1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\%documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
26:
27:
28: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
29:
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %%\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
48: \newcommand{\HII}{H {\small II} }
49: \newcommand{\kms}{{\rm ~km~s}^{-1}}
50: \newcommand{\Msun} {M_\sun}
51: \newcommand{\accrate} {M_\sun~{\rm yr}^{-1}}
52:
53: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
54:
55: \slugcomment{To appear in The Astrophysical Journal Letters}
56:
57: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
58: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
59: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
60: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
61: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
62: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
63:
64: \shorttitle{TIME VARIATION IN G24.78+0.08 A1}
65: \shortauthors{GALV\'AN-MADRID ET AL.}
66:
67: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
68: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
69:
70: \begin{document}
71:
72: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
73: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
74: %% you desire.
75:
76: \title{TIME VARIATION IN G24.78+0.08 A1: EVIDENCE FOR AN ACCRETING HYPERCOMPACT \HII REGION?}
77:
78: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
79: %% author and affiliation information.
80: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
81: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
82: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
83: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
84:
85: \author{Roberto Galv\'an-Madrid\altaffilmark{1,2}, Luis F. Rodr{\'\i}guez\altaffilmark{1},
86: Paul T. P. Ho\altaffilmark{2,3}, and Eric Keto\altaffilmark{2}}
87:
88:
89: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
90: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
91: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
92: %% affiliation.
93:
94: \altaffiltext{1}{Centro de Radioastronom{\'\i}a y Astrof{\'\i}sica, UNAM, Morelia 58090, M\'exico;
95: l.rodriguez@astrosmo.unam.mx}
96: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
97: Cambridge MA 02138, USA; rgalvan, eketo@cfa.harvard.edu}
98: \altaffiltext{3}{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
99: Taipei, Taiwan; pho@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
100:
101:
102: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
103: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
104: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
105: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
106: %% editorial office after submission.
107:
108: \begin{abstract}
109:
110: Over a timescale of a few years, an observed change in
111: the optically thick radio continuum flux can indicate whether an unresolved
112: \HII region around a newly formed massive star is changing in size.
113: In this Letter we report on a study of archival VLA observations
114: of the hypercompact \HII region G24.78+0.08 A1 that shows a decrease
115: of $\sim 45$ $\%$ in the 6-cm flux over a five year period.
116: Such a decrease indicates a contraction of $\sim 25$ $\%$ in the ionized
117: radius and could be caused by an increase in the ionized gas density if
118: the size of the \HII region is determined by a balance between photoionization
119: and recombination.
120: This finding is not compatible with continuous expansion of the \HII region after the
121: end of accretion onto the ionizing star,
122: but is consistent with the hypothesis of gravitational trapping and ionized
123: accretion flows if the mass-accretion rate is not steady.
124:
125: \end{abstract}
126:
127:
128: \keywords{
129: \HII regions --- ISM: individual (G24.78+0.08) --- stars: formation
130: }
131:
132: \section{Introduction} \label{intro}
133:
134: The formation of massive stars ($M>8$ $\Msun$) by accretion presents a number of theoretical
135: difficulties; among them, that once a star attains a sufficient mass
136: its surface temperature is high enough to produce a small \HII region
137: (see the reviews on ultracompact and hypercompact \HII regions by Churchwell 2002;
138: Kurtz 2005; and Hoare et al. 2007).
139: The thermal pressure differential between the hot
140: ($\sim 10^4$ K) ionized gas and the cold ($\sim 100$ K) molecular gas can potentially
141: reverse the accretion flow of molecular gas and
142: prevent the star from ever reaching a higher mass. However, recent models that include
143: the effects of gravity \citep[e.g.,][]{Keto07} have shown
144: that if the \HII region is small enough (ionized diameter $\leq 1000$ AU for total stellar
145: mass $\geq 350$ $\Msun$), the gravitational attraction of the star(s)
146: dominates the thermal pressure and the molecular
147: accretion flow can cross the ionization boundary and proceed toward the star as an
148: ionized accretion flow within the \HII region. In this stage the \HII region is said to be
149: gravitationally trapped by the star.
150:
151:
152: Previous studies have demonstrated a number of observational techniques bearing on the
153: evolution of small \HII regions around newly formed stars.
154: Accretion flows onto and through \HII regions can be directly observed
155: by mapping molecular and radio recombination lines (RRLs) at very high angular
156: resolution
157: \citep[e.g.,][]{Sol05, KW06}. If the \HII region is too small to be spatially resolved,
158: the frequency dependence of the velocities and widths of
159: RRLs can be used to infer steep density gradients and supersonic velocities
160: within the \HII regions
161: \citep{KZK07}, as expected from the presence of ionized accretion flows or bipolar outflows.
162: Radio continuum observations
163: at very high
164: angular resolution, made at two epochs some years apart,
165: can also be used to directly observe
166: changes in size of small \HII regions
167: (Franco-Hernandez \& Rodriguez 2004). Changes in size indicate
168: whether
169: the evolution of the \HII region is consistent with pressure-driven expansion or
170: gravitational trapping.
171:
172: In this Letter we demonstrate yet another technique -- how a comparison
173: of radio continuum observations
174: at different epochs can be used to infer size changes in \HII regions even if the observations
175: do not spatially resolve them. At optically thick frequencies the radio continuum
176: flux depends to first approximation only on the size of an \HII region and is independent of its
177: internal density structure. Therefore, even if the size is not known, a change in the flux over
178: time still indicates a change in the size of the \HII region.
179: This technique is particularly valuable because it
180: can be used on the smallest and youngest \HII regions,
181: and because lower angular resolution radio continuum observations generally
182: require less observing time than spectral line and high angular resolution observations.
183:
184: For the study presented in this Letter we selected the hypercompact (HC) \HII region G24.78+0.08 A1
185: which lies at the center of a massive molecular accretion flow \citep{Bel04, Bel06} and also has
186: multi-epoch 6 cm radio continuum observations in the VLA archive.
187: G24.78+0.08 was detected in the centimetric (cm) continuum by \cite{Beck94},
188: and later resolved by \cite{Cod97} into a compact (A) and an extended (B) component.
189: A millimeter (mm) interferometric study \citep[]{Bel04}
190: revealed the presence of two massive rotating toroids centered in respective dust cores (A1 and
191: A2). The compact cm emission comes from the mm component A1 (hereafter G24 A1), and has recently been
192: resolved
193: by \cite{Bel07}. If G24 A1 is ionized by a single star, its spectral type should be earlier
194: than O9 \citep[]{Cod97}. Also, G24 A1
195: likely powers a massive CO outflow \citep[]{Fur02}.
196:
197: The infalling and rotating molecular gas and bipolar outflow all
198: suggest ongoing accretion. However, based on proper motions of H$_2$O masers
199: around the \HII region,
200: \cite{Bel07} and \cite{Mos07} proposed that at the present time, the \HII region is
201: expanding into the accretion flow. The suggested timescale for the expansion is short enough that
202: we should be able to detect a corresponding increase in the optically thick radio continuum
203: flux within a few years.
204:
205:
206:
207:
208: \section{Observations} \label{obs}
209:
210:
211: We searched the VLA\footnote{The
212: National Radio Astronomy Observatory is operated by Associated Universities,
213: Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}
214: archive for multi-epoch observations centered in the G24 A1 region
215: at optically
216: thick frequencies (below 23 GHz for G24 A1).
217: Since in the optically thick part of the spectrum the flux density of the source
218: scales as the angular size squared,
219: flux density variations corresponding to size variations
220: can be detected even in observations of modest angular resolution.
221: We chose three data sets of 6-cm observations
222: in the C configuration, two from 1984 and one from 1989 (see Table 1).
223:
224: The observations were made in both circular polarizations with an effective
225: bandwidth of 100 MHz. The amplitude scale was derived from observations of the absolute
226: amplitude calibrator 3C286. This scale was transferred to the phase calibrator and
227: then to the source. We estimate an error not greater than $10$ $\%$ for the flux densities
228: of the sources.
229:
230: We edited and calibrated each epoch separately following the standard VLA
231: procedures using the reduction software AIPS. Precession to J2000 coordinates was performed running
232: the task UVFIX in the $(u, v)$ data. After self-calibration, we made CLEANed images
233: with uniform weighting and cutting the short spacings (up to 10 K$\lambda$) to minimize the
234: presence of extended emission at scales larger than $\sim 20''$.
235:
236: Before subtraction, we made the images as similar as possible. We restored the CLEAN
237: components with an identical Gaussian beam
238: HPBW $4\rlap.{''}79 \times 3\rlap.{''}38$, PA$=-15^\circ$.
239: We applied primary beam corrections and
240: aligned the maps. No significant differences were found in the difference image
241: between the 1984 May 11 and 14 images, as expected for such a small time baseline.
242: We therefore averaged the two 1984 epochs into a single data set.
243: In subtracting the final maps we allowed the 1984 image to have small ($\simeq 0.1''$)
244: shifts in position as well as a scaling of $\simeq 10$ $\%$ in amplitude.
245: This was done in order to minimize the rms residuals of the difference image in the
246: region of interest. A similar procedure was used by \cite{FH04} to detect a variation in the
247: lobes of the bipolar UC \HII region NGC 7538 IRS1.
248: The individual maps, as well as the final difference image between 1984 and 1989
249: are shown in Figure 1.
250:
251: \section{Discussion} \label{discu}
252:
253: \subsection{The Expected Variation Trend} \label{trend}
254:
255: \subsubsection{If G24 A1 Is Expanding} \label{trend-exp}
256:
257: \citet{Bel07} suggested that the 7 mm and 1.3 cm continuum morphologies
258: are consistent with limb-brightening from a thin, ionized-shell structure.
259: Based on H$_2$O maser proper motions
260: \citep[see Fig. 3 of][ or Fig. 4 of Moscadelli et al. 2007]{Bel07} they
261: also suggested an expansion speed of $\sim 40\kms$.
262: The increase in flux corresponding to the increase in size due to
263: expansion ought to be detectable in a few years.
264:
265: \subsubsection{If G24 A1 Is Accreting} \label{trend-acc}
266:
267: If G24 A1 is the ionized inner portion of the star forming accretion flow,
268: the long-term growth of the \HII region due to the increasing
269: ionizing flux of the star should be imperceptible. However, the \HII region could
270: change in size over an observable timescale if the gas density in the accretion
271: flow is time variable. Because the mass of ionized gas within the \HII region
272: is very small compared to the mass of the accretion flow, even a small
273: change in the flow density could affect the size of the \HII region.
274:
275: For example, we can obtain a lower limit for the mass of G24 A1 assuming that
276: it is spherical and homogeneous.
277: From the equations of \cite{MH67} we have that:
278:
279: \begin{eqnarray}
280: \biggl[\frac{M_{\HII}}{\Msun}\biggr]=3.7\times10^{-5}\biggl[\frac{S_\nu}{\mathrm{mJy}}\biggr]^{0.5}
281: & &
282: \biggl[\frac{T_e}{10^4~\mathrm{K}}\biggr]^{0.175} \times \nonumber \\
283: \biggl[\frac{\nu}{4.9~\mathrm{GHz}}\biggr]^{0.05}
284: \biggl[\frac{D}{\mathrm{kpc}}\biggr]^{2.5} \biggl[\frac{\theta_s}{\mathrm{arcsec}}\biggr]^{1.5},
285: \nonumber
286: \end{eqnarray}
287:
288: \noindent
289: where the flux density $S_\nu$ has been measured at a frequency $\nu$ in which the \HII region is
290: optically thin, $T_e$ is the electron temperature, $D$ is the distance to the region, and $\theta_s$
291: is its FWHP. Taking $S_\nu=101$ mJy, $D=7.7$ kpc, and $\theta_s=0\rlap.{''}17$ at 7 mm
292: \citep[]{Bel07}, and assuming $T_e=10^4$ K, the ionized mass in G24 A1 would be
293: $\sim 5 \times 10^{-3}\Msun$. A higher limit to the mass can be obtained
294: considering that HC \HII regions should have density
295: gradients ($n \propto r^\alpha$, with $\alpha=-1.5$ to $-2.5$) rather than being homogeneous
296: \citep[]{Keto07}. In this case we obtain ionized masses between $1 \times 10^{-2}$ $\Msun$ and
297: $3 \times 10^{-2}$ $\Msun$, a factor of $2-6$ higher than under the assumption of homogeneity, but still
298: very small when compared to that of the surrounding molecular material or the ionizing star itself.
299:
300:
301: \subsection{The Observed Variation} \label{obsvar}
302:
303: Figure 1 shows the individual maps of the 1984 May $11+14$ (1984.36) and 1989 June 23
304: (1989.48) epochs, as well as the difference image. Sources A1 and B \citep[the former
305: labeled A by][]{Cod97}
306: are unresolved ($\theta_s \leq 2{''}$), and the total emission is dominated by component B.
307: However, the
308: flux decrease is centered at the position of A1. We performed Gaussian fits to both
309: components using the task JMFIT in AIPS,
310: and the results are summarized in Table 2.
311: We have checked the reliability of the fits to the image by
312: making direct fits to the {\it (u,v)} data. The values obtained
313: from both techniques are entirely consistent but suggest that
314: the errors given by the tasks used in the image (JMFIT) and
315: {\it (u,v)} (UVFIT) fittings are underestimated by a factor
316: of 2. The errors given in Table 2 have been corrected by this factor.
317:
318: The decrease in the flux density of G24 A1
319: between 1989.48 and 1984.36 is $5.1 \pm 1.1$ mJy, or $45 \pm 10$ $\%$. Component B shows no
320: evidence of time variability, as expected for a more evolved \HII region not associated
321: with signs of current star-forming activity such as H$_2$O or OH masers \citep[][]{Cod97}.
322: We set an upper limit of 2 $\%$ to the circularly-polarized emission of the sources, which
323: indicates that we are not dealing with variable gyrosynchrotron emission from an
324: active stellar magnetosphere.
325:
326:
327: \subsection{Is G24 A1 Accreting?}
328:
329: The $\sim 45$ $\%$ flux decrease (i.e., a contraction of $\sim 25$ $\%$ in the ionized radius)
330: we have detected at 6 cm toward G24 A1 is not consistent with the hypothesis that this \HII
331: region is expanding rapidly into the molecular accretion flow.
332: Assuming a radius $R \sim 500$ AU and an expansion velocity $v \sim 40 \kms$ \citep{Bel07}, a
333: flux {\it increase} of $\sim 20$ $\%$ should have been observed between the compared epochs.
334:
335: We attribute the contraction of the \HII region to an increase in its density produced by the
336: enhancement of accretion, either caused by an isotropic increment in the mass-accretion rate or
337: by the sudden accretion of a localized clump in the neutral inflow
338: \citep[for example, clumps have been observed in the accretion flow onto the
339: UC \HII region G10.6--0.4;][]{SoHo05,KW06}.
340: Our data do not allow us to distinguish among these two possibilities.
341:
342: The additional mass required to increase the density can be estimated.
343: The ionized radius $r_{\rm s}$ scales roughly with the density $n$ as
344: $r_{\rm s} \propto n^{-2/3}$ (if the radius of the \HII region is set by a balance
345: between photoionization and recombination) and at optically thick frequencies the
346: flux density scales as $S_\nu \propto r_{\rm s}^2$.
347: The ionized mass within G24 A1 is
348: $\sim 1 \times 10^{-2}$ $\Msun$ (\S \ref{trend-acc}). Therefore,
349: the sudden accretion of
350: $\sim 5 \times 10^{-3}$ $\Msun$ into the \HII region would suffice to explain
351: the observed $45$ $\%$ flux decrease.
352: The molecular accretion flow
353: around this \HII region has a mass of $\sim 130$ $\Msun$ \citep[][]{Bel04}.
354: Thus, the required variation, 50 $\%$ of the mass of the \HII region, is
355: only 0.001 \% of the total mass of the accretion flow.
356:
357: Finally, we shall mention that even when the observations here reported are not
358: consistent with a simple, continuous expansion of G24 A1, they do not rule out
359: other more complex, non-steady evolutionary scenarios.
360:
361: \section{Conclusions}
362:
363: Our analysis of archival VLA observations of the \HII region G24.78+0.08 A1
364: indicates a contraction of its radius between 1984.36 and 1989.48. This
365: finding is consistent with the hypothesis that this HC \HII is the inner, ionized part of the
366: larger scale accretion flow seen in the molecular line observations of \citet{Bel04,Bel06}.
367: Future high-resolution RRL observations could unambiguously resolve the ionized-gas
368: kinematics and confirm this hypothesis.
369:
370: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
371: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
372: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
373: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
374: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
375: %%
376: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
377: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
378: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
379: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
380: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
381: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
382: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
383: %% place of the \cite commands.
384:
385: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
386: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
387: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
388:
389: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
390: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
391: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
392: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
393: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
394:
395: \begin{thebibliography}{}
396:
397: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1994)]{Beck94} Becker, R. H., White, R. L., Helfand, D. J., \&
398: Zoonematkermani, S. 1994, \apj, 91, 347
399:
400: \bibitem[Beltr\'an et al.(2006)]{Bel06} Beltr\'an, M. T., Cesaroni, R., Codella, C., Testi, L.,
401: Furuya, R. S., \& Olmi, L. 2006, Nature, 443, 427
402:
403: \bibitem[Beltr\'an et al.(2007)]{Bel07} Beltr\'an, M. T., Cesaroni, R., Moscadelli, L., \&
404: Codella C. 2007, \aap, 471, L13
405:
406: \bibitem[Beltr\'an et al.(2004)]{Bel04} Beltr\'an, M. T., Cesaroni, R., Neri, R., Codella, C.,
407: Furuya, R. S., Testi, L., \& Olmi, L. 2004, \apj, 601 L187
408:
409: \bibitem[Codella et al.(1997)]{Cod97} Codella, C., Testi, L., \& Cesaroni, R. 1997, \aap, 325,
410: 282
411:
412: \bibitem[Churchwell(2002)]{Ch02} Churchwell, Ed. 2002, ARA\&A, 40, 27
413:
414: \bibitem[Franco-Hern\'andez \& Rodr{\'\i}guez(2004)]{FH04} Franco-Hern\'andez, R., \& Rodr{\'\i}guez,
415: L. F. 2004, \apj, 604, L105
416:
417: \bibitem[Furuya et al.(2002)]{Fur02} Furuya, R. S., Cesaroni, R., Codella, C., Testi, L.,
418: Bachiller, R., \& Tafalla, M. 2002, \aap, 390, L1
419:
420: \bibitem[Hoare et al.(2007)]{Hoare07} Hoare, M. G., Kurtz, S. E., Lizano, S., Keto, E.,
421: \& Hofner, P. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil
422: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 181
423:
424: \bibitem[Keto(2007)]{Keto07} Keto, E. 2007, \apj, 666, 976
425:
426: \bibitem[Keto \& Wood(2006)]{KW06} Keto, E., \& Wood, K. 2006, \apj, 637, 850
427:
428: \bibitem[Keto et al.(2007)]{KZK07} Keto, E., Zhang, Q., \& Kurtz, S. 2007, preprint (arXiv:0708.3388)
429:
430: \bibitem[Kurtz(2005)]{K05} Kurtz, S. 2005, in IAU Symp. 227, Massive Star Birth:
431: A Crossroad of Astrophysics, ed. R. Cesaroni et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 111
432:
433: \bibitem[Mezger \& Henderson(1967)]{MH67} Mezger, P. G., \& Henderson, A. P. 1967, \apj, 147, 471
434:
435: \bibitem[Moscadelli et al.(2007)]{Mos07} Moscadelli, L., Goddi, C., Cesaroni, R., Beltr\'an, M. T.,
436: \& Furuya, R. S. 2007, \aap, 472, 867
437:
438: \bibitem[Sollins and Ho(2005)]{SoHo05} Sollins, P. K., \& Ho, P. T. P. 2005, ApJ, 630, 987
439:
440: \bibitem[Sollins et al.(2005)]{Sol05} Sollins, P. K., Zhang, Q., Keto, E., \& Ho, P. T. P.
441: 2005, \apj, 624, L49
442:
443:
444: \end{thebibliography}
445:
446: %\clearpage
447:
448: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
449: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
450: %% To embed the sample graphics in
451: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
452: %% \includegraphics commands
453: %%
454: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
455: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
456: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
457: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
458: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
459: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
460: %%
461: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
462: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
463: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
464: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
465: %% journal to journal.
466:
467: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
468: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
469: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
470: %% available in the electronic journal.
471:
472:
473: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
474: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
475: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
476: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
477: %%
478:
479: %\begin{figure}
480: %\plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}
481: %\caption{A panel taken from Figure 2 of \citet{rudnick03}.
482: %See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color version
483: %of this figure.\label{fig2}}
484: %\end{figure}
485:
486: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
487: %% for an mpeg animation.
488:
489: %\begin{figure}
490: %\includegraphics[angle=90,scale=0.3]{f3.eps}
491: %\caption{Animation still frame taken from \citet{kim03}.
492: %This figure is also available as an mpeg
493: %animation in the electronic edition of the
494: %{\it Astrophysical Journal}.}
495: %\end{figure}
496:
497: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
498: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
499: %% User Guide for details.
500: %%
501: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
502: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
503: %% after every seventh one.
504:
505: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
506: %% each one.
507:
508: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
509: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
510: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
511: %%
512:
513: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
514: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
515:
516: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
517: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
518: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
519: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
520: %% reduced font size.
521: %%
522: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
523: %% inside the \tablecaption.
524:
525: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
526: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
527: %% edition.
528:
529: \clearpage
530:
531:
532: \begin{center}
533: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc} \label{tab1}
534: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
535: \tablecaption{Observational Parameters}
536: \tablewidth{0pt}
537: \tablehead{
538: \colhead{Epoch} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Phase Center\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Amplitude} &
539: \colhead{Phase} &
540: \colhead{Bootstrapped Flux} & \colhead{Beam} \\\cline{2-3}
541: & $\alpha$(J2000) & $\delta$(J2000) & Calibrator & Calibrator & Density (Jy) &(arcsec $\times$
542: arcsec; deg) \\
543: }
544: \startdata
545: 1984 May 11 & 18 36 12.145 & $-07$ 11 28.17 & 3C286 & $1743-038$ & $2.414 \pm 0.005$ &
546: $5.38 \times 3.44$; $-29$ \\
547: \\
548: 1984 May 14 & 18 36 12.145 & $-07$ 11 28.17 & 3C286 & $1743-038$ & $2.464 \pm 0.007$ &
549: $4.78 \times 3.34$; $+03$ \\
550: \\
551: 1989 Jun 23 & 18 36 10.682 & $-07$ 11 19.87 & 3C286 & $1834-126$ & $0.153 \pm 0.001$ &
552: $4.50 \times 3.31$; $-10$
553:
554: \enddata
555: \tablenotetext{a}{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds. Units of declination are
556: degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.}
557: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
558: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
559: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
560: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1} is published in its entirety in the
561: %electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is
562: %shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
563: \end{deluxetable}
564: \end{center}
565:
566:
567: \clearpage
568:
569:
570: \begin{center}
571: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc} \label{tab2}
572: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
573: \tablecaption{Gaussian Fit Results}
574: \tablewidth{0pt}
575: \tablehead{
576: \colhead{Epoch} & \colhead{Component} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Position\tablenotemark{a,b}} &
577: \colhead{Flux Density}
578: \\\cline{3-4}
579: & & $\alpha$(J2000) & $\delta$(J2000) & (mJy) \\
580: }
581: \startdata
582: 1984.36 & A1 & 18 36 12.545 & $-07$ 12 10.87 & $11.4 \pm 0.8$ \\
583: 1984.36 & B & 18 36 12.668 & $-07$ 12 15.37 & $31.4 \pm 1.0$ \\
584: 1989.48 & A1 & 18 36 12.545 & $-07$ 12 10.87 & $06.3 \pm 0.8$ \\
585: 1989.48 & B & 18 36 12.668 & $-07$ 12 15.37 & $32.8 \pm 0.8$ \\
586: \enddata
587: \tablenotetext{a}{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds. Units of declination are
588: degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.}
589: \tablenotetext{b}{For the 1989.48 epoch, the centers of the Gaussians were fixed to those obtained for
590: the 1984.36 epoch.}
591: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
592: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
593: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
594: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1} is published in its entirety in the
595: %electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is
596: %shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
597: \end{deluxetable}
598: \end{center}
599:
600: \clearpage
601:
602:
603: \begin{figure}
604: \epsscale{.30}
605: \plotone{f1.eps}
606: \caption{
607: VLA images of G24.78+0.08 for 1984.36 ({\it top}), 1989.48 ({\it middle}), and the difference
608: of 1989.48 - 1984.36 ({\it bottom}). The contours are -10, -8, -6, -5, -4, 4,
609: 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, 40, and 60 times 0.57 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
610: The half power contour of the synthesized beam ($4\rlap.{''}79 \times
611: 3\rlap.{''}38$ with a position angle of $-15^\circ$) is shown in the bottom left corner
612: of the images.
613: The crosses indicate the positions of the components A1 and B from our Gaussian fits to the
614: 1984.36 image. The negative residuals observed in the difference image indicate a decrease
615: of $\sim 45$ $\%$
616: in the flux density of component A1.
617: }
618: \label{fig1}
619: \end{figure}
620:
621:
622: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
623: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
624: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
625: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
626: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
627: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
628: %% to include it in this document.)
629:
630: %% \input{table}
631:
632: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
633: %% that appears after it.
634:
635: \end{document}
636:
637: %%
638: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
639:
640: