1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: \input{macros_vdbosch}
5:
6: %\slugcomment{Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Letters}
7: \begin{document}
8:
9:
10: \title{New Constraints on the Efficiencies of Ram-Pressure Stripping\\
11: and the Tidal Disruption of Satellite Galaxies}
12:
13: \author{X. Kang\altaffilmark{1}, Frank C. van den Bosch\altaffilmark{1}}
14:
15: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, K\"onigstuhl 17,
16: D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany}
17: %\email{kang,vdbosch@mpia.de}
18:
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: Using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) it has recently
22: been shown that the red fraction of satellite galaxies increases
23: with stellar mass. Semi-analytical models, however, predict red
24: satellite fractions that are independent of stellar mass, and much
25: higher than observed. It has been argued that this discrepancy owes
26: to the fact that the models assume that satellite galaxies are
27: instantaneously stripped of their hot gas reservoirs at the moment
28: they are accreted into a bigger halo. In this letter we show that
29: the fraction of red satellites can be brought in better agreement
30: with the data by simply decreasing this stripping efficiency.
31: However, this also results in a red fraction of massive centrals
32: that is much too low. This owes to the fact that the massive
33: centrals now accrete satellite galaxies that are bluer and more
34: gas-rich. However, if a significant fraction of low mass satellite
35: galaxies is tidally disrupted before being accreted by their central
36: host galaxy, as suggested by recent studies, the red fractions of
37: both centrals and satellites can be reproduced reasonably well. A
38: problem remains with the red fraction of centrals of intermediate
39: mass, which is likely to reflect an oversimplified treatment of AGN
40: feedback.
41: \end{abstract}
42: \keywords{galaxies: general -- galaxies: formation -- intergalactic
43: medium}
44:
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47: \label{sec:intro}
48:
49: Recently it has become clear that semi-analytical models for galaxy
50: formation predict red satellite fractions that are much too high
51: (Weinmann \etal 2006; Baldry \etal 2006). It has been argued that
52: this owes to an oversimplified treatment of ram-pressure stripping
53: (Gunn \& Gott 1972) of the hot gaseous halos of satellite galaxies.
54: In all semi-analytical models it is assumed that the entire hot gas
55: reservoir of a galaxy is instantaneously stripped the moment it is
56: accreted into a larger halo (i.e., the moment it becomes a satellite
57: galaxy).
58:
59: Although this was originally motivated by the fact that the vast
60: majority of (faint) satellite galaxies in clusters are red and
61: deficient in cold gas (e.g., Binggeli, Tammann \& Sandage 1987),
62: detailed analytical and hydrodynamical simulations have shown that the
63: typical time scale for this stripping process (sometimes called
64: `strangulation') ranges from $\sim 1$ Gyr to 10 Gyr (e.g., Balsara,
65: Livio \& O'Dea 1994; Mori \& Burkert 2000; Bekki, Couch \& Shioya
66: 2002; Mayer \etal 2006; McCarthy \etal 2008).
67:
68: In this letter we study the impact of a prolonged strangulation on the
69: colors of satellite and central galaxies as function of stellar mass.
70: To that extent we implement a new recipe for ram pressure stripping of
71: hot gaseous halos of satellite galaxies in a semi-analytical model for
72: galaxy formation, and compare the red fractions of central and
73: satellite galaxies to data obtained from a SDSS galaxy group
74: catalogue.
75:
76: \section{Semi-Analytical Model}
77: \label{sec:sam}
78:
79: In order to model the colors of central and satellite galaxies we use
80: the semi-analytical model of galaxy formation of Kang \etal (2005) and
81: Kang, Jing \& Silk (2006; hereafter K06), and we refer the reader to
82: these two papers for details. Briefly, dark matter merger trees are
83: extracted from a high resolution $N$-body simulation (with subhalos
84: resolved, Jing \& Suto 2002) and populated with galaxies following a
85: semi-analytical description. Galaxies are assumed to form at the
86: centers of their dark matter halos, using recipes for cooling, star
87: formation, super-nova feedback, radio-mode AGN feedback, and spheroid
88: formation that are all very similar to those of Croton \etal (2006).
89: When a dark matter halo with its associated `central' galaxy is
90: accreted by a larger halo, and thus becomes a subhalo, its central
91: galaxy becomes a `satellite' galaxy. The orbital evolution of
92: satellite galaxies is tracked using the orbital evolution of its
93: corresponding subhalo, up to the point where the subhalo is dissolved
94: in the simulation. From that point on the satellite galaxy (now
95: called an `orphan galaxy') is merged with the central galaxy in the
96: host halo after a dynamical friction time computed using the standard
97: Chandrasekhar prescription. Throughout this paper, we adopt the same
98: model parameters as in K06, for which the model reproduces the
99: present-day luminosity function, and yields a bimodal color
100: distribution in reasonable agreement with the data (see below). The
101: only changes we make here regard the treatment of the stripping of hot
102: gas around satellite galaxies.
103: %
104: \begin{figure}
105: \begin{center}
106: \includegraphics[width=1.0\columnwidth,height=0.75\columnwidth]{f1.eps}
107: \caption{The distribution of model galaxies as function of
108: $^{0.1}(g-r)$ color and the `observed' stellar mass, obtained from
109: the relation between stellar mass-to-light ratio and color of Bell
110: \etal (2003). The dashed line corresponds to $^{0.1}(g-r) = 0.81 +
111: 0.15(\log[M_{\ast}/(h^{-2}M_{\odot})]-10)$ and is used to split the
112: model galaxies in red and blue populations (cf. Fig.7 in vdB07).}
113: \label{fig:cm}
114: \end{center}
115: \end{figure}
116:
117: In the standard model it is assumed that the hot gas associated with a
118: halo is instantaneously stripped as soon as the halo is accreted by a
119: larger halo (i.e., as soon as it becomes a subhalo). However,
120: hydrodynamic simulations indicate that the ram-pressure stripping of
121: the hot gas is not instantaneous, and may even not be complete after
122: as much as 10 Gyr. Although the characteristic time scale of this
123: stripping process varies from one simulation to the other, and ranges
124: from $\sim 1$ Gyr to 10 Gyr (see \S\ref{sec:intro}), all simulations
125: suggest that the stripping rate is approximately constant. Motivated
126: by these findings we model the rate at which the subhalo is stripped
127: of its hot gas as
128: %
129: \begin{equation}\label{rate}
130: {{\rm d}M_{\rm hot} \over {\rm d}t} = -(1-f_{\rm hot})
131: {M_{{\rm hot},0} \over \tau}\,.
132: \end{equation}
133: %
134: Here $M_{{\rm hot},0}$ is the hot halo gas mass of the satellite at
135: accretion, $\tau$ is the characteristic time scale for stripping, and
136: $f_{\rm hot}$ is the fraction of hot gas left after one characteristic
137: time scale. In addition to being stripped, the hot gas reservoir of a
138: satellite galaxy also decreases due to cooling. In order to compute
139: the cooling rate of the hot gas associated with a satellite galaxy, we
140: assume that the cooling radius and cooling time of the hot gas remain
141: fixed at their values at the time of accretion. We also assume that
142: the hot gas remains associated with the orphan galaxy even after its
143: subhalo is dissolved in the N-body simulation (we will discuss this in
144: \S\ref{sec:res}). Finally, we ignore any potential dependency of
145: $f_{\rm hot}$ or $\tau$ on the satellite mass, the host halo mass, the
146: orbit of the subhalo, or the density distribution of the hot gas
147: associated with the host halo. These assumptions are certainly
148: oversimplified. However, the main aim of this paper is not to give
149: the most accurate description of the rate at which the hot gas of
150: satellite galaxies is stripped, but merely to investigate how changes
151: in $\tau$ and $f_{\rm hot}$ impact on the colors of central and
152: satellite galaxies.
153:
154: \section{results}
155: \label{sec:res}
156:
157: In a recent paper, van den Bosch \etal (2007; hereafter vdB07) used
158: the SDSS galaxy group catalogue of Yang \etal (2007) to determine the
159: red fractions of central and satellite galaxies as function of their
160: stellar masses. Here central galaxies have been defined as the most
161: massive group members (in terms of their stellar masses), while
162: satellite galaxies are all group members that are not centrals. Using
163: the fact that the color-stellar mass relation of SDSS galaxies is
164: clearly bimodal, vdB07 split the galaxies in blue and red populations
165: using the stellar-mass dependent cut,
166: %
167: \begin{equation}\label{colcut}
168: ^{0.1}(g-r) = 0.76 + 0.15 \left( \log[M_{\ast}/(h^{-2}M_{\odot})]-10\right)\,.
169: \end{equation}
170: %
171: Here $^{0.1}(g-r)$ is the $(g-r)$ color $K$-corrected to redshift
172: $z=0.1$, and $M_{\ast}$ is the stellar mass computed using the
173: relation between stellar mass-to-light ratio and color of Bell \etal
174: (2003; eq.~[2] in Yang \etal 2007).
175: %
176:
177:
178: For our model galaxies, we compute the $^{0.1}(g-r)$ colors using the
179: stellar population synthesis code of Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) for a
180: Salpeter IMF\footnote{We have verified that our results are not
181: sensitive to the choice of the IMF.}. In order to model the
182: photometric errors in the SDSS, we add a random, Gaussian error of
183: 0.05 magn to both the $^{0.1}g$ and $^{0.1}r$-band magnitudes of our
184: model galaxies. Finally, for each model galaxy we compute the
185: `observed' stellar mass using the same relation between stellar
186: mass-to-light ratio and color as used for the data. The color-stellar
187: mass relation thus obtained for our fiducial model (with $\tau = 0$,
188: corresponding to instantaneous stripping of the hot gas) is shown in
189: Fig.~\ref{fig:cm}. It clearly shows a bimodal color distribution, with
190: a red sequence that extends to more massive galaxies than the blue
191: sequence. This owes mainly to our inclusion of AGN feedback (see also
192: Croton \etal 2006 and Bower \etal 2006), and is in good, qualitative
193: agreement with the data (cf. Fig.~7 in vdB07). Upon closer inspection,
194: though, we find that the colors of the red sequence and the bimodality
195: scale are $\sim 0.05$ magn redder than for the SDSS. It is unclear at
196: present what the origin of this color offset is. In order to limit its
197: impact on our analysis, we split our model galaxies in red and blue
198: populations using eq.~(\ref{colcut}) but with a zero-point that is
199: $0.05$ magn redder (indicated by the dashed line in Fig.~\ref{fig:cm})
200: %
201: \begin{figure*}
202: \begin{center}
203: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{f2.eps}
204: \caption{The fraction of red centrals (left-hand panel) and
205: satellites (right-hand panel) as function of stellar mass. Open
206: symbols correspond to the results of vdB07, obtained from the SDSS
207: group catalogue of Yang \etal (2007), while different lines
208: correspond to the results obtained from our semi-analytical model
209: for different values of the characteristic time scale for
210: strangulation, as indicated. Errorbars are obtained using the
211: jackknife technique and, for clarity, are only shown for the
212: fiducial model with instantaneous stripping (i.e, $\tau=0$)}
213: \label{fig:fred}
214: \end{center}
215: \end{figure*}
216: %
217:
218: Fig.\ref{fig:fred} compares the red fractions, $f_{\rm red}$, of
219: centrals (left-hand panel) and satellites (right-hand panel) as
220: function of `observed' stellar mass obtained from our fiducial,
221: instantaneous stripping model (solid line) with the results of vdB07
222: (open symbols). Note that this model predicts a red satellite fraction
223: that is $\sim 0.85$, almost independent of stellar mass, and in clear
224: disagreement with the data. As demonstrated in Weinmann \etal (2006)
225: and Baldry \etal (2006) the semi-analytical models of Croton \etal
226: (2006) and Bower \etal (2006), which also assume instantaneous
227: stripping of the hot gas, suffer from exactly the same problem. As
228: for the centrals, the model roughly predicts the correct red fraction
229: at the massive end, which is mainly due to the inclusion of
230: radio-model AGN feedback. However, for centrals with $M_{\ast} \lta
231: 10^{11} \Msun$, the red fraction predicted by the model is a poor
232: match to the data. At the low mass end ($M_{\ast} < 10^{10} \Msun$),
233: it is upwards and inconsistent with the data. These low-mass galaxies
234: are too red because the cold gas are consumed rapidly in their
235: earlier, low-mass progenitors. Observational work (Kennicutt 1998)
236: shows that stars form efficiently only in galaxies with surface density
237: higher than a threshold, so star formation should be more inefficient
238: in low-mass progenitors, but this process is ignored in our model.
239: Another disagreement is seen at $M_{\ast} \sim 10^{10} \Msun$, where
240: model galaxies are too blue. We will discuss this in \S\ref{sec:concl}
241: and in this section we focus on the model predictions at the massive
242: end ($M_{\ast} \sim 10^{11} \Msun$).
243:
244:
245: As discussed in \S\ref{sec:intro}, the over-prediction of red
246: satellites could be due to the inaccurate treatment of hot gas
247: stripping from satellite galaxies. To test this, we now consider
248: models with less efficient stripping. Seen from eq.(\ref{rate}) that
249: this can be obtained by increasing $\tau$ or $f_{\rm hot}$, and both
250: are found to have similar trends on model predictions. Here we show
251: only results by changing $\tau$. The dotted and dashed lines in
252: Fig.~\ref{fig:fred} show the results obtained using eq.~(\ref{rate})
253: with $f_{\rm hot}=0.3$ and $\tau = 3$ Gyr and 10 Gyr, respectively.
254: The effects of a prolonged stripping are twofold. First of all, as
255: expected, it reduces the red fraction of satellite galaxies. Note
256: that there is relatively little difference between the models with
257: $\tau = 3$ Gyr and 10 Gyr, and that neither model can reproduce the
258: detailed stellar mass dependence of $f_{\rm red}$ observed. Secondly,
259: both models predict a much lower red fraction among the most massive
260: central galaxies, ruining the good agreement achieved with the
261: fiducial model. This owes to the fact that the central galaxies now
262: `accrete' more blue satellite galaxies with significant amounts of
263: fresh cold gas which triggers a starburst in the central galaxy. In
264: principle, we could improve the fit of the red fraction of the
265: satellites at the low mass end by making $f_{\rm hot}$ and/or $\tau$
266: depend on the stellar mass of the satellite galaxy, but this would
267: only worsen the red fraction of the (massive) centrals. Furthermore,
268: since the massive centrals are now too blue (on average), the red
269: fraction of the massive satellites (which were centrals before they
270: were accreted) is now also too low. Clearly, simply prolonging the
271: stripping of the hot gas of satellite galaxies creates more problems
272: than it solves.
273:
274:
275: %
276: \begin{figure*}
277: \begin{center}
278: %\includegraphics[scale=0.95]{newf3.eps}
279: \includegraphics[width=1.8\columnwidth,height=1.15\columnwidth]{f3.eps}
280: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:fred}, but showing the results for
281: models in which we change certain properties of satellite galaxies
282: once they become orphans (i.e., once their associated subhalos are
283: dissolved in the N-body simulation). In the upper panels the
284: reservoirs of hot gas (solid lines) and both hot and cold gas
285: (dashed lines) are removed once the satellite galaxies become
286: orphans. In the lower panels it is assumed that 50 percent of all
287: satellite galaxies with $M_{\ast} < 10^{10}\Msun$ (solid lines) and
288: with $M_{\ast} > 0$ (dashed lines) are tidally disrupted once they
289: become orphans. All models shown here model the hot gas stripping
290: of satellite galaxies using eq.~(\ref{rate}) with $\tau=3$Gyr and
291: $f_{\rm hot}=0.3$.}
292: \label{fig:fred1}
293: \end{center}
294: \end{figure*}
295:
296:
297: How can we prevent the massive galaxies from becoming too blue?
298: Clearly, we need to prevent the (massive) central galaxies from
299: accreting orphan galaxies that are too blue and that have significant
300: amounts of cold gas. As a first attempt we assume that a satellite
301: galaxy is completely stripped of its hot gas once it becomes an orphan
302: galaxy (i.e., when its subhalo in the numerical simulation dissolves).
303: The resulting red fractions are shown as solid lines in the upper
304: panels of Fig.\ref{fig:fred1}. A comparison with the dotted lines in
305: Fig.~\ref{fig:fred} shows that this has little impact on the red
306: fractions. If we assume, however, that the satellite is also stripped
307: of its cold gas once it becomes an orphan we obtain the results shown
308: by the dashed lines in Fig.\ref{fig:fred1}. Although in good
309: agreement with the data at the massive end, we don't consider this
310: model very physical.
311:
312: Recently, a number of studies have argued that the lack of evolution
313: in the massive end of the galaxy stellar mass function, and the
314: presence of a significant amount of intra-cluster light, suggest that
315: a significant fraction of satellite galaxies is (tidally) disrupted
316: before it has the chance of being accreted by its central host galaxy
317: (e.g. Mihos et al. 2005; Zibetti et al. 2005; Monaco et al. 2006;
318: Conroy, Wechsler \& Kravtsov 2007). The lower panels of
319: Fig.\ref{fig:fred1} show the red fractions obtained if we assume that
320: a certain fraction of satellite galaxies is tidally disrupted once
321: they become orphans. The solid lines correspond to a model in which 50
322: percent of all orphans with a stellar mass $M_{\ast} < 10^{10}\Msun$
323: are tidally disrupted. This model yields red satellite fractions that
324: are in good agreement with the data, without causing a serious
325: under-prediction of the red fraction of massive centrals. For
326: comparison, the dashed lines correspond to a model in which 50\% of
327: {\it all} orphan galaxies are tidally disrupted, independent of their
328: stellar mass. This causes a drastic under-prediction of the red
329: fractions of massive centrals and satellites, which owes to fact that
330: the number of major mergers experienced by a central galaxy is
331: effectively reduced by a factor two. Consequently, the majority of
332: massive centrals are now disk dominated and the associated AGN
333: feedback (assumed to be proportional to the mass of the spheroid, see
334: K06) is not sufficiently efficient to suppress the cooling of hot gas.
335:
336: \section{Conclusions}
337: \label{sec:concl}
338:
339: We have used a semi-analytical model of galaxy formation to study the
340: fractions of red centrals and satellites as functions of their stellar
341: mass. In agreement with Weinmann et al. (2006) and Baldry et al.
342: (2007) we find that the models severely over-predict the red fraction
343: of satellite galaxies. This owes to an oversimplified treatment of
344: ram-pressure stripping of the hot gas associated with satellite
345: galaxies. In particular, all semi-analytical models assume that the
346: hot gas reservoir of a galaxy is instantaneously stripped the moment
347: it is accreted into a bigger halo (i.e., the moment it becomes a
348: satellite galaxy). We have demonstrated that the fractions of red
349: satellites can be brought in better agreement with the data, if the
350: efficiency of this stripping process is significantly reduced.
351: However, the implication is that massive centrals also become bluer to
352: the extent that their red fraction is much too low. This owes to the
353: fact that the satellite galaxies that are accreted by the centrals are
354: now bluer and more gas rich. This problem can be prevented if roughly
355: half of all satellite galaxies with a stellar mass $M_{\ast} <
356: 10^{10}\Msun$ are tidally disrupted prior to being accreted by the
357: central host galaxy. This is in qualitative agreement with the lack of
358: evolution in the massive end of the galaxy stellar mass function, and
359: with the presence of a significant amount of intra-cluster light.
360:
361:
362: All models presented here predict a red fraction of central galaxies
363: with $M_{\ast} \sim 10^{10} \Msun$ that is significantly too low.
364: As shown by Baldry et al. (2006), the semi-analytical model of Croton
365: et al. (2006) suffers from exactly the same problem, while the model
366: of Bower et al. (2006) seems to be in better agreement with the data.
367: The main difference between the model of Bower et al. and those
368: presented here and in Croton et al. is the way in which the efficiency
369: of AGN feedback scales with galaxy properties. In fact, for galaxies
370: with $M_{\ast} \sim 10^{10} \Msun$, QSO activities are commonly seen
371: across cosmic time, and it has been shown that QSO wind can also quench
372: their star formation (e.g., Di Matteo, Springel \&
373: Hernquist 2005). As already eluded to in Weinmann et al. (2006), it
374: thus seems that the red fractions of central galaxies as function of
375: their stellar mass yield important constraints on the efficiency of
376: AGN feedback (or any other mechanism that can quench the star
377: formation in central galaxies, e.g., Birnboim, Dekel \& Neistein
378: 2007). Although a study of radio AGN or QSO feedback is beyond the
379: scope of this paper, we emphasize that a modification of the red
380: fraction of central galaxies will also modify that of the satellites.
381: After all, the former are the direct progenitors of the latter. In
382: particular, a model that would predict a higher red fraction of
383: centrals with $M_{\ast} \sim 10^{10}M_{\odot}$ requires an even lower
384: efficiency of ram pressure stripping of the hot gas of satellites than
385: obtained here.
386:
387:
388:
389:
390: \begin{thebibliography}{}
391:
392: \bibitem[Baldry et al. 2006]{Bal06}
393: Baldry, I.K., Balogh, M.L., Bower, R.G., Glazebrook, K., Nichol, R.C.,
394: Bamford, S.P., \& Budavari T., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 469
395:
396: \bibitem[Balsara et al. 1994]{Bal94}
397: Balsara, D., Livio, M., \& O$^{,}$Dea, C.P., 1994, ApJ, 437, 83
398:
399: \bibitem[Bekki et al. 2002]{Be02}
400: Bekki, K., Couch, W.J., \& Shioya, Y., 2002, ApJ, 577, 651
401:
402: \bibitem[Bell et al. 2003]{Be03}
403: Bell, E.F., McIntosh, D.H., Katz, N.,\& Weinberg, M.D.,
404: 2003, ApJS, 149, 289
405:
406: \bibitem[Binggeli et al. 1987]{Bin87}
407: Binggeli, B., Tammann, G.A., \& Sandage, A., 1987, AJ, 94, 251
408:
409: \bibitem[Birnboim et al. 2007]{Bi07}
410: Birnboim, Y., Dekel, A.,\& Neistein, E., 2007, MNRAS, 380, 339
411:
412: \bibitem[Bower et al. 2006]{Bow06}
413: Bower, R.G., Benson, A.J., Maldon, R., Helly, J.C., Frenk, C.S.,
414: Baugh, C.M., Cole, S., \& Lacey, C.G.,2006, MNRAS, 370, 645
415:
416: \bibitem[Bruzual et al. 2003]{BC03}
417: Bruzual, G., \& Charlot, S., 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000
418:
419: \bibitem[Conroy et al. 2007]{Co07}
420: Conroy, C., Wechsler, R.H., \& Kravtsov, A.V., 2007, ApJ, 668, 826
421:
422: \bibitem[Croton et al. 2006]{cr06}
423: Croton, D.J., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 11
424:
425: \bibitem[Di Matteo et al. 2005]{Di05}
426: Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., \& Hernquist, L., 2005, Nature, 433, 604
427:
428:
429: \bibitem[Gunn \& Gott 1972]{GG72}
430: Gunn, J.E., \& Gott, J.R.I., 1972, ApJ, 176, 1
431:
432: \bibitem[Jing et al. 2002]{Jing02}
433: Jing, Y.P., \& Suto, Y., 2002, ApJ, 574, 538
434:
435: \bibitem[Kang et al. 2005]{kang05}
436: Kang, X., Jing, Y.P., Mo, H.J, \& B\"orner, G., 2005, ApJ, 631, 21
437:
438: \bibitem[Kang et al. 2006]{kang06}
439: Kang, X., Jing, Y.P., \& Silk, J., 2006, ApJ, 648, 820 (K06)
440:
441: \bibitem[Kennicutt 1998]{Ken98}
442: Kennictt, R. C., 1998, ApJ, 498, 541
443:
444: \bibitem[Mayer et al. 2006]{My06}
445: Mayer, L., Mastropietro, C., Wadsley, J., Stadel, J., \&
446: Moore, B., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1021
447:
448: \bibitem[McCarthy et al. 2007]{Mc07}
449: McCarthy, I.G., Frenk, C.S., Font, A.S., Lacey, C.G., Bower, R.G.,
450: Mitchell, N.L., Balogh, M.L., \& Theuns, T., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 593
451:
452: \bibitem[Mihos et al. 2005]{Mi05}
453: Mihos, J.C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J.,\& Morrison, H.,
454: 2005, ApJ, 631L, 41
455:
456: \bibitem[Monaco et al. 2006]{Mo06}
457: Monaco, P., Murante, G., Borgani, S., \& Fontanot, F.,
458: 2006, ApJ, 652L, 89
459:
460: \bibitem[Mori \& Burkert 2000]{MB00}
461: Mori, M., \& Burkert, A., 2000, ApJ, 538, 559
462:
463: \bibitem[Springel et al. 2001]{Springel01}
464: Springel, V., White, S.D.M., Tormen, G., \& Kauffmann, G.,
465: 2001, MNRAS, 328, 726
466:
467: \bibitem[Yang et al. 2007]{Y07}
468: Yang, X., Mo, H.J., van den Bosch, F.C., Pasquali, A., Li,C.,
469: \& Barden, M., 2007, ApJ, 671, 153
470:
471: \bibitem[van den Bosch et al. 2007]{v07}
472: van den Bosch, F.C., et al., preprint, (arXiv:0710.3164) (vdB07)
473:
474: \bibitem[Weinmann et al. 2006]{W06}
475: Weinmann, S.M., van den Bosch, F.C., Yang, X., Mo, H.J.,
476: Croton, D.J., \& Moore, B., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1161
477:
478: \bibitem[Zibetti et al. 2005]{Zi05}
479: Zibetti, S., White, S.D.M., Schneider, D.P., \& Brinkmann, J.,
480: 2005, MNRAS, 358, 949
481:
482: \end{thebibliography}
483:
484: \end{document}
485:
486: