1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document\begin{huge}\end{huge}
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%\documentclass[preprint1]{aastex}
18: %%\usepackage{emulateapj5}
19: %%\input epsf
20:
21:
22: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
23:
24: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
25: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
27: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29:
30: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
31: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
32: %% the \begin{document} command.
33: %%
34: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
35:
36: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
37: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
38: %% for information.
39:
40: %%\usepackage{pjournal}
41: %\usepackage{natbib}
42:
43: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
44:
45: \slugcomment{}
46:
47: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
48: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
49: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
50: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
51: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
52: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
53:
54:
55:
56: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
57: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
58:
59: \begin{document}
60:
61: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
62: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
63: %% you desire.
64: \shorttitle{3-D Transfer in Hot Star Winds}
65: \shortauthors{Lobel \& Blomme}
66:
67: %________________________________________________________________
68:
69: \title{Modeling Ultraviolet Wind Line Variability in Massive Hot Stars}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{A. Lobel$^1$ and R. Blomme$^1$ }
79:
80: \affil{$^1$Royal Observatory of Belgium, Ringlaan 3, 1180 Brussels, Belgium} \email{alobel@sdf.lonestar.org, Ronny.Blomme@oma.be}
81:
82:
83: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
84: %% identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
85: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
86: %% affiliation.
87:
88:
89: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
90: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
91: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
92: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
93: %% editorial office after submission.
94:
95: \begin{abstract}
96: We model the detailed time-evolution of Discrete Absorption
97: Components (DACs) observed in P Cygni profiles of the Si~{\sc{iv}}
98: $\lambda$1400 resonance doublet lines of
99: the fast-rotating supergiant HD~64760 (B0.5 Ib).
100: We adopt the common assumption that the DACs are caused by Co-rotating Interaction Regions (CIRs)
101: in the stellar wind.
102: We perform 3D radiative transfer calculations with hydrodynamic models of the
103: stellar wind that incorporate
104: these
105: large-scale density- and velocity-structures.
106: We develop the 3D transfer code {\sc Wind3D} to investigate
107: the physical properties of CIRs with detailed fits to the
108: DAC shape and morphology.
109:
110: The CIRs are caused by irregularities on the stellar surface that
111: change the radiative force in the stellar wind. In our hydrodynamic model
112: we approximate these irregularities by circular symmetric
113: spots on the stellar surface.
114: We use the {\sc Zeus3D} code to model the stellar wind and the CIRs,
115: limited to the equatorial plane.
116: We compute a large grid
117: of hydrodynamic models and dynamic spectra for the different spot parameters
118: (brightness, opening angle and velocity).
119: We demonstrate important effects of these input parameters
120: on the structured wind models that determine the detailed DAC evolution.
121:
122: We constrain the properties of large-scale wind structures with detailed
123: fits to DACs observed in HD~64760.
124: A model with two spots of unequal brightness and size
125: on opposite sides of the equator, with opening angles of
126: 20$\degr$ $\pm$5$\degr$~and 30$\degr$ $\pm$5$\degr$~diameter,
127: and that are 20$\pm$5\% and 8$\pm$5\% brighter than the
128: stellar surface, respectively, provides the best fit to the observed DACs.
129: The recurrence time of the DACs compared to the
130: estimated rotational period corresponds to spot velocities
131: that are 5 times slower than the rotational velocity.
132:
133: The mass-loss rate of the structured wind model for HD~64760 does not exceed the rate of the
134: spherically symmetric smooth wind model by more than 1\%.
135: The fact that DACs are observed in a large number of hot stars
136: constrains the clumping that can be present in their winds, as substantial
137: amounts of clumping would tend to destroy the CIRs.
138: \end{abstract}
139:
140: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
141: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
142: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
143: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
144:
145: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
146: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
147: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
148: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
149: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
150: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
151: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
152: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
153: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
154: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
155: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
156: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
157:
158: \keywords{stars: winds, outflows --- individual (HD 64760) --- line: formation, profiles --- radiative transfer --- hydrodynamics}
159:
160: %% \keywords{globular clusters: general ---
161: %% globular clusters: individual(\objectname{NGC 6397},
162: %% \object{NGC 6624}, \objectname[M 15]{NGC 7078},
163: %% \object[Cl 1938-341]{Terzan 8})}
164:
165: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
166: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
167: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
168: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
169: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
170: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
171: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
172: %% each reference.
173:
174: \section{Introduction}
175: Over recent years
176: compelling evidence has accumulated
177: that the mass-loss rates of hot massive stars
178: have systematically been overestimated because their winds are not simply steady outflows of
179: stellar material, but frequently contain complex density- and velocity-structures.
180: There is considerable observational evidence that hot star winds are clumped
181: both on small and large length scales.
182: The presence of structure significantly influences the mass-loss rate
183: determinations \citep{Fullerton06, Prinja05, Puls06}.
184: This in turn is important for models of stellar and galactic evolution.
185:
186: Hydrodynamic models by
187: \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96} showed that large-scale (or coherent) wind structures
188: in the form of Co-rotating Interaction Regions (CIRs) can
189: at least qualitatively explain
190: the behavior of Discrete Absorption Components (DACs)
191: in UV resonance lines of hot stars.
192: The DACs are observed to propagate bluewards through the line
193: profiles on time scales comparable with the stellar rotation period
194: \citep[e.g.][]{Massa+al95a, Prinja98}.
195: The CIRs are spiral-shaped density and velocity perturbations winding up
196: in or above the plane
197: of the equator that extend from the stellar surface to possibly several
198: tens of stellar radii.
199: CIRs can be produced by intensity irregularities
200: at the stellar surface, such as dark and bright spots, magnetic loops and
201: fields, or non-radial pulsations. The surface intensity
202: variations alter the radiative wind acceleration locally, which creates streams of faster and slower material
203: through the extended stellar wind. The CIRs are formed where the fast and slow wind regions collide.
204:
205: In this paper we investigate to what extent the CIR wind model can explain the
206: {\em detailed} wind line variability observed in the B0.5 Ib supergiant HD~64760.
207: \citet{Fullerton97} pointed out how exceptional IUE data have made this
208: (apparently single) field star ($V$ $\sim$4.24) a key object for studying the origin
209: and nature of variability in hot-star winds. For this star there is a substantial
210: amount of high-quality IUE observations \citep[MEGA campaign,][]{Massa+al95a}
211: with unsaturated P Cygni
212: profiles we utilize to model wind regions where the CIRs dominate the dynamics.
213: \citet{Fullerton97} propose to clearly distinguish the slowly bluewards shifting
214: DACs from a second type of wind line variability called `modulations'. The
215: latter are most
216: pronounced at intermediate blueshifts and drift fast. They are not `discrete' absorption
217: components, but are very broad and rather shallow.
218: We do not investigate
219: the modulations here, but we refer to
220: \cite{Hamann01}, \cite{Brown+al05}
221: and \cite{Krticka+al04} who
222: provide kinematical models for these modulations.
223: \citet{Owocki+al94} present a model specifically for HD~64760.
224:
225: We focus instead on the detailed DAC properties with fully
226: hydrodynamic models.
227: We extend the work of \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96} by using CIR models
228: to obtain a best fit of the DAC evolution for
229: HD~64760.
230: The star has a high rotational velocity, suggesting we
231: see it close to equator-on (in what follows, we will assume that
232: $\sin i=1$): this will considerably
233: simplify the modeling of the CIRs and the comparison
234: to the observations.
235:
236: \citet{Kaufer+al06} investigate variability observed in optical lines of HD~64760
237: and propose a model with perturbations (spots) resulting from the interference of non-radial pulsations
238: at the base of the wind. This interference pattern does
239: {\em not} co-rotate with the stellar surface. In this paper
240: we show that the shape and evolution of the slow DACs observed in UV wind lines, such as Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395,
241: of HD~64760 can correctly be computed with a spot velocity different from
242: the stellar surface velocity. The requirement that the CIRs originate from
243: spots
244: that are not locked onto the surface turns out to be crucial for the
245: development of more realistic hydrodynamic models of large-scale wind structures
246: in massive hot stars.
247:
248: In fitting the HD~64760 observations, we concentrate on the apparent
249: acceleration of the DAC (i.e.~the evolution of the velocity position
250: of the flux minimum with time) and the morphology (DAC FWHM evolution
251: over time). Using a kinematical model,
252: \cite{Hamann01} showed that the apparent acceleration of DACs is
253: always steeper than derived from non-rotating wind models with the same
254: velocity law in the radial direction. For spots locked to the surface they
255: concluded that the DAC acceleration does not depend at all on
256: the stellar rotation rate.
257: The present work allows us to check if this conclusion still holds
258: for spots not locked on the surface.
259:
260: We implement an advanced 3D radiative transfer code {\sc Wind3D}
261: for the detailed modeling of the properties of radiatively driven winds
262: (Sect.~\ref{section radiative transfer code} and Appendix).
263: It solves the radiation transport problem in three geometric dimensions for winds with
264: arbitrary density models and velocity fields.
265: The transfer modeling assumes that the line under consideration is a pure scattering line
266: (which is an important ingredient of non-LTE) for calculating its detailed shape formed
267: in a supersonic accelerating wind.
268: We investigate the physics of dynamic wind structures by analyzing HD~64760 both
269: observationally (Sect.~\ref{obs}) and theoretically (Sect.~\ref{dacfit}).
270: We compute an advanced hydrodynamic model and perform radiative transfer calculations in its
271: rotating wind. We explore models with structured wind regions that either co-rotate
272: with the stellar surface, or rotate slower than the surface (Sect.~\ref{grids}).
273: We compare time series of theoretical line profiles (`dynamic spectra')
274: with detailed spectroscopic observations of the
275: Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395 line variability. In Sect.~\ref{discuss} we discuss some physical properties
276: of the large-scale structured wind regions (mass-loss rate and dynamic properties) that
277: result from our best fit procedure. We address the important question of how much additional
278: material the structured wind contains compared to
279: spherically symmetric smooth wind models.
280: We also compare our results to the \citet{Kaufer+al06} model for
281: H$\alpha$ variability in HD~64760.
282: The summary and conclusions are given in Sect.~\ref{concl}.
283:
284: \section{Numerical Wind Modeling}
285:
286: \subsection{3D Radiative Transfer Code Implementation}\label{section radiative transfer code}
287:
288: We develop the computer code {\sc Wind3D} for the spatial transfer of radiation
289: in optically thick resonance lines observed in massive star spectra. Our implementation
290: is based on the finite element method described by \citet{Adam90}.
291: In the Appendix we present the implementation of the 3D radiative transfer
292: scheme by further developing Adam's Cartesian method with three new aspects.
293: (i) We considerably accelerate the 3D lambda iteration of the source function with
294: appropriate starting values computed with the Sobolev approximation.
295: (ii) Since the lambda iteration is the bottleneck of the numerical transfer problem
296: we fully parallelize the mean intensity computation.
297: (iii) We introduce a new technique that 3D interpolates the converged source function
298: to a higher resolution (spatial) grid to solve the final 3D transfer equation for very narrow
299: line profile functions. It enables us to resolve small flux variations in the
300: absorption portions of very broad unsaturated P Cygni line profiles.
301:
302: In the following sections we apply {\sc Wind3D} to model the profiles
303: of the Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395 line of HD~64760 and investigate the effects of
304: large-scale wind structures on the detailed variability of the emergent line
305: fluxes.
306: We model only the short-wavelength component of this doublet resonance line.
307: We can do this as the lines are well separated because the
308: terminal velocity ($v_{\infty}$=1500 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$)
309: is not too high.
310: The code could easily be adapted to model both components at the
311: same time.
312: In the next Section we test the detailed line formation calculations with
313: models of accelerating isothermal winds that incorporate parameterized 3D
314: density- and velocity-structures. In Sect.~\ref{section hydro models} we replace the input models with more realistic
315: hydrodynamic models that invoke large-scale wind structures in the plane of the equator.
316:
317: \subsection{3D Parameterized Wind Models}\label{section parameterized models}
318:
319: Preliminary tests of the {\sc Wind3D} code
320: were carried out to compare the accuracy of the equidistant 3D rectangular
321: grid computations with a simplified radiative transfer (SEI) method.
322: The latter method \citep[Sobolev with Exact Integration;][]{Lamers+al87}
323: is however limited to spherically symmetric winds which is not applicable
324: to more realistic asymmetric wind conditions. The SEI method, however, offers a simplified line source
325: function, critical for very fast calculations of the detailed shape of resonance lines that form
326: in radiatively driven winds. It was therefore temporarily adopted to test the numerical
327: accuracy and efficiency of {\sc Wind3D}. Over following code implementation stages the assumptions
328: of a smooth and symmetric wind were relaxed to the more realistic conditions of
329: structured asymmetric winds. The simplified SEI source function was therefore
330: replaced with the fully lambda-iterated line source function.
331:
332: The {\sc Wind3D} code very efficiently computes the transport of radiation in
333: detailed spectral lines formed in extended stellar winds. The FORTRAN code
334: is developed for high-performance computers with parallel processing. It has been
335: implemented as a fully parallelized (exact) lambda iteration scheme with
336: a two-level atom formulation.
337: We also implemented and tested an accelerated lambda iteration scheme (ALI),
338: but which turned out to not significantly accelerate the overall convergency rates
339: for pure scatting lines formed in optically thin
340: wind conditions (see discussion in Appendix B).
341: Applications of {\sc Wind3D} to wind conditions that are much more
342: optically thick will be given elsewhere.
343: The model calculations are performed with $71^{3}$
344: grid-points on an equidistant grid. The code lambda-iterates the 3D line source
345: function to accuracies below 1\% differences between subsequent lambda iteration
346: steps. The local mean intensity integral sums
347: 80 $\times$ 80 spatial angles over 100 wavelength points
348: covering the P Cygni profile.
349: Next the source function is interpolated to $701^{3}$ grid-points and the
350: 3D radiative transfer equation is solved to determine the emergent flux.
351: Both during the lambda iteration and in the final radiative
352: transfer equation, the intrinsic line profile function is assumed to be
353: a narrow Gaussian function.
354:
355: Tests with spherically symmetric models show that the 1~\%
356: constraint on the difference between subsequent lambda iteration steps
357: results in a final source function that is very close to the SEI solution.
358: However, more important for our detailed modeling purposes
359: is the effect on the resulting line fluxes. We find that these differ by
360: less than $10^{-3}$ in the flux normalized absorption portion of the P Cygni
361: profile. Lambda iterating to 0.1\% (or 0.01\%) therefore yields
362: identical emergent flux profiles, but lengthens iteration times tremendously.
363: We emphasize however that the emergent line fluxes we compute strongly depend
364: on the very narrow intrinsic line profile width of only
365: 8 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ we adopt. Our grid of $71^{3}$ points for the
366: line source function undersamples the narrow line profile function $\phi_{\nu}$.
367: For the actual line flux calculations we therefore have to refine
368: the grid to at least $701^{3}$ points, to avoid an undersampling of $\phi_{\nu}$.
369: We 3D-interpolate the iterated line source function values to this
370: higher-resolution grid (see Appendix~\ref{appendix 3D Radiative Transfer Solution}).
371: Lower-resolution grids would result in line profiles that are too
372: (numerically) noisy to compare with the observations.
373:
374: {\sc Wind3D} has been carefully load balanced for parallel processing with
375: the OpenMP programming strategy, and shows excellent scaling properties for multi-threading.
376: It accepts arbitrary 3D density models and velocity fields without assumptions of axial symmetry.
377: As it uses an observer frame approach, complicated code constructs
378: to track multiple resonance points are avoided.
379: {\sc Wind3D} is `fast' and very accurate to trace small variations of local velocity
380: gradients and density on line opacities in strongly scattering dominated
381: extended stellar winds.
382: It currently runs on a
383: parallel compute server with 64-bit Itanium-2 1.5 GHz
384: microprocessors and a memory architecture allowing for very fast access
385: to all the memory on the server.
386: A typical run ($71^{3}$ mesh,
387: $80^{2}$ angles, 100 wavelengths) for a single spectral line with `normal' convergence rates of
388: the source function takes
389: $\sim$300 min of wallclock time using 16 CPUs, followed by another $\sim$300 min to interpolate the
390: source function ($701^{3}$ gridpoints), and to compute the dynamic spectrum over 36 lines of sight.
391: We discuss some memory allocation and parallelization properties in Appendices B \& C.
392:
393: We test {\sc Wind3D} with parameterized input models of the wind-velocity and -opacity.
394: We consider a $\beta$-velocity law for an isothermal wind with $\beta$=1
395: and $R_{*}$=35 $\rm R_{\odot}$.
396: The underlying smooth wind reaches a terminal
397: velocity of $v_{\infty}$=1600 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ within the simulation box of 30 $R_{*}$.
398: The smooth wind is perturbed with 3D spiraling density structures wound around
399: the central star
400: (the velocities are unchanged from their smooth-wind values).
401: The source function in the structured model is 3D lambda-iterated
402: to equilibrium with the radiation field of the structured wind. The convergency
403: of the iterations can be accelerated but our tests show that it is already fast
404: and converges within 5 to 8 iterations when the size of the CIRs above and below the
405: plane of the equator is limited to 0.5 $R_{*}$ at the outer edge. The converged
406: 3D line source function is used to solve the transfer problem for
407: a uniformly distributed set of sight-angles
408: in the plane of the equator around the star. In the test input
409: models important free parameters for our detailed line profile modeling
410: are therefore the properties of the adopted 3D wind structures, such as the number
411: of spiral arms, their curvature and width, the height (or flaring angle),
412: the density contrast profile throughout the spiral arms, and the inclination
413: angle of the observer's line of sight in or above the equatorial plane.
414:
415: Parameterized 3D models of Co-rotating Interaction Regions (CIR) already
416: provide comprehensive comparisons to the DAC evolution observed in resonance
417: lines of massive hot stars.
418: Figure~\ref{fig two CIRs} shows a schematic drawing of a parameterized wind
419: velocity grid with two CIRs in the shape of winding density spirals.
420: The smooth wind expansion is spherically symmetric with a beta-power velocity law
421: ({\em outer arrows}). The wind velocities inside the CIRs also assume the beta
422: law of the ambient wind and are directed radially ({\em velocity vectors drawn
423: with much finer spacing in the equatorial plane}). The widths of both CIRs increase
424: outwards with an exponential curvature. The outer edges of the
425: CIRs are truncated at a maximum radius of $\pm$12 $R_{\star}$.
426: Figure~\ref{fig two DACs} shows the dynamic spectrum
427: computed with {\sc Wind3D} for the structured wind model in Fig.~\ref{fig two CIRs}.
428: The computed line profiles reveal two (and for certain rotation phases three)
429: Discrete Absorption Components (DACs) drifting
430: toward shorter wavelengths in the unsaturated absorption trough of the P Cygni line profile
431: (time runs upward). The time sequence of these line fluxes is shown in the right-hand panel
432: in grey-scale. The line opacity
433: {\bf ($\chi^l = \kappa \rho$) }%bf
434: inside the CIR has been increased by one order of
435: magnitude with respect to the surrounding smooth wind opacity. The dynamic spectrum is
436: computed for 72 angles of sight in the plane of the equator around the star.
437: The Figure shows that the widths of the DACs decrease while they asymptotically drift
438: toward shorter wavelengths. The DACs shift toward the blue edge of the P Cygni profile
439: because the observer probes regions of increased wind absorption inside the CIR at larger
440: distances from the star
441: as
442: the entire CIR structure rotates through the line of sight.
443: The widths of the DACs decrease because the range of (radial) velocities
444: in the CIR projected in the observer's line of sight (inside the absorbing cylinder in front
445: of the stellar disk) decreases at larger distances from the star. At large distances from
446: the star a radially expanding spherically symmetric wind has a smaller dispersion of
447: radial velocities projected into the line of sight for the wind volume in front of the
448: stellar disk.
449: In Sect. 4.3.2 we investigate the DAC line formation with advanced hydrodynamic models
450: in which both the CIR density and resulting wind velocity gradients turn out to be
451: important for the detailed DAC evolution.
452:
453: Further 3D transfer tests with parameterized spherical wind perturbations
454: (`blobs' or `clumps') of denser gas that move in front of the star produce
455: extra and less absorption at different wavelengths in the wind profile.
456: In Fig.~\ref{fig blob} the opacity in
457: the clump has been increased by an order of magnitude compared to the ambient wind opacity.
458: The clump passes in front of the stellar disk and partly obscures it.
459: It moves {\em perpendicular} ({\it tangentially drawn arrows}) to the surrounding
460: radially expanding wind ({\it outer arrows}) which enhances the line absorption
461: around the rest velocity (small dips in the line emission lobe). The dynamic spectrum
462: in Fig.~\ref{fig spectrum blob} shows how the absorption portion of the P Cygni
463: profile
464: becomes weaker
465: when the local opacity enhancement in the blob crosses the observer's
466: line of sight. However, the amount of photon scattering
467: between the star and the observer also decreases because the blob removes a
468: region in the wind where resonant scattering would occur at the velocity of
469: the surrounding wind (as the blob moves perpendicular to the
470: radial wind expansion in the model). Around $\sim$70~\% of $v_{\infty}$ the
471: wind scattering therefore diminishes, yielding somewhat larger line fluxes in
472: the absorption portion of the P Cygni profile (small bumps in the absorption trough).
473: The clump diminishes the amount of line absorption in the line profile
474: of Fig.~\ref{fig spectrum blob}, but also the line re-emission.
475: For a given line of sight the decrease of absorption
476: due to the blob does not have to equal the decrease of emission.
477: When the clump is located in front of the star the``loss of absorption exceeds the loss of
478: emission since absorption of photons is re-emitted into 4 $\pi$.
479: Other calculations with {\sc Wind3D} show how the line absorption decreases further with
480: larger clump opacities and larger clump sizes. The distance of the clump to the star determines
481: the precise velocity position of the flux bump since the wind accelerates radially.
482: In this example the velocity position of the small flux bump is (almost) invariable because
483: the smooth wind velocity profile is spherically symmetric and the clump moves at
484: the same distance from the star through the wind for an observer in the plane
485: of the equator.
486:
487:
488: It is not a priori clear if a fully self-consistent line source function
489: calculation is required in our modeling.
490: We are, after all,
491: not concerned with detailed changes in the relative depth of DACs
492: (our best fit procedure is based on the DAC shape and FWHM evolution),
493: and far blue-shifted DAC absorption chiefly results from line opacity in the
494: wind volume in front of the stellar disk.
495: When the volume in this cylinder is relatively small compared to the
496: total wind volume its emission can safely be neglected with respect to
497: the contributions from the emission lobes. Since the height of our
498: hydrodynamic wind models is only 1 $R_{*}$ around the plane of the equator,
499: having almost {\em strictly radially} expanding wind structures, there is no far
500: blue-shifted emission emerging from the emission lobes that can significantly
501: alter the small DAC absorption. It is however not correct to assume that an
502: iteration of the source function in 3D radiative transfer calculations can be neglected
503: for detailed modeling of wind features observed in any type of spectral line.
504: A stronger underlying P Cygni profile would be influenced more
505: by the emission, which could start to ``erase" the DAC at lower
506: velocities. Also, when
507: the absorption features occur at much smaller velocities (around stellar
508: rest say), and the hydrodynamic structures yield far blue-shifted emission,
509: the detailed source function of the structured wind cannot be neglected.
510: This is for instance the case for the double-peaked emission lines formed in
511: Be-star disk winds, or for the wine-bottle type H$\alpha$ emission profiles
512: modeled by \citet{Hummel92}. The study of the physical properties of
513: large-scale structures in winds of massive hot stars is not limited
514: to UV resonance lines only. The H$\alpha$ profile of HD~64760 \citep{Kaufer+al06}
515: reveals symmetrically blue- and red-shifted emission humps with 2.4 d modulations
516: that can result from variations at the base of the stellar wind. It remains
517: to be studied how 3D radiative transfer modeling of H$\alpha$ can be combined with
518: hydrodynamic models of rotational modulations observed in the Si~{\sc iv} line
519: (but not addressed in this paper). It is clear however that to compare
520: detailed normalized fluxes of both lines
521: a self-consistent calculation
522: of the H$\alpha$ and Si~{\sc iv} line source functions in the structured
523: wind model is required.
524:
525:
526: \subsection{Hydrodynamic Wind Models}\label{section hydro models}
527:
528: Our approach of computing hydrodynamic CIR models is very similar to that of
529: \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96}. The main differences are that we utilize the
530: {\sc Zeus3D}\footnote{{\tt http://www.astro.princeton.edu/$\sim$jstone/zeus.htm}}
531: \citep{Stone+Norman92} code rather than the VH-1 code, and that we
532: introduce a spot velocity that does not have to equal the stellar rotational
533: velocity.
534:
535: We first outline the procedure and summarize the assumptions that we share with
536: Cranmer \& Owocki. The time-dependent
537: 3D equations of hydrodynamics are solved, limited to the equatorial
538: plane of the star. Full 3D hydrodynamic calculations of CIRs
539: have been presented
540: by \citet{Dessart04} and these suggest that 3D effects are small
541: for spots that are symmetric around the equator.
542: We opted to limit our calculations to the equatorial plane
543: as the gain in computing time allows us to more fully explore the parameter space.
544:
545: Our models include the rotation in the equatorial plane of the star, the gravity acceleration (corrected for electron scattering),
546: and the line force due to radiative driving by line scattering. For evaluating the line force we
547: apply the local Sobolev approximation and the CAK parameterization using
548: a finite-disk correction. Note that this approach neglects the diffuse
549: radiation field, which also suppresses the line-driven instability.
550: It allows us to investigate the effect of the
551: large-scale CIR wind structures rather than small-scale
552: structures due to instability.
553: For the Sobolev approximation we apply the absolute value of the
554: radial velocity gradient \citep{Rybicki+Hummer78}, while we neglect any
555: multiple resonance points due to the possibly non-monotonic wind velocity.
556: Although HD~64760 is a rapidly rotating supergiant
557: we neglect possible effects of gravity darkening and rotational oblateness
558: on the star and its wind. Limb darkening is also neglected.
559: We include only the radial component of the radiative force in our
560: model.
561:
562: The neglect of non-radial forces, gravity darkening and oblateness
563: could be relevant for the mass loss rate in the equatorial
564: plane. \citet{Owocki+al96} have shown how material can flow poleward
565: if these effects are included (contrary to what might be expected from
566: the Wind-Compressed Disk model -- \citet{Bjorkman+Cassinelli93}).
567: The mass-loss in the equator could therefore be smaller than the
568: published value.
569:
570: In our hydrodynamic model, one or more local radiation force
571: enhancements (`spots') can be introduced at the base of the stellar
572: wind.
573: Each spot is determined by its position $\phi_0$ at time $t=0$ on the stellar
574: surface, spot rotation velocity $v_{\rm sp}$, spot strength $A_{\rm sp}$ (or brightness),
575: and opening angle $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ (the diameter of the spot).
576: The spot is assumed to be
577: circular symmetric
578: and centered on the equator. Only
579: the radial component of the additional line force due to this spot
580: is included in the model. The additional force is responsible
581: for the structure in the wind.
582: The line force takes into account the full extent of the spot (i.e.
583: not only the part on the equator but also those parts above and below it).
584: The force is calculated
585: analytically for any point directly above the spot center
586: (including limb darkening in the spot).
587: For other positions it is assumed that a Gaussian
588: function (of azimuthal angle) relates the line force there to that
589: directly above the spot center; this assumption is made to reduce
590: computation times.
591: For detailed equations we refer to
592: \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96}.
593:
594: Our hydrodynamic modeling also includes radiative cooling in the energy conservation
595: equation. Radiative heating has not been implemented, but instead
596: a floor temperature is adopted to prevent the wind material from
597: cooling down to below 80\% of the stellar effective temperature.
598: However, in the models presented in this paper this cooling turned out
599: to be unimportant and all models are isothermal at 0.8 $T_{\rm eff}$.
600: We find in our exploratory calculations that this is no longer true for
601: very bright spots (brighter than is required for modeling HD~64760).
602: As an example, for $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ = 20\degr~and $A_{\rm sp} > 1.2$,
603: the wind is no longer isothermal due to shock heating. The
604: boundary value for $A_{\rm sp}$ where shocks become important is
605: dependent of the spot angle and velocity. We find however
606: that the wind is isothermal for all models with $A_{\rm sp} \le 1.0$.
607:
608: The main difference in our modeling with \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96} is
609: that we allow the (angular) velocity of the spot rotation to differ
610: from the velocity of the rotating stellar surface
611: ($v_{\rm sp}$ $\neq$ $v_{\rm rot}$). This is based on two arguments.
612: Firstly, \citet{Kaufer+al06} have shown
613: that a beat pattern of non-radial oscillations (in HD~64760) can produce
614: local surface spots required for modeling the large-scale wind structures.
615: The beat patterns, however, are not locked onto the stellar surface,
616: but can rotate with a velocity different from the stellar rotational velocity.
617: Secondly, the observed recurrence time scale of the DAC
618: compared to the
619: estimated
620: rotation period
621: (Sect.~\ref{dacfit}) demonstrates that spot velocities
622: considerably different from the surface velocity are required to match the
623: observations. By abandoning the usual assumption that
624: $v_{\rm sp}$ equals $v_{\rm rot}$ a much wider range
625: in the dynamic behavior of the large-scale wind structures emerges from the models.
626:
627: We have thoroughly tested the new hydrodynamic code and can successfully
628: reproduce the results of \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96}.
629: We tested that the results of the code are not sensitive to
630: details, such as the number of points in the grid, the extent
631: of the grid, the Courant number and the assumed floor temperature.
632: The results are slightly sensitive to the order of the advection
633: scheme that is used (by default we use a second-order scheme),
634: but the effect is not large
635: enough, however, to influence the conclusions of this paper.
636:
637: The stellar and wind parameters of HD~64760 were adopted from \citet{Kaufer+al06}
638: and are listed in Table~\ref{table parameters}.
639: Note that these parameters are in acceptable agreement with the more
640: recent ones derived by Lefever, Puls, \& Aerts (2007).
641: We determine the CAK $k$ and $\alpha$
642: parameters to obtain the observed mass-loss rate and the terminal wind
643: velocity
644: (for simplicity, we assumed the CAK parameter $\delta=0$).
645: We apply a polar grid in the hydrodynamic calculations. 800 grid points
646: sample the radial direction covering the wind range 1--30 $R_*$.
647: The grid-step increases by a fixed ratio from the inside to the outside
648: of the radius grid.
649: For the angular part 900 spatial angle points are uniformly distributed
650: over the full $2\pi$ range.
651: We set the Courant number to 0.5.
652: The initial conditions of the model start with an angle-independent smooth
653: wind flow having a $\beta$-velocity law with the observed $v_{\infty}$.
654: The density structure of the smooth wind is derived from the conservation
655: of mass and the observed mass loss rate. During the initial part of our
656: hydrodynamic calculations the smooth wind settles into a stable steady-state outflow
657: that becomes time-independent. Next one or more local spots are turned on at
658: the stellar surface, yielding large-scale asymmetric structures in the extended stellar
659: wind. We then proceed until the models assume a stationary state with a
660: steadily expanding structured rotating wind.
661:
662: The resulting equatorial density and velocity structure are then
663: introduced into the {\sc Wind3D} code. This is done by copying
664: the structure in all planes parallel to the equatorial one, within
665: $\pm 0.5 R_{\rm *}$ around the equatorial plane.
666: Outside this region, the density and velocity have their smooth
667: wind value (as calculated by {\sc Zeus3D}).
668:
669:
670: \section{Observations}\label{obs}
671:
672: We investigate the detailed DAC properties in the high-resolution time series
673: of IUE spectra of the B-type supergiant HD~64760 (B0.5 Ib), observed during the 1995 MEGA campaign
674: \citep{Massa+al95a}.
675: Detailed analyses of the 1993 and 1995 IUE MEGA campaign data of this star have been presented
676: in the literature. The 1993 data are thoroughly discussed in \citet{Massa+al95b}, while
677: \citet{Prinja+al95} and \citet{Howarth+al98} present time-series analyses of
678: both data sets. These studies however provide periods for the rotationally modulated
679: wind variations rather than for the slower evolving DAC structures we model in this paper.
680: \citet{Fullerton97} presented a complete Fourier analysis of these data comparing
681: detailed time-series of many lines individually, however also primarily focusing on the
682: modulation periods. Only in a more recent study did \citet{Prinja+al02} point out
683: that the recurrence time scale for the (slowly migrating high-velocity) DACs is not
684: constrained. We therefore re-analyzed the 1995 MEGA campaign data with the goal
685: of determining an accurate recurrence time for the DACs of HD~64760.
686:
687: The 1995 data sets are extracted from the IUE archive maintained at the Goddard Space Flight Center.
688: The IUE SWP spectra cover the wavelength range from 1150 to 1975~\AA\, with a nominal spectral resolution
689: $R$ $\simeq$ 10,000. The spectra were created by staff at GSFC using the IUEDAC software to combine
690: most of the echelle
691: orders to form a single continuous spectrum, which was placed on a uniformly
692: spaced wavelength grid with 0.05 \AA\, spacing. The wavelength scale calibration
693: was improved by centering the spectra on selected interstellar lines using an echelle order-dependent
694: correction (see also \citet{Prinja+al02}).
695: The mean signal-to-noise ratio in the continuum is typically
696: $\sim$20 to 30 for both data sets.
697:
698: We combine a time series of 145 SWP spectra observed between
699: 1995 January 13 at UT 12:57:35 (JD 2449731.03999) and January 29 at 01:02:18 (JD 2449746.54326).
700: The spectra are integrated with the large aperture during 60 s, and observed about every 3 hours
701: over this period of 15.5~d. The left-hand panel of
702: Fig.~\ref{fig 64760 spectra} shows the time-sequence of the
703: flux spectrum in velocity scale centered around the
704: short-wavelength line of the Si {\sc iv} $\lambda$1400 resonance doublet.
705: The dynamic spectrum is plotted with grey-scales for which dark and bright shades
706: indicate low and high flux levels, respectively. The dark and bright shades correspond to
707: red (or violet) and blue colors in the online image versions. The dynamic spectra
708: in Fig.~\ref{fig 64760 spectra} are linearly interpolated over time to provide a
709: uniform time-sampling. The dynamic spectrum reveals many subtle spectral features
710: in the absorption portion of the P Cygni profile of both Si {\sc iv} lines.
711:
712: The straight vertical lines around 0 and $+$1900
713: $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ are due to interstellar absorption of Si {\sc iv} toward HD~64760.
714: We plot the velocity scale in the stellar rest frame using
715: a radial velocity of 41 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ (CDS Simbad), and a small heliocentric correction
716: ($\sim$5.43 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ from GSFC data header files).
717: The flux minimum in the interstellar lines is constant
718: within a fraction of a percent of the local continuum flux which indicates that
719: the absolute flux calibration of the sequence is reliable.
720: Note that the straight vertical line around $-$800 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ in the left-hand
721: panel of Fig.~\ref{fig 64760 spectra}
722: is due to a detector reseau mark. The zero flux values for these bins in the spectra
723: have been set to a fixed value to prevent a compression of the
724: grey-scale range in the dynamic spectrum image.
725:
726: We investigate the Si {\sc iv} lines of HD~64760 because they exhibit a variety of
727: remarkable spectral features that signal formation in dynamic wind structures. Most striking
728: are the slowly migrating high-velocity DACs observed between $T$=0 and $\sim$5
729: d (further `lower DAC'), and between $T$=10 and 15~d (`upper DAC')
730: in Fig.~\ref{fig 64760 spectra}. Both Si {\sc iv} resonance doublet lines are
731: sufficiently well separated. The blue edge velocity of the
732: long wavelength P Cygni line profile does not overlap with the flux evolution of the DAC observed
733: in the short-wavelength line. The S/N ratios in the Si {\sc iv} wavelength region are sufficiently
734: large to permit image processing techniques to the dynamic flux spectrum to investigate
735: the detailed DAC properties without the application of any compromising spectral smoothing
736: operations. In the right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig 64760 spectra}
737: we subtract the mean flux per wavelength
738: bin from the absolute flux image in the left-hand panel.
739: This operation removes the overall
740: shape of the underlying P Cygni profiles of both doublet lines. The strong absorption
741: feature observed around the blue edge velocity of $\sim$ $-$1600 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$
742: is therefore removed in the right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig 64760 spectra}.
743:
744: The flux difference image shows that the DACs in
745: both doublet lines assume comparable depths and also reveal an almost identical
746: flux evolution over time (see also the flux difference spectrum in Fig.~9 of \citet{Fullerton97}).
747: They drift bluewards from velocities exceeding
748: $\sim$ $-$1000 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ to $-$1600 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$.
749: The depth and width of the DACs decrease over time while drifting bluewards.
750: The DACs are rather broad and intense when they appear in the P Cygni absorption line
751: portion and gradually weaken and narrow while shifting bluewards. The base of the
752: DAC evolution in HD~64760 reveals the shape of a slanted triangle over a period
753: of $\sim$3~d. The top of the triangle further extends into a `tube-like' narrow absorption
754: feature that can be traced over the next 7~d and drifts asymptotically to a maximum
755: velocity that slowly approaches the blue edge velocity of the P Cygni line profile.
756: This is considerably clearer in the difference spectrum than
757: in the original one.
758: The flux difference spectrum clearly reveals that the lower DAC extends over time to at least
759: $T$ $\simeq$ 10~d.
760:
761:
762: We next constrain the recurrence time-scale for the DAC in HD~64760. For our DAC modeling purposes
763: in Sect.~\ref{dacfit} it is important to establish an accurate period over which the DAC
764: recurs.
765: In the right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig 64760 spectra}
766: we observe besides the DACs several
767: individual spectral features that cover a large velocity range. They reveal a
768: rather `bow-shaped' morphology, extending bluewards and redwards at the
769: same time. The `horizontal bow' shape of these features clearly differs from
770: the more `triangular' shape of the DACs. These `modulations' exhibit a possible period in HD~64760
771: of $\sim$1.2~d \citep{Fullerton97,Prinja+al02}, although careful inspection of the flux difference image
772: reveals that these shallow modulations alternate over time
773: with comparable absorption features that extend even more horizontally
774: (i.e. they are almost completely horizontal without the rounded bow-like shape).
775: Clear examples of both types of
776: horizontal features are observed around 4.8~d and 6~d, and around 7.3~d and 8.5~d.
777: Similarly shaped, but stronger modulations, occur around 12~d and 13.2~d when they distort
778: the tube-like narrow absorption in the DAC at larger velocities.
779: We observe that the flux differences in the bow-shaped modulations are distributed almost symmetrically
780: around a velocity axis that is located $\sim$ $-$930 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$. For example, the
781: fluxes in the modulation observed around 4.8~d decrease nearly symmetrically blueward and redward
782: of this velocity value. We use this near-symmetry property of the bow-shaped features to remove the disturbing
783: flux contributions from the modulations to the detailed DAC evolution, and to increase the flux
784: contrast of the DAC. In the right-hand panel of
785: Fig.~\ref{fig DAC minima} we subtract
786: the mirror image from the left-hand panel. The velocity position of the
787: mirror axis at $\sim$ $-$930 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ is determined by minimizing the flux contributions in the horizontal
788: features observed between 11.5~d and 15~d that distort the flux values across the upper DAC.
789:
790: Our mirroring flux difference procedure effectively cancels out the flux contributions
791: from the modulations, while the fluxes inside the DAC remain unaffected (since the DAC
792: is not observed symmetrically around the selected mirror axis).
793: %We can determine the recurrence time of the DAC more accurately from the
794: %fluxes corrected in this way because our automatic procedure to find
795: %the flux minimum at each time will in most cases find the minimum of
796: %the DAC, rather than that of a perturbing feature.
797: We next apply an automatic procedure to find the flux minimum for each
798: separate spectrum. Due to our mirroring correction, this procedure will
799: in most cases find the minimum of the DAC rather than that of a
800: perturbing `modulation' feature.
801: The minima thus found are indicated
802: in black (lower DAC) and white (upper DAC). In the right-hand panel
803: of Fig.~\ref{fig DAC minima} we
804: shift the upper DAC minima downwards and compute
805: the best match with the shape of the lower DAC minima.
806: We apply a simple least-squares minimization technique to the velocity positions of
807: the shifted upper and the lower flux minima and find
808: the best match for $\Delta T = 10.3$~d.
809: We hence determine a recurrence time of 10.3~d for the DAC in
810: Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395 of HD~64760.
811: We estimate an error bar of $\pm 0.5$~d on this result.
812: It is clear from Fig.~\ref{fig DAC minima} that the upper DAC is
813: not a repeat of the lower DAC.
814: We show in Sect. 5 that a hydrodynamic wind model with two unequal CIRs
815: provides the best fit to the shape and morphology of the lower and upper DAC.
816:
817: It is of note that the detailed shape of the high-velocity DACs observed
818: in HD~64760 strongly resembles the shape of DACs observed in the Si~{\sc iv} lines
819: of $\xi$ Per (O7.5 III). The peculiar slanted triangular shape of the DAC base,
820: which extends into a tube-like absorption feature, is also observed in a sequence of
821: IUE spectra of 1991 October \citep{Kaper+al99}. Interestingly these data reveal
822: that the DACs in $\xi$ Per can extend to velocities considerably below the
823: values observed for the DAC in HD~64760. In HD~64760 DAC velocities are observed
824: only blueward of $\sim$ $-$1000 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$, while in $\xi$~Per they reach
825: almost zero velocity, or down to the very base of the stellar wind. The foot of
826: the DAC base in $\xi$~Per is nearly horizontal (e.g. the boundary where the DAC
827: first appears is very sharp) signaling that the dynamic structures that produce
828: the DACs can extend geometrically very far through the wind when they start to
829: rotate into the observer's line of sight (from almost the base of the wind to
830: $\sim$ $v_{\infty}$).
831:
832: In the following Sections we compute hydrodynamic models that correctly fit the
833: detailed shape and morphology of the DACs in HD~64760. We find that the peculiar
834: DAC shape cannot be computed with (simple) parameterized models of the wind
835: density in Sect.~\ref{section parameterized models}. A detailed hydrodynamic
836: model of $\xi$~Per will be presented in a future paper.
837:
838:
839:
840:
841: \section{Hydrodynamic Wind Modeling}\label{grids}
842:
843: \subsection{Model Example}
844:
845: Figure~\ref{fig best fit}
846: shows the density contrast for the hydrodynamic
847: model\footnote{Animations of a number of hydrodynamic models are available at
848: {\tt http://www.astro.oma.be/HOTSTAR/CIR/CIR.html}
849: }
850: of HD~64760
851: with $v_{\rm sp} = v_{\rm rot}/5$, having two spots
852: that are 20\% and 8\% brighter than the stellar surface ($A_{\rm sp}$=0.2 and 0.08),
853: with spot angle diameters of $\Phi_{\rm sp}$=20\degr~ and 30\degr, respectively.
854: The wind velocity deceleration is typically largest inside the large-scale dynamic structures
855: where the density contrast is also largest. This results from the conservation of
856: momentum in the hydrodynamics equations. For an observer in the laboratory frame,
857: wind particles expelled at the stellar surface follow
858: almost straight radial paths outward. When the wind particles cross the spiraling structure radially
859: they temporarily decelerate with respect to the smoothly accelerating wind, thereby enhancing
860: the wind density locally.
861: The extra mass from the bright spots
862: induces stable density waves through which the surrounding fast wind streams.
863: The density waves rotate in the plane of the equator with a period set by that of the spots.
864: The tangential wind velocity components are small compared to the radial velocity
865: components. They become relatively largest close to the stellar surface where the radial wind
866: velocity is smallest. In this model the local deceleration of the flow
867: across the density spirals does not exceed $\sim 140$ $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ and decreases outward
868: along the large-scale wind structures, becoming vanishingly small at radial distances beyond
869: 30 $R_{*}$ where the density approaches that of the smooth wind expanding at $v_{\infty}$.
870:
871:
872: \subsection{Model Grid}\label{section model grid}
873:
874: To understand the effects of the different input parameters on the hydrodynamics,
875: we compute a large grid of models with the {\sc Zeus3D} code. We first compute the
876: hydrodynamic model for the stellar parameters of HD~64760 and its smooth wind properties
877: (Table 1). Next we introduce in the model a
878: {\em single}
879: spot at the equator. We
880: vary the spot parameters of brightness ($A_{\rm sp}$), spot angle ($\Phi_{\rm sp}$), and
881: spot velocity ($v_{\rm sp}$) that provide different models for the large-scale structured wind.
882: These models then serve as input to the {\sc Wind3D} code, which calculates the
883: resulting dynamic spectra. The underlying smooth-wind profile is subtracted from
884: all calculated profiles to allow a comparison to the observed flux difference
885: spectra.
886:
887: In our transfer calculations we compute the structured wind opacity in the Si~{\sc iv}
888: resonance lines from the wind density contrast since
889: $\overline{\chi^{l}}$/$\overline{\chi^{l}_{\rm smooth}}$ $\simeq$ $\rho$/$\rho_{\rm smooth}$
890: (as long as Si {\sc iv} is the dominant ion, which is the case
891: for HD~64760).
892: The smooth wind opacity $\overline{\chi^{l}_{\rm smooth}}$ in the lines is given by the
893: \citet{Groenewegen89} parameterization (see Appendix B).
894: We set the thermal broadening to a small value of 8 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$.
895: When the opacity parameters are set to $T_{\rm tot}=1$, $\alpha_1=1$, $\alpha_2=1$,
896: we find an acceptable ``fit" to the underlying (unsaturated) P Cygni profile of the
897: UV Si~{\sc iv} lines. Figure~\ref{fig underlying profile} shows the average normalized flux
898: profile of the Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395 line of HD~64760 observed over a period
899: of 15.5~d in 1995.
900: It is of note that the Si~{\sc iv} line also contains other photospheric absorption
901: lines (i.e. around $\sim$500 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$), together with an interstellar
902: absorption line (around the stellar rest velocity), a detector reseau mark, and a
903: steady strong absorption feature around $-$1500 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$, which cannot all
904: be accounted for in our 3D hydrodynamic wind models. We emphasize however that
905: our DAC modeling is based on a best fit procedure in the absorption portion of
906: the unsaturated Si~{\sc iv} P Cygni line profile. The best fit procedure is therefore
907: based on the observed and computed flux difference profiles, instead of the normalized
908: flux profiles shown in Fig.~\ref{fig underlying profile}.
909:
910:
911: \subsection{Parameter Study}
912:
913: In this Section we discuss the influence of the various parameters on the
914: CIR hydrodynamics, and how the shape and morphology of the DACs in HD~64760
915: changes.
916: We concentrate on the spot parameters as we assume all other parameters
917: to be known. This parameter study
918: will be important in Sect.~\ref{dacfit}
919: where we determine the best fit to the observed DACs.
920: In doing so we concentrate on the detailed DAC shape (velocity position of the flux
921: minima with time) and morphology (DAC FWHM evolution over time).
922: We do not fit the detailed intensity variation of the DACs because
923: that also depends on the opacity in wind structures above and below the
924: equatorial plane we currently do not incorporate in our hydrodynamic models.
925: We demonstrate however that detailed fits to the precise DAC depth are not
926: needed primarily because the DAC shape and morphology are uniquely determined by
927: the spot parameters.
928:
929: \subsubsection{Spot Strength $A_{\rm sp}$}
930:
931: From the small grid of hydrodynamic models calculated by
932: \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96}, it is already clear that
933: the effect of a larger spot brightness is
934: to increase the range of density contrast
935: (the ratio of density of the structured and the smooth wind $\rho$/$\rho_{0}$).
936: The density contrast maxima increase while the minima decrease.
937: Furthermore, the variations of the wind
938: velocity with respect to the smooth wind velocity also increase with
939: larger $A_{
940: \rm sp}$.
941: Our more extensive grid confirms their results.
942: For an example of a spot with $v_{\rm sp} = v_{\rm rot}$
943: and $\Phi_{\rm sp}=20\degr$,
944: an increase of
945: $A_{\rm sp}$ from 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, to 1.0 increases the maximum of $\rho$/$\rho_{0}$
946: from 1.5, 2.0, 5.0, to 13.7, respectively.
947: The maximum velocity difference increases from 130 to 390 km\,s$^{-1}$.
948: This trend is directly related to the local increase of the total mass-loss rate
949: the spot causes by additional radiative wind driving
950: (see also Sect.~\ref{discuss}). At the stellar surface
951: the spot injects extra material into the wind that collides with smooth-wind
952: material, thereby locally increasing the density in the resulting large-scale wind structures.
953: The larger the spot brightness, the more material is injected into the wind, and the
954: stronger the dynamics of this collision.
955:
956: In Fig.~\ref{fig Asp effect} we show the effect of $A_{\rm sp}$ on the
957: detailed DAC structure computed with {\sc Wind3D}.
958: We increase the spot intensity $A_{\rm sp}$ from 0.1 ({\em upper left panels}),
959: over 0.3 ({\em upper right panels}) and 0.6 ({\em lower left panels}),
960: to 1.0 ({\em lower right panels}). The spot angle $\Phi_{\rm sp}$=20\degr, while
961: the spot velocity is set equal to the surface rotation velocity ($v_{\rm sp} = v_{\rm rot}$) in the four models.
962: We plot both the hydrodynamic models and the dynamic spectra.
963: The hydrodynamic model shows the density contrast and velocity vectors with
964: respect to the smooth wind. The model rotates counter-clockwise over one period.
965: The dynamic spectra show the rotation phase from 0.0 to 1.0.
966: The rotation phase zero corresponds to the spectrum we compute for an observer in the plane of the equator
967: viewing the rotating hydrodynamic model edge-on from the south side in these images. The flux difference
968: profiles are shown between 0 and $-$1700 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$, which is the absorption portion of the P Cygni line profile.
969:
970:
971: \subsubsection{DAC Formation Region}
972:
973: To study the formation region of the DAC, we introduce the ``relative"
974: Sobolev optical depth:
975: \begin{equation}
976: \frac{\tau}{\tau_0} = \frac{\displaystyle\frac{\rho}{|dv/dr|}}{\displaystyle\frac{\rho_0}{|dv/dr|_0}}
977: \label{eq Sobolev}
978: \end{equation}
979: where the subscript `0' refers to the smooth wind model, and we neglect the
980: finite size of the stellar disk by considering only the central ray.
981: DACs are formed in wind regions with large $\tau/\tau_0$ values.
982: These regions are indicated in Figs.~\ref{fig Asp effect},
983: \ref{fig Phisp effect}, \& \ref{fig vsp effect} by hatched areas on the
984: hydrodynamic plots. It follows from Eq.~(\ref{eq Sobolev}) that both the
985: density and velocity gradients can play an important role for the formation
986: of DACs.
987:
988: As first pointed out by \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96}, the DACs are more
989: likely to be due to velocity plateaus than to the increased density
990: in the CIR. The CIR causes a discontinuity in the velocity gradient
991: (``kink"). This kink moves upstream and therefore trails the density
992: enhancement of the CIR. The velocity plateau is bounded on one side
993: by the kink and extends on the other side towards the CIR
994: (see, e.g., Fig.~\ref{fig Asp effect}). Because of the upstream
995: movement of the kink and velocity plateau, they are more warped
996: than the CIR. As the spot rotates, different parts of the velocity
997: plateau cross the line of sight at increasing wind velocities. If the DAC is
998: completely formed in the velocity plateau, this directly translates
999: to the DAC drifting toward larger velocities.
1000: Because of the strong spiral
1001: winding, the DAC velocity increases only slowly with time, which explains
1002: the slow apparent acceleration of DACs
1003: \citep[see also][]{Hamann01}.
1004:
1005:
1006: Our results confirm that DACs are mainly formed in the velocity plateau.
1007: As an example, consider
1008: the upper right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig vsp effect}. The dynamic spectrum
1009: shows a DAC that persists over the whole cycle (starting at low
1010: velocities around phase 0.25 and then narrowing with increasing phase until
1011: it disappears around phase 1.3). The hydrodynamic plot, however,
1012: shows a CIR that persist only over somewhat more than a quarter of the cycle.
1013: The density enhancement in the CIR can therefore not be
1014: responsible for the DAC.
1015: Looking in more detail we find, e.g., that at phase 0 the DAC is present
1016: around $-1500$ $\rm km\,s^{-1}$. On the hydrodynamic plot there is no
1017: density enhancement at all around phase 0 (south direction).
1018: The large Sobolev optical depth (hatched area) at this phase is due to
1019: the small value of the velocity gradient (i.e. a velocity plateau).
1020:
1021: However, in certain cases it is the CIR density
1022: enhancement that creates the DAC. We again refer to the example
1023: of the upper right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig vsp effect}. A more detailed
1024: study of this case shows that the
1025: relative Sobolev optical depth ($\tau/\tau_0$) is dominated by the density
1026: enhancement when the DAC is at low velocities (phases 0.25-0.5).
1027: At larger velocities, the velocity plateau dominates in the formation of the DAC.
1028:
1029: An important aspect of the hydrodynamic models is that an
1030: increase of $A_{\rm sp}$ (all other model parameters being equal) enhances the
1031: density contrast
1032: $\rho$/$\rho_{0}$ inside the CIR {\em and}
1033: decreases
1034: the corresponding radial wind
1035: velocity gradient
1036: behind the CIR (i.e. the wind regions between the stellar surface and the
1037: CIR).
1038: An increase of $A_{\rm sp}$ over the four models in Fig.~\ref{fig Asp effect}
1039: causes the CIR with large $\rho/\rho_{0}$ to occur farther away from the
1040: stellar surface and its overall curvature to diminish.
1041: The wind region with large $\tau/\tau_0$ also shifts farther away from the denser
1042: CIR.
1043: In regions where $|\frac{dv}{dr}|$ is small the local outflow velocity close
1044: to the stellar
1045: surface considerably decreases because of the larger density inside the CIR.
1046: For this reason strong DAC absorption in the dynamic spectrum extends further
1047: towards smaller velocities
1048: when the spot strength $A_{\rm sp}$ increases.
1049:
1050: The radial approximation we introduced in Eq.~(\ref{eq Sobolev})
1051: only provides an estimate of the DAC line formation depth.
1052: It breaks down in wind
1053: regions where non-radial
1054: velocities are large compared to the overall radial wind expansion.
1055: We emphasize however that the DACs we compute in the dynamic spectra with {\sc
1056: Wind3D} do not utilize the
1057: radial approximation. Furthermore they also include the effect
1058: of a (small) intrinsic Doppler broadening in the source function
1059: and therefore go beyond the Sobolev approximation.
1060: The line source function in the transfer is fully 3D
1061: lambda iterated to
1062: self-consistency with the radiative transfer equation to compute the detailed
1063: DAC fluxes.
1064:
1065:
1066:
1067: \subsubsection{Spot Opening Angle $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ }\label{spot opening angle}
1068:
1069: \cite{Cranmer+Owocki96} conclude from their hydrodynamic models that the maximum density {\em decreases}
1070: with increasing spot angle ($\Phi_{\rm sp}$) with the exception
1071: of the smallest $\Phi_{\rm sp}$, where they presume to have undersampled
1072: the wind structure. Our more extensive grid (also calculated at a higher
1073: spatial resolution) shows a clearer picture.
1074: For small spot angles, the range in density contrast and the velocity
1075: differences {\em increase} with increasing spot angle.
1076: This is consistent with the idea that
1077: larger spot angles also increase the amount
1078: of mass injected into the surrounding stellar wind.
1079: Towards even larger spot angles, however, the larger density contrast
1080: and velocity differences begin to level off and to decrease
1081: (consistent with the findings of Cranmer \& Owocki).
1082: An example with $v_{\rm sp} = v_{\rm rot}$ and $A_{\rm sp}=0.5$
1083: shows that the maximum $\rho$/$\rho_{0}$ varies from 1.2, over 3.8, down to 1.9
1084: when $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ increases from 5\degr~over 20\degr~to 180\degr.
1085: The decrease of $\rho$/$\rho_{0}$ with larger $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ results from the
1086: larger angular extent over which the extra mass injected by the spot
1087: spreads out, which makes its collision with the ambient smooth wind
1088: material less efficient
1089: (also noted by Cranmer \& Owocki).
1090:
1091: In Fig.~\ref{fig Phisp effect} we increase the spot opening angle from 5\degr, over 20\degr~and 90\degr, to 180\degr.
1092: The spot co-rotates with the stellar surface, and $A_{\rm sp}$=0.5.
1093: We find that an increase of the spot angle considerably alters the FWHM evolution of the DAC.
1094: The DAC base strongly broadens when $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ increases from 20\degr~to 90\degr~because
1095: extra wind material injected by the spot becomes more spread out over the plane of the equator.
1096: The maximum of $\rho/\rho_{0}$ in the CIR occurs within $\sim$5 $R_{*}$ above the stellar surface.
1097: Inside this region the extra wind material is distributed over a larger geometric region above
1098: the bright spot (and surface), which also considerably broadens the density contrast in the tail of the CIR.
1099: When this region rotates in front of the stellar disk (around rotation phase 0.2 in the lower right-hand panel)
1100: the DAC base becomes much broader because {\em the range of velocities projected in the observer's line of sight}
1101: (that contribute to the DAC opacity) strongly increases (see Sect. 2.2). Note that the
1102: wind flows almost radially through the CIR density structure near the surface (where particles decelerate as they approach and cross the CIR and
1103: accelerate again once they have passed it) with rather small tangential components.
1104: It is however the range of projected radial velocities in front of the stellar disk
1105: that determines the total width of the DAC base.
1106: We find that the Sobolev approximation that only includes strictly radial velocity gradients
1107: yields line formation regions in the hydrodynamic models ({\em hatched regions in Fig.~\ref{fig Phisp effect}})
1108: that do not correspond with the actual DAC formation regions when the tangential wind velocity
1109: components cannot be neglected.
1110:
1111:
1112: \subsubsection{Spot Rotation Velocity $v_{\rm sp}$ }
1113:
1114: The winding of the large-scale structures in the hydrodynamic models (i.e. the number
1115: of turns of the spiral arm in the equatorial plane around the central star)
1116: largely depends on the spot velocity (for fixed $v_{\infty}$).
1117: The spiral winding increases when the spot velocity
1118: increases with respect to the surface rotation velocity.
1119: Much smaller effects on the spiral winding are due to the spot angle;
1120: the spiral winding decreases somewhat when the spot angle increases.
1121:
1122: In Fig.~\ref{fig vsp effect} we compute the DAC for a spot rotation velocity $v_{\rm sp}$ that
1123: increases from $v_{\rm rot}$/10, $v_{\rm rot}$/3 and $v_{\rm rot}$, to $v_{\rm rot}\times 3$,
1124: with $A_{\rm sp}$=0.5 and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$=20\degr. When the spot rotation trails
1125: the surface rotation, the curvature of the CIR considerably decreases ({\em upper panels}).
1126: For $v_{\rm sp}$=$v_{\rm rot}$/10 the density contrast in the CIR has the shape of a
1127: somewhat curved sector in the equatorial plane.
1128: When this sector rotates through the observer's line of sight (around rotation phases of 0.6-0.7),
1129: $|\frac{dv}{dr}|$ becomes small over a wind region that extends from the base of the wind
1130: (close to the surface) to the outmost wind regions beyond 30 $R_{*}$ in the hydrodynamic model
1131: ({\em hatched area in the upper left-hand panel}).
1132: The DAC forms over the entire wind region along the line of sight which samples
1133: nearly all outflow velocities of the accelerating wind.
1134: The DAC has therefore an almost horizontal shape around rotation phases of 0.6-0.7 in the
1135: upper left-hand dynamic spectrum.
1136: An increase of the spot rotation velocity enlarges the curvature of the CIR, and further extends
1137: the spiral winding of the DAC line formation region around the star.
1138: The larger CIR curvature reduces the range of wind velocities the DAC samples along lines of sight
1139: where the radial wind velocity gradient is small and tangential wind components in front of the
1140: stellar disk can be neglected.
1141: The computed DAC therefore narrows towards larger $v_{\rm sp}$, and also appreciably alters
1142: its overall flux shape (e.g. the velocity position of the DAC minima with rotation phase).
1143: When the spot rotation leads the surface rotation (e.g. $v_{\rm sp}$=$v_{\rm rot}\times$3 in the
1144: lower right-hand panels), the curvature of the CIR becomes so large that the density spiral
1145: warps several times around the central star.
1146: The large curvature of the CIR yields several DACs at any rotation phase that move simultaneously
1147: at different velocities through the dynamic spectrum, but which in fact all belong to the same
1148: large-scale spiraling wind structure produced by a single bright spot at the stellar surface.
1149:
1150: Besides introducing a parameter $v_{\rm sp}$ $\neq$ $v_{\rm rot}$, we also
1151: considered the option of simply reducing the value of $v_{\rm rot}$
1152: (which would of course be in contradiction with the observed
1153: $v$~sin~$i$, but would provide the correct period of the DACs).
1154: However, changes of $v_{\rm rot}$ would alter the smooth wind
1155: due to the effect of the centrifugal acceleration.
1156: As HD~64760 is rotating at 0.65 of the breakup velocity
1157: \citep{Kaufer+al06}, a change of $v_{\rm rot} = 265\,\rm km\,s^{-1}$
1158: to $100\,\rm km\,s^{-1}$ would increase $v_{\infty}$ by
1159: $\sim$30\%, and would decrease the mass-loss rate by $\sim$30\%
1160: \citep[see, e.g.,][]{Blomme91}. The changes in the underlying smooth wind
1161: in turn would influence the development of the CIR. A model with
1162: a lower $v_{\rm rot}$ is therefore not equivalent to one
1163: with $v_{\rm sp}$ $<$ $v_{\rm rot}$.
1164:
1165: This point is also relevant to the conclusion of \cite{Hamann01}
1166: that (for spots locked onto the stellar surface) the DAC acceleration
1167: does not depend on the stellar rotation rate. The centrifugal acceleration
1168: forces already influence the smooth wind structure, thereby creating a dependence on the rotational velocity.
1169: One could of course artificially change the CAK parameters to compensate
1170: for the centrifugal acceleration in the smooth wind. But this would not
1171: compensate perfectly what happens inside the CIR, where the hydrodynamics
1172: is driven by a stronger radiation field. A (small) effect due to a different
1173: rotational velocity would therefore remain.
1174:
1175:
1176: We summarize this Section by noting that the spot strength $A_{\rm sp}$ chiefly determines
1177: the density contrast inside the large-scale equatorial wind structures of hydrodynamic models.
1178: Our 3D radiative transfer calculations reveal that $A_{\rm sp}$
1179: mainly influences the velocity extension of the DACs in the absorption portion of the P Cygni wind profile.
1180: The spot opening angle $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ chiefly determines the width of the spiraling
1181: wind structures, which determines the FWHM evolution of the DAC over time (DAC morphology),
1182: and primarily the velocity range and shape of the DAC at its base.
1183: The rotation velocity of the spot $v_{\rm sp}$ with respect to the stellar surface rotation
1184: velocity mostly determines the curvature of the hydrodynamic structures, which mainly alters
1185: the velocity positions of the DAC flux minima over time (detailed DAC shape).
1186: Since the large-scale density- and velocity-structures in the hydrodynamic models are
1187: uniquely determined by the three spot parameters $A_{\rm sp}$, $\Phi_{\rm sp}$, and $v_{\rm sp}$
1188: (assuming the smooth-wind properties are a priori known), they also uniquely determine the
1189: detailed DAC shape and morphology in our 3D radiative transfer calculations.
1190: It justifies to constrain the spot parameters from best fits to the detailed shape of
1191: observed DACs in the next Section.
1192:
1193:
1194: \section{Best Model Fit}\label{dacfit}
1195:
1196: In this Section we determine the spot parameters at the stellar surface of HD~64760 by matching
1197: the detailed DAC evolution in the Si~{\sc iv} lines. The best-fit spot parameters determine the density
1198: contrast and flow velocities in the large-scale equatorial wind structures. The additional
1199: mass-loss rate due to the CIRs
1200: is therefore determined by the best-fit spot parameters,
1201: which we discuss in Sect.~\ref{discuss}.
1202:
1203: In Sect.~\ref{obs} we obtain a recurrence period of 10.3$\pm$0.5~d for the DAC observed in the Si~{\sc iv} lines of
1204: HD~64760. We assume that the star is observed edge-on (sin $i$=1). The surface rotation velocity of
1205: $v_{\rm rot}$=265 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$
1206: yields a rotation period of 4.12~d (for $R_{*}$=22~$R_{\odot}$),
1207: or 2.5 times shorter than the observed DAC recurrence period.
1208: This is direct evidence that the spots cannot rotate with the surface.
1209: We therefore use models having either one, two, four, or eight bright spots,
1210: with the spot parameter $v_{\rm sp}$ set equal to $v_{\rm rot}$ / 2.5, $v_{\rm rot}$ / 5,
1211: $v_{\rm rot}$ / 10, and $v_{\rm rot}$ / 20, respectively, in the equatorial structured wind models.
1212: We compute the dynamic spectra of Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395 in HD~64760 over a period of 15.5~d for direct
1213: comparison to the IUE observations.
1214:
1215: \subsection{One-spot model fits}\label{one spot fit}
1216:
1217: Figure~\ref{fig variants best fit} shows part of
1218: an atlas of one-spot models. The Figure shows
1219: six dynamic spectra computed with {\sc Wind3D} which are
1220: closest to the best-fit solution.
1221: The Figure contains certain combinations for
1222: spot parameters $A_{\rm sp}$=0.1, 0.2, \& 0.3, and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$=30\degr, 40\degr, 50\degr, \& 60\degr.
1223:
1224: We first discuss the goodness of fit by considering how well
1225: the position of the model flux minima match the observations.
1226: The computed spectra are shown between 0 and $-$1700 $\rm km\, s^{-1}$,
1227: with the underlying smooth P Cygni wind profile subtracted. The computed flux minima in the DAC are
1228: marked with black dots, while the flux minima of the observed DAC are over-plotted with white dots.
1229: We vary the spot parameters $A_{\rm sp}$ and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ until a best match between the black and
1230: white dots is obtained. When we increase $A_{\rm sp}$ from 0.1, and 0.2, to 0.3 in the upper panels
1231: of Fig.~\ref{fig variants best fit}, the base of the DAC extends toward velocities redward of $\sim$ $-$1000 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$
1232: that are
1233: not observed in HD~64760 (Sect.~\ref{obs}). We therefore find that $A_{\rm sp}$ does not significantly exceed 0.1.
1234: For $A_{\rm sp}=0.1\pm$0.05, the morphology of the computed DAC compares
1235: very well to the observed DAC, and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ can be determined from a best fit to the detailed velocity
1236: position of the DAC flux minima over time. We apply a least-squares minimization method to the observed
1237: and computed DAC flux minima ({\em black and white dots}) yielding a best fit for models with
1238: $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ between 40\degr~and 50\degr. When $\Phi_{\rm sp}$=60\degr~({\em lower right-hand panel})
1239: the computed DAC base crosses the observed DAC base too rapidly. If $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ is lowered
1240: to 50\degr~(at most) the velocity positions of the flux minima at the DAC base shift bluewards almost linearly
1241: over time ({\em lower left-hand panel}) conform with the observed DAC evolution. For $A_{\rm sp}$ $<$ 0.1
1242: and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ $<$ 40\degr~the DAC becomes invisible
1243: against the underlying smooth wind absorption.
1244: Our best-fit solution
1245: with a one-spot model
1246: is therefore: $v_{\rm sp}$ = $v_{\rm rot}$ / 2.5;
1247: $A_{\rm sp}=0.1 \pm 0.05$ and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ = $50 \pm 10$\degr.
1248:
1249:
1250: Figure~\ref{fig comparison best fit} compares the best fit dynamic spectrum
1251: ({\em upper left-hand panel}) with the observed spectrum ({\em upper right-hand panel}).
1252: The computed dynamic spectrum correctly fits the observed flux difference spectrum in great detail.
1253: The velocity positions of the flux minima in the computed DAC ({\em marked with red dots})
1254: differ by less than $\sim$50 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ from the observed velocity positions ({\em white dots})
1255: for $T$ between 0 and 3.5~d (lower DAC), and for $T$ between 10 and 15.5~d (upper DAC).
1256: Over these time intervals the computed flux evolution in the DAC base correctly fits the detailed
1257: shape and morphology changes of the observed spectra.
1258:
1259: We proceed with a detailed comparison of the observed DAC {\em shape} and the models.
1260: In Fig.~\ref{fig detailed comparison best fit} we compare the computed ({\em left-hand panel})
1261: and observed ({\em right-hand panel}) shape and morphology at the DAC base for 0~d $\leq$ $T$ $\leq$ 3.75~d.
1262: The dynamic spectra are plotted between $-$758 and $-$1666 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$, revealing the slanted
1263: triangular shape of the DAC base. The characteristic shape results from wind regions
1264: within a few $R_{*}$ above the stellar surface where the density increase of the CIR spreads out
1265: above the spot. The DAC line formation region rotates in front of the stellar disk and samples a
1266: decreasing range of (projected) radial wind velocities along the line of sight
1267: causing a narrower DAC base over time.
1268: The FWHM of the computed DAC decreases from $\sim$100 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ at $T$=0~d
1269: to $\sim$20 $\rm km\, s^{-1}$ around $T$=3.5~d, consistent with the observed DAC narrowing.
1270: The DAC width is small and stays nearly constant over the next 6.5~d, after which it fades away.
1271: The `tube-like' extension of the DAC base also corresponds to the observations (upper right-hand panel of
1272: Fig.~\ref{fig comparison best fit}).
1273: It results from the CIR above $\sim$20 $R_{*}$ in the DAC line formation region where
1274: the wind velocity is within 5\% of $v_{\infty}$=1500 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$.
1275: The DAC samples only a very small range of wind velocities around $v_{\infty}$, although
1276: its formation region (in front of the disk) extends geometrically from $\sim$20 to 30 $R_{*}$.
1277: The DAC approaches $v_{\infty}$, remains very narrow and visible, until the outer wind regions
1278: in the CIR rotate out of the observer's line of sight.
1279: The time scale over which the DAC remains visible is set by the curvature of the CIR around
1280: the star which mainly depends on $v_{\rm sp}$.
1281: Note that the computed DAC fades away after $T\simeq$ 10 d in the best fit model, as is observed in HD~64760.
1282: However, the velocity positions of the tube-like DAC feature observed between $T$= 7
1283: and 10~d somewhat exceed the DAC velocities of our best fit model by 100-150 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$.
1284: The smooth wind model has $v_{\infty}$=1500 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$, which we slightly vary to improve the fit.
1285: We find however that changing $v_{\infty}$ by $\pm$200 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ leaves the spot parameters
1286: practically unchanged since the best fit criterion primarily relies on the DAC shape and
1287: morphology between $T$=0~d and 7~d.
1288:
1289: \subsection{Two-spot model fits}\label{two spot fit}
1290:
1291: The upper left-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig comparison best fit} shows the best fit for a
1292: two-spot model with $v_{\rm sp}$ = $v_{\rm rot}$ / 5. Models with two unequal spots
1293: better match the detailed DAC shape compared to our one-spot model fits.
1294: The spot parameters are varied separately until the best fit to the detailed shape
1295: and morphology of the observed upper and lower DAC ({\em upper right-hand panel}) is
1296: accomplished. We find the best fit to the lower DAC with a spot of
1297: $A_{\rm sp}=0.2 \pm 0.05$ and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ = $20 \pm 5$\degr.
1298: The upper DAC
1299: is best fit with a second spot inserted on the opposite side of the stellar equator
1300: with $A_{\rm sp}=0.08 \pm 0.05$ and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ = $30 \pm 5$\degr.
1301: Since the spot velocity is halved compared to one-spot models, the curvature of
1302: both CIR wind structures in Fig.~\ref{fig best fit} diminishes, yielding DAC shapes
1303: that are less curved. The left-hand and middle panels of
1304: Fig.~\ref{fig detailed comparison best fit} show the best fit to the detailed
1305: shape of the lower DAC with one- and two-spot models. The best two-spot fit
1306: to the lower DAC is an improvement and the computed flux minima correctly
1307: match the almost constant drift observed for its flux minima over time.
1308: The shape of the upper DAC flux minima is somewhat more curved (but less
1309: sharply defined due to the intersecting modulations), while its base is
1310: slightly more blue-shifted compared to the lower DAC.
1311: The upper DAC is therefore best fit using a somewhat larger
1312: $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ = 30\degr. The larger spot opening angle used for the
1313: upper DAC broadens the computed width at its base and shifts the velocity positions of
1314: the flux minima very close to the observed values. The velocity
1315: extension of the upper DAC base somewhat decreases by reducing $A_{\rm sp}$ to
1316: 0.08 compared to the lower DAC (see also Sect.~\ref{spot opening angle}).
1317: One-spot models with $V_{\rm sp}$=$V_{\rm rot}$/2.5 produce DACs that accelerate
1318: considerably faster than a two-spot model with the same spot parameters, but having
1319: $V_{\rm sp}$=$V_{\rm rot}$/5. On the other hand, if the $V_{\rm sp}$ is
1320: also set identical for one- and two-spot models the differences in DAC
1321: shapes are very small and solely result from weak hydrodynamic interactions
1322: between the CIRs in the two-spot model (in the CIR tails at large wind velocity).
1323:
1324: We also computed models with four and eight spots inserted at equal distances
1325: around the stellar equator. For models with four spots we set $v_{\rm sp}$=$v_{\rm rot}$ / 10,
1326: with $A_{\rm sp}$- and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$-values for all four spots comparable to the two-spot best fit
1327: model parameters ({\em lower left-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig comparison best fit}}).
1328: We find however that hydrodynamic interactions between the four CIRs become
1329: stronger and substantially alter the resulting DAC structures. The high-velocity tail of the CIRs can
1330: partially overlap with the structures at the base of the wind from the trailing CIRs. The base of the
1331: upper DAC therefore time overlaps too long with the high-velocity tube-like extension
1332: observed in the lower DAC. The detailed morphologies of DACs computed with four- and eight-spot
1333: models are not sufficiently well separated over time to be compatible with the
1334: behavior of the DACs observed in HD~64760.
1335:
1336: The best fit models are obtained from a least-squares fit to the
1337: minima of the lower DAC for a grid of one-spot models and a grid of two-spot models {\it separately}.
1338: The least-squares fits to the lower DAC uses 36 spectra observed between 0 and 3.5 d
1339: because its DAC minima are poorly determined after 3.5 d (see Fig. 14). The least-squares
1340: fit procedure {\em within} both grids provides values that are significant
1341: indicators of the best fit spot parameters for the one-spot models or two-spot models.
1342: A least-squares fit comparison {\em between} one-spot and two-spot fits however
1343: is cumbersome strictly quantitatively because two-spot models always introduce
1344: two extra (spot) parameters in the fit compared to one-spot models.
1345: We compute a sigma (square root of the weighted sum of squares of velocity differences between the
1346: computed and observed DAC minima) of 22.2 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ for the best fit two-spot model,
1347: and 24.7 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ for the best fit one-spot model. These values are limited to 36
1348: spectra between 0 and 3.5 d, and can therefore be compared.
1349: The two-spot best fit model quantitatively better fits the observed
1350: minima than the one-spot best fit model. The difference of 2.5 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ between
1351: these sigma values is however too small to conclude that the two-spot model
1352: significantly (in a statistical sense) better fits than the one-spot model
1353: when limited to the lower DAC. If the minima of the upper DAC are also included
1354: in the comparison, the difference of sigma values substantially increases, but
1355: the direct comparison of these values is more complicated because of the different number
1356: of free parameters.
1357:
1358: We note however that none of the one-spot models yield the very linear shape
1359: we observe for the lower DAC. The one-spot models accelerate too fast,
1360: or the DACs are always too curved below the observed (rather straight) DAC shape.
1361: The two-spot models rotate twice slower and do provide this very linear
1362: DAC shape. The difference of DAC shapes in Fig. 14 is an
1363: improvement of the best fit with one-spot models.
1364: We also find that the two-spot best fit model yields a substantial
1365: broadening of the long-wavelength wing of the lower DAC base
1366: (between 0 and ~1 d), which better than the one-spot best fit model
1367: corresponds to the width changes observed in the lower DAC.
1368: It results from the smaller spot velocity in two-spot models.
1369: The long-wavelength DAC base wing further broadens in the four-spot models
1370: (Fig. 13) which rotate another factor of two slower.
1371: One-spot models leave no room to adjust for the observed shape of
1372: the upper DAC which is visibly (although perturbed) slightly
1373: different from the lower DAC. For example, in the lower right-hand
1374: panel of Fig. 13 the best fit one-spot model yields computed DAC
1375: minima that fall below the lower DAC and above the upper DAC.
1376: This fit problem is removed with the best fit two-spot model
1377: ({\it upper left-hand panel}).
1378:
1379: Our best fit procedure does not include the detailed evolution of the DAC depth because the
1380: current hydrodynamics does not compute the extension of the models above and below the equatorial plane.
1381: The computed DAC depth is therefore determined by the geometric height $h$ of the CIR which
1382: we set to 0.5 $R_{*}$ above and below the equatorial plane. An increase of $h$ of the structured
1383: wind model enhances the DAC depth in the P Cygni absorption profile because the amount of scattering
1384: due to the CIR in front of the stellar disk enlarges.
1385: We assume that the CIR height remains
1386: constant with distance from the star, having a fixed geometric height of $\pm$0.5 $R_{*}$
1387: (the latter value is very close to the maximum height of a circular spot
1388: extending over $\pm$25\degr~above and below the equatorial plane
1389: we find for a best fit with one-spot models).
1390: The relative variation of the DAC depth over time is however dependent on
1391: the assumption of a fixed geometric height for the CIR model. The actual CIR height is of course expected
1392: to also increase with distance from the stellar surface (e.g. due to the 1/$r^{2}$ decrease of the
1393: smooth wind density), causing the large-scale wind structures to grow
1394: in latitude over a `flaring angle' from the star.
1395: We however checked with 3D transfer calculations that $h$ and the flaring angle do not influence the detailed
1396: DAC shape or morphology we use for our best fits. In principle $h$ and the flaring angle can
1397: be determined from fully 3D hydrodynamic model calculations. They would allow us to also invoke the detailed
1398: DAC depth changes in our best fit procedure. A calculation of more sophisticated 3D models
1399: is however beyond the scope of this paper. The DAC shape and morphology suffice to obtain the best
1400: spot parameters for large-scale equatorial wind structures.
1401:
1402:
1403: While we assume in this paper that sin~$i = 1$ for HD~64760,
1404: the inclination angle $i$ could be considered as
1405: an additional free parameter in the 3D radiative transfer computations.
1406: The detailed model geometry ($h$ and flaring angle) of the structured wind influences
1407: the column densities that result from the CIRs along the line of sight
1408: for an observer slightly above or below the equatorial plane.
1409: Small flaring angles decrease
1410: the relative DAC depth formed at the base of the wind (at small velocities in the dynamic spectra),
1411: while large inclination angles decrease the relative DAC depth formed in the outermost wind regions
1412: (at large velocities). Important influences of the observer inclination angle on the dynamic spectra are
1413: shown in the left-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig detailed comparison best fit} with $i$=85\degr.
1414: Around $T$ = 3~d the DAC depth decreases rapidly because the CIR in wind regions above $\sim$10 $R_{*}$
1415: is tilted below the stellar disk when viewed by the observer above the plane of the equator
1416: (compare to the lower right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig comparison best fit} with $i$=90\degr). A larger
1417: decrease of $i$ decreases the DAC depth further. The DAC becomes invisible for
1418: $i$ $< $80\degr~when $h$ is constant and set equal to $\pm$ 0.5 $R_{*}$ in our 3D radiative transfer
1419: calculations. These calculations reveal that the observer line of sight towards HD~64760 does not exceed
1420: $\pm$10\degr~from its equator-on direction, or that sin$i$ $>$ 0.984.
1421:
1422:
1423:
1424: \section{Discussion}\label{discuss}
1425:
1426: \subsection{Additional Mass Loss Rate}
1427:
1428: At first sight, it may seem that we do not have enough information to evaluate
1429: the mass-loss rate of the structured wind models because the hydrodynamics equations
1430: are solved in the equatorial plane only. However, we do assume that the
1431: spots are
1432: circularly symmetric on the stellar surface, which we can use to determine
1433: the mass-loss rate. To first approximation, we can assume that very close to the
1434: stellar surface the wind density and radial flow velocity have the same
1435: circular symmetry as the spot. Hence, the mass-loss rate of the structured wind
1436: ($\dot{M}_{\rm struct}$)
1437: for a one-spot model
1438: is:
1439: \begin{equation}
1440: \dot{M}_{\rm struct} = 2 \pi \int_0^{\pi}
1441: {\rm d} \theta' \sin \theta' \rho' (r,\theta') v' (r,\theta') r^2,
1442: \label{equation Mdot struct}
1443: \end{equation}
1444: where $\theta'$ is the angle measured from the spot center. Transforming
1445: to
1446: standard spherical coordinates $(r,\theta,\phi)$ gives
1447: $\rho' (r,\theta') = \rho (r,\phi=\phi_0-\theta')$, where $\phi_0$
1448: is the $\phi$ coordinate of the spot center. The assumption of circular
1449: symmetry in the wind is not exactly correct
1450: however, not even close to the stellar surface. The leading edge of the density spiral
1451: slows down due to collision with the smooth wind, which results in a decrease of
1452: the mass-loss rate at the leading edge close to the surface.
1453: \citep[Note that the boundary conditions in the spot do not specify a
1454: mass-loss rate, but rather use a constant-slope extrapolation
1455: for the radial velocity and a fixed base density -- see]
1456: []{Cranmer+Owocki96}.
1457: To obtain a reliable estimate of the mass-loss
1458: rate, we therefore neglect this effect by replacing the values of $\rho\, v$ smaller than
1459: the smooth wind $\rho\, v$-values with the smooth wind values.
1460:
1461: We use this method to compute the effect of the CIR on the mass-loss rate.
1462: In Fig.~\ref{fig Mdot effect}
1463: we plot $\dot{M}_{\rm struct}/\dot{M}_{\rm smooth}-1$
1464: as a function of spot strength and spot angle for a number of
1465: one-spot
1466: hydrodynamic models.
1467: The Figure clearly shows that the extra mass-loss rate due to the CIR
1468: is always very small. Our best-fit model
1469: with one spot
1470: in Sect.~\ref{one spot fit} yields an increase of
1471: only 0.6 \% for the mass-loss rate.
1472:
1473: The model mass-loss rates can be checked against a simplified version of
1474: Eq.~(\ref{equation Mdot struct}).
1475: In the model, the additional line force due to the spot is only
1476: calculated for a position directly above the spot center, while for
1477: other positions we relate it to that directly above the spot center
1478: by using a Gaussian function of azimuthal angle
1479: (Sect.~\ref{section hydro models}).
1480: If we simplify this by using
1481: a function that is unity above the spot
1482: and vanishes outside it, we find
1483: for a one-spot model
1484: :
1485: \begin{equation}
1486: \frac{\dot{M}_{\rm struct}}{\dot{M}_{\rm smooth}} =
1487: \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 - \cos \frac{\Phi_{\rm sp}}{2} \right)
1488: \frac{\dot{M}_{\rm spot}}{\dot{M}_{\rm smooth}} +
1489: \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 + \cos \frac{\Phi_{\rm sp}}{2} \right),
1490: \label{equation Mdot struct simple1}
1491: \end{equation}
1492: where $\dot{M}_{\rm spot}$ is the mass-loss rate over the spot.
1493: We can further use the approximate relationship between mass-loss rate
1494: and luminosity ($\dot{M} \propto L^{1/\alpha}$),
1495: which casts Eq.~(\ref{equation Mdot struct simple1}) into:
1496: \begin{equation}
1497: \frac{\dot{M}_{\rm struct}}{\dot{M}_{\rm smooth}} =
1498: \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 - \cos \frac{\Phi_{\rm sp}}{2} \right)
1499: \left( 1 + A_{\rm sp} \right)^{1/\alpha} +
1500: \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 + \cos \frac{\Phi_{\rm sp}}{2} \right)
1501: \label{equation Mdot struct simple2}
1502: \end{equation}
1503: We find very good agreement between the mass-loss rates derived from detailed
1504: hydrodynamic models with Eq.~(\ref{equation Mdot struct}) and the approximation of Eq.~(\ref{equation Mdot struct simple2}).
1505: This
1506: demonstrates that our method of computing the mass-loss rates for structured
1507: wind models is appropriate.
1508:
1509: Equation~(\ref{equation Mdot struct simple2}) can be extended to include
1510: two symmetrical spots:
1511: \begin{equation}
1512: \frac{\dot{M}_{\rm struct}}{\dot{M}_{\rm smooth}} =
1513: \left( 1 - \cos \frac{\Phi_{\rm sp}}{2} \right)
1514: \left( 1 + A_{\rm sp} \right)^{1/\alpha} +
1515: \cos \frac{\Phi_{\rm sp}}{2}
1516: \end{equation}
1517: Applying a similar formula to our best-fit model with two asymmetrical spots (Sect.~\ref{two spot fit}), we find a
1518: mass-loss rate increase of only 0.5~\%.
1519:
1520: Only
1521: a relatively small enhancement of the mass-loss rate in the
1522: smooth wind is required to maintain the large-scale density- and velocity-structures in the equatorial
1523: plane of radiatively accelerated hot star winds.
1524: Figure~\ref{fig density contrast} shows the density contrast $\rho$/$\rho_{0}$
1525: along the CIR in the best-fit one and two-spot hydrodynamic models of HD~64760.
1526: The density enhancement
1527: in the CIR compared to the smooth wind density is only 32\% at most
1528: (for the two-spot model). This type of
1529: large-scale wind structure does not reveal the dynamic flow properties of a shock wave, but
1530: rather of a rotating density wave. The small density increase in the CIR signals that these
1531: large-scale extended wind structures can also easily be perturbed by other types of
1532: dynamic wind structures that may exist on smaller length scales in winds of massive hot stars.
1533: The best example would be the structure due to the instability of the radiative driving
1534: mechanism \citep{Owocki+al88}.
1535: The presence of DACs therefore provides a substantial constraint on the
1536: amount of clumping present in the wind: too much clumping would
1537: destroy the DACs \citep{Owocki98}.
1538: The large-scale wind structures are a direct consequence of local
1539: irregularities in the radiative driving source at the base of the wind that involve limited
1540: variations of the surface intensity caused by dynamic surface structures that trail the stellar rotation.
1541:
1542:
1543: \subsection{Comparison with Previous Work}
1544:
1545:
1546: \citet{Kaufer+al06} studied the observed photospheric and H$\alpha$ line
1547: profile variations of HD~64760. In the photospheric lines they detected
1548: non-radial pulsations (NRPs) with three closely spaced periods
1549: ($P_1 = 4.810$~h, $P_2 = 4.672$~h, $P_3 = 4.967$~h, in order of
1550: decreasing amplitude).
1551: To explain the variability in the H$\alpha$ line, they proposed a model
1552: in which the beat period between $P_1$ and $P_2$ ($P_{\rm beat} = 6.8$~d)
1553: is responsible for the CIRs in the wind. Both periods have quantum
1554: numbers $l=-m$ and $\Delta m = 2$, so there are two diametrically opposed
1555: spots on the equator. In general, the interference between modes
1556: with arbitrary quantum numbers can result in considerably more
1557: complicated interference patterns than is the case here. Because
1558: $m_1 < m_2$, the beat pattern moves in the opposite direction of
1559: rotation, with $-80.5~\rm km\,s^{-1}$. The whole pattern therefore
1560: rotates in $4.12 \times 80.5/265 = 13.6$~d. Because there are two spots,
1561: the effects on H$\alpha$ repeat with the beat period of 6.8~d.
1562:
1563: A literal application of the \citet{Kaufer+al06} model to the IUE
1564: data does not work, because the timescale over which their model
1565: repeats (6.8~d) is not compatible with the observed 10.3~d timescale
1566: in the UV DACs. This is the main reason why we did not use the
1567: specific values from the \citet{Kaufer+al06} work, but only their
1568: important idea of using spots that need not rotate with the rotational velocity.
1569:
1570: Nevertheless, it should be noted that the beat period calculated
1571: by \citet{Kaufer+al06} is quite sensitive to the accuracy with which
1572: the NRP periods have been determined. A change in periods $P_1$ and $P_2$
1573: of only 0.0235~h would result in a 10.3~d beat period, rather than
1574: a 6.8~d one. From the power spectrum presented in their Fig.~5,
1575: it is clear that the NRP periods are not determined to such a precision.
1576: We also note that their 6.8~d period is not compatible with the
1577: suggested 2.4~d period in H$\alpha$. Interference between periods
1578: $P_2$ and $P_3$ can give a 2.4~d beat period, provided that small shifts
1579: to both periods are applied. It is therefore conceivable that the
1580: UV DACs are due to a beat pattern between $P_1$ and $P_2$, while the
1581: variability in H$\alpha$ and the UV modulations are due to
1582: a beat pattern between $P_2$ and $P_3$. It of course remains to be explained why the $P_1$-$P_2$ beat pattern is only
1583: seen in the UV DACs and the $P_2$-$P_3$ one only in Halpha.
1584: The critical test is to
1585: calculate both the Si~{\sc iv} and the H$\alpha$ line profile
1586: variations with our code. We defer this to a subsequent paper.
1587:
1588:
1589:
1590:
1591:
1592: \section{Summary and Conclusions}\label{concl}
1593:
1594: In this paper we show that a combination of advanced hydrodynamic and radiation transport calculations
1595: in three dimensions can correctly fit the detailed behavior of Discrete Absorption Components observed
1596: in variable UV wind lines of the hot supergiant HD~64760 (B0.5 Ib). The best fits are accomplished with
1597: sophisticated numerical simulations that invoke the physics of the transport of radiation in fast accelerating
1598: stellar winds. The hydrodynamic models
1599: use spots of enhanced brightness on the stellar surface to initiate
1600: large-scale density- and velocity-structures rotating
1601: in the plane of the equator.
1602:
1603: We confirm and somewhat refine the conclusions of \citet{Cranmer+Owocki96}
1604: regarding the effects of spot strength and opening angle on the resulting
1605: CIRs. We also confirm their result that DACs are mainly formed in the
1606: velocity plateau between the kink and the CIR. In some cases, however,
1607: the density enhancement is responsible for the DAC formation (e.g. at low velocities).
1608: The conclusion of \cite{Hamann01} that (for spots locked onto the stellar
1609: surface) the DAC acceleration does not depend at all on
1610: the stellar rotation rate, cannot be extended. This is mainly due
1611: to the effect of the centrifugal acceleration, which already plays
1612: a role for the underlying smooth wind structure. Even when artificially
1613: changing the CAK parameters to compensate for this, a (small) effect
1614: would remain in the CIRs.
1615:
1616: We find that the CIRs in fast-rotating HD~64760 are very extended
1617: density waves. The discrepancy between the 10.3~d recurrence time of the DACs
1618: and the estimated 4.12~d rotation period is direct evidence that spots cannot
1619: rotate with the stellar surface. For a two-spot model, they instead
1620: lag 5 times (i.e. 2 $\times$ 10.3 / 4.12) behind the stellar surface rotation. The best fits to the observed DAC
1621: shape and morphology show that the Co-rotating Interaction Regions are caused by bright spots at the base
1622: of the wind that do not exceed the surface brightness by more than 20$\pm$5\%. The opening
1623: angles of the (circular) spots are around 20\degr~ and 30\degr~
1624: diameter,
1625: hence together covering an appreciable fraction of the stellar surface area.
1626: The structured wind models reveal density enhancements that do not exceed the density of the
1627: surrounding smooth wind by more than $\sim$~30~\%. The wind flow radially crosses the CIRs in the plane of the
1628: equator where it decelerates by less than $\sim$~140 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$.
1629: The base of the DACs form in wind regions within a few $R_{*}$ above the surface where extra material
1630: spreads out above the spots. The width of the DACs decrease over time because the CIR
1631: structures rotate across the stellar disk, causing regions of larger optical depth
1632: farther out in the accelerating wind where the radial velocity dispersion in front
1633: of the stellar disk decreases.
1634: The properties (shape and dynamics) of the DAC line formation regions are uniquely determined
1635: by the spot properties at the base of the wind. It enables us to obtain a unique best fit to
1636: the shape and morphology of the DACs. We find
1637: a better fit to the shape of the upper and lower DACs with a
1638: two-spot model than with a one-spot model.
1639: Our detailed transfer calculations correctly match the (slanted) triangular shape of the DAC base
1640: that further extends into a (tube-like) bluewards-drifting narrow absorption feature observed
1641: in HD~64760 (and also in $\xi$~Per).
1642: The spots at the surface increase the total mass-loss rate of the smooth symmetric wind model for HD~64760
1643: by only $\sim$0.5\%.
1644:
1645: We conclude that the large-scale structured wind of HD~64760 is caused by perturbations of the
1646: surface intensity that trail the fast surface rotation. This points to dynamic structures at
1647: the base of the wind that do not co-rotate
1648: with the stellar surface
1649: (unlike, e.g., surface magnetic fields).
1650: Such structures could possibly result from an interference of
1651: non-radial pulsations traveling the stellar circumference with periods set by the properties of permitted
1652: stellar pulsation modes. The relatively small perturbations that are required to create these DACs
1653: probably explains why they are so ubiquitous.
1654: Their presence also puts a substantial constraint on the amount of
1655: clumping that can be present in the wind.
1656: The large-scale coherent CIR structures may become perturbed by wind
1657: clumping on much smaller length scales. They will however built up again
1658: very rapidly as well, provided that the perturbation
1659: time-scales are sufficiently short for the CIR structures to completely
1660: develop and to cause the UV DACs.
1661: In future work we will investigate the effect of CIRs on
1662: other spectral lines and other stars, trying to best fit the observational data.
1663: For stars not observed close to equator-on, we will develop 3D hydrodynamic models.
1664:
1665:
1666:
1667: \acknowledgments
1668: This work has been supported by the Belgian
1669: Federal Science Policy - Terugkeermandaten.
1670: We thank Asif ud-Doula for making his version of the {\sc Zeus3D} code available
1671: to us. We thank the referee for several comments that improved the content and clarity of the paper.
1672:
1673:
1674:
1675: \appendix
1676: \centerline{\bf APPENDIX}
1677:
1678: \section{3D Transfer Formalism and Discretization}
1679: We denote by the vector $\bf{n}$ the direction in which the light rays
1680: travel at position coordinates $\bf{p}$.
1681: $I$=$I_{\nu}$($\bf{p}$,$\bf{n}$) denotes the specific intensity at
1682: frequency $\nu$ of radiation traveling in direction $\bf{n}$ through point $\bf{p}$ (or the
1683: direction of photon extinction at $\bf{p}$). We solve the transfer problem in the observer frame
1684: because the co-moving frame formulation is not applicable to structured winds that can expand
1685: asymmetrically and that have non-monotonic wind velocity structures.
1686: When we denote the opacity and emissivity of the material $\chi$=$\chi_{\nu}$($\bf{p}$,$\bf{n}$)
1687: and $\eta$=$\eta_{\nu}$($\bf{p}$,$\bf{n}$), respectively, the time-independent monochromatic
1688: transfer equation at $\bf{p}$ for a ray traveling in direction $\bf{n}$ is $\bf{n}$ $.$ $\nabla$ $I$ = $\eta$ $-$ $\chi$ $I$.
1689: We use the two-level atom approximation with complete frequency redistribution so that
1690: $S^{l}$ = (1-$\epsilon$) $\bar{J}$ + $\epsilon$ $B$, where $S^{l}$ = $S^{l}$ ($\bf{p}$) is the
1691: line source function, $B$ = $B$ ($\bf{p}$,$T$) the Planck function at $\bf{p}$,
1692: $\epsilon$ the
1693: `thermalization parameter'
1694: in the non-LTE transfer problem, and $\bar{J}$ the frequency-weighted mean
1695: intensity at $\bf{p}$.
1696: In this paper we solve the pure scattering problem for resonance lines formed in
1697: the very extended winds of massive stars that are considered to be isothermal in the
1698: lines formation region. In these conditions the
1699: spontaneous de-excitation rate greatly exceeds the collisional transition rate.
1700: We therefore assume $\epsilon$ = 0, and currently neglect LTE contributions
1701: in the transfer problem.
1702: It permits to solve the pure scattering transfer equation with the line source function at $\bf{p}$
1703: \begin{equation}
1704: {\it S}^{l}({\bf p}) = {\bar J}({\bf p}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \int_{4\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty}
1705: \phi_{\nu}(\nu,{\bf n}) \, {\it I}_{\nu}({\bf p},{\bf n}) \, {\it d}\nu \, {\it d}\Omega \,,
1706: \end{equation}
1707: which integrates the specific intensity over all spatial angles $\Omega$,
1708: weighted by the line profile function $\phi_{\nu}$. $\theta$ and $\psi$ denote the two spherical
1709: coordinate angles with $d\Omega$=sin($\theta$)\,$d\theta$\,$d\psi$.
1710: Note that we use $\psi$ instead of the more common $\phi$, to avoid
1711: confusion with the profile function. When we denote $\nu_{0}$ the
1712: rest frequency of the line and $\bf{v}$ the wind velocity vector at $\bf{p}$,
1713: the Gaussian line profile function $\phi$ = $\phi_{\nu}(\nu,\bf{n})$ is
1714: \begin{equation}
1715: \phi_{\nu}(\nu,\bf{n}) = \frac{1}{\Delta \nu_{D}\sqrt{\pi}} \, {\rm exp} \left( -\left(\frac{\nu-{\nu_{0}}{(1-\frac{v.n}{{\it c}})}}{\Delta \nu_{D}}\right)^{2} \right) \\.
1716: \end{equation}
1717: $\Delta \nu_{\rm D}$ denotes the line width $\Delta \nu_{\rm D}$=$\nu_{0}$ $({v_{\rm th}^{2}+ v_{\zeta}^{2}})^{1/2}$/c,
1718: with $v_{\rm th}$ the mean thermal particle velocity and $v_{\zeta}$ the turbulence velocity.
1719: We assume a Gaussian profile function for lines that are not intensity saturated.
1720: We do not consider line formation on the root part of the curve of growth, which would otherwise
1721: require parameterized damping profile functions. Also, we currently do not include a partial redistribution or
1722: correlation function in the atom's frame because the 3D transfer problem should remain tractable by
1723: assuming complete redistribution over all line frequencies.
1724: Note that the integration of Eq.~(A1) yields a frequency independent line source function in $\bf{p}$,
1725: which renders the problem of lambda iteration on $S^{l}$ independent of detailed frequency redistribution
1726: in the line profile.
1727:
1728: The 3D scattering transfer problem consists of calculating $S^{l}$ by summing in Eq.~(A1) over contributions from
1729: light rays that travel through $\bf{p}$ from all directions, while accounting for Doppler
1730: effects in Eq.~(A2) caused by the local wind velocity $\bf{v}$,
1731: and lambda iterating till $S^{l}$ becomes consistent
1732: with the radiative transfer equation. With $\eta$=$\eta^{\rm c}+\eta^{l}$ and $\chi$=$\chi^{\rm c}+\chi^{l}$
1733: the isotropic contributions from the continuum radiation, and anisotropic contributions from the line radiation
1734: to $\eta$ and $\chi$, the transport equation for stationary advection of the radiation field with respect to $\bf{n}$ is
1735: \begin{equation}
1736: \bf{n}\, .\, \nabla {\it I} = \chi^{l} \, \, {\it S}^{l} + \chi^{c} \, {\it S}^{c} - (\chi^{l}\, + \chi^{c})\, {\it I} \,,
1737: \end{equation}
1738: where $S^{\rm c}$=$S^{\rm c}$($\bf{p}$) denotes the continuum source function and $S^{\rm c}$=$\eta^{c}$/$\chi^{\rm c}$.
1739:
1740: The time-independent multi-dimensional radiative transfer problem
1741: involves the development of a sophisticated numerical scheme that has to be
1742: tailored to solve a Boltzmann equation for photons. A wide variety of such
1743: algorithms is discussed in the literature which, dependent on the considered astrophysical
1744: conditions, are suitable to solve this equation from its diffusion limit
1745: (optically thick) to the pure transport (optically thin) limit. In
1746: astrophysical line and continuum transport, where scattering cannot
1747: be neglected, one applies a finite element discretization
1748: technique to solve
1749: an integro-differential equation (or a set of them).
1750: Generally, the complexity of this transfer problem results from the
1751: fact that due to scattering the radiation field is not only determined
1752: by local gas conditions but has to be consistent with the (atomic)
1753: state of the matter through which it can propagate over large geometric
1754: distances. While for 1D problems numerical methods are well established
1755: \citep[e.g.,][]{Hubeny97}, adequate solutions for 3D problems are still in their infancy.
1756: A concise overview of 3D non-LTE radiative transfer problems in the past
1757: decades has recently been presented in \citet{Hauschildt06}.
1758: We opted to implement Adam's \citep{Adam90} spatially implicit first order method because
1759: it is one of the few 3D schemes that has successfully been applied to spectral lines
1760: that form in astrophysical conditions such as Be-star disk winds \citep[e.g.,][]{Hummel94}.
1761:
1762: Adam's method consists of integrating Eq.~(A3) for a finite volume in a Cartesian system
1763: of coordinates. The computation of $I$ and $S^{l}$ involves solving a system of integro-differential
1764: equations (Eqns. (A1) \& (A3)) for which we consider an equidistant 3D rectangular grid with grid-points
1765: $\bf{p}$=$\bf{p}_{\it ijk}$=($x_{i}$,$y_{j}$,$z_{k}$) where $i$=1..$N_{x}$, $j$=1..$N_{y}$, $k$=1..$N_{z}$, and
1766: with velocity vectors $\bf{v}$= $\bf{v}_{\it ijk}$=($v_{x_{i}}$,$v_{y_{j}}$,$v_{z_{k}}$). Along a chosen direction $\bf{n}$,
1767: Eqn. (A3) can be discretized in the observer frame, and cast into
1768: \begin{eqnarray}
1769: I_{ijk}=\left( \chi^{l}_{ijk} \, S^{l}_{ijk} + \chi^{c}_{ijk} \, S^{c}_{ijk} +
1770: n_{x_{i}} \, \frac{I_{i-\alpha,j,k}}{x_{i}-x_{i-\alpha}} + n_{y_{j}} \, \frac{I_{i,j-\beta,k}}{y_{j}-y_{j-\beta}} +
1771: n_{z_{k}} \, \frac{I_{i,j,k-\gamma}}{z_{k}-z_{k-\gamma}} \right) / \nonumber \\
1772: \left( \chi^{l}_{ijk} + \chi^{c}_{ijk} + \frac{n_{x_{i}}}{x_{i}-x_{i-\alpha}} + \frac{n_{y_{j}}}{y_{j}-y_{j-\beta}} + \frac{n_{z_{k}}}{z_{i}-z_{i-\gamma}} \right) \,.
1773: \end{eqnarray}
1774: The monochromatic specific intensity $I_{ijk}$=$I_{\nu}(\bf{p}_{\it ijk},\bf{n}$) in $\bf{p}$ is computed with Eq.~(A4) by incrementing $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$ by $+1$ or $-1$ depending on the direction $\bf{n}$ of the rays in the grid.
1775: A general application of the Adam's method treats $\chi^{\rm c}$ as a parameter,
1776: while $S^{c}$ it set equal to $B$ throughout. Since $B$ is constant in an isothermal
1777: wind over one line width, we can set $\eta^{\rm c}$ equal to a constant value.
1778: The detailed treatment of continuum processes is not included at this point.
1779: For our application of Adam's method in this paper, we set $\chi^{c}$=0 and $S^{c}$=0
1780: throughout the wind, and only use non-zero values for the continuum flux emitted at the
1781: stellar surface.
1782: We set the boundary conditions $\chi^{l}$=0 and $\chi^{c}$=0 for grid-points outside the grid.
1783: To be consistent with the
1784: nearly
1785: spherical geometry of a stellar wind,
1786: we also set these boundary conditions on the sphere that just fits inside our simulation volume.
1787: The corners of the grid ($|\bf{p}_{\it ijk}|$ $\geq$ $R_{\rm max}$)
1788: therefore also have $\chi^{l}$=0 and $\chi^{c}$=0.
1789: At the boundary of the grid
1790: we set $I_{ijk}$=0 and solve Eq.~(A4) by stepping through the indices {\it i,j,k}.
1791: This is done for a set of observer frequencies $\nu_{a}$ and a number of directions
1792: specified by angles ($\psi_{b}$,$\theta_{c}$). We then
1793: compute $S^{l}_{ijk}$ or $\bar{J}_{ijk}$=$\bar{J}_{ijk}$($\bf{p}_{\it ijk}$) with a quadrature sum over $I_{ijk}$;
1794: \begin{equation}
1795: \bar{J}_{ijk} = \frac{1}{4\pi} \sum_{a=1}^{N_{\nu}}A_{a}\,\sum_{b=1}^{N_{\psi}}B_{b}\, \sum_{c=1}^{N_{\theta}}C_{c}\,\,{\rm sin}(\theta_{c})\,\,I_{ijk}(\nu_{a},\psi_{b},\theta_{c})\,\,\phi(\nu_{a},{\bf{v}}_{\it ijk},\psi_{b},\theta_{c})\,.
1796: \end{equation}
1797: The summation in Eq.~(A5) can be limited to an interval (1..$N_{\nu}$) around the rest frequency $\nu_{0}$ that covers
1798: the entire wind line (i.e. with a P Cygni profile). The summation over angular coordinates
1799: ($\theta_{c}$,$\psi_{b}$) is computed with a number of integration points that decreases toward higher latitudes $\theta_{c}$ on the sphere
1800: by using $N_{\psi}$=$N_{\psi}$($\theta_{c}=\pi/2$)\,{\rm sin}($\theta_{c}$).
1801: The calculation of $\bar{J}_{ijk}$ therefore sums
1802: angles (or directions $\bf{n}$) that are isotropically distributed around ${\bf{p}}_{ijk}$. It ensures that
1803: the 3D transfer is correctly solved for random opacity and velocity distributions (i.e. no
1804: preferential directions are considered for transfer in for example an equatorial disk). Note in Eq.~(A1) that
1805: both $I$ and $\phi$ are direction dependent which makes the accuracy of Eq.~(A5) very sensitive
1806: to the total number of directions $\bf{n}$ in the summation. The number of $\bf{n}$ (or $N_{\psi}$,$N_{\theta}$)
1807: in Eq.~(A5) scales with the size of the grid ($N_{x}$,$N_{y}$,$N_{z}$), because grid-points at increasing distances from
1808: ${\bf{p}}_{ijk}$ require finer sampling of $\bf{n}$ to ensure the same accuracy of ${\bar{J}}_{ijk}$.
1809: The quadrature coefficients $A_{a}$, $B_{b}$, and $C_{c}$ in Eq.~(A5) are computed with the fast (and simple)
1810: three-point Simpson formula for uneven grid-sizes, while Simpson's 3/8 rule is used in case of even grid-sizes.
1811:
1812: Equations (A4) and (A5) are solved iteratively whereby $S^{l}_{ijk}$ converges to
1813: a solution that changes by less than 1\% over following cycles (exact lambda iteration). This technique
1814: is used to evaluate $S^{l}_{ijk}$ over successive iterations (iteration between radiation transfer and statistical
1815: equilibrium), followed by one final transfer iteration that computes the emergent line fluxes for a given
1816: set of directions $\bf{n}$.
1817: For the implementation of {\sc Wind3D} the transfer computations are separated into an `iteration phase' (discussed in Appendix~B)
1818: and an `interpolation phase' (Appendix~C) because of memory limitation requirements and parallelization optimizations.
1819:
1820: \section{3D Lambda Iteration}
1821:
1822: During the iteration phase {\sc Wind3D} computes the lambda iteration on $S^{l}_{ijk}$ in every grid-point starting
1823: from initial values that are well chosen as to limit the number of lambda iterations. The {\em starting} values
1824: are computed with the Sobolev approximation in Eq.~(A4). The structured wind opacity $\chi^{l}$ in strong UV wind
1825: lines is computed from the wind density contrast since
1826: $\overline{\chi^{l}}$ $\simeq$ $\overline{\chi^{l}_{\rm smooth}}$ $\rho$/$\rho_{\rm smooth}$, where $\overline{\chi^{l}}$
1827: is the frequency integrated line opacity
1828: (i.e. $\chi^{l}$= $\overline{\chi^{l}}$ $\phi$)
1829: The smooth wind opacity $\overline{\chi^{l}_{\rm smooth}}$ in the lines is given by the
1830: \citet{Groenewegen89} parameterization:
1831: \begin{eqnarray}
1832: \overline{\chi^{l,ijk}_{\rm smooth}} & = & \frac{T_{\rm tot}}{Y_{ijk}} \left(\frac{v_{ijk}}{v_\infty}\right)^{\alpha_1}
1833: \left[1 - \left(\frac{v_{ijk}}{v_\infty}\right)^{\frac{1}{\beta}} \right]^{\alpha_2}
1834: \frac{{\rm d}v_{ijk}}{{\rm d}r} \frac{1}{v_{\rm th}} \\
1835: Y_{ijk} & = & \int_{v_0}^{v_\infty} \left(\frac{v_{ijk}}{v_\infty}\right)^{\alpha_1}
1836: \left[1 - \left(\frac{v_{ijk}}{v_\infty}\right)^{\frac{1}{\beta}} \right]^{\alpha_2}
1837: {\rm d}\left(\frac{v_{ijk}}{v_\infty}\right),
1838: \end{eqnarray}
1839: where $\beta$ is the parameter of a $\beta$ velocity law for the surrounding smooth wind.
1840: $v_{ijk}$ is the radial wind velocity in $\bf{p}$, and $v_{\rm th}$ the thermal broadening
1841: for the scattering ion. Note that this neglects the
1842: large turbulent broadening found by
1843: \citet{Hamann81}
1844: and \citet{Groenewegen89}.
1845: $T_{\rm tot}$, $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ are the opacity parameters, and the other symbols have their
1846: usual meaning.
1847: These opacity parameters determine whether or not the absorption portion of the
1848: computed profile intensity saturates.
1849: The values of the parameters are determined from
1850: an approximate fit of
1851: the computed average flux profile to the observed line profile.
1852: The detailed shape of the computed underlying
1853: line profile is not further optimized as we do not model the precise DAC
1854: depth in the profile, but rather its shape and FWHM evolution.
1855: The value of $\beta$ in Eqns. (B1)
1856: and (B2) is however determined from a best fit using a $\beta$-velocity law to
1857: the smooth wind structure of the hydrodynamic model. For our best fit hydro
1858: model of HD~64760 we find $\beta=0.71$.
1859:
1860: It is of note that Adam's scheme uses the widespread short characteristics
1861: method \citep[e.g.,][]{Koesterke+al02}. The method is rather straightforward to implement
1862: for solving the non-relativistic, two-level atom, 3D transfer problem
1863: with complete frequency redistribution, which includes the solid angle and
1864: frequency grid parallelization. We find that this is particularly the case
1865: for the pure scattering problem in optically thin (wind) line formation
1866: conditions we consider in this paper. Adam's method of lambda iterating the
1867: line source function to consistency with the transfer equation
1868: in a two-level atom
1869: proves
1870: to be very efficient and avoids the usual problems with non-convergence.
1871: For the pure scattering problem ($\epsilon$=0) {\sc Wind3D} always converges
1872: $S^{l}$ within a dozen iterations at most. \citet{Adam90} already pointed
1873: out that the method of Cartesian upwind discretization is unconditionally
1874: stable because only positive terms occur in Eq.~(A4) (see also the study by \citet{Hummel92}
1875: of the transfer scheme). Our combination of a starting Sobolev source
1876: function with Adam's discretization method provides an adequate lambda iteration
1877: scheme that is particularly suited for 3D scattering dominated transfer in
1878: asymmetric wind opacity- and velocity-structures.
1879:
1880: The short characteristics method is
1881: however known to suffer from beam widening because the interpolation
1882: introduces angular diffusion in the numerical solution.
1883: The long characteristics method removes this defocusing problem because much
1884: higher accuracies can be achieved with it. The latter method is however
1885: computationally very expensive if one wants to sample high angular resolution, so as
1886: to accurately sample space at large distances from the source in an extended structured wind.
1887: It is also time-consuming because the long characteristics usually cover the same
1888: part of the transfer domain many times, which introduces strong redundancy.
1889: Long characteristics methods have only recently been examined within the framework
1890: of 3D radiative line transfer, but still await applications to real astrophysical problems
1891: \citep{Baron07}.
1892:
1893:
1894: In our current implementation, Adam's method also requires large memory storage capacity
1895: during the iterations because the computation of $I_{ijk}$ in Eq.~(A4) requires to store two matrices for
1896: $I_{i-\alpha,j,k}$ of at least $N_{y}\times N_{z}$ elements for lightrays traveling in the
1897: forward and backward (incrementing $\alpha$ with $+$1 and $-$1) direction along the $x$-axis of the grid.
1898: This number has to be multiplied by the number of directions that is considered for the isotropic
1899: integration of $\bar{J}_{ijk}$ in Eq.~(A5) and the frequency resolution of the line profile, yielding
1900: 2$\,N_{y}\,N_{z}\,N_{\psi}\,N_{\theta}\,N_{\nu}$ matrix elements per iteration cycle. The requirement
1901: that the integration accuracy of $\bar{J}_{ijk}$ is maintained toward larger grid-sizes demands
1902: that the number of directions $N_{\psi}\times N_{\theta}$ scales linearly with $N_{y}\times N_{z}$.
1903: For $N_{\nu} \simeq N_{y}$ we therefore find that the required memory capacity scales with $N^{5}$
1904: for fast computation of $\bar{J}_{ijk}$. For example, a doubling of the size of a cubic grid
1905: requires an increase of total memory with at least a factor of 32. In principle the large memory
1906: requirements can be reduced by solving Eq.~(A4) monochromatically in one direction (per $\nu$ and per $\bf{n}$)
1907: whereby Eq.~(A5) is then computed in incrementing steps. The bottleneck of the 3D lambda iteration
1908: is however in Eq.~(A5), which can adequately be parallelized by distributing the frequencies
1909: (and directions) over different threads (multi-threading). {\sc Wind3D} currently implements a
1910: parallelization strategy that
1911: provides fastest possible integration of $\bar{J}$. The parallelization technique of $\bar{J}$ yields
1912: excellent load balancing results with the least occupied CPU (using one thread per CPU) always performing
1913: within a few percent of the most occupied one.
1914:
1915: We also implemented 3D lambda iteration in {\sc Wind3D} that invokes an accelerator scheme to improve
1916: convergency times for the source function calculation. We use a linear average of source functions computed
1917: over preceding iterations cycles to predict the source function for the next iteration. In case of slow convergence
1918: (e.g. at very large optical depths and $\epsilon$ $\ll$ 1) lambda acceleration can shorten iteration
1919: times with factors of 3 to 5. For the pure scattering case ($\epsilon$=0) we however find that the lambda
1920: iteration can be converged within a limited number of iterations, which turn out hard to decrease further
1921: using the acceleration scheme. The combination of 3D source functions computed during n past iterations
1922: also requires to store n $\times$ $N^{3}$ additional array elements. These large memory requirements are
1923: a setback of the acceleration scheme when convergence is already sufficiently fast.
1924:
1925: When 0 $<$ $\epsilon$ $\ll$ 1 however, one classically starts the source function
1926: iterations with $\epsilon B$ \citep[see][]{Adam90} or $\sqrt\epsilon B$
1927: \citep{Hubeny97}, but which are both useless in case $\epsilon$=0.
1928: Towards very small values of $\epsilon$ increasingly more iteration steps $n_{\rm it}$ are
1929: required \citep[since $n_{\rm it}$ $\sim$ 1/$\sqrt\epsilon$, e.g.][]{mihalas84},
1930: but which do not become unacceptably large as long as the initial source function
1931: values are well-chosen, i.e. by starting from an escape probability approximation for
1932: optically thin wind conditions. For the major portion of our 3D models information
1933: propagates nearly directly from the stellar surface to any point in the wind,
1934: because there is nearly no opacity between the emission of a photon at the
1935: stellar surface and its absorption in the wind.
1936: The thickness of the 3D structured wind models is limited to 1 $R_{*}$ around
1937: the equatorial plane. The majority of the 3D wind model is therefore
1938: a smooth $\beta$-wind structure. Only the structured wind regions close to
1939: the surface (where the line optical depth increases)
1940: slow down the convergence rate. The initial source function values in $\sim$90\% of the model
1941: are already very close to the final values, and only $\sim$10\% of the model
1942: (around the plane of the equator) requires further iterations of $S^{l}$ to self-consistency.
1943:
1944:
1945: Finally, 3D lambda iteration with {\sc Wind3D} assumes symmetry about the plane of the equator of the
1946: central star. The code however accepts arbitrary 3D wind structures that are asymmetric about the equatorial plane.
1947: {\sc Wind3D} first performs the lambda iteration for the northern hemisphere, followed by the southern hemisphere.
1948: It offers the advantage that iteration times become halved when equator-symmetric wind structures are (commonly)
1949: adopted. Our hydrodynamic wind models are symmetric about the plane of the equator so that the lambda iteration
1950: can be converged for the northern hemisphere, followed with a convergence test of the source function values
1951: in all grid-points of the southern hemisphere.
1952:
1953: \section{3D Radiative Transfer Solution}
1954: \label{appendix 3D Radiative Transfer Solution}
1955: An important aspect of the 3D transfer problem is that the computation of the line source function consistent
1956: with the transfer equation through lambda iteration takes orders of magnitude more time than only solving the
1957: 3D transfer equation (with a fully iterated source function) to compute emergent line fluxes.
1958: This results from the time-consuming geometric and frequency integration in Eq.~(A1) required to iterate $S^{l}(\bf{p})$
1959: at every grid-point, compared to the fast computation of the specific
1960: intensities with Eq.~(A4) when $\chi^{l}_{ijk}$ and $S^{l}_{ijk}$ are available. The accuracy of the iterated
1961: line source function therefore directly determines the accuracy of line fluxes computed with the transfer equation.
1962: This interdependence is particularly important when computing small flux variations inside wind line
1963: profiles due to small changes of the line source function caused by local density- and velocity-structures
1964: in the stellar wind. In this paper we typically compute line flux variations of less
1965: than 100 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ wide
1966: in P Cygni profiles that can have total line widths of up to 5000 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ (from the blue edge velocity
1967: to the red velocity end of the emission lobe). Using about 100 frequency
1968: points is therefore sufficient to adequately sample the line profile for solving the transfer equation. On the
1969: other hand, the accuracy of $\it \bar{J}_{ijk}$ in Eq.~(A5) also strongly depends on the number of frequency points
1970: for integrating the profile function $\phi$. But to resolve small flux variations in the absorption portion of the
1971: wind profile, the width of the line profile function has to remain sufficiently small as to not broaden them or
1972: render them invisible with respect to the overall flux profile of the line. When we adopt a FWHM of $\phi$
1973: below 50 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ the frequency integration in Eq.~(A5) samples the full width of line profile function
1974: at only three frequency points. An under-sampling of $\phi$ therefore limits the accuracy of $\bar{J}$ and
1975: the resulting line source function. This problem cannot be resolved by only increasing the number of frequency
1976: points $N_{\nu}$ for the integration of $\bar{J}$ because it linearly increases its computation time
1977: (per lambda iteration cycle) at the bottleneck of the 3D transfer problem. For the problem to
1978: remain tractable an increase of $N_{\nu}$ therefore requires to reduce the number of directions $N_{\theta}$
1979: and $N_{\psi}$ to compute $\bar{J}$. An accurate integration of $\bar{J}$ over a limited number of directions
1980: can hence only be accomplished when the number of grid-points is also limited.
1981:
1982: We adopt an equidistant grid with $N_{x}$=$N_{y}$=$N_{z}$=71 for the $\bar{J}$
1983: calculation. The method we present is to linearly 3D
1984: interpolate the lambda-iterated line source function on a much finer grid with $701^{3}$ grid-points to solve the
1985: 3D transfer equation. Our method of 3D interpolating $S^{l}_{ijk}$ is very efficient and proves to be sufficiently
1986: accurate to resolve small high-frequency flux variations in broad P Cygni line profiles. The 3D interpolation
1987: procedure is permitted when the length scales of the local density- and velocity-structures in the
1988: wind are larger than the distance between the $\bar{J}$ grid-points, or ($\delta\rho$, $\delta\bf{v}$) $>$
1989: ($\Delta$ x, $\Delta$ y, $\Delta$ z). This condition applies to our hydrodynamic models we compute for
1990: the large-scale structures in winds of massive hot stars. Note that the 3D transfer equation (A4) has
1991: a term $\chi^{l}_{ijk} \, S^{l}_{ijk}$ in which $\chi^{l}_{ijk}$= $\overline{\chi^{l}_{ijk}}\,\phi$ contains
1992: the line profile function as well.
1993: Since we 3D interpolate $S^{l}_{ijk}$ on a finer grid the
1994: influence of the local velocity field $\bf{v}$ on the emergent specific intensity $I_{ijk}$
1995: is computed also more accurately because $\phi$ is directly dependent of $\bf{v}$ (Eq.~A2) through
1996: the Doppler effect.
1997:
1998: Following Adam's method for Cartesian grids, the monochromatic flux
1999: $F_{\nu}$=$\int\,I_{\nu}\,\bf{n}\,{\it d}\bf{A}$ can be computed by integrating over the three
2000: visible surfaces $\bf{A}$ of the grid for any given direction $\bf{n}$ determined by angles
2001: $\theta$ and $\psi$,
2002:
2003: \begin{eqnarray}
2004: F=F_{\nu}(\nu,\bf{n(\theta,\psi)})
2005: ={\it \sum_{i=1}^{N_{x}}\,\sum_{j=1}^{N_{y}}\,I_{i,j,k=1:N_{z}}(\nu,\theta,\psi)\,\Delta x\, \Delta y\, \cos(\theta)} \nonumber \\
2006: +{\sum_{i=1}^{N_{x}}\,\sum_{k=1}^{N_{z}}\,I_{i,j=1:N_{y},k}(\nu,\theta,\psi)\,\Delta x\, \Delta z\, \sin(\theta) \, \sin(\psi) }
2007: \nonumber \\
2008: +{\sum_{j=1}^{N_{y}}\,\sum_{k=1}^{N_{z}}\,I_{i=1:N_{x},j,k}(\nu,\theta,\psi)\,\Delta y\, \Delta z\, \sin(\theta) \, \cos(\psi) } \,.
2009: \end{eqnarray}
2010: In Eq.~(C1) $I_{i,j,k=1:N_{z}}$ are the monochromatic intensities computed at the up- and down-side surfaces ($A_{\pm z}$) of the block,
2011: $I_{i,j=1:N_{y},k}$ are computed at the left- and right-side surfaces ($A_{\pm y}$), and $I_{i=1:N_{x},j,k}$ at the front-
2012: and back-side surfaces ($A_{\pm x}$). Equation (C1) sums the intensities from the three surfaces that are visible from any direction ($\theta$,$\psi$), over projected surface elements with $\Delta\,x$=$(x_{\rm max}-x_{\rm min})$/$N_{x}$,
2013: $\Delta\,y$=$(y_{\rm max}-y_{\rm min})$/$N_{y}$, and $\Delta\,z$=$(z_{\rm max}-z_{\rm min})$/$N_{z}$.
2014: We also compute frequency integrated intensity images at the six surfaces of the grid with
2015: \begin{eqnarray}
2016: I_{\pm x}=I_{i=1:N_{x},j,k}(\pm n_{x}) = \sum_{l=1}^{N_{\nu}}\,I_{i=1:N_{x},j,k}(\nu_{l},\theta=\pm \frac{\pi}{2},\psi=0)\, \Delta \nu \nonumber \\
2017: I_{\pm y}=I_{i,j=1:N_{y},k}(\pm n_{y}) = \sum_{l=1}^{N_{\nu}}\,I_{i,j=1:N_{y},k}(\nu_{l},\theta=0:\pi,\psi=0)\, \Delta \nu \nonumber \\
2018: I_{\pm z}=I_{i,j,k=1:N_{z}}(\pm n_{z}) = \sum_{l=1}^{N_{\nu}}\,I_{i,j,k=1:N_{z}}(\nu_{l},\theta=0,\psi=\pm \frac{\pi}{2})\, \Delta \nu \,,
2019: \end{eqnarray}
2020: for six different combinations of perpendicular angles $\theta$ and $\psi$, and where $\Delta \nu$=($\nu_{\rm max}$-$\nu_{\rm min}$)/$N_{\nu}$ is the frequency resolution of the line profile. In this paper we apply Eq.~(C1) for detailed
2021: 3D radiative transfer modeling of spectral lines formed in the tenuous and supersonic winds of massive
2022: hot stars. Applications of Eq.~(C2) for 3D radiative transfer imaging will be presented elsewhere.
2023:
2024:
2025:
2026:
2027:
2028: \begin{thebibliography}{}
2029: \bibitem[Adam(1990)]{Adam90} Adam, J. 1990, \aap, 240, 541
2030: \bibitem[Baron \& Hauschildt(2007)]{Baron07} Baron, E., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2007, \aap, 468, 255
2031: \bibitem[Bjorkman \& Cassinelli(1993)]{Bjorkman+Cassinelli93} Bjorkman, J. E.,
2032: \& Cassinelli, J. P. 1993, \apj, 409, 429
2033: \bibitem[Blomme(1991)]{Blomme91} Blomme, R. 1991, \aap, 246, 199
2034: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2005)]{Brown+al05} Brown, J.C., Barrett, R. K.,
2035: Oskinova, L.M, Owocki, S.P., Hamann, W.-R., De Jong, J.A.,
2036: Kaper L., \& Henrichs, H.F. 2004, \aap, 413, 959
2037: \bibitem[Cranmer \& Owocki(1996)]{Cranmer+Owocki96} Cranmer, S.R., \&
2038: Owocki, S. P. 1996, \apj, 462, 469
2039: \bibitem[De Jong et al.(2001)]{De Jong+al01} De Jong, J. A., Henrichs, H. F.,
2040: Kaper, L., Nichols, J. S., Bjorkman, K., Bohlender, D. A., Cao, H.,
2041: Gordon, K., et al. 2001, \aap, 368, 601
2042: \bibitem[Dessart(2004)]{Dessart04} Dessart, L. 2004, \aap, 423, 693
2043: \bibitem[Fullerton et al.(1997)]{Fullerton97} Fullerton, A.W., Massa D. L.,
2044: Prinja, R.K., Owocki, S. P., \& Cranmer, S. R. 1997, \aap, 327, 699
2045: \bibitem[Fullerton et al.(2006)]{Fullerton06} Fullerton, A. W., Massa, D. L.,
2046: \& Prinja, R. K. 2006, \apj, 637, 1025
2047: \bibitem[Groenewegen \& Lamers(1989)]{Groenewegen89} Groenewegen, M.A.T.,
2048: \& Lamers, H.J.G.L.M. 1989, \aaps, 79, 359
2049: \bibitem[Hamann(1981)]{Hamann81} Hamann, W.-R. 1981, \aap, 93, 353
2050: \bibitem[Hamann et al.(2001)]{Hamann01} Hamann, W.-R., Brown, J.C.,
2051: Feldmeier, A., \& Oskinova, L.M. 2001, \aap, 378, 946
2052: \bibitem[Hauschildt \& Baron(2006)]{Hauschildt06} Hauschildt, P. H., \& Baron, E.
2053: 2006, \aap, 451, 273
2054: \bibitem[Howarth et al.(1998)]{Howarth+al98} Howarth, I. D., Townsend, R. H. D., Clayton, M. J.,
2055: Fullerton, A. W., Gies, D. R., Massa, D., Prinja, R. K, \& Reid, A. H. N. 1998, \mnras, 296, 949
2056: \bibitem[Hubeny(1997)]{Hubeny97} Hubeny, I. 1997, in Stellar Atmospheres: Theory
2057: and Observations, eds. J.P. De Greve, R. Blomme, and H. Hensberge, Springer, Berlin
2058: \bibitem[Hummel(1992)]{Hummel92} Hummel, W., Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of
2059: Bochum, 1992
2060: \bibitem[Hummel(1994)]{Hummel94} Hummel, W. 1994, \aap, 289, 458
2061: \bibitem[Kaper et al.(1999)]{Kaper+al99} Kaper, L., Henrichs, H. F.,
2062: Nichols, J. S., \& Telting, J. H. 1999, \aap, 244, 231
2063: \bibitem[Kaufer et al.(2006)]{Kaufer+al06} Kaufer, A., Stahl, O.,
2064: Prinja, R. K, \& Witherick, D. 2006, \aap, 447, 325
2065: \bibitem[Koesterke et al.(2002)]{Koesterke+al02} Koesterke, L., Hamann, W.-R.,
2066: \& Gr\"{a}fener, G. 2002, \aap, 384, 562
2067: \bibitem[Krti\v{c}ka et al.(2004)]{Krticka+al04} Krti\v{c}ka, J.,
2068: Barrett, R. K., Brown, J. C., \& Owocki, S. P. 2004, \aap, 417, 1039
2069: \bibitem[Lamers et al.(1987)]{Lamers+al87} Lamers, H. J. G. L. M.,
2070: Cerruti-Sola, M., \& Perinotto, M. 1987, \apj, 314, 726
2071: \bibitem[Lefever et al.(2007)]{Lefever+al07} Lefever, K., Puls, J., \&
2072: Aerts, C. 2007, \aap, 463, 1093
2073: \bibitem[Massa et al.(1995a)]{Massa+al95a} Massa, D., Fullerton, A. W.,
2074: Nichols, J. S., et al. 1995a, ApJ, 452, L53
2075: \bibitem[Massa et al.(1995b)]{Massa+al95b} Massa, D., Prinja, R. K., \& Fullerton, A. W. 1995b,
2076: \apj, 452, 842
2077: \bibitem[Mihalas \& Weibel-Mihalas(1984)]{mihalas84} Mihalas, D., \& Weibel-Mihalas, B. 1984,
2078: Foundations of Radiation Hydrodynamics, Dover Publ., New York
2079: \bibitem[Morel et al.(2004)]{Morel+al04} Morel, T., Marchenko, S. V.,
2080: Pati, A. K., et al. 2004, \mnras, 351, 552
2081: \bibitem[Owocki(1998)]{Owocki98} Owocki, S.P. 1998, in Kaper L.,
2082: Fullerton A.W., eds., in ``Cyclical Variability in Stellar
2083: Winds", ESO Astroph. Symp., Springer, Berlin, 325
2084: \bibitem[Owocki (1999)]{Owocki99} Owocki, S. P. 1999, Lecture Notes in Physics,
2085: 523, 294
2086: \bibitem[Owocki et al.(1988)]{Owocki+al88} Owocki, S. P., Castor, J. I., \&
2087: Rybicki, G. B. 1988, \apj, 335, 914
2088: \bibitem[Owocki et al.(1994)]{Owocki+al94} Owocki, S. P., Cranmer, S. R., \&
2089: Fullerton, A.W. 1995, \apj, 453, L37
2090: \bibitem[Owocki et al.(1996)]{Owocki+al96} Owocki, S. P., Cranmer, S. R., \&
2091: Gayley, K. G. 1996, \apj, 472, L115
2092: \bibitem[Owocki et al.(1999)]{Owocki+al99} Owocki, S. P., \& Cohen, D. H. 1999,
2093: \apj, 520, 833
2094: \bibitem[Prinja(1998)]{Prinja98} Prinja R.K., 1998, in Kaper L.,
2095: Fullerton A.W., eds., in ``Cyclical Variability in Stellar
2096: Winds", ESO Astroph. Symp., Springer, Berlin, 92
2097: \bibitem[Prinja et al.(1995)]{Prinja+al95} Prinja, R. K., Massa, D., \&
2098: Fullerton, A. W. 1995, \apj, 452, L61
2099: \bibitem[Prinja et al.(2002)]{Prinja+al02} Prinja, R. K., Massa, D., \&
2100: Fullerton, A. W. 2002, \aap, 388, 587
2101: \bibitem[Prinja et al.(2005)]{Prinja05} Prinja, R. K., Massa, D., \&
2102: Searle, S. C. 2005 \aap, 430, L41
2103: \bibitem[Puls et al.(2006)]{Puls06} Puls, J., Markova, N., Scuderi, S.,
2104: et al. 2006, \aap 454, 625
2105: \bibitem[Rybicki \& Hummer(1978)]{Rybicki+Hummer78}
2106: Rybicki, G. B., \& Hummer, D. G. 1978, \apj, 219, 654
2107: \bibitem[Stone \& Norman(1992)]{Stone+Norman92} Stone, J. M., \&
2108: Norman, M. L. 1992, \apjs, 80, 753
2109:
2110:
2111:
2112: \end{thebibliography}
2113:
2114:
2115: \clearpage
2116: \begin{table}
2117: \caption{Stellar and wind parameters of HD~64760 (from \citet{Kaufer+al06}).}
2118: \label{table parameters}
2119: \begin{tabular}{lllll}
2120: Effective temperature & $T_{\rm eff}$ (K) & 24\,600 \\
2121: Luminosity & $L$ (L$_{\sun}$) & $1.55 \times 10^5$\\
2122: Radius & $R$ (R$_{\sun}$) & 22 \\
2123: Mass & $M$ (M$_{\sun}$) & 20 \\
2124: Terminal velocity & $v_\infty$ (km s$^{-1}$) & 1\,500 \\
2125: Mass loss rate & $\dot{M}$ (M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$) & $9 \times 10^{-7}$ \\
2126: Projected rotational velocity & $v$ sin $i$ (km s$^{-1}$) & 265 \\
2127: Equatorial angular velocity & $\Omega$ (s$^{-1}$) & $1.763 \times 10^{-5}$
2128: (sin $i$ = 1 assumed)
2129: \\
2130: \end{tabular}
2131: \end{table}
2132:
2133:
2134: \begin{figure}
2135: %\epsscale{1.0}
2136: \plotone{fig1.eps}
2137: \epsscale{1.0}
2138: \caption{Schematic drawing of a parameterized structured wind model for {\sc Wind3D}.
2139: The simulation box size is 24 $R_{\star}$, with the hot star at box center.
2140: The smooth stellar wind is radially symmetric with a $\beta$-power velocity law
2141: ({\it outer arrows}). The local velocities inside the CIRs also assume the $\beta$-law
2142: of the ambient wind, but the velocity vectors are drawn with much finer spacing
2143: ({\it inner set of arrows}). The height of the CIRs above and below the plane
2144: of the equator is set to 0.5 $R_{\star}$. The wind model rotates over one period and is
2145: viewed by the observer in the plane of the equator for the line profiles in
2146: Fig.~\ref{fig two DACs}.
2147: }
2148: \label{fig two CIRs}
2149: \end{figure}
2150:
2151:
2152:
2153: \clearpage
2154: \begin{figure}
2155: %\epsscale{.7}
2156: \vspace*{-5cm}
2157: \plotfiddle{fig2a.eps}{1.6in}{90.}{260.}{350.}{50}{235}
2158: \vspace*{-2.5cm}
2159: \plotfiddle{fig2b.eps}{-3.6in}{90.}{260.}{350.}{50}{225}
2160: \vspace*{-1cm}
2161: \caption{{\bf Left-hand panel:} Spectral time sequence computed with {\sc Wind3D} in the expanding wind of a hot star with two equatorial CIRs shown in
2162: Fig.~\ref{fig two CIRs}. The theoretical line profiles show two DACs drifting blueward in the unsaturated absorption trough
2163: of the P Cygni profile (time runs upward over one rotation period). Each spectrum is arbitrarily offset by +0.2 in flux compared to the preceding one.
2164: {\bf Right-hand panel:} The same time sequence of line fluxes shown with grey-scale (color scale in the electronic version) for phases 0 to 1 in the rotational cycle.
2165: The width of the DACs decreases while shifting blueward. They narrow because the dispersion of wind
2166: velocities projected in the observer's line of sight in front of the stellar disk decreases
2167: at larger distances from the surface, while the wind velocity increases to the terminal wind
2168: velocity. }
2169: \label{fig two DACs}
2170: \end{figure}
2171:
2172:
2173: \clearpage
2174: \begin{figure}
2175: %\epsscale{1.0}
2176: \plotone{fig3.eps}
2177: \epsscale{1.}
2178: \caption{Schematic drawing of the wind velocity model with a spherical clump ({\it small front sphere}).
2179: The blob has a radius of 0.5 $R_{\star}$ and passes at 3 $R_{\star}$ in front of the central hot star
2180: ({\it large sphere}). The size of the simulation box is 12 $R_{\star}$. The blob moves perpendicular
2181: ({\it tangentially drawn arrows}) to the radially accelerating wind ({\it outer arrows}).
2182: The opacity in the blob is increased by an order of magnitude compared to the ambient wind opacity.
2183: The dynamic spectrum in Fig.~\ref{fig spectrum blob} is computed for 13 lines of sight in the plane of the equator over
2184: $\pm$45$\degr$ in the front plane of the simulation box.}
2185: \label{fig blob}
2186: \end{figure}
2187:
2188:
2189: \clearpage
2190: \begin{figure}
2191: \epsscale{0.8}
2192: \plotone{fig4.eps}
2193: \caption{Line profiles computed with {\sc Wind3D} for the wind model shown in
2194: Fig.~\ref{fig blob}.
2195: The absorption in the P Cygni profile weakens because wind scattering in front of the
2196: stellar disk decreases when a local opacity enhancement (a spherical clump model) tangentially
2197: crosses the line of sight and partly obscures the star. The blob diminishes the wind scattering
2198: volume in the cylinder towards the observer where the absorption in the expanding wind
2199: locally diminishes ({\em see text}).
2200: }
2201: \label{fig spectrum blob}
2202: \end{figure}
2203:
2204:
2205:
2206: \clearpage
2207: \begin{figure}
2208: \plotone{fig5.eps}
2209: \caption{{\bf Left-hand panel:} Time sequence of the IUE normalized flux spectrum of HD~64760
2210: (time runs upward) of the Si {\sc iv} $\lambda$1400 resonance doublet in velocity scale
2211: centered around the short-wavelength line. Dark and bright shades indicate low and high
2212: flux levels. {\bf Right-hand panel:} The flux difference spectrum shows DACs drifting
2213: blueward from velocities exceeding $\sim$ $-$1000 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ to $-$1600 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$.
2214: The depth and width of the DACs decrease over time.
2215: They assume the shape of a `slanted triangle' over a period of $\sim$3~d. The top of the triangle
2216: extends further into a `tube-like' narrow absorption feature that remains visible over the next 7~d
2217: and drifts asymptotically to a maximum velocity.
2218: }
2219: \label{fig 64760 spectra}
2220: \end{figure}
2221:
2222: \clearpage
2223: \begin{figure}
2224: \plotone{fig6.eps}
2225: \caption{{\bf Left-hand panel:} HD~64760 flux difference spectrum of the short-wavelength
2226: component of the Si~{\sc iv} doublet.
2227: The DAC minima of the lower DAC are indicated with black dots, those of the upper DAC
2228: with white dots. Around $T\simeq$ 10~d ({\em white dots}) the DACs are distorted by
2229: horizontal rotational modulations, complicating a reliable determination of the DAC recurrence time.
2230: {\bf Right-hand panel: } The flux contributions of the horizontal modulations are canceled out by mirroring
2231: and subtracting
2232: the left-hand image. Black dots mark the flux minima in the lower DAC, white dots the upper DAC.
2233: They are also shown shifted downwards for a best match.
2234: The DAC recurrence time of 10.3$\pm$0.5~d is more accurately constrained from this image rather
2235: than from the left-hand image.
2236: }
2237: \label{fig DAC minima}
2238: \end{figure}
2239:
2240:
2241:
2242: \clearpage
2243: \begin{figure}
2244: \plotone{fig7.eps}
2245: \caption{Hydrodynamic wind model with large-scale density- and velocity-structures computed with {\sc Zeus3D}
2246: for HD~64760 required to best fit the DACs in Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395. The bright spots at the equator
2247: are 20\% and 8\% brighter than the stellar surface,
2248: having opening angle diameters of 20\degr~and 30\degr, respectively,
2249: and rotate 5 times slower
2250: than the surface. The spots produce wind structures with density enhancements in CIRs compared
2251: to the smooth wind density. The minimum density contrast is 0.87 ({\em dark shades of grey}),
2252: increasing to a maximum value of 1.32 ({\em bright regions}). The size of the over-plotted arrows indicates
2253: the magnitude of the velocity deceleration with respect to the smooth unperturbed wind. The maximum
2254: velocity difference in the CIRs compared to the smooth wind
2255: does not exceed $\sim$~140 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$. The bright spots cause density waves in the equatorial
2256: rotating wind.
2257: [{\em This figure is available as an animation in the electronic
2258: version of the Journal}
2259: ]
2260: }
2261: \label{fig best fit}
2262: \end{figure}
2263:
2264:
2265: \clearpage
2266: \begin{figure}
2267: \plotone{fig8.eps}
2268: \caption{Mean normalized flux of Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395 observed with IUE in HD~64760 during 15.5~d in 1995.
2269: The average flux of the computed dynamic spectrum that fits the observed DAC shape and morphology in the
2270: line is over-plotted.}
2271: \label{fig underlying profile}
2272: \end{figure}
2273:
2274: \clearpage
2275: \begin{figure}
2276: \plotone{fig9.eps}
2277: \caption{The spot intensity $A_{\rm sp}$ is increased from 0.1 ({\em upper left panels}),
2278: 0.3 ({\em upper right panels}) and 0.6 ({\em lower left panels}), to 1.0 ({\em lower right panels}).
2279: The hydrodynamic models show the density contrast and velocity vectors with respect to the smooth wind.
2280: The dynamic spectra show the rotation phase from 0.0 to 1.0 ({\em time runs upward}).
2281: Rotation phase zero corresponds to the spectrum we compute for an observer in the plane of the equator
2282: viewing the rotating hydrodynamic model edge-on from the south side in these images.
2283: The formation regions of the DAC in the spectra are located behind the CIR in these
2284: hydrodynamic models ({\em hatched areas}). The increase of $A_{\rm sp}$ extends the DAC towards smaller velocities
2285: across the spectra. Hatched areas are those with high Sobolev optical depth ({\em see text}).}
2286: \label{fig Asp effect}
2287: \end{figure}
2288:
2289:
2290: \clearpage
2291: \begin{figure}
2292: \plotone{fig10.eps}
2293: \caption{The spot opening angle $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ increases from 5\degr, over 20\degr~and 90\degr, to 180\degr.
2294: The spot co-rotates with the stellar surface ($v_{\rm sp}$=$v_{\rm rot}$), and $A_{\rm sp}$=0.5.
2295: The increase of $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ alters the FWHM evolution of the DAC with time.
2296: The base of the DAC strongly broadens because extra wind material injected by the spot is more distributed
2297: over the plane of the equator.
2298: The maximum density contrast $\rho/\rho_{0}$ inside the CIR therefore decreases when
2299: $\Phi_{\rm sp}$=90\degr~ increases to 180\degr~({\em lower panels}).
2300: The CIR wind structure spreads out yielding broader DAC bases formed close to the stellar surface.
2301: Hatched areas are those with high Sobolev optical depth ({\em see text}).}
2302: \label{fig Phisp effect}
2303: \end{figure}
2304:
2305: \clearpage
2306: \begin{figure}
2307: \plotone{fig11.eps}
2308: \caption{DACs are computed for spot rotation velocities $v_{\rm sp}$ increasing
2309: from $v_{\rm rot}$/10, $v_{\rm rot}$/3 and $v_{\rm rot}$, to $v_{\rm rot}\times 3$.
2310: When the spot rotation lags behind the surface rotation the curvature of the CIR decreases,
2311: yielding DAC shapes that curve less over time ({\em upper panels}).
2312: Larger spot rotation velocities enhance the curvature of the CIR which further
2313: extends the spiral winding of the DAC line formation region around the star.
2314: For $v_{\rm sp}$=$v_{\rm rot}\times 3$ a single spiraling CIR yields several DACs
2315: crossing the line of sight at the same time ({\em lower right-hand panel}).
2316: Hatched areas are those with high Sobolev optical depth.}
2317: \label{fig vsp effect}
2318: \end{figure}
2319:
2320: \clearpage
2321: \begin{figure}
2322: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
2323: \plotone{fig12.eps}
2324: \caption{Part of an atlas of dynamic spectra
2325: (one-spot models)
2326: of Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395 in HD~64760 computed
2327: over a period of 15.5 d for various $A_{\rm sp}$ and $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ values that determine
2328: the detailed shape and morphology of the DAC.
2329: The spectra are shown between 0 and $-$1700 $\rm km\, s^{-1}$ and subtracted for the underlying
2330: smooth P Cygni wind profile. The flux minima in the DAC model are marked with black dots. The
2331: minima in the observed DAC are over-plotted with white dots. The hydrodynamic models
2332: are computed with a single bright spot that lags 2.5 times behind the surface rotation,
2333: yielding an observed DAC recurrence time of 10.3~d. An increase of $A_{\rm sp}$ from 0.1 to 0.3
2334: ({\em upper panels}) extends the DAC base toward unobserved velocities redward of $\sim$ $-$1000
2335: $\rm km\,s^{-1}$. $A_{\rm sp}$ therefore does not exceed 0.1. A least-squares minimization method
2336: applied to the observed and computed DAC flux minima ({\em black and white dots}) yields the best
2337: fit ({\em lower left-hand panel}) for one-spot models with $\Phi_{\rm sp}$ around 50\degr~({\em see text}).
2338: }
2339: \label{fig variants best fit}
2340: \end{figure}
2341:
2342:
2343: \clearpage
2344: \begin{figure}
2345: \vspace*{-0.9cm}
2346: \plotone{fig13.eps}
2347: \caption{The best fit dynamic spectrum of Si~{\sc iv} $\lambda$1395
2348: for the two-spot model ({\em upper left-hand panel}) and the one-spot model ({\em lower right-hand panel})
2349: compared to the observed spectrum ({\em upper right-hand panel}) of HD~64760. The shape and morphology
2350: of the computed DACs fit the properties of the observed DACs. The velocity positions of the
2351: DAC flux minima computed with the best fit two-spot model
2352: differ by less than $\sim$20 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ from the observed velocity positions ({\em white dots})
2353: for 0~d $\leq$ $T$ $\leq$ 3.5~d, and 10~d $\leq$ $T$ $\leq$ 15.5~d.
2354: The FWHM of the computed DAC decreases from $\sim$100 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$ at $T$=0~d
2355: to $\sim$20 $\rm km\, s^{-1}$ around $T$=3.5~d, in agreement with the narrowing of the observed DAC.
2356: The lower DAC width remains almost constant over the following 6.5~d, after which it fades away.
2357: The `tube-like' extension of the DAC base is also observed in the upper right-hand panel, but somewhat
2358: exceeds the computed DAC velocities after $T$=7~d. A four-spot model in the lower left-hand panel
2359: yields DAC shapes and overlap not compatible with the observed shapes (see text).}
2360: \label{fig comparison best fit}
2361: \end{figure}
2362:
2363:
2364:
2365: \clearpage
2366: \begin{figure}
2367: \vspace*{-0.9cm}
2368: \plotone{fig14.eps}
2369: \caption{Detailed comparison of the shape and morphology of the DAC base
2370: for 0~d $\leq$ $T$ $\leq$ 4.5~d, computed with
2371: the best fit one-spot ({\em left-hand panel})
2372: and the two-spot model ({\em middle panel}), with Si~{\sc iv} observations ({\em right-hand panel})
2373: shown between $-$760 and $-$1600 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$. The slanted triangle of the DAC base emerges from wind regions
2374: within a few $R_{*}$ above the stellar surface in Fig.~\ref{fig best fit}. The DAC line formation region
2375: rotates in front of the stellar disk and samples a decreasing range of wind velocities projected in the
2376: line of sight, yielding the narrowing of the DAC base over time. The decrease of the computed DAC
2377: width is strongly dependent of the three spot parameters since they uniquely determine the large-scale
2378: density- and velocity-structures the CIR produces in the smooth ambient wind.
2379: The one-spot dynamic spectrum is computed for an inclination angle $i$=85\degr~.
2380: The two-spot model with half the spot velocity of the one-spot model better fits
2381: the rather linear shape observed for the lower DAC
2382: ({\em see text}).}
2383: \label{fig detailed comparison best fit}
2384: \end{figure}
2385:
2386: \clearpage
2387: \begin{figure}
2388: \plotone{fig15.eps}
2389: \caption{Contour plot of the effect on the mass-loss rate due to the CIR (i.e.
2390: $\dot{M}_{\rm struct}/\dot{M}_{\rm smooth}-1$), as a function of spot strength and
2391: size for a number of hydrodynamic models
2392: with one spot.
2393: The `+' symbols indicate computed models.
2394: The square marks the best-fit one-spot model for HD~64760. The mass-loss rate of
2395: the best-fit structured wind model with one spot is only 0.6 \% larger than the
2396: spherically symmetric smooth wind model.}
2397: \label{fig Mdot effect}
2398: \end{figure}
2399:
2400:
2401: \clearpage
2402: \begin{figure}
2403: \plotone{fig16.eps}
2404: \caption{Density contrast $\rho$/$\rho_{0}$ along the CIR in the best-fit
2405: one-spot and two-spot hydrodynamic models
2406: of HD~64760. The density in the equatorial CIR compared to the smooth
2407: wind density increases to a maximum of
2408: 21\% (one-spot) or 32\% (two-spot).
2409: }
2410: \label{fig density contrast}
2411: \end{figure}
2412:
2413:
2414:
2415:
2416:
2417:
2418:
2419: \end{document}
2420:
2421: \end{normalsize}\end{large}
2422: