1: % v3
2:
3: %%
4: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
5: %%
6: %% Modified 2005 December 5
7: %%
8: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
9: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
10:
11: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
12: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
13: %% any data that comes before this command.
14:
15: %% The command below calls the preprint style
16: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
17: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
18: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
19: %%
20: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
21:
22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
23:
24: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
25:
26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
27:
28: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
29:
30: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
31: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
32: %% use the longabstract style option.
33:
34: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
35:
36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
38: %% the \begin{document} command.
39: %%
40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
43: %% for information.
44:
45: \usepackage{natbib}
46: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
47:
48: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
49: \newcommand{\myemail}{swolf@mpia.de}
50:
51: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
52:
53: \slugcomment{}
54:
55: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
56: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
57: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
58: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
59: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
60: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
61:
62: % 1 2 3
63: % 123456789012345678901234567890123456789
64: \shorttitle{Butterfly Star: Submillimeter Structure}
65: \shortauthors{Wolf et al.}
66:
67: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
68: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
69:
70: % sw ---
71: % show all todo items
72: \newcommand{\todo}[1]
73: {
74: \noindent
75: {\bf
76: [tbd: #1]
77: }
78: }
79:
80: \newcommand{\mic}{{\,$\mu$m\ }}
81: \newcommand{\micd}{{\,$\mu$m}}
82: \newcommand{\degree}{{$^{\rm o}$}}
83: \newcommand{\about} {$\sim$\ts}
84: \newcommand{\aboutless}{$\simless$\ts}
85: \newcommand{\aboutmore}{$\simgreat$\ts}
86: \newcommand{\ts}{\thinspace}
87: \newcommand{\simless}{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
88: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'074$}}\mathchar"7218$}}}
89: \newcommand{\simgreat}{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
90: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'076$}}\mathchar"7218$}}}
91: \newcommand{\cy}[1]{\citeyear{#1}}
92: % -- ---
93:
94: \hyphenation{
95: ana-ly-sis
96: }
97:
98: \begin{document}
99:
100: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
101: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
102: %% you desire.
103:
104: \title{Submillimeter Structure of the Disk of the Butterfly Star}
105:
106: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
107: %% author and affiliation information.
108: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
109: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
110: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
111: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
112:
113: \author{S.\ Wolf, A.\ Schegerer, H.\ Beuther}
114: \affil{Max Planck Institute for Astronomy,
115: K\"onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
116: \email{swolf@mpia.de, schegerer@mpia.de, beuther@mpia.de}
117:
118: \and
119:
120: \author{D.\ L.\ Padgett}
121: \affil{California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd,
122: Mail code 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
123: \email{dlp@ipac.caltech.edu}
124:
125: \and
126:
127: \author{K.\ R.\ Stapelfeldt}
128: \affil{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
129: 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109}
130: \email{krs@exoplanet.jpl.nasa.gov}
131:
132: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
133: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
134: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
135: %% affiliation.
136:
137: % example:
138: % \altaffiltext{1}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
139:
140: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
141: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
142: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
143: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
144: %% editorial office after submission.
145:
146: \begin{abstract}
147: We present a spatially resolved 894\,$\mu$m map of the circumstellar disk
148: of the Butterfly star in Taurus (IRAS\,04302+2247),
149: obtained with the Submillimeter Array (SMA).
150: The predicted and observed radial brightness profile agree well in the outer disk region,
151: but differ in the inner region with an outer radius of \about80-120\,AU.
152: In particular, we find a local minimum of the radial brightness distribution at the center,
153: which can be explained by an increasing density / optical depth
154: combined with the decreasing vertical extent of the disk towards the center.
155: Our finding indicates that young circumstellar disks can be optically thick
156: at wavelengths as long as 894\,$\mu$m.
157: While earlier modeling lead to general conclusions about the global disk structure
158: and, most importantly, evidence for grain growth in the disk (Wolf, Padgett, \& Stapelfeldt~2003),
159: the presented SMA observations provide more detailed constraints for the disk
160: structure and dust grain properties in the inner, potentially planet-forming region
161: (\aboutless80-120\,AU) vs.\ the outer disk region (\about120-300\,AU).
162: \end{abstract}
163:
164: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
165: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
166: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
167: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
168:
169: \keywords{circumstellar matter ---
170: planetary systems: protoplanetary disks ---
171: planetary systems: formation ---
172: submillimeter ---
173: radiative transfer ---
174: stars: individual (IRAS\,04302+2247, ``Butterfly Star'')}
175:
176: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
177: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
178: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
179: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
180: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
181: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
182: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
183: %% each reference.
184:
185:
186: % ---
187: \section{Introduction}\label{intro}
188:
189: IRAS~04302+2247 is a Class~I protostar in the Taurus-Auriga molecular cloud complex
190: whose equatorial plane is inclined edge-on to the line of sight
191: (inclination = 90$^{\rm{o}} \pm 3^{\rm{o}}$; Wolf et al.~2003, hereafter WPS03).
192: Parallel to the increasing amount of observational constraints,
193: such as ground-based near-infrared images and polarization maps (Lucas \& Roche~1997, 1998),
194: near-infrared images obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope (Padgett et al.~1999)
195: and
196: spatially resolved 1.3\,mm and 2.7\,mm maps (WPS03),
197: several attempts have been undertaken to model the structure
198: and physical conditions in the circumstellar disk and envelope of this object
199: (e.g., Lucas \& Roche~1998, WPS03, Stark et al.~2006).
200: In particular, spatially resolved images of the circumstellar environment
201: of the Butterfly Star, obtained in the near-infrared and millimeter wavelength range,
202: allowed WPS03 to conclude that the grains in the envelope of
203: this object cannot be distinguished from those of the interstellar medium,
204: while grains have grown via coagulation by up to 2 - 3 orders of magnitude
205: in the much denser circumstellar disk.
206: %
207: The separated dust grain evolution is in agreement with the theoretical prediction
208: of a sensitive dependence of grain growth on the location in the circumstellar environment
209: of young (proto)stars: Grain growth is expected to occur on much
210: shorter timescales in the dense region of circumstellar disks than
211: in the thin circumstellar envelope.
212: For the same reason a radial dependence of the dust grain evolution
213: in the disk itself is expected.
214: However, the observational data presented by WPS03 did not allow to constrain
215: the spatial dependence of the dust grain properties in the disk.
216:
217: Based on radiative transfer simulations, using the disk model by WPS03, we found
218: that further insights into and constraints for the dust grain growth as the first stage
219: of planet formation in the circumstellar disk of the Butterfly Star can be obtained
220: with high-resolution submillimeter observations.
221: As outlined in Sect.~\ref{sect.ana}, the apparent structure of the disk is predicted to change significantly
222: as the observing wavelength is decreased from millimeter to submillimeter wavelengths,
223: allowing to constrain the radial and vertical disk structure and distribution
224: of the dust grain properties.
225:
226: In this paper we present and discuss new, spatially resolved observations of the circumstellar disk
227: of the Butterfly Star, obtained with the Submillimeter Array\footnote{
228: The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
229: and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics
230: and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.}
231: (SMA) at 894\,$\mu$m.
232: The observations and data reduction are described in Sect.~\ref{sect.obs},
233: followed by a description of the data analysis (Sect.~\ref{sect.ana})
234: and conclusions in Sect.~\ref{sect.sum}.
235:
236:
237: % ---
238: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}\label{sect.obs}
239:
240: IRAS\,04302+2247 was observed with the SMA \cite{ho} on January~$9^\mathrm{th}$, 2006,
241: using the upper and lower side bands at 330\,GHz and 340\,GHz, respectively.
242: The phase center was
243: R.A.\ $=4^{\rm h}33^{\rm m}16.219^{\rm s}$ and Dec.\ $=22^{\circ}53'20.''29$ (J2000.0). Both,
244: the upper and lower sideband had a width of 2\,GHz consisting of $24 \times
245: 256$ channels with a spectral resolution of 0.41\,MHz.
246: The angular diameter, i.e., the radial extent of the disk
247: derived from the previous 1.36\,mm continuum observations
248: amounts to $\sim$\,$4.''3$ (WPS03).
249: For this reason we used the extended configuration of
250: the array with 7 antennas and corresponding projected baseline lengths of
251: $24$\,m -- $254$\,m during the observation. The resulting size of the
252: synthesized beam is $0.''67 \times
253: 0.''53$ with a position angle of $104^{\circ}$. The weather conditions during
254: the 6\,hours of observation of the target were stable with typical 225\,GHz zenith sky
255: opacities of $\tau=0.05-0.07$ measured by the National Radio Astronomy
256: Observatory (NRAO) tipping radiometer operated by the Caltech Submillimeter
257: Observatory (CSO). This result corresponds to an opacity of $\tau \approx
258: 0.23$ at 345\,GHz \cite{masson}. The radio galaxy
259: 3c111 was used for gain calibration while passband calibration was done with
260: the quasar 3c273. The flux calibration was determined with Uranus.
261: The SMA data were reduced and calibrated with the MIR software package
262: \cite{qi}. The 1\,$\sigma$ continuum r.m.s amounts to
263: 3.3\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$.
264:
265: The resulting 894\,$\mu$m continuum map of the disk of the Butterfly Star is shown
266: in Fig.~\ref{sma+hst.map}.
267: In order to remove the potential influence of the $^{13}$CO(3-2) line at
268: 330.587\,GHz on the total flux and continuum map, we cut a band with a width
269: of 16\,MHz around its corresponding position in the spectrum.
270:
271: The 894\,$\mu$m continuum flux of IRAS\,04302+2247
272: amounts to 267\,mJy with a corresponding calibration error of \about$15\%$.
273: This flux is consistent with our predicted flux of 225\,mJy.
274: Consequently, our SMA measurements confirm the previously estimated disk mass
275: ($M_{\rm disk}$=0.07 M$_\sun$; WPS03).
276: We wish to emphasize that this flux / mass estimate does not rely
277: on the assumption of optically thin emission, but was derived
278: from the self-consistent model by WPS03
279: (i.e., self-consistent with respect to the disk density distribution,
280: dust grain parameters, and resulting disk temperature structure;
281: see Sect.~\ref{s.sect.model} for details).
282:
283:
284:
285: % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
286: \section{Data Analysis}\label{sect.ana}
287:
288: \subsection{Disk model}\label{s.sect.model}
289:
290: In the following we provide a brief summary of the disk model
291: we use in the subsequent data analysis and discussions (see WPS03 for more details):
292:
293: \noindent
294: {\em Density profile}:
295: We assume a disk density profile as described by Shakura \& Sunyaev~(1973):
296: \begin{equation}\label{dendisk}
297: \rho_{\rm disk} = \rho_0
298: \left( \frac{R_{*}}{\varpi} \right)^{\alpha}
299: \exp \left\{ -\frac{1}{2} \left[ \frac{z}{h(\varpi)} \right]^2 \right\},
300: \end{equation}
301: where $\varpi$ is the radial distance from the star in the disk midplane, $R_{*}$ is the stellar radius,
302: and $h(\varpi)$ is the disk scale height $h = h_0 (\varpi/R_{*})^{\beta}$.
303: For the exponents $\alpha$ and $\beta$ which describe the radial density profile and disk flaring
304: we use the relation $\alpha = 3 (\beta - 1/2)$,
305: which results from viscous accretion theory (Shakura \& Sunyaev~1973).
306:
307: In addition to the circumstellar disk, the model for the environment
308: of IRAS~04302+2247 consists of a rotating, infalling envelope.
309: However, based on the analysis of the relative contributions of the disk and envelope
310: to the spectral energy distribution, the second component has no significant influence
311: on the 894\,$\mu$m data discussed here.
312:
313: % ---
314: \noindent
315: {\em Heating sources}:
316: The main heating source of the circumstellar environment is the embedded star.
317: We assume typical parameters of a T~Tauri star:
318: $R_{*} = 2\,{\rm R}_{\sun}$, $T_{*} = 4000\,{\rm K}$ (Gullbring~1998) which correspond to a luminosity of
319: $L_{*} = 0.92\,L_{\sun}$ under the assumption of a blackbody.
320: %
321: Further heating of the disk is provided by accretion, where we apply
322: the viscous disk model by Lynden-Bell \& Pringle (1974).
323:
324: \noindent
325: {\em Dust grain properties:}
326: We consider the dust grains to be homogeneous spheres (radius $a$) with a size distribution described
327: by a power-law of the form $ n(a) \propto a^{-3.5}$.
328: The dust grain ensemble consists of silicate and graphite grains with relative abundances of
329: 62.5~\% astronomical silicate and 37.5~\% graphite.
330: We use the optical data
331: of ``smoothed astronomical silicate'' and graphite published by Weingartner \& Draine~(2001) and Draine \& Lee~(1984).
332: We assume a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100:1 and a grain mass density of $2.5{\rm g}\,{\rm cm}^{-3}$.
333:
334: \noindent
335: {\em Results:}
336: Radiative transfer simulations are used to calculate the disk temperature structure
337: self-consistently and to derive observables subsequently.
338: These simulations are performed with the three-dimensional
339: continuum radiative transfer code MC3D (e.g., Wolf et al.~1999, Wolf~2003).
340: Based on this model, WPS03 find the following best-fit model parameters:
341: The outer radius amounts to 300\,AU,
342: $\beta = 58/45$ ($\alpha=213/90$),
343: $h$(100\,AU)=15\,AU, and
344: $M_{\rm disk} = 0.07\,{\rm M}_{\sun}$.
345: In particular, an upper grain size of \about$100\,\mu{\rm m}$ was found.
346:
347:
348: % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
349: \subsection{Comparison of the model predictions with the submillimeter observation}\label{s.sect.comp}
350:
351: % ---
352: In Fig.~\ref{sma.radprof} the radial brightness profile along the disk midplane is shown (solid line).
353: It agrees well with the predicted profile (dashed line) in the outer regions of the disk
354: with radial distances larger than \about80-120\,AU from the center.
355: Thus, our observations confirm the radial density distribution and dust grain properties
356: for the outer, cold region of the disk.
357: Consequently, our observations confirm the disk size (radius: 300 AU) derived by WPS03.
358:
359: Inside \about80-120\,AU we find a discrepancy between the model prediction
360: and the observed brightness profile. While the model predicts a rather flat plateau for this region,
361: the observed map even shows a local minimum at the potential location of the star.
362: The discrepancy amounts to only \about2$\sigma$.
363: However, we want to stress that the location of this mininum is not arbitrary, but at the disk center.
364: Furthermore, the corresponding local maxima show
365: a slight symmetry with respect to the disk center.
366:
367: Two explanation for this brightness minimum are at hand:
368: First, the minimum could be caused by the lack of emitting dust, i.e.,
369: an inner region void of small dust grains.
370: Inner holes in circumstellar disks in different stages of their evolution
371: have been inferred from their mid-infrared spectral energy distribution
372: and spatially resolved images. In the particular case of young disks (as the counterpart
373: to evolved, debris-type disks), inner disk radii which are much larger than the dust
374: sublimation radius have been deduced from the mid-infrared spectral energy distribution
375: for example in the case of TW~Hydrae (Calvet et al.~2002) and GM~Aurigae (Rice et al.~2003).
376: As radiative transfer simulations based on the disk model by WPS03 show,
377: the radius of the dust free region would have to amount to \about70\,AU
378: (compared to a radius of \about300\,AU of the disk).
379: We can test the hypothesis of the existence of a large inner hole by comparing
380: the corresponding 1.36\,mm simulated images with our continuum observations
381: we obtained at this wavelength with the Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO; WPS03).
382: We find that this gap would have caused a similar local minimum at 1.36\,mm
383: (note that the size of the synthesized beam was similar to that of our SMA observations:
384: $0.64'' \times 0.52''$).
385: Since this was not observed (see Fig.~3 in WPS03), we can exclude this explanation.
386:
387: One usually would apply a second independent test to the above conclusion.
388: If considering the disk alone, the amount of the optical to mid-infrared flux
389: depends sensitively on the existence or absence of such a large inner hole.
390: However, this test is not applicable in our case because the emission
391: of the Butterfly star is dominated by the circumstellar envelope
392: up to wavelengths of \about174\,$\mu$m (WPS03).
393:
394:
395: The second and thus remaining explanation is the lack of ``visible'' emitting dust grains.
396: %
397: In particular, the model predicts an optical depth in the midplane (as seen from the star)
398: which amounts to $\tau_{894\mu{\rm m}} \approx 2 \times 10^3$.
399: Going from millimeter to submillimeter wavelengths, the dust in the innermost,
400: dense regions close to the disk midplane cannot be traced anymore.
401: Consequently, the disk brightness profile which is very steep in the millimeter range
402: becomes significantly flatter at shorter wavelengths.
403: In other words, due to the increasing optical depth in the disk midplane, the relative
404: contribution of the lower density outer regions and the directly heated -- and therefore warm --
405: upper disk layers
406: (disk photosphere above the effective disk surface at $\tau_{\rm optical}$\about1)
407: increases with respect to the contribution from the disk midplane.
408: %
409: This effect is amplified by the decrease of the disk scale height towards the star,
410: resulting in a further decrease of the amount of dust in the upper, optically thin disk layers.
411: %
412: The relative amount of dust that can efficiently contribute to the disk reemission
413: decreases towards the star compared to the total amount of dust at the same line of sight.
414: Depending on the optical properties of the dust grains and the particular disk structure,
415: the radial intensity profile might thus even decrease,
416: resulting in a local minimum at the position of the central star.
417: The amount of dust grains which efficiently contribute to the flux measured
418: at 1.36\,mm (OVRO), but not at 894\,$\mu$m (SMA) depends sensitively both on
419: the radial {\em and} vertical distribution of the disk density and dust grain properties
420: and thus also on the disk temperature structure.
421:
422: Based on the WPS03 disk model outlined in Sect.~\ref{s.sect.model}, the predicted
423: size of the region around the star in which the flux decreases is too narrow
424: to be spatially resolved by our SMA observations, i.e.,
425: the quantitative behavior of the radial brightness profile
426: is different in the simulation and observation for the inner \about80-120\,AU
427: (see Fig.~\ref{sma.radprof}).
428: Consequently, the opacity structure, and therefore the quantities
429: that determine it (outlined above), are different in this region than assumed in the model.
430: As we assume perfect mixing of the dust throughout the entire disk,
431: i.e., the dust properties and the gas-to-dust mass ratio are the same
432: at every point in the disk, this finding is not surprising.
433: Indeed, detailed theoretical investigations of the planet forming process,
434: which is expected to take place in this inner region,
435: predict that these assumptions have to be given up because
436: of the radial and vertical dependence of the evolution of the dust and disk parameters
437: (e.g., Nomura \& Nakagawa~2006).
438: However, a self-consistent model which takes into account
439: the various processes involved
440: (e.g., grain growth and fragmentation, dust sedimentation, radial and vertical mixing;
441: see Sect.~\ref{sect.sum})
442: is beyond the scope of this publication.
443:
444: A very clear test of our conclusions will be possible with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA; Wootten~2003).
445: Thanks to its significantly higher spatial resolution it will not only be able
446: to trace the local minimum centered on the stellar position,
447: but also detect the brightness decrease in vertical direction, centered
448: on the disk midplane.
449: The resulting quadrupolar disk structure can be seen in the predicted ideal 0.3\,mm, 1.36\,mm, and 2.74\,mm maps
450: (Fig.~4, WPS03).
451: However, since the optical depth effect is even stronger than predicted, the effect will be even more pronounced
452: for a given wavelength.
453:
454:
455: % ---
456: \section{Summary and Conclusions}\label{sect.sum}
457:
458: We obtained the first spatially resolved submillimeter map of circumstellar disk
459: of the prominent Butterfly Star in Taurus.
460: We find a good agreement between the observed and the predicted brightness profile
461: in the outer region of the disk.
462: However, a discrepancy between the predicted and observed radial flux distribution
463: was found in the inner region (inside \about80-120\,AU),
464: showing a decrease of the flux towards the center.
465: This discrepancy -- a local minimum at the stellar position -- amounts to only \about2$\sigma$.
466: However, the specific location of the minimum at the disk center and
467: the slight symmetry of the corresponding local maxima with respect
468: to the disk center indicate that this profile is
469: an intrinsic feature of the real disk brightness distribution.
470: %
471: Based on radiative transfer simulations and additional observations at 1.36\,mm
472: we exclude a large inner hole (strongly depleted from small dust grains) as a possible
473: explanation of this local minimum in the radial brightness distribution.
474:
475: These observations may provide the basis for a detailed model of the inner structure
476: of the disk of the Butterfly Star. While earlier modeling lead to conclusion
477: about grain growth in the disk (WPS03), the new SMA observations provide constraints
478: for the disk structure and dust grain properties in the inner, potentially
479: planet-forming region (\about80-120\,AU) vs.\ the outer disk region (\about120-300\,AU).
480: %
481: It was found that the optical depth in the inner disk region
482: is higher than predicted by WPS03.
483: The column density of dust along the line of sight is therefore higher
484: in the inner disk region than derived from the previous disk model
485: in which a perfect mixing of dust and gas throughout the entire disk is assumed.
486: These observations indicate that there exists a higher dust density and
487: therefore a higher dust-to-gas mass ratio in the inner disk region.
488: This conclusion is based on the assumption that the density profile
489: of the gas phase of the disk can be described by the same approach
490: in the inner and outer disk region (Eq.~\ref{dendisk})
491: and that there exists no discontinuity in the gas density profile.
492:
493: Since the optical depth effect discussed above is constrained by both
494: the radial and vertical disk structure and dust grain properties,
495: such a model will have to take the predicted grain evolution and its
496: dependence on the radial and vertical position in the disk into account.
497: %
498: Furthermore, dust settling and the resulting
499: increase of the grain-grain interaction probability will result in a further
500: vertical dependence of the grain size distribution
501: (e.g., Weidenschilling~1997).
502: Beside the grain evolution, mixing processes, such as convection
503: and radial mixing within circumstellar disks have to be considered
504: since these processes lead to a redistribution of processed, evolved dust grains
505: to outer, less dense and colder disk regions
506: (see, e.g., Klahr et al.~1999, Gail~2001).
507:
508: Our observations illustrate the high potential of submillimeter observations
509: for studying circumstellar disks around young (proto)stars.
510: Although the spatial resolution
511: is significantly lower than that aimed for in the case of ALMA in a few years from now,
512: the tight correlation between the density and temperature structure in the disk
513: is already able to constrain the radial and vertical disk structure
514: and thus the dust grain properties as a function of the distance from the disk midplane,
515: based on
516: the spatially resolved radial brightness profile
517: obtained with the SMA
518: in the submillimeter wavelength range.
519:
520: % ---
521: \acknowledgments
522:
523: S.W.\ and A.S.\ are supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG)
524: through the Emmy Noether grant WO\,857/2.
525: H.B.\ is supported by the DFG through the Emmy Noether grant BE\,2578.
526: We wish to thank the anonymous referee for valuable suggestions
527: concerning the presentation and discussion of our results.
528:
529: \begin{thebibliography}{}
530: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2002)]{calvet2003} Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L.,
531: Wilner, D., Walsh, A., Sitko, M., 2002, \apj, 568, 1008
532: %\bibitem[Clark(1991)]{cl91} Clark, F.O.\ 1991, ApJSS, 75, 611
533: \bibitem[draine(1984)]{draine84} Draine, B.T., Lee, H.M.\ 1984, \apj, 285, 89
534: \bibitem[Gail(2001)]{gail2001} Gail, H.-P., 2001, \aap, 378, 192
535: \bibitem{gu98} Gullbring, E., Hartmann, L., Brice$\tilde{\rm n}$o, C., Calvet, N.\ 1998, \apj 492, 323
536: \bibitem{ha98} Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., D'Alessio, P.\ 1998, \apj, 495, 385
537: %\bibitem[Henning et al.(2006)]{henning2006} Henning, Th., Dullemond, C.P., Dominik, C., Wolf, S.,
538: % in ``Planet Formation'' (Book), H. Klahr and W. Brandner (eds.),
539: % Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
540: \bibitem[Ho et al.~2004]{ho} Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M., \& Lo, K. Y. 2004, ApJ, 616, L1
541: \bibitem[Klahr et al.(1999)]{kahr99} Klahr, H.~H., Henning, Th., Kley, W., 1999, \apj, 514, 325
542: \bibitem[Lucas \& Roche(1997)]{lr97} Lucas, P.W., Roche, P.F.\ 1997, MNRAS, 286, 895
543: \bibitem[Lucas \& Roche(1998)]{lr98} Lucas, P.W., Roche, P.F.\ 1998, MNRAS, 299, 699
544: \bibitem{lbp74} Lynden-Bell, D., Pringle, J.E.\ 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603
545: \bibitem[Padgett et al.(1999)]{pad99} Padgett, D.L., Brandner, W., Stapelfeldt, K.R., Strom, S.E.,
546: Terebey, S., Koerner, D.\ 1999, \apj, 117, 1490
547: \bibitem[Masson~1994]{masson}
548: Masson, C. R. 1994, in ASP Conf. Ser. 59, Atmospheric Effects and
549: Calibration, eds. M. Ishiguro \& Wm. J. Welch
550: \bibitem[nomura06]{no06} Nomura, H., Nakagawa, Y. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1099
551: \bibitem[Qi~2005]{qi}
552: Qi, C. 2005, The MIR Cookbook, The Submillimeter Array / Harvard-Smithsonian
553: Center for Astrophysics (http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/$\sim$cqi/mircook.html)
554: \bibitem[Rice et al.(2003)]{rice2003} Rice, W.~K.~M., Wood, K., Armitage, P.~J., Whitney, B.~A.,
555: Bjorkman, J.~E., 2003, MNRAS, 342, 79
556: %\bibitem[Sault et al.~1995]{sault}
557: % Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., \& Wright, M. C., H. 1995, in Astronomical Data
558: % Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne and J. J. E.
559: % Hayes, PASP Conf. Ser. 77, 433
560: \bibitem[shakura(1973)]{shakura73} Shakura, N.I., \& Sunyaev, R.A.\ 1973, \apj, 24, 337
561: \bibitem[Stark et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...649..900S} Stark, D.~P., Whitney, B.~A., Stassun, K.,
562: Wood, K., 2006, \apj, 649, 900
563: %\bibitem[Thamm et al.(1994)]{1994A&A...287..493T}
564: % Thamm, E., Steinacker, J., Henning, Th. 1994, \aap, 287, 493
565: \bibitem[Weidenschilling(1997)]{weid1997} Weidenschilling, S.~J., 1997, Icarus, 127, 290
566: \bibitem{wd01} Weingartner, J.C., Draine, B.T., 2001, ApJ, 548, 296
567: \bibitem[wolf(2003)]{cpc03} Wolf, S.\ 2003, Comp.\ Phys.\ Comm., 150, 99
568: \bibitem[wolf(1999)]{wolf99} Wolf, S., Henning, Th., Stecklum B.\ 1999, \aap, 349, 839
569: \bibitem[Wolf et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...588..373W}
570: Wolf, S., Padgett, D.~L., Stapelfeldt, K.~R. 2003, \apj, 588, 373 (WPS03)
571: \bibitem[Wootten (2003)]{wootten2003} Wootten, A., 2003,
572: In SPIE Proc.~vol. 4837, ``Large Ground-based Telescopes'', Oschmann, J.M.\ and Stepp, L.M. (eds.)
573: p. 110
574: \end{thebibliography}
575:
576: \begin{figure}[h!]
577: \begin{center}
578: % \resizebox{.99\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{i04302_nic_sma890.ps}}
579: \resizebox{.99\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{f1.eps}}
580: \end{center}
581: \caption{
582: Submillimeter map of the Butterfly Star (894\,$\mu$m, contour lines),
583: overlayed on the near-infrared scattered light map (Padgett et al.~1999).
584: The levels of the solid contour are
585: 6.8,
586: 10.2,
587: 13.7,
588: 23.9,
589: 34.1,
590: 44.3, and
591: 54.5 mJy/beam
592: which correspond to the
593: 2$\sigma$,
594: 3$\sigma$,
595: 4\,$\sigma$,
596: 7\,$\sigma$,
597: 10\,$\sigma$,
598: 13\,$\sigma$, and
599: 16\,$\sigma$ levels.
600: The levels of the dashed contours are
601: -6.8 and
602: -10.2 mJy/beam
603: which correspond to the -2\,$\sigma$ and -3\,$\sigma$ level, respectively.
604: % The levels of the contours are 7.5, 17.0, 26.5, 36.0, 45.5, and 55.0 mJy/beam.
605: % The size and orientation of the synthesized beam are indicated
606: % in the lower left of the figure.
607: }
608: \label{sma+hst.map}
609: % \bigskip
610: \end{figure}
611:
612: \begin{figure}[t!]
613: \begin{center}
614: % \resizebox{1.0\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=00]{ideal+obs.850.ps}}
615: \resizebox{1.0\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=00]{f2.ps}}
616: \end{center}
617: \caption{
618: Radial brightness profile.
619: {\em Solid line:} Observed 894\,$\mu$m profile.
620: The maxima to the left and the right of the center are \about1.4$\sigma$ and \about1.8$\sigma$
621: above the local minimum, respectively ($\sigma$: standard deviation).
622: The radial scale is based on an assumed distance of 140\,pc.
623: %
624: {\em Dashed line:}
625: For comparison:
626: Simulated 894\,$\mu$m profile, convolved with the corresponding synthesized SMA beam
627: (based on the model by WPS03).
628: %
629: For comparison with the 1.3\,mm and 2.7\,mm radial brightness profiles see Fig.~3 in WPS03.
630: }
631: \label{sma.radprof}
632: % \bigskip
633: \end{figure}
634: %\clearpage
635:
636: \end{document}
637: