1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: %% The command below calls the preprint style

13: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

14: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

15: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

16: 

17: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

18: 

19: %\usepackage{natbib}

20: 

21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

22: 

23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

24: 

25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

26: 

27: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

28: 

29: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

30: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

31: %% the \begin{document} command.

32: %%

33: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

34: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

35: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

36: %% for information.

37: 

38: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

39: %%\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

40: \newcommand{\Th}{\mbox{This paper}}

41: \newcommand{\sTh}{\mbox{this paper}}

42: \newcommand{\um}{\,$\mu$m}

43: \newcommand{\mum}{\,$\mu${\rm m}}

44: \newcommand{\CenA}{\mbox{Centaurus\,A}}

45: \newcommand{\cenA}{\mbox{Centaurus\,A}}

46: %\newcommand{\n083}{\mbox{NGC\,083}}

47: %\newcommand{\n759}{\mbox{NGC\,759}}

48: %\newcommand{\n807}{\mbox{NGC\,807}}

49: %\newcommand{\n1503}{\mbox{UGC\,1503}}

50: %\newcommand{\n3656}{\mbox{NGC\,3656}}

51: %\newcommand{\n4476}{\mbox{NGC\,4476}}

52: %\newcommand{\n5666}{\mbox{NGC\,5666}}

53: %%\newcommand{\m82}{\mbox{M\,82}}

54: \def\aj{{AJ}}

55: \def\araa{{ARA\&A}}

56: \def\apj{{ApJ}}

57: \def\apjl{{ApJL}}

58: \def\apjs{{ApJS}}

59: \def\ao{{Appl.~Opt.}}

60: \def\apss{{Ap\&SS}}

61: \def\aap{{A\&A}}

62: \def\aapr{{A\&A~Rev.}}

63: \def\aaps{{A\&AS}}

64: \def\azh{{AZh}}

65: \def\baas{{BAAS}}

66: \def\jrasc{{JRASC}}

67: \def\memras{{MmRAS}}

68: \def\mnras{{MNRAS}}

69: \def\pra{{Phys.~Rev.~A}}

70: \def\prb{{Phys.~Rev.~B}}

71: \def\prc{{Phys.~Rev.~C}}

72: \def\prd{{Phys.~Rev.~D}}

73: \def\pre{{Phys.~Rev.~E}}

74: \def\prl{{Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}}

75: \def\pasp{{PASP}}

76: \def\pasj{{PASJ}}

77: \def\qjras{{QJRAS}}

78: \def\skytel{{S\&T}}

79: \def\solphys{{Sol.~Phys.}}

80: \def\sovast{{Soviet~Ast.}}

81: \def\ssr{{Space~Sci.~Rev.}}

82: \def\zap{{ZAp}}

83: \def\nat{{Nature}}

84: \def\iaucirc{{IAU~Circ.}}

85: \def\aplett{{Astrophys.~Lett.}}

86: \def\apspr{{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.}}

87: \def\bain{{Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands}}

88: \def\fcp{{Fund.~Cosmic~Phys.}}

89: \def\gca{{Geochim.~Cosmochim.~Acta}}

90: \def\grl{{Geophys.~Res.~Lett.}}

91: \def\jcp{{J.~Chem.~Phys.}}

92: \def\jgr{{J.~Geophys.~Res.}}

93: \def\jqsrt{{J.~Quant.~Spec.~Radiat.~Transf.}}

94: \def\memsai{{Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Italiana}}

95: \def\nphysa{{Nucl.~Phys.~A}}

96: \def\physrep{{Phys.~Rep.}}

97: 

98: \def\physscr{{Phys.~Scr}}

99: \def\planss{{Planet.~Space~Sci.}}

100: \def\procspie{{Proc.~SPIE}}

101: \let\astap=\aap

102: \let\apjlett=\apjl

103: \let\apjsupp=\apjs

104: \let\applopt=\ao

105: 

106: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

107: 

108: \slugcomment{Version \today;\\ 

109: Accepted and scheduled for ApJ 

110: %April 10, 

111: 2008, v677 n1 issue}

112: % ApJ 2008, } 

113: % in prep. for re-submission to ApJ}

114: %, 2007}

115: 

116: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

117: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

118: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

119: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

120: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

121: %% will not print in the manuscript style.

122: 

123: \shorttitle{

124: %Spatially Resolved 

125: %The First Ever Spatially Resolved 

126: Continuum Imaging

127: %Cold Dust Emission 

128: %of Nearby Ellipticals} 

129: of Elliptical Galaxies at 350$\mu$m} 

130: %Galaxies Cold Dust 

131: %Observations of  Continuum Emission 

132: %in Nearby Ellipticals}

133: % Galaxies}

134: \shortauthors{Leeuw et al.}

135: 

136: %%, & Hughes}

137: 

138: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

139: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

140: 

141: %\received{2003 October 6}

142: \begin{document}

143: 

144: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

145: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

146: %% you desire.

147: 

148: \title{Spatially Resolved Imaging at 350$\mu$m of Cold Dust in Nearby Elliptical Galaxies}

149: 

150: \author{Lerothodi L. Leeuw\altaffilmark{1,2}, Jacqueline Davidson\altaffilmark{3}, C. Darren Dowell\altaffilmark{4}, and Henry E. Matthews\altaffilmark{5}}

151: 

152: 

153: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics \& Electronics, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa; lerothodi@alum.mit.edu.}

154: \altaffiltext{2}{Space Science and Astrophysics Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-6, Moffett Field, CA 94035; lleeuw@arc.nasa.gov.}

155: \altaffiltext{3}{USRA-SOFIA, NASA Ames Research Center, MS 211-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035; jdavidson@sofia.usra.edu.}

156: \altaffiltext{4}{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 169-506, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA  91109; charles.d.dowell@jpl.nasa.gov.} 

157: \altaffiltext{5}{Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada, P. O. Box 248, Penticton, BC, V2A 6J9, Canada; Henry.Matthews@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.}

158: 

159: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

160: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

161: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

162: %% affiliation.

163: 

164: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

165: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

166: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

167: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

168: %% editorial office after submission.

169: 

170: 

171: \begin{abstract}

172: %SHARC\,II c

173: Continuum observations at 350\,$\mu$m

174: are presented of 

175: %three the 

176: seven 

177: %galaxies in our sample of 

178: nearby elliptical galaxies, for which

179: CO-gas disks have recently

180: been resolved 

181: %detected 

182: with interferometry mapping.  

183: These SHARC\,II mapping results

184: provide the first {\em clearly resolved}

185: far-infrared(FIR) to submillimeter(submm)

186: %FIR-submm 

187: continuum emission from cold dust (with temperatures 32\,K $> T >$

188: 22\,K) of any elliptical galaxy at a distance $>40$\,Mpc.       

189: %These new data show that the cold dust has temperatures 30\,K $> T >$ 20\,K.  

190: %\ldots

191: %are used in conjunction

192: %with archival Digital Sky Survey maps and other published data 

193: %to determine dust associations with galactic structures, including

194: %dominant heating sources such as nuclear-activity, star-formation or

195: %diffuse-stellar radiation.

196: %and appears co-spatial with recently interferometerically resolved CO in these galaxies.

197: % (Young 2002 and Wilkind et al. 1997).

198: %and that its 

199: %%Calculations of 

200: The measured FIR excess shows that the 

201: %dust's

202: %Its 

203: most likely and dominant heating source 

204: of this dust 

205: is not dilute stellar radiation or cooling flows, but rather

206: star-formation, that 

207: %.  The star-formation 

208: could have been 

209: triggered by an accretion or

210: merger event and fueled by dust-rich

211: %y, gas-rich 

212: material 

213: %from at least one galaxy

214: that has settled in a 

215: %star-formation 

216: dense region 

217: %around

218: %towards 

219: %the galactic nucleus and is 

220: co-spatial with the

221: %previously detected

222: %interferometerically resolved, 

223: central CO-gas disks.

224: %involved in the event. 

225: % that were 

226: %previously 

227: %interferometerically resolved by others.

228: The 

229: %star-formation 

230: dust is detected even in two 

231: %galaxy 

232: cluster ellipticals

233: %which 

234: that are deficient in H\,I, showing 

235: %uggesting 

236: that, unlike the H\,I, cold dust and CO in ellipticals can survive 

237: %among

238: in the presence of hot X-ray gas, even in galaxy clusters.

239: No dust cooler than 20\,K, either distributed outside the CO disks, 

240: or co-spatial with and heated by the entire dilute stellar optical galaxy

241: (or very extended H\,I), 

242: %and heated by the dilute stellar radiation

243: is currently evident.

244: %Therefore, t

245: %The 

246: %showing that the 

247: %currently detected dust is 

248: %clearly 

249: %centrally concentrated 

250: %and decoupled from the large-scale stellar and

251: %H\,I galactic components.  

252: 

253: %%%These observations clearly show that the

254: %%%FIR-submm emission in our sample 

255: %ellipticals galaxies 

256: %%%is primarily from cold dust

257: %%%that is associated with 

258: %%%centrally concentrated star-formation 

259: %that exists 

260: %located in the central parts 

261: %%%and decoupled from the large-scale stellar 

262: %and

263: %%%or H\,I 

264: %galactic 

265: %%%components of these galaxies.    

266: 

267: %\vspace{6.5cm}

268: \end{abstract}

269: 

270: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

271: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

272: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

273: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

274: 

275: \keywords{galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD --  galaxies: ISM

276:   --  galaxies: photometry -- infrared: galaxies --  radio continuum:

277:   galaxies -- submillimeter}

278: 

279: %\keywords{galaxies : dust -- galaxies: individual ( NGC\,2986,

280: %NGC\,3156, NGC\,3962, NGC\,4374, NGC\,4697, NGC\,5353/NGC\,5354) --

281: %galaxies: ellipticals}

282: 

283: \section{Introduction}

284: \label{sec:intro_es}

285: 

286: Cold gas and dust in nearby elliptical galaxies were detected only

287: fairly recently 

288: %(Sadler \& Gerhard 1985; Knapp et al. 1989; Lees et al. 1991; Wiklind et al. 1995).   

289: \citep[][]{sad85, kna89, lee91, wik95}.

290: %\citep[][]{kna89, lee91, wik95}.

291: Compared to that in spiral galaxies, 

292: %the cold

293: the cold Interstellar Medium (ISM) 

294: %ISM 

295: in ellipticals is  

296: present in relatively small amounts and is seen in only 50\% to 80\% of

297: nearby ellipticals.  The source and content of the cold ISM in these

298: galaxies is still uncertain, with optical and

299: far-infrared (FIR) dust-mass estimates differing by $\sim$ 10 to 100

300: %(e.g. Goudfrooij \& de Jong 1995).  

301: \citep[e.g.,][]{gou95_b}.

302: 

303: There is some evidence for an internal origin of the dust 

304: %from

305: arising in circumstellar envelopes of red giant stars. 

306: This internal origin is supported by the detection of

307: $\sim 10\,\mu$m emission  

308: in excess of the stellar emission, 

309: %having

310: with the same de Vaucouleurs

311: profile as the optical stellar  

312: images and near- to mid-IR photospheric emission 

313: %(e.g. Athey et al. 2002).

314: \citep[e.g.,][]{ath02}.

315:  Some have 

316: %argued

317: suggested that 

318: this dust would come in contact with the hot ISM ($\sim 10^7$\,K) and

319: be eroded in thermal collisions  

320: with ions and destroyed in only $\sim 10^7$ to $10^8$\,

321: years 

322: %(e.g. Schweizer, 1998).

323: \citep[e.g.,][]{sch98_w}.

324:  However, 

325: %Matthews and Brighenti (2003)  

326: \citet[][]{mat03}

327: have argued that the dust may induce efficient cooling of the hot gas

328: on a timescale shorter than  

329: the destruction lifetimes of the dust in the hot gas, allowing

330: some dust to survive and settle primarily in the centers of the galaxies

331: while the hot gas cools.  They 

332: %argue

333: propose that if

334: this dust-induced cooling is the dominant evolutionary path of the dust

335: from stars, the thermal energy released by the hot ISM should be 

336: re-radiated by dust in the FIR and could be responsible

337: for the central dusty disks and clouds seen in ellipticals. 

338: 

339: %Mounting evidence has also been published 

340: It has also been suggested that mergers or accretion

341: events that include a gas-rich galaxy may be the dominant source of dust

342: in ellipticals.  The total far-IR luminosities 

343: %(e.g. Temi et al. 2004)

344: \citep[e.g.,][]{tem04}

345: and cold gas content 

346: %(e.g. Knapp, Turner, \& Cuniffe 1985, Lees et al. 1991)

347: \citep[][]{kna85, lee91}

348:  of ellipticals are observed to be

349: uncorrelated with their optical  

350: luminosities.  This lack of correlation, together with HST detections

351: of irregular dust lanes and

352: filaments with random orientations with respect to the optical major

353: axes 

354: %(e.g. Tran et al. 2001)  

355: \citep[e.g.,][]{tra01}

356: is usually interpreted as evidence that the dust has been externally

357: acquired. The external origin  

358: is likely

359: %from

360: to be accretion 

361: %in an 

362: via the interaction of an elliptical galaxy

363: with a gas-rich spiral, or in  

364: mergers of gas-rich spirals that evolve through an FIR-bright

365: (starburst) phase as they relax to  

366: form ellipticals 

367: %(e.g. Toomre \& Toomre 1972; Schweizer 1998).

368: \citep[e.g.,][]{too72, sch98_w}.  

369: In fact, if elliptical galaxies are formed through spiral mergers,

370: then starbursts are necessary to produce the high phase-space

371: densities seen in the centers of elliptical galaxies \citep[e.g.,][and

372: references therein]{rot04}. 

373: Numerical simulations by 

374: %Barnes (2002)

375: \citet[][]{bar02}

376:  have shown that 20\% to 60\% of the gas from two spirals

377: merging can form relaxed disks  

378: of sizes up to 20\,kpc, with some of the gas maybe losing angular momentum,

379: falling to the nucleus of  

380: the galaxy, and perhaps leading to star-formation.

381: 

382: Observations of dust emission from elliptical galaxies have 

383: been made using $IRAS$ or $ISO$ primarily   

384: %(e.g., Knapp et al. 1989; Temi et al. 2004).

385: \citep[e.g.,][]{kna89, tem04}.

386:   These measurements

387: favored the warm dust  

388: components of the ISM and produced unresolved images of the dust

389: emission.  The $IRAS$ and $ISO$  

390: derived SEDs of these galaxies clearly show that there are

391: multi-temperature components to  

392: the dust. Indeed, the presence of an additional, low-level, very cold

393: ($<20$\,K) dust component in ellipticals has been suggested by limited

394: detections of unresolved mm and submm emission in some nearby galaxies

395: %(Knapp et al. 1991; Wiklind et al. 1995; Leeuw et al. 2004; Temi et

396: %al. 2004),

397: \citep[][]{kna91, wik95b, lee04, tem04},

398:  as well as clearly extended FIR to submm detections from the

399: dust lane in the nearest giant elliptical galaxy NGC\,5128 that hosts

400: the active galactic nucleus (AGN) Centaurus\,A 

401: %(e.g. Leeuw et al. 2002; Quillen et al. 2006).

402: \citep[e.g.,][]{lee02, qui06}.

403: Observations of CO emission from a number of ellipticals

404: show that many of them  

405: contain significant amounts of

406: molecular gas 

407: %components 

408: %(Lees et al. 1991; Wiklind, Combes \& Henkel 1995),  

409: \citep[][]{lee91, wik95},

410: but many of these observations do not spatially resolve the CO emission.  

411: 

412: Recently, 

413: %the 

414: interferometric measurements 

415: %of 

416: %Young (2002; 2005)

417: by \citet[][]{you02, you05}

418:  and 

419: %Wiklind et al. (1997)

420: \citet[][]{wik97}

421:  have spatially  

422: resolved the CO (1-0) emission in seven elliptical galaxies with spatial

423: resolutions of 7 and 3 arcsec,  

424: respectively. These data imply that the molecular gas is 

425: %distributed

426: contained mostly

427: in rotating disks lying within  

428: the central 5\,kpc

429: %regions

430:  of the galaxies. 

431: %The gas disks could be a result of could 

432: This prompted the study by

433: our group to spatially resolve  

434: the dust emission in these seven elliptical galaxies. 

435: %The study's aim is

436: Our goals were (a) to determine the physical properties of  

437: the dust coincident with the molecular gas; (b) to see if there are

438: dust associations with other  

439: spatial distributions (e.g., stellar distribution); and (c) to

440: determine the most likely heating source (or sources) for the dust.

441: We wanted also to address the question of whether these observed gas

442: disks are the result of external merger/accretion events, as suggested

443: by the optical morphological signatures of the galaxies, or 

444: %simply

445: internal mass-losing stars that constitute their elliptical optical

446: components.     

447: 

448: %This paper presents the first ever spatially resolved 

449: %350\,$\mu$m, extended dust emission of the 

450: %seven elliptical galaxies NGC\,83, NGC\,759, NGC\,807, UGC\,1503, NGC\,3656,

451: %NGC\,4476, and NGC\,5666, that have all been

452: %detected with the Submillimeter High Angular Resolution Camera\,II (SHARC\,II, Dowell et   

453: %al. 2003) on the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO).  

454: %When the original sample by Wiklind et al. (1995) to study cold gas

455: %and dust in these galaxies was compiled, they 

456: The seven galaxies in our sample (NGC\,83, NGC\,759, NGC\,807, UGC\,1503, NGC\,3656,

457: NGC\,4476, and NGC\,5666) 

458: were all classified by 

459: %Wiklind et al. (1995)

460: \citet[][]{wik95}

461:  as ellipticals, based on 

462: the determination that their luminosity profiles follow the $R^{-1/4}$ de Vaucouleurs law. 

463: However, 

464: morphologically

465: the sample 

466: %constitutes

467: includes galaxies 

468: from different extragalactic environments and represents a spread of 

469: possible 

470: merger/accretion tracers or ages,

471: from galaxies that have been classified as on-going or early-age 

472: major mergers 

473: %(e.g. NGC 3656, Balcells et al., 2001)

474: \citep[e.g., NGC\,3656,][]{bal01}

475:  to very-late accretion or quiescent systems 

476: %(e.g. NGC 807, Murray, Oosterloo, \& Morganti, 2000).

477: \citep[e.g., NGC\,807,][]{mur00}.

478:   Recent CCD imaging of some of

479: the galaxies, 

480: %e.g. NGC\,5666 by Donzelli \& Davoust (2003), 

481: e.g., NGC\,5666 by

482: \citet[][]{don03},

483: have disputed the

484: classification as ellipticals in favor of SO galaxies, while new

485: optical observations of others, 

486: %e.g. NGC\,83 by Young 2005, 

487: e.g., NGC\,83 by

488: \citet[][]{you05},

489: have

490: confirmed the elliptical classification.  

491: %The galaxies 

492: 

493: %\section{Introduction}

494: %\subsection{The Elliptical Sample's 

495: %General Properties and 

496: %Merger/Accretion

497: %Signatures}

498: % Stages}

499: %\label{sec:sample_es}

500: 

501: The sample's updated environments, general properties,  

502: and molecular gas content are summarized in Table 1.

503: %~\ref{tab:one}.  

504: %The galaxies are all nearby ($<100$\,Mpc), far-infrared bright

505: %($>1.4$\,Jy at 100\,$\mu$m), and have extended CO detections.  These

506: %last three criteria were choosen to improve the chances of resolving structures in the submm. 

507: The observational merger or accretion signatures of the sample

508: %as listed in the table

509:  are worthy of note as

510: % of seven galaxies 

511: %were chosen to 

512: they fortuitously 

513: allow an evolutionary analysis in the context 

514: of

515: %the galacties relative 

516: merger/accretion 

517: stages 

518: and 

519: %comparative 

520: cold dust and gas properties. These merger/accretion signatures are

521: described further with

522: other observational characteristics of the  

523: %individual

524: galaxies in Section~\ref{sec:submm_morph} below.  

525: 

526: \section{Mapping Observations 

527: %of three nearby 

528: %selected ellipticals

529: %NGC\,807, UGC\,1503, and NGC\,759

530: %  with 

531: using SHARC\,II at 350$\mu$m}\label{sec:sharc_obs}  

532: 

533: We observed NGC\,83, NGC\,807, UGC\,1503, and NGC\,759 

534: %at 350\,$\mu$m 

535: %the Submillimeter High Angular Resolution Camera\,II 

536: with SHARC\,II

537: %, Dowell et al. 2003) on the CSO 

538: on 

539: %October 11th, 12th, 13th, and 14th of 2005 

540: October 11--14, 2005, 

541: and  NGC\,3656,

542: NGC\,4476, and NGC\,5666 on 

543: %April 19th, 21st, and 22nd of 2006.

544: April 23 and 29, 2006.  

545: %An observing summary for each of the objects is

546: %given in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.  The opacity ...

547: SHARC\,II has a $12 \times 32$

548: bolometer array with an instantaneous field of view of  

549: %$146'' \times 37''$.  

550: $148'' \times 56''$.

551: We achieved background subtraction and mapping coverage

552: for the galaxies by having the telescope execute a 

553: %Lissajous scanning pattern.  

554: Lissajous scanning pattern with amplitude $60''$ in azimuth and

555: $40''$ in elevation.

556: During the observations, we 

557: %kept track

558: maintained a log of

559: air mass and the zenith water vapor; the telescope dish-segments were

560: kept in optical alignment using the CSO Dish Surface

561: Optimization System (DSOS); and pointing calibrations were executed every

562: hour, allowing us to achieve a FWHM beamsize of $8.5''$

563: %\,arcseconds 

564: and pointing accuracy of about $2''$ rms.  

565: The zenith atmospheric opacity at 225\,GHz, during the observations

566: and as measured by the CSO facility radiometer, varied from 0.04 to 0.06.

567: 

568: For flux calibration, we observed

569: either Callisto, Uranus, CRL\,618, CRL\,2688, Vesta, Arp\,220, CIT6, Neptune,

570: or o\,Cet hourly.

571: % overburden.  

572: The assumed fluxes for the exosolar calibrators are 

573: 10.2\,Jy/beam for Arp\,220,   

574: 19.4\,Jy/beam for CRL\,618,   

575: 2.33\,Jy/beam for o\,Cet, 

576: 41.6\,Jy/beam for CRL\,2688, and 

577: 2.42\,Jy/beam for CIT6, and, for the solar-system calibrators, 

578: %are

579: %and 

580: in October 

581: 232\,Jy/beam for Uranus,

582: 90.0\,Jy/beam for Neptune,  

583: 5.77\,Jy/beam for  Vesta,

584: and 

585: in April 

586: 95.8\,Jy/beam for Callisto.

587: The absolute

588: calibration uncertainty is estimated to be 20\%.  

589: 

590: The SHARC\,II contour maps are shown in 

591: %Figures~\ref{fig:cso} and ~\ref{fig:cso2} 

592: %Figures~\ref{fig:ugc1503}, ~\ref{fig:ngc83}, ~\ref{fig:ngc759}, ~\ref{fig:ngc807}, ~\ref{fig:ngc3656}, ~\ref{fig:ngc4476}, and ~\ref{fig:ngc5666}    

593: Figures~\ref{fig:ngc3656} to~\ref{fig:ngc4476}    

594: and are the

595: result of about 3.0\,hours

596: of observing on NGC\,83, 7.4\,hours

597: %observing 

598: on NGC\,807, 6.3\,hours 

599: %observing 

600: on UCG\,1503, 2.3\,hours

601: %observing 

602: on NGC\,759, 1.9\,hours 

603: %of observing 

604: on NGC\,3656, 2.4\,hours 

605: %observing 

606: on NCG\,4476, and 1.3\,hours

607: on 

608: %observing for 

609: NGC\,5666.  

610: %During the observations,

611: %the zenith atmospheric opacity at 225 GHz, as measured by the CSO

612: %facility radiometer, varied from 0.04 to 0.06.

613: The data were analyzed 

614: %with

615: using the SHARC\,II reduction software SHARCSOLVE, which iteratively solves

616: for the source image, atmospheric background, and detector gains and

617: %drifts.  

618: offsets.  During the iterations, a constraint was applied in the map

619: domain: outside a diameter of $37''$ or $46''$, the source image was

620: assumed to be zero.  The 

621: %larger-

622: $46''$ diameter was applied to the

623: maps of NGC\,807 and

624: UGC\,1503, and the 

625: %smaller-

626: $37''$ diameter applied to those of the other sources.

627: %Absolute positional coordinates of the galaxies are based on the

628: %calibration sources.

629: %Absolute

630: The positional accuracies

631: %coordinates 

632: of the galaxies are based on the

633: pointing observations of the calibration sources.

634:   However, to optimize the effective resolution,

635: the coadded images are composed of hour-long sub-images whose

636: centroids have been aligned.  This relative alignment was performed

637: for all objects except NGC\,807 and UGC\,1503, which were too faint and

638: extended to have well-defined centroids after one-hour integrations.

639: The 350\,$\mu$m fluxes 

640: %and statistical noise 

641: of these maps are given in Table~\ref{tab:iras}.  The integrated fluxes

642: were obtained in a 

643: %10 pixel or $23.2''$ 

644: $46''$ aperture for NGC\,807 and

645: UGC\,1503 and a 

646: %8 pixel or $8.5''$ 

647: $37''$ aperture for all the other target objects.

648: 

649: 

650: \section{Submm Morphology versus Observations from other Wavebands}\label{sec:submm_morph}  

651: 

652: %%It has already been mentioned in this paper that interferometry

653: %%mapping of CO emission  

654: %from 

655: %%%has been presented by 

656: %Wiklind et al. (1997)

657: %%presented by \citet[][]{wik97}

658: %% and

659: %Young (2002, 2005)

660: %%\citet[][]{you02, you05}

661: %% for the sample galaxies.  The 

662: %%CO studies 

663: %by Young 2002 and 2005 

664: %showed that 

665: %these 

666: %detected 

667: %%resolved cold gas 

668: %exists 

669: %%in centrally located disks 

670: %that are 

671: %%in the sample

672: %se galaxies 

673: %%and prompted the submm observations of cold dust 

674: %emission 

675: %%presented here.  

676: %%One 

677: The goal of this submm 

678: wavelength

679: study 

680: %here 

681: is to directly map

682: %study 

683: the emission from

684: cold dust that may be co-spatial with the optical dust features 

685: and/or the CO gas-disks 

686: presented by \citet[][]{wik97}

687:  and

688: %Young (2002, 2005)

689: \citet[][]{you02, you05}

690:  for the sample galaxies, as well as any emission from dust not detected

691: by the optical and CO studies.  The presented submm mapping is

692: sensitive to continuum emission from optically-thin dust 

693: %because 

694: and, thus, the observations

695: % can directly

696: will detect emission from

697: dust that may be deep or in the 

698: %background 

699: far-side of the galaxies, and thus

700: not easily

701: % observed

702: visible in the optical images.  The detected submm

703: distribution and fluxes

704: are analysed to assess their galactic associations and the possible

705: mechanisms heating the dust; 

706: %source 

707: %and thus, 

708: therefore, the submm mapping spatially and physically probes the 

709: %emission's 

710: dust's origin, in complement with

711: observations at other wavelengths.  

712: %In Section~\ref{sec:obs_og} 

713: 

714: Below,

715: the distributions of the mapped submm emission are compared

716: to those of galactic components observed at other wavelengths. 

717: %while 

718: Later in

719: Section~\ref{sec:sfr_es}, the observed submm fluxes are used to calculate

720: and analyse the heating of dust by star-formation and other possible

721: submm-emitting, galactic sources.

722: %mechanisms 

723: %of the submm continuum 

724: %in these galaxies.             

725:  

726: 

727: %\subsection{Submm-Continuum 

728: %%Dust 

729: %and 

730: %Molecular-Gas

731: %Distribution vs. Optical Galaxy}

732: %and Dust Patches}

733: %\label{sec:obs_og}  

734: 

735: %The SHARC\,II mapping results displayed in 

736: 

737: Figures~\ref{fig:ngc3656} to~\ref{fig:ngc4476}      

738: show contours of the detected

739: %submm 

740: 350\,$\mu$m dust continuum  for the

741: sample

742: %the presented ellipticals

743: and the total integrated CO(1-0) 

744: intensity maps from 

745: %Young (2002; 2005)

746: \citet[][]{you02, you05}

747:  and 

748: %Wiklind et al. (1997), 

749: \citet[][]{wik97},

750: overlayed on the optical Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) maps, and where there are no SDSS images available on the 

751: Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2) images.  

752: The SDSS images have more reliable photometry than the DSS2 images; and,

753: %therefore, 

754: the SDSS images are plotted convolved to a $10''$ beam

755: similar to that of the CSO dust emission images, while the DSS2 images are

756: plotted at their 

757: %digitized 

758: full resolution. 

759: % for the sample.

760: Figures~\ref{fig:ngc3656}, ~\ref{fig:ngc5666}, and ~\ref{fig:ngc4476} 

761: also show

762: % in Figures~\ref{fig:ngc3656} to~\ref{fig:ngc4476} are the

763: %DSS2-red-minus-blue 

764: SDSS i- minus g-band color or extinction maps and their linear

765: contours in an attempt to show some of the dust's 

766: %varying 

767: geometry.

768: %and its features that are evident and 

769: %perhaps 

770: %may be coincident on the optical and submm images.

771: %coincident with 

772: For a smooth presentation, these color maps are shown 

773: %at both full SDSS resolution and

774: convolved to a $2''$ beam. 

775: %(respectively bottom left and right images in the plots.

776: %Figures~\ref{fig:ngc3656}, ~\ref{fig:ngc5666}, \& ~\ref{fig:ngc4476}).

777: %distribution 

778: %Tables~\ref{tab:cso_2}  

779: %to ~\ref{tab:iras} 

780: 

781: The SDSS and DSS2 intensity contours are percentages of the respective peaks in the maps and are

782: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial at the different

783: wavelengths.  The  50\%-contour-level diameters determined by eye 

784: from these plots

785: after deconvolution are listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_2}. For

786: NGC\,3656, the optical 50\%-contour-level diameter is well off the maps

787: flotted in Figure~\ref{fig:ngc3656}, and therefore only the optical

788: 70\%-contour-level diameter is listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_2}.   

789: These tabulated image sizes were derived after deconvolving beamsizes

790: of $7''$ for the CO images (except for the size of NGC\,759, where a

791: $3''$ beam was used) and $10''$ for the submm and SDSS images.  For the

792: submm and SDSS images, the 

793: diameter

794: measurements done by eye were 

795: %doubled checked

796: compared with FWHM diameters from 2D gaussian

797: fits assuming elliptical shapes and agreed to within about $\sim 5$\%.  For

798: the DSS2 images, the diameters listed are from the full resolution

799: maps.  

800: %numbers are   

801: %Because there galaxies have centrally located gas disks with dust

802: %whose distribution and optical depth is not known apriory, the optical

803: The relative percentage contours of the 

804: %DSS2-red and -blue 

805: optical maps will

806: be affected by the distribution of dust in these galaxies, 

807: therefore the optical intensity contours on 

808: %the DSS2 

809: those maps are not a simple reflection

810: of the stellar distributions 

811: %as they are 

812: %intended to 

813: as shown on those maps and listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_2}; but rather,

814: they show the stars plus their

815: attentuation by internal galactic dust of varying distributions, and for the

816: DSS2 images may also show saturation from the original photographic images.

817: %dust in the centrgas disks.

818: %extinction. relative spatial   

819: % in the figures.

820: 

821: 

822: The 

823: %displayed SHARC\,II mapping 

824: 350\,$\mu$m results 

825: %displayed in 

826: %(see Figures~\ref{fig:ngc3656} to~\ref{fig:ngc4476})      

827: %Tables~\ref{tab:iras} to ~\ref{tab:iras} 

828: show that the detected

829: %submm 

830:  dust continuum of all the 

831: presented 

832: ellipticals

833: %closely 

834: generally

835: follows the extended CO emission 

836: %of the gas-disks 

837: that has been previously detected in these galaxies.  This is

838: therefore consistent with emission

839: %that is 

840: from cold dust

841: that occurs in 

842: %is mixed-in with 

843: dense, gas-rich star-formation regions, as is commonly seen in mapping

844: observations of the Milky Way and

845: other star-forming galaxies 

846: %(e.g. Seaquist et al.  )

847: \citep[e.g.,][]{sea01}

848: and confirms

849: CO-FIR correlations of unresolved data from elliptical galaxies that have

850: suggested 

851: %this to be the case 

852: that cold gas and dust co-exist 

853: %together 

854: in ellipticals 

855: %(e.g. Lees et al. 1991).

856: \citep[e.g.,][]{lee91}.

857: %the 

858: %se galaxies (lee)

859: %as is expected to be the case in these galaxies () 

860: %and as is . 

861: %%The 350\,$\mu$m-dust continuum and

862: %closely follows the 

863: %%CO emission of all the presented 

864: %ellipticals

865: %%galaxies are smaller in extent and 

866: %are 

867: %clearly 

868: %%more centrally

869: %concentrated 

870: %%located than 

871: %that of 

872: %%the optical, stellar galactic components.  

873: %We discuss i

874: Individual galaxies are discussed in the following sub-sections.

875: 

876: \subsection{The Early-Age Major-Merger/Accretion Elliptical NGC\,3656}

877: \label{subsec:3656}

878: 

879: Resolved 

880: %H\,I 

881: imaging 

882: %has 

883: %also 

884: %been obtained for 

885: of NGC\,3656 

886: %(Balcells et al. 2001)

887: by \citet[][]{bal01}

888: % and

889: %NGC\,5666 

890: %(Lake, Schommer, \& van Gorkom 1987).

891: %\citep[][]{lak87}.

892: %  In NGC\,3656 the 

893: showed that H\,I

894: occurs in shells and

895: tidal tails that are thought to be signatures of a recent (or {early-age}), major

896: merger of this galaxy.  The H\,I is more extended than the galaxy's

897: main optical component.

898: % and also  

899: %(Balcells al. 1991, 2001).

900: Sensitive CCD optical images of the dust 

901: %distributions 

902: features in 

903: %the following galaxies have 

904: %respectively been studied

905: %outlined by the following authors: NGC\,83 by

906: %\citet[][]{you05}; %Young (2005); 

907: NGC\,3656 

908: %have been

909: were studied by 

910: \citet[][]{bal97}

911: %Balcells et al. (1991)

912:  and 

913: \citet[][]{rot06},

914: %Rothberg \& Joseph (2006);

915: who 

916: %interpret the dust as 

917: suggest that the dust is a remnant of a dust-rich merger that involved this

918: galaxy's primary optical elliptical component.

919: % of this 

920: 

921: Figure~\ref{fig:ngc3656} shows that large-scale, 

922: %dust-

923: 350\,$\mu$m-dust continuum spurs in the 

924: %southwest

925: southeast

926: of 

927: %the early-merger galaxy 

928: NGC\,3656 

929: %closely follows the 

930: %and

931: %closely 

932: generally follow the 

933: CO-emission and optical spurs respectively presented by 

934: %Young (2002)

935: \citet[][]{you02}

936:  and

937: %Balcells et al. (1997).

938: \citet[][]{bal97}.

939:  The 

940: %large-scale dust-

941: 350-$\mu$m continuum spurs also follow the optical spurs shown by 

942: %Balcells et al. (1997).

943: \citet[][]{bal97} in the

944: %southeast and northeast 

945: %southwest and northwest 

946: west

947: of this early-merger galaxy.

948: These spurs may be large-scale 

949: features of a warped-disk  of dust that has been reported in the center

950: of NGC\,3656 \citep[e.g.][]{bal97} and described further below. 

951: 

952: %(see 

953: Figure~\ref{fig:ngc3656} 

954: %depicts 

955: also shows 

956: that 

957: the extinction contours of 

958: %this early-merger galaxy 

959: NGC\,3656 are 

960: very

961: %rather complex and 

962: asymmetric, depicting

963: %showing 

964: %the highest and weakest extinctions respectively in

965: %the center and west of the galaxy.

966: strong extinction in the galactic 

967: east

968: % of the galaxy 

969: and 

970: %rather complex 

971: dense north-south central dust

972: distribution.

973: % that appears Y-shaped in the north (and greyish in the plot). 

974: % 

975: The 

976: dust in 

977: NGC\,3656

978: %this galaxy 

979: is probably

980: in a thin, warped disk that provides the strongest extinction where

981: the disk is tangent to the line of slight.  In the center, the thin disk is

982: therefore tangent to the line of sight and thus provides the strong optical extinction

983: and submm emission seen there, while it is more face-on or in the

984: background in the western part of the galaxy.  In the east of the galaxy, the

985: disk is either more 

986: edge-on or in the foreground,

987: % of the galaxy, 

988: and thus exhibits the moderate

989: optical extinction seen there (see Figure~\ref{fig:ngc3656}).  

990: 

991: %appear to be 

992: 

993: A thin,

994: warped disk 

995: %such as 

996: similar to that described for 

997: %this of 

998: NGC\,3656 has also been 

999: observed in another early-merger

1000: %/accretion

1001:  galaxy Centaurus\,A 

1002: %(Leeuw et al. 2002; Quillen et al. 2006),

1003: \citep[][]{lee02, qui06},

1004:  showing

1005: similar extinction and submm emission features as seen in NGC\,3656.

1006: In Centaurus\,A, it has been speculated that the disk has formed from

1007: dust-rich material accreted from a merger that involved a gas-rich

1008: spiral galaxy 

1009: %(e.g. Quillen et al. 2006).

1010: \citep[e.g.,][]{qui06}.

1011:  The similarity of the warped dust-disk together with

1012: the H\,I shells 

1013: %(Balcells et al. 2001)

1014: \citep[][]{bal01}

1015:  detected in NGC\,3656 to those same features observed in

1016: Centaurus\,A suggests these two galaxies have a similar evolutionary history

1017: and that NGC\,3656 may indeed be a younger, more distant analog of

1018: Centaurus\,A.  

1019: 

1020: \subsection{The Intermediate-Age Merger/Accretion Elliptical NGC\,5666}

1021: \label{subsec:5666}

1022: 

1023: The H\,I in NGC\,5666 

1024: %also 

1025: extends well beyond the optical galaxy; 

1026: %but,

1027: and, it is

1028: in circular orbits that indicate it is in dynamic equilibirum 

1029: %(Lake, Schommer, \& van Gorkom 1987), 

1030: \citep[][]{lak87},

1031: since

1032: %an intermediate 

1033: a not too recent ({or intermediate-age}) merger/accretion event that

1034: is thought to have occured in this galaxy 

1035: %(e.g., Donzelli \& Davoust 2003).

1036: \citep[e.g.,][]{don03}.

1037: %Donzelli \& Davoust (2003)

1038: Using the Canada France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), \citet[][]{don03}

1039: obtained optical CCD spectroscopy and imaging that revealed a ``spiral''

1040:  dusty structure with tidal tails and H\,II regions 

1041: %in NGC\,5666. 

1042: this galaxy. The

1043:  ``spiral'' and tidal tails are revealed after subtracting a model of the 

1044:  bulge plus disk of the host galaxy.  

1045: 

1046: Figure~\ref{fig:ngc5666} shows that

1047: CO emission and submm continuum contours of NGC\,5666 follow each

1048:  other in the high-brightness region greater than the 50\% contour

1049: level.  Outside the $10 ''$-radius the CO emission contours are more

1050:  North-South while the submm ones (which are not detected at a high

1051: signal-to-noise) are East-West and slightly more extended than the CO.  

1052: %Figure~\ref{fig:ngc5666} also shows 

1053: In the eastern part of the galaxy,

1054: the submm and optical SDSS i-band contour levels follow each other  

1055: down to the 30\% level.  However, in the western part, these contour

1056: only follow each other to the 70\% levels.  The asymmetry in the

1057: contour correspondence 

1058: %suggests

1059: %confirms

1060: supports the idea that the dust distribution or

1061: extinction in NGC\,5666 is not even, but for example in a ``spiral''

1062: structure as suggested by \citet[][]{don03}. 

1063: %perhaps 

1064: 

1065: Figure~\ref{fig:ngc5666} also shows a red

1066:  extinction region within the $10''$ diameter that coincides with  the

1067: CO emission and submm continuum

1068:  peaks and the

1069:  location of the ``spiral''  that was revealed in this galaxy by

1070: \citet[][]{don03}. This extinction map 

1071: %in this figure 

1072: also shows 

1073: % a rather blue

1074: %bluish

1075: % 

1076: a patchy region outside $15''$-radius that may coincide with foreground

1077: dust patches or 

1078: the

1079: location of the

1080: optical tidal tails connected to the "spiral" dusty structure.

1081: % or simply 

1082: %%These dust features are consistent with  

1083: %This is consistent with 

1084: %%the "spiral" dusty structure that was revealed in this galaxy by

1085: %\citet[][]{don03}.   

1086: 

1087: %The CO emission and submm continuum contours follow each

1088: % other in the high-brightness region greater than the 50\% contour level, but

1089: % outside the $5''$-radius the CO emission contours are more

1090: % North-South while the 

1091: % submm ones (which are not detected at a high signal-to-noise) are

1092: % East-West and slightly more extended than the CO.  

1093: 

1094: \subsection{The ``Late-Merger/Accretion'' Ellipticals NGC\,83 and NGC\,759}

1095: \label{subsec:83_759}

1096: 

1097: 

1098: %The optical extinction maps of NGC\,83 shown here are consistent with

1099: %those of 

1100: 

1101: NGC\,083 and NGC\,759 are elliptical galaxies with surface brightness

1102: profiles 

1103: %of this galaxy is

1104: that are 

1105: %classically 

1106: fit by the ${\rm r}^{1/4}$ law

1107: \citep[e.g.][]{you05, wik97}.

1108: % and \citep[][]{wik97}. 

1109: %\citet[][]{you05} obtained 

1110: Using deep CCD $V$ and $R$ images, \citet[][]{you05} 

1111: confirmed 

1112: %showed 

1113: in detail that

1114: NGC\,83 is 

1115: %indeed 

1116: classically

1117:  fit by the ${\rm r}^{1/4}$ law 

1118: from about radii $6''$ to $80''$ and that within about radii $6''$

1119: %there is 

1120: it has a regular-shaped cold gaseous dust disk. NGC\,759 is also an

1121: elliptical galaxy 

1122: in which \citet[][]{wik97} earlier showed that there is

1123: a compact, star-forming, central cold gaseous disk 

1124: %were respectively observed by \citep[][]{you05} and \citep[][]{wik97}.

1125: %that showed that the 

1126: %surface brightness profile of this galaxy is

1127: %classically fit by the ${\rm r}^{1/4}$ law 

1128: 

1129: %in the that The gaseous, dust disk in the 

1130: %In the context of the evolution discussion in this paper,

1131: %the regular dust disk in this 

1132: %galaxy 

1133: %elliptical qualifies it

1134: %the 

1135: %as a late-merger/accretion galaxy,

1136: %elliptical,

1137: %elliptical, 

1138: %with its merger/accretion signature being the dust disk.

1139: %in this 

1140: %galaxy's 

1141: 

1142: Consistent with dust emitting components that are likely co-incident with the

1143: compact gaseous disk detections in NGC\,83 \citep[][]{you05} and NGC\,759 \citep[][]{wik97}, both these

1144: galaxies are  

1145: %barely 

1146: %marginally 

1147: %slightly 

1148: not resolved in the submm images presented in Figures~\ref{fig:ngc83}

1149: and~\ref{fig:ngc759}.

1150: The DSS2 blue and red optical images of these galaxies are saturated;

1151: %that are consistent with 

1152: %so, 

1153: and here, the $V-R$ extinction maps of 

1154: %Young (2005)

1155: \citet[][]{you05}

1156:  are 

1157: %compared 

1158: %described and 

1159: compared with SHARC\,II emission maps of the dust. 

1160: The compact size derived from the 

1161: $V-R$ extinction map of

1162: the dust disk in NGC\,83 by \citet[][]{you05}

1163: %and 

1164: %%the DDS2 optical extinction 

1165: %%or color contours 

1166: %%5of 

1167: %%the galaxies

1168: %%NGC\,759

1169: %%are

1170: is smaller in extent than the 350\,$\mu$m

1171: %-SHARC\,II 

1172: continuum 

1173: beam, consistent with the deconvolved, compact submm size of this galaxy

1174: measured from the presented data, and 

1175: %; therefore, 

1176: %%%%%suggesting 

1177: that 

1178: %%%%%5(1) resolved submm emission

1179: %slighly 

1180: %%%%beyond the optical extinction 

1181: %maybe 

1182: %%%%%%%5may be marginally 

1183: %have been 

1184: %%%5detected here

1185: %%%%with SHARC\,II or (2) 

1186: submm emission from the dust-disk of NGC\,83 (or NGC\,759) 

1187: %are

1188: being simply 

1189: unresolvable with SHARC\,II. 

1190: %of NGC\,83 and NGC\,759 are

1191: %%%%%%The DSS2 optical color 

1192: %extinction 

1193: %%%%%maps of 

1194: %NGC\,83 and 

1195: %%%%%NGC\,759 show more extinction in the

1196: %northeastern

1197: %%%%%%western parts of this galaxies, suggesting that 

1198: %that 

1199: %%%%%%%this is the near-side of the dusty-gas disk 

1200: %(cf. Wiklind et al. 1997; Young 2002).

1201: %%%%%%\citep[cf.][]{wik97, you02}. 

1202: %% From their respective 

1203: %%$V-R$ and DSS2 extinction maps, the disks in

1204: %%NGC\,759 is asymmetric and irregular, while that in NGC\,83 looks 

1205: %more

1206: %%regular 

1207: %(cf. Young 2002).  

1208: %\citep[cf.][]{you05}.

1209: %rather are

1210: 

1211: %%%The DSS2 optical color 

1212: %extinction 

1213: %5555map presented in 

1214: %s~\ref{fig:ngc83} and

1215: %%%Figure~\ref{fig:ngc759}

1216: %%%also shows that

1217: %these galaxies

1218: %NGC\,83 and 

1219: %%%%%%NGC\,759  is relatively bluer than those of

1220: %%%%5NGC\,4476 and NGC\,5666 and may reflect 

1221: %more 

1222: %relatively 

1223: %%%%5bluer stars or less

1224: %%%%extinction in these galaxies.  The bluer stars and their associated greater

1225: %%%%star-formation would be consistent

1226: %with the This is consistent 

1227: %%%%%5with the relatively higher peak 350\,$\mu$m optical

1228: %%%%depth or surface density and total star-formation rates (SFRs) that

1229: %%%%5have been calculated 

1230: %%%for this galaxy (see Section~\ref{sec:sfr_es} and

1231: %%%%%%5Table~\ref{tab:cso_1}).  In fact, their SFRs are only 

1232: %%%%second in the sample to the early-merger galaxy NGC\,3656.

1233: %and 

1234: %%%5It is argued in Section~\ref{sec:sfr_es} below

1235: %%%% that NGC\,759 and NGC\,3656 have the

1236: %%%potential (in gas) for considerably 

1237: %%%%%5more star formation than is presently being observed in the FIR.

1238: % but that the other galaxies in our sample are using their gas

1239: % reservoirs at about the ``normal'' rate to form stars. 

1240: %%%%Consistent with this, Wiklind et al. 1997 found NGC\,759 to be

1241: %%%a factor of 3 to 10 under-luminous in the FIR with respect to its gas

1242: %%%%%content.  

1243: %If this is the case, it is possible that the detected

1244: %``excess'' gas in NGC\,759 and NGC\,3656 is coupled with potentially

1245: %undetected,

1246: %low-surface-brightness, FIR emission from a dust component that

1247: %possibly has a very cold temperature, is diffusely distributed, and

1248: %offers relatively little optical extinction.  

1249: 

1250: 

1251: %from about radii $6''$ to $80''$ and that within about radii $6''$

1252: %there is a regular-shaped dust disk.

1253: 

1254: %in which compact, star-forming, central gaseous, dust disks were respectively

1255: %observed by \citep[][]{you05} and \citep[][]{wik97}.

1256: %Young (2005)

1257: %\citet[][]{you05}

1258: %obtained deep CCD $V$ and $R$ images of NGC\,83 that

1259: %showed that the 

1260: 

1261: %surface brightness profile of this galaxy is

1262: %classically fit by the ${\rm r}^{1/4}$ law 

1263: 

1264: %from about radii $6''$ to

1265: %$80''$ and that within about radii $6''$ there is a regular-shaped

1266: %dust disk.

1267: 

1268: %The CCD data confirmed that NGC\,83 is a classical elliptical

1269: %with a central dust disk 

1270: %(Young 2005).

1271: %\citep[][]{you05}.

1272: % Here, 

1273: 

1274: The central

1275: disks in NGC\,083 and NGC\,759 

1276: %are possible signatures of 

1277: %these galaxies

1278:  could represent a late stage in the merging of two disk

1279: galaxies or accretion of gas-rich material.

1280: % For example, 

1281: The gas could have lost momentum in the merging

1282: process (or since the accretion) and fallen to the center of the

1283: galaxy. If this gas component 

1284: is capable of forming stars, it could produce the high phase density

1285: characteristic of ellipticals.  

1286: 

1287: \subsection{The Quiescent  or Very-Late-Accretion

1288: %systems Field 

1289: Ellipticals UGC\,1503 and NGC\,807}

1290: \label{subsec:1503_807}

1291: 

1292: %However, in t

1293: 

1294: Of the ellipticals presented here, UGC\,1503 and NGC\,807 are the only

1295: object that are (1) field

1296: %elliptical 

1297: galaxies and (2) have 

1298: %the least 

1299: no currently identified optical morphological signatures of a merger

1300: or accretion event. Therefore, they are 

1301: %identified as 

1302: referred to as quiescent or very-late-accretion, to mean that if there

1303: has been any possible accretion event during their evolutionary lives,

1304: % of these galaxies, 

1305: that happened a very

1306: long time ago, and the galaxies have now settled beyond any such

1307: event.

1308: %acrretion or merger. 

1309: Being field galaxies also means that there is no near neighbor that 

1310: %would

1311: may have interacted with 

1312: %these galaxies

1313: them in the near past.

1314: 

1315: %The field elliptical galaxies 

1316: UGC\,1503 and NGC\,807

1317: %the 

1318: have intrinsic 50\% contours of the CO-emission 

1319: and 350\,$\mu$m-continuum fluxes that are 

1320: %both 

1321: comparable in extent to and

1322: only slightly smaller than those of the optical.

1323: %  The dust distribution in 

1324: These galaxies probably have dust that is 

1325: distributed in  

1326: %almost face-on disk, 

1327: slightly edge-on disks with their

1328: %foreground 

1329: near-side 

1330: %or more 

1331: %tangent to the line of site 

1332: %edge-on parts 

1333: in the 

1334: %southeast and southwest 

1335: %southwest and southeast 

1336: northeast and northwest

1337: for UGC\,1503 and NGC\,807

1338: respectively.

1339: %The 

1340: %Young (2002)

1341: \citet[][]{you02}

1342:  report that in

1343: NGC\,807, 70\% of the CO emission is detected in the south of the

1344: galaxy (see Figures~\ref{fig:ngc807}), suggesting the 

1345: bulk of the disk's content is in the southern parts.

1346: %%Consistent with this, the 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

1347: %peak

1348: %%fluxes

1349: %emission 

1350: %%of 

1351: %UGC\,1503 and 

1352: %%NGC\,807

1353: %this galaxy is 

1354: %%are also a little more 

1355: %concentrated 

1356: %%in the south,

1357: %%as would be the case if their dust disks were more tangent to the

1358: %%line of site there. 

1359: %  In

1360: %NGC\,

1361: %UGC\,1503 the submm continuum peak is also asymmetric and more

1362: %in the south.

1363: %, but not as 

1364: %not as 

1365: %dramatic as it is in NGC\,807.    

1366: 

1367: %%The observed asymmetry and orientation of the dusty-disk of UGC\,1503 and

1368: %%NGC\,807 also manifests in the 

1369: %contours of the 

1370: %%DSS2-red-minus-blue

1371: %%optical 

1372: %%contour images presented in

1373: %%Figures~\ref{fig:ugc1503} and~\ref{fig:ngc807}, and show that the

1374: %%strongest extinction is in the northern parts of these galaxies. 

1375: %(see

1376: %, as displayed in 

1377: %Figures~\ref{fig:ugc1503} and~\ref{fig:ngc807}.    

1378: %Figures~ and .  

1379: %%The southern parts of the dusty disks offer little

1380: %%extinction but still emit detectable low-level submm emission,

1381: %%because the submm emission is optically thin and can be seen deep in the

1382: %%galaxies where there is no discernable extinction. 

1383: 

1384: 

1385: \subsection{The Accretion Virgo-Cluster Dwarf Elliptical NGC\,4476}

1386: \label{subsec:4476}

1387: %Resolved 

1388: 

1389: Despite directed searches, H\,I

1390: has not been detected in the cluster galaxy NGC\,4476 (or NGC\,759)

1391: %(Lucero et al. ; )

1392: %(e.g., Lucero, Young, \& van Gorkom 2005);

1393: \citep[e.g.,][]{luc05};

1394:  this is in spite of CO-gas detections in

1395: these galaxies 

1396: %(Lees et al. 1991; Wiklind et al. 1995, 1997; Young 2002).

1397: \citep[][]{lee91, wik95, wik97, you02}.

1398: It is thought the H\,I may been destroyed by the hot cluster gas or, in

1399: the case or NGC\,4476, by ram-pressure stripping 

1400: %(Lucero, Young, van \& Gorkom 2005).    

1401: \citep[][]{luc05}.

1402: 

1403: Using $HST$ {\bf V} (F555W) imaging, 

1404: \citet[][]{van95}

1405: %van Dokkum and Franx (1995)

1406: showed that NGC\,4476 has a regular, 

1407: %elliptically shaped 

1408: ``spiral-like'' dust lane

1409: that is about $20''$ in diameter.  

1410: %van Dokkum 

1411: They determined a difference

1412: of 19 degrees between the major axis position angle of the dust lane

1413: and that of the stellar component and used the evidence

1414: in this and a sample or other early galaxies to argue that {\em the dust

1415: lane in 

1416: NGC\,4476} did

1417: not originate from

1418: %was not associated misaligned from 

1419: the stellar component 

1420: %and thus 

1421: but {\em was} instead {\em externally accreted}.  

1422: %Tomita et al. (2000)

1423: \citet[][]{tom00}

1424:  confirmed the

1425: existence of the regular dust lane using $HST$ {\bf {\it E(V-I)}} [{\it

1426:     F555W - F814W}] extinction images and showed that NGC\,4476 has

1427: H\,II regions. They also noted a blue unresolved nucleus that

1428: they suggested may come from a young star cluster(s) associated with

1429: the dust system.

1430: % in NGC\,4476.

1431: %Young (2002)

1432: \citet[][]{you02}

1433:  detected CO gas in a relaxed disk that is co-spatial with

1434: the dust lane and has a diameter of about $27''$.

1435: 

1436: Figure~\ref{fig:ngc4476} shows 350\,$\mu$m-continuum contours of dust

1437: emission from NGC\,4476 that 

1438: %is co-spatial with generally 

1439: generally follow the direction of the ellipticity and major axis 

1440: %orientation

1441: position angle of those of the CO disk and 

1442: %optical 

1443: %DSS2

1444: SDSS-extinction maps 

1445: except at parts of

1446: the 350\,$\mu$m-continuum 

1447: %low

1448: %, 10\% and 

1449: at 30\% flux levels.

1450: %(e.g. the 

1451: %The correspondence is so good that the 

1452: In the eastern part of the

1453: galaxy, the 70\%, 50\%, and 30\% contour levels of the SDSS i-band and

1454: SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m (respectively of the stellar and dust

1455: components) intensities co-incide quite well. The SDSS extinction image in this

1456: region all extends to the 30\% SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m contour

1457: level. 

1458: However, in the

1459: western part of the galaxy, the correspondence of the contours levels

1460: is not so good, suggesting that the dust and stellar disks

1461: are not in the same plane. Indeed, the SDSS-color map shows less

1462: extinction in the 

1463: western part of the galaxy, as may be the case if the dust disk is towards

1464: the background or inner parts of the galaxy in that region.

1465: %.  

1466: The 350\,$\mu$m-continuum 50\% 

1467: %and 30\% 

1468: contour levels along the major axis of the galaxy are

1469: %longer

1470: more extended than the CO and stellar intensities of the same relative

1471: levels. These results suggest that the dust component is separate from the

1472: stellar one, as concluded by \citet[][]{van95} from their $HST$ data of

1473: the central region in this galaxy.

1474: %and supports the conclusion by 

1475: The 

1476: %10\% and 

1477: 350\,$\mu$m-continuum 30\% contour levels 

1478: (which are not detected at a high signal-to-noise)

1479: %, that 

1480: are also 

1481: %slightly 

1482: more

1483:  extended than the CO 

1484: and extinction ones and have 

1485: a 

1486: %various 

1487: spur 

1488: %with some prominent ones 

1489: in the

1490: southwest.

1491: %east.  

1492: This emission spur may be part of the dust disk in the eastern

1493: background of the galaxy. 

1494: 

1495: %%Figure~\ref{fig:ngc4476} also shows an unresolved, 

1496: %blue, 

1497: %%pointlike nuclear 

1498: %%source 

1499: %(c.f. Tomita et al. 2000)

1500: %%\citep[c.f.][]{tom00}

1501: %% in the DSS2 blue image and nuclear

1502: %%clumps both in the

1503: %% DSS2 red and extinction maps.  The nuclear sources are in the region

1504: %% of the peak CO emission and submm continuum. 

1505: 

1506: The H\,II regions

1507:  in NGC\,4476 (and NGC\,5666) most probably obtain their fuel from the

1508:  dust seen both in the optical extinction and submm and in turn heat

1509:  the dust to produce the FIR-submm emission seen in these

1510:  galaxies. Futher discussion of star-formation, the heating mechanisms,

1511:  as well as the dust sources are discussed in Section~\ref{sec:sfr_es}

1512:  below and will 

1513:  subsequently be analysed in more detail in a follow-up

1514: paper that uses $Spitzer$ mid-IR spectroscopy of these galaxies (Leeuw

1515:  et al. {\it in prep}).

1516: 

1517: 

1518: %In the all the presented 

1519: %ellipticals galaxies are smaller in extent and 

1520: %are 

1521: %clearly more centrally

1522: %concentrated located than 

1523: %that of the optical, stellar galactic components. At large sca

1524: 

1525: 

1526: 

1527: %It is noted

1528: 

1529: 

1530: %A comparison between the SFR values estimated using the two methods

1531: %given above would imply  

1532: 

1533:  

1534: %\subsection{Submm Continuum 

1535: %Dust 

1536: %Distribution vs. Atomic Gas  Extents

1537: %Optical Galaxy and Dust Patches

1538: %}\label{sec:obs_ogdp}  

1539: 

1540: %\ldots

1541: %\vspace{1.5cm}

1542: 

1543: 

1544: %\subsection{Submm Continuum 

1545: %Dust 

1546: %Distribution vs. Molecular and Atomic Gas

1547: %  Extents}\label{sec:obs_ism}  

1548: 

1549: %Figure ... shows our SHARC II results, and also shows how the

1550: %350\,$\mu$m flux in the central regions of these ellipticals closely

1551: %traces the CO emission shown in Figure 2.

1552: 

1553: %\ldots

1554: %\vspace{2.0cm}

1555: 

1556: 

1557: %\subsection{Submm Continuum Distribution vs. Radio

1558: %  Continuum}\label{sec:obs_radio} 

1559: %Dust 

1560: 

1561: 

1562: 

1563: %\ldots

1564: %\vspace{1.5cm}

1565: 

1566: 

1567: %\section{Submm Fluxes versus Optical and Radio Star Formation Indicators

1568: %SED

1569: %}\label{sec:submm_sfr_es}

1570: 

1571: 

1572: %\ldots

1573: %\vspace{2.0cm}

1574:  

1575: \section{

1576: %Decomposing 

1577: The Mid-IR

1578: %nfrared 

1579: to Submm 

1580: Spectral Energy Distribution 

1581: and Luminosities}\label{sec:sed_es}

1582: %Dust Parameters

1583: %- The results 

1584: %SED

1585: 

1586: 

1587: 

1588: %The mid-IR  flux is expected

1589: %to come primarily from the envelopes of evolved stars, or "warm" dust.

1590: %We have to be mindful of this when we talk about excesses to or

1591: %and perhaps , or  

1592: %and need to be specific about which part 

1593: %of the SED we are talking about.  In this light, I think a general

1594: %submm to opt/uv SED would be more useful for a proper radiative model

1595: %that combines all the components (e.g. Dale et al. ,  Draine et al.

1596: %[note, I think their models are for spirals]).  When we are looking at

1597: %just

1598: 

1599: The mid-infrared (mid-IR or MIR) flux in ellipticals 

1600: %is expected to 

1601: comes primarily from 

1602: ``warm'' galactic dust, nebulae, or the envelopes of evolved stars, 

1603: while the FIR to submm flux 

1604: %is expected to 

1605: comes 

1606: %eminates 

1607: mainly

1608: from cold dust with temperatures, 

1609: %$T$, $<{\sim} 100$\,K; 

1610: $T \la 100$\,K; 

1611: and, in the case of

1612: radio-bright sources, 

1613: %perhaps 

1614: it can also originate  from the high-frequency-radio

1615: components.  On the other hand, flux in the optical/near-IR 

1616: %should 

1617: comes

1618: primarily from the stellar components of 

1619: %$T > {\sim} 1000$\,K, 

1620: $T \ga 1000$\,K, 

1621: with negligible

1622: contribution to the FIR to submm spectrum.  

1623: %These different components and their relative contributions

1624: %in rather specific wavelength regimes need to be borne in mind in any

1625: %decompositions of the galaxy spectral energy distributions (SEDs).

1626: %Therefore, 

1627: For the radio-faint sources observed in this program, 

1628: %I think we are  okay with the 

1629: it is assumed that the mid-IR to submm SED emission comes from 

1630: %a mid-IR composite component model with a power-law functionband

1631: %composite model of  

1632: a cold to cool (5\,K$ < T < 100$\,K) thermal component 

1633: %with negligible direct stellar-flux contribution. 

1634: plus a mid-IR power-law component that 

1635: includes PAHs, warm ($T \ga 100$\,K) dust, and stellar galactic components.

1636: %%constitutes various galactic components.

1637: %radiation.   

1638: 

1639: %To model the

1640: %se 

1641: %The mid-infrared 

1642: %thermal mid-IR to submm SEDs,

1643: 

1644: %\ldots

1645: 

1646: 

1647: Motivated by the general appearance of the SEDs of the elliptical

1648: galaxies and the available data, the SED is modeled with a power law

1649: in the mid-IR (8 to 40\,$\mu$m)

1650: % micron) 

1651: and a graybody in the far-IR (40 to 2000\,$\mu$m).

1652: %micron).  

1653: The Mid-IR power-law fit 

1654: %to the 

1655: %portion of the SED 

1656: %for these galaxies

1657:  is not a physical model, but 

1658: %just

1659: rather a mathematical tool to aid in the calculation of total mid-IR luminosity for the galaxies.

1660: % in the 

1661: However, the graybody fit is an attempt at physically modeling the average temperature, emissivity, and optical depth of the cold dust emission for the galaxies.  

1662: 

1663: The model fits are plotted in 

1664: Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw}, and their

1665: derived parameters are labeled on the plots as well as listed in

1666: Table~\ref{tab:cso_1}.

1667: The power-law model is generated with a truncated $F {\nu}$

1668: temperature distribution, and thus the shape of the mid-IR components

1669: shown in the SED plots.  

1670: For sources which have less than two measurements in the

1671: mid-IR, the median power law 

1672: %Fnu ~ nu^-0.4 

1673: $F {\nu}^{\sim -0.4} $

1674: is assumed. 

1675: The power law 

1676: for NGC\,4476,

1677: which has no mid-IR detection,

1678: %Figure 8 

1679: shows a $3\,\sigma$

1680: %3-sigma 

1681: upper limit in Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw}.  

1682: %For the graybody part of the spectrum, we are able to 

1683: Reasonable temperature and beta are derived for the graybody part of

1684: the spectrum for all sources

1685: except NGC\,83.  For that source, it is assumed that the dust emissivity index

1686: beta is equal to the median value of 1.8.

1687: 

1688: %The composite model of the thermal plus mid-IR power-law has the form

1689: 

1690: %\begin{equation}

1691: 

1692: %\end{equation},

1693: 

1694: %where ...

1695: 

1696: %\vspace{1.5cm}

1697: 

1698: %.  The implications of t

1699: 

1700: %The fitting results are discussed below.   

1701: %and 

1702: 

1703: %%\section{Derived Cold Dust Parameters and their Implications

1704: %%}\label{sec:para_es}  

1705: %\subsection{Dust Temperatures and Emissivities}

1706: %Peak Submm Optical Depths and Star Formation Rates}

1707: %\label{sec:dustt_es} 

1708: %The dust temperatures and emissivity indices derived from of The 

1709: 

1710: %The emission is from c

1711: Cold dust 

1712: %whose 

1713: temperatures and emissivity indices 

1714: are respectively determined to be between 

1715: 22\,K $<T<$ 31\,K and 

1716: %emissivity indices

1717: $1.6 \leq \beta \leq 2.2$ 

1718: %are derived 

1719: for the sample.

1720: %FIR to submm fluxes fitted here.  

1721: These parameters are typical for single-graybody

1722: %blackbody

1723:  fits to

1724: unresolved FIR-to-submm fluxes of dust emitting from elliptical galaxies

1725: %(e.g. Leeuw et al. 2004; Temi et al. 2004).

1726: \citep[e.g.,][]{lee04, tem04}.

1727:   However, they

1728: are about seven degrees cooler than dust temperatures of ellipticals derived from 60 and

1729: 100\,$\mu$m flux ratios alone and a fixed $\beta = 1.0$ (e.g. Wiklind et al. 1995).

1730: % and they

1731: %Moreover, 

1732: On the other hand, the dust temperatures are also slightly warmer and

1733: the emissivity 

1734: indices similar 

1735: to those of dust in the Milky Way Galaxy and nearby spiral galaxies 

1736: %, and SLUGS 

1737: %(e.g. Dunne et al. 2000).

1738: \citep[e.g.,][]{dun00}.

1739: 

1740: %Previous unresolved FIR-to-submm data 

1741: %(e.g. Leeuw et al. 2004; Temi et al. 2004) 

1742: %\citep[e.g.,][]{lee04, tem04}

1743: %as well as 

1744: %and new

1745: %$Spitzer$ mapping data of

1746: %from 

1747: %ellipticals 

1748: %(e.g. Temi et al. 2007)

1749: %\citep[e.g.,][]{tem07}

1750: %have suggested that there may be a diffuse component of cold

1751: %dust in ellipticals.

1752: 

1753: The cold dust continuum emission 

1754: %cold dust emission 

1755: %from the cold dust 

1756: %with temperatures 25\,K $<T<$ 33\,K,

1757: %emissivity indices $1.4 \leq \beta \leq 2.0$, and 

1758: presented here extends over

1759: 10\,kpc for some galaxies in the

1760: %presented 

1761: sample,

1762: is detected at high signal to noise with SHARC\,II, and 

1763: is generally co-spatial with previously imaged CO emision

1764:  (see, e.g., Section~\ref{sec:submm_morph}). 

1765: %sec:submm_morph}

1766: Above the 50\% contour levels, 

1767: %%where 

1768: %we have

1769: %%the submm detections are of high significance, 

1770: the submm dust continuum 

1771: %fluxes

1772:  and optical stellar

1773: intensities of 

1774: %the same

1775: similar spatial resolution have the same general

1776: distribution, suggesting that the dust, CO, and stellar components

1777: in the central regions are all co-spatial. The early-merger elliptical

1778: NGC\,3656, with its disturbed optical morphology,

1779: %dense optical dust lane that is thought to be in a highly

1780: %inclined warped disk, 

1781: is an exception to this coupling of submm and optical

1782: central flux  

1783: %similar

1784: distributions.  

1785: %Below the 50\% contour levels,

1786: %and especially 

1787: 

1788: The current maps are not

1789: detected at high enough significance that proper dust distributions can

1790: be discerned below the 30\% contour levels.  If there

1791: exists any dust component for the sample that 

1792: is cooler

1793: or 

1794: %more extended and 

1795: %with 

1796: has lower-level emission that perhaps

1797: extends over the entire galactic stellar or H\,I distributions  (see, e.g., Section~\ref{sec:sfr_es}),

1798: % of the galaxies,

1799: its detection 

1800: will have to await the next-generation submm detectors such as those

1801: that will be

1802: on ALMA, $Herschel$, 

1803: %SCUBA\,II

1804: JCMT, or SOFIA.    

1805: %at scales in the  however,

1806: % these galaxies, but 

1807: %this diffuse dust has not

1808: % observely d

1809: %been detected in the presently

1810: %mapped sample 

1811: %or any previous mapping observations of ellipticals.  

1812: Combining the

1813: current data set together with 

1814: %upcoming new 

1815: anticipated $Spitzer$ and other upcoming sensitive FIR-to-submm 

1816: %emission 

1817: observations and analysing the 

1818: %doing 

1819: SED 

1820: %analysis 

1821: of mapping data from various FIR-to-submm bands 

1822: %may

1823: should put tighter constraints on the physical parameters

1824: of cold dust in the sample. 

1825: %may detect or rule-out this diffuse emission.  

1826: 

1827: %FIR to submm emission of u single backbody 

1828: %derived from of ies

1829: %The model fits are plotted in 

1830: %Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw} and their

1831: %derived parameters labeled on the plots as well as listed in

1832: %Table~\ref{tab:cso_1}.

1833: 

1834: %\ldots

1835: %\vspace{2.0cm}

1836: 

1837: 

1838: %\subsection{

1839: %Decomposing 

1840: %The Mid-IR

1841: %nfrared 

1842: %to Submm 

1843: %Spectral Energy Distribution and 

1844: %Luminosities}\label{subsec:lum_es}

1845: 

1846: 

1847: %$L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}}$ & $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}$

1848: 

1849: MIR-to-submm luminosities ($L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}}$ and $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm

1850:     mm}}$) that were obtained by integrating below the model

1851: fits

1852: %.  These 

1853: %are labeled o

1854: %in the plots 

1855: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw}

1856: %, and their derived parameters are labeled on the plots as well as listed in

1857: %and 

1858: are listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}  

1859: %\vspace{2cm}

1860: %Figure~\ref{fig:cso_es_lbl} shows that, except for

1861: %These MIR-to-submm data

1862: %luminosities 

1863: %are 

1864: and these can be compared to the optical 

1865: %ones

1866: luminosities ($L_{{\rm B}}$) that are also listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}.

1867: % and 

1868: The percentage excess MIR-to-submm luminosities

1869: over the total luminosities ($L_{{\rm B}-1{\rm mm}}$) 

1870: %from the optical to the mm wavelengths 

1871: are

1872: determined and 

1873: also 

1874: listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}.  

1875: For most of the galaxies, the MIR-to-submm excess luminosities are

1876: about 20\% to 30\% of the total  luminosities, with about 70\% or more

1877: of 

1878: %that 

1879: the excess 

1880: emitted at FIR to mm wavebands

1881: as thermal, cold dust 

1882: %continuum 

1883: emission (see

1884: Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw} and Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}).

1885: The respective early-age and intermediate-age galaxies NGC\,3656 and NGC\,5666 have

1886: higher than 

1887: average MIR-to-submm excesses 

1888: %luminosities 

1889: of the total 

1890: %galactic 

1891: luminosities (

1892: %of at least 

1893: $\ga 50$\%)

1894: %, see Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}) 

1895: for the sample (see Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}),

1896: suggestive of more or denser dust and star-formation or, 

1897: %any other

1898: at least, fairly high 

1899: MIR-to-submm 

1900: emission 

1901: %luminosity

1902:  in comparison to 

1903: %the 

1904: total emission

1905: %source luminosity, 

1906: in these more recent merger-remnant/dust-accretion

1907: galaxies.

1908: 

1909: %are from  used ti determine the 

1910: %The Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}.  

1911: %MIR-to-submm luminosities ($L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}}$ and $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm

1912: %    mm}}$). T

1913: %MIR-to-submm luminosities ($L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}}$ and $L_{8\mu{\rm

1914: %m}-1{\rm mm}}$)

1915: %as t $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}$)

1916: %($L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}}$ and  

1917: 

1918: 

1919: 

1920: 

1921: 

1922: %\ldots

1923: 

1924: %The 

1925: %bottom 

1926: %plots in Figure~\ref{fig:cso_es_lbl} show 

1927: %that 

1928: %an anti-correlation between the optical luminosities ($L_{\rm B}$) and the

1929: %percentage ratios of the MIR-to-submm luminosities over the sum of the

1930: %optical plus the MIR-to-submm luminosities ($L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}} /

1931: %[L_{\rm B} + L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}]$ and 

1932: %$L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}} / 

1933: %[L_{\rm B} + L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}]$).  The anti-correlation

1934: %suggests the ellipticals with the 

1935: %highest 

1936: %optical luminosities 

1937: %have less 

1938: %versus MIR-to-submm excess (or dust

1939: %and related components) as a

1940: %percentage of their total optical-to-submm luminosity.

1941: 

1942: %Data points that are clearly off the trend are from NGC\,4476.

1943: %, for the same reasons as 

1944: %explained 

1945: %noted aboved.

1946: %I as 

1947: %It has already been said that NGC\,4476 is thought to have 

1948: %been stripped of 

1949: %lost its H\,I by ram-pressure strepping

1950: %and perhaps also some of its dust component (e.g., see

1951: %Sections~\ref{sec:obs_og} and ~\ref{sec:sfr_es}). Part 

1952: %Section~\ref{sec:sfr_es}). Therefore, it is 

1953: %This is also 

1954: %not surprising that this galaxy

1955: %has MIR-to-submm luminosity that is lower than average.  

1956: %Part of the reason 

1957: %Another reason NGC\,4476 has 

1958: %a low 

1959: %a relatively low MIR-to-submm luminosity or excess is that it is a dwarf

1960: %galaxy with also a lower optical luminosity.

1961: 

1962: \section{

1963: Estimates of Star Formation Rates 

1964: %(SFRs) 

1965: and Other Luminosity Sources}

1966: \label{sec:sfr_es}

1967: 

1968: %\subsection{Peak Submm Optical Depths and Star Formation

1969: % Rates }\label{sec:sfr_es}

1970: 

1971: The peak 

1972: %350 um

1973: 350\,$\mu$m

1974:  optical depths given in 

1975: Table~\ref{tab:cso_3} 

1976: %Table 6 

1977: were determined using the 

1978: 350\,$\mu$m

1979: %350 um

1980:  continuum fluxes  and 

1981: %the

1982:  intrinsic 

1983: 350\,$\mu$m

1984: %350 um

1985:  sizes 

1986: respectively presented in Tables~\ref{tab:iras}

1987: %Table 2

1988: and

1989: %Table

1990: ~\ref{tab:cso_2}

1991: %Table 3.

1992:  for each galaxy.

1993: %for each galaxy given in 

1994: %Table~\ref{tab:cso_3} shows the peak 350\,$\mu$m

1995: %optical depth of the dust in each of the galaxies that has been

1996: %determined using the 350\,$\mu$m continuum fluxes presented in

1997: %Table~\ref{tab:iras}

1998: %and the intrinsic source sizes in Table~\ref{tab:cso_2}.

1999: %These optical depth

2000: %values are listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_1}.  

2001: According to

2002: %\citet[][]{dra03},

2003: \citet{dra03},

2004: %Draine (2003),

2005: the corresponding

2006: peak optical extinctions are about 14,000 times larger than the sub-mm

2007: optical depth values, implying

2008: peak visual extinctions ($A_V$)

2009: greater than 2\,mag for all the galaxies in the sample.

2010: Therefore, the dust

2011: measured at 350\,$\mu$m for these galaxies

2012: is dense enough to 

2013: %intersect

2014: absorb almost all the UV or optical radiation

2015: emitted by any massive star embedded within it.

2016: 

2017: If the far-IR luminosity, L(FIR), for each galaxy in our sample is due to the

2018: reprocessing of radiation from embedded, newly formed stars,

2019: then 

2020: an estimate can be made of the current Star Formation Rate, SFR, in each

2021: galaxy using the relation given in Kennicutt (1998)

2022: %\citet[][]{ken98}

2023: \begin{equation}

2024:        SFR ({\rm M}_{\odot} / {\rm yr}) = 1.75 \times 10^{-10} L_{\odot}{\rm(FIR)},

2025: \end{equation}

2026: where L(FIR) includes radiation from 8 through to 1000\,$\mu$m.

2027: Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5} lists

2028: the estimate of L(FIR) for each galaxy

2029: based on the fits to the data shown in Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw}.

2030: Except for NGC\,4476,

2031: Equation 1 yields SFR estimates ranging from 1 to 3 ${\rm M}_{\odot}/{\rm yr}$

2032: for the galaxies in the sample (see Table~\ref{tab:cso_3}).

2033: These rates are similar to the SFR in the Milky Way, a

2034: spiral galaxy, but are about 10

2035: times those for `normal' elliptical galaxies.  NGC\,4476 has a SFR

2036: estimate more in line with a normal elliptical galaxy.  However, NGC\,4476 is

2037: exceptional in this sample in that it is a dwarf elliptical

2038: near the center of the Virgo cluster.

2039: %% and has been shown to be depleted of neutral gas,

2040: %%possibly because of ram-pressure stripping

2041: %by the hot, X-ray gas

2042: %%in the cluster

2043: %(Lucero et al. 2005).

2044: %%\citep[][]{luc05}.

2045: 

2046: For the most part, the FIR luminosity given in Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5}

2047: for each galaxy is composed of  power radiating at wavelengths

2048: longer than 40\,$\mu$m.

2049: Based on the SED's shown in Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw}, the

2050: majority of this FIR power, therefore, could be coincident

2051: with the 350\,$\mu$m emission, which seems to be embedded in rotating

2052: CO ``disks''.

2053: Thus, the FIR data and our 350\,$\mu$m data imply for most of the

2054: galaxies in our sample,

2055: the presence of mini-starbursts inside central rotating disks of gas

2056: and dust.

2057: 

2058: There is another more indirect way to estimate SFR, by

2059: using the empirical relationship from \citet[][]{ken98} between SFR surface density, $SD_{\rm(SFR )}$, and the

2060: molecular gas surface density, $SD_{\rm (Gas)}$: 

2061: %(another

2062: %Kennicutt (1998)

2063: %\citep[][]{ken98}

2064: %relationship):

2065: \begin{equation}

2066:        SD_{\rm(SFR )}({\rm M}_{\odot}/{\rm yr}/{\rm kpc}^2) = 2.5

2067:        \times 10^{-4} (SD_{\rm (Gas)}({\rm M}_{\odot}/{\rm pc}^2))^{1.4}.

2068: \end{equation}

2069: Estimates of the SFR surface densities at the peaks

2070: of the gas distributions in these galaxies have been derived 

2071: %and are listed in Table~\ref{tab:cso_2} 

2072: based on the total molecular gas masses (Table~\ref{tab:one}) and the

2073: intrinsic sizes of the CO distributions in these

2074: galaxies (Table~\ref{tab:cso_2}).  The product of the SFR surface densities with the

2075: intrinsic areas of the

2076: CO distributions yield the total SFRs for the galaxies and these are listed in 

2077: Table~\ref{tab:cso_3}.

2078: %Table~\ref{tab:cso_2}.

2079: 

2080: A comparison between the SFR values estimated using the two methods given above

2081: would imply that NGC\,759 and, especially, NGC\,3656 have the

2082: potential (in gas) for considerably 

2083: more star formation than is presently being observed in the FIR, but that

2084: the other galaxies in our sample are using their gas reservoirs at about the

2085: ``normal'' rate to form stars. 

2086: %It is possible that the detected

2087: %``excess'' gas in NGC\,759 and NGC\,3656 is coupled with potentially undetected,

2088: % low-surface-brightness, FIR emission from a dust component that

2089: % possibly has a very cold temperature and is diffusely distributed.

2090: 

2091: The discussion above assumes the FIR excess from these galaxies

2092: originates from star formation; however, as noted in the Section 1,

2093: %Mathews and Brighenti (2003)

2094: \citet[][]{mat03}

2095:  argue that the FIR excess could be due to

2096: the thermal energy released by the hot ISM as it cools through thermal

2097: electron collisions with dust grains. In this scenario, the central

2098: cold dust seen in these elliptical galaxies originates from the

2099: settling of the cooled hot dusty gas from mass losing red giants

2100: distributed throughout each of the elliptical galaxies, 

2101: %not

2102: rather than from the

2103: gas and dust from recent galaxy merger or accretion events.

2104: %  Mathews and Brighenti (2003)

2105: \citet[][]{mat03}

2106: estimated the FIR luminosity radiated from the dust grains involved in

2107: the cooling of the hot gas of about $10^{7} K$ for a given total

2108: stellar mass-loss rate, $\dot{\rm M}/{\rm M}_{\odot}{\rm yr^{-1}}$, to

2109: be approximately   

2110: \begin{equation}

2111:        L_{\rm(FIR)}({\rm L}_{\odot}) \sim 5.1 \times 10^{7} ({\rm T}/{10^7 K})(\dot{\rm M}/{\rm M}_{\odot}{\rm yr^{-1}}).

2112: \end{equation}

2113: Substituting the FIR luminosity listed for each galaxy in

2114: Table~\ref{tab:cso_1.5} gives mass-loss rates ranging from 15 to 340

2115: ${\rm M}_{\odot}{\rm yr^{-1}}$ for this set of galaxies.  These rates

2116: are much higher than those for giant elliptical galaxies, which are

2117: normally $ \sim 1 {\rm M}_{\odot}{\rm yr^{-1}}$.  The larger mass-loss

2118: rates seem consistent with the larger than normal dust masses at the

2119: center of these galaxies as implied by our 350\,$\mu$m data; however,

2120: the optical/near-IR luminosity for each galaxy in the sample presented

2121: here is similar to normal giant elliptical galaxy optical/near-IR

2122: luminosities, so normal stellar mass-loss rates would be expected for

2123: these galaxies. 

2124: %So

2125: Hence, although both the FIR luminosity and the

2126: 350\,$\mu$m dust mass estimates are consistent with large stellar

2127: mass-loss rates for the galaxies in this sample, the optical/near-IR

2128: luminosities for these galaxies are not consistent with such a stellar

2129: mass-loss increase. 

2130: 

2131: In summary, the calculations given in this section favor the FIR

2132: luminosity of these galaxies resulting primarily from 

2133: %for the 

2134: cold dust in the central currently star formation regions 

2135: that were probably induced and supported by accretion or merger events

2136: involving a gas- or dust-rich galaxy or satelite, 

2137: %whose 

2138: %for the cold dust is 

2139: %settled in the central regions of these galaxies,  

2140: %that involved the host galaxy, 

2141: rather than 

2142: %a significant FIR luminosity 

2143: coming from hot ISM cooling in collisions 

2144: with dusty gas from stellar mass-loss.

2145: However, a small FIR luminosity contribution from the hot ISM cooling,

2146: the stellar, or any other dilute galactic radiation field is not excluded.

2147: 

2148: %the galaxy 

2149: %merger or accretion origin for the cold dust in the central regions of these

2150: %galaxies, rather than the stellar mass-loss origin, with the FIR

2151: %luminosity resulting from current star formation, rather than hot ISM

2152: %cooling.  And finally, the estimated star formation rates for most of

2153: %the galaxies in this sample are much higher than for normal elliptical

2154: %galaxies.  

2155: 

2156: %In summary, the calculations given in this section favor the galaxy

2157: %merger or accretion origin for the cold dust in the central regions of these

2158: %galaxies, rather than the stellar mass-loss origin, with the FIR

2159: %luminosity resulting from current star formation, rather than hot ISM

2160: %cooling.  And finally, the estimated star formation rates for most of

2161: %the galaxies in this sample are much higher than for normal elliptical

2162: %galaxies.  

2163: 

2164: 

2165: 

2166: %\subsection{

2167: %Cold 

2168: \section{Dust Masses 

2169: %from the Mid-IR to Submm SED Fitting Results

2170: and Gas-to-Dust Mass Ratios} 

2171: \label{sec:dustmasses} 

2172: %with $T > 20$\,K}\label{sec:tpara_es}  

2173: %Average 

2174: 

2175: Following 

2176: %work by 

2177: \citet[][]{hil83}, the mass of dust, $M_{\rm d}$, that emits mid-IR to submm continuum can 

2178: %then 

2179: be estimated from

2180: \begin{equation}

2181: M_{\rm d}= \frac{{F_{\nu} D^2}}{{k_{\rm d} B(\nu ,T)}},

2182: \label{eqn:md}

2183: \end{equation}

2184: \noindent

2185: where $F_{\nu}$ is the measured flux density at frequency $\nu$, $D$ is the

2186: distance to the source, $B({\nu} ,T)$ the Planck function and $k_{\rm d} =

2187: 3Q_{\nu}/4a\rho$ the grain mass absorption coefficient where $a$ and

2188: $\rho$ are respectively the grain radius and density.  A recently

2189: updated value of

2190: $k_{\rm d}^{350\,\mu {\rm m}} = 1.92 \times 10^{-1}\,{\rm m}^2 {\rm kg}^{-1}$

2191: %$k_{\rm d}^{100\,\mu {\rm m}} = 2.71 \times 10^{0}\,{\rm m}^2 {\rm kg}^{-1}$

2192: %and $k_{\rm d}^{60\,\mu {\rm m}} = 8.70  \times 10^{0}\,{\rm m}^2 {\rm kg}^{-1}$

2193: %\citep[][]{li01}

2194: \citep[][]{dra03}, as for Galactic

2195: %-like

2196:  dust (cf. above),

2197: %\citep{li01} 

2198: is assumed, yielding dust masses that range

2199: from $\sim 9

2200: %\ldots

2201: \times 10^5$ 

2202: %{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

2203: to $

2204: %\ldots

2205: \sim 2.5 \times 10^7 {\rm M}_{\odot}$ for 

2206: %primarily cold

2207:  dust with temperatures 

2208: %$k_{\rm d}^{350\,\mu {\rm m}}  = 0.19\,{\rm m}^2 {\rm kg}^{-1}$, 

2209: in the range 22\,K$ \la T \la 30$\,K

2210: % and $\sim 

2211: %\ldots

2212: %2 \times 10^2 {\rm M}_{\odot}$ to $

2213: %\ldots 

2214: %5 \times 10^4 {\rm M}_{\odot}$ for cool dust  with $k_{\rm d}^{100\,\mu {\rm m}} = 2.71\,{\rm m}^2 {\rm kg}^{-1}$, $T >  30$\,K 

2215: (see Figure~\ref{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw} and 

2216: %their derived parameters labeled on the plots as well as listed in

2217: Table~\ref{tab:cso_1}).  

2218: %The implications of the fitting results are

2219: %(see Table~\ref{tab:sedthree} and Figures ...).  

2220: 

2221: %These results show that, in the observed elliptical

2222: %galaxies, the mass of dust that emits mid-IR to submm

2223: %continuum is primarily in cold dust with temperatures between 25 and 33\,K.

2224: %, while only about 1\% or less of this mass is in cool dust with

2225: %temperatures greater than 30\,K.  

2226: 

2227: %The H$_2$ gas to dust mass ratios in these objects ranges from about 

2228: %70 to 370.

2229: 

2230: % respectively for NGC\,807 to NGC\,4476, with UGC\,1503 and

2231: %NGC\,759 having ratios of about 100 as has been observed in the Milky

2232: %Way galaxy. 

2233: 

2234: NGC\,4476 has the lowest dust mass in the sample. The relative paucity

2235: of dust in this galaxy is not surprising as NGC\,4476 is a dwarf

2236: elliptical.  However, 

2237: %Lucero et al. (2005)

2238: \citet[][]{luc05} 

2239: %has

2240:  observed that this

2241: galaxy, which lies within the Virgo Cluster, has been stripped of its

2242: H\,I, maybe through ram-pressure; therefore, the presence of any compact

2243: distribution of CO and cold dust at all implies that the H\,I is more

2244: vulnerable to ram-pressure stripping than is the denser molecular gas

2245: and the dust associated with it

2246: %the molecular gas) 

2247: within this cluster

2248: galaxy. 

2249: 

2250: %%NGC\,4476 has the lowest dust mass in the sample. The relative paucity 

2251: %defeciate 

2252: %%of dust in this galaxy 

2253: %

2254: %%is not surprising as it

2255: %NGC\,4476 

2256: %this galaxy 

2257: %%is a dwarf elliptical

2258: % and 

2259: %%thought to be

2260: %%stripped of its neutral gas, and evidently also some dust, by ram pressure in

2261: %%the Virgo Cluster 

2262: %(Lucero, Young, \& van Gorkom 2005).  

2263: %%\citep[][]{luc05}.

2264: %It is actually surprising that any 

2265: %%The cold dust and CO that have been observed in this galaxy respectively

2266: %%from our 

2267: %CSO 

2268: %%$350\,\mu {\rm m}$ and CO observations by 

2269: %Young et al. (2002)

2270: %%\citet[][]{you02} seems to be confined

2271: %%in a disk of diameter $\sim 20''$ {\rm to} $\sim 27''$ and

2272: %%co-spatial with an optical dust lane observed

2273: %%with the HST \citep[][]{van95, tom00} in the inner region of this

2274: %%galaxy.  If the apparent 

2275: %%absence of H\,I in this object is due to ram pressure stripping as

2276: %%suggested by 

2277: %Lucero, Young, \& van Gorkom (2005),

2278: %%\citet[][]{luc05} then the detection of CO

2279: %%and dust in this object, in spite of the non-detection of H\,I, suggests

2280: %%that H\,I is more vulnerable

2281: %sustable 

2282: %%to ram-pressure stripping than is CO and dust.

2283: %at all, since no HI was

2284: %observed in the galaxy during very deep observations with the VLA.  

2285: %%Moreover, the observations suggest that CO is a better tracer of the

2286: %%presently observed dust than 

2287: %%it is of H\,I, at least in objects that have been 

2288: %susitable 

2289: %%exposed to ram-pressure stripping.  

2290: 

2291: %Most of 

2292: 

2293: Table~\ref{tab:cso_1} shows that the sample has diverse H$_2$-mass to dust-mass ratios 

2294: %in 

2295: %that range

2296: %$\sim 

2297: that are mostly between

2298: $120 \la M$(H$_2$)/$M_{\rm dust} \la 160$,

2299: %but 

2300: and in the quiescent galaxy NGC\,807 and early-merger remnant NGC\,3656 respectively range

2301: %NGC\,807 and NGC\,3656

2302: %have H$_2$-mass

2303: %to dust-mass ratios of 

2304: from $\sim 60$ (about half the average) to $\sim

2305: 310$  (about twice the average). 

2306: The ratios suggest that, in the central galactic regions where the H$_2$

2307: and dust masses are respectively measured from the resolved CO and our

2308: CSO continuum measurements,

2309: some of the sample galaxies are 

2310: %to be 

2311: relatively under-massive in H$_2$

2312: and over-massive in dust content, while the 

2313: %very-early cases are      

2314: others are over-massive in H$_2$ and under-massive in dust content.

2315: %%These ratios seem 

2316: %a good 

2317: %%to follow the optical morphological aging 

2318: %and also 

2319: %by giving some indication of the merger-age 

2320: %%of the galaxies, with NGC\,807 and

2321: %%NGC\,3656 respectively being very-late and very-early mergers or

2322: %%accretions.  In this scenario, very-late 

2323: %and very-early

2324: %%mergers/accretions are shown to be relatively under-massive in H$_2$

2325: %%and over-massive in dust content, while the very-early cases are      

2326: %%over-massive in H$_2$ and under-massive in dust content.

2327: %%The ratios of UGC\,1503 and NGC\,759 would then put them closer to the

2328: %%early-merger/accretion scenario, while that of NGC\,83, NGC\,4476,

2329: %NGC\,5666 put them

2330: %%closer to the late scenario.

2331: %%  The physical environments where these

2332: %%galaxies reside, such as the hot gas found in clusters, are likely going to

2333: %%affect the gas phases in these objects; and, therefore, the mass ratios are

2334: %%discussed just as a zero-order age-indicator of the merger/accretion events.

2335: %However It is apparent 

2336: %%Physically, the trend of the mass ratios with age suggests H$_2$ is the main 

2337: %%ISM contituent or fuel in

2338: %%the early phases of the merger, and is diminished or 

2339: %may gets

2340: %%converted to dust as the galaxy evolves.  

2341: %and thus NGC\,3656 seems outside

2342: %the average here because of its early merger status.  On the other

2343: %hand, it is not clear why

2344: %NGC\,807 seems under-mass in H$_2$ or over-mass in dust content.

2345: %\sim 160$. 

2346: The implications of these mass ratios

2347: and their possible 

2348: %indication of 

2349: association with star-formation 

2350: %rates

2351: %merger-age

2352: or, at least, gas-phases in the central regions of

2353: these galaxies 

2354: %the sample 

2355: will be investigated further in our upcoming paper that

2356: uses $Spitzer$ IRS data to 

2357: %investigate probe 

2358: study the MIR spectral evolution and/or 

2359: %further 

2360: star-formation properties of

2361: these galaxies. 

2362: 

2363: 

2364: The total cold-gas-mass (i.e., (H$_2$ + H\,I)-mass) to

2365: dust-mass ratios for the sample are, however, less diverse 

2366: %for the sample 

2367: and in 

2368: %a relatively 

2369: a narrower range of 

2370: $230 \la M$(H$_2$ + H\,I)/$M_{\rm dust} \la 400$, with 

2371: NGC\,807 and NGC\,3656 

2372: %now 

2373: at much closer ratios of 300 and 387,

2374: respectively (see Table~\ref{tab:cso_1}).

2375: %To first approximation, 

2376: At face value, it may appear that the 

2377: %dtermined 

2378: total cold-gas-mass

2379: %(i.e., (H$_2$ + H\,I)-mass) 

2380: to dust-mass ratio for the sample

2381: %are 

2382: is

2383: %$2.5 \la M$(H$_2$ + H\,I)/$M_{\rm dust} \la

2384: %4.5$, or 

2385: about 3 times the value for the Milky Way Galaxy (i.e., $M$(H$_2$ +

2386: H\,I)/$M_{\rm dust} \sim 100$). 

2387: However, 

2388: %our observations show that 

2389: %dust in our measurements

2390: %traces the molecular gas, while 

2391: in sample objects where H\,I has been

2392: resolved \citep[e.g.,][]{lak87, bal01}, the atomic gas  has been observed to be much more

2393: extended than the inner galactic regions 

2394: where our observations have mapped dust emission and shown it to be

2395: associated with molecular gas.

2396: %show that  the cold dust or molecular gas been mapped.

2397: A cold and extended dust component may yet be detected that 

2398: %may be

2399: is associated with the atomic hydrogen, and perhaps massive enough to

2400: bring the total cold gas-to-dust mass ratio for the sample in line

2401: with the Milky Way value.

2402: %%This could be observed with future more sensitive FIR/submm 

2403: %instruments

2404: %%detectors

2405: %%such as will be on SOFIA, $Herschel$, SCUBA\,II, or ALMA. 

2406: %Sensitive measurements of resolved H\,I for the entire sample 

2407: 

2408: 

2409: 

2410: %Most of the sample has 

2411: 

2412: %The H\,I-mass to dust-mass ratio is also interesting.  For the sample,

2413: %its range is $140 \la M$(H\,I)/$M_{\rm dust} \la 310$; and, NGC\,807,

2414: %the very-late merger/accretion galaxy, has the very highest ratio.  It

2415: %may be that if the H\,I-mass to dust-mass ratio can also serve as some

2416: %age-indicator of the merger/accretion events, then this ratio is

2417: %anti-correlated with that of H$_2$-mass to dust-mass.  These mass ratios

2418: %and their possible indication of merger-age or at least gas-phase in

2419: %these galaxies 

2420: %the sample will be investigated further in an upcoming paper that

2421: %uses $Spitzer$ IRS data to 

2422: %investigate probe 

2423: %study the MIR spectral evolution of

2424: %these galaxies. 

2425: %inverse to the 

2426: 

2427: %$\sim s in the range

2428: %$120 \la M$(H$_2$) $\la 160$. 

2429: 

2430: %\ldots

2431: %\vspace{1.5cm}

2432: 

2433: %\subsection{

2434: %Cold 

2435: %Gas-to-Dust Mass Ratios and Luminosity Correlations}

2436: %es from the Mid-IR to Submm SED Fitting Results} 

2437: %\label{sec:mass_ratios} 

2438: 

2439: 

2440: %\ldots

2441: %\vspace{1.5cm}

2442: 

2443: 

2444: %\sub

2445: %\section{Comparisons of the Results to those of Nearby Spiral and

2446: %  FIR-Bright Galaxies}\label{sec:com_sslugs}  

2447: 

2448: %\ldots

2449: %\vspace{2.0cm}

2450: 

2451: 

2452: %\sub

2453: %\section{Implications of the Results on the 

2454: %  Evolution of Dust and Elliptical Galaxies}\label{sec:impara_des}   

2455: 

2456: %\ldots

2457: %\vspace{2.0cm}

2458: 

2459: 

2460: %\section{Conclusions}\label{sec:con_es}  

2461: 

2462: %The current observations have detected extended cold dust in

2463: %ellipticals with properties similar to 

2464: 

2465: %\ldots

2466: %\vspace{1.5cm}

2467: 

2468: 

2469: \section{Summary of Results and 

2470: %Future Work

2471: Conclusions

2472: }\label{sec:sum_es}  

2473: 

2474: SHARC\,II continuum observations at 350\,$\mu$m

2475: have been presented of 

2476: %three the 

2477: seven elliptical galaxies 

2478: %galaxies in our sample of 

2479: %nearby elliptical galaxies

2480: %, for which

2481: %with resolved

2482: with known CO-gas disks 

2483: %(Wiklind et al. 1997; Young 2002, 2005).

2484: \citep[][]{wik97, you02, you05}.

2485: % have recently been detected with interferometry mapping.  

2486: The SHARC\,II mapping 

2487: %results

2488: provides the first {\em clearly resolved}

2489: %far-infrared(FIR)-submillimeter(submm)

2490: FIR-submm 

2491: continuum emission from cold dust (with temperatures $\sim 31$\,K $> T >$

2492: 23\,K) of any elliptical galaxy $>40$\,Mpc.       

2493: %These new data show that the cold dust has temperatures 30\,K $> T >$ 20\,K.  

2494: %\ldots

2495: %are used in conjunction

2496: %with archival Digital Sky Survey maps and other published data 

2497: %to determine dust associations with galactic structures, including

2498: %dominant heating sources such as nuclear-activity, star-formation or

2499: %diffuse-stellar radiation.

2500: %and appears co-spatial with recently interferometerically resolved CO in these galaxies.

2501: % (Young 2002 and Wilkind et al. 1997).

2502: %and that its 

2503: Calculations of the measured FIR excess show that the dust's

2504: %Its 

2505: most likely and dominant heating source 

2506: %of this dust 

2507: is not dilute stellar radiation or cooling flows but rather

2508: star-formation, that 

2509: %.  The star-formation 

2510: could have been 

2511: triggered by an accretion or

2512: merger event and fueled by dust-rich

2513: %y, gas-rich 

2514: material 

2515: %from at least one galaxy

2516: that has settled in a 

2517: %star-formation 

2518: dense region 

2519: %around

2520: %towards 

2521: %the galactic nucleus and is 

2522: co-spatial with the

2523: %previously detected

2524: %interferometerically resolved, 

2525: central CO-gas disks.

2526: %involved in the event. 

2527: % that were 

2528: %previously 

2529: %interferometerically resolved by others.

2530: The 

2531: %star-formation 

2532: dust is detected even in two 

2533: %galaxy 

2534: cluster ellipticals

2535: %which 

2536: that are deficient in H\,I, showing 

2537: %uggesting 

2538: that, unlike the H\,I, cold dust and CO in ellipticals can survive among

2539: hot X-ray gas, even in galaxy clusters.

2540: 

2541: Above the 50\% contour levels, where 

2542: %we have

2543: the submm detections are of high significance, the submm dust continuum 

2544: %fluxes

2545:  and optical stellar

2546: intensities of 

2547: %the same

2548: similar spatial resolution have the same general

2549: distribution, suggesting that the dust, CO, and stellar components

2550: in the central regions are co-spatial. The early-merger elliptical

2551: NGC\,3656, with its dense optical dust lane that is thought to be in a highly

2552: inclined warped disk, is an exception to this coupling of submm and optical

2553: central flux  

2554: %similar

2555: distributions.  Below the 50\% contour levels,

2556: and especially below the 30\% levels, the current maps are not

2557: detected at high enough significance that proper dust distributions can

2558: be discerned.  

2559: 

2560: No dust cooler than 20\,K, distributed outside the CO disks, 

2561: or co-spatial with and heated by the entire, dilute stellar optical galaxy

2562: (or very extended H\,I) 

2563: %and heated by the dilute stellar radiation

2564: is currently evident.

2565: % showing that 

2566: %Therefore, 

2567: %The currently

2568: %detected dust is 

2569: %clearly 

2570: %centrally concentrated and decoupled from the large-scale stellar and

2571: %H\,I galactic components.  

2572: These observations clearly show that the

2573: FIR-submm emission in our sample ellipticals 

2574: %galaxies 

2575: is primarily from cold dust

2576: that is associated with star-formation 

2577: %that exists 

2578: located in the central parts of these

2579: galaxies.      

2580: The results support the hypothesis that if ellipticals are formed

2581: through mergers of gas-rich spirals, their 

2582: starbursts (1) are necessary to produce the high phase-space

2583: density seen in the center of ellipticals 

2584: and (2) would power the FIR-bright stage as the merger relaxes. 

2585: %to form ellipticals and 

2586: Combining the

2587: current data set together with 

2588: %upcoming new 

2589: anticipated $Spitzer$ and other upcoming sensitive FIR-to-submm 

2590: %emission 

2591: mapping observations 

2592: %and analysing the 

2593: %doing 

2594: %SED 

2595: %analysis 

2596: %of mapping data from various FIR-to-submm bands 

2597: may detect or

2598: rule-out the existence of larger-scale, diffusely distributed cold 

2599: %emission 

2600: dust with an average

2601: temperature that is perhaps $<20$\,K (and maybe associated with H\,I).

2602: %; e.g., see below).   

2603: 

2604: Assuming the grain mass absorption coefficient 

2605: $k_{\rm d}^{350\,\mu {\rm m}} = 1.92 \times 10^{-1}\,{\rm m}^2 {\rm kg}^{-1}$,

2606: %$k_{\rm d} = 3Q_{\nu}/4a\rho$, 

2607: as for Galactic-like dust 

2608: %(Draine 2003),

2609: \citep[][]{dra03}, 

2610: the

2611: measured submm fluxes and dust temperatures yield dust masses for the

2612: sample that range

2613: from $\sim 9

2614: %\ldots

2615: \times 10^5 {\rm M}_{\odot}$ to $

2616: %\ldots

2617: \sim 2 \times 10^7 {\rm M}_{\odot}$.  

2618: %%One of the cluster galaxies,

2619: %%NGC\,4476, has the lowest dust mass in the sample.  This is not

2620: %%surprising as this is a dwarf galaxy; and, further, 

2621: %since 

2622: %%it has been argued

2623: %%that NGC\,4476 may have lost its undetected H\,I 

2624: %(Lucero, Young, \& van Gorkom 2005),

2625: %%\citep[][]{luc05},

2626: %% and evidently also some dust, by ram-pressure stripping.

2627: The sample has diverse H$_2$-mass to dust-mass ratios 

2628: %in 

2629: %that range

2630: %$\sim 

2631: that 

2632: %range

2633: cover

2634: %$\sim 

2635: $60 \la M$(H$_2$)/$M_{\rm dust} \la 310$,

2636: %The ratios 

2637: suggesting that in the central galactic regions, where the H$_2$

2638: and dust masses are respectively measured from the resolved CO and our

2639: CSO/SHARC\,II continuum measurements,

2640: some of the sample galaxies are 

2641: %to be 

2642: relatively under-massive in H$_2$

2643: and over-massive in dust content, while others are the opposite.

2644: %, while the 

2645: %very-early cases are      

2646: %others are over-massive in H$_2$ and under-massive in dust content.

2647: %%These ratios seem 

2648: %a good 

2649: %%to follow the optical morphological aging 

2650: %and also 

2651: %by giving some indication of the merger-age 

2652: %%of the galaxies, with NGC\,807 and

2653: %%NGC\,3656 respectively being very-late and very-early mergers or

2654: %%accretions.  In this scenario, very-late 

2655: %and very-early

2656: %%mergers/accretions are shown to be relatively under-massive in H$_2$

2657: %%and over-massive in dust content, while the very-early cases are      

2658: %%over-massive in H$_2$ and under-massive in dust content.

2659: %%The ratios of UGC\,1503 and NGC\,759 would then put them closer to the

2660: %%early-merger/accretion scenario, while that of NGC\,83, NGC\,4476,

2661: %NGC\,5666 put them

2662: %%closer to the late scenario.

2663: %%  The physical environments where these

2664: %%galaxies reside, such as the hot gas found in clusters, are likely going to

2665: %%affect the gas phases in these objects; and, therefore, the mass ratios are

2666: %%discussed just as a zero-order age-indicator of the merger/accretion events.

2667: %However It is apparent 

2668: %%Physically, the trend of the mass ratios with age suggests H$_2$ is the main 

2669: %%ISM contituent or fuel in

2670: %%the early phases of the merger, and is diminished or 

2671: %may gets

2672: %%converted to dust as the galaxy evolves.  

2673: %and thus NGC\,3656 seems outside

2674: %the average here because of its early merger status.  On the other

2675: %hand, it is not clear why

2676: %NGC\,807 seems under-mass in H$_2$ or over-mass in dust content.

2677: %\sim 160$. 

2678: The possible implications of these mass ratios

2679: %and their 

2680: %indication of 

2681: %association with 

2682: on star-formation 

2683: %rates

2684: %merger-age

2685: or, at least, gas-phases in the central regions of

2686: these galaxies 

2687: %the sample 

2688: will be investigated further in our upcoming paper that

2689: uses $Spitzer$ IRS data to 

2690: %investigate probe 

2691: study the detailed MIR spectral 

2692: %evolution 

2693: and/or 

2694: %further 

2695: star-formation 

2696: properties of

2697: these galaxies. 

2698: 

2699: The total cold-gas-mass 

2700: %(i.e., (H$_2$ + H\,I)-mass) 

2701: to dust-mass ratios for the sample are

2702: %, however, less diverse 

2703: %for the sample and 

2704: in 

2705: %a relatively 

2706: a narrower range of 

2707: $230 \la M$(H$_2$ + H\,I)/$M_{\rm dust} \la 400$, 

2708: %with NGC\,807 and NGC\,3656 

2709: %now 

2710: %at much closer ratios of 377 and 454,

2711: %respectively (see Table~\ref{tab:cso_1}).

2712: %To first approximation, 

2713: %At face value, it 

2714: %and, it may appear that the 

2715: %dtermined 

2716: with a total cold-gas-mass

2717: %(i.e., (H$_2$ + H\,I)-mass) 

2718: to dust-mass ratio for the sample

2719: %are 

2720: that, at face value, may appear to be

2721: %is

2722: %$2.5 \la M$(H$_2$ + H\,I)/$M_{\rm dust} \la

2723: %4.5$, or 

2724: about 3 times the value for the Milky Way Galaxy (i.e., $

2725: %M$(H$_2$ + H\,I)/$M_{\rm dust} 

2726: \sim 100$). 

2727: However, 

2728: %our observations show that 

2729: %dust in our measurements

2730: %traces the molecular gas, while 

2731: in sample objects where 

2732: atomic gas 

2733: %H\,I 

2734: has been

2735: resolved \citep[e.g.,][]{lak87, bal01}, 

2736: the H\,I

2737: has been observed to be much more

2738: extended than the inner galactic regions 

2739: where our observations have mapped dust emission 

2740: %and 

2741: %shown it to be

2742: that is associated with molecular gas.

2743: %show that  the cold dust or molecular gas been mapped.

2744: A cold and extended dust component may yet be detected that 

2745: %may be

2746: is associated with the atomic hydrogen, and perhaps massive enough to

2747: bring the total cold gas-to-dust mass ratio for the sample in line

2748: with the Milky Way value.

2749: As noted above, this 

2750: %could be observable

2751: may be oberved with future more sensitive FIR/submm 

2752: %instruments

2753: detectors

2754: such as those that will be on SOFIA, $Herschel$, 

2755: %SCUBA\,II,

2756: JCMT, or ALMA. 

2757: %Sensitive measurements of resolved H\,I for the entire sample 

2758: 

2759: 

2760: 

2761: 

2762: \acknowledgments

2763: 

2764: Part of this work was done while Lerothodi L. Leeuw (LLL) was at the

2765: University of Chicago and partially supported by a Chicago 2004 NASA

2766: Mini-Award Grant and NSF grant AST-0505124 and at NASA Ames Research

2767: Center.  LLL finalized this research and wrote this paper while  

2768: %is currently 

2769: supported by the South Africa

2770: Square Kilometer Array Postdoctoral Bursary at Rhodes University.

2771: Research at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory is supported by NSF

2772: grant AST-0540882.

2773: 

2774: This publication makes use of data products from the second Digital Sky

2775: Survey (DSS2), that was based on photographic data obtained using

2776: the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on Palomar Mountain. The Palomar

2777: Observatory Sky Survey was funded by the National Geographic

2778: Society. The Oschin Schmidt Telescope is operated by the California

2779: Institute of Technology and Palomar Observatory. The plates were

2780: processed into the present compressed digital format with their

2781: permission.  The DSS was produced

2782: at the Space Telescope Science Institute under US Government grant NAG W-2166.

2783: 

2784: %This publication also makes use of data products from the Two Micron All

2785: %Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of

2786: %Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis

2787: %Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National

2788: %Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science

2789: %Foundation.

2790: 

2791: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.

2792: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix

2793: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.

2794: 

2795: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.

2796: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix

2797: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.

2798: 

2799: %%\appendix

2800: 

2801: %%\section{Appendicial material}

2802: 

2803: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.

2804: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.

2805: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of

2806: %% curly braces.  If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error

2807: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".

2808: %%

2809: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite

2810: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a

2811: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds

2812: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).

2813: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the

2814: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain

2815: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in

2816: %% place of the \cite commands.

2817: 

2818: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.

2819: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.

2820: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.

2821: 

2822: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly

2823: %% different from previous examples.  The natbib system solves a host

2824: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly

2825: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.

2826: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.

2827: 

2828: %\clearpage

2829: 

2830: %\bibliographystyle{apj}

2831: %\bibliography{bib}

2832: %\bibliography{lero_bib}

2833: 

2834: \begin{thebibliography}{36}

2835: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

2836: 

2837: \bibitem[{{Athey} {et~al.}(2002){Athey}, {Bregman}, {Bregman}, {Temi}, \&

2838:   {Sauvage}}]{ath02}

2839: {Athey}, A., {Bregman}, J., {Bregman}, J., {Temi}, P., \& {Sauvage}, M. 2002,

2840:   \apj, 571, 272

2841: 

2842: \bibitem[{{Balcells}(1997)}]{bal97}

2843: {Balcells}, M. 1997, \apjl, 486, L87

2844: 

2845: \bibitem[{{Balcells} {et~al.}(2001){Balcells}, {van Gorkom}, {Sancisi}, \& {del

2846:   Burgo}}]{bal01}

2847: {Balcells}, M., {van Gorkom}, J.~H., {Sancisi}, R., \& {del Burgo}, C. 2001,

2848:   \aj, 122, 1758

2849: 

2850: \bibitem[{{Barnes}(2002)}]{bar02}

2851: {Barnes}, J.~E. 2002, \mnras, 333, 481

2852: 

2853: \bibitem[{{Donzelli} \& {Davoust}(2003)}]{don03}

2854: {Donzelli}, C.~J. \& {Davoust}, E. 2003, \aap, 409, 91

2855: 

2856: \bibitem[{{Draine}(2003)}]{dra03}

2857: {Draine}, B.~T. 2003, \araa, 41, 241

2858: 

2859: \bibitem[{{Dunne} {et~al.}(2000){Dunne}, {Eales}, {Edmunds}, {Ivison},

2860:   {Alexander}, \& {Clements}}]{dun00}

2861: {Dunne}, L., {Eales}, S., {Edmunds}, M., {Ivison}, R., {Alexander}, P., \&

2862:   {Clements}, D.~L. 2000, \mnras, 315, 115

2863: 

2864: \bibitem[{{Goudfrooij} \& {de Jong}(1995)}]{gou95_b}

2865: {Goudfrooij}, P. \& {de Jong}, T. 1995, \aap, 298, 784

2866: 

2867: \bibitem[{{Hildebrand}(1983)}]{hil83}

2868: {Hildebrand}, R.~H. 1983, \qjras, 24, 267

2869: 

2870: \bibitem[{{Kennicutt}(1998)}]{ken98}

2871: {Kennicutt}, R.~C. 1998, \araa, 36, 189

2872: 

2873: \bibitem[{{Knapp} {et~al.}(1989){Knapp}, {Guhathakurta}, {Kim}, \&

2874:   {Jura}}]{kna89}

2875: {Knapp}, G., {Guhathakurta}, P., {Kim}, D., \& {Jura}, M. 1989, \apjs, 70, 329

2876: 

2877: \bibitem[{{Knapp} \& {Patten}(1991)}]{kna91}

2878: {Knapp}, G.~R. \& {Patten}, B.~M. 1991, \aj, 101, 1609

2879: 

2880: \bibitem[{{Knapp} {et~al.}(1985){Knapp}, {Turner}, \& {Cunniffe}}]{kna85}

2881: {Knapp}, G.~R., {Turner}, E.~L., \& {Cunniffe}, P.~E. 1985, \aj, 90, 454

2882: 

2883: \bibitem[{{Lake} {et~al.}(1987){Lake}, {Schommer}, \& {van Gorkom}}]{lak87}

2884: {Lake}, G., {Schommer}, R.~A., \& {van Gorkom}, J.~H. 1987, \apj, 314, 57

2885: 

2886: \bibitem[{{Lees} {et~al.}(1991){Lees}, {Knapp}, {Rupen}, \& {Phillips}}]{lee91}

2887: {Lees}, J.~F., {Knapp}, G.~R., {Rupen}, M.~P., \& {Phillips}, T.~G. 1991, \apj,

2888:   379, 177

2889: 

2890: \bibitem[{{Leeuw} {et~al.}(2002){Leeuw}, {Hawarden}, {Matthews}, {Robson}, \&

2891:   {Eckart}}]{lee02}

2892: {Leeuw}, L.~L., {Hawarden}, T.~G., {Matthews}, H.~E., {Robson}, E.~I., \&

2893:   {Eckart}, A. 2002, \apj, 565, 131

2894: 

2895: \bibitem[{{Leeuw} {et~al.}(2004){Leeuw}, {Sansom}, {Robson}, {Haas}, \&

2896:   {Kuno}}]{lee04}

2897: {Leeuw}, L.~L., {Sansom}, A.~E., {Robson}, E.~I., {Haas}, M., \& {Kuno}, N.

2898:   2004, \apj, 612, 837

2899: 

2900: \bibitem[{{Lucero} {et~al.}(2005){Lucero}, {Young}, \& {van Gorkom}}]{luc05}

2901: {Lucero}, D.~M., {Young}, L.~M., \& {van Gorkom}, J.~H. 2005, \aj, 129, 647

2902: 

2903: \bibitem[{{Mathews} \& {Brighenti}(2003)}]{mat03}

2904: {Mathews}, W.~G. \& {Brighenti}, F. 2003, \apjl, 590, L5

2905: 

2906: \bibitem[{{Murray} {et~al.}(2000){Murray}, {Oosterloo}, \& {Morganti}}]{mur00}

2907: {Murray}, C.~M., {Oosterloo}, T.~A., \& {Morganti}, R. 2000, in Bulletin of the

2908:   American Astronomical Society, Vol.~32, Bulletin of the American Astronomical

2909:   Society, 1591

2910: 

2911: \bibitem[{{Quillen} {et~al.}(2006){Quillen}, {Brookes}, {Keene}, {Stern},

2912:   {Lawrence}, \& {Werner}}]{qui06}

2913: {Quillen}, A.~C., {Brookes}, M.~H., {Keene}, J., {Stern}, D., {Lawrence},

2914:   C.~R., \& {Werner}, M.~W. 2006, \apj, 645, 1092

2915: 

2916: \bibitem[{{Rothberg} \& {Joseph}(2004)}]{rot04}

2917: {Rothberg}, B. \& {Joseph}, R.~D. 2004, \aj, 128, 2098

2918: 

2919: \bibitem[{{Rothberg} \& {Joseph}(2006)}]{rot06}

2920: ---. 2006, \aj, 132, 976

2921: 

2922: \bibitem[{{Sadler} \& {Gerhard}(1985)}]{sad85}

2923: {Sadler}, E.~M. \& {Gerhard}, O.~E. 1985, \mnras, 214, 177

2924: 

2925: \bibitem[{{Schweizer}(1998)}]{sch98_w}

2926: {Schweizer}, F. 1998, in Saas-Fee Advanced Course 26: Galaxies: Interactions

2927:   and Induced Star Formation, ed. R.~C. {Kennicutt}, Jr., F.~{Schweizer}, J.~E.

2928:   {Barnes}, D.~{Friedli}, L.~{Martinet}, \& D.~{Pfenniger}, 105

2929: 

2930: \bibitem[{{Seaquist} \& {Clark}(2001)}]{sea01}

2931: {Seaquist}, E.~R. \& {Clark}, J. 2001, \apj, 552, 133

2932: 

2933: \bibitem[{{Temi} {et~al.}(2004){Temi}, {Brighenti}, {Mathews}, \&

2934:   {Bregman}}]{tem04}

2935: {Temi}, P., {Brighenti}, F., {Mathews}, W., \& {Bregman}, J. 2004, \apjs, 151,

2936:   237

2937: 

2938: \bibitem[{{Tomita} {et~al.}(2000){Tomita}, {Aoki}, {Watanabe}, {Takata}, \&

2939:   {Ichikawa}}]{tom00}

2940: {Tomita}, A., {Aoki}, K., {Watanabe}, M., {Takata}, T., \& {Ichikawa}, S.-i.

2941:   2000, \aj, 120, 123

2942: 

2943: \bibitem[{{Toomre} \& {Toomre}(1972)}]{too72}

2944: {Toomre}, A. \& {Toomre}, J. 1972, \apj, 178, 623

2945: 

2946: \bibitem[{{Tran} {et~al.}(2001){Tran}, {Tsvetanov}, {Ford}, {Davies}, {Jaffe},

2947:   {van den Bosch}, \& {Rest}}]{tra01}

2948: {Tran}, H.~D., {Tsvetanov}, Z., {Ford}, H.~C., {Davies}, J., {Jaffe}, W., {van

2949:   den Bosch}, F.~C., \& {Rest}, A. 2001, \aj, 121, 2928

2950: 

2951: \bibitem[{{van Dokkum} \& {Franx}(1995)}]{van95}

2952: {van Dokkum}, P.~G. \& {Franx}, M. 1995, \aj, 110, 2027

2953: 

2954: \bibitem[{{Wiklind} {et~al.}(1995){Wiklind}, {Combes}, \& {Henkel}}]{wik95b}

2955: {Wiklind}, T., {Combes}, F., \& {Henkel}, C. 1995, \aap, 297, 643

2956: 

2957: \bibitem[{{Wiklind} {et~al.}(1997){Wiklind}, {Combes}, {Henkel}, \&

2958:   {Wyrowski}}]{wik97}

2959: {Wiklind}, T., {Combes}, F., {Henkel}, C., \& {Wyrowski}, F. 1997, \aap, 323,

2960:   727

2961: 

2962: \bibitem[{{Wiklind} \& {Henkel}(1995)}]{wik95}

2963: {Wiklind}, T. \& {Henkel}, C. 1995, \aap, 297, L71

2964: 

2965: \bibitem[{{Young}(2002)}]{you02}

2966: {Young}, L.~M. 2002, \aj, 124, 788

2967: 

2968: \bibitem[{{Young}(2005)}]{you05}

2969: ---. 2005, \apj, 634, 258

2970: 

2971: \end{thebibliography}

2972: 

2973: 

2974: \clearpage

2975: 

2976: 

2977: \begin{table}[ht!]

2978: \centering

2979: \caption[]{

2980: \small{ 

2981: Published optical and molecular-gas properties of the 

2982: ellipticals 

2983: \citep[adopted from][and references therein]{mur00, tom00, wik95b,

2984:   wik97, you02, you05}

2985: %(adopted from 

2986: %Wiklind  

2987: %Donzelli \& ... 2003; 

2988: %Tomita et al. 2000; 

2989: %Wiklind et al. 1995b, 1997; Young 2002, 2005; and references therein)

2990: }}

2991: %\label{tab:leeuw1}

2992: %\label{tab:op_gas}

2993: \label{tab:one}

2994: \vspace*{0.1cm}

2995: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}

2996: \hline

2997: Source & Type & Environment, Notables, \& &

2998: $M\rm{(H_2)}$   & 

2999: $M\rm{(HI)}$   & 

3000: %$\rm{Diameter}_{\rm CO}$ \\

3001: %Distance 

3002: $D$ & $L_B$ & $(B-$ \\

3003: & & Merger or Accretion Stage & 

3004: %[$10^8\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$] & 

3005: [$10^8$ & 

3006: %[$10^8\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$] & 

3007: [$10^8$ & 

3008: [M & 

3009: [$10^9$ & $V)_e$

3010:  \\ 

3011: & & &

3012: %Accretion (A) or Merger (M) Stage & 

3013: %[$10^8\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$] & 

3014: ${\rm M}_{\odot}$] & 

3015: %[$10^8\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$] &

3016: ${\rm M}_{\odot}$] &  

3017: pc] & 

3018: ${\rm L}_{\odot}$] &  mag

3019:  \\ 

3020: \hline

3021: NGC 3656  & Ep & Early-Age Major Merger/Accr.? & 47 

3022: %$\times 10^9\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

3023: %& 34$''$ (7.4\,kpc)\\

3024: & 11 & 45 & 16 & \\

3025: NGC 5666  & cE2/SO & Intermediate Merger/Accr.? & 5.7 

3026: %$\times 10^8\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

3027: %& 28$''$ (4.7\,kpc) \\

3028: & 10 & 35 & 6 & 0.86 \\

3029: NGC  83  & E0 & Group Member, Late Merger/Accr.? 

3030: %Relaxed Disk 

3031: &  20

3032: %$\times 10^9\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

3033: %& 40$''$ (12\,kpc) \\

3034: & & 85 & 44 & 1.12  \\

3035: %$-21.1$ 

3036: NGC  759  & E0/1 & Cluster A262, 

3037: Late Merger/Accr.? & 24 

3038: %$\times 10^9\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

3039: %& 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) \\

3040: & $<$24 & 66 & 34 & 1.05 \\

3041: NGC  807  & E3 & Field, Quiescent / Very-Late Accr.?

3042: %Very-Late Accretion   

3043: & 14 

3044: %$\times 10^9\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

3045: %& 40$''$ (12\,kpc) \\

3046: & 61 & 64 & 31 & 0.97 \\

3047: UGC 1503  & E1 & Field, Quiescent / Very-Late Accr.?   & 18 

3048: %$\times 10^8\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

3049: %& 30$''$ (11\,kpc) \\

3050: & 16 & 69 & 16 & \\

3051: NGC 4476  & dE5p/SO

3052: %(SO) 

3053: & 

3054: %Center of 

3055: Virgo Cluster, Dwarf Merger/Accr.?

3056: & 1.1 

3057: %\times 10^8\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ 

3058: %& 27$''$ (2.4\,kpc) \\

3059: & $<$1 & 18 & 3 & 0.85  \\

3060: \hline

3061: \end{tabular}

3062: %\tablenotetext{a}{t}

3063: \end{table}

3064: 

3065: 

3066: 

3067: \begin{table}[h!]

3068: \vspace{-0.3cm}

3069: \centering

3070: \caption[]{

3071: \small{

3072: SHARC\,II \& $IRAS$ 

3073: %total 

3074: continuum fluxes for the selected elliptical galaxies 

3075: }}\label{tab:iras}

3076: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}

3077: \hline

3078: Source  & Peak @350$\mu$m & Total & Total & Total & Total & Total \\

3079:   &  (mJy/$9''$ beam) & 350$\mu$m (Jy) & 100$\mu$m (Jy) & 60$\mu$m (Jy) & 25$\mu$m (Jy) & 12$\mu$m(Jy) \\

3080: \hline

3081: %NGC 3656   & $ 368 \pm 73$ &  $0.69 \pm 0.14$ & $6.58 \pm 0.66$ & $2.54 \pm 0.25$ & $0.32 \pm 0.06$ & $0.14 \pm 0.03$  \\

3082: %NGC 5666   & $ 150 \pm 30 $ & $0.52 \pm 0.14$ & $3.98 \pm 0.42$ & $1.99 \pm 0.48$ & $0.16 \pm 0.04$ & $0.12 \pm 0.04$  \\

3083: %NGC  83   & $ 191 \pm 38 $ & $0.25 \pm 0.05$ & $2.15 \pm 0.22$ & $0.34 \pm 0.09$ & $ <0.03 $ & $0.06 \pm 0.02$  \\

3084: %NGC  759   & $ 71 \pm 14 $ & $0.42 \pm 0.08$ & $2.36 \pm 0.24$ & $0.85 \pm 0.09$ & $0.07 \pm 0.02$ & $0.07 \pm 0.03$  \\

3085: %NGC  807   & $ 63 \pm 12 $ & $0.45 \pm 0.09$ & $1.83 \pm 0.18$ & $0.41 \pm 0.04$ & $0.12 \pm 0.02$ & $ 0.12\pm 0.02$  \\

3086: %UGC 1503   & $ 57 \pm 11 $ & $0.24 \pm 0.05$ & $1.43 \pm 0.15$ & $0.40 \pm 0.08$ & $0.07 \pm 0.03$ & $<0.03$ \\

3087: %NGC 4476   & $ 117 \pm 23 $ & $0.28 \pm 0.06$ & $1.84 \pm 0.18$ & $0.66 \pm 0.13$ & $<0.04$ & $<0.05$  \\

3088: %Below is NED/1994 flux + 5% calibration uncertainty at 12-60 micron and 10% at 100 micron, added in quadrature

3089: %Also fixed the 350 micron uncertainty for NGC 5666

3090: %CDD, 2007 Jun 17

3091: NGC 3656   & $ 368 \pm 73$ &  $0.69 \pm 0.14$ & $6.58 \pm 0.68$ & $2.54 \pm 0.13$ & $0.32 \pm 0.03$ & $0.14 \pm 0.03$  \\

3092: NGC 5666   & $ 150 \pm 30 $ & $0.52 \pm 0.10$ & $3.98 \pm 0.40$ & $1.99 \pm 0.10$ & $0.16 \pm 0.04$ & $0.12 \pm 0.04$  \\

3093: NGC  83   & $ 191 \pm 38 $ & $0.25 \pm 0.05$ & $2.15 \pm 0.28$ & $0.34 \pm 0.09$ & $ <0.03 $ & $0.06 \pm 0.02$  \\

3094: NGC  759   & $ 71 \pm 14 $ & $0.42 \pm 0.08$ & $2.36 \pm 0.28$ & $0.85 \pm 0.06$ & $0.07 \pm 0.02$ & $0.07 \pm 0.03$  \\

3095: NGC  807   & $ 63 \pm 12 $ & $0.45 \pm 0.09$ & $1.83 \pm 0.22$ & $0.41 \pm 0.03$ & $0.12 \pm 0.02$ & $ 0.12\pm 0.03$  \\

3096: UGC 1503   & $ 57 \pm 11 $ & $0.24 \pm 0.05$ & $1.43 \pm 0.20$ & $0.40 \pm 0.03$ & $0.07 \pm 0.03$ & $<0.03$ \\

3097: NGC 4476   & $ 117 \pm 23 $ & $0.28 \pm 0.06$ & $1.84 \pm 0.21$ & $0.66 \pm 0.05$ & $<0.04$ & $<0.05$  \\

3098: \hline

3099: \end{tabular}

3100: %\vspace*{-0.3cm}

3101: \end{table}

3102: 

3103: 

3104: \begin{table}[ht!]

3105: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

3106: \centering

3107: \caption[]{

3108: \small{ 

3109: %Sources, Distances, and related, 

3110: %SHARC\,II-derived cold-dust 

3111: %together with 

3112: %and related gas properties 

3113: %fluxes and 

3114: Intrinsic 

3115: Galactic sizes of the stellar, molecular gas, and dust

3116: distributions at the 50\% contour levels of 

3117: the 

3118: respective peak

3119: surface brightness 

3120: %\footnote{

3121: (The listed SDSS i-band size for NGC\,3656 is at the 70\% contour level. See text for further details.)

3122: %and the 

3123: %surface-density and 

3124: %total FIR and CO star-formation rates

3125: %\footnote{The}  

3126: %derived from 

3127: }}

3128: %\label{tab:leeuw2}

3129: \label{tab:cso_2}

3130: \vspace*{0.1cm}

3131: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}

3132: \hline

3133: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Source} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{@50\% 350\,$\mu{\rm

3134: m}$ Flux} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{@50\% CO Flux} &

3135: \multicolumn{2}{c}{@50\% SDSS i-Band Flux} \\

3136: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} &

3137: \multicolumn{2}{c}{{\it or} $^*$ @50\% DSS2 Red Flux} \\

3138:  & arcs $\times$ arcs & kpc $\times$ kpc

3139: & arcs $\times$ arcs & kpc $\times$ kpc

3140: & arcs $\times$ arcs & kpc $\times$ kpc \\

3141: %& arcs $\times$ arcs \\

3142: %& ${\rm M}_{\odot}$/yr &  ${\rm M}_{\odot}$/yr \\ 

3143: \hline

3144: NGC 3656  & 

3145: %337\,mJy & 

3146: %368\,mJy & 690\,mJy &

3147: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3148: $6.5 \times 12.7$ & $ 1.5 \times 2.8$

3149: & $2.6 \times 13.2$ & $ 0.5 \times 2.8$

3150: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3151: %& 69 

3152: %& 27.6 & 2.01 & 368 & & 13.8 \\

3153:  & 

3154: %$48 \times 48$ & $28 \times 30$ 

3155: %$32 \times 38$ &

3156: $11.2 \times 17.3$ &  $2.4 \times $ 3.8 \\

3157: %%$**22.5 \times 27$ &  $4.9 \times $ 5.9 \\

3158: %$28 \times 30$ &  $6.0 \times $ 6.5 \\

3159: %%%& 3.04  & 14.33  \\

3160: %& 3.04  & 26.89  \\

3161: %14.326  \\

3162: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3163: NGC  5666  & 

3164: %435\,mJy & 

3165: %150\,mJy & 521\,mJy &

3166: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3167: $10.3 \times 11.2$ & $ 1.8 \times 2.0 $

3168: & $8.2 \times 11.1$ & $ 1.3 \times 1.8 $

3169: %& 64 

3170: %& 31.7 & 1.62 & 127 & & 5.6 \\

3171:  & 

3172: %$23.9 \times 25.9$ & 

3173: $12.5 \times 15$ & $ 2.1 \times 2.5 $ \\

3174: %%%& 1.17  & 0.39  \\

3175: %& 1.17  & 1.17  \\

3176: %0.394  \\

3177: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3178: NGC  83  & 

3179: %446\,mJy & 

3180: %191\,mJy & 246\,mJy &

3181: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3182: $4.1 \times 5.0$ & $ 2.0 \times 1.8 $

3183: & $3.8 \times 5.2$ & $ 1.5 \times 2.0 $

3184: %& 66 

3185: %& 19.7 & 3.09 & 60 & & 14.2 \\

3186: & 

3187: %$35.4 \times 32.4$ & $68 \times 68$ 

3188: %{\it saturated} & 

3189: {\it saturated} & {\it saturated} 

3190: %$ \times $ 

3191: \\

3192: %%%& 2.65  & 1.62 \\

3193: %& 2.65  & 6.13 \\

3194: %1.615 \\

3195: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3196: NGC  759  & 

3197: %446\,mJy & 

3198: %375\,mJy & 441\,mJy &

3199: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3200: $5.0 \times 5.0$ & $ 1.5 \times 1.5 $

3201: & $3.7 \times 4.5$ & $ 1.0 \times 1.5 $

3202: %& 66 

3203: %& 29.9 & 1.40 & 159 & & 11.0 \\

3204: & 

3205: %$19.0 \times 19.3$ & 

3206: % $^*21.6 \times 22.1$ & $^*6.8 \times 7.0 $ \\ 

3207: {\it saturated} & {\it saturated} \\

3208: %%%& 2.41 & 5.38  \\

3209: %& 2.41 & 10.38  \\

3210: %5.379  \\

3211: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3212: NGC  807  & 

3213: %435\,mJy & 

3214: %63\,mJy & 453\,mJy &

3215: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3216: $13.7 \times 30.4$ & $ 4.3 \times 9.3 $

3217: & $11.7 \times 20.3$ & $ 3.5 \times 6.3 $

3218: %& 64 

3219: %& 25.5 & 1.55 & 70 & & 7.8 \\

3220: & 

3221: %$17 \times 32$ & 

3222: $^*20 \times 32$ & $^*6.3 \times 9.8 $ \\

3223: %%%& 2.17 & 0.07  \\

3224: %& 2.17 & 1.73  \\

3225: %0.067  \\

3226: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3227: UGC 1503  & 

3228: %337\,mJy & 

3229: %57\,mJy & 238\,mJy &

3230: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3231: $12.1 \times 21.4$ & $ 4.0 \times 7.0 $

3232: & $9.4 \times 15.2$ & $ 3.0 \times 5.0 $

3233: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3234: %& 69 

3235: %& 26.2 & 1.79 & 157 & & 6.9 \\

3236: & 

3237: %$15.9 \times 20.4$ & 

3238: $^*15.3 \times 18.9$ & $^*5.0 \times 6.3 $ \\

3239: %%%& 1.44 & 0.16  \\

3240: %& 1.44 & 2.83  \\

3241: %0.157  \\

3242: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3243: NGC  4476  & 

3244: %446\,mJy & 

3245: %117\,mJy & 289\,mJy &

3246: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3247: $4.1 \times 19.1$ & $ 0.3 \times 1.5 $

3248: & $3.0 \times 13.4$ & $ 0.3 \times 1.0 $

3249: %& 66 

3250: %& 28.7 & 1.59 & 139 & & 0.6 \\

3251:  & 

3252: %$40 \times 55$ & 

3253: $2.0 \times 9.8$ & $0.2 \times 0.9$ \\

3254: %$18 \times 26$ & $1.5 \times 2.3$ \\

3255: %%%& 0.14  & 0.80  \\

3256: %& 0.14  & 0.28  \\

3257: %0.795  \\

3258: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3259: \hline

3260: \end{tabular}

3261: \end{table}

3262: 

3263: 

3264: 

3265: %CDD, 2007 Jun 17 -- updated T and beta, but not masses.

3266: %Note using median beta = 1.8 for NGC 83

3267: \begin{table}[ht!]

3268: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

3269: \centering

3270: \caption[]{

3271: \small{ 

3272: %Sources, Distances, and related, 

3273: Mid-IR to SHARC\,II-derived 

3274: %power-law component plus 

3275: cold-dust parameters

3276: %together with 

3277: %and gas to dust mass ratios

3278: and related gas properties 

3279: %fluxes and 

3280: }}

3281: %\label{tab:leeuw2}

3282: \label{tab:cso_1}

3283: \vspace*{0.1cm}

3284: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}

3285: \hline

3286: Source 

3287: %& Total 

3288: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & 

3289: %$1 \sigma $  

3290: %Total 

3291: %350\,$\mu{\rm m}$

3292: %& 50\% & 50\% 

3293: %& D

3294: %& Mid 

3295: & $T$ & $\beta$ 

3296: &${M{\rm{(d)}}}$ 

3297: & $\frac{M\rm{(H_2)}}{M{\rm{(d)}}}$ 

3298: & $\frac{M\rm{(H_2 + H\,I)}}{M{\rm{(d)}}}$ \\

3299: %& $L_{\rm GB}$ & $L_{\rm Total}$ \\

3300: %& $L_{\rm GB}$ & $L_{\rm MIR-SMM}$ \\

3301: %& $L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}}$ & $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}$ 

3302: %& $L^{0.04{\rm mm}}_{{\rm to} \,\,1{\rm mm}}$ & $L^{8\mu{\rm m}}_{{\rm

3303: %to} \,\,1{\rm mm}}$ 

3304: %& $L^{B \,\,{\rm to}}_{1{\rm mm}}$ & \%$L^{B \,\,{\rm to}}_{1{\rm mm}}$ 

3305: %& $L_{B-1{\rm mm}}$ & $ \%L_{B-1{\rm mm}}$ 

3306: %& \%$L^{B \,\,{\rm to}}_{1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3307: %& $\%L_{B-1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3308: %& $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3309: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & map-

3310: %& Peak Flux/   & Peak

3311: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ 

3312: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & CO 

3313: %& [Mpc] 

3314: %& -IR

3315: & [K] & & [$10^6\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$] & & \\

3316: %[$10^9\,{\rm L}_{\odot}$] \\

3317: %[$10^9$ & [$10^9$ &  [$10^9$ & as & as \\

3318: % & Flux & noise 

3319: % & $9''$\,beam  

3320: %& $\tau_{\rm optical}$

3321: %& Flux 

3322: %& Size & Size 

3323: %& 

3324: %& $ - \alpha $

3325: %& & & ${\rm M}_{\odot}$] & & \\

3326: %&

3327: %${\rm L}_{\odot}$] & ${\rm L}_{\odot}$] &

3328: %${\rm L}_{\odot}$] 

3329: %& $L^{8\mu{\rm m}}_{{\rm to} \,\,1{\rm mm}}$ & $L^{0.04{\rm mm}}_{{\rm to} \,\%,1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3330: %&   & \\

3331: \hline

3332: NGC\,3656  

3333: %& 

3334: %337\,mJy & 

3335: %368\,mJy & 0.00119

3336: %690\,mJy 

3337: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3338: %&$6.5 \times 12.7$ & $2.6 \times 13.2$ 

3339: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3340: %& 69 

3341: %& 1.1

3342: %& 25.4 & 2.2 & 13 & 368 & 

3343: & 25.4 & 2.2 & 15 & 313 & 

3344: %86 

3345: %454 \\

3346: 387 \\

3347: %& 13.6 &  17.4 

3348: %& 33 & 52 & 41 \\

3349: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3350: NGC\,5666  

3351: %& 

3352: %435\,mJy & 

3353: %150\,mJy & 0.00050

3354: %521\,mJy 

3355: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3356: %&$10.3 \times 11.2$ & $8.2 \times 11.1$ 

3357: %& 64 

3358: %& 0.8

3359: %& 30.7 & 1.6 & 5 & 127 & 

3360: & 30.7 & 1.6 & 4.8 & 119 & 

3361: %222

3362: %349 \\

3363: 327 \\

3364: %& 5.4 & 6.7 

3365: %& 13 & 53 & 41 \\

3366: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3367: NGC\,83  

3368: %& 

3369: %446\,mJy & 

3370: %191\,mJy & 0.00171

3371: %246\,mJy 

3372: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3373: %&$5.0 \times 4.1$ & $3.8 \times 5.2$ 

3374: %& 66 

3375: %& 19.7 & 3.09 & 34 & 60 & & 12.7 & 15.1 \\

3376: %& (0.4)

3377: %& 25.8 & (1.8) & 16 & 123 & \\

3378: & 25.8 & (1.8) & 19 & 105 & \\

3379: %& 12.7 & 15.1 

3380: %& 59 & 26 & 21 \\

3381: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3382: NGC\,759  

3383: %& 

3384: %446\,mJy & 

3385: %375\,mJy & 0.00206

3386: %0.01285

3387: %441\,mJy 

3388: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3389: %&$2.0 \times 2.0$ & $3.7 \times 4.5$ 

3390: %& 66 

3391: %& 0.0

3392: %& 29.1 & 1.5 & 15 & 159 & 

3393: & 29.1 & 1.5 & 15 & 160 & 

3394: %$<$159 

3395: %$<$318 \\

3396: $<$320 \\

3397: %& 10.9 & 13.8 

3398: %& 48 & 29 & 23 \\

3399: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3400: NGC\,807  

3401: %& 

3402: %435\,mJy & 

3403: %63\,mJy & 0.00018

3404: %453\,mJy 

3405: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3406: %&$13.7 \times 30.4$ & $11.7 \times 20.3$ 

3407: %& 64 

3408: %& 0.0

3409: %& 22.6 & 1.9 & 20 & 70 & 

3410: & 22.6 & 1.9 & 25 & 56 & 

3411: %307 

3412: %377 \\

3413: 300 \\

3414: %& 7.8 & 12.4 

3415: %& 43 & 28 & 18 \\

3416: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3417: UGC\,1503  

3418: %& 

3419: %337\,mJy & 

3420: %57\,mJy & 0.00015

3421: %238\,mJy 

3422: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3423: %& $12.1 \times 21.4$ & $9.4 \times 15.2$ 

3424: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3425: %& 69 

3426: %& (0.4)

3427: %& 25.1 & 1.9 & 11 & 157 & 

3428: & 25.1 & 1.9 & 12 & 150 & 

3429: %140 

3430: %297 \\

3431: 283 \\

3432: %& 6.8 & 8.2 

3433: %& 24 & 34 & 28 \\

3434: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3435: NGC\,4476  

3436: %& 

3437: %446\,mJy & 

3438: %117\,mJy & 0.00047

3439: %289\,mJy 

3440: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3441: %&$4.1 \times 19.1$ & $3.0 \times 13.4$ 

3442: %& 66 

3443: %& (0.4)

3444: %& 27.2 & 1.8 & 1 & 139 & 

3445: & 27.2 & 1.8 & 0.9 & 122 & 

3446: %$<$126

3447: %$<$265 \\

3448: $<$233 \\

3449: %& 0.6 & 0.7 

3450: %& 4 & 21 & 16\\

3451: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3452: \hline

3453: \end{tabular}

3454: \end{table}

3455: 

3456: %CDD, 2007 Jun 17 -- Updated first two luminosity columns, but not the rest

3457: \begin{table}[ht!]

3458: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

3459: \centering

3460: \caption[]{

3461: \small{ 

3462: %Sources, Distances, and related, 

3463: Mid-IR to mm

3464: %SHARC\,II 

3465: luminosity excess

3466: %-derived 

3467: %power-law component plus 

3468: %cold-dust parameters

3469: %together with 

3470: %and related gas properties 

3471: %fluxes and 

3472: }}

3473: %\label{tab:leeuw2}

3474: \label{tab:cso_1.5}

3475: \vspace*{0.1cm}

3476: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}

3477: %\begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}

3478: \hline

3479: Source 

3480: %& $L_{\rm GB}$ & $L_{\rm Total}$ \\

3481: %& $L_{\rm GB}$ & $L_{\rm MIR-SMM}$ \\

3482: %& $L_{0.04-1{\rm mm}}$ & $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}$ 

3483: & $L^{0.04{\rm mm}}_{{\rm to} \,\,1{\rm mm}}$ & $L^{8\mu{\rm m}}_{{\rm

3484: to} \,\,1{\rm mm}}$ 

3485: & $L^{B \,\,{\rm to}}_{1{\rm mm}}$ & \%$L^{B \,\,{\rm to}}_{1{\rm mm}}$ 

3486: %& $L_{B-1{\rm mm}}$ & $ \%L_{B-1{\rm mm}}$ 

3487: & \%$L^{B \,\,{\rm to}}_{1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3488: %& $\%L_{B-1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3489: %& $L_{8\mu{\rm m}-1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3490: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & map-

3491: %& Peak Flux/   & Peak

3492: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ 

3493: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & CO 

3494: %& [Mpc] 

3495: %& -IR

3496: %& [K] & & [$10^6$ & & &

3497: %[$10^9\,{\rm L}_{\odot}$] \\

3498: & [$10^9$ & [$10^9$ 

3499: &  [$10^9$ & 

3500: as & as \\

3501: % & Flux & noise 

3502: % & $9''$\,beam  

3503: %& $\tau_{\rm optical}$

3504: %& Flux 

3505: %& Size & Size 

3506: %& 

3507: %& $ - \alpha $

3508: %& & & ${\rm M}_{\odot}$] & & &

3509: & ${\rm L}_{\odot}$] & ${\rm L}_{\odot}$] &

3510: ${\rm L}_{\odot}$] 

3511: & $L^{8\mu{\rm m}}_{{\rm to} \,\,1{\rm mm}}$ & $L^{0.04{\rm mm}}_{{\rm to} \,\,1{\rm mm}}$ \\

3512: %&   & \\

3513: \hline

3514: NGC\,3656  

3515: %& 

3516: %337\,mJy & 

3517: %368\,mJy & 0.00119

3518: %690\,mJy 

3519: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3520: %&$6.5 \times 12.7$ & $2.6 \times 13.2$ 

3521: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3522: %& 69 

3523: %& 1.1

3524: %& 27.6 & 2.0 & 13 & 368 & 

3525: %86 

3526: %454

3527: & 14.0 &  17.8 

3528: %& 33 & 52 & 41 \\

3529: & 33.8 & 53 & 41 \\

3530: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3531: NGC\,5666  

3532: %& 

3533: %435\,mJy & 

3534: %150\,mJy & 0.00050

3535: %521\,mJy 

3536: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3537: %&$10.3 \times 11.2$ & $8.2 \times 11.1$ 

3538: %& 64 

3539: %& 0.8

3540: %& 31.7 & 1.6 & 5 & 127 & 

3541: %222

3542: %349 

3543: & 5.4 & 6.8 

3544: %& 13 & 53 & 41 \\

3545: & 12.8 & 53 & 42 \\

3546: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3547: NGC\,83  

3548: %& 

3549: %446\,mJy & 

3550: %191\,mJy & 0.00171

3551: %246\,mJy 

3552: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3553: %&$5.0 \times 4.1$ & $3.8 \times 5.2$ 

3554: %& 66 

3555: %& 19.7 & 3.09 & 34 & 60 & & 12.7 & 15.1 \\

3556: %& (0.4)

3557: %& 27.8 & (1.6) & 16 & 123 & & 

3558: & 11.7 & 13.8 

3559: %& 59 & 26 & 21 \\

3560: & 57.8 & 24 & 20 \\

3561: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3562: NGC\,759  

3563: %& 

3564: %446\,mJy & 

3565: %375\,mJy & 0.00206

3566: %0.01285

3567: %441\,mJy 

3568: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3569: %&$2.0 \times 2.0$ & $3.7 \times 4.5$ 

3570: %& 66 

3571: %& 0.0

3572: %& 29.9 & 1.4 & 15 & 159 & 

3573: %$<$159 

3574: %$<$318

3575: & 10.9 & 13.8 

3576: %& 48 & 29 & 23 \\

3577: & 47.8 & 29 & 23 \\

3578: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3579: NGC\,807  

3580: %& 

3581: %435\,mJy & 

3582: %63\,mJy & 0.00018

3583: %453\,mJy 

3584: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3585: %&$13.7 \times 30.4$ & $11.7 \times 20.3$ 

3586: %& 64 

3587: %& 0.0

3588: %& 25.5 & 1.6 & 20 & 70 & 

3589: %307 

3590: %377

3591: & 8.1 & 12.6 

3592: %& 43 & 28 & 18 \\

3593: & 43.6 & 29 & 18 \\

3594: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3595: UGC\,1503  

3596: %& 

3597: %337\,mJy & 

3598: %57\,mJy & 0.00015

3599: %238\,mJy 

3600: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3601: %& $12.1 \times 21.4$ & $9.4 \times 15.2$ 

3602: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3603: %& 69 

3604: %& (0.4)

3605: %& 26.2 & 1.8 & 11 & 157 & 

3606: %140 

3607: %297

3608: & 6.9 & 8.3 

3609: %& 24 & 34 & 28 \\

3610: & 24.3 & 34 & 28 \\

3611: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3612: NGC\,4476  

3613: %& 

3614: %446\,mJy & 

3615: %117\,mJy & 0.00047

3616: %289\,mJy 

3617: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3618: %&$4.1 \times 19.1$ & $3.0 \times 13.4$ 

3619: %& 66 

3620: %& (0.4)

3621: %& 28.7 & 1.6 & 1 & 139 & 

3622: %$<$126

3623: %$<$265 

3624: & 0.6 & 0.7 

3625: %& 4 & 21 & 16\\

3626: & 3.7 & 19 & 16\\

3627: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3628: \hline

3629: \end{tabular}

3630: \end{table}

3631: 

3632: 

3633: 

3634: \begin{table}[ht!]

3635: \vspace*{-0.5cm}

3636: \centering

3637: \caption[]{

3638: \small{ 

3639: %Sources, Distances, and related, 

3640: %SHARC\,II-derived cold-dust 

3641: %together with 

3642: %and related gas properties 

3643: %fluxes and 

3644: %Intrinsic galactic sizes of the stellar, molecular gas, and dust

3645: %distributions at the 50\% contour levels of 

3646: %the 

3647: %respective peak

3648: %surface brightness and the 

3649: %surface-density and 

3650: The optical depth and total FIR and CO star-formation rate estimates

3651: %\footnote{The}  

3652: %derived from 

3653: }}

3654: %\label{tab:leeuw2}

3655: \label{tab:cso_3}

3656: \vspace*{0.1cm}

3657: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}

3658: \hline

3659: Source &

3660: %& Total 

3661: %Peak & 

3662: %$1 \sigma $  

3663: %Total & 

3664: %50\% & 50\% 

3665: %& D 

3666: %& 50\% & 50\% 

3667: 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & A$_{\rm V}$

3668: %& T & $\beta$ 

3669: %& $\frac{M\rm{(H_2)}}{M{\rm{(d)}}}$ 

3670: %& $\frac{M\rm{(HI)}}{M{\rm{(d)}}}$ 

3671: %& L \\

3672: &  Total & Total \\

3673: %%%&  FIR & CO \\

3674: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & map-

3675: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$

3676: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ 

3677: %& 350\,$\mu{\rm m}$ & CO 

3678: %& [Mpc] 

3679: & Peak & 

3680: %DSS2 & DSS2

3681: %& [K] & 

3682: %[$10^9\,{\rm L}_{\odot}$] \\

3683: %[$10^9$ \\

3684: &  FIR SFR & CO SFR \\

3685: %%%&  SFR & SFR \\

3686: % & Flux & noise 

3687: % & Flux  & Flux 

3688: %& Size & Size 

3689: %& &

3690: %& 

3691: %& $\tau_{\rm optical}$ &

3692: %Blue & Red 

3693: %${\rm L}_{\odot}$] 

3694: %& SFR & SFR \\

3695: %%%&  &  \\

3696: % & arcs $\times$ arcs & arcs $\times$ arcs & arcs $\times$ arcs &

3697: %arcs $\times$ arcs 

3698: %& &

3699: & $\tau_{\rm optical}$ & & ${\rm M}_{\odot}$/yr &  ${\rm M}_{\odot}$/yr \\

3700: \hline

3701: NGC\,3656  & 

3702: %337\,mJy & 

3703: %368\,mJy & 690\,mJy &

3704: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3705: %$6.5 \times 12.7$ & $2.6 \times 13.2$ 

3706: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3707: %& 69 

3708: %& 27.6 & 2.01 & 368 & & 13.8 \\

3709: % & 

3710: %$48 \times 48$ & $28 \times 30$ 

3711: %$32 \times 38$ & $28 \times 30$ 

3712: 0.00119 & 17 

3713: %%%& 3.04  & 14.33  \\

3714: & 3.04  & 26.89  \\

3715: %14.326  \\

3716: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3717: NGC\,5666  & 

3718: %435\,mJy & 

3719: %150\,mJy & 521\,mJy &

3720: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3721: %$10.3 \times 11.2$ & $8.2 \times 11.1$ 

3722: %& 64 

3723: %& 31.7 & 1.62 & 127 & & 5.6 \\

3724: % & 

3725: %$23.9 \times 25.9$ & $20.4 \times 21.4$ 

3726: %%%& 1.17  & 0.39  \\

3727: 0.00050 & 7 

3728: & 1.17  & 1.17  \\

3729: %0.394  \\

3730: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3731: NGC\,83  & 

3732: %446\,mJy & 

3733: %191\,mJy & 246\,mJy &

3734: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3735: %$4.1 \times 5.0$ & $3.8 \times 5.2$ 

3736: %& 66 

3737: %& 19.7 & 3.09 & 60 & & 14.2 \\

3738: %& 

3739: %$35.4 \times 32.4$ & $68 \times 68$ 

3740: %{\it saturated} & {\it saturated}

3741: %%%& 2.65  & 1.62 \\

3742: 0.00171 & 24

3743: & 2.65  & 6.13 \\

3744: %1.615 \\

3745: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3746: NGC\,759  & 

3747: %446\,mJy & 

3748: %375\,mJy & 441\,mJy &

3749: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3750: %$5.0 \times 5.0$ & $3.7 \times 4.5$ 

3751: %& 66 

3752: %& 29.9 & 1.40 & 159 & & 11.0 \\

3753: %& 

3754: %$19.0 \times 19.3$ & $21.6 \times 22.1$ 

3755: %%%& 2.41 & 5.38  \\

3756: 0.00206 & 29 

3757: & 2.41 & 10.38  \\

3758: %5.379  \\

3759: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3760: NGC\,807  & 

3761: %435\,mJy & 

3762: %63\,mJy & 453\,mJy &

3763: %$28.4 \times 12.2$ & $22 \times 12.3$ 

3764: %$13.7 \times 30.4$ & $11.7 \times 20.3$ 

3765: %& 64 

3766: %& 25.5 & 1.55 & 70 & & 7.8 \\

3767: %& 

3768: %$17 \times 32$ & $20 \times 32$ 

3769: %%%& 2.17 & 0.07  \\

3770: 0.00018 & 25

3771: & 2.17 & 1.73  \\

3772: %0.067  \\

3773: %&  &  & & $1.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 40$''$ (12\,kpc) & \\

3774: UGC\,1503  & 

3775: %337\,mJy & 

3776: %57\,mJy & 238\,mJy &

3777: %$23.9 \times 15.3$ & $16.7 \times 10.6$ 

3778: %$12.1 \times 21.4$ & $9.4 \times 15.2$ 

3779: %$24 \times 15$ & $17 \times 11$ 

3780: %& 69 

3781: %& 26.2 & 1.79 & 157 & & 6.9 \\

3782: %& 

3783: %$15.9 \times 20.4$ & $15.3 \times 18.9$ 

3784: 0.00015 & 2 

3785: %%%& 1.44 & 0.16  \\

3786: & 1.44 & 2.83  \\

3787: %0.157  \\

3788: % $1.8 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 30$''$ (11\,kpc) & \\

3789: NGC\,4476  & 

3790: %446\,mJy & 

3791: %117\,mJy & 289\,mJy &

3792: %$4.9 \times 3.2$ & $4.4 \times 3.6$ 

3793: %$4.1 \times 19.1$ & $3.0 \times 13.4$ 

3794: %& 66 

3795: %& 28.7 & 1.59 & 139 & & 0.6 \\

3796: % & 

3797: %$40 \times 55$ & $18 \times 26$ 

3798: %%%& 0.14  & 0.80  \\

3799: 0.00047 & 7

3800: & 0.14  & 0.28  \\

3801: %0.795  \\

3802: % &  &  & & $2.4 \times 10^7\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ & 5$''$ (1.3\,kpc) & \\

3803: \hline

3804: \end{tabular}

3805: \end{table}

3806: 

3807: 

3808: 

3809: \clearpage

3810: 

3811: 

3812: 

3813: %\clearpage

3814: 

3815: 

3816: \begin{figure}[!h]

3817: \vspace*{-0.2cm}

3818: \begin{center} 

3819: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{3656stars+co.ps}

3820: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{smooth_ngc3656_simul_perdss2_blue_350um_p_3.eps}

3821: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{smooth_ngc3656_simul_perdss2red_350um_p_3.eps}

3822: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{smooth_ngc3656_simul_vla_1p4Ghz_350um_p_3.eps}

3823: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{ngc3656_dss2b-r_sm_350um_p_3.eps}

3824: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f1a.eps}

3825: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f1b.eps}

3826: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.618in]{f1c.eps}

3827: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.618in]{f1d.eps}

3828: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

3829: \caption{

3830: {\it Top Left:} 

3831: White contours of the total integrated CO(1-0) intensity map 

3832: of NGC\,3656, with a measured 10\%-contour-level diameter of $34''$,

3833: are overlayed on the grey scale and black contours from the 

3834: %optical

3835: red part of the optical Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2), as presented  by 

3836: \citet{you02}. 

3837: The white contours are in units of -5\%, -2\%, 2\%, 5\%, 10\%, 20\%,

3838: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of 

3839: 81.1\,Jy $\rm{beam}^{-1} \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1} = 4.7 \times 

3840: 10^{22} \rm{cm}^{-2} $

3841: CO peak 

3842: \citep{you02}.

3843: {\it Top Right:} 

3844: White contours of the 

3845: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

3846: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

3847: smoothed to $10''$ are overlayed on

3848: intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

3849: %Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2) 

3850: %DSS2-blue

3851: Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) i-band 

3852: %red 

3853: image of

3854: %s, respectively UGC\,1503.

3855: %, NGC\,83, NGC\,759, , 

3856: NGC\,3656 smoothed to $10''$.

3857: The SDSS i-band

3858: %contours 

3859: %are $\sim 60\%$, 70\%, and 90\% 

3860: %DSS2-blue 

3861: and submm contours 

3862: are respectively 

3863: $\sim 57\%$, 58\%, 59\%,

3864: 60\%, 70\%, and 90\% 

3865: %20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% 

3866: and 10\%, 

3867: %20\%, 

3868: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

3869: on the 

3870: %350\,$\mu$m 

3871: maps and are  

3872: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial with the CO as shown 

3873: in the adjacent figure.

3874: %~\ref{fig:co_b}.  

3875: {\it Bottom left:} A zoom-in of the {\it top-right} figure.

3876: {\it Bottom right:} 

3877: White contours of the 

3878: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

3879: %%%at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

3880: smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

3881: %intensity

3882: grey scale and black contours of the 

3883: %%%$K$-band 

3884: %%DSS2-red map.

3885: %DSS2-red map

3886: SDSS i- minus g-band images 

3887: %at full resolution ({\it bottom left}) and

3888: %slightly 

3889: smoothed to $2''$.

3890: % ({\it bottom right}). 

3891: %and DSS2-red-minus-blue map and linear contours

3892: % from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). 

3893: The 

3894: %DSS2-red 

3895: SDSS contours are on a linear scale,

3896: %as the DSS2-blue, 

3897: and the submm contours are as above. 

3898: In the 

3899: %DSS2-red-minus-blue 

3900: SDSS i- minus g-band maps, darker pixels have

3901:  redder colors.

3902: %The

3903: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

3904: %submm contours 

3905: %are presented to correspond to the

3906: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $\eqg 10\%$ with respect to the detected

3907: %emission peaks and 

3908: %are 2.5\%, 5\%, 10\%, 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

3909: %on the 350\,$\mu$m maps and are  

3910: %intended to display areas co-spatial with the CO as shown 

3911: %in the adjacent figure.

3912: %{\it Bottom:}

3913: %White contours of the 

3914: %CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

3915: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

3916: %smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

3917: %intensity-grey scale and black contours of the $K$-band map from the Two

3918: %Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) and 

3919: %{\it Bottom right}: The 1.5\,GHz continuum from the Very

3920: %Large Array (VLA) First Survey. 

3921: %({\it bottom left} and {\it right}, left} and {respectively).  

3922: %To facilitate cross-comparison, the CSO and VLA

3923: %continua contours are 2.5\%, 5\%, 10\%, 20\%, 

3924: %30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of their respective maximum pixel values.

3925: \label{fig:ngc3656}}

3926: \end{center}

3927: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

3928: \end{figure}

3929: 

3930: \begin{figure}[!h]

3931: \vspace*{-0.2cm}

3932: \begin{center} 

3933: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.618in]{5666stars+co.ps}

3934: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.618in]{smooth_ngc5666_simul_perdss2_blue_350um_p_3.eps}

3935: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.618in]{smooth_ngc5666_simul_perdss2red_350um_p_3.eps}

3936: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.618in]{smooth_ngc5666_simul_vla_1p4Ghz_350um_p_3.eps}

3937: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.618in]{ngc5666_dss2b-r_sm_350um_p_3.eps}

3938: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f2a.eps}

3939: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f2b.eps}

3940: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f2c.eps}

3941: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f2d.eps}

3942: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

3943: \caption{

3944: {\it Top Left:} 

3945: White contours of the total integrated CO(1-0) intensity map 

3946: of NGC\,5666, with a measured 10\%-contour-level diameter of $26''$,

3947: are overlayed on the grey scale and black contours from the 

3948: red part of the optical Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2), as presented  by 

3949: %optical

3950: \citet{you02}. 

3951: The white contours are in units of 

3952: -10\%, -5\%, 5\%, 10\%, 20\%,

3953: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of 

3954: 21.3\,Jy $\rm{beam}^{-1} \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1} = 7.5 \times 

3955: 10^{21} \rm{cm}^{-2} $ 

3956: CO peak 

3957: \citep{you02}.

3958: {\it Top Right:} 

3959: White contours of the 

3960: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

3961: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

3962: smoothed to $10''$ 

3963: are overlayed on

3964: intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

3965: %Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2) 

3966: %DSS2-blue 

3967: Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) i-band 

3968: %red 

3969: image of NGC\,5666

3970: smoothed to $10''$.

3971: %The

3972: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

3973: %submm contours are presented to correspond to the

3974: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $> 10\%$ with respect to the detected

3975: %emission peaks and are intended to display areas co-spatial with the

3976: %CO as shown

3977: %in the adjacent figure. 

3978: The 

3979: %DSS2-blue 

3980: SDSS i-band

3981: and  

3982: submm contours 

3983: are respectively 

3984: %20\%, 

3985: $\sim 40\%$, 41\%, 42\%, 45\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% and 

3986: %10\%, 

3987: 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

3988: on the 

3989: %350\,$\mu$m 

3990: maps and are  

3991: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial with the CO as shown 

3992: in the adjacent figure.

3993: {\it Bottom left:} A zoom-in of the {\it top-right} plot.

3994: {\it Bottom right:} White contours of the 

3995: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

3996: %%%at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

3997: smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

3998: %intensity

3999: grey scale and black contours of the 

4000: %%%$K$-band 

4001: %%DSS2-red map.

4002: %DSS2-red map

4003: SDSS i- minus g-band images 

4004: %at full resolution ({\it bottom left}) and

4005: smoothed to $2''$. 

4006: %({\it bottom right}). 

4007: %and DSS2-red-minus-blue map and linear contours

4008: % from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). 

4009: The 

4010: %DSS2-red 

4011: SDSS contours are on a linear scale,

4012: %as the DSS2-blue, 

4013: and the submm contours are as above. 

4014: In the 

4015: %DSS2-red-minus-blue 

4016: SDSS i- minus g-band maps, darker pixels have

4017:  redder colors.

4018: %left} and {\it}, respectively).  

4019: %To facilitate cross-comparison, 

4020: %the DSS2-red contours are as the DSS2-blue above and the CSO and VLA

4021: %continua contours are 5\%, 10\%, 20\%, 

4022: %30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of their respective maximum pixel values. 

4023: \label{fig:ngc5666}}

4024: \end{center}

4025: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

4026: \end{figure}

4027: 

4028: 

4029: 

4030: \begin{figure}[!th]

4031: %\vspace*{-0.3cm}

4032: \begin{center} 

4033: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{ngc083_young05.eps} 

4034: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{smooth_ngc083_simul_perdss2_blue_350um_p_3.eps}

4035: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{smooth_ngc083_simul_perdss2red_350um_p_3.eps}

4036: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{ngc083_dss2b-r_sm_350um_p_3.eps}

4037: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f3a.eps}

4038: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f3b.eps}

4039: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f1c.eps}

4040: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f1d.eps}

4041: \caption{

4042: %{\it Top Left:} 

4043: {\it Left:} 

4044: White contours of the total integrated CO(1-0) intensity map 

4045: of NGC\,83, with a measured 10\%-contour-level diameter of $10''$,

4046: are overlayed on the grey scale and black contours 

4047: from the 

4048: %optical

4049: red part of the optical Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2), as presented  by 

4050: \citet{you05}. 

4051: The white contours are in units 

4052: of -20\%, -10\%, 10\%, 20\%,

4053: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of 

4054: the 12.7\,Jy $\rm{beam}^{-1} \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1} = 8.8 \times 

4055: 10^{21} \rm{cm}^{-2} $ CO peak 

4056: \citep{you05}. 

4057: %(Young 2005).

4058: %{\it Top Right:} 

4059: {\it Right:} 

4060: White contours of the 

4061: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4062: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4063: smoothed to $10''$ 

4064: are overlayed on

4065: intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

4066: %Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2) 

4067: DSS2 

4068: %red 

4069:  blue image of

4070: %s, respectively 

4071: NGC\,83.

4072: %, NGC\,83, NGC\,759, NGC\,807, NGC\,3656, NGC\,4476, and NGC\,5666.

4073: % plotted to display the mapped areas that are co-spatial with the 

4074: %CO intensity contours shown in Figure~\ref{fig:leeuw1}.  

4075: %The

4076: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

4077: %submm contours are presented to correspond to the

4078: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $> 10\%$ with respect to the detected

4079: %emission peaks and are intended to display areas co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4080: %in the adjacent figure.

4081: The DSS2-blue and  

4082: submm contours 

4083: are respectively 

4084: %20\%, 30\%, 

4085: 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% and 

4086: %10\%, 

4087: 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4088: on the 

4089: %350\,$\mu$m 

4090: maps and are  

4091: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4092: in the adjacent figure.  The DSS2 image of NGC\,83 is saturated and

4093: plotted only as a guide of the possible optical extent of this galaxy.

4094: %~\ref{fig:co_b}.  

4095: %%%%{\it Bottom:} White contours of the 

4096: %%%%%CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4097: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4098: %%%%5smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

4099: %%%%%intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

4100: %$K$-band 

4101: %DSS2-red map.

4102: %%%%%DSS2-red map

4103: %%%%5({\it bottom left})

4104: %%%%and DSS2-red-minus-blue map and linear contours

4105: %%%%({\it bottom right}).

4106: % from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). 

4107: %%%%%%% The DSS2-red contours are as the DSS2-blue, and the submm contours are as above.  

4108: %The

4109: %350\,$\mu$m  se submm contours 

4110: %are presented to correspond to the

4111: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $\eqg 10\%$ with respect to the detected

4112: %emission peaks and 

4113: %are 10\%, 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4114: %on the 350\,$\mu$m maps and are  

4115: %intended to display areas co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4116: %in the adjacent figure.

4117: %{\it Bottom:} White contours of the 

4118: %CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4119: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4120: %smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

4121: %intensity-grey scale and black contours of the $K$-band map from the Two

4122: %Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).  The submm contours are as above.  

4123: %\label{fig:co_a}

4124: \label{fig:ngc83}}

4125: \end{center}

4126: \end{figure}

4127: 

4128: 

4129: 

4130: \begin{figure}[!th]

4131: %\vspace*{-0.6cm}

4132: \begin{center} 

4133: %\hspace{-3.3cm}

4134: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=4.318in]{fig2.ps}

4135: %\includegraphics[angle=0,

4136: %height=2.718in]{smooth_ngc759_simul_perdss2_blue_350um_p_3.eps}

4137: %\includegraphics[angle=0,

4138: %height=2.818in]{smooth_ngc759_simul_perdss2red_350um_p_3.eps}

4139: %\includegraphics[angle=0,

4140: %height=2.818in]{ngc759_dss2b-r_sm_350um_p_3.eps}

4141: \vspace*{-30mm}

4142: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=4.318in]{f4a.eps}

4143: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.718in]{f4b.eps}

4144: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{f4c.eps}

4145: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{f4d.eps}

4146: \caption{

4147: %{\it Top:} 

4148: {\it Top Left:} 

4149: %{\it Left to right:} 

4150: Total integrated CO(1-0) intensity map

4151: of NGC\,759 (grey scale and black contours) that is 

4152: adopted from the paper by 

4153: %Wilkind et al. 1997.

4154: \citet[][]{wik97}.

4155: The diameter of the CO, black contour level spacing, and rms noise in the map

4156: %of NGC\,759 

4157: are respectively $5''$, 0.8\,Jy $

4158: \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1}$, and 0.8\,Jy $ \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1}$ 

4159: %(Wilkind et al. 1997).

4160: \citet[][]{wik97}

4161: {\it Top Right:} 

4162: White contours of the 

4163: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4164: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4165: smoothed to $10''$ 

4166: are overlayed on

4167: intensity-grey scale and black contours of the Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2) 

4168:  blue

4169: %red 

4170: image of

4171: %s, respectively 

4172: %UGC\,1503.

4173: %, NGC\,83, 

4174: NGC\,759. 

4175: %NGC\,807, NGC\,3656, NGC\,4476, and NGC\,5666.

4176: % plotted to display the mapped areas that are co-spatial with the 

4177: %CO intensity contours shown in Figure~\ref{fig:leeuw1}.  

4178: %The

4179: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

4180: %submm contours are presented to correspond to the

4181: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $> 10\%$ with respect to the detected

4182: %emission peaks and are intended to display areas co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4183: %in the adjacent figure.

4184: The DSS2-blue and  

4185: submm contours 

4186: are respectively 

4187: %20\%, 

4188: 30\%, 

4189: 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% and 

4190: %10\%, 

4191: 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4192: on the 

4193: %350\,$\mu$m 

4194: maps and are  

4195: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4196: in the adjacent figure.

4197: %~\ref{fig:co_b}.  

4198: %The

4199: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

4200: %submm contours 

4201: %are presented to correspond to the

4202: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $\eqg 10\%$ with respect to the detected

4203: %emission peaks and 

4204: %are 5\%, 10\%, 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4205: %on the 350\,$\mu$m maps and are  

4206: %intended to display areas co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4207: %in the adjacent figure.

4208: %{\it Bottom:} 

4209: %White contours of the 

4210: %CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4211: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4212: %smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

4213: %intensity-grey scale and black contours of the $K$-band map from the Two

4214: %Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).  The submm contours are as above.

4215: \label{fig:ngc759}}

4216: %\label{fig:co_a}

4217: \end{center}

4218: \end{figure}

4219: 

4220: 

4221: 

4222: \begin{figure}[!th]

4223: %\vspace*{-1.6cm}

4224: \begin{center} 

4225: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=2.818in]{1503stars+co.ps} 

4226: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=2.818in]{smooth_ugc1503_simul_perdss2_blue_350um_p_3.eps}

4227: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=2.818in]{smooth_ugc1503_simul_perdss2red_350um_p_3.eps}

4228: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=2.818in]{ugc1503_dss2b-r_sm_350um_p_3.eps}

4229: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f5a.eps}

4230: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f5b.eps}

4231: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f5c.eps}

4232: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f5d.eps}

4233: \caption{

4234: {\it Top Left:} 

4235: White contours of the total integrated CO(1-0) intensity map 

4236: %() 

4237: of UGC\,1503, with a measured 10\%-contour-level diameter of $30''$,

4238: %\citep{you02}, 

4239: are overlayed on the grey scale and black contours 

4240: from the red part of the optical Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2), as presented  by 

4241: \citet{you02}. 

4242: %$5''$, $10''$, $40''$ and 

4243: %respectively of NGC\,759 (grey scale and black contours), 

4244: %adopted from by Wilkind et al. 1997, and NGC\,83, NGC\,807, and ; here 

4245: The white contours are in units 

4246: of -20\%, -10\%, 10\%, 20\%,

4247: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of 

4248: 6.3\,Jy $\rm{beam}^{-1} \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1} = 3.9 \times 

4249: 10^{21} \rm{cm}^{-2} $ CO integrated intensity 

4250: peak

4251: \citep{you02}.

4252: {\it Top Right:} 

4253: White contours of the 

4254: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4255: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4256: smoothed to $10''$ 

4257: are overlayed on

4258: intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

4259: %Digitized Sky Survey 2 

4260: DSS2 blue image of

4261: %s, respectively 

4262: UGC\,1503.

4263: The DSS2-blue and  

4264: submm contours 

4265: are respectively 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% and 

4266: %10\%, 

4267: 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4268: on the 

4269: %350\,$\mu$m 

4270: maps and are  

4271: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4272: in the adjacent figure.

4273: %~\ref{fig:co_b}.  

4274: %\label{fig:co_a}

4275: \label{fig:ugc1503}}

4276: \end{center}

4277: \end{figure}

4278: 

4279: 

4280: 

4281: 

4282: \begin{figure}[!th]

4283: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

4284: \begin{center} 

4285: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{807stars+co.ps} 

4286: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{smooth_ngc807_simul_perdss2_blue_350um_p_3.eps}

4287: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{smooth_ngc807_simul_perdss2red_350um_p_3.eps}

4288: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{ngc807_perdss2red_per6um.eps}

4289: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{ngc807_dss2b-r_sm_350um_p_3.eps}

4290: %\vspace*{-0.3cm}

4291: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f6a.eps}

4292: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f6b.eps}

4293: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f6c.eps}

4294: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f6d.eps}

4295: \caption{

4296: {\it Top Left:} 

4297: White contours of the total integrated CO(1-0) intensity map 

4298: of NGC\,807, with a measured 10\%-contour-level diameter of $40''$,

4299: are overlayed on the grey scale and black contours 

4300: from the 

4301: %optical 

4302: red 

4303: part of the optical Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2), as presented  by 

4304: \citet{you02}. 

4305: The white contours are in units 

4306: of -20\%, -10\%, 10\%, 20\%,

4307: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of 

4308: 7.6\,Jy $\rm{beam}^{-1} \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1} = 2.6 \times 

4309: 10^{22} \rm{cm}^{-2} $ 

4310: %CO integrated intensity 

4311: CO peak 

4312: %for NGC\,807.

4313: \citep{you02}.

4314: %(Young 2002).  

4315: {\it Top Right:} 

4316: White contours of the 

4317: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4318: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4319: smoothed to $10''$ are overlayed on

4320: intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

4321: %Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2) 

4322: DSS2 blue image of

4323: %s, respectively UGC\,1503.

4324: %, NGC\,83, NGC\,759, , NGC\,3656, NGC\,4476, and NGC\,5666. 

4325: NGC\,807.

4326: % plotted to display the mapped areas that are co-spatial with the 

4327: %CO intensity contours shown in Figure~\ref{fig:leeuw1}.  

4328: %The

4329: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

4330: %submm contours are presented to correspond to the

4331: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $> 10\%$ with respect to the detected

4332: %emission peaks and are intended to display areas co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4333: %in the adjacent figure.

4334: The DSS2-blue and  

4335: submm contours 

4336: are respectively 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% and 

4337: %10\%, 

4338: 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4339: on the 

4340: %350\,$\mu$m 

4341: maps and are  

4342: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4343: in the adjacent figure.

4344: %~\ref{fig:co_b}.  

4345: %{\it Bottom:} White contours of the CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4346: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

4347: %intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

4348: %$K$-band 

4349: %DSS2-red map.

4350: % from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). 

4351: % The DSS2-red contours are as the DSS2-blue, and the submm contours are as above.  

4352: %The

4353: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

4354: %submm contours 

4355: %are presented to correspond to the

4356: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $\eqg 10\%$ with respect to the detected

4357: %emission peaks and 

4358: %are 5\%, 10\%, 20\%, 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4359: %on the 350\,$\mu$m maps and are  

4360: %intended to display areas co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4361: %in the adjacent figure.

4362: %The submm contours are as above, 

4363: %and the 6\,$\mu$m 

4364: %contours 

4365: %are 40\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel value

4366: %on the ISOCAM map. The 30\% ISOCAM contour is at the map noise level.

4367: %\label{fig:co_a}

4368: \label{fig:ngc807}}

4369: \end{center}

4370: \end{figure}

4371: 

4372: 

4373: 

4374: \begin{figure}[!h]

4375: \vspace*{-0.2cm}

4376: \begin{center} 

4377: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{4476stars+co.ps} 

4378: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{smooth_ngc4476_simul_perdss2_blue_350um_p_3.eps}

4379: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{smooth_ngc4476_simul_perdss2red_350um_p_3.eps}

4380: %\includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.818in]{ngc4476_dss2b-r_sm_350um_p_3.eps}

4381: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f7a.eps}

4382: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f7b.eps}

4383: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f7c.eps}

4384: \includegraphics[angle=0,height=2.518in]{f7d.eps}

4385: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

4386: \caption{

4387: {\it Top Left:} 

4388: White contours of the total integrated CO(1-0) intensity map 

4389: of NGC\,4476, with a measured 10\%-contour-level diameter of $27''$,

4390: are overlayed on the grey scale and black contours from the 

4391: %optical

4392: red part of the optical Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2), as presented  by 

4393: \citet{you02}. 

4394: The white contours are in units of 

4395: -20\%, -10\%, 10\%, 20\%,

4396: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of 

4397: 12.4\,Jy $\rm{beam}^{-1} \rm{km} \rm{s}^{-1} = 7.3 \times 

4398: 10^{21} \rm{cm}^{-2} $

4399: CO peak 

4400: \citep{you02}.

4401: {\it Top Right:} 

4402: White contours of the 

4403: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4404: %at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4405: smoothed to $10''$ are overlayed on

4406: intensity-grey scale and black contours of the 

4407: %Digitized Sky Survey 2 (DSS2) 

4408: %DSS2-blue

4409: Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) i-band 

4410: % red 

4411: image of NGC\,4476

4412: smoothed to $10''$.

4413: %The

4414: %350\,$\mu$m  se 

4415: %submm contours are presented to correspond to the

4416: %percentage of integrated CO intensity $> 10\%$ with respect to the detected

4417: %emission peaks and are intended to display areas co-spatial with the

4418: %CO as shown

4419: %in the adjacent figure. 

4420: The 

4421: %DSS2-blue

4422: SDSS i-band and  

4423: submm contours 

4424: are respectively 

4425: %20\%, 30\%, 

4426: $\sim 31\%$, 32\%, 33\%, 35\%, 40\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% and 

4427: %10\%, 20\%, 

4428: 30\%, 50\%, 70\%, and 90\% of the maximum pixel values

4429: on the 

4430: %350\,$\mu$m 

4431: maps and are  

4432: intended to display areas that may be co-spatial with the CO as shown 

4433: in the adjacent figure.

4434: %~\ref{fig:co_b}. 

4435: {\it Bottom left:} A zoom in of the {\it top-rright} figure. 

4436: {\it Bottom right:} 

4437: White contours of the 

4438: CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum 

4439: %%%at $\sim 9''$ spatial resolution and 

4440: smoothed to $\sim 10''$ are overlayed on

4441: %intensity

4442: grey scale and black contours of the 

4443: %%%$K$-band 

4444: %%DSS2-red map.

4445: %DSS2-red map

4446: SDSS i- minus g-band images 

4447: %at full resolution ({\it bottom left}) and

4448: smoothed to $2''$.

4449: % ({\it bottom right}). 

4450: %and DSS2-red-minus-blue map and linear contours

4451: % from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). 

4452: The 

4453: %DSS2-red 

4454: SDSS contours are on a linear scale,

4455: %as the DSS2-blue, 

4456: and the submm contours are as above. 

4457: In the 

4458: %DSS2-red-minus-blue 

4459: SDSS i- minus g-band maps, darker pixels have

4460:  redder colors.

4461: \label{fig:ngc4476}}

4462: \end{center}

4463: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

4464: \end{figure}

4465: 

4466: 

4467: \clearpage

4468: \thispagestyle{empty}

4469: \setlength{\voffset}{-18mm}

4470: 

4471: \begin{figure}[h]

4472: %\vspace{1.0cm}

4473: \vspace*{-0.6cm}

4474: \begin{center} 

4475: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{ngc3656.eps}\\

4476: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{ngc5666.eps}

4477: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{ngc83.eps}

4478: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{ngc759.eps}

4479: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{ugc1503.eps}

4480: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{ngc807.eps}

4481: %\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{ngc4476.eps}

4482: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{f8a.eps}\\

4483: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{f8b.eps}

4484: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{f8c.eps}

4485: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{f8d.eps}

4486: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{f8e.eps}

4487: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{f8f.eps}

4488: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=3.215in]{f8g.eps}

4489: \vspace{-0.3cm}

4490: \caption{

4491: %{\it Left to right:} 

4492: %Power-law plus single-temperature greybody (GB) composite fits to the

4493: %mid-IR to submm data

4494: %for the sample galaxies.  

4495: The CSO/SHARC\,II 350\,$\mu$m continuum

4496: integrated fluxes and mid-IR to

4497: submm data obtained from public archives and literature (see Table~\ref{tab:iras}) for the

4498: sample galaxies are plotted and fitted with a composite model of a

4499: single-temperature greybody plus mid-IR power-law (see Section~\ref{sec:sed_es}). 

4500: % and ~\ref{tab:iras}).  

4501: %For galaxies with four or less data points, only

4502: %the single-temperature GB was fitted.  Where the data points spanned the

4503: %submm to mid-IR wavelengths, the double-temperature GB

4504: %produced better fits than the single-temperature ones (see

4505: %Table~\ref{tab:iras}).    

4506: \label{fig:cso_sed_bb_pw}}

4507: %\label{fig:leeuw2}

4508: \end{center}

4509: \vspace*{-0.9cm}

4510: \end{figure}

4511: \clearpage

4512: \setlength{\voffset}{0mm}

4513: 

4514: \end{document}

4515: 

4516: