1: \begin{abstract}
2: This paper is concerned with resolvent estimates on the real axis for the Helmholtz equation posed in the exterior of a bounded obstacle with Dirichlet boundary conditions when the obstacle is \emph{trapping}.
3: There are two resolvent estimates for this situation currently in the literature: (i) in the case of {\em elliptic trapping} the general ``worst case'' bound of exponential growth
4: applies, and examples show that this growth can be realised through some sequence of wavenumbers;
5: (ii) in the prototypical case of {\em hyperbolic trapping} where the Helmholtz equation is posed in the exterior of two strictly convex obstacles (or several obstacles with additional constraints) the nontrapping resolvent estimate holds with a logarithmic loss.
6:
7: This paper proves the first resolvent estimate for {\em parabolic trapping} by obstacles, studying a class of obstacles the prototypical example of which is the exterior of two squares (in 2-d), or two cubes (in 3-d), whose sides are parallel. We show, via developments of the vector-field/multiplier argument of Morawetz and the first application of this methodology to trapping configurations, that a resolvent estimate holds with a polynomial loss over the nontrapping estimate. We use this bound, along with the other trapping resolvent estimates, to prove results about integral-equation formulations of the boundary value problem in the case of trapping.
8: Feeding these bounds into existing frameworks for analysing finite and boundary element methods, we obtain
9: the first wavenumber-explicit proofs of convergence for numerical methods for solving the Helmholtz equation in the exterior of a trapping obstacle.
10:
11: \vspace{-1.5ex}
12:
13: \paragraph{Keywords:} Helmholtz equation, high frequency, trapping, resolvent, scattering theory, semiclassical analysis, boundary integral equation.
14:
15: \vspace{-1.5ex}
16:
17: \paragraph{AMS subject classifications:} 35J05, 35J25, 35P25, 65N30, 65N38, 78A45
18:
19: \end{abstract}
20: