1: %% *************************************************************************
2: %% chjaa.tex
3: %% ChJAA Ver. 1.2, LaTeX class for Chinese Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
4: %% demonstration file
5: %% (C) Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys.
6: %% revised by Zhou Ai-Ying, 2001.08.28;2003.04.20;2006.09.07
7: %%
8: %% Note: 1. The ChJAA macro class chjaa.cls for LaTeX2e was originally adapted from
9: %% aa.cls, the A&A's macro class (Ver.5.01). Manuscripts for
10: %% ChJAA can be prepared following this demo file using chjaa.cls.
11: %% 2. To include EPS/PS graphics, you may use one of the graphics macro packages:
12: %% graphicx.sty, epsf.sty or psfig.sty, or their mix. Please note the usage
13: %% of \input{*.sty} and \usepackage{*}, they have no difference.
14: %% 3. Pay close attention to the format of ChJAA's reference list and
15: %% other requirements. See Instructions for Authors (2001, ChJAA, Vol.1, No.1)
16: %% or visit ChJAA's web pages at http://www.chjaa.org
17: %% 4. Final publication layout will be produced with this LaTeX source file.
18: %%---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19: %%
20: \documentclass[referee]{chjaa} % referee version: for submission
21: %\documentclass{chjaa} % preprint, the final version for publication
22: %if use preprint, please de-comment \volnopage{} too.
23:
24: \usepackage{graphicx,times} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, new
25: \input{epsf.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, old
26: \input{psfig.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, old
27:
28: \headsep=6mm
29: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.15}
30:
31:
32: \begin{document}
33:
34: \title{Simultaneous multi-wavelength observations of the TeV Blazar Mrk 421
35: during February $-$ March 2003: X-ray and NIR correlated variability}
36: %\,$^*$
37: %\footnotetext{$*$ Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.}
38: %}
39: % \subtitle{I. Place Your Subtitle Here}
40:
41: \volnopage{Vol.0 (200x) No.0, 000--000} %%preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
42: \setcounter{page}{1} %%starting page, preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
43:
44: \author{Alok C. Gupta
45: \inst{1}\mailto{}
46: %% Please move "\mailto{}" to the corresponding author of the paper.
47: %% For single author or all the authors from an institute, use "\inst{}" only
48: %% Here is an example of three authors come from different institutes.
49: \and B. S. Acharya
50: \inst{2}
51: \and Debanjan Bose
52: \inst{2}
53: \and Varsha R. Chitnis
54: \inst{2}
55: \and Jun-Hui Fan
56: \inst{1}
57: }
58:
59: \institute{Center for Astrophysics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China \\
60: \email{acgupta30@gmail.com}
61: %% Please give the E-mail address of the author, to whom future correspondence and
62: %% offprint requests will be sent. Note to pair \mailto{} with \email{}
63: \and
64: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road,
65: Colaba, Mumbai - 400 005, India \\
66: }
67:
68: \date{Received~~2007 month day; accepted~~2007~~month day}
69:
70: \abstract{
71: In the present paper, we have reported the result of simultaneous
72: multi-wavelength observations of the TeV blazar Mrk 421 during February
73: $-$ March 2003. In this period, we have observed Mrk 421 using Pachmarhi
74: Array of \v Cerenkov Telescopes (PACT) of Tata Institute of Fundamental
75: Research at Pachmarhi, India. Other simultaneous data were taken from
76: the published literature and public data archives. We have analyzed the
77: high quality X-ray (2-20 keV) observations from the NASA Rossi X-Ray
78: Timing Explorer (RXTE). We have seen a possible correlated variability
79: between X-ray and J band (1.25 $\mu$) near infrared (NIR) wavelength.
80: This is the first case of X-ray and NIR correlated variability in Mrk 421 or
81: any high energy peaked (HBL) blazar. The correlated variability reported
82: here is indicating a similar origin for NIR and X-ray emission. The
83: emission is not affected much by the environment of the surrounding
84: medium around the central engine of the Mrk 421. The observations are
85: consistent with the shock-in-jet model for the emission of radiations.
86: \keywords{galaxies: active - galaxies: blazars: general - galaxies:
87: blazars: individual: Mrk 421}
88: }
89:
90: \authorrunning{Gupta et al.} %author_head in even pages
91: \titlerunning{Variability of Mrk 421} % title_head in odd pages
92:
93: \maketitle
94: %% The author head (on even pages) and the title head (on odd pages) will be
95: %% automatically extracted from \author{} and \title{}. Whenever the title is too long,
96: %% you will be asked to supply a shorter one by inserting either \authorrunning{} or
97: %% \titlerunning{} before \maketitle. Anyway, you can specify your own heads in advance.
98: %%
99: %%
100: %% Note: In the following text body of your manuscript, please note several differences from
101: %% other major journals:
102: %% (1) \subsection{Please Capitalize the First Letter of Each Notional Word in Subsection Title}
103: %% (2) Please Capitalize the First Letter of Each Notional Word in all tables' captions
104:
105: %
106: %________________________________________________ sections below
107: %
108: \section{Introduction} %% first-level sections will be auto-capitalized
109: \label{sect:intro}
110:
111: A small subgroup of radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs) show
112: significant flux variability in the complete electromagnetic (EM)
113: spectrum, variable polarization and their radiation at all wavelengths
114: is predominantly non-thermal. They are known as blazars, which is a
115: collective name of subclasses (BL Lac objects, optically violent
116: variables OVVs, high polarization quasars HPQs and flat spectrum
117: radio quasars FSRQs) of radio-loud AGNs. On a unified model of
118: radio-loud AGNs based on the angle between the line of sight and
119: the emitted jet from the source, blazars jet make angle of
120: $<$ 10$^{\circ}$ from the line of sight (Urry \& Padovani 1995).
121: Since, blazars emit radiation
122: in the complete EM spectrum which gives an excellent opportunity
123: to study the spectral energy distribution (SEDs). It is found from
124: observations that blazars SEDs have two peaks. The first component
125: peaks any where from IR to optical in so called red blazars or low
126: energy blazars (LBLs) or radio selected blazars (RBLs) and at UV/X-ray
127: in so called blue blazars or high energy blazars (HBLs) or X-ray
128: selected blazars (XBLs). Its origin is synchrotron emission from high
129: energy electrons in the jet. The second component extends up to
130: $\gamma-$rays, peaking at GeV energies in RBLs and at TeV in XBLs.
131: The electromagnetic emission is dominated by synchrotron component
132: at low-energy and at high-energy by inverse Compton component
133: (Coppi 1999, Sikora et al. 2001, Krawczynski 2004).
134:
135: Mrk 421 is the nearest detected TeV BL Lac object (redshift z = 0.031).
136: It was first noted to be an object with blue excess which later turned
137: out to be an elliptical galaxy with bright point like nucleus (Ulrich et
138: al. 1975). Since the energy of synchrotron peak of the source is higher
139: than 0.1 keV, it is classified as a HBL. Mrk 421 was the first extragalactic
140: object discovered at TeV energies (Punch et al. 1992). This source was
141: later confirmed by the {\it high energy gamma ray astronomy} (HEGRA) group
142: (Petry et al. 1996). It is also one of the TeV blazars detected by
143: {\it energetic gamma ray experiment telescope} (EGRET) instrument in
144: the 30 MeV - 30 GeV energy range by the {\it Compton gamma ray observatory}
145: (CGRO) (Thompson et al. 1995). This source has been detected by the other
146: detectors like, the {\it imaging Compton telescope} (COMPTEL) on board
147: CGRO at the 3.2 $\sigma$ level in the 10-30 MeV energy range
148: (Collmar et al. 1999) and the {\it solar tower atmosphere \v Cerenkov effect
149: experiment} (STACEE) in the 140 GeV energy band (Boone et al. 2002).
150:
151: Mrk 421 variability has been studied in all EM regimes in isolation. An
152: exhaustive compilation of radio data at 22 and 37 GHz, spanning for about
153: 25 years, for several extragalactic sources including Mrk 421 were reported
154: by (Tar$\ddot{a}$sranta et al. 2004, 2005). NIR data for three
155: decades, for several blazars including Mrk 421, were given by
156: (Fan \& Lin 1999). A much systematic and comprehensive study of this
157: source was done by Gupta et al. (2004) in the same period of the campaign
158: for which the present paper is written. In the compiled optical data for
159: long term observations, variation of 4.6 mag was reported by Stein et al.
160: (1976) and rapid variability of 1.4 mag in 2.5 hours was reported by
161: Xie et al. (1988). There are several simultaneous X-ray and gamma-ray
162: as well as multi-wavelength campaigns for the source (Makino et al. 1987,
163: Macomb et al. 1995, Takahashi et al. 2000, Katarzynski et al. 2003,
164: Blazejowski et al. 2005).
165:
166: In the present paper, we aimed to search for correlated multi-wavelength
167: variability in Mrk 421. This kind of study will be an important tool for
168: understanding the emission mechanism of blazars. This paper is structured
169: as follows. In section 2, we present multi-wavelength observations and data
170: reduction; section 3 and 4 give the results and discussions of the present
171: work.
172:
173: %% Authors can use \cite, \citep and \citet for citation.
174: %% You may also give a citation as 'Michel et al. 1992', and use Table~1 or Fig.~1
175: %% and so forth. Using \ref and \label for cross-references of Tables/Figures is
176: %% a good way in adjusting/adding/removing text, tables or figures.
177:
178: \section{Observations, Data and the Data Reduction}
179: \label{sect:Obs}
180:
181: \subsection{TeV Observations with PACT}
182:
183: \begin{figure}
184: \centering
185: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=4in]{fig1.ps}
186: \caption{Space-angle distribution of source and background events for
187: a typical run.}
188: %\label{fig0}
189: \end{figure}
190:
191: We have used Pachmarhi Array of \v Cerenkov Telescopes (PACT), for observation
192: of Mrk 421 in TeV gamma rays.
193: PACT is located in Central India (latitude 22$^\circ$ 28$^\prime$ N, longitude
194: 78$^\circ$ 25$^\prime$ E, altitude 1075 $m$).
195: We use wavefront sampling technique to
196: detect {\it TeV} $\gamma$-rays from astronomical sources. There are 24
197: telescopes spread over an area of $80m \times 100m$. Each telescope has 7
198: para-axially mounted parabolic mirrors (f/d $\sim$ 1) of diameter 0.9m with a PMT
199: (EMI 9807B) mounted at the focus of each mirror.
200: Each telescope is independently steerable, controlled remotely
201: and monitored throughout the observation (Gothe et al. 2000).
202: The entire array is sub-divided into 4 sectors with 6 telescopes in each.
203: Each sector has its own data acquisition system (DAQ) where data on real time,
204: relative arrival time of PMT pulses (using TDCs) and photon density (using ADCs)
205: are recorded. A Master DAQ at the center of the array is also used for
206: recording informations of an event relevant to entire array.
207: The 7 PMT pulses of a telescope are also linearly added to form a
208: telescope pulse for trigger generation. Data recording is initiated when a
209: coincidence of 4 out of any 6 telescope pulses generates an event trigger for a
210: sector. Typical trigger rate was about 1-3 Hz per sector. The details of this
211: array are given in (Bhat et al. 2000, Majumdar et al. 2003).
212:
213: Observations are carried out in ON-OFF mode on clear moonless nights.
214: In year 2003 from 26th February to 5th March there was a
215: world-wide multi-wavelength campaign in several wavebands for this source
216: including PACT. During these nights 2 sectors out of 4 were aligned along
217: the source direction and remaining 2 were looking at a background region
218: simultaneously. The background region is chosen to be a dark region
219: with the same declination as that of the source but with different RA.
220: Background region is chosen in such a way that there is substantial overlap
221: of zenith angle range between the source and background runs.
222: The typical run span was about 1-3 hours. The sectors that look at source
223: and background were interchanged on a daily basis.
224:
225: A number of preliminary checks were carried out on the data before doing
226: actual analysis. It was found that data taken on 26th and 27th February,
227: 3rd and 5th March were very bad therefore rejected. Observations taken on
228: 28th February, 1st, 2nd and 4th March are analyzed.
229: The arrival direction of each shower is determined by reconstructing
230: shower front using the relative arrival times of \v Cerenkov photons at
231: various telescopes (or PMTs). \v Cerenkov photon front is then fitted with
232: a plane, normal to this plane gives the direction of the shower axis. Then,
233: for each shower or event, this space angle is estimated as an angle between the
234: direction of shower axis and the source direction. Thus space angles are
235: obtained for all the events for source as well as background runs.
236: Space angle distributions of source runs are compared with respective
237: background runs over the same zenith angle region. Due to some
238: technical problem same night's source and background runs could not
239: be compared for these runs. Each source run is compared with previous
240: nights or next nights background run so that the geometry of the telescope
241: setup is also same for Source and Background runs. For this comparison,
242: the shapes of space angle distributions in
243: 2.5$^\circ$ to 6.5$^\circ$ region of source and background were normalized,
244: as we do not expect any signal beyond 2.5$^\circ$ (Majumdar et al. 2003).
245: Normalization of distributions corresponding to the background with
246: that of the source is necessary as these two data sets were taken
247: at different times. Differences between the number of source and
248: normalized background events within 2.5$^\circ$ gives the estimate
249: of $\gamma$-ray events.
250: Figure 1 shows the space angle distributions for a typical pair
251: of source and background runs.
252: Details of analysis procedure are given in (Bose et al. 2005).
253: During the campaign nights no excess of events
254: over the background is detected in any of those four nights, implying
255: $\gamma$-ray flux is close to or below the sensitivity limit of PACT.
256:
257: \v Cerenkov photon showers initiated by $\gamma$-rays and protons were
258: simulated using CORSIKA air shower simulation (Heck et al. 1998) code
259: to estimate trigger rate, energy threshold, collection area etc for the PACT setup.
260: For $\gamma$-rays incident vertically the energy threshold, defined as the peak of
261: differential rate curve, is estimated to be 750 GeV and the corresponding
262: collection area is 1.58$\times$10$^{5}$~m$^{2}$. For Mkn421, which is at an angle
263: of 20$^{\circ}$ w.r.t. zenith the energy threshold is estimated to be 1.2 TeV
264: and the collection area as 1.8$\times$10$^{5}$~m$^{2}$.
265:
266: \subsection{X-Ray Observations with RXTE}
267:
268: We have analyzed Mrk 421 data observed with RXTE during 26/2/2003 -
269: 6/3/2003. We have extracted archival data sets corresponding to this
270: multi-wavelength campaign under the guest observing program 80172.
271: RXTE has two types of detectors viz, Proportional Counter Array (PCA)
272: and High-Energy X-ray Timing Explorer (HEXTE) on-board along with
273: All Sky Monitor (ASM). The PCA consists of five identical xenon filled
274: proportional counter units (PCUs) covering an energy range of 2-60 keV.
275: During these observations only PCU 0 and PCU 2 were used. Since PCU 0
276: lost pressure in the top veto at the beginning of Epoch 5,
277: we have used only data from PCU 2. HEXTE consists of two clusters
278: of phoswich scintillation detectors covering an energy range of 15-250
279: keV, but is less sensitive. We do not discuss HEXTE data here. ASM
280: consists of three xenon filled position sensitive proportional counters
281: with field of view of 6 $\times$ 90 degrees. It covers 80\% of the sky every
282: 90 minutes and spans an energy range of 2-10 keV.
283:
284: We analyzed Standard 2 PCA data which has a time resolution of 16s
285: with energy information in 128 channels. Data reduction is done with
286: FTOOLS (version 5.3.1) distributed as part of HEASOFT (version 5.3).
287: For each of the observations, data was filtered using standard procedure
288: for faint sources given in RXTE Cook Book. For extraction of background,
289: model appropriate for faint sources (pca\_bkgd\_cmfaintl7\_eMv20031123.mdl)
290: was used. Light curves were extracted from data for three energy bands:
291: 2-9, 9-20 and 20-40 keV. Background light curves were also extracted
292: and subtracted from source light curves.
293: We obtained ASM data from MIT archive. Light curves were generated
294: taking one-day average.
295:
296: \subsection{Data from Literature: Multi-wavelength Data}
297:
298: Near Infrared data in J band used in the present paper is taken from
299: (Gupta et al. 2004). They have done observations from 1.2 meter
300: optical/NIR telescope at Gurushikhar observatory, Mount Abu, India
301: using NICMOS-3 detector and J band filter. The detail about NIR
302: observations and data reductions is given in (Gupta et al. 2004).
303:
304: The radio data is taken from the recent paper by (Tar$\ddot{a}$sranta
305: et al. 2005). They observed the source during the campaign by their
306: 17.7 meter Mets$\ddot{a}$hovi radio telescope at 22 and 37 GHz. The
307: detail about radio data is given in (Tar$\ddot{a}$sranta et al. 1998).
308:
309: \begin{figure}[h]
310: \centering
311: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=4in]{fig2.ps}
312: \caption{Multi-wavelength data of Mrk 421 as a function
313: of time for all bands from radio to gamma-rays observed during February 25
314: $-$ March 05, 2003. Vertical lines in panel (c)$-$(g) show simultaneous
315: variability in NIR and X-ray bands. In general uncertainties are
316: smaller than the symbols, the error bars have been omitted.}
317: \label {fig2}
318: \end{figure}
319:
320: \section{Results}
321:
322: \subsection{Multi-wavelength Light Curves}
323:
324: Figure 2 gives the radio to gamma-ray light curves for the multi-wavelength
325: campaign during February 25 - March 05, 2003. The data plotted here for
326: different bands of the EM spectrum is daily average. Daily average of a
327: specific date is reported at 00h 00m 00s UT. The radio flux seems to be
328: in stable state, implies variability timescale may be longer than the
329: duration of the campaign. On the other hand gamma-ray data is noisy.
330: The figure shows highly correlated variability among the different energy
331: bands of the PCA data.
332:
333: \begin{figure}
334: \centering
335: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=4in]{fig3.ps}
336: \caption{NIR and X-ray bands data of Mrk 421 as a function
337: of time observed during February 26 $-$ March 05, 2003.}
338: \label{fig3}
339: \end{figure}
340:
341: Figure 3 gives the NIR and X-ray light curves (with 5 minutes binning)
342: for the observations during February 26 - March 05, 2003. X-ray
343: coverage was much longer than the NIR coverage therefore we have selected
344: that portion of X-ray data which was approximately simultaneous with NIR.
345: For this plot PCA data of 2 energy bands, 2-4 keV and 4-9 keV are combined.
346:
347: \subsection{Cross correlation function (ZDCF)}
348:
349: We computed ZDCF (Z-transformed discrete correlation function)
350: (Alexander 1997) from light curves in X-ray and NIR bands. The
351: ZDCF is a method for determining the cross-correlation function
352: (CCF) of light curves in different energy bands which have non-evenly
353: sampled data. The ZDCF makes use of the Fisher's z-transform of the
354: correlation coefficient. Fisher's z-transform of the linear
355: correlation coefficient, r, is used to estimate the confidence level
356: of the measured correlation. This method attempts to correct the
357: biases that affect the original DCF (discrete correlation function)
358: by using equal population binning. The ZDCF involves the following
359: three steps: \\
360: (i) All possible pairs of observations, (a$_{i}$, b$_{j}$), are
361: sorted according to their time-lag $t_{i} - t_{j}$, and binned into
362: equal population bins. \\
363: (ii) Each bin is assigned its mean time-lag and the intervals above
364: and below the mean that contain 1$\sigma$ of the each point. \\
365: (iii) The correlation coefficients of the bins are calculated and
366: z-transformed. The error is calculated in z-space and transformed back
367: to r-space.
368:
369: The time-lag corresponding to the ZDCF is assumed as the time delay
370: between both components. This function is much more efficient in
371: detecting any correlation present also it takes care of the data gaps.
372: The ZDCF seems to peak at a negative lag $-$3 days, which implies that
373: X-ray variability lags the NIR variability. Since the dataset is
374: sparse and the value of ZDCF (max) is $\sim$ 0.5, so, we claim it as
375: a weak correlated variability. It will be interesting to see with more
376: such observations with focused effort in future.
377:
378: The ZDCFs are plotted in figure 4 for the three combination of light
379: curves plotted in figure 3. The cross-correlation coefficient max(ZDCF) and time lag
380: $\tau$ for each combination of light curves are as follows: \\
381: (i) ~~For PCA (2$-$9 keV) vs 12500 $\AA$ \\
382: \hspace*{0.24in} max(ZDCF) = 0.530$^{+0.1715}_{-0.1515}$, $\tau$ = $-$3.02 days \\
383: (ii) ~For PCA (9$-$20 keV) vs 12500 $\AA$ \\
384: \hspace*{0.24in} max(ZDCF) = 0.460$^{+0.1915}_{-0.1728}$, $\tau$ = $-$3.02 days \\
385: (iii) For PCA (2$-$9 keV) vs PCA (9$-$20 keV) \\
386: \hspace*{0.24in} max(ZDCF) = 0.747$^{+0.0173}_{-0.0168}$, $\tau$ = $-$0.11 days
387:
388: \begin{figure}[t]
389: \centering
390: \includegraphics[width=4in,height=4in]{fig4.ps}
391: \caption{NIR and X-ray correlations. Positive lags imply that the second
392: light curve lags the first.}
393: \label {fig4}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396: The visual inspection of the data in the figure 2 show, a strong correlation
397: in NIR and X-ray bands at JD 2452697.5, 2452698.5, 2452701.5 and 2452702.5.
398: In particular, the source has tendency to come to faint stage at JD 2452697.5
399: and a flaring activity at JD 2452701.5. Thus the positive correlation is seen
400: in both in flaring state and quiescent state. At JD 2452699.5, NIR has shown
401: anti-correlation with PCA data (this anti-correlation is responsible for lowering
402: the correlation coefficients mentioned above). On March 01, 2003 observations
403: could not be taken in NIR J band due to bad weather condition. So, NIR data for
404: JD 2452700.5 is not present in the panel (c) of the figure 2.
405:
406: \subsection{Spectral Energy Distribution (SED)}
407:
408: The SED of Mrk 421 is plotted in the figure 5 in the form log $\nu$F$_{\nu}$
409: vs. log $\nu$. All frequencies used here are observed frequencies. The
410: synchrotron component of the SED was fitted using NIR and X-ray data with
411: a parabolic function
412: \begin{eqnarray}
413: y = Ax^{2} + Bx + C
414: \end{eqnarray}
415: the synchrotron peak frequency is determine by $\nu_{peak} = -$B/2A. The
416: $\nu_{peak} =$ 16.30 is calculated from the figure 5. It has been noticed
417: for HBLs by Nieppola et al. (2006) that simple parabolic function produces
418: some error. For HBLs, the synchrotron peak is expected close to soft X-ray
419: band which decline to be very rapid. Thus in the real sense, the peak
420: frequency will be slightly higher to the reported value.
421:
422: \begin{figure}[h]
423: \centering
424: \includegraphics[width=4in,height=4in]{fig5.ps}
425: \caption{Spectral energy distribution of the Mrk 421.}
426: \label {fig5}
427: \end{figure}
428:
429: \section{Discussions}
430:
431: We have found here the evidence of a possible correlation between X-ray
432: and NIR wavelengths in Mrk 421 which is an HBL blazar.
433:
434: So far, correlated X-ray and NIR variation was observed in a LBL blazar 3C 273,
435: a flat spectrum radio quasar (FSRQ) (McHardy et al. 1999). For another LBL blazar
436: AO 0235$+$164, simultaneous radio and optical variability was reported during the
437: optical outbursts occurred in 1975, 1979 and 1997 (MacLeod et al. 1976; Ledden et
438: al. 1976; Rieke et al. 1976; Balonek \& Dent 1980; Webb et al. 2000) on the other
439: hand no correlation was found between radio and optical emission of another LBL
440: blazar S5 0716+714 (Ostorero et al. 2006). In a multi-wavelength campaign of LBL
441: blazar 3C 279 reported by (Wehrle et al. 1998), correlated variability in X-ray
442: (PCA) and EGRET CGRO is seen without any time lag; UV leading gamma-ray by $\sim$
443: 2.5 days. Since UV and gamma-ray data was less, so its reliability is doubtful.
444:
445: Edelson et al. (1995) have reported correlated emission between X-ray, UV and optical
446: emissions from PKS 2155-304 (an HBL BL Lac object). In another multi-wavelength campaign
447: of PKS 2155-304 from 10 days data, Urry et al. 1997 have reported X-ray flare leading
448: EUV flare by one day and UV flare by two days. McComb et al. (1995) and Maraschi et al.
449: (1999) have reported simultaneous X-ray and $\gamma-$ray flares in Mrk 421 in two different
450: campaigns. In other campaign of Mrk 421 in 1998 (Takahashi et al. 2000), complex
451: variability, positive and negative lags were found which authors report may not be real,
452: If the lag from both signs are real, these imply that particle acceleration and X-ray cooling
453: timescales are similar. Katarzynski et al. (2003) show a well defined correlation between
454: observed radio outburst in Mrk 421 with a corresponding X-ray outburst and a $\gamma-$ray
455: flare in TeV range. In simultaneous TeV and optical observations of blazar 1406$-$076, optical
456: flare leading gamma-ray flare by $\sim$ 1 days (Wagner et al. 1995).
457:
458: In a recent paper, Villata et al. (2006) have shown, in the historical radio and optical
459: light curves variability behavior is different, while prominent and long-lasting radio
460: outbursts were visible at various radio frequencies, with higher-frequency variations
461: preceding the lower-frequency ones. After that date, the optical activity increased
462: and the radio flux is less variable, suggest that optical and radio emissions come from
463: two separate and misaligned jet regions. The correlated emissions reported in several papers
464: here, support models involving single populations of relativistic electrons responsible for
465: the emission.
466:
467: One of the important question is ``Where does the NIR radiation originate"?
468: There are three possibilities: (i) emission from circumstellar dust (ii)
469: emission from the accretion disk (iii) synchrotron emission by relativistic
470: electrons in the jet, the first two are external to the jet.
471: The variability behavior is indicating the similar origin for NIR and
472: X-ray emission. X-ray emission is originating from synchrotron radiation by
473: electrons in this AGN as mentioned before.
474:
475: From different multi-wavelength campaigns it has been noticed that variations on
476: longer wavelengths are generally not seen during X-ray and $\gamma-$ray flaring
477: events (Tosti et al. 1998 and references therein). Ghisellini \& Maraschi (1996)
478: have shown that the overall emission of the BL Lac Mrk 421 could be explained using a
479: homogeneous SSC model, in which the equilibrium particle distribution is found
480: balancing continuum injection, cooling and particle escape. In this, single
481: population of relativistic electrons emit synchrotron radiation up to the UV
482: or X-ray band and soft photons upto the IR-optical bands undergo upscattering
483: with the most energetic electrons to form TeV $\gamma-$rays.
484: However, Blazejowski et al. (2005) have found TeV flares
485: reached its peak days before X-ray flare during a giant flare or outburst in 2004.
486: Spectral energy distribution (SED) generated by Blazejowski et al. (2005) was not
487: fitted with one-zone synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model but could be fitted
488: well with additional zones.
489:
490: Following Ghisellini \& Maraschi (1996), Marscher (1996) and other authors,
491: we note that the lags in the multi-frequency light curves of Mrk 421 (of
492: the order of hours between soft and medium X-ray photons, near simultaneous
493: X-ray and $\gamma-$ray flares, IR leading X-rays by couple of days) require
494: energy stratification in the source. Similar delays were noticed in 3C 279
495: (IR leads X-ray by 0.75$\pm$0.25 day) and in PKS 2155$-$304
496: (a day between EUV and X-rays, 2 days between UV and X-rays) and of
497: the order of few hours between these (Edelson et al. 1995) as well.
498: Frequency stratification and different time scales for the duration of these
499: flares (shorter times for higher frequencies) are possible with the shock-in-jet
500: model (Marscher 1996 and references therein).
501:
502: Within the context of the shock-in-jet model of AGNs, we attribute the NIR
503: emission component to the internal shock driven into the jet by the variation
504: of the central engine. The correlated X-ray and NIR variability with time
505: lag of few days is a strong probe of the jet emission not affected much by
506: the environment of the surrounding medium. The anti-correlation seen in the
507: NIR and soft X-ray light curve at JD 2452699.5 may be due to the reverse
508: shock arising by the jet's collision with the surrounding medium.
509:
510: \begin{acknowledgements}
511: We thankfully acknowledge the referee for useful comments.
512: The work of A. C. Gupta and J. H. Fan is supported by the National Natural Scientific
513: Foundation of China (grant no. 10573005 and 10125313). We gratefully acknowledge the
514: use of RXTE data from the public archive of GSFC/NASA. Also, we are grateful to all
515: the members of PACT collaboration for their respective contributions.
516: \end{acknowledgements}
517:
518: \begin{thebibliography}{}
519: %% you can type \apj for ApJ, \aap for A&A, \apss for Ap&SS, etc. Please consult
520: %% the macro chjaa.cls. You can also find them in aasguide.tex (AASTeX for ApJ, AJ, PASP)
521: %% Please follow the format of ChJAA's reference list
522:
523: \bibitem[]{} Alexander, T., 1997, Astronomical Time Series, ed. D. Maoz, A. Sternberg
524: \& E. M. Leibowitz, Dordrecht: Kluwer, p. 163
525:
526: \bibitem[]{} Balonek, T. J., Dent, W. A., 1980, ApJ, 240, L3
527:
528: \bibitem[]{} Bhat, P. N. et al., 2000, Bulletin of Astronomical Society of India, 20, 455
529:
530: \bibitem[]{} Blazejowski, M., Blaylock, G., Bond, I. H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 130
531:
532: \bibitem[]{} Boone, L. M., Hinton, J. A., Bramel, D., et al. 2002, ApJ, 579, L5
533:
534: \bibitem[]{} Bose, D. et al., 2005, 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference Proceedings,
535: 4, eds. B. S. Acharya et al., p. 343
536:
537: \bibitem[]{} Collmar, W., Bennett, K., Bloemen, H., et al. 1999, ApL\&C, 39, 57
538:
539: \bibitem[]{} Coppi, P. S. 1999, in workshop summary for the Cracow Workshop on
540: Relativistic Jets in AGNs, ed. M. Ostrowski, M. Sikora, G. Madejski \& M. Begelman,
541: Jagellonian University Press, p. 333
542:
543: \bibitem[]{} Edelson, R., Krolik, J., Madejski, G., et al., 1995, ApJ, 438, 120
544:
545: \bibitem[]{} Fan, J. H., \& Lin, R. G., 1999, ApJS, 121, 131
546:
547: \bibitem[]{} Ghisellini, G. \& Maraschi, L., 1996, ASP Conf. Series 110 on Blazar
548: Continuum Variability, eds. H. R. Miller, J. R. Webb \& J. C. Noble, p. 436
549:
550: \bibitem[]{} Gothe, K. S. et al., 2000, Indian Journal of Pure \& Applied Physics, 38, 269
551:
552: \bibitem[]{} Gupta, A. C., Banerjee, D. P. K., Ashok, N. M., \& Joshi, U. C.,
553: 2004, A\&A, 422, 505
554:
555: \bibitem[]{} Heck D. et al., 1998, FZKA 6019 Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe
556:
557: \bibitem[]{} Katarzynski, K., Sol, H., \& Kus, A. 2003, A\&A, 410, 101
558:
559: \bibitem[]{} Krawczynski, H. 2004, New Astronomy Rev., 48, 376
560:
561: \bibitem[]{} Ledden, J. E., Aller, H. D., Dent, W. A., 1976, Nature, 260, 752
562:
563: \bibitem[]{} Macomb, D. J., Akerlof, C. W., Aller, H. D., et al. 1995, ApJL, 449, L99
564:
565: \bibitem[]{} MacLeod, J. M., Andrew, B. H., Harvey, G. A., 1976, Nature, 260, 751
566:
567: \bibitem[]{} Makino, F., Tanaka, Y., Matsuoka, M., et al. 1987, ApJ, 313, 662
568:
569: \bibitem[]{} Majumdar, P., Acharya, B. S., Chitnis, V. R., et al. 2003, Astropaticle
570: Physics, 18, 339
571:
572: \bibitem[]{} Maraschi, L., Fossati, G., Tavecchio, F., et al. 1999, ApJ, 526, L81
573:
574: \bibitem[]{} Marscher, A. P., 1996, ASP Conf. Series 110 on Blazar Continuum Variability,
575: eds. H. R. Miller, J. R. Webb \& J. C. Noble, p. 248
576:
577: \bibitem[]{} McHardy, I., Lawson, A., Newsam, A., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 571
578:
579: \bibitem{} Nieppola, E., Tornikoski, M., \& Valtaoja, E., 2006, A\&A, 445, 441
580:
581: \bibitem[]{} Ostorero, L., Wagner, S. J., Gracia, J., et al. 2006, A\&A, 451, 797
582:
583: \bibitem[]{} Petry, D., Bradbury, S. M., Konopelko, A., et al. 1996, A\&A, 311, L13
584:
585: \bibitem[]{} Punch, M., Akerlof, C. W., Cawley, M. F., et al. 1992, Nature, 358, 477
586:
587: \bibitem[]{} Rieke, G. H., Grasdalen, G. L., Kinman, T. D., et al. 1976, Nature, 260, 754
588:
589: \bibitem[]{} Sikora, M., \& Madejski, G., 2001, in AIP Conf. Proc. 558, High Energy
590: Gamma-Ray Astronomy, ed. F. A. Aharonian \& H. J. V$\ddot{o}$lk (new York: AIP), p. 463
591:
592: \bibitem[]{} Stein, W. A., O'Dell, S. L., \& Strittmatter, P. A., 1976, ARA\&A, 14, 173
593:
594: \bibitem[]{} Takahashi, T., Kataoka, J., Madejski, G. et al. 2000, ApJ, 542, L105
595:
596: \bibitem[]{} Tar$\ddot{a}$sranta, H., Achren, J., Hanski, M., et al. 2004, A\&A, 427, 769
597:
598: \bibitem[]{} Tar$\ddot{a}$sranta, H., Wiren, S., Koivisto, P., et al. 2005, A\&A, 440, 409
599:
600: \bibitem[]{} Thompson, D. J., Bertsch, D. L., Dingus, B. L., et al. 1995, ApJS, 101, 259
601:
602: \bibitem[]{} Tosti, G., Fiorucci, M., Luciani, M., et al. 1998, A\&A, 339, 41
603:
604: \bibitem[]{} Ulrich, M. H., Kinman, T. D., Lynds, C. R., et al. 1975, ApJ, 198, 261
605: eds. H. R. Miller, J. R. Webb \& J. C. Noble, p. 391
606:
607: \bibitem[]{} Urry, C. M., \& Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803
608:
609: \bibitem[]{} Urry, C. M., Treves, A., Maraschi, L., et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, 799
610:
611: \bibitem[]{} Villata, M., Raiteri, C. M., Balonek, T. J., et al. 2006, A\&A, 453, 817
612:
613: \bibitem[]{} Wagner, S. J., Mattox, J. R., Hopp, U., et al. 1995, ApJ, 454, L97
614:
615: \bibitem[]{} Webb, J. R., Howard, E., BenÃtez, E., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 41
616:
617: \bibitem[]{} Wehrle, A. E., Pian, E., Urry, C. M., et al. 1998, ApJ, 497, 178
618:
619: \bibitem[]{} Xie, G.-Z., Lu, R.-W., Zhou, Y., et al. 1988, A\&AS, 72, 163
620:
621: \end{thebibliography}
622:
623: \end{document}
624:
625:
626: