1031: is that GRB\,070201 is indeed related to M31,
1032: and that it was an SGR giant flare.
1033: %
1034: This is supported by the fact that, like other
1035: known SGRs (Gaensler et al. 2001),
1036: the GRB\,070201 error box is spatially associated
1037: with star forming regions in M31 (Fig.~\ref{GALEX_X}).
1038:
1039:
1040: We note that, if located in M31,
1041: the energy of this event ($\sim10^{45}$~erg)
1042: is too large for other kinds of known ``Galactic GRBs''
1043: (e.g., Kasliwal et al. 2007).
1044: %
1045: Moreover, Abbott et al. (2007b) search for
1046: a gravitational wave signal coincident
1047: with the time of this burst using
1048: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory
1049: (LIGO).
1050: The lack of signal argues against a compact
1051: object merger (neutron stars/black-holes)
1052: in M31, while is consistent with this event
1053: being an SGR giant flare in the Andromeda galaxy.
1054:
1055:
1056: Finally, we note that instruments like {\it Swift}-BAT
1057: (Gehrels et al. 2004),
1058: and {\it GLAST}-GBM (Band et al. 2004),
1059: will be able to detect fainter bursts, with energy
1060: of about $\sim10^{42}$~erg, from the Andromeda galaxy.
1061: Such bursts are several orders of magnitude
1062: more common than $\sim10^{45}$~erg events.
1063: Therefore, with appropriate fast response
1064: X-ray follow up observations of GRBs with
1065: error regions that include nearby galaxies,
1066: it may be possible to detect the afterglows
1067: of such extragalactic SGR flares.
1068:
1069:
1070: To summarize,
1071: we do~not identify a visible light afterglow
1072: associated with GRB\,070201.
1073: Furthermore, we did~not find any periodic X-ray source
1074: in archival {\it XMM} images of the intersection of
1075: the error quadrilateral of GRB~070201 with M31.
1076: We show
1077: that the probability to detect a pulsating
1078: X-ray source associated with an AXP/SGR
1079: in M31, in the available {\it XMM} data,
1080: is $\sim10\%$.
1081: Therefore, the fact that we did not find
1082: a X-ray pulsating source within the error quadrilateral
1083: does not rule out the possibility that GRB~070201
1084: is an SGR giant flare in M31.
1085:
1086:
1087:
1088:
1089:
1090: \acknowledgments
1091: This work is supported in part by grants from NSF and NASA.
1092: HS acknowledges support from the Bundesministerium f\"ur Wirtschaft und
1093: Technologie/Deutsches Zentrum f\"ur Luft- und Raumfahrt
1094: (BMWI/DLR, FKZ 50 OR 0405).
1095: MMK acknowledges the Moore Foundation for
1096: the George Ellory Hale Fellowship.
1097:
1098:
1099: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1100:
1101: \bibitem[The LIGO Scientific Collaboration:
1102: B.~Abbott(2007a)]{2007arXiv0711.3041T} The LIGO Scientific Collaboration:
1103: B.~Abbott 2007a, astro-ph:0711.3041
1104:
1105: \bibitem[Abbott \& for the LIGO Scientific
1106: Collaboration(2007b)]{2007arXiv0711.1163A} Abbott, B., \& for the LIGO
1107: Scientific Collaboration 2007b, astro-ph:0711.1163
1108:
1109: \bibitem[Alard \& Lupton(1998)]{1998ApJ...503..325A} Alard, C., \& Lupton,
1110: R.~H.\ 1998, ApJ, 503, 325
1111:
1112: %\bibitem[Band et al.(1993)]{1993ApJ...413..281B} Band, D., et al.\ 1993,
1113: %ApJ, 413, 281
1114:
1115: \bibitem[Band et al.(2004)]{2004AIPC..727..688B} Band, D., Briggs, M.,
1116: Connaughton, V., Kippen, M., \& Preece, R.\ 2004, Gamma-Ray Bursts: 30
1117: Years of Discovery, 727, 688
1118:
1119: %\bibitem[Barthelmy et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.438..994B} Barthelmy, S.~D., et
1120: %al.\ 2005, Nature, 438, 994
1121:
1122: \bibitem[Berger et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.438..988B} Berger, E., et al.\
1123: 2005, Nature, 438, 988
1124:
1125: %\bibitem[Bloom et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...638..354B} Bloom, J.~S., et al.\
1126: %2006, ApJ, 638, 354
1127:
1128: \bibitem[Briggs et al.(1999)]{1999ApJS..122..503B} Briggs, M.~S.,
1129: Pendleton, G.~N., Kippen, R.~M., Brainerd, J.~J., Hurley, K., Connaughton,
1130: V., \& Meegan, C.~A.\ 1999, ApJS, 122, 503
1131:
1132: \bibitem[Cameron et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.434.1112C} Cameron, P.~B., et al.\
1133: 2005, Nature, 434, 1112
1134:
1135: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{1989ApJ...345..245C} Cardelli, J.~A.,
1136: Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
1137:
1138: \bibitem[Cheng et al.(1996)]{1996Natur.382..518C} Cheng, B., Epstein,
1139: R.~I., Guyer, R.~A., \& Young, C.\ 1996, Nature, 382, 518
1140:
1141: \bibitem[Cline et al.(1980)]{1980ApJ...237L...1C} Cline, T.~L., et al.\
1142: 1980, ApJL, 237, L1
1143:
1144: \bibitem[Cline et al.(1982)]{1982ApJ...255L..45C} Cline, T.~L., et al.\
1145: 1982, ApJL, 255, L45
1146:
1147: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{1998AJ....115.1693C} Condon, J.~J., Cotton,
1148: W.~D., Greisen, E.~W., Yin, Q.~F., Perley, R.~A., Taylor, G.~B., \&
1149: Broderick, J.~J.\ 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
1150:
1151: \bibitem[Dar(2005)]{2005GCN..2942....1D} Dar, A.\ 2005, GRB Coordinates
1152: Network, 2942, 1
1153:
1154: \bibitem[della Valle \& Livio(1995)]{1995ApJ...452..704D} della Valle, M.,
1155: \& Livio, M.\ 1995, ApJ, 452, 704
1156:
1157: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{1990ARA&A..28..215D} Dickey, J.~M., \&
1158: Lockman, F.~J.\ 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
1159:
1160: \bibitem[Eichler(2002)]{2002MNRAS.335..883E} Eichler, D.\ 2002, MNRAS,
1161: 335, 883
1162:
1163: \bibitem[Evans et al.(1980)]{1980ApJ...237L...7E} Evans, W.~D., et al.\
1164: 1980, ApJL, 237, L7
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.437..845F} Fox, D.~B., et al.\ 2005,
1167: Nature, 437, 845
1168:
1169: \bibitem[Frail et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...480L.129F} Frail, D.~A., Vasisht,
1170: G., \& Kulkarni, S.~R.\ 1997, ApJL, 480, L129
1171:
1172: \bibitem[Frederiks et al.(2007a)]{2007AstL...33....1F} Frederiks, D.~D.,
1173: Golenetskii, S.~V., Palshin, V.~D., Aptekar, R.~L., Ilyinskii, V.~N.,
1174: Oleinik, F.~P., Mazets, E.~P., \& Cline, T.~L.\ 2007a, Astronomy Letters,
1175: 33, 1
1176:
1177: \bibitem[Frederiks et al.(2007b)]{2007AstL...33...19F} Frederiks, D.~D.,
1178: Palshin, V.~D., Aptekar, R.~L., Golenetskii, S.~V., Cline, T.~L., \&
1179: Mazets, E.~P.\ 2007b, Astronomy Letters, 33, 19
1180:
1181: \bibitem[Freedman et al.(1994)]{1994ApJ...427..628F} Freedman, W.~L., et
1182: al.\ 1994, ApJ, 427, 628
1183:
1184: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...559..963G} Gaensler, B.~M.,
1185: Slane, P.~O., Gotthelf, E.~V., \& Vasisht, G.\ 2001, ApJ, 559, 963
1186:
1187: \bibitem[Gal-Yam et al.(2005)]{2005astro.ph..9891G} Gal-Yam, A., et al.\
1188: 2005, astro-ph/0509891
1189:
1190: \bibitem[Gehrels et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...611.1005G} Gehrels, N., et al.\
1191: 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005
1192:
1193: \bibitem[Gehrels et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.437..851G} Gehrels, N., et al.\
1194: 2005, Nature, 437, 851
1195:
1196: \bibitem[Golenetskii et al.(2005)]{2005GCN..4197....1G} Golenetskii, S., et
1197: al.\ 2005, GRB Coordinates Network, 4197, 1
1198:
1199: \bibitem[Golenetskii et al.(2007a)]{2007GCN..6088....1G} Golenetskii, S., et
1200: al.\ 2007a, GRB Coordinates Network, 6088, 1
1201:
1202: \bibitem[Golenetskii et al.(2007b)]{2007GCN..6094....1G} Golenetskii, S.,
1203: Aptekar, R., Mazets, E., Pal'Shin, V., Frederiks, D., \& Cline, T.\ 2007b,
1204: GRB Coordinates Network, 6094, 1
1205:
1206: \bibitem[Hjorth et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.437..859H} Hjorth, J., et al.\
1207: 2005, Nature, 437, 859
1208:
1209: \bibitem[Hoopes et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...619L..99H} Hoopes, C.~G., et al.\
1210: 2005, ApJL, 619, L99
1211:
1212: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(1994)]{1994A&A...288L..49H} Hurley, K.~J., McBreen,
1213: B., Rabbette, M., \& Steel, S.\ 1994, A\&A, 288, L49
1214:
1215: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(1999)]{1999ApJS..120..399H} Hurley, K., Briggs,
1216: M.~S., Kippen, R.~M., Kouveliotou, C., Meegan, C., Fishman, G., Cline, T.,
1217: \& Boer, M.\ 1999, ApJS, 120, 399
1218:
1219: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.434.1098H} Hurley, K., et al.\
1220: 2005, Nature, 434, 1098
1221:
1222: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6103....1H} Hurley, K., et al.\
1223: 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6103, 1
1224:
1225: \bibitem[Kalberla et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...440..775K} Kalberla, P.~M.~W.,
1226: Burton, W.~B., Hartmann, D., Arnal, E.~M., Bajaja, E., Morras, R., {P{\"o}ppel},
1227: W.~G.~L.\ 2005, A\&A, 440, 775
1228:
1229: \bibitem[Kasliwal et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0708.0226K} Kasliwal, M.~M., et
1230: al.\ 2007, astro-ph/0708.0226
1231:
1232: \bibitem[Kulkarni(2005)]{2005astro.ph.10256K} Kulkarni, S.~R.\ 2005, astro-ph/0510256
1233:
1234: \bibitem[Laros et al.(1987)]{1987ApJ...320L.111L} Laros, J.~G., et al.\
1235: 1987, ApJL, 320, L111
1236:
1237: \bibitem[Lazzati et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.362L...8L} Lazzati, D., Ghirlanda,
1238: G., \& Ghisellini, G.\ 2005, MNRAS, 362, L8
1239:
1240: \bibitem[Levan et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.368L...1L} Levan, A.~J., Wynn,
1241: G.~A., Chapman, R., Davies, M.~B., King, A.~R., Priddey, R.~S., \& Tanvir,
1242: N.~R.\ 2006, MNRAS, 368, L1
1243:
1244: \bibitem[Lithwick \& Sari(2001)]{2001ApJ...555..540L} Lithwick, Y., \&
1245: Sari, R.\ 2001, ApJ, 555, 540
1246:
1247: \bibitem[Magnier et al.(1995)]{1995A&AS..114..215M} Magnier, E.~A., Prins,
1248: S., van Paradijs, J., Lewin, W.~H.~G., Supper, R., Hasinger, G., Pietsch,
1249: W., \& Truemper, J.\ 1995, A\&AS, 114, 215
1250:
1251: \bibitem[Mazets et al.(1979)]{1979Natur.282..587M} Mazets, E.~P.,
1252: Golentskii, S.~V., Ilinskii, V.~N., Aptekar, R.~L., \& Guryan, I.~A.\ 1979,
1253: Nature, 282, 587
1254:
1255: \bibitem[Mazets \& Golenetskii(1981)]{1981Ap&SS..75...47M} Mazets, E.~P.,
1256: \& Golenetskii, S.~V.\ 1981, Ap\&SS, 75, 47
1257:
1258: \bibitem[Mazets et al.(1999)]{1999AstL...25..635M} Mazets, E.~P., Cline,
1259: T.~L., Aptekar', R.~L., Butterworth, P.~S., Frederiks, D.~D., Golenetskii,
1260: S.~V., Il'Inskii, V.~N., \& Pal'Shin, V.~D.\ 1999, Astronomy Letters, 25,
1261: 635
1262:
1263: \bibitem[Mazets et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0712.1502M} Mazets, E.~P., et al.\
1264: 2007, astro-ph/0712.1502
1265:
1266:
1267: \bibitem[Monet et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....125..984M} Monet, D.~G., et al.\
1268: 2003, AJ, 125, 984
1269:
1270: \bibitem[Nakar \& Piran(2002)]{2002MNRAS.330..920N} Nakar, E., \& Piran,
1271: T.\ 2002, MNRAS, 330, 920
1272:
1273: %\bibitem[Nakar et al.(2005a)]{2005astro.ph.11254N} Nakar, E., Gal-Yam, A.,
1274: %\& Fox, D.~B.\ 2005a, astro-ph/0511254
1275:
1276: %\bibitem[Nakar et al.(2005b)]{2005ApJ...635..516N} Nakar, E., Piran, T., \&
1277: %Sari, R.\ 2005b, ApJ, 635, 516
1278:
1279: \bibitem[Nakar et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...640..849N} Nakar, E., Gal-Yam, A.,
1280: Piran, T., \& Fox, D.~B.\ 2006, ApJ, 640, 849
1281:
1282: \bibitem[Nakar(2007)]{2007PhR...442..166N} Nakar, E.\ 2007, Physics Reports, 442, 166
1283:
1284: \bibitem[Ofek et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...652..507O} Ofek, E.~O., et al.\ 2006,
1285: ApJ, 652, 507
1286:
1287: \bibitem[Ofek(2007a)]{2007ApJ...659..339O} Ofek, E.~O.\ 2007a, ApJ, 659, 339
1288:
1289: \bibitem[Ofek(2007b)]{2007GCN..6092....1O} Ofek, E.~O.\ 2007b, GRB
1290: Coordinates Network, 6092, 1
1291:
1292: %\bibitem[Ofek et al.(2005)]{2005GCN..4208....1O} Ofek, E.~O., Cenko, S.~B.,
1293: %Soderberg, A.~M., Kulkarni, S.~R., \& Fox, D.~B.\ 2005, GRB Coordinates
1294: %Network, 4208, 1
1295:
1296: \bibitem[Palmer et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.434.1107P} Palmer, D.~M., et al.\
1297: 2005, Nature, 434, 1107
1298:
1299: \bibitem[Paturel et al.(2002)]{2002A&A...389...19P} Paturel, G.,
1300: Teerikorpi, P., Theureau, G., Fouqu{\'e}, P., Musella, I., \& Terry, J.~N.\
1301: 2002, A\&A, 389, 19
1302:
1303: \bibitem[Perelmuter \& Racine(1995)]{1995AJ....109.1055P} Perelmuter,
1304: J.-M., \& Racine, R.\ 1995, AJ, 109, 1055
1305:
1306: \bibitem[Perlmutter et al.(1999)]{1999ApJ...517..565P} Perlmutter, S., et
1307: al.\ 1999, ApJ, 517, 565
1308:
1309: \bibitem[Perley \& Bloom(2007)]{2007GCN..6091....1P} Perley, D.~A., \&
1310: Bloom, J.~S.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6091, 1
1311:
1312: \bibitem[Pietsch et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...434..483P} Pietsch, W., Freyberg,
1313: M., \& Haberl, F.\ 2005, A\&A, 434, 483
1314:
1315: \bibitem[Popov \& Stern(2005)]{2005MNRAS.tmp.1092P} Popov, S.~B., \& Stern,
1316: B.~E.\ 2005, MNRAS, 1092
1317:
1318: \bibitem {quimby2006} Quimby, R. 2006, PhD thesis, University of Texas, United States
1319:
1320: \bibitem[Ribas et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...635L..37R} Ribas, I., Jordi, C.,
1321: Vilardell, F., Fitzpatrick, E.~L., Hilditch, R.~W., \& Guinan, E.~F.\ 2005,
1322: ApJL, 635, L37
1323:
1324: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...500..525S} Schlegel, D.~J.,
1325: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
1326:
1327: %\bibitem[Schmidt et al.(1993)]{1993AN....314..371S} Schmidt, K.-H., Priebe,
1328: %A., \& Boller, T.\ 1993, Astronomische Nachrichten, 314, 371
1329:
1330: \bibitem[Stiele et al.(2007)]{2007} Stiele, H., Pietsch, W., Haberl, F., Barnard, R., Burwitz, V., Freyberg, M., Greiner, J., Hatzidimitriou, D.,
1331: Hernanz, M., Kolb, U., Kong, A., Plucinsky, P., Reig, P., Sasaki, M., Sala, G., Shaw Greening, L., Stella, L., and Williams, B., 2007 astro-ph:0711.3696
1332:
1333: \bibitem[Supper et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...373...63S} Supper, R., Hasinger,
1334: G., Lewin, W.~H.~G., Magnier, E.~A., van Paradijs, J., Pietsch, W., Read,
1335: A.~M., \& Tr{\"u}mper, J.\ 2001, A\&A, 373, 63
1336:
1337: \bibitem[Tanvir et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.438..991T} Tanvir, N.~R., Chapman,
1338: R., Levan, A.~J., \& Priddey, R.~S.\ 2005, Nature, 438, 991
1339:
1340: %\bibitem[Taylor et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...634L..93T} Taylor, G.~B., et al.\
1341: %2005, ApJL, 634, L93
1342:
1343: \bibitem[Terasawa et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.434.1110T} Terasawa, T., et al.\
1344: 2005, Nature, 434, 1110
1345:
1346: \bibitem[Thompson \& Duncan(1995)]{1995MNRAS.275..255T} Thompson, C., \&
1347: Duncan, R.~C.\ 1995, MNRAS, 275, 255
1348:
1349: \bibitem[Thompson \& Duncan(1996)]{1996ApJ...473..322T} Thompson, C., \&
1350: Duncan, R.~C.\ 1996, ApJ, 473, 322
1351:
1352: %\bibitem[Tiengo et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...440L..63T} Tiengo, A., Esposito,
1353: %P., Mereghetti, S., Rea, N., Stella, L., Israel, G.~L., Turolla, R., \&
1354: %Zane, S.\ 2005, \aap, 440, L63
1355:
1356: %\bibitem[Voges et al.(1999)]{1999A&A...349..389V} Voges, W., et al.\ 1999,
1357: %A\&A, 349, 389
1358:
1359: %\bibitem[Voges et al.(2000)]{2000IAUC.7432....3V} Voges, W., et al.\ 2000,
1360: %IAU Circ., 7432, 3
1361:
1362: \bibitem[Watson et al.(2003)]{2003AN....324...89W} Watson, M.~G., et al.\
1363: 2003, Astronomische Nachrichten, 324, 89
1364:
1365: \bibitem[White et al.(2000)]{2000yCat.9031....0W} White, N.~E., Giommi, P.,
1366: \& Angelini, L.\ 2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 9031, 0
1367:
1368: \bibitem[Woods et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...552..748W} Woods, P.~M.,
1369: Kouveliotou, C., G{\"o}{\u g}{\"u}{\c s}, E., Finger, M.~H., Swank, J.,
1370: Smith, D.~A., Hurley, K., \& Thompson, C.\ 2001, ApJ, 552, 748
1371:
1372: \bibitem[Woods et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...654..470W} Woods, P.~M.,
1373: Kouveliotou, C., Finger, M.~H., G{\"o}{\u g}{\"u}{\c s}, E., Wilson, C.~A.,
1374: Patel, S.~K., Hurley, K., \& Swank, J.~H.\ 2007, ApJ, 654, 470
1375:
1376: \bibitem[Woods \& Thompson(2004)]{2004astro.ph..6133W} Woods, P.~M., \&
1377: Thompson, C.\ 2006, in Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, Eds. W.H.G. Lewin \& M. van~der~Klis, Cambrideg University Press, astro-ph/0406133
1378:
1379:
1380: \end{thebibliography}
1381:
1382:
1383:
1384:
1385:
1386:
1387:
1388: \end{document}
1389:
1390:
1391:
1392:
1393: