1: \begin{abstract}

2: A one-step analysis of Anderson acceleration with general algorithmic 

3: depths is presented.  The resulting residual bounds within both contractive and noncontractive

4: settings clearly show the balance between the contributions from the higher and 

5: lower order terms, which are both dependent on the success of the optimization problem solved at each step of the algorithm.

6: In the contractive setting, the bounds sharpen previous convergence

7: and acceleration results.   The bounds rely on  sufficient 

8: linear independence of the differences between consecutive residuals, rather 

9: than assumptions on the boundedness of the optimization coefficients.

10: Several numerical tests illustrate the analysis primarily in the noncontractive

11: setting, and demonstrate the use of the method on a nonlinear Helmholtz equation

12: and the steady Navier-Stokes equations with high Reynolds number in three

13: spatial dimensions.

14: \end{abstract}

15: