1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \shortauthors{Ramanpreet Kaur et al.}
3: \shorttitle{QPO evolution in 4U 1626--67}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{A study of the long term evolution of quasi periodic
7: oscillations in the accretion powered X-ray pulsar 4U 1626--67}
8:
9:
10: \author{Ramanpreet Kaur\altaffilmark{1},
11: Biswajit Paul\altaffilmark{2}, Brijesh Kumar\altaffilmark{1,3}, Ram Sagar\altaffilmark{1}}
12:
13: \altaffiltext{1}{Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Manora Peak, NainiTal 263\,129, India}
14: \altaffiltext{2}{Raman Research Institute, C.V. Raman Avenue, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore 560\,080, India}
15: \altaffiltext{3}{Departamento de Fi$\!^{'}\!$sica, Universidad de Concepcio$\!^{'}\!$n, Casilla 160-C, Concepcio$\!^{'}\!$n, Chile}
16:
17: %\maketitle
18:
19: \label{firstpage}
20:
21: \begin{abstract}
22:
23: We report here a study of the long term properties of Quasi Periodic
24: Oscillations (QPO) in an unusual accreting X-ray pulsar, 4U 1626--67. This
25: is a unique accretion powered X-ray pulsar in which we have found the
26: QPOs to be present during all sufficiently long X-ray observations with
27: a wide range of X-ray observatories. In the present spin-down era of this
28: source, the QPO central frequency is found to be decreasing. In the earlier
29: spin-up era of this source, there are only two reports of QPO detections,
30: in 1983 with EXOSAT and 1988 with GINGA with an increasing trend.
31: The QPO frequency evolution in 4U 1626--67 during the last 22 years changed
32: from a positive to a negative trend, somewhat coincident with the torque
33: reversal in this source. In the accretion powered X-ray pulsars, the QPO frequency
34: is directly related to the inner radius of the accretion disk, as per
35: Keplerian Frequency Model (KFM) and Beat Frequency Model (BFM).
36: A gradual depletion of accretion disk
37: is reported earlier from the X-ray spectral, flux and pulse profile measurements.
38: The present QPO frequency evolution study shows that X-ray flux and mass accretion
39: rate may not change by the same factor, hence the simple KFM and BFM are not able to
40: explain the QPO evolution in this source.
41: This is the only X-ray pulsar to show persistent QPOs
42: and is also the first accreting X-ray pulsar in which the QPO history is
43: reported for a long time scale relating it with the long term evolution
44: of the accretion disk.
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48: \keywords{
49: binaries: close - pulsars: individual: 4U 1626--67 - stars: neutron - X-rays: binaries
50: }
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53:
54: The X-ray source 4U 1626--67 was discovered with the Uhuru satellite
55: (Giacconi et al. 1972) in 2-6 keV band.
56: Pulsations, with a period of 7.68 s were first discovered by
57: Rappaport et al. (1977) with SAS-3 observations and has been extensively
58: monitored since then, especially with the BATSE detectors onboard CGRO
59: (Chakrabarty et al 1997; Bildsten et al 1997).
60: Optical counterpart of the pulsar was identified as KZ TrA, a faint blue star
61: (V $\approx$ 18.5) with little or no reddening (McClintock et al. 1977; Bradt and
62: McClintock 1983).
63: Optical pulsations with 2\% amplitude were detected at the same frequency
64: as the X-ray pulsations (Ilovaisky, Motch, \& Chevalier 1978) and are
65: understood to be due to reprocessing of the pulsed X-ray flux by the
66: accretion disk (Chester 1979). A faint optical counterpart and the observed optical
67: pulsed fraction requires the companion star to be of very small mass
68: (McClintock et al. 1977, 1980).
69: The X-ray light curve does not show any orbital modulation or eclipse.
70: However, from the reprocessed pulsed optical emission and a close sideband
71: in the power-spectrum of optical light curve, an orbital period of 42 minutes
72: was inferred (Middleditch et al. 1981).
73: Therefore, it falls under the category of ultra compact binaries
74: (P$_{orb}$ $<$ 80 minutes), which have hydrogen-depleted secondaries to reach
75: such short periods (Paczynski \& Sienkiewicz 1981; Nelson et al. 1986).
76:
77: Despite extensive searches, the orbital motion of this binary has never
78: been detected in the X-ray pulse timing studies (Rappaport et al, 1977;
79: Levine et al. 1988; Jain et al. 2007).
80: A very low mass secondary, in a nearly face on orbit can possibly account for
81: the lack of pulse arrival time delay. Recently Jain et al (2007)
82: have also proposed this source to be a candidate for a neutron star with
83: a supernova fall back accretion disk.
84: From the extensive timing and spectral observations both in optical and
85: X-ray bands, it has not yet been possible to establish the presence of a
86: binary companion, and the upper limit of the companion mass has been
87: determined to be very low.
88: However, the presence of an accretion disk in 4U 1626--67 is beyond any
89: doubt. Optical spectral and timing studies confirm that most of the optical
90: emission is strongly dominated by the accretion disk (Grindlay 1978;
91: McClintock et al. 1980). The X-ray spectrum also shows bright hydrogen-like and
92: helium-like oxygen and neon emission lines with red and blue shifted
93: components, a certain sign for accretion disk origin (Schulz et al. 2001,
94: Krauss et al. 2007).
95: Another direct evidence of an accretion disk in 4U 1626--67 is found from the
96: detection of quasi-periodic oscillations, at a frequency of 40 mHz, from Ginga
97: observations (Shinoda et al. 1990) and subsequently at a higher frequency of
98: about 48 mHz from Beppo-SAX, ASCA, RXTE and XMM-Newton (Owens et al. 1997;
99: Angelini et al. 1995; Kommers et al. 1998, Krauss et al. 2007). The QPOs have also
100: been detected in reprocessed optical emission from both ground based
101: and HST observations (Chakrabarty et al. 1998, 2001).
102:
103: For more than a decade since its discovery, 4U 1626--67 was found to be
104: spinning up with a characteristic timescale P/\.{P} $\approx$ 5000 yr.
105: It was found to be spinning down at about the same rate by BATSE onboard CGRO in
106: the beginning of 1991 (Chakrabarty et al. 1997). Even though
107: the torque reversal was abrupt, the decrease in bolometric X-ray flux has been
108: gradual and continuous over the past $\approx$ 30 yr (Chakrabarty et al.
109: 1997, Krauss et al 2007). Recently, from a set of Chandra monitoring
110: observations Krauss et al (2007) have established that the bolometric
111: X-ray flux and various emission line fluxes
112: have decreased continuously over the last few years, indicating a gradual
113: depletion of the accretion disk. The X-ray flux and mass accretion rate are
114: directly related and these are likely to be related to the mass and extent
115: of the material in the accretion disk. Therefore, the observed gradual
116: decrease in X-ray flux indicates a depletion of material in the accretion
117: disk of the pulsar. Another signature of this is seen by Krauss et al. (2007)
118: as a change in the pulse profile of the pulsar as compared to the
119: earlier observations.
120:
121: In the present work, we have investigated the QPO frequency evolution of
122: 4U 1626--67 over a long period and discuss the relation of the change in
123: QPO frequency with the a possible recession of the inner accretion disk.
124:
125: \section{Observations and Analysis}
126:
127: 4U 1626--67 has been observed with various X-ray telescopes over different
128: epochs of time. Table 1 lists the log of observations of 4U 1626--67 that
129: were found to be useful for the present study.
130: Details of individual observations described below are in chronological order.
131: Detection of QPOs at around 48 mHz have been mentioned from some of these
132: observations, sometimes from a different instrument also (Ginga - Shinoda
133: et al. 1990; ASCA - Angelini et al. 1995; Beppo-SAX - Owens et al. 1997,
134: RXTE - Kommers et al. 1998, Chakrabarty 1998; XMM-Newton - Krauss et al.
135: 2007). However, the QPO frequencies measured from these observations are
136: often not reported with good enough accuracy to investigate a slow frequency
137: evolution. For the present study, we have therefore reanalysed the data
138: and measured the QPO parameters with the highest possible accuracy.\\
139:
140: EXOSAT Medium Energy (ME) proportional counter lightcurve of 4U 1626--67
141: was obtained from HEASARC archive with the time resolution of 0.3125 s for
142: an observations made on August 30, 1983 for 27 ks. ME lightcurve of another
143: observations made by EXOSAT on March 30, 1986 for $\approx$ 84 ks that was
144: reported earlier by Levine et al. (1988) is not available in the HEASARC
145: Archive. \\
146:
147: ASCA observations of 4U 1626--67 were made on August 11, 1993 with the
148: two Gas Imaging Spectrometers (GIS2 and GIS3) and the two Solid-state Imaging
149: Spectrometers (SIS0 and SIS1) and light curves with total useful exposures
150: of 40 ks and 25 ks were obtained for the GIS and SIS respectively.
151: During the ASCA observation, the GIS detectors were operated in Pulse Height
152: mode and SIS detectors were operated in Fast mode and the lightcurves
153: were extracted from the unscreened high bit mode data with the minimum time
154: resolution of 0.125 s for both GIS and SIS detectors. The light curves from
155: the pairs of GIS and SIS instruments were added and a single power spectra
156: is generated with the summed lightcurves.\\
157:
158: 4U 1626--67 was observed with BeppoSAX on August 09, 1996 for 116 ks by the
159: three units of Medium Energy Concentrator Spectrometer (MECS) and for 35 ks
160: by the Low Energy Concentrator Spectrometer (LECS). Lightcurves were extracted
161: from all the instruments with 0.125 s. Single summed lightcurve was generated
162: from three lightcurves of the MECS instruments to increase the signal-to-noise ratio.\\
163:
164: RXTE-PCA pointed observations of the source were made from February 1996 to
165: August 1998. In 1996, the observations were made in the beginning of the
166: year and at the end of the year under obs ID P10101 and P10144 respectively.
167: The observations made under obs IDs P10101 covers time span of almost
168: 5 days from MJD 50123 to 50128. There were nine observations in this
169: obs ID each lasting for 4-8 hrs. A single observation was made under
170: obs ID P10144 for $\approx$ 5 hrs on MJD 50445. In 1997, all the
171: observations were made under obs ID P20146 covers a time range
172: of almost a year from MJD 50412 to MJD 50795 but individual observations
173: were made only for a few minutes. In 1998, RXTE-PCA made
174: observations under two obs ID P30058 and P30060. There were three
175: observations made under obs ID P30058, out of which two observations were
176: made on MJD 50926 and the third observation was made on MJD 51032. In
177: obs ID P30060, there were 10 short observations each for about an
178: hour. For almost all the observations of RXTE, all five PCUs were on.
179: Lightcurves were extracted from observations of 4U 1626--67 with a time
180: resolution of 0.125 s using the Standard-1 data that covers the entire
181: 2-60 keV energy range of the PCA detectors. We divided the whole
182: RXTE-PCA observations from 1996 to 1998 into three segments from MJD 50123
183: to 50128, 50412 to 50795 and 50926 to 51032. The signal-to-noise ratio of
184: the power spectra generated from the individual observations made between
185: MJD 50412 to 50795 was poor to detect QPO except on MJD 50445, thus a single
186: power spectrum was produced by combining powerspectra of all observations
187: made between MJD 50412 to 50795.\\
188:
189:
190: XMM-Newton has observed 4U 1626--67 four times, but significant amount of
191: science data was present only in two of these observations, made under obs IDs
192: 0111070201 and 0152620101, listed in Table 1.
193: We have analysed data only from PN detector of European Photon Imaging Camera
194: (EPIC) onboard XMM-Newton. PN operates in the energy band of 0.15-15 keV.
195: Lightcurves were extracted with a time resolution of 0.125 s for both the
196: observations. \\
197:
198:
199: All the lightcurves were divided into small segments each of length 1024 s
200: and a power density spectrum of each segment was generated.
201: The power spectra were normalized such that their integral gives the standard
202: rms fractional variability and the expected white noise was subtracted.
203: Final power spectra was generated with the average of all the power spectra
204: generated for each of the observations listed in Table 1.
205: Flares with duration of 1000 s are clearly seen in the EXOSAT data as mentioned by
206: Levine et al. (1988). However these flares are not detected in rest of the data
207: mentioned in Table 1.
208: QPO at a frequency of $\sim$ 48 mHz is clearly seen in the power spectra
209: of all the data sets except from EXOSAT observations during which it is detected at $\sim$
210: 36 mHz. Figure 1 shows the QPO detection from the EXOSAT observations made on August 30, 1983
211: in the range of 15 mHz to 100 mHz. A Gaussian model is fitted to the QPO feature to
212: determine its central frequency and width (FWHM of Gaussian) for all the datasets.
213: The continuum of the power spectrum in the band of 20 mHz to 80 mHz is fitted with a constant
214: or a linear model. The uncertainty of the Gaussian model peak at 1 $\sigma$ confidence
215: interval is quoted as an error on the Gaussian centre.
216:
217: The QPO feature detected in the power spectrum of EXOSAT data is quite narrow $\sim$
218: 2 mHz as compared to the QPOs seen in rest of the data with a width of $\sim$ 4 to 5 mHz.
219: Figure 2 shows powerspectra in the frequency range 26 mHz to 72 mHz for the observations
220: listed in Table 1 except the EXOSAT observations. Different constant numbers were added
221: to each plot for clarity. A best-fitted Gaussian model for the QPOs
222: and a constant model or a linear model for the continuum is shown on each plot with
223: a solid line. A dotted vertical line at the best
224: fitted Gaussian center to the ASCA 1993 data is plotted in the same figure. A shift of $\sim$
225: 2 mHz is clearly seen from bottom to the top plot shown in Figure 2.
226:
227: The evolution of the QPO central frequency as observed by
228: various X-ray telescopes in both spin-up and spin down era is shown in Figure 3.
229: An error bar plotted on each point in Fig 3 represents 1$\sigma$ error estimates.
230: We couldn't find GINGA observations of 4U 1626--67 made in July, 1988 from archive data, thus the
231: central frequency of QPOs and error estimate on it is taken from Shinoda et al. 1990
232: and is also shown in Fig 3. To confirm the consistency of QPO frequency for each
233: data set listed in Table 1, the QPO frequencies were measured from smaller
234: segments of the data, 10 each for the 1996 RXTE observation and the
235: 2004 XMM observation. The values determined from smaller segments
236: have larger uncertainties but within uncertainties, these values are consistent
237: with the QPO frequency measured using the complete data sets in each case.
238: It can be clearly seen in Figure 3 that the QPO central frequency has increased from
239: 1983 to 1993 and after that it gradually decreased from 1993 to 2004. However the lack
240: of observations doesn't allow us to define an exact time when the QPO frequency
241: evolution changed from an increasing trend to a decreasing trend. The
242: observations from 1993 to 2004 showed frequency decrease of $\sim$ 2.3 mHz while
243: the error bars on all the data points during this era are within 0.4 mHz except the
244: ASCA 1993 data point for which the error bar is 0.6 mHz, confirms the real decrease
245: in QPO frequency with time. The QPO frequency derivative during spin-down era is
246: $\sim$ (0.2 $\pm$ 0.05) mHz/yr. A linear fit is shown on the data points with a solid line
247: in the spin-down era in Figure 3. The reduced $\chi^2$ of the linear
248: fit is 1.07 for 5 degrees of freedom. To further confirm the linearity, a constant model
249: is also fitted to the data from 1993 to 2004. The reduced $\chi^2$ for a constant model is 3.22
250: for 6 degrees of freedom, indicates poor fit as compared to the linear fit.
251:
252: \section{Discussion}
253:
254: In high magnetic field X-ray pulsars, the QPO frequency is in the range of
255: a few mHz to a few Hz (Kaur et al. 2007). The QPOs are known to occur
256: sporadically, only in a few percent of the X-ray observations.
257: For example, QPOs are detected in only 15\% of the out-of-eclipse
258: observations of Cen X-3 (Raichur et al. 2007). Our independent investigation
259: of the RXTE-PCA lightcurves of several persistent sources show that the
260: QPOs are quite rare. Exception to this are some of the transient sources,
261: like 3A 0535+262 (Finger et al. 1996), and XTE J1858+034 (Paul \&
262: Rao 1998) which showed QPOs during most of the observations made during
263: their outbursts. In the present study, using lightcurves of 4U 1626--67
264: taken with various observatories over a period of more than 20 years we
265: have detected QPOs in every single observation of sufficient length.
266: This is the first accretion
267: powered pulsar for which the QPO study has been made over a long time scale.
268: In this regard, 4U 1626--67 is unique among persistent high magnetic field
269: accreting X-ray pulsars. It shows that the accretion disk of the pulsar is
270: quite stable to hold this feature for years. However, in a few cases, the
271: observation duration was not long enough to make accurate measurement of
272: the QPO parameters.
273:
274: QPOs in accretion powered X-ray sources are widely believed to arise
275: due to inhomogeneities near the inner accretion disk. The QPO frequency
276: is the Keplerian frequency at the inner disk radius and is therefore positively
277: related to the mass accretion rate or the X-ray luminosity. If the compact
278: object is a neutron star, the inner disk is coupled with the central object
279: through the magnetic field lines and QPOs corresponding to the beat
280: frequency between the spin frequency and the Keplerian frequency of the
281: inner disk can also be seen. In accretion powered high magnetic field X-ray pulsars,
282: the two different QPOs are never seen to occur in the same source.
283: In some of the sources, like 4U 1626--67, the QPO frequency is lower than
284: the spin frequency and therefore the QPOs can only be explained by the
285: BFM.
286:
287: According to both KFM and BFM, the radius of the QPO production
288: area, r$_{qpo}$, is defined as
289: \begin{equation}
290: r_{qpo} = \left(\frac{GM_{NS}}{4\pi^2\nu_k^2}\right)^{1/3}
291: \end{equation}
292: where G is the Gravitational constant, M$_{NS}$ is the mass of the neutron star and
293: $\nu_k$ is the keplerian frequency of the inner accretion disk.
294:
295: The radius of the inner accretion disk, r$_M$ can be defined as
296: \begin{equation}
297: r_M = 3 \times 10^8 L_{37}^{-2/7}\mu_{30}^{4/7}
298: \end{equation}
299: where L$_{37}$ is the X-ray luminosity in units of 10$^{37}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ and $\mu_{30}$ is
300: magnetic moment in units of 10$^{30}$ cm$^3$Gauss.
301: If the QPOs are as per Keplerian frequency model ($\nu_k$ = $\nu_{qpo}$, where $\nu_{qpo}$ is
302: QPO frequency of the pulsar), then we expect
303: $\nu_k$ $\propto$ $L_{37}^{3/7}$ or $\nu_{qpo}$ $\propto$ $L_{37}^{3/7}$. The flux of
304: 4U 1626--67 has decreased from 0.32 to 0.15 units from 1993 to 2004 (Krauss et al. 2007),
305: implies that the change in QPO frequency is expected to be $\sim$ 27\% from 1993 to 2004.
306: The present QPO observations have shown only 4 \% decrease in QPO frequency during the
307: same time. However, Keplerian frequency model is not valid in this source. In the BFM
308: ($\nu_k$ = $\nu_{qpo}$ + $\nu_s$, where $\nu_s$ is pulsar spin frequency), the inner disk
309: frequency is higher as compared to
310: KFM, and the relative change in QPO frequency is expected to be even larger. Therefore,
311: we see that the evolution of QPO frequency and the decrease of X-ray flux cannot be
312: explained in the standard QPO generation mechanism and usual relation between inner
313: disk and X-ray luminosity. We can consider two possibilities : One is that the QPOs
314: are not generated from the inner disk, these are generated due to reprocessing in
315: some outer structure of the disk. This is not very likely due to the large (upto
316: 15\%) rms in the QPO feature. Second possibility is that the observed X-ray flux
317: change is not due to change of mass accretion rate by the same factor. Many X-ray
318: sources show X-ray flux variation at long time scale upto a few months due to obstruction
319: provided by complex accretion disk mechanism.
320:
321: The earlier study by Chakrabarty et al. (1997) has concluded that
322: there was an abrupt torque reversal in 1990 and the system moved from
323: spin-up to spin-down era with a characteristic time scale P/\.{P} of
324: $\sim$ 5000 yr. The two QPO detections with EXOSAT (35 mHz in 1983)
325: and GINGA (40 mHz in 1988) are during the spin-up era of this pulsar, with increasing
326: trend while the observations from 1993 to 2004, in the spin-down era, showed
327: a slow decreasing trend in QPO frequency with time, somewhat coincident
328: with the torque reversal in this source, shown in Fig 3. QPO
329: frequency is found to be decreasing in the spin-down era with a frequency derivative
330: of $\sim$ (0.2 $\pm$ 0.05) mHz/yr.
331: The X-ray spectral and flux evolution study along with pulse profile changes
332: of 4U 1626--67 by Krauss et al (2007) have concluded that the accretion disk
333: in this source is depleting with a time scale of 30-70 years. Krauss et al.
334: (2007) has also estimated the long term average accretion rate to be
335: 3 $\times$ 10$^{-11}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ for a distance $\ge$ 3kpc.
336: However, a gradual change in mass accretion rate
337: can not explain the unique torque reversal phenomena of this source (Li et al. 1980).
338:
339: \section{Conclusions}
340:
341: \begin{itemize}
342: \item We have detected very persistent quasi-periodic oscillations in the unique
343: accretion powered X-ray pulsar 4U 1626--67.
344: \item Using data from several observatories, we have detected a gradual
345: evolution of the oscillation frequency over a period of 22 years.
346: \item The frequency evolution indicates a possible recession of the accretion disk
347: of the pulsar during the present spin-down era.
348: \end{itemize}
349:
350: \section*{Acknowledgments}
351: This research has made use of data obtained through the High Energy Astrophysics
352: Science Archive Research Center Online Service, provided by
353: the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center.
354:
355: \begin{thebibliography}{}
356: \bibitem{}Angelini, L., White, N. E., Nagase, F., Kallman, T. R., Yoshida, A., Takeshima, T., Becker, C. M., \& Paerels, F. 1995, ApJ, 449, L41
357: \bibitem{}Bildsten, L., Chakrabarty, D., Chiu, J., et al. 1997, ApJS, 113, 367
358: \bibitem{}Bradt, H. V. D., McClintock, J. E. 1983, 21, 13
359: \bibitem{}Chakrabarty, D., Bildsten, L., Grunsfeld J.M. et al. 1997 ApJ, 474, 414
360: \bibitem{}Chakrabarty, D. 1998, ApJ, 492, 342
361: \bibitem{}Chakrabarty, D., Homer. L., Charles, P. A., \& O'Donoghue, D. 2001, ApJ, 562, 985
362: \bibitem{}Chester, T. J. 1979, ApJ, 227, 569
363: \bibitem{}Finger, M.H., Wilson, R.B., Harmon, B.A. 1996, ApJ, 459, 288
364: \bibitem{}Giacconi, R., Murray, S., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Schreier, E., \& Tananbaum, H. 1972, ApJ, 178, 281
365: \bibitem{}Grindley, J.E. 1978, ApJ, 225, 1001
366: \bibitem{}Ilovaisky, S. A., Motch, C., \& Chevalier, C. 1978, A\&A, 70, L19
367: \bibitem{}Jain, C., Paul, B., Joshi, K., Dutta, A., \& Raichur, H. 2007, Submitted to JApA
368: \bibitem{}Joss, P. C., Avni, Y., \& Rappaport, S. 1978, ApJ, 221, 645
369: \bibitem{}Kaur, R., Paul, B., Raichur, H., Sagar, R. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1409
370: \bibitem{}Kommers, J. E., Chakrabarty, D., \& Lewin, W. H. G. 1998, 497, L33
371: \bibitem{}Krauss, M.I., Schulz, N.S., Chakrabarty, D. 2007, ApJ, 660, 605
372: \bibitem{}Levine, A., Ma, C. P., McClintock, J., Rappaport, S., van der Klis, M., \& Verbunt, F. 1988, ApJ, 327, 732
373: \bibitem{}Li, F. K., Joss, P.C., McClintock, J. E., Rappaport, S., \& Wright, E. L. 1980, ApJ, 240, 628
374: \bibitem{}McClintock, J. E., Bradt, H. V., Doxsey, R. E., Jernigan, J. G., Canizares, C. R., \& Hiltner, W. A. 1977, Nature, 270, 320
375: \bibitem{}McClintock, J. E., Li, F. K., Canizares, C. R., \& Grindlay, J. E. 1980, ApJ, 235, L81
376: \bibitem{}Middleditch, J., Mason, K. O., Nelson, J. E., \& White, N. E. 1981, ApJ, 244, 1001
377: \bibitem{}Nelson, L. A., Rappaport, S. A., \& Joss, P. C. 1986, ApJ, 311, 226
378: \bibitem{}Owens, A., Oosterbroek, T., Parmar, A.N. 1997, A\&A, 324, L9
379: \bibitem{}Paczynski, B., \& Sienkiewicz, R. 1981, ApJ, 248, L27
380: \bibitem{}Paul. B., Rao, A.R. 1998, A\&A, 337, 815
381: \bibitem{}Raichur, H., \& Paul, B. 2007, Submitted to ApJ
382: \bibitem{}Rappaport, S., Markert, T., Li, F. K., Clark, G. W., Jernigan, J. G., \& McClintock, J. E. 1977, ApJ, 217, L29
383: \bibitem{}Schulz, N.S., Chakrabarty, D., Marshall, H.L., Canizares, C.R., Lee, J.C., Houck, J. 2001, ApJ, 563, 941
384: \bibitem{}Shinoda, K., Kii, T., Mitsuda, K., Nagase, F., Tanaka, Y., Makishima, K., \& Shibazaki, N. 1990, PASJ, 42, L27
385: %\noindent
386: \end{thebibliography}
387: \newpage
388: %Tables
389:
390:
391: \clearpage
392: {
393: \begin{table}
394: \caption{Log of Observations of 4U 1626--67}
395: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
396: \hline
397: Telescope&Year&Obs Ids&No. of & Obs span (ks) & Time on \\
398: & & & Pointings &(End time--Start time) & Source (ks) \\
399: \hline
400: EXOSAT/ME &1983&128 &1&27&27\\
401: \hline
402: ASCA/GIS &1993&40021000&1&72&40\\
403: ASCA/SIS &1993&40021000&1&70&25\\
404: \hline
405: BeppoSAX/MECS &1996&10017001&1&162&116\\
406: BeppoSAX/LECS &1996&10017001&1&128&35\\
407: \hline
408: RXTE/PCA &1996&P10101&9&395&147\\
409: \hline
410: RXTE/PCA &1996&P10144&1&13&10\\
411: & 1997&P20146&14&33125&13\\
412: \hline
413: RXTE/PCA &1998&P30058&3&9167&40\\
414: & &P30060&10&2758&44\\
415: \hline
416: XMM-Newton/PN &2001&0111070201&1&17&16\\
417: \hline
418: XMM-Newton/PN &2003&0152620101&1&84&84\\
419: \hline
420: \end{tabular}
421: \end{table}
422: }
423: \clearpage
424: \begin{figure}
425: \centering
426: \includegraphics[height=6.5in, angle =-90]{f1.ps}
427: \caption{Power density spectrum generated from the lightcurve obtained from
428: the EXOSAT observation made on August 30, 1983.}
429: \end{figure}
430:
431: \clearpage
432:
433: \begin{figure}
434: \centering
435: \includegraphics[height=5.5in, angle =-90]{f2.ps}
436: \caption{All power density spectrum are generated from the lightcurves obtained
437: from observations listed in Table 1. in chronological order. Different constant
438: numbers were added to each plot for clarity. The year of observations is written along with
439: each PDS. A vertical line is drawn at 49.77 mHz, QPO frequency of ASCA 1993 observations,
440: to clearly see the decrease in QPO frequency with time.}
441: \end{figure}
442:
443: \clearpage
444:
445: \begin{figure}
446: \centering
447: \includegraphics[height=6.5in, angle =-90]{f3.ps}
448: \caption{QPO frequency evolution history of 4U 1626--67 from 1983 to 2004.
449: The solid line is a linear fit to the data from 1993 to 2004. Error bars represent the
450: 1$\sigma$ confidence intervals.}
451: \end{figure}
452:
453: \end{document}
454: