1: %
2: %--------------------------------
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[12pt]{article}
5: %\documentclass{aastex}
6: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
7:
8: \shortauthors{Okamoto et al.}
9: \shorttitle{EMERGING HELICAL FLUX ROPE UNDER PROMINENCE}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{EMERGENCE OF A HELICAL FLUX ROPE UNDER AN ACTIVE REGION PROMINENCE}
14: \author{\textsc{
15: Takenori J. Okamoto,$^{1,2}$\footnote{T. J. O. is supported by the Research Fellowships from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.}
16: Saku Tsuneta,$^1$
17: Bruce W. Lites,$^3$
18: Masahito Kubo,$^3$
19: Takaaki Yokoyama,$^4$
20: Thomas E. Berger,$^5$
21: Kiyoshi Ichimoto,$^1$
22: Yukio Katsukawa,$^1$
23: Shin'ichi Nagata,$^2$
24: Kazunari Shibata,$^2$
25: Toshifumi Shimizu,$^6$
26: Richard A. Shine,$^5$
27: Yoshinori Suematsu,$^1$
28: Theodore D. Tarbell,$^5$
29: and Alan M. Title$^5$
30: }}
31: \affil{
32: $^{1}$National Astronomical Observatory, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan\\
33: $^{2}$Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University, Yamashina, Kyoto, 607-8471, Japan\\
34: $^{3}$High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder CO 80307-3000, USA%
35: \footnote{The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.}\\
36: $^{4}$Department of Earth and Planetary Science, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan\\
37: $^{5}$Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, B/252, 3251 Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA\\
38: $^{6}$ISAS/JAXA, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 229-8510, Japan\\
39: \ \\
40: {\it Received} 2007 October 27; {\it accepted} 2007 December 18
41: }
42: \email{joten.okamoto@nao.ac.jp}
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45:
46: Continuous observations were obtained of active region 10953 with the Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) on board the \emph{Hinode} satellite during 2007 April 28 to May 9.
47: A prominence was located over the polarity inversion line (PIL) in the south-east of the main sunspot.
48: These observations provided us with a time series of vector magnetic fields on the photosphere under the prominence.
49: We found four features:
50: (1) The abutting opposite-polarity regions on the two sides along the PIL first grew laterally in size and then narrowed.
51: (2) These abutting regions contained vertically-weak, but horizontally-strong magnetic fields.
52: (3) The orientations of the horizontal magnetic fields along the PIL on the photosphere gradually changed with time from a normal-polarity configuration to a inverse-polarity one.
53: (4) The horizontal-magnetic field region was blueshifted.
54: These indicate that helical flux rope was emerging from below the photosphere into the corona along the PIL under the pre-existing prominence.
55: We suggest that this supply of a helical magnetic flux into the corona is associated with evolution and maintenance of active-region prominences.
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \keywords
60: {Sun: prominences --- Sun: filaments}
61:
62:
63:
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66: Solar prominences are cool material (10$^4$ K) floating in the corona (10$^6$ K) and located over polarity inversion lines (PILs) of the photosphere.
67: It is known that prominences are supported by coronal magnetic fields against gravity (see references in Martin 1998).
68: Such magnetic fields have dipped shapes, and the cool plasma is sitting at the bottom of the dips
69: (Kippenhahn \& Schl\"{u}ter 1957).
70: Moreover, many observations of prominences show inverse polarity (Leroy et al. 1984; Tandberg-Hanssen 1995; Lites 2005),
71: which means that the direction of horizontal magnetic fields is toward the positive polarity side from the negative polarity side.
72: Hence, it is often thought that magnetic fields in prominences have helical structures
73: (e.g., Kuperus \& Tandberg-Hanssen 1967; Kuperus \& Raadu 1974; Hirayama 1985).
74: This topology of magnetic fields is suggested from observations of erupting prominences, or coronal mass ejections
75: (e.g., Dere et al. 1999; Ciaravella et al. 2000; Low 2001).
76:
77: How is such a helical magnetic field created in association with prominences in the corona ?
78: Two theories have been discussed: flux rope models (e.g., Rust \& Kumar 1994; Low \& Hundhausen 1995; Low 1996; Lites 2005; Zhang \& Low 2005) and sheared-arcade models
79: (e.g., Pneuman 1983; van Ballegooijen \& Martens 1989, 1990; Antiochos et al. 1994; DeVore \& Antiochos 2000; Martens \& Zwaan 2001; Aulanier et al. 2002; Karpen et al. 2003;
80: Mackay \& van Ballegooijen 2005, 2006).
81: In the former model, an originally-twisted flux rope emerges from below the photosphere into the corona.
82: The helical structure is thought to be made by the convection in the solar interior.
83: In the latter one, potential fields in the corona are sheared by the photospheric motion along PILs.
84: As a result, magnetic reconnection occurs among the sheared fields, and then helical fields are constructed in the corona.
85: Both models have the same final configuration, but the processes leading to it are quite different.
86: However, we have no clear observational evidence to support either model, although emerging twisted magnetic fields related to flares have already been observed
87: (e.g., Tanaka 1991; Lites et al. 1995; Leka et al. 1996; Ishii et al. 1998).
88: We have had difficulties due to seeing and discontinuity of observing time with ground-based observations in revealing the mechanism of prominence formation.
89:
90: The \emph{Hinode} satellite (Kosugi et al. 2007) has a sun-synchronous polar orbit, so that we can observe the Sun continuously without interruption by a spacecraft night.
91: The Solar Optical Telescope (SOT, Tsuneta et al. 2007; Suematsu et al. 2007; Ichimoto et al. 2007; Shimizu et al. 2007) on board \emph{Hinode}
92: has the Spectro-Polarimeter (SP), which provides long sequences of vector magnetic field measurements at high spatial resolution.
93: We have an observation of one active region that had a pre-existing prominence to investigate the evolution of its associated magnetic fields on the photosphere.
94: We report on the results and findings from this observation in this letter.
95:
96:
97: \section{Observation and Data Analysis}
98:
99: The \emph{Hinode} satellite was tracking a sunspot in active region NOAA 10953 from 2007 April 28 to May 9.
100: At the beginning of this period, we had periodic scannings of this active region including a pre-existing prominence
101: with the SP as well as time series of images with the Filtergraph (FG).
102: The multiple scanning was mainly performed with Fast Mapping mode,
103: which has an integration time of 3.2 seconds for one slit and the pixel sampling of 0''.32.
104: The average cadence of the scanning was three hours and the field of view was 160''$\times$160" (512$\times$512 pixels).
105: The SP simultaneously measured the full Stokes profiles of the Fe I lines at 6301.5 and 6302.5 \AA\ with a sampling of 21.6 m\AA.
106:
107: Vector magnetic fields were derived from the calibrated Stokes profiles on the assumption of a Milne-Eddington atmosphere.
108: We resolved the 180$^{\circ}$ azimuth ambiguity with the AZAM utility (Lites et al. 1995),
109: where the basic premise is minimization of spatial discontinuities in the field orientation.
110:
111: Dopplergrams were also produced by the inversion.
112: However, we cannot determine the absolute zero velocity since these include various kinds of Dopplershift components.
113: Therefore, we define the average velocity in the plage region for which vertical field strength is larger than 1000 Gauss as zero.
114:
115: \begin{figure}
116: \epsscale{0.7}
117: \plotone{f1.eps}
118: \caption{
119: ({\it a}) H$\alpha$ image taken with the FG of \emph{Hinode}/SOT. North is up and east is to the left.
120: ({\it b}) Magnetogram derived from the SP. The field of view is the same as that of Panel {\it a}.
121: The scanning was performed from east to west during 04:51 to 05:23 UT in this field of view.
122: Color contour indicates the strength of vertical magnetic fields; red is positive and blue is negative.
123: Arrows show the strength of horizontal magnetic fields.
124: The yellow line is PIL, which is calculated from the smoothed vertical magnetic fields.
125: The black line contour means $\pm$650 Gauss boundary of the vertical magnetic fields.
126: The vector magnetic fields are converted in the solar local frame.
127: }
128: \label{fig1}
129: \end{figure}
130:
131:
132: \section{Result}
133:
134: Figure \ref{fig1} shows an H$\alpha$ filtergram, and a vector magnetogram of the active region taken or scanned around 05:00 UT on 2007 April 30.
135: The magnetogram displays vertical magnetic field strength (color contour; red is positive and blue is negative),
136: horizontal magnetic field strength (arrow), the PIL (yellow line), and the $\pm$650 Gauss boundary of vertical fields (black line contour).
137: The vector magnetic fields are transformed into the solar local frame.
138: A prominence in the south-east of the sunspot was located along the PIL.
139: We notice that horizontal magnetic fields under the prominence have the same direction.
140: The direction is almost parallel to the prominence.
141: Moreover, the opposite-polarity regions on the both sides of the PIL have mainly horizontal fields, as indicated by the relatively weak vertical magnetic field (Fig. \ref{fig1}b).
142: Hereafter, we call this region the {\it weak-field region}.
143: The reason we drew the 650-G boundary for the vertical fields is that this value is the averaged strength of the horizontal magnetic field near the PIL.
144: The 650-G boundary appears to be the boundary separating the outer vertical-field dominated region from the inner horizontal-field dominated region although this is less clear for sunspot side.
145:
146: We focus on the evolution of the photospheric magnetic field along the PIL.
147: Panels {\it a1--a6}, {\it b1--b6}, and {\it c1--c6} in Figure \ref{fig2} show time series of continuum images, vector magnetograms, and Dopplergrams, respectively.
148: The field of view is indicated with the black solid box in Figure \ref{fig1}.
149: In the series of the magnetograms, we found that the {\it weak-field region} broadened (Panels {\it b2--b4} in Fig. \ref{fig2}) and then narrowed (panels {\it b5--b6} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
150: In other words, the abutting opposite polarities were spatially widened, and closed like a sliding door.
151: The {\it weak-field region} is blueshifted (Panels {\it c2--c6} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
152: We investigated the angle between the PILs and the horizontal magnetic fields (Panels {\it d1--d6} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
153: Positive angle indicates the normal polarity, while negative angle means the inverse polarity.
154: We find that the angles along the PILs gradually decreased from positive to negative during the widening and narrowing process of the {\it weak-field region}.
155:
156: These observational results indicate emergence of a helical flux rope from below the photosphere into the corona.
157: The scenario is as follows.
158: First, a helical flux rope is located along the PIL under the photosphere (Panel {\it e1} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
159: This horizontally oriented rope with weak twist explains the dominance of the horizontal fields on the two sides of the PIL as the rope rises into the photosphere.
160: Second, as the rope rises up, it pushes aside the occupying photospheric plasma containing vertical fields.
161: When the top of the rope reaches the photosphere, we observe its horizontal field on the photosphere in what is called the normal-polarity configuration (Panel {\it e2} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
162: As the rope continues to rise through the photosphere, the angle between the PIL and the observed horizontal fields of the rope becomes smaller (Panel {\it e3} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
163: In a cylindrically shaped twisted flux rope, we expect the field to have an azimuthal component in its outer part of the rope.
164: Hence, as the rope continues to rise through the photosphere,
165: the angle between the PIL and the observed horizontal fields of the rope becomes smaller until the axis of the rope has reached the photosphere (Panel {\it e3} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
166: Then, after the rope axis has risen above the photosphere, the angle shows the inverse polarity because the lower part of the helical rope crosses the photosphere (Panel {\it e5} in Fig. \ref{fig2}).
167: Simultaneously, the {\it weak-field region} narrows as the cross section decreases.
168: Thus, throughout the rising of the flux, a blueshift is seen in the {\it weak-field region}.
169:
170:
171: \section{Discussion}
172:
173: The \emph{Hinode}/SP observations presented here offer clear evidence of an emerging helical flux rope along the PIL under an active-region prominence:
174: The {\it weak-field region} became first wider and then narrower during the emergence of the flux rope,
175: while the orientation of the horizontal magnetic fields observed at the photosphere changes from the normal-polarity to the inverse-polarity configuration.
176: We note that we distinguish the {\it weak-field region} from the filament channel since the {\it weak-field region} appears temporarily in the filament channel.
177: Cheung et al. (2007) observed similar polarity reversal in their radiative MHD simulation.
178: Lites (2005) pointed out in a similar evolutionary event that the abutting opposite polarities may spatially separate under an active-region prominence
179: although the cadence of that observation was one day and the resolution was much lower than that of ours.
180: Gaizauskas et al. (1997) also reported that elongated voids appeared along a filament channel seen in off-band H$\alpha$ a few days before prominence formation.
181: Our results with \emph{Hinode}/SOT suggest that such broadening is associated with emergence of the horizontal flux tubes.
182:
183: We obtain the following physical parameters from the ME inversion of the SP data for our emerging flux rope event.
184: The {\it weak-field region} had a width of up to 10,000 km, a duration of one and a half days, and an upward velocity of up to 300 m $s^{-1}$.
185: Hence, the diameter of the flux tube is roughly estimated to be 39,000 km if the maximum upward velocity continues for one and a half days.
186: This estimation is consistent with both the maximum width of the {\it weak-field region} and typical height of active-region prominences on the limb.
187: The filling factor and strength of horizontal magnetic fields are estimated to be 0.15 and 650 Gauss on average in the {\it weak-field region}, respectively.
188: When this flux is supplied into the corona, the average strength of the magnetic fields is 100 Gauss.
189: This value is consistent with active-region prominences according to previous measurements of magnetic fields
190: (e.g., Tandberg-Hanssen and Malville 1974; Wiehr and Stellmacher 1991; Casini et al. 2003; Okamoto et al. 2007),
191: and this flux rope is strong enough to support prominences.
192: Therefore, we suggest that this emergence of the helical magnetic flux rope is associated with evolution and maintenance of the prominence.
193:
194: This is the only observation made so far of an active-region prominence, and we do not rule out the sheared arcade model (see Introduction).
195: It will be useful to observe quantitatively both active-region and quiescent prominences with the SP to determine whether the event reported in this paper is common in the solar atmosphere.
196: We suggest that the above observational evidence must be closely related to the evolution of a prominence via the emergence of a twisted magnetic flux rope.
197: The H$\alpha$ prominence was already seen before the start of the emerging episode reported here.
198: The appearance of the pre-existing prominence was considerably changed, but after the emergence of the flux rope, the prominence became stable.
199: We will report the relationship between the emerging helical flux rope and the prominence activity in a subsequence paper.
200:
201:
202: \
203:
204: The authors thank B. C. Low for useful comments.
205: \emph{Hinode} is a Japanese mission developed and launched by ISAS/JAXA, with NAOJ as domestic partner and NASA and STFC (UK) as international partners.
206: It is operated by these agencies in co-operation with ESA and NSC (Norway).
207: This work was carried out at the NAOJ Hinode science center, which was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research ``The Basic Study of
208: Space Weather Prediction'' from MEXT, Japan (Head Investigator: K. Shibata), generous donation from the Sun Microsystems Inc., and NAOJ internal funding.
209:
210:
211: \begin{thebibliography}
212:
213: \bibitem[Antiochos, Dahlburg, \& Klimchuk 1994]{ant94}
214: Antiochos, S. K., Dahlburg, R. B., \& Klimchuk, J. A. 1994, ApJ, 420, L41
215:
216: \bibitem[Aulanier et al. 2002]{aul02}
217: Aulanier, G., DeVore, C. R., \& Antiochos, S. K. 2002, 567, L97
218:
219: \bibitem[Casini et al. 2003]{cas03}
220: Casini, R., L\'opez Ariste, A., Tomczyk, S., \& Lites, B. W. 2003, ApJ, 598, L67
221:
222: \bibitem[Cheung et al. 2007]{che07}
223: Cheung, M. C. M., Sch\"{u}ssler, M., \& Moreno-Insertis, F. 2007, A\& A, 467, 703
224:
225: \bibitem[Ciaravella et al. 2000]{cia00}
226: Ciaravella, A., Raymond, J. C., Thompson, B. J., van Ballegooijen, A., Strachan, L., Li, J., Gardner, L., O'Neal, R., Antonucci, E., Kohl, J., \& Noci, G. 2000, ApJ, 529, 575
227:
228: \bibitem[Dere et al. 1999]{der99}
229: Dere, K. P., Brueckner, G. E., Howard, R. A., Michels, D. J., \& Delaboudiniere, J. P. 1999, ApJ, 516, 465
230:
231: \bibitem[DeVore and Antiochos 2000]{dev00}
232: DeVore, C. R., \& Antiochos, S. K. 2000, ApJ, 539, 954
233:
234: \bibitem[Gaizauskas et al. 1997]{gai97}
235: Gaizauskas, V., Zirker, J. B., Sweetland, C., \& Kovacs, A. 1997, ApJ, 479, 448
236:
237: \bibitem[Hirayama (1985)]{hir85}
238: Hirayama, T. 1985, Sol. Phys. 100, 415
239:
240: \bibitem[Ichimoto et al. 2007]{ich07}
241: Ichimoto, K., et al.
242: %Lites, B., Elmore, D., Suematsu, Y., Tsuneta, S., Katsukawa, Y., Shimizu, T.,
243: %Shine, R., Tarbell, T., Title, A., Kiyohara, J., Shinoda, K., Card, G., Lecinski, A., Streander, K.,
244: %Nakagiri, M., Miyashita, M., Noguchi, M., Hoffmann, C., \& Cruz, T.
245: 2007, Sol. Phys., submitted
246:
247: \bibitem[Ishii et al. 1998]{ish98}
248: Ishii, T. T., Kurokawa, H., Takeuchi, T. T. 1998, ApJ, 499, 898
249:
250: \bibitem[Karpen et al. (2003)]{kar03}
251: Karpen, J. T., Antiochos, S. K., Klimchuk, J. A., \& MacNeice, P. J. 2003, ApJ, 593, 1187
252:
253: \bibitem[Kippenhahn \& Schl\"{u}ter 1957]{kip57}
254: Kippenhahn, R., \& Schl\"{u}ter, A. 1957, Z. Astrophys., 43, 36
255:
256: \bibitem[Kosugi et al. 2007]{kos07}
257: Kosugi, T., et al.
258: %Matsuzaki, K., Sakao, T., Shimizu, T., Sone, Y., Tachikawa, S., Hashimoto, T.,
259: %Minesugi, K., Ohnishi, A., Yamada, T., Tsuneta, S., Hara, H., Ichimoto, K., Suematsu, Y.,
260: %Shimojo, M., Watanabe, T., Davis, J. M., Hill, L. D., Owens, J. K., Title, A. M., Culhane, J. L.,
261: %Harra, L., Doschek, G. A., \& Golub, L.
262: 2007, Sol. Phys., 243, 3
263:
264: %\bibitem[Kubo and Shimizu 2007]{kub07}
265: %Kubo, M., \& Shimizu, T. ApJ reprint, doi:10.1086/'523080
266:
267: \bibitem[Kuperus \& Raadu 1974]{kup74}
268: Kuperus, M., \& Raadu, M. A. 1974, A\&A, 31, 189
269:
270: \bibitem[Kuperus \& Tandberg-Hanssen 1967]{kup67}
271: Kuperus, M., \& Tandberg-Hanssen, E. 1967, Sol. Phys., 2, 39
272:
273: \bibitem[Leka et al. 1996]{lek96}
274: Leka, K. D., Canfield, R. C., McClymont, A. N., \& van Driel-Gesztelyi, L. 1996, ApJ, 462, 547
275:
276: \bibitem[Leroy et al. 1984]{ler84}
277: Leroy, J. L., Bommier, V., \& Sahal-Br\'{e}chot, S. 1984, A\& A, 131, 33
278:
279: \bibitem[Lites 1995]{lit95}
280: Lites, B. W., Low, B. C., Mart\'{\i}nez Pillet, V., Seagraves, P., Skumanich, A., Frank, Z., Shine, R. A., \& Tsuneta, S. 1995, ApJ, 446, 877
281:
282: \bibitem[Lites 2005]{lit05}
283: Lites, B. W. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1275
284:
285: \bibitem[Low 1996]{low96}
286: Low, B. C. 1996, Sol. Phys., 167, 217
287:
288: \bibitem[Low 2001]{low01}
289: --------. 2001, JGR, 106, 25141
290:
291: \bibitem[Low \& Hundhausen 1995]{low95}
292: Low, B. C., \& Hundhausen, J. R. 1995, ApJ, 443, 818
293:
294: \bibitem[Mackay and van Ballegooijen 2005]{mac05}
295: Mackay, D. H., \& van Ballegooijen, A. A. 2005, ApJ, 621, L77
296:
297: \bibitem[Mackay and van Ballegooijen 2006]{mac06}
298: --------. 2006, ApJ, 641, 577
299:
300: \bibitem[Martens \& Zwaan (2001)]{mar01}
301: Martens, P. C., \& Zwaan, C. 2001, ApJ, 558, 872
302:
303: \bibitem[Martin 1998]{mar98}
304: Martin, S. F. 1998, Sol. Phys., 182, 107
305:
306: \bibitem[Okamoto et al. 2007]{oka07}
307: Okamoto, T. J., Tsuneta, S., Berger, T. E., et al.
308: %Ichimoto, K., Katsukawa, Y., Lites, B. W., Nagata, S., Shibata, K., Shimizu, T., Shine, R. A., Suematsu, Y., Tarbell, T. D., Title, A. M.
309: 2007, Science, 318, 1577
310:
311: %\bibitem[Okamoto et al. 2008]{--}
312: %Okamoto, T. J., Tsuneta, S., Lites, B. W., Kubo, M., Yokoyama, T., Berger, T. E., Ichimoto, K., Katsukawa, Y., Nagata, S., Shibata, K., Shimizu, T., Shine, R. A., Suematsu, Y., Tarbell, T. D., Title, A. M. 2008, in preparation
313:
314: \bibitem[Pneuman 1983]{pne83}
315: Pneuman, G. W. 1983, Sol. Phys., 88, 219
316:
317: \bibitem[Rust and Kumar 1994]{rus94}
318: Rust, D. M., \& Kumar, A. 1994, Sol. Phys., 155, 69
319:
320: \bibitem[Shimizu et al. 2007]{shi07}
321: Shimizu, T., et al.
322: %Nagata, S., Tsuneta, S., Tarbell, T., Edwards, C., Shine, R., Hoffmann, C., Thomas, E.,
323: %Sour, S., Rehse, R., Ito, O., Kashiwagi, Y., Tabata, M., Kodeki, K., Nagase, M., Matsuzaki, K.,
324: %Kobayashi, K., Ichimoto, K., \& Suematsu, Y.
325: 2007, Sol. Phys., in press
326:
327: \bibitem[Suematsu et al. 2007]{sue07}
328: Suematsu, Y., et al.
329: %Tsuneta, S., Ichimoto, K., Shimizu, T., Otsubo, M., Katsukawa, Y., Nakagiri, M.,
330: %Noguchi, M., Tamura, T., Kato, Y., Hara, H., Mikami, I., Saito, H., Matsushita, T., Kawaguchi, N.,
331: %Nakaoji, T., Nagae, K., Shimada, S., Takeyama, N., \& Yamamuro, T.
332: 2007, Sol. Phys., submitted
333:
334: \bibitem[Tanaka 1991]{tan91}
335: Tanaka, K. 1991, Sol. Phys., 136, 133
336:
337: \bibitem[Tandberg-Hanssen and Malville 1974]{tan74}
338: Tandberg-Hanssen, E., \& Malville, J. M. 1974, Sol. Phys., 39, 107
339:
340: \bibitem[Tandberg-Hanssen 1995]{tan95}
341: Tandberg-Hanssen, E. 1995, The Nature of Solar Prominences (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
342:
343: \bibitem[Tsuneta et al. 2007]{tsu07}
344: Tsuneta, S., et al.
345: %Suematsu, Y., Ichimoto, K., Shimizu, T., Otsubo, M., Nagata, S., Katsukawa, Y.,
346: %Title, A., Tarbell, T., Shine, R., Rosenberg, B., Hoffmann, C., Jurcevich, B., Levay, M.,
347: %Lites, B., Elmore, D., Matsushita, T., Kawaguchi, N., Mikami, I., Shimada, S., Hill, L., \& Owens, J.
348: 2007, preprint (arXiv:0711.1715)
349:
350: \bibitem[van Ballegooijen and Martens 1989]{vba89}
351: van Ballegooijen, A. A., \& Martens, P. C. H. 1989, ApJ, 343, 971
352:
353: \bibitem[van Ballegooijen and Martens 1990]{vba90}
354: ---------. 1990, ApJ, 361, 283
355:
356: \bibitem[Wiehr and Stellmacher 1991]{wie91}
357: Wiehr, E., \& Stellmacher, G. 1991, A\& A, 247, 379
358:
359: \bibitem[Zhang and Low 2005]{Zha05}
360: Zhang, M., \& Low, B. C. 2005, ARAA, 43, 103
361:
362:
363: %\bibitem[Yokoyama et al. 2007]{yok07}
364: %Yokoyama, T., et al. 2007, in preparation
365:
366:
367:
368:
369: \end{thebibliography}
370:
371:
372:
373: \begin{figure}
374: \epsscale{1.0}
375: %\epsscale{1.0}
376: \rotatebox{90}{
377: \plotone{f2.eps}
378: }
379: \caption{Time series of SP data. Panel ({\it b4}) is the same as the area indicated by the black solid box in Figure \ref{fig1}.
380: The field of view is 32''$\times$19'' (23,000 km$\times$14,000 km).
381: The scanning time is about six minutes in these small regions and the middle time is displayed at the top of each column.
382: ({\it a1--a6}) Continuum images.
383: ({\it b1--b6}) Magnetograms: Same as Figure \ref{fig1}{\it b}.
384: ({\it c1--c6}) Dopplergrams: Red (blue) indicates redshift (blueshift). Black lines are the same as those of {\it b1--b6}.
385: ({\it d1--d6}) Angles between the PIL and the orientations of horizontal magnetic fields: Positive (negative) means ``normal (inverse) polarity''.
386: ({\it e1--e6}) Schematic interpretation of our observations: The red (blue) region indicates the plage (sunspot side) on the photosphere. The white tube is a helical flux rope.
387: The yellow line shows a magnetic field line on the surface of the flux tube.
388: Black arrows indicate the orientation of horizontal magnetic fields of this rope crossing with the photosphere.
389: }
390: \label{fig2}
391: \end{figure}
392:
393:
394:
395: \end{document}
396: