1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46: \newcommand{\aanda} {A\&A\nolinebreak }
47: \newcommand{\aasupp} {A\&AS\nolinebreak}
48: \newcommand{\annrev} {ARA\&A\nolinebreak}
49: \newcommand{\mn} {MNRAS\nolinebreak }
50: \newcommand{\mnras} {MNRAS\nolinebreak }
51: \newcommand{\apj} {ApJ\nolinebreak}
52: \newcommand{\apjs} {ApJ {\it Supplement}}
53: \newcommand{\apjl} {ApJ {\it Letters}}
54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
55: %% FRONTMATTER
56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57:
58: \begin{document}
59:
60: \title{Strong spectral evolution during the prompt emission of GRB\,070616}
61:
62: \classification{98.70.Rz}
63: \keywords {$\gamma$-ray sources; $\gamma$-ray bursts}
64:
65: \author{R.L.C. Starling}{
66: address={Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK}
67: }
68:
69: %\author{<author2>}{
70: % address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
71: %}
72:
73: %\author{<author3>}{
74: % address={<common address for author2 and author3>}
75: % ,altaddress={<author1 address>} % additional visiting address
76: %}
77:
78:
79: \begin{abstract}
80: {\it Swift} has revealed features in GRB early light curves, such as steep decays and
81: X-ray flares, whose properties are consistent with an internal origin though
82: they are far from understood. The steep X-ray decay is often explained using
83: the curvature effect; however a significant number of GRBs display strong
84: spectral evolution during this phase, and a new mechanism must be invoked to
85: explain this.
86: Of particular interest are the longest duration GRBs in which the early emission can be
87: studied in most detail. Here we present data for GRB\,070616, in which the prompt
88: emission shows a complex multipeaked structure, leading to one of the
89: longest prompt emission durations ever recorded. We take advantage of extensive coverage of such a long
90: burst by all Swift instruments. Combining data from {\it Swift} and {\it Suzaku} we study
91: the evolution of the prompt emission spectrum, following the temporal
92: variability of the peak energy and spectral slope.
93:
94: \end{abstract}
95:
96: \maketitle
97:
98: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
99: %% MAINMATTER
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101:
102: \section{Introduction}
103: The prompt emission mechanism for Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs) is usually
104: attributed to internal shocks due to collisions of shells of different
105: Lorentz factors ejected from the vicinity of a compact object
106: \citep{Rees}. Though the general picture appears applicable to most GRBs, the
107: details are far from understood and other models have also been proposed
108: \citep[see][and references therein]{Zhang1}. The {\it Swift}
109: mission
110: %\citep{Gehrels1}
111: has revealed complex early emission, as yet largely unexplained. The steeply
112: decaying phases that directly follow both prompt emission and X-ray flares are
113: often interpreted as due to the curvature effect \citep[e.g.][]{Kumar2}
114: where high latitude emission is delayed with respect to that on-axis. However,
115: in this scenario significant spectral evolution is not expected but is seen in
116: a large number of cases \citep{Zhang2}.
117: The longest duration GRBs provide rare opportunities to study the
118: relationship between various possible early emission components. Very few GRBs are detected in $\gamma$-rays
119: for more than 400 seconds when using the T$_{\rm 90}$ parameter. Only
120: $\sim$0.5\% of the BATSE sample meet this criteria \citep{Paciesas} and such GRBs
121: remain rare in the {\it Swift} era.
122:
123: Here we present {\it Swift} and {\it Suzaku} data for GRB\,070616, whose T$_{90} =
124: 402\pm10$ s is one of the longest on record. We
125: study the evolution of the prompt
126: emission through broadband lightcurves and spectra. Further details of this
127: study can be found in \cite{Starling}.
128:
129: \section{Results}
130: %\subsubsection{Temporal analysis}
131: {\it Swift} BAT
132: triggered on a gradual rise of $\gamma$-ray emission which lasted approximately 100 s before the
133: first and strongest peak, centred at T$_{\rm 0}$+120 s. Thereafter multiple blended peaks continue
134: the seemingly flat prompt emission in both $\gamma$-rays and X-rays out to T$_{\rm 0}$+500--600 s. At this point the $\gamma$-ray
135: emission appears to return to the count rate at which it began at T$_{\rm 0}$, whilst the X-ray
136: emission begins a very steep decay lasting until T$_{\rm 0}$+1200 s. Fig. 1 shows
137: the joint BAT-XRT lightcurve in which peaks are temporally coincident strongly suggesting that the X-ray and $\gamma$-ray
138: emission come from the same component. Contrastingly,
139: the $V$ band optical emission observed with UVOT is rising.
140:
141: The BAT hardness ratio (50--100 keV/15--50 keV) remained approximately constant
142: until T$_{\rm 0}$+285 s when the spectra softened
143: significantly over the remainder of the $\gamma$-ray observations. The XRT hardness
144: ratio (1--10 keV/0.3--1 keV) shows the same behaviour, with the spectral
145: evolution beginning at $\sim$T$_{\rm 0}$+500 s.
146: %\subsubsection{Time dependent spectral analysis}
147: To examine the spectral evolution seen in the hardness ratios, we time-sliced
148: the BAT and XRT data into 100s-long bins covering T$_{\rm 0}$+137--737 s.
149: We adopted an absorbed Band function model \citep{Band}, fixing the high energy power law slope to $\beta=2.36$ as found in the
150: {\it Suzaku} spectrum \citep[][and adopting $F_{\nu} \propto
151: \nu^{-\beta}$]{Morigami,Starling}. Intrinsic extinction was determined from fits to the
152: X-ray data alone to be constant, amounting to a total Galactic+intrinsic
153: absorbing column of $N_{\rm H} = 0.4 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ (no redshift is
154: available). The peak
155: energy is derived from the free parameters $\alpha$ (low energy power law
156: index) and $E_{\rm 0}$ (characteristic energy) using $E_{\rm pk} = E_{\rm 0} (2-\alpha)$.
157: %\begin{equation}
158: %E_{\rm pk} = E_{\rm 0} (2-\alpha).
159: %\end{equation}
160: $E_{\rm pk}$
161: can be well constrained and is observed to move to lower
162: energies with time from 135 keV down to 4 keV in $\sim$600 s, while the spectral slope
163: $\alpha$ also varies gradually, softening with time, shown in Fig. 2.
164:
165: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
166: The lightcurve is atypical in that the
167: emission rises relatively slowly over $\sim$100 s to a peak,
168: then persists at a fairly constant level before
169: showing a rapid decline. Strong spectral evolution is observed
170: throughout the prompt phase. We are able to track the spectral peak energy as
171: it moves from the WAM/BAT energies down to a few keV. At the same time we find
172: a softening of the spectrum below the peak energy.
173:
174: Spectral evolution through the prompt phase has been noted previously, and is inconsistent with the idea that
175: the curvature effect alone is driving the
176: emission during the steep decay \citep[e.g.][]{Liang}. Using a curvature
177: effect model to explain the steep decay in GRB\,070616 we require that phase to begin at T$_{\rm 0}$+632$^{+11}_{-12}$ s requiring a long initial emission period
178: of $>$600 s.
179: The curvature effect is in fact a poor fit, but the combination of the curvature
180: effect and the strong spectral evolution
181: we observe
182: may be able to account for the steep X-ray decay.
183:
184: Only 25\% of {\it Swift} GRB
185: prompt X-ray tails can be
186: fit with the curvature effect alone \citep{Zhang2}; those not well fit show spectral evolution. From fits to 16 GRBs, \cite{Zhang2} tested and subsequently disfavoured
187: two possible causes of the spectrally evolving X-ray tails, namely an
188: angle-dependent spectral index in structured jets and a superposition of the
189: curvature effect and a power law decay component.
190: The observed spectral softening could, they suggest, be caused by cooling of the
191: plasma where the cooling frequency decreases with time. This manifests itself as a cut-off power law shape with the
192: cut-off moving to lower energies with time, proposed for GRBs 060218 and 980923 and similar to our Band function results for GRB\,070616. In this
193: scenario the peak energy we track through the BAT band would be the
194: cooling frequency. In addition we observe softening of the low energy power
195: law slope which remains unexplained.
196:
197: It is possible that we are observing a combination of components which
198: together mimick spectral evolution. We investigated a scenario with two
199: spectrally invariant power laws: the relative contribution of the softer power
200: law to the total spectrum increasing with time.
201: This is a viable explanation of the spectral
202: evolution, but can be ruled out as it does not fit the lightcurve behaviour.
203: We then applied the modelling procedure of \cite{O'Brien,Willingale} in which it was shown
204: that many GRB early lightcurves can be well modelled by up to two emission components
205: each consisting of an exponential$+$power law decay. But
206: again the prompt emission lightcurve of GRB\,070616 is not well fit by this model.
207: Interestingly, several, although not all,
208: of the GRBs with strong spectral evolution studied in \cite{Zhang2} are also
209: not well fitted by the two-component lightcurve model
210: \citep[e.g. GRBs 051227 and 060614, see][]{Willingale}. Others not
211: well fitted by this type of modelling (e.g. GRB\,051117A) were
212: identified by \cite{Zhang2} as having evolution which
213: they attributed to flares. Such GRBs may instead be more similar to
214: GRB\,070616.
215:
216: In conclusion, the prompt emission of GRB\,070616 comprises a component well fitted with a
217: Band function and a possible further component. The movement of the peak
218: energy shows that great care must be taken when using average $E_{\rm pk}$ values.
219: It is clear that both broadband coverage and good time resolution are crucial to
220: pinning down the origins of the complex prompt emission in GRBs.
221:
222: %\subsubsection{<A subsubsection>}
223: %Some url test \url{http://www.world.universe}.
224: %
225: %Et iam nox umida caelo praecipitat $J_{ion}$ suadentque cadentia
226: %sidera somnos. Sed si tantus amor casus cognoscere nostros et breviter
227: %Troiae $J_{ion}$ supremum audire laborem:
228: %\begin{equation}
229: %J_{ion}=A\frac{exp\left[-\frac{E_a}{kT}\right]}{kT}\alpha \label{ionflux}
230: %\end{equation}
231: %lamentabile regnum cruerint Danai; quaeque ipse miserrima vidi, et
232: %quorum pars magna fui. $A$ talia fando, $E_a$ iam nox umida, $k$ caelo
233: %praecipitat, suadentque cadentia sidera somnos. See \eqref{ionflux}.
234:
235: %\paragraph{<A subsubsubsection>}%
236: %
237: %Infandum, regina, iubes renovare dolorem, Troianas ut opes et
238: %lamentabile regnum cruerint Danai; quaeque ipse miserrima vidi, et
239: %quorum pars magna fui \cite{Brown2000,BrownAustin:2000}. Quis talia fando
240: %Myrmidonum Dolopumve aut duri miles Ulixi temperet
241: %\cite{Mittelbach/Schoepf:1990} a lacrimis? Et iam
242: %nox umida caelo praecipitat, suadentque \cite{Wang} cadentia
243: %sidera somnos.
244:
245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
246: %% Sample figure:
247: %%
248: %% The option [height=...] scales the picture to the given height,
249: %% without it it would be printed at its nominal size
250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
251: \begin{figure}
252: \includegraphics[height=.4\textheight,angle=-90]{fig1.ps}
253: \caption{The joint BAT-XRT lightcurve (BAT extrapolated to the XRT band
254: using multiple spectral fits) showing the coincidence of peaks, long-lived
255: flat behviour and steep X-ray decline.}
256: \end{figure}
257:
258: \begin{figure}
259: \includegraphics[height=.4\textheight,angle=90]{fig2.ps}
260: \caption{The variability of spectral slope $\alpha$ (upper panel) and peak energy
261: $E_{\rm pk}$ (lower panel) in
262: Band function fits to the early BAT-XRT spectra.}
263: \label{Epkband}
264: \end{figure}
265:
266: %
267: %Et iam
268: %nox umida caelo praecipitat, suadentque cadentia\footnote{Here we test
269: %footnotes.} sidera somnos.
270:
271: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
272: %% SAMPLE TABLE
273: %%
274: %% Shows the use of \tablehead and \tablenote
275: %% macros
276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
277:
278: %\begin{table}
279: %\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}
280: %\hline
281: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Single\\outlet}
282: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Small\tablenote{2-9 retail outlets}\\multiple}
283: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Large\\multiple}
284: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Total} \\
285: %\hline
286: %1982 & 98 & 129 & 620 & 847\\
287: %1987 & 138 & 176 & 1000 & 1314\\
288: %1991 & 173 & 248 & 1230 & 1651\\
289: %1998\tablenote{predicted} & 200 & 300 & 1500 & 2000\\
290: %\hline
291: %\end{tabular}
292: %\caption{Average turnover per shop: by type
293: % of retail organisation}
294: %\label{tab:a}
295: %\end{table}
296:
297: %\begin{enumerate}
298: %\item
299: % An item \cite{Liang:1983}
300: %\item
301: % Another item with sub entries
302: % \begin{enumerate}
303: % \item
304: % A sub entry \cite{Wang}
305: % \item
306: % Second sub entry
307: % \end{enumerate}
308: %\item
309: % The final item with normal label.
310: %\end{enumerate}
311: %Infandum, regina, iubes renovare dolorem, Troianas ut opes et
312: %lamentabile regnum cruerint Danai; quaeque ipse miserrima vidi, et
313: %quorum pars magna fui. Quis talia fando Myrmidonum Dolopumve aut duri
314: %miles Ulixi temperet a lacrimis?
315: %\begin{description}
316: %\item[Infandum]
317: % regina, iubes renovare dolorem, Troianas ut opes et lamentabile
318: % regnum cruerint Danai.
319: %\item[Lamentabile] regnum cruerint Danai; quaeque ipse miserrima vidi, et
320: %quorum pars magna fui. Quis talia fando Myrmidonum Dolopumve aut duri
321: %miles Ulixi temperet a lacrimis?
322: %\end{description}
323:
324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
325: %% BACKMATTER
326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
327:
328: \begin{theacknowledgments}
329: We thank the {\it Swift} and {\it Suzaku} WAM teams for their contributions,
330: in particular P.T. O'Brien, R. Willingale, K.L. Page, J.P. Osborne, M. De
331: Pasquale, N.P.M. Kuin and M. Tashiro. RLCS acknowledges support from STFC.
332: \end{theacknowledgments}
333:
334: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
335: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
336: %% manually.
337: %%
338: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
339: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
340: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
341: %%
342: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
343: %% after the \end{document}
344: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
345:
346: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
347: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
348: %% setup or preferences.
349: %%
350: %%
351: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
352: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
353:
354: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
355: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
356:
357: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
358: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
359: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
360: \bibliography{ms}
361:
362: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
363: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
364: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
365: %% if you don't like the warning.
366: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
367: \IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
368: {\typeout{}
369: \typeout{******************************************}
370: \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to optain}
371: \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
372: \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
373: \typeout{******************************************}
374: \typeout{}
375: }
376:
377: \end{document}
378:
379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
380: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
381: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
382: %% of the above.
383: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
384:
385: \endinput
386: %%
387: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
388: