1: 

2: \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}

3: \usepackage{graphicx}

4: %\usepackage{cite}

5: %\usepackage{showkeys}

6: 

7: %Defining page heading where RCS-Id is written.

8: \pagestyle{myheadings}

9: 

10: %Defining some abbreviations

11: \renewcommand{\dj}{\hbox{d\hskip-1.1ex{\raise0.640ex\hbox{--}}\skip 0.70ex}}

12: \newcommand{\calQ}{\mathcal{Q}}

13: \newcommand{\calU}{\mathcal{U}}

14: \newcommand{\calD}{\mathcal{D}}

15: \newcommand{\calS}{\mathcal{S}}

16: \newcommand{\calL}{\mathcal{L}}

17: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1 |}

18: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{| #1 \rangle}

19: 

20: %

21: \newcommand{\lsim}[1]{

22: \setlength{\unitlength}{12pt}

23: \begin{picture}(1.4,1.)

24: \put(.7,-0.3){\makebox(0.0,1.)[t]{$<$}}

25: \put(.7,-0.3){\makebox(0.0,1.)[b]{$\sim$}}

26: \end{picture}#1}

27: %

28: 

29: 

30: \begin{document}

31: 

32: \thispagestyle{empty}

33: \begin{flushright}

34: % preprint number

35: \end{flushright}

36: 

37: %\end{flushleft}

38: 

39: %\vspace{1.0cm}

40: 

41: \begin{center}

42: 

43:   \begin{Large}

44: 

45:   \begin{bf}

46: 

47: %Unexpectedly small vector strangeness of nucleons

48: %rehabilitates a baryon model

49: 

50: Unexpectedly small empirical vector strangeness of nucleons

51: realized in a baryon model

52: 

53:   \end{bf}

54: 

55:   \end{Large}

56: 

57: \vspace{4mm}

58: 

59:   \begin{Large}

60: 

61: 

62: \center{D. Horvati\'c$^{1}$, D. Klabu\v{c}ar$^{2,\rm a,b,c}$ and D. Mekterovi\'{c}$^{3}$  }

63: 

64: \vspace{6mm}

65: 

66: {\footnotesize

67: 

68: {\small $^1$ Department of Physics, Faculty of

69: Science, University of Zagreb, \\ Bijeni\v cka c. 32, Zagreb,

70: Croatia    }

71: 

72: \vspace{0.2cm}

73: 

74: {\small $^2$ International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy }

75: 

76: \vspace{0.2cm}

77: 

78: %{\small $^2$ Permanent address: Department of Physics, Faculty of 

79: %Science, University of Zagreb, \\ Bijeni\v cka c. 32, HR-10000 Zagreb, 

80: %Croatia    }

81: %

82: %\vspace{0.2cm}

83: 

84: $^3$ Rudjer Bo\v{s}kovi\'{c} Institute,

85:          P.O. Box 180, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia \\ }

86: 

87: \vspace{0.2cm}

88: 

89: 

90: \end{Large}

91: 

92: \end{center}

93: 

94: \vspace{0.1cm}

95: \begin{center}

96:   {\bf Abstract}

97: \end{center}

98: \begin{quotation}

99: \noindent

100: 

101: \noindent

102: Most of model considerations of the hidden nucleon strangeness,

103: as well as some preliminary experimental evidence, led to the

104: expectations of relatively sizeable strange vector form factors

105: of the proton. For example, it seemed that the contribution of 

106: the fluctuating strange quark-antiquark pairs accounts for as 

107: much as one tenth of the proton's magnetic moment. 

108: By the same token, baryon models which failed to produce 

109: the ``vector strangeness" of the nucleon seemed disfavored.

110: Recently, however, more accurate measurements and more 

111: sophisticated data analysis, as well as lattice simulations,

112: revealed that the form factors associated with the vector 

113: strangeness of the nucleon are much smaller than thought 

114: previously; in fact, due to the experimental uncertainties,

115: the measured strange vector-current proton form factors

116: may be consistent with zero. In the light of that, we 

117: re-asses the merit of the baryon models leading to little 

118: or no vector strangeness of the nucleon. It is done on the 

119: concrete example of the baryon model which essentially 

120: amounts to the MIT bag enriched by the diluted instanton 

121: liquid.

122: 

123: \vspace{0.2cm}

124: 

125: %PACS numbers:  12.38.Lg, 14.20.--c

126: 

127: \end{quotation}

128: 

129: \vfill

130: 

131: ----------------------------------------

132: 

133: $^{\rm a}$ Corresponding author, e-mail: klabucar@phy.hr

134: 

135: $^{\rm b}$ Senior associate of the Abdus Salam ICTP

136: 

137: $^{\rm c}$ Permanent address: Department of Physics, Faculty of

138: Science, \\ \indent University of Zagreb, Bijeni\v cka c. 32, Zagreb,

139: Croatia

140: 

141: 

142: \newpage

143: 

144: \markright{$$\small

145: Unexpectedly small empirical vector strangeness of nucleons

146: realized in a baryon model

147: $$}

148: 

149: 

150: %\Large

151: 

152: \section{Introduction}

153: \label{INTRO}

154: 

155: The simple, ``naive" picture of hadrons, based on the models where 

156: only valence quarks are present, suffers a radical change when one 

157: takes into account the quantum field effects and consequently, the 

158: presence of the fluctuating virtual quark-antiquark ($q\bar q$) pairs. 

159: Indeed, the production of such fluctuating virtual pairs by 

160: interactions present in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) can be quite 

161: significant for the light quark flavors $q=u,d,s$.

162: 

163: The nucleon states, although they of course contain no {\it net} strangeness,

164: are thus expected to have also an intrinsic strangeness component due to 

165: fluctuating $s\bar s$ pairs. Precisely because nucleons have no valence 

166: strange ($s$) quarks, quantities originating from, or being influenced

167: by strange quarks, provide us with the information on the dynamics of 

168: virtual quarks within nucleons. 

169: 

170: A review of the issue of nucleon strangeness containing a very complete 

171: set of original references is for example Ref. \cite{28}, and for more

172: recent discussions of nucleon structure addressing also the nucleon 

173: strangeness issue, see for example 

174: Refs. \cite{Beck:2001yx,Ramsey-Musolf:2005rz,Thomas:2005qb}. 

175: 

176: Such considerations have led to the wide-spread belief that strange

177: quarks and antiquarks play a major role in protons and neutrons. 

178: For example, although estimates of such $s\bar s$ contributions to 

179: the nucleon mass vary between 100 to 300 MeV, they are in any case

180: very significant, between 10\% to 30\% of the nucleon mass.

181: However, the quantities related to the present considerations

182: are the proton magnetic moment and related electromagnetic form

183: factors of the proton, so now we turn to them.

184: 

185: 

186: \section{Strange form factors}

187: \label{FormFactors}

188: 

189: The Dirac and the Pauli strange vector form factors

190: (denoted by $F_{1}^{s}$ and $F_{2}^{s}$, respectively) of 

191: the nucleon ($N$) are defined through the matrix element of 

192: \begin{equation}

193: V_{\mu}^{s} = \bar{s}\gamma_{\mu}s \;,

194: \end{equation}

195: namely the vector current of $s$-quarks: 

196: \begin{equation}

197: \bra{N} V_{\mu}^{s} \ket{N} =

198: \bra{N}\bar{s}\gamma_{\mu}s\ket{N} = \bar{u}_{N}(p')

199: \left[ F_{1}^{s}(q^2)\gamma_{\mu} + F_{2}^{s}(q^2)

200: \frac{i\sigma_{\mu\nu} q^{\nu}} {2 M_{N}}\right]u_{N}(p) \;,

201: \label{f1f2}

202: \end{equation}

203: where $u_N$ is a nucleon spinor, $p'$ and $p$ are nucleon

204: momenta, and $q=p' - p$ is the transferred momentum.

205: 

206: Although $F_{1}^{s}(0)=0$, as it is the net nucleon strangeness, 

207: its momentum dependence determines the strangeness radius

208: \begin{equation}

209: r_{s}^{2}=6\frac{d}{dq^2}F_{1}^{s}(q^2)\Bigg|_{q^2=0} \;,

210: \end{equation}

211: while the strange magnetic moment is given by

212: \begin{equation}

213: \mu_{s}=F_{2}^{s}(0) \;.

214: \end{equation}

215: 

216: For comparison with experimental data, the (stran\-ge) Sachs form factors

217: $G^s_E$ (electric) and $G^s_M$ (magnetic) are widely used:

218: \begin{eqnarray}

219: G^s_E(q^2) &=& F^s_1(q^2) + \frac{q^2}{4 M_N^2} F^s_2(q^2) \;,\nonumber\\

220: G^s_M(q^2) &=& F^s_1(q^2) + F^s_2(q^2) \;.

221: \end{eqnarray}

222: Taking the non-relativistic nucleon spinor (of momentum $p$

223: and spin projection $\footnotesize\zeta$)

224: \begin{equation}

225: u_N(p,\zeta) = \sqrt{\frac{E+M_N}{2 E}} \left(

226: \begin{array}{c}

227: \chi_{\zeta} \\

228: \frac{\displaystyle{ \mbox{\boldmath$\sigma$} \cdot \vec{p}}}{

229: %\frac{\displaystyle{ \mbox{\vec{$\sigma$}} \cdot \vec{p}}}{

230: \displaystyle{E+m}} \chi_\zeta

231: \end{array}

232: \right)  \;,

233: \end{equation}

234: where $\chi_\zeta$ is a two-component Pauli spinor. 

235: Going to the Breit frame defined by

236: \begin{eqnarray}

237: q^{\mu} &=& (q^{0}, \vec{q} ) = (0,\vec{q}_B) \;, \nonumber\\

238: \vec{p} &=& \frac{ \vec{q}_{B}}{2}\; , \;

239: \vec{p}' = -\frac{ \vec{q}_{B}}{2} \;,

240: \end{eqnarray}

241: the components of the vector-current nucleon matrix elements

242: are expressed by Sachs form factors through the relations

243: \begin{eqnarray}

244: \langle N(p',\zeta')| V_0^s | N(p,\zeta)\rangle &=& \frac{m}{E}

245: \chi^{\dagger}_{\zeta'}\chi_\zeta G_{E}^{s}(-\vec{q}^2_B) \;, \\

246: \langle N(p',\zeta')| \vec{V}^s | N(p,\zeta)\rangle &=& \frac{1}{2 E}

247: \chi_{\zeta'}^{\dagger} i ( \mbox{\boldmath$\sigma$} \times \vec{q}_B)

248: \chi_\zeta G_{M}^{s}(-\vec{q}^2_B) \;.  

249: %\nonumber \\ \;.

250: \label{defGm}

251: \end{eqnarray}

252: 

253: 

254: \section{How we get vector strangeness}

255: \label{Evaluating}

256: 

257: In the recent past, numerous model and lattice calculations gave 

258: very differing results for such strangeness contributions. For

259: example, various results on the $s\bar s$ contribution $\mu_s$ to

260: the proton magnetic moment range from 0.003 to as high as 0.8 

261: nucleon magnetons ($\mu_N$) in absolute magnitude. What is more,

262: they differ among each other even up to a sign. (For overview 

263: and references, see Ref. \cite{Beck:2001yx}.)

264: 

265: 

266: Overall, majority of the model calculations of nucleon strangeness

267: led to the expectations of substantial strangeness contributions to 

268: the vector form factors and the magnetic moment of the nucleon. 

269: In contrast to that, the model introduced by Klabu\v car {\it et 

270: al.} \cite{Klabucar:1998pb} and elaborated in Refs.

271: \cite{Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx}, yields 

272: zero results for these strange quantities, although it reveals 

273: substantial scalar strangeness. This is in accord with the 

274: conjecture \cite{Zh97} that a non-trivial QCD-vacuum structure 

275: selects the pseudoscalar and scalar channels, which experience 

276: the axial and trace anomaly, respectively. However, in the light 

277: of the aforementioned prevalence of model results indicating 

278: that the vector strangeness of the proton is probably significant,

279: the vanishing vector strangeness obtained in the model of

280: Refs. \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu} seemed as a 

281: drawback, a weakness of that model. Thus, when the model was

282: further developed \cite{diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh}, the 

283: vector strangeness and its significance was not discussed,

284: it was hardly even mentioned. (Only the scalar strangeness for the 

285: improved model was discussed \cite{Klabucar:2003mh}, and at 

286: length.) 

287: 

288: 

289: Both in Refs. \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu} and 

290: Refs. \cite{diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh},

291: the model is essentially the MIT bag model enriched by the 

292: presence of a dilute instanton liquid

293: \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx},

294: so that it focuses on QCD-vacuum fluctuations as given by

295: the instanton-liquid model \cite{ShVZ80,DiP84,NoVZ89}. 

296: However, 

297: Refs. \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx} 

298: employed the so-called linearized approximation \cite{Klabucar:1994qf}, 

299: which implies freezing the baryon radii in their original MIT values.  

300: In Refs. \cite{diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh} this approximation 

301: was removed: the baryon bag radii were allowed to vary 

302: in the course of parameter fitting to the masses of the baryons 

303: from the ground state octet and decuplet. (The re-fitting was 

304: performed so that the radii had to satisfy the pressure-balance 

305: condition \cite{diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh}. For details of 

306: the re-fitting, see Ref. \cite{diplomskiDM}.)

307: 

308: In any case, in all Refs. 

309: \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx,diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh},

310: the instanton-induced interaction of the instanton-liquid 

311: model \cite{ShVZ80,DiP84,NoVZ89} produces QCD-vacuum fluctuations,

312: including presently interesting $s$-quark loops,

313: schematically shown in Fig. \ref{figb}.

314: Let us denote the corresponding Lagrangian density by $\calL_{I}$.

315: The instanton-induced interaction contains the one-, two-, and 

316: three-body operators (respectively denoted by $\calL_{1}$, 

317: $\calL_{2}$, and $\calL_{3}$ and given explicitly in 

318: Refs. \cite{Klabucar:1994qf,Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu}),

319: \begin{equation}

320: \calL_{I}=\calL_{1}+\calL_{2}+\calL_{3} \;.

321: \label{Linst}

322: \end{equation}

323: 

324: \begin{figure}

325: \centerline{\resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{strfigb.ps}}}

326: \caption{Instanton-induced local strangeness induced in the proton by

327: the effective one-, two- and three-body operators in the interaction

328: (\ref{Linst}), namely $\calL_{1}$, $\calL_{2}$, and $\calL_{3}$,

329: respectively. Non-strange quarks are denoted by solid lines, and

330: strange ones by dashed lines.\label{figb}}

331: \end{figure}

332: 

333: 

334: Fig. \ref{strfig1} shows how an external probe couples at

335: the vertex $\Gamma$ to such an $s$-quark loop produced

336: by $\calL_{I}$. Various couplings are possible:

337: $\Gamma=1, \gamma_{5}, \gamma_{\mu}$, $\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5}, 

338: \sigma_{\mu\nu}$, corresponding, respectively, to the scalar,

339: pseudoscalar, vector, axial vector, and tensor strangeness. 

340: 

341: 

342: \begin{figure}

343: \centerline{\resizebox{0.40\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{strfig1.ps}}}

344: \caption{A non-vanishing $s\bar s$ component of the nucleon state

345: found (at the moment $t=t_0$)

346: by the probe coupled at the vertex $\Gamma$ (denoted by $\times$).

347: More precisely, this graph is that part of the proton response which

348: arises only through one interaction ${\cal L}_I$. In the concrete case 

349: depicted in this figure, it is the two-body interaction $\calL_{2}$.

350: \label{strfig1}}

351: \end{figure}

352: 

353: The instanton-induced interaction (\ref{Linst}) contains 

354: the instanton density $n$ as an overall factor.

355: In the linearized approximation, the instanton density inside the 

356: bag was found \cite{Klabucar:1994qf,Klabucar:1998pb} to be very 

357: depleted with respect to its value in the nonperturbative QCD vacuum.

358: It is then a good approximation to keep only the first term in the 

359: perturbation series in the interaction $-\mathcal{L}_{I}$. Thus, the 

360: result of Ref. \cite{Klabucar:1998pb} for evaluating the 

361: nucleon-strangeness matrix element can be written as

362: \begin{eqnarray}

363: \lefteqn{\langle N | : \bar{s} \Gamma s : | N \rangle = 

364:  i \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}

365: dt' \; \langle N_0 | \hat{T} : \int d^3x } \nonumber \\

366: &\times& \bar{s}( \vec{x}, t_0) \Gamma s ( \vec{x}, t_0):

367:   \; :\! \int d^3 y\: \mathcal{L}_{I}

368: ( \vec{y}, t'): | N_0 \rangle \;,

369: \label{inststran}

370: \end{eqnarray}

371: where $:...:$ denotes the normal ordering, and $| N_0 \rangle$

372: is the model nucleon ground state composed of the non-strange 

373: valence quarks only. Note that $s(\vec{x},t)$ denotes the 

374: strange quark field. In our model calculation, for any quark

375: flavor $q$ (and we are now interested only in the light flavors,

376: $q=u,d,s$), we expand the quark fields $q(\vec{x}, t)$ in 

377: an appropriate wave-function basis $\{ q_{K} \}$

378: in terms of creation

379: (${\cal U}^\dagger_{K}, {\cal D}^\dagger_{K}, {\cal S}^\dagger_{K}$)

380: and annihilation (${\cal U}_{K}, {\cal D}_{K},{\cal S}_{K}$) 

381: operators of {\it dressed} quarks and antiquarks:

382: \begin{equation}

383: q(\vec{x}, t)=\sum_K \left[ \calQ_K\, q_{K}({\vec{x}})e^{-i\omega_K t} +

384:   \calQ^{c^\dagger}_K\, q_{K}^{c} ({\vec{x}})e^{ i\omega_K t}

385:         \right] \;.

386: \label{expandq}

387: \end{equation}

388: Here, $q_{K}(\vec{r})$ denotes a model wave function of a quark 

389: of flavour $q$, where $K$ stands for the set of quantum numbers 

390: labeling a model quark state.  

391: 

392: 

393: As already said, for concrete evaluations of a nucleon-strangeness 

394: matrix element (\ref{inststran}), Refs.

395: \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx,diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh}

396: chose to employ the MIT bag model. With this choice, $q_{K}(\vec{r})$ 

397: is the solution for the quark in the $K$-th mode of the MIT bag.

398: For the wavefunctions and other details of the model calculations, 

399: see especially Ref. \cite{Klabucar:2000gu}.

400: 

401: 

402: For a concrete evaluation of a nucleon-strangeness matrix element 

403: (\ref{inststran}), one should also specify the pertinent tensor 

404: structure of the vertex $\Gamma$ -- i.e., which kind of nucleon 

405: strangeness one wants to evaluate.  The presently relevant case is 

406: $\Gamma=\gamma_{\mu}$, i.e., the case of the ``vector strangeness"

407: of the proton, as we are interested in the form factors of the 

408: vector current -- see Eq. (\ref{f1f2}). 

409: 

410: 

411: In order to calculate the contribution of the instanton-induced vector strange 

412: current inside the MIT bag, we have to identify the form factors in 

413: (\ref{defGm}) with the Fourier-transformed vector current within the bag:

414: \begin{eqnarray}

415: \lefteqn{\langle N(p')|: V_{\mu}^{s}:| N(p) 

416: \rangle  } \nonumber \\

417: & = & \langle N(p')|: \! \int d^3 r\: e^{-i \vec{q}_B\cdot 

418: \vec{r} } \bar{s}(\vec{r})

419: \gamma_{\mu} s(\vec{r}): |N(p)\rangle,

420: \end{eqnarray}

421: using the static limit $q \rightarrow 0$. From the $V^s_0$

422: component of the vector current, the electric Sachs form factor

423: $G_{E}^{s}(q^2=0)= 0$ (in the leading order) 

424: in the original model employing linearized approximation

425: \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx},

426: since $\langle N(p')|: V_{0}^{s}:| N(p)\rangle$ evaluated 

427: through Eq. (\ref{inststran}) vanishes identically in the 

428: original model. 

429: Also, the calculation for the space components $\vec{V}^s$ 

430: yields the vanishing magnetic form factor, $G_M^s(0) = 0$.

431: This implies the vanishing strange magnetic moment

432: \begin{equation}

433: \mu_{s}=F_{2}^{s}(0) = 0 \;,

434: \label{mus}

435: \end{equation}

436: 

437: 

438: Now we want to point out that this vanishing of 

439: $G_{E}^{s}(q^2=0)$ still holds in the improved 

440: version of the model \cite{diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh} 

441: not employing linearized approximation, which can be 

442: seen easily in the evaluation of Eq. (\ref{inststran}). 

443: Obtaining the vanishing of $G_M^s(0)$ or, equivalently, 

444: $\mu_{s}=0$, is not so trivial in the explicit calculation, 

445: as it happens due to

446: a subtle cancellation among the contributions of quarks

447: in the loop with different spin orientations (and the

448: calculation requires careful handling of mode sums 

449: resulting from Eqs. (\ref{inststran}) and (\ref{expandq})

450: -- see. Eq. (28) in Ref. \cite{Klabucar:1998pb}). In any 

451: case, one can get some non-vanishing vector strangeness 

452: only from higher orders in the instanton-induced interaction.

453: However, such contributions would be very small and could 

454: be neglected in deriving Eq. (\ref{inststran}) if the 

455: instanton density allowed inside the bag is sufficiently 

456: low, and this was certainly the case in the linearized 

457: approximation \cite{Klabucar:1998pb}.

458:  

459: In retrospect, one should note that such a result of the 

460: explicit model evaluation is expected in any model on general

461: grounds, since there is the qualitative mechanism of the 

462: suppression of the violation of the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka 

463: rule in the vector channel \cite{Geshkenbein:1979vb}.

464: It is due to the spin structure in the 'tHooft's single

465: instanton-induced quark interaction.

466: On the model level, 

467: %the unchanged result for the 

468: %expression (\ref{inststran}) is what one might

469: %expect, since 

470: removing the linearized approximation

471: amounts (in the sense of implications on re-fitting

472: the bag model parameters) to allowing the bag radii

473: to vary freely, which cannot upset the

474: aforementioned cancellation in Eq. (\ref{inststran}). 

475: However, removing the

476: linearized approximation also led \cite{Klabucar:2003mh}

477: to much larger values of the instanton density inside

478: the MIT bag than before, in Ref. \cite{Klabucar:1998pb}).

479: The question then arises whether Eq. (\ref{inststran})

480: remains a good approximation, i.e., whether one can 

481: still consider the second and higher order terms in 

482: the instanton-induced interaction as negligibly small.

483: 

484: %The instanton density allowed inside the MIT bag

485: %in the case of the linearized approximation was 

486: %found \cite{Klabucar:1998pb} to be just 

487: %$n = 0.266 · 10^{−4}$ GeV$^{4}$. 

488: 

489: Without the linearized approximation, 

490: Ref. \cite{Klabucar:2003mh} obtained solutions where the 

491: densities $n$ inside the bag are an order of magnitude 

492: larger than in the linearized approximation, where it 

493: was found \cite{Klabucar:1998pb} to be just 

494: $n = 0.266 \cdot 10^{-4}$ GeV$^{4}$.  Nevertheless, for all 

495: acceptable phenomenological fits without the linearized 

496: approximation, Ref. \cite{Klabucar:2003mh} found that 

497: instanton densities possible inside the MIT bag, are still 

498: appreciably lower (at least by the factor of 3 or more) 

499: than $n_0$, the usual non-perturbative vacuum instanton 

500: density in the non-perturbative vacuum, where 

501: $n_0 \approx 1 $ fm$^{-4}$ $= 1.6 \cdot 10^{-−3}$ GeV$^{4}$.

502: Thus, is still justified to neglect the higher order instanton 

503: contributions and adopt the first order approximation 

504: (\ref{inststran}).

505: (It should be noted that Ref. \cite{Kochelev:1985de} 

506: also estimated it could neglect higher orders in the 

507: instanton-induced interaction, although it used the 

508: full, non-depleted value of the instanton density, 

509: i.e., $n_0$, the instanton density appropriate for the 

510: non-perturbative QCD vacuum, in a part of the bag volume.)

511: 

512:  

513: 

514: \section{Discussion and conclusion}

515: \label{Conclusion}

516: 

517: At the time of publication of Ref. \cite{Klabucar:1998pb},

518: such results on vector strangeness seemed compatible with

519: the experimental results \cite{Mu97,An99} available then.

520: However, since that time, not only other theoretical 

521: considerations, but, more importantly, preliminary 

522: announcements of more precise experimental results seemed, 

523: for a while, to point out that vector strangeness is rather 

524: large and that our approach is not suitable for treating it.

525: The strange form factors and magnetic moment were therefore 

526: not considered in the improved version of the model beyond the 

527: linearized approximation \cite{diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh}.

528: Such situation with the strange vector form factors seemed

529: confirmed when the G0 collaboration, performing high-precision

530: measurement at Jefferson Lab, announced large 

531: positive results for the magnetic form factor (over substantial

532: range of momentum transfers, $0.12\leq Q^2 \leq 1.0$ GeV$^2$)

533: \cite{Armstrong:2005hs}.

534: 

535: 

536: More recent developments, however, took a surprising turn.

537: One may first note the recent lattice results which 

538: differ from the quoted G0 results even by the sign

539: ($G_M^s = (-0.046 \pm 0.022) \mu_N$ 

540: \cite{Leinweber:2004tc,Thomas:2006jf}). 

541: The most notable are of course the experimental results of the 

542: nucleon strange form factors,

543: also obtained at Jefferson Lab but by HAPPEX collaboration,

544: which show that the electric form factor essentially 

545: vanishes: $G_E^s(Q^2=0.1\, {\rm GeV}^2) = -0.01 \pm 0.03$

546: \cite{Aniol:2005zf,Aniol:2005zg}. This is in excellent 

547: agreement \cite{Thomas:2006jf} with the lattice results 

548: \cite{Leinweber:2006ug}

549: also essentially showing the vanishing of the same quantity, 

550: obtained by the same method as $G_M^s$ \cite{Leinweber:2004tc}. 

551: Careful analyses of the methods of extracting individual

552: form factors revealed that it was difficult to perform an 

553: experimental separation of the individual form factors, and 

554: that it was not always clear what had been measured and what 

555: the role of theoretical input had been \cite{Thomas:2006jf}.

556: The proper insight has finally been gained by unifying all

557: pertinent world data, which means the results of SAMPLE 

558: \cite{Spayde:2003nr}, A4 \cite{Maas:2004ta,A4nemaNaQspires},

559: G0 \cite{Armstrong:2005hs} and HAPPEX 

560: \cite{Aniol:2005zf,Aniol:2005zg} collaborations,

561:  and by {\it joint analysis} of various form

562: factors. For our present purposes, the most illustrative

563: is Fig. 2 from Ref. \cite{Aniol:2005zg}, showing the 

564: data on $G_E^s$ and $G_M^s$ from SAMPLE, A4, G0 and HAPPEX

565: collaborations (along with some theoretical predictions).

566: In that plot, the ellipse shows the 95\% confidence level

567: for the possible values of $G_E^s$ and $G_M^s$ and indicates 

568: that the vector strangeness is not that large as people 

569: came to think previously. The best fit values are 

570: $G_E^s = -0.01 \pm 0.03$, which is perfectly consistent

571: with zero, and $G_M^s = (+0.55 \pm 0.28) \mu_N$. 

572: While this fit thus favors nonzero values for $G_M^s$, 

573: we should note {\it i)} the

574: suspicious sign difference with respect to the lattice 

575: results for $G_M^s$ \cite{Leinweber:2004tc,Thomas:2006jf},

576: and {\it ii)} that the value  $G_M^s = 0$ is still allowed

577: at the 95\% confidence level. 

578: 

579: 

580: In conclusion, we have shown how the improved version

581: \cite{diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh} of the model 

582: \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx}

583: which we used to study various aspects of the hidden 

584: nucleon strangeness, also yields the zero vector

585: strangeness of the nucleon, namely the vanishing 

586: form factors $G_E^s$ and $G_M^s$ of the nucleons. 

587: While until recently this was considered wrong and 

588: an unpleasant artefact of the model, more precise 

589: measurements and more sophisticated data analysis,

590: along with lattice QCD simulations, now show that 

591: such a vanishing vector strangeness may well be 

592: genuine, or at least that it is a good approximation.

593: This simple model in the both variants

594: \cite{Klabucar:1998pb,Klabucar:2000gu,Klabucar:2000rx,diplomskiDM,Klabucar:2003mh}

595: in the end turned out to be more physical than many

596: very sophisticated models designed to produce

597: a large vector strangeness of the nucleon.

598: 

599: 

600: 

601: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

602: 

603: \section*{Acknowledgments}

604: \noindent

605: D. Klabu\v car acknowledges the hospitality of the Abdus Salam ICTP in Trieste.

606: 

607: 

608: 

609: \newpage

610: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

611: 

612: \bibitem{28} R. Decker, M. Nowakowski, U. Wiedner,

613:                        Fort. Phys. {\bf 41}, 87 (1993) 87.

614: 

615: 

616: %\cite{Beck:2001yx}

617: \bibitem{Beck:2001yx}

618:   D.~H.~Beck and R.~D.~McKeown,

619:   %``Parity-violating electron scattering and nucleon structure,''

620:   Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\  {\bf 51} (2001) 189.

621: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0102334].

622:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102334;%%

623: 

624: 

625: 

626: %\cite{Ramsey-Musolf:2005rz}

627: \bibitem{Ramsey-Musolf:2005rz}

628:   M.~J.~Ramsey-Musolf,

629:   %``Parity-violation with electrons: Theoretical perspectives,''

630:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A {\bf 24S2} (2005) 197.

631: %  [arXiv:nucl-th/0501023].

632:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0501023;%%

633: 

634: 

635: %\cite{Thomas:2005qb}

636: \bibitem{Thomas:2005qb}

637:   A.~W.~Thomas, R.~D.~Young and D.~B.~Leinweber,

638:   %``Hadron structure on the back of an envelope,''

639:   arXiv:nucl-th/0509082.

640:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0509082;%%

641: 

642: 

643: %\cite{Klabucar:1998pb}

644: \bibitem{Klabucar:1998pb}

645:   D.~Klabu\v car, K.~Kumeri\v cki, B.~Meli\'c and I.~Picek,

646:   %``On the instanton-induced portion of the nucleon strangeness,''

647:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\  C {\bf 9} (1999) 589.

648: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/9807357].

649:   %%CITATION = EPHJA,C9,589;%%

650: 

651: %\cite{Klabucar:2000gu}

652: \bibitem{Klabucar:2000gu}

653:   D.~Klabu\v car, K.~Kumeri\v cki, B.~Meli\'c and I.~Picek,

654:   %``Nucleon strangeness as the response to a strangeness-sensitive

655:   %probe in a class of hadron models,''

656:   Fizika B {\bf 8} (1999) 505.

657: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0004054].

658:   %%CITATION = FZKAA,B8,505;%%

659: 

660: %\cite{Klabucar:2000rx}

661: \bibitem{Klabucar:2000rx}

662:   D.~Klabu\v car, K.~Kumeri\v cki, I.~Picek and B.~Meli\'c,

663:   %``Proton Strangeness Induced By Instantons,''

664:   Czech.\ J.\ Phys.\  {\bf 50S1} (2000) 187.

665:   %%CITATION = CZYPA,50S1,187;%%

666: 

667: \bibitem{Zh97}

668: A.~R. Zhitnitsky, Phys. Rev. {\bf D55} (1997) 3006.

669: 

670: %\bibitem{diplomskiDM}

671: %Mekterovi\'c, Darko,

672: %``Instantoni i spektar masa bariona u MIT modelu vre\'ce", diplomski rad,

673: %Prirodoslovno-matemati\v cki fakultet Sveu\v{c}ili\v{s}ta u Zagrebu,

674: %listopad 2001, voditelj Dubravko Klabu\v car.

675: 

676: \bibitem{diplomskiDM}

677: D. Mekterovi\'c,

678: ``Instantons and baryon mass spectrum in the MIT bag model",

679: diploma thesis (in Croatian), Physics Department, Faculty of Science, 

680: University of Zagreb, August 2001, thesis advisor Dubravko Klabu\v car.

681: 

682: 

683: %\cite{Klabucar:2003mh}

684: \bibitem{Klabucar:2003mh}

685:   D.~Klabu\v car, K.~Kumeri\v cki, D.~Mekterovi\'c and B.~Podobnik,

686:   %``On the instanton-induced portion of the nucleon strangeness. II: The  MIT

687:   %model beyond the linearized approximation,''

688:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\  C {\bf 29} (2003) 71.

689: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0304083].

690:   %%CITATION = EPHJA,C29,71;%%

691: 

692: 

693: \bibitem{ShVZ80}

694: M.~A. Shifman, A.~I. Vainshtein and V.~I. Zakharov, 

695:                     Nucl. Phys. {\bf B163} (1980) 46.

696: 

697: 

698: \bibitem{DiP84}

699: D.~I. Diakonov and V.~Y. Petrov, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B245} (1984) 259.

700: 

701: 

702: \bibitem{NoVZ89}

703: M.~A. Nowak, J.~J.~M. Verbaarschot and I.~Zahed, 

704:                      Nucl. Phys. {\bf B324} (1989) 1.

705: 

706: 

707: %\cite{Klabucar:1994qf}

708: \bibitem{Klabucar:1994qf}

709:   D.~Klabu\v car,

710:   %``Instantons and baryon mass splittings in the MIT bag model,''

711:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 49} (1994) 1506.

712: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/9312344].

713:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,1506;%%

714: 

715: 

716: %\cite{Geshkenbein:1979vb}

717: \bibitem{Geshkenbein:1979vb}

718:   B.~V.~Geshkenbein and B.~L.~Ioffe,

719:   %``The Role Of Instantons In Generation Of Mesonic Mass Spectrum,''

720:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 166} (1980) 340.

721:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B166,340;%%

722: 

723: 

724: %\cite{Kochelev:1985de}

725: \bibitem{Kochelev:1985de}

726:   N.~I.~Kochelev,

727:   %``Role Of Instantons In Formation Of Hadron Mass Spectrum,''

728:   Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 41} (1985) 291

729:   [Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 41} (1985) 456].

730:   %%CITATION = YAFIA,41,456;%%

731: 

732: 

733: \bibitem{Mu97}

734: B.~Mueller et~al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} (1997) 3824.

735: 

736: \bibitem{An99}

737: K.~A. Aniol et~al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82} (1999) 1096.

738: 

739: 

740: %\cite{Armstrong:2005hs}

741: \bibitem{Armstrong:2005hs}

742:   D.~S.~Armstrong {\it et al.}  [G0 Collaboration],

743:   %``Strange quark contributions to parity-violating asymmetries in the  forward

744:   %G0 electron proton scattering experiment,''

745:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 95} (2005) 092001.

746: %  [arXiv:nucl-ex/0506021].

747:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,95,092001;%%

748: 

749: 

750: %\cite{Leinweber:2004tc}

751: \bibitem{Leinweber:2004tc}

752:   D.~B.~Leinweber {\it et al.},

753:   %``Precise determination of the strangeness magnetic moment of the  nucleon,''

754:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 94} (2005) 212001.

755: %  [arXiv:hep-lat/0406002].

756:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,94,212001;%%

757: 

758: 

759: %\cite{Thomas:2006jf}

760: \bibitem{Thomas:2006jf}

761:   A.~W.~Thomas and R.~D.~Young,

762:   %``Recent Developments Concerning the Role of Strangeness in the Nucleon,''

763:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  A {\bf 782} (2007) 1.

764:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,A782,1;%%

765: 

766: %\cite{Aniol:2005zf}

767: \bibitem{Aniol:2005zf}

768:   K.~A.~Aniol {\it et al.}  [HAPPEX Collaboration],

769:   %``Parity-violating electron scattering from He-4 and the strange electric

770:   %form factor of the nucleon,''

771:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 96} (2006) 022003.

772: %  [arXiv:nucl-ex/0506010].

773:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0506010;%%

774: 

775: 

776: %\cite{Aniol:2005zg}

777: \bibitem{Aniol:2005zg}

778:   K.~A.~Aniol {\it et al.}  [HAPPEX Collaboration],

779:   %``Constraints on the nucleon strange form factors at Q**2 approx.

780:   %0.1-GeV**2,''

781:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 635} (2006) 275.

782: %  [arXiv:nucl-ex/0506011].

783:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0506011;%%

784: 

785: 

786: 

787: %\cite{Leinweber:2006ug}

788: \bibitem{Leinweber:2006ug}

789:   D.~B.~Leinweber {\it et al.},

790:   %``Strange electric form factor of the proton,''

791:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 97} (2006) 022001.

792: %  [arXiv:hep-lat/0601025].

793:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,97,022001;%%

794: 

795: 

796: %\cite{Spayde:2003nr}

797: \bibitem{Spayde:2003nr}

798:   D.~T.~Spayde {\it et al.}  [SAMPLE Collaboration],

799:   %``The strange quark contribution to the proton's magnetic moment,''

800:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 583} (2004) 79.

801: %  [arXiv:nucl-ex/0312016].

802:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B583,79;%%

803: 

804: %\cite{Maas:2004ta}

805: \bibitem{Maas:2004ta}

806:   F.~E.~Maas {\it et al.}  [A4 Collaboration],

807:   %``Measurement of strange quark contributions to the nucleon's form  factors

808:   %at Q**2 = 0.230-(GeV/c)**2,''

809:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 93} (2004) 022002.

810: %  [arXiv:nucl-ex/0401019].

811:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,93,022002;%%

812: 

813: \bibitem{A4nemaNaQspires}

814: F.~E.~Maas {\it et al.}  [A4 Collaboration], 

815: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 94} (2005) 152001.

816: 

817: \end{thebibliography}

818: 

819: 

820: \end{document}

821: 

822:                         

823: