1: %%

2: %% This is file `template-8d.tex',

3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.

4: %%

5: %% The original source files were:

6: %%

7: %% template.raw  (with options: `8d')

8: %% 

9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.

10: %% 

11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach

12: %% All rights reserved

13: %% 

14: %%

15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $

16: %%

17: 

18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you

20: %% are satisfied that your installation is

21: %% complete and working.

22: %%

23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting

24: %% potential problems.

25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

26: 

27: \input{aipcheck}

28: 

29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT

31: %%

32: %% The class supports further options.

33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.

34: %%

35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

36: 

37: \documentclass[

38:     ,final            % use final for the camera ready runs

39: %%  ,draft            % use draft while you are working on the paper

40: %%  ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections

41: %%  ,                 % add further options here if necessary

42:   ]

43:   {aipproc}

44: 

45: \layoutstyle{8x11double}

46: 

47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

48: %% FRONTMATTER

49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

50: 

51: \begin{document}

52: 

53: \title{NC $\pi^0$ Production in the MiniBooNE Antineutrino Data}

54: 

55: \classification{13.15.+g, 12.15.Mm, 14.40.Aq}

56: \keywords      {Neutrino scattering, Neutral pion}

57: 

58: 

59: \author{V. T. Nguyen, for the MiniBooNE Collaboration} {

60:   address={Department of Physics, Columbia University}

61: }

62: 

63: \begin{abstract}

64: The single largest background to future $\bar{\nu_{\mu}}\rightarrow \bar{\nu_e}$ ($\nu_{\mu} \rightarrow {\nu_e}$) oscillation searches is neutral current $\pi^{0}$ production.  MiniBooNE, which began taking antineutrino data in January 2006, has the world's largest sample of reconstructed $\pi^{0}$'s produced by antineutrinos in the 1 GeV energy range.  These neutral pions are primarily produced through the $\Delta$ resonance but can also be created through ``coherent production.''  The latter process is the coherent sum of glancing scatters of (anti)neutrinos off a neutron or proton, in which the nucleus is kept intact but a $\pi^{0}$ is created.  Current analysis of NC $\pi^0$ production in the MiniBooNE antineutrino data will be discussed.

65: \end{abstract}

66: 

67: \maketitle

68: 

69: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

70: %% MAINMATTER

71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

72: 

73: 

74: %\vspace{-1.cm}

75: \section{The MiniBooNE Experiment}

76: %\vspace{-.1cm}

77: 

78: The Mini Booster Neutrino Experiment (MiniBooNE) [1] uses the Fermilab Booster neutrino beam, which is produced from 8 GeV protons incident on a Be target.  The target is located inside a horn, which produces a toroidal magnetic field that focuses pions and kaons.  These mesons then pass through a collimator and can decay inside a 50-m-long tunnel.   The MiniBooNE Cherenkov detector, located 541 m from the front of the target, is a spherical tank filled with 800 tons of pure mineral oil. The inside wall is lined with 1280 phototubes while the outside wall is covered by 240 veto phototubes.  Neutrino interactions in the mineral oil are simulated with the v3 NUANCE [2] event generator.

79: 

80: MiniBooNE began running in antineutrino mode in January 2006 and currently has the world's largest sample of reconstructed $\pi^0$'s produced by antineutrinos in the 1 GeV energy range (with over 1700 events after cuts).  As with any antineutrino beam, there is a non-negligible ``wrong-sign'' (WS) $\nu$ background, which comprises $\sim30\%$ of the total events according to our predictions.  This is due to the large $\pi^+$ to $\pi^-$ ratio produced by a proton beam incident on the target.

81: 

82: %\vspace{-0.4cm}

83: \section{Neutral Current $\pi^0$ Production}

84: 

85: %\vspace{-.1cm}

86: At low energy, neutral current (NC) $\pi^0$'s are produced via two different mechanisms:

87: \begin{equation}

88: \bar{\nu}N \rightarrow \bar{\nu} \Delta \rightarrow \bar{\nu}\pi^0 N  \qquad (resonant)

89: \end{equation}

90: %\vspace{-.7cm}

91: \begin{equation}

92: \bar{\nu}A \rightarrow \bar{\nu} A \pi^0  \qquad (coherent)

93: \end{equation}

94: 

95: In resonant $\pi^0$ production, a(n) (anti)neutrino interacts with an n or a p, exciting the nucleon into a $\Delta^0$ or $\Delta^+$, which then decays to an n or a p, and a $\pi^0$.  In coherent $\pi^0$ production, very little energy is exchanged between the (anti)neutrino and the n or p.  The nucleus is left intact but a $\pi^0$ is created from the coherent sum of scattering from all the nucleons.  A signature of this process is a $\pi^0$ which is distinctly forward-scattered.

96: 

97: %\vspace{-0.1cm}

98: % [4] [5] [6]

99: \subsection{NC $\pi^0$'s as an Oscillation Search Background}

100: A $\pi^0$ decays very promptly into two photons ($\tau_{\pi^0}\sim8$x$10^-17$s), which can be detected in MiniBooNE as two electron-like rings.  However, if only one track is resolvable, this event can be misidentified as a single electron-like ring, which is the event signature of a $\bar{\nu_e}$ ($\nu_e$) interaction.  Thus, understanding of NC $\pi^0$ events is crucial.

101: 

102: Unfortunately, there is currently only one published measurement of the absolute rate of antineutrino NC $\pi^0$ production [3]; this measurement was reported with 25$\%$ uncertainty at 2 GeV.  There exist no experimental measurements below 2 GeV.  Furthermore, current theoretical models on coherent $\pi^0$ production [4,5,6] can vary by up to an order of magnitude in their predictions at low energy, the region most relevant for (anti)neutrino oscillation experiments.

103: 

104: %\vspace{-0.1cm}

105: \section{Coherent $\pi^0$'s in Terms of $E_\pi(1-\cos{\theta_\pi})$ in $\bar{\nu}$ Mode}

106: Coherent and resonant $\pi^0$ production are distinguishable by $\cos{\theta_\pi}$, which is the cosine of the lab angle of the outgoing $\pi^0$ with respect to the beam direction.  It turns out that it is even better to study coherent $\pi^0$'s in terms of the pion energy-weighted angular distribution since in coherent events, $E_\pi(1-\cos{\theta_\pi})$ has a more regular shape as a function of momentum, than $\cos{\theta_\pi}$ alone (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).  Thus, we will fit for the coherent content as a function of the pion energy-weighted angular distribution.

107: 

108: \begin{figure}[!h]

109: \hfill

110: \begin{minipage}[b]{.45\textwidth}

111: \begin{center}

112: %\hspace{-.7cm}

113:   \includegraphics[height=.3\textheight]{true_coh_cos.eps}

114: %  \vspace{-.25cm

115:   \caption{Generated $\cos{\theta_\pi}$ for different momenta (MeV).}

116: \end{center}

117: \end{minipage}

118: \hfill

119: \end{figure}

120: 

121: \begin{figure}[!h]

122: \hfill

123: \begin{minipage}[b]{.45\textwidth}

124: \begin{center}

125: %\hspace{-.7cm}

126:   \includegraphics[height=.3\textheight]{true_coh_ecos.eps}

127: %  \vspace{-.25cm

128:   \caption{Generated $E_\pi(1-\cos{\theta_\pi})$ for different momenta (MeV).}

129: \end{center}

130: \end{minipage}

131: \hfill

132: \end{figure}

133: 

134: 

135: 

136: This fit has in fact been done in neutrino mode [7].  However, in antineutrino scattering there is a helicity suppression for most interactions, including resonant production of $\pi^0$'s, but not for coherent production.  Thus, the ratio of coherent to resonant scattering, which is small, is enhanced in antineutrino running.

137: 

138: %\vspace{-0.35cm}

139: \subsection{Event Selection}

140: %\vspace{-0.1cm}

141: 

142: In selecting MiniBooNE NC $\pi^0$ events, we require the following: only one sub-event (so that the interaction is NC), veto hits<6 (to eliminate cosmic rays), tank hits>200 (to eliminate Michel electrons),  and the event occurs within the fiducial volume. The surviving events are then reconstructed under four hypotheses: a single electron-like Cherenkov ring, a single muon-like ring, two gamma-like rings with unconstrained kinematics, and two gamma-like rings with the invariant mass = $m_{\pi^0}$.  The reconstruction package uses a detailed model of track light production and propagation in the tank to predict the charge and time of hits on each PMT.  Event parameters are then varied to maximize the likelihood of the observed hits.

143: 

144: %\vspace{-0.35cm}

145: 

146: \subsection{Data/MC Comparisons}

147: %\vspace{-0.1cm}

148: The following figures show comparisons between MiniBooNE antineutrino data and MC\footnote{RES = NUANCE channels 6,8,13, and 15.  COH = NUANCE channel 96.  BGD = NUANCE channels other than 6,8,13,15, and 96.  MC TOT = RES + COH + BGD.  See [2] for channel defintions.}, which have been relatively normalized.  Only statistical errors are shown.  The MC includes a rescaling of the Rein-Sehgal coherent cross section based on the measurement in [7].  The antineutrino data set shown has not yet been fit for coherent content.  (This is in progress.)\\

149: 

150: 

151: 

152: \begin{figure}[!h]

153: \hfill

154: \begin{minipage}[b]{.45\textwidth}

155: \begin{center}

156: %\hspace{-.7cm}

157:   \includegraphics[height=.3\textheight]{proc_mass2.eps}

158: %  \vspace{-.25cm

159:   \caption{The invariant mass with the right sign and wrong sign contributions.}

160: \end{center}

161: \end{minipage}

162: \hfill

163: \end{figure}

164: 

165: 

166: \begin{figure}[!h]

167: \hfill

168: \begin{minipage}[b]{.45\textwidth}

169: \begin{center}

170: %\hspace{-.7cm}

171:   \includegraphics[height=.3\textheight]{proc_ppi0.eps}

172: %  \vspace{-.25cm}

173:   \caption{The $\pi^0$ momentum.}

174:       \label{fig:sub:c}

175: \end{center}

176: \end{minipage}

177: \hfill

178: \end{figure}

179: 

180: 

181: 

182: \begin{figure}[!h]

183: \hfill

184: \begin{minipage}[b]{.45\textwidth}

185: \begin{center}

186: %\hspace{-.7cm}

187:   \includegraphics[height=.3\textheight]{proc_costheta.eps}

188: %  \vspace{-.25cm}

189:   \caption{The cosine of the $\pi^0$ angle with respect to the beam direction.}  

190:       \label{fig:sub:c}

191: \end{center}

192: \end{minipage}

193: \hfill

194: \end{figure}

195: 

196: 

197: \begin{figure}[!h]

198: \hfill

199: \begin{minipage}[b]{.45\textwidth}

200: \begin{center}

201: %\hspace{-.7cm}

202:   \includegraphics[height=.3\textheight]{proc_money.eps}

203: %  \vspace{-.25cm}

204:   \caption{The pion energy-weighted angular distribution.}

205: \end{center}

206: \end{minipage}

207: \hfill

208: \end{figure}

209: 

210: \begin{figure}[!h]

211: \hfill

212: \begin{minipage}[b]{.45\textwidth}

213: \begin{center}

214: %\hspace{-.7cm}

215:   \includegraphics[height=.3\textheight]{proc_money3.eps}

216: %  \vspace{-.25cm}

217:   \caption{The pion energy-weighted angular distribution with no coherent contribution in the total MC.}

218: \end{center}

219: \end{minipage}

220: \hfill

221: \end{figure}

222: 

223: 

224: 

225: 

226: When coherent $\pi^0$ production is absent from the MC (Fig. 7), one can see the poor agreement between data and MC in the lower end of $E_\pi(1-\cos{\theta_\pi})$, where most of the $\pi^0$'s are expected to be produced from coherent scattering.  The agreement improves considerably when coherent $\pi^0$ production is included (Fig. 6).  Thus, the MiniBooNE data already seems to be suggesting evidence for antineutrino coherent $\pi^0$ production.

227: 

228: 

229: \begin{theacknowledgments}

230: I would like to give many thanks to the MiniBooNE Collaboration and the NSF.

231: \end{theacknowledgments}

232: 

233: 

234: \begin{thebibliography}{9}

235: \bibitem{1} A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo {\it et al}. [MiniBooNE Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 231801 (2007).

236: \bibitem{2} D. Casper, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. {\bf 112}, 161 (2002).

237: \bibitem{3} see footnote on page 235 in H. Faissner {\it et al}., Phys. Lett. {\bf 125B}, 230 (1983).

238: \bibitem{4} B. Z. Kopeliovich, arXiv:0409079 [hep-ph].

239: \bibitem{5} J. Marteau, arXiv:9906449 [hep-ph].

240: \bibitem{6} E. A. Paschos, arXiv:0309148 [hep-ph].

241: \bibitem{7} J. M. Link, arXiv:0709.3213 [hep-ex].

242: \end{thebibliography}

243: 

244: 

245: \end{document}

246: 

247: