1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %
20: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
21: %\textwidth=6.2in
22: %\textheight=9.1in
23:
24: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
25:
26: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
27:
28: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
29:
30: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
31:
32: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
33: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
34: %% use the longabstract style option.
35:
36: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
37:
38: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
39: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
40: %% the \begin{document} command.
41: %%
42: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
43: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
44: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
45: %% for information.
46:
47: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
48: \newcommand{\myemail}{acgupta30@gmail.com}
49:
50: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
51:
52: \slugcomment{Submitted to New Astronomy}
53:
54: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
55: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
56: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
57: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
58: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
59: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
60:
61: \shorttitle{Variability of Mrk 501}
62: \shortauthors{Gupta et al.}
63:
64: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
65: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
66:
67: \begin{document}
68:
69: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
70: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
71: %% you desire.
72:
73: \title{Multi-color Optical Variability of the TeV Blazar
74: Mrk 501 in the Low-State}
75:
76: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
77: %% author and affiliation information.
78: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
79: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
80: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
81: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
82:
83: \author{A. C. Gupta\altaffilmark{1}, W. G. Deng\altaffilmark{2,1},
84: U. C. Joshi\altaffilmark{3}, J. M. Bai\altaffilmark{1}
85: and M. G. Lee\altaffilmark{4}}
86:
87: %\author{S. Djorgovski\altaffilmark{1,2,3} and Ivan R. King\altaffilmark{1}}
88: %\affil{Astronomy Department, University of California,
89: % Berkeley, CA 94720}
90:
91: %\author{C. D. Biemesderfer\altaffilmark{4,5}}
92: %\affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85719}
93: \email{acgupta30@gmail.com, Phone No. +86 15920411403, Fax No. +86 871 3920599}
94:
95: %\and
96:
97: %\author{R. J. Hanisch\altaffilmark{5}}
98: %\affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
99:
100: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
101: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
102: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
103: %% affiliation.
104:
105: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories / Yunnan Observatory, Chinese
106: Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 110, Kunming, Yunnan 650011, China.}
107: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan 650091, China.}
108: \altaffiltext{3}{Astronomy and Astrophysics Division, Physical Research Laboratory,
109: Navrangpura, Ahmedabad - 380 009, India.}
110: \altaffiltext{4}{Astronomy Program, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, South Korea.}
111:
112: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
113: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
114: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
115: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
116: %% editorial office after submission.
117:
118: \begin{abstract}
119:
120: We report results based on the monitoring of the BL Lac object Mrk 501
121: in the optical (B, V and R) passbands from March to May 2000. Observations
122: spread over 12 nights were carried out using 1.2 meter Mount Abu Telescope,
123: India and 61 cm Telescope at Sobaeksan Astronomy Observatory, South Korea. The
124: aim is to study the intra-day variability (IDV), short term variability
125: and color variability in the low state of the source. We have detected flux
126: variation of 0.05 mag in the R-band in time scale of 15 min in one night.
127: In the B and V passbands, we have less data points and it is difficult to infer
128: any IDVs. Short term flux variations are also observed in the V and R bands during
129: the observing run. No significant variation in color (B$-$R) has been
130: detected but (V$-$R) shows variation during the present observing run.
131:
132: Assuming the shortest observed time scale of variability (15 min) to
133: represent the disk instability or pulsation at a distance of
134: 5 Schwarschild radii from the black hole (BH), mass of the central BH is
135: estimated $\sim$ 1.20 $\times$ 10$^{8} M_{\odot}$.
136:
137: {\bf PACS:} 98.54.Cm, 95.85.Kr, 95.75.De, 95.75.Wx
138: \end{abstract}
139:
140: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
141: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
142: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
143: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
144:
145: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
146: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
147: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
148: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
149: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
150: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
151: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
152: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
153: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
154: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
155: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
156: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
157:
158:
159: \keywords{Optical: observations - BL Lacertae objects: individual: (\objectname{Mrk 501})}
160:
161:
162: %\keywords{globular clusters: general ---
163: %globular clusters: individual(\objectname{NGC 6397},
164: %\object{NGC 6624}, \objectname[M 15]{NGC 7078},
165: %\object[Cl 1938-341]{Terzan 8})}
166:
167: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
168: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
169: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
170: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
171: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
172: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
173: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
174: %% each reference.
175:
176: \section{Introduction}
177:
178: Blazars constitute a class of radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs) consisting of
179: BL Lacertae objects (BL Lacs) and flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs). In the
180: unified schemes of AGNs, blazars are believed to be the beamed counterparts of the
181: FR I/FR II radio galaxies and many of their properties can be well understood in
182: such a scenario (e.g. Browne 1983; Antonucci 1993; Urry \& Padovani 1995). According
183: to orientation based unification scheme for radio-loud AGNs, blazar's jet make angles
184: $\leq$ 20$^{\circ}$ or so to the line of sight (Urry \& Padovani 1995). Significant
185: flux variations in the whole range of electromagnetic spectrum on time scale of less
186: than a day to several years are common in blazars. Their radiation at all wavelengths
187: is predominantly non thermal and strongly polarized ($> 3\%$) in radio to optical
188: bands.
189:
190: Blazar variability can be broadly divided into 3 classes viz. micro variability or
191: intra-night variability or intra-day variability, short term outbursts and long term
192: trends. Variations in flux of a few tenth of a magnitude in a time scale of tens
193: of minutes to a few hours (less than a days) is often known as intra-day variability
194: (IDV) (Wagner \& Witzel 1995). Short term outbursts can range from weeks to months and
195: long term trends can have time scales of months to several years.
196:
197: Study of optical and near-IR variability of blazars on diverse time scales was carried out
198: by several groups (Miller \& McGimsey 1978; Xie et al. 1988; Webb et al. 1988; Kidger \& de
199: Diego 1990; Carini 1990; Carini et al. 1992; Heidt \& Wagner 1996; Bai et al. 1998, 1999;
200: Fan \& Lin 1999; Ghosh et al. 2000; Gupta et al. 2002, 2004; Stalin et al. 2005; and references
201: therein). The first convincing evidence of optical IDV was found in BL Lacertae by Miller et al.
202: (1989). The typical optical IDV found in most of the blazars is $\sim$ 0.01 mag hr$^{-1}$.
203: Carini (1990) observed a sample of 20 blazars and found most of them showing detectable
204: inter-night variations. He also noted that in observing runs of more than 8 hours, the probability
205: of detecting significant IDV was $\sim$ 80\%. Subsequently, Heidt \& Wagner (1996) observed a sample
206: of 34 radio selected BL Lacs and detected IDV in 28 (i.e. 82\%) sources out of which 75\% sources
207: showed significant variation with in $<$ 6 hours which further supports the finding of high frequency
208: of occurrence of IDV in blazars. In our recent paper (Gupta \& Joshi, 2005), we studied the frequency
209: of occurrence of optical IDV in different classes of AGNs and found about 10\% (18/174) radio-quiet
210: AGNs, 35$-$40\% (41/115) radio-loud AGNs (excluding blazars) and 70\% (79/113) blazars to show IDV
211: (in fact $\sim$ 80$-$85\% blazars show IDV, if observed for more than 6 hours).
212:
213: Mrk 501 is one of the most interesting and nearby BL Lac object at z = 0.034
214: which makes it the second closest known BL Lac object after Mrk 421 (z =
215: 0.031). Mrk 501 has been studied for variability in all regions of the
216: electromagnetic spectrum (e.g. Fan \& Lin 1999, Kataoka et al. 1999,
217: Sambruna et al. 2000, Ghosh et al. 2000, Xue \& Cui 2005, Gliozzi, et al.
218: 2006, and references therein). In optical region this source has been studied
219: by several groups e.g Stickel et al. (1993) have reported variation of 1.3
220: magnitude in luminosity; Heidt \& Wagner (1996) have reported $\sim$ 32\%
221: variation in flux in less than two weeks time; Ghosh et al. (2000) have made 10
222: nights observations on Mrk 501 during March to June, 1997 to search for
223: rapid variability and reported rapid variability in 7 nights;
224: and recently, Fan et al. (2004) observed Mrk 501 for two hours in one night
225: in October 2000 and found no significant variation.
226:
227: The variability in blazars is mainly attributed to either due to the disc instability
228: or the activity in the jet. IDV reported in the flaring and high state is generally
229: attributed to the shock moving down the inhomogeneous medium in the jet. But small
230: amplitude variation in the low state of blazar could be due to instability in the
231: accretion disk (Witta et al. 1991, 1992; Chakrabarti \& Wiita 1993; Mangalam \&
232: Wiita 1993). Recently, it is noticed that, in the low luminosity AGNs, accretion disk is
233: radiatively inefficient (Chiaberge et al. 2006; Chiaberge \& Macchetto 2006; Macchetto
234: \& Chiaberge 2007; Capetti et al. 2007). So, there will be an alternative way to
235: explain the IDV in the low-state of blazars, in which a weak jet emission will
236: be responsible for the IDV. So far there is no clear answer to this. There is a need
237: to study IDV and short term variability in the optical bands with a good sampling in time
238: when the source is in low state. In view of this we pursued the present study to address
239: both the IDV and short term variability on Mrk 501.
240:
241: This paper is structured as follows: section 2 describes photometric observations
242: and data reductions, section 3 present the results, and
243: discussions and conclusions are presented in section 4.
244:
245: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
246:
247: Observations were made from two places: Mount Abu Observatory of Physical Research
248: Laboratory, India and Sobaeksan Optical Astronomy Observatory, South Korea. \\
249: {\bf Observations from Mount Abu Observatory:} \\
250: Photometric monitoring of Mrk 501 was done in B Johnson and R Cousins passbands
251: using a thinned back illuminated Tektronix 1K $\times$ 1K CCD detector at f/13 Cassegrain
252: focus of the 1.2 meter telescope at Gurushikhar, Mount Abu, India. To improve the S/N ratio,
253: 2 $\times$ 2 on chip binning was done resulting in pixel size of 0.634 arcsec in both
254: the dimension of the sky. The entire CCD chip covers $\sim$ 5.4 $\times$ 5.4 arcmin$^{2}$
255: of the sky. The readout noise and gain of the CCD chip were 4 electrons and 10 electrons/ADU
256: respectively. Exposure time for B and R passband were 300s and 150s respectively.
257: The average seeing during the observing run remained at 1.5 arcsec.
258: For flat field correction, twilight flats and bias frames were taken every night.
259:
260: For each night median bias and median flat frames were constructed which
261: were used in image processing. Image processing (bias subtraction, flat-fielding and cosmic
262: rays removal), photometric reduction (getting instrumental magnitude of stars and Mrk 501)
263: and calibration were done at Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India.
264: Image processing was done using standard routines in the IRAF package.
265:
266: Star no. 1, 4 and 6 (see Villata et al., 1998)
267: in the field of Mrk 501 were selected as comparison stars.
268: But, for the observing run March 8-10, 2006, star no. 1 was saturated in 6
269: out of 9 R-band image frames and star no. 4 was found to be unstable, so,
270: we used star no. 6 to calibrate the Mrk 501 data obtained in March 2000.
271: Observations taken in April 2000 were calibrated using star no. 1. In April 2000 observations
272: star no. 4 and 6 were having poor S/N ratio compared to Mrk 501.
273: There is advantage, sky variation (seeing) and cloud effects are effectively eliminated by
274: Instrumental magnitude of Mrk 501 and standard stars in the field of Mrk 501 were determined
275: with the help of DAOPHOT II package
276: (Stetson 1987, 1992) using concentric aperture photometric technique taking
277: apertures of radii 5.0, 7.0, 9.5 and 12.0 pixels.
278: The data reduced with different aperture radii were found in good agreement. However, it
279: was noticed that the
280: best signal to noise ratio was obtained with aperture radius of
281: 9.5 pixels (6 arcsec $\sim$ 4 $\times$ FWHM).
282: Stars in different image frames of Mrk 501 field were cross matched by using DAOMATCH
283: routine in DAOPHOT II package. \\
284: {\bf Observations from Sobaeksan Optical Astronomy Observatory:} \\
285: Photometric observations of Mrk 501 were also carried out in V and R passbands
286: with the 61 cm
287: Richey-Chretian telescope (f/13.5) and PM512 CCD Camera at the Sobaeksan Optical Astronomy
288: Observatory, South Korea. The field of view of the CCD image is 4.3 $\times$ 4.3 arcmin$^{2}$
289: and its pixel scale is 0.5 arcsec/pixel. The gain is 9 electrons/ADU, and the readout noise
290: is 10 electrons. The exposure time varies between 150s and 300s. Maximum exposure time is
291: 300s due to unstable tracking of the telescope. The CCD uses an LN2 cooling system. Bias
292: images were taken at the beginning and the end of the observation. Sky flat images were
293: taken at both dusk and dawn.
294: The instrumental magnitudes were obtained using the aperture photometry
295: routine in IRAF/DAOPHOT package as discussed above.
296: For aperture photometry, aperture radii were decided depending on the seeing,
297: that is, 3 or 4 times of the FWHM.
298: In the image frames 3 comparison (standard) stars, no. 1, 4 and 6 were present.
299: Data are calibrated
300: using star no. 1. We did not use star no. 4 and 6 for calibration, since these stars
301: were having poor S/N ratio compared to Mrk 501.
302:
303: Observation log and the intra-day variability results are listed in Table 1.
304: Photometric data in B, V and R passbands are given in Table 2, 3 and 4 respectively.
305: Photometric software DAOPHOT does not give the actual internal error of brightness but
306: it gives the photon noise. The internal photometric errors of brightness for each passband
307: are estimated using artificial addstar experiment as described by Stetson (1987). We found
308: the standard deviation ($\sigma$) = 0.015, 0.012 and 0.010 for B, V and R passbands respectively.
309:
310: \section{Results}
311:
312: \subsection {Flux and Color Variations}
313:
314: \subsubsection {Intraday Variability}
315:
316: Light curves of comparison star (instrumental mag.), Mrk 501 (instrumental mag.)
317: and Mrk 501 (standard mag.) in V and R passbands are plotted in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.
318: For plotting purpose, only the data for those nights are taken where the data points
319: are more than seven. We report here objectively the presence or absence of IDV
320: at a confidence level of more than 5$\sigma$.
321:
322: {\bf B Passband:} The source has been observed in B passband on 3 nights
323: but there are only a few data points (three) in each night and hence the
324: data are not plotted.
325: Measurements in B passband show variation to the extent of 0.013 mag on March 8, 0.080
326: mag on March 9 and 0.015 mag on March 10. Looking at the data of March 9, we notice
327: fluctuations in brightness of comparison star, which might be partly responsible for
328: the apparent variation of 0.015 mag seen in Mrk 501, so the
329: variation detected is doubtful. Hence as per our criterion, there is no
330: significant IDV seen in B band data.
331:
332: {\bf V Passband:} Light curves in V passband show variation to the extent of 0.079
333: mag on March 30 (Fig. 1 (a)). Visual inspection of the figure indicates that the
334: the variation seen
335: in Mrk 501 might be due to the fluctuations in comparison star.
336: So, the variation seen may not be a genuine IDV.
337: Variations are also noticed on other nights: 0.019 mag on March 31, 0.026 mag on May 1,
338: 0.035 mag
339: on May 2 and 0.034 mag on May 3. However, as per our IDV detection criterion,
340: we conclude no detection of significant IDV during the observing run of 5 nights.
341:
342: {\bf R Passband:} Light curves in R passbands show variation to the extent of
343: 0.004 mag on March 8, 0.027 mag on March 9, 0.009 mag on March 10,
344: 0.022 mag on March 30, 0.029 mag on March 31, 0.147 mag on April 1, 0.053 mag
345: on April 5, 0.018 mag on April 6, 0.021 mag on May 1, 0.077 mag on May 2 and
346: 0.039 mag on May 3. The data on April 1 are noisy, therefore
347: the variation of 0.147 mag seen in this night is not taken as genuine IDV.
348: Visual inspection of light curve on May 2 shows fluctuations in the magnitude of
349: comparison star and hence the apparent variation seen in Mrk 501 might be
350: partly due to this. Therefore, the variation seen is not considered as real.
351: So, out of 11 nights observations in R passband, IDV is seen
352: only in 1 night, i.e April 5.
353:
354: Variations, similar to that seen in the present work, have also
355: been noted earlier by other researchers e.g. on one occasion Ghosh et
356: al. (2000) have reported variation of 0.13 mag in V band in less than 30
357: min while on the other occasion they report brightness variation of
358: 0.04 mag in 29 minutes followed by steady brightness. According to
359: Ghosh et al. (2000), the source was not in active phase during their
360: observing run. Fan et al. (2004) have reported the results on Mrk 501
361: based on the continuous observing run of two hours in October 2000 in
362: R band and no significant variations were noticed. A blazar generally
363: show IDV of relatively large amplitude during its outburst period
364: while it shows very small flux variation or no obvious variation
365: during the quiescent state. Thus during our observing run, Mrk 501
366: appears to be in quiescent state as the intraday brightness variations
367: detected are less than 6 to 7\%.
368:
369: \subsubsection{Short Term Variability}
370:
371: In Fig. 4 we have plotted all the data points in B, V and R passbands
372: against the time in JD. The inter-night brightness variations are
373: distinctly visible in the figure; the maximum variation of the source
374: in V passband being 0.19 mag (between its faintest level at 13.78 mag
375: on JD 2451635.320 and the brightest level at 13.59 mag on JD
376: 2451667.237) whereas in R passband it has varied by 0.29 mag (between
377: its faintest level at 13.46 mag on JD 2451613.505 and the brightest
378: level at 13.17 mag on JD 2451667.194).
379: Data of April 1 being noisy, are not included in the short term
380: variability analysis.
381: During the observing run of about 8 weeks, the source shows
382: brightness variation of about $\sim$ 15 \% in V passband and $\sim$ 25 \%
383: in R passband. Heidt \& Wagner (1996) have reported $\sim$ 32\%
384: variation in flux in less than two weeks time which is larger than the
385: variation seen in the present work
386: (the maximum brightness variation detected in the present work is about 25\%
387: in about 2 months time).
388:
389: \subsubsection{Color Variation}
390:
391: In Fig. 4 panel (d) and (e), nightly average color (B$_{ave}$ $-$ R$_{ave}$)
392: and (V$_{ave}$ $-$ R$_{ave}$) respectively are plotted against the time (in JD).
393: For plotting purpose instead of taking the mean time (in JD) of the observing
394: run, we have taken JD at 00h 00m 00s UT of that specific date. In Fig. 2, panel
395: (d), there is no significant change in (B$_{ave}$ - R$_{ave}$) color but in panel
396: (e) the variation in color (V$_{ave}$ $-$ R$_{ave}$) is apparent. The effect of
397: variation in V and R magnitude (see panel (c) and (d)) has reflected in the
398: (V$_{ave}$ - R$_{ave}$) color showing, the source has become
399: 0.19 mag bluer during the observing
400: campaign (between 0.53 at JD 2451635.50 and 0.33 at JD 2451669.50).
401:
402: \subsection{Variability time scale}
403:
404: Fig. 2, panel (g) shows the light curve of Mrk 501 in R-band on April 5, 2000.
405: During the period JD 2451640.412 to JD 2451640.421, the luminosity has decreased
406: by 0.04 mag and then a rapid flare has occurred at epoch JD 2451640.421, reaching
407: a brightness excursion of 0.05 mag at JD 2451640.431. Just after the flare, again
408: there is a decrease in luminosity of 0.02 mag between JD 2451640.431 and
409: JD 2451640.438. There after the source became steady
410: (see Fig 2 (g) top panel).
411:
412: To search for the
413: time scale of variation quantitatively, we carried out Structure Function (SF) analysis
414: on the R-band IDV of Fig. 2 (g) (top panel).
415: SF is usually calculated twice by using an interpolation algorithm, first starting
416: from the beginning of the time series and proceeding forward and then starting from
417: the end and proceeding backward. This will give two slightly different SF curves
418: but will provide a rough assessment of the errors due to the interpolation process
419: (Wu et al. 2006).
420:
421: The first order structure function is equivalent to the power spectrum
422: density (PSD) and is a powerful tool to search for periodicities
423: and time scales in a time series data (see e.g. Rutman 1978; Simonetti,
424: Cordes \& Heeschen 1985; Paltani et al. 1997). The
425: first order SF for a light curve having uniformly spaced data points
426: is defined as
427: \begin{eqnarray}
428: D_{a}^{1} (k) = \frac {1}{N_{a}^{1}(k)} \sum_{i=1}^{N} w(i) w(i+k)
429: [a(i+k) - a(i)]^{2}
430: \end{eqnarray}
431: where k is time lag, ${N_{a}^{1}(k)} = \Sigma w(i) w(i+k)$ and the weighting
432: factor w(i) is 1 if a measurement exists for the ith interval, 0 otherwise.
433: The squared uncertainties in the estimated SF is
434: \begin{eqnarray}
435: \sigma^{2}(k) = {\frac {8\sigma^{2}_{\delta f}}{N^{1} (k)}} D^{1}_{f} (k)
436: \end{eqnarray}
437: where $\sigma^{2}_{\delta f}$ is the measured noise variance.
438:
439: Since the data sampling in our light curve is quasi-uniform, we used
440: interpolation method to determine the first order SF. For any time lag k,
441: the value of a(i+k) was calculated by linear interpolation between the
442: two adjacent data points. In a similar fashion SF was calculated for a large
443: number of IDV light curves (Sagar et al. 2004, Stalin et al. 2005). The behavior
444: of the first order SF have the following types:
445:
446: (i) If the source first order SF does not display any plateau, it represents
447: the time scale of the variability to be larger than the length of the data.
448:
449: (ii) If the source first order SF display a plateau followed by a dip
450: in the SF, the dip indicates a possible cycle and plateau the
451: time scale of the variability.
452:
453: Fig. 3 displays the SF of the light curve of top panel of Fig 2. (g). SF
454: display one plateau followed by a dip. From the plateau we deduce the variability
455: time scales to be 0.01 day i.e $\sim$ 15 min.
456:
457: \section {Discussions \& Conclusions}
458:
459: From our observations on Mrk 501 during March - May, 2000, we find the existence
460: of IDV (to the extent of $\sim$ 6-7 \%) in R band on one occasion.
461: The source has shown
462: short term flux variability and total variation detected in our observations in V
463: passband is $\sim$ 15 \% and in R passband is $\sim$ 25 \%. The data do not show
464: any significant variation in (B$-$R) color but (V$-$R) color has varied
465: by about 0.2 mag. Though we see some variation in brightness in the light curves,
466: it appears that Mrk 501 was not in active phase during our observations.
467:
468: We have detected variation, on April 5, in time scale of $\sim$ 15 min in Mrk
469: 501.
470: Our observations do not show any periodicity or quasi-periodicity in intra-day or short
471: time scales. But, in some other blazars quasi periodic variations have been reported
472: earlier on longer as well as shorter time scales e.g. quasi periodic variations,
473: existing
474: simultaneously in optical and radio wavelength, are reported on the timescale of 1 to 7
475: days in S5 0716+714 (Quirrenbach et al. 1991). The same source on other occasion shows
476: quasi periodic variation in time scale of 4 days in optical region (Heidt \&
477: Wagner 1996). Quasi periodic variations were also found in the PKS 2155-304 in
478: UV and X-ray wavelength (Urry et al. 1993). On short time scale, for
479: example,
480: periodic flux variation is reported in OJ 287 in radio as well as in
481: optical band. Valtaoja et al. (1985) have reported 15.7 min periodicity at
482: 37 GHz, Carrasco et al. (1985) have reported 23 minute period in
483: their observations in optical B passband
484: and Carini et al. (1992) have shown the optical periodicity of 32 min.
485:
486: Several models have been developed to explain the IDV and short term
487: variability in blazars viz. the shock-in-jet models, accretion-disk based
488: models (e.g. Wagner \& Witzel 1995; Urry \& Padovani 1995; Ulrich, Maraschi \&
489: Urry 1997 and references therein). The detection of quasi-periodicity in
490: time scale of minutes to less than a week in some of the blazars could be
491: taken as evidence for the existence of accretion disk pulsation, or the
492: presence of a single dominating hot-spot on the accretion disk, or of a
493: helical structure in a jet (Vila 1979, Mangalam \& Wiita 1993, Chakrabarti \&
494: Wiita 1993). Quasi-periodic variation may also be attributed to a precessing
495: jet. So search for periodic variations has great interests. The variability
496: reported in the present work could be explained by any of the above models.
497:
498: However, the variability detected in the low state of blazars can be
499: explained on the basis of some kind of instability in the
500: accretion disk, because in the low state, jet emission is less
501: dominant over the thermal emission from the disk. Within unified schemes, the
502: blazars are seen nearly face on, hence any accretion disk fluctuations
503: should be directly visible. The models for the flares randomly emerging at
504: different locations and at different time on accretion disks could be very
505: relevant to the variations seen in blazars at low-state. Eclipse of the
506: hot spot by
507: parts of the disk between the individual spot and the observer could be
508: the other possible
509: mechanism to produce variability in blazars at low-state. There
510: often exists a range of azimuthal positions at a given radius within which the
511: spot is eclipsed, and this is directly depends on the geometry of disk and
512: the viewing angle of observer.
513: The central black hole mass is expected to shed some light on the evolution process
514: in AGNs (Barth et al. 2002, Fan 2003). There are several ways to find
515: the BH mass but there is no consensus on this and the BH mass reported in the
516: literature for a particular source differ significantly. The BH mass for Mrk 501,
517: estimated by many authors, is in the range (0.01 $-$ 3.4) $\times$
518: 10$^{9}$ M$_{\odot}$ (Barth et al. 2002, Fan et al. 1999, Merritt \& Ferrarese 2001,
519: Rieger \& Mannheim 2003).
520: For Mrk 501, our optical observation show the variability time scale of 15
521: min. We assume that detected IDV is due to an instability in the vicinity of
522: the super massive BH and the size of emitting region is taken as R $=$ ct,
523: where t is the variability time scale (i.e 15min). Further assuming that the
524: 15 min variability time scale corresponds to instability or disk pulsation on
525: the accretion disk at a distance of R = 5 R$_{S}$ where R$_{S} =$2GM/c$^{2}$
526: is Schwarschild radius, the mass of the super massive BH, M can
527: be estimated by using the formula: M = c$^{3}$t/10G = 1.20 $\times$ 10$^{8}$
528: M$_{\odot}$. The Eddington luminosity for a black hole of mass M is given by
529: L$_{E} =$ 1.3 $\times$ 10$^{38}$ (M/M$_{\odot}$) erg s$^{-1}$ (Witta 1985),
530: which in the present case will be L$_{E} =$ 1.56 $\times$ 10$^{46}$ erg
531: s$^{-1}$. The result is in the range of (0.01 $-$ 3.4) $\times 10^{9}
532: M_{\odot}$, and hence consistent with other results.
533:
534: There is an alternative way to explain the IDV detected in the present work.
535: In the recent work (e.g. Chiaberge et al. 1999, 2006; Chiaberge \& Macchetto 2007;
536: Capetti et al. 2007; Macchetto \& Chiaberge 2007 and references therein), by analyzing
537: R band HST images of a sample of 33 FR I sources, they were able to detect the
538: unresolved optical nuclear sources. They found that optical and radio nuclear
539: luminosities were strongly correlated. They also found tight correlation between the radio and
540: X-ray luminosities measured from Chandra observations (Balmaverde et al. 2006). Furthermore,
541: the correlation between radio, optical and X-ray emission extends to the large population of
542: radio-loud AGNs found in early-type galaxies, with luminosities smaller by
543: a factor $\sim$ 1000 with respect to classical low-luminosity radio-galaxies
544: (Balmaverde \& Capetti 2006). According to these findings the nuclear emission
545: in low luminosity radio-loud AGNs is dominated by non-thermal emission from the
546: base of the jet. Assuming FR I and BL Lacs unification, which is yet to be established,
547: the alternate possibility is that the IDV seen in BL Lacs could arise in
548: the jet. Considering this model, the detected small IDV in the low-state
549: of the BL Lac object Mrk 501 might be due to a weak emission from the base
550: of the jet.
551:
552: It will be really interesting to start a long term multi-color optical monitoring
553: program of BL Lac objects in their low-states to search for the IDV. We believe,
554: with focused effort, we can make a large data set, and we may be able to find
555: which model is more appropriate to discuss the results of IDV in the low-state of
556: BL Lac objects. At this stage, we leave it as an open problem.
557:
558: We thank the anonymous referees for their useful suggestions. A. C. Gupta,
559: W. G. Deng and J. M. Bai gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the
560: National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 10533050 and 10573030).
561: The research work at Physical Research Laboratory was funded by the Department
562: of Space, Government of India. M. G. Lee acknowledges the financial support
563: from the BK21 Project of the Korean government. IRAF is distributed by NOAO, USA.
564:
565: \begin{thebibliography}{}
566:
567: \bibitem[]{}
568: Antonucci, R.
569: \newblock 1993, ARA\&A, 31, 473
570:
571: \bibitem[]{}
572: Bai, J. M., Xie, G. Z., Li, K. H., et al.
573: \newblock 1998, {A\&AS}, 132, 83
574:
575: \bibitem[]{}
576: Bai, J. M., Xie, G. Z., Li, K. H., et al.
577: \newblock 1999, {A\&AS}, 136, 455
578:
579:
580: \bibitem[]{}
581: Balmaverde, B. \& Capetti, A.
582: \newblock 2006, {A\&A}, 447, 97
583:
584: \bibitem[]{}
585: Balmaverde, B. \& Capetti, A. \& Grandi, P.
586: \newblock 2006, {A\&A}, 451, 35
587:
588: \bibitem[]{}
589: Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C., Sargent, W. L. W.
590: \newblock 2002, {ApJ}, 566, L13
591:
592: \bibitem[]{}
593: Browne, I. W. A.
594: \newblock 1983, {MNRAS}, 204, 23
595:
596: \bibitem[]{}
597: Capetti, A., Axon, D. J., Chiaberge, M., et al.
598: \newblock 2007, {A\&A}, 471, 137
599:
600: \bibitem[]{}
601: Carini, M. T.
602: \newblock 1990, Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University, USA
603:
604: \bibitem[]{}
605: Carini, M. T., Miller, H. R., Nobel, J. C., \& Goodrich, B. D.
606: \newblock 1992, {AJ}, 104, 15
607:
608: \bibitem[]{}
609: Carrasco, L., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., \& Cruz-Gonzalez.
610: \newblock 1985, {Nature}, 314, 146
611:
612: \bibitem[]{}
613: Chakrabarti, S. K., \& Wiita, P. J.
614: \newblock 1993, {ApJ}, 411, 602
615:
616: \bibitem[]{}
617: Chiaberge, M., Capetti, A. \& Celotti, A.
618: \newblock 1999, {A\&A}, 349, 77
619:
620: \bibitem[]{}
621: Chiaberge, M., Gilli, R., Macchetto, F. D. et al.
622: \newblock 2006, ApJ, 651, 728
623:
624: \bibitem[]{}
625: Chiaberge, M. \& Macchetto, D.
626: \newblock 2007, AAS, 209, 7217
627:
628: \bibitem[]{}
629: Fan, J. H.
630: \newblock 2003, {ApJ}, 585, L23
631:
632: \bibitem[]{}
633: Fan, J. H., Kurtanidze, O. M., Nikolashvili, M. G., et al.
634: \newblock 2004, {ChJAA}, 4, 133
635:
636: \bibitem[]{}
637: Fan, J. H., \& Lin, R. G.
638: \newblock 1999, {ApJS}, 121, 131
639:
640: \bibitem[]{}
641: Fan, J. H., Xie, G. Z., \& Bacon, R.
642: \newblock 1999, {A\&AS}, 136, 13
643:
644: \bibitem[]{}
645: Ghosh, K. K., Ramsey, B. D., Sadun, A. C., et al.
646: \newblock 2000, {ApJS}, 127, 11
647:
648: \bibitem[]{}
649: Gliozzi, M., Sambruna, R. M., Jung, I., et al.
650: \newblock 2006, {ApJ}, 646, 61
651:
652: \bibitem[]{}
653: Gupta, A. C., Banerjee, D. P. K., Ashok, N. M., \& Joshi, U. C.
654: \newblock 2004, {A\&A}, 422, 505
655:
656: \bibitem[]{}
657: Gupta, A. C., \& Joshi, U. C.
658: \newblock 2005, {A\&A}, 440, 855
659:
660: \bibitem[]{}
661: Gupta, A. C., Joshi, U. C., \& Fan, J. H.
662: \newblock 2002, {Ap\&SS}, 282, 655
663:
664: \bibitem[]{}
665: Heidt, J., \& Wagner, S. J.
666: \newblock 1996, {A\&A}, 305, 42
667:
668: \bibitem[]{}
669: Kataoka, J., Mattox, J. R., Quinn, J. et al.
670: \newblock 1999, {ApJ}, 514, 138
671:
672: \bibitem[]{}
673: Kidger, M. R., \& de Diego, J. A.
674: \newblock 1990, {A\&A}, 227, L25
675:
676: \bibitem[]{}
677: Macchetto, F. D. \& Chiaberge, M.
678: \newblock 2007, IAUS, 238, 273
679:
680: \bibitem[]{}
681: Mangalam, A. V., \& Wiita, P. J.
682: \newblock 1993, {ApJ}, 406, 420
683:
684: \bibitem[]{}
685: Merritt, D., \& Ferrarese, L.
686: \newblock (2001) in The Central Kiloparsec of Starbursts and AGNs,
687: edited by J. H. Knapen, J. E. Beckman, et al. ASP Conf. Proc. 249,
688: p335
689:
690: \bibitem[]{}
691: Miller, H. R., Carini, M. T., \& Goodrich, B. D.
692: \newblock 1989, {Nature}, 337, 627
693:
694: \bibitem[]{}
695: Miller, H. R., \& McGimsey, B. Q.
696: \newblock 1978, {ApJ}, 220, 19
697:
698: \bibitem[]{}
699: Paltani, S., Courvoisier, T. J.-L., Blecha, A., \& Bratschi, P.
700: \newblock 1997, A\&A, 327, 539
701: \bibitem[]{}
702: Quirrenbach, A., Witzel, A., Wagner, S. J., et al.
703: \newblock 1991, {ApJ}, 372, L71
704:
705: \bibitem[]{}
706: Rieger, F. M., \& Mannheim, K.
707: \newblock 2003, {A\&A}, 397, 121
708:
709: \bibitem[]{}
710: Rutman, J.
711: \newblock 1978, Proc. IEEE, 66, 1048
712:
713: \bibitem[]{}
714: Sagar, R., Stalin, C. S., et al.
715: \newblock 2004, {MNRAS}, 348, 176
716:
717: \bibitem[]{}
718: Sambruna, R. M., Aharonian, F. A., \& Krawczynski, H.
719: \newblock 2000, {ApJ}, 538, 127
720:
721: \bibitem[]{}
722: Simonetti, J. H., Cordes, J. M., \& Heeschen, D. S.
723: \newblock 1985, ApJ, 296, 46
724:
725: \bibitem[]{}
726: Stalin, C. S., Gupta, A. C., et al.
727: \newblock 2005, {MNRAS}, 356, 607
728:
729: \bibitem[]{}
730: Stickel, M., Fried, J. W., \& K$\ddot{u}$hr, H.
731: \newblock 1993, {A\&AS}, 98, 393
732:
733: \bibitem[]{}
734: Stetson, P. B.,
735: \newblock 1987, {PASP}, 99, 191
736:
737: \bibitem[]{}
738: Stetson, P. B.,
739: \newblock 1992, IAU col. 136 on stellar photometry $-$ current techniques and
740: future developments, eds. C. J. Butler and I. Elliot, p. 291
741:
742: \bibitem[]{}
743: Ulrich, M.-H., Maraschi, L., \& Urry, C. M.
744: \newblock 1997, {ARA\&A}, 35, 445
745:
746: \bibitem[]{}
747: Urry, C. M., Maraschi, L., Edelson, R., et al.
748: \newblock 1993, {ApJ}, 411, 614
749:
750: \bibitem[]{}
751: Urry, C. M., \& Padovani, P.
752: \newblock 1995, {PASP}, 107, 803
753:
754: \bibitem[]{}
755: Valtaoja, E., Lehto, H., Teerikorpi, P., et al.
756: \newblock 1985, {Nature}, 314, 148
757:
758: \bibitem[]{}
759: Vila, S. C.
760: \newblock 1979, {ApJ}, 234, 636
761:
762: \bibitem[]{}
763: Villata, M., Raiteri, C. M., Lanteri, L., et al.
764: \newblock 1998, {A\&AS}, 130, 305
765:
766: \bibitem[]{}
767: Wagner, S. J., \& Witzel, A.
768: \newblock 1995, {ARA\&A}, 33, 163
769:
770: \bibitem[]{}
771: Webb, J. R., Smith, A. G., Leacock, R. J., et. al.
772: \newblock 1988, {AJ}, 95, 374
773:
774: \bibitem[]{}
775: Wiita, P. J.
776: \newblock 1985, {Physics Report}, 123, 117
777:
778: \bibitem[]{}
779: Wiita, P. J., Miller, H. R., Carini, M. T., \& Rosen, A.
780: \newblock 1991, in Structure and Emission Properties of Accretion Disks,
781: ed. J. P. Lasota et al. (Editions Frontieres, Gif-sur-Yvette), IAU Colloq., 129, 557
782:
783: \bibitem[]{}
784: Wiita, P. J., Mangalam, A. V., \& Chakrabarti, S. K.
785: \newblock 1992, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 254, p. 251
786:
787: \bibitem[]{}
788: Wu, J., Zhou, X., Wu, Xue-Bing., et al.
789: \newblock 2006, {AJ}, 132, 1256
790:
791: \bibitem[]{}
792: Xie, G-Z, Lu, R-W, Zhou, Y., et al.
793: \newblock 1988, {A\&AS}, 72, 163
794:
795: \bibitem[]{}
796: Xue, Y., \& Cui, W.
797: \newblock 2005, {ApJ}, 622, 160
798:
799: \end{thebibliography}
800:
801: \clearpage
802:
803: \begin{figure}
804: \plotone{fig1.ps}
805: \caption{Light-curves for V-band are plotted in panel (a), (b), (c) and (d)
806: respectively for March 30, March 31, May 1 and May 3. The R-band light-curves
807: for March 30 and March 31 are plotted respectively in panel (e) and (f).}
808: \end{figure}
809:
810: \begin{figure}
811: \plotone{fig2.ps}
812: \caption{The R-band light-curves
813: for April 5, April 6, May 1, May 2 and May 3
814: are plotted respectively in panel (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k).}
815: \end{figure}
816:
817: \begin{figure}
818: \plotone{fig3.eps}
819: \caption{First order structure function of the BL Lac object Mrk 501 of the top
820: panel of Fig. 2 (g). Error bars are also plotted in the figure but the size of error
821: bars are less than the size of the symbol, so, not visible clearly.}
822: \end{figure}
823:
824: \begin{figure}
825: \plotone{fig4.ps}
826: \caption{Panels a, b, c, d and e represent light-curves
827: in magnitude B,V, R and color (B$_{ave}$ - R$_{ave}$
828: and (V$_{ave}$ - R$_{ave}$) respectively for the
829: observing run March 8 - May 3, 2000.}
830: \end{figure}
831:
832: \clearpage
833:
834: \begin{table}
835: \caption[]{The complete log of observations of Mrk 501 and IDV status. V and NV
836: represent intraday variability observed and not observed respectively.}
837: \begin{center}
838: \begin{tabular}{ccclcl} \hline \hline
839: Date & Filter & No. of & Telescope & IDV & Time \\
840: (dd.mm.yyyy)& & data & & Status & Scale \\
841: & & points & & & \\ \hline
842: 08.03.2000 & B & ~3 & India & NV & \\
843: & R & ~3 & India & NV & \\
844: 09.03.2000 & B & ~3 & India & NV & \\
845: & R & ~4 & India & NV & \\
846: 10.03.2000 & B & ~3 & India & NV & \\
847: & R & ~2 & India & NV & \\
848: 30.03.2000 & V & 17 & Korea & NV & \\
849: & R & 18 & Korea & NV & \\
850: 31.03.2000 & V & 12 & Korea & NV & \\
851: & R & 49 & Korea & NV & \\
852: 01.04.2000 & R & 32 & Korea & Noisy & \\
853: 04.04.2000 & R & ~1 & India & NV & \\
854: 05.04.2000 & R & 45 & India & ~V & 15 min \\
855: 06.04.2000 & R & 32 & India & NV & \\
856: 01.05.2000 & V & ~8 & Korea & NV & \\
857: & R & 16 & Korea & NV & \\
858: 02.05.2000 & V & ~6 & Korea & NV & \\
859: & R & 76 & Korea & NV & \\
860: 03.05.2000 & V & ~9 & Korea & NV & \\
861: & R & 70 & Korea & NV & \\
862: \hline
863: \end{tabular}
864: \end{center}
865: \end{table}
866:
867: \begin{table}
868: \caption[]{The B-band data of Mrk 501.}
869: \begin{center}
870: \begin{tabular}{ccc} \hline \hline
871: JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error \\\hline
872: 1612.479 & 14.659 & 0.017 \\
873: 1612.486 & 14.666 & 0.017 \\
874: 1612.493 & 14.672 & 0.016 \\
875: 1613.478 & 14.635 & 0.019 \\
876: 1613.487 & 14.628 & 0.018 \\
877: 1613.494 & 14.708 & 0.018 \\
878: 1613.501 & 14.685 & 0.018 \\
879: 1613.516 & 14.700 & 0.019 \\
880: 1613.525 & 14.691 & 0.036 \\
881: \hline
882: \end{tabular}
883: \end{center}
884: \end{table}
885:
886: \begin{table}
887: \caption[]{The V-band data of Mrk 501.}
888: \begin{center}
889: \begin{tabular}{cccccc} \hline \hline
890: JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error & JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error \\\hline
891: 1634.245 & 13.718 & 0.005 & 1635.334 & 13.764 & 0.004 \\
892: 1634.250 & 13.685 & 0.005 & 1635.338 & 13.766 & 0.004 \\
893: 1634.253 & 13.695 & 0.005 & 1635.341 & 13.761 & 0.004 \\
894: 1634.255 & 13.671 & 0.005 & 1667.232 & 13.601 & 0.006 \\
895: 1634.258 & 13.685 & 0.005 & 1667.234 & 13.599 & 0.006 \\
896: 1634.261 & 13.681 & 0.005 & 1667.237 & 13.588 & 0.005 \\
897: 1634.263 & 13.688 & 0.005 & 1667.240 & 13.589 & 0.005 \\
898: 1634.266 & 13.674 & 0.005 & 1667.242 & 13.614 & 0.006 \\
899: 1634.329 & 13.711 & 0.009 & 1667.245 & 13.600 & 0.006 \\
900: 1634.335 & 13.716 & 0.008 & 1667.247 & 13.600 & 0.006 \\
901: 1634.338 & 13.733 & 0.008 & 1667.250 & 13.608 & 0.005 \\
902: 1634.340 & 13.739 & 0.009 & 1668.303 & 13.763 & 0.006 \\
903: 1634.343 & 13.733 & 0.009 & 1668.307 & 13.766 & 0.006 \\
904: 1634.346 & 13.747 & 0.009 & 1668.309 & 13.735 & 0.006 \\
905: 1634.348 & 13.750 & 0.011 & 1668.317 & 13.731 & 0.006 \\
906: 1634.351 & 13.686 & 0.012 & 1668.321 & 13.735 & 0.006 \\
907: 1634.354 & 13.715 & 0.017 & 1668.323 & 13.737 & 0.006 \\
908: 1635.308 & 13.756 & 0.004 & 1669.270 & 13.751 & 0.008 \\
909: 1635.311 & 13.756 & 0.004 & 1669.272 & 13.742 & 0.009 \\
910: 1635.314 & 13.757 & 0.004 & 1669.274 & 13.762 & 0.009 \\
911: 1635.317 & 13.762 & 0.004 & 1669.277 & 13.750 & 0.009 \\
912: 1635.320 & 13.775 & 0.004 & 1669.279 & 13.728 & 0.011 \\
913: 1635.323 & 13.756 & 0.004 & 1669.281 & 13.756 & 0.011 \\
914: 1635.325 & 13.758 & 0.004 & 1669.284 & 13.745 & 0.010 \\
915: 1635.328 & 13.772 & 0.004 & 1669.286 & 13.759 & 0.009 \\
916: 1635.331 & 13.762 & 0.004 & 1669.288 & 13.758 & 0.009 \\
917: \hline
918: \end{tabular}
919: \end{center}
920: \end{table}
921:
922: \begin{table}
923: \caption[]{The R-band data of Mrk 501.}
924: \scriptsize
925: \begin{center}
926: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc} \hline \hline
927: JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error & JD (2450000+)& Magnitude & Error & JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error \\\hline
928: %\begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}
929: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
930: %\tablewidth{0pt}
931: %\tablecaption{The R-band data of Mrk 501.}
932: %\tablehead{
933: %\colhead{JD (2450000+)} &
934: %\colhead{Magnitude} &
935: %\colhead{Error} &
936: %\colhead{JD (2450000+)} &
937: %\colhead{Magnitude} &
938: %\colhead{Error} &
939: %\colhead{JD (2450000+)} &
940: %\colhead{Magnitude} &
941: %\colhead{Error}\\
942: %}
943: %\startdata
944: 1612.474 & 13.446 & 0.005 & 1635.217 & 13.230 & 0.003 & 1636.184 & 13.290 & 0.042 \\
945: 1612.483 & 13.450 & 0.005 & 1635.219 & 13.226 & 0.003 & 1636.186 & 13.215 & 0.035 \\
946: 1612.490 & 13.450 & 0.005 & 1635.222 & 13.230 & 0.003 & 1636.203 & 13.212 & 0.016 \\
947: 1613.475 & 13.437 & 0.005 & 1635.224 & 13.230 & 0.003 & 1636.206 & 13.199 & 0.010 \\
948: 1613.483 & 13.415 & 0.005 & 1635.227 & 13.229 & 0.003 & 1636.208 & 13.180 & 0.010 \\
949: 1613.491 & 13.442 & 0.005 & 1635.230 & 13.236 & 0.003 & 1636.211 & 13.176 & 0.013 \\
950: 1613.498 & 13.439 & 0.005 & 1635.232 & 13.242 & 0.003 & 1636.214 & 13.203 & 0.014 \\
951: 1613.505 & 13.459 & 0.005 & 1635.235 & 13.230 & 0.003 & 1636.216 & 13.199 & 0.029 \\
952: 1613.516 & 13.450 & 0.005 & 1635.237 & 13.248 & 0.003 & 1636.218 & 13.177 & 0.022 \\
953: 1634.269 & 13.218 & 0.003 & 1635.240 & 13.236 & 0.003 & 1636.220 & 13.176 & 0.019 \\
954: 1634.272 & 13.225 & 0.003 & 1635.243 & 13.240 & 0.003 & 1636.222 & 13.214 & 0.018 \\
955: 1634.276 & 13.224 & 0.004 & 1635.248 & 13.227 & 0.003 & 1636.224 & 13.190 & 0.033 \\
956: 1634.279 & 13.222 & 0.004 & 1635.250 & 13.241 & 0.003 & 1636.226 & 13.232 & 0.030 \\
957: 1634.281 & 13.215 & 0.004 & 1635.253 & 13.242 & 0.003 & 1636.228 & 13.189 & 0.040 \\
958: 1634.284 & 13.223 & 0.004 & 1635.255 & 13.241 & 0.003 & 1636.240 & 13.143 & 0.025 \\
959: 1634.286 & 13.215 & 0.004 & 1635.258 & 13.243 & 0.003 & 1636.242 & 13.214 & 0.023 \\
960: 1634.289 & 13.216 & 0.004 & 1635.261 & 13.246 & 0.003 & 1636.245 & 13.165 & 0.025 \\
961: 1634.291 & 13.218 & 0.004 & 1635.264 & 13.236 & 0.003 & 1636.248 & 13.172 & 0.026 \\
962: 1634.309 & 13.220 & 0.004 & 1635.266 & 13.236 & 0.003 & 1636.250 & 13.212 & 0.032 \\
963: 1634.311 & 13.216 & 0.004 & 1635.269 & 13.241 & 0.003 & 1636.252 & 13.179 & 0.036 \\
964: 1634.313 & 13.216 & 0.004 & 1635.271 & 13.255 & 0.003 & 1636.254 & 13.202 & 0.024 \\
965: 1634.315 & 13.223 & 0.004 & 1635.273 & 13.245 & 0.003 & 1636.256 & 13.219 & 0.022 \\
966: 1634.317 & 13.218 & 0.004 & 1635.276 & 13.241 & 0.003 & 1636.258 & 13.160 & 0.018 \\
967: 1634.319 & 13.214 & 0.004 & 1635.278 & 13.236 & 0.003 & 1636.260 & 13.198 & 0.013 \\
968: 1634.323 & 13.203 & 0.004 & 1635.280 & 13.237 & 0.003 & 1636.262 & 13.175 & 0.012 \\
969: 1634.325 & 13.223 & 0.005 & 1635.282 & 13.241 & 0.003 & 1636.278 & 13.151 & 0.027 \\
970: 1634.327 & 13.212 & 0.005 & 1635.286 & 13.235 & 0.003 & 1636.282 & 13.179 & 0.037 \\
971: 1635.175 & 13.233 & 0.004 & 1635.288 & 13.239 & 0.003 & 1636.284 & 13.218 & 0.031 \\
972: 1635.178 & 13.226 & 0.004 & 1635.290 & 13.248 & 0.003 & 1639.445 & 13.475 & 0.002 \\
973: 1635.180 & 13.230 & 0.003 & 1635.292 & 13.235 & 0.003 & 1640.408 & 13.409 & 0.003 \\
974: 1635.183 & 13.233 & 0.003 & 1635.295 & 13.236 & 0.003 & 1640.410 & 13.410 & 0.003 \\
975: 1635.187 & 13.237 & 0.003 & 1635.297 & 13.238 & 0.003 & 1640.412 & 13.409 & 0.003 \\
976: 1635.189 & 13.231 & 0.003 & 1635.299 & 13.233 & 0.003 & 1640.414 & 13.412 & 0.003 \\
977: 1635.192 & 13.235 & 0.003 & 1635.301 & 13.231 & 0.003 & 1640.416 & 13.427 & 0.003 \\
978: 1635.196 & 13.227 & 0.003 & 1635.303 & 13.234 & 0.003 & 1640.419 & 13.430 & 0.003 \\
979: 1635.200 & 13.242 & 0.003 & 1635.306 & 13.243 & 0.003 & 1640.421 & 13.446 & 0.003 \\
980: 1635.204 & 13.230 & 0.003 & 1636.176 & 13.207 & 0.010 & 1640.423 & 13.431 & 0.003 \\
981: 1635.209 & 13.233 & 0.003 & 1636.178 & 13.204 & 0.022 & 1640.425 & 13.426 & 0.003 \\
982: 1635.212 & 13.233 & 0.003 & 1636.180 & 13.288 & 0.049 & 1640.427 & 13.413 & 0.003 \\
983: 1635.214 & 13.232 & 0.003 & 1636.182 & 13.178 & 0.060 & 1640.429 & 13.416 & 0.003 \\
984: \hline
985: \end{tabular}
986: \end{center}
987: \end{table}
988:
989:
990: \begin{table}
991: \scriptsize
992: \begin{center}
993: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc} \hline \hline
994: JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error & JD (2450000+)& Magnitude & Error & JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error \\\hline
995: 1640.431 & 13.393 & 0.003 & 1641.418 & 13.448 & 0.002 & 1667.229 & 13.189 & 0.003 \\
996: 1640.433 & 13.408 & 0.003 & 1641.420 & 13.440 & 0.002 & 1668.113 & 13.239 & 0.005 \\
997: 1640.436 & 13.405 & 0.003 & 1641.423 & 13.442 & 0.002 & 1668.116 & 13.242 & 0.005 \\
998: 1640.438 & 13.413 & 0.003 & 1641.426 & 13.439 & 0.002 & 1668.118 & 13.241 & 0.005 \\
999: 1640.440 & 13.412 & 0.003 & 1641.428 & 13.442 & 0.002 & 1668.121 & 13.239 & 0.005 \\
1000: 1640.442 & 13.410 & 0.003 & 1641.430 & 13.441 & 0.002 & 1668.123 & 13.246 & 0.005 \\
1001: 1640.444 & 13.409 & 0.003 & 1641.433 & 13.432 & 0.002 & 1668.126 & 13.239 & 0.005 \\
1002: 1640.446 & 13.415 & 0.003 & 1641.436 & 13.436 & 0.002 & 1668.128 & 13.238 & 0.006 \\
1003: 1640.449 & 13.410 & 0.003 & 1641.438 & 13.436 & 0.002 & 1668.133 & 13.235 & 0.006 \\
1004: 1640.451 & 13.402 & 0.003 & 1641.441 & 13.433 & 0.002 & 1668.135 & 13.207 & 0.006 \\
1005: 1640.453 & 13.408 & 0.003 & 1641.443 & 13.430 & 0.002 & 1668.137 & 13.278 & 0.006 \\
1006: 1640.456 & 13.398 & 0.003 & 1641.445 & 13.433 & 0.002 & 1668.139 & 13.229 & 0.005 \\
1007: 1640.458 & 13.404 & 0.003 & 1641.448 & 13.442 & 0.002 & 1668.142 & 13.237 & 0.005 \\
1008: 1640.460 & 13.401 & 0.003 & 1641.451 & 13.442 & 0.002 & 1668.144 & 13.228 & 0.004 \\
1009: 1640.463 & 13.400 & 0.003 & 1641.453 & 13.442 & 0.002 & 1668.146 & 13.245 & 0.005 \\
1010: 1640.465 & 13.402 & 0.003 & 1641.456 & 13.441 & 0.002 & 1668.149 & 13.243 & 0.004 \\
1011: 1640.466 & 13.401 & 0.003 & 1641.458 & 13.441 & 0.002 & 1668.151 & 13.236 & 0.004 \\
1012: 1640.469 & 13.401 & 0.003 & 1641.461 & 13.447 & 0.002 & 1668.154 & 13.233 & 0.004 \\
1013: 1640.471 & 13.397 & 0.003 & 1641.464 & 13.436 & 0.002 & 1668.158 & 13.228 & 0.004 \\
1014: 1640.473 & 13.397 & 0.003 & 1641.466 & 13.437 & 0.002 & 1668.160 & 13.241 & 0.004 \\
1015: 1640.475 & 13.401 & 0.003 & 1641.468 & 13.440 & 0.002 & 1668.163 & 13.230 & 0.004 \\
1016: 1640.477 & 13.396 & 0.003 & 1641.470 & 13.439 & 0.002 & 1668.165 & 13.228 & 0.005 \\
1017: 1640.479 & 13.399 & 0.003 & 1641.473 & 13.446 & 0.002 & 1668.168 & 13.238 & 0.005 \\
1018: 1640.481 & 13.408 & 0.003 & 1641.476 & 13.439 & 0.002 & 1668.170 & 13.242 & 0.004 \\
1019: 1640.484 & 13.405 & 0.003 & 1641.478 & 13.431 & 0.002 & 1668.173 & 13.246 & 0.005 \\
1020: 1640.485 & 13.400 & 0.003 & 1667.189 & 13.187 & 0.009 & 1668.175 & 13.237 & 0.004 \\
1021: 1640.488 & 13.397 & 0.003 & 1667.191 & 13.191 & 0.004 & 1668.177 & 13.249 & 0.004 \\
1022: 1640.490 & 13.403 & 0.003 & 1667.194 & 13.172 & 0.004 & 1668.180 & 13.240 & 0.005 \\
1023: 1640.492 & 13.399 & 0.003 & 1667.197 & 13.180 & 0.004 & 1668.182 & 13.236 & 0.006 \\
1024: 1640.495 & 13.411 & 0.003 & 1667.201 & 13.183 & 0.003 & 1668.184 & 13.237 & 0.005 \\
1025: 1640.497 & 13.406 & 0.003 & 1667.203 & 13.181 & 0.004 & 1668.187 & 13.229 & 0.006 \\
1026: 1640.499 & 13.396 & 0.003 & 1667.206 & 13.180 & 0.003 & 1668.192 & 13.242 & 0.006 \\
1027: 1640.501 & 13.397 & 0.003 & 1667.208 & 13.182 & 0.003 & 1668.194 & 13.229 & 0.005 \\
1028: 1640.503 & 13.396 & 0.003 & 1667.210 & 13.193 & 0.003 & 1668.196 & 13.253 & 0.006 \\
1029: 1641.402 & 13.441 & 0.002 & 1667.214 & 13.179 & 0.003 & 1668.201 & 13.229 & 0.006 \\
1030: 1641.405 & 13.444 & 0.002 & 1667.216 & 13.179 & 0.003 & 1668.217 & 13.250 & 0.005 \\
1031: 1641.408 & 13.442 & 0.002 & 1667.218 & 13.193 & 0.003 & 1668.221 & 13.237 & 0.004 \\
1032: 1641.411 & 13.445 & 0.002 & 1667.221 & 13.173 & 0.003 & 1668.224 & 13.246 & 0.004 \\
1033: 1641.413 & 13.441 & 0.002 & 1667.223 & 13.185 & 0.003 & 1668.232 & 13.250 & 0.004 \\
1034: 1641.416 & 13.441 & 0.002 & 1667.226 & 13.182 & 0.003 & 1668.239 & 13.239 & 0.004 \\
1035: \hline
1036: \end{tabular}
1037: \end{center}
1038: \end{table}
1039:
1040: \begin{table}
1041: \scriptsize
1042: \begin{center}
1043: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc} \hline \hline
1044: JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error & JD (2450000+)& Magnitude & Error & JD (2450000+) & Magnitude & Error \\\hline
1045: 1668.242 & 13.234 & 0.004 & 1669.155 & 13.408 & 0.004 & 1669.244 & 13.411 & 0.006 \\
1046: 1668.244 & 13.260 & 0.004 & 1669.158 & 13.411 & 0.004 & 1669.249 & 13.421 & 0.004 \\
1047: 1668.247 & 13.243 & 0.004 & 1669.161 & 13.421 & 0.004 & 1669.252 & 13.413 & 0.005 \\
1048: 1668.250 & 13.252 & 0.004 & 1669.163 & 13.404 & 0.004 & 1669.255 & 13.415 & 0.005 \\
1049: 1668.252 & 13.249 & 0.004 & 1669.166 & 13.407 & 0.004 & 1669.258 & 13.406 & 0.005 \\
1050: 1668.254 & 13.251 & 0.004 & 1669.168 & 13.408 & 0.004 & 1669.260 & 13.418 & 0.005 \\
1051: 1668.257 & 13.246 & 0.004 & 1669.170 & 13.415 & 0.004 & 1669.262 & 13.431 & 0.004 \\
1052: 1668.259 & 13.245 & 0.004 & 1669.173 & 13.409 & 0.004 & 1669.265 & 13.419 & 0.004 \\
1053: 1668.261 & 13.248 & 0.004 & 1669.175 & 13.412 & 0.004 & 1669.267 & 13.418 & 0.004 \\
1054: 1668.264 & 13.244 & 0.004 & 1669.178 & 13.398 & 0.004 & 1669.290 & 13.413 & 0.005 \\
1055: 1668.266 & 13.201 & 0.004 & 1669.180 & 13.411 & 0.004 & 1669.293 & 13.415 & 0.004 \\
1056: 1668.268 & 13.240 & 0.004 & 1669.182 & 13.410 & 0.004 & 1669.295 & 13.417 & 0.004 \\
1057: 1668.271 & 13.257 & 0.004 & 1669.184 & 13.404 & 0.004 & 1669.297 & 13.424 & 0.005 \\
1058: 1668.273 & 13.237 & 0.004 & 1669.187 & 13.426 & 0.004 & 1669.301 & 13.414 & 0.005 \\
1059: 1668.277 & 13.225 & 0.004 & 1669.189 & 13.415 & 0.004 & 1669.303 & 13.423 & 0.006 \\
1060: 1668.280 & 13.244 & 0.004 & 1669.191 & 13.412 & 0.004 & 1669.307 & 13.402 & 0.006 \\
1061: 1668.285 & 13.233 & 0.004 & 1669.194 & 13.413 & 0.004 & 1669.310 & 13.401 & 0.006 \\
1062: 1668.283 & 13.231 & 0.004 & 1669.196 & 13.411 & 0.004 & 1669.312 & 13.412 & 0.005 \\
1063: 1668.287 & 13.244 & 0.004 & 1669.198 & 13.405 & 0.004 & 1669.314 & 13.411 & 0.005 \\
1064: 1668.290 & 13.237 & 0.004 & 1669.201 & 13.428 & 0.004 & 1669.317 & 13.405 & 0.005 \\
1065: 1668.293 & 13.231 & 0.004 & 1669.203 & 13.406 & 0.004 & 1669.320 & 13.431 & 0.006 \\
1066: 1668.295 & 13.229 & 0.004 & 1669.205 & 13.407 & 0.004 & 1669.323 & 13.418 & 0.008 \\
1067: 1668.297 & 13.227 & 0.004 & 1669.207 & 13.417 & 0.004 & 1669.326 & 13.437 & 0.006 \\
1068: 1668.299 & 13.234 & 0.004 & 1669.210 & 13.426 & 0.004 & 1669.328 & 13.416 & 0.005 \\
1069: 1668.326 & 13.219 & 0.004 & 1669.212 & 13.421 & 0.004 & 1669.331 & 13.419 & 0.004 \\
1070: 1668.329 & 13.229 & 0.004 & 1669.214 & 13.422 & 0.004 & 1669.333 & 13.414 & 0.005 \\
1071: 1668.331 & 13.224 & 0.004 & 1669.216 & 13.418 & 0.004 & 1669.335 & 13.418 & 0.005 \\
1072: 1668.334 & 13.216 & 0.004 & 1669.219 & 13.405 & 0.004 & 1669.338 & 13.421 & 0.004 \\
1073: 1668.336 & 13.222 & 0.004 & 1669.221 & 13.422 & 0.004 & 1669.340 & 13.415 & 0.004 \\
1074: 1668.338 & 13.223 & 0.004 & 1669.224 & 13.431 & 0.005 & 1669.343 & 13.426 & 0.005 \\
1075: 1668.340 & 13.225 & 0.004 & 1669.227 & 13.416 & 0.005 & 1669.348 & 13.425 & 0.006 \\
1076: 1668.343 & 13.213 & 0.004 & 1669.229 & 13.415 & 0.005 & 1669.350 & 13.420 & 0.006 \\
1077: 1668.345 & 13.229 & 0.004 & 1669.231 & 13.410 & 0.005 & 1669.352 & 13.429 & 0.007 \\
1078: 1668.347 & 13.232 & 0.004 & 1669.237 & 13.422 & 0.005 & 1669.354 & 13.434 & 0.007 \\
1079: 1668.352 & 13.227 & 0.005 & 1669.241 & 13.420 & 0.004 & 1669.357 & 13.437 & 0.009 \\
1080: 1668.355 & 13.231 & 0.006 & & & & & & \\
1081: \hline
1082: \end{tabular}
1083: \end{center}
1084: \end{table}
1085: %\enddata
1086: %\end{deluxetable}
1087:
1088: \end{document}
1089: