1: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

2: 

3: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

4: 

5: %% AASTeX v5.0 LaTeX 2e macros.

6: 

7: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.0 document

8: 

9: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

10: 

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the default manuscript style,

14: 

15: %% which will produce a double-spaced document on one column.

16: 

17: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

18: 

19: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

20: 

21: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

22: 

23: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:

24: 

25: % \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}

26: 

27: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

28: 

29: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

30: 

31: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

32: 

33: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

34: 

35: %% the \begin{document} command.

36: 

37: %%

38: 

39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

40: 

41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

42: 

43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.0 Author Guide

44: 

45: %% for information.

46: 

47: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

48: 

49: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

50: 

51: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

52: 

53: %\slugcomment{To submit to ApJ}

54: 

55: \def\etal{{\it et al.~}}

56: 

57: \def\ds{\displaystyle}

58: 

59: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

60: 

61: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

62: 

63: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

64: 

65: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

66: 

67: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

68: 

69: %% will not print in the manuscript style.

70: 

71: \shorttitle{Infall and Outflow in Sgr B2}

72: 

73: \shortauthors{Qin et al.}

74: 

75: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

76: 

77: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

78: 

79: \begin{document}

80: 

81: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

82: 

83: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

84: 

85: %% you desire.

86: 

87: \title{Infall and Outflow of Molecular Gas in Sgr B2}

88: 

89: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

90: 

91: %% author and affiliation information.

92: 

93: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

94: 

95: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

96: 

97: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

98: 

99: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.

100: 

101: \author{Sheng-Li Qin \altaffilmark{1,2}, Jun-Hui Zhao \altaffilmark{1}, James M. Moran \altaffilmark{1},

102: Daniel P. Marrone \altaffilmark{1},\\

103: Nimesh A. Patel \altaffilmark{1}, Jun-Jie Wang\altaffilmark{2},

104: Sheng-Yuan Liu \altaffilmark{3}, Yi-Jehng Kuan \altaffilmark{3,4}}

105: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60

106: Garden Street, MS 42, Cambridge, MA 02138; sqin@cfa.harvard.edu.}

107: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese

108: Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012.} \altaffiltext{3}{Academia

109: Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, P.O.Box 23-141,

110: Taipei 106, Taiwan.} \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Earth

111: Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 88 Section 4,

112: Ting-Chou Road, Taipei 116, Taiwan.}

113: 

114: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

115: 

116: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

117: 

118: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

119: 

120: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

121: 

122: %% editorial office after submission.

123: 

124: \begin{abstract}

125: 

126: Observations of two H$_2$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$ and $3_{21}-2_{20}$)

127: lines and continuum emission at 1.3 mm towards Sgr B2(N) and Sgr

128: B2(M) have been carried out with the SMA. The mosaic maps of Sgr

129: B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) in both continuum and lines show a complex

130: distribution of dust and molecular gas in both clumps and

131: filaments surrounding the compact star formation cores. We have

132: observed a decelerating outflow originated from the Sgr B2(M)

133: core, showing that both the red-shifted and blue-shifted outflow

134: components have a common terminal velocity. This terminal velocity

135: is 58$\pm$2 km s$^{-1}$. It provides an excellent method in

136: determination of the systematic velocity of the molecular cloud.

137: The SMA observations have also shown that a large fraction of

138: absorption against the two continuum cores is red-shifted with

139: respect to the systematic velocities of Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M),

140: respectively, suggesting that the majority of the dense molecular

141: gas is flowing into the two major cores where massive stars have

142: been formed. We have solved the radiative transfer in a

143: multi-level system with LVG approximation. The observed H$_2$CO

144: line intensities and their ratios can be adequately fitted with

145: this model for the most of the gas components. However, the line

146: intensities between the higher energy level transition H$_2$CO

147: ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) and the lower energy level transition H$_2$CO

148: ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) is reversed in the red-shifted outflow region of

149: Sgr B2(M), suggesting the presence of inversion in population

150: between the ground levels in the two K ladders (K$_{-1}$= 0 and

151: 2). The possibility of weak maser processes for the H$_2$CO

152: emission in Sgr B2(M) is discussed.

153: 

154: \end{abstract}

155: 

156: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

157: 

158: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

159: 

160: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

161: 

162: %% what keyword punctuat ion is appropriate.

163: 

164: \keywords{Galaxy:center --- ISM:individual (Sgr B2) ---

165: ISM:kinematics and dynamics --- ISM:molecules --- radio lines: ISM

166: --- star:formation}

167: 

168: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

169: 

170: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

171: 

172: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

173: 

174: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

175: 

176: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

177: 

178: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

179: 

180: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

181: 

182: %% each reference.

183: 

184: 

185: \section{Introduction}

186: 

187: The giant molecular cloud Sgr B2, located close to the Galactic

188: center ($\sim$44 arcmin from Sgr A*), is a well-known massive

189: star-forming region in our Galaxy. Sgr B2 consists of an extended

190: envelope, a hot ring and a few compact cores (e.g. Goicoechea,

191: Rodriguze-Fernandez \& Cernicharo 2004). The radio continuum and

192: recombination line observations of the compact HII regions suggest

193: that Sgr B2(N) and Sgr~B2~(M) are the two most active star forming

194: cores in this region (Gaume \& Claussen 1990; Gaume et al. 1995,

195: Mehringer et al. 1993; de Pree et al. 1995, 1996, 1998). Masers,

196: outflows and possible rotation of the two dense cores have been

197: revealed from observations of various molecular lines at

198: centimeter and millimeter wavelengths (Reid et al. 1988; Gaume \&

199: Claussen 1990; Martin-Pintado et al. 1990; Mehringer, Goss \&

200: Palmer 1994; Lis et al. 1993; Kuan \& Snyder 1996; Liu \& Snyder

201: 1999). In addition, previous observations have shown evidence for

202: the two hot cores to be at different evolutionary stages and to

203: have different molecular abundances (e.g. Vogel et al. 1987; Lis

204: et al. 1993; Miao et al. 1995; Kuan, Mehringer \& Snyder 1996; Liu

205: \& Snyder 1999).

206: 

207: H$_2$CO pervades the interstellar medium and it has a simple

208: chemical reaction path which has been proven to be a useful probe

209: of physical conditions (e.g. Mangum \& Wootten 1993). The

210: H$_{2}$CO (1$_{10}-1_{11}$) transition at 6 cm was observed in

211: absorption against discrete continuum sources towards Sgr B2

212: complex with an angular resolution of

213: $\sim10^{\prime\prime}\times20^{\prime\prime}$, showing nearly the

214: same radial velocity pattern as that of the radio recombination

215: lines (Martin-Pintado et al. 1990; Mehringer, Palmer \& Goss

216: 1995). These authors suggested that the H$_{2}$CO

217: (1$_{10}-1_{11}$) transition probably arises from the surrounding

218: gas with a relatively low mean H$_{2}$ density of $\sim 10^{4}$

219: cm$^{-3}$ (Martin-Pintado et al. 1990; Mehringer, Palmer \& Goss

220: 1995).

221: 

222: The millimeter H$_{2}$CO lines are an excellent tracer of H$_{2}$

223: density $> 10^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$ (e.g., Mangum \& Wootten 1993). In

224: addition, H$_{2}$CO is a planar asymmetric top molecule with very

225: little asymmetry. The symmetry of the spin function of the

226: molecule leads to two transition classes: ortho-H$_{2}$CO levels

227: if the spin wavefunction is symmetric and para-H$_{2}$CO levels if

228: antisymmetric. Since para-H$_{2}$CO is 1-3 times less abundant

229: than ortho-H$_{2}$CO, observations of para-H$_{2}$CO have less

230: opacity effect (Kahane et al 1984; Mangum \& Wootten 1993). Hence,

231: para-H$_{2}$CO appears to be a better probe to determine the

232: physical conditions of the massive star formation regions.

233: 

234: The millimeter/submillimeter transitions of H$_{2}$CO gas require

235: relatively high excitation temperature and high H$_{2}$ density

236: compared to those in the centimeter wavebands. If the brightness

237: temperature of the continuum emission is higher than the

238: excitation temperature, the absorption against the continuum cores

239: can be observed in millimeter and sub-millimeter wavebands with

240: the high angular resolution of an interferometric array (such as

241: the Submillimeter Array,\footnote {The Submillimeter Array is a

242: joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

243: and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics

244: and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia

245: Sinica.} hereafter SMA). Taking advantage of the large bandwidth

246: coverage of the SMA, we have observed multiple H$_{2}$CO lines

247: towards Sgr B2 at 1.3 mm within a bandwidth of 2 GHz. Thus, with

248: the same telescope system and calibration procedure, the

249: uncertainties due to absolute flux density calibration among the

250: different line transitions can be mitigated by measuring the

251: line-intensity ratios, which are needed to determine physical

252: conditions, such as kinetic temperature and H$_{2}$ number

253: density, of the gas. In addition, the SMA is not sensitive to

254: extended larger scale emission ($\sim$ 50\arcsec). Thus, the SMA

255: observations are sensitive to the clumps of high density gas

256: rather than the extended diffuse components.

257: 

258: In this paper, we present the results from the SMA observations of

259: Sgr B2 at the H$_{2}$CO lines and continuum at 1.3 mm. The paper

260: is organized as follows: \S 2 discusses the observations and data

261: reduction. In \S 3 we present the data analysis and results. In \S

262: 4, we present the kinematics in Sgr B2(M) by a model incorporating

263: a spherically symmetric inflow along with a decelerating outflow.

264: In \S 5 we model the physical properties of the H$_{2}$CO gas in

265: Sgr B2 using the large velocity gradient (LVG) approach. In \S 6,

266: we discuss the important results derived from our observations and

267: analysis. We summarize the results in \S7. We adopt a distance of

268: 8 kpc to Sgr B2.

269: 

270: \section{Observations \& Data Reduction}

271: 

272: Observations towards Sgr~B2(N) and Sgr~B2(M) were carried out at

273: 218 (lower sideband) and 228 GHz (upper sideband) with seven

274: antennas of the SMA in the compact-north array on August 1, 2005

275: for 8 hours. The projected baselines ranged from 5 to 50

276: k${\lambda}$. The weather was good during the observations with

277: $\tau$$\sim$0.09 at 225 GHz. The typical system temperature was

278: 130 K. Sgr~B2(N) and Sgr~B2(M) were observed in separate fields

279: with 15 min observing time on each source interleaving 5 min on

280: the phase reference source Sgr A* ($<0.1$ mas, $\sim$3 Jy at 230

281: GHz, $\sim$45 arcmin from Sgr B2). Our two target fields were

282: centered at RA(J2000)=17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$19$\rlap{.}^{\rm

283: s}$882,

284: DEC(J2000)=$-28^{\circ}$22$^{\prime}$18$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$37

285: and RA(J2000)=17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$20$\rlap{.}^{\rm s}$156,

286: DEC(J2000)=$-28^{\circ}$23$^{\prime}$03$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$56,

287: for Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M), respectively. In addition, Callisto

288: (4.1 Jy) and the QSO 3C454.3 (32 Jy) were also observed for the

289: flux-density and bandpass calibrations. The flux density was

290: estimated from Callisto with the assumption that its brightness

291: temperature was 120 K and its angular size was

292: 1$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$14. The three transitions H$_{2}$CO

293: (3$_{03}-2_{02}$), (3$_{22}-2_{21}$) and (3$_{21}-2_{20}$) were

294: positioned in the lower 2 GHz sideband (LSB). H$_{2}$CO

295: (3$_{22}-2_{21}$) emission appears to be blended with a transition

296: of CH$_{3}$OH and will be not used in the analysis in this paper.

297: The two unblended transitions, H$_{2}$CO, (3$_{03}-2_{02}$) and

298: (3$_{21}-2_{20}$), have upper level energies of 21.0 and 67.8 K

299: and rest frequencies of 218.2222 and 218.7601 GHz, respectively.

300: The spectral resolution of 0.8125 MHz corresponds to a velocity

301: resolution of 1.1 km~s$^{-1}$.

302: 

303: The data reduction was carried out in {\it Miriad} \footnote {The

304: data reduction procedures for SMA data are outlined in the web site

305: http://sma-www.cfa.harvard.edu/miriadWWW}. We recomputed the

306: Doppler velocity for each of the target sources since the on-line

307: Doppler tracking was only made on Sgr~B2(N). System temperature

308: corrections were applied. Antenna-based bandpass ripples were

309: corrected by applying the linear interpolation of the bandpass

310: solutions determined from Callisto and 3C454.3. There are

311: spectral-window-based offsets in amplitude and phase on some

312: baselines due to the correlator errors, which were also corrected.

313: The residual errors due to the bandpass shape of the individual

314: spectral windows were reduced to a level below 1\% of the

315: continuum level. In the antenna-based gain corrections, we chose

316: the visibilities of Sgr~A* in the UV range between 20 kilo

317: wavelengths and longer in order to eliminate the contamination

318: from the extended dust and HII emission. The gains determined from

319: the point source (emission from Sgr A*) were applied to the Sgr~B2

320: data.

321: 

322: The molecular lines were identified in the rest frame by use of

323: the JPL catalog, as done by others (Sutton et al. 1985 and

324: Nummelin et al. 1998). The H$_{2}$CO transitions and a few other

325: molecular lines have been unambiguously identified (see spectrum

326: in Fig. 1).

327: 

328: The continuum was subtracted with a linear fitting to the spectrum

329: of line-free channels in each baseline. For Sgr~B2(M), the

330: line-free channels can be easily selected from the spectrum in the

331: (u, v) domain (Fig. 1). However, for Sgr~B2(N), the molecular

332: spectral lines are crowded over each 2 GHz band and it is

333: difficult to choose the line-free channels. We developed a

334: procedure to select the line-free channels for the continuum

335: subtraction. First, after reducing of the spectral resolution to 1

336: km~s$^{-1}$, we made each of the channel maps (2600 channels over

337: the 2 GHz band) including both the line and continuum. From the

338: channel maps, we selected the channels without extended emission

339: ($>$4$\sigma$). The continuum level was determined from these

340: apparently line-free channels. We selected 16 and 37 line-free

341: spectral windows for the fields of Sgr~B2(M) and Sgr~B2(N),

342: respectively. Then, using the task UVLIN in {\it Miriad}, we

343: determined the continuum level by fitting to the line-free

344: channels. The UVLIN gives two output (u, v) data sets, one for the

345: continuum and the other for continuum-free spectral line.

346: 

347: Self-calibration was performed to the continuum data using the

348: compact sources of the continuum cores for a few iterations in

349: order to eliminate residual errors. The gain solutions determined

350: from the continuum data were applied to the line data, from which

351: we constructed the spectral data cube. The preliminary images of

352: the continuum and lines were made using natural weighting. The

353: clean algorithm was applied to remove the effects of the

354: side-lobes. The synthesized beam sizes of the continuum and line

355: images were approximately 5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4\times

356: 3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}2$ (PA=12.5$^{\circ}$). The mosaic maps of

357: the two fields, Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M), were made using a simple

358: linear mosaic algorithm. The primary beam attenuation was also

359: corrected in the final line cubes and continuum image. The

360: statistical 1$\sigma$ rms noise of the continuum was 0.1

361: Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The 1$\sigma$ rms noise levels of the line images

362: were 0.18 and 0.16 Jy~beam$^{-1}$ per channel for the H$_{2}$CO

363: (3$_{03}-2_{02}$) and (3$_{21}-2_{20}$) lines, respectively. The

364: higher noise in the H$_{2}$CO (3$_{03}-2_{02}$) line images was

365: due to its strong line intensity and the limit of the dynamic

366: range in the clean process.

367: 

368: \section{Data Analysis \& Results}

369: 

370: \subsection{The Continuum at 1.3 mm}

371: 

372: Fig. 2 shows the mosaic continuum map of Sgr~B2(N) and Sgr~B2(M)

373: at 1.3 mm. The brightest components of Sgr~B2(N) (I$_{\rm

374: p}$=29.2$\pm$2.1 Jy~beam$^{-1}$) and Sgr~B2(M) (I$_{\rm

375: p}$=20.2$\pm$1.3 Jy~beam$^{-1}$), are associated with the massive

376: star forming cores K1-3 and F1-4 (Gaume \& Claussen 1990),

377: respectively. In addition to the emission from these cores, a few

378: nearby continuum clumps were detected, including the components K4

379: (I$_{\rm p}$=1.40$\pm$0.12 Jy~beam$^{-1}$), NE (I$_{\rm

380: p}$=1.20$\pm$0.14 Jy~beam$^{-1}$), NW (I$_{\rm p}$=1.00$\pm$0.11

381: Jy~beam$^{-1}$), ME (I$_{\rm p}$=0.58$\pm$0.15 Jy~beam$^{-1}$) and

382: MW (I$_{\rm p}$=1.70$\pm$0.18 Jy~beam$^{-1}$).

383: 

384: Gaussian fitting to the individual continuum components was

385: carried out. The individual emission clumps near the compact cores

386: or the K1-3 and F1-4 clusters were modeled as simple Gaussian

387: components. The two compact cores, K1-3 and F1-4, appeared to be

388: too complicated to be fitted with single Gaussian components. A

389: model consisting of a Gaussian and two unresolved compact

390: components was used to fit to the data of the core (K1-3). The

391: peaks of the Gaussian component and one of the point components

392: are consistent with K3 and K2 positions, respectively. Another

393: point component agrees (within $\sim$ 1$^{\prime\prime}$) with the

394: 3.5 mm continuum source that is located south of K3 (see Fig.1(b)

395: of Liu \& Snyder 1999). Sgr B2(M) core (F1-4) is fitted well with

396: a Gaussian component and a point component (close to F3 within

397: $\sim$ 0$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$5). The peak positions,

398: deconvolved angular sizes, peak intensities and total flux

399: densities of the continuum components are summarized in Table 1.

400: 

401: The components K4, MW and Z10.24 have been detected at radio and

402: millimeter wavelengths (Lis et al. 1993; Kuan \& Snyder 1994;

403: Gaume et al. 1995; Liu \& Snyder 1999). Z10.24 located in the

404: middle between Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) (see Fig. 2) shows a unique

405: filamentary structure at 1.3 mm continuum. The designation of

406: Z10.24 follows that used by Gaume et al. (1995) and  de Pree et

407: al. (1996) who detected the H66$\alpha$ line towards it. Z10.24

408: was marginally detected at 1.3 mm by Lis et al. (1993) with higher

409: angular resolution

410: (4$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}5\times3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}7$) and

411: poorer sensitivity. The SMA observations show an elongated

412: structure in Z10.24 with a peak intensity of 2.02 $\pm$ 0.16 Jy

413: beam$^{-1}$ (12 $\sigma$). The core of Z10.24 is unresolved in the

414: sub-arcsec resolution images at both 1.3 cm and 3.5 mm (Gaume et

415: al. 1995; Liu \& Snyder 1999). The 1.3 mm continuum image and the

416: detected vibrational HC$_{3}$N emission (de Vicente et al. 2000)

417: suggest that the 1.3 mm continuum of Z10.24 is dominated by the

418: dust emission and Z10.24 is likely to be a younger massive star

419: formation region.

420: 

421: There have been no detections of the components NW, NE and ME in

422: the previous observations at longer wavelengths. These three

423: components are possibly the dust emission from sub-cores at a

424: relatively early stage of star formation. The detections need to

425: be verified with further observations at shorter wavelengths and

426: at higher angular resolutions.

427: 

428: \subsection{H$_{2}$CO Lines}

429: 

430: The continuum-free channel maps in both H$_{2}$CO

431: (3$_{03}-2_{02}$) and H$_{2}$CO (3$_{21}-2_{20}$) lines were

432: constructed in the velocity range from 8 to 151 km~s$^{-1}$ at

433: intervals of 1 km~s$^{-1}$. The channel maps of the H$_{2}$CO

434: transitions are complicated, containing several kinematical

435: features in either emission or absorption. Those emission and

436: absorption components are separated well in our higher spectral

437: resolution maps but some of them (in the continuum core regions)

438: are overlapped. In the moment analysis, the negative intensity

439: value from the absorption and the positive value from the emission

440: may cancel each other in the overlapping regions and thus the

441: resultant moment maps might not reflect the true gas distribution.

442: Hence, the emission and absorption need to be handled separately.

443: 

444: \subsubsection{Line Emission}

445: 

446: Fig. 3 is the integrated line emission images constructed from the

447: channel maps for the two transitions, H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$)

448: and ($3_{03}-2_{02}$), respectively. The moment 0 images were made

449: with a 4 $\sigma$ cutoff in each channel maps. The less

450: significant emission and the absorption are excluded in the moment

451: analysis. Most of emission is distributed around the two cores of

452: Sgr~B2(N) and Sgr~B2(M). Clearly, the distribution of the

453: H$_{2}$CO emission is not spherically symmetric with respect to

454: each of these cores. In the Sgr~B2(N) region, in addition to the

455: gas concentration at the core, gas clumps located north-east and

456: south-west of the core are observed in both H$_{2}$CO transitions.

457: We note that in Sgr~B2(N), the morphology of H$_{2}$CO

458: ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) emission, the higher transition gas, is similar

459: to that of the emission from the lower transition gas H$_{2}$CO

460: ($3_{03}-2_{02}$). Hereafter we refer H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$)

461: as the higher transition and H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) as the

462: lower transition. In the Sgr~B2(M) region, a strong emission

463: component elongated in northwest-southeast direction is observed

464: in both H$_{2}$CO transitions. An arch structure (M1~

465: 30$^{\prime\prime}$ long and 10$^{\prime\prime}$ wide),

466: 8$^{\prime\prime}$ northwest of the Sgr~B2(M) core appears in both

467: H$_{2}$CO transitions. The major difference in the emission

468: distribution from the two transitions occurs in the outflow (Lis

469: et al. 1993) region located south-east of the Sgr~B2(M) core. A

470: significant emission ``tongue'' (M5)

471: (15$^{\prime\prime}\times7^{\prime\prime}$) was detected from the

472: higher H$_{2}$CO transition gas while no significant detection was

473: made of the lower H$_{2}$CO transition gas.

474: 

475: \subsubsection{Systematic velocities}

476: 

477: Based on a line survey at 340 GHz from single dish observations,

478: Sutton et al. (1991) obtained mean systematic velocities 65 and 61

479: km~s$^{-1}$ of Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M). Their observations showed

480: significant velocity variations among the different species. The

481: differences are mostly caused by the chemical differences of the

482: molecules. The different species sample different physical

483: environments. The high angular resolution observations of

484: H66$\alpha$ (de Pree et al. 1995; 1996) showed that the mean

485: systematic velocities are 69.8 and 65.3 km~s$^{-1}$ for the Sgr

486: B2(M)-F and Sgr B2(N)-K clusters, respectively. The relatively

487: higher mean velocity of 69.8 km~s$^{-1}$ in Sgr B2(M) is likely

488: caused by the high velocity motion of the ionized gas of the UCHII

489: regions with respect to the centroid of the system. In section 4,

490: we will show that the systematic velocity determined from the

491: terminal velocity of the outflow in Sgr~B2(M) is 58 km s$^{-1}$

492: (see also Appendix A). In the rest of the paper, we adopt

493: systematic velocities of 58 km s$^{-1}$ and 65 km s$^{-1}$ for

494: Sgr~B2(M) and Sgr~B2(N), respectively.

495: 

496: \subsubsection{Absorption towards the cores}

497: 

498: The strong continuum cores are excellent probes of absorption by

499: the cold gas that resides in front of them. Absorption is observed

500: towards both Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) continuum cores (see the

501: top-left and bottom-left panels of Fig. 3). Multiple Gaussian line

502: components were fitted to the spectra for each of the two

503: transitions in both cores. The parameters of these fits are listed

504: in Table 2. The systematic velocities are marked with the vertical

505: lines in Fig. 3. The majority of the absorbing gas in Sgr~B2(N)

506: and Sgr~B2(M) is red-shifted with respect to the systematic

507: velocities 58 and 65 km~s$^{-1}$, respectively. The red-shifted

508: absorption gas provides evidence for the existence of gas

509: accreting onto the two cores.

510: 

511: If the absorbing gas covers the continuum source completely and

512: the emission from the gas is insignificant, the line intensity is

513: ${\rm I}_{\rm L} \approx {\rm I}_{\rm C} e^{-\tau_{\rm L}}$. The

514: optical depth (${\tau}_{\rm L}$) can be derived from the formula

515: 

516: \begin{equation}

517: \tau_{\rm L}=-ln(\frac{{\rm I}_{\rm L}}{{\rm I}_{\rm

518: C}})=-ln(1+\frac {\Delta {\rm I}_{\rm L}}{{\rm I}_{\rm C}}),

519: \end{equation}

520: 

521: \noindent where $\Delta {\rm I}_{\rm L} = {\rm I}_{\rm L}-{\rm

522: I}_{\rm C}$ is the observed line intensity and the ${\rm I}_{\rm

523: C}$ is the observed continuum intensity. The errors in $\tau_{\rm

524: L}$ based on the fractional errors $\sigma_{{\rm I}_{\rm L}}/{\rm

525: I}_{\rm L}$ of each line channel and $\sigma_{{\rm I}_{\rm

526: C}}/{\rm I}_{\rm C}$ if the line is optically thin ($\displaystyle

527: -\frac{\Delta {\rm I}_{\rm L}}{{\rm I}_{\rm C}}< 1-e^{-1} \approx 0.6$)

528: are given by

529: 

530: \begin{equation}

531:        \sigma_{ \tau}\approx \sqrt{(\sigma_{

532:        {\rm I}_{\rm L}}/{\rm I}_{\rm L})^{2}+(\sigma_{{\rm I}_{\rm C}}/{\rm I}_{\rm

533:        C})^{2}}.

534: \end{equation}

535: 

536: \noindent In the optically thick case, the channels in the line

537: center are saturated and the line-to-continuum ratio only gives a

538: lower limit to the optical depth of the line. For example if $n$

539: spectral channels are saturated by the absorption gas component at

540: a velocity, we have ${\rm I}_{\rm L}< 3\sigma_{ {\rm I}_{\rm

541: L}}/\sqrt{n}$ in 3 ${\sigma}$. Substituting this formula into the

542: equation (1), the lower limit of the optical depth is

543: 

544: \begin{equation}

545: \tau_{\rm L}>-ln(\frac {3\sigma_{{\rm I}_{\rm L}}}{\sqrt{n}{\rm

546: I}_{\rm C}}).

547: \end{equation}

548: 

549: With the Rayleigh-Jeans approximation, the value of 1

550: Jy~beam$^{-1}$ in our SMA observations is equivalent to 1.5 K. The

551: observed peak continuum intensities of the Sgr~B2(N) and Sgr~B2(M)

552: cores are 29.2 and 20.2 Jy~beam$^{-1}$, which correspond to

553: brightness temperature of 44 and 30 K in our observations,

554: respectively. The solution of radiation transfer function in terms

555: of the observed brightness temperature of the line ($\Delta {\rm

556: T}_{\rm L}^{\rm obs}$) is given by

557: 

558: \begin{equation}

559:     \Delta {\rm T}_{\rm L}^{\rm obs}=( f_{\rm L}{\rm T}_{\rm ex}-f_{o}{\rm T}^{\rm obs}_{\rm C})

560: (1-e^{-{\tau_{\rm L}}}),

561: \end{equation}

562: 

563: \noindent where ${\rm T}_{\rm ex}$ is the excitation temperature

564: of the molecular line and ${\rm T}_{\rm C}^{\rm obs} = f_{\rm C}

565: {\rm T}_{\rm C}$ is the observed brightness temperature of the

566: continuum emission with the true brightness temperature of ${\rm

567: T}_{\rm C}$; $\tau_{\rm L}$ is the optical depth of the molecular

568: cloud; for given solid angles of the molecular cloud ($\Omega_{\rm

569: L}$), continuum source ($\Omega_{\rm C}$) and the telescope beam

570: ($\Omega_{\rm B}$), $f_{\rm L}=\Omega_{\rm L}/(\Omega_{\rm

571: L}+\Omega_{\rm B})$ and $f_{\rm C}=\Omega_{\rm C}/(\Omega_{\rm

572: C}+\Omega_{\rm B})$ are the beam filling factors of the line and

573: continuum, respectively, if both the source and the telescope beam

574: are in Gaussian shape; $f_0$ denotes the fraction of the continuum

575: source covered by the molecular cloud.

576: 

577: If the molecular cloud is in front of the larger continuum source

578: ($f_0 \le {\displaystyle f_{\rm L} \over \displaystyle f_{\rm

579: C}}$), the observed brightness temperature of the line (${\rm

580: T}_{\rm L}^{\rm obs}$) becomes:

581: 

582: \begin{equation}

583:        \Delta {\rm T}_{\rm L}^{\rm obs}=( f_{\rm L}{\rm T}_{\rm ex}-{f_{\rm L}\over f_{\rm C}}{\rm T}^{\rm obs}_{\rm

584:        C})(1-e^{-{\tau_{\rm L}}}).

585: \end{equation}

586: 

587: \noindent If the molecular clouds cover the continuum cores with

588: the same beam filling factor ($f_{\rm L}=f_{\rm C}$), the upper

589: limits of the excitation temperatures H$_{2}$CO absorbing gas

590: ($\Delta {\rm T}_{\rm L}^{\rm obs}< 0$) are imposed by the

591: observed continuum brightness temperatures of the continuum cores,

592: i.e. 44/$f_{\rm L}$ and 31/$f_{\rm L}$ K, for the Sgr~B2(N) and

593: Sgr~B2(M) cores. For a given filling factor $f_{\rm L}=0.3$, the

594: excitation temperatures of H$_{2}$CO would be less than 150 and

595: 103 K for Sgr~B2(N) and Sgr~B2(M), respectively.

596: 

597: \subsubsection{Individual components}

598: 

599: Fig.~4 shows the spectra of the H$_{2}$CO lines (averaged over one

600: beam) made from the image cube for the rest of components. Each of

601: spectral panels includes both the lower (3$_{03}-2_{02}$, the

602: green profile) and the higher (3$_{21}-2_{20}$, the red profile)

603: transition lines. Gaussian fits to the H$_{2}$CO spectra were

604: carried out for both absorption and emission components. The

605: emission and absorption probably come from the different regions

606: along the line of sight. The angular resolution of our

607: observations appears to be inadequate to distinguish the discrete

608: components in the cores. However, our high spectral resolution is

609: adequate to separate the emission from the absorption in the

610: Gaussian fits. The parameters derived from the Gaussian fits to

611: the two H$_{2}$CO transitions are summarized in Table 2 including

612: the central line velocity (V$_{\rm LSR}$), the full width of half

613: maximum ($\Delta$V) and peak intensity (I$_{\rm p}$).

614: 

615: The M1, M4 and M5 are located along the major axis of the bipolar

616: outflow originated from the F-cluster (Lis et al. 1993). M1 is on

617: the blue-shifted side of the outflow. Both the high- and

618: low-transition spectra can be fitted with two Gaussian components

619: at 52 km s$^{-1}$ in emission and 64 km s$^{-1}$ in absorption.

620: The weak red-shifted absorption with respect to the systematic

621: velocity suggests that a relatively cold gas component in front of

622: the continuum source are moving towards it. The strong

623: blue-shifted emission with respect to the systematic velocity is

624: the highly-excited gas emission in the outflow (in front of the

625: continuum source) likely mixed with the infall gas emission

626: (behind the continuum source).

627: 

628: Sgr~B2(M)-M4 is located close to the HII regions, {\it i.e.}, the

629: F1-4 cluster. The higher transition spectrum can be fitted with

630: two Gaussian components in emission at 66 and 70 km s$^{-1}$, both

631: of which are red-shifted with respect to the systematic velocity

632: 58 km s$^{-1}$. The lower transition spectrum can be fitted with

633: five Gaussian components at velocity 51, 65, 70, 75 km s$^{-1}$ in

634: absorption and 100 km s$^{-1}$ in emission. The morphology of this

635: region is a complex.

636: 

637: A possible model to interpret the spectral characteristics of M4

638: is considered here. If we assume a non-LTE condition for the gas

639: and that both higher and lower transition gas comes from the same

640: gas clump located in front of the continuum core, the excitation

641: temperature of the higher transition gas is larger than the

642: brightness temperature of the continuum, while the excitation

643: temperature of the lower transition gas is less than the

644: brightness temperature of the continuum. The red-shifted

645: absorption suggests that the gas flows towards the continuum core.

646: The nature of absorption and emission at M4 suggests that the

647: process of excitation of the infall molecular cloud is

648: complicated. The radiative excitation by the strong FIR radiation

649: field might play an important role in the region near the core

650: since the collision alone can not produce the observed line ratio

651: or the inverse population between the higher transition in

652: K$_{-1}$=2 and the lower transition in K$_{-1}$=0 based on the LVG

653: fitting (see Appendix B).

654: 

655: The inversion in population between the two lowest K ladders is

656: observed best in the red-shifted  outflow component. At M5, the

657: spectrum of the higher transition gas shows a very significant

658: line emission (7-8 $\sigma$), fitted to a Gaussian at 66 km

659: s$^{-1}$ with a line width of 16 km s$^{-1}$, while less

660: significant emission (1-2 $\sigma$) of the lower transition gas is

661: shown at the same position. The highly reversed line ratio

662: ${\displaystyle {\rm I}(3_{21}-2_{20})\over \displaystyle {\rm

663: I}(3_{03}-2_{02})}\sim 6$ suggests that local thermodynamic

664: equilibrium (LTE) is not valid at this location and a weak maser

665: process is active in the outflow region.

666: 

667: The gas components M2 and M3 and MW show significant line emission

668: ($>10$ $\sigma$) from the lower transition gas while the higher

669: transition  emission is relatively weak. The line ratio

670: ${\displaystyle {\rm I}(3_{03}-2_{02}) \over \displaystyle {\rm

671: I}(3_{21}-2_{20}) }$ in those isolated component varies in the

672: range between 1.5 to 5.2.

673: 

674: H$_{2}$CO maser at 6 cm (Mehringer, Goss \& Palmer 1994) was

675: detected in the Z10.24 region. The SMA spectrum of the lower

676: transition at Z10.24 shows that a significant amount of gas is in

677: absorption while the emission is present but red-shifted with

678: respect to the absorption feature, a typical P-cygni profile

679: suggesting an outflow in this region. The spectrum of the higher

680: H$_{2}$CO transition can be fitted with two emission Gaussian

681: components at 50 and 84 km s$^{-1}$ with an absorbing Gaussian at

682: 75 km s$^{-1}$, which is consistent with the H66$\alpha$

683: transition (de Pree, et al. 1996). Excluding the possibility of

684: the expanding shell model, de Pree et al. argued that an ionized

685: outflow is likely centered at Z10.24. Our H$_{2}$CO observations

686: appear to favor their argument of a bipolar outflow from the UCHII

687: region.

688: 

689: Towards the NE continuum source, both the higher and lower

690: H$_{2}$CO transitions show that the majority of the gas in

691: absorption is red-shifted with respect to the mean systematic

692: velocity 65 km s$^{-1}$.

693: 

694: Towards NW, a broad ($\Delta {\rm V}=18\pm1.3$ km s$^{-1}$)

695: absorption ($-1.1$ Jy beam$^{-1}$) from the lower transition line

696: is detected at 71 km s$^{-1}$. The spectrum of the higher

697: transition shows no significant lines in either emission or

698: absorption.

699: 

700: \subsection{Kinematics}

701: 

702: Figs. 5 and 6 show the images of intensity weighted velocity (or

703: moment 1) of the H$_{2}$CO emission gas from both transitions. The

704: moment 1 maps were constructed with a cutoff of 8 $\sigma$ from

705: each of the channel images in the velocity range of 8-151 km

706: s$^{-1}$.

707: 

708: In the Sgr B2(M) region, the kinematical structure observed from

709: the lower transition (see Fig. 5) consists of the highly

710: red-shifted components 5$^{\prime\prime}$ south-east of the

711: compact core and a northeast-southwest arch structure. The

712: component M4 appears to be a fast moving compact component

713: (V$_{\rm LSR}\sim100$ km s$^{-1}$) ejected from the core. The

714: morphology of the northeast-southwest arch in Sgr~B2(M) from the

715: velocity field in the higher transition gas (see Fig. 6) appears

716: to be consistent with that observed in the lower transitions. A

717: velocity gradient is present south-east of M4 (shown in Fig. 6),

718: which appears to indicate a decelerating outflow. In the case of

719: Sgr B2(M), the higher H$_{2}$CO transition appears to trace

720: outflow well, which is consistent with the interpretation of the

721: larger scale mass outflow based on the lower angular-resolution

722: observations of NH$_{3}$ and SO (Vogel, Genzel \& Palmer 1987).

723: The higher angular-resolution observations of NH$_{3}$ (Guame \&

724: Claussen 1990) showed that the red-shifted emission is located

725: south of the F3 HII region, and the blue-shifted absorption is

726: located north of the red-shifted emission, showing a velocity

727: gradient in north-south direction. Based on their higher

728: angular-resolution observations of OH maser and NH$_{3}$, Guame \&

729: Claussen (1990) suggested that the north-south velocity gradient

730: can be explained by a rotating disk or a torus of material with an

731: extent of 2$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$5 surrounding the Sgr B2(M)-F

732: cluster. Although the angular resolution in our observations is

733: not adequate to verify the kinematical model proposed by Guame \&

734: Claussen (1990), our observed arch-liked morphology of the H$_2$CO

735: gas shown in blue-shifted emission from northeast to southwest in

736: the larger scale also indicates that the gas is undergoing a

737: complicated infall process interacting with the outflow while the

738: gas is spiraling onto the core rather than being in simple free

739: fall.

740: 

741: In the Sgr B2(N) region, the lower transition map (see Fig. 5)

742: shows the red-shifted velocity located north of K2 and

743: blue-shifted velocity located south of K2 with a north-south

744: velocity gradient across K2. A similar velocity gradient has been

745: observed in the HC$_{3}$N line (Lis et al. 1993). These authors

746: argued that the north-south velocity gradient in Sgr B2(N) traces

747: rotation. The kinematics of the lower H$_{2}$CO transition in

748: emission gas of Sgr~B2(N) is likely dominated by the gas rotating

749: around the core. In addition to the north-south velocity gradient

750: from the higher transition H$_{2}$CO( $3_{21}-2_{20}$) map as

751: observed in the lower transition gas, an east-west velocity

752: gradient is also observed in Sgr~B2(N) (see Fig. 6). The outflow

753: in Sgr~B2(N) was observed in east-west direction (Lis et al.

754: 1993). The higher angular-resolution observations of NH$_{3}$

755: (Gaume \& Claussen 1990) appeared to show a southeast-northwest

756: velocity gradient across K2. The southeast-northwest velocity

757: gradient in the larger scale from our observations appears to be

758: consistent with the kinematical structure observed in NH$_{3}$.

759: Based on the higher angular-resolution observations of NH$_{3}$,

760: ruling out a simple outflow/rotation model, Gaume \& Claussen

761: (1990) suggested that several kinematic components in outflow,

762: infall and rotation might be involved in the Sgr B2(N) core. The

763: southeast-northwest velocity gradient observed from the H$_{2}$CO

764: emission gas in Sgr~B2(N) appears to be caused by a combination of

765: rotation, infall and outflow. The angular resolution of our

766: observations is not adequate to discern the details of these

767: motions.

768: 

769: \section {Outflow and Infall}

770: 

771: In order to better understand the on-going astrophysical processes

772: in the star formation cores, we modeled the observed kinematics

773: and the ratio of the line intensities. In comparison to Sgr~B2(N),

774: the kinematics observed from Sgr~B2(M) appears to be relatively

775: simple and characterized by infall and outflow. Fig. 7 shows the

776: single field map of  H$_2$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) centered at the

777: F-cluster. The major axis of the red-shifted outflow

778: (PA=158$^{\circ}$) can be drawn by connecting the continuum core

779: and the tips of the outflows (M1 and M5).

780: 

781: Along the major axis of outflow (PA=158$^{\circ}$), we have made a

782: position-velocity diagram (PV) from the higher H$_{2}$CO

783: transition line cube (see Fig. 8). The solid contours show the

784: emission and dashed contours indicate the absorption. This diagram

785: shows two distinct decelerating outflow components clearly. The

786: red-shifted component shows that the emission near the core

787: (position at 0\arcsec~in the vertical axis) starts with a high

788: velocity of 106 km s$^{-1}$ and the velocity declines to a

789: terminal velocity at 58 km s$^{-1}$ as the gas goes to the outer

790: region (20\arcsec away from the core). If we shifted velocity to

791: the terminal velocity 58 km s$^{-1}$ or in the system rest frame,

792: the decelerating red-shifted outflow is mainly located in the

793: first quadrant with the absolute velocity decreasing from $\sim$48

794: to 0 km s$^{-1}$. The third quadrant shows the decelerating

795: blue-shifted outflow component with deceleration from $\sim$50 to

796: 0 km s$^{-1}$.

797: 

798: Appendix A describes the numerical calculations that have been

799: carried out to model the kinematical characteristics of a

800: decelerating outflow combined with spherically infall. With a

801: simple assumption of mass conservation and power law distributions

802: in  both outflow velocity and molecular density, the observed

803: kinematics of the outflow components can be well fitted to the

804: decelerating outflow model with an initial velocity of V$_0$=83 km

805: s$^{-1}$ at r$_0$=1\arcsec~(0.04 pc) from the core center with the

806: outflow opening angle of $\Theta=$30$^\circ$ and inclination of

807: $\varphi=$45$^\circ$ for the red-shifted component (the thick red

808: curve in Fig. 8). The blue-shifted component can be fitted with

809: V$_0$=33 km s$^{-1}$ at r$_0$=1\arcsec ~(0.04 pc),

810: $\Theta=$30$^\circ$ and $\varphi=$45$^\circ$ (the thick blue

811: curve). The dashed curves range initial velocity V$_0$ at

812: r$_0$=1$^{\prime\prime}$ given the same opening angle and

813: inclination  angle. For the red-shifted outflow, V$_0$ is from 250

814: km s$^{-1}$ to 17  km  s$^{-1}$. The blue-shifted velocity ranges

815: from  83 km s$^{-1}$ to 4  km s$^{-1}$.

816: 

817: Our observations and analysis have shown the presence of a

818: decelerating outflow from the core in Sgr B2(M). Such a

819: decelerating outflow can be caused by the entrainment of gas

820: through the interaction between a fast wind flow from the central

821: stars and an ambient cloud core, where the incorporation of

822: additional mass into the outflow decelerates the wind (Lizano et

823: al. 1988). As the wind moves farther from the cores, the outflow

824: velocity terminates at the systematic velocity 58 km s$^{-1}$ of

825: the molecular cloud. We note that both the red-shifted and

826: blue-shifted outflows terminate at a common velocity, which is

827: close to the mean systematic velocity 61 km~s$^{-1}$ of Sgr B2(M)

828: (Sutton et al. 1991). In fact, the common terminal velocity

829: 58$\pm$2 km s$^{-1}$ of blue-shifted and red-shifted outflow

830: appears to provide an unambiguous method, independent of the

831: chemical processes in molecular clouds, for accurately measuring

832: the systematic velocity of Sgr B2(M). The uncertainty in the

833: terminal velocity is mainly due to the velocity resolution in the

834: PV diagram and the uncertainty in the model fitting process.

835: 

836: Finally, the absorption located in the second quadrant is shown to

837: be red-shifted with respect to the systematic velocity 58$\pm$2 km

838: s$^{-1}$. Thus, with the accurately determined systematic velocity

839: we can be certain that this absorption feature arises from gas

840: flowing towards the continuum source.

841: 

842: \section{Excitation}

843: 

844: Based on the line ratio of the two transitions from the spectra,

845: most of the gas in the Sgr B2 region does not satisfy the LTE

846: condition. Under the assumption that the molecular cloud has

847: spherical geometry, the non-LTE calculation requiring the

848: collisional excitation rates for H$_2$CO (Green 1991) has been

849: carried out for Sgr B2 using the large velocity gradient (LVG)

850: approximation (e.g. Evans, Davis \& Plambeck 1979; Scoville \&

851: Solomon 1974; Lucy 1971). The radiative transfer calculations and

852: model fitting are discussed in details in Appendix B. The fitting

853: results for the line components for models with various sets of

854: parameters are given in Table 3.

855: 

856: We summarize the excitation properties for the various ${\rm

857: H_2CO}$ components in the following:

858: 

859: \noindent 1. Towards the absorption components of the cores (K1-3,

860: F1-4), the kinetic temperature depends on the beam filling factor

861: of the continuum emission, ranging from a few tens K for a large

862: continuum beam $f_{\rm C}$ (0.3) to a few hundreds K for a small

863: $f_{\rm C}$ (0.05). High angular resolution observations are

864: necessary to precisely determine the range of T$_{\rm k}$. The

865: typical values of ${\rm n_{H_2}}$ are 10$^{5-7}$ cm$^{-3}$ for the

866: core components. The derived column densities ${\rm

867: N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V}$ are in the range of 10$^{14-17}$

868: cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s.

869: 

870: \noindent 2. For the discrete ${\rm H_2CO}$ components, no LVG

871: solutions could be fitted to the observations with either model A

872: or model B in which $f_{\rm C}$ is large and the brightness

873: temperature of the background radiation is too small to produce

874: significant absorption lines as observed. For excitation

875: temperature of a few tens K and higher, the intensity of

876: absorption (see equation(5)) suggests that the beam filling factor

877: must be small, {\it i.e.} $f_{\rm C}\sim$0.1 or smaller, for a

878: region with a continuum peak intensity of $\sim$2 Jy beam$^{-1}$

879: in our observations. The kinetic temperatures derived from the LVG

880: fitting are all below 100 K for both emission and absorption

881: components except for M3 emission component in which T$_{\rm

882: k}=150_{-50}^{+250}$ K. In general the components outside the

883: cores are cooler. The typical values of ${\rm n_{H_2}}$ are

884: 10$^{4-6}$ cm$^{-3}$ for the discrete components. The derived

885: column density ${\rm N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V}$ is in the range of

886: 10$^{13-16}$ cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s.

887: 

888: \noindent 3. For the components in the red-shifted outflow of Sgr~

889: B2(M), the line ratio ${\displaystyle {\rm I}(3_{03}-2_{02})\over

890:  \displaystyle {\rm I}(3_{21}-2_{20})}$ is

891: significantly smaller than unity, suggesting that the population

892: of the ground levels in the two K ladders ($K_{-1}=0$ and 2) is

893: inverted. Hence, a weak maser process between the two different K

894: ladders must occur in this region. Based on our radiative transfer

895: code with the collisional excitation rates for kinetic temperature

896: T$_{\rm k}$$\le$ 300 K (Green 1991), we cannot rule out the

897: possibility that the H$_2$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) line in Sgr B2(M)

898: outflow is excited in the high temperature C-shocks. On the other

899: hand, the strong FIR radiation field near the Sgr B2(M) core might

900: also play a role in the population inversion of the molecule.

901: 

902: \section{Discussion}

903: 

904: The assessment of molecular cloud mass from molecular lines can be

905: affected by the excitation, opacity, abundance variations and gas

906: dynamics of the molecular lines. The optically thin submillmeter

907: dust continuum emission has been proven to be a good tracer of

908: molecular cloud mass (Pierce-Price et al. 2000, Gordon 1995). If

909: we take an average grain radius of 0.1 $\mu$m and grain density of

910: 3 g~cm$^{-3}$ and a gas to dust ratio of 100 (Hildebrand 1983,

911: Lis, Carlstrom \& Keene 1991), the dusty cloud mass and column

912: density are given by the formulae (Lis, Carlstrom \& Keene 1991)

913: 

914:  \begin{equation}

915:  M_{H_{2}}=1.3\times 10^{4}\frac{e^{h{\nu}/{\kappa}T}-1}{Q({\nu})}

916:  (\frac {S_{\nu}}{Jy})(\frac {D}{kpc})^{2}(\frac {{\nu}}{GHz})^{-3}~M_{\odot},

917: \end{equation}

918: 

919: \begin{equation}

920: N_{H_{2}}=8.1\times

921: 10^{17}\frac{e^{h{\nu}/{\kappa}T}-1}{Q({\nu}){\Omega}}(\frac {

922: S_{\nu}}{Jy})(\frac {{\nu}}{GHz})^{-3}~ ({\rm cm}^{-2}),

923: \end{equation}

924: 

925: \noindent where $T$ is the mean dust temperature (K), $Q({\nu})$

926: is grain emissivity at frequency ${\nu}$, $S_{\nu}$ is the flux

927: density corrected for free-free emission, $\Omega$ is the solid

928: angle subtended by the source. Assuming $Q({\nu})$ at 1.3 mm is

929: 2$\times$10$^{-5}$ and the dust temperature is 150 K for Sgr B2 (

930: Carlstrom \& Vogel 1989; Lis et al. 1993; Kuan, Mehringer \&

931: Snyder 1996), we derived the masses, H$_{2}$ column densities and

932: number densities.

933: 

934: Because the continuum at 1.3 mm contains free-free emission, we

935: estimate the physical parameters using the flux densities of the

936: continuum corrected for free-free emission. Assuming 3.6 cm

937: continuum emission with FWHM beam of

938: 3$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}8\times 2\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}0$

939: (Mehringer et al. 1993) of Sgr B2(N) (K1-3)  and Sgr B2(M) (F1-4)

940: come from optically thin free-free emission ($S_{\nu} \varpropto

941: {\nu}^{-0.1}$), we estimate the free-free contribution of 4.7 and

942: 8.4 Jy ($\sim$ 9\% and  24\% of the total flux densities at 1.3

943: mm) at 1.3 mm towards the continuum cores K1-3 and F1-4 in our

944: observations. Our estimates are consistent with the determinations

945: of Lis et al. (1993) (6\% and 33\% of the total flux densities at

946: 1.3 mm) and Martin-Pintado et al. (1990) ($\sim$ 9\% and 28\% of

947: the total flux densities at 1.3 mm ) for K1-3 and F1-4. The

948: continuum flux densities at 1.3 mm corrected for free-free

949: emission are 47.4 and 27.2 Jy for K1-3 and F1-4, respectively.

950: 

951: From the flux densities at 1.3 cm (Gaume et al. 1995), the

952: estimated free-free emission contributions at 1.3 mm are 0.02 Jy,

953: 0.04 Jy and 1.26 Jy for K4, Z10.24 and MW, respectively. The

954: corresponding continuum flux densities corrected for free-free

955: emission are 3.5, 9.1 and 11.0 Jy, respectively.

956: 

957: The derived H$_{2}$ masses, column densities and number densities

958: are summarized in Table 4. The estimated H$_{2}$ masses of the Sgr

959: B2(N) core (K1-3) and the Sgr B2(M) core (F1-4) are larger than

960: those given by Lis et al. (1993), while the H$_{2}$ number

961: densities are less than their results. This result is caused by

962: the relatively larger size and higher flux densities of the

963: continuum in our observations.

964: 

965: The H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) spectra show absorption against

966: both Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) compact cores and multiple absorbing

967: peaks. The absorptions are dominated by red-shifted gas,

968: suggesting that the lower transition H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$)

969: traces the cold gas in front of the continuum cores falling into

970: the two compact cores.

971: 

972: Previous observations showed multiple massive young stars in Sgr

973: B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) (e.g., Gaume et al. 1995, de Pree, Goss \&

974: Gaume 1998). There are multiple absorbing peaks with different

975: optical depths from our H$_{2}$CO spectra in the Sgr B2(N) and Sgr

976: B2(M) cores, which appears to indicate that the gas is falling

977: into the massive stars or massive star forming cores embedded at

978: different depths in the molecular clouds (Mehringer, Palmer \&

979: Goss 1995). However, the angular resolution of our observations is

980: inadequate for us to determine whether there are multiple regions

981: present or whether the overall gravitation potential dominates the

982: infalling gas. If infalling gas is in simple free-fall, the

983: infalling velocities can be estimated by

984: 

985:  \begin{equation}

986:  V_{in}=\sqrt {\frac {2MG}{r_{in}}}=0.09\sqrt {\frac

987:  {M/M_{\odot}}{r_{in}/pc}} ~ {\rm km~s^{-1}},

988: \end{equation}

989: 

990: \noindent where $r_{in}$ is the infall radius, $M$ is the sum of

991: the gas and star masses included in the $r_{in}$ and $G$ is the

992: gravitation constant.

993: 

994: The H$_{2}$ masses derived from the continuum are

995: 1.4$\times$10$^{4}$ and 7.9$\times$10$^{3}$ M$_{\odot}$ for the

996: cores of Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M), respectively. The VLA

997: observations of radio continuum at 1.3 cm (Gaume et al. 1995)

998: showed that there are three UCHII regions (K1, K2 and K3) in the

999: core of Sgr B2(N) and four UCHII regions (F1, F2, F3 and F4) in

1000: the core of Sgr B2(M). By use of the relationships between stellar

1001: spectral type and stellar mass (Vacca, Garmany \& Shull 1996), a

1002: total stellar mass of 68 M$_{\odot}$ was inferred for the massive

1003: stars in the core of Sgr B2(N). The higher resolution observations

1004: (0$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$05) at 7 mm (de Pree, Goss \& Gaume

1005: 1998) resolved out F1, F2, F3 and F4 into twenty-one UCHII

1006: regions, and a stellar mass of 443 M$_{\odot}$ was inferred

1007: corresponding to the massive stars in the core of Sgr B2(M). The

1008: mass of the massive stars in the Sgr B2(M) core is six times

1009: larger than that in the Sgr B2(N) core. Taking the major axis

1010: sizes of 0.24 and 0.29 pc as the infall radii of the two cores

1011: (K1-3 and F1-4), we inferred the infall velocities of 21 and 15

1012: km~s$^{-1}$ for Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M), respectively. Hence,

1013: based on our SMA observations, we have shown that high-density

1014: molecular gas is continuously feeding onto the active star

1015: formation cores in both Sgr B2(M) and Sgr B2(N).

1016: 

1017: \section{Summary}

1018: 

1019: The continuum emission and H$_{2}$CO spectral lines at 1.3 mm were

1020: observed with the SMA. We detected the continuum emission from the

1021: compact cores of Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M). Outside of the two

1022: compact cores, a few clumps, K4, NE, NW, ME, MW and the filament

1023: of Z10.24 were also observed. Except for the three newly observed

1024: objects, NE, NW and ME, all of the other compact cores, clumps and

1025: the filament have radio counterparts at centimeter wavelengths.

1026: 

1027: The spectra in the two H$_{2}$CO lines towards the continuum and

1028: outside of the continuum showed the gas components in either

1029: emission or absorption. From the integrated line intensity and

1030: intensity weighted velocity maps in line emission, we identified

1031: possible outflow motion in Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) cores. The

1032: infalling gas was detected by the red-shifted absorbing gas

1033: against the continuum in Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) compact cores and

1034: the nearby dust clumps and filament Z10.24. The absorbing gas in

1035: Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) cores is red-shifted with respect to the

1036: systematic velocities, suggesting that the gas in front of the

1037: continuum cores is flowing onto the continuum cores.

1038: 

1039: In comparison to Sgr B2(N), the kinematics in Sgr B2(M) are

1040: relatively simple. We interpreted the observed outflow and infall

1041: in Sgr B2(M) by a model incorporating a spherically symmetric

1042: inflow with a decelerating outflow. A decelerating outflow from

1043: Sgr B2(M) was evident in our observations. We showed that both the

1044: red-shifted and blue-shifted outflow components share a common

1045: terminal velocity. From the outflow terminal velocity, we

1046: determined the systematic velocity of 58$\pm$2 km s$^{-1}$ for Sgr

1047: B2(M). With the systematic velocity well determined in a manner

1048: independent of chemistry in the molecular cloud, we are confident

1049: that the majority of the absorbing gas at least in Sgr B2(M) is

1050: red-shifted and flowing towards the active star forming core.

1051: 

1052: Using the observed two H$_{2}$CO lines, we have derived the

1053: excitation conditions of Sgr B2 region in LVG approximation. For

1054: the absorbing components in the Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) cores, the

1055: kinetic temperature, the H$_2$ density and column density are in

1056: the range of several tens to hundreds K, 10$^{5-7}$ cm$^{-3}$,

1057: 10$^{14-17}$ cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s, respectively. The components

1058: outside of the cores are relatively cooler, and the H$_2$ density

1059: and column density are one order of magnitude less than those in

1060: the Sgr B2(N) and Sgr B2(M) cores. In the Sgr B2(M) outflow

1061: region, the intensity of the H$_{2}$CO (3$_{21}-2_{20}$) is larger

1062: than that of the H$_{2}$CO (3$_{03}-2_{02}$), suggesting the

1063: inversion of the distribution of the particle number between the

1064: two ground levels of K$_{-1}$ =0 and 2. The H$_2$CO

1065: ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) might be excited by C-shocks in the outflow. The

1066: radiative excitation by the strong FIR radiation field in Sgr

1067: B2(M) may play an important role in the population inversion.

1068: 

1069: 

1070: \acknowledgments

1071: We thank the SMA staff for making the

1072: observations possible. J.J. Wang acknowledges support from

1073: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10328306).

1074: 

1075: 

1076: \appendix

1077: 

1078: \section{A Model for A Molecular Cloud With Inflow And Decelerating Outflow Components}

1079: 

1080: In this appendix, we discuss a model incorporating a spherically

1081: symmetric inflow (Shu 1977) with a decelerating outflow (Cabrit \&

1082: Bertout 1990, Raga et al. 1993). We calculated position-velocity

1083: (PV) diagrams based on this infall-outflow model. These PV

1084: diagrams can be compared with the observed PV diagrams from Sgr

1085: B2(M) to better understand the physical processes in the Sgr B2(M)

1086: molecular cloud.

1087: 

1088: \subsection{Infall}

1089: 

1090: For an ideal isothermal flow, under the assumption of spherically

1091: symmetric collapse, the volume density $\rho(r)$ and velocity

1092: profiles $V(r)$ as functions of radius $r$ within the collapsing

1093: inner envelope can be described by the power-laws (Shu 1977),

1094: 

1095: \begin{equation}

1096:  \rho(r)=\rho_{0}(\frac{r}{R})^{-\frac{3}{2}},~~~~V(r)=-(\frac

1097: {2GM(r)}{r})^{\frac{1}{2}},

1098: \end{equation}

1099: 

1100: \noindent where $R$ is outer boundary of the collapsing cloud in

1101: spherical geometry, $\rho_{0}$ is the density at $R$, $M(r)$ is

1102: the mass of the cloud interior to $r$, $G$ is the gravitational

1103: constant. Because the actual core has a finite size, the infall is

1104: terminated at an inner radius of  $r_{0}$. The negative sign in

1105: the velocity indicates that the direction of the inflow is

1106: opposite that of the unit vector of radius in the spherical

1107: geometry. The geometry of a cloud with spherical inflow and

1108: decelerating outflow is shown in the Cartesian coordinate system

1109: ($x$, $y$, $z$) in Fig. 9. The sky plane is the x-y plane.

1110: 

1111: The column density ($N$) at a sky position (x,y) can be calculated

1112: by integrating the volume density $\rho(r)$. The column density in

1113: the sky plane is

1114: 

1115: \begin{equation}

1116: N(x,

1117: y)=2\rho_{0}R\int_{0}^{\sqrt{1-a^2}}(s^{2}+a^{2})^{-\frac{3}{4}}

1118: ds,

1119: \end{equation}

1120: 

1121: \noindent  where $s=z/R$, $a =\sqrt{(x/R)^{2}+(y/R)^{2}}$. In

1122: order to get an analytical form for the column density, we express

1123: $(s^{2}+a^{2})^{-\frac{3}{4}}$ in a Taylor expansion. Neglecting

1124: the contribution from higher order terms since the interesting

1125: region corresponds to $a<<1$ (or $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}<<R$) in the

1126: practical case, the final

1127: solution of equation (A2) is

1128: 

1129: \begin{equation}

1130: N(x, y) \cong 5\rho_{0} \frac{R^{3/2}} {(x^{2}+y^{2})^{1/4}}, ~~

1131: ~~~\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}\ne0.

1132: \end{equation}

1133: 

1134: \noindent At (x,y)=(0,0), the inflow terminates at the inner

1135: boundary $r_{0}$. Assuming the emission from the far-side gas is

1136: blocked by the central compact object, the effective column

1137: density along the line-of-sight is

1138: 

1139: \begin{equation}

1140: N(0, 0) = 2\rho_{0} R[ (\frac{r_{0}}{R})^{-\frac {1}{2}} - 1].

1141: \end{equation}

1142: 

1143: From equation (A1), excluding the mass of the central compact

1144: object, the mass $M(r)$ of the spherically symmetric cloud within

1145: $r$ can be derived by

1146: 

1147: \begin{equation}

1148: M(r)=\int_{r_0}^{r}4\pi r^{2}\rho (r) dr=\int_{r_0}^{r}4\pi r^{2}

1149: \rho_{0} (\frac{r}{R})^{-\frac{3}{2}}dr=\frac{8\pi \rho_{0}R^3}{3

1150: }[(\frac{r}{R})^{\frac{3}{2}}- (\frac{r_0}{R})^{\frac{3}{2}}].

1151: \end{equation}

1152: 

1153: \noindent The mass interior to $R$ is $\displaystyle M_R \approx

1154: \frac{8\pi \rho_{0}}{3 }R^{3}$ if $R>>r_0$. Therefore the equation

1155: (A5) can be re-written as

1156: 

1157: \begin{equation}

1158: M(r) \cong M_R (\frac{r}{R})^{\frac{3}{2}}.

1159: \end{equation}

1160: 

1161: The radial velocity of infall gas is the projection of the

1162: velocity vector {\bf V} on $z$ axis. The radial velocity averaged

1163: along the line-of-sight is zero at a position away from the

1164: central position (x, y)=(0,0) due to the cancellation of the

1165: velocity in a spherically-symmetric inflow. At the position (x,

1166: y)=(0,0), ignoring the contribution of the emission from the

1167: region behind the central object, the velocity at (x, y)=(0,0) in

1168: front of the central object can be expressed by

1169: 

1170: \begin{equation}

1171:    V_{infall}=\frac{\int_{r_{0}}^{R}V(r)dr}{\int_{r_{0}}^{R}dr}=-\frac

1172:    {\int_{r_{0}}^{R}(\displaystyle\frac

1173:     {2GM(r)}{r})^{\frac{1}{2}}dr}{\int_{r_{0}}^{R}dr}=-\frac{4\sqrt{2}}{5}

1174: \sqrt{\frac {GM_{R}}{R}} \frac{1-(\frac{r_{0}}{R})^{\frac{5}{4}}}

1175: {1-\frac{r_{0}}{R}}.

1176: \end{equation}

1177: 

1178: We note that the sign convention in the spherically symmetric

1179: description of infalling gas in front of the central object is

1180: opposite to the convention of the radial velocity with respect to

1181: the central object in the local standard rest (LSR) frame. In

1182: addition, in the derivation above, the systematic velocity is

1183: assumed to be zero.

1184: 

1185: \subsection{Decelerating Outflow}

1186: 

1187: Molecular outflows are observed in star formation regions. Various

1188: models have been also proposed to interpret the observed outflow

1189: morphology (e.g., Raga et al. 1993; Cabrit \& Berout, 1990). In

1190: this appendix, a PV diagram for a decelerating flow is calculated.

1191: The outflow velocity field and density are assumed to have

1192: power-law distributions along the major axis of the flow (cf.

1193: Cabrit \& Bertout 1990)

1194: 

1195: \begin{equation}

1196: V(r)=V_{0}(\frac{r_{min}}{r})^{\alpha},~~~~\rho(r)=\rho_{0}(\frac{r_{min}}{r})^{\delta},

1197: \end{equation}

1198: 

1199: \noindent where $\rho_{0}$ and $V_{0}$ are the volume density and

1200: velocity at the inner radius $r_{min}$, respectively;

1201: $r=\sqrt{x^{2}+z^{2}}$, the distance from the center, because the

1202: flow is in the x-z panel, i.e., $y=0$. The geometry of the

1203: blue-shifted outflow is illustrated in Fig. 9 by the cone in the

1204: $x-z$ plane with an opening angle of 2$\Theta$. The inclination

1205: angle of $\varphi$ is the angle between the z-axis and the axis of

1206: the blue-shifted outflow. The angle between the north and x-axis

1207: is the negative position angle of the blue-shifted outflow if we

1208: take the convention of position angle in AIPS. The radius of an

1209: outflow cross-section is equal to $r\cdot {\rm tan}(\Theta)$.

1210: Given conservation of mass flux across a cross-section and

1211: $0<\Theta <90^{\circ}$, the relationship of the power-law indices

1212: $\delta$ and $\alpha$ can be derived

1213: 

1214: \begin{equation}

1215: \delta=2-\alpha.

1216: \end{equation}

1217: 

1218: \noindent The size of a cut across the major-axis of the outflow

1219: along the line-of-sight ($z$-axis) can be expressed approximately

1220: by,

1221: \begin{equation}

1222:  L_{Z} \approx {\rm tan}(\Theta) x / {\rm sin}^{2}(\varphi),

1223: \end{equation}

1224: 

1225: \noindent if we take $\alpha=1$ and $\delta=1$ (Cabrit \& Bertout

1226: 1990), then the column density along the line-of-sight can be

1227: calculated from

1228: 

1229: \begin{equation}

1230: N(x)=\int \rho dz=\int_{0}^{L_{Z}} \rho_{0}(\frac{r_{min}}{r}) dz,

1231: \end{equation}

1232: 

1233: \noindent the result of the integration is

1234: 

1235: \begin{equation}

1236:     N(x)=\rho_{0}r_{min}g(\Theta,\varphi), ~~~g(\Theta,\varphi)=ln

1237: (\frac {{\rm tan}\Theta+({\rm tan}^{2}\Theta+{\rm

1238: sin}^{4}\varphi)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{{\rm sin}^{2}\varphi}).

1239: \end{equation}

1240: 

1241: \noindent The column density depends on the radius of the inner

1242: cross section ($r_{min}$), volume density $\rho_{0}$ at $r_{min}$,

1243: the opening angle ($\Theta$) and inclination angle ($\varphi$). In

1244: practice, the $\varphi$ and $\Theta$ are in the ranges of

1245: $0<\varphi <180^{\circ}$ and $0<\Theta <90^{\circ}$, respectively.

1246: A blue-shifted outflow corresponds to $0<\varphi <90^{\circ}$ and

1247: $90^{\circ}<\varphi <180^{\circ}$ to a red-shifted outflow. Fig.

1248: 10 plots  $g(\Theta,\varphi)$ as function of $\Theta$ and

1249: $\varphi$. $g(\Theta,\varphi)$ is a weak function of $\Theta$ and

1250: $\varphi$. Given $\Theta=30^{\circ}$ and $\varphi = 45^{\circ}$, $g$

1251: is close to unity.

1252: 

1253: The mean radial velocity of the outflow can be expressed as

1254: \begin{equation}

1255: V(x)=\frac {\int v(r){\rm cos}\varphi dz}{\int dz}= \frac

1256: {V_{0}r_{min}f(\Theta,\varphi)}{x}, ~~~~f(\Theta,\varphi)=\frac

1257: {g(\Theta,\varphi){\rm sin}^{2}\varphi {\rm cos}\varphi }{{\rm

1258: tan} \Theta}.

1259: \end{equation}

1260: 

1261: \noindent The radial velocity of the outflow is inversely

1262: proportional to $x$ along the major axis of the outflow and is a

1263: weak function ($f(\Theta,\varphi)$) of $\Theta$ and $\varphi$. As

1264: noted in the calculation of the infall velocity, the sign of the

1265: velocity used in the equation (A13) is opposite to the convention

1266: of the radial velocity with respect to the central source. The

1267: velocity of the central source with respect to the LSR, or

1268: systematic velocity, is not included here.

1269: 

1270: Fig. 11 shows the plot of $f(\Theta,\varphi)$ as a function of

1271: $\Theta$ and $\varphi$. In the range of $90^{\circ}<\varphi

1272: <180^{\circ}$, $f(\Theta,\varphi)$ has a negative value

1273: corresponding to a red-shifted outflow, while $0^{\circ}<\varphi

1274: <90^{\circ}$ is for a blue-shifted outflow. Given

1275: $\Theta=30^{\circ}$ and $\varphi = 45^{\circ}$, $f$ is about 0.6.

1276: In addition, for given $\varphi$, $r_{min}$, and $V_0$, the

1277: observed radial velocity decreases as $\Theta$ increases.

1278: 

1279: Assuming $V_{0}= 85$ km~s$^{-1}$ at $r_{0}=1^{\prime\prime}$ (0.04

1280: pc), $\Theta=30^{\circ}$ and $\varphi = 45^{\circ}$, we can

1281: calculate a PV diagram of an outflow (the thick solid contour in

1282: Fig. 12). Fig. 12 shows a PV diagram for the parameter

1283: ${V_{0}r_{min}f(\Theta,\varphi)}$ in a range between 0.5 to 5.1 km

1284: s$^{-1}$ pc assuming that the blue and red-shifted outflows are

1285: symmetric around the central source, whose velocity is 58 km

1286: s$^{-1}$ with respect to the LSR. In this diagram, we also

1287: includes an absorption component of a spherical inflow with a mean

1288: infall velocity of 8 km s$^{-1}$ with respect to the central

1289: source. The PV-diagram (Fig. 12) shows the typical configuration

1290: of a spherically inflow and decelerating outflows in an active

1291: star formation region.

1292: 

1293: \section{Radiative Transfer with LVG approximation}

1294: 

1295: In order to model the excitation conditions and the physical

1296: properties of the molecular cloud components observed in Sgr B2,

1297: we solve for the radiation transfer in a multi-level system with

1298: the large velocity gradient (LVG) approximation. In this model, a

1299: molecular cloud is assumed to be spherically uniform at kinetic

1300: temperature (${\rm T_k}$), column density per unit velocity

1301: interval (${\rm N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V}$) and H$_2$ density

1302: (${\rm n_{H2}}$) with a volume filling factor $f_{\rm L, V}$ of

1303: the line emitting gas. The escape probability,

1304: $\beta=(1-e^{-\tau})/\tau$, is used to account for photon

1305: trapping. The volume filling factor $f_{\rm L, V}$ is incorporated

1306: into the opacity calculation via the equation

1307: 

1308: \begin{equation}

1309: \tau_0={\rm A_{21}\over 8\pi \nu^3}

1310:  {{\rm X_{para-H_2CO} n_{H_2}}f_{\rm L, V}

1311:  \over {\rm dv/dz}} (x_1 {g_2\over g_1} -x_2),

1312: \end{equation}

1313: 

1314: \noindent where $\tau_0$ is the optical depth at the line center,

1315: A$_{21}$ is the Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission,

1316: ${\rm X_{para-H_2CO}}$ is the abundance of para-H$_2$CO, ${\rm

1317: dv/dz}$ is the velocity gradient, ${ x_{\rm i}}$ and ${g_{\rm i}}$

1318: are the fractional population and statistical weight of level i,

1319: respectively. The column density per unit velocity interval at the

1320: line center in the LVG model is given by

1321: 

1322: \begin{equation}

1323: {\rm N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V}={{\rm X_{para-H_2CO} n_{H_2}} f_{\rm

1324: L, V}\over{\rm dv/dz}}.

1325: \end{equation}

1326: 

1327: \noindent Given ${\rm n_{H_2}}$, ${\rm T_k}$ and ${\rm

1328: N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V}$, the local LVG model gives the radiative

1329: temperature or the intensity of the line requiring as input the

1330: collisional excitation rates. We adopted the collision rates

1331: calculated by Green (1991). Green used the interaction potential

1332: between H$_2$CO and He. Since He has twice mass of H$_2$,

1333: collisional excitation due to H$_2$ should be 2.2 times more

1334: effective than collisional excitation by He (Green 1991; Mangum \&

1335: Wootten 1993). The collisional excitation rates from Green were

1336: multiplied by this factor in our calculations. The accuracy in the

1337: Green's calculation of the total collisional excitation rates is

1338: $\sim$20\%.

1339: 

1340: Incorporating the Green's collisional excitation rates and the

1341: volume filling factor discussed above, we used the radiative

1342: transfer code in {\it Miriad} to solve for the radiative

1343: intensities from the para-H$_2$CO for the two transitions

1344: $3_{03}-2_{02}$ and $3_{21}-2_{20}$. In the line emission case,

1345: the line intensity ratio of the two transitions is a good

1346: indicator of the kinetic temperature in molecular clouds ({\it

1347: e.g.} Mangum \& Wootten 1993). This ratio becomes strongly

1348: dependent upon the volume density (${\rm n_{H_2}}$) when the

1349: kinetic temperature is greater than the upper state energy of the

1350: highest excitation transition (${\rm E_u}$). Given a column

1351: density (${\rm N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V}$), both the intensity of

1352: the lower transition I($3_{03}-2_{02}$) and the intensity ratio

1353: (I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$)) as a function of ${\rm

1354: T_k}$ and ${\rm n_{H_2}}$ can be calculated. We calculate five

1355: models with different sets of volume filling factor of the

1356: para-H$_2$CO gas ($f_{\rm L,V}$), beam filling factor of the line

1357: emission or absorption ($f_{\rm L}$) and beam filling factor of

1358: the continuum emission ($f_{\rm C}$). In model A, B, C and D, the

1359: line filling factors $f_{\rm L,V}=0.25$ and $f_{\rm L}=0.4$ are

1360: assumed while $f_{\rm L,V}=1$ and $f_{\rm L}=1$ are assumed in

1361: model E. The continuum filling factors of $f_{\rm C} = 0.3, 0.2,

1362: 0.1, 0.05$ and 0.05 are assumed in model A, B, C, D and E

1363: respectively. Fig.13 shows the LVG results calculated with model C

1364: for the component K1-3 at 72 km s$^{-1}$. The absorption line

1365: intensities of the two transitions $3_{03}-2_{02}$ and

1366: $3_{21}-2_{20}$ are plotted as function of the kinetic temperature

1367: and H$_2$ density. The line intensity ratio

1368: I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$) is also shown (bottom

1369: panel). In the high density and cold region (the right-bottom

1370: corner), both transitions becomes optically thick and the

1371: excitation temperature is much smaller than the brightness

1372: temperature of the background continuum radiation and the line

1373: ratio becomes unity. When the gas becomes hot and less dense

1374: (left-top corner), the line ratio becomes large. Fitting the

1375: observed results of the line intensity and the intensity ratio to

1376: the LVG model, we can determine ${\rm T_k}$ and ${\rm n_{H_2}}$.

1377: We find that the absorption case is different from the case of

1378: emission, and the absorption line intensity of the lower energy

1379: transition, I($3_{03}-2_{02}$), is a good indicator of the kinetic

1380: temperature (${\rm T_k}$) of a cloud component while the line

1381: intensity ratio I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$) places a

1382: strong constraint on the H$_2$ volume density ( ${\rm n_{H_2}}$)

1383: (see the top panel of Fig. 14).

1384: 

1385: Fig. 14 shows examples of the LVG fitting with model C ($f_{\rm

1386: L,V}=0.25$,  $f_{\rm L}=0.4$, and $f_{\rm L,V}=0.1$) to the

1387: observed results from three typical regions. Top panel in Fig. 14

1388: is the result showing the LVG model curves fitting to the observed

1389: I($3_{03}-2_{02}$) and I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$) for

1390: the velocity component at 72 km s$^{-1}$ in the region K1-3 of Sgr

1391: B2(N). The dashed lines are absorption in the units of Jy

1392: beam$^{-1}$. The thick dashed line and two thin dashed lines in

1393: light blue are the observed values of I($3_{03}-2_{02}$) and 1

1394: $\sigma$ uncertainty. The solid lines are the intensity ratio

1395: I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$). The thick line and two thin

1396: lines in red correspond to the observed ratio and 1 $\sigma$

1397: uncertainty. The hatched region marks the solution ranges of

1398: 2.9$\times10^6$--7.9$\times10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ in  ${\rm n_{H_2}}$ and

1399: ${\rm T_k}=350-360$ K for given ${\rm log(N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta

1400: V)=16.4}$ cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s. We searched for LVG solutions in

1401: a wide range of $11.0-19.0$ cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s in log(${\rm

1402: N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V}$).

1403: 

1404: The bottom-left panel in Fig. 14 shows the velocity component at

1405: 68 km s$^{-1}$ in the F1-4 region of Sgr B2(M). Given ${\rm

1406: log(N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V)=17.0}$ cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s, two

1407: possible solutions were found for this region, one with higher

1408: temperature (T$_{\rm k}=$ 150 K) and lower density ${\rm

1409: n_{H_2}}=4.6\times10^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$ and other with lower

1410: temperature (T$_{\rm k}=$ 110 K) and higher density ${\rm

1411: n_{H_2}}=1.2\times10^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$.

1412: 

1413: The bottom-right panel in Fig. 14 shows a LVG model to the

1414: observed results from the isolated emission region (M3) at 53 km

1415: s$^{-1}$. Given ${\rm log(N_{para-H_2CO}/\Delta V)=13.7}$

1416: cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s, T$_{\rm k}=90-240$ K and ${\rm

1417: n_{H_2}}=0.79-2.3\times10^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$ were found. The large

1418: uncertainties in T$_{\rm k}$ and ${\rm n_{H_2}}$ are due to

1419: relatively weaker line emission.

1420: 

1421: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1422: 

1423: \bibitem{cB90} Cabrit, S. \& Bertout, C. 1990, ApJ, 348, 530

1424: 

1425: \bibitem{cv89} Carlstrom, J.E. \& Vogel, S.N. 1989, ApJ, 337, 408

1426: 

1427: \bibitem{dgg95} de Pree, C.G., Gaume, R.A., Goss, W.M., et al. 1995, ApJ, 451, 284

1428: 

1429: \bibitem{dgg96} de Pree, C.G., Gaume, R.A., Goss, W.M., et al. 1996, ApJ, 464, 788

1430: 

1431: \bibitem{dgg98} de Pree, C.G., Goss, W.M. \& Gaume, R.A. 1998, ApJ, 500, 847

1432: 

1433: \bibitem{dmn00} de Vicente, P., Martin-Pintado, J., Nera, R., et al. 2000, A\&A, 361, 1058

1434: 

1435: \bibitem{edp75} Evans II, N.J., Davis, J.H. \& Plambeck, R.L. 1979, ApJ, 227, L25

1436: 

1437: \bibitem{gg90} Gaume, R.A. \& Claussen, M.J. 1990, ApJ, 351,538

1438: 

1439: \bibitem{gg95} Gaume, R.A., Claussen, M.J., de Pree, C.G., et al. 1995, ApJ, 449, 663

1440: 

1441: \bibitem{grc04} Goicoechea, J.R., Rodriguze-Fernandez, N.J. \& Cernicharo J. 2004, ApJ, 600, 214

1442: 

1443: \bibitem{g95} Gordon, M. A. 1995, A\&A, 301, 853

1444: 

1445: \bibitem{g91} Green, S. 1991, ApJS, 76, 979

1446: 

1447: \bibitem{h83} Hildebrand, R.H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267

1448: 

1449: \bibitem{klf84}Kahane, C., Lucas, R., Frerking, M.A., et al. 1984, A\&A, 137, 211

1450: 

1451: \bibitem{ks94} Kuan Yi-Jehng \& Snyder L.E. 1994, ApJS, 94, 651

1452: 

1453: \bibitem{ks96} Kuan Yi-Jehng \& Snyder L.E. 1996, ApJ, 470, 981

1454: 

1455: \bibitem{kms96} Kuan Yi-Jehng, Mehringer D. M. \& Snyder L.E. 1996, ApJ, 459, 619

1456: 

1457: \bibitem{lck91} Lis, D.C., Carlstrom, J.E. \& Keene. J. 1991, ApJ, 380, 429

1458: 

1459: \bibitem{lgc93} Lis, D.C., Goldsmith, P.F., Carlstrom, J.E., et al. 1993, ApJ, 402, 238

1460: 

1461: \bibitem{ls99}  Liu, Sheng-Yuan  \& Snyder, L.E. 1999, ApJ, 523, 683

1462: 

1463: \bibitem{l99}Lizano, S., Heiles, C., Rodriguez, L.F., et al. 1988, ApJ, 328, 763

1464: 

1465: \bibitem{lu71}Lucy, L. B. 1971, ApJ, 163, 95

1466: 

1467: \bibitem{mw93}Mangum, J.G. \& Wootten, A. 1993, ApJS, 89, 123

1468: 

1469: \bibitem{mdw90}Martin-Pintado, J., de Vicente, Wilson, T.L., et al. 1990, A\&A, 236, 193

1470: 

1471: \bibitem{mpg93}Mehringer, D. M., Palmer, P., Goss, W.M., et al. 1993, ApJ, 412, 684

1472: 

1473: \bibitem{mgp94} Mehringer, D. M., Goss, W.M. \& Palmer, P. 1994, ApJ, 434, 237

1474: 

1475: \bibitem{mdp95}Mehringer, D.M., Palmer, P. \& Goss, W. M. 1995, ApJS, 97, 497

1476: 

1477: \bibitem{mmd95}Miao, Y. T., Mehringer, D. M., Kuan, Yi-Jheng, et al. 1995, ApJ, 445, L59

1478: 

1479: \bibitem{nbh98} Nummelin, A., Bergman, P., Hjalmarson, A., et al. 1998, ApJS, 117, 427

1480: 

1481: \bibitem{prg00} Pierce-Price, D., Richer, J.S., Greaves, W.S., et al. 2000, ApJ, 545, L121

1482: 

1483: \bibitem{rcc93}Raga, A.C., Canto, J., Calvet, N., et al. 1993, A\&A, 276, 539

1484: 

1485:  \bibitem{rsm88} Reid, M.J., Schneps M.H., Moran J.M. et al. 1988, ApJ, 330, 809

1486: 

1487: \bibitem{ss74} Scoville, N. Z. \& Solomon, P. M. 1974, ApJ, 187, L71

1488: 

1489: \bibitem{s77} Shu, F. 1977, ApJ, 214, 488

1490: 

1491: \bibitem{sbm85} Sutton, E.C., Blake, G.A., Masson, C.R., et al. 1985, ApJS, 58, 341

1492: 

1493: \bibitem{sjd91} Sutton, E.C., Jaminet, P.A., Danchi, W.C., et al. 1991, ApJS, 77, 255

1494: 

1495: \bibitem{vgs96} Vacca, W., Garmany, C. \& Shull, J. 1996, ApJ, 460, 914

1496: 

1497: \bibitem{vgp87} Vogel, S.N., Genzel, R. \& Palmer, P. 1987, ApJ, 316, 243

1498: 

1499: 

1500: \end{thebibliography}

1501: 

1502: 

1503: \clearpage

1504: 

1505: 

1506: %\input table.tex

1507: 

1508: 

1509: \clearpage

1510: 

1511: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllrrr}

1512: 

1513: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablenum{1} \tablewidth{0pt}

1514: 

1515: \tablecaption{The SMA Measurements of Continuum Emission}

1516: \tablehead{ \colhead{Source}& \colhead{RA(J2000)} &

1517: \colhead{$\Delta$RA}& \colhead{DEC(J2000)} &

1518: \colhead{$\Delta$DEC}& \colhead{Angular size}& \colhead{Peak

1519: Intensity}&

1520: \colhead{Flux Density}\\

1521: &~~h~~m~~s~~&~

1522: (${\prime\prime}$)&~~$~~{\circ}$~~${\prime}$~~${\prime\prime}$~~&~~

1523: (${\prime\prime}$) &~~~~~and (PA)

1524: ~~~~~ &~~~(Jy~beam$^{-1}$)&(Jy)~~~~~~ \\

1525: }

1526: 

1527: \startdata

1528: 

1529: K1-3$^a$&17 47 19.89 ~&$\pm$0.1&--28 22

1530: 17.6~&$\pm$0.3&6$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}8\times3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}5(-25^{\circ}$)

1531: &29.2$\pm$2&52.1$\pm$4  \\

1532: 

1533: K4 & 17 47 20.02~&$\pm$0.1 &--28 22

1534: 04.7~&$\pm$0.1&5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}2\times4\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}8(-49^{\circ}$)

1535: &1.4$\pm$0.1&3.5$\pm$0.3\\

1536: 

1537: NE&17 47 20.56~~&$\pm$0.5 &--28 22 14.4~~&$\pm$0.3

1538: &5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}9\times1\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4(-71^{\circ}$)

1539: &1.2$\pm$0.1&2.5$\pm$0.3\\

1540: 

1541: NW&17 47 19.27~~&$\pm$0.3 &--28 22

1542: 11.8~~&$\pm$0.3&5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}1\times4\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}1(0^{\circ}$)

1543: &1.0$\pm$0.1&2.3$\pm$0.2\\

1544: 

1545: Z10.24& 17 47 20.04~~&$\pm$0.3&--28 22 41.2~~&$\pm$0.4

1546: &13$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}3\times4\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4(66^{\circ}$)

1547: &2.0$\pm$0.2&9.1$\pm$0.8\\

1548: 

1549: F1-4$^b$&17 47 20.17~~&$\pm$0.2&--28 23 04.9~~&$\pm$0.3

1550: &7$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}8\times4\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4(-58^{\circ}$)

1551: &20.2$\pm$1.3&35.6$\pm$3 \\

1552: 

1553: ME&17 47 21.65~~&$\pm$0.6&--28 22

1554: 57.0~~&$\pm$0.7&4$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}1\times2\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}6(73^{\circ}$)&0.58$\pm$0.15&1.0$\pm$0.3\\

1555: 

1556: MW&17 47 19.56~~&$\pm$0.8&--28 23

1557: 04.3~~&$\pm$0.6&12$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}8\times8\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}3(-13^{\circ}$)

1558: &1.7$\pm$0.2&12.3$\pm$1.3\\

1559: 

1560: \enddata

1561: 

1562: \tablenotetext{\it a}{Sgr B2(N) compact core (K1-3) was fitted

1563: with a Gaussian source

1564: (6$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}8\times3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}5$,

1565: PA=$-24.8^{\circ}$) centered on K3 (RA(J2000)=17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm

1566: m}$19$\rlap{.}^{\rm s}$90,

1567: DEC(J2000)=$-28^{\circ}$22$^{\prime}$16$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$9)

1568: and two point sources at K2 (RA(J2000)=17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm

1569: m}$19$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$88, DEC(J2000)=

1570: $-28^{\circ}$22$^{\prime}$18$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$6) and at

1571: (RA(J2000)=17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$19$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$95,

1572: DEC(J2000)=

1573: $-28^{\circ}$22$^{\prime}$12$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$3). The flux

1574: densities of the Gaussian source and the two point sources are

1575: 29.4$\pm$3.7, 19.1$\pm$1.5 and 3.6$\pm$1.0 Jy, respectively. The

1576: total flux density of the compact core (K1-3) is 52.1$\pm$4 Jy.}

1577: 

1578: \tablenotetext{\it b} {Sgr B2(M) compact core (F1-4) was fitted

1579: with a Gaussian source

1580: (7$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}8\times4\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4$,

1581: PA=$-58.1^{\circ}$) located within F cluster at

1582: (RA(J2000)=17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$20$\rlap{.}^{\rm s}$17,

1583: DEC(J2000)=$-28^{\circ}$23$^{\prime}$05$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$1)

1584: and a point source centered on F3 (RA(J2000)=17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm

1585: m}$20$\rlap{.}^{\rm s}$14,

1586: DEC(J2000)=$-28^{\circ}$23$^{\prime}$04$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}$6).

1587: The flux densities of the Gaussian and the point sources are

1588: 21.3$\pm$2.6 and 14.3$\pm$1.0 Jy, respectively. The total flux

1589: density of the compact core (F1-4) is 35.6$\pm$3 Jy.}

1590: 

1591: \end{deluxetable}

1592: 

1593: 

1594: \begin{deluxetable} {lrrrrrrrrr}

1595: 

1596: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1597: 

1598: \tablenum{2}

1599: 

1600: \tablewidth{0pt}

1601: 

1602: \tablecaption{The SMA Measurements of  H$_{2}$CO Lines}

1603: \tablehead{&&H$_{2}$CO&(3$_{03}-2_{02}$)&&&H$_{2}$CO&(3$_{21}-2_{20}$)\\

1604: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{I$_{\rm p1}$}& \colhead{V$_{\rm

1605: LSR1}$}& \colhead{$\Delta$V$_{1}$}& \colhead{$\tau_{1}$}&

1606: \colhead{I$_{\rm p2}$}& \colhead{V$_{\rm LSR2}$}& \colhead{

1607: $\Delta$V$_{2}$}& \colhead{$\tau_{2}$}\\

1608: 

1609: &Jy beam$^{-1}$&km~s$^{-1}$&km~s$^{-1}$&&Jy

1610: beam$^{-1}$&km~s$^{-1}$&km~s$^{-1}$& }

1611: 

1612: \startdata

1613: 

1614: K1-3

1615: 

1616:      &5.9$\pm$0.1&49$\pm$0.5&8$\pm$0.5&\dots

1617: 

1618:      &11.3$\pm$0.2&46$\pm$0.5&18$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1619: 

1620: 

1621:      &--8.3$\pm$0.3&56$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$0.5&0.3$\pm$0.1

1622: 

1623:      &4.7$\pm$0.1&60$\pm$0.5&5$\pm$0.5&\dots&\\

1624: 

1625: 

1626:      &--19.0$\pm$1.6&63$\pm$0.5&9$\pm$0.5&1.1$\pm$0.2

1627: 

1628:      &--8.7$\pm$0.1&65$\pm$0.5&4$\pm$0.5&0.4$\pm$0.1\\

1629: 

1630: 

1631:      &--23.5$\pm$0.7&72$\pm$0.5&12$\pm$1.2&1.6$\pm$0.1

1632: 

1633:      &--16.6$\pm$0.1&73$\pm$0.5&7$\pm$0.5&0.8$\pm$0.1\\

1634: 

1635: 

1636:      &--20.0$\pm$1.1&84$\pm$0.5&11$\pm$0.5&1.1$\pm$0.1

1637: 

1638:      &--4.0$\pm$0.1&82$\pm$0.5&4$\pm$0.5&0.1$\pm$0.1\\

1639: 

1640: 

1641:      &18.5$\pm$0.1&96$\pm$0.5&7$\pm$0.5&\dots

1642: 

1643:      &19.6$\pm$0.1&92$\pm$0.5&7$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1644: 

1645: 

1646:      &7.5$\pm$0.1&106$\pm$0.5&8$\pm$0.5&\dots

1647: 

1648:      &12.1$\pm$0.5&105$\pm$0.5&10$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1649: 

1650: 

1651:      &15.4$\pm$0.2&121$\pm$0.5&15$\pm$0.5&\dots

1652: 

1653:      &7.8$\pm$0.2&116$\pm$0.5&15$\pm$0.9&\dots\\

1654: 

1655: %%fit 10 components, lists central 8

1656: 

1657: K4&

1658: 

1659:      $<0.54^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots

1660: 

1661:      &$<0.48^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots\\

1662: 

1663: NE&

1664: 

1665:      --1.2$\pm$0.1&72$\pm$0.5&20$\pm$1.1&2.5$\pm$1.3

1666: 

1667:      &--0.5$\pm$0.1&71$\pm$0.9&18$\pm$2.2&0.5$\pm$0.2\\

1668: 

1669: NW&

1670: 

1671:      --1.1$\pm$0.1&71$\pm$0.5&18$\pm$1.3&2.5$\pm$1.4

1672: 

1673:      &$<0.48^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots\\

1674: 

1675: Z10.24&

1676: 

1677:      --1.0$\pm$0.1&70$\pm$1.1&24$\pm$2.6 &0.7$\pm$0.1

1678: 

1679:      &--0.3$\pm$0.1&74$\pm$7.0&15$\pm$9.5&0.2$\pm$0.1\\

1680: 

1681: 

1682:      &1.2$\pm$0.1&90$\pm$0.5&11$\pm$1.1&\dots

1683: 

1684:      &0.3$\pm$0.1&87$\pm$6.5&13$\pm$8.5&\dots\\

1685: 

1686: F1-4

1687: 

1688: 

1689:      &0.9$\pm$0.7&45$\pm$2.0&18$\pm$7.8&\dots

1690: 

1691:      &1.6$\pm$0.1&39$\pm$0.5&7$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1692: 

1693: 

1694:      &1.6$\pm$0.2&54$\pm$0.5&2$\pm$0.5&\dots

1695: 

1696:      &1.5$\pm$0.1&53$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1697: 

1698: 

1699:      &--6.1$\pm$0.4&58$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$0.5&0.4$\pm$0.1

1700: 

1701:      &--3.8$\pm$0.3&58$\pm$0.5&2$\pm$0.5&0.2$\pm$0.1\\

1702: 

1703: 

1704:      &--7.6$\pm$0.7&62$\pm$0.5&4$\pm$0.5&0.5$\pm$0.1

1705: 

1706:      &--2.2$\pm$0.4&62$\pm$0.8&4$\pm$1.4&0.1$\pm$0.1\\

1707: 

1708: 

1709:      &--16$\pm$0.1&68$\pm$0.5&10$\pm$0.5&1.6$\pm$0.1

1710: 

1711:      &--5.1$\pm$0.9&67$\pm$1.5&5$\pm$3.4&0.3$\pm$0.1\\

1712: 

1713: 

1714:      &--10$\pm$0.3&76$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$0.5&0.7$\pm$0.1

1715: 

1716:      &--2.0$\pm$0.4&74$\pm$0.6&2$\pm$1.0&0.1$\pm$0.1\\

1717: 

1718: 

1719:      &1.6$\pm$0.1&96$\pm$0.5&17$\pm$0.9&\dots

1720: 

1721:      &1.7$\pm$0.1&91$\pm$0.5&13$\pm$0.6&\dots\\

1722: 

1723: 

1724:      &1.1$\pm$0.1&112$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$0.5&\dots

1725: 

1726:      &1.0$\pm$0.1&107$\pm$0.5&5$\pm$0.6&\dots\\

1727: 

1728: %%fit 10 components, list 8 componets

1729: 

1730: ME&

1731: 

1732:      $<0.76^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots

1733: 

1734:      &$<0.67^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots\\

1735: 

1736: MW&

1737: 

1738:      6.6$\pm$0.1&53$\pm$0.5&6$\pm$0.5&\dots

1739: 

1740:      &4.3$\pm$0.1&53$\pm$0.5&6$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1741: 

1742: 

1743:      &--0.7$\pm$0.1&70$\pm$0.9&19$\pm$2.4&0.5$\pm$0.1

1744: 

1745:      &--0.1$\pm$0.1&70$\pm$3.8&17$\pm$9.8&0.1$\pm$0.1\\

1746: 

1747: M1&

1748: 

1749:       6.7$\pm$0.4&52$\pm$0.5&11$\pm$0.5&\dots

1750: 

1751:      &4.0$\pm$0.1&52$\pm$0.5&11$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1752: 

1753: 

1754:      &--1.4$\pm$0.1&64$\pm$2.3&21$\pm$3.4&0.9$\pm$0.1

1755: 

1756:      &--1.0$\pm$0.1&64$\pm$1.2&12$\pm$2.1&0.6$\pm$0.1\\

1757: 

1758: M2&

1759: 

1760:       2.6$\pm$0.1&55$\pm$0.5&6$\pm$0.5&\dots

1761: 

1762:      &0.5$\pm$0.1&53$\pm$0.5&4$\pm$1.1&\dots\\

1763: 

1764: M3&

1765: 

1766:      1.9$\pm$0.1&53$\pm$0.5&7$\pm$0.5&\dots

1767: 

1768:      &0.8$\pm$0.1&55$\pm$0.5&9$\pm$0.9&\dots \\

1769: 

1770: M4&

1771: 

1772:       --2.1$\pm$0.1&51$\pm$0.5&7$\pm$0.5&0.8$\pm$0.1

1773: 

1774:      &$<0.48^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots\\

1775: 

1776: 

1777:      &--2.2$\pm$0.1&65$\pm$0.7&14$\pm$1.5&0.9$\pm$0.1

1778: 

1779:      &5.9$\pm$0.1&66$\pm$0.5&10$\pm$0.5&\dots \\

1780: 

1781: 

1782:      &--0.8$\pm$0.3&70$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$1.1&0.2$\pm$0.1

1783: 

1784:      &4.2$\pm$0.2&70$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$0.5&\dots\\

1785: 

1786: 

1787:      &--1.6$\pm$0.3&75$\pm$0.5&3$\pm$0.6&0.5$\pm$0.1

1788: 

1789:      &$<0.48^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots\\

1790: 

1791: 

1792:      &1.8$\pm$0.1&100$\pm$0.5&8$\pm$0.5&\dots

1793: 

1794:      &$<0.48^a$&\dots&\dots&\dots\\

1795: 

1796: M5

1797: 

1798:      &0.2$\pm$0.1&66$\pm$3.1&16$\pm$7.4&\dots

1799: 

1800:      &1.2$\pm$0.1&64$\pm$0.5&14$\pm$0.8 &\dots\\

1801: 

1802: \enddata

1803: 

1804: \tablenotetext{\it}{ $^a$ 3$\sigma$ limit.}

1805: 

1806: \end{deluxetable}

1807: 

1808: 

1809: \begin{deluxetable}{lcclcllc}

1810: 

1811: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablenum{3} \tablewidth{-5pt}

1812: \tablecaption{LVG Model Results} \tablehead{ \colhead{Source}& &

1813: \colhead{V$_{\rm LSR}$} & \colhead{I$_{\rm p1}$/I$_{\rm p2}$}&

1814: \colhead{Model\tablenotemark{\it a}}& \colhead{T$_{\rm k}$} &

1815: \colhead{n$_{\rm H_{2}}$} &

1816: \colhead{$\rm log( { N_{para-H_{2}CO}\over \Delta V})$} \\

1817: & &(km s$^{-1}$) & & &~~(K)& (10$^{5}$~cm$^{-3}$)&

1818:  (cm$^{-2}$ km$^{-1}$ s)\\

1819: 

1820: } \startdata

1821: 

1822: K1-3   &(a)\tablenotemark{\it b}&63&2.2$\pm$0.2&A&

1823: 61$^{+12}_{-11}$  &

1824:             12.6$^{+6.1}_{-3.3}$

1825: 

1826:        &14.9--15.2 \\

1827: 

1828:        &   &  &           &B& 135$^{+5}_{-5}$  & 17.8$^{+10.4}_{-0.5}$

1829: 

1830:        &15.3--15.6 \\

1831: 

1832:        &   &  &           &C& 200$^{+280}_{-70}$  & 10.0$^{+10.0}_{-7.5}$

1833: 

1834:        &15.3--15.7 \\

1835: 

1836:        &   &  &           &D& 300$^{+150}_{-150}$  &0.22$^{+0.03}_{-0.09}$

1837: 

1838:        &16.5--17.6 \\

1839: 

1840:        &   &  &           &E& 255$^{+95}_{-95}$  &0.07$^{+0.02}_{-0.01}$

1841: 

1842:        &17.1--17.3 \\

1843: 

1844:        &(a)&72&1.4$\pm$0.1&A& 61$^{+4}_{-3}$   & 71$^{+245}_{-26}$

1845: 

1846:        &15.1--15.2 \\

1847: 

1848:        &   &  &           &B& 105$^{+25}_{-35}$  & 8.3$^{+5.9}_{-3.3}$

1849: 

1850:        &15.8--16.2 \\

1851: 

1852:        &   &  &           &C& 356$^{+12}_{-10}$  & 35$^{+124}_{-27}$

1853: 

1854:        &16.3--16.8 \\

1855: 

1856:        &   &  &           &D& 80$^{+120}_{-30}$  &0.25$^{+0.07}_{-0.09}$

1857: 

1858:        &17.3--17.4 \\

1859: 

1860:        &   &  &           &E& 105$^{+75}_{-50}$  &0.09$^{+0.01}_{-0.03}$

1861: 

1862:        &17.3--17.4 \\

1863: 

1864:        &(a)&84&5$\pm$0.3&A& 25$^{+4}_{-5}$    & 79$^{+36}_{-23}$

1865: 

1866:        &13.7--14.1 \\

1867: 

1868:        &   &  &           &B& 34$^{+5}_{-7}$  & 316$^{+1268}_{-158}$

1869: 

1870:        &13.8--13.9 \\

1871: 

1872:        &   &  &           &C& 30$^{+14}_{-14}$  & 316$^{+2195}_{-158}$

1873: 

1874:        &13.5--13.6 \\

1875: 

1876:        &   &  &           &D& 200$^{+20}_{-40}$  &0.025$^{+0.007}_{-0.008}$

1877: 

1878:        &17.2--17.3 \\

1879: 

1880:        &   &  &           &E& 200$^{+100}_{-100}$  &0.03$^{+0.01}_{-0.00}$

1881: 

1882:        &17.0--17.11 \\

1883: 

1884: NE     &(a)&72&2.4$\pm$0.5&C&25$^{+1}_{-1}$    &

1885:            25.0$^{+476}_{-11}$

1886: 

1887:        &14.6--14.8 \\

1888: 

1889:        &   &  &           &D& 55$^{+1}_{-10}$  &6.3$^{+93.7}_{-6}$

1890: 

1891:        &14.8--15.8 \\

1892: 

1893:        &   &  &           &E& 55$^{+2}_{-10}$  &5.0$^{+26.6}_{-2.5}$

1894: 

1895:        &14.9--15.5 \\

1896: 

1897: Z10.24 &(a)&70&3.3$\pm$1.1&C& 26$^{+1}_{-1}$     &

1898:          10$^{+30}_{-4}$

1899: 

1900:        &14.6--14.8 \\

1901: 

1902:        &   &  &           &D& 50$^{+8}_{-20}$  &2.0$^{+23.1}_{-1.9}$

1903: 

1904:        &14.8--15.6 \\

1905: 

1906:        &   &  &           &E& 56$^{+3}_{-17}$  &2.5$^{+97.5}_{-2.3}$

1907: 

1908:        &14.7--15.1 \\

1909: 

1910:        &(e)&90&4.0$\pm$1.3&C& 50$^{+47}_{-11}$   & 1.45$^{+0.54}_{-0.60}$

1911: 

1912:        &13.3--14.1 \\

1913: 

1914:        &   &  &           &D& \dots & \dots & \dots\\

1915: 

1916:        &   &  &           &E& 60$^{+120}_{-15}$  &0.79$^{+1.72}_{-0.69}$

1917: 

1918:        &13.0--13.9 \\

1919: 

1920: F1-4   &(a)&58&1.6$\pm$0.2&A& 77$^{+3}_{-3}$   &

1921:          17.8$^{+23.9}_{-6.6}$

1922: 

1923:        &15.4--15.7 \\

1924: 

1925:        &   &  &           &B& 132$^{+2}_{-3}$ & 10$^{+22}_{-6}$

1926: 

1927:        &15.7--16.0 \\

1928: 

1929:        &   &  &           &C& 288$^{+5}_{-8}$ & 8.91$^{+41.1}_{-5.76}$

1930: 

1931:        &16.3--17.1 \\

1932: 

1933:        &   &  &           &D& 575$^{+10}_{-15}$ & 7.08$^{+8.72}_{-3.92}$

1934: 

1935:        &17.1--17.4 \\

1936: 

1937:        &   &  &           &E& 260$^{+10}_{-20}$ & 0.05$^{+0.01}_{-0.01}$

1938: 

1939:        &17.05--17.15 \\

1940: 

1941:        &(a)&62&3.4$\pm$0.6&A& 40$^{+26}_{-26}$   & 7.94$^{+31.8}_{-4.78}$

1942: 

1943:        &14.6--14.9 \\

1944: 

1945:        &   &  &           &B& 40$^{+20}_{-20}$ &  12.6$^{+87.4}_{-8.6}$

1946: 

1947:        &14.4--14.7 \\

1948: 

1949:        &   &  &           &C& 180$^{+30}_{-60}$ & 0.063$^{+0.078}_{-0.043}$

1950: 

1951:        &16.88--17.04 \\

1952: 

1953:        &   &  &           &D& 425$^{+125}_{-25}$ & 0.28$^{+0.22}_{-0.12}$

1954: 

1955:        &17.0--17.08 \\

1956: 

1957:        &   &  &           &E& 280$^{+60}_{-120}$ & 0.04$^{+0.01}_{-0.01}$

1958: 

1959:        &16.86--17.02 \\

1960: 

1961:        &(a)&68&3.1$\pm$0.5&A& 30$^{+9}_{-10}$   & 17.8$^{+39.7}_{-7.8}$

1962: 

1963:        &14.60--14.9 \\

1964: 

1965:        &   &  &           &B& 41$^{+9}_{-11}$ & 31.6$^{+168}_{-19}$

1966: 

1967:        &14.5--14.7 \\

1968: 

1969:        &   &  &           &C& 110$^{+60}_{-25}$ & 0.10$^{+0.06}_{-0.08}$

1970: 

1971:        &17.1--17.2 \\

1972: 

1973:        &   &  &           &D& 465$^{+35}_{-195}$ & 0.14$^{+0.48}_{-0.07}$

1974: 

1975:        &17.0--17.18 \\

1976: 

1977:        &   &  &           &E& 240$^{+80}_{-100}$ & 0.06$^{+0.02}_{-0.01}$

1978: 

1979:        &17.0--17.2 \\

1980: 

1981:        &(a)&76&5.0$\pm$1.0&A& 26$^{+13}_{-10}$   & 36.3$^{+122}_{-16.3}$

1982: 

1983:        &14.1--14.2 \\

1984: 

1985:        &   &  &           &B& 25$^{+21}_{-12}$   & 63.1$^{+137}_{-23.3}$

1986: 

1987:        &13.8--13.92 \\

1988: 

1989:        &   &  &           &C& 24$^{+1}_{-1}$     & 150$^{+166}_{-79}$

1990: 

1991:        &13.25--13.76 \\

1992: 

1993:        &   &  &           &D& 500$^{+30}_{-50}$     & 0.018$^{+0.032}_{-0005}$

1994: 

1995:        &16.8--17.1 \\

1996: 

1997:        &   &  &           &E& 150$^{+30}_{-70}$     & 0.02$^{+0.005}_{-0.005}$

1998: 

1999:        &16.8--16.89 \\

2000: 

2001: MW     &(e)&53&1.6$\pm$0.1&C& 34$^{+1}_{-1}$   &

2002:             4.50$^{+1.81}_{-1.42}$

2003: 

2004:        &15.0--15.16 \\

2005: 

2006:        &   &  &           &D& \dots & \dots & \dots\\

2007: 

2008:        &   &  &           &E& 16$^{+1}_{-1}$     & 7.94$^{+7.86}_{-7.38}$

2009: 

2010:        &15.4--15.8 \\

2011: 

2012:        &(a)&70&3.5$\pm$1.7&C& 28$^{+1}_{-4}$   & 3.20$^{+12.6}_{-1.90}$

2013: 

2014:        &14.83--15.77 \\

2015: 

2016:        &   &  &           &D& 52$^{+8}_{-22}$     & 2.0$^{+77.4}_{-1.6}$

2017: 

2018:        &14.4--14.9 \\

2019: 

2020:        &   &  &           &E& 53$^{+6}_{-31}$     & 1.68$^{+48.4}_{-1.52}$

2021: 

2022:        &14.9--15.0 \\

2023: 

2024: M1     &(e)&52&1.7$\pm$0.1&C& 35$^{+5}_{-4}$   &

2025:          3.47$^{+1.54}_{-1.07}$

2026: 

2027:        &15.00--15.16 \\

2028: 

2029:        &   &  &           &D& \dots & \dots & \dots\\

2030: 

2031:        &   &  &           &E& 15$^{+1}_{-1}$     & 10.0$^{+15.1}_{-9.44}$

2032: 

2033:        &15.3--16.8 \\

2034: 

2035:        &(a)&64&1.6$\pm$0.2&C& 25$^{+1}_{-1}$   & 3.47$^{+1.54}_{-1.07}$

2036: 

2037:        &15.05--15.1 \\

2038: 

2039:        &   &  &           &D& 55$^{+1}_{-4}$     & 20$^{+20}_{-9}$

2040: 

2041:        &15.2--16.1 \\

2042: 

2043:        &   &  &           &E& 90$^{+1}_{-1}$     & 12.6$^{+37.5}_{-11.3}$

2044: 

2045:        &15.2--16.0 \\

2046: 

2047: M2     &(e)&55&5.2$\pm$1.0&C& 40$^{+10}_{-7}$    &

2048:         10.0$^{+5.8}_{-2.4}$

2049: 

2050:        &13.45--13.8 \\

2051: 

2052:        &   &  &           &D& \dots & \dots & \dots\\

2053: 

2054:        &   &  &           &E& 45$^{+35}_{-15}$     & 2.82$^{+7.18}_{-2.19}$

2055: 

2056:        &13.00--13.85 \\

2057: 

2058: M3     &(e)&53&2.4$\pm$0.3&C&150$^{+249}_{-50}$  &

2059:         1.86$^{+0.77}_{-0.66}$

2060: 

2061:        &13.62--13.8 \\

2062: 

2063:        &   &  &           &D& \dots & \dots & \dots\\

2064: 

2065:        &   &  &           &E& 150$^{+250}_{-50}$     & 0.45$^{+0.81}_{-0.31}$

2066: 

2067:        &13.30--13.85 \\

2068: 

2069: \enddata

2070: 

2071: \tablenotetext{\it a}{The filling factors are $f_{\rm C}$=0.3,

2072: $f_{\rm L}$=0.4, $f_{\rm L, V}$=0.25 for Model A, $f_{\rm C}$=0.2,

2073: $f_{\rm L}$=0.4, $f_{\rm L, V}$=0.25 for Model B, $f_{\rm C}$=0.1,

2074: $f_{\rm L}$=0.4, $f_{\rm L, V}$=0.25 for Model C , $f_{\rm

2075: C}$=0.05, $f_{\rm L}$=0.4, $f_{\rm L, V}$=0.25

2076:  for Model D and $f_{\rm C}$=0.05, $f_{\rm L}$=1, $f_{\rm L, V}$=1 for Model E.

2077: For the absorption components, we used the following formula in

2078: the radiative transfer calculation:

2079:    $$\Delta {\rm T}_{\rm L}^{\rm obs} = (f_{\rm L} {\rm T}_{\rm ex} -{f_{\rm L}\over f_{\rm C}} {\rm T}_{\rm C}^{\rm obs})

2080: (1- e^{-\tau_{\rm L}}).$$ For the emission components, we assumed

2081: $f_0=0$ and used the following formula:

2082:  $$\Delta {\rm T}_{\rm L}^{\rm obs} = (f_{\rm L} {\rm T}_{\rm ex} - {\rm T}_{\rm cmb}) (1- e^{-\tau_{\rm L}}),$$

2083:  where ${\rm T}_{\rm cmb}$ is the temperature of

2084: the cosmic microwave background radiation. }

2085: 

2086: \tablenotetext{\it b}{ The (a) and (e) indicate absorption and

2087: emission, respectively.}

2088: \end{deluxetable}

2089: 

2090: 

2091: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}

2092: 

2093:  \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablenum{4} \tablewidth{-5pt}

2094: 

2095: \tablecaption{The Properties of Sgr B2 Derived from Dust Emission}

2096: 

2097: \tablehead{ \colhead{Source}& \colhead{M$_{\rm H_2}$} &

2098: 

2099: \colhead{N$_{\rm H_{2}}$} &

2100: 

2101: \colhead{n$_{\rm H_{2}}$} \\

2102: 

2103: &(10$^{3}$~M$_{\odot}$)& (10$^{24}$~cm$^{-2}$)&

2104: 

2105:  (10$^{6}$~cm$^{-3}$)

2106: 

2107:  \\

2108: 

2109: } \startdata

2110: 

2111: K1-3$^a$ &13.7$\pm$1&21.2$\pm$2&18.7$\pm$2 \\

2112: 

2113: K4 &1.0$\pm$0.1&1.5$\pm$0.1&1.3$\pm$0.1 \\

2114: 

2115: NE&0.73$\pm$0.06&3.2$\pm$0.3 &4.8$\pm$0.4\\

2116: 

2117: NW&0.66$\pm$0.06&1.2$\pm$0.1&1.1$\pm$0.1\\

2118: 

2119: Z10.24 &2.6 $\pm$0.2&1.7$\pm$0.1&0.9$\pm$0.1 \\

2120: 

2121: F1-4$^b$ &7.8$\pm$0.8&9.0$\pm$1.3&6.6$\pm$0.7\\

2122: 

2123: ME&0.28$\pm$0.03&1.0$\pm$0.1&2.4$\pm$0.3\\

2124: 

2125: MW&3.2$\pm$0.4&1.1$\pm$0.1&0.46$\pm$0.06\\

2126: 

2127: 

2128: \enddata

2129: 

2130: \tablenotetext{\it a} {The core of Sgr B2(N).}

2131: 

2132: \tablenotetext{\it b} {The core of Sgr B2(M).}

2133: 

2134: \end{deluxetable}

2135: 

2136: 

2137: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using

2138: 

2139: %% \tableline, not \hline.

2140: 

2141: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.

2142: 

2143: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.

2144: 

2145: \clearpage

2146: 

2147: 

2148: \begin{figure}

2149: \hspace{-10mm} \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f1.eps} \caption{The

2150: spectrum from (u, v) domain on the baseline 3-4 for Sgr B2(M). The

2151: horizontal axis is the frequency in the rest frame and the

2152: vertical is the amplitude and phase. The 24 spectral windows of

2153: the SMA's spectrometer are coded in different color. UL indicates

2154: the unidentified lines. We note that the features at 218.222 and

2155: 218.760 GHz are apparently dominated by H$_{2}$CO (3$_{03}-2_{02}$

2156: and 3$_{21}-2_{20}$) and the possible contaminations from

2157: O$^{13}$CS, c-C$_3$H$_2$ and SO$^{18}$O at the transitions near

2158: the H$_{2}$CO frequencies 218.222 and 218.760 GHz appear to be

2159: insignificant in Sgr B2(M). These molecular lines also appear to

2160: be insignificant in Sgr B2(N). }

2161: 

2162: \end{figure}

2163: 

2164: 

2165: \begin{figure}

2166: 

2167: \hspace{-15mm} \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f2.eps} \caption{The mosaic

2168: image of the continuum emission towards Sgr B2 at 1.3 mm obtained

2169: by combining the data from both sidebands (218 and 228 GHz). The

2170: synthesized beam is 5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4\times

2171: 3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}2$, PA=12.5$^{\circ}$ (lower-right

2172: corner). The contours are -4, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 23, 32, 45, 64,

2173: 91, 128, and 181 $\sigma$. The rms (1 $\sigma$) noise level is 0.1

2174: Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The plus symbols indicate the positions of the

2175: continuum sources at 1.3 mm. The UCHII region K1-3 and F1-4

2176: positions were taken from Gaume et al. 1995. }

2177: 

2178: \end{figure}

2179: 

2180: 

2181: \begin{figure}

2182: 

2183: \hspace{-10mm} \epsscale{1.1} \plotone{f3.eps} \vspace{-8mm}

2184: 

2185: \caption{The mosaic images of integrated intensities with FWHM

2186: beam of 5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4\times

2187: 3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}2$, PA=12.5$^{\circ}$. The pseudo-color is

2188: for integrated H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) emission intensity with

2189: 4 $\sigma$ cutoff in each channel (1 $\sigma$  is 0.16

2190: Jy~beam$^{-1}$). The color scale on the right shows the range from

2191: 0 to 80 Jy~beam$^{-1}~$km~s$^{-1}$. The contours (4, 8, 16, 32,

2192: 64, 128, 256 Jy~beam$^{-1}~$km~s$^{-1}$) are the integrated

2193: H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) emission intensity with 4 $\sigma$

2194: cutoff in each channel (1 $\sigma$ is 0.18 Jy~beam$^{-1}$).

2195: Top-left panel shows the observed spectra (solid curves) towards

2196: Sgr B2(N), green for H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) and red for

2197: H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$). The dashed curves are the Gaussian

2198: fitting to the multiple components. Bottom-left panel shows the

2199: spectra towards Sgr B2(M). The vertical lines mark the systematic

2200: velocities, 58 km s$^{-1}$ for Sgr B2(M) and 65 km s$^{-1}$ for

2201: Sgr B2(N).}

2202: 

2203: \end{figure}

2204: 

2205: 

2206: \begin{figure}

2207: 

2208: \epsscale{1.} \plotone{f4.eps} \vspace{-8mm} \caption{Spectra from

2209: various components, green for H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) and red

2210: for H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$). Solid curves are the observed

2211: spectra and dashed are the multiple Gaussian fitting. The vertical

2212: lines mark the systematic velocities, 58 km s$^{-1}$ for M1, M2,

2213: M3, M4, M5 and MW in Sgr B2(M) and 65  km s$^{-1}$ for NE, NW and

2214: K4 in Sgr B2(N).} \label{fig:graphics_01}

2215: 

2216: \end{figure}

2217: 

2218: 

2219: \begin{figure}

2220: 

2221: \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f5.eps} \caption{The mosaic image of the

2222: intensity weighted velocity map in pseudo-color constructed from

2223: the data after imposing a cutoff of 8 $\sigma$, showing velocity

2224: field traced by H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) emission in

2225: pseudo-color. The scale on the right shows the velocity range from

2226: 40 to 80 km~s$^{-1}$. The contours outline the integrated

2227: intensity of H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) emission at the level of

2228: 4 Jy~beam$^{-1}$ km~s$^{-1}$. The FWHM beam is

2229: 5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4\times 3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}2$

2230: (PA=12.5$^\circ$). }

2231: 

2232: \end{figure}

2233: 

2234: 

2235: \begin{figure}

2236: 

2237: \centering \plotone{f6.eps} \caption{The mosaic image of the

2238: intensity weighted velocity map in pseudo-color constructed from

2239: the data after imposing a cutoff of 8 $\sigma$, showing velocity

2240: field traced by H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) emission in

2241: pseudo-color. The  scale shows the velocity range from 40 to 80

2242: km~s$^{-1}$. The contours outline the integrated intensity of

2243: H$_{2}$CO ($3_{03}-2_{02}$) emission at the level of 4

2244: Jy~beam$^{-1}$ km~s$^{-1}$. The FWHM beam is

2245: 5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4\times 3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}2$

2246: (PA=12.5$^\circ$). } \label{fig:graphics_02}

2247: 

2248: \end{figure}

2249: 

2250: \begin{figure}

2251: \epsscale{0.9}\hspace{-18mm} \plotone{f7.eps}  \caption{The

2252: integrated line intensity of H$_{2}$CO ($3_{21}-2_{20}$) in Sgr

2253: B2(M), showing the emission from the decelerating outflow along

2254: the direction in PA=158$^\circ$. The color scale gives the

2255: intensity from 0 to 90 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$. The FWHM beam

2256: is 5$\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}4\times 3\rlap{.}^{\prime\prime}2$

2257: (PA=12.5$^\circ$).}

2258: \end{figure}

2259: 

2260: \begin{figure}

2261: 

2262: \centering \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f8.eps} \caption{The

2263: velocity-position diagram cutting along the major axis of the

2264: outflows (see Fig. 7), which was constructed from the H$_{2}$CO

2265: (3$_{21}-2_{20}$) spectral line cube. The solid contours show the

2266: emission from the decelerating outflows. The dashed contours are

2267: the absorption. The effective resolution of this map is labelled

2268: with the plus sign at bottom-right corner, i.e. 5 km s$^{-1}$ in

2269: velocity and 5 arcsec in position. The vertical green line marks

2270: the systematic velocity. The solid curves are the best fitting to

2271: the decelerating outflow, with the decelerating outflow parameter

2272: $V_0 r_{min} f(\Theta,\varphi)=2$ km s$^{-1}$ pc for the

2273: red-shifted component (red) and $V_0 r_{min}

2274: f(\Theta,\varphi)=0.8$ km s$^{-1}$ pc for the blue-shifted. The

2275: dashed color lines show the range of  $V_0 r_{min}

2276: f(\Theta,\varphi)$ between 0.4 to 6 km s$^{-1}$ pc for the

2277: red-shifted component and 0.1 to 2 km s$^{-1}$ pc for the

2278: blue-shifted component. }

2279: 

2280: \end{figure}

2281: 

2282: 

2283: \begin{figure}

2284: 

2285: \centering \centering \epsscale{.70} \plotone{f9.eps} \caption{The

2286: geometry of the layout for a spherical infall (indicated by the

2287: small arrows towards the origin of the coordinates) and a

2288: decelerating outflow. Here the sky plane is the $x-y$ plane. The

2289: outflow lies in the $x-z$ plane with an opening angle of $2\Theta$

2290: and an inclination angle of $\varphi$. The z-axis points towards

2291: the observer. }

2292: 

2293: \end{figure}

2294: 

2295: 

2296: \begin{figure}

2297: 

2298: \centering \plotone{f10.eps} \caption{The geometric function

2299: $g$($\Theta$,$\varphi$).}

2300: \end{figure}

2301: 

2302: 

2303: \begin{figure}

2304: 

2305: \centering \plotone{f11.eps} \caption{The geometric function

2306: $f$($\Theta$,$\varphi$).}

2307: \end{figure}

2308: 

2309: 

2310: \begin{figure}

2311: 

2312: \centering \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f12.eps} \caption{The PV

2313: diagram calculated from a model incorporating a spherical inflow

2314: with decelerating bipolar outflow for the parameter $V_0 r_{min}

2315: f(\Theta,\varphi)$ in a range between 0.5 and 5.1 km s$^{-1}$ pc

2316: (scaled in color). The position axis (vertical) is a cut along the

2317: major axis of the outflow. The velocity axis (horizontal) is the

2318: radial velocity of the outflow with respect to the LSR. The

2319: systematic velocity of the central object is assumed to be 58 km

2320: s$^{-1}$ and the mean infall velocity of the absorption component

2321: is 8 km s$^{-1}$. The contours correspond to $V_0 r_{min}

2322: f(\Theta,\varphi)$=0.8, 1, 1.4 and 2 km s$^{-1}$ pc. The thick

2323: contour in the blue-shifted outflow corresponds to 2 km s$^{-1}$

2324: pc. The absorption (dashed contours) feature at V=66 km s$^{-1}$

2325: and X=0 arcsec shows the component of spherical inflow. The normalized

2326: absorption intensity is scaled in color.}

2327: 

2328: \end{figure}

2329: 

2330: \begin{figure}

2331: 

2332: \centering \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f13.eps} \vspace{-5mm}

2333: \caption{An example shows the LVG analysis results derived with

2334: model C for component K1-3 at 72 km s$^{-1}$. Top panel: The line

2335: intensity of para-H$_2$CO transition I($3_{03}-2_{02}$) as a

2336: function of n$_{\rm H_2}$ and T$_{\rm k}$. Middle panel: The line

2337: intensity of para-H$_2$CO transition I($3_{21}-2_{20}$) as a

2338: function of n$_{\rm H_2}$ and T$_{\rm k}$. Bottom panel: The line

2339: ratio of I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$) as a function of

2340: n$_{\rm H_2}$ and T$_{\rm k}$. }

2341: \end{figure}

2342: 

2343: 

2344: \begin{figure}

2345: 

2346: \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f14a.eps} \epsscale{1.0}

2347: 

2348: \plottwo{f14b.eps}{f14c.eps} \vspace{-3mm} \caption{Examples of

2349: fitting the observed line intensity and intensity ratio to model C

2350: with the LVG approximation. Dashed lines are the line intensity of

2351: the $3_{03}-2_{02}$ transition. The solid lines are the line ratio

2352: I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$). The thick solid and dashed

2353: lines correspond to the observed values of I($3_{03}-2_{02}$) and

2354: I($3_{03}-2_{02}$)/I($3_{21}-2_{20}$). The hashed grey zones mark

2355: the solution regions in the n$_{\rm H_2}$-T$_{\rm k}$ domain. Top:

2356: for the absorption component K1-3 at 72 km s$^{-1}$. Bottom-left:

2357: for the absorption component F1-4 at 68 km s$^{-1}$. Bottom-right:

2358: for the emission component M3 at 53 km s$^{-1}$. }

2359: 

2360: \end{figure}

2361: 

2362: \end{document}

2363: