1: % MANUSCRIPT: Crab Jet
2: %
3: %
4: %\documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
5: \documentclass[usenatbib,useAMS]{mn2e}
6:
7: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
8:
9: \title[Crab Nebula Jet]{The Crab Nebula's Dynamical Age as Measured from its Northern Filamentary Jet}
10:
11: \author[G. C. Rudie, R. A. Fesen, and T. Yamada]{G. C.
12: Rudie$^{1,2}$\thanks{E-mail: gwen@astro.caltech.edu (GCR);
13: fesen@snr.dartmouth.edu (RAF); yamada@astr.tohoku.ac.jp (TY)}, R. A. Fesen$^{2}$,
14: and T. Yamada$^{3}$\\ $^{1}$Department of Astrophysics, MC 105-24, Caltech,
15: 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA\\
16: $^{2}$Department of Physics \& Astronomy, 6127 Wilder
17: Laboratory, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA\\
18: $^{3}$Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, JAPAN}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21: \date{Accepted 2007 MONTH DAY. Received 2007 MONTH DAY; in original form 2007 July 30}
22: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2007}
23:
24: \maketitle
25:
26: \label{firstpage}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29:
30: We present a deep [O~III] $\lambda\lambda$4959,5007 image of the northern
31: filamentary jet in the Crab Nebula taken with the 8.2m Subaru telescope. Using
32: this image and an image taken with the KPNO 4m in 1988 \citep{fes93}, we have
33: computed proper motions for 35 locations in the jet. \textbf{The results suggest that when
34: compared to the main body of the remnant, the jet experienced less outward acceleration
35: from the central pulsar's rapidly expanding synchrotron nebula.}
36: The jet's apparent expansion rate yields an undecelerated
37: explosion date for the Crab Nebula of 1055 $\pm$24 C.E., a date much closer to
38: the appearance of the historic 1054 C.E.\ guest star than the 1120 -- 1140 C.E.\
39: dates estimated in previous studies using filaments located within the
40: remnant's main nebula. \textbf{Our proper motion measurements suggest the jet likely formed during
41: the 1054 supernova explosion and represents the remnant's highest velocity
42: knots possibly associated with a suspected N-S bipolar outflow from the supernova
43: explosion.}
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \begin{keywords}
48: nebulae: Crab Nebula - nebulae: supernova remnants
49: \end{keywords}
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52:
53: The first object in Messier's catalog of nebulous sources, the Crab Nebula
54: (M1), is a young galactic supernova remnant (SNR) and one of the most well
55: known astronomical objects. It possesses a variety of remarkable properties and
56: structures including: a highly complex structure of optically bright filaments
57: as seen in recent high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope images \citep{hes96,loll04},
58: an unusually luminous central pulsar (see Harden \& Seward 1984 and Rots et al.
59: 2004 and references therein) with accompanying X-ray jets \citep{bri85}, and a
60: radio and optically bright synchrotron nebula which exhibits fine-scale
61: structural changes on timescales of just days or weeks \citep{sca69,sca70,hes95}.
62:
63: The Crab Nebula is generally considered the archetype of a pulsar driven
64: synchrotron wind nebula (PWN) and of the so-called ``plerionic'' remnants in
65: general (see review by \citealt{dav85}). The spinning magnetic field of
66: the pulsar and strong relativistic wind of particles off the neutron star have
67: measurably accelerated the remnant's optical filaments such that their
68: velocities, when projected back, give a date of $\sim$1130 C.E. \citep{tri70,
69: nug98}. This date is $\sim$80 years more recent than the 1054 C.E. date, the
70: year a ``guest star" associated with the Crab supernova is reported to have
71: been observed by the Chinese and other cultures in several ancient astronomical
72: texts \citep{cla77,ste02}. This apparent filament acceleration, confirmed by
73: several independent proper motion studies (see Table 1), due to an outward
74: pressure contained within the remnant's rapidly expanding PWN is described in detail by
75: \citet{TR70}.
76:
77: %
78: %
79: % Table 1: Previous Results proper motion results
80: %\begin{verbatim}
81: \setcounter{table}{0}
82: \begin{table*}
83: %\footnotesize
84: \centering
85: \begin{minipage}{140mm}
86: \caption{Results from Previous Proper Motion Studies}
87: \begin{tabular}{@{}lcccc@{}}
88: \hline
89: Reference &
90: Number of Knots & Image Epochs & Convergence Date & $\sigma$ (yr)\\
91: \hline
92: Duncan
93: 1939 & 20 & 1909, 1938 & 1172 &
94: ... \\
95: Trimble 1968 & 132 & 1939, 1950, 1953, 1964, 1966, 1966
96: & 1140 & 15 \\
97: Nugent 1998 & 50 & 1939, 1960,
98: 1976, 1992 & 1130 & 16 \\
99: \hline
100: %\tablenotetext{~} {Duncan images: All images taken with the 60 inch (Mount
101: %Wilson ??)\\ Trimble images: The 1939, 1953, and 1966 epoch images were taken
102: %with the Mount Wilson 100 inch telescope. The 1950, 1964, and 1966 epoch
103: %images were taken with the Mount Palomar 200 inch telescope.\\ Nugent images:
104: %The 1939 image was taken with the 100 inch Mount Wilson telescope. The 1960
105: %image was taken with the 120 Lick telescope. The 1976 image was taken with the
106: %KPNO 4 m. The 1992 image was taken with the Mauna Kea 2.2 m.}
107: \end{tabular}
108: \end{minipage}
109: \end{table*}
110: %\end{verbatim}
111: %
112: %
113:
114: %
115: % Figure 1: Large 2005 Subaru Full Crab image
116: %
117: %\begin{verbatim}
118: %\clearpage
119: \setcounter{figure}{0}
120: \begin{figure*}
121: \centering
122: \includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{f1_gimp.ps}
123: \caption{Subaru [O~III] image of the Crab Nebula using a log intensity stretch
124: to show the position of the northern filamentary jet in relation to the remnant's brighter
125: inner filament complex.}
126: \label{fig1}
127: \end{figure*}
128: %\end{verbatim}
129: %
130: %
131: %
132:
133: A particularly intriguing feature of the Crab is a faint, northern filamentary `chimney'
134: or `jet' of emission filaments, which we will henceforth refer to simply as the
135: ``jet'', but which should not to be confused with the physically smaller X-ray
136: synchrotron jets off the central pulsar. First detected in the optical by
137: \citet{van70}, this optical filamentary jet consists of line-emitting
138: filaments, especially prominent in [O~III] $\lambda\lambda$4959,5007 \citep{che75}.
139: Although primarily a line-emission feature, very weak coincident non-thermal continuum
140: emission was subsequently discovered, first in the radio \citep{vel84} and then
141: in the optical \citep{wol87}, suggesting the jet itself is also filled with
142: relativistic particles off the pulsar.
143:
144: One especially puzzling aspect of the jet is its morphology. The first deep
145: [O~III] images of the jet showed it to be a complex network of filaments that
146: appear to be cylindrically symmetric, but with a central axis
147: unaligned with either the Crab's center of expansion or pulsar \citep{gul82}.
148: Follow-up imaging and kinematic studies \citep{shu84,ver85,mar90} lead to several proposed
149: explanations including a mass loss trail from a red giant progenitor
150: \citep{bla83}, interaction of ejecta with an interstellar
151: cloud \citep{mor85}, and transverse synchrotron driven shocks \citep{san97}. However,
152: preliminary proper motion studies of the jet indicated ordinary
153: radial motions away from the center of expansion \citep{fes86, fes93}.
154:
155: Due to the jet's greater distance from the pulsar and the remnant's
156: synchrotron nebula, the jet may have
157: experienced much less acceleration than most other regions of the remnant.
158: In that case, the jet might lead to a dynamically greater remnant age leading to
159: a date closer to the 1054 C.E. historic supernova sighting.
160:
161: Here we present a deep and high resolution [O~III] image of the Crab jet taken
162: with the 8.2 m Subaru telescope. This image shows a
163: network of extremely fine and detailed filaments. We have compared this image
164: to a 1988 epoch image obtained with the KPNO 4m telescope \citep{fes93} to
165: obtain improved proper motion measurements of its optical filaments and an estimate of the
166: jet's expansion age.
167:
168: %Indeed, we do find that the jet's filaments are considerably less accelerated
169: %than the rest of the nebula, and yield an undecelerated explosion
170: %date of 1055 $\pm$24 C.E. -- close to the reported sighting of the
171: %``guest star'' in 1054 C.E. Additionally, we find that these filaments exhibit
172: %radial motions which trace back toward the center of expansion \citep{tri70,
173: %nug98}. These data suggest that the jet could have formed in the original
174: %explosion and may simply be the highest velocity ejecta from a bipolar outflow.
175:
176: \section{Observations and Analysis}
177:
178: Optical images of the Crab Nebula were
179: obtained 10 October 2005 using the 8.2 m Subaru telescope located on Mauna
180: Kea. The image was taken using the Suprime-Cam Prime Focus Camera \citep{miy02}
181: with the `NB497' narrow-band filter \citep{hay04} centered at approximately 4977
182: \AA \ (FWHM of 77 \AA). A series of 180 s exposures taken under good seeing
183: conditions (FWHM = 0.8$''$) were assembled to form a mosaic image of the entire
184: Crab Nebula with a combined exposure time of 900 s. Figure~1 shows the full mosaic
185: of the Crab with Figure~2 showing an enlarged section of the image centered on the
186: northern jet feature.
187:
188: %
189: % Figure 2: Large 2005 Subaru Jet image
190: %
191: %\begin{verbatim}
192: %\clearpage
193: \setcounter{figure}{1}
194: \begin{figure}
195: %\centering
196: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f2_gimp.ps}
197: \caption{An enlarged section of the 2005 Subaru [O~III] image of the Crab
198: Nebula showing its northern jet.}
199: \label{fig2}
200: \end{figure}
201: %\end{verbatim}
202: %
203: %
204: %
205:
206: We compared this Subaru 2005 image to a similar [O~III] image taken on 10 November 1988
207: obtained using the KPNO Mayall 4 m telescope. The 1988 image is the same one previously used by
208: \citet{fes93} to estimate the proper motions of the jet. Here we chose
209: 35 emission knots within the upper portion of the jet (see Fig.\ 3) well detected on both
210: images for proper motion measurement. The 2005 Subaru data were reduced using the
211: Suprime-Cam Deep field Reduction package which includes bias subtraction,
212: flat-fielding, distortion and atmospheric dispersion correction, and sky subtraction
213: \citep{yag02,ouc04}. The 1988 image was reduced using standard IRAF\footnote{
214: The Image Analysis and Reduction Facility is distributed by the National Optical
215: Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities
216: for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
217: Science Foundation.} image reduction routines including bias subtraction,
218: flat-fielding, and cosmic-ray rejection.
219:
220: %
221: % Figure 3: Subaru Jet image with 35 locations overlaid
222: %
223: %\begin{verbatim}
224: %\clearpage
225: \setcounter{figure}{2}
226: \begin{figure}
227: \centering
228: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f3_gimp.ps}
229: % \vspace{144mm}
230: \caption{Subaru [O~III] image of the northern jet
231: with the 2005 positions of the 35 measured jet ejecta knots marked.}
232: \label{fig3}
233: \end{figure}
234: %\end{verbatim}
235: %
236: %
237: %
238:
239: World Coordinate System (WCS) information was applied to the images in a two
240: step process. First, stellar positions from the full 2005 image were compared
241: with the USNO B1.0 Star Catalog yielding a total of 232 matched fiducial stars.
242: The RMS deviation in the fit was 0.2$''$ in both RA and Dec.
243:
244: The WCS fit for the 1988 image was determined in a slightly different manner.
245: The 1988 jet image did not include the main body of the Crab and is slightly less
246: deep than the 2005 image. Consequently, the total possible number of USNO
247: fiducial stars in the 1988 imaged field is considerably fewer than on the
248: Subaru image. For this reason, we correlated the 2005 imaged stellar field with
249: the smaller 1988 image. The IRAF task `starfind' was used to determine the WCS
250: positions of stars in the jet region in the 2005 image. Then, from these
251: positions, eight stars were selected due to their low proper motions and PSFs.
252: These stars then were used as the fiducial ties between the 2005 WCS data and
253: the 1988 WCS image. The resulting RMS deviation between the WCS fits of the
254: 2005 and 1988 images was 0.1$''$ in RA and Dec and we believe the total
255: error in the WCS matching of the two images to be less than 0.2$''$.
256:
257: Both images were projected onto tangent planes, with proper
258: motions computed from the corrected WCS coordinates.
259: Knot and filament positions in the jet were visually centroided on the 1988 and
260: 2005 images. Features were selected based mainly on the ease with which they
261: could be reliably centroided and because they exhibited negligible shape and
262: brightness variations apparent over the 17.1 year time interval between the
263: two images.
264:
265: The absolute accuracy of our proper motion measurements was limited by the
266: lower resolution of the 1988 image (FWHM = 1.0$''$) and by the
267: often diffuse nature of the knots and filaments. We estimate the errors of our
268: centroided jet knot positions to be generally better than 0.3$''$ on the
269: 1988 image and 0.2$''$ on the 2005 image. The resulting proper motion
270: estimates should be more reliable and accurate than the prior study of
271: \citet{fes93} of the jet principally due to the deeper and higher resolution of
272: the 2005 jet image and a longer time interval (17 yr) between images
273: \citep{fes86, fes93}.
274:
275: \section{Results}
276:
277: %\subsection{Proper Motion}
278:
279: Our primary goal was to investigate whether the jet's knots and filaments
280: experienced less acceleration due to their greater distance from the Crab
281: pulsar and its rapidly expanding synchrotron nebula. In order to test and
282: verify the accuracy of our measurement technique for the jet knots and
283: filaments, we also included measurements for several emission knots in the
284: bright, inner portion of the remnant studied by \citet{tri68} and
285: \citet{nug98}. For these knots, we made measurements on the 2005 Subaru image
286: and also an image taken 28 November 1959 by N.\ Mayall with the 120-inch
287: Lick Telescope.
288:
289: Proper motion measurements were computed for a total of 140 knot and filament
290: positions distributed throughout the main nebula and the northern jet.
291: Measurements for knots located within the main body of the remnant resulted in
292: proper motion estimates ranging between 0.04$''$ and 0.21$''$ yr$^{-1}$
293: corresponding to transverse velocities of $350 - 1820$ km s$^{-1}$ at a
294: distance of 1.83 kpc \citep{dav85}. Looking only at those knots measured in
295: previous studies, projected back motions yielded estimated explosion dates
296: of 1136 C.E.\ for 23 of Nugent's knots and
297: 1146 C.E.\ for 42 of Trimble's knots, consistent with their reported
298: convergence dates of 1130 C.E. and 1140 C.E., respectively \citep{tri68,
299: nug98}.
300:
301: Measurements of 35 knots located in the northern half of the jet (see Fig.\ 3)
302: give a range of proper motion estimates of $0.19'' - 0.29''$ yr$^{-1}$,
303: corresponding to a transverse velocity range of 1650 -- 2520 km s$^{-1}$ at a
304: distance of 1.83 kpc \citep{dav85}. We also examined the motion of each
305: individual knot and projecting their positions back into the nebula. For each
306: of these knots, we obtained an estimated convergence date back to the remnant's
307: center. We chose the remnant's center of expansion as estimated by
308: \citet{nug98} and derived the convergence date as the year when the knot's backward
309: motion was closest to this expansion point. The resulting convergence dates
310: are listed in Table 2. The average of these dates suggests an explosion date of
311: 1050 C.E.\ with a standard deviation of 27.5 yr.
312:
313: Differences in the positional measurement uncertainties for the 35 jet knots
314: selected lead to several knots missing the expansion point by larger values
315: than the average of the sample. Therefore, in order to try to improve our
316: convergence date, we selected a smaller knot sample which included just
317: those knots which showed the most radial proper motions, i.e., motions which
318: when projected back fell within 10$''$ of the \citet{nug98} center of
319: expansion. Out of the 35 knots measured in the top of the jet, 22 had proper
320: motions which projected within this radius. This knot sample gave an average
321: convergence date of 1055 C.E.\ with a standard deviation of 24 yr. Figure 4
322: shows the scatter in the date given by all 34 measured jet knots with the
323: larger symbol (dots) indicating those which projected closest to the expansion
324: center.
325:
326: %
327: % Table 2: Measurements of Jet Knots
328: %
329: %\begin{verbatim}
330: \setcounter{table}{1}
331: \begin{table*}
332: \centering
333: \begin{minipage}{115mm}
334: \caption{Proper Motion Measurements for Jet Knots}
335: \label{tab2}
336: \begin{tabular}{@{}lcrrcccc@{}}
337: \hline
338: Knot& Convergence\footnote{Estimated date of knot's closest
339: (least squared distance) to the center of expansion}& D$_{CE}$
340: \footnote{The projected shortest distance between the knot and the center of expansion.
341: } & $\mu_{x}~~~~$ & $\mu_{y}$
342: & $\mu_{T}$ & $\alpha$ (J2000)\footnote{Knot J2000 coordinates on the 2005 Subaru image.} & $\delta$ (J2000)$^{c}$
343: \\
344: ID&Date&($''$)~ & ($''$ yr$^{-1}$) & ($''$ yr$^{-1}$)& ($''$ yr$^{-1}$)&
345: (h~ m~ s)&($^{\circ}$ ~ $'$ ~ $''$) \\
346: \hline
347: 1 & 1095 & 7.276 & 0.02~~~ & 0.29 & 0.29 & 05 34 33.692 &+22 05 13.98 \\
348: 2 & 1066 & 4.404 & 0.01~~~ & 0.27 & 0.28 & 05 34 33.971 &+22 05 05.45 \\
349: 3 & 1092 & 11.639 & 0.03~~~ & 0.28 & 0.28 & 05 34 33.759 &+22 05 01.88 \\
350: 4 & 1065 & 1.344 & 0.03~~~ & 0.27 & 0.27 & 05 34 34.523 &+22 05 00.36 \\
351: 5 & 1090 & 12.195 & 0.04~~~ & 0.27 & 0.27 & 05 34 34.749 &+22 04 57.36 \\
352: 6 & 1054 & 9.951 & -0.02~~~ & 0.26 & 0.26 & 05 34 31.929 &+22 04 54.81 \\
353: 7 & 1059 & 3.076 & 0.01~~~ & 0.26 & 0.26 & 05 34 33.440 &+22 04 51.64 \\
354: 8 & 1015 & 15.081 & 0.05~~~ & 0.24 & 0.25 & 05 34 34.901 &+22 04 49.99 \\
355: 9 & 1035 & 2.589 & -0.01~~~ & 0.25 & 0.25 & 05 34 32.508 &+22 04 49.44 \\
356: 10 & 1044 & 6.287 & -0.02~~~ & 0.25 & 0.25 & 05 34 32.045 &+22 04 47.47 \\
357: 11 & 1048 & 7.347 & 0.03~~~ & 0.24 & 0.25 & 05 34 34.552 &+22 04 41.48 \\
358: 12 & 1067 & 4.962 & 0.04~~~ & 0.25 & 0.25 & 05 34 35.171 &+22 04 40.49 \\
359: 13 & 1039 & 14.228 & -0.03~~~ & 0.24 & 0.24 & 05 34 31.983 &+22 04 38.45 \\
360: 14 & 1050 & 7.636 & -0.01~~~ & 0.24 & 0.24 & 05 34 32.709 &+22 04 37.49 \\
361: 15 & 1023 & 9.589 & 0.04~~~ & 0.23 & 0.23 & 05 34 34.918 &+22 04 35.54 \\
362: 16 & 1001 & 10.281 & 0.04~~~ & 0.22 & 0.23 & 05 34 34.816 &+22 04 35.45 \\
363: 17 & 1029 & 11.021 & 0.04~~~ & 0.23 & 0.23 & 05 34 34.740 &+22 04 34.83 \\
364: 18 & 1028 & 9.539 & 0.02~~~ & 0.23 & 0.23 & 05 34 33.755 &+22 04 34.83 \\
365: 19 & 1004 & 11.673 & -0.01~~~ & 0.22 & 0.23 & 05 34 32.796 &+22 04 33.51 \\
366: 20 & 1038 & 13.634 & -0.02~~~ & 0.23 & 0.23 & 05 34 31.995 &+22 04 29.60 \\
367: 21 & 1083 & 6.839 & 0.03~~~ & 0.24 & 0.24 & 05 34 34.285 &+22 04 29.55 \\
368: 22 & 1085 & 10.776 & 0.05~~~ & 0.24 & 0.24 & 05 34 35.086 &+22 04 27.58 \\
369: 23 & 1087 & 4.165 & 0.00~~~ & 0.24 & 0.24 & 05 34 33.127 &+22 04 26.01 \\
370: 24 & 1011 & 3.100 & -0.01~~~ & 0.22 & 0.22 & 05 34 32.477 &+22 04 25.57 \\
371: 25 & 1020 & 18.716 & -0.03~~~ & 0.22 & 0.22 & 05 34 32.209 &+22 04 23.55 \\
372: 26 & 1081 & 5.428 & 0.04~~~ & 0.22 & 0.23 & 05 34 34.716 &+22 04 15.33 \\
373: 27 & 1024 & 12.762 & 0.01~~~ & 0.21 & 0.21 & 05 34 34.498 &+22 04 12.67 \\
374: 28 & 1028 & 11.971 & 0.01~~~ & 0.21 & 0.21 & 05 34 34.381 &+22 04 10.86 \\
375: 29 & 1051 & 8.362 & 0.01~~~ & 0.21 & 0.21 & 05 34 34.103 &+22 04 07.95 \\
376: 30 & 1055 & 1.637 & 0.02~~~ & 0.21 & 0.21 & 05 34 34.284 &+22 04 04.00 \\
377: 31 & 1076 & 6.288 & 0.05~~~ & 0.21 & 0.21 & 05 34 35.381 &+22 04 03.93 \\
378: 32 & 1063 & 4.861 & -0.00~~~ & 0.21 & 0.21 & 05 34 32.904 &+22 04 03.66 \\
379: 33 & 1067 & 7.809 & 0.04~~~ & 0.21 & 0.21 & 05 34 34.972 &+22 04 03.23 \\
380: 34 & 1007 & 0.479 & 0.01~~~ & 0.19 & 0.19 & 05 34 33.222 &+22 03 57.80 \\
381: 35 & 1066 & 11.303 & 0.05~~~ & 0.19 & 0.20 & 05 34 35.343 &+22 03 53.13 \\
382: \hline
383: \end{tabular}
384: \end{minipage}
385: \end{table*}
386: %\end{verbatim}
387: %
388: %
389:
390:
391: %
392: % Figure 4: Scatter in Jet PM Date Estimates
393: %
394: %\begin{verbatim}
395: %\clearpage
396: \setcounter{figure}{3}
397: \begin{figure}
398: \centering
399: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{f4.ps}
400: % \vspace{144mm}
401: \caption{Plot of the computed convergence date of each knot upon the center of expansion. The size of the dot
402: in the figure corresponds inversely to the distance between the traced back motion of the knot and the center of expansion.
403: Thus the largest dots correspond to those knots which project back closest to the center of expansion.}
404: \label{fig4}
405: \end{figure}
406: %\end{verbatim}
407: %
408: %
409:
410: In order to help judge the meaning of these northern jet proper motion results, proper motions
411: estimates were also made from the same images for knots in the southernmost part of
412: the jet and outside of the jet to the east and west, along the northernmost periphery of
413: the Crab's optical structure. The results of these measurements are listed
414: in Table 3. These knot measurements yielded convergence dates
415: considerably earlier than those obtained from knots located in the main part of
416: the remnant but still later than the date we derived from the northernmost jet
417: knots. Specifically, the 17 measured knots located in the base of the jet
418: whose projected-back proper motions fall within 10 arcseconds of the center of
419: expansion give a convergence date of 1081 $\pm$37 yr. The 22 measured knots
420: located to the east and west of the jet's base whose projected-back proper
421: motions also fall within 10 arc seconds of the center of expansion give a
422: convergence date of 1077 $\pm$45 yr.
423:
424: %
425: % Table 3: Summary of Proper Motion Measurements
426: %\begin{verbatim}
427: \setcounter{table}{2} \begin{table*} \centering \begin{minipage}{115mm}
428: \caption{Summary of Proper Motion Measurements} \label{tab3}
429: \begin{tabular}{@{}lcccccc@{}} \hline Region & r range &Number & Image Epochs
430: & $\mu_{T}$ & Convergence & $\sigma$\\ & ($''$) & of Knots\footnote{ The
431: number of knots quoted here reflect the number of knots whose projected-back
432: proper motions fell within 10$''$ of the center of expansion.
433: } & & ($''$ yr$^{-1}$) & Date & (yr) \\ \hline Top of Jet
434: & 190 -- 270 & 22 & 1988.7 -- 2005.8 & 0.19 -- 0.29 & 1055 & 24 \\
435: Base of Jet & 120 -- 160 & 17 & 1988.7 -- 2005.8 & 0.14 --
436: 0.17 & 1081 & 37 \\ SE \& SW of Jet Base & 110 -- 180 & 22 &
437: 1988.7 -- 2005.8 & 0.11 -- 0.19 & 1077 & 45 \\ Whole SNR, Nugent &
438: 60 -- 180 & 23 & 1960.7 -- 2005.8 & 0.06 -- 0.20 & 1136 & 68 \\
439: Whole SNR, Trimble\footnote{Trimble's filament proper motions computed adopting
440: Nugent's center of expansion.} & 40 -- 180 & 42 & 1960.7 -- 2005.8
441: & 0.04 -- 0.21 & 1146 & 54 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{minipage}
442: \end{table*}
443: %\end{verbatim}
444: %
445: %
446:
447: In Figure 5, we show the projected motions of all 35 northern jet knots for an
448: expansion date of 1055 C.E., both for our measured knot proper motion
449: paths (right hand figure), and then assuming the motions of the knots were
450: completely radial, tracing perfectly away from the center of expansion as
451: defined by \citet{nug98} (left hand figure). Overall, the observed motions of
452: knots within the jet region suggest a nearly radial expansion and trace back to
453: a location very close to the remnant's nominal center of expansion. Our
454: estimated positional measurement errors could have resulted in up to a
455: 3$^{\circ}$ change in direction which would account for a substantial fraction
456: of the apparent non-radial motions seen in the right hand figure. Thus, despite
457: the jet's strongly overall non-radial appearance with its long axis mis-aligned
458: with the remnant's center, individual jet knots and filaments appear to move in a radial fashion
459: away from the remnant's estimated explosion center.
460:
461: Two additional things should be noted from Figure 5. The first is that
462: a substantial number of jet knots appear to cross at a position north of
463: the center of expansion. Secondly,
464: knots located along the jet's western limb tend to show a convergence point
465: east of the center of expansion, while knots along the jet's eastern side appear
466: to favor a convergence point west of the center of expansion. Both these effects might
467: indicate a small, non-radial component to the jet's expansion which will be
468: addressed below.
469:
470: %
471: % Figure 5: Kaboom 2 frame figure
472: %
473: %\begin{verbatim}
474: %\clearpage
475: \setcounter{figure}{4}
476: \begin{figure}
477: \centering
478: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f5.ps}
479: % \vspace{144mm}
480: \caption{Plots of the extrapolated proper
481: motions of the jet knots. Both plots show two points, the measured positions
482: of the knots in 2005 and 1988. The lines in the left hand plot shows what the
483: motions would look like if they were perfectly radial. The lines in the right
484: hand plot show the true measured motions of the knots. The red circle is 10$''$
485: in radius centered on the center of expansion.}
486: \label{fig5}
487: \end{figure}
488: %\end{verbatim}
489: %
490: %
491:
492: \section{Discussion}
493:
494: \subsection{Dynamical Age of the Crab Nebula}
495:
496: Our computed convergence date for the jet is 1055 $\pm 24$ C.E., in excellent
497: agreement with historical records which indicate the Crab SN occurred in the
498: year 1054. We attribute the reason for the difference between our result and
499: earlier age estimates to be chiefly the jet's northernmost knots experiencing
500: little appreciable acceleration by the pulsar's rapidly expanding
501: synchrotron nebula. All previous age estimates based upon proper motion studies
502: used knots and filaments located within the main body of the Crab remnant.
503: Consequently, interior knot motions reflected both an expansion due to the SN
504: event itself and a post-SN acceleration resulting from the interaction of the pulsar
505: wind nebula. Although the 1054 explosion date for the Crab Nebula's SN has not
506: been in serious doubt, it is nonetheless valuable to have a direct
507: confirmation based on expansion dynamics.
508:
509: Although the jet's knots and filaments appear not to have been significantly
510: accelerated radially away from the remnant's central region, our measured jet
511: knot proper motions may indicate a small, non-radial component. As shown in
512: Figure 5 (right hand panel), the projected motions of the knots intersect north
513: of the position of the center of expansion. This effect may not represent the actual
514: nature of the jet as there are several sources of error which could contribute to this motion.
515: First, it is possible that there may be a slight rotational shift between the
516: two World Coordinate System fits for the images. Because the original motions
517: of the jet ejecta were so close to directly northward, a slight shift east or
518: west would cause a much more noticeable change in the E-W component of their
519: proper motion than would a similarly sized shift in the N-S direction. Thus, the
520: directions of the knots would be greatly affected by such a shift, while the
521: velocities would show considerably less error. Secondly, an error in
522: centroiding the knots can account for a slight shift as well. Our computed
523: errors show a change in direction of approximately 3$^{\circ}$ is possible
524: which could account for the non-radial motions of the knots.
525:
526: On the other hand, it is possible that the measured motions do reflect the
527: jet's true expansion properties. The jet is essentially a hollow structure and as shown by
528: \citet{vel84} and \citet{wol87}, the jet does contain some faint synchrotron
529: emission, most visible at its southern base. If this plasma induced an
530: acceleration that was largely against the jet's filamentary walls, this might act to
531: expand the jet in the east-west plane and explain why the
532: northwestern jet knots end up east of the center of expansion while most knots
533: located at the northeastern portion of the jet project back west of the center
534: of expansion. Since our derived expansion date for the jet is most sensitive
535: to north-south motions, such an acceleration would not significantly effect our
536: estimated dynamical age.
537:
538: \subsection{The Nature of the Jet}
539:
540: Our proper motion measurements provide a valuable constraint on the
541: origin of the Crab's northern jet of ejecta. A successful jet formation model should
542: explain the jet's non-radial appearance, its peak expansion velocity, specific location
543: along the remnant's outer periphery, and the lack of any obvious counter-jet to the south.
544: Below, we briefly review some of the proposed theories for the jet's origin and discuss
545: them in relation to our dynamical measurement results.
546:
547: \subsubsection{Plasma Instabilities Models }
548:
549: Several authors have suggested the jet is a post-SN feature resulting from an
550: interaction between the ejecta and the pulsar wind nebula. Many variations of
551: plasma instability models have been suggested including: 1) an aneurysm of
552: ejecta pushed aside by the pulsar's plasma flow \citep{byc75,ver85,mar90}, 2)
553: Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities \citep{che75,kun83} or differential acceleration
554: \citep{che75}, 3) pressure from swept-up magnetic field lines \citep{shu84}, 4)
555: ejecta entrainment in magnetic fields formed by highly-ordered outflows from
556: the polar caps of the pulsar itself \citep{ben84}, and 5) synchrotron driven
557: shocks \citep{san97}.
558:
559: A particularly attractive feature of such models is their ability to
560: explain both the non-radial appearance of the jet and the
561: lack of a counter-jet to the south. However, our proper motion measurements
562: indicate an essentially radial expanding jet. Moreover,
563: some of these plasma instability models call for greater
564: acceleration of the jet's filaments than those found in the main body of the
565: nebula \citep{che75,shu84}, or a younger age compared to the rest of the nebula
566: \citep{kun83}. \textbf{ While a greater degree of acceleration or a younger age for the jet is
567: not supported by our data which suggests a current jet age around 950 yr similar to the
568: Crab's historic age, a more modest expansion breakout acceleration is not completely
569: ruled out by our proper motion measurements. }
570:
571: \textbf{ For most plasma instability (`blowout') models, the exact location of a
572: high-velocity ``jet'' along the remnant's outer boundary is
573: undefined but with a greater likelihood along
574: the pulsar's NW--SE wind injection axis. }
575: However, the remnant's filamentary jet is some 45 degrees away from the pulsar's synchrotron jets,
576: which lie along a NW--SE axis (PA = 300 deg; \citealt{ng04}). Along this NW--SE
577: axis, the PWN appears to have pushed aside the remnant's outer ejecta filaments creating a
578: virtual hole in the filamentary ejecta along the NW limb \citep{law95,cad04}.
579: There the synchrotron emission can be seen to leak out of the
580: remnant's thick thermal plasma shell in optical, X-rays, and radio images
581: of the remnant. The lack of extened filamentary line emission ejecta in this
582: region similar to the northern `jet' is suggestive that the northern jet
583: was not the result of a breakout of the pulsar's synchrotron wind nebula.
584:
585: \subsubsection{An Asymmetrical Explosion?}
586:
587: \textbf{ Despite a lack of an obvious southern counter-jet, the remnant's northern jet might
588: represent high-velocity ejecta resulting from
589: a north-south bipolar expansion asymmetry.} In 1989, MacAlpine et al.
590: showed that N-S oriented spectral drift scans of the
591: Crab revealed a nearly N-S bipolar structure. The data showed that the pinched waist
592: of the hourglass-like expansion coincided with a band of helium
593: rich filaments (a ``high-helium band'') in which the computed helium mass fraction was
594: at least 75\% \citep{uom87}. \citet{mac89} suggested a helium rich circumstellar torus or disk
595: could have resulted in constrained velocities in the horizontal region around
596: the progenitor. Subsequent drift scans of the remnant by \citet{fes97} and \citet{Smith03}
597: confirmed the presence of a strong bipolar expansion.
598:
599: Additional support for a circumstellar torus was presented by \citet{sch79} and
600: \citet{fes92} who examined the east and west indentations seen in
601: the synchrotron emission (the synchrotron bays) and suggested these may have be caused by an E-W
602: magnetic torus associated with the E-W band of He-rich filaments. Such a magnetic torus might
603: constrain the east-west expansion of the PWN,
604: leaving the bay indentations seen today.
605:
606: In an asymmetrical explosion model for the jet, its location along the northern edge of
607: the remnant is not accidental \citep{fes93}. The alignment of the jet
608: with the northern extent of the north expansion bubble seen in spectral drift
609: scans of the remnant plus its major axis aligned nearly perpendicular
610: to the synchrotron bays suggest a causal link between the jet and
611: a possible constrained E-W expansion of the SN ejecta.
612: The lack of an equally obvious southern `counter-jet' might be
613: explained by either a weaker ejection of material to the south and/or increased
614: ejecta confinement, and indeed drift scans of the remnant do show
615: higher velocities to the north compared to the south,
616: relative to the pinched central zone \citep{mac89,fes97,Smith03}.
617:
618: The jet's filaments, being farther from the pulsar's energetic wind, would
619: experience less acceleration compared to knots and filaments located in the
620: main body of the nebula. Our measurements of other locations at the base of the
621: jet and to the east and west appear consistent with this picture, showing \textbf{larger}
622: dynamical ages correlating with their increased distance from the pulsar (See
623: Table 3).
624:
625: Finally, we note that our computed expansion age of the jet, although yielding an
626: expansion age consistent with the historic SN sighting in the year 1054, could
627: also be viewed consistent with \textbf{an initial} acceleration by the pulsar and \textbf{subsequent}
628: deceleration through an interaction with a suspected outer
629: halo of unshocked ejecta \citep{che77,mur81,lun86,hes96}. The presence of appreciable outer
630: ejecta, however, remains highly controversial with several radio, optical, and X-ray observations
631: failing to find any supportive evidence for its existence \citep{fra95,fes97,wal99,sew06}.
632: \textbf{In any case, we view it as unlikely
633: that the degree of any PWN acceleration and possible outer ejecta induced deceleration
634: would be so nearly offsetting as to lead to the currently derived jet expansion date
635: of around C.E. 1054}.
636:
637: \section{Summary}
638:
639: Proper motion analysis of 35 ejecta knots in the northern filamentary jet in the Crab
640: Nebula show the ejecta which form the jet to be less accelerated than the main
641: body of the nebula. Traced-back proper motions give an explosion date of 1055
642: $\pm$24 C.E. which lie in much closer agreement to the appearance of the 1054
643: C.E. historical guest star. The measure proper motions are largely radial
644: and directed away from the center of expansion. These data suggest the jet was
645: likely formed in the original explosion possibly as a result of bipolar SN kinematics
646: in which the E-W expansion of the ejecta was constrained by the presence of a
647: circumstellar disk.
648:
649: \section{Acknowledgments}
650:
651: This research was partially funded by a DOF Research Grant, the ORL SS
652: program, and the Richter Memorial fund from Dartmouth College.
653: We thank Molly Hammell for considerable programming assistance
654: and Yuki Nakamura for reduction
655: of the Suprime Cam image. This work is based in part on data collected at
656: Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National Astronomical
657: Observatory of Japan.
658:
659: \begin{thebibliography}{}
660:
661: %\bibitem[Aschenbach \& Brinkmann(1975)]{asc75} Aschenbach, B., \& Brinkmann, W. 1975, A\&A, 41, 147
662: \bibitem[Benford(1984)]{ben84}Benford, G. 1984, ApJ, 282, 154
663: \bibitem[Blandford(1983)]{bla83} Blandford, R.~D., Kennel, C.~F., McKee, C.~F., \& Ostriker, J.~P. 1983, Nat, 301, 586
664: \bibitem[Brinkmann et al.(1985)]{bri85} Brinkmann, W., Aschenbach, B., \& Langmeier, A. 1985, Nat, 313, 662
665: \bibitem[Bychkov(1975)]{byc75}Bychkov, K. V. 1975, Sov. Astron. AJ, 18, 420
666: \bibitem[\u Cade\u z et al.(2004)]{cad04} \u Cade\u z, A., Carremi\~ana, A., \& Vidrih, S. 2004, ApJ, 609, 797
667: \bibitem[Chevalier(1977)]{che77} Chevalier, R.~A. 1977, in Supernovae, ed. D.~N. Schramm (Dordrecht: Reidel), 53
668: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Gull(1975)]{che75} Chevalier, R.~A., \& Gull, T.~R. 1975, ApJ, 200, 399
669: \bibitem[Clark \& Stephenson(1977)]{cla77} Clark, D.~H., \& Stephenson, F.~R. 1977, The Historical Supernovae (Pergamon, Oxford)
670: \bibitem[Davidson \& Fesen(1985)]{dav85} Davidson, K., \& Fesen, R.~A. 1985, ARA\&A, 23, 119
671: \bibitem[Fesen \& Gull(1986)]{fes86} Fesen, R.~A., \& Gull, T.~R. 1986, ApJ, 306, 259
672: \bibitem[Fesen \& Staker(1993)]{fes93} Fesen, R.~A., \& Staker, B. 1993, MNRAS, 263, 69
673: \bibitem[Fesen et al.(1992)]{fes92} Fesen, R.~A., Martin, C.~L., \& Shull, J.~M. 1992, ApJ, 399, 599
674: \bibitem[Fesen et al.(1997)]{fes97} Fesen, R.~A., Shull, J.~M., \& Hurford, A.~P. 1997, AJ, 113, 354
675: %\bibitem[Fesen et al. (2006)]{fes06} Fesen, R.~A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 283
676: \bibitem[Frail et al.(1995)]{fra95} Frail, D.~A., Kassim, N.~E., Cornwell, T.~J., \& Goss, W.~M. 1995, ApJ, 454, L129
677: \bibitem[Gull \& Fesen(1982)]{gul82} Gull, T.~R., \& Fesen, R.~A. 1982, ApJ, 260, L75
678: %\bibitem[Harnden \& /eward(1984)]{har84} Harnden, F.~R.,Jr., \& Seward, F.~D. 1984, ApJ, 283, 279
679: \bibitem[Hayashino et al.(2004)]{hay04}Hayashino, T., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 2073
680: \bibitem[Hester et al.(1995)]{hes95} Hester, J.~J., et al. 1995, ApJ, 448, 240
681: \bibitem[Hester et al.(1996)]{hes96} Hester, J.~J., et al. 1996, ApJ, 456, 225
682: \bibitem[Kundt(1983)]{kun83} Kundt, W. 1983, A\&A, 121, L15
683: \bibitem[Lawrence et al.(1995)]{law95} Lawrence, S.~S. et al. 1995, AJ, 109, 2635
684: \bibitem[Loll et al.(2004)]{loll04} Loll, A., Hester, J.~J., Sankrit, R., \& Blair, W.\ 2004,
685: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 36, 1521
686: \bibitem[Lundqvist et al.(1986)]{lun86} Lundqvist, P., Fransson, C., \& Chevalier, R.~A. 1986, A\&A, 162, L6
687: \bibitem[MacAlpine et al.(1989)]{mac89} MacAlpine, G.~M., McGaugh, S.~S.,Mazzarella, J.~M., \& Uomoto, A.~1989, ApJ, 342, 364
688: %\bibitem[MacAlpine \& Uomoto(1991)]{mac91} MacAlpine, G.~M., \& Uomoto, A. 1991, AJ, 102, 218
689: \bibitem[Marcelin et al.(1990)]{mar90}Marcelin, M., et al. 1990, A\&A, 228, 471
690: \bibitem[Miyazaki et al.(2002)]{miy02} Miyazaki, S., et al. 2002, Subaru Prime Focus Camera --- Suprime-Cam, PASJ, 54, 833
691: \bibitem[Morrison \& Roberts(1988)]{mor85}Morrison,~P. \& Roberts,~D. 1985, Nature, 313, 661
692: \bibitem[Murdin \& Clark(1981)]{mur81} Murdin, P., \& Clark, D.~H. 1981, Nat, 294, 543
693: \bibitem[Ng \& Romani(2004)]{ng04} Ng, C.-Y., \& Romani, R.~W.\ 2004, ApJ, 601, 479
694: %%\bibitem[Ng \& Romani(2006)]{ng06} Ng, C.~-Y., \& Romani, R.~W. 2006, ApJ, 644, 445
695: \bibitem[Nugent(1998)]{nug98} Nugent, R. L. 1998, PASP, 110, 831
696: \bibitem[Ouchi et al.(2004)]{ouc04}Ouchi et al., 2004, ApJ, 611, 660
697: \bibitem[Rots et al.(2004)]{rot04} Rots, A.~H., Jahoda, K., \& Lyne, A.~G. 2004, ApJ, 605, L129
698: \bibitem[Sankrit \& Hester(1997)]{san97} Sankrit, R., \& Hester, J.~J., 1997, ApJ, 491, 796
699: \bibitem[Scargle(1969)]{sca69} Scargle, J.~D. 1969, ApJ, 156, 401
700: \bibitem[Scargle(1970)]{sca70} Scargle, J.~D. 1970, PASP, 82, 388
701: \bibitem[Schmidt et al.(1979)]{sch79} Schmidt, G.~D., Angel, J.~R.~P., \& Beaver, E.~A. 1979, ApJ, 227, 106
702: \bibitem[Seward et al.(2006)]{sew06} Seward, F.~D., Gorenstein, P., \& Smith, R.~K. 2006, ApJ, 636, 873
703: \bibitem[Shull et al.(1984)]{shu84}Shull, P., Carsenty, U., Sarcander, M., \& Neckel, T. 1984, ApJ, 285, L75
704: \bibitem[Smith(2003)]{Smith03} Smith, N.\ 2003, MNRAS, 346, 885
705: \bibitem[Stephenson \& Green(2002)]{ste02} Stephenson, F.~R., \& Green, D.~A., 2002,
706: Historical Supernovae and their Remnants (Oxford),117
707: \bibitem[Trimble(1968)]{tri68} Trimble, V. 1968, AJ, 73, 535
708: \bibitem[Trimble(1970)]{tri70} Trimble, V. 1970, PASP, 82, 375
709: \bibitem[Trimble \& Rees(1970)]{TR70} Trimble, V., \& Rees, M.\ 1970, Astrophys. Lett., 5, 93
710: \bibitem[van den Bergh(1970)]{van70} van den Bergh, S. 1970, ApJ, 160, L27
711: \bibitem[Velusamy(1984)]{vel84} Velusamy, T. 1984, Nat, 308, 251
712: \bibitem[V\'eron-Cetty et al.(1985)]{ver85} V\'eron-Cetty, M. P., V\'eron, P., \& Woltjer, L. 1985, A\&A, 151, 101
713: \bibitem[Wallace et al.(1999)]{wal99} Wallace, B.~J., Landecker, T.~L., Kalberla, P.~M.~W., \& Taylor, A.~R. 1999, ApJS, 124, 181
714: \bibitem[Woltjer \& V\'eron-Cetty(1987)]{wol87} Woltjer, L., \& V\'eron-Cetty, M.~-P. 1987, A\&A, 172, L7
715: \bibitem[Uomoto \& MacAlpine(1987)]{uom87} Uomoto, A., \& MacAlpine, G.~M.\ 1987, AJ, 93, 1511
716: \bibitem[Yagi et al.(2002)]{yag02}Yagi et al., 2002, AJ, 123, 66
717:
718: \end{thebibliography}
719:
720: \clearpage
721:
722: \end{document}
723: