1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2:
3: %%% PREAMBLE MATTER
4:
5: \usepackage{asp2006}
6: \usepackage{epsf}
7: %\usepackage{psfig}
8: \usepackage{lscape}
9:
10: \markboth{Pandey, Lambert \& Rao }{Fluorine in RCBs} %%% Fill in authors' names and short running title
11:
12: \pagestyle{myheadings}
13: \setcounter{equation}{0}
14: \setcounter{figure}{0}
15: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
16: \setcounter{section}{0}
17: \setcounter{table}{0}
18:
19: %%% MAIN PART OF DOCUMENT
20:
21: \begin{document}
22: \title{Fluorine in R Coronae Borealis and Extreme Helium Stars} %%% Fill in title
23: \author{Gajendra Pandey\altaffilmark{1}, David L.\ Lambert\altaffilmark{2}, and
24: N. Kameswara Rao\altaffilmark{1}} %%% Fill in author names
25:
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Indian Institute of Astrophysics;
27: Bangalore, 560034 India} %%% Fill in author affiliations
28:
29: \altaffiltext{2}{The W.J. McDonald Observatory, University of Texas at Austin; Austin,
30: TX 78712-1083}
31:
32: \begin{abstract} %%% Abstract to run on from here.
33:
34: Neutral fluorine (F\,{\sc i}) lines are identified in the optical
35: spectra of several R\,Coronae Borealis stars (RCBs) at maximum light.
36: These lines provide the first measurement of the fluorine
37: abundance in these stars. Fluorine is enriched in some RCBs by factors of 800 to 8000
38: relative to its likely initial abundance.
39: The overabundances of fluorine are evidence for the synthesis
40: of fluorine. These results are discussed in the light of the scenario that
41: RCBs are formed by accretion of an He white dwarf by a C-O white dwarf.
42: Sakurai's object (V4334\,Sgr), a final He-shell flash product, shows no
43: detectable F\,{\sc i} lines.
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: %%% MAIN BODY OF TEXT GOES HERE. CONSULT "INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS USING
48: %%% LATEX2E MARKUP", SECTIONS 2.3-2.6 FOR HELP WITH EQUATIONS, FIGURES,
49: %%% AND TABLES.
50:
51: \section{Introduction} %%% Top level section head (remove "%" symbol)
52:
53: R Coronae Borealis (RCB) stars comprise a sequence of hydrogen-deficient
54: supergiants with effective temperatures from about $T_{\rm eff} = 3500$ K,
55: as represented by Z\,UMi and DY\,Per, to about 19,500 K, as represented
56: by DY\,Cen.
57: The characteristic of H-deficiency is shared by the H-deficient cool
58: carbon (HdC) stars at low temperatures and by the extreme helium
59: (EHe) stars at high temperatures. A common assumption is that the
60: sequence HdC - RCB - EHe in the ($T_{\rm eff},\log g$) plane
61: reflects a close evolutionary connection. In this sequence, the
62: RCBs are distinguished from HdC and EHe stars by their second principal defining
63: characteristic: their propensity to fade, in visual light, unpredictably as a
64: cloud of carbon dust obscures the star. This propensity is not universally shared:
65: XX\,Cam has yet to be observed below maximum light. In addition, DY\,Cen might be
66: considered as an EHe star known to experience RCB-like fadings.
67:
68: If HdC, RCB, and EHe stars share a common heritage, the expectation
69: is that their atmospheric compositions should show some common
70: features \citep{pan2004a,rao2005}. It is through the compositions that one hopes to test
71: theoretical ideas about the origins of these extremely rare
72: stars; just five HdC, about 40 RCB \citep{zanie2005}, and 21 EHe
73: stars are known in the Galaxy. Currently, two
74: scenarios remain in contention to account for these
75: H-poor high luminosity stars. In the first, a final He-shell flash in a
76: post-AGB star on the white dwarf cooling track creates a H-poor luminous
77: star. This is dubbed the `final flash' (FF) scenario. In the second, the H-poor
78: star is formed from a merger of a He white dwarf with a C-O white dwarf.
79: In a close binary system, accretion of the He white dwarf by the C-O white dwarf
80: may lead to a H-poor supergiant with the C-O white dwarf as its core. This is
81: called the `double degenerate' (DD) scenario.
82:
83: Products of both the FF and DD scenarios may be presumed to exist.
84: A determination of which scenario provided which star rests in large
85: part on the observed chemical composition of a star's atmosphere and theoretical
86: predictions about the FF and DD products. Evidence from
87: elemental abundances, especially the H, C, N, and O abundances, suggests that
88: the RCB and EHe stars evolved via the
89: DD rather than the FF route \citep{asp00,pan2001,saio02,pan2006}.
90: Convincing, essentially incontrovertible, evidence
91: that the DD scenario led to the HdCs and some cool RCBs was
92: presented by \citet{clay2007} with their discovery that
93: the $^{18}$O was very abundant in their atmospheres. This usually
94: rare isotope of oxygen was attributed to nucleosynthesis occurring
95: during and following accretion of the He-rich material onto the C-O white dwarf.
96:
97: Determination of the oxygen isotopic ratios demands
98: a cool star with the CO vibration-rotation bands in its spectrum.
99: The majority of RCBs and all of the EHes are too hot for CO to contribute
100: to their spectra \citep{tenen2005}.
101: An alternative tracer of nucleosynthesis during a merger may
102: be provided by the fluorine abundance. Considerable enrichment
103: of EHe stars with F was discovered by \citet{pana2006} from detection and
104: analysis of about a dozen F\,{\sc i} lines in optical spectra of
105: cool EHe stars. Clayton et al.'s (2007) calculations suggest that F synthesis is
106: possible in the DD scenario. Here, we report on a search for
107: F\,{\sc i} lines in spectra of RCBs and discuss the F abundances in
108: light of the results for EHes and the expectations for the DD and FF
109: scenarios.
110:
111: \section{Observations}
112:
113: High-resolution optical spectra of RCBs at maximum light obtained
114: at the W.J. McDonald Observatory and the Vainu Bappu Observatory
115: were examined for the presence of F\,{\sc i} lines.
116:
117: Suitable McDonald spectra of 13 RCBs were available for analysis. In
118: several cases, spectra of the same star from different epochs were
119: available. The stars are listed in Table 1.
120: At VBO, spectra were obtained of UW\,Cen, a star inaccessible from
121: the McDonald Observatory, and also of XX\,Cam, R\,CrB, RY\,Sgr, and VZ\,Sgr.
122: The UW\,Cen spectrum was complemented by a CTIO spectrum from 1992 (see
123: Asplund et al. 2000).
124:
125: \section{F\,{\sc i} Lines}
126:
127: In the atmosphere of a RCB star, fluorine is present as neutral
128: atoms. The leading lines of F\,{\sc i} in optical spectra come from excited levels
129: with lower excitation potentials of 12.7 eV or higher.
130: The adopted $gf$-values come from \citet{musie99}.
131: The following F\,{\sc i} lines were identified as the principal or
132: leading contributor to a stellar line: 7398.68, 7754.69, 6902.47, 7425.65,
133: and 6834.26\AA.
134: The measured mean fluorine abundances (Table 1) are given as
135: log $\epsilon(\rm F)$, normalized such that log $\Sigma$$\mu_i \epsilon(i)$ = 12.15
136: where $\mu_i$ is the atomic weight of element $i$.
137: The errors of the derived F abundances
138: given in Table 1 are the line-to-line scatter.
139: %The number of lines used is given within
140: %brackets. The F abundances derived for the RCBs cooler or about effective temperature 6500 K
141: %are uncertain and are marked : in Table 1.
142:
143: \begin{landscape}
144: \begin{table}[!ht]
145: %{llcccccr}
146: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
147: %\tablewidth{0pt}
148: %\tablecolumns{7}
149: %\tablewidth{0pc}
150: %\setcounter{table} {0}
151: \caption{The analyzed RCBs, their stellar parameters,
152: and fluorine abundances from individual F\,{\sc i} lines. The Sakurai's object, a final He-shell flash product, is also listed.}
153: \smallskip
154: \begin{center}
155: {\small
156: \begin{tabular}{llcccccr}
157: \tableline
158: \noalign{\smallskip}
159: Star & ($T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, $\xi$) & \multicolumn{6}{c}{log $\epsilon(\rm F)$}\\
160: \noalign{\smallskip}
161: \cline{3-8}
162: \noalign{\smallskip}
163: & & 7398.68\AA\ & 7754.69\AA\ & 6902.47\AA\ & 7425.64\AA\ & 6834.26\AA\ & Mean \\
164: \noalign{\smallskip}
165: \tableline
166: \noalign{\smallskip}
167: %\tablehead{
168: %\colhead{Star} & \colhead{($T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, $\xi$)} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{log $\epsilon(\rm F)$}\\
169: %\cline{3-8} \\
170: %\colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{7398.68\AA} & \colhead{7754.69\AA} & \colhead{6902.47\AA} & \colhead{7425.64\AA} & \colhead{6834.26\AA} & \colhead{Mean}}
171: %\colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}}
172: %\startdata
173: V3795\,Sgr & (8000, 1.0, 10.0) & ... & 6.60 & 6.65 & 6.70 & 6.70 & 6.66$\pm$0.05(4)\\
174: &&&&&&&\\
175: UW\,Cen & (7500, 1.0, 12.0) & 7.20 & ... & 7.00 & 7.10 & 7.20 & 7.1$\pm$0.1(4)\\
176: &&&&&&&\\
177: RY\,Sgr & (7250, 0.75, 6.0) & ... & ... & 6.80 & ... & 7.10 & 6.95$\pm$0.2(2) \\
178: &&&&&&&\\
179: XX\,Cam & (7250, 0.75, 9.0) & ... & ... & $<$5.6 & ... & $<$5.6 & $<$5.6 \\
180: &&&&&&&\\
181: UV\,Cas & (7250, 0.5, 7.0) & ... & ... & 6.20 & ... & ... & 6.2(1)\\
182: &&&&&&&\\
183: UX\,Ant & (7000, 0.5, 5.0) & ... & ... & $<$6.2 & ... & $<$6.2 & $<$6.2\\
184: &&&&&&&\\
185: VZ\,Sgr & (7000, 0.5, 8.0) & ... & ... & 6.30 & ... & 6.50 & 6.4$\pm$0.1(2)\\
186: &&&&&&&\\
187: R\,CrB & (6750, 0.5, 7.0) & ... & ... & 6.85 & ... & 7.00 & 6.9$\pm$0.1(2)\\
188: &&&&&&&\\
189: V2552\,Oph & (6750, 0.5, 7.0) & ... & ... & 6.60 & ... & ... & 6.6(1)\\
190: &&&&&&&\\
191: V854\,Cen & (6750, 0.0, 6.0) & ... & ... & ... & ... & $<$5.7 & $<$5.7\\
192: &&&&&&&\\
193: SU\,Tau & (6500, 0.5, 7.0) & ... & ... & 6.90 & ... & 7.00 & 6.95$\pm$0.1(2)\\
194: &&&&&&&\\
195: V\,CrA & (6500, 0.5, 7.0) & ... & ... & 6.5: & ... & ... & 6.5:(1)\\
196: &&&&&&&\\
197: V482\,Cyg & (6500, 0.5, 4.0) & ... & ... & ... & ... & 6.6: & 6.6:(1)\\
198: &&&&&&&\\
199: GU\,Sgr & (6250, 0.5, 7.0) & ... & ... & ... & ... & 7.2: & 7.2:(1)\\
200: &&&&&&&\\
201: FH\,Sct & (6250, 0.25, 6.0) & ... & ... & ... & ... & 7.2: & 7.2:(1)\\
202: &&&&&&&\\
203: Sakurai's object & (7500, 0.0, 8.0) & ... & ... & ... & ... & $<$5.4 & $<$5.4\\
204: &&&&&&&\\
205: \noalign{\smallskip}
206: \tableline
207: \end{tabular}
208: }
209: \end{center}
210: \end{table}
211: \end{landscape}
212:
213: \section{Discussion}
214:
215: The analyzed RCBs (excluding stars with upper limits to the F abundances and,
216: uncertain F abundances) have a mean F abundance of 6.7 which is the same
217: for the analyzed EHes \citep{pana2006}. Thus, the F abundances are similar across
218: an effective temperature range from about 6500 K to 14000 K, an indication
219: that non-LTE effects are possibly small.
220: The F abundances of the analyzed RCB and
221: EHe stars show no obvious trend with their abundances of other elements.
222: More interestingly, the F overabundances are extremely large:
223: enhancements of about 800, 2500, and 8000 at $\log\epsilon$(Fe)$ = 7.5$, 6.5, and 5.5,
224: respectively.
225:
226: \subsection{The DD Scenario and Fluorine}
227:
228: In the `cold' (i.e., no nucleosynthesis during the merger) version of the
229: DD scenario, the He white dwarf is stripped and accreted by the
230: C-O white dwarf. In the `hot' DD scenario, nucleosynthesis
231: occurs during and following accretion.
232: Fluorine in PG1159 stars shows a range of abundances \citep{werner2005,werner2006}
233: from solar to 250 times solar. As Werner \& Herwig discuss, this
234: range is not out of line with theoretical predictions for the He-intershell.
235: But in the cold DD scenario, the He-intershell material
236: is diluted, according to the canonical recipe, by a factor of about ten and,
237: then, overabundances of up to 25 times solar for the
238: RCBs and EHes are predicted. The observed overabundances of F range upward of 1000 times.
239: $^{19}$F synthesis is demonstrated by \citet{clay2007} which was briefly about 100 times
240: above its solar abundance. Challenge is to show that the `hot' DD scenario
241: includes the possibility of robustly increasing the F abundances to the observed
242: levels of 1000 times over solar.
243: %\subsection{} %%% Second level section head (remove "%" symbol)
244: %\subsubsection{} %%% Lowest level section head (remove "%" symbol)
245: %\section*{} %%% Unnumbered top level section head (remove "%" symbol)
246: %\subsection*{} %%% Unnumbered second level section head (remove "%" symbol)
247:
248:
249:
250: \acknowledgements %%% Text of acknowledgements runs on after this command.
251: GP thanks Klaus Werner, Thomas Rauch, the Organising committee, and IIA Bangalore
252: for all their support.
253:
254:
255: %%% THE BIBLIOGRAPHY
256: %%%
257: %%% CONSULT SECTION 3 OF "INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS" FOR HOW TO USE NATBIB.
258: %%% AUTHORS ARE ENCOURAGED TO USE EITHER THE "THEBIBLIOGRAPY" ENVIRONMENT
259: %%% BY UNCOMMENTING (DELETING THE "%" SYMBOL) THE COMMANDS BELOW, OR BY
260: %%% USING THE BIBTEX ENVIRONMENT. TO FIND OUT WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO YOUR
261: %%% CONTRIBUTION, CONSULT THE VOLUME EDITORS FOR YOUR PROCEEDINGS.
262: %%%
263:
264: \begin{thebibliography}{}
265: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2000)]{asp00} Asplund, M., Gustafsson, B., Lambert, D. L.,
266: \& Rao, N. K. 2000, \aap, 353, 287
267: \bibitem[Clayton et al.(2007)]{clay2007} Clayton, G. C., Geballe, T. R., Herwig, F., Fryer, C.,
268: \& Asplund, M. 2007, \apj, 662, 1220
269: \bibitem[Musielok et al.(1999)]{musie99} Musielok, J., Pawelec, E., Griesmann, U., \&
270: Wiese, W. L. 1999, \pra, 60, 947
271: \bibitem[Pandey et al.(2001)]{pan2001} Pandey, G., Rao, N. K., Lambert, D. L.,
272: Jeffery, C. S., \& Asplund, M. 2001, \mnras, 324, 937
273: \bibitem[Pandey et al.(2004)]{pan2004a} Pandey, G., Lambert, D. L., Rao, N. K.,
274: \& Jeffery, C. S. 2004, \apjl, 602, L113
275: \bibitem[Pandey et al.(2006)]{pan2006} Pandey, G., Lambert, D. L.,
276: Jeffery, C. S., \& Rao, N. K. 2006, \apj, 638, 454
277: \bibitem[Pandey(2006)]{pana2006} Pandey, G. 2006, \apjl, 648, L143
278: \bibitem[Rao(2005)]{rao2005} Rao, N. K. 2005, ASP Conf. Ser. 336, 185
279: \bibitem[Saio \& Jeffery(2002)]{saio02} Saio, H., \& Jeffery, C. S. 2002, \mnras, 333, 121
280: \bibitem[Tenenbaum et al.(2005)]{tenen2005} Tenenbaum, E. D., Clayton, G. C.,
281: Asplund, M., Engelbracht, C. W., Gordon, K. D., Hanson, M. M., Rudy, R. J.,
282: Lynch, D. K., Mazuk, S., Venturini, C. C., \& Puetter, R. C. 2005, \aj, 130, 256
283: \bibitem[Werner, Rauch \& Kruk(2005)]{werner2005} Werner, K., Rauch, T., \&
284: Kruk, J. W. 2005, \aap, 433, 641
285: \bibitem[Werner \& Herwig(2006)]{werner2006} Werner, K., \& Herwig, F. 2006,
286: \pasp, 118, 183
287: \bibitem[Zaniewski et al.(2005)]{zanie2005} Zaniewski, A., Clayton, G. C., Welch, D. L.,
288: Gordon, K. D., Minniti, D., \& Cook, K. H. 2005, \aj, 130, 2293
289: \end{thebibliography}
290:
291: \end{document}
292: