1: %\documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}

2: \documentclass[usenatbib]{emulateapj}

3: \bibliographystyle{apj}

4: 

5: \usepackage{graphicx}

6: 

7: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}

8: %\usepackage{times}

9: \usepackage{apjfonts}

10: 

11: \makeatletter

12: \newenvironment{inlinetable}{%

13: \def\@captype{table}%

14: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}\footnotesize}

15: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}

16: 

17: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{%

18: \def\@captype{figure}%

19: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}

20: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}

21: \makeatother

22: 

23: 

24: 

25: 

26: %\usepackage{mathptmx}

27: 

28: % \usepackage{mathtime}

29: % \usepackage[parens,letters,alpha]{fixmathtimebelleek}

30: % \usepackage{timesexpert}

31: % \def\altaffilmark#1{\mbox{\hskip0.05em\normalfont\fontshape{fn}\selectfont#1}}

32: 

33: 

34: \def\keV{ke\kern-0.05emV}

35: \newcommand{\chandra}{\emph{Chandra}}

36: \newcommand{\chandraintitle}{{\itshape\footnotesize CHANDRA}\/}

37: \newcommand{\ROSAT}{\textsl{ROSAT}}\newcommand{\NGC}{NGC\,}

38: \renewcommand{\arcsec}{\ensuremath{''}}

39: \renewcommand{\mp}{m_{\!p}}

40: 

41: %\def\baselinestretch{1.3}\

42: 

43: 

44: \def\asca       {{\em ASCA}\/}

45: \def\chandra    {{\em Chandra}\/}

46: \def\rxj1720    {{RXJ1720.1+2638}\/}

47: \def\ginga      {{\em Ginga}\/}

48: \def\xmm        {{\em XMM}\/}

49: \def\rosat      {{\em ROSAT}\/}

50: \def\am         {$^\prime$}

51: \def\as         {$^{\prime\prime}$}

52: \def\cmsq       {~cm$^{-2}$}

53: \def\kms        {~km$\;$s$^{-1}$}

54: \def\kmsmpc     {~km$\;$s$^{-1}\,$Mpc$^{-1}$}

55: \def\msunyr     {$M_{\odot}\;$yr$^{-1}$}

56: \def\degd       {$^{\circ}\!$}

57: \def\second     {{\prime\prime}}

58: \def\2A     {{2A 0335+096}}

59: \def\ms1455     {{MS1455.0+2232}}

60: \def\ltsim{\raise 2pt \hbox {$<$} \kern-1.1em \lower 4pt \hbox {$\sim$}}

61: \begin{document}

62: 

63: \submitted{Accepted for publication ApJL}

64: 

65: \title{Do radio core-halos and cold fronts in non major merging clusters originate from the same gas 

66: sloshing?}

67: 

68: \author{Pasquale\ Mazzotta\altaffilmark{1,2} and Simona Giacintucci\altaffilmark{2,3}} 

69: \altaffiltext{1}{Dipartimento di Fisica Universit\'a di Roma ``Tor Vergata'',

70: Via della ricerca scientifica 1, I-00133 Roma, Italy; mazzotta@roma2.infn.it}

71: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St.,

72: Cambridge, MA 02138}

73: \altaffiltext{3}{INAF - Istituto di Radioastronomia, via Gobetti 101, I-40129, Bologna, Italy; sgiaci\_s@ira.inaf.it}

74: \shorttitle{Cold fronts in clusters and radio core-halos}

75: \shortauthors{MAZZOTTA \& GIACINTUCCI}

76: 

77: 

78: 

79: \begin{abstract}

80: 

81: We show an interesting correlation between the surface brightness 

82: and temperature structure of the relaxed clusters \rxj1720 ~ and 

83: \ms1455 , hosting a pair of cold fronts, and their central 

84: core--halo radio source. We discuss the possibility that the 

85: origin of this diffuse radio emission may be strictly connected 

86: with the gas sloshing mechanism suggested 

87: to explain the formation of cold fronts in non major

88: merging clusters. We show that the radiative lifetime 

89: of the relativistic electrons is much shorter than the timescale 

90: on which they can be transported from the central galaxy up to the 

91: radius of the outermost cold front. This strongly indicates that 

92: the observed diffuse radio emission is likely produced by electrons 

93: re--accelerated via some kind of turbulence generated within the 

94: cluster volume limited by the cold fronts during the gas sloshing.

95: 

96: \end{abstract}

97: 

98: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general --- galaxies: clusters: individual

99:   (\rxj1720 , \ms1455 ) --- X-rays: galaxies --- cooling flows}

100: 

101: 

102: \section{Introduction}\label{par:intro} 

103: 

104: A number of cool core clusters of galaxies host 

105: very peculiar diffuse radio sources at their 

106: center characterized by a {\it core--halo} (CH herafter) 

107: structure (e.g. PKS\,0745--191;  \citealt{1991MNRAS.250..737B}). 

108: These objects show an amorphous steep spectrum halo 

109: which surrounds a bright core coincident with 

110: the dominant galaxy, with no jets on the kpc 

111: scale. Even though the connection between 

112: CHs and cool core clusters is well 

113: established, the origin of these sources 

114: remains uncertain. \cite{1995ApJ...451..125S} 

115: argued that they might be produced by 

116: the interaction between the radio source 

117: and the thermal gas cooling at the cluster 

118: center, i.e. in the form of disruption of 

119: the jets by the high--pressure ambient 

120: medium and buoyant effects on the radio 

121: plasma from the disrupted jets. In this Letter 

122: we show an interesting spatial correlation 

123: between the CH emission and X-ray 

124: features in two galaxy clusters 

125: \rxj1720 ~ ($z=0.159$)  and \ms1455 ~ ($z=0.258$), 

126: both showing a pair of cold fronts (CF hereafter) in their core. 

127: We suggest a connection between the origin 

128: of the CH structure and the

129:  same 

130: gas sloshing mechanism responsible for the 

131: formation of the CFs. 

132: We use $H_0=70$~km~s$^{-1}$~kpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega=0.27$, and $\Lambda=0.73$.

133: 

134: 

135: 

136: \section{X-Ray data preparation and analysis}\label{par:data} 

137: 

138: For the purpose of this Letter we provide a short summary 

139: of the X-ray data preparation and analysis. We refer to two 

140: companion papers for details (Mazzotta et 

141: al. in preparation). The analysis of \rxj1720 

142: ~ was performed combining 3 \chandra ~ observations (OBS\_ID=1453, 

143: 3224, and 4631). A single \chandra ~ observation (OBS\_ID=4192) 

144: was used for MS1455.0+2232. After flare cleaning, the 

145: useful exposure time is $42508\,{\rm s}$ and $88556\,{\rm s}$ 

146: for \rxj1720 ~ and \ms1455 , respectively. All images 

147: are background subtracted and vignetting corrected.

148: The spectral analysis was carried out in the 0.7--9~keV 

149: energy band in PI channels. The spectral fitting was 

150: performed assuming fixed absorption and metallicity 

151: appropriate for each cluster ($N_H=3.6\times 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$; 

152: $Z=0.39\ Z_\odot$,  and $N_H=3.0\times 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$; 

153: $Z=0.5\ Z_\odot$, for \rxj1720 ~ and \ms1455 , respectively).

154: The temperature maps were produced using a radially 

155: increasing Gaussian smoothing of $\sigma=1$~pixel in 

156: the center up to $\sigma=10$~pixels in the more external 

157: regions (see \citealt{2001ApJ...551..160V} for details.)

158: 

159: 

160: \section{X-ray image and Temperature map}\label{par:image} 

161: 

162: Both \rxj1720 ~ and \ms1455 ~ were known to host two 

163: sharp variations of the surface brightness (edges) 

164: on opposite side with respect to the cluster center (\citealt{2001ApJ...555..205M}

165: and \citealt{2001astro.ph..8476M}). It was suggested 

166: that such features were CFs but no final conclusion was possible

167: due to the limited statistics available. 

168: The new deeper observations allow us to disentangle 

169: the nature of the observed edges. To better highlight 

170: the spatial structure of the edges, we created a ratio 

171: image for both clusters by dividing the photon image 

172: in the $[0.5,2.5]$~keV energy band by its radial 

173: mean values simply obtained from the radial profile centered in the X-ray peak.

174:  The resulting image was smoothed using 

175: a top--hat function with $r=3$~pixels. The ratio image 

176: and projected temperature map of \rxj1720 ~ are shown 

177: in the left and right panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:ratio_rxj1720}, 

178: respectively. Overlaid are the 1.5 GHz radio contours 

179: (from VLA--B archive data) of the central CH. 

180: In the left and right panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:fig:ratio_ms1455} 

181: we show the same images for \ms1455 , with overlaid 

182: the GMRT 610 MHz contours. 

183: Figs.~\ref{fig:ratio_rxj1720} and \ref{fig:fig:ratio_ms1455}

184: clearly show that the edges

185: appear as part of a more extended spiral--like excess 

186: structure at the center of both clusters. 

187: They  seem to confine the CH radio emission. 

188: Furthermore, the radio structure appears spatially 

189: correlated with the X--ray excess, following the spiral 

190: pattern in its more external regions. 

191: 

192: %\begin{inlinefigure}

193: \begin{figure*}

194: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=1.\linewidth]{f1.eps}}

195: %\centerline{\plotone{f1.eps}}

196: \caption{{\it Left panel} -- Ratio \chandra ~ X--ray image of \rxj1720 ~ in 

197: the [0.5,2.5]~keV band overlaid to the 1.5~GHz VLA--B contours. The X-ray 

198: ratio image is obtained by dividing the actual cluster image by its radial 

199: mean values and by smoothing the result using a tophat function with $r=3$~pixels. 

200: Each pixel corresponds to $4\arcsec$. Blue lines indicate the position of the 

201: CFs. Radio contours are logarithmically spaced by a factor 2 from 

202: $0.10$ mJy b$^{-1}$. The radio beam is $5.7\arcsec \times 4.8\arcsec$. 

203: {\it Right panel} -- X-ray projected temperature map of \rxj1720 ~ in~KeV. 

204: Contours and lines as in the left panel.}

205: \label{fig:ratio_rxj1720}

206: \end{figure*}

207: %\end{inlinefigure}

208: 

209: 

210: %\begin{inlinefigure}

211: \begin{figure*}

212: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=1.\linewidth]{f2.eps}}

213: %\centerline{\plotone{f2.eps}}

214: \caption{{\it Left panel} -- Ratio \chandra ~ X-ray image of \ms1455 ~ in the 

215: [0.5,2.5]~keV band overlaid to the GMRT 610~MHz contours. The X-ray ratio image 

216: is obtained by dividing the actual cluster image by its radial mean values and 

217: by smoothing the result using a tophat function with $r=3$~pixels. Each pixel 

218: corresponds to $1\arcsec$. Blue lines indicate the position of the CFs. 

219: Radio contours are logarithmically spaced by a factor 2

220: from $0.15$ mJy b$^{-1}$. The radio beam is $5.9\arcsec \times 4.6\arcsec$. 

221: {\it Right panel} -- X-ray projected temperature map of \ms1455 ~ in~KeV. 

222: Contours and blue lines as in the left panel.}

223: \label{fig:fig:ratio_ms1455}

224: \end{figure*}

225: %\end{inlinefigure}

226: 

227: 

228: \section{Cold Fronts}\label{par:cold_fronts}

229: 

230: In this Section we demonstrate that all the edges indicated 

231: by blue lines in Figs.~\ref{fig:ratio_rxj1720} 

232: and \ref{fig:fig:ratio_ms1455} are CFs. 

233: We provide a brief description of these features, 

234: and refer to the forthcoming papers for a detailed 

235: analysis and discussion. For each edge we extracted 

236: the surface brightness profile within the relative sector. 

237:  The centers and position angles for each sector 

238: are reported in Tab.~\ref{table:1}. In Figs.~\ref{fig:rxj1720_cf} and \ref{fig:ms1455_cf} we show the surface brightness and projected temperature 

239: profiles of the two sectors of \rxj1720 ~ and \ms1455 , respectively.

240:  We modeled the edge

241: using a simple analytic function for the electron density 

242: ($n_e$) and 3D temperature ($T$), both with 

243: a discontinuity (a jump) at the front:

244:   

245: \begin{equation}

246:   n_{e}=n_0 

247: \left\{ 

248:   \begin{array}{rc} 

249:     D_n(r/r_{jump})^{\alpha_1} & r<r_{jump} \,  \\ 

250:     (r/r_{jump})^{\alpha_2} & r>r_{jump} \, , \\ 

251:    \end{array}

252:    \right . 

253: \label{eq:1}

254: \end{equation}

255: and

256: \begin{equation}

257:   T= T_0

258: \left\{ 

259:   \begin{array}{lc} 

260:     1 & r<r_{jump} \,  \\ 

261:     D_T\left[\frac {1+(r_{jump}/r_T)^2} {1+(r/r_T)^2}\right]^c & r>r_{jump} \, . \\ 

262:    \end{array}

263:    \right . 

264: \label{eq:2}

265: \end{equation}

266: 

267: Assuming spherical symmetry we projected both 

268: density and temperature models, and fitted them 

269: simultaneously to the observed surface brightness 

270: and temperature profiles. 

271: For the temperature projection we used the spectroscopic 

272: like definition $T_{sl}$ introduced by \cite{2004MNRAS.354...10M}. 

273: 

274: \begin{inlinefigure}

275: %\begin{figure}

276: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=1.\linewidth]{f3.eps}}

277: %\centerline{\plotone{f3.eps}}

278: \caption{Projected surface brightness and temperature profiles of the cluster 

279: sectors containing the South-East (left) and North-West (right) 

280: CFs of \rxj1720 . Vertical dotted lines indicate the positions of the edges. {\it Upper panels}) Surface brightness profiles. 

281: The continuous histograms are the projected best fit models shown in the upper 

282: panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:rxj1720_cf_model}. {\it Middle panels}) Residuals of 

283: the surface brightness profile with respect to the best fit model in sigmas. 

284: {\it Lower panels}) Projected Temperature profiles. The continues histograms 

285: are the projected best fit models shown in the middle panels of Fig~\ref{fig:rxj1720_cf_model}}

286: \label{fig:rxj1720_cf}

287: %\end{figure}

288: \end{inlinefigure}

289: 

290: \begin{inlinefigure}

291: %\begin{figure}

292: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=1.\linewidth]{f4.eps}}

293: %\centerline{\plotone{f4.eps}}

294: \caption{Same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:rxj1720_cf} but for the North-East (left) and 

295: South-West (right) CFs of \ms1455 . }

296: \label{fig:ms1455_cf}

297: %\end{figure}

298: \end{inlinefigure}

299: 

300: If Figs.~\ref{fig:rxj1720_cf_model} and \ref{fig:ms1455_cf_model} 

301: we show the best fit within the 68\% confidence level error 

302: curves relative to the density, temperature and pressure 

303: profiles of each edge. We also report as solid line

304: the best fit models of the surface brightness and temperature

305: profiles to highlight the good agreement between the fit 

306: and the data. Furthermore, the middle panels of the same 

307: figures show the departures in sigmas of the surface brightness 

308: data with respect to the best fit. 

309: All the observed edges are CFs. We notice 

310: that 

311: the pressure profile is continuous, within the errors, across the front

312: (Tab.~\ref{table:1}), so the speed 

313: of the fronts is highly subsonic.  

314: 

315: \begin{inlinefigure}

316: %\begin{figure}

317: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=1.\linewidth]{f5.eps}}

318: %\centerline{\plotone{f5.eps}}

319: \caption{Electron density ($n_e$), temperature ($T$) and thermal pressure ($P$) profiles 

320: of the sectors containing the South-East (left) and North-West (right) CFs of \rxj1720 . 

321: The shadow regions indicate the relative 68\% confidence level errors.}

322: \label{fig:rxj1720_cf_model}

323: %\end{figure}

324: \end{inlinefigure}

325: 

326: %\begin{figure}

327: \begin{inlinefigure}

328: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=1.\linewidth]{f6.eps}}

329: %\centerline{\plotone{f6.eps}}

330: \caption{Same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:rxj1720_cf_model} but for the North-East (left) and 

331: South-West (right) CFs of \ms1455 .}

332: \label{fig:ms1455_cf_model}

333: \end{inlinefigure}

334: %\end{figure}

335: 

336: 

337: 

338: 

339: 

340:  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

341:  % Table 1

342:  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

343: 

344: 

345: \begin{table*}[t]

346: \centering

347: %{\bf TABLE 1}\\

348:  {

349: \footnotesize

350: %\tiny

351: \caption{Parameters of the cold fronts}

352: \label{table:1}

353:  \noindent

354:  \begin{tabular}{ l c c c  c c c c} 

355:  \hline \hline

356:  & & & &  & & & \\

357: 

358: 

359:  Sector      &$x,y$            & Position angle   & $r_{jump}$ & $D_n$     & $D_T$  & $r_T$   & $c$  \\

360:              &(J2000)          & (deg){\dag}      &   (Mpc)   &           &        & (Mpc)   &      \\ 

361: \hline

362:  & & & &  & & & \\

363: \rxj1720 ~ N &(17:20:10,+26:37:25) & 2--80              & $0.0994\pm 0.0005$ &  $1.68\pm 0.03$    & $1.68\pm 0.12$ & 0.1 & 0\\

364: \rxj1720 ~ S &(17:20:10,+26:37:25) & 180--280           & $0.1551\pm 0.0007$ &  $1.66\pm 0.05$    & $1.49\pm 0.16$ & 0.1 & 0 \\

365:  & & & &  & & & \\

366: \ms1455 ~ N  &(14:57:15,+22:20:35)&46--163          & $0.1367\pm 0.002$  &  $1.67\pm 0.06$    & $1.72\pm 0.24$ & $1.9 \pm 0.3$ & $2.6 \pm 0.27$\\

367: \ms1455 ~ S  &(14:57:15,+22:20:30)&270--330         & $0.0397\pm 0.003$  &  $1.50\pm 0.08$    & $2.50\pm 0.30$ & $0.23\pm 0.04$ & $0.5 \pm 0.10$\\

368:  \hline 

369:  \multicolumn{8}{l}{\dag Position angles are measured anticlockwise from West}\\ 

370:  \end{tabular}

371:  }

372:  \end{table*}

373: 

374: 

375: 

376: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}\label{par:discussion}

377: 

378: Using high resolution simulations differet authors

379:  showed that CFs in the 

380: core of relaxed galaxy clusters may be the result 

381: of gas sloshing induced by a minor merger with a 

382: small dark matter halo occurred within the last few 

383: Gyrs  (see e.g \citealt{2006ApJ...650..102A} --AM hereafter-- 

384: and references therein). 

385: The only condition for the CF to form 

386: is that the cluster has a steep entropy profile 

387: (as observed in cool core clusters) and the dark 

388: matter sub--halo has a non--zero impact parameter. 

389: When the sub--halo flies through the main 

390: cluster, it produces a gravitational disturbance that 

391: pushes the cool gas away from its initial position. 

392: This makes the gas slosh and two or more CFs 

393: form on opposite side with respect to the cluster 

394: center. AM noticed that, when the gas is displaced 

395: from the center for the first time, it does not fall 

396: back radially, and the subsequent CF(s) is (are) 

397: not exactly concentric but combines into a spiral pattern 

398: (see 1.9--2.1 Gyrs panels in Fig.~7 of AM). As shown 

399: in \S~\ref{par:image}, both the CF pairs 

400: in \rxj1720 ~ and \ms1455 , which are clearly two 

401: distinct non concentric structures, seem to combine 

402: into a spiral pattern very similarly to what predicted 

403: by AM. These structures are remarkably similar to 

404: the simulated ones in the surface brightness map 

405: (compare left panels of Figs.~\ref{fig:ratio_rxj1720} 

406: and \ref{fig:fig:ratio_ms1455} with upper--left panel 

407: of Fig.~19 of AM) as well as in the temperature map 

408: (compare right panels of Figs.~\ref{fig:ratio_rxj1720} 

409: and \ref{fig:fig:ratio_ms1455} with lower--left panel 

410: of Fig.~19 of AM). Thus the X-ray observations of these 

411: two clusters seems to confirm the prediction of AM for the 

412: gas sloshing.

413: 

414: What appear to be very interesting is that both clusters host 

415: a CH radio source. These sources seem to be well confined 

416: (in projection) within the CF pairs of the respective 

417: cluster. Furthermore, we noticed a spatial correlation between the

418: radio emission and the X-ray spiral structure which might suggest 

419: that the radio emitting electrons are trapped into the same ICM 

420: flows that produced the CFs. Given the lack of jets on 

421: the kpc scale, the relativistic electrons need to be transported 

422: by some other mechanism from the central galaxy up to the radii 

423: of the outermost CFs. We might speculate that the relativistic 

424: electrons injected by the central AGN, and trapped into the ICM 

425: magnetic field, are transported at the CFs radii by the 

426: motion of the low entropy thermal gas induced by the gas sloshing. 

427: In fact, the AM simulations show that the CFs are formed 

428: by the continuous circulation of lower entropy gas that comes from 

429: the inner core region and falls back soon after (see Fig~7 of AM). 

430: However, AM show that the speed of this gas circulation is 

431: relatively low with an upper limit of $v_{max}=500~{\rm km/s}$. 

432: In both clusters the outermost CF is at a radial 

433: distance of $\Delta r \approx 150~{\rm kpc}$. Assuming  radial 

434: transport, we estimate that the minimum time needed for the 

435: relativistic electrons to be displaced up to the position of the 

436: outermost front is $t_{min}\ge 3\times 10^{8}\, {\rm yr}$. This time is 

437: much larger than the radiative lifetime of relativistic electrons

438: which suffer energy losses mainly due to Inverse Compton with the 

439: cosmic microwave background photons ($t\approx 10^{7-8}/(1+z)^4\, 

440: {\rm yr}$; see e.g. \citealt{2001MNRAS.320..365B}). This simple 

441: calculation suggests that the observed radio emission might be 

442: produced by re--acceleration of a population of relic electrons,

443: injected into the ICM by a previous activity of the central AGN.

444: Due to the subsonic nature of the gas sloshing, we can exclude 

445: that 

446: the re--acceleration may be driven by  thermal shock. An 

447: alternative and plausible mechanisms may be the re--acceleration 

448: by MHD turbulence, as suggested to explain the cluster 

449: mini--halos (\citealt{2002A&A...386..456G}) and giant radio halos 

450: (e.g. \citealt{2004MNRAS.350.1174B}).  These authors claim that, 

451: to be effective, this re--acceleration mechanism requires 

452: only a modest level (few per cent) of turbulence.

453: In fact, 2D simulations

454: with much higher resolutions have shown that the gas sloshing could

455: automatically create turbulence in a core (e.g. \citealt{2004ApJ...612L...9F}).

456: 

457: It is worth noting that the CH/CFs correlation 

458: described in this Letter is not limited to these two clusters 

459: but seems to be present also in other clusters hosting a CH, 

460: as e.g. 2A\,0335+096 (\citealt{2003ApJ...596..190M}), 

461: PKS\,0745--191 (\citealt{1991MNRAS.250..737B}), and A\,2052 

462: (\citealt{1993ApJ...416...51Z}).

463: These results calls for further and deeper investigation 

464: of the radio--X-ray connection in relaxed clusters with 

465: CFs, which will be addressed in forthcoming papers.

466: 

467: 

468: 

469: 

470: 

471: \acknowledgments

472:  

473: We thank M. Markevitch, G. Brunetti, T. Venturi, and A. Vikhlinin for 

474: constructive criticism.  This work was supported by contract ASI-INAF 

475: I/023/05/0, CXC grants AR6-7015X, GO5-6124X, NASA grant NNG04GK72G 

476: and by the Smithsonian Institution.

477: 

478: %\bibliography{ms}

479: \begin{thebibliography}{10}

480: %\expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

481: 

482: \bibitem[{{Ascasibar} \& {Markevitch}(2006)}]{2006ApJ...650..102A}

483: {Ascasibar}, Y., \& {Markevitch}, M. 2006, \apj, 650, 102

484: 

485: \bibitem[{{Baum} \& {O'Dea}(1991)}]{1991MNRAS.250..737B}

486: {Baum}, S.~A., \& {O'Dea}, C.~P. 1991, \mnras, 250, 737

487: 

488: \bibitem[{{Brunetti} {et~al.}(2004){Brunetti}, {Blasi}, {Cassano}, \&

489:   {Gabici}}]{2004MNRAS.350.1174B}

490: {Brunetti}, G., {Blasi}, P., {Cassano}, R., \& {Gabici}, S. 2004, \mnras, 350,

491:   1174

492: 

493: \bibitem[{{Brunetti} {et~al.}(2001){Brunetti}, {Setti}, {Feretti}, \&

494:   {Giovannini}}]{2001MNRAS.320..365B}

495: {Brunetti}, G., {Setti}, G., {Feretti}, L., \& {Giovannini}, G. 2001, \mnras,

496:   320, 365

497: 

498: \bibitem[Fujita et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...612L...9F} Fujita, Y., Matsumoto, 

499: T., \& Wada, K.\ 2004, \apjl, 612, L9 

500: 

501: \bibitem[{{Gitti} {et~al.}(2002){Gitti}, {Brunetti}, \&

502:   {Setti}}]{2002A&A...386..456G}

503: {Gitti}, M., {Brunetti}, G., \& {Setti}, G. 2002, \aap, 386, 456

504: 

505: \bibitem[{{Mazzotta} {et~al.}(2003){Mazzotta}, {Edge}, \&

506:   {Markevitch}}]{2003ApJ...596..190M}

507: {Mazzotta}, P., {Edge}, A.~C., \& {Markevitch}, M. 2003, \apj, 596, 190

508: 

509: \bibitem[{{Mazzotta} {et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{a}}){Mazzotta}, {Markevitch},

510:   {Forman}, {Jones}, {Vikhlinin}, \& {VanSpeybroeck}}]{2001astro.ph..8476M}

511: {Mazzotta}, P., {Markevitch}, M., {Forman}, W.~R., {Jones}, C., {Vikhlinin},

512:   A., \& {VanSpeybroeck}, L. 2001{\natexlab{a}}, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints

513: 

514: \bibitem[{{Mazzotta} {et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{b}}){Mazzotta}, {Markevitch},

515:   {Vikhlinin}, {Forman}, {David}, \& {VanSpeybroeck}}]{2001ApJ...555..205M}

516: {Mazzotta}, P., {Markevitch}, M., {Vikhlinin}, A., {Forman}, W.~R., {David},

517:   L.~P., \& {VanSpeybroeck}, L. 2001{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 555, 205

518: 

519: \bibitem[{{Mazzotta} {et~al.}(2004){Mazzotta}, {Rasia}, {Moscardini}, \&

520:   {Tormen}}]{2004MNRAS.354...10M}

521: {Mazzotta}, P., {Rasia}, E., {Moscardini}, L., \& {Tormen}, G. 2004, \mnras,

522:   354, 10

523: 

524: \bibitem[{{Sarazin} {et~al.}(1995){Sarazin}, {Baum}, \&

525:   {O'Dea}}]{1995ApJ...451..125S}

526: {Sarazin}, C.~L., {Baum}, S.~A., \& {O'Dea}, C.~P. 1995, \apj, 451, 125

527: 

528: \bibitem[{{Vikhlinin} {et~al.}(2001){Vikhlinin}, {Markevitch}, \&

529:   {Murray}}]{2001ApJ...551..160V}

530: {Vikhlinin}, A., {Markevitch}, M., \& {Murray}, S.~S. 2001, \apj, 551, 160

531: 

532: \bibitem[{{Zhao} {et~al.}(1993){Zhao}, {Sumi}, {Burns}, \&

533:   {Duric}}]{1993ApJ...416...51Z}

534: {Zhao}, J.-H., {Sumi}, D.~M., {Burns}, J.~O., \& {Duric}, N. 1993, \apj, 416,

535:   51

536: \end{thebibliography}

537: 

538: 

539:  

540: 

541: \end{document}

542: 

543:  

544: 

545: 

546: 

547: 

548: 

549: 

550: 

551: