1: %Tim edited 25/4/08,27/4/08,29/4/08,30/4/08
2: %Mu-Chun edited 01/05/08
3: % Tim 1/5/08
4: % Mu-Chun 1/5/08
5: %Tim 2/5/08
6:
7: %Mu-Chun 29/06/08
8:
9:
10: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ******
11: %%
12: %%
13: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
14: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
15: %%
16: %%
17: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
18: %%
19: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
20: %%
21: %
22: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
23: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
24: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
25: %
26: % Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
27: % author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
28: % For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
29: % Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, or rmp for journal
30: % Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
31: % Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
32: % Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear
33: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
34: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
35: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
36: %\documentclass[aps,prd,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
37: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
38: %\documentclass[aps,preprint,groupedaddress,11pt]{revtex4}
39:
40: %\documentclass[aps,prd,twocolumn,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
41:
42: %\documentclass[aps,preprint,superscriptaddress,11pt]{revtex4}
43:
44: %\documentclass[twocolumn,preprintnumbers,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
45:
46: \usepackage{epsfig}
47: \usepackage{amsmath}
48: \usepackage{graphicx}
49: \usepackage[mathcal]{eucal}
50:
51: \def\eV{\hbox{eV}}
52: \def\GeV{\hbox{GeV}}
53: \def\TeV{\hbox{TeV}}
54: \def\vev#1{\mathopen\langle #1\mathclose\rangle }
55: \def\chibar{{\overline{\chi} }}
56: \def\phibar{{\overline{\phi} }}
57:
58:
59: \begin{document}
60:
61:
62: \title{Fermion Mass Hierarchy and Proton Stability from
63: Non-anomalous $U(1)_F$ in SUSY $SU(5)$}
64:
65: \author{Mu-Chun Chen}\email{muchunc@uci.edu}
66: \affiliation{Department of Physics \& Astronomy,
67: University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA}
68:
69:
70: \author{D.~R. Timothy Jones}\email{drtj@liverpool.ac.uk}
71: \affiliation{Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of
72: Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK}
73:
74: \author{Arvind Rajaraman}\email{arajaram@uci.edu}
75: \affiliation{Department of Physics \& Astronomy,
76: University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA}
77:
78: \author{Hai-Bo Yu}\email{haiboy@uci.edu}
79: \affiliation{Department of Physics \& Astronomy,
80: University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA}
81:
82:
83: \date{April, 2008}
84:
85: \preprint{\vbox{\hbox{UCI-TR-2007-54}}}
86: \preprint{\vbox{\hbox{LTH 790}}}
87:
88: \begin{abstract}
89: We present a realistic supersymmetric $SU(5)$ model combined with
90: a non-anomalous $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry.
91: We find a set of $U(1)_F$ charges which
92: automatically lead to the realistic mass hierarchy and mixing
93: patterns for quarks, leptons and neutrinos.
94: All gauge anomalies, including the $[U(1)_{F}]^{3}$ anomaly, are
95: cancelled in our model without invoking the Green-Schwarz
96: mechanism or having exotic fields.
97: Proton decay mediated by dimension 5 operators is automatically
98: suppressed in our model, because the scale set by the largest
99: right-handed neutrino mass is much less than the GUT scale.
100: \end{abstract}
101:
102: \maketitle
103: \section{Introduction}
104: The fermion mass hierarchy and mixings are some of the least
105: understood aspects of the Standard Model (SM). Many attempts have
106: been made to understand the large disparity among the masses and
107: mixing angles~\cite{Chen:2003zv}.
108: One
109: approach is the Froggatt-Nielsen (FN) mechanism \cite{Froggatt:1978nt},
110: where an $U(1)_F$ family symmetry is introduced under which the SM
111: fermions are charged. The $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry is broken by the
112: vacuum expectation value of a SM-singlet scalar field $\phi$
113: whose $U(1)_{F}$ charge, without loss of generality, is normalized
114: to be -1. Fermion masses are generated by the operators
115: \begin{eqnarray}\label{fn}
116: Y_{ij}\left(\frac{\phi}{\Lambda}\right)^{|q_i+q_j+q_H|}
117: \overline{\Psi}_i\Psi_jH
118: \; ,
119: \end{eqnarray}
120: if $( q_{i} + q_{j} + q_{H} ) $ is a positive integer,
121: and $\phi$
122: is replaced by $\phi^{\dagger}$ if $(q_{i} + q_{j} +
123: q_{H})$ is a negative integer. Here $i,j$ are generation indices,
124: and $q_i, \, q_j$ and $q_H$ are respectively the $U(1)_F$ charges
125: of the fermions $\overline{\Psi}_i$, $\Psi_j$ and the SM Higgs doublet $H$.
126: The parameter $\Lambda$ is the cutoff scale of the $U(1)_{F}$
127: symmetry. Upon breaking the $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry,
128: the effective Yukawa couplings can be written as
129: \begin{eqnarray}
130: Y^{eff}_{ij}=Y_{ij}\lambda^{|q_i+q_j+q_H|} \; ,
131: \end{eqnarray}
132: where $\lambda = \left< \phi \right> / \Lambda $ if $( q_{i} +
133: q_{j} + q_{H} ) $ is a positive integer, and $\lambda = \left<
134: \phi^{\dagger}\right> / \Lambda $ if $(q_{i} + q_{j} + q_{H})$ is a
135: negative integer. By having appropriate $U(1)_{F}$ charges for
136: various fermions, the realistic masses and mixing patterns can be
137: accommodated, with $\lambda$ being smaller than unity and
138: $Y_{ij}\sim {\cal O}(1)$. If the model is supersymmetric, which is
139: the case in our model, the couplings to the $\phi^{\dagger}$ are not
140: allowed, since the superpotential must be holomorphic.
141: However, in order to ensure
142: D-flatness,
143: a $\overline{\phi}$ field, which carries charge +1, must be
144: introduced, with a vacuum expectation value close to that of $\phi$.
145: In this case, $\lambda = \left<
146: \overline{\phi}\right> / \Lambda $ if $(q_{i} + q_{j} + q_{H})$ is a
147: negative integer. Note that as a result the contributions of $\phi,\phibar$
148: to gauge anomalies cancel.
149:
150: Models based on a global $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry have been constructed
151: before (see references in \cite{Chen:2003zv}). However, as any
152: global symmetry is broken by quantum gravity effects, one inevitably
153: has to promote the $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry to be a gauge symmetry. In
154: this case, the $U(1)_{F}$ charges of the fields are constrained by
155: the anomaly cancellation conditions.
156: Most attempts~\cite{Irges:1998ax,Dreiner:2007vp,Duque:2008ah} so far have focussed on
157: an {\it anomalous} $U(1)_F$ symmetry, in which the
158: mixed anomalies are cancelled by the Green-Schwarz
159: mechanism~\cite{Green:1984sg}, while the $[U(1)_{F}]^{3}$ anomaly
160: is not addressed. The $[U(1)_{F}]^{3}$ anomaly can be
161: cancelled by introducing exotic matter fields charged under
162: $U(1)_F$~\cite{Bijnens:1987ff}. However, these models often involve a
163: rather large number of exotic particles whose role is merely to
164: cancel the anomalies~\cite{Kang:2004ix}.
165:
166: Here we pursue an alternative scenario~\cite{Chen:2006hn} where the theory is
167: anomaly-free, without invoking the Green-Schwarz mechanism or
168: exotic particles other than the right-handed neutrinos,
169: which are required
170: for neutrino masses. (We do have the FN pair of SM singlets $\phi,\phibar$
171: described above,
172: and we will find it necessary to introduce another such oppositely-charged
173: pair, but these do not contribute to gauge anomalies.)
174: We propose a SUSY $SU(5)$ model, combined with
175: a {\it non-anomalous} $U(1)_{F}$, in the presence of right-handed
176: neutrinos. We find a set
177: of $U(1)_{F}$ charges that satisfy {\it all} the anomaly cancellation conditions,
178: including the $[U(1)_{F}]^{3}$ anomaly.
179: Note that these charges have to be rational numbers in order for the model to be
180: embedded into a simple group in the UV completed theory;
181: it is thus highly non-trivial for these
182: solutions to exist. We show that these $U(1)_{F}$ charges give rise to
183: realistic quark
184: and charged lepton masses and mixing patterns.
185:
186: The charges we find also lead to a FN mixing pattern for the Dirac
187: neutrino Yukawa matrix, $Y_{\nu}$; however to accommodate the
188: right-handed neutrino masses required for the see-saw mechanism we need
189: to introduce a second pair of SM singlet fields $(\chi,\chibar)$ with
190: charges $\mp \frac{5}{9}$. This leads to a realistic texture for the
191: light neutrino mass matrix, and if we assume that the observed atmospheric
192: neutrino $(\hbox{mass})^2$ difference sets the scale of the heaviest
193: neutrino mass, it follows that $\vev{\chi},\vev{\chibar}\sim 10^{11}\GeV$.
194:
195: Furthermore we then find that the dimension 4 R-parity violating
196: operators ${\bf10}_i {\bf\overline5}_j{\bf\overline5}_k$,
197: are forbidden,
198: and moreover the dimension 5 operators which mediate proton decay are
199: automatically suppressed without additional assumptions or fine-tuning
200: of parameters, because they arise from higher dimensional operators in
201: the effective field theory involving powers of $\chi,\chibar$. This
202: solves a major problem with the usual minimal SUSY $SU(5)$ GUT theories,
203: and allows our model to be viable.
204:
205:
206: \section{The Model}
207: In $SU(5)$, the three generations of matter fields are unified
208: into ${\bf\overline 5}_i$ and ${\bf 10}_i$ representations, where
209: $i = 1, 2, 3$ is the generation index. Under $U(1)_F$,
210: ${\bf\overline 5}_i$ and ${\bf 10}_i$ have charges
211: $q_{f_{i}}$ and $q_{t_{i}}$, respectively. We also introduce
212: right-handed neutrinos, the number of which
213: is a free parameter. If the type-I
214: seesaw~\cite{seesaw} is the mechanism that gives rise to light
215: neutrino masses, we need at least two right-handed neutrinos to
216: accommodate the current neutrino oscillation data;
217: we will take three right-handed neutrinos,
218: $N_i$, which are $SU(5)$ singlets and carry $U(1)_F$ charges,
219: $q_{n_{i}}$.
220:
221: To generate realistic fermion mass hierarchy utilising the
222: FN mechanism
223: and to cancel the gauge anomalies, it turns out that two
224: conjugate pairs of $\bf 5$ and $\bf\overline 5$ Higgses are
225: required (this will be clear once the $U(1)_F$ charges are presented),
226: which we denote as ${\bf
227: 5}_{H_{1}}$, ${\bf\overline{5}}_{H_{1}}$, ${\bf 5}_{H_{2}}$ and
228: ${\bf\overline{5}}_{H_{2}}$. The $U(1)_{F}$ charges of
229: ${\bf5}_{H_{1}}$ and ${\bf5}_{H_{2}}$ are $q_{H_{1}}$ and
230: $q_{H_{2}}$ respectively. In addition, we need a $\bf
231: 24$-dim Higgs to break $SU(5)$ to the SM gauge group. We
232: take this Higgs to be neutral under the $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry.
233: The $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry is broken spontaneously by the vacuum
234: expectation values of the $SU(5)$ singlets, $\phi$ and
235: $\overline\phi$, whose $U(1)_F$ charges are normalized to $-1$ and
236: $+1$, respectively. Note that $\langle\phi\rangle -
237: \langle\overline{\phi}\rangle << \Lambda$, as required by D-flatness.
238:
239: There are three anomaly cancellation conditions that have to be
240: satisfied: the $[SU(5)]^{2} U(1)_{F}$, gravitation-$U(1)_{F}$ and
241: $[U(1)_{F}]^{3}$ anomalies. Since the $\bf 24$-dim Higgs is
242: neutral under the $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry, it does not contribute to
243: these anomalies. As the $\bf 5$-dim Higgses and $\phi$ all appear
244: in conjugate pairs, they do not contribute either. Therefore, only
245: the matter fields, ${\bf\overline5}_i,~{\bf10}_i$ and right-handed
246: neutrinos $N_i$, contribute to the anomalies. To cancel the
247: anomalies, their $U(1)_{F}$ charges must satisfy
248: \begin{eqnarray}
249: \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i} q_{f_{i}} + \frac{3}{2} \sum_{i} q_{t_{i}}=0\label{ano1} \; ,\\
250: 5 \sum_{i}q_{fi} + 10 \sum_{i}q_{t_{i}} + \sum_{i}q_{n_{i}}=0\label{ano2} \; ,\\
251: 5 \sum_{i}q^3_{fi} + 10 \sum_{i}q^3_{t_{i}} + \sum_{i}q^3_{n_{i}}=0\label{ano3}
252: \; .
253: \end{eqnarray}
254: Following \cite{Chen:2006hn}, we parametrize the charges as
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: q_{t_{1}}&=&-\frac{1}{3}q_{f_{1}}-2a \; ,\\
257: q_{t_{2}}&=&-\frac{1}{3}q_{f_{2}}+a+a' \; ,\\
258: q_{t_{3}}&=&-\frac{1}{3}q_{f_{3}}+a-a' \; ,
259: \end{eqnarray}
260: and
261: \begin{eqnarray}
262: q_{n_{1}}&=&-\frac{5}{3}q_{f_{1}}-2b \; ,\\
263: q_{n_{2}}&=&-\frac{5}{3}q_{f_{2}}+b+b' \; ,\\
264: q_{n_{3}}&=&-\frac{5}{3}q_{f_{3}}+b-b' \; .
265: \end{eqnarray}
266: With this parametrisation, the
267: conditions (\ref{ano1}) and (\ref{ano2})
268: are satisfied automatically. The values of $q_{f_{i}}$, $a$,
269: $a^\prime$, $b$ and $b^{\prime}$ are constrained by the cubic
270: equation (\ref{ano3}), as well as the observed fermion masses and mixing
271: patterns.
272:
273:
274: \section{Fermion Masses and Mixings}
275:
276:
277: The up-type quark mass matrix is given by the Yukawa coupling,
278: \begin{equation}
279: \lambda^{|q_{t_{i}} + q_{t_{j}} + q_{H_{1}}|} {\bf
280: 10}_{i}{\bf10}_{j} {\bf5}_{H_{1}} \; , \label{eq:up}
281: \end{equation}
282: where $\lambda = \langle\phi\rangle / \Lambda$. We will take the
283: expansion parameter to be the Cabibbo angle, $\lambda\sim0.22$.
284: Note that if the sum of the charges
285: $( q_{t_{i}} + q_{t_{j}} + q_{H_{1}} )$ is non-integer for some $i$ and $j$,
286: that particular Yukawa coupling is forbidden.
287:
288: In general, there are similar
289: operators involving ${\bf{5}}_{H_{2}}$ which contribute to
290: the up-type quark masses
291: and thus must be included.
292: As we will show later, due to the $U(1)_{F}$ charge of the ${\bf
293: 5}_{H_{2}}$, these operators are suppressed because the sum of charges
294: $( q_{t_{i}} + q_{t_{j}} + q_{H_{2}} )$
295: is non-integer for all $i$ and $j$.
296: It is thus sufficient to consider only the operators given in
297: Eq.~(\ref{eq:up}). %Without loss of generality,
298: In this paper, we restrict ourselves to %the we will consider
299: the case with $( q_{t_{i}} + q_{t_{j}} + q_{H_{1}} )>0$. The
300: exponents that determine the quark mass matrix elements $U_{ij}$
301: are then
302: \begin{eqnarray}
303: \begin{pmatrix}
304: ~|2q_{t_{1}}+q_{H_{1}}|~ & ~|q_{t_{1}}+q_{t_{2}}+q_{H_{1}}|~
305: & ~|q_{t_{1}}+q_{t_{3}}+q_{H_{1}}|~ \\
306: ~ & |2q_{t_{2}}+q_{H_{1}}|
307: & |q_{t_{2}}+q_{t_{3}}+q_{H_{1}}| \\
308: &&|2q_{t_{3}}+q_{H_{1}}| \end{pmatrix}~
309: \end{eqnarray}
310: with $U_{ij} = U_{ji}$.
311:
312: As the top quark mass is large, it is natural to assume that it is
313: un-suppressed by the expansion parameter. We therefore demand
314: $2q_{t_{3}}+q_{H_{1}}=0$. We also assume $q_{f_{2}}=q_{f_{3}}$,
315: which is motivated by the large atmospheric neutrino mixing.
316: With these assumptions, the parameters
317: \begin{equation}
318: a'=1,~~-\frac{1}{3}(q_{f_1}-q_{f_2})-3a=2 \; , \label{eq:up1}
319: \end{equation}
320: gives the up-type quark Yukawa couplings
321: \begin{eqnarray}\label{fu}
322: Y_u\sim\begin{pmatrix}\lambda^6&\lambda^5&\lambda^3\\\lambda^5&\lambda^4&
323: \lambda^2\\\lambda^3&\lambda^2&1\end{pmatrix} \; ,
324: \end{eqnarray}
325: yielding a realistic up-type quark mass
326: hierarchy~\cite{Sato:1997hv}.
327:
328:
329: Down-type quark masses are generated by the Yukawa couplings,
330: \begin{equation}
331: \lambda^{|q_{t_{i}} + q_{f_{j}} - q_{H_{2}}|}
332: {\bf10}_i{\bf\overline5}_j{\bf\overline5}_{H_{2}} \; .
333: \end{equation}
334: All couplings to the $\overline{5}_{H_{1}}$ are highly suppressed,
335: because the corresponding sums of the $U(1)_F$ charges
336: are non-integer, as we shall see when we present the solutions for the
337: charges.
338:
339:
340: Let us assume that the b-quark mass is generated at the renormalisable
341: level. (In fact we have also examined the cases when the
342: $b$-mass Yukawa is suppressed by a factor of $\lambda^{\alpha_b}$
343: with $\alpha_b = 1,2,3$,
344: but without finding a solution more elegant than the one we present here).
345: The exponents of the elements in the down-type quark mass matrix
346: are then \begin{eqnarray} \begin{pmatrix}~|-9a-3| ~ &~ 3~ &~ 3~\\ ~
347: |-9a-4| ~&~2~&~2~\\~ |-9a-6| ~ &~0~&~0~\end{pmatrix} \; . \end{eqnarray}
348: The observed mass hierarchy among the down-type quarks can be obtained
349: with $a=-\frac{7}{9}$ and $q_{f_{1}}-q_{f_{2}}=1$ when we take
350: $(q_{t_{i}} + q_{f_{j}} - q_{H_{2}})>0$. The Yukawa couplings for the
351: down type quarks and the charged leptons are \begin{eqnarray}\label{fd}
352: Y_d\sim
353: Y^T_e\sim\begin{pmatrix}\lambda^4&\lambda^3&\lambda^3\\\lambda^3&
354: \lambda^2&\lambda^2\\\lambda&1&1 \end{pmatrix} \; . \end{eqnarray} The
355: Yukawa matrices $Y_{u}$ and $Y_{d}$ also give rise to realistic CKM
356: matrix elements~\cite{Sato:1997hv}. In addition, the Georgi-Jarlskog
357: relations~\cite{Georgi:1979df} for the first and second generations of
358: down type quarks and charged leptons can be obtained by introducing a
359: $\bf 45$-dim Higgs (accompanied by a $\overline{{\bf 45}}$ to maintain
360: anomaly cancellation). The following discussion does not depend on this.
361:
362:
363:
364: Let us return to the anomaly cancellation conditions. The cubic equation
365: in terms of the three free parameters $b$, $b^{\prime}$ and $q_{f_{2}}$
366: reduces to a linear one and it is given by \begin{equation} q_{f_2} = -
367: \frac{4550+2430b^{2} + 729b^{3} - 81 b (-25+9b^{\prime \, 2})}
368: {45(124+90b+81b^{2} + 27b^{\prime \, 2})} \; . \end{equation} Thus for
369: any rational values of $b$ and $b^{\prime}$, there always exists a
370: solution for $q_{f_2}$. The simplest set of solutions we found
371: correspond to $b = -37/18$ and $b^{\prime} = 3/2$. The corresponding
372: $U(1)_F$ charges for all the fields in the model are shown in Table I.
373: It is remarkable that such a simple solution to all the anomaly
374: cancellation constraints exists. We note that there are degenerate
375: solutions. With $b=-5/9$ and $b^{\prime} = 3$, we again get $q_{f_2}= -1/2$,
376: but now $q_{n_{1}} = 5/18$
377: and $q_{n_{2}}=59/18$. These charges lead to the same effective neutrino
378: mass matrix, $m_{\nu}$, as given in Eq.~(\ref{lightneutrinomass}) below.
379:
380:
381: We now consider the neutrino sector.
382: The neutrino Dirac mass matrix is generated by the Yukawa
383: couplings
384: \begin{equation}
385: \lambda^{|q_{f_{i}} + q_{n_{j}} + q_{H_{1}}|}
386: {{\bf\overline5}_i}N_j{{\bf5}_{H_{1}}} \; .
387: \end{equation}
388: As in the charged fermion sector, we will find that all couplings to
389: the other Higgs (in this case ${\bf5}_{H_{2}}$)
390: are highly suppressed.
391: With the charge assignment given in Table I, the neutrino Dirac Yukawa
392: matrix is given by
393: \begin{eqnarray}
394: Y_{\nu}\sim
395: \begin{pmatrix}
396: \lambda^{7} & \lambda^4 & \lambda\\
397: \lambda^{6} & \lambda^3 & 1\\
398: \lambda^{6} & \lambda^3 &1\end{pmatrix}
399: \; .
400: \end{eqnarray}
401:
402: In order to use the type-I seesaw mechanism
403: to generate the effective neutrino masses, we must introduce a second pair
404: of SM-singlets $\chi, \chibar$ with charges $\mp 5/9$. Then the
405: Majorana mass matrix for the right-handed neutrinos is
406: \begin{eqnarray}
407: M_{RR}
408: \sim\begin{pmatrix}
409: \lambda^{6} & \lambda^3 & 1\\
410: \lambda^{3} & 1 & \lambda^3 \\
411: 1 & \lambda^{3} & \lambda^{6}
412: \end{pmatrix}
413: \left< \chi \right> \; .
414: \end{eqnarray}
415: The effective light neutrino mass matrix, after implementing the
416: seesaw mechanism, is
417: \begin{eqnarray}\label{lightneutrinomass}
418: m_{\nu}\sim
419: Y_{\nu}M_{RR}^{-1}Y^T_{\nu}v^2\sim
420: \begin{pmatrix}
421: \lambda^{8} & \lambda^{7} & \lambda^{7} \\
422: \lambda^{7} & \lambda^{6} & \lambda^{6} \\
423: \lambda^{7} & \lambda^{6} & \lambda^{6} \end{pmatrix}
424: \frac{v^2}{\left<\chi \right>} \; ,
425: \end{eqnarray}
426: %where $M_{R}=\Lambda\lambda^4$. For $\Lambda$ near the GUT scale
427: %$\sim 10^{16}~{\rm GeV}$, we find $M_{R} \sim 10^{13}-10^{14}~{\rm
428: %GeV}$.
429: where $v = \vev {H_1}$. If we assume $v\sim 240 \GeV$ and that the largest
430: neutrino $(\hbox{mass})^2$ is around $2\times 10^{-3}\eV^2$, we find
431: $\left< \chi \right> \sim 10^{11} \;$ GeV.
432: The textures given in Eqs.~(\ref{fu}),
433: (\ref{fd}) and (\ref{lightneutrinomass}) have been shown to give successful
434: fermion masses and mixings~\cite{Sato:1997hv}, including those in
435: the neutrino sector~\cite{Chen:2007afa}.
436:
437:
438:
439:
440: %
441: %
442: %If the type-I seesaw mechanism is
443: %implemented to generate the effective neutrino masses, the
444: %$U(1)_F$ charges of the right-handed neutrinos should be chosen
445: %such that some of the operators for right-handed neutrino Majorana
446: %masses
447: %\begin{equation}
448: %\lambda^{|q_{n_{i}} + q_{n_{j}}|} N_{i} N_{j} \Lambda \;
449: %\end{equation}
450: %are allowed. We therefore demand that $|q_{n_{i}} + q_{n_{j}}|$
451: %and $|q_{f_{i}} + q_{n_{j}} + q_{H_{1}}|$ are integral, which is
452: %required to generate the correct neutrino masses by the seesaw
453: %mechanism.
454:
455: %We express each of $b, \; b^\prime$ and $q_{f_{2}}$ as a ratio
456: %of two integers, and scan these six integers in the range from
457: %$-30$ to $30$.
458: %Remarkably, we find
459: %only three viable solutions. These are $(b=7/9, \; b'=1)$, $(b=-
460: %2/9, \, b'=2)$ and $(b=-11/9, \, b'=1)$, and in all cases
461: %$q_{f_{2}} = -10/3$. These three solutions turn out to be equivalent
462: %as they give rise to the same right-handed neutrino charges but
463: %with different generation orderings. The corresponding $U(1)_F$
464: %charges for all the fields in the model are shown in Table I (we
465: %have set $b=7/9,~b'=1$ and $q_{f_2}=-10/3$).
466:
467:
468: \begin{table}
469: \begin{tabular}{|c|c| c| c| c| c| c| c|c|c|c|c|}
470: \hline Field&${\bf \overline{5}}_1$&${\bf \overline{5}}_2$&${\bf
471: \overline{5}}_3$&${\bf 10}_1$&${\bf 10}_2$&${\bf
472: 10}_3$&$N_1$&$N_2$&$N_3$&${\bf 5}_{H1}$&${\bf 5}_{H2}$\\\hline
473: $U(1)_F$
474: charge&$\frac{1}{2}$&$-\frac{1}{2}$&$-\frac{1}{2}$&$\frac{25}{18}$&
475: $\frac{7}{18}$&$-\frac{29}{18}$&$\frac{59}{18}$&$\frac{5}{18}$
476: &$-\frac{49}{18}$&$\frac{29}{9}$&$-\frac{19}{9}$\\
477: \hline
478: \end{tabular}
479: \caption{$U(1)_F$ charges of different fields.}
480: \end{table}
481:
482: %It is interesting to observe that the solution gives
483: %$q_{n_{1}}=0$, indicating that one of the right-handed neutrinos,
484: %$N_1$, does not play a role in the anomaly cancellations. In the
485: %absence of $N_1$, viable effective neutrino masses and mixings can
486: %still arise.
487: %To see this, consider the neutrino Dirac Yukawa coupling matrix
488: %involving only the right-handed neutrinos $N_2$ and $N_3$.
489:
490: \section{Proton decay}
491: The usual minimal SUSY $SU(5)$ GUT model suffers from the problem
492: of having rapid proton decay due to the dimension 5 operators
493: mediated by colored triplet Higgsinos, if the masses of the
494: SUSY particles are $\sim 1~{\rm TeV}$ \cite{protondecay}.
495:
496: In our model the R-parity violating operators
497: $\lambda_{ijk}{\bf10}_i{\bf\overline5}_j{\bf\overline5}_k$
498: are forbidden by our $U(1)_F$ charge assignments, and moreover
499: cannot be generated via higher dimensional terms involving
500: powers of $\phi,\phibar$ and/or $\chi,\chibar$.
501: (In fact with right handed neutrinos
502: we also have the possibility of
503: dimension-4 R-parity violating operators of the form
504: $N_i N_j N_k$ and $N_i {\bf 5}_{H_{1,2}}{\bf\overline 5}_{H_{1,2}}$; these
505: are similarly forbidden).
506:
507: Let us now consider the dimension 5 operators $\kappa_{ijkl}{\bf10}_i{\bf10}_j
508: {\bf10}_k{\overline5}_l$. In the usual SUSY GUT theory,
509: one needs to tune the
510: parameters $\kappa_{1121},\kappa_{1122}$ to be smaller than
511: $10^{-8}/M_{Pl}$ \cite{Hinchliffe:1992ad}.
512: These operators are also forbidden here by $U(1)_F$ conservation, but can
513: be generated from higher-dimension operators involving $\phi,\phibar$ and
514: $\chi,\chibar$. for example the operator
515: ${\bf10}_1{\bf10}_1{\bf10}_2{\overline5}_1$ has $U(1)_F$
516: charge $11/3$, which can be generated from the operator
517: \begin{equation}
518: {\bf10}_1{\bf10}_1{\bf10}_2{\overline5}_1
519: \left( \frac{\phi^2\chi^3}{\Lambda^6}\right)
520: \end{equation}
521: which for $\Lambda \sim M_{\hbox{\small GUT}}$ is very suppressed. All the
522: $\kappa_{ijkl}$ operators are suppressed by $({\vev \chi}/\Lambda)^3$.
523: \begin{figure}[t]
524: \includegraphics[scale=0.59]{proton.eps}
525: %\includegraphics[scale=0.59]{proton}
526: \caption{Feynman diagrams of dimension 5 operators that lead to proton
527: decay mediated by color triplet Higgsinos. (a): Dimension 5 proton
528: decay operators in the usual minimal SUSY $SU(5)$
529: model~\cite{Sakai:1981pk}. (b) and (c): in the presence of the
530: $U(1)_{F}$, these operators are absent because the Yukawa
531: couplings that are circled are highly suppressed.}
532: \end{figure}
533:
534: In the standard $SU(5)$ treatment these operators are generated by
535: color triplet Higgs exchange.
536: In our model, however, we have two conjugate pairs of Higgses,
537: $({\bf 5}_{H_{1}} \oplus {\bf\overline 5}_{H_{1}}$)
538: and $({\bf 5}_{H_{2}} \oplus {\bf\overline
539: 5}_{H_{2}}$). With the $U(1)_F$ charge assignment given in Table I,
540: the couplings ${\bf10}_i{\bf10}_j{\bf5}_{H_{2}}$ and
541: ${\bf10}_i{\bf\overline5}_j{\bf\overline5}_{H_{1}}$ are also suppressed
542: by $({\vev \chi}/\Lambda)^3$ for any $i$ and $j$,
543: because the sums of the $U(1)_F$ charges of the
544: fields involved in each of these operators are fractions of the form
545: $2/3, -1/3, 7/3$ etc.
546: The mass terms that mixes ${\bf5}_{H_{1}}-{\bf\overline5}_{H_{2}}$ and
547: ${\bf5}_{H_{2}}-{\bf\overline5}_{H_{1}}$ are similarly suppressed by
548: a factor of $({\vev \chi}/\Lambda)^3\lambda^7$.
549: In Fig.~(1) we contrast the situations in the standard $SU(5)$ treatment
550: and in our model.
551:
552:
553: Therefore, all dangerous dimension 5 operators that could lead to fast proton decay
554: are absent in this model~\footnote{Of course it is possible to envisage models where dimension 5 proton
555: decay contributions are permitted which are nevertheless consistent
556: with observations~\cite{Berezhiani:2006mt}; however it seems to us more attractive if
557: they are forbidden in a natural way.}.
558:
559: We note that a similar mechanism to suppress dimension 5 proton decay
560: operators has been discussed in, for example~\cite{Babu:1993we,Dreiner:2007vp}.
561: For more recent work utilising a discrete symmetry, see
562: \cite{Mohapatra:2007vd}. In these models, unlike in our
563: case, the cubic anomaly cancellation condition was not imposed
564: to constrain the charges.
565:
566: \section{Conclusion} We have constructed a realistic model based on SUSY
567: $SU(5)\times U(1)_F$, which is free {\it all gauge anomalies}. It is
568: quite remarkable that we are able to find such a simple solution for
569: the charges that achieves this. Realistic
570: fermion masses and mixing angles are generated upon breaking of the
571: $U(1)_{F}$ symmetry. We find that three right-handed neutrinos are
572: required in this model in order to cancel the gauge anomalies, in
573: addition to generating neutrino masses. Most interestingly, all dimension 5
574: operators that could lead to proton decay are automatically suppressed.
575: The model therefore possesses all the successes of grand unification,
576: while still being consistent with the limits from non-observation of
577: proton decay.
578:
579: We have not discussed the supersymmetry-breaking sector of the theory,
580: nor the origin of the low energy Higgs potential. One might, for
581: example, consider anomaly mediated supersymmetry-breaking; particularly
582: since then introduction of an anomaly-free $U(1)$ has been advocated
583: as leading to a solution of the tachyonic slepton problem. However for
584: this to work all the lepton doublets and the charged lepton singlets
585: must have the same sign of the $U(1)$ charge, so it is not compatible
586: with the structure of our model. In a non-GUT context a viable
587: marriage of FN textures with anomaly mediation and a $U(1)_F$ was
588: described in Ref.~\cite{Jack:2003qg} (although in that analysis, unlike
589: here, exotic SM singlets are again required to cancel the $U(1)_F$
590: cubic and gravitational anomalies).
591:
592: Since our quark and lepton mass matrices arise from Yukawa couplings to
593: ${\bf 5}_{H_1}$ and ${\bf\overline{5}}_{H_2}$, we need the light Higgs
594: doublets $H_u$ and $H_d$ to come primarily from these representations.
595: Note that as indicated above the
596: ${\bf5}_{H_{1}}-{\bf\overline5}_{H_{2}}$ mass term is suppressed;
597: however the ${\bf5}_{H_{1}}-{\bf\overline5}_{H_{1}}$ and
598: ${\bf5}_{H_{2}}-{\bf\overline5}_{H_{2}}$ mass terms are allowed. One
599: way to obtain light Higgs doublets would be to introduce couplings
600: ${\bf5}_{H_{1}}{\bf 24}\,{\bf\overline5}_{H_{1}}$ and
601: ${\bf5}_{H_{2}}{\bf 24}\,{\bf\overline5}_{H_{2}}$ tuned as in the
602: original supersymmetric $SU(5)$ model so as to leave 2 pairs of light
603: Higgs doublets and heavy Higgs triplets. Having two pairs of Higgs
604: doublets would mean that there would have to be quite large threshold
605: corrections in order to maintain gauge unification, unless one arranged
606: to have a one light pair of color triplets. (This possibility has been
607: considered recently in $E_6$-based models~\cite{Athron:2007en}.) We hope
608: to return elsewhere to a full construction of the Higgs sector of the
609: theory.
610:
611:
612:
613: It would be interesting to see if this model can be realized in a
614: more direct way, for example in a string theory model of
615: intersecting branes.
616: %As our model has only two right-handed neutrinos,
617: It may be possible to
618: implement the mechanism of \cite{Frampton:2002qc},
619: in which the connection between leptogenesis and low energy
620: leptonic CP violation can be established~\cite{Chen:2004ww}.
621: It would be interesting to investigate this further.
622:
623:
624:
625: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
626:
627: \section{Acknowledgements}
628: The authors thank K.T. Mahanthappa and R. N. Mohapatra for useful
629: discussions. The work of M.-C.C. and H.B.Y. is supported in part by the
630: National Science Foundation under Grant No. PHY-0709742. The work of
631: A.R. is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant
632: Nos. PHY-0354993 and PHY-0653656.
633:
634: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
635:
636: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
637:
638:
639: \begin{thebibliography}{90}
640:
641: %\cite{Chen:2003zv}
642: \bibitem{Chen:2003zv}
643: For review, see e.g. M.-C.~Chen and K.T.~Mahanthappa,
644: %``Fermion masses and mixing and CP-violation in SO(10) models with family
645: %symmetries,''
646: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys. {\bf A18}, 5819 (2003).
647: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0305088].
648: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A18,5819;%%
649:
650:
651: \bibitem{Froggatt:1978nt}
652: C.D.~Froggatt and H.B.~Nielsen,
653: %``Hierarchy Of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles And CP Violation,''
654: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B147}, 277 (1979).
655:
656:
657: \bibitem{Irges:1998ax}
658: N. Irges, S.~Lavignac and P.~Ramond,
659: %``Predictions from an anomalous U(1) model of Yukawa hierarchies,''
660: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D58}, 035003 (1998).
661: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9802334].
662: %\cite{Dreiner:2007vp}
663:
664: \bibitem{Dreiner:2007vp}
665: H.~K.~Dreiner, C.~Luhn, H.~Murayama and M.~Thormeier,
666: %``Proton Hexality from an Anomalous Flavor U(1) and Neutrino Masses - Linking
667: %to the String Scale,''
668: arXiv:0708.0989 [hep-ph].
669: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0708.0989;%%
670:
671: %\cite{Duque:2008ah}
672: \bibitem{Duque:2008ah}
673: L.~F.~Duque, D.~A.~Gutierrez, E.~Nardi and J.~Norena,
674: %``Fermion mass hierarchy and non-hierarchical mass ratios in SU(5) x
675: %U(1)_F,''
676: arXiv:0804.2865 [hep-ph].
677: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0804.2865;%%
678:
679: \bibitem{Green:1984sg}
680: M.B.~Green and J.H.~Schwarz,
681: %``Anomaly Cancellation In Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory And Superstring
682: %Theory,''
683: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B149}, 117 (1984).
684:
685: \bibitem{Bijnens:1987ff}
686: J.~Bijnens and C.~Wetterich,
687: %``QUARK, LEPTON AND NEUTRINO MASSES IN GRAND UNIFIED THEORIES WITH LOCAL
688: %GENERATION GROUP,''
689: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B292}, 443 (1987);
690: %\bibitem{Batra:2005rh}
691: P.~Batra, B.A.~Dobrescu and D.~Spivak,
692: %``Anomaly-free sets of fermions,''
693: J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 47}, 082301 (2006).
694: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0510181].
695:
696: %\cite{Kang:2004ix}
697: \bibitem{Kang:2004ix}
698: J.H.~Kang, P.~Langacker and T.J.~Li,
699: %``Neutrino masses in supersymmetric SU(3)C x SU(2)L x U(1)Y x U(1)'
700: %models,''
701: Phys.\ Rev. {\bf D71}, 015012 (2005).
702: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0411404].
703: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D71,015012;%%
704:
705: \bibitem{Chen:2006hn}
706: M.-C.~Chen, A.~de Gouvea and B.~A.~Dobrescu,
707: %``Gauge trimming of neutrino masses,''
708: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D75}, 055009 (2007).
709: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0612017].
710:
711:
712:
713: \bibitem{seesaw} P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 67}, 421 (1977);
714: M.~Gell-Mann, P.~Ramond and R.~Slansky, \emph{Supergravity}
715: (P.~van Nieuwenhuizen et al. eds.),
716: 1979, p.~315;
717: T.~Yanagida, in \emph{Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified
718: Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe}, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979, p.~95;
719: S.~L. Glashow, %\emph{The future of elementary particle physics},
720: in \emph{Proceedings of the 1979 Carg{\`e}se Summer Institute on Quarks
721: and Leptons}, Plenum Press, New York, 1980, p.~687; R.~N.
722: Mohapatra and G.~Senjanovi{\'c}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 44}, 912
723: (1980).
724:
725:
726:
727: \bibitem{Sato:1997hv}
728: J.~Sato and T.~Yanagida,
729: %``Large lepton mixing in a coset-space family unification on E(7)/SU(5) x
730: %U(1)**3,''
731: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B430}, 127 (1998);
732: %\cite{Kane:2005va}
733: %\bibitem{Kane:2005va}
734: G.~L.~Kane, S.~F.~King, I.~N.~R.~Peddie and L.~Velasco-Sevilla,
735: %``Study of theory and phenomenology of some classes of family symmetry and
736: %unification models,''
737: JHEP {\bf 0508}, 083 (2005).
738: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0504038].
739: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0508,083;%%
740:
741: \bibitem{Georgi:1979df}
742: H.~Georgi and C.~Jarlskog,
743: %``A New Lepton - Quark Mass Relation In A Unified Theory,''
744: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B86}, 297 (1979).
745:
746:
747: %\cite{Chen:2007afa}
748: \bibitem{Chen:2007afa}
749: Here the neutrino mixing pattern is bi-maximal. The tri-bimaximal mixing pattern can also be obtained in SU(5) with a non-abelian discrete family symmetry; see, M.-C.~Chen and K.~T.~Mahanthappa,
750: %``CKM and Tri-bimaximal MNS Matrices in a $SU(5) \times ^{(d)}T$ Model,''
751: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B652}, 34 (2007).
752: % [arXiv:0705.0714 [hep-ph]].
753: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B652,34;%%
754:
755:
756: \bibitem{protondecay}
757: %For a review, see
758: J.~Hisano,
759: %``Proton decay in the supersymmetric grand unified models,''
760: arXiv:hep-ph/0004266; T.~Goto and T.~Nihei,
761: %``Effect of RRRR dimension 5 operator on the proton decay in the minimal
762: %SU(5) SUGRA GUT model,''
763: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D59}, 115009 (1999); %[arXiv:hep-ph/9808255]
764: H.~Murayama and A.~Pierce,
765: %``Not even decoupling can save minimal supersymmetric SU(5),''
766: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D65}, 055009 (2002); %[arXiv:hep-ph/0108104];
767: B.~Bajc, P.~Fileviez Perez and G.~Senjanovi{\'c},
768: %``Proton decay in minimal supersymmetric SU(5),''
769: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D66}, 075005 (2002); % [arXiv:hep-ph/0204311];
770: for review, see e.g. P.~Nath and P.~Fileviez Perez,
771: %``Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings, and in branes,''
772: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 441} (2007) 191.
773: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0601023].
774:
775: \bibitem{Hinchliffe:1992ad}
776: I.~Hinchliffe and T.~Kaeding,
777: %``B+L Violating Couplings In The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model,''
778: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D47}, 279 (1993).
779:
780: \bibitem{Sakai:1981pk}
781: N.~Sakai and T.~Yanagida,
782: %``Proton Decay In A Class Of Supersymmetric Grand Unified Models,''
783: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B197}, 533 (1982);
784: % \bibitem{Weinberg:1981wj}
785: S.~Weinberg,
786: %``Supersymmetry At Ordinary Energies. 1. Masses And Conservation Laws,''
787: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D26}, 287 (1982).
788:
789:
790:
791: %\cite{Berezhiani:2006mt}
792: \bibitem{Berezhiani:2006mt}
793: Z.~Berezhiani, F.~Nesti and L.~Pilo,
794: %``Soft SUSY breaking contributions to proton decay,''
795: JHEP {\bf 0610}, 030 (2006);
796: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0607303].
797: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0610,030;%%
798: %\cite{Bachas:1995yt}
799: %\bibitem{Bachas:1995yt}
800: C.~Bachas, C.~Fabre and T.~Yanagida,
801: %``Natural gauge-coupling unification at the string scale,''
802: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 370}, 49 (1996);
803: % [arXiv:hep-th/9510094].
804: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B370,49;%%
805: %\cite{Bajc:2002pg}
806: %\bibitem{Bajc:2002pg}
807: B.~Bajc, P.~Fileviez Perez and G.~Senjanovic,
808: %``Minimal supersymmetric SU(5) theory and proton decay: Where do we stand?,''
809: arXiv:hep-ph/0210374.
810: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0210374;%%
811:
812:
813: \bibitem{Babu:1993we}
814: K.~S.~Babu and S.~M.~Barr,
815: %``Natural suppression of Higgsino mediated proton decay in supersymmetric
816: %SO(10),''
817: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D48}, 5354 (1993);
818: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9306242].
819: %\cite{Jack:2003pb}
820: %\bibitem{Jack:2003pb}
821: I.~Jack, D.~R.~T.~Jones and R.~Wild,
822: %``Yukawa textures and the mu-term,''
823: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 580} (2004) 72.
824: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0309165].
825: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B580,72;%%
826:
827:
828:
829:
830:
831: \bibitem{Mohapatra:2007vd}
832: R.~N.~Mohapatra and M.~Ratz,
833: %``Gauged Discrete Symmetries and Proton Stability,''
834: Phys.\ Rev. {\bf D76}, 095003 (2007);
835: %
836: % \bibitem{Lee:2007qx}
837: H.~S.~Lee, C.~Luhn and K.~T.~Matchev,
838: %``Discrete gauge symmetries and proton stability in the U(1)'-extended
839: %MSSM,''
840: arXiv:0712.3505 [hep-ph].
841:
842: %\cite{Jack:2003qg}
843: \bibitem{Jack:2003qg}
844: I.~Jack and D.~R.~T.~Jones,
845: %``Yukawa textures and anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking,''
846: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 662}, 63 (2003).
847: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0301163].
848: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B662,63;%%
849:
850:
851:
852:
853:
854:
855:
856: \bibitem{Athron:2007en}
857: P.~Athron, S.~F.~King, D.~J.~Miller, S.~Moretti and R.~Nevzorov,
858: %``Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in the E6SSM,''
859: arXiv:0708.3248 [hep-ph].
860: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0708.3248;%%
861:
862:
863:
864:
865: %\cite{Frampton:2002qc}
866: \bibitem{Frampton:2002qc}
867: P.~H.~Frampton, S.~L.~Glashow and T.~Yanagida,
868: %``Cosmological sign of neutrino CP violation,''
869: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B548}, 119 (2002).
870: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0208157].
871: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B548,119;%%
872:
873: %\cite{Chen:2004ww}
874: \bibitem{Chen:2004ww}
875: M.-C.~Chen and K.~T.~Mahanthappa,
876: %``Relating leptogenesis to low energy flavor violating observables in models
877: %with spontaneous CP violation,''
878: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D71}, 035001 (2005);
879: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0411158].
880: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D71,035001;%%
881: %\cite{Chen:2006bv}
882: %\bibitem{Chen:2006bv}
883: % M.~C.~Chen and K.~T.~Mahanthappa,
884: %``Low scale seesaw, electron EDM and leptogenesis in a model with
885: %spontaneous CP violation,''
886: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D
887: {\it ibid.} {\bf D75}, 015001 (2007);
888: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0609288].
889: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,015001;%%
890: %\cite{Chen:2007fv}
891: %\bibitem{Chen:2007fv}
892: for review, see e.g.
893: M.-C.~Chen,
894: %``TASI 2006 Lectures on Leptogenesis,''
895: arXiv:hep-ph/0703087.
896: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0703087;%%
897:
898:
899: \end{thebibliography}
900: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
901:
902: \end{document}
903:
904: