1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3:
4:
5: \shortauthors{L. \ Bouchet et al.}
6: \shorttitle
7: { \textit{INTEGRAL} SPI all-sky view}
8:
9:
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13:
14:
15: \title{\textit{INTEGRAL} SPI all-sky view in soft $\gamma$ -rays:
16: Study of point source and Galactic diffuse emissions\footnote{
17: Based on observations with INTEGRAL, an ESA project with instruments and science data centre
18: funded by ESA member states (especially the PI countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy,
19: Spain, and Switzerland), Czech Republic and Poland with participation of Russia and USA.} }
20:
21: \author{L. Bouchet, E.Jourdain, J.P.Roques}
22: \affil{CESR--CNRS, 9 Av. du Colonel Roche, 31028 Toulouse Cedex~04, France}
23:
24: \author{A. Strong, R. Diehl}
25: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1603, 85740 Garching, Germany}
26: \and
27:
28: \author{F. Lebrun, R. Terrier}
29: \affil{DSM/DAPNIA/SAp, CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France}
30: \affil{APC, UMR 7164, 10 rue A. Domon et L. Duquet, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France}
31:
32: \author{\it Received ; accepted }
33:
34:
35:
36:
37:
38: %\altaffiltext{2}{{\it To whom proofs and offprint requests should be sent}
39: %\email{bouchet@cesr.fr}}
40:
41:
42:
43:
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46:
47: We have processed the data accumulated with \textit{INTEGRAL} SPI during 4 years ($\sim$ 51 Ms)
48: to study the Galactic ``diffuse'' emission morphology in the 20 keV to 8 MeV energy range.
49: To achieve this objective, we have derived simultaneously an all-sky census of emitting sources and images
50: of the Galactic Ridge (GR) emission.
51: In the central radian, the resolved point source emission amounts to 88\%, 91\% and 68\% of the total emission in the
52: 25-50, 50-100 and 100-300 keV domains respectively.
53: We have compared the GR emission spatial distribution to those obtained from CO and NIR maps,
54: and quantified our results through latitude and longitude profiles. Below 50 keV, the SPI data
55: are better traced by the latter, supporting a stellar origin for this emission.
56: Furthermore, we found that the GR emission spectrum follows a power law with a photon index $\sim$
57: 1.55 above 50 keV while an additional component is required below this energy. This component
58: shows a cutoff around 30 keV, reinforcing a stellar origin, as proposed by Krivonos et al. (2007).\\
59: %that this emission is produced by an unresolved population of accreting magnetic white dwarfs,
60: %polar caps and intermediate polar caps.
61: %To investigate further the role of undetected sources, we have built Log~N - Log~F curves in the
62: %Galactic Ridge region and estimate their potential contribution to what we ascribe to the "diffuse" emission.
63: The annihilation diffuse emission component is extracted simultaneously,
64: leading to the determination of the related parameters (positronium flux and fraction).
65: A specific discussion is devoted to the annihilation line distribution since a significant emission
66: is detected over a region as large as $\sim 80^\circ$ by $\sim 10^\circ$ potentially
67: associated with the disk or halo surrounding the central regions of our Galaxy.
68:
69:
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \keywords{Galaxy: general--- Galaxy: structure --- gamma rays: observations
73: --- surveys --- (ISM): cosmic rays --- ISM:general}
74:
75:
76: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
77: \section{Introduction}
78: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
79:
80: The soft $\gamma$-ray GR Emission ($>$ 20 keV) has been previously studied essentially with
81: the CGRO and GRANAT missions (Purcell et al., 1996, Skibo et al., 1997, Kinzer, Purcell \& Kurfess, 1999).
82: The main conclusion was that point sources explain at least 50 \% of the total emission up to
83: $\sim$ ~200 keV, allowing the possibility to anticipate that unresolved sources
84: could explain a major part of what was seen as ``diffuse continuum emission''.
85: Soon after its launch, first INTEGRAL results indicated
86: that the GR diffuse emission is less than 15 \% of the total in the 20-200 keV domain (Lebrun et al., 2004,
87: Terrier et al., 2004, Strong et al., 2005, Bouchet et al., 2005).
88: In more recent works, Revnivtsev et al. (2006), with RXTE~PCA data, and Krivonos et al. (2007), using the data
89: collected with the \textit{INTEGRAL} IBIS telescope, suggest that the GRXE (Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission)
90: between 3 and $\sim$ 60 keV is explained in terms of sources belonging to the population of accreting white dwarfs
91: binaries. \\
92: In a previous paper using one year of SPI data (Bouchet et al., 2005, hereafter paper I),
93: we had used Galactic tracer morphologies
94: to extract the spectrum of the diffuse continuum emission as well as that of the positronium/annihilation
95: in the central radian of our Galaxy. We thus derived the relative contributions of these emissions along with
96: that of the point source emission to the total Galactic emission. In this paper,
97: we present a global view of the soft $\gamma$-ray sky emission based on a larger amount of data
98: covering the whole sky and perform an imaging analysis of the diffuse component,
99: with an estimate of its spectrum between 20 keV and 8 MeV.
100:
101: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
102: \section{Instrument and Observations}
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104:
105: The ESA's INTEGRAL (INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory) observatory
106: was launched from Baikonour, Kazakhstan, on 2002 October 17.
107: The spectrometer SPI (Vedrenne et al., 2003) observes the sky in the 20 keV - 8 MeV energy range
108: with an energy resolution ranging from 2 to 8 keV. It consists in an array of 19
109: high purity Germanium (Ge) detectors operating at 85 K. Its geometrical surface is 508 cm$^{2}$
110: with a thickness of 7 cm. In addition to its spectroscopic capability, SPI can
111: image the sky with a spatial resolution of $2.6^\circ$ (FWHM ) over a field
112: of view of $30^\circ$, thanks to a coded mask located 1.7 m above the detection plane.
113: Despite such a modest angular resolution, it is possible to locate intense sources with
114: an accuracy of few arc minutes (Dubath et al., 2005).
115: The assembly is surrounded by a 5-cm thick BGO shield which stops and measures the flux of particles arriving
116: from outside the FoV.
117: The instrument in-fligh performance is given in Roques et al. (2003). \\
118: Due to the small number of detectors, SPI imaging capability relies on a specific observational strategy,
119: based on a dithering procedure (Jensen et al., 2003):
120: the pointing direction varies around the target by steps of $2^\circ$ within
121: a $5 \times 5$ square or a 7-point hexagonal pattern. In general, a pointing lasts 40 minutes,
122: and along its 3-day orbit, INTEGRAL can be operated $\sim 85\%$ of the time outside the radiation belts.
123:
124: We have analysed observations recorded from 2002, February to 2006 May,
125: covering the entire sky (Fig.~\ref{fig:expo}). The central region of the
126: Galaxy, within $-50^\circ$ $\leq$ l $\leq$ $50^\circ$, $-25^\circ$ $\leq$ b $\leq$
127: $25^\circ$, is thus particularly well scanned.
128:
129: Data polluted by solar flares and radiation belt entries are excluded.
130: After image analysis and cleaning, we obtained
131: 51$\times$10$^6$ seconds of effective observing time.
132:
133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
134: \section{Technical considerations and algorithm descriptions}
135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
136:
137: The analysis method used in this paper is similar to the one described in our 'paper I',
138: with some significant enhancements however.
139: We first summarize the analysis method basics, consisting of an iterative procedure between
140: source position determination (with SPIROS) and flux extraction (with Time-Model-Fit) steps.
141:
142:
143: - Source catalogues are iteratively produced using the SPIROS software
144: (Skinner \& Connell, 2003), in several
145: energy bands.\\
146: An iterative search is performed for point sources, starting from the strongest one identified,
147: and successively adding weaker ones in successive iterations. Each time a source is found in
148: a search of trial positions on the sky, it is added to a working source catalogue, and then used
149: as baseline knowledge for the next source search in the following iteration. \\
150: In order to avoid unnecessary artifacts from spatial-resolution limits of our instrument, for
151: each newly-found source an identification step is introduced, and, for sufficient proximity, the
152: (more accurate) position of the identified source is used instead. \\
153: In crowded regions, due to the
154: 2.6$^\circ$ SPI angular resolution, the brightest sources are considered as
155: representative of the local emissions.
156: For the central degree of the Galaxy
157: good fits have been obtained in paper I, considering 1E 1740-2942.7 only.
158: The better statistic of our new set of data
159: requires a more complex description of this region. Thus two other (softer) sources
160: have been considered below 200 keV, tentatively identified with SLX 1744-299 and IGR J17475-2822.\\
161:
162: - Using the SPIROS output catalogues, source fluxes and diffuse emission intensity distribution
163: are derived with Time-Model-Fit (see Paper I) algorithm.\\
164: Time-model-fit algorithm is a model fitting procedure based on the
165: likelihood/$\chi^2$ statistics.
166: We thus model the sky successively with a set of three models for the large-scale diffuse and
167: extended emission plus the sources accumulated in the search, allowing for intensity variations
168: down to the time scale of individual pointings ($\sim$ 2000 sec) for the brightest point sources as well as
169: for background. This latter high variability time scale is not needed normally, in particular
170: our background rates are usually quite stable; but for cases such as solar flare events this
171: flexibility has proven useful.
172: For each energy band, the Time-model-fit algorithm determines
173: the (time dependent) flux normalisation for point sources, extended emissions and
174: background. Diffuse components and strong variable sources
175: contributions are then subtracted from the data to produce a "corrected" data set
176: used as SPIROS input for the next iteration.\\
177: With such flexibility, and simultaneous analysis of more than four years of data, the number
178: of free parameters in such fitting approach can easily grow out of hand. Major
179: improvements have been carried out, therefore:
180: \begin{itemize}
181: \item The matrix associated with the imaging transfer function is sparse with only a few percents
182: of non-zero elements. We take advantage of this property by minimizing the storage and
183: speeding-up the numerous matrix-vector operations through a Compressed Column Storage scheme (Duff et al. 1989).
184: In addition, the transfer function related to a variable source exhibits a peculiar structure which allows
185: a direct inversion of a part of the matrix. Thanks to these optimisations the algorithm is able to
186: handle many more observations together with more free parameters e.g. for source variability.
187: \item The background determination has been refined:
188: We decompose background variability to global intensity variation and into the pattern of rates
189: among the 19 detectors of our camera. We retain freedom of variability for global background
190: intensity as described above, and allow the general background count rate pattern in the SPI
191: camera to vary on a much more restrictive time scale (on the order of months). We find that
192: over 6 months of data, no pattern variations are noticeable. With this compromise
193: of allowing high variability for intensity parameters of model components, and modest
194: variability allowance for the background pattern, we obtain adequate fits to our measurements
195: with a minimum number of parameters.
196: \item The total energy redistribution matrix is included for the final flux extraction,
197: with the proper spectral shape taken into account for each source and diffuse component.
198: \item The algorithm is able to handle a sky described by cells of various sizes whose intensities
199: are determined together with the other parameters. The use of "large" cells is suitable to
200: gather flux from diffuse emissions in a model independent way.
201: \end{itemize}
202:
203: This hybrid reconstruction algorithm takes the best of methods to map point source and extended emissions
204: simultaneously .
205: It is the basis for the results presented in this paper.\\
206:
207:
208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
209: \section{Mapping the sky}
210: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
211: The GR emission is difficult to measure since
212: its surface brightness and its signal-to-noise ratio are low.
213: Moreover, as the distribution of a population of weak unresolved
214: point sources formally mimics an extended structure, the goal of any diffuse emission study
215: consists in estimating always better the source component
216: in order to derive upper limits for the GR emission.\\
217: In paper I, the small amount of data, covering only the central radian of the Galaxy, justified the
218: global model-fitting approach to estimate the different contributions :
219: The GR Emission was tentatively described with a CO map while the annihilation process (511 keV line and
220: positronium continuum) was modeled by an azimuthally symmetric Gaussian of $8^\circ$ FWHM (following previous
221: works by Kn\"odlseder et al., 2005).\\
222: In this paper, we attempt to estimate a model-independent GR emission morphology, by extracting
223: local fluxes without spatial model.
224: For this, the sky will be represented by "large" cells of fixed sizes (tested values range from $2^\circ$ to $16^\circ$)
225: whose intensities are fitted to the data through the likelihood maximisation method, together with the ponctual
226: sources ones. \\
227: This represents the best trade off between a priori (model dependent) information introduced
228: in the model-fitting algorithm (positions of a catalog of known sources plus variability timescale of each source)
229: and model independent results (fluxes of sources and of cells of the extended emission).
230: \\
231: The first step consists thus to build a catalog of individual sources as complete as possible, following the
232: procedure used in Paper I. Then, large cells are added in the convergence process to obtain the
233: diffuse emission distribution.
234:
235:
236:
237: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
238: \subsection{Source catalogue}
239: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
240: We used the method described in paper I to generate source catalogues: the SPIROS software delivered in the
241: INTEGRAL OSA (Off-line Scientific Analysis) package is used iteratively in conjunction with our hybrid algorithm.
242: The latter calculates variable source flux contributions using Galactic tracers models
243: for spatial morphologies of the interstellar emissions (8$^\circ$ axisymmetric Gaussian for the annihilation emission,
244: DIRBE 4.9~$\mu$
245: and CO maps for the GR continuum below and above 120 keV respectively),for which
246: a normalisation factor is adjusted during the fitting process. The extended emission and variable point source
247: contributions are then removed from the data set provided to SPIROS for the next iteration.\\
248: It should be noted that the point source fluxes remain the same (within error bars) whatever the GR continuum
249: distribution model is used (CO or DIRBE), as expected given the low surface brightness of this component.
250:
251: As explained in paper I, to minimize the error bars (maximize the signal-to-noise ratios), we need to
252: describe the sky with a minimum number of free parameters. We thus define a sky model for
253: each of the energy bands.
254: In practice, 12 sources (marked with '*' in table I) have been considered as variable for the
255: 25-50 keV band. Above 50 keV, the reduced $\chi^2$ being sufficiently close to 1, only Cyg X-1 is set variable up to 200 keV.\\
256:
257: Figure~\ref{fig:maps} displays the resulting sky images sum of point sources and ``diffuse'' components in different energy
258: bands and illustrates their evolution. At low energy, the sky emission is dominated by
259: sources while a "diffuse/extended" structure appears above 200-300 keV, in a domain
260: corresponding to the annihilation radiation.
261: %, as illustrated in the 4th panel of Figure~\ref{fig:maps}.
262: %This image has been built in a narrow band around 511 keV without the a priori 8$^\circ$ axisymmetric
263: % Gaussian distribution in order to reveal the emission spatial distribution straightly from the data. In
264: %this 10 keV wide band, source contribution is less than 10\% while the annihilation
265: % processus lights up the central regions of our Galaxy.
266: We will come back to it in the next section, dedicated to the diffuse emissions.
267: Above 511 keV, sources again dominate the sky emission.
268:
269: The resulting catalogues contain 173, 79, 30 and 12 sources detected
270: above $\sim 3.5 \sigma $ in the 25-50 keV and the 50-100 keV bands and above $\sim 2.5 \sigma$ in the 100-200 keV and 200-600 keV
271: ones
272: (see Table I).
273: All of them except one are associated (within 1$^\circ$) with at least one IBIS source (Bird et al., 2006).
274:
275: Above 600 keV only the Crab Nebula, Cyg X-1, GRS1915+115 and GRS1758-258 are detected, the 2 former being
276: still emitting above 2 MeV.
277:
278:
279: Note that the reported fluxes are four years averaged values, and that this analysis is not
280: optimised for any particular source, since all data are adjusted simultaneously. An individual source analysis should be
281: based on a restricted number of exposures, selected on the basis of the pointing direction (typically less
282: than $\sim 12^\circ$ relatively to the source direction), and requires a detailed study of the source
283: time evolution.
284:
285: %XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
286: % VERIFIER SI C'EST UTILE
287: % (mis dans les improvements)
288:
289: %Once the final catalog realised, a last step has been included to take into account the off-diagonal
290: %terms of the energy redistribution matrix (position search and flux extraction have been
291: %performed using only the photopeak efficiency).
292: %For each source, the complete projected pattern (taken into account Aperture Response Function and total energy
293: %Redistribution Matrix Function) has been calculated and a last run performed to obtain final
294: %fluxes.
295:
296: %XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
297:
298:
299:
300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
301: \subsection{GR Diffuse emission}
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303:
304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
305: \subsubsection{morphology}
306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
307: Once the contribution of the individual sources has been independently estimated, we can
308: study the unresolved component.
309: The a priori information will thus now be introduced in the source terms.
310: To determine the spatial distribution of the Galactic Ridge emission, we have considered the region
311: $|l|<100 ^\circ$, $|b|<20^\circ$ and divided it into cells of size $\delta l = 16^\circ$ x
312: $\delta b = 2.6 ^\circ$, the 511 keV line case being treated apart.
313: These cell or pixel sizes have been chosen a posteriori to optimize the signal-to-noise
314: ratio per cell while being sufficiently small to follow the observed spatial variations.
315: We use the a priori information on the source positions obtained in the previous step, whereas
316: the ``diffuse'' pixel cells, sources and background intensities are to be fitted to the data.
317: The number of unknowns is high but reasonable
318: compared to the data and the problem is easily tractable by a simple likelihood optimisation to
319: determine all the corresponding intensities and error bars.
320:
321: Figure~\ref{fig:diffuse} displays the images obtained through this method for the ``diffuse''
322: component(s) in different energy bands. The last one contains the $^{26}$Al 1.8 MeV line
323: but it is clear that its contribution to the large band flux is quite negligible.
324: %The spatial extension seems to evolve with energy,
325: %particularly above 1 MeV, where the broader distribution could be related to an emission mecanism
326: %of different nature.
327:
328: To quantify more easily the behavior of the diffuse emission, we present our results in terms of
329: longitude and latitude profiles (figures~\ref{fig:profilong} and ~\ref{fig:profilat}). They have been built
330: by integrating the flux measured for $|b|<6.5^\circ$ or $|l|<24 ^\circ$, in longitude
331: and latitude bins respectively. We can then compare them to those obtained from CO (Dame et al. 2001) and
332: NIR Dirbe 4.9~$\mu$ corrected from reddening (http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov) maps.
333:
334: Both models agree grossly with SPI longitude profiles, showing a slowly decreasing intensity
335: of the GR emission toward high longitudes.
336: \\
337: The latitude profiles are not so similar:
338: Up to $\sim$ 100 keV, the GR high energy and NIR emissions
339: seem to be concentrated in a region slightly more
340: extended than the CO one. This is supported by calculating a $\chi^2$ between the resulting sky images
341: and the proposed models. We obtained $\chi^2$ values
342: of 74 and 86 (37 dof) in the 25-50 keV energy band, while in the 50-100
343: keV energy band, chisquare values are of 50 and 53 for DIRBE and CO maps, respectively.
344: This fits in with the current understanding of
345: a stellar origin for the GR emission in the X ray domain ($<50$ keV) proposed by Krivonos et al. (2007).
346: However, at energies below ~50 keV, systematic effects from instrumental properties and/or variability
347: of the sources provides limitations to fit quality.
348: \\
349:
350: The signal to noise ratio has a mininum in the 600~keV-1.5~MeV domain, prohibiting any serious analysis
351: but at high energies ($>$ 1.8 MeV), the SPI data analysis shows clearly that the diffuse emission is detected up to
352: several MeV. All the compared spatial distributions are here compatible but
353: the expectation is that the high energy GR diffuse emission coincides with the CO regions, where CR
354: interact.\\
355:
356: A deeper analysis has been performed for the annihilation line emission morphology.
357: A 505-516 keV sky map has been built using cells of size
358: $\delta l = 5^\circ$ x $\delta b = 5^\circ$ (fig.~\ref{fig:511map}).
359: In this narrow energy range, the emission is almost entirely due to
360: the annihilation line, the contribution of the other components being negligible. The emission
361: profiles (figures~\ref{fig:profilong511} and ~\ref{fig:profilat511}) are peaked towards
362: the Galactic Centre. This structure, corresponding to the bulge, has been modeled with an
363: axisymmetric Gaussian of 8.0$^\circ \pm 0.9^\circ$
364: in good agreement with previous \textit{INTEGRAL} SPI
365: results (e. g. Kn\"odlseder et al. (2005)).
366: However, the map together with the profiles suggest that the emission is not limited
367: to that structure but
368: exhibits an additional extented component revealed by the long exposure.
369:
370:
371: To quantify this result, we attempted to describe the extended spatial distribution superimposed
372: to the central bulge, with various models. Simple geomerical shapes (ie two-dimensional
373: Gaussians) have been tested as well as maps obtained in other wavelengthes (CO and DIRBE
374: maps). The best results are obtained with NIR data (more precisely the 3.5 to
375: 240~$\mu$ maps, too close to be differentiated in these tests) which, independently, happen
376: to be good tracers of the $^{26}Al$ line emission (Kn\"odlseder et al., 1999).\\
377: For a sky model consisting of the
378: 240~$\mu$ map plus a 8$^\circ$ axisymmetric Gaussian, we obtain fluxes of
379: $1.7\pm 0.3 \times 10^{-3} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$, in the extended structure
380: and $ 0.87 \pm 0.06 \times 10^{-3} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$ in the central one.
381: Even though it is difficult to describe the emission in more detail, this represents a good indication
382: for a bulge/disk structure.\\
383: % Coming back to the central bulge emission, we also tested several possibilities
384: % (one or two Gaussians
385: %of varying widths, centered on (l=0$^\circ$, b=0$^\circ$))
386: %and come to the conclusion that
387: %the best adjustment is obtained with two Gaussians
388: %of FWHM 3.0 $^\circ$ and 10.4 $^\circ$ with fluxes of $ 2.0 \pm 0.5 \times 10^{-4} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$ and
389: %$ 7.7 \pm 0.7 \times 10^{-4} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$ respectively.
390: %In this configuration, the extended emission (with the 240~$\mu$ map distribution) gathers
391: %$ 1.7 \pm 0.33 \times 10^{-3} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$.
392: % We point out here the probable
393: %complexity of the bulge geometry and a precise study of its morphology would require
394: %a specific analysis.
395: Coming back to the central bulge emission, we also tested several possibilities
396: as we suspect a geometry more complex than a single axisymetric gaussian.
397: A precise study of its morphology would require a specific analysis, but first investigations
398: show that the fluxes corresponding to each structure vary within the error bars.
399:
400:
401: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
402: \subsubsection{Central radian Spectrum}
403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
404:
405: The spectral shape of the diffuse continuum remains of prime importance to determine its origin.
406: As this emission is concentrated in the central regions, the spectral analysis has been restricted
407: to the Galactic central radian ($|l| < 30^\circ$ and $|b| < 15^\circ$).\\
408: The ``diffuse'' continuum spectrum shown in fig~\ref{fig:spectrum} has been extracted assuming a
409: NIR 4.9~$\mu$ spatial distribution (up to 120 keV) and a CO map (above 120 keV) and fitted with 3 components.
410: \begin{itemize}
411: \item The diffuse spectrum (apart from positronium) is fitted by a power law of index $1.55 \pm 0.25$, with
412: a 100 keV flux of $4.8 \pm 0.6 \times 10^{-5} ~ photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~keV^{-1}$.
413: \item The additional component below $\sim$ 50 keV presents a curved shape, which can be modeled by a
414: power law of index fixed to 0 with an exponential cutoff at $7.5 \pm 1 $ keV and a 50 keV flux of
415: $6.6 \pm 0.5 \times 10^{-5} ~ photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~keV^{-1}$. These parameters differ from those
416: derived in Paper I, since many more sources have been identified, and thus removed
417: from 'diffuse" component. This remaining "diffuse" low energy component, with
418: a central radian luminosity of $\sim~ 1 \times 10^{37} erg.s^{-1}$, is likely to correspond to the population
419: of accreting magnetic white dwarfs proposed to provide a dominant contribution to the Galactic
420: X-ray emission (Krivonos el al., 2007).
421: \item The third component is due to the positronium/annihilation emission with its characteristic
422: shape. We extract it using a 8 $^\circ$ Gaussian spatial distribution and obtained
423: a 511 keV line flux of $8.68 \pm 0.61 \times 10^{-4} ~ photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$.
424: A fit to the data allows us to determine a positronium flux of $3.6 \pm 0.42 \times
425: 10^{-3} ~ photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$ corresponding to a positronium fraction (as defined by
426: Brown and Leventhal, 1987) of $F_p$ =$ 0.98 \pm 0.05$.
427: \item The 511 keV emission component reveals a disk component in addition to the well-known
428: bright bulge. We estimate a bulge-to-disk ratio of $\sim 0.5$.
429: \end{itemize}
430: Above results, synthetized in Table 2, are consistent with our results in Paper I (except for
431: the newly-found disk component at 511 keV).
432:
433:
434: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
435: \section{Sources vs diffuse emission contribution}
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437: In Fig~\ref{fig:spectrum} we compare the different contributions to the Galactic emission :
438: The total point source emission spectrum has been built by adding spectra from all sources
439: detected between $|l| < 30^\circ$ and $|b| < 15^\circ$. It can be roughly
440: described between 20 keV and 1 MeV by a power law
441: with a photon index of $2.67 $ and a flux at 50 keV of
442: $2.47 \times 10^{-3} ~ photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~keV^{-1}$.
443: The diffuse emission is represented together with its 3 components.
444:
445: >From the analysis presented above, we can deduce ratios of combined emission of detected sources to
446: the total emission
447: of 88\%, 91\% and 68\% in the 25-50, 50-100 and 100-300~keV bands respectively.
448: These values represent lower limits as a population of weak unresolved sources may be
449: confused with a diffuse emitting structure.
450:
451:
452: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
453: \section{Discussion}
454: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
455:
456: The unresolved/extended emission observed in the soft $\gamma$ -ray domain
457: comprises three separate components: The electron-positron interactions
458: are known to produce a large scale emission. In another hand,
459: an interstellar emission is expected due to high energy particles travelling
460: inside the whole galaxy. The third component has been identified more recently,
461: with a contribution exponentially decreasing above ~10 keV. We discuss each of them
462: in the following sections.
463:
464:
465: \subsection{$e{^-}/e{^+}$ interaction}
466: Between 300 and 511 keV, the annihilation process plays the major role.\\
467: We have determined a 511 keV flux of 8.7 $\pm 0.6 \times 10^{-4}~photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$
468: and
469: a positronium fraction $F_{p}$ = $0.98 \pm 0.05$.
470: Comparison with previous results is quite satisfying : for example, Kinzer et al. (2001)
471: reported a positronium fraction of $0.93 \pm 0.04$ in OSSE data, while independent
472: SPI data analyses led to $F_{p}$ = $0.94 \pm 0.06$ (Churazov et al. 2005),
473: $F_{p}$ = $0.97 \pm 0.08$ (Paper I), $F_{p}$ = $0.92 \pm 0.09$ (Weidenspointner et al., 2006) and $F_{p}$ = $0.967
474: \pm 0.022$ (Jean et al. 2006). Fluxes values are more difficult to compare as they depend
475: on the assumed spatial distribution but they range around 1~$\times 10^{-3}~photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$ in the quoted references. \\
476: Indeed, the 511 keV line emission spatial distribution
477: is essentially concentrated within the central region of the Galaxy but
478: its morphology may be more complex than the proposed axisymetric ($\sim 8^\circ$) Gaussian distribution.
479: The regions surrounding this central part contain a
480: significant flux ($\sim 1.7 \pm 0.3 \times 10^{-3} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$) which is not compatible with
481: this simple spatial distribution. As a function of longitude, this emission
482: seems to extend symetrically up to $\sim 40-50^\circ$, while in latitude, it extends $\sim 15-20^\circ$.
483: %This suggests either a more complex morphology for the 511 keV and/or an extended disk emission. In the latter case,
484: This emission could for example correspond to the disk component, as already suggested by the OSSE team (Kinzer et al. 1999).
485: Among several models, the NIR emission distributions, otherwise considered as good $^{26}Al$ tracers, reveal themselves to give the best
486: description of the SPI data in this energy domain.
487: The mentionned link with the $^{26}Al$ emission
488: leads to a straightforward interpretation: the $^{26}Al$ decay produces 1809 keV photons
489: simultaneously with positrons and thus 511 keV photons in such a way that
490:
491: $Flux(511 keV) = 0.85 \times (2-1.5 \times fp)\times Flux(1809 keV)$\\
492: where fp is a positronium fraction of the annihilation process.\\
493: Using the COMPTEL measurement F(1809 keV) = $ 7-10\times 10^{-4} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$ (Kn\"odlseder, 1999)
494: and assuming fp= 0.98, we expect a 511 keV flux of $ 3-5\times 10^{-4} photons~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$.
495: We thus conclude that ~ 20-30\% of the 511 keV flux emitted in the disk/halo structure could
496: be explained by the $^{26}Al$ decay. The remaining $\sim 75\%$ of the observed disk/halo emission
497: require another origin and will be refined by adding future observations.\\
498:
499: Previous ratio estimates of the bulge-to-disk flux ratios have been obtained
500: with OSSE/CGRO, varying from 0.2 to 3.3 depending upon whether
501: the bulge component features a halo (which leads to a large ratio) or not (Milne et al. 2000, Kinzer et al., 2001).
502: Benefiting from a more uniform Galactic plane coverage than the OSSE data, the SPI data allow to
503: better constrain this parameter.
504: Indeed, even though the bulge-to-disk flux ratio depends on the assumed bulge and disk shapes,
505: tests with several representative configurations lead to a bulge-to-disk flux ratio
506: estimation of $\sim$ 0.5.
507:
508:
509:
510:
511:
512: \subsection{The $<$ 50 keV component }
513:
514: This low energy component deserves a short discussion: it has been found to
515: follow the same spatial distribution as the NIR DIRBE 4.9 $\mu$ emission (see fig.~\ref{fig:profilat}).
516: Together with
517: the soft spectral shape, this corroborates the interpretation
518: of the Galactic ridge emission between 20 and 60 keV by Krivonos et al. (2007) in terms of a
519: population of accreting magnetic white dwarfs, which present a spectral cutoff around 30-50 keV
520: (Suleimanov et al, 2005). Our observed luminosity of $\sim$ 1 $\times$ $10^{37}~erg~s^{-1}$
521: between 20 and 60 keV in the central radian is in good agreement with the estimation of 1.23 $\pm$ 0.05
522: $\times$ $10^{37}~erg~s^{-1}$ given by Krivonos et al. (2007)
523: on the basis of the proposed model. However, it is obviously beyond the SPI capacities (and
524: objectives) to resolve this emission since the potential objects which could explain it
525: are too faint, even thought the global emission is clearly detected as a large scale distribution.\\
526:
527:
528:
529: \subsection{Interstellar emission}
530:
531: Above 50 keV, we detected an emission following a power law,
532: which joins the high energy points previously measured by \textit{CGRO} OSSE (Kinzer et al. 1999) in the MeV region
533: (fig~\ref{fig:spectreGR}). Our photon index of $\sim 1.55 \pm 0.25$ is quite compatible with the $\sim$ 1.75 value
534: reported by these authors, in the 200 keV to 10 MeV domain.
535: Krivonos et al. (2007) do not detect any Galactic Ridge Emission
536: in the ~ 60-200 keV range. The SPI measurements give marginal detections at those energies,
537: fully compatible with their upper limits, as illustrated on fig~\ref{fig:spectreGR}.
538: To go further on this point, we have to improve the determination of the source emission contribution.
539: Indeed, if the Galactic ridge emission intensity measured with our model fitting procedure depends only slightly on the
540: assumed spatial morphology, the number of sources included in the sky model can lead to different results.
541: It is clear that a population of weak sources, below the current SPI sensitivity, could contribute to
542: the detected emission.
543: % We have thus built Log~N - Log~F curves and extrapolated them
544: %toward fainter sources. Our conclusion is that if the Galactic ridge emission is really due to a large
545: %number of sources whose intensities are between 1 and $\sim$~3 mCrab, we should be able to derive
546: %constraining values in the framework of an extended INTEGRAL mission (so far confirmed
547: %until 2010), more particularly below 100 keV.
548: \\
549:
550: Still, the nature of this emission can be actually related to high energy particles.
551: At the energies of interest to SPI the main gamma-ray emission process is
552: inverse-Compton (IC) emission from
553: relativistic electrons; non-thermal bremsstrahlung is of minor importance.
554: The electrons for IC have typical energies of 1 GeV and below, and the
555: important
556: radiation fields are CMB, starlight and IR.
557: A theoretical prediction in the SPI energy range using the GALPROP model
558: (Strong \& Moskalenko, 1998; Strong et al, 2004;
559: Moskalenko et al., 2007; Strong, Moskalenko and Ptuskin, 2007)
560: can be seen in Strong et al (2005).
561: The general conclusion up to now has been that the IC component fails by a
562: factor of a few
563: to explain the observed emission.\\
564: However now in this new work, with three times as much SPI data it is
565: possible to determine the
566: non-thermal component with much greater accuracy, both because of
567: increased exposure
568: and better accounting for point sources and better handling of the
569: instrumental background.
570:
571: The result is a significantly lower intensity of the power-law component
572: than given by Strong et al (2005), where however the error bars were much larger than
573: now.
574: The result is that now there is better agreement with the IC prediction,
575: mitigating the need for other processes. In fact, the hard power law continuum
576: is now in good agreement with predictions from the GALPROP code, which takes
577: into account both cosmic-ray
578: primary electrons and secondary electrons/ positrons: the hard power law
579: continuum component can be identified with inverse Compton scattering.
580: Detailed modelling and interpretation of the data will
581: be given in Porter et al. (2007).
582:
583:
584:
585: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
586: \section{ Conclusions}
587: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
588:
589: The "diffuse emission" generic term gathers a set of various processus depending on the energy domain,
590: and making the determination of its origin rather difficult.
591: In the soft $\gamma$-ray domain, the diffuse emission represents a complex problem, as its presence is swamped
592: with the individual sources emission and difficult to disentangle.\\
593: To investigate it, we have developed an imaging algorithm dedicated to extended structures.
594: This code first determines
595: and takes into account the point sources emitting in the same energy domain,
596: allowing us to then better estimate the geometry of the regions producing diffuse emissions.\\
597: The SPI all-sky survey analysis reveals that 173 sources can be identified in the 25-50 keV with 30 of them
598: emitting a significant flux ($>$ $\sim$ 2.5 $\sigma$) above 100 keV.
599: It is clear now that the sources dominate the Galactic emission up to $\sim$ 300 keV (Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}).
600: Finally, upper limits on the diffuse emission are estimated to be one tenth of the total emission
601: below 100 keV and one third in the 100-300 keV band. \\
602:
603: The $e{^-}/e{^+}$ annihilation produces an emission which has already been the subject of many studies.
604: The main point emerging from our analysis concerns the spatial distribution of this emission since
605: a large structure, potentially associated with the Galactic disk/halo has been found to contain
606: a significant fraction of the 511 keV line total flux. While a deeper analysis is required to refine
607: this result, it is clear that the $\sim 8^\circ$ Gaussian distribution previoulsy reported
608: does not represent the complexity of the 511 keV line emission morphology.\\
609: Once the source and annihilation process contributions have been taken into account, we can
610: access to the "diffuse" Galactic emission, whose origin remains problematic.\\
611: Its morphology is of prime importance as it is thought to trace the CR electron population, observed
612: through
613: bremsstrahlung or Compton emission.
614: The \textit{INTEGRAL} SPI data allow us to investigate this particular topic,
615: and we present for the first time images of the diffuse Galactic emission up to a few MeV.\\
616: This diffuse emission is clearly detected between 50 keV and 2 MeV with a power law relatively
617: hard (photon index around 1.55), and an additional component, much steeper, required below 50 keV.\\
618: Toward high energy, the SPI spectrum joins with the OSSE and EGRET measurements. All together, they can be
619: compared to various models to understand the nature of this emission. The inverse Compton
620: interaction is a good candidate and will be investigated in a forthcoming paper.
621: Other interstellar processes have been invoked to explain the emission below 1 MeV
622: (Dogiel et al., 2002; Masai et al., 2002;
623: Schr\"oder et al., 2005).
624: In another side, unresolved point sources are the most probable origin below 50 keV (Krivonos et al., 2007)
625: and are also a possibility at higher energies as AXPs or other pulsars (see for exemple Kuiper et al. 2004;
626: Strong, 2007).
627: Observations of such sources up to a few MeV would allow to quantify their potential contribution
628: and bring a new piece to the Galactic diffuse emission riddle.
629:
630:
631:
632:
633: %\begin{acknowledgements}
634: \section*{Acknowledgments} The \textit{INTEGRAL} SPI project has been completed under the responsibility and leadership of CNES.
635: We are grateful to ASI, CEA, CNES, DLR, ESA, INTA, NASA and OSTC for support.
636:
637: AWS is supported by the German Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung,
638: Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BMBF/DLR) under contract No.
639: FKZ 50 OG 0502.
640: %\end{acknowledgements}
641:
642:
643:
644:
645:
646:
647:
648: \begin{thebibliography}{}
649:
650:
651: \bibitem[Bazzano(2006)]{Bazzano06}
652: Bazzano A., Stephen J.B., Fiocchi M. et ~al., 2006, ApJ, 649, L9
653:
654: \bibitem[Bird(2006)]{Bird06}
655: Bird A.J., Malizia A., Bazzano A. et ~al., 2006, ApJS, 170, 175
656:
657: \bibitem[Bouchet(2005)]{Bouchet05}
658: Bouchet L., Roques J. P., Mandrou P. et ~al., 2005, ApJ, 635, 1115
659: (Paper I)
660:
661: \bibitem[Brown(1987)]{Brown87}
662: Brown B. \& Leventhal M., 1987, ApJ, 319, 637
663:
664:
665: %%%%%% En plus %%%%%%%
666: %\bibitem[Cheng et al. (1997)]{Cheng97}
667: %Cheng, L. X., Leventhal, M., Smith, D. M., et al. 1997, ApJ, 481, L43
668: %%%%%% En plus %%%%%%%
669:
670:
671: \bibitem[Churazov(2005)]{Churazov2005}
672: Churazov E., Sunyaev R., Sazonov S. et~al, 2005, MNRAS, 357, 1377
673:
674: \bibitem[Dame(2201)]{Dame2001}
675: Dame T. M., Hartmann D. \& Thaddeus P., 2001, ApJ, 547, 792
676:
677: \bibitem[Dean et al.(2005)]{Dean05}
678: Dean A.J., Hill, A. B., Stephen J. B., et~al, 2005, A\&A, 443, 485
679:
680: \bibitem[Dogiel et al.(2002)]{Dogiel02}
681: Dogiel V. A., Sch\"onfelder V. and Strong, A. W., 2002, A\&A, 382,730
682:
683: \bibitem[Dubath(2005)]{Dubath05}
684: Dubath P., Kn\"odlseder J., Skinner G.K., et~al., 2005, MNRAS, 357, 420
685:
686: \bibitem[duff(1989)]{stuff89}
687: Duff I., Grimes R. and J. Lewis, Sparse matrix test problems,
688: ACM Trans. Math. Soft., 15 (1989), pp. 1-14.
689:
690: \bibitem[Jean et al.(2006)]{Jean06}
691: Jean P., , et~al., 2006, A\&A, 445, 579
692:
693:
694: \bibitem[Jensen(2003)]{Jensen03}
695: Jensen P.L., Clausen K., Cassi C., et~al., 2003, A\&A, 411, L7
696:
697: \bibitem[Kinzer et al.(1999)]{Kinzer99}
698: Kinzer R.L., Purcell W.R., Kurfess J.D. et ~al., 1999, ApJ, 515, 215
699:
700:
701: \bibitem[Kinzer(2001)]{Kinzer01}
702: Kinzer R.L., Milnes P.A., Kurfess J.D. et ~al., 2001, ApJ, 559, 282
703:
704: \bibitem[Kn\"odlseder(1999)]{kn99}
705: Kn\"odlseder J., 1999, PhD, Universit\'e P. Sabatier, Toulouse, France
706:
707: \bibitem[Kn\"odlsederetal(1999)]{kn+99}
708: Kn\"odlseder J., Bennett K., Bloemen H., et ~al., 1999, A\&A, 344, 68
709:
710:
711: \bibitem[Kn\"odlseder(2005)]{kn05}
712: Kn\"odlseder J., Pierre J., Lonjou V., et ~al., 2005, A\&A, 441, 513
713:
714: \bibitem[krivonos(2007)]{Krivonos07}
715: Krivonos R., Revnivtsev M., Churazov E. et ~al., 2007, A\&A, 463, 957
716:
717: \bibitem[kuiper et al. (2004)]{Kuiper04}
718: Kuiper, L., Hermsen W. and Mendez M., 2004, ApJ, 613, 1173
719:
720: \bibitem[Lebrun(2004)]{Lebrun04}
721: Lebrun F., Terrier R., Bazzano A. et~al., 2004, Nature, 428, 293
722:
723: \bibitem[Masai et al. (2002) ]{Masai02}
724: Masai K., Dogiel V. A., Inoue H. et al., 2002, ApJ, 581, 1071
725:
726: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% En plus %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
727:
728: \bibitem[Mile et al. (2000) ] {Milne00}
729: Milne, P. A., Kurfess, J. D., Kinzer et al., 2000, AIP Conf. Proc., 510, 211
730:
731: %\bibitem[Mile et al. (2004) ] {Milne04}
732: %Milne, P. A. 2004, New Astron. Rev., 48, 93
733:
734: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% En plus %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
735:
736: %\bibitem[Moskalenko(1998)]{mos98}
737: %Moskalenko I. \& Strong A.W., 1998, ApJ, 493, 694
738:
739: \bibitem[Moska(2007)]{Moska07}
740: Moskalenko I. V. et al., 2007, AIP Conf Proc 921, 490
741:
742: \bibitem[Porter et al. 07]{Porter96}
743: Porter T.A., Moskalenko I. V., Strong A. W., Orlando E. and Bouchet L., 2007, ApJ, submitted
744:
745: \bibitem[Purcell96]{Purcell96}
746: Purcell W.R., Bouchet L., Johnson W.N. et~al., 1996, A\&AS, 120, 389
747:
748: \bibitem[Revnivtsev(2006)]{Revnivtsev06}
749: Revnivtsev M., Sazonov S., Gilfanov M. et ~al., 2006, A\&A, 452, 169
750:
751: \bibitem[Roques(2003)]{Roques03}
752: Roques J.P., Schanne S., Von Kienlin A., et~al, 2003, A\&A, 411, L91
753:
754: \bibitem[Schroder(2005)]{Schroder05}
755: Schr\"oder R., Schlickeiser R. and Strong A. W., 2005. A\&A, 442, L45
756:
757: %\bibitem[Skibo(1997)]{Skibo97}
758: %Skibo J.G, 1997, Proceedings 2nd INTEGRAL workshop 'The Transparent Universe', St Malo, France, ESA SP-382, 555
759:
760: \bibitem[Skibo97]{Skibo97}
761: Skibo J. G., Johnson W. N., Kurfess J. D. et ~al., 1997, ApJ, 483, L95
762:
763: \bibitem[SkinnerPaul(2003)]{SkinnerPaul03}
764: Skinner G. \& Connell P., 2003, A\&A, 411, L123
765:
766: \bibitem[Strong+(1998)]{Strong+1998}
767: Strong A. W. \& Moskalenko I. V., 1998, ApJ, 509, 212
768:
769: \bibitem[Strong+(2004)]{Strong+04}
770: Strong A. W., Moskalenko I. V. and Reimer O., 2004, ApJ 613, 962
771:
772: \bibitem[Strong+(2005)]{Strong+05}
773: Strong A. W., Diehl R., Halloin H. et ~al., 2005, A\&A, 444, 495
774:
775: \bibitem[Strong(2007)]{Strong07}
776: Strong A. W., 2007, Astrophysics and Space Science, 309, 35
777: Proceedings of Conference 'The multi-messenger approach to high-energy
778: gamma-ray sources', Barcelona, 2006. astro-ph/0609359v3
779:
780: \bibitem[Strong+(2007)]{Strong+07}
781: Strong A. W., Moskalenko I. V. and Ptuskin V. S., 2007, Ann. Rev. Nuc. Part. Sci. 57, 285
782:
783: \bibitem[Suleimanov(2005)]{Sulei05}
784: Suleimanov V., Revnivtsev M., \& Ritter H., 2005, A\&A, 435, 191
785:
786: \bibitem[Terrier et al.(2004)]{terrier04}
787: Terrier R., Lebrun F., Belanger G. et al., 2004, Proc. 5th INTEGRAL Workshop, ESA SP-552, p513; astro-ph/0405207
788:
789: \bibitem[Vedrenne(2003)]{Vedrenne03}
790: Vedrenne G., Roques J.P., Schonfelder V., et~al, 2003, A\&A, 411, L63
791:
792: \bibitem[Weidenspointner2006]{Weidenspointner06}
793: Weidenspointner G., Kn\"odlseder J., Pierre J. et al, 2006, A\&A, 450, 1013
794: \end{thebibliography}
795:
796: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
797: %%%%%%%%%% Figures
798: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
799: \clearpage
800: \begin{figure}%1
801:
802:
803: \plotone{f1.eps}
804: \caption{25-50 keV \textit{INTEGRAL} SPI exposure map. Units are in cm$^2$ s. This map takes into account the differential sensitivity of SPI accross its
805: field of view.}
806: \label{fig:expo}
807: \end{figure}
808:
809: \newpage
810:
811: \clearpage
812: \begin{figure}%2
813:
814:
815: \includegraphics[width=18 cm,height=22cm]{f2.eps}
816: \caption{Sky-maps in the 25-50 keV (top-left), 50-100 keV (top-right),
817: 100-200 keV (bottom-left) and 200-600 (bottom-right) energy bands.
818: The images are scaled logarithmically with a rainbow color map
819: (the scale of colors ranges from black (weakest intensity) to red (strongest intensity)).
820: The scale is saturated to reveal the weakest sources. There are some systematics
821: due to strong variable sources such as Cyg X-1 combined with the finite
822: precision of SPI response, especially in the 25-50 keV band. We take into
823: account this systematic by using a higher threshold in this domain.}
824: \label{fig:maps}
825: \end{figure}
826: \clearpage
827:
828: \newpage
829: \newpage
830: \begin{figure}%3
831: \includegraphics[width=14 cm,height=18 cm]{f3.eps}
832: \caption{Diffuse emission morphology in different energy bands (significance maps):
833: 25-50 keV, 50-100 keV, 100-200 keV, 200-600 keV and 1.8-7.8 MeV from up to bottom.
834: %Note that for the last image (E $>$1.8 MeV), the latitude scale is larger.
835: }
836: \label{fig:diffuse}
837:
838: \end{figure}
839: \newpage
840:
841:
842: \begin{figure}%4
843: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,height=17.0cm]{f4.eps}
844: \caption{Longitude profiles in different energy bands for $|$b$|$ $\leq$ $6.5^\circ$
845: (except for the last band).
846: Dotted and dashed lines correspond respectively to the NIR 4.9 $\mu$ and CO maps.
847: For the 200-600 keV band, the annihilation contribution ($8^circ$gaussian distribution)
848: is represented by the solide line.}
849: \label{fig:profilong}
850: \end{figure}
851:
852: \begin{figure}%5
853: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,height=17.0cm]{f5.eps}
854: \caption{Latitude profiles in different energy bands for $|$l$|$ $\leq$ $24^\circ$
855: (except for the last band).
856: Dotted and dashed lines correspond respectively to the NIR 4.9 $\mu$ and CO maps.
857: For the 200-600 keV band, the annihilation contribution ($8^circ$gaussian distribution)
858: is represented by the solide line.}
859: \label{fig:profilat}
860: \end{figure}
861:
862: \newpage
863: \begin{figure}%6
864: \includegraphics[width=18 cm,height=5 cm]{f6.eps}
865:
866: \caption{map of the significance of the 511 keV line emission
867: }
868: \label{fig:511map}
869: \end{figure}
870:
871:
872:
873: \begin{figure}%7
874: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,height=4.0cm]{f7.eps}
875: \caption{Longitude profile in the 511 keV line for $|$b$|$ $\leq$ $8^\circ$.
876: Dotted-dashed line corresponds to a $8^\circ$ axisymetric Gaussian. Dotted line corresponds
877: to the extended distribution (240 $\mu$ map model). The sum of both has been integrated
878: on the same bins as the data (histogram) to compare to them.}
879: \label{fig:profilong511}
880: \end{figure}
881:
882: \begin{figure}%8
883: \includegraphics[width=8.8cm,height=4.0cm]{f8.eps}
884:
885: \caption{Latitude profile in the 511 keV line for $|$l$|$ $\leq$ $8^\circ$.
886: Dotted-dashed line corresponds to a $8^\circ$ axisymetric Gaussian. Dotted line corresponds
887: to the extended distribution (240 $\mu$ map model). The sum of both has been integrated
888: on the same bins as the data (histogram) to compare to them.}
889: \label{fig:profilat511}
890: \end{figure}
891:
892: \begin{figure}%9
893: \plotone{f9.eps}
894: \caption{Spectra of the different emission components in the central radian of the Galaxy,
895: for $|$l$|$ $\leq$ $30^\circ$ and $|$b$|$ $\leq$ $15^\circ$: Sum of sources (stars),
896: annihilation spectrum (long dashed line) and
897: total ``diffuse'' emission (solid line). ``Diffuse'' contiunuum components are described by a power law (dotted line)
898: and power law plus exponential cutoff (dashed line).}
899: \label{fig:spectrum}
900: \end{figure}
901: \newpage
902:
903: \newpage
904: \begin{figure}%10
905: %\plotone{f10.ps}
906: \plotone{f10.eps}
907: \caption{SPI all sky diffuse emission spectrum (triangles) compared to the broad band spectrum compiled by Krivonos et al. (2007).
908: Small diamonds are \textit{RXTE} PCA ($<$17 keV) and \textit{INTEGRAL} IBIS ($>$17 keV) data, the big ones \textit{CGRO} OSSE \& EGRET data.
909: The dotted line represent the SPI Galactic Ridge emission best fit.}
910: \label{fig:spectreGR}
911: \end{figure}
912: \newpage
913:
914: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
915: %%%% Table 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
916: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
917: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}%1
918: \tablewidth{0pt}
919: \tablecaption{Sources catalogue }
920:
921: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
922: \tablehead{
923: \colhead{Name}
924: &\colhead{l}
925: &\colhead{b}
926: &\colhead{25 - 50 keV}
927: &\colhead{50 - 100 keV}
928: &\colhead{100 - 200 keV}
929: &\colhead{200 - 600 keV} \\
930: %&\colhead{~}
931: &\colhead{deg}
932: &\colhead{deg}
933: &\colhead{mCrab}
934: &\colhead{mCrab}
935: &\colhead{mCrab}
936: &\colhead{mCrab} }
937: \startdata
938: A0535+26$^{*}$ & 181.45 & -2.6 & 78.4 $\pm$ 1.3 & 33.6 $\pm$ 2.0 & $<$ 3.9 & \\
939: Crab & 184.55 & -5.8 & 1000.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 1000.0 $\pm$ 1.9 & 1000.0 $\pm$ 3.7 & 1000.0 $\pm$ 8.3 \\
940: 4U~0614+091 & 200.87 & -3.4 & 21.1 $\pm$ 1.3 & 13.1 $\pm$ 3.1 & $<$ 5.5 & \\
941: IGR~J07597-3842 & 254.48 & -4.7 & 3.0 $\pm$ 0.6 & 5.6 $\pm$ 1.5 & 6.4 $\pm$ 2.7 & $<$ 12.0 \\
942: IGR~J07565-4139 & 256.68 & -6.7 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 3.5 $\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 5.6 & \\
943: 4U~0836-429 & 261.94 & -1.1 & 19.2 $\pm$ 0.4 & 13.9 $\pm$ 1.1 & 6.5 $\pm$ 2.2 & $<$ 10.2 \\
944: IGR~J09103-3741 & 261.97 & 7.0 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.9 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 2.5 & \\
945: MCG-05-23-016 & 262.70 & 17.2 & 6.3 $\pm$ 1.5 & 5.1 $\pm$ 3.3 & $<$ 5.2 & \\
946: Vela~X-1$^{*}$ & 263.05 & 3.9 & 190.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 24.0 $\pm$ 1.1 & 3.8 $\pm$ 2.2 & $<$ 5.1 \\
947: Vela~pulsar & 263.55 & -2.8 & 10.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 8.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 12.6 $\pm$ 2.1 & 13.9 $\pm$ 4.9 \\
948: IGR~J09026-4812 & 268.84 & -1.1 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.4 & $<$ 1.1 & & \\
949: SWIFT~J1009.3-4250 & 273.93 & 10.8 & 4.6 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.7 $\pm$ 1.9 & $<$ 3.5 & \\
950: 4U0919-54 & 275.81 & -3.9 & 3.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & 3.2 $\pm$ 1.2 & $<$ 4.6 & \\
951: LMC~X-4 & 276.33 & -32.5 & 38.3 $\pm$ 1.3 & 9.6 $\pm$ 3.6 & $<$ 7.0 & \\
952: NGC~4388 & 279.16 & 74.3 & 12.6 $\pm$ 1.2 & 18.4 $\pm$ 3.1 & 14.7 $\pm$ 5.5 & $<$ 23.6 \\
953: EXO~0748-676 & 279.98 & -19.8 & 16.7 $\pm$ 1.5 & 16.8 $\pm$ 3.7 & $<$ 6.3 & \\
954: GRO~J1008-57 & 282.98 & -1.8 & 4.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 3.5 $\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 5.4 & \\
955: IGR~J09025-6814 & 284.17 & -14.2 & 3.8 $\pm$ 1.0 & $<$ 2.7 & & \\
956: IGR~J10147-6354 & 286.70 & -6.1 & 2.6 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.6 & & \\
957: ESO~33-2 & 287.84 & -33.3 & 4.4 $\pm$ 1.2 & $<$ 3.3 & & \\
958: 3C~273 & 290.00 & 64.3 & 8.5 $\pm$ 0.9 & 13.8 $\pm$ 2.5 & 9.4 $\pm$ 4.9 & $<$ 22.2 \\
959: Cen~X-3 & 292.09 & 0.3 & 30.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.2 $\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 5.8 & \\
960: IGR~J11305-6256 & 293.94 & -1.5 & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.6 & & \\
961: 1E~1145.1-6141 & 295.49 & -0.0 & 23.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & 13.1 $\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 2.8 & \\
962: IGRJ12026-5349 & 295.72 & 8.4 & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & $<$ 1.7 & & \\
963: NGC~4593 & 297.51 & 57.4 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.9 & 3.6 $\pm$ 2.6 & $<$ 10.2 & \\
964: XSS~J12270-4859 & 298.97 & 13.8 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.9 & $<$ 2.4 & & \\
965: NGC~4507 & 299.65 & 22.9 & 6.2 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 3.5 & & \\
966: GX~301-2$^{*}$ & 300.10 & -0.0 & 110.2 $\pm$ 1.1 & 7.6 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.4 & \\
967: SMC~X-1 & 300.39 & -43.6 & 17.3 $\pm$ 3.0 & 10.4 $\pm$ 7.9 & $<$ 13.7 & \\
968: 4U~1246-588 & 302.67 & 3.8 & 6.0 $\pm$ 0.6 & 9.0 $\pm$ 1.6 & 8.4 $\pm$ 3.1 & $<$ 13.6 \\
969: IGR~J13020-6359 & 304.11 & -1.1 & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & 3.6 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 6.4 & \\
970: NGC~4945 & 305.27 & 13.3 & 17.6 $\pm$ 0.8 & 18.9 $\pm$ 2.1 & 14.3 $\pm$ 4.0 & 20.2 $\pm$ 8.3 \\
971: ESO323-G077 & 306.02 & 22.3 & 3.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 2.9 & & \\
972: 4U~1323-62 & 307.03 & 0.5 & 10.8 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.9 $\pm$ 1.8 & $<$ 3.3 & \\
973: Cen~A & 309.51 & 19.4 & 38.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 42.8 $\pm$ 2.5 & 56.9 $\pm$ 4.6 & 70.1 $\pm$ 9.8 \\
974: 4U~1344-60 & 309.76 & 1.5 & 6.0 $\pm$ 0.7 & 6.9 $\pm$ 1.6 & 4.4 $\pm$ 3.1 & $<$ 14.0 \\
975: Circinus~galaxy & 311.32 & -3.8 & 15.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & 11.8 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.3 & \\
976: IGR~J14331-6112 & 314.90 & -0.7 & 10.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & 7.0 $\pm$ 1.6 & 12.3 $\pm$ 2.9 & $<$ 12.8 \\
977: IGR~J14471-6414$^{+}$ & 315.00 & -4.1 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & $<$ 1.8 & & \\
978: IC~4329A & 317.51 & 30.9 & 12.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 14.9 $\pm$ 2.9 & 11.1 $\pm$ 5.3 & $<$ 11.5 \\
979: % IGR~J14175-4641 & 317.87 & 13.7 & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & 7.8 $\pm$ 1.7 & 12.9 $\pm$ 3.1 & $<$ 6.8 \\
980: IGR~J14536-5522$^{+}$ & 319.76 & 3.4 & 11.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 12.5 $\pm$ 1.4 & 7.9 $\pm$ 2.8 & $<$ 6.1 \\
981: PSR~B1509-58 & 320.31 & -1.2 & 3.8 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.7 $\pm$ 1.6 & 9.4 $\pm$ 3.0 & \\
982: 4U~1626-67 & 321.80 & -13.1 & 9.1 $\pm$ 1.0 & 4.6 $\pm$ 2.6 & $<$ 4.7 & \\
983: Cir~X-1 & 322.12 & 0.0 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.5 & & \\
984: IGR~J16377-6423 & 324.53 & -11.5 & 7.2 $\pm$ 0.8 & 9.0 $\pm$ 1.9 & $<$ 7.0 & $<$ 7.6 \\
985: IGRJ16119-6036 & 325.23 & -6.7 & 4.4 $\pm$ 0.6 & 4.2 $\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 2.8 & \\
986: XTE~J1550-564 & 325.88 & -1.8 & 19.3 $\pm$ 0.5 & 27.6 $\pm$ 1.3 & 30.2 $\pm$ 2.5 & 18.8 $\pm$ 5.5 \\
987: 4U~1538-522 & 327.43 & 2.2 & 12.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & $<$ 1.3 & & \\
988: % End correction page : Note that a very supurious source has been doscarded (it is not used in fact)
989:
990:
991: ESO~138-1 & 329.66 & -9.5 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.6 & & \\
992: 4U~1608-522 & 330.92 & -0.9 & 13.9 $\pm$ 0.6 & 7.0 $\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 2.7 & \\
993: IGR~J15479-4529 & 332.42 & 7.0 & 7.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & 4.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & $<$ 4.8 & \\
994: PSR~J1617-5055$^{+}$ & 332.45 & -0.3 & 9.9 $\pm$ 0.6 & 8.0 $\pm$ 1.4 & 6.2 $\pm$ 2.3 & $<$ 10.4 \\
995: 4U~1636-536 & 332.91 & -4.8 & 19.3 $\pm$ 0.5 & 9.1 $\pm$ 1.3 & 3.7 $\pm$ 2.5 & $<$ 5.7 \\
996:
997: IGR~J16318-4848 & 335.61 & -0.4 & 36.2 $\pm$ 1.2 & 15.4 $\pm$ 1.4 & 4.9 $\pm$ 2.8 & $<$ 6.3 \\
998:
999: 4U~1630-47$^{a}$ & 336.91 & 0.2 & 34.4 $\pm$ 2.1 & 26.7 $\pm$ 1.4 & 21.7 $\pm$ 2.4 & 21.4 $\pm$ 5.3 \\
1000: IGR~J16358-4726$^{a}$ & 337.10 & 0.0 & 6.8 $\pm$ 2.1 & 14.5 $\pm$ 5.5 & $<$ 10.7 & \\
1001:
1002:
1003: % 4U~1630-47$^{a}$ & 336.91 & 0.2 & 34.4 $\pm$ 2.1 & 14.5 $\pm$ 5.5 & $<$ 10.7 & \\
1004: %IGR~J16358-4726$^{a}$ & 337.10 & 0.0 & 6.8 $\pm$ 2.1 & 26.7 $\pm$ 1.4 & 21.7 $\pm$ 2.4 & 21.4 $\pm$ 5.3 \\
1005:
1006: GX~339-4 & 338.94 & -4.3 & 36.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & 40.1 $\pm$ 1.3 & 35.6 $\pm$ 2.4 & 30.0 $\pm$ 5.2 \\
1007: GX~340+0 & 339.59 & -0.1 & 16.6 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.0 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 2.4 & \\
1008: SPI J1720-49$^{***}$ & 340.46 & -6.8 & 4.4 $\pm$ 0.6 & 11.1 $\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 2.5 & \\
1009:
1010: IGR~J16493-4348$^{+}$ & 341.37 & 0.6 & 7.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 2.8 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 2.6 & \\
1011:
1012: 4U~1705-440 & 343.32 & -2.3 & 14.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & 3.6 $\pm$ 1.6 & 6.6 $\pm$ 3.0 & $<$ 13.8 \\
1013: 4U~1702-429 & 343.87 & -1.3 & 9.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 7.7 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.3 & \\
1014: OAO~1657-415 & 344.37 & 0.3 & 69.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & 33.5 $\pm$ 1.3 & 10.3 $\pm$ 2.2 & 13.0 $\pm$ 4.8 \\
1015: GRO~J1655-40 & 344.98 & 2.5 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & 6.3 $\pm$ 1.1 & 9.1 $\pm$ 2.2 & $<$ 4.9 \\
1016: 4U~1735-444 & 346.05 & -7.0 & 8.4 $\pm$ 0.5 & $<$ 1.3 & & \\
1017: IGR~J17195-4100 & 346.98 & -2.2 & 6.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & 4.8 $\pm$ 1.2 & $<$ 4.6 & \\
1018: 4U~1700-377$^{*}$ & 347.75 & 2.2 & 189.6 $\pm$ 0.8 & 103.1 $\pm$ 1.1 & 35.5 $\pm$ 2.2 & 6.4 $\pm$ 4.8 \\
1019: IGR~J16194-2810 & 349.08 & 15.5 & 6.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & $<$ 1.8 & & \\
1020: GX~349+2 & 349.11 & 2.7 & 8.8 $\pm$ 0.9 & $<$ 2.2 & & \\
1021:
1022: IGR~J17091-3624 & 349.52 & 2.2 & 7.8 $\pm$ 0.8 & 10.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 5.6 $\pm$ 2.0 & 9.8 $\pm$ 4.4 \\
1023: IGR~J16500-3307 & 349.71 & 7.3 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.4 & & \\
1024:
1025: Swift~J1656.3-3302 & 350.61 & 6.3 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.5 & 8.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 5.0 $\pm$ 1.9 & 17.6 $\pm$ 4.0 \\
1026:
1027: IGR~J17204-3554 & 351.27 & 0.7 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.5 & & \\
1028:
1029: IGR~J16482-3036 & 351.43 & 9.2 & 2.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & 7.1 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.2 $\pm$ 1.9 & $<$ 4.3 \\
1030:
1031: EXO~1722-363 & 351.50 & -0.3 & 8.9 $\pm$ 0.6 & 4.3 $\pm$ 1.5 & 5.1 $\pm$ 2.8 & \\
1032: 4U~1705-32 & 352.79 & 4.7 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 3.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & $<$ 4.0 & \\
1033: 1A~1744-361 & 354.12 & -4.2 & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.4 $\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 2.7 & \\
1034: GX~354-0 & 354.31 & -0.1 & 34.2 $\pm$ 0.4 & 14.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 7.6 $\pm$ 1.8 & 7.9 $\pm$ 4.1 \\
1035: XTE~J1720-318$^{+}$ & 354.62 & 3.1 & 7.6 $\pm$ 0.4 & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.9 & $<$ 3.4 & \\
1036: GRS~1724-308 & 356.31 & 2.3 & 17.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 8.7 $\pm$ 0.9 & $<$ 3.4 & \\
1037: XTE~J1710-281 & 356.35 & 6.9 & 4.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 3.3 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 2.2 & \\
1038: SLX~1746-331$^{+}$ & 356.81 & -3.0 & 8.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & 6.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 4.4 & \\
1039: 3A~1822-371 & 356.86 & -11.3 & 19.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 4.4 & \\
1040:
1041: IGR~J17464-3213$^{*}$ & 357.26 & -1.8 & 17.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & 13.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & 11.2 $\pm$ 1.6 & 9.9 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
1042:
1043: XTE~J1709-267 & 357.48 & 7.9 & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 2.6 $\pm$ 2.1 & $<$ 4.9 \\
1044:
1045: GRS~1734-294 & 358.90 & 1.4 & 11.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & 7.4 $\pm$ 1.0 & 6.1 $\pm$ 2.1 & $<$ 4.7 \\
1046: Sco~X-1$^{*}$ & 359.09 & 23.8 & 205.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 16.4 $\pm$ 1.9 & 11.5 $\pm$ 3.8 & $<$ 8.2 \\
1047: 1E~1740.7-2942 & 359.12 & -0.1 & 49.6 $\pm$ 1.0 & 52.5 $\pm$ 1.2 & 48.3 $\pm$ 1.6 & 39.2 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
1048: SLX~1744-299 & 359.28 & -0.9 & 16.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & 8.6 $\pm$ 2.1 & $<$ 8.2 & \\
1049: XTE ~J817-330 & 359.82 & -8.0 & 7.3 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 7.8 \\
1050: V2400~Oph & 359.86 & 8.7 & 6.7 $\pm$ 0.7 & $<$ 1.7 & & \\
1051: Oph~Cluster & 0.59 & 9.3 & 4.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.6 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.2 & \\
1052:
1053: % IGR~J17475-2822 & 0.61 & -0.1 & 32.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 20.2 $\pm$ 1.1 & 9.2 $\pm$ 2.3 & 12.0 $\pm$ 5.4 \\
1054: IGR~J17475-2822 & 0.61 & -0.1 & 32.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 20.2 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 4.6 & \\
1055:
1056: SLX~1735-269 & 0.79 & 2.4 & 12.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & 7.7 $\pm$ 0.9 & $<$ 1.8 & \\
1057: RX~J1832-330 & 1.53 & -11.4 & 8.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 6.7 $\pm$ 1.0 & 7.7 $\pm$ 2.0 & $<$ 9.0 \\
1058: GX~1+4 & 1.93 & 4.8 & 48.3 $\pm$ 0.4 & 32.8 $\pm$ 0.9 & 6.2 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.5 \\
1059: GX~3+1 & 2.30 & 0.8 & 4.6 $\pm$ 0.5 & 2.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 2.3 & \\
1060: 4U~1820-303 & 2.78 & -7.9 & 11.6 $\pm$ 0.4 & 1.4 $\pm$ 1.0 & $<$ 4.0 & \\
1061: GRS~1758-258 & 4.50 & -1.4 & 62.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 79.2 $\pm$ 1.7 & 83.4 $\pm$ 1.6 & 47.4 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
1062:
1063:
1064: V1223~Sgr & 4.97 & -14.3 & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.5 & & \\
1065: GX~5-1 & 5.08 & -1.0 & 20.4 $\pm$ 0.8 & 4.2 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.4 & \\
1066: V2487~Oph & 6.59 & 7.8 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & $<$ 1.1 & & \\
1067: IGR~J18173-2509 & 6.78 & -4.3 & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & $<$ 3.4 & \\
1068: IGR~J17597-2201 & 7.56 & 0.8 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.8 & 4.1 $\pm$ 1.9 & 5.1 $\pm$ 3.6 & \\
1069: IGR~J17586-2129 & 8.05 & 1.3 & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.9 & 2.5 $\pm$ 2.2 & $<$ 4.2 & \\
1070:
1071: IGR~J17513-2011 & 8.17 & 3.4 & 2.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 3.1 $\pm$ 1.0 & $<$ 2.0 & \\
1072:
1073: GX~9+9 & 8.50 & 9.0 & 4.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & $<$ 1.2 & & \\
1074: GS~1826-24 & 9.27 & -6.1 & 83.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 66.1 $\pm$ 1.0 & 33.6 $\pm$ 1.9 & 24.5 $\pm$ 3.9 \\
1075: SAX~J1802.7-201 & 9.42 & 1.0 & 8.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.6 & & \\
1076: SGR~1806-20 & 9.98 & -0.2 & 5.4 $\pm$ 0.6 & 4.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & $<$ 2.4 & \\
1077:
1078: PSR~J1811-1926$^{b}$ & 11.17 & -0.3 & 3.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & 7.7 $\pm$ 1.2 & 6.3 $\pm$ 1.8 & $<$ 8.0 \\
1079:
1080: HETE~J1900.1-2455 & 11.30 & -12.9 & 15.8 $\pm$ 0.7 & 10.9 $\pm$ 1.5 & 7.1 $\pm$ 2.8 & $<$ 6.0 \\
1081: PKS~1830-211 & 12.17 & -5.7 & 3.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 5.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 4.3 $\pm$ 2.1 & $<$ 9.4 \\
1082:
1083: IGR~J18135-1751$^{+}$ & 12.79 & 0.0 & 4.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 4.4 $\pm$ 2.3 & $<$ 4.5 & \\
1084:
1085:
1086: GX~13+1 & 13.52 & 0.1 & 8.1 $\pm$ 0.9 & 6.6 $\pm$ 2.2 & $<$ 4.3 & \\
1087:
1088: 2E~1739.1-1210 & 13.93 & 9.4 & 4.5 $\pm$ 0.6 & 6.6 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 4.8 & \\
1089:
1090: NGC~7172 & 15.12 & -53.1 & 6.9 $\pm$ 1.6 & 12.1 $\pm$ 4.4 & $<$ 8.6 & \\
1091: GX~17+2 & 16.43 & 1.3 & 20.6 $\pm$ 0.8 & $<$ 1.9 & & \\
1092: AX~J1820.5-1434 & 16.48 & 0.1 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.9 & $<$ 7.4 & \\
1093: IGR~J18214-1318 & 17.69 & 0.5 & 3.8 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.6 $\pm$ 1.9 & $<$ 3.6 & \\
1094: M~1812-12 & 18.03 & 2.4 & 25.9 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 1.3 & 12.9 $\pm$ 2.4 & $<$ 5.0 \\
1095: IGR~J183047-1232 & 19.44 & -1.2 & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.4 $\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 5.8 & \\
1096: SNR~021.5-00.9 & 21.51 & -0.9 & 4.9 $\pm$ 1.0 & 3.4 $\pm$ 2.5 & $<$ 4.8 & \\
1097:
1098: AX~J183039-1002$^{+}$ & 21.67 & 0.0 & 4.4 $\pm$ 1.0 & 3.7 $\pm$ 2.5 & $<$ 4.8 & \\
1099:
1100: IGR~J18325-0756 & 23.71 & 0.6 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.8 $\pm$ 1.8 & 4.9 $\pm$ 3.4 & \\
1101:
1102: SWIFT~J1753.5-0127$^{*}$ & 24.90 & 12.2 & 12.4 $\pm$ 1.3 & 18.4 $\pm$ 2.0 & 14.5 $\pm$ 3.5 & $<$ 7.6 \\
1103:
1104: AX~J1838.0-0655 & 25.26 & -0.2 & 4.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 3.9 $\pm$ 1.9 & $<$ 3.7 & \\
1105:
1106:
1107:
1108: 4U~1850-087 & 25.35 & -4.3 & 8.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & 4.1 $\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 5.8 & \\
1109:
1110: AX~J1841.0-0535$^{+}$ & 26.77 & -0.2 & 7.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 10.2 $\pm$ 1.3 & 11.5 $\pm$ 2.5 & $<$ 11.0 \\
1111: RX~J1940.1-1025$^{+}$ & 28.98 & -15.5 & 9.8 $\pm$ 1.3 & 8.3 $\pm$ 2.7 & $<$ 9.4 & \\
1112: IGR~J18483-0311$^{+}$ & 29.75 & -0.7 & 7.6 $\pm$ 1.0 & $<$ 5.2 & & \\
1113:
1114: 4U1822-000 & 29.94 & 5.8 & 2.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & $<$ 1.5 & & \\
1115: 3A~1845-024 & 30.42 & -0.4 & 4.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 5.8 & & \\
1116: XTE~J1855-026 & 31.08 & -2.1 & 11.4 $\pm$ 0.6 & 6.8 $\pm$ 1.3 & 2.9 $\pm$ 2.5 & $<$ 5.7 \\
1117: 4U~1916-053 & 31.35 & -8.5 & 7.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & 7.6 $\pm$ 1.5 & 8.8 $\pm$ 2.9 & $<$ 6.4 \\
1118:
1119: IGR~J18485-0047 & 31.90 & 0.3 & 6.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & 7.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & 2.5 $\pm$ 2.4 & $<$ 5.5 \\
1120:
1121: GS~1843+009 & 33.05 & 1.7 & 4.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & 2.2 $\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 5.4 & \\
1122: XTE~J1901+014 & 35.37 & -1.6 & 4.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.0 $\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 2.6 & \\
1123: Aql~X-1$^{*}$ & 35.71 & -4.1 & 16.6 $\pm$ 0.8 & 13.9 $\pm$ 1.2 & 5.8 $\pm$ 2.3 & $<$ 5.3 \\
1124: Ser~X-1 & 36.12 & 4.8 & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.5 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 2.5 & \\
1125: XTE~J1858+034 & 36.82 & -0.1 & 10.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.3 $\pm$ 1.6 & $<$ 6.4 & \\
1126: 4U~1901+03 & 37.18 & -1.3 & 14.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & $<$ 1.7 & & \\
1127: SS~433 & 39.69 & -2.2 & 6.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 2.7 $\pm$ 1.2 & $<$ 5.6 & \\
1128:
1129:
1130: 4U~1909+07 & 41.90 & -0.8 & 11.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 5.0 & \\
1131:
1132: XTE~J1908+094$^{+}$ & 43.27 & 0.4 & 14.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.7 $\pm$ 1.6 & $<$ 6.4 & \\
1133:
1134: IGR~J19140+0951 & 44.29 & -0.5 & 8.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 11.4 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.3 & \\
1135: GRS~1915+105$^{*}$ & 45.36 & -0.2 & 207.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 93.1 $\pm$ 1.6 & 61.8 $\pm$ 2.3 & 38.6 $\pm$ 5.2 \\
1136: 2E~1853.7+1534 & 47.40 & 6.1 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.1 $\pm$ 1.4 & $<$ 2.8 & \\
1137:
1138: IGR~J19443+2117 & 57.79 & -1.4 & 6.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & 2.8 $\pm$ 2.1 & $<$ 3.9 & \\
1139:
1140: Her~X-1 & 58.15 & 37.5 & 44.4 $\pm$ 1.6 & 10.5 $\pm$ 4.3 & $<$ 17.0 & \\
1141:
1142: 3C382 & 61.32 & 17.4 & 21.1 $\pm$ 3.5 & 11.2 $\pm$ 7.2 & $<$ 11.3 & \\
1143: KS~1947+300 & 66.10 & 2.1 & 18.9 $\pm$ 0.9 & 9.1 $\pm$ 2.2 & 12.8 $\pm$ 4.0 & $<$ 17.6 \\
1144: Cyg~X-1$^{**}$ & 71.33 & 3.1 & 811.0 $\pm$ 1.1 & 876.5 $\pm$ 1.7 & 769.9 $\pm$ 3.1 & 500.6 $\pm$ 6.9 \\
1145: Cyg~A & 76.21 & 5.8 & 2.8 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.6 & & \\
1146: EXO~2030+375 & 77.14 & -1.2 & 39.0 $\pm$ 0.6 & 15.4 $\pm$ 1.5 & $<$ 2.8 & \\
1147: Cyg~X-3 & 79.84 & 0.7 & 146.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & 56.2 $\pm$ 1.5 & 25.0 $\pm$ 2.9 & 14.8 $\pm$ 6.2 \\
1148:
1149:
1150: SAX~J2103.5+4545 & 87.12 & -0.7 & 11.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & $<$ 1.6 & & \\
1151: Cyg~X-2 & 87.32 & -11.3 & 8.8 $\pm$ 0.8 & $<$ 2.1 & & \\
1152:
1153: IGR~J21335+5105 & 94.41 & -0.5 & 11.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & $<$ 2.2 & & \\
1154:
1155: 4U~2206+543 & 100.60 & -1.1 & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.8 & 5.1 $\pm$ 2.1 & 11.6 $\pm$ 3.7 & $<$ 7.6 \\
1156: Cas~A & 111.71 & -2.1 & 2.6 $\pm$ 0.4 & 3.0 $\pm$ 1.1 & $<$ 2.2 & \\
1157: 709~Cas & 120.07 & -3.4 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.4 & $<$ 1.2 & & \\
1158: $\gamma$~Cas & 123.55 & -2.2 & 3.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.3 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 2.5 & \\
1159: 1A~0114+650 & 125.71 & 2.6 & 6.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & 2.7 $\pm$ 1.6 & $<$ 3.1 & \\
1160: X0115+63 & 125.92 & 1.0 & 19.8 $\pm$ 0.9 & 8.3 $\pm$ 1.3 & $<$ 5.2 & \\
1161: 4U0142+61 & 129.38 & -0.4 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 1.7 & $<$ 3.0 & \\
1162: GT~0236+610 & 135.68 & 1.1 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 4.8 $\pm$ 2.4 & $<$ 4.5 & \\
1163: MKN3 & 143.30 & 22.7 & 5.9 $\pm$ 1.3 & 7.4 $\pm$ 3.7 & $<$ 7.0 & \\
1164: V0332+53$^{*}$ & 146.05 & -2.2 & 105.4 $\pm$ 1.9 & 11.7 $\pm$ 3.1 & $<$ 6.0 & \\
1165: NGC~4151 & 155.08 & 75.1 & 28.2 $\pm$ 1.4 & 34.4 $\pm$ 3.9 & 22.9 $\pm$ 6.8 & 46.9 $\pm$ 14.1 \\
1166: X~Per & 163.09 & -17.1 & 22.7 $\pm$ 2.6 & 41.1 $\pm$ 6.2 & 27.7 $\pm$ 11.2 & $<$ 23.9 \\
1167:
1168: NGC1068 & 172.14 & -51.9 & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.2 & 9.9 $\pm$ 3.3 & 7.7 $\pm$ 6.5 &
1169:
1170:
1171: \enddata
1172:
1173: \tablecomments{The catalog contains only the sources detected
1174: in the 50-150 keV band. The counts for diffuse continuum and sources
1175: were extracted simultaneously to obtain these data.(**) Source tentatively identified.}
1176: (*) are sources variables on pointing time scale ($\sim$ 2500 s in the 25-50 keV band. Cyg X-1(***) is variable
1177: up to 200 keV. (+) more than one possible identification
1178: (a) Sources are separated in the 20-50 keV band, but may be confused at higher energies.\\
1179: (b) can be affected by SGR 1806-20.
1180:
1181: \end{deluxetable}
1182:
1183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1184: %%%% Table 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1186: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}%1
1187: \tablewidth{0pt}
1188: \tablecaption{The best fit parameters for the spectra presented on fig~\ref{fig:spectrum}}
1189:
1190: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1191: \tablehead{
1192: \colhead{}\\
1193: %\colhead{}
1194: %&\colhead{low energy}
1195: %&\colhead{Cutoff power law}
1196: % &\colhead{}
1197: %&\colhead{power }
1198: %&\colhead{ law}
1199: % &\colhead{$F_{511 keV}$}
1200: %%&\colhead{~}
1201: %&\colhead{$F_{posit}$}
1202: %&\colhead{$f_{p}$} \\
1203: \colhead{ }
1204: &\colhead{index1}
1205: &\colhead{Ecut}
1206: &\colhead{$F1_{50 keV}$}
1207: &\colhead{index2}
1208: &\colhead{$F2_{50 keV}$}
1209: &\colhead{$F_{511 keV}$}
1210: %%&\colhead{~}
1211: &\colhead{$F_{posit}$}
1212: &\colhead{$f_{p}$} \\
1213: &&&\colhead{$\times 10^{-4}~ph$}
1214: &&\colhead{$\times 10^{-4}~ph~$}
1215: &\colhead{$\times 10^{-4}~ph~$}
1216: &\colhead{$\times 10^{-4}~ph~$}\\
1217: %&\colhead{}
1218:
1219: &&\colhead{keV }
1220:
1221:
1222: &\colhead{$~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~keV^{-1}$}
1223:
1224: &\colhead{}
1225:
1226: &\colhead{$cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~keV^{-1}$}
1227:
1228: &\colhead{$ cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$}
1229: &\colhead{$ cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$}
1230:
1231: }
1232: \startdata
1233:
1234:
1235: Diffuse 1& 0 (fixed) & 7.5 $\pm$ 1 & 0.66 $\pm$ 0.05 & & & & & \\
1236: Diffuse 2 & & & & 1.55 $\pm$ 0.25 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.15 & & & \\
1237: Diffuse 3& & & & & & 8.68 $\pm$ 0.61 & 36.1 $\pm$ 4.2 & 0.98 $\pm$ 0.05 \\
1238: Sources & 2.67 $\pm$ 0.04 & & 24.7$\pm$ 1.0 & & & & & \\
1239:
1240: \enddata
1241:
1242: \tablecomments{Diffuse 1 corresponds to the component at low energy, potentially associated with a
1243: white dwarf population.\\
1244: Diffuse 2 corresponds to the "true" diffuse emission, potentially related to the CR particles.\\
1245: Diffuse 3 corresponds to the annihilation processus. \\
1246: Sources : a 5\% systematic error is added to the combined spectrum.
1247: }
1248:
1249: \end{deluxetable}
1250:
1251: \end{document}
1252:
1253: