1:
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4:
5: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
6: \newcommand{\myemail}{dicarlo@oa-teramo.inaf.it}
7:
8:
9: \shorttitle{SN2006jc}
10: \shortauthors{Di Carlo et al.}
11:
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{Near-Infrared observations of the type Ib Supernova SN2006jc:
16: evidence of interactions with dust}
17:
18:
19: \author{E. Di Carlo\altaffilmark{1}; C. Corsi\altaffilmark{2};
20: A. A. Arkharov\altaffilmark{3}; F. Massi\altaffilmark{4};
21: V. M. Larionov\altaffilmark{3,5}; N. V. Efimova\altaffilmark{3}; \\
22: M. Dolci\altaffilmark{1}; N. Napoleone\altaffilmark{2};
23: A. Di Paola\altaffilmark{2}}
24:
25: \email{dicarlo@oa-teramo.inaf.it}
26:
27:
28: \altaffiltext{1}{Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico
29: Collurania-Teramo, Via Mentore Maggini I-64100, Teramo, Italy}
30: \altaffiltext{2}{Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico
31: di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00040, Monteporzio Catone (Roma), Italy}
32: \altaffiltext{3}{Central Astronomical Observatory at Pulkovo, Pulkovskoe
33: shosse 65, 196140, Saint Petersburg, Russia}
34: \altaffiltext{4}{Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astrofisico
35: di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi 5, I-50125, Firenze, Italy}
36: \altaffiltext{5}{Astronomical Institute of St. Petersburg University, Russia}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: In the framework of a program for the monitoring of Supernovae in the
40: Near-Infrared (NIR) carried out by the Teramo, Rome and Pulkovo observatories
41: with the AZT-24 telescope, we observed the Supernova SN2006jc in the $J,H,K$
42: photometric bands during a period of 7 months, starting $\sim 36$ days after
43: its discovery. Our observations evidence a NIR re-brightening, peaking $\sim
44: 70$ days after discovery, along with a
45: reddening of $H-K$ and $J-H$ colors until 120 days from discovery. After that
46: date, $J-H$ seems to evolve towards bluer colors. Our data, complemented by
47: IR, optical, UV and X-ray observations found in the literature, show that the
48: re-brightening is produced by hot dust surrounding the supernova,
49: formed in the interaction of the ejecta with dense circumstellar matter.
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52:
53: \keywords{supernovae: general --- supernovae: individual (SN~2006jc) ---
54: galaxies: individual (UGC~4904) --- infrared: stars}
55:
56:
57: \section{Introduction}
58: One of the main aims in the astronomical research on Supernovae (SNe) has been
59: the
60: study of hydrogen-deficient objects, among them Type Ib SNe (helium-rich) and
61: Type Ic SNe (helium-deficient; see Filippenko 1997 for a review on SNe classification).
62: These two subclasses of events are of great interest because, more than for
63: all other
64: types into which SNe have been classified, there are still
65: many issues open about
66: them, both in terms of observational properties and concerning their
67: progenitors and the physics of the explosion. A number of different models
68: have been proposed to account for
69: the observed characteristics of SNe Ib/c. The most agreed scenario is that of
70: the core-collapse (CC) of massive stars. It is now believed that their progenitors
71: are Wolf-Rayet stars, i. e., highly evolved stars that have shed their H
72: envelopes
73: (or He envelopes in the case of SNe Ic progenitors) due to mass transfer in a
74: binary system or by means of a stellar wind (for an updated review,
75: see Crowther 2007). However, no observational
76: evidence has been found to date allowing one to identify an explosion
77: picture.
78:
79: Since supernovae are believed to be a major source of dust in galaxies
80: (Todini \& Ferrara 2001, and references therein),
81: events showing signatures of interactions with circumstellar matter
82: are of great interest to study how dust forms around these objects.
83: In particular, NIR observations until late epochs are instrumental
84: in providing information on the ongoing processes. As an example,
85: IR traces of dust condensation were found in the ejecta of SN1987A
86: starting $\sim 500$ days after the outburst (see, e.\ g., Bouchet \&
87: Danziger 1993). Unfortunately,
88: only in few cases good NIR light curves spanning until late epochs are
89: available.
90: The observatories of Teramo (Italy), Rome (Italy) and Pulkovo (Russia) are
91: involved in a
92: program aimed at providing accurate light curves of SNe in the Near-Infrared
93: (Di Carlo et al.\ 2002, Di Paola et al.\ 2002, Valentini et al.\ 2003) by
94: using a dedicated 1m class telescope equipped with a Near-Infrared camera.
95: In the framework of this program,
96: we present the results of our NIR follow-up of SN2006jc,
97: discovered on 2006 October 9.752 UT (Nakano et al. 2006) in the Galaxy UGC
98: 4904.
99: The earliest photometric and spectroscopic observations (Crotts et al. 2006;
100: Itagaki et al. 2006; Modjaz et al. 2006) already identified the object
101: as a peculiar Type Ib SN a few days past maximum light.
102: The main feature of SN2006jc in the NIR is a late re-brightening in the
103: corresponding Light Curves (LCs), making SN2006jc an intriguing event, that
104: gives us a huge opportunity for a study of dust formation around CC SNe and
105: allows to deepen our knowledge on how massive stars die.
106:
107: Nakano et al.\ (2006) soon drew attention to an LBV-like luminous flare that
108: had been detected in the same position as SN2006jc two years before. The
109: spatial coincidence of the two events was carefully analyzed by Pastorello et
110: al.\ (2007).
111:
112: Both the character of the event and the preceding flare occurrence,
113: led many groups to carry out ground-based and satellite observations from
114: many facilities and over a wide range of wavelengths, providing a wealth
115: of data.
116: Arkharov et al.\ (2006) were the first ones to note that the NIR brightness of
117: the SN was undergoing a steady increase after the optical maximum, suggesting
118: some kind of relation with dust.
119: Immler, Modjaz \& Brown (2006) also suggested this, based on X-ray
120: observations.
121: It can be hypothesized that as a result of the LBV-like flare in 2004, a dense circumstellar medium was originated within which the supernova
122: exploded. However, LBV stars are supposed to be massive stars in a brief and
123: unstable evolutionary phase from core H-burning to He-burning (WR stage). So,
124: stellar evolution theories do not predict that a star in this phase can become
125: a Supernova after only two years or that a WR star would produce such a
126: luminous eruption (Eldridge \& Tout 2004; Heger et al. 2003).
127: Pastorello et al.\ (2007) suggest as an alternative picture that
128: the SN progenitor was part of a binary system and that the LBV-like eruption
129: actually occurred in the companion star of the SN2006jc progenitor.
130: Nevertheless, the SN would have exploded in a dense CSM, as testified by the
131: evidence of interactions with it.
132: Tominaga et al.\ (2007) used the available observations from the X-ray to the
133: optical, complemented with our NIR photometry,
134: and modeled the event as the explosion of a WR star that
135: was $\sim 40$ $M_{\odot}$ during its main sequence phase. Dust
136: carbonaceous grains would then have formed within the ejecta.
137:
138: This is one of the peculiarities of SN2006jc, since dust signature is hardly
139: found in Type Ib/c SNe. One of the few instances of Ib SNe whom dust may
140: have been associated with is SN1990I. However, in this case the presence of
141: dust was only indirectly inferred from the optical data (missing NIR
142: information) around day 250 (Elmhamdi et al.\ 2004).
143: SN2006jc is probably the very first instance of a Type Ib SN showing clear
144: evidence of interaction with a dusty circumstellar
145: environment, be the dust newly-formed or pre-existing.
146:
147: The paper is organized as follows.
148: We first describe the observations and data reduction (Sect.~\ref{obse}).
149: Then we present the NIR light curves and color evolution of SN 2006jc,
150: and describe the construction of a bolometric (uvoir) LC (Sect.~\ref{resu}).
151: Finally, in Sect.~\ref{disc:conc} we discuss the most likely origin of the NIR
152: emission and its main constraints to the circumstellar medium.
153:
154:
155:
156: \section{Observations and data reduction}
157: \label{obse}
158:
159:
160: The observations of the SN 2006jc were performed with the 1.1m AZT-24
161: Telescope at the Campo Imperatore
162: Observatory (Italy), equipped with the Near-Infrared SWIRCAM camera (Brocato
163: \& Dolci 2003), which is based on a $256 \times 256$ HgCdTe NICMOS3-class array (PICNIC).
164: The detector is sensitive
165: to radiation in the spectral range from 0.9 to 2.5 $\mu$m and, at the focus of AZT-24,
166: yields a scale of $1.04$ arcsec pixel$^{-1}$, resulting in a field of view
167: of $4.4 \times 4.4$ arcmin$^2$.
168:
169: A single set of observations in one of the $J$,$ H$,$ K$ bands
170: consists of 3--5 off-source images and 5
171: on-source images. During a night, for each band the number of sets acquired
172: was selected based on the source brightness in that band.
173: The on-source images in a same set are dithered with maximum shifts of $15"$
174: and the individual integration times are 30 seconds.
175: Off-source frames are offset by $20'$ and were taken with the same observational procedure
176: and exposure times as the on-source ones, but using a wider ($30"$) dithering.
177: For each set, sky images were obtained as a median of the closest
178: dithered off-source frames and subtracted from each on-source image in the
179: same set.
180:
181: A number of frames were acquired at twilight and used to obtain
182: normalized flat-field images using the differential flat
183: technique, as described in Di Carlo et al.\ (2002). Each sky-subtracted
184: image was flat-field divided accordingly.
185: To correct for residual low spatial frequency inhomogeneities in the system response over the frame,
186: we used a set of observations of a standard star with many different pointings
187: covering a grid of $7 \times 7$ regularly-spaced positions on the detector area
188: plus 7 more positions at the center.
189: For each of the 56 frames, a "sky" image was constructed by median-filtering
190: together the 12 frames closest to it in time. Each sky was then removed from
191: the corresponding frame and the obtained images were corrected for flat-field.
192: Aperture photometry of the standard star was carried out on each image,
193: yielding a flux (in counts) as a function of the position on the grid. We
194: fitted a polynomial of 2nd degree to the grid and transformed it into a frame
195: that, once normalized to the value at the centermost location, was used as a
196: "super-flat". Therefore, after flat-fielding, each frame was further divided
197: by the super-flat. The super-flats evidence large-scale smooth variations of at most $\sim 0.1$ mag from the frame center to its edge.
198:
199: At last, the relevant scientific images were then obtained by removing the bad pixels,
200: and finally registering and averaging together the dithered exposures using a
201: $5 \sigma$ threshold.
202:
203: Photometric observations in the $JHK$ bands began on November 15, 2006,
204: going on until June 6, 2007.
205: The standard star AS20 (Hunt et al.\ 1998) was observed to calibrate a sequence
206: of secondary standards properly selected in the supernova field among the ones
207: with the highest S/N (stars 1--5 in Fig.~\ref{fig1}).
208: We checked the calibrated magnitudes of the stars in the local sequence
209: against the 2MASS catalog and found that they are in general
210: within $\sim 0.02-0.04$ mag of their 2MASS magnitudes.
211: Only the two faintest ones exhibit larger differences in some of the band.
212: Also, we found that the relative magnitudes of the local sequence remain
213: constant within a few $0.01$ mag.
214:
215: The magnitudes of SN2006jc and the
216: secondary standards in the field, were obtained by Point-Spread Function
217: photometry, using the ROMAFOT package (Buonanno et al. 1979). The procedure
218: adopted to remove the
219: contribution of the galaxy background diffuse emission is sketched in
220: Fig.~\ref{fig2} and consisted of modeling the galaxy by a set of several
221: (5--8) gaussians with variable Full-Width at Half-Maximum.
222: The analytical reconstruction of the galaxy was subtracted from the original
223: image and the background residual around the SN was checked interactively.
224: Finally, the SN photometry was carried out on the subtracted image showing the
225: flattest background distribution.
226: Table~\ref{table1} lists the results of our photometry. The uncertainties due
227: to photon statistics and fitting are also indicated.
228:
229: \section{Results}
230: \label{resu}
231:
232: \subsection{The Near-Infrared Light Curves}
233: The $JHK$ Light Curves of SN 2006jc are shown in Fig.~\ref{figLCs}.
234: Unfortunately, no
235: NIR data are available around the optical maximum, the coverage starting
236: roughly 36 days after discovery.
237: The NIR LCs span a period of about 7 months and exhibit a clear peak (hereby,
238: the re-brightening) around JD2454083 or shortly after (i. e., 60--70 days
239: after discovery)
240: that is correlated with a slope decrease in the light curves at optical
241: wavelengths (see Fig.~\ref{figLCs}). In $\sim 30$ days,
242: $H$ and $K$ became brighter by at least 1 mag, whereas in $J$ only a plateau
243: is evident (or a small brightness increase, $\sim 0.2$ mag). Hence, the
244: re-brightening
245: mostly affected the NIR wavelengths and its effects became smaller and smaller
246: at shorter wavelengths. Then, while $J$ and $H$ faded by $\sim 3$ mag in
247: 120 days, $K$ dimmed by $\sim 3.6$ mag in 176 days. Note that the SN
248: was brighter in $K$ than it was in $J$ and $H$, so could be followed longer in this band. Two optical spectra taken around the re-brightening
249: (Smith et al.\ 2007) exhibit a red continuum (along with a blue emission)
250: that confirms excess emission in the NIR.
251:
252: \subsection{NIR color evolution}
253: \label{ccd:text}
254: The evolution of the NIR colors ($J-H$ and $H-K$) is also shown in
255: Fig.~\ref{figLCs}.
256: A reddening with time is evident, with $H-K$ having steadily increased by $\sim 1$
257: mag in $\sim 150$ days, whereas $J-H$ increased by $\sim 1.6$ mag in $\sim 120$
258: days and then decreased by $\sim 1$ mag, although with larger errorbars, in the
259: last $\sim 30$ days of the plotted color curve.
260: The evolution of NIR colors can be better studied in a color-color diagram,
261: where it can be compared with cooling and extinction of known stellar
262: sources.
263: As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig3}, the NIR colors of the SN mainly evolve along a
264: track that is in practice parallel to the reddening vector. However, at the
265: latest epochs plotted in the diagram, the blueing of $J-H$
266: evidenced above causes the SN colors to move in a different direction,
267: roughly perpendicular to an extinction vector.
268: Although the errors in $J-H$ become large at these late
269: epochs, this change in color evolution might be real.
270: Anyway, we are mainly concerned with the color evolution in the earlier phase
271: shown in our diagram, i. e., during the re-brightening time, when the photometric errors are smaller.
272:
273: This behavior in the NIR colors during the re-brightening is not only totally at odds with that of other non-stellar objects like SNe Ia (e. g., Valentini et
274: al.\ 2003), where dust is expected to play quite a marginal role in the light
275: emission, but also different, e. g., from that of a ``dusty'' core-collapse SN like
276: the IIn-type 1999el (Di Carlo et al.\ 2002). In the latter case,
277: dust is expected to be the main cause of the observed NIR excess and, in
278: fact, the NIR colors evolve below the reddening band of the stellar
279: main sequence in an $H-K$ vs.\ $J-H$ diagram. But the spread
280: that it exhibits in the space of colors is much less than in the case of SN2006jc. Indeed, this evidence points
281: to the fact that most of the NIR emission of SN2006jc at the
282: epochs considered in this work, is likely to arise
283: due to warm dust.
284:
285: Two processes may be envisaged to explain the
286: reddening trend with time of the NIR colors:
287: steady formation of dust in front of a NIR source
288: (which would cause the extinction to increase with time), or cooling of
289: hot (i.e., $\sim 1000$K -$ 2000$K) dust
290: shells surrounding the SN (irrespective whether formed in the ejecta
291: or pre-existing in the circumstellar matter).
292:
293: As for the first scenario, i. e., steady formation of dust in front of a
294: NIR source, it leads to an extinction that is
295: inconsistent with the optical and NIR light curves and it can be discarded
296: (see Sect.~\ref{disc:conc}). Nevertheless, it allows one to roughly derive an
297: upper limit to the total mass of dust around the SN in the hypothesis of a
298: spherically symmetric distribution of dust forming in the SN ejecta.
299: From Fig.~\ref{fig3}, the track in the color-color diagram spans roughly
300: $A_{V} = 15$ mag and this can be roughly assumed as the maximum extinction
301: that dust may cause. From this, we can make an order-of-magnitude estimate of
302: the dust mass involved. By using Eq.~(7--18) from Spitzer (1978), assuming
303: $R_{V} = 3.1$ and a dust-to-gas mass ratio of 0.01, we obtain that the dust
304: mass column density as a function of $A_{V}$ is given by:
305: \begin{equation}
306: \label{ccd:eq}
307: M_{\rm dust} \sim 2 \times 10^{21} \times A_{V} \times m_{\rm H} / 100
308: \end{equation}
309: where $m_{\rm H}$ is the mass of a hydrogen atom. Note that the dust-to-gas
310: mass ratio is only used to derive the dust mass column density
311: from the gas column density in a galactic environment; as long as the dust
312: properties are the same, the above relation holds in every other environment
313: irrespective of the actual dust-to-gas ratio there.
314: If we assume that the dust is homogeneously distributed in a spherical volume
315: of radius $R$, then the total dust mass is given by
316: $(4/3)\pi R^{2}M_{\rm dust}$; we can estimate $R = v \times t \sim 10^{16}$
317: cm, where $v$ is the ejecta velocity and $t$ is the time from the
318: explosion (we adopted $v \sim 10000$ km s$^{-1}$ and $t \sim 200$ days).
319: The dust mass needed to produce $A_{V} = 15$ mag
320: would then be $\sim 10^{-4}$ $M_{\odot}$. If the dust was concentrated in
321: a thin shell at distance $R$, it is easy to see that the mass would be increased
322: by a factor 3. Also, we can expect that the grains are smaller than
323: in the interstellar medium, then lowering their effective cross sections and
324: further raising the mass.
325:
326: In the framework of the second scenario, the NIR emission would be
327: due to cooling dust. By assuming the dust to be homogeneously
328: distributed in a plane-parallel geometry and at a constant temperature
329: (although decreasing with time), from the radiative transfer equation
330: we obtain
331: $I_{\lambda} = q(\lambda) B_{\lambda}(T) (1 -e^{-\tau_{\lambda}})$,
332: where $q(\lambda)$ is the dust emission efficiency, $B_{\lambda}(T)$ is
333: the brightness of a blackbody at temperature $T$ and $\tau_{\lambda}$
334: is the dust optical depth at a wavelength $\lambda$.
335: We can then use the Wien approximation and see that the NIR colors are given
336: by:
337: \begin{equation}
338: m_{\lambda_2} - m_{\lambda_1} = A(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\tau_{\lambda_1})
339: + 1.086 \times \frac{hc}{kT}(\frac{1}{\lambda_2} - \frac{1}{\lambda_1})
340: \end{equation}
341: where every dependence on dust properties and opacity now lies in
342: the term $A$ and, so,
343: the dependence on $T$ is explicit. Once ``starting'' colors are
344: given (for any initial $T$, they are accounted for only in
345: $A$), it is obvious that the cooling ``sequence'' causes a shift roughly
346: in the same direction as the reddening vector. In particular, dust
347: cooling from 2000 K to 1000 K would cause $H-K$ to redden by 1.2 mag
348: and $J - H$ by 1.5 mag, enough to account for the total change in NIR
349: colors observed. This is also shown in Fig.~\ref{fig3}. The choice of
350: the temperature interval is such to roughly agree with the determinations
351: of grain temperatures at different epochs discussed in the following.
352: Furthermore, the upper limit is determined by the dust sublimation
353: temperature, that is $\sim 2000-3000$ K (e. g., Draine \& Lei 2002).
354:
355: The late color evolution, perpendicular to the reddening and to the blackbody
356: sequence, cannot be explained either by extinction or by dust cooling.
357: The most likely cause is a major change in the geometry of the source, in
358: temperature gradients and/or in the grains properties.
359:
360: \subsection{Bolometric light curve}
361: \label{blc:text}
362:
363: We used our $J, H, K$ photometry and the published $U, B, V, R, I$ photometry,
364: listed in Pastorello et al.\ (2007), to construct both a ``uvoir'' (when the
365: two datasets overlap) bolometric curve and a $UBVRI$ (quasi-)bolometric light
366: curve.
367: We assume a distance modulus of $(25.8 \pm 2.6)$ Mpc and a galactic
368: extinction $E(B-V) = 0.05$, as estimated by Pastorello et al.\ (2007).
369: Measurements in all bands were first dereddened according to the extinction law
370: from Cardelli et al.\ (1989), adopting $R_{V} = 3.1$ that gives
371: $A_{V} = 0.155 $ mag.
372: The optical magnitudes were converted to fluxes according to Bessel (1979),
373: while the NIR ones were converted according to Tokunaga \& Vacca (2005),
374: following the standard of the UK InfraRed Telescope. Note that ARNICA standards
375: were defined using UKIRT standards (Hunt et al.\ 1998).
376: We used spline fits to the LCs in order to have a homogeneous set of data at
377: all wavelengths for each phase. The total flux at each epoch was
378: computed by simply ``connecting'' the fluxes at the isophotal wavelengths and
379: determining the total area. The results are listed in Table~2 and shown in
380: Fig.~\ref{bolo}.
381: The error on the derived bolometric luminosity is dominated by that on the
382: distance and the one due to the limited band used to calculate
383: the total flux. As for the first, it is easy to see that it amounts to a
384: $\sim 20$ \% of the bolometric luminosity. Being systematic, it causes a shift
385: of the bolometric light curve as a whole. The second contribution is more
386: difficult to estimate, but it may be quite significant and may vary with
387: time. However, it is likely to cause only small
388: deformations of the logarithmic bolometric light curve, the
389: major effect being a shift of the curve, as well.
390:
391: It is clear from the figure that the inclusion of the NIR fluxes
392: change significantly the slope of the bolometric LC,
393: their contribution increasing with time from
394: a factor 1.35 to a factor 3.6 of that from $UBVRI$.
395:
396: Figure~\ref{bolo} also shows the bolometric luminosity obtained on
397: JD2454022.6 by
398: adding the UV fluxes measured with Swift/UVOT (Brown et al.\ 2006);
399: the UV contribution amounts to $\sim 80$ \% of that from $UBVRI$.
400: We roughly estimated the UV fluxes\footnote{We used zero points, wavelengths
401: and count to flux ratioes as given in the Swift WEB page, at
402: {\it http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/heasarc/caldb/swift/docs/uvot/index.html}\\
403: We also assumed $ A_{\lambda} = A_{U} $ in all three UV bands to estimate the
404: reddening correction for the UV flux.}
405: on other dates from the figure shown
406: in Holland et al.\ (2007). We found that the UV to optical
407: {\em plus NIR} luminosity ratio appears to remain constant with time, although
408: it is also roughly equal to the ratio of UV to optical luminosity as calculated at
409: the discovery time, when NIR data are not available. Anyway,
410: we decided not to scale the bolometric luminosity by including a constant
411: contribution from UV emission, lacking a conclusive list of UV fluxes.
412: The point marked in Fig.~\ref{bolo} allows one to shift the bolometric light
413: curve as a whole if a constant fraction of UV contribution is assumed.
414:
415:
416: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
417: \label{disc:conc}
418:
419: Among the two proposed scenarios to explain the NIR color evolution, that of
420: pure
421: extinction can be easily ruled out. Firstly, in the time interval when optical
422: and NIR observations overlap, the extinction should have increased up to
423: $A_{V} = 5$ mag. This can be easily estimated from Fig.~\ref{fig3}, exploiting
424: the labeled dates. Since in this interval the increase in $V$ is ``only''
425: $\sim 2.5$ mag,
426: the background emitting region should have steadily increased its brightness
427: to ``compensate'' for the remaining $2.5$ mag of extinction. This can be
428: obviously excluded.
429: Secondly, even considering the much longer interval spanned by the NIR
430: observations,
431: a pure extinction scenario can be discarded on similar grounds.
432: From Table~\ref{table1} it can be seen that, e. g.,
433: $K$ increased by $\sim 2$ mag from the epoch of the re-brightening peak to the
434: latest
435: dates plotted in the color-color diagram. Since on this time-scale the
436: extinction $A_{V}$
437: should have increased by $15$ mag, that translates into
438: an increase of $A_{K}$ by $ \sim 1.7 $ mag, then the growth of $K$ would be
439: fully explained by the extinction. Hence, the re-brightening would have needed again a
440: source in the background of the newly-formed dust whose NIR flux at first increased and
441: then remained almost constant.
442:
443: The simpler way to explain the NIR re-brightening is that the
444: shock or the UV-flash radiation engulfed a distant dense shell
445: of circumstellar matter from a past eruptive episode of the progenitor,
446: either forming new warm dust in the dense post-shock gas, or
447: warming pre-existing dust. Smith et al. (2007) show that if this
448: eruptive episode is related to the 2004 flare event, than the shock would
449: have reached the corresponding shell in $\sim 100 - 200$ days, comparable
450: with the epoch of the re-brightening.
451: Whereas the bulk of the dust cooled behind, the shock or the UV flash would
452: have yielded new layers of hot dust. We explored this possible mechanism by solving
453: the transfer equation under the same assumptions as in Sect.~\ref{ccd:text}, but
454: adding a a plane-parallel outer layer of warmer dust around
455: the emitting volume. If we adopt
456: the reddening law by Rieke \& Lebofsky (1985), then the {\em variation}
457: of both $JHK$ magnitudes and NIR colors depends only on the temperatures
458: of the two regions and their opacities (in the $K$ band).
459: We checked that, by suddenly heating up the outer layer,
460: a magnitude decrease of $\sim 1$ mag (in the $JHK$
461: bands) and a blueing in $J-H$, $H-K$ of only few tenths of a mag can be yielded.
462: This just using
463: slightly different temperatures in the two regions (around 1500 K)
464: and an optically thin outer envelope ($\tau_{K} \sim 0.1$). It is noteworth also
465: that an optically thin inner layer produces better results.
466: This would agree with what found by Foley et al.\ (2007), i. e., that
467: there is little mass in the CSM, although there is evidence that
468: it is quite dense. Our results
469: are roughly consistent with both the $JHK$ magnitude decrease
470: and the $H-K$ behavior around the re-brightening epoch, but fail
471: to fit the apparent reddening of $J-H$ around peak evident in Fig.~\ref{fig3}
472: (at $H-K \sim 0.8$, $J-H \sim 1.2$).
473: We also checked that two thicker layers ($\tau_{K} \sim 0.5$), with the
474: outer one a little thicker and pre-existing, would fit better the data,
475: since now $J-H$ is reddened by few tenths of a magnitude (along with
476: $H-K$, that however is less reddened). This may suggest that a shock
477: proceeding in a moderately thick shell of circumstellar matter could fit
478: marginally better the NIR data, although it does not agree with the
479: estimated limit to the extinction.
480: However, our two-layer model is too rough
481: to help us deciding which is the best selection of physical parameters.
482: Accurate modeling including dust properties (the adopted reddening
483: law by Rieke \& Lebofsky is likely not to fit newly-formed grains)
484: and the actual distribution
485: of the circumstellar matter around the SN is then needed to carefully
486: investigate the proposed processes.
487:
488: Sakon et al.\ (2007) observed SN2006jc in the NIR and MIR with IRC, on
489: board the AKARI satellite, 200 days after discovery. They showed that the 2--5
490: $\mu$m spectrum is well fitted by thermal emission from amorphous carbon grains at
491: $\sim 800$ K. Smith et al.\ (2007) also suggest that some
492: observational evidence gathered roughly 79 days after discovery,
493: points to hot ($\sim 1700$ K) dust formation (carbonaceous grains) in a dense
494: circumstellar shell engulfed by the shock.
495: These confirm our scenario of dust cooling from $\sim 2000$ K to $\sim 1000$ K.
496: According to Sakon et al.\ (2007), their derived temperature 200 days after discovery
497: is consistent with newly formed dust; the total mass in carbonaceous grains
498: at that date has been estimated to be $\sim 7 \times 10^{-5}$ $M_{\odot}$.
499: This is of the same order of the upper limit to the dust mass we have derived in
500: Sect.~\ref{ccd:text} and may suggest that dust is not distributed with spherical
501: symmetry. However, by using the same grain properties as in Sakon et al.\ (2007),
502: we obtain a slightly
503: lower opacity (in the $K$ band) than our estimated limit even in spherical symmetry.
504:
505: Our NIR data alone do not allow us to discern
506: between newly formed dust in dense post-shock gas and heating of pre-existing
507: dust. But this issue can be addressed by comparing optical and NIR observations.
508: In Fig.~\ref{bolo}, the curve of luminosity from the
509: radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni and $^{56}$Co has been drawn (Branch 1992) for
510: an initial mass $\sim 0.07$ $M_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni. This process is believed to power
511: the light curve at late epochs. No wonder that radioactive decay does not fit
512: the slopes of the uvoir and $UBVRI$ (quasi-)bolometric curves, since an increasing
513: escape probability of gamma rays with time is expected (Clocchiatti \& Wheeler 1997).
514: A simple model accounting for this effect in an expanding envelope has been
515: developed by Clocchiatti \& Wheeler (1997); it can be seen in Fig.~\ref{bolo} that
516: by modifying the radioactive decay curve by including the decrease of $\gamma$-ray trapping,
517: we obtain a good fit to the uvoir bolometric curve from JD2454060 on. Here we have assumed
518: an initial mass $\sim 0.22$ $M_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni, a kinetic energy $\sim 20 \times 10^{51}$
519: erg s$^{-1}$, an ejecta mass of $4.6$ $M_{\odot}$ and JD2454005 as the explosion date.
520: These values are the same as the parameters derived by Tominaga et al.\ (2007)
521: through one of their explosion models.
522: However, note that our uvoir curve does not include the UV contribution, that appears to
523: be a consistent fraction of the total radiated energy.
524:
525: We draw attention to the clear steepening of the $UBVRI$ (quasi-)bolometric curve around
526: JD2454070, after being roughly parallel to the modeled bolometric curve for $\sim 20$ days. This is
527: obviously not matched by the uvoir bolometric curve and reflects an analogous
528: steepening of the $U,B,V,R,I$ LCs around the same date (see Fig.~\ref{fig3}).
529: This has not been found in other
530: Ib/c SNe, where the decline rate both of the $V$ band LC and of the $UBVRI$
531: (quasi-)bolometric curve, although larger than the slope of radioactive
532: decay curve, remains constant until later epoch (Elmhamdi et al.\ 2004, Pastorello et al.\ 2007,
533: Valenti et al.\ 2007). I. e., they usually are correlated to the radioactive decay
534: curve (when $\gamma$-ray trapping is accounted for) until late epochs. The
535: drop of the $UBVRI$ curve is riminiscent
536: of what found for SN1990I significantly later, around 250 days after maximum,
537: and attributed to dust formation (Elmhamdi et al.\ 2004).
538: Since in the case of SN2006jc the $UBVRI$ drop is well correlated with the re-brightening,
539: in our view it also is the signature of incipient dust formation, occurring earlier than
540: in the case of SN1990I.
541: The drop of the $UBVRI$ (quasi-)bolometric curves is also evident in Fig.~9 of
542: Tominaga et al.\ (2007), where it clearly departs from their modeled bolometric curves
543: from the same date on. Note that the analogous drop in the $I$ band LC is less than that in the $V$ band LC
544: (see Fig.~\ref{fig3}),
545: as is expected from the extinction law. The amount of extinction at
546: maximum $K$ can be roughly derived
547: by fitting a linear relation to the $UBVRI$ (quasi-)bolometric curve in the period
548: JD2454050--2454070 and measuring the difference between the actual curve and this
549: line. This implies an $A_{V} \sim 0.5$ mag, or $\sim 3.5 \times 10^{-6}$ $M_{\odot}$
550: of dust assuming it is homogeneously distributed in a spherical volume of radius
551: $R$ (as defined in Sect.~\ref{ccd:text}). This values are much lower than those involved in our pure extinction scenario,
552: then consistent with its rejection.
553:
554: The last open issue is that of the source of energy fueling the re-brightening.
555: As shown, the uvoir bolometric curve appears to be consistent with the curve
556: of radioactive decay, once modified by including the simple $\gamma$-ray trapping
557: model developed by Clocchiatti \& Wheeler (1997). This would accord with Tominaga et
558: al.\ (2007), that propose the radioactive decay as the major energy input
559: powering the LCs. Nevertheless, the presence of UV excess in two spectra taken during the
560: re-brightening (Smith et al.\ 2007) would indicate the shock as the major contributor to
561: grain heating, leading to the NIR re-brightening. This is also suggested by
562: the concomitant brightening of X-ray emission,
563: from $\sim 20$ days to $\sim 100$ days after discovery (Immler et al. 2007).
564: Holland et al.\ (2007) observed SN2006jc through the three UV bands (UVW1, UVM2, UVW2)
565: allowed by UVOT on board the Swift satellite. Although still tentative, their data seem to show
566: a decrease in the slope of the corresponding LCs during the re-brightening and they found
567: evidence that the UV color became bluer with time. As shown in Sect.~\ref{blc:text},
568: the UV to the optical {\em plus} NIR luminosity ratio appears to remain constant with time;
569: since the NIR increases in fraction with respect to the optical, then the UV fraction has
570: also to increase with respect to the optical. Pending a refinement of data
571: reduction, the available UV and X-ray data point to a correlation with the
572: NIR re-brightening that would confirm the occurring of an interaction of the ejecta
573: with circumstellar matter.
574:
575: In summary, the case for a strong interaction of SN2006jc ejecta and
576: a dense circumstellar medium leading to the formation of hot dust
577: in the post-shock denser gas,
578: appears well supported by the available dataset of multi-wavelength observations.
579: \\
580:
581:
582:
583:
584: \acknowledgments
585: We wish to thank Amedeo Tornamb\'{e} for discussions, suggestions and
586: encouragement at all stages of this work.
587: We thank also M.\ Limongi and N.\ Tominaga for their kindly collaboration. \\
588: This work is supported by governmental grant PRIN-MIUR 2006, under the
589: scientific project: {\it ``Fasi finali dell'evoluzione stellare - Nucleosintesi
590: in Supernovae.``}
591:
592: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky
593: Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the
594: Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology,
595: funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National
596: Science Foundation. \\
597:
598:
599:
600:
601: \begin{thebibliography}{}
602: \bibitem[Arkharov et al. (2006)]{ark06} Arkharov, A., Efimova, N., Leoni, R.,
603: Di Paola, A., Di Carlo, E., Dolci, M. 2006, ATel, 961, 1
604: \bibitem[Bessel (1979)]{bes79} Bessel, M.\ S. 1979, PASP, 91, 589
605: \bibitem[Bouchet \& Danziger (1993)]{bouda93} Bouchet, P., \& Danziger, I.\
606: J.\ 1993, A\&A, 273, 451
607: \bibitem[Branch (1992)]{bran92} Branch, D. 1992, ApJ, 392, 35
608: \bibitem[Brocato \& Dolci 2003]{brodo03} Brocato, E. \& Dolci, M. 2003, Mem.
609: SAIt Suppl. 74, 110
610: \bibitem[Brown et al. (2006)]{brown06} Brown, P., Immler, S., Modjaz, M. 2006,
611: ATel 916, 1
612: \bibitem[Buonanno et al. (1979)]{buon79} Buonanno, R., Corsi, C.\ E., De Biase,
613: G.\ A., Ferraro, I. 1979, {\it International Workshop on Image Processing in
614: Astronomy}. Proceedings of the 5th. Colloquium on Astrophysics, held in
615: Trieste, Italy, June 4-8, 1979. Editors, G. Sedmak, M. Capaccioli, R.\ J.
616: Allen; Publisher, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Trieste, Italy, 1979.
617: ISBN \# NONE. LC \# QB51.3.E43 C64 1979, P. 354, 1979 354
618: \bibitem[Cardelli et al. (1989)]{card89} Cardelli, J.\ A., Clayton, G.\ C. \&
619: Mathis, J.\ S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
620: \bibitem[Clocchiatti \& Wheeler (1997)]{cew97} Clocchiatti, A. \&
621: Wheeler, J.\ C.\ 1997, ApJ, 491, 375
622: \bibitem[Crotts et al. (2006)]{crot06} Crotts, A., Eastman, J., Depoy, D.,
623: Prieto, J.\ L., Garnavich, P. 2006, CBET, 672
624: \bibitem[Crowther (2007)]{crow} Crowther, P.\ A.\ 2007, ARA\&A, 45, 177
625: \bibitem[Di Carlo et al. (2002)]{dic02} Di Carlo, E., Massi, F., Valentini, G., et al. 2002, ApJ, 573, 144
626: \bibitem[Di Paola et al. (2002)]{dipa02} Di Paola, A., et al. 2002, A\&A, 393,
627: L21
628: \bibitem[Draine \& Lei (2002)]{drai02} Draine, B.\ T.\ \& Lei, H.\ 2002, ApJ,
629: 569, 780
630: \bibitem[Elhamdi et al. (2004)]{el04} Elmhamdi, A., Danziger, I.\ J., Cappellaro,
631: E., et al.\ 2004, A\&A, 426, 963
632: \bibitem[Eldridge \& Tout (2004)]{eldr04} Eldridge, J.\ J. \& Tout, C.\ A.
633: 2004, MNRAS, 353, 87
634: \bibitem[Filippenko (1997)]{fili97} Filippenko, A.\ V. 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 309
635: \bibitem[Foley et al. 2007]{fol07} Foley, R. J., Smith, N., Ganeshalingam M., Li, W., Chornock, R., \& Filippenko, A. V. 2007, ApJL, 657, 105
636: \bibitem[Heger et al. (2003)]{hege03} Heger, A., Fryer, C.\ L., Woosley, S.\
637: E., Langer, N. \& Hartmann, D.\ H. 2003, ApJ, 591, 288
638: \bibitem[Holland et al. 2007]{holl07} Holland, S.,et al. 2007, {\it Supernova
639: 1987A: 20 Years After: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters.} Ed. S. Immler, K.\
640: W. Weiler and R. McCray (AIP: New York), in press. The poster paper is
641: available at:\\
642: {\it http://astrophysics.gsfc.nasa.gov/conferences/supernova1987a/Holland$\_$poster.pdf}
643: \bibitem[Hunt et al.(1998)]{hunt} Hunt, L. K., Mannucci, F., Testi. L.,
644: Migliorini, S., Stanga, R. M., Baffa, C., Lisi, F.,
645: \& Vanzi, L. 1998, AJ, 115, 2594
646: \bibitem[Immler, Modjaz \& Brown (2006)]{imm06} Immler, S., Modjaz, M. \& Brown, P.\ J. 2006, ATel 934, 1
647: \bibitem[Immler et al. (2007)]{imm07} Immler, S., et al. 2007 ApJ submitted
648: \bibitem[Itagaki et al. (2006)]{itag06} Itagaki, K. et al. 2006, IAUC 8762
649: \bibitem[Koornneef (1983)]{koo83} Koornneef, J.\ 1983, A\&A, 128, 84
650: \bibitem[Modjaz et al. (2006)]{modj06} Modjaz, M. et al. 2006, CBET, 667
651: \bibitem[Nakano et al. (2006)]{nak06} Nakano, S., Itagaki, K., Puckett, T., \&
652: Gorelli, R. 2006, CBET, 666
653: \bibitem[Pastorello et al. (2007)]{pas07} Pastorello, A., Smartt, S.\ J., Mattila, S., et al. 2007, Nature, 447, 829
654: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky (1985)]{rie85} Rieke, G.\ H., \& Lebofsky, M.\ J.\ 1985, ApJ, 288, 618
655: \bibitem[Sakon et al. (2007)]{sea07} Sakon, I., et al.\ 2007, submitted to ApJ (arxiv:0711.4801)
656: \bibitem[Smith, Foley \& Filippenko (2007)]{smi07} Smith, N., Foley, R.\ J. \& Filippenko, A.\ V., 2007, ApJ submitted (astro-ph 0704.2249)
657: \bibitem[Spitzer (1978)]{spi78} Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical processes in the Interstellar Medium, John Wiley \& Sons, New York
658: \bibitem[Todini \& Ferrara (2001)]{todfe01} Todini, P., \& Ferrara, A.\ 2001,
659: MNRAS, 325, 726
660: \bibitem[Tokunaga \& Vacca (2005)]{toku05} Tokunaga, A. T. \& Vacca, W. D. 2005, PASP 117, 421
661: \bibitem[Tominaga et al. (2007)]{tomi07} Tominaga, N., et al. 2007, ApJ
662: submitted [arXiv: astro-ph/0711.4782]
663: \bibitem[Valenti et al. (2007)]{valetal07} Valenti, S. et al.\ 2007, MNRAS in
664: Press [arXiv: astro-ph/0710.5173]
665: \bibitem[Valentini et al. (2003)]{val03} Valentini, G. et al. 2003, ApJ, 595,779
666: \end{thebibliography}
667:
668: \clearpage
669:
670:
671: \begin{figure}
672: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.70]{f1.eps}
673: \caption{J-band image of SN2006jc obtained at the AZT-24 telescope on JD 2,454,083. Stars of the
674: local sequence are indicated by numbers. \label{fig1}}
675: \end{figure}
676:
677: \clearpage
678:
679: \begin{figure}
680: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.80]{f2.eps}
681: \caption{Sketch of the procedure used to remove the background contribution
682: from the SN photometry.
683: The region around the SN in the original image is shown in the left
684: panel and the same region after background subtraction in the right panel.
685: The subtracted contribution from the host galaxy
686: has been modeled as a sum of 6 gaussians (middle panel).
687: \label{fig2}}
688: \end{figure}
689:
690: \clearpage
691:
692:
693: \begin{figure}
694: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.70]{f3.eps}
695: \caption{(a) NIR light curves and (b) the corresponding NIR colors ($J-H$ and
696: $H-K$) of SN2006jc. Full circles correspond to epochs when photometry in all
697: three bands is available, whereas empty circles mark epochs when only
698: photometry in two bands is available and this has been complemented by
699: interpolated values in the missing band. (c) To allow a more complete view of
700: the NIR temporal evolution, the optical light curves (from Pastorello et al.\
701: 2007) are also shown, shifted by the amount indicated on the lower-right
702: corner of the box.\label{figLCs}}
703: \end{figure}
704:
705: \clearpage
706:
707:
708: \begin{figure}
709: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.70]{f4.eps}
710: \caption{Color-color diagram ($J-H$ vs.\ $H-K$) showing the temporal evolution
711: of SN2006jc NIR colors. Each symbol is labeled with the corresponding epoch
712: (JD2454000+). The symbols are the same as in Fig.~(\ref{figLCs}b). For the sake of clarity,
713: errorbars are omitted; however, they are plotted in the previous figure.
714: The stellar main sequence of O6--O8 to M8 stars (Koornneef 1983) is also drawn
715: (solid black line on the lower-left
716: corner), along with its reddening band (red dashed lines).
717: The solid lines above and below the main sequence reddening band mark,
718: respectively: an extinction $A_{V} \sim 10$ mag and a blackbody cooling
719: sequence from $2000 K$ to $1000 K$. Both of them are shifted by arbitrary
720: intervals.\label{fig3}}
721: \end{figure}
722:
723:
724: \clearpage
725:
726: \begin{figure}
727: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.65]{f5.eps}
728: \caption{``uvoir'' bolometric light curve and $UBVRI$ (quasi-)bolometric light curve, complementing the NIR
729: data with optical photometry from Pastorello et al.\ (2007). The topmost
730: point includes also UV fluxes from Brown et al.\ (2007) to illustrate the
731: UV contribution to the bolometric luminosity (see the text). Also plotted:
732: the radioactive decay curve of $^{56}$Ni and $^{56}$Co (dotted line; Branch 1992)
733: for an initial mass $0.07$ $M_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni; the same curve
734: (solid line), but
735: for an initial mass $0.22$ $M_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni and modified according to
736: Clocchiatti \& Wheeler (1997) to account for varying $\gamma$-ray trapping
737: (by assuming a kinetic energy $20 \times 10^{51}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and an ejecta
738: mass $4.6$ $M_{\odot}$). In both case, we adopt JD2454005 as the explosion
739: time. \label{bolo}}
740: \end{figure}
741:
742: \clearpage
743:
744:
745:
746:
747:
748:
749: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
750: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
751: \tablecaption{NIR photometry of SN2006jc. \label{table1}}
752: \tablewidth{0pt}
753: \tablehead{
754: \colhead{Julian Day} & \colhead{$J$} & \colhead{$\Delta J$} & \colhead{$H$} &
755: \colhead{$\Delta H$} & \colhead{$K$} & \colhead{$\Delta K$} \\
756: \colhead{(2454000+)}& \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} &
757: \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} }
758: \startdata
759: 54.6 & 16.16 & 0.04 & 15.68 & 0.04 & 15.12 & 0.03 \\
760: 55.6 & \nodata & \nodata & 15.64 & 0.04 & \nodata & \nodata \\
761: 62.6 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 14.74 & 0.04 \\
762: 63.6 & 16.03 & 0.05 & 15.54 & 0.03 & \nodata & \nodata \\
763: 72.6 & 16.12 & 0.05 & 15.24 & 0.02 & 14.45 & 0.04 \\
764: 75.6 & 16.05 & 0.04 & 15.07 & 0.02 & 14.27 & 0.02 \\
765: 76.6 & 16.09 & 0.05 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
766: 77.6 & \nodata & \nodata & 15.00 & 0.02 & 14.17 & 0.02 \\
767: 82.7 & 15.95 & 0.06 & 14.78 & 0.02 & 13.96 & 0.02 \\
768: 83.7 & 15.96 & 0.04 & 14.75 & 0.02 & 14.03 & 0.02 \\
769: 132.3 & 17.67 & 0.17 & 15.99 & 0.03 & 14.78 & 0.02 \\
770: 137.3 & 17.64 & 0.15 & 16.23 & 0.03 & 14.94 & 0.03 \\
771: 159.4 & 18.18 & 0.31 & \nodata & \nodata & 15.22 & 0.04 \\
772: 162.4 & \nodata & \nodata & 16.75 & 0.05 & 15.46 & 0.10 \\
773: 164.4 & 18.77 & 0.38 & 16.83 & 0.03 & 15.32 & 0.05 \\
774: 165.5 & 18.74 & 0.33 & \nodata & \nodata & 15.35 & 0.05 \\
775: 168.4 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 15.42 & 0.06 \\
776: 172.4 & 18.90 & 0.40 & 16.80 & 0.02 & 15.48 & 0.05 \\
777: 173.4 & \nodata & \nodata & 16.87 & 0.02 & 15.43 & 0.06 \\
778: 174.4 & \nodata & \nodata & 16.89 & 0.02 & 15.30 & 0.07 \\
779: 175.4 & 18.84 & 0.48 & 17.0 8 & 0.04 & 15.62 & 0.12 \\
780: 176.4 & \nodata & \nodata & 16.96 & 0.03 & 15.54 & 0.11 \\
781: 177.4 & \nodata & \nodata & 17.04 & 0.02 & 15.61 & 0.09 \\
782: 181.3 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 15.58 & 0.11 \\
783: 197.4 & 18.86 & 0.50 & 17.45 & 0.17 & 15.91 & 0.09 \\
784: 202.3 & 18.98 & 0.51 & 17.78 & 0.28 & 16.13 & 0.11 \\
785: 207.3 & 19.06 & 0.72 & \nodata & \nodata & 16.25 & 0.13 \\
786: 219.3 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 16.51 & 0.11 \\
787: 226.3 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 16.53 & 0.11 \\
788: 235.2 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 16.68 & 0.11 \\
789: 258.3 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 17.58 & 0.21 \\
790: \enddata
791: \end{deluxetable}
792:
793: \clearpage
794:
795: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
796: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
797: \tablecaption{Bolometric luminosities for SN2006jc. \label{table2}}
798: \tablewidth{0pt}
799: \tablehead{
800: \colhead{Julian Day} & \colhead{$Log_{10}(L_{UBVRI})$} &
801: \colhead{$Log_{10}(L_{uvoir})$} \\
802: \colhead{(2454000+)}& \colhead{[erg s-1]} & \colhead{[erg s-1]}}
803: \startdata
804: 21.66 & 42.55 & \nodata \\
805: 22.68 & 42.53 & \nodata \\
806: 24.68 & 42.48 & \nodata \\
807: 24.70 & 42.49 & \nodata \\
808: 28.65 & 42.35 & \nodata \\
809: 29.64 & 42.31 & \nodata \\
810: 30.66 & 42.26 & \nodata \\
811: 31.63 & 42.23 & \nodata \\
812: 32.63 & 42.19 & \nodata \\
813: 32.63 & 42.19 & \nodata \\
814: 35.66 & 42.07 & \nodata \\
815: 36.62 & 42.04 & \nodata \\
816: 37.61 & 42.00 & \nodata \\
817: 37.62 & 41.99 & \nodata \\
818: 38.59 & 41.96 & \nodata \\
819: 44.60 & 41.76 & \nodata \\
820: 49.58 & 41.64 & \nodata \\
821: 49.64 & 41.64 & \nodata \\
822: 50.58 & 41.63 & \nodata \\
823: 52.59 & 41.60 & \nodata \\
824: 54.60 & 41.56 & 41.69 \\
825: 55.60 & 41.54 & 41.68 \\
826: 56.67 & 41.52 & 41.67 \\
827: 62.60 & 41.43 & 41.59 \\
828: 63.60 & 41.41 & 41.58 \\
829: 66.47 & 41.35 & 41.55 \\
830: 70.53 & 41.25 & 41.48 \\
831: 72.60 & 41.19 & 41.45 \\
832: 75.60 & 41.10 & 41.41 \\
833: 76.60 & 41.06 & 41.39 \\
834: 77.60 & 41.02 & 41.38 \\
835: 82.70 & 40.81 & 41.32 \\
836: 83.70 & 40.73 & 41.29 \\
837: \enddata
838: \end{deluxetable}
839:
840: \end{document}
841: