1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2004 January 9

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %%

18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

19: 

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21: 

22: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: 

24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

25: 

26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

27: %%\usepackage{natbib}

28: \bibliographystyle{apj}

29: 

30: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

31: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

32: %% use the longabstract style option.

33: 

34: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

35: 

36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

38: %% the \begin{document} command.

39: %%

40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

43: %% for information.

44: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\sun}$}

45: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

46: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

47: 

48: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

49: 

50: \slugcomment{}

51: 

52: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

53: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

54: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

55: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

56: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

57: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

58: 

59: \shorttitle{HI in NGC 5746}

60: \shortauthors{Rand, Benjamin}

61: 

62: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

63: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

64: 

65: \begin{document}

66: 

67: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

68: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

69: %% you desire.

70: 

71: \title{Vertically Extended Neutral Gas in the Massive Edge-on Spiral NGC 5746}

72: 

73: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

74: %% author and affiliation information.

75: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

76: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

77: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

78: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.

79: 

80: \author{Richard J. Rand}

81: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New

82: Mexico, 800 Yale Blvd, NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131}

83: \email{rjr@phys.unm.edu}

84: \and

85: 

86: \author{Robert. A. Benjamin}

87: \affil{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin at Whitewater,

88: 800 West Main Street, Whitewater, WI 53190}

89: \email{ benjamir@uww.edu}

90: 

91: 

92: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

93: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

94: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

95: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

96: %% editorial office after submission.

97: 

98: \begin{abstract}

99: 

100: We present Very Large Array 21-cm observations of the massive edge-on spiral

101: galaxy NGC 5746.  This galaxy has recently been reported to have a luminous

102: X-ray halo, which has been taken as evidence of residual hot gas as predicted

103: in galaxy formation scenarios.  Such models also predict that some of this gas

104: should undergo thermal instabilities, leading to a population of warm clouds

105: falling onto the disk.  If so, then one might expect to find a vertically

106: extended neutral layer.  We detect a substantial high-latitude component, but

107: conclude that almost all of its mass of $1.2-1.6 \times 10^9$ \msun\ most

108: likely resides in a warp.  Four features far from the plane containing about

109: $10^8$ \msun\ are found at velocities distinct from this warp.  These clouds

110: may be associated with the expected infall, although an origin in a disk-halo

111: flow cannot be ruled out, except for one feature which is counter-rotating.

112: The warp itself may be a result of infall according to recent models.  But

113: clearly this galaxy lacks a massive, lagging neutral halo as found in NGC 891.

114: The disk HI is concentrated into two rings of radii 1.5 and 3 arcminutes.

115: Radial inflow is found in the disk, probably due to the bar in this

116: galaxy.  A nearby member of this galaxy group, NGC 5740, is also detected.  It

117: shows a prominent one-sided extension which may be the result of ram pressure

118: stripping.

119: 

120: \end{abstract}

121: 

122: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

123: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

124: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

125: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

126: 

127: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper

128: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the

129: %% subject header.  Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"

130: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the

131: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each

132: %% individual object, not exceed six.  The \objectname{} macro, and its

133: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object.  The macro takes the object

134: %% name as its primary argument.  This name will appear in the paper

135: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name

136: %% is recognized by the data centers.  The macro also takes an optional

137: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification

138: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.

139: 

140: \keywords{galaxies: ISM --- galaxies: spiral --- 

141: galaxies: kinematics and

142: dynamics --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies: evolution ---

143: galaxies: individual (\object{NGC 5746}, \object{NGC 5740})}

144: 

145: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

146: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

147: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

148: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

149: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

150: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

151: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

152: %% each reference.

153: 

154: \section{Introduction}

155: 

156: Gaseous thick disks or halos in spiral galaxies hold promise for answering key

157: questions about galaxy formation and evolution.  These vertically extended

158: layers are multiphase, with detailed studies of the nearest edge-on galaxies

159: revealing halos of neutral hydrogen \citep[e.g.][]{1994ApJ...429..618I,

160: 1997ApJ...491..140S}, diffuse ionized gas \citep[DIG; e.g.][]{

161: 1990ApJ...352L...1R, 1990A&A...232L..15D, 2003A&A...406..505R}, hot X-ray

162: emitting gas \citep[e.g.][]{1994ApJ...420..570B, 2004ApJ...606..829S,

163: 2006A&A...448...43T}, radio continuum emission \citep[e.g.][]{

164: 1999AJ....117.2102I,2001A&A...374...42D} and dust

165: \citep[e.g.][]{1999AJ....117.2077H,2000A&AS..145...83A, 2006A&A...445..123I}.

166: 

167: Especially for the extended DIG, X-ray, dust and radio continuum components,

168: it has been well established that their prominence is correlated with the star

169: formation activity in the underlying disk \citep[e.g.][]{1996ApJ...462..712R,

170: 2003A&A...406..493R,1999AJ....117.2077H,2006A&A...457..779T,2006A&A...457..121D}.

171: Large shell-like and vertically oriented filamentary structures are also seen

172: in many of the more actively star-forming edge-ons, in, e.g., DIG \citep

173: {1990ApJ...352L...1R} and HI \citep[e.g.][]{2001A&A...377..759L}.  All of this

174: evidence has led to a picture of the origin of these layers in a

175: star-formation-driven disk-halo cycle, which has been theoretically modeled as

176: a general galactic fountain flow

177: \citep{1976ApJ...205..762S,1980ApJ...236..577B} with later models

178: incorporating the fact that mass and energy input into the halo may

179: efficiently occur through localized structures such as supershells and

180: chimneys \citep{1989ApJ...345..372N}.

181: 

182: As for the Milky Way, the WHAM survey \citep{2003ApJS..149..405H} has

183: characterized in detail the so-called Reynolds layer of vertically-extended

184: DIG \citep{1973ApJ...179..651R}, revealing further instances of possible

185: superbubbles \citep{2001ApJ...558L.101R}.  Very relevant to this paper are the

186: High Velocity Clouds (HVCs) and Intermediate Velocity Clouds (IVCs).  For the

187: latter, a few are known to be 0.3--4 kpc above the midplane, with

188: metallicities close to solar, and it is quite possible that these clouds

189: originate in a disk-halo flow (\citealt{2004Ap&SS.289..381W}, and references

190: therein).  The situation for the HVCs is different, however.  Not

191: considering the contribution from the Magellanic Stream

192: \citep{2003ApJ...586..170P}, some well studied complexes are found to be many

193: kpc from the plane (e.g. 8--10 kpc for part of complex A, $>$4 kpc for complex

194: C; \citealt {2004Ap&SS.289..381W} and references therein).  Although

195: information is scarce, their metallicities are also well below solar

196: (e.g. \citealt{2007ApJ...657..271C}), suggesting that such clouds are not part

197: of a disk-halo flow but may be extragalactic clouds that are mixing with

198: metal-enriched gas in the halo as they fall onto the disk.

199: 

200: Such a population of infalling warm clouds is a prediction of recent models of

201: galaxy formation, in which galaxies are still growing by this mechanism.  The

202: idea that galaxies form by gas cooling out of a shock-heated hot halo was

203: presented by \citet{1978MNRAS.183..341W}.  This hot gas should be thermally

204: unstable and given to fragmentation \citep{1965ApJ...142..531F,

205: 1985ApJ...298...18F,1990ApJ...363...50M}.  \citet{2004MNRAS.355..694M}

206: explored the consequences of such an inflow of fragmenting material.  The

207: remaining hot gas has such a low density that it can support itself against

208: infall for a long time.  This may explain the "over-cooling" problem in galaxy

209: formation models that leads to overly massive galaxies and the finding that

210: most of the baryons in the universe never ended up in galaxies

211: (\citealt{2003ApJ...599...38B} and references therein).  Instabilities in

212: cooling inflows have also been studied by \citet{2006MNRAS.370.1612K} and

213: \citet{2006ApJ...644L...1S}.  The cloud populations and distributions in these

214: high-resolution models vary, with clouds having an uncertain but probably high

215: ionization fraction.

216: 

217: An alternative explanation to the "over-cooling" problem in the most massive

218: galaxies is feedback.  Reheating of the halo gas by core-collapse supernovae

219: or a (possibly recurrent) AGN prevents the gas from cooling and flowing in

220: \citep{2004MNRAS.347.1093B}.  Heating by Type Ia supernovae is considered by

221: \citet{2005ASPC..331..329W}.  It is also argued that, except in the most

222: massive halos, infalling gas never heats to the virial temperature but flows

223: in cold \citep{1977ApJ...215..483B,2003MNRAS.345..349B,2004MNRAS.347.1093B,

224: 2005MNRAS.363....2K,2006MNRAS.368....2D}.

225: 

226: %TOO MUCH HERE BELOW?

227: 

228: The rotation of gaseous halos may also provide clues as to their origin and

229: the physical processes occurring within them.  In recent years, the manner in

230: which rotation speeds change as a function of height has begun to be

231: characterized in the DIG \citep{2006ApJ...647.1018H, 2006ApJ...636..181H,

232: 2007ApJ...663..933H, 2007AJ....134.1019O}.  Heald and coworkers have measured

233: the gradient in rotation speed with height ($dV_{rot}/dz$) in three edge-ons

234: which form a decreasing sequence of star forming activity and DIG

235: scale-height: NGC 5775 (--8 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$), NGC 891 (--17 km s$^{-1}$

236: kpc$^{-1}$), and NGC 4302 (--30 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$).  The gradients, when

237: expressed in terms of km s$^{-1}$ per DIG scale-height, show much less range:

238: --15 to --25 km s$^{-1}$ (scale height)$^{-1}$.  The authors show that simple

239: ballistic models of disk-halo flow \citep{2002ApJ...578...98C} greatly

240: underpredict the magnitude of these gradients and also predict the wrong trend

241: with scale-height.  Two possible resolutions are: 1) the physics of disk-halo

242: flows are not well described by ballistic models and that hydrodynamical

243: effects such as pressure \citep{2006A&A...446...61B} or magnetic or viscous

244: forces \citep{2002ASPC..276..201B} dominate the rotation, or 2) part or all of

245: the gas does not originate in a flow from the high-angular-momentum disk, but

246: rather from infalling low-angular-momentum primordial gas.  For the DIG, the

247: latter explanation must also account for morphological and other connections

248: with ongoing star formation discussed above.

249: 

250: For NGC 891, $dV_{rot}/dz$ has also been measured for the HI and is --15 km

251: s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ \citep{2007AJ....134.1019O}, in good agreement with the

252: DIG value .  The authors conclude from this gradient that at least some of the

253: $1.2 \times 10^9$ \msun\ HI halo must be accreted, low angular momentum

254: material (see also \citealt{2006MNRAS.366..449F}).

255: 

256: Furthering our understanding of both galactic infall and disk-halo cycling, as

257: well as possible interactions between the two, would be made easier if one

258: could isolate galaxies where one or the other origin is expected to obtain.

259: High star-forming galaxies like NGC 5775 presumably have gaseous halos

260: dominated by disk-halo flows.  The recent discovery of a bright ( $L_x = 7.3

261: \pm 3.9 \times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$) X-ray halo around the massive, nearby

262: (29.4 Mpc is the commonly adopted distance), low star forming edge-on Sb

263: galaxy NGC 5746 \citep{2006NewA...11..465P,2006astro.ph.10893R} presents a

264: challenge to disk-halo models as the X-ray luminosity clearly exceeds that

265: expected \citep{2006A&A...457..779T,2004ApJ...606..829S} for a galaxy with no

266: detected DIG halo (\citealt{1996ApJ...462..712R}; in an image with an Emission

267: Measure noise level of 3.7 pc cm$^{-6}$) and little star formation.

268: \citet{1996ApJ...462..712R} roughly characterized the star formation rate per

269: unit disk area of many edge-ons using the far infrared luminosity measured by

270: the {\it Infrared Astronomical Satellite} (IRAS) divided by the optical disk

271: area: $L_{FIR}$/$D_{25}^2$ (values calculated from the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic

272: Database\footnote{The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) is operated by

273: the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under

274: contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.}).  NGC 5746

275: is one of the lower of the 16 edge-ons thus characterized, at $4 \times

276: 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$.  Rather, the X-ray luminosity puts NGC 5746

277: on the expected steep relationship $L_x \propto V_{rot}^7$ for hot halos in

278: galaxy formation models \citep{2002MNRAS.335..799T}, and, in such an

279: interpretation, it is only because of the very high rotation speed (measured

280: in this paper to be about 310 km s$^{-1}$) that this residual hot halo can be

281: detected at all.  The metallicity of the hot gas is found to be low, at about

282: 0.04 solar \citep{2006astro.ph.10893R}, but is uncertain and could be biased

283: toward low values (see \citealt{2000MNRAS.311..176B}).  But overall, this

284: galaxy may well be an attractive test case where disk-halo cycling is

285: minimized.

286: 

287: There are some caveats to this interpretation, however.  First, NGC 5746 is in

288: a group of 26 cataloged members \citep{2000ApJ...543..178G}, and there may

289: well have been interactions in the past leading to gas in the group

290: environment.  Second, although there is little ongoing star formation, it may

291: be that Type Ia supernovae or an AGN create a hot

292: wind or provide energy to keep a pre-existing halo heated, as discussed above.

293: However, \citet{2006astro.ph.10893R} argue that the likely Type Ia SN rate in

294: a galaxy like NGC 5746 would be far too low to explain the X-ray luminosity.

295: They also argue that there is little evidence for at least current nuclear

296: activity in this galaxy, and that a soft, thermal X-ray halo would not be

297: expected for an AGN outflow anyway.  We do note, however, that NGC 5746 is

298: classified as a LINER by \citet{1999RMxAA..35..187C}, and there is a compact

299: X-ray source \citep{2006A&A...460...45G} at the center, indicating at least

300: low level activity at present, although no compact radio source has been

301: detected \citep{2005A&A...435..521N}.  If the metallicity of the hot gas is

302: indeed as low as 0.04, these alternative sources are not very likely.

303: 

304: If this X-ray halo is a residual of galaxy formation and thus an indication of

305: missing baryons, then an obvious question is whether the predicted thermal

306: instabilities are occurring, leading to an infalling warm component.  If it

307: exists, the lack of a DIG halo may simply mean that there are few disk sources

308: capable of significant ionization.  But there may be a neutral halo.  Either a

309: detection or an upper limit will constrain galaxy formation models and

310: the \lq\lq missing baryon\rq\rq\ question, and shed light on the origin of the

311: Milky Way's HVCs, more so if individual clouds can be seen.  A detection of a

312: significant neutral halo would also be challenging to explain in terms of a

313: disk-halo cycle origin.

314: 

315: We have therefore observed NGC 5746 in 21-cm emission with the Very Large

316: Array (VLA), as described in \S 2.  We analyze high-latitude emission in

317: \S 3, and end with a brief discussion in \S 4 in terms of the theories of the

318: halo gas discussed above.

319: 

320: \section{Observations}

321: 

322: NGC 5746 was observed in the C array of the VLA on 2007 January 7, 8, 12 and

323: 13.  Phase calibration was achieved through observations of VLA calibrator

324: 1445+099 about every 30 minutes.  Observations of 3C286 and 3C48 were used for

325: flux and bandpass calibration.  Sixty three spectral channels were employed,

326: centered at 1725 km s$^{-1}$, with channel width 20.85 km s$^{-1}$, while

327: online Hanning smoothing yielding a velocity resolution of twice this width.

328: A total of about 28.3 hours were spent observing NGC 5746.  Eight of the 27

329: antennae were unavailable for most of the final track, while two were

330: absent on the other three dates.  Smaller amounts of data were also lost due

331: to high winds, interference, and equipment failures.  Data were inspected for

332: high amplitudes and any suspect data excised.  Some small baseline corrections

333: for a few antennae were made, based on later observations in the same

334: configuration.  The calibration of all four tracks is of very high quality.

335: 

336: High amplitude visibilities were clipped before mapping.  Dirty maps of each

337: track were made to check for additional problems before concatenating the four

338: $uv$ datasets.  Continuum was subtracted in the $uv$-plane using line-free

339: channels at either end of the spectrometer with the AIPS tasks UVSUB and

340: UVLSF.  This was very successful.  The AIPS task IMAGR was used to produce

341: clean maps using clean boxes that covered the emission from NGC 5746 as well

342: as NGC 5740, which is also detected, albeit somewhat outside the 31.9' FWHM

343: primary beam.  The pointing center is R.A. 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$

344: 56.4$^{\rm s}$, Decl. 1$^\circ$ 57' 16" (J2000).  The primary data cube

345: discussed here was made with no $uv$-tapering and has a resolution of

346: 15.5"x14.8" (2.2 x 2.1 kpc) at a P.A. of $-3.6^\circ$.  A cube with

347: 61.3"x58.1" resolution (8.7 x 8.3 kpc), at a P.A. of 45.5$^\circ$, created via

348: $uv$-tapering is also discussed here.  All maps have 1024x1024 pixels of 3"

349: size, and were made with uniform $uv$-weighting with the IMAGR 'ROBUST'

350: parameter equal to 0.  The noise in a single channel of the full-resolution

351: cube is 0.23 mJy (beam)$^{-1}$.  No primary beam correction was made for maps

352: of NGC 5746.  Primary beam attenuation reaches 4\% at the ends of the major

353: axis.  Maps of NGC 5740 are corrected for primary beam attenuation; the

354: response at the center of this galaxy has dropped to 0.36, and thus structure

355: may not be accurately mapped.  No other galaxies in the NGC 5746 group are

356: within the mapped region.  Observed velocities are on the heliocentric scale.

357: The noise corresponds to an HI column density of $4.6 \times 10^{19}$

358: cm$^{-2}$ averaged over one resolution element for optically thin gas.  In a

359: zeroth-moment map made using all data and all channels, a 5$\sigma$ detection

360: of a point source corresponds to $2.3 \times 10^6$ \msun, using the conversion

361: from (e.g.)  \citet{1997ApJ...490..173Z}.  All masses are of total atomic gas

362: and include a correction of 1.36 for helium content.

363: 

364: Finally, the GIPSY task BLOT was used to blank emission-free regions in each

365: channel, reducing the noise in moment maps.  Moment maps were made with

366: various strategies to eliminate as much noise as possible while retaining as

367: much emission as possible that appears to be real in the channel maps and

368: position-velocity (pv) diagrams (given its signal-to-noise ratio and continuity

369: over multiple velocity channels).  The zeroth-moment map presented here for

370: the full-resolution cube includes all emission in the blotted cube above the

371: 1$\sigma$ level in each pixel in two consecutive channels.  For the 60"

372: resolution cube, such a strategy introduced too many features in the

373: zeroth-moment map that did not appear real in the data cube, and thus a

374: 2.5$\sigma$ cutoff was used.  A concern with the velocity resolution of 42 km

375: s$^{-1}$ is that many real spectrally narrow features may be rejected by

376: this strategy.

377: 

378: \section{Results}

379: 

380: Channel maps of the full-resolution cube are shown in Figure 1.  Zeroth- and

381: first-moment maps made from the blotted full-resolution cube are shown in

382: Figure 2.  The zeroth-moment map is overlaid on an Digitized Sky Survey red

383: image in Figure 3.  Also labeled in Figure 3 are the four extraplanar features

384: discussed in \S 3.5.  The emission from NGC 5746 is dominated by what appears

385: to be a highly inclined disk at a position angle (PA) of 350$^\circ$ (measured

386: CCW from N to the receding side of the major axis) with a large central

387: depression of about 2' diameter.  In this sense it is somewhat reminiscent of

388: the {\it Infrared Space Observatory} ISOCAM 12$\mu$m image from

389: \citet{2002AJ....123.3067B}, which has the appearance of an inclined ring of

390: approximate diameter 2.3' (19.7 kpc).  It is possible the HI hole is larger

391: but limited resolution has made it appear smaller.

392: 

393: %viewport'' first number controls offset from left, but in reverse sense

394: %second number seems to shift image and caption together, but in reverse sense

395: %fourth number seems to shift image relative to caption, but in reverse sense

396: \clearpage

397: \begin{figure}

398: \epsscale{1.00}

399: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=17 121 578 697]{f1.eps}

400: \caption{Channel maps from the full-resolution cube for NGC 5746.  Contour

401: levels are 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 times the 1 $\sigma$ noise in column

402: density units of $4.6 \times 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$.  Each map is labeled with

403: its heliocentric velocity.

404: \label{fig1}}

405: \end{figure}

406: 

407: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.00}

408: %online color version

409: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=38 159 480 763]{f2_color.eps}

410: %print bw version

411: %\includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=38 159 480 763]{f2bw.eps}

412: \caption{{\it Left:} Zeroth-moment map of NGC 5746 from the full-resolution

413: cube.  Contour levels are 1, 2, 4, 8, 17 and 32 times $10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.

414: The beam is shown in the lower right corner.

415: {\it Right:} First-moment map from the full-resolution cube.  Contours run from

416: 1500 to 2020 km s$^{-1}$ in 40 km s$^{-1}$ increments from south to north.

417: \label{fig2}}

418: \end{figure}

419: 

420: \begin{figure}

421: \epsscale{0.60}

422: %online color version

423: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=17 21 578 637]{f3_color.eps}

424: %print bw version

425: %\includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=17 21 578 637]{f3bw.eps}

426: \caption{Zeroth-moment map of NGC 5746 from the full-resolution

427: cube overlaid on a Digitized Sky Survey red image.  Contour

428: levels are as in Figure 2 (left).  The approximate locations of the centers

429: of the four features discussed in \S 3.5 are also indicated.

430: \label{fig3}}

431: \end{figure}

432: \clearpage

433: 

434: At fainter levels, a component extended along the minor axis is clearly

435: detected.  It is resolved into individual clouds and filaments to some degree.

436: This is in contrast to the HI map of NGC 891 (see Figure 1 of

437: \citealt{2007AJ....134.1019O}) where the halo is smoother in appearance

438: despite better linear resolution (1.4 kpc vs. 2.1 kpc).  Emission is detected

439: up to about 70" (10 kpc) from the midplane.  The northern end of the disk

440: also suggests a warp. 

441: 

442: The total flux in the map in Figure 2 is 33.7 Jy km s$^{-1}$, yielding a total

443: atomic mass of $9.4 \times 10^9$ \msun.  For comparison, the total observed

444: flux found by \citet{2005ApJS..160..149S} using the Arecibo telescope is 38.8

445: Jy km s$^{-1}$.

446: 

447: Figure 4 shows the zeroth- and first-moment maps from the 60"-resolution cube.

448: The total mass in this map is $8.8 \times 10^9$ \msun, slightly less than in

449: the full-resolution map.  We attribute this to the somewhat higher cutoff that

450: was necessary to eliminate noisy features in the moment map at this

451: resolution.  However, it also indicates that there is very little diffuse, low

452: surface brightness emission that is missed in the full resolution cube.  The

453: ends of the disk in this map also suggest a warp, but with the opposite sense

454: of bending than is evident at lower radii in the full resolution map.

455: 

456: \clearpage

457: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

458: %online color version

459: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=38 159 480 763]{f4_color.eps} 

460: %print bw version

461: %\includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=38 159 480 763]{f4bw.eps} 

462: \caption{{\it Left:} Zeroth-moment map of NGC 5746 from the 1'-resolution cube.

463: Contour levels are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 and 92 times $1.3 \times 10^{19}$ 

464: cm$^{-2}$.  The beam is shown in the lower right corner.

465: {\it Right:} First-moment map from the 1'-resolution cube.  Contours run from

466: 1460 to 2020 km s$^{-1}$ in 40 km s$^{-1}$ increments from south to north.

467: \label{fig4}} \end{figure}

468: \clearpage

469: 

470: \subsection{Modeling the Atomic Mass Distribution and Rotation}

471: 

472: Our main goal here is to understand the origin of the faint, vertically

473: extended component seen in Figure 2 through full modeling of the data cubes.

474: Although we are able to quantitatively constrain many of the model parameters,

475: we do not carry out a full search of parameter space, not least because of

476: asymmetries in the data, but rather explore and constrain a few well motivated

477: types of models.

478: 

479: We begin by constraining the radial density profile at the midplane.  As a

480: first estimate, we employ the GIPSY task RADIAL, which fits radial profiles of

481: the column density integrated vertically through the disk to averaged major

482: axis emission profiles for highly inclined galaxies.  The observed major axis

483: emission profile is shown in Figure 5 as the solid line.  Since in the below

484: modeling we will use axisymmetric density distributions, we also show a

485: profile where the north and south sides have been averaged to produce an

486: axisymmetric profile (dashed line).  The fitted axisymmetric profile is shown

487: as the dotted line.  The radial column density profile derived by RADIAL is

488: shown in Figure 6 as the filled circles.  The disk is dominated by two rings

489: of radius 1.5' and 3' and width about 1', while the profile confirms the

490: aforementioned central depression of radius 1'.  RADIAL reproduces the

491: observed profile in Figure 5 very well, except for a moderate overestimate of

492: the emission in the central depression.  This overestimate cannot be rectified

493: by creating a more prominent central hole but is instead a result of projected

494: emission from gas at larger radii; it presumably indicates an asymmetry in the

495: galaxy.  The other symbols in Figure 6 show the deviations from the basic

496: profile featured in the models described below.

497: 

498: \clearpage

499: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

500: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=107 41 578 597]{f5.eps} 

501: \caption{The solid line shows the observed major axis emission profile

502: averaged over the minor-axis extent of the emission in NGC 5746.  The dashed

503: line shows the average of the north and south sides of the observed profile.

504: The dotted line shows the fitted profile from the GIPSY task RADIAL.

505: \label{fig5}} \end{figure}

506: 

507: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

508: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=7 41 578 597]{f6.eps}

509: \caption{Filled circles show the axisymmetric radial profile

510: of the column densities integrated vertically through the disk derived by

511: RADIAL for NGC 5746.  This profile is used for the unwarped component of

512: Models A and B.  Open circles show the modification necessary to model the

513: extended emission along the minor axis as a warp in Models A and B.  Triangles

514: show the slightly lower profile for the disk component in the lagging halo

515: Models C, D, and E.  The 'x' and the open squares show the column density of

516: the ringlike lagging halo Models D and E, respectively.  See text for further

517: details of the models.

518: \label{fig6}} \end{figure}

519: \clearpage

520: 

521: We use the major axis pv diagram (Figure 7) and the envelope tracing method to

522: estimate the rotation curve.  The method is described in

523: \citet{2001ARA&A..39..137S}.  We use $\eta=0.3$ (see

524: \citealt{2001ARA&A..39..137S} for the definition of this parameter).  We

525: assume the inclination is close enough to $90^\circ$ so that no correction for

526: projection is necessary.  As there is little modeled column density in the

527: central 1' radius, the rotation curve is very poorly constrained there.  In

528: fact, long-slit spectra and a peanut bulge indicate that NGC 5746 is clearly

529: barred, with the bar elongated more across the line of sight than along it

530: \citep{1995ApJ...443L..13K, 1999AJ....118..126B}.  The bar manifests itself

531: kinematically in a steeply rising component within major axis offsets of $\pm

532: 0.25'$ in pv diagrams of emission lines (indicative of $x_2$ orbits

533: perpendicular to the bar), which is clearly not seen in HI.  For our rotation

534: curve we have simply extended the value at $R=1.15'$ inwards.  Our adopted

535: rotation curve is shown in Figure 8.  The dynamical mass within $R=5'$ (42.8

536: kpc), given by $M(R) = R\,V^2(R)/G$, is $7.9 \times 10^{11}$ \msun.

537: 

538: \clearpage

539: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

540: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=27 241 578 797]{f7.eps} 

541: \caption{At the top, middle and bottom are shown major-axis position-velocity

542: diagrams for NGC 5746 from the full-resolution cube, Model B and Model D

543: respectively (see text for model details).

544: Contour levels are as in Figure 1.

545: \label{fig7}} \end{figure}

546: 

547: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

548: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=77 41 578 547]{f8.eps} 

549: \caption{The filled circles show the rotation curve for NGC 5746 derived from

550: envelope fitting.  The open circles show the assumed extension at

551: low radii.

552: \label{fig8}} \end{figure}

553: \clearpage

554: 

555: We next need to constrain the inclination, $i$.  For nearly edge-on galaxies,

556: tilted-ring programs such as ROTCUR in GIPSY cannot do this accurately,

557: especially if a warp along the line of sight or a lagging halo is suspected

558: and contributes significantly to the velocity field.  However, $i$ can be

559: estimated by assuming axisymmetry in the ringlike appearance of the emission

560: at the center of the zeroth-moment map.  Hence, we use our adopted rotation

561: curve and radial column density profile as inputs to the GIPSY program GALMOD

562: (a program which allows construction of model galaxies with specified radial

563: column density profiles, rotation curves, and various forms for the vertical

564: density distribution) in order to generate a zeroth-moment map and match it to

565: the data.  The radial bins in all our models have a width of 15" (2.1 kpc).

566: The models produced by GALMOD are convolved to the resolution of the data.

567: From the measured separation of the two sides of the ring along the minor axis

568: near the galaxy center in Figure 2, we find that $i$ must be about 86$^\circ$.

569: This value is confirmed by the modeling described below.  ROTCUR was run to

570: constrain other parameters, and indicates a PA of $350 \pm 0.3^\circ$, a

571: systemic velocity of $1733 \pm 7$ km s$^{-1}$, and a kinematic center about 6"

572: or 850 pc west of the pointing center, at R.A. 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$

573: 56.0$^{\rm s}$, Decl. 1$^\circ$ 57' 16" (J2000).  The gas is initially assumed

574: to be in a single exponential layer with scale height 3" or about 400 pc.  The

575: true scale height of the bulk of the emission is not well constrained because

576: of the resolution and could be substantially lower than 3''.

577: 

578: We next show that the vertical structure cannot be fit by a single component

579: at a given inclination, or by two exponential components.  Figure 9 shows a

580: minor-axis emission profile, averaged over 3' along the major axis (solid

581: line).  There are clearly tails at both ends of the profile.  The dashed line

582: shows our modeled component for an exponential layer with 3" scale height.  It

583: fits the bulk of the emission well but not the tails.  The dotted line shows

584: an exponential model with a scale height of 18".  It fits the tails well but

585: is broader than the bulk of the emission and washes out the splitting at low

586: latitudes (which is due to the ringlike distribution).  No combination of two

587: exponentials were found to produce a reasonable fit.  This result does not

588: change if a gaussian or sech$^2$ form is used.

589: 

590: \clearpage

591: \begin{figure} \epsscale{.80}

592: \includegraphics[scale=.8,viewport=27 80 578 527]{f9.eps} 

593: \caption{The solid line in both panels shows the minor axis emission profile

594: averaged over the inner 3' (25.6 kpc) of the major axis, in column density

595: units.  The dashed and dotted lines in the top panel show profiles for models

596: as described in the text with exponential scale heights of 3" and 18",

597: respectively.  The dashed line in the bottom panel shows the profile for Model

598: A, as described in the text.  The profiles for the other models described are

599: almost identical to that of Model A.

600: \label{fig9}} \end{figure}

601: \clearpage

602: 

603: Instead we consider two possibilities to explain the tails.  The first is a

604: warp along the line of sight, and the second is a halo with a box-like

605: (employed for ease of modeling although it is unphysical) profile in $z$.  The

606: model parameters are summarized in Table 1.

607: 

608: The morphology of the tails turns out to be very much coupled with their

609: kinematics, so we now consider these together by introducing pv diagrams

610: parallel to the minor axis at various positions along the major axis which

611: provide good leverage on the parameters of interest.  These are shown in

612: Figure 10, along with several models generated by GALMOD and variants on that

613: program.  The characteristic appearance of the disk component in these

614: diagrams is one of narrow angular extent at velocities furthest from $V_{sys}$

615: which broadens and (where the ringlike structure is evident) splits as

616: velocities move towards $V_{sys}$.  The faint high-latitude component has a

617: characteristic appearance which will greatly constrain its morphology and

618: kinematics.  Although it varies significantly among cuts, it generally

619: manifests itself as an extended, spectrally very narrow component at

620: velocities closer to $V_{sys}$ than the disk component, with a definite

621: gradient in $V_{hel}$ with $b$ that is more evident in panels

622: further from the galaxy center.  Some east-west asymmetries are

623: evident in this component.

624: 

625: \clearpage

626: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

627: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=17 121 578 697]{f10.eps} 

628: \caption{Position-velocity diagrams parallel to the minor axis at various

629: offsets along the major axis from the full-resolution data cube and various

630: models described in the text.  Contour levels are as in Figure 1.  The offsets 

631: along the major axis are shown in the panels for the data.

632: \label{fig10}} \end{figure}

633: \clearpage

634: 

635: We first consider a warp along the line of sight.  In GALMOD, this is achieved

636: by slowly decreasing the inclination of outer rings.  However, in order to

637: reproduce the minor axis emission profile, the column density in the warped

638: rings had to be increased significantly from the major-axis-based starting

639: point, as shown in Figure 6.  The warp begins at a radius of 4' (34.2 kpc),

640: where $i=84^\circ$, dropping to $79^\circ$ by 5' (42.8 kpc) radius (Figure

641: 11).  The maximum displacement of the midplane of the outermost warped ring

642: from the unwarped disk is about 5 kpc.  A slightly larger warping is required

643: for the SE quadrant (top three panels of Figure 10 at negative minor axis

644: offsets) but is not modeled here.  The resulting model, Model A, appears to

645: match the observed minor-axis pv diagrams very well.

646: \clearpage

647: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

648: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=7 41 578 547]{f11.eps} 

649: \caption{Filled circles show the run of inclination (left scale) for

650: Models A and B.  Open triangles show the run of PA (right scale) for Model B.

651: Open circles show the inclination for Models C, D and E.

652: \label{fig11}} \end{figure}

653: \clearpage

654: 

655: Model B is an attempt to incorporate the bending across the line of sight

656: evident in the zeroth-moment maps.  Retaining the run of inclination in Model

657: A, the PA in this model decreases from 350$^\circ$ to 346$^\circ$ over the

658: radius range 3' to 4', and then increases back to 5$^\circ$ by 5' radius

659: (Figure 11).  The asymmetry introduced into the minor-axis pv diagrams (Figure

660: 10) provides a slightly better match to the data at high latitudes, although

661: still probably underestimating the observed asymmetry.  The zeroth-moment map

662: of this model (Figure 12) also exhibits a slight brightness asymmetry with

663: respect to the minor axis at major axis distances less than 4' from the center

664: and at heights 30--60'' from the plane that is also apparent on the east side

665: in Figure 2.  The model appears to somewhat overestimate the bending to larger

666: PAs evident in Figure 2 (and, of course, there is too much emission at the

667: ends of the major axis because of the excess column density in the modeled

668: warp).  However, a model version smoothed to 60'' (Figure 12, center), is a

669: reasonable match to the bending in Figure 4.  We note that warps are often

670: asymmetric \citep{2002A&A...394..769G}, so one should not expect a warp fitted

671: to kinematic information parallel to the minor axis to match perfectly the

672: morphology along the major axis.  A second caveat to this exercise is that

673: some of the bending along the major axis may be due to outer spiral structure

674: seen not quite edge-on.  In fact, the initial bending to lower PAs in the

675: model is only present to match the morphology in the moment maps.  The

676: subsequent increase in PA is responsible for the asymmetries in the pv

677: diagrams.  As mentioned at the beginning of this section, for these kinds of

678: reasons, we have not carried out a full exploration of parameter space but

679: simply present these models as reasonable fits to the data.

680: 

681: \clearpage

682: \begin{figure} \epsscale{.80}

683: \includegraphics[scale=.8,viewport=8 159 480 763]{f12.eps}

684: \caption{{\it Left:} Zeroth-moment map of Model B, convolved to 15'' resolution.

685: Contour levels are as in Figure 2 (left).

686: {\it Center:} Zeroth-moment map of

687: Model B, convolved to 60'' resolution.   Contour levels are as in Figure 3.

688: {\it Right:} Zeroth-moment map of Model D, convolved to 15'' resolution.

689: Contour levels are as in Figure 2 (left).

690: \label{fig12}}

691: \end{figure}

692: \clearpage

693: 

694: We next consider the box-like halo, extending to $z=50"$ (7.1 kpc).  Such a

695: component, when convolved with the beam, loses its sharp edges and, added in

696: the right proportion to the disk component, reasonably reproduces the

697: minor-axis emission profile in Figure 9, being almost indistinguishable from

698: the warp model profile.  The disk component column density is normalized

699: downwards by a factor of 1.24 in these models.

700: 

701: For the halo models, the gradient in $V_{hel}$ with $b$ at high latitudes in

702: Figure 10 implies a rotational velocity that decreases with $z$,

703: i.e. $dV_{rot}/dz < 0$.  The spectral narrowness implies that such a halo

704: cannot occupy a large range in radius, otherwise projection of the rotational

705: velocity would cause broadening of the $V_{hel}$ profiles in disagreement with

706: the data.

707: 

708: To illustrate these constraints, we first consider a model where the halo has

709: the same radial density profile shape as the disk, and a vertical gradient in

710: rotation velocity of --3.5 km s$^{-1}$ (arcsec)$^{-1}$ (--25 km s$^{-1}$

711: kpc$^{-1}$). We refer to this as Model C in Figure 10.  Although the amount of

712: high-latitude emission is well matched to the data, there is little such

713: emission seen at the first solid contour level of this model.  This is because

714: the velocity profiles there are broader with lower peak intensities, extending

715: to velocities much too far from $V_{sys}$ to be consistent with the data, and

716: we demonstrate this by including a low-level dashed contour. Clearly, this

717: model is a poor match to the halo emission.

718: 

719: The narrowness of the high-latitude velocity profiles puts a strong constraint

720: on the radial range of the halo component, and leads us to consider annular

721: distributions, beginning with one in which the entire halo is contained in one

722: 15" ring.  Model D in Figure 10 features a ring of central radius $R_0$ =

723: 180", with $dV_{rot}/dz = -3.5$ km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$, and a necessarily

724: high column density of $9 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ to match the minor axis

725: emission profile.  Comparison of modeled and data pv diagrams for other values

726: of $R_0$ constrain this parameter to be in the range 160--200" (22.8--28.5

727: kpc).  Even for such a narrow ring, the high-latitude velocity profiles tend

728: to be broader than in the data.  For values of $dV_{rot}/dz$ outside the range

729: --3 to --4 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ the gradient in the halo component in the

730: pv diagrams is not well matched.  However, a somewhat higher gradient is

731: required for the SE quadrant, and models indicate a value of $dV_{rot}/dz =

732: -5$ km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$.  All halo models employ $i=86.25^\circ$ to

733: match the minor-axis emission profile.

734: 

735: The narrowness of the ring also introduces a strong edge-brightening in the

736: halo in zeroth-moment maps (Figure 12) due to the projection of the ring which

737: is clearly not seen in the data.  This halo would therefore need to be much

738: more asymmetric than the warp of Models A and B.  The normalization of the

739: modeled halo also now depends on the radial range used to form the minor axis

740: emission profiles.  We have chosen to normalize using the same radial range as

741: above, realizing that the edge-brightening will lead to excess mass in the

742: modeled halo.

743: 

744: An annulus wider than 1' (8.6 kpc), although featuring a more plausible column

745: density, causes the high-latitude velocity profiles to broaden, if only

746: slightly.  Model E, where the annulus is 1.25' wide and its column density is

747: $1.8 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$, shows this effect.

748: 

749: The major-axis pv diagram for the data and Models B and D are compared in

750: Figure 7.  The general shape of the flat part of the pv diagram is reproduced

751: quite well, given that we do not attempt to model the aforementioned asymmetry

752: in the emission around the major axis.  The general slope of the rising

753: part of the diagram is underestimated.  In the models, the slope is

754: dictated by the fact that most of the gas is in the outer ($R=3'$) ring

755: in our axisymmetric radial profile.  Asymmetries, in the sense of gas

756: being more centrally concentrated in the vicinity of the inner ring

757: at major axis offsets within 1' of the center, could be the cause

758: of this discrepancy.

759: 

760: The velocity dispersion is not well constrained because of the somewhat

761: low velocity resolution.  A value of 10 km s$^{-1}$ was used in the models

762: for both disk and halo.

763: 

764: We roughly estimate the fraction of mass in the extended component in two

765: different ways.  First, we simply assume that in the zeroth-moment map of

766: Figure 2, all emission above a certain height can be attributed to the

767: extended component.  Using two values of this height -- 9" and 11" (1.3 and

768: 1.6 kpc) --, its mass is $1.2-1.6 \times 10^9$ \msun.  The second estimate

769: comes from the models.  In the warp model, the excess column density in the

770: warped region accounts for $1.8 \times 10^9$ \msun.  For the halo models, we

771: calculate the mass in the halo component and find $3.1 \times 10^9$ \msun.

772: These are both overestimates, especially the latter, because the extra column

773: density along the line of sight required by the axisymmetric models

774: overestimates the emission along the major axis.  The estimate from the data

775: themselves is likely to be superior.

776: 

777: Although both models are inaccurate because of their symmetry, the problem is

778: much worse for the halo model.  This model is also much more contrived in that

779: it requires a very large mass in a very small radial range.  The narrowness of

780: the high-latitude spectra is also better reproduced by the warp model.  We

781: therefore conclude that the extended component is a warp rather than a halo.

782: Further fine tuning of the warp model may produce a slightly better match to

783: the data, but the asymmetries preclude a significant improvement, and hence we

784: do not pursue this further here.

785: 

786: \subsection{Radial Inflow}

787: 

788: Figure 13 (top panel) shows a pv diagram along the minor axis of the galaxy.

789: A shift in mean velocity between the positive and negative sides is apparent

790: in the disk component, while a very small shift also exists in the warp

791: component (the double-peaked nature of the disk component is due to the inner

792: ring of 1.5' radius as discussed above).  Such a shift is a potential sign of

793: radial inflow in a not quite edge-on galaxy.  All diagrams for major axis

794: offsets within one beam width of this one show this signature.  For the warp,

795: such a shift is also seen, albeit at a slightly smaller amplitude, in the

796: corresponding pv diagram of Model B (bottom panel of Figure 13), and we cannot

797: rule out that it is an effect of the warp geometry.  For the disk, since there

798: is strong kinematic evidence of a bar (see \S 1), the signature would suggest

799: radial inflow in the inner ring-like gas distribution surrounding the bar.  To

800: measure the inflow amplitude, we have created two spectra from the minor axis

801: pv diagram, averaged over the range 3--18" in the minor axis direction on the

802: east and west sides.  A Gaussian is fit to each spectrum to find the mean

803: velocity, and half of the velocity difference between the east and west sides

804: is taken as the inflow velocity.  The result is $V_{inflow} = 9.7 \pm 0.4$ km

805: s$^{-1}$.

806: \clearpage

807: \begin{figure} \epsscale{.80}

808: \includegraphics[scale=.8,viewport=0 91 578 797]{f13.eps} 

809: \caption{Minor-axis position-velocity diagram for the full-resolution

810: cube (top) and Model B (bottom).  Contour levels are 

811: 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 times the 1 $\sigma$ noise in column

812: density units of $4.6 \times 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$.

813: \label{fig13}} \end{figure}

814: \clearpage

815: \subsection{A Possible Supershell}

816: 

817: A structure in the SW quadrant above the disk has the form of a closed shell

818: -- better seen in Figure 14 -- although it is always possible that projection

819: of unrelated features has given it this appearance.  The total mass is about

820: $10^8$ \msun, and the extent parallel to the major axis is about 3.4 kpc.

821: Position-velocity diagrams parallel to the minor axis for the northern wall,

822: center and southern wall of the shell are shown in Figure 15.  Above about 10"

823: (1.4 kpc) from the plane, the walls show emission at the velocities of the

824: warp as well as a broad component extending to about the terminal velocity in

825: the northern wall, and some evidence for line splitting in the southern wall.

826: The northern wall is detected over nine velocity channels, or about 190 km

827: s$^{-1}$.  The line splitting in the southern wall is five channels or about

828: 100 km s$^{-1}$.  Given that the velocities in the warp component are due to

829: the warp geometry, it would be incorrect to conclude that this line

830: broadening/splitting is due to expansion.  Rather, it may just indicate that

831: the feature is extended along the line of sight.  There is no indication of a

832: corresponding ionized feature in the H$\alpha$ image of

833: \citet{1996ApJ...462..712R}.

834: 

835: \clearpage

836: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

837: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=100 141 578 697]{f14.eps} 

838: \caption{Close-up of the zeroth-moment map of NGC 5746 showing the

839: shell-like structure described in the text.

840: \label{fig14}} \end{figure}

841: 

842: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

843: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=-100 141 578 597]{f15.eps} 

844: \caption{Position-velocity diagrams parallel to the minor axis from the

845: full-resolution cube for the northern wall, center and southern wall of the

846: possible supershell.  Contour levels are 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 times the 1

847: $\sigma$ noise in column density units of $4.6 \times 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$as in

848: Figure 1.

849: \label{fig15}} \end{figure}

850: \clearpage

851: 

852: \subsection{A Clumpy Warp?}

853: 

854: Figure 2 shows that the high-latitude emission is partially resolved into

855: individual clumps.  Almost thirty such features have been identified by visual

856: inspection and are listed in Table 2.  This selection is not meant to be

857: complete or statistically well defined, but is simply meant to give a

858: first-order idea of the masses of well detected features.  These range from

859: about $4 \times 10^6$ \msun\ to $10^8$ \msun, and their masses sum to $7

860: \times 10^8$ \msun, or about half of the total mass of the high-latitude

861: emission.  The most massive, numbered 18, is the shell-like structure

862: discussed above.  Most are unresolved but a few have a filamentary appearance

863: and lengths of 3--6 kpc.  The line widths are difficult to estimate for many

864: features because of the velocity resolution of 42 km s$^{-1}$ (FWHM) and the

865: low signal-to-noise ratio of some of the detections.  For example, the

866: significant emission for three of the best detected clouds, numbered 5, 6 and

867: 8 in Table 2, is confined to two channels and therefore the lines are

868: unresolved.  Others, such as 11 and 28, show emission over $6-7$ channels, or

869: $125-145$ km s$^{-1}$, and it is not clear if these represent actual internal

870: motions or reflect the extent of the features along the line of sight, for

871: example.

872: 

873: The 60"-resolution zeroth-moment map (Figure 4) reveals two faint vertical

874: extensions from the plane in the SE quadrant, reaching heights of 15 and 20

875: kpc.  Summing their emission above where they appear to merge with the disk,

876: we obtain masses of $7.9 \times 10^6$ \msun\ and $6.8 \times 10^6$ \msun, for

877: the northern and southern feature, respectively.  A faint extension is also

878: seen off the NW end of the disk.  Its mass is about $6.2 \times 10^6$ \msun.

879: The first-moment map shows that the SE features have about the same velocity

880: as the part of the warp that they connect to with little change in velocity

881: along their vertical extent.

882: 

883: \subsection{High Latitude Features Not in the Warp}

884: 

885: We have carefully combed the channel maps and pv diagrams to look for

886: high-latitude emission which does not have the velocities of the warp

887: component but which may not be evident in Figure 2.  We have found four such

888: features.  Position-velocity diagrams for the first three, at the center of

889: their extent along the major axis, are shown in Figure 16.  The features'

890: locations are also marked in Figure 3, and their properties are summarized in

891: Table 3.  One is an unresolved feature in the NE quadrant of the halo.  The

892: second and third are diffuse features with appreciable extents along the major

893: axis of 0.7' and 0.6' (6.0 and 5.1 kpc), respectively.  The second feature is

894: also counterrotating and its emission spans more than 300 km s$^{-1}$.  The

895: fourth is the low-$V_{hel}$ side of the possible shell (Cloud 18 in Table 2).

896: \clearpage

897: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

898: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=-100 121 578 697]{f16.eps} 

899: \caption{Position-velocity diagrams parallel to the minor axis from the full-resolution

900: cube showing emission (indicated by arrows) from three high-latitude features

901: that do not have the velocities of the warp.  From top to bottom, these are

902: Clouds 1, 2, and 3 in Table 3.  Contour levels are 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36

903: and 48 times the 1 $\sigma$ noise in column density units of 

904: $4.6 \times 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$.

905: \label{fig16}} \end{figure}

906: \clearpage

907: 

908: \subsection{NGC 5740}

909: 

910: As this barred \citep{2005MNRAS.364..283E} Sb galaxy is beyond the half-power

911: radius of the primary beam, the detailed structure may not be accurate and we

912: limit ourselves to general properties only.  We assume its distance to be the

913: same as that of NGC 5746.  Channel maps of the full-resolution cube are shown

914: in Figure 17.  Zeroth- and first-moment maps of NGC 5740 are presented in

915: Figure 18, using all data above $2\sigma$ in two consecutive channels.  The

916: zeroth-moment map is overlaid on a Digitized Sky Survey red image in Figure

917: 19.  There is a disk of about 30 kpc diameter and a large extension to the

918: NNW.  The disk has a mass of about $5.3 \times 10^9$ \msun\ and the extension

919: $9.4 \times 10^8$ \msun.  For comparison, \citet{1986AJ.....92..742S} quote a

920: mass in atomic hydrogen of $7.0 \times 10^9$ \msun, scaled to our distance.

921: \clearpage

922: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

923: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=17 121 578 697]{f17.eps}

924: \caption{Channel maps from the full-resolution cube for NGC 5740, corrected

925: for primary beam attenuation.  Contour levels are 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48

926: times $4.6 \times 10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$.  Each map is labeled with its

927: heliocentric velocity.

928: \label{fig17}}

929: \end{figure}

930: 

931: \begin{figure} \epsscale{1.0}

932: %online color version

933: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=67 121 578 697]{f18_color.eps}

934: %print bw version

935: %\includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=67 121 578 697]{f18bw.eps}

936: \caption{

937: {\it Left:} Zeroth-moment map of NGC 5740 from the full-resolution,

938: primary-beam-corrected cube.  Contour levels are 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 times

939: $10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$. {\it Right:}  First-moment map of NGC 5740. Contours run

940: from 1440 to 1740 (the closed contour on the NE side at Decl. 1$^\circ$ 42') 

941: km s$^{-1}$ in 20 km s$^{-1}$ increments from SW to NE.

942: \label{fig18}}

943: \end{figure}

944: 

945: \begin{figure}

946: \epsscale{0.6}

947: %online color version

948: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=17 21 578 637]{f19_color.eps}

949: %print bw version

950: %\includegraphics[scale=1.0,viewport=17 21 578 637]{f19bw.eps}

951: \caption{Zeroth-moment map of NGC 5740 from the full-resolution

952: cube overlaid on a Digitized Sky Survey red image.  Contour

953: levels are as in Figure 18 (left).

954: \label{fig19}}

955: \end{figure}

956: \clearpage

957: 

958: A ROTCUR analysis of the disk indicates a PA of $339 \pm 0.5^\circ$, an

959: inclination of $58 \pm 2^\circ$, $V_{sys} = 1586 \pm 6$ km s$^{-1}$, a

960: dynamical center of R.A. 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 24.4$^{\rm s}$,

961: Decl. 1$^\circ$ 40' 52", with approximate uncertainty 3" in R.A. and 8" in

962: Decl.  The first-moment map suggests regular rotation continues into the NNW

963: extension.  Keeping $V_{sys}$ and the dynamical center fixed, and fitting the

964: receding half of the galaxy only, the extension exhibits little change in PA

965: but a continued fall in $V_{rot}$ and an increase in inclination to $61^\circ$

966: at 2' and $70^\circ$ at 4'.  The derived rotation curve is shown in Figure 20.

967: The dynamical mass within $R=2'$ (17.1 kpc) is $1.2 \times 10^{11}$ \msun.

968: 

969: Morphologically, the NNW extension is similar to extensions in several Virgo

970: Cluster galaxies, most of which are best explained by ram pressure stripping

971: \citep{2007ApJ...659L.115C}.  There is no obvious evidence of compression of

972: the gas on the opposite side of the disk, however.  The condition for ram

973: pressure stripping, as given by \citet{2001ApJ...561..708V}, is

974: $\rho_{IGM}\,v^2_{gal} > \Sigma_{ISM}\,V_{rot}^2/R$, where $\rho_{IGM}$ is the

975: intragroup medium (IGM) density, and $v_{gal}$ is the velocity of the galaxy

976: through the medium, for gas at surface density $\Sigma_{ISM}$ at a radius $R$

977: from the galactic center.  At the outskirts of the main disk the typical

978: surface density is about 2 \msun pc$^{-2}$, while $V_{rot} = 175 $ km

979: s$^{-1}$.  The condition for stripping is then ($n/10^{-3}$ cm$^{-3}$)($v$/100

980: km s$^{-1}$)$^2> 14$.  Both required numbers are not constrained.  We find

981: that the one-dimensional velocity dispersion for the catalogued galaxies of

982: the NGC 5746 group is 120 km s$^{-1}$.  The IGM density is unknown.  X-ray

983: bright groups are found to be HI-deficient by \citet{2006MNRAS.369..360S}, who

984: calculate a range of IGM densities from $5 \times 10^{-4}$ to $2 \times

985: 10^{-3}$ cm$^{-3}$, but it is unknown how extensive X-ray emission is in the

986: NGC 5746 group.  Hence, it is unclear whether the stripping condition can be

987: met.  Tidal stripping seems less likely given the morphology and that the

988: closest group galaxy on the sky, NGC 5746, is 155 kpc away in projection.

989: 

990: \clearpage

991: \begin{figure} \epsscale{.80}

992: \includegraphics[scale=.8,viewport=47 41 578 547]{f20.eps} 

993: \caption{Filled circles show the rotation curve for NGC 5740 derived from

994: a tilted ring analysis.  Open circles show the extension of the

995: rotation curve into the NNW extended emission component.

996: \label{fig20}} \end{figure}

997: \clearpage

998: 

999: \section{Discussion}

1000: 

1001: Almost all of the high-latitude gas we have detected can be associated with

1002: the warp.  At the level of sensitivity of our data, only the features listed

1003: in Table 3, summing to about 10$^8$ \msun, may have originated in a disk-halo

1004: flow or infall.  The heights off the plane of their centers range from 2 to 8

1005: kpc.  One of the more massive ones is counter-rotating and is unlikely to have

1006: originated in the disk.  A few$\,\times\, 10^7$ \msun\ worth of

1007: counter-rotating clouds were also discovered in the neutral halo of NGC 891 by

1008: \citet{2007AJ....134.1019O}.

1009: 

1010: Are these few clouds consistent with predictions from the halo thermal

1011: instability simulations mentioned in \S 1?  In the simulations of

1012: \citet{2006ApJ...644L...1S}, most of the warm clouds are within 50 kpc from

1013: the center of the galaxy and total $10^8$ \msun, with most having masses a few

1014: times $10^5$ to a few times $10^6$ \msun\ for a galaxy like the Milky Way.  By

1015: comparison, for an M33-like galaxy, \citet{2006MNRAS.370.1612K} expect clouds

1016: of radii $0.1-0.6$ kpc and masses from $10^5$ to a few times $10^6$ \msun,

1017: totaling $\sim 10^7-10^8$ \msun\ depending on the simulation parameters,

1018: confined to within about 10--20 kpc above the disk.  If the few clouds in

1019: Table 3 are due to infall, we note that their total mass is comparable to

1020: these model predictions, with the caveat that the fraction of neutral gas is

1021: uncertain in the simulations.  The small number of detected clouds is in fact

1022: comparable to that in the ``very high resolution'' simulation of

1023: \citet{2006ApJ...644L...1S}, where the mass resolution is comparable to that

1024: of our data.

1025: 

1026: For galaxies like the Milky Way, \citet{2004MNRAS.355..694M} predict $2 \times

1027: 10^{10}$ \msun\ of mostly ionized clouds of mass $5 \times 10^{6}$ \msun\ and

1028: size $\sim 1$ kpc, extending to 150 kpc from the center of the galaxy.  At our

1029: sensitivity, it is difficult to rule out with confidence such a widespread

1030: population of clouds from the HI data alone.

1031: 

1032: It would be interesting to know how much mass in warm clouds forms in

1033: simulations of more massive systems like NGC 5746, and where it is located.

1034: The cooling rate, at least, of the hot gas in this galaxy can be estimated

1035: from the observations, but is very uncertain.  The rate inferred by

1036: \citet{2006astro.ph.10893R}, who exclude the projected disk area where there

1037: may be contamination by other sources of hot gas, is only 0.2 \msun\

1038: (yr)$^{-1}$.  The rate is modest because the estimated halo temperature is

1039: rather high, at 0.56 keV.  However, most of the halo cooling is likely to be

1040: occurring in the excluded area, and their models of massive disks suggest that

1041: the cooling rate could be 5--10 times higher as a result.  In summary, it is

1042: unclear whether the observed clouds are consistent with theoretical

1043: expectations for halo cooling in a massive disk galaxy like NGC 5746.

1044: 

1045: What fraction of these halo clouds do we expect to be fully or mostly ionized?

1046: This depends on the incident ionizing flux, the mass, and most importantly,

1047: the bounding pressure on the cloud. If we assume that the ionized gas in a

1048: cloud is in thermal pressure equilibrium with an outside pressure, the density

1049: of a cloud is given by $n_{-2}=4.55 T_{4}^{-1}\left[p_{3}/k\right]$, where

1050: $n_{-2}=n_{H}/10^{-2}~{\rm cm^{-3}}$ is the normalized hydrogen density of the

1051: cloud, $T_{4}=T/(10^{4}~{\rm K})$ is the normalized temperature, and $\left[

1052: p_{3}/k \right]=[p/k]/(10^{3}\, {\rm cm^{-3}~K})$ is the normalized thermal

1053: pressure.  (We use here $\rho/n_{H}=2.4 \times 10^{-24}$ for solar metallicity

1054: gas, $n_{tot}=2.2n_{H}$, and $n_{e}=1.2n_{H}$ for fully ionized plasma). For a

1055: constant density spherical cloud, the cloud radius is given by $R=(532~ {\rm

1056: pc}) M_{6}^{1/3} T_{4}^{1/3} \left[ p_{3}/k \right] ^{-1/3}$.

1057: 

1058: We assume that the outer skin of this cloud will be ionized by a

1059: (plane-parallel) flux of H ionizing photons, $\phi_{5}=\phi / (10^{5}~{\rm

1060: photons~ cm^{-2}\, s^{-1}})$. The metagalactic flux is estimated to be $\phi_{5}

1061: < 0.45$ (\citealt{2002ApJS..143..419S}, and references therein), while high

1062: velocity clouds in the Galactic halo experience $\phi_{5}=2$

1063: \citep{2002ApJ...572L.153T}. The thickness of this skin, $\ell$, is determined

1064: by the balance of ionizations and recombinations,

1065: $\phi=\alpha_{B}n_{e}^{2}\ell$ where the Case B recombination coefficient is

1066: $\alpha_{B} \cong 3 \times 10^{-13}\, {\rm cm^{3}\, s^{-1}}$. (Note that for

1067: optically thick clouds, $\phi=\alpha_{B}~{\rm EM}$, so that the surface averaged

1068: emission measure is a simple measure of the ionizing flux.)  In this case, the

1069: skin depth is given by $\ell=(35.7~ {\rm pc}) \phi_{5} T_{4}^{2} \left[

1070: p_{3}/k \right] ^{-2}$.

1071: 

1072: With these approximations, the ionized volume and mass of the cloud is given

1073: by $f_{ion}=1-[1-(\ell/R)]^{3}$ or $f_{ion}=3(\ell/R)-3(\ell/R)^{2}+...$ for

1074: small $(\ell/R)$. The condition for a cloud to be fully ionized is

1075: 

1076: \begin{equation} 

1077:  \left[ \frac{p}{k} \right] < (197~ {\rm cm^{-3}~K})~ \phi_{5}^{3/5}T_{4}M_{6}^{-1/3} . 

1078: \end{equation} 

1079: 

1080: For very low ionization fraction ($f_{ion} < 5$\%), this criterion is well

1081: approximated by

1082: 

1083: \begin{equation}

1084:   \left[ \frac{p}{k} \right] = (380~{\rm cm^{-3}~K}) f_{ion}^{-3/5}  \phi_{5}^{3/5}T_{4}M_{6}^{-1/3}.

1085: \end{equation}

1086: 

1087: \noindent so that an ionization fraction of less than 1\% requires  $[p/k] > (6022~ {\rm cm^{-3}~K})~ \phi_{5}^{3/5}T_{4}M_{6}^{-1/3}. $  

1088: 

1089: The sensitivity of the ionization fraction of gas clouds to the outside

1090: pressure has been studied by \citet{1994ApJ...423..665F},

1091: \citet{1995ApJ...453..673W}, and \citet{2003ApJ...589..270M} with comparable

1092: results. The normalization constant relating the pressure to the ionization

1093: fraction and cloud mass will depend on the assumed geometry.  The presence of

1094: central condensation due to dark matter halos can also lower somewhat the

1095: pressure necessary to form neutral clouds \citep{2002ApJS..143..419S}.

1096: 

1097: These considerations show that not only are X-ray halos associated with galaxy

1098: formation more likely to form condensations, but that the higher pressures of

1099: such halos result in a much larger neutral fraction for the

1100: condensation. Using the density and temperature estimate for the X-ray halo of

1101: NGC 5746 \citep{2006astro.ph.10893R}, the halo pressure is given by

1102: $[p/k]=6200~ {\rm cm^{-3}~K}$. Such a high bounding pressure would guarantee

1103: that clouds embedded in this hot gas will be primarily neutral.  It is also

1104: interesting to note that the bounding pressure for the cloud can be either the

1105: thermal gaseous halo pressure or the ram pressure associated with a cloud's

1106: motion through the halo. The one cloud showing counter rotation presumably has

1107: a much higher ram pressure than most of the rest of neutral gas detected and

1108: could be expected to have a higher neutral fraction.

1109: 

1110: At larger radius than that traced by the X-ray gas, it remains possible that

1111: the pressure will drop to such a point that a large population of fully

1112: ionized clouds might be present, but uncertainties in the X-ray data and

1113: analysis prevent such pressure variations from being assessed.  Although the

1114: predicted emission measure from the front and back face of an individual cloud

1115: is a relatively low EM$= 2 \times (0.11~{\rm pc~cm^{-6}}) ~\phi_{5}$, a

1116: population of unresolved smaller clouds in the beam might boost the H$\alpha$

1117: emission to detectable levels. However, processes such as thermal conduction

1118: and evaporation should set a lower limit on the mass of cloud that can survive

1119: \citep{2004MNRAS.355..694M}.  We have reexamined the H$\alpha$ image of

1120: \citet{1996ApJ...462..712R}, smoothed to 1.5'' resolution -- yielding a noise

1121: level of 2.2 pc cm$^{-6}$ -- and find no evidence for such bright clouds in

1122: the halo.

1123: 

1124: To attempt to constrain the origin of the neutral gas halo in this and other

1125: galaxies, we can compare the neutral halo mass and mass fraction with

1126: estimates for other galaxies and look for correlations with other parameters

1127: (Table 4).  In this comparison one should keep in mind that some of the

1128: galaxies are edge-on, one (NGC 6946) very much face-on, and some at

1129: intermediate inclinations (NGC 4559, NGC 2403 and NGC 253), and thus the

1130: characterization of halo gas necessarily varies from galaxy to galaxy.  In the

1131: galaxies not viewed edge-on, the extraplanar gas is identified by its

1132: anomalous velocities compared to the bulk of the emission.  We also note that

1133: the sensitivity and linear resolution of these observations vary

1134: significantly.

1135: 

1136: NGC 5746 ranks near the bottom of the table in terms of halo mass and mass

1137: fraction and also has one of the lowest levels of star formation activity, as

1138: estimated from $L_{FIR}$/$D_{25}^2$, lending support for an origin in a weak

1139: disk-halo flow.  However, there is no discernable trend among the galaxies in

1140: this direction.  NGC 6946 and NGC 253 stand out as having little HI in their

1141: halos given their star forming activity.  The halo HI in the latter is

1142: particularly puzzling as it is found only on one side of the disk, away from

1143: the center of the galaxy \citep{2005A&A...431...65B}.  It is possible that the

1144: neutral gas has been swept radially outward by the central starburst outflow

1145: or that much of the halo gas is ionized.  In NGC 6946,

1146: \citet{2007PhDT.........1B} note that the mass of halo gas more than doubles

1147: in a map at 64'' resolution vs.  one at 22'' resolution.  The rotation speeds

1148: of the galaxies span a factor of three, and thus the ability of supernova

1149: power to raise gas off the plane should vary significantly from galaxy to

1150: galaxy.  In particular, the high fractions of halo HI in NGC 4559, NGC 2403

1151: and UGC 7321 could be in part due to their low mass.  Finally, there does not

1152: seem to be any correlation between halo mass or mass fraction and rotation

1153: speed alone.

1154: 

1155: However, at this point it is not unreasonable to conclude for NGC 5746 that

1156: the three non-counterrotating clouds in Table 3 may just as likely be due to a

1157: relatively inactive disk-halo cycle as to infall.  One possible further clue

1158: to their origin would be infrared emission, and indeed imaging observations of

1159: this and other edge-ons with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} have been

1160: proposed.  A detection of dust would argue against an origin in low-metallicity

1161: infalling gas.

1162: 

1163: A larger sample of edge-ons needs to be observed with comparable sensitivity

1164: and angular resolution to understand how the mass and kinematics (rotational

1165: lags in particular) of neutral halo gas relates to other galactic properties

1166: such as star formation activity, assuming that such gas can always be

1167: kinematically distinguished from warps and flares.  A better measure of such

1168: activity than the somewhat crude tracer employed here would be the 24$\mu$m

1169: surface density as measured by the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}

1170: \citep{2005ApJ...633..871C}, hence 24$\mu$m maps of a large sample of edge-ons

1171: would be of great benefit in such comparisons.  For NGC 5746, deeper

1172: observations with higher spectral resolution are clearly called for in order

1173: to carry out a more complete census of halo gas that can be distinguished from

1174: the warp, so that its spatial distribution, kinematics, and cloud masses can

1175: be compared to the various models discussed here.

1176: 

1177: It should also be remembered that NGC 5746 is in a group environment, and some

1178: of the high-latitude gas may owe its origin to previous encounters, although

1179: the apparently low metallicity of the hot gas argues against encounters with

1180: other large galaxies.

1181: 

1182: We reemphasize that our best warp model (Model B) is not necessarily

1183: a unique fit to the data, especially because of asymmetries, but does

1184: demonstrate that a warp is a superior explanation to a lagging halo.

1185: It is not surprising that a warp is present in NGC 5746, as they are

1186: common in disk galaxies \citep[e.g][]{2002A&A...394..769G}.  As far as

1187: the warp parameters are concerned, we note that it is generally the case in

1188: such galaxies \citep{1990ApJ...352...15B} that the line of nodes increases

1189: in the direction of galaxy rotation for radii beyond the Holmberg radius,

1190: which is 4.5' for NGC 5746 \citep{1958MeLu2.136....1H}.  Our warp model

1191: implies an increase beginning just inside this radius.  More recently,

1192: \citet{2007A&A...466..883V} finds evidence from edge-ons that warps begin just

1193: beyond the radius where a truncation is evident in the stellar disk, but finds

1194: no indication of such a truncation in NGC 5746.

1195: 

1196: Finally, there is the possibility that the warp itself is caused by infall.

1197: The origin of warps is debated, but the possibility receiving most attention

1198: recently is that they are due to infalling gas with an angular momentum vector

1199: tilted with respect to the inner disk

1200: \citep{1999MNRAS.303L...7J,2006MNRAS.370....2S}.  In the N-body simulations of

1201: \citet{2006MNRAS.370....2S}, in which particles are injected into an outer

1202: torus inclined at a fixed angle with respect to the main disk, the warp can

1203: persist for several Gyr, making it difficult to infer the accretion history

1204: from the mere presence of a warp.  That is, the large gas mass in the warp may

1205: reflect accretion over a substantial period of time and not necessarily demand

1206: a high accretion rate, as would more likely be the case such a large mass were

1207: contained in a lagging halo.  On the other hand, if the centrally concentrated

1208: X-ray halo emission reflects the hot gas density, then one would expect any

1209: warm clouds recently formed by cooling out of the hot phase to be more

1210: centrally concentrated.

1211: 

1212: \section{Conclusions}

1213: 

1214: We have observed the massive edge-on spiral NGC 5746 with the VLA, in an

1215: attempt to find a vertically extended component of atomic gas as predicted by

1216: recent galaxy formation models.  A high-latitude component has been

1217: discovered, but almost all of its mass, summing to $1.2-1.6 \times 10^9$

1218: \msun\ -- or about 15\% of the total HI mass -- is more readily explained as a

1219: warp than as a halo.  The warp must be asymmetric in its column density

1220: distribution and geometry, but this is not unusual.  If the high-latitude

1221: component is a lagging halo, it must feature a large mass in a rather narrow

1222: radial range, be centered at a large radius, and have a much larger degree of

1223: asymmetry than the warp.  Even then, such a model has difficulty reproducing

1224: the narrowness of the high-latitude spectra as well as the warp model.  We

1225: therefore conclude that a warp is the more likely explanation.  The warp

1226: itself may be a result of infall according to recent models.  It partially

1227: resolves into clouds of mass $4 \times 10^6$ \msun\ to $10^8$ \msun,

1228: accounting for about half the mass in the warp.

1229: 

1230: We have found four high-latitude features at velocities distinct from the

1231: warp, totaling about 10$^8$ \msun.  These could be accreting onto the disk, or

1232: they may originate in a disk-halo flow, although there is no other sign of

1233: such a flow in this galaxy with little star forming activity.  One cloud is

1234: counter-rotating and must have an external origin.  The cloud properties are

1235: roughly comparable to those expected in the galaxy formation models of

1236: \citet{2006MNRAS.370.1612K} and \citet{2006ApJ...644L...1S} where warm clouds

1237: form by thermal instabilities in the residual hot halos.  However, these

1238: models have not been tailored to galaxies as massive as NGC 5746, and it would

1239: be interesting to compare our results with such a model.  Given the calculated

1240: pressure in the hot halo, we expect any clouds to be primarily neutral.

1241: Alternatively, we cannot rule out a weak disk-halo flow as the origin for

1242: these clouds, except for the counter-rotating one.  How neutral gaseous halos

1243: relate to other galaxian properties needs to be tested with more observations.

1244: 

1245: The disk shows the signature of radial inflow at the level of about

1246: 10 km s$^{-1}$.  This is most likely due to the bar, which is known to

1247: have a strong kinematical signature from optical long-slit spectra.

1248: 

1249: The group member NGC 5740 is also detected, albeit outside the half-power

1250: points of the primary beam.  The most important result here is a broad

1251: extension of gas to the NE, which is more likely to be due to ram pressure

1252: than tidal stripping, although whether the condition for such stripping is

1253: met is unknown.

1254: 

1255: 

1256: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the

1257: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]

1258: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,

1259: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the

1260: %% text to be printed in the second.

1261: 

1262: \acknowledgments

1263: 

1264: We thank J. Mulchaey for discussions regarding X-rays in groups, and L.

1265: Sparke for discussion about warps.  We also thank an anonymous referee for

1266: many useful comments.

1267: 

1268: %Acknowledgements of telescopes or software.

1269: 

1270: The VLA is operated by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, which is a

1271: facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative

1272: agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.  We thank the VLA staff for making

1273: these observations possible.  This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC

1274: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion

1275: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the

1276: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

1277: 

1278: 

1279: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their

1280: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope

1281: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches

1282: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be

1283: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes

1284: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.

1285: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX

1286: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.

1287: 

1288: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the

1289: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research

1290: %% for the paper.  Each keyword will be checked against the master list during

1291: %% copy editing.  Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,

1292: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.

1293: 

1294: Facilities: \facility{VLA}.

1295: 

1296: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.

1297: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.

1298: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of

1299: %% curly braces.  If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error

1300: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".

1301: %%

1302: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite

1303: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a

1304: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds

1305: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).

1306: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the

1307: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain

1308: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in

1309: %% place of the \cite commands.

1310: 

1311: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.

1312: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.

1313: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.

1314: 

1315: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly

1316: %% different from previous examples.  The natbib system solves a host

1317: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly

1318: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.

1319: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.

1320: 

1321: %%\begin{thebibliography}{}

1322: \bibliography{ms}

1323: %%\end{thebibliography}

1324: 

1325: \clearpage

1326: 

1327: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before

1328: %% each one.

1329: 

1330: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables:  the

1331: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX

1332: %% table environment.  Use of deluxetable is preferred.

1333: %%

1334: 

1335: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,

1336: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.

1337: 

1338: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text

1339: %% that appears after it.

1340: 

1341: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}

1342: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1343: \tablecaption{Models of the High Latitude Emission\label{tbl-1}}

1344: \tablewidth{0pt}

1345: \tablehead{

1346: \colhead{Model} &

1347: \colhead{Description} &

1348: \colhead{Incl.}   &

1349: \colhead{P.A.} &

1350: \colhead{Disk rotation}   &

1351: \colhead{High-latitude} \cr

1352: \colhead{} &

1353: \colhead{} &

1354: \colhead{(degrees)} &

1355: \colhead{(degrees)} &

1356: \colhead{curve} &

1357: \colhead{N$_{\rm H}$ profile}

1358: }

1359: \startdata

1360: A & warp along    & Figure 11 & 350 & Figure 8 & Figure 6 \\

1361:   & line of sight &           &     &          &          \\

1362: B & warp at angle to & Figure 11 & Figure 11 & Figure 8 & Figure 6 \\

1363:   & line of sight &           &     &          &          \\

1364: C & lagging halo & 86.25 & 350 & Figure 8 & Figure 6 \\

1365:   & (radial profile of disk) &           &     &          &          \\

1366: D & lagging halo & 86.25 & 350 & Figure 8 & Figure 6 \\

1367:   & (narrow ring) &           &     &          &          \\

1368: E & lagging halo & 86.25 & 350 & Figure 8 & Figure 6 \\

1369:   & (broader ring) &           &     &          &          \\

1370: \enddata

1371: 

1372: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1373: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1374: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1375:  

1376: \end{deluxetable}

1377: 

1378: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}

1379: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1380: \tablecaption{Properties of Clumps in Extended Component\label{tbl-2}}

1381: \tablewidth{0pt}

1382: \tablehead{

1383: \colhead{Number\tablenotemark{a}} &

1384: \colhead{R.A.} &

1385: \colhead{Decl.}   &

1386: \colhead{Offset along major axis\tablenotemark{b}} &

1387: \colhead{Offset along minor axis\tablenotemark{b}}   &

1388: \colhead{Mass } \cr

1389: \colhead{} &

1390: \colhead{(J2000.0)} &

1391: \colhead{(J2000.0)} &

1392: \colhead{(arcmin)} &

1393: \colhead{(arcmin)} &

1394: \colhead{(10$^6$ \msun)}

1395: }

1396: \startdata

1397: 1  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 53.5$^{\rm s}$ & 2$^\circ$ 2' 13'' &  4.95& -0.25  &39  \\

1398: 2  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 56.0$^{\rm s}$ & 2$^\circ$ 1' 48''  &  4.45& -0.75  &7.4 \\

1399: 3  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 57.0$^{\rm s}$ & 2$^\circ$ 1' 21''  &  4.00& -0.85  &14  \\

1400: 4  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 56.9$^{\rm s}$ & 2$^\circ$ 0' 56''  &  3.60& -0.85  &7.9 \\

1401: 5  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 57.1$^{\rm s}$ & 2$^\circ$ 0' 12''  &  2.90& -0.75  &14  \\

1402: 6  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 57.3$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 59' 44''  &  2.45& -0.75  &15  \\

1403: 7  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 59.0$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 59' 14'' &  1.90& -1.10  &7.6 \\

1404: 8  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 57.8$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 58' 32'' &  1.15& -0.75  &31  \\

1405: 9  & 14$^{\rm h}$ 45$^{\rm m}$ 0.2$^{\rm s}$  & 1$^\circ$ 57' 24'' & -0.05& -1.05  &6.8 \\

1406: 10 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 59.6$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 56' 36''& -0.80& -0.75  &16  \\

1407: 11 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 45$^{\rm m}$ 1.0$^{\rm s}$ &  1$^\circ$ 55' 8''& -2.30& -0.85  &36  \\

1408: 12 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 45$^{\rm m}$ 1.4$^{\rm s}$ &  1$^\circ$ 53' 52''& -3.55& -0.70  &35  \\

1409: 13 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 45$^{\rm m}$ 2.7$^{\rm s}$ &  1$^\circ$ 53' 30''& -4.00& -1.00  &12 \\

1410: 14 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 45$^{\rm m}$ 2.9$^{\rm s}$ &  1$^\circ$ 52' 0''& -5.55& -0.75  &14  \\

1411: 15 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 59.2$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 52' 1''& -5.25&  0.15  &14  \\

1412: 16 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 58.4$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 53' 2''& -4.25&  0.10  &40  \\

1413: 17 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 57.2$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 53' 25''& -3.85&  0.35  &43  \\

1414: 18 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 55.9$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 54' 8'' & -3.15&  0.45  &84  \\

1415: 19 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 53.8$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 54' 1'' & -2.80&  1.00  &3.7 \\

1416: 20 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 54.0$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 56' 28'' & -0.70&  0.60  &31  \\

1417: 21 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 52.4$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 57' 22''  &  0.20&  0.85  &23  \\

1418: 22 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 52.5$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 58' 8''  &  1.10&  0.75  &39  \\

1419: 23 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 51.6$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 59' 2''  &  1.95&  0.80  &31  \\

1420: 24 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 49.7$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 59' 19''  &  2.30&  1.20  &14  \\

1421: 25 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 51.9$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 59' 56''  &  2.75&  0.50  &41  \\

1422: 26 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 50.1$^{\rm s}$  &1$^\circ$ 59' 55''  &  2.90&  1.00  &12  \\

1423: 27 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 50.2$^{\rm s}$  &2$^\circ$ 0'  14'' &  3.20&  0.95  &9.5 \\

1424: 28 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 50.2$^{\rm s}$  &2$^\circ$ 0'  42'' &  4.55&  0.50  &27  \\

1425: 29 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 50.8$^{\rm s}$  &2$^\circ$ 1'  42'' &  4.85&  0.90  &12  \\

1426: 30 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 49.0$^{\rm s}$  &2$^\circ$ 1'  54'' &  4.85&  0.90  &13  \\

1427: \enddata

1428: 

1429: 

1430: \tablenotetext{a}{Numbers generally run in a counter-clockwise direction around the disk

1431: starting at the northern end.}

1432: 

1433: \tablenotetext{b}{Offsets are from the dynamical center determined in the text.}

1434:  

1435:                                                                                 

1436: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1437: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1438: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1439:  

1440: \end{deluxetable}

1441: 

1442: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}

1443: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1444: \tablecaption{High-{\it z} Emission Features Not Associated with the Warp\label{tbl-3}}

1445: \tablewidth{0pt}

1446: \tablehead{

1447: \colhead{Number} &

1448: \colhead{R.A.} &

1449: \colhead{Decl.}   &

1450: \colhead{Offset along major axis\tablenotemark{a}} &

1451: \colhead{Offset along minor axis\tablenotemark{a}}   &

1452: \colhead{Mass} &

1453: \colhead{Range in $V_{hel}$} \cr

1454: \colhead{} &

1455: \colhead{(J2000.0)} &

1456: \colhead{(J2000.0)} &

1457: \colhead{(arcmin)} &

1458: \colhead{(arcmin)} &

1459: \colhead{(10$^6$ \msun)} &

1460: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}

1461: }

1462: \startdata

1463: 1 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 56.6$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 59' 19'' &   2.00 & -0.45 &    7.2 & 1933--2017 \\

1464: 2 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 52.2$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 58' 43'' &   1.70 &  0.75 &    24  & 1493--1808 \\

1465: 3 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 58.0$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 58' 34'' &   1.15 & -0.70 &    56  & 1933--2058 \\

1466: 4 & 14$^{\rm h}$ 44$^{\rm m}$ 56.0$^{\rm s}$ & 1$^\circ$ 54' 19'' &  -2.90 &  0.60 &    7.9 & 1391--1495 \\

1467: \enddata

1468: 

1469: \tablenotetext{a}{Offsets are from the dynamical center determined in the text.}

1470:  

1471: 

1472: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1473: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1474: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1475:  

1476: \end{deluxetable}

1477: 

1478: 

1479: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}

1480: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1481: \tablecaption{Neutral Gaseous Halos of Nearby Galaxies\label{tbl-4}}

1482: \tablewidth{0pt}

1483: \tablehead{

1484: \colhead{Galaxy} &

1485: \colhead{HI halo mass} &

1486: \colhead{Percentage of HI} &

1487: \colhead{$L_{FIR}$/$D_{25}^2$}   &

1488: \colhead{Rotation speed\tablenotemark{a}} \\

1489: \colhead{} &

1490: \colhead{($10^8$ \msun)} &

1491: \colhead{mass in halo} &

1492: \colhead{($10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$)} &

1493: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}\\

1494: }

1495: \startdata

1496: NGC 891\tablenotemark{b}   & 12  & 30	&   3.5 & 225 \\

1497: NGC 4559\tablenotemark{c}  &  6  & 10	&   0.8 & 120 \\

1498: NGC 3044\tablenotemark{d}  &  4  & 7    &   4.7 & 150 \\

1499: NGC 2403\tablenotemark{e}  &  3  & 10	&   1.1 & 135 \\

1500: NGC 6946\tablenotemark{f}  &  3  & 4    &   9.6 & 170 \\

1501: UGC 7321\tablenotemark{g}  & 1.3 & 12	&   0.1 & 105 \\

1502: NGC 5746                   & 1.0 & 1    &   0.4 & 310 \\

1503: NGC 253\tablenotemark{h}   & 0.8 & 3	&  10.6 & 230 \\

1504: M31\tablenotemark{i}   & 0.35 & 1	&   0.2 & 270 \\

1505: \enddata

1506: 

1507: 

1508: \tablenotetext{a}{An approximate value for the flat part of the disk rotation

1509: curve.}

1510: \tablenotetext{b}{Halo mass and rotation speed from \citet{2007AJ....134.1019O}} 

1511: \tablenotetext{c}{Halo mass and rotation speed from \citet{2005A&A...439..947B}}

1512: \tablenotetext{d}{Halo mass and rotation speed from \citet{1997ApJ...490..247L}} 

1513: \tablenotetext{e}{Halo mass and rotation speed from \citet{2002AJ....123.3124F}} 

1514: \tablenotetext{f}{Halo mass and rotation speed from \citet{2007PhDT.........1B}} 

1515: \tablenotetext{g}{Halo mass from \citet{2003ApJ...593..721M} and rotation speed

1516: from \citet{2003AJ....125.2455U}}

1517: \tablenotetext{h}{Halo mass and rotation speed from \citet{2005A&A...431...65B}}

1518: \tablenotetext{i}{Halo mass from \citet{2004ApJ...601L..39T}, total mass from 

1519: \citet{1992ApJ...386..120B},

1520: rotation speed from \citet{1984A&A...141..195B}}

1521: 

1522: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1523: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1524: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1525:  

1526: \end{deluxetable}

1527: 

1528: 

1529: 

1530: \end{document}

1531: 

1532: %%

1533: %% End of file `sample.tex'.

1534: 

1535: 

1536: 

1537: 

1538: 

1539: 

1540: