1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% author.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % sample root file for your contribution to a "contributed book"
4: %
5: % "contributed book"
6: %
7: % Use this file as a template for your own input.
8: %
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Springer-Verlag %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10:
11:
12: % RECOMMENDED %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: \documentclass[vecphys]{svmult}
14:
15: % choose options for [] as required from the list
16: % in the Reference Guide, Sect. 2.2
17:
18: \usepackage{makeidx} % allows index generation
19: \usepackage{graphicx} % standard LaTeX graphics tool
20: % when including figure files
21: \usepackage{multicol} % used for the two-column index
22: \usepackage[bottom]{footmisc}% places footnotes at page bottom
23: % etc.
24: % see the list of further useful packages
25: % in the Reference Guide, Sects. 2.3, 3.1-3.3
26:
27: \makeindex % used for the subject index
28: % please use the style sprmidx.sty with
29: % your makeindex program
30:
31:
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33:
34: \begin{document}
35:
36: \title*{The ESO Large Programme ``First Stars''}
37: % Use \titlerunning{Short Title} for an abbreviated version of
38: % your contribution title if the original one is too long
39: \authorrunning{Bonifacio et al.}
40: \author{P. Bonifacio\inst{1,2,3}\and
41: J. Andersen\inst{4,5}
42: \and
43: S.M. Andrievsky\inst{6}
44: \and
45: B. Barbuy\inst{7}
46: \and
47: T.C.~Beers\inst{8}
48: \and
49: E. Caffau\inst{2}
50: \and
51: R.~Cayrel\inst{2}
52: \and
53: E. Depagne\inst{9}
54: \and
55: P. Fran\c cois\inst{2}
56: \and
57: J.I.~Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez\inst{1,2}
58: \and
59: C.J.~Hansen\inst{10}
60: \and
61: F. Herwig\inst{11}
62: \and
63: V. Hill\inst{2}
64: \and
65: S.A.~Korotin\inst{6}
66: \and
67: H.-G.~Ludwig\inst{1,2}
68: \and
69: P.~Molaro\inst{3}
70: \and
71: B.~Nordstr\"om\inst{4}
72: \and
73: B. Plez\inst{12}
74: \and
75: F.~Primas\inst{10}
76: \and
77: T.~Sivarani\inst{8}
78: \and
79: F. Spite\inst{2}
80: \and
81: M.~Spite\inst{2}
82: }
83: % Use \authorrunning{Short Title} for an abbreviated version of
84: % your contribution title if the original one is too long
85: \institute{CIFIST Marie Curie Excellence Team
86: %\texttt{name@email.address}
87: \and
88: GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Universit\'e Paris Diderot; Place
89: Jules Janssen 92190
90: Meudon, France
91: \and
92: Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica,
93: Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11,
94: I-34143 Trieste, Italy
95: \and
96: The Niels Bohr Institute, Astronomy, Juliane Maries Vej 30,
97: DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
98: \and
99: Nordic Optical Telescope, Apartado 474, E-38700 Santa Cruz de
100: La Palma, Spain
101: \and
102: Department of Astronomy and
103: Astronomical Observatory,
104: Odessa National University, Shevchenko Park, 65014 Odessa, Ukraine
105: \and
106: Universidade de Sao Paulo, Departamento de Astronomia,
107: Rua do Matao 1226, 05508-900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
108: \and
109: Department of Physics \& Astronomy and JINA: Joint Institute for Nuclear
110: Astrophysics, Michigan State University,
111: East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
112: \and
113: Las Cumbres Observatory, Santa Barbara, California, USA
114: \and
115: European Southern Observatory (ESO),
116: Karl-Schwarschild-Str. 2, D-85749 Garching b. M\"unchen,
117: Germany
118: \and
119: Keele Astrophysics Group, School of Physical
120: and Geographical Sciences,
121: Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
122: \and
123: GRAAL, Universit\'e de Montpellier II, F-34095
124: Montpellier
125: Cedex 05, France
126: }
127: \maketitle
128:
129:
130: \section{Introduction}
131: \label{sec:1}
132: % Always give a unique label
133: % and use \ref{<label>} for cross-references
134: % and \cite{<label>} for bibliographic references
135: % use \sectionmark{}
136: % to alter or adjust the section heading in the running head
137:
138: In ESO period 65 (April-September 2000)
139: the large programme 165.N-0276, led by Roger Cayrel, began
140: making use of UVES at the Kueyen VLT telescope.
141: Known within the Team and outside as ``First Stars'', it
142: was aimed at obtaining high resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio
143: spectra in the range 320 nm -- 1000 nm for a large sample
144: of extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars identified from the HK objective prism
145: survey \cite{beers85,beers92}.
146: The goal was to use these spectra to determine accurate
147: atmospheric parameters and chemical composition of these
148: stars which are among the oldest objects amenable to our
149: detailed study.
150: Although these stars are not the first generation of stars
151: they must be very close descendants of the first generation.
152: One may hope to gain insight on the nature of the progenitors
153: from detailed information on the descendants.
154:
155: The extremely metal-poor stars are very rare objects and
156: finding them in large numbers requires specially designed
157: surveys. All of the proponents of the large programme had
158: been actively working on the medium-resolution follow-up
159: of the HK survey (results still to be published), from either
160: ESO La Silla, Kitt Peak or Roque de los Muchachos.
161: Such a follow-up is mandatory in order to obtain a good list
162: of candidates on which one can invest the time of an 8 m telescope.
163:
164: The programme was allocated a total of 39 nights between periods 65
165: and 68, these were split into 8 observational runs of unequal length.
166: The observations were carried out in visitor mode because
167: UVES was used in non-standard settings.
168: The settings selected were Dic1 396+573 and Dic1 396+850,
169: typically with a $1''$ slit for a resolution $R\sim 43000$.
170: These settings were preferred over the standard Dic1 390+580
171: and Dic1 390+860, because you gain the Ba\,{\sc ii} 455.4 nm
172: line in the blue, Zn\,{\sc i} 471 nm in the red and
173: Li\,{\sc i} 670.8 nm in the reddest setting.
174:
175: The main results of the large programme are published on a series
176: of papers ``First Stars'' on A\&A, so far 10 papers have been published,
177: one is in press, a few more in preparation. In addition a number
178: of papers not in the ``series'' have been published, up to know
179: there are 19 refereed papers published, which make use of the
180: data acquired in the course of this large programme.
181:
182: In this contribution we highlight the main results of the large programme.
183:
184: \section{Uranium in a EMP star}
185: \label{sec:2}
186:
187: The first surprise came quite early in the programme,
188: Vanessa Hill was conducting the observations in August 2000
189: when she realised, from the quick look data,
190: that the giant CS 31082-001 had an exceptional
191: spectrum, characterised by extremely low metallicity and a large
192: enhancement of the r-process elements. She was in fact
193: able to identify immediately the Th{\sc ii} 401.9 nm line,
194: which displayed a remarkable strength. This induced her in the
195: following nights to acquire blue spectra of higher resolution
196: with slicer \# 2 in the hope of being able to identify
197: and perhaps measure uranium in this star.
198: The star is now often colloquially dubbed as ``Hill's star'',
199: and in fact her intuition proved correct since this was the
200: first metal-poor star for which it was possible
201: to measure the uranium abundance, opening up a new
202: possibility for nucleochronology\cite{cayrel01,hill}.
203: This star actually showed how little we knew on the r-process.
204: While Th/U proved to be a reliable chronometer Eu/Th
205: and Eu/U provided unrealistically small ages, using
206: the then available production ratios.
207: Also Pb in this star is a real puzzle, in fact
208: the majority of lead in this star is what
209: you expect from the decay of Th and U, leaving
210: very little space for Pb production during the
211: r-process\cite{plez}.
212:
213: \section{The Spite plateau at the lowest metallicities}
214: \label{sec:3}
215:
216: Ever since Monique and Fran\c cois Spite discovered
217: that warm metal-poor stars share the same Li abundance
218: (the {\em Spite plateau})\cite{spite82a,spite82b}, there
219: has been an active research on this field.
220: What we wish to understand is if this {\em plateau}
221: indicates the primordial Li abundance, as
222: initially proposed\cite{spite82a,spite82b}, or not.
223:
224: \begin{figure}
225: \centering \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{pl_fehli_VLT_ELT.eps}}
226: \caption{The Spite plateau at the lowest metallicities as portrayed by the
227: ``First Stars'' data. The stars whose names are labelled are binaries,
228: for CS 22876-32 an orbital solution is available and the analysis has been
229: done taking properly into account the veiling and Li in both
230: components has been measured, for CS22957-15 this has not
231: been possible, due to the lack of the necessary data, however
232: the correction for the veiling is likely not very large.}
233: \label{spitepl}
234: \end{figure}
235:
236: The ``First Stars'' large programme allowed to explore
237: the {\em Spite plateau} at the lowest known metallicities.
238: There are no known dwarf stars with a metallicity (meant as
239: $Z$, total metallicity, not [Fe/H]) lower than the
240: stars shown in Fig.\ref{spitepl}.
241: The data are those of \cite{B07} and \cite{jonay}, the picture
242: which emerges is that the plateau seems to continue
243: at the lowest metallicities. It is possible that there is a larger
244: scatter, however the impact on this picture of stars in which
245: lithium may have been partially depleted is yet unclear.
246: The difference in lithium content between the two components
247: of the binary system CS 22876-32 has no clear explanation.
248: The cooler component (star B) has an effective temperature
249: of 5900 K and should not display Li depletion according
250: to standard models.
251:
252: From the cosmological point of view there is a tension between
253: the value of the {\em Spite plateau}, A(Li)$\sim 2.1$
254: and the value predicted by standard big bang nucleosynthesis,
255: when the baryonic density derived from the power spectrum
256: of the fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background is
257: used\cite{spergel,B07}, A(Li)$= 2.64$.
258: Several ways to explain this discrepancy have been suggested,
259: and generally they go in two possible directions:
260: a) the {\em Spite plateau} does not represent the
261: primordial abundance or b) primordial nucleosynthesis
262: did not proceed as assumed in the ``standard'' model.
263: At present both solutions are possible and
264: further observations of EMP stars, to understand if
265: there is an excess scatter of Li at the lowest metallicities,
266: could give useful indications.
267:
268:
269: \section{Abundance ratios, what did we learn ?}
270: \label{sec:4}
271:
272: When we started the large programme, several of us,
273: were expecting that at the lowest metallicities
274: we would begin to see the effects of the pollution
275: of very few supernovae(SNe), possibly a single supernova.
276: As a consequence we were expecting considerable
277: scatter in the abundance ratios, which would be
278: the signature of the different masses of the polluting SNe
279: and incomplete mixing of the gas in the early Galaxy.
280: To the surprise of several of us we found instead that
281: the majority of elements C to Zn display a remarkable uniformity,
282: with well defined trends with metallicity\cite{cayrel04}. The scatter
283: in these trends can be totally explained by observational
284: error. One explanation of this low scatter is an efficient
285: mixing of the early Galaxy.
286: Alternatively one could argue in favour of a narrow range
287: of masses of SNe actually contributing to chemical enrichment.
288:
289:
290: %\subsection{Na and Al, the need for NLTE}
291:
292: The exceptions, among lighter elements, were Na and Al, that
293: displayed a star to star
294: scatter larger than observed for other elements.
295: This excess scatter also made the definition of trends somewhat ambiguous.
296: A reanalysis of both elements using full NLTE line formation
297: was in fact able to solve the problem\cite{A07,A08}.
298: Sodium appears to be constant with metallicity among EMP stars,
299: with [Na/Fe]$ = −0.21\pm 0.13 $, and the same is true for aluminium
300: with [Al/Fe] $= −0.08\pm 0.12$.
301:
302:
303: %\subsection{C and N and mixing in giants}
304:
305: The observations of C and N, showed that
306: in a [C/Fe] vs. [N/Fe] diagram the giants split nicely
307: into two groups, one with high [N/Fe] and low [C/Fe],
308: which we call ``mixed'',
309: the other with lower [N/Fe] and higher [C/Fe
310: which we call ``unmixed''\cite{spite05,spite06}.
311: As expected from the theory of stellar
312: evolution ``mixed' stars are typically the more luminous giants,
313: although there are a few exceptions.
314:
315: %\subsection{n-capture elements}
316:
317: At variance with lighter elements the n-capture elements
318: display a large scatter, which cannot be explained
319: by observational errors\cite{F07}.
320: Such scatter, coupled with the very uniform
321: ratios of the lighter elements demands an inhomogeneous
322: chemical evolution.
323: Already from the results of CS 31082-001 it was clear
324: that the r-process is not ``universal'' and several r-processes
325: may be needed.
326: The data on n-capture elements clearly indicates that a {\em second} r-process
327: is the main production channel at [Ba/H]$<-2.5$.
328:
329: %\subsection{C enhanced EMP dwarfs}
330:
331: Among the dwarf stars we found four
332: which were C enhanced \cite{S04,S06}.
333: In all of them the C-enhancement has come about
334: as a consequence of mass-transfer from an AGB companion.
335: The abundance pattern of n-capture elements is rather
336: diverse among the stars, suggesting nucleosynthesis taking place under
337: different physical conditions.
338:
339:
340: %\subsection{CS 22949-037, an extraordinary object}
341:
342: The giant CS 22949-037 is one of the most extraordinary found in
343: the course of the large programme\cite{depagne}.
344: With [Fe/H]$\sim -4.0$ it is one of the most iron
345: poor stars found in the sample, however its
346: high abundances of CNO ([O/Fe]$\sim +2$, [C/Fe]$\sim +1.2$,
347: [N/Fe]$\sim +2.6$) make its global metallicity $Z$ not so
348: extreme as that of the four giants with [Fe/H]$\sim -4$\cite{F03},
349: which are, so far, the star with the lowest $Z$ known.
350: There is no totally satisfactory model to explain
351: the abundance pattern in CS 22949-037, however
352: it is clear that some special kind of SN is needed to
353: explain such an extraordinary pattern.
354:
355: \section{Needs for the future}
356:
357: One would like to extend the work done so far, with high resolution,
358: high S/N ratio spectra of stars of even lower metallicities. Such
359: stars should be found by on-going and projected surveys (SEGUE, LAMOST, SkyMapper...).
360: Most of these are however expected to be around 18th magnitude or fainter, UVES
361: can work at these faint magnitudes, but...slowly.
362: The proposed high resolution spectrograph ESPRESSO (see Pasquini this meeting)
363: in the mode combining the 4UTs, would be ideal for these targets.
364: According to the preliminary estimates ESPRESSO 4UTs, at a resolution
365: of $R\sim 45000$ should beat UVES in efficiency for all targets
366: fainter than V=17.5, when read-out-noise begins to be important.
367:
368:
369: \begin{thebibliography}{}
370:
371: \bibitem{A07} Andrievsky, S.~M., et al.: A\&A \textbf{464}, 1081 (2007)
372:
373: \bibitem{A08} Andrievsky, S.~M., et al.: A\&A \textbf{accepted}
374:
375: \bibitem{beers85} Beers, T.~C., Preston, G.~W., Shectman, S.~A.: AJ \textbf{90}, 2089 (1985)
376:
377: \bibitem{beers92} Beers, T.~C., Preston, G.~W., Shectman, S.~A.: AJ \textbf{103}, 1987 (1992)
378:
379: \bibitem{B07} Bonifacio, P., et al.: A\&A \textbf{462}, 851 (2007) [Paper VII]
380:
381: \bibitem{cayrel01} Cayrel, R., et al.: Natur \textbf{409}, 691 (2001)
382:
383: \bibitem{cayrel04} Cayrel, R., et al.: A\&A \textbf{416}, 1117 (2004) [Paper V]
384:
385: \bibitem{depagne} Depagne, E., et al.: A\&A \textbf{390}, 187 (2002) [Paper II]
386:
387: \bibitem{F03} Fran{\c c}ois, P., et al.: A\&A \textbf{403}, 1105 (2003) [Paper III]
388:
389: \bibitem{F07} Fran{\c c}ois, P., et al.: A\&A \textbf{476}, 935 (2007) [Paper VIII]
390:
391: \bibitem{jonay} Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez J.I, et al.: A\&A \textbf{accepted}, arXiv 0712.2949 [Paper XI]
392:
393: \bibitem{hill} Hill, V., et al.: A\&A \textbf{387}, 560 (2002) [Paper I]
394:
395: \bibitem{plez} Plez, B., et al.: A\&A \textbf{428}, L9 (2004)
396:
397:
398: \bibitem{S06} Sivarani, T., et al.: A\&A \textbf{459}, 125 (2006) [Paper X]
399:
400: \bibitem{S04} Sivarani, T., et al.: A\&A \textbf{413}, 1073 (2004) [Paper IV]
401:
402: \bibitem{spergel} Spergel, D.~N., et al.: ApJS \textbf{170}, 377 (2007)
403:
404: \bibitem{spite82a} Spite, M., Spite, F.: Natur \textbf{297}, 483 (1982)
405:
406: \bibitem{spite82b} Spite, F., Spite, M.: A\&A \textbf{115}, 357 (1982)
407:
408: \bibitem{spite05} Spite, M., et al.: A\&A \textbf{430}, 655 (2005) [Paper VI]
409:
410: \bibitem{spite06} Spite, M., et al.: A\&A \textbf{455}, 291 (2006) [Paper IX]
411:
412:
413: \end{thebibliography}
414: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% }
415:
416: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
417:
418: \printindex
419: \end{document}
420:
421:
422:
423:
424:
425: