1: %20/11/07 barbara
2: %02/10/07 rtr mostly small changes in language
3: %18/09/07 Ema: sistemate referenze
4: %14/09/07 frf & barbara
5: %13/09/07 barbara "
6: %15/08/07 mss5 rtr GP comments, no proper motion membership
7: %27/07/07 rtr abstract, EHB, & BSS conclusions
8: %27/07/07 few comments and changes
9: %26/07/07: rtr
10: %06/07/07: Emanuele
11: %-------------------------------------------------------
12: % modulo di distanza (calcolato qua): (m-M)_0=15.6 ==> dist=13.18 Kpc
13: % best-fit mono-mass King core radius: 7.2 arcsec
14: % ==> core radius in pc: 0.46 pc
15: %-------------------------------------------------------
16: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
17: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
18: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,apjfonts,epsf,versioncopy]{article}
19: \def\versionnumber{2} % <-- here the version number
20: %
21: \newcommand{\gras}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
22: \def\rtrcom#1{{\bf RTR: #1}}
23: \def\teff{\ensuremath{T_{\rm eff}}}
24: \def\etal{{et al.~}}
25: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
26: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
27: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
28: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
29: \def\lapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}
30: \def\gapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{>}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}
31: \newdimen\minuswidth %define @ width of minus sign for tables
32: \setbox0=\hbox{$-$}
33: \minuswidth=\wd0
34: \catcode`@=\active
35: \def@{\kern\minuswidth}
36: %\newdimen\digitwidth %define ! a one digit width for tables
37: \setbox0=\hbox{\rm0}
38: %\digitwidth=\wd0
39: %\catcode`!=\active
40: %\def!{\kern\digitwidth}
41:
42: \shorttitle{Blue Stragglers in NGC6388}
43: \shortauthors{Dalessandro et al.}
44:
45: \begin{document}
46: \title{Blue Straggler Stars in the Unusual Globular Cluster NGC~6388\footnote{Based on observations with the NASA/ESA {\it HST}, obtained at the
47: Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under
48: NASA contract NAS5-26555. Also based on WFI observations collected
49: at the European Southern Observatory, La Silla, Chile.}}
50:
51: \author{
52: %
53: E. Dalessandro\altaffilmark{1,2},
54: %
55: B. Lanzoni\altaffilmark{1},
56: %
57: F.R. Ferraro\altaffilmark{1},
58: %
59: R.T. Rood\altaffilmark{3},
60: %
61: A. Milone\altaffilmark{4},
62: %
63: G. Piotto\altaffilmark{4}.
64: %
65: E. Valenti\altaffilmark{5}
66: }
67: %
68: \affil{\altaffilmark{1} Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a degli Studi
69: di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I--40127 Bologna, Italy}
70: %
71: \affil{\altaffilmark{2} ASI,Centro di Geodesia Spaziale, contrada Terlecchia,
72: I-75100, Matera, Italy }
73: %
74: \affil{\altaffilmark{3} Astronomy Department, University of Virginia,
75: P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA, 22904}
76: %
77: \affil{\altaffilmark{4} Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a degli Studi
78: di Padova, vic. Osservatorio 2, I--35122 Padova, Italy}
79: %
80: \affil{\altaffilmark{5} European Southern Observatory,
81: Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile}
82: %
83: \date{2 October, 07}
84:
85: \begin{abstract}
86:
87: We have used multi-band high resolution {\it HST} WFPC2 and ACS
88: observations combined with wide field ground-based observations to
89: study the blue straggler star (BSS) population in the galactic
90: globular cluster NGC~6388. As in several other clusters we have
91: studied, the BSS distribution is found to be bimodal: highly peaked in
92: the cluster center, rapidly decreasing at intermediate radii, and
93: rising again at larger radii. In other clusters the sparsely populated
94: intermediate-radius region (or ``zone of avoidance'') corresponds well
95: to that part of the cluster where dynamical friction would have caused
96: the more massive BSS or their binary progenitors to settle to the
97: cluster center. Instead, in NGC~6388, BSS still populate a region
98: that should have been cleaned out by dynamical friction effects, thus
99: suggesting that dynamical friction is somehow less efficient than
100: expected. As by-product of these observations, the peculiar
101: morphology of the horizontal branch (HB) is also confirmed. In
102: particular, within the (very extended) blue portion of the HB we are
103: able to clearly characterize three sub-populations: ordinary blue HB
104: stars, extreme HB stars, and blue hook stars. Each of these
105: populations has a radial distribution which is indistinguishable from
106: normal cluster stars.
107:
108: \end{abstract}
109:
110: \keywords{Globular clusters: individual (NGC6388); stars: evolution --
111: Horizontal Branch - binaries:
112: general - blue stragglers}
113:
114: \section{INTRODUCTION}
115:
116: The present work is a continuation of a series of papers exploring the
117: interplay of dynamics and stellar evolution in Galactic globular clusters
118: (GCs), through the detailed study of their peculiar stellar populations. To
119: date we have primarily focused on Blue Straggler Stars (BSS). BSS are
120: brighter and hotter than the Main Sequence (MS) Turnoff (TO) and are thought
121: to form by the evolution of primordial binaries and/or by the effect of
122: stellar dynamical interactions. They are most abundant in the central regions
123: of GGCs, which are usually very congested in the optical bands, but
124: relatively open in the UV. To fully understand the role of dynamics one must
125: track how the population of BSS (or any other population arising from binary
126: evolution or stellar interactions) varies over the entire radial extent of
127: the cluster. The results of the earlier papers in the series are summarized
128: in Table~\ref{tab:papers}.
129:
130: Of the clusters we have explored so far NGC~6388 is perhaps the strangest. As
131: shown for the first time by Rich et al. (1997), this bulge cluster has an
132: extended blue Horizontal-Branch (HB), despite its high metal content
133: \citep[${\rm [Fe/H]}=-0.44$;][]{carretta07}. Such an HB morphology is
134: contrary to expectations: metal-poor clusters usually have predominantly blue
135: HBs, while metal-rich clusters have stubby red HBs. NGC~6388 is a vivid
136: example of the so-called second-parameter phenomenon \citep[see,
137: e.g.,][]{swcat98, catelan06}. Moreover, hints for the presence of an
138: intemediate mass black hole (IMBH) at the center of NGC~6388 have been
139: recently inferred from the observed surface brightness profile (which shows a
140: deviation from a flat core behavior in the inner $\sim 1\arcsec$) and from
141: detailed dynamical modeling \citep{miocchi07, lan07bh}. More robust
142: evidence (through kinematics, X-ray and/or radio observations) is
143: needed to confirm this finding.
144:
145: In this paper we present multi-wavelength observations of NGC~6388. We have
146: combined high-resolution ultraviolet (UV) and optical images of the cluster
147: center obtained with {\it HST}, with complementary wide-field observations
148: from the ground, covering the entire cluster extension. The data and
149: photometric reductions are described in \S~\ref{sec:data}. A general
150: overview of the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) is discussed in
151: \S~\ref{sec:cmd}. The BSS population is described in \S~\ref{sec:BSS}, and
152: the Discussion is presented in \S~\ref{sec:discus}.
153:
154: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS}
155: \label{sec:data}
156:
157: \subsection{The data sets}
158: We have used a combination of high-resolution and wide-field photometric data
159: sets:
160:
161: {\it 1. The High resolution set} consists of a series of public multiband
162: (from the UV, to the optical) WFPC2 and ACS {\it HST} images, which have been
163: retrieved from the ESO/ST-ECF Science Archive. The WFPC2 images were
164: obtained through filters $F255W$ (mid-UV) and $F336W$ ($U$), with total
165: exposure times ($t_{\rm exp}$) of 9200 and 1060 s, respectively (Prop. 8718,
166: P.I. Piotto), and trough filters $F439W$ ($B$) and $F555W$ ($V$), with
167: $t_{\rm exp}= 370$ and 62 s, respectively (Prop. 6095, P.I. Djorgovski).
168: This combined dataset allows us to examine both the hot (HB and BSS) and the
169: cool (red giant branch and subgiant branch, RGB and SGB, hereafter) stellar
170: populations in the cluster. In this dataset the planetary camera (PC, with
171: the highest resolution of $\sim 0\farcs{046}\,{\rm pixel}^{-1}$) was roughly
172: centered on the cluster center, while the wide field cameras (WFCs, at a
173: lower resolution of $\sim 0\farcs{1}\,{\rm pixel}^{-1}$) sampled the
174: surrounding outer regions. The photometric reduction of these images was
175: performed using ROMAFOT (Buonanno at al. 1983), a package developed to
176: perform accurate photometry in crowded regions and specifically optimized to
177: handle under-sampled Point Spread Functions (PSFs; Buonanno \& Iannicola
178: 1989), as in the case of the WF chips.
179: %
180: The ACS dataset is composed of a series of images (Prop. 9821, P.I. Pritzl)
181: obtained through filters $F435W$ ($B$) and $F606W$ ($V$), with $t_{\rm
182: exp}=11$ and 7\,s, respectively. It gives complete coverage of the central
183: cluster region out to $110\arcsec$ from the center (see the following
184: section). All the ACS images were corrected for geometric distortions and
185: effective flux (Sirianni et al. 2005). The photometric analysis was performed
186: independently in the two images by using the the aperture photometry code
187: SExtractor (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996) and adopting an aperture radius of
188: 3~pixels (corresponding to 0\farcs15).
189:
190: {\it 2. The Wide field set} is a complementary set of public $B$ and $V$
191: images obtained with the Wide Field Imager (WFI) mounted at the 2.2m ESO-MPI
192: telescope at La Silla ESO-Observatory and retrieved from the ESO
193: Science Archive. The WFI is a mosaic of 8-CCD chips, each of $2000\times
194: 4000$ pixels, with a pixel size of $\sim 0\farcs24$. It has exceptional
195: image capability, with a global field of view (FoV) of $33\arcmin\times
196: 34\arcmin$. Thanks to such a FoV, this dataset covers the entire cluster
197: extension with the cluster roughly centered on the CCD \#7. The WFI images
198: have been corrected for flatness, bias and overscan using IRAF tools. The PSF
199: fitting was performed independently on each image using DAOPHOT \citep{dao}.
200:
201: \subsection{Astrometry, Photometric Calibration, and Sample Definition}
202: Using the procedure described in Ferraro et al. (2001, 2003) the WFI
203: catalogue has been placed on the absolute astrometric system. The 8 WFI CCDs
204: have been astrometrized by cross-correlating each of them with the new
205: astrometric 2-MASS catalogue using a specific tool developed at Bologna
206: Observatory. Several hundred astrometric reference stars were found in each
207: WFI chip, thus allowing an accurate absolute positioning of the sources. As
208: a second step, a few hundred stars in the overlapping area between the WFI,
209: and the WFPC2 and ACS FoVs were used as secondary astrometric standards, in
210: order to place the {\it HST} catalogs on the absolute astrometric system. At
211: the end of the procedure the rms residuals (that we take as representative of
212: the astrometric accuracy) were of the order of $\sim 0\farcs 3$ both in RA
213: and Dec.
214:
215: By using the procedure described in Ferraro et al. (1997, 2001), the
216: photometric calibration of the UV magnitudes ($F255W$ and $F336W$) has
217: been performed in the STMAG system, adopting the \citet{holtz95}
218: zero-points. The optical ($B$ and $V$) magnitudes have been
219: transformed to the Johnson system by using the stars in common with
220: the catalog of \citet{pio02}. Linear transformations were adopted,
221: and only small color equation terms were required to correct the
222: response of the different filter profiles.
223:
224: Final lists with the absolute coordinates and homogeneous magnitudes for all
225: the stars in the three considered catalogs were obtained. To minimize
226: incompleteness effects in the ground based observations of the crowded
227: central regions of the cluster, while still taking advantage of the superior
228: capability of UV observations in detecting the BSS (Ferraro et al 1999a,
229: 2001), we divided the dataset in two main samples: The {\it HST sample},
230: includes only stars in the WFPC2 and complementary ACS catalogs. It covers
231: approximately the inner $r<110\arcsec$ of the system (with the WFPC2 FoV
232: almost entirely included in the ACS FoV; see Figure~\ref{fig:maphst}). The
233: {\it WFI sample} includes only stars observed with WFI and lying beyond the
234: WFPC2 and ACS FoVs. The {\it WFI sample} covers the outer regions, well
235: beyond the cluster extension (see Figure~\ref{fig:mapwfi}).
236:
237: By combining the data sets described above, with additional images of the
238: cluster center obtained with the {\it HST} ACS High Resolution Camera, very
239: accurate determinations of the center of gravity, surface density profile,
240: and surface brightness profile have been recently obtained by
241: \citet{lan07bh}. In particular, it has been found that the observed profiles
242: show a deviation from a flat core behavior in the inner $\sim 1\arcsec$,
243: suggesting that NGC~6388 might host an IMBH of $\sim 5.7\times 10^3\,
244: M_\odot$ in its center. However, by excluding the points at $r<1\arcsec$,
245: the density profile is well fit by an isotropic single-mass King model. The
246: resulting cluster structural parameters (concentration, core radius and tidal
247: radius) are listed in Table~\ref{tab:param}, together with the new estimate
248: of the center of gravity.
249:
250: \section{CMD OVERVIEW}
251: \label{sec:cmd}
252: \subsection{The HST Sample}
253: \label{sec:hst}
254: The CMDs of the {\it HST sample} in the UV and the
255: optical bands are shown in Figures~\ref{fig:uvcmd} and \ref{fig:hstcmd},
256: respectively. As apparent, all of the cluster evolutionary sequences are
257: clearly defined and well populated.
258:
259: Particularly notable is the Horizontal Branch (HB) morphology. Beside the
260: red clump, which is a typical feature of metal rich stellar populations, the
261: HB clearly shows an extended blue tail (BT), first noticed by Rich et
262: al. (1997) and by Piotto at al. (1997). Among a total of 1763 HB stars
263: counted in the {\it HST sample}, five sub-populations can be distinguished
264: (see Sect.~\ref{sec:HB} and \ref{sec:RHB} for details): {\it (i)} the red-HB
265: (RHB) population, consisting of 1418 stars grouped in the red clump; {\it
266: (ii)} 15 RR Lyrae variables, which we identified by cross correlating the
267: positions in our catalog with those published by Pritzl et al. (2002)
268: \footnote{Since our photometry is just a snapshot, the position of each
269: variable star in the CMD is not an indication of the mean properties. The
270: remaining stars found within the "RR Lyrae region" of the CMD, but not
271: included in the Pritzl et al. catalog are not considered in the following
272: analysis, since they possibly are field contaminating stars.}; {\it (iii)}
273: 267 blue-HB (BHB) stars ; {\it (iv)} 26 Extreme-HB (EHB) stars ; and {\it
274: (v)} 37 Blue Hook (BHk, to avoid confusion with BH for black hole) stars.
275:
276: Several previous works have shown that the HB morphology in NGC~6388 is
277: complex. A new extensive study, based on much of the same observational data
278: used here, and also discussing the HB morphology of NGC~6441, has recently
279: been published by \citet{busso07}. In the present paper we take advantage of
280: the complex HB structure of NGC~6388 to review the HB nomenclature, which has
281: become rather confused in the literature and is often ambiguously used. Then,
282: we briefly discuss the blue HB sub-populations and the HB red clump, the
283: latter being used as cluster reference population for the study of the BSS
284: radial distribution (Sect.~\ref{sec:radist}).
285:
286: \subsubsection{The HB population: nomenclature and radial distribution}
287: \label{sec:HB}
288: The HB is composed by helium-core/hydrogen-shell burning stars. It is
289: traditionally split into red, variable, and blue (RHB, VHB, and BHB,
290: respectively), depending on whether the stars are redder than, within, or
291: bluer than, the RR~Lyrae instability strip.
292:
293: The concept of {\em HB blue tails} probably originated with the CMD of
294: NGC~6752, which was presented by Russell Cannon at the 1973 Frascati globular
295: cluster workshop, but not published for many years. In visual CMDs of
296: NGC~6752 (and many others to follow), the HB drops downward at high
297: temperature often becoming an almost vertical sequence. This feature looked
298: like a tail hanging from the horizontal part of the BHB, hence the
299: name. \citet{rc89}, \citet{bt-dens93}, and \citet{recio-blanco06} have each
300: suggested ways to measure BTs, and the fact that measures of BTness keep
301: being invented demonstrates a lack of consensus on a definition of BTs. In
302: addition, sub-populations like EHB or BHk stars are sometimes recognized
303: within the observed BTs, even if without a precise observational definition.
304:
305: The {\em extreme HB} population is theoretically well defined: EHB stars lie
306: at the hottest extreme of the zero-age HB (ZAHB), and they do not return to
307: the asymptotic giant branch (AGB), but rather spend their He-shell burning
308: phase as hot AGB-manqu\'e or Post-early AGB stars \citep[for
309: example,][]{dor93}. There is no comparably precise way to observationally
310: select EHB stars. If far-UV (FUV) (e.g., {\it HST} F160W) photometry is
311: available, detailed comparisons with stellar models can be made. These
312: suggest that in a few clusters, the transition between BHB and EHB stars may
313: be associated with a gap in the HB morphology \citep{fe98}. In the present
314: paper we have assumed this to be the case (see below), but at this point that
315: is only an assumption. The importance of EHB stars is also connected with
316: the fact that they and their progeny are thought to be the source of the UV
317: radiation excess observed in the integrated spectra of some elliptical
318: galaxies (Dorman et al 1995; Yi et al. 1998), and one might be able, for
319: example, to determine the age of the galaxy on the basis of its UV excess. In
320: this context NGC~6388 plays a particularly important role, since it is one of
321: the most metal-rich systems containing EHB stars that can be individually
322: observed.
323:
324: In a few clusters, including NGC~6388, there is an additional population
325: hotter and less luminous than the EHB stars. Following nomenclature used in
326: recent studies, we call this population {\em Blue Hook} stars. In visual and
327: even some UV (e.g., $m_{255},~m_{255}-m_{336}$) CMDs, BHk stars appear as
328: fainter extension of the BT and are separated from the EHB population by a
329: gap. While the effective temperature \teff\ of HB stars can be reasonably
330: well determined from their position along the BT, it is not appropriate to
331: extrapolate this to the BHk. Accurate stellar parameters for BHk stars
332: require FUV photometry \citep[see for example the BHk studies in NGC~2808 and
333: $\omega$\,Cen by][]{moehler2808}. Indeed, it is only in FUV CMDs that the
334: origin of the name ``blue hook'' becomes apparent.
335:
336: Not all BT clusters have EHB stars \citep[see the case of
337: NGC~1904][]{lan07_1904}, and not all clusters with EHB stars have BHk stars
338: \citep[see the cases of M13 and M80][]{fe98}. In order to clearly show the
339: difference between cluster with BTs populated up to the EHB region, and
340: clusters with BHk stars, UV photometry is essential. In Figure~\ref{fig:m80}
341: we compare the ($m_{255},~m_{255}-U$) CMDs of NGC~6388 to that of M80
342: (Ferraro et al. 1997, 1999a). We chose M80 because, among the clusters for
343: which we have a full range of data, it is the one with the HB extending to
344: highest \teff. From comparison with evolutionary tracks in the
345: ($m_{160},~m_{160}-V$) plane (Dorman and Rood, unpublished) we know that the
346: M80 HB is populated all the way to the extreme blue-end of the ZAHB. In this
347: plane the HB of M80 shows a clear gap at the transition from BHB to EHB
348: \citep{fe98}. In Fig.~\ref{fig:m80} this gap is also visible at $m_{255} =
349: 19$. Since there is a corresponding gap in NGC~6388, we tentatively identify
350: the stars with $19.0 < m_{255} <19.8$ as EHB. The HB sequence of NGC~6388 is
351: significantly more extended than that observed in M80, where there is no
352: analogous population at $m_{255} \simeq 20$. For that reason we identify the
353: latter as BHk stars in NGC~6388, as do \citet{busso07}. The BHk extends well
354: below the cluster TO in the optical CMD: $V>21$ in the $(V,~B-V)$ plane (see
355: Fig.~\ref{fig:Optsel}). Because of the uncertainties in detection of these
356: faint stars using optical wavelengths in such crowded regions, our BHk sample
357: is selected from the UV CMD (WFPC2 sample). By using these criteria we have
358: defined the selection boxes sketched in Figs.~\ref{fig:uvcmd} and
359: \ref{fig:Optsel}, and obtained the values quoted in the previous section for
360: the number of HB stars belonging to each sub-population.
361:
362: It has been suggested that EHB might originate in binary systems
363: (Bailyn 1995), or they were formed through a collisional
364: channel. Indeed, similar stars in the field and in old open clusters
365: have been found to often belong to binary systems
366: \citep{green01,heber02}. In contrast, a recent study by Moni Bidin et
367: al. (2006) has found no evidence of binarity in the EHB population of
368: two globular clusters (M80 and NGC5986). The nature of BHk stars is
369: still a matter of debate. They may be related to the so-called late
370: hot flashers \citep{moehler2808}, or to high helium abundances
371: \citep{busso07}. Given that the origin of EHB and BHk stars is still
372: uncertain, it is useful to check whether their radial distributions
373: show any suggestion of binarity or stellar interaction, as it is the
374: case for BSS. We have therefore compared the cumulative radial
375: distributions of the BHB, EHB, and BHk stars to that of RHB stars,
376: which are representative of normal cluster populations (see
377: Sect.~\ref{sec:radist}). As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:HB_KS}, all
378: radial distributions are consistent with being extracted from the same
379: parent population, with Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test probabilities of
380: 59\%, 46\% and 60\%, respectively. Thus, the radial distribution of
381: BHB, EHB and BHk populations is consistent with that of normal cluster
382: stars, in agreement with previous findings by Rich et al. (1997), and
383: possibly suggesting a non-binary nature for these systems. However, a
384: binary EHB star could consist of a 0.5\,$M_\odot$ He-burning star with
385: a 0.2\,$M_\odot$ He white dwarf companion, i.e., a total mass smaller
386: than the TO mass and comparable to RHB masses. As a consequence, even
387: if the initial binary mass were large enough to have sunk to the
388: cluster core, the central relaxation time of NGC~6388 is $8.3 \times
389: 10^7$\,yr \citep{djorg93}, less than the HB lifetime, so that an EHB
390: binary could move outward, instead of being segregated into the
391: center.
392:
393: \subsubsection{The red HB clump and the distance of NGC~6388}
394: \label{sec:RHB}
395: Since the HB red clump in this cluster is very well defined in the optical
396: CMDs, we have selected the RHB population in this plane, and then used the
397: stars in common between the optical and the UV WFPC2 samples to identify it
398: in the $(m_{255},~m_{255}-U$) CMD. The selected stars are marked as
399: pentagons in Figs.~\ref{fig:uvcmd} and \ref{fig:Optsel}.
400:
401: With our high-quality data set and such a well defined HB red clump,
402: we have estimated the distance modulus and the reddening of NGC~6388
403: by comparing its CMD and luminosity function to those of the
404: proto-type of metal-rich GCs: 47~Tuc. As shown in
405: Figure~\ref{fig:47tuc}, other than the blue HB, the overall CMD
406: properties of NGC~6388 closely resemble those of a normal metal-rich
407: cluster. In order to overlap the CMDs, and align the HB red clump and
408: the RGB bump of the two clusters, the color and the magnitude of
409: NGC~6388 have to be shifted by $\delta (B-V)=-0.28$ and $\delta
410: V=-3.15$, respectively. Thus, by adopting $(m-M)_0=13.32$ and
411: $E(B-V)=0.04$ for 47~Tuc (Ferraro et al. 1999b), we obtain
412: $(m-M)_V=16.59$ and $E(B-V)=0.32$ for NGC~6388. This yields a true
413: (unreddened) distance modulus of $ (m-M)_0=15.60 \pm 0.2$, which
414: corresponds to a distance of $13.2\pm 1.2$ Kpc \citep[to be compared
415: with 10 Kpc quoted by][]{har96}.
416:
417: The proper comparison of the CMDs of the two clusters deserves
418: additional comments. First, NGC~6388 is known to be slightly more
419: metal-rich \citep[${\rm [Fe/H]}= -0.44$;][]{carretta07} than 47~Tuc
420: \citep[${\rm [Fe/H]} \simeq-0.6$;][]{carretta04}. However, current
421: theoretical models suggest that such a small overabundance
422: ($\delta{\rm [Fe/H]}\sim 0.15$ dex) would generate just a small
423: difference in the HB absolute magnitude ($\delta M_V^{\rm HB} \sim
424: 0.03$ mag). Second, the presence of differential reddening of the
425: order of 0.07 (see Busso et al. 2007) can spread the HB red clump,
426: increasing the uncertainties of the entire procedure. However, this
427: contribution is significantly smaller than the conservative estimate
428: of the error in the derived cluster distance, $\delta(m-M)=\pm 0.2$
429: mag. Finally, the morphology of the HB red clump is not exactly the
430: same in the two clusters. However, as discussed by \citet{catelan06},
431: who compared the two CMDs by using a reddening-independent quantity,
432: the main difference between the two red HB clumps consists in the fact
433: that the bluer RHB stars in NGC~6388 ($\sim 20\%$ of the total RHB
434: population) are slightly brighter than the average in 47~Tuc. This
435: feature might be interpreted in the framework of a sub-population with
436: a higher helium content. However comparison of the luminosity
437: functions in Figure~\ref{fig:47tuc} clearly shows that the relative
438: position of the HB red clump and RGB bump is quite similar in the two
439: clusters. Since the location in magnitude of the RGB bump is quite
440: sensitive to the helium content (see Fusi Pecci et al. 1990), such a
441: nice correspondence clearly demonstrates that at least the main
442: component of the stellar population of NGC~6388 has an helium
443: abundance fully compatible with that of 47~Tuc, while only a minor
444: fraction of the cluster stars could be helium enhanced (this is also
445: in agreement with the findings of Catelan et al. 2006, and Busso et
446: al. 2007). The possible impact on the relative distance of the two
447: clusters derived above is therefore negligible.
448:
449: \subsection{The WFI Sample and Background Contamination}
450: \label{sec:contamination}
451: Figure~\ref{fig:wficmd} shows $(V,~B-V)$ CMDs of four radial zones of the WFI
452: sample. The sequences seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:hstcmd} are still obvious in the
453: interval $120\arcsec<r<250\arcsec$, but there is also significant
454: contamination from field stars. The CMDs are progressively more contaminated
455: as $r$ increases: cluster sequences are barely visible in the region
456: $250\arcsec<r<490\arcsec$, less so for $490\arcsec<r<800\arcsec$, and have
457: vanished for $r>800\arcsec$. The contamination has two main components (the
458: bulge and the disk populations of the Galaxy): the first is an almost
459: vertical blue sequence with $0.5<(B-V)<1.0$, the second is another vertical
460: sequence with $(B-V)\sim 1.3$, which clearly indicates the presence of metal
461: rich stars.
462:
463: Indeed, Figure~\ref{fig:wficmd} shows that field contamination is
464: particularly severe in this cluster. For this reason we decided to
465: limit the following analysis to the {\it HST sample}, and to use the
466: most external region of the WFI sample ($r > 800\arcsec$) to
467: statistically estimate the field contamination level. We have counted
468: the number of background stars and derived an appropriate background
469: density for each selection box discussed in the paper (see
470: Sect.~\ref{sec:BSS} for the definition of the BSS population). Then,
471: we have used this background density to statistically decontaminate
472: each population in the {\it HST sample}, by following a procedure
473: similar to that described by \citet{bel99}. Table~\ref{tab:decon}
474: shows the observed sample size and the resulting statistical estimate
475: of field contamination for each of the sub-populations in each radial
476: region of the cluster. Statistical decontamination has the
477: disadvantage that we don't know whether a given star is a member of a
478: given sub-population or not. However, all of the conclusions of the
479: current paper depend on number counts, so that background correction
480: only increases the noise without affecting the conclusions. Future
481: proper motion studies currently ongoing for this cluster will finally
482: assess the real membership of each star. Preliminary results indicate
483: contamination counts which are in agreement with those listed in Table
484: 4.
485:
486: \section{THE BLUE STRAGGLER STAR POPULATION}
487: \label{sec:BSS}
488: \subsection{The BSS Selection}
489: Hot populations like BSS and BHB stars are the
490: brightest objects in UV CMDs, while the RGB stars, that dominate the emission
491: of GCs in the optical bands, are faint at these wavelengths. In addition, the
492: high spatial resolution of {\it HST} minimizes problems associated with
493: photometric blends and crowding in the high density central regions. Thus
494: {\it HST} UV CMDs are the optimal tool for selecting BSS in GCs. Given this,
495: our main criterion for the selection of the BSS population is the position of
496: stars in the ($m_{255},~m_{255}-U$) CMD. To avoid incompleteness biases and
497: contamination from TO and sub-giant stars, we adopt a magnitude threshold
498: that is about one magnitude brighter than the TO point: $m_{255}= 21.85$.
499: Figure~\ref{fig:uvcmd} shows the adopted selection box and the candidate BSS
500: in the UV CMD.
501: %
502: Using the BSS in common between the WFPC2 and the ACS FoVs, we have
503: transformed the BSS selection box from the UV plane into the optical
504: plane. To avoid regions with very high risk of Galactic contamination, we
505: have considered only stars with $(B-V)<0.7$. The resulting candidate BSS in
506: the complementary ACS field are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Optsel}.
507:
508: The final sample is of 153 BSS in the {\it HST sample}: 114 are found in the
509: WFPC2 dataset, and 39 in the complementary ACS sample. The magnitude and the
510: positions of the selected BSS are listed in Table~\ref{tab:bss}, which is
511: available in full size in electronic form.
512:
513: \subsection{The BSS Projected Radial Distribution}
514: \label{sec:radist}
515: In order to study the radial distribution of BSS (or any other population)
516: for detecting possible peculiarities, a reference population representative
517: of normal cluster stars must be defined.
518:
519: In our previous papers we have used both the RGB or the HB as reference
520: populations. In NGC~6388 the RGB population is affected by a significantly
521: larger field contamination, with respect to the HB. On the other hand, the HB
522: morphology is quite complex, the presence of a BT in such a metal-rich
523: cluster is unusual, and the nature of EHB and BHk stars is still unclear (see
524: Sect.~\ref{sec:HB}). Instead, the HB red clump is a common feature of
525: similar metallicity GCs, it is bright and well defined both in the UV and in
526: the optical CMDs, and it comprises the majority (80\%) of the HB population
527: (see \S~\ref{sec:hst}). We have verified that RHB and RGB stars
528: share the same radial distribution over the region ($r <
529: 110\arcsec$), suggesting that RHB stars are indeed representative of normal
530: cluster populations. For all these reasons, we have chosen the RHB as the
531: reference population for NGC~6388.
532:
533: We first compare the BSS and the RHB cumulative radial distributions.
534: Since we expect a negligible number of field stars contaminating the
535: BSS and RHB sample (see Table 4) no correction has been applied to the
536: observed sample used to construct these cumulative radial
537: distributions. As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:KS}, the trend is bimodal,
538: with the BSS more segregated than RHB stars in the central cluster
539: regions, and less concentrated outward. This result replicates what
540: we found in a number of other clusters and listed in Table~1 (See also
541: for M5 \citep{w06} and for M55 \citep{zag97}). The KS probability that the
542: two populations are extracted from the same parent distribution is
543: $\sim10^{-4}$.
544:
545: For a more quantitative analysis we have divided the surveyed area in 6
546: concentric annuli (sketched in Fig.~\ref{fig:maphst}), and the number of BSS
547: ($N_{\rm BSS}$) and RHB ($N_{\rm RHB}$) stars was counted in each annulus
548: (see the values listed in Table~\ref{tab:decon}).
549: We have then computed the
550: double normalized ratio (Ferraro et al. 1993):
551: \begin{displaymath}
552: R_{\rm pop}=\frac{N_{\rm pop}/ N^{\rm tot}_{\rm pop}}{L^{\rm samp}/ L^{\rm
553: samp}_{\rm tot}},
554: \label{eq:Rpop}
555: \end{displaymath}
556: where pop=BSS, RHB, $N_{\rm pop}$ refers to statistically decontaminated
557: number counts (see Sect.~\ref{sec:contamination}), and the luminosity in each
558: annulus has been calculated by integrating the single-mass King model that
559: best fits the observed surface density profile \citep[see][]{lan07bh}, with
560: the distance modulus and the reddening previously quoted, and by properly
561: taking into account the incomplete spatial coverage of the outermost annulus.
562:
563: As expected from stellar evolution theory (Renzini \& Fusi Pecci
564: 1988), the radial trend of $R_{\rm RHB}$ is essentially constant with
565: a value close to unity. On the contrary, the BSS radial distribution
566: is very different and is clearly bimodal. As shown in
567: Figure~\ref{fig:Rpop}, $R_{\rm BSS}$ reaches a value of almost two at
568: the center, while $R_{\rm RHB}$ has no central peak. $R_{\rm BSS}$
569: decreases to a minimun near $r=5\,r_c$, and rises again near
570: $r=11\,r_c$.
571:
572: \section{DISCUSSION}
573: \label{sec:discus}
574: In Figure~\ref{fig:confro} we have compared the radial distribution of the
575: ratio between the BSS and HB number counts computed for NGC~6388, with that
576: obtained for other GCs showing a bimodal distribution \citep[see for
577: example][]{lan07_M5}. The position of the observed minimum in NGC~6388
578: resembles that of M3, but NGC~6388 has a core radius $\sim$ 3 times smaller.
579: In physical units its minimum is closer to the cluster center than in any
580: previously observed cluster. By equating the dynamical friction timescale
581: \citep[$t_{df}\propto \sigma^3 /\rho$;][see also Mapelli et al. 2006]{BT} to
582: the cluster age (assumed to be $t=12\,$Gyr), one can estimate the value of
583: the radius of avoidance ($r_{\rm avoid}$). This is defined as the radius
584: within which all the stars of $\sim 1.2\,M_\odot$ (the expected average mass
585: for BSS) have already sunk to the core because of dynamical friction effects.
586: As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:confro}, the position of $r_{\rm avoid}$ well
587: corresponds to that of the observed minimum for all the clusters studied to
588: date in a similar way. For NGC~6388, by adopting $\sigma_0= 18.9 \,{\rm
589: km\,s^{-1}}$ and $n_0= 10^6 \,{\rm \,stars\,pc^{-3}}$ as central velocity
590: dispersion and stellar density \citep{pry93}, and by assuming the cluster
591: structural parameters derived from the best-fit King model by \citet[][see
592: Table~\ref{tab:param}]{lan07bh}, we have obtained $r_{\rm avoid}\simeq
593: 15\,r_c$. This is about 3 times larger than the location of observed
594: minimum, thus representing the first case where the two distances do not
595: coincide. This result is quite puzzling and somehow suggests that NGC6388
596: appears ``dynamically younger'' than expected on the basis of its structural
597: properties. In fact, our observations suggest that the dynamical friction in
598: this cluster has been effective in segregating BSS (and similar massive
599: objects) out to only 4--5 $r_c$, whereas the theoretical expectation
600: indicates that, within $15\,r_c$, all stars with the mass of BSS or their
601: binary progenitors should have already sunk to the center. Note that
602: significantly larger (by a factor of 2) velocity dispersion, or lower (by a
603: factor of 7) central density would be necessary to reconcile the expected and
604: the observed minima. Why is dynamical friction less efficient in this
605: cluster? Could the presence of an IMBH in the cluster center be important?
606: As discussed in Lanzoni et al (2007), the radius of influence of a $5\times
607: 10^3\, M_{\odot}$ BH at the center of NGC~6388 is only 0.07\,pc or
608: 0.15\,$r_c$, so it is not obvious how it might affect cluster evolution at
609: 5--15\,$r_c$. Perhaps the BSS that we observe at $r \gg r_c$ are stars which
610: have ``visited'' the central region and have been put on highly eccentric
611: orbits by the interaction with the BH. However this effect would probably
612: fill-in the BSS avoidance region in the projected radial distribution.
613:
614: Could the BHk population, the suspected presence of a central IMBH, the
615: anomalous position of the BSS radius of avoidance be connected to each other?
616: While it is tempting to think that such a connection exists, we are at a loss
617: to what that connection actually is.
618:
619:
620: \acknowledgements
621: %
622: This research was supported by contract ASI-INAF I/023/05/0, PRIN-INAF2006
623: and by the Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universit\'a e della Ricerca, and
624: it is also part of the {\it Progetti Strategici di Ateneo 2006} granted by
625: the University of Bologna. ED is supported by ASI. RTR is partially supported
626: by STScI grant GO-10524. This research has made use of the ESO/ST-ECF
627: Science Archive facility which is a joint collaboration of the European
628: Southern Observatory and the Space Telescope - European Coordinating
629: Facility.
630:
631: \begin{thebibliography}{}
632:
633: %\bibitem[Albrow et al.(2001)]{albr01} Albrow, M.~D., et al. \ 2001, \apj, 559,
634: %1060
635: %\bibitem[Anderson&King (2006)]{ak06} Anderson, J.,\& King, I. R. 2006, HST ACS/ISR
636: %2006-01
637:
638: %\bibitem[Bailyn (1994)]{bail94} Bailyn, C.~D.\ 1994, \aj, 107, 1073
639:
640: \bibitem[Bailyn(1995)]{1995ARA&A..33..133B} Bailyn, C.~D.\ 1995, \araa, 33,
641: 133
642:
643: \bibitem[Beccari et al.(2006a)]{bec06a} Beccari, G., Ferraro, F.~R.,
644: Possenti, A., Valenti, E., Origlia, L., \& Rood, R.~T.\ 2006a, \aj, 131, 2551
645:
646: %\bibitem[Beccari et al.(2006b)]{bec06b} Beccari, G., Ferraro, F.~R., Lanzoni,
647: %B., \& Bellazzini, M., 2006b, \apj, 652, L121
648:
649: % \bibitem[Bedin et al.(2005)]{bed05} Bedin, L.~R., Cassisi, S., Castelli, F.,
650: % Piotto, G., Anderson, J., Salaris, M., Momany, Y., \& Pietrinferni, A.\ 2005,
651: % \mnras, 357, 1038
652:
653: %\bibitem[Bedin et al.(2004)]{bedin04} Bedin, L.~R., Piotto, G.,
654: %Anderson, J., Cassisi, S., King, I.~R., Momany, Y., \& Carraro, G.\ 2004,
655: %\apjl, 605, L125
656:
657: \bibitem[Bellazzini, Ferraro \& Buonanno (1999)]{bel99} Bellazzini, M.,
658: Ferraro, F.~R., \& Buonanno, R. \ 1999, \mnras 307, 619
659:
660: \bibitem[Bellazzini et al.(2002)]{bel02} Bellazzini, M., Fusi
661: Pecci, F., Messineo, M., Monaco, L., \& Rood, R.~T.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 1509
662:
663: %\bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{be96} Bertin, E., \&
664: %Arnouts, S.\ 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
665:
666: \bibitem[Binney \& Tremaine (1987)] {BT} Binney, J., \& Tremaine, S.\ 1987,
667: Galactic Dynamics, (Princeton University Press)
668:
669: \bibitem[Buonanno et al. (1983)]{buon83} Buonanno, R., Buscema, G., Corsi,
670: C.~E., Ferraro, I., \& Iannicola, G.\ 1983, \aap, 126, 278
671:
672: \bibitem[Buonanno \& Iannicola (1989)]{buon89}Buonanno, R., \& Iannicola,
673: G. \ 1989, PASP, 101, 294
674:
675: %\bibitem[Busso et al.(2004)]{busso04} Busso, G., Piotto, G., \&
676: %Cassisi, S.\ 2004, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 75, 46
677:
678: \bibitem[Busso et al.(2007)]{busso07} Busso, G., et al. 2007, \aap, 474, 105
679:
680: %\bibitem[Camilo et al. (2000)]{cam00} Camilo, F., Lorimer, D.~R., Freire, P.,
681: %Lyne, A.~G., \& Manchester, R.~N.\ 2000, \apj, 535, 975
682:
683: %\bibitem[Caloi \& D'Antona(2007)]{caloi07} Caloi, V., \&
684: %D'Antona, F.\ 2007, \aap, 463, 949
685:
686: %\bibitem[Cariulo et al.(2004)]{cariu04} Cariulo, P., Degl'Innocenti, S., \&
687: %Castellani, V.\ 2004, \aap, 421, 1121
688:
689: %\bibitem[Catelan et al.(1998)]{catetelan98} Catelan, M., Borissova,
690: %J., Sweigart, A.~V., \& Spassova, N.\ 1998, \apj, 494, 265
691:
692: \bibitem[Catelan et al.(2006)]{catelan06} Catelan, M., Stetson,
693: P.~B., Pritzl, B.~J., Smith, H.~A., Kinemuchi, K., Layden, A.~C., Sweigart,
694: A.~V., \& Rich, R.~M.\ 2006, \apjl, 651, L133
695:
696: %\bibitem[Castellani et al. (1991)]{cast91}Castellani, V.,
697: %Chieffi, A., \& Pulone, L.\ 1991, \apjs, 76, 911
698:
699: \bibitem[Carretta et al.(2004)]{carretta04} Carretta, E., Gratton, R.~G.,
700: Bragaglia, A., Bonifacio, P., \& Pasquini, L.\ 2004, \aap, 416, 925
701:
702: \bibitem[Carretta et al.(2007)]{carretta07} Carretta, E., et al.\
703: 2007, \aap, 464, 967
704:
705: %\bibitem[Cool \& Bolton (2002)]{co02}Cool A. M., Bolton A. S., 2002, in ASP Conf.
706: %Ser. 263, Stellar Collisions, Mergers and their Consequences. Astron. Soc. Pac.,
707: %San Francisco, p. 163
708:
709: %\bibitem[Cordier et al. (2007)]{corider07} Cordier D., Pietrinferni A., Cassisi
710: %S., Salaris M. \ 2007, \aj, 133, 468
711:
712: %\bibitem[D'Cruz et al.(2000)]{dcruz-omega} D'Cruz, N.~L., et al.\
713: %2000, \apj, 530, 352
714:
715: %\bibitem[Desidera et al. (1998)]{desidera} Desidera, S. 1998, Master's
716: %thesis, Padua Univ.
717:
718: \bibitem[Djorgovski (1993)]{djorg93} Djorgovski, S.\ 1993, in ASPC
719: Conf. Ser. 50, Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters,
720: ed. S.~G. Djorgovski \& G. Meylan (San Francisco: ASP), 373D
721:
722: %\bibitem[Dolphin (2000)]{dolph00}Dolphin, A.~E.\ 2000, PASP, 112, 1383
723:
724: \bibitem[Dorman et al.(1993)]{dor93} Dorman, B., Rood, R.~T.,
725: \& O'Connell, R.~W.\ 1993, \apj, 419, 596
726:
727: \bibitem[Dorman et al.(1995)]{1995ApJ...442..105D} Dorman, B., O'Connell,
728: R.~W., \& Rood, R.~T.\ 1995, \apj, 442, 105
729:
730: %\bibitem[Drissen \& Shara (1998)]{dris98} Drissen, L., \& Shara, M.~M. \
731: %1998, AJ, 115, 725
732:
733: %\bibitem[Dubath et al. (1997)]{dub97} Dubath P., Meylan G., Mayor M., 1997,
734: %\aap, 324, 505
735:
736: %\bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1992)]{fe92} Ferraro, F.~R., Clementini, G., Fusi
737: %Pecci, F., Sortino, R., Buonanno, R.\ 1992, \mnras 256, 391
738:
739: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1993)]{fe93} Ferraro, F.~R., Fusi Pecci, F.,
740: Cacciari, C., Corsi, C., Buonanno, R., Fahlman, G.~G., \& Richer, H.~B.\
741: 1993, \aj, 106, 2324
742:
743: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1997)]{fe97} Ferraro, F.~R., Paltrinieri, B., Fusi
744: Pecci, F., Cacciari, C., Dorman, B., Rood, R.~T., Buonanno, R., Corsi, C.~E.,
745: Burgarella, D., \& Laget, M., 1997, \aap, 324, 915
746:
747: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1998)]{fe98} Ferraro, F.~R.,
748: Paltrinieri, B., Pecci, F.~F., Rood, R.~T., \& Dorman, B.\ 1998, \apj, 500,
749: 311
750:
751: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1999a)]{fe99a} Ferraro, F.~R., Paltrinieri, B., Rood,
752: R.~T., \& Dorman, B.\ 1999a, ApJ 522, 983
753:
754: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1999b)]{fe99b} Ferraro F. R., Messineo M., Fusi Pecci
755: F., De Palo M. A., Straniero O., Chieffi A.,\& Limongi M.\ 1999b, \aj, 118, 1738
756:
757: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2001)]{fe01} Ferraro, F.~R., D'Amico, N., Possenti,
758: A., Mignani, R.~P., \& Paltrinieri, B.\ 2001, \apj, 561, 337
759:
760: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2003)]{fe03} Ferraro, F.~R., Sills, A., Rood, R.~T.,
761: Paltrinieri, B., \& Buonanno, R. \ 2003, \apj, 588, 464
762:
763: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2004)]{fe04} Ferraro, F.~R.,
764: Beccari, G., Rood, R.~T., Bellazzini, M., Sills, A., \& Sabbi, E.\ 2004,
765: \apj, 603, 127
766:
767: %\bibitem[Ferraro (2006)]{fe06} Ferraro, F.~R., 2006, in Resolved Stellar
768: %Populations, ASP Conference Series, D. Valls-Gabaud \& M. Chaves Eds.,
769: %astro-ph/0601217
770:
771: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2006a)]{COdep} Ferraro, F.~R., et al.\ 2006a, \apj,
772: 647, L53
773: %Sabbi, E., Gratton, R., Piotto, G., Lanzoni, B., Carretta, E., Rood, R.~T.,
774: %Sills, A., Fusi Pecci, F., Moehler, S., \& 3 coauthors
775:
776: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2006b)]{fe06b} Ferraro, F.~R., Sollima, A., Rood,
777: R.~T., Origlia, L., Pancino, E., \& Bellazzini, M. \ 2006b, \apj, 638, 433
778:
779: \bibitem[Fusi Pecci et al.(1990)]{fusi90} Fusi Pecci, F., Ferraro, F.~R.,
780: Crocker, D.~A., Rood, R.~T., \& Buonanno, R. \ 1990, \aap, 238, 95
781:
782: %\bibitem[Fusi Pecci et al. (1992)]{fp92}Fusi Pecci, F., Ferraro, F.~R.,
783: %Corsi, C.~E., Cacciari, C., \& Buonanno, R.\ 1992, AJ, 104, 1831
784:
785: \bibitem[Fusi Pecci et al.(1993)]{bt-dens93} Fusi Pecci, F.,
786: Ferraro, F.~R., Bellazzini, M., Djorgovski, S., Piotto, G., \& Buonanno,
787: R.\ 1993, \aj, 105, 1145
788:
789: \bibitem[Green et al.(2001)]{green01} Green, E.~M., Liebert,
790: J., \& Saffer, R.~A.\ 2001, 12th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, 226,
791: 192
792:
793: %\bibitem[Guhathakurta et al.(1992)]{gu92} Guhathakurta, P., Yanny, B,,
794: %Schneider, D.~P., \& Bahcall, J.~N.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 1790
795:
796: %\bibitem[Grindlay et al.(2001)]{g01} Grindlay, J.~E.,
797: %Heinke, C., Edmonds, P.~D., \& Murray, S.~S.\ 2001, Science, 292, 2290
798:
799: \bibitem[Harris (1996)]{har96} Harris, W.E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487
800:
801: \bibitem[Heber et al.(2002)]{heber02} Heber, U., Moehler, S.,
802: Napiwotzki, R., Thejll, P., \& Green, E.~M.\ 2002, \aap, 383, 938
803:
804: %\bibitem[Hills \& Day (1976)]{colbss} Hills, J.~G., \& Day, C.~A.\ 1976,
805: %\aplett, 17, 87
806:
807: \bibitem[Holtzman et al. (1995)]{holtz95} Holtzman, J.~A., Burrows, C.~J.,
808: Casertano, S., Hester, J.~J., Trauger, J.~T., Watson, A.~M., \& Worthey, G. \
809: 1995, PASP, 107, 1065
810:
811: %\bibitem[Hurley et al. (2007)]{hurley07} Hurley, J.~R., Aarseth,
812: %S.~J., \& Shara, M.~M.\ 2007, in press on \apj (astro-ph/0704.0290)
813:
814: %\bibitem[Irwin \& Trimble (1984)]{irwtrim84}Irwin, M.~J., \& Trimble, V. \ 1984,
815: %\aj, 89, 83
816:
817: %\bibitem[Ivanova et al.(2005)]{ivanova05} Ivanova, N.,
818: %Belczynski, K., Fregeau, J.~M., \& Rasio, F.~A.\ 2005, \mnras, 358, 572
819:
820: %\bibitem[Kaluzny et al. (2004)]{kalu04} Kaluzny J., Olech A., Thompson I.~B.,
821: %Pych W., Krzemi\'nski W., \& Schwarzenberg-Czerny A.\ 2004, \aap, 424, 1101
822:
823: %\bibitem[Knigge et al.(2002)]{k02} Knigge, C., Zurek,
824: %D.~R., Shara, M.~M., \& Long, K.~S.\ 2002, \apj, 579, 752
825:
826:
827: \bibitem[Lanzoni et al.(2007)]{lan07_M5} Lanzoni, B.,
828: Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F.~R., Mancini, C., Beccari, G., Rood, R.~T.,
829: Mapelli, M., \& Sigurdsson, S.\ 2007, \apj, 663, 267
830:
831:
832: \bibitem[Lanzoni et al. (2007b)]{lan07_1904} Lanzoni, B., et al. \ 2007b, \apj,
833: 663, 1040
834: %(astro-ph/0704.1393)
835: %Sanna, N., Ferraro, F.~R., Valenti, E., Beccari, G., Schiavon, R.~P., Rood,
836: %R.~T., Mapelli, M., \& Sigurdsson, S. \ 2007, in press on \apj
837: %(astro-ph/0704.1393)
838:
839: \bibitem[Lanzoni et al. (2007c)]{lan07bh} Lanzoni, B., Dalessandro, E.,
840: Ferraro, F.~R., Miocchi, P., Valenti, E., \& Rood, R.T. \ 2007c, \apj, 668,
841: L139
842:
843: \bibitem[Lanzoni et al. (2007d)]{lan07_M55} Lanzoni, B., Dalessandro, E.,
844: Perina, S., Ferraro, F.~R., Rood, R.~T., \& Sollima, A. \ 2007d, \apj, 670,
845: 1065
846:
847:
848: %\bibitem[Leonard(1989)]{leon89} Leonard, P.~J.~T.\ 1989, \aj, 98, 217
849:
850: %\bibitem[Lombardi et al. (1995)]{lomb95} Lombardi, J.~C.~Jr., Rasio, F.~A., \&
851: %Shapiro, S.~L.\ 1995, ApJ, 445, L117
852:
853: %\bibitem[Mandushev et al.(1997)]{mandu97} Mandushev, G.~I., Fahlman, G.~G.,
854: %Richer, H.~B., \& Thompson, I.~B.\ 1997, \aj, 114, 1060
855:
856: \bibitem[Mapelli et al.(2004)]{ma04} Mapelli, M.,
857: Sigurdsson, S., Colpi, M., Ferraro, F.~R., Possenti, A., Rood, R.~T.,
858: Sills, A., \& Beccari, G.\ 2004, \apj, 605, L29
859:
860: \bibitem[Mapelli et al.(2006)]{map06} Mapelli, M.,
861: Sigurdsson, S., Ferraro, F.~R., Colpi, M., Possenti, A., \& Lanzoni, B.\
862: 2006, \mnras, 373, 361
863:
864:
865: %\bibitem[Mateo (1996)]{mateo96} Mateo M., in ``The origins, evolution, and
866: %destinies of binary stars in clusters'', E.~F. Milone \& J.~C. Mermilliod
867: %Eds.\ 1996, ASPC, 90, 346
868:
869: %\bibitem[McLaughlin \& van der Marel(2005)]{mcL05} McLaughlin, D.~E., \& van
870: %der Marel, R.~P. \ 2005, \apjs, 161, 304
871:
872: %\bibitem[McCrea (1964)]{mtbss1} McCrea, W.~H.\ 1964, \mnras, 128, 147
873:
874: \bibitem[Miocchi (2007)]{miocchi07} Miocchi, P. \ 2007, \mnras, 381, 103
875:
876: \bibitem[Moehler et al. (2004)]{moehler2808} Moehler, S., Sweigart, A.~V.,
877: Landsman, W.~B., Hammer, N.~J., \& Dreizler, S.\ 2004, \aap, 415, 313
878:
879: %\bibitem[Montegriffo et al. (1995)]{mont95}Montegriffo, P., Ferraro, F.~R.,
880: %Fusi Pecci, F., \& Origlia, L.\ 1995, \mnras, 276, 739
881:
882: %\bibitem[Olech et al.(1999)]{olech99} Olech, A., Kaluzny, J., Thompson,
883: %I.~B., Pych, W., Krzeminski, W., \& Shwarzenberg-Czerny, A.\ 1999, \aj, 118,
884: %442
885:
886: %\bibitem[Paresce et al.(1991)]{par91} Paresce, F., Meylan, G., Shara, M.,
887: %Baxter, D., \& Greenfield, P.\ 1991, Nature, 352, 297
888:
889: %\bibitem[Pietrinferni et al.(2006)]{pietri06} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S.,
890: %Salaris, M., \& Castelli, F.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 797
891:
892: \bibitem[Moni Bidin et al. (2006)]{monibidin06} Moni Bidin, C., Moehler, S.,
893: Piotto, G., Momany, Y., Recio-Blanco, A., \& Mendez, R.~A.\ 2006, in
894: "Globular Clusters: Guides to Galaxies", March 2006, Concepcion (Chile);
895: astro-ph/0606035
896:
897: \bibitem[Piotto et al.(1997)]{piotto97} Piotto, G., et al.\
898: 1997, Advances in Stellar Evolution, 84
899:
900: %\bibitem[Piotto et al.(1999)]{piotto99} Piotto, G., Zoccali, M.,
901: %King, I.~R., Djorgovski, S.~G., Sosin, C., Rich, R.~M., \& Meylan, G.\
902: %1999, \aj, 118, 1727
903:
904: \bibitem[Piotto et al. (2002)]{pio02} Piotto, G.,
905: King, I. R.; Djorgovski, S. G.; Sosin, C.; Zoccali, M.; Saviane, I.; De
906: Angeli, F.; Riello, M.; Recio-Blanco, A.; Rich, R. M.; and 2 coauthors
907: et al.\ 2002, \aap, 391, 945
908:
909: \bibitem[Pritzl et al.(2002)]{pri02} Pritzl, B.~J., Smith,
910: H.~A., Catelan, M., \& Sweigart, A.~V.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 949
911:
912: \bibitem[Pryor \& Meylan (1993)]{pry93} Pryor C., \& Meylan G., 1993,
913: Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters. Proceedings of a Workshop held
914: in Berkeley, California, July 15-17, 1992, to Honor the 65th Birthday of Ivan
915: King. Editors, S.G. Djorgovski and G. Meylan; Publisher, Astronomical Society
916: of the Pacific, Vol. 50, 357
917:
918: %\bibitem[Pych et al.(2001)]{pych01} Pych, W., Kaluzny, J., Krzeminski, W.,
919: %Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A., \& Thompson, I.~B.\ 2001, \aap, 367, 148
920:
921: %\bibitem[Renzini \& Buzzoni(1986)]{renbuz86} Renzini, A., \&
922: %Buzzoni, A.\ 1986, ASSL Vol.~122: Spectral Evolution of Galaxies, 195
923:
924: %\bibitem[Raimondo et al.(2002)]{raim02} Raimondo, G.,
925: %Castellani, V., Cassisi, S., Brocato, E., \& Piotto, G.\ 2002, \apj, 569,
926: %975
927:
928: \bibitem[Recio-Blanco et al.(2006)]{recio-blanco06} Recio-Blanco, A.,
929: Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., de Angeli, F., \& Djorgovski, S.~G.\ 2006, \aap,
930: 452, 875
931:
932: \bibitem[Renzini \& Fusi Pecci(1988)]{renfusi88} Renzini, A., \& Fusi Pecci, F.\
933: 1988, ARA\&A, 26, 199
934:
935: \bibitem[Rich et al.(1997)]{rich97} Rich, R.~M., et al.\ 1997,
936: \apjl, 484, L25
937:
938: %\bibitem[Robin et al.(2003)]{robin03} Robin, A.~C., Reyl{\'e},
939: %C., Derri{\`e}re, S., \& Picaud, S.\ 2003, \aap, 409, 523
940:
941: %\bibitem[Rubenstein \& Bailyn(1997)]{ru97} Rubenstein,
942: %E.~P., \& Bailyn, C.~D.\ 1997, \apj, 474, 701
943:
944: \bibitem[Rood \& Crocker(1989)]{rc89} Rood, R.~T., \&
945: Crocker, D.~A.\ 1989, IAU Colloq.~111: The Use of pulsating stars in
946: fundamental problems of astronomy, 103
947:
948: \bibitem[Sabbi et al.(2004)]{sabbi04} Sabbi, E., Ferraro, F.~R., Sills, A., \&
949: Rood, R.~T., 2004, ApJ 617, 1296
950:
951: %\bibitem[Sosin et al.(1997)]{sos97} Sosin, C., et al.\ 1997,
952: %\apjl, 480, L35
953:
954: %\bibitem[Sandquist et al. (1996)]{sand96} Sandquist, E.~L., Bolte, M.,
955: %Stetson, P.~B.; Hesser, J.~E. \ 1996, \apj, 470, 910
956:
957: %\bibitem[Sarna \& de Greve (1996)]{sarna96} Sarna, M.~J., \& de Greve, J.~P.\
958: %1996, QJRAS, 37, 11
959:
960: %\bibitem[Schechter et al. (1993)]{dophot} Schechter, P. L., Mateo, M., \&
961: %Saha, A.\ 1993, PASP, 105, 1342
962:
963: %\bibitem[Shara et al. (1997)]{sha97} Shara, M.~M., Saffer, R.~A., \& Livio,
964: %M.\ 1997, \apj, 489, L59
965:
966: %\bibitem[Sigurdsson \& Phinney (1995)]{sigu95} Sigurdsson S., \& Phinney, E.~S.,
967: %1995, ApJS, 99, 609
968:
969: \bibitem[Sirianni et al.(2005)]{si05} Sirianni, M., et al.\
970: 2005, \pasp, 117, 1049
971:
972: %\bibitem[Sollima et al.(2007)]{sollima07} Sollima, A., Beccari., G., Ferraro,
973: %F.~R., Fusi Pecci, F., \& Sarajedini, A., 2007, in press on MNRAS
974: %(astro-ph/0706.2288)
975:
976: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{dao} Stetson, P.~B.\ 1987, \pasp,
977: 99, 191
978:
979: \bibitem[Sweigart \& Catelan(1998)]{swcat98} Sweigart, A.~V.,
980: \& Catelan, M.\ 1998, \apjl, 501, L63
981:
982: %\bibitem[Verbunt (2003)]{verb03} Verbunt, F.\ 2003, in ASP Conf. Ser. 296,
983: %New Horizons in Globular Cluster Astronomy, ed. G. Piotto et al. (San
984: %Francisco: ASP), 245
985:
986: \bibitem[Warren et al. (2006)]{w06} Warren, S.~R., Sandquist, E.~L., \&
987: Bolte, M., 2006, ApJ 648, 1026 (W06)
988:
989: %\bibitem[Wylie et al.(2006)]{wy06} Wylie, E.~C., Cottrell,
990: %P.~L., Sneden, C.~A., \& Lattanzio, J.~C.\ 2006, astro-ph/0605538
991:
992: \bibitem[Zaggia et al.(1997)]{zag97} Zaggia, S.~R., Piotto, G., \&
993: Capaccioli, M., 1997, \aap, 327, 1004 (Z97)
994:
995: \bibitem[Zhao et al.(2006)]{zhao06} Zhao, J.-L., Chen, L., \&
996: Wen, W.\ 2006, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6, 435
997:
998: %\bibitem[Zinn \& Searle (1976)]{mtbss2} Zinn, R., \& Searle, L.\ 1976, \apj,
999: %209, 734
1000:
1001: \bibitem[Yi et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...492..480Y} Yi, S., Demarque, P., \&
1002: Oemler, A.~J.\ 1998, \apj, 492, 480
1003:
1004: \end{thebibliography}
1005:
1006:
1007: %--Table 1
1008: \begin{deluxetable}{lp{7cm}l}
1009:
1010: %\tablewidth{14cm}
1011: \tablecaption{Papers in This Series}
1012: \startdata \\
1013: \hline
1014: \hline
1015: NAME & ARGUMENT & REFERENCES\\
1016: \hline
1017: M3 & First detection of a BSS bimodal radial distribution & Ferraro et al. 1993,1997\\
1018: %
1019: M80 & BSS population in the core & Ferraro et al. 1999\\
1020: %
1021: 47Tuc & BSS radial distribution & Ferraro et al. 2003\\
1022: %
1023: NGC288 & BSS population in the core & Bellazzini et al. 2002\\
1024: %
1025: 47Tuc & BSS dynamical modeling and introduction of zone
1026: of avoidance concept & Mapelli et al. 2004\\
1027: %
1028: NGC6752 & BSS radial distribution & Sabbi et al. 2004\\
1029: %
1030: $\omega$ Cen & The first and so far only flat BSS radial distribution & Ferraro et al. 2006a\\
1031: %
1032: 47Tuc & BSS chemical signatures & Ferraro et al. 2006b \\
1033: %
1034: NGC6266 & BSS population in the core & Beccari et al. 2006a\\
1035: %
1036: -- & BSS dynamical modeling of four GCs & Mapelli et al. 2006\\
1037: %
1038: M5 & BSS obs and theoretical studies & Lanzoni et al. 2007a\\
1039: %
1040: NGC~1904 & BSS obs and theoretical studies & Lanzoni et al. 2007b\\
1041: %
1042: M55 & BSS radial distribution & Lanzoni et al. 2007d\\
1043: %
1044: \hline
1045: \enddata
1046: \label{tab:papers}
1047: \end{deluxetable}
1048:
1049:
1050: %--Table 2
1051: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
1052: \tablecolumns{3}
1053: \tablewidth{0pc}
1054: \tablecaption{Adopted cluster parameters}
1055: \startdata
1056: \hline
1057: %\\
1058: %\multicolumn{3}{c}
1059: %{\textbf{Adopted parameters}}\\
1060: %\\
1061: \hline
1062: \\
1063: Center of Gravity & $\alpha_{\rm J2000} = 17^{\rm h}\, 36^{\rm m}\, 17^{\rm s}.23$ &
1064: $\delta_{J2000} = -44\arcdeg\,44\arcmin\, 07\farcs1$ \\
1065: Concentration ($c$) & 1.8 & \\
1066: Core Radius ($r_{c}$) & 7\farcs2 & 0.46\,pc \\
1067: Tidal radius ($r_{t}$) & 454\arcsec & 29\,pc \\
1068: Distance & $(m-M)_0=15.60$ & 13.2\,kpc \\
1069: Reddening & $E(B-V)=0.32$ & \\
1070: \hline
1071: \enddata
1072: \label{tab:param}
1073: \end{deluxetable}
1074:
1075:
1076: %--Table 3
1077: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
1078: \footnotesize
1079: \tablewidth{15cm}
1080: \tablecaption{The BSS population of NGC~6388}
1081: \startdata \\
1082: \hline \hline
1083: Name & RA & DEC &$m_{255}$& U & B & V & \\
1084: & [degree] & [degree] & & & & & \\
1085: \hline
1086: \\
1087: BSS-1 & 264.0713276 & -44.7367013 & 19.586 & 19.232 & 19.995 & --- \\
1088: BSS-2 & 264.0744196 & -44.7337510 & 19.883 & 19.252 & 18.321 & 17.876 \\
1089: BSS-3 & 264.0662077 & -44.7330923 & 20.279 & 19.453 & 18.507 & 17.842 \\
1090: BSS-4 & 264.0684376 & -44.7363620 & 20.298 & 19.463 & 18.457 & 17.709 \\
1091: ....... & & & & & & \\
1092: \hline
1093: \enddata
1094: \tablecomments{The complete table is available in electronic form.}
1095: \label{tab:bss}
1096: \end{deluxetable}
1097:
1098:
1099: %--Table 4
1100: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrrrrrrc}
1101: \tablecolumns{12}
1102: \tablewidth{0pc}
1103: \tablecaption{Number Counts of BSS and HB sub-population Stars}
1104: \startdata
1105: \hline
1106: %\\
1107: %\multicolumn{12}{c}
1108: %{\textbf{Galactic Contamination}}\\
1109: %\\
1110: \hline
1111: \\
1112: $r_i$ & $r_e$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$N_{\rm BSS}$} &
1113: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$N_{\rm RHB}$} &
1114: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$N_{\rm BHB}$} &
1115: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$N_{\rm EHB}$} &
1116: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$N_{\rm BHk}$} &
1117: $L^{\rm samp}/ L^{\rm samp}_{\rm tot}$\\
1118: ${\rm [arcsec]}$ &${\rm [arcsec]}$ & obs & bck & obs & bck & obs & bck & obs &
1119: bck & obs & bck & \\
1120: \hline
1121: 0 & 5 & 22 & 0 & 91 & 0 & 18& 0 & 1 &0 &6 &0 & 0.08 \\
1122: 5 & 15 & 43 & 0 & 346 & 0 & 57& 0 & 7 &0 &8 &0 & 0.26 \\
1123: 15 & 25 & 17 & 0 & 221 & 0 & 43& 0 & 3 &0 &5 &0 & 0.18 \\
1124: 25 & 40 & 10 & 1 & 247 & 1 & 54& 0 & 3 &0 &4 &0 & 0.17 \\
1125: 40 & 65 & 24 & 2 & 248 & 2 & 52& 1 & 8 &0 &8 &0 & 0.16 \\
1126: 65 & 110 & 37 & 7 & 237 & 6 & 40& 1 & 4 &0 &6 &0 & 0.15 \\
1127: \hline
1128: \enddata
1129: \tablecomments{The values listed as ``obs'' correspond to the observed number
1130: of stars counted, while those listed as ``bck'' quote the estimated number of
1131: contaminating field stars in each radial annulus (see
1132: Sect.~\ref{sec:contamination}).}
1133: \label{tab:decon}
1134: \end{deluxetable}
1135:
1136: \newpage
1137: %---Fig.1
1138: \begin{figure}[!hp]
1139: \begin{center}
1140: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f1.ps}
1141: \caption{Map of the {\it HST sample}. The thick solid line delimits the WFPC2
1142: {\it HST} FoV. The concentric annuli are used to study the radial
1143: distribution of BSSs. The inner and the outer annuli correspond to
1144: $r=5\arcsec$ and $r=110\arcsec$, respectively.}
1145: \label{fig:maphst}
1146: \end{center}
1147: \end{figure}
1148:
1149:
1150: %--Fig.2
1151: \begin{center}
1152: \begin{figure}[!p]
1153: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f2.ps}
1154: \caption{Map of the {\it WFI sample}. This sample has been used to estimate
1155: the structural parameters of NGC~6388 and the Galaxy contamination, but not
1156: for constructing the radial distribution of BSS. The dashed line marks the
1157: cluster tidal radius ($r_t=454\arcsec$).}
1158: \label{fig:mapwfi}
1159: \end{figure}
1160: \end{center}
1161:
1162:
1163: %--Fig.3
1164: \begin{figure}[!p]
1165: \begin{center}
1166: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f3.ps}
1167: \caption{Ultraviolet CMD of the {\it HST} WFPC2 sample. The different stellar
1168: populations discussed in the paper are marked with different symbols, as
1169: indicated by the labels. Solid dots mark the selected RR Lyrae stars.}
1170: \label{fig:uvcmd}
1171: \end{center}
1172: \end{figure}
1173:
1174:
1175: %--Fig.4
1176: \begin{figure}[!p]
1177: \begin{center}
1178: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f4.ps}
1179: \caption{Optical CMDs of the {\it HST} WFPC2 and the complementary ACS
1180: samples.}
1181: \label{fig:hstcmd}
1182: \end{center}
1183: \end{figure}
1184:
1185:
1186: %--Fig.5
1187: \begin{figure}[!p]
1188: \begin{center}
1189: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f5.ps}
1190: \caption{Comparison between the UV CMDs of NGC~6388 and M80. The latter
1191: has been suitably shifted in color and magnitude in order to superimpose the
1192: knees of the two HBs (at $m_{255}-U\simeq 0.2$ and $m_{255}\simeq 18.5$). The
1193: dotted line marks the limit ($m_{255}\simeq 20$) below which there are no
1194: more BHB stars in M80, and that we have adopted as the brightest boundary of
1195: the BHk population.}
1196: \label{fig:m80}
1197: \end{center}
1198: \end{figure}
1199:
1200:
1201: %--Fig.6
1202: \begin{figure}[!p]
1203: \begin{center}
1204: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f6.ps}
1205: \caption{Zoom of the optical CMD of the complementary {\it HST} ACS
1206: sample, showing the different stellar populations discussed in the paper,
1207: marked as in Fig.~\ref{fig:uvcmd}. The selection box of BHk stars is marked
1208: as a dashed line, since this population is near the detection limits in the
1209: optical wavelengths.}
1210: \label{fig:Optsel}
1211: \end{center}
1212: \end{figure}
1213:
1214:
1215: %--Fig.7
1216: \begin{figure}[!p]
1217: \begin{center}
1218: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f7.ps}
1219: \caption{Cumulative radial distributions of BHB, EHB and BHk stars (dashed
1220: lines), compared to that of the reference RHB population. No evidences of
1221: peculiar radial distributions are found for the blue HB sub-populations, with
1222: respect to normal cluster stars.}
1223: \label{fig:HB_KS}
1224: \end{center}
1225: \end{figure}
1226:
1227:
1228: %--Fig.8
1229: \begin{figure}[!p]
1230: \begin{center}
1231: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f8.ps}
1232: \caption{Differential Luminosity Function of NGC~6388 shifted to that of
1233: 47~Tuc. The dotted lines indicate the HB red clump and the RGB-bump
1234: level. From the inserts it is apparent that, other than the blue HB, the CMDs
1235: of the two clusters are quite similar.}
1236: \label{fig:47tuc}
1237: \end{center}
1238: \end{figure}
1239:
1240:
1241: %--Fig.9
1242: \begin{figure}[!p]
1243: \begin{center}
1244: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f9.ps}
1245: \caption{Optical CMDs of the {\it WFI sample} for four different radial
1246: ranges, as marked by the labels in each panel.}
1247: \label{fig:wficmd}
1248: \end{center}
1249: \end{figure}
1250:
1251:
1252: %--Fig.10
1253: \begin{figure}[!p]
1254: \begin{center}
1255: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f10.ps}
1256: \caption{Cumulative radial distribution of BSS (solid line) and RHB stars
1257: (dashed line) as a function of the projected distance from the cluster
1258: center, for the combined HST sample. The probability that they are extracted
1259: from the same population is $\simeq 10^{-4}$.}
1260: \label{fig:KS}
1261: \end{center}
1262: \end{figure}
1263:
1264:
1265: %--Fig.11
1266: \begin{figure}[!p]
1267: \begin{center}
1268: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f11.ps}
1269: \caption{Radial distribution of the BSS and HB double normalized ratios, as
1270: defined in equation (\ref{eq:Rpop}), plotted as a function of the radial
1271: coordinate expressed in units of the core radius. $R_{\rm RHB}$ (with the size
1272: of the rectangles corresponding to the error bars computed as described in
1273: Sabbi et al. 2004) is almost constant around unity over the entire cluster
1274: extension, as expected for any normal, non-segregated cluster
1275: population. Instead, the radial trend of $R_{\rm BSS}$ (dots with error bars)
1276: is bimodal: highly peaked in the center (more than a factor of $\sim$ 2
1277: higher than $R_ {RHB}$), decreasing at intermediate radii, and rising again
1278: outward.}
1279: \label{fig:Rpop}
1280: \end{center}
1281: \end{figure}
1282:
1283:
1284: %--Fig.12
1285: \begin{figure}[!p]
1286: \begin{center}
1287: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f12.ps}
1288: \caption{Radial distributions of the specific frequency $N_{\rm BSS}/N_{\rm
1289: HB}$, as observed for NGC~6388 and for other four clusters \citep[see
1290: references in][]{lan07_M5}. The arrows mark the position of the estimated
1291: radius of avoidance (see Sect.~\ref{sec:discus}). This well corresponds to
1292: the position of the observed minimum of distributions, but in the case of
1293: NGC~6388.}
1294: \label{fig:confro}
1295: \end{center}
1296: \end{figure}
1297:
1298: \end{document}
1299: