1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
27:
28: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
29: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
30: \usepackage{apjfonts}
31:
32: \newcommand{\cmjj}{\mbox{${\rm cm^{-2}}$}}
33: \newcommand{\hI}{\mbox{${\rm H\,I}$}}
34: \newcommand{\civ}{\mbox{${\rm C\,IV}$}}
35: \newcommand{\lya}{\mbox{${\rm Ly}\alpha$}}
36: \newcommand{\lyb}{\mbox{${\rm Ly}\beta$}}
37: \newcommand{\ha}{\mbox{${\rm H}\alpha$}}
38: \newcommand{\apg}{\gtrsim}
39: \newcommand{\apll}{\lesssim}
40: \newcommand{\etal}{\ensuremath{\mbox{et~al.}}}
41: \newcommand{\hmsol}{\mbox{$h^{-1}\,{\rm M}_\odot$}}
42: \newcommand{\ibid}{\underline{\makebox[0.5in]{}}.}
43: \providecommand{\kms}{\,\ensuremath{\rm{km\,s}^{-1}}}
44: \providecommand{\cm}{\,\ensuremath{\mbox{cm}^{-2}}}
45:
46: \shorttitle{Baryon Content of Dark Matter Halos}
47: \shortauthors{Chen \& Tinker}
48:
49: \begin{document}
50:
51: \slugcomment{Accepted for Publication in the Astrophysical Journal}
52:
53: \title{The Baryon Content of Dark Matter Halos: Empirical Constraints from Mg\,II Absorbers}
54:
55: \author{Hsiao-Wen Chen and Jeremy L.\ Tinker}
56: \affil{Dept.\ of Astronomy \& Astrophysics and
57: Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics,
58: University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, U.S.A. \\
59: {\tt hchen@oddjob.uchicago.edu}}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62:
63: We study the extent and covering fraction of cool baryons around
64: galaxies of different luminosity and mass, based on a survey of Mg\,II
65: $\lambda\lambda\,2796, 2803$ absorption features near known galaxies.
66: The initial sample consists of 13 galaxy and absorber pairs and 10
67: galaxies that do not produce Mg\,II absorption lines to within
68: sensitive upper limits. The redshifts of the galaxy and absorber
69: pairs range from $z = 0.2067$ to 0.892 with a median of $z = 0.3818$.
70: We find that galaxies at larger impact parameters produce on average
71: weaker Mg\,II absorbers. This anti-correlation is substantially
72: improved when accounting for the intrinsic luminosities of individual
73: galaxies. In addition, there exists a distinct boundary at
74: $\rho=R_{\rm gas}$, beyond which no Mg\,II absorbers are found. A
75: maximum likelihood analysis shows that the observations are best
76: described by an isothermal density profile and a scaling relation
77: $R_{\rm gas}=91\times (L_B/L_{B_*})^{(0.35\pm 0.05)}\ h^{-1}$ kpc (or
78: $69\ h^{-1}$ kpc at $W(2796)=0.3$ \AA) with a mean covering factor of
79: $\langle\kappa\rangle=80-86$ \%. Together with the scaling relation
80: between halo mass and galaxy luminosity inferred from halo occupation
81: studies, this scaling of $R_{\rm gas}$ indicates that gas radius is a
82: fixed fraction of the dark matter halo radius. We compare our results
83: with previous studies and discuss the implications of our analysis for
84: constraining the baryon content of galactic halos and for
85: discriminating between competing scenarios for understanding the
86: nature of the extended gas.
87:
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90: \keywords{cosmology: observations---intergalactic medium---quasars: absorption lines}
91:
92: \section{INTRODUCTION}
93:
94: The Mg\,II $\lambda\lambda\,2796, 2803$ doublets are among the
95: absorption features commonly seen in the spectra of distant quasars
96: that are produced by intervening gaseous clouds along the quasar lines
97: of sight. Their rest-frame absorption equivalent width $W(2796)$,
98: ranging from $W(2796)\apll 0.3$ \AA\ to $W(2796)>2$ \AA\ (e.g.\ Steidel
99: \& Sargent 1990; Nestor \etal\ 2005; Prochter \etal\ 2006a), is found
100: to represent the underlying gas kinematics (e.g.\ Petitjean \&
101: Bergeron 1990; Churchill \etal\ 2000). Based on comparisons of the
102: abundance ratios of various associated ions, these Mg\,II absorption
103: transitions are understood to arise primarily in photo-ionized gas of
104: temperature $T\sim 10^4$ K (Bergeron \& Stas\'inska 1986; Hamann 1997)
105: and neutral hydrogen column density $N(\hI)=10^{18}-10^{22}$ \cmjj\
106: (Churchill \etal\ 2000; Rao \etal\ 2006). In addition, surveys for
107: galaxies near the observed Mg\,II absorbers have often uncovered
108: luminous galaxies at projected distances ($\rho \apll 50\ h^{-1}$ kpc)
109: and velocity separations ($\Delta\,v \le 250$ \kms) from the absorbers
110: (Bergeron 1986; Lanzetta \& Bowen 1990, 1992; Steidel \etal\ 1994;
111: Zibetti \etal\ 2005; Nestor \etal\ 2007; Kacprzak \etal\ 2007). The
112: relatively large associated $N(\hI)$ and the small separation between
113: Mg\,II absorbers and galaxies along common lines of sight indicate
114: that Mg\,II absorbers may offer a sensitive probe of photo-ionized halo
115: gas around galaxies at redshifts from $z=0.3$ to $z=2.3$ in the
116: optical spectral window.
117:
118: Understanding the physical origin of these Mg\,II absorbers bears
119: significantly on all efforts to apply their known statistical
120: properties for constraining the baryon content of dark matter halos on
121: different mass scales (Tinker \& Chen 2008). Various theoretical
122: models have been developed in the past that describe the nature of the
123: absorbers in the context of gas accretion, including ram pressure
124: stripped gas from accreted satellites (Wang 1993), gravitationally
125: bound cold gas in halo substructures (e.g., Sternberg \etal\ 2002),
126: and condensed cold clouds in a thermally unstable hot halo (Mo \&
127: Miralda-Escude 1996; Maller \& Bullock 2004; Chelouche \etal\ 2007).
128:
129: Insights to the origin of Mg\,II absorbers can be obtained from
130: their clustering amplitude on large scales ($\apg\,1\,h^{-1}$ Mpc).
131: The clustering of the absorbers is a consequence of dark matter halos
132: in which they are found. Measurements of the galaxy and absorber
133: cross--correlation function offer a means of quantifying the mean halo
134: mass of the absorbers. High-mass halos are expected to be highly
135: clustered, while low mass halos on average have weaker clustering
136: strength. The cross--correlation function of Mg\,II absorbers and
137: luminous red galaxies (LRGs) have been measured at $\langle
138: z\rangle=0.6$ by Bouch\'e \etal\ (2006), who found that Mg\,II
139: absorbers of $W(2796)>0.3$ \AA\ cluster strongly with LRGs and that
140: weaker absorbers with $W(2796)=0.3-1.15$ \AA\ on average arise in dark
141: matter halos that are 10 times more massive than those of stronger
142: absorbers with $W(2796)=2-2.85$ \AA.
143:
144: Both the observed clustering amplitude and the inverse correlation
145: between the mean halo mass and absorber strength are difficult to
146: interpret. For example, the frequency distribution function of Mg\,II
147: absorbers show that there are on average 10 times more $W(2796)=1$
148: \AA\ absorbers than those of $W(2796)=2$ \AA\ (e.g.\ Nestor \etal\
149: 2005; Prochter \etal\ 2006a) which, when combined with the clustering
150: measurements, implies that the majority of absorbers reside in
151: massive, highly biased halos. At the same time, we expect that
152: observed Mg$^+$ ions originate primarily in photo-ionized gas of
153: temperature $T\sim 10^4$ K and the halo gas in massive dark matter
154: halos becomes too hot for abundant Mg$^+$ to survive.
155:
156: In Tinker \& Chen (2008; hereafter TC08), we developed a new
157: technique that adopts the halo occupation framework for understanding
158: the origin of QSO absorption-line systems. Specifically, the
159: technique adopts a model density profile for the Mg$^+$ ions in
160: individual dark matter halos. The ``cold'' baryon content of
161: individual dark matter halos, as probed by the presence of Mg$^+$, is
162: then constrained through matching the space density and clustering
163: amplitude of dark matter halos with the observed frequency
164: distribution function of Mg\,II absorbers and their clustering
165: amplitude. Our model allows the possibility that a predominant
166: fraction of the gas in massive halos is shock heated to the virial
167: temperature of the halo and becomes too hot to host abundant Mg\,II
168: absorbing clouds. Within the hot halo, we further allow the
169: possibility that some dense, cold clouds may penetrate through as seen
170: in high resolution cosmological simulations (Kravtsov 2003). The
171: result of this halo occupation analysis is the probability function
172: $P(W|M_h)$ that characterizes, for each dark matter halo of $M_h$, the
173: total probability of finding a Mg\,II absorber of equivalent width
174: $W$.
175:
176: The halo occupation analysis shows that observations, including both
177: the Mg\,II absorber frequency distribution function and their
178: clustering amplitude, demand a rapid transition in the halo gas
179: content at $M_h^{crit}\sim 10^{11.5}$ \hmsol. Below $M_h^{crit}$,
180: halos contain predominantly cold gas and therefore contribute
181: significantly to the observed Mg\,II statistics. Beyond $M_h^{crit}$,
182: the cold gas fraction is substantially reduced and presumably the halo
183: gas becomes too hot to maintain a large contribution to Mg\,II
184: absorbers. In order to reproduce the observed overall strong
185: clustering of the absorbers and the inverse correlation between
186: $W(2796)$ and halo mass $M_h$, roughly 5\% of the gas in halos up to
187: $10^{14}$ \hmsol\ is required to be cold. It is understood under our
188: model that {\it the $W(2796)$ vs.\ $M_h$ inverse correlation arises
189: mainly as a result of an elevated clustering amplitude of $W(2796)\apll
190: 1$ \AA\ absorbers, rather than a suppressed clustering strength of
191: $W(2796)\apg 2$ \AA\ absorbers.} The clustering amplitude of weak
192: absorbers is elevated because of the presence of cold streams in
193: massive hot halos. The amount of cold gas in clusters is small,
194: therefore these halos can only contribute to weak absorbers.
195:
196: The initial results of our halo occupation analysis demonstrate that
197: combining known statistics of dark matter halos with a simple model
198: for their gas content can already reproduce the statistical properties
199: known for Mg\,II absorbers. It provides a simple prescription for
200: populating baryons in dark matter halos that can be compared directly
201: to results from numerical simulations and offer insights for
202: understanding the physics of gas accretion in halos of all mass
203: scales. However, some uncertainties remain in the halo occupation
204: analysis.
205:
206: First, a key parameter that constrains the distribution of Mg$^+$
207: ions in individual dark matter halos is their incidence rate,
208: $\kappa(M_h)$, per halo. It specifies the total probability of
209: detecting an absorber in a halo of mass $M_h$. In the halo occupation
210: analysis of TC08, we find that dark matter halos of
211: $M_h=10^{11.5-12.5}$ \hmsol\ on average have 100\% incidence rate of
212: Mg$^+$ ions, $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle=1$, at $R_{\rm gas}\le R_{\rm
213: 200}/3$ for Mg$^+$ ions and $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle=0$ at larger
214: radii.\footnote{The halo size $R_{\rm 200}$ corresponds to the radius,
215: within which the enclosed mean density is $200\times\bar{\rho}_m$ and
216: $\bar{\rho}_m$ is the background density. It is motivated by
217: estimates of the virial radius both from the spherical collapse model
218: and from $N$-body simulations that predict $\approx
219: 180\times\bar{\rho}_m$.} In halos of lower masses,
220: $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle$ declines sharply.
221:
222: While a 100\% incidence rate shows that every dark matter halo hosts
223: a uniform gaseous halo of Mg$^+$ ions with size $R_{\rm gas}$, the low
224: $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle$ is more difficult to interpret because
225: $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle$ represents a mean value averaged over all
226: halos of mass $M_h$. A low $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle$ may be a
227: result of only a small fraction of dark matter halos containing
228: extended distributions of Mg$^+$ ions or a result of a small covering
229: factor of Mg$^+$ in all halos. In addition, we have assumed in our
230: initial analysis that the gaseous extent is related to halo mass
231: according to $R_{\rm gas}= R_{{\rm
232: gas}*}\,[M_h/(10^{12}\,\hmsol)]^{\beta}$, and $R_{{\rm gas}*}=50\
233: h^{-1}$ physical kpc and $\beta=1/3$. This scaling relation follows
234: the theoretical expectation between virial radius and halo mass, but a
235: higher $R_{\rm gas}$ would naturally lower $\kappa$ for a fixed
236: frequency distribution function of Mg\,II absorbers.
237:
238: Second, the physical origin of the cold clouds probed by the Mg\,II
239: absorption transitions is ambiguous. While the mass scale at which
240: halo gas is found to experience a transition from a cold-mode
241: dominated state to a hot-mode dominated state agrees well with the
242: expectation of theoretical models established to characterize the gas
243: accretion history in dark matter halos (e.g.\ Birnboim \& Dekel 2003;
244: Kere{\^s} \etal\ 2005; Dekel \& Birnboim 2006; Birnboim \etal\ 2007),
245: the observed cold-hot transition can also be interpreted as a
246: declining formation efficiency of cool clouds in a hot halo with
247: increasing halo mass (e.g.\ Mo \& Miralda-Escude 1996; Maller \&
248: Bullock 2004). Both of these scenarios predict that halo gas is
249: primarily cold at $M_h\apll 10^{11.5}\,\hmsol$. On the other hand,
250: Bouch\'e \etal\ (2006) have argued that the inverse correlation
251: between $W(2796)$ and clustering amplitude is suggestive of the
252: absorbers arising in non-virialized gas flows, such as starburst
253: winds.
254:
255: While dense clumps in starburst driven outflows are expected to
256: contribute to some fraction of the observed Mg\,II absorbers, an
257: important quantity to specify is the significance of this fraction.
258: If a large fraction of Mg\,II absorbers originate in cold dense clumps
259: in starburst winds, then one must also account for the more complex
260: star formation physics in efforts to apply known Mg\,II statistics for
261: constraining the gas content of dark matter halos.
262: We defer to \S\ 5.3 for a more detailed discussion of the caveats in
263: interpreting the known properties of Mg\,II absorbers as evidence to
264: support their origin in starburst winds.
265:
266: Direct constraints on the covering fraction of Mg\,II absorbing gas
267: versus halo mass not only help to break the degeneracy between the
268: fraction of dark matter halos containing cold baryons and the extent
269: of cold gas in individual halos, in principle they also serve to
270: discriminate between the starburst wind scenario and gas accretion.
271: Under the starburst wind scenario, superwind driven outflows are
272: expected to proceed over a finite angular span along the minor axis
273: (e.g.\ Heckman \etal\ 1990; Veilleux \etal\ 2005), and result in only
274: partial covering of the halos. In addition, because at a given epoch
275: only some fraction of galaxies are found at starburst or
276: post-starburst stages, we would expect a fraction of dark matter halos
277: to contain extended Mg\,II absorbing gas due to outflows.
278:
279: To obtain empirical constraints on the extent and covering fraction
280: of Mg$^+$ ions around galaxies of different luminosity and mass, we
281: have initiated a survey of Mg\,II absorbers around known galaxies at
282: small projected distances ($\rho\apll 100\ h^{-1}$ kpc) to a background
283: QSO. Accounting the presence or absence of Mg\,II absorbers for an
284: unbiased sample of galaxies at different impact parameters yields a
285: statistical estimate of the gas covering fraction around field
286: galaxies. A detailed comparison between the absorber strength and
287: galaxy properties further constrains the density profile and extent of
288: the gas. The primary objectives of our study are (1) to improve the
289: uncertainties of our halo occupation analysis by obtaining empirical
290: measurements of $R_{\rm gas}$ and $\beta$, and (2) to examine whether
291: starburst driven outflows are the predominant mechanism for producing
292: the observed Mg\,II absorbers by obtaining an empirical constraint of
293: the gas covering factor $\kappa$. Here we present the initial results
294: of our study.
295:
296: This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe the
297: design of our experiment for constraining the extent and covering
298: fraction of Mg$^+$ ions. In Section 3, we describe the imaging and
299: spectroscopic data available for our experiment. In Section 4, we
300: examine the correlation between Mg\,II absorption strength and galaxy
301: properties, such as the impact parameter and luminosity. We compare
302: our results with previous studies and discuss the implications of our
303: analysis in Section 5. We adopt a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology,
304: $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.3$ and $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$, with a dimensionless
305: Hubble constant $h = H_0/(100 \ {\rm km} \ {\rm s}^{-1}\ {\rm
306: Mpc}^{-1})$ throughout the paper.
307:
308:
309: \section{EXPERIMENT DESIGN}
310:
311: Accurate estimates of the extent and covering fraction of Mg$^+$ ions
312: around galaxies require an unbiased survey of Mg\,II absorbers in the
313: vicinity of {\it known} galaxies. Nearly all studies published in the
314: literature to date focus on surveys of galaxies that correspond to
315: known Mg\,II absorbers (e.g.\ Bergeron 1986; Lanzetta \& Bowen 1990,
316: 1992; Steidel \etal\ 1994; Zibetti \etal\ 2007; Kacprzak \etal\ 2007),
317: with the exception of an on-going study described in Tripp \& Bowen
318: (2005). Searching for galaxies that give rise to known Mg\,II
319: absorbers bears a large uncertainty due to contamination from
320: galaxies that are correlated with the true absorbing galaxies. In
321: addition, these surveys based on known presence of Mg$^+$ ions do not
322: yield constraints on the incidence of these ions in galactic halos.
323:
324: We are conducting a survey of Mg\,II absorbers at the locations of
325: known galaxies close to the line of sight toward a background QSO. We
326: identify galaxies at impact parameters $\rho\le r_0$. The value of
327: $r_0$ is selected to allow identifications of galaxies at impact
328: parameters beyond the size of extended Mg\,II halos, in order to
329: constrain the extent and covering fraction of the gas. At the same
330: time, we require $r_0$ to be small enough in order to minimize the
331: contamination of galaxies that do not give rise to the absorbers but
332: are merely correlated with the absorbing galaxies through clustering.
333:
334: To estimate the contamination rate of correlated galaxies as a
335: function of projected distance, we adopt the distribution of dark
336: matter halos identified in cosmological simulations as a guide. We
337: use the $z=0.5$ output of a $400\ h^{-1}$ co-moving Mpc simulation
338: described in Tinker \etal\ (2007). First, we identify for each random
339: line of sight dark matter halos that have $M_h \ge 10^{11}$ \hmsol\
340: and are located at $\rho\le R_{\rm 200}/3$ from the sightline. From
341: TC08, we consider these halos likely to host a Mg\,II absorber along
342: the line of sight. This is also consistent with the results from the
343: halo occupation distribution models of galaxies found in DEEP2 and
344: Sloan Digital Sky Survey from Zheng, Coil, \& Zehavi (2007; hereafter
345: ZCZ07). These authors found that the minimum mass of a dark matter
346: halo that on average hosts a galaxy of $\apg\,0.1\,L_*$ is
347: $\approx\,2\times\,10^{11}$ \hmsol. Next, for each potential Mg\,II
348: absorber, we search for neighboring halos that are at $|\delta\,v|\le
349: 250$ \kms\ and projected distance less than $\rho$ from the absorber
350: and may therefore contaminate the search of the true absorber.
351: Finally, we repeat this exercise over 10,000 random lines of sight and
352: calculate the frequency of finding contaminating halos as a function
353: of $\rho$.
354:
355: \begin{figure}
356: \begin{center}
357: % \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{frho.pdf}
358: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{f1.ps}
359: \caption{The probability of finding more than one galaxy with
360: $|\delta\,v|\le 250$ \kms\ and at projected distances less than $\rho$
361: from an absorber. The errorbars represent the 68\% scatter that was
362: estimated using a jackknife resampling technique.}
363: \end{center}
364: \end{figure}
365:
366: The result of our exercise is presented in Figure 1, where we show
367: the probability of contamination due to correlated galaxies versus
368: impact parameter. The errorbars represent the 68\% scatter of the
369: mean from 16 jackknife subsamples. Figure 1 shows that at $\rho>100\
370: h^{-1}$ physical kpc there is a $>$ 30\% chance that one would
371: mis-identify a correlated galaxy as the true absorber. Combining the
372: contamination rate estimates with previous search reports that
373: indicate a mean gaseous extent of $\sim 50\ h^{-1}$ physical kpc for
374: luminous galaxies (Bergeron 1986; Lanzetta \& Bowen 1990, 1992;
375: Steidel \etal\ 1994), we carry out our study based on a sample of
376: galaxies that are within $r_0=100\ h^{-1}$ kpc from a background QSO.
377:
378: \section{DATA}
379:
380: To study the extent and covering fraction of Mg$^+$ ions in galactic
381: halos, it requires survey data of both galaxies and absorbers along
382: common lines of sight toward background quasars. We have selected
383: seven QSO fields for which galaxies data are already available, and
384: echelle spectra of the background QSOs have also been obtained either
385: from our own observations or through the ESO science data archive. We
386: describe available QSO spectra and galaxy data separately in the
387: following sections.
388:
389: \subsection{Echelle Spectra of QSOs}
390:
391: Echelle spectroscopic observations of the QSOs, PKS\,0122$-$0021
392: ($z_{\rm QSO}=1.0765$), HE 0226$-$4110 ($z_{\rm QSO}=0.495$),
393: PKS\,0349$-$1438 ($z_{\rm QSO}=0.6163$), and PKS\,0454$-$2203 ($z_{\rm
394: QSO}= 0.5335$) were obtained using the MIKE echelle spectrograph
395: (Bernstein \etal\ 2003) on the Magellan Clay telescope in 2007
396: October. The spectrograph contains a blue camera and a red camera,
397: allowing a full wavelength coverage from near-ultraviolet 3350 \AA\
398: through near-infrared 9400 \AA. Depending on the brightness of the
399: QSO, the observations were carried out in a sequence of one to three
400: exposures of duration 600 s to 900 s each. The mean seeing condition
401: over the period of integration was $0.7''$. We used a $1''$ slit and
402: $2\times 2$ binning during readout, yielding a spectral resolution of
403: FWHM $\approx 13$ \kms\ at wavelength $\lambda=4500$ \AA\ and $\approx
404: 16$ \kms\ at $\lambda=8000$ \AA. The data were processed and reduced
405: using the MIKE data reduction software developed by Burles, Prochaska,
406: \& Bernstein\footnote{see
407: http://web.mit.edu/\char'176burles/www/MIKE/mike\_cookbook.html.}.
408: Wavelengths were calibrated to a ThAr frame obtained immediately after
409: each exposure and subsequently corrected to vacuum and heliocentric
410: wavelengths. Flux calibration was performed using a sensitivity
411: function derived from observations of the flux standard EG131. The
412: flux calibrated spectra have a mean $S/N>25$ per resolution element
413: across the entire spectral range.
414:
415: Echelle spectra of the QSOs, PKS1354$+$1933 ($z_{\rm QSO}=0.7200$),
416: PKS1424$-$1150 ($z_{\rm QSO}=0.8060$), and PKS1622$+$23 ($z_{\rm
417: QSO}=0.927$) were obtained using the Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle
418: Spectrograph (UVES; D'Odorico \etal\ 2000) on the VLT/UT2 telescope
419: and were retrieved from the ESO data archive. Observations of
420: PKS1354$+$1933 (program ID 076.A$-$0860) and PKS1424$-$1150 (program
421: ID 075.A$-$0841) were obtained using a $1''$ slit and the dichroics
422: \#1 B346$+$R580 and \#2 B437$+$R860 in a sequence of two to three
423: exposures of duration 180s to 300 s each. The data were binned
424: $2\times 2$ during readout. Observations of PKS 1622$+$23 (program ID
425: 069.A$-$0371) were obtained using a $1''$ slit and the dichroic \#1
426: B346$+$R580 in a sequence of three exposures of duration 4900 s each.
427: The data were also binned $2\times 2$ during readout. The UVES
428: spectra were processed and calibrated using the standard data
429: reduction pipeline. The combined spectra of the three QSOs cover a
430: spectral range from 3300 \AA\ to 6600 \AA, with a pixel scale of 0.035
431: \AA\ per pixel and $S/N>10$ per pixel at $\lambda>3700$ \AA. The high
432: $S/N$ and high spectral resolution MIKE and UVES spectra together
433: allow us to search for Mg\,II absorption features at redshifts $0.2 <
434: z < 2.3$ to a limiting absorption strength $W(2796)=0.01$ \AA\ along
435: the lines of sight toward the seven background QSOs.
436:
437: \begin{center}
438: \begin{small}
439: \begin{deluxetable*}{p{1in}cccccrc}
440: \tablewidth{0pc}
441: \tablecaption{Summary of the Echelle Spectroscopic Observations of Distant QSOs}
442: \tabletypesize{\small}
443: \tablehead{ \colhead{Field} & \colhead{RA(J2000)} & \colhead{Dec(J2000)} & \colhead{$z_{\rm QSO}$} & \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{Exptime} & \colhead{Spectral Coverage}}
444: \startdata
445: PKS\,0122$-$0021 \dotfill & 01:25:28.8 & $-$00:05:56 & 1.0765 & 16.4 & MIKE & $1200$ & 3350--9400 \nl
446: HE\,0226$-$4110 \dotfill & 02:28:15.2 & $-$40:57:16 & 0.4950 & 15.2 & MIKE & $600$ & 3350--9400 \nl
447: PKS\,0349$-$1438 \dotfill & 03:51:28.5 & $-$14:29:09 & 0.6163 & 16.2 & MIKE & $1800$ & 3350--9400 \nl
448: PKS\,0454$-$2203 \dotfill & 04:56:08.9 & $-$21:59:09 & 0.5335 & 16.1 & MIKE & $2700$ & 3350--9400 \nl
449: PKS\,1354$+$1933 \dotfill & 13:57:04.4 & $+$19:19:07 & 0.7200 & 16.0 & UVES & $600$ & 3300--6800 \nl
450: PKS\,1424$-$1150 \dotfill & 14:27:38.1 & $-$12:03:50 & 0.8060 & 16.5 & UVES & $720$ & 3300--6600 \nl
451: 3C336 \dotfill & 16:24:39.1 & $+$23:45:12 & 0.9274 & 17.5 & UVES & $14,700$ & 3300--6600 \nl
452: \enddata
453: \end{deluxetable*}
454: \end{small}
455: \end{center}
456:
457: \subsection{The Galaxy Sample}
458:
459: For the purpose of the study described in \S\ 2, we need to identify
460: a representative sample of galaxies at $\rho\apll 100\ h^{-1}$ kpc from
461: the background QSOs. Galaxies in six of the seven QSO fields listed in
462: Table 1 have been observed and analyzed by Chen \etal\ (1998, 2001a).
463: Specifically, galaxies in the fields around PKS\,0122$-$0021,
464: PKS\,0349$-$1438, and PKS\,0454$-$2203, PKS1354$+$1933, and
465: PKS1424$-$1150 were observed as part of the survey program to study
466: the gaseous extent of galaxies based on the presence or absence of
467: corresponding \lya\ and C\,IV absorption features in the spectra of
468: the background QSOs (Lanzetta \etal\ 1995; Chen \etal\ 1998, 2001a;
469: Chen \etal\ 2001b). The authors carried out a redshift survey of
470: galaxies brighter than $R=21.5$ mag at angular distances $\theta <
471: 1.3'$. The survey depth enabled findings of galaxies with
472: luminosities greater than $0.01-1.0\ L_*$ and impact parameters less
473: than $100-350\ h^{-1}$ kpc at the redshifts $0.1\apll z_{\rm gal}\apll
474: 0.6$. The galaxy sample is therefore ideally suited for our present
475: study.
476:
477: Galaxies in the field of PKS\,1622$+$2352 were first published in
478: Steidel \etal\ (1997) as part of a program to determine the redshifts
479: of galaxies found in deep Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images that are
480: brighter than $R\approx 24.5$. Images of individual galaxies were
481: also analyzed by Chen \etal\ (1998). Galaxies in the field of
482: HE\,0226$-$4110 were observed in an on-going program to uncover
483: galaxies brighter than $R=23$ mag at $z_{\rm gal}<0.5$ for
484: understanding the cross-correlation between galaxies and O\,VI
485: $\lambda\lambda\,1031, 1037$ absorbers (Chen \etal\ 2008 in
486: preparation). The two galaxy samples satisfy the selection criterion
487: of an unbiased galaxy survey in QSO fields that does not rely on known
488: knowledge of the presence of an Mg\,II absorber. We therefore include
489: the galaxy data in our sample. Images of the galaxies are presented
490: in Figure 2. The data were obtained using the Wide Field and
491: Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) and the F702W filter (see also Chen \etal\
492: 2001a) on board HST, with the exception of the images of galaxies in
493: the field around HE\,0226$-$4110 that were obtained using IMACS and
494: the $R$-band filter on the Magellan Baade telescope.
495:
496: \begin{figure*}
497: \begin{center}
498: %\includegraphics[scale=0.6,angle=0]{images.pdf}
499: \includegraphics[scale=0.6,angle=0]{f2.ps}
500: \caption{Images of the 23 galaxies in our sample that are identified
501: at $\rho\apll 100\ h^{-1}$ kpc from the lines of sight toward a
502: background QSO. With the exception of the two galaxies in the field
503: of HE\,0226$-$4110, the galaxy images were obtained using WFPC2 and
504: the F702W filter (see also Chen \etal\ 2001a). Images of the galaxies
505: in the field of HE\,0226$-$4110 were obtained using IMACS and the $R$
506: filter on the Magellan Baade telescope. The spatial extent of each
507: image is roughly 25 $h^{-1}$ physical kpc on a side at the redshift of
508: the galaxy indicated in the upper right-corner. The orientation of
509: each image is arbitrary. The absorption strength of the corresponding
510: Mg\,II absorbers found in the spectra of the background QSO described
511: in \S\ 3.1 is indicated in the lower-right corner. For
512: non-detections, we provide a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit to the rest-frame
513: absorption equivalent width.}
514: \end{center}
515: \end{figure*}
516:
517: The sample of galaxies identified at $\rho\apll 100\ h^{-1}$ kpc from
518: the lines of sight toward seven background QSOs is presented in Table
519: 2, where we list for each galaxy in columns (1)---(7) the field, Right
520: Ascension and Declination offsets from the QSO $\Delta \alpha$ and
521: $\Delta \delta$, redshift $z_{\rm gal}$, impact parameter $\rho$,
522: apparent $R$-band magnitude, and absolute $B$-band magnitude $M_B - 5
523: \log h$.\footnote{All magnitudes presented in this paper are in the
524: $AB$ system.} Measurement uncertainties in $R$ and $M_B - 5 \log h$
525: were typically $0.2$ dex. Our initial galaxy sample consists of 23
526: galaxies at redshifts from $z_{\rm gal} = 0.2067$ to $z_{\rm
527: gal}=0.892$ with a median of $z_{\rm gal} = 0.3818$\footnote{We note
528: that 12 of the 23 galaxies in our sample are from the field around
529: 3C336. These 12 galaxies have spectroscopic redshifts evenly
530: distributed from $z=0.261$ to $z=0.892$ with a median of $\langle
531: z\rangle=0.6$, covering a comoving distance of $\approx 1.4\ h^{-1}$
532: Gpc. Therefore these galaxies are not part of a coherent structure.
533: There is no known galaxy clusters along the sightline toward 3C336 and
534: there is no physical mechanism that suggests that slight overdensities
535: on scales of 0.1-1 Gpc would affect gas properties within individual
536: halos.}. We have excluded galaxies that are within $|\Delta\,v|<3000$
537: \kms\ from the background QSOs, where most of the gas is expected to
538: be highly ionized due to the QSO proximity effect (e.g.\ Bajtlik
539: \etal\ 1988). The rest-frame $B$-band magnitudes of the galaxies
540: range from $M_B-5\,\log\,h=-15.9$ to $-20.3$ with a median of
541: $M_B-5\,\log\,h=-19.0$, corresponding to $0.5\,L_{B_*}$ for
542: $M_{B_*}-5\,\log\,h=-19.8$ that characterizes the blue galaxy
543: population at $z_{\rm gal}\sim 0.4$ (e.g.\ Faber \etal\ 2007).
544:
545: \subsection{The Galaxy--Mg\,II Absorber Pair Sample}
546:
547: To establish a galaxy--Mg\,II absorber pair sample for the
548: subsequent analysis, we examine the echelle spectra of the background
549: QSOs and search for the corresponding Mg\,II absorption doublet at the
550: locations of the galaxies presented in \S\ 3.2. Specifically, we
551: accept absorption lines according to a $3 \sigma$ detection threshold
552: criterion, which is appropriate because the measurements are performed
553: at a small number of known galaxy redshifts. Next, we form galaxy and
554: absorber pairs by requiring a velocity difference\footnote{We note
555: that the galaxy at $z_{\rm gal}=0.4592$ in the field around
556: 1354$+$1933 is $\approx 550$ \kms\ from the identified Mg\,II
557: absorber. However, including the redshift measurement uncertainty of
558: 300 \kms\ reported in Ellingson \etal\ (1991), we consider this pair a
559: match. } $\Delta\,v\le 250$ \kms. Finally, we measure 3-$\sigma$
560: upper limits to the 2796-\AA\ absorption equivalent widths of galaxies
561: that are not paired with corresponding absorbers. The procedure
562: identifies 13 galaxy and absorber pairs and 10 galaxies that do not
563: produce Mg\,II absorption lines to within sensitive upper limits.
564: Impact parameter separations of the galaxy and absorber pairs range
565: from $\rho = 16.3$ to $100.1 \ h^{-1}$ physical kpc with a median of
566: $\rho = 54.8 \ h^{-1}$ kpc. The corresponding Mg\,II absorption
567: strength of each of the 23 galaxies in our sample is listed in columns
568: (8)---(9) of Table 2.
569:
570: \begin{center}
571: %\begin{small}
572: \begin{deluxetable*}{lrrccccccc}
573: %\multicolumn{19}{c}{Table 1.4} \\
574: \tablewidth{0pc}
575: \tablecaption{Galaxies and Absorption Systems}
576: \tabletypesize{\small}
577: \tablehead{ & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Galaxies} & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Absorption Systems} \\
578: \cline{2-7}
579: \cline{9-10}
580: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta \alpha$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta \delta$} & &
581: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\rho$} & & \colhead{$M_B$} & & & \colhead{$W(2796)$} \\
582: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Field} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(arcsec)} &
583: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(arcsec)} & \colhead{$z_{\rm gal}$} & \colhead{($h^{-1}$ kpc)} & \colhead{$R$\tablenotemark{a}} &
584: \colhead{$-5 \log h$} & & \colhead{$z_{\rm abs}$} & \colhead{(\AA)} \\
585: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(1)} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(2)} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(3)} &
586: \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & & \colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)} }
587: \startdata
588: 0122$-$0021 & $ -8.7$ & $ -12.3$ & $0.3788$ & $ 54.8$ & $ 20.6$ & $-19.2$ & & $0.3791$ & $0.05\pm 0.01$ \\
589: 0226$-$4110 & $ -7.9$ & $ -7.9$ & $0.2067$ & $ 26.5$ & $ 22.2$ & $-16.4$ & & ... & $< 0.02$ \\
590: & $ 11.6$ & $ -12.5$ & $0.2674$ & $ 49.0$ & $ 20.4$ & $-18.4$ & & $0.2678$ & $0.03\pm 0.01$ \\
591: 0349$-$1438 & $ -9.4$ & $ 10.8$ & $0.3567$ & $ 50.1$ & $ 20.6$ & $-19.1$ & & $0.3572$ & $0.21\pm 0.01$ \\
592: & $ 11.7$ & $ -24.1$ & $0.3236$ & $ 88.0$ & $ 20.0$ & $-19.1$ & & ... & $<0.01$ \\
593: 0454$-$2203 & $ 10.6$ & $ 5.7$ & $0.2784$ & $ 35.6$ & $ 21.1$ & $-18.0$ & & ... & $<0.01$ \\
594: & $ -1.1$ & $ -18.0$ & $0.4847$ & $ 75.8$ & $ 20.1$ & $-20.3$ & & $0.4834$ & $0.42\pm 0.01$ \\
595: & $ 0.3$ & $ -19.7$ & $0.3818$ & $ 72.0$ & $ 20.8$ & $-19.1$ & & ... & $<0.01$ \\
596: 1354$+$1933 & $ 1.2$ & $ 7.5$ & $0.4592$ & $ 31.0$ & $ 21.0$ & $-19.3$ & & $0.4563$ & $0.85\pm 0.01$ \\
597: & $ -21.6$ & $ -12.2$ & $0.4406$ & $ 98.8$ & $ 20.9$ & $-19.1$ & & ... & $<0.01$ \\
598: 1424$-$1150 & $ -0.2$ & $ 17.6$ & $0.3404$ & $ 59.8$ & $ 20.5$ & $-19.1$ & & $0.3415$ & $0.12\pm 0.04$ \\
599: 3C336 & $ 3.0$ & $ -0.0$ & $0.8920$ & $ 16.3$ & $ 23.3$ & $-19.0$ & & $0.8909$ & $1.55\pm 0.01$ \\
600: & $ -4.2$ & $ -3.8$ & $0.4720$ & $ 23.6$ & $ 22.5$ & $-17.9$ & & $0.4716$ & $0.81\pm 0.01$ \\
601: & $ -5.5$ & $ 7.5$ & $0.6350$ & $ 44.7$ & $ 24.1$ & $-17.1$ & & ... & $<0.02$ \\
602: & $ -8.9$ & $ 3.2$ & $0.7980$ & $ 49.9$ & $ 22.4$ & $-19.5$ & & $0.7969$ & $0.45\pm 0.01$ \\
603: & $ -3.3$ & $ 9.1$ & $0.5650$ & $ 44.1$ & $ 23.8$ & $-17.1$ & & ... & $<0.01$ \\
604: & $ -6.7$ & $ 9.7$ & $0.3180$ & $ 38.3$ & $ 20.2$ & $-18.9$ & & $0.3172$ & $0.50\pm 0.01$ \\
605: & $ 1.6$ & $ 14.2$ & $0.6560$ & $ 69.6$ & $ 22.7$ & $-18.6$ & & $0.6556$ & $1.43\pm 0.01$ \\
606: & $ -12.3$ & $ 9.9$ & $0.7020$ & $ 79.1$ & $ 21.9$ & $-19.6$ & & $0.7023$ & $0.04\pm 0.01$ \\
607: & $ 7.9$ & $ -17.0$ & $0.8280$ & $ 99.7$ & $ 24.2$ & $-18.3$ & & ... & $<0.01$ \\
608: & $ -21.3$ & $ -6.2$ & $0.3680$ & $ 79.2$ & $ 19.9$ & $-19.9$ & & $0.3677$ & $0.25\pm 0.01$ \\
609: & $ -24.1$ & $ 5.3$ & $0.3680$ & $ 81.0$ & $ 23.4$ & $-16.4$ & & ... & ... \\
610: & $ 25.5$ & $ 17.6$ & $0.2610$ & $ 87.5$ & $ 21.6$ & $-17.3$ & & ... & $< 0.03$ \\
611: & $ 12.7$ & $ -31.2$ & $0.2800$ & $ 100.1$ & $ 22.9$ & $-15.9$ & & ... & $< 0.02$ \\
612: \enddata
613:
614: \tablenotetext{a}{The $R$ magnitudes presented here were measured in
615: HST/WFPC2 F702W filter for all galaxies but the two in the field
616: around HE0226$-$4110. No filtered HST images are available for the
617: field of HE0226$-$4110. The magnitudes were determined based on a
618: ground-based image obtained with the Magellan Baade telescope using
619: IMACS and the Johnson $R$ filter.}
620: \end{deluxetable*}
621: \end{center}
622:
623: \section{THE EXTENT AND COVERING FACTOR OF Mg$^+$ IONS IN GALACTIC HALOS}
624:
625: In this section, we examine the correlation between galaxies and
626: Mg\,II absorbers identified along common lines of sight, using the
627: sample of 13 galaxy--Mg\,II absorber pairs and 10 galaxies at
628: $\rho\apll 100\ h^{-1}$ kpc that do not give rise to Mg\,II absorption
629: to a sensitive upper limit. The choice of $r_0=100\ h^{-1}$ kpc in
630: selecting galaxies at $\rho\apll r_0$ for our analysis is adopted, in
631: order to minimize the contamination of galaxies that are correlated
632: with the true Mg\,II absorbing galaxies through clustering and to
633: maximize the fraction of physical galaxy and absorber pairs in our
634: sample. In addition to the simulation results presented in \S\ 2,
635: this criterion is further supported by the stronger clustering signal
636: at small ($\rho<100\ h^{-1}$ kpc) impact parameters of LRGs (Bouch\'e
637: \etal\ 2004). This strong signal is a natural consequence of
638: cross-correlating objects inside the same dark matter halos of the
639: LRGs.
640:
641: To examine the existence of a fiducial relationship between the
642: strength of Mg\,II absorption and galaxy impact parameter, we present
643: in Figure 3 the distribution of $W(2796)$ with respect to $\rho$.
644: Circles represent elliptical or S0 galaxies, triangles represent
645: early-type spiral galaxies, and squares represent late-type spiral
646: galaxies. Galaxy morphological types are adopted from the
647: classifications of Chen \etal\ (1998, 2001a) that were based on a 2D
648: surface profile analysis of the high resolution HST/WFPC2 images. We
649: have also classified the galaxy at ($-7.9'',-7.9''$) and the galaxy at
650: ($11.6'',-12.5''$) from the QSO HE\,0226$-$4110 as a late-type and an
651: early-type spiral galaxy based on their respective spectral features.
652: Points with arrows in Figure 3 indicate $3 \sigma$ upper limits.
653:
654: \begin{figure}
655: \begin{center}
656: %\includegraphics[scale=0.75]{w_rho.pdf}
657: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{f3.eps}
658: \caption{Comparison of the corresponding rest-frame absorption
659: equivalent width $W(2796)$ versus galaxy impact parameter $\rho$ for a
660: sample of 23 galaxies. Circles represent elliptical or S0 galaxies,
661: triangles represent early-type spiral galaxies, and squares represent
662: late-type spiral galaxies. Points with arrows indicate $3 \sigma$
663: upper limits. }
664: \end{center}
665: \end{figure}
666:
667: Figure 3 shows that there is a moderate anti-correlation between
668: $W(2796)$ and $\rho$, i.e.\ weaker Mg\,II absorption strength is
669: observed for galaxies at larger impact parameter. We note that the
670: obvious outlier of a Mg\,II absorber with $W(2796)=1.43\pm 0.01$ \AA\
671: at $z=0.656$, currently assigned to a galaxy at $\rho=69.6\ h^{-1}$
672: kpc, is a known damped \lya\ absorber of $\log\,N(\hI)=20.36\pm 0.08$
673: (Steidel \etal\ 1997; Rao \etal\ 2006). Although the galaxy satisfies
674: our sample selection criterion, it is unlikely that the galaxy at
675: $\rho=69.6\ h^{-1}$ kpc is physically related to the absorber due to
676: the large neutral gas content for two reasons. First, all radio
677: detected sources in non-cluster environment from deep 21cm surveys
678: have coincident optical counterparts (e.g.\ Doyle \etal\ 2005).
679: Second, deep 21cm observations of the M\,31 halo reveal no H\,I clouds
680: of $N(\hI)>10^{20}$ \cmjj\ (e.g.\ Thilker \etal\ 2004). This is also
681: roughly consistent with the expected contamination rate at this
682: projected separation presented in Figure 1.
683:
684: To assess the significance of this anti-correlation, we perform a
685: generalized Kendall test that accounts for the presence of
686: non-detections and find that the null hypothesis, in which $W(2796)$
687: is randomly distributed with respect to $\rho$, can be ruled out at a
688: $>97$\% confidence level. However, the scatter of the $W(2796)$ vs.\
689: $\rho$ anti-correlation is clearly large. Specifically, 10 of the 23
690: galaxies at $\rho\apll 100\ h^{-1}$ kpc do not produce a corresponding
691: Mg\,II absorber to a sensitive upper limit, implying a mean covering
692: factor of the Mg$^+$ ions $\langle\kappa\rangle\approx 57$ \% at
693: $\rho<100\ h^{-1}$ kpc. At $\rho < 45\ h^{-1}$ kpc, we find
694: $\langle\kappa\rangle\approx 50$ \%, similar to the preliminary result
695: reported in Tripp \& Bowen (2005).
696:
697: We note, however, that the rest-frame $B$-band magnitudes of the
698: galaxies range from $M_B-5\,\log\,h=-15.9$ to $-20.3$ with a median of
699: $M_B-5\,\log\,h=-19.0$, corresponding to a range in intrinsic $B$-band
700: luminosity from $0.03\,L_{B_*}$ to $1.6\,L_{B_*}$ with a median of
701: $0.5\,L_{B_*}$ for $M_{B_*}-5\,\log\,h=-19.8$ at $z_{\rm gal}\sim 0.4$
702: (e.g.\ Faber \etal\ 2007). Because more massive galaxies are expected
703: to reside in more massive halos and therefore possess larger gaseous
704: halos, we examine whether accounting for galaxy intrinsic luminosity
705: can improve upon the anti-correlation displayed in Figure 3.
706:
707: Following TC08, we adopt an isothermal profile of finite extent
708: $R_{\rm gas}$ for representing the density of the Mg$^+$ ions around
709: individual galaxies. The expected Mg\,II absorption equivalent width,
710: $\bar{W}$ as a function of galaxy impact parameter can be calculated
711: following
712: \begin{equation}
713: \bar{W}(2796)=\frac{\bar{W}_0}{\sqrt{\rho^2+a_h^2}}\tan^{-1}{\sqrt{\frac{R_{\rm gas}^2-\rho^2}{\rho^2+a_h^2}}}
714: \end{equation}
715: at $\rho\le R_{\rm gas}$ and $\bar{W}(2796)=0$ otherwise. The core
716: radius $a_h$ is defined to be $a_h=0.2\,R_{\rm gas}$ and does not
717: affect the expected $\bar{W}(2796)$ at large $\rho$. The extent of
718: Mg\,II absorbing gas scales with the luminosity of the absorbing
719: galaxy according to
720: \begin{equation}
721: \frac{R_{\rm gas}}{R_{{\rm gas}*}}=\left(\frac{L_B}{L_{B_*}}\right)^{\beta}.
722: \end{equation}
723: Following the definition of Equation (2), $R_{{\rm gas}*}$
724: characterizes the gaseous extent of $L_*$ galaxies. The gaseous
725: extent of fainter/more luminous galaxies differs from $R_{{\rm gas}*}$
726: according the scaling relation.
727:
728: To determine the values of $\bar{W}_0$, $R_{{\rm gas}*}$, and
729: $\beta$ that best describe the data, we perform a maximum-likelihood
730: analysis that includes the upper limits in our galaxy and Mg\,II
731: absorber pair sample. The likelihood function of this analysis is
732: defined as
733: %\begin{equation}
734: \begin{eqnarray}
735: {\cal L} & = & \left( \prod_{i=1}^{n} \exp \left\{ -\frac{1}{2} \left[ \frac{y_i -
736: \bar{y}(\rho_i, L_{B_i})}{\sigma_i} \right]^2 \right\} \right)\times \\ \nonumber
737: & &
738: \left( \prod_{i=1}^m \int_{y_i}^{-\infty} dy' \exp \left\{ -\frac{1}{2} \left[
739: \frac{y' - \bar{y}(\rho_{i}, L_{B_i})}{\sigma_i} \right]^2 \right\} \right),
740: %\end{equation}
741: \end{eqnarray}
742: where $y_i=\log\,W_i$, $\bar{y}=\log\,\bar{W}$, and $\sigma_i$ is the
743: measurement uncertainty of $y_i$. The first product of Equation (3)
744: extends over the $n$ measurements and the second product extends over
745: the $m$ upper limits. (This definition of the likelihood function is
746: appropriate if the residuals about the mean relationship are normally
747: distributed.) Because $\sigma_i$ may include significant intrinsic
748: scatter (which presumably arises due to intrinsic variations between
749: individual galaxies) as well as measurement error, $\sigma_i$ is taken
750: to be the quadratic sum of the cosmic scatter $\sigma_c$ and the
751: measurement error $\sigma_{m_i}$
752: \begin{equation}
753: \sigma_i^2 = \sigma_c^2 + \sigma_{m_i}^2,
754: \end{equation}
755: where the intrinsic scatter is defined by
756: \begin{equation}
757: \sigma_c^2 = {\rm med} \left( \left\{ y_i - \bar{y}(\rho_{i},L_{B_i}) -
758: \frac{1}{n} \sum_{j=1}^n \left[ y_j - \bar{y}(\rho_{j},L_{B_j}) \right]
759: \right\}^2 - \sigma_{m_i}^2 \right).
760: \end{equation}
761: Because $\sigma_c$ depends on the maximum-likelihood solution
762: $\bar{y}=\log\,\bar{W}(\rho_{i},L_{B_i})$, the maximum-likelihood
763: solution is obtained iteratively with respect to equations (1) and
764: (2). The maximum-likelihood analysis yields
765: \begin{equation}
766: \beta=0.35\pm 0.05,
767: \end{equation}
768: and
769: \begin{equation}
770: R_{{\rm gas}*}=91_{-8}^{+3}\ h^{-1}\ {\rm kpc},
771: \end{equation}
772: and $\bar{y}_0=\log\,\bar{W}_0=-0.25\pm 0.05$ for the best-fit $R_{\rm
773: gas*}$. The errors represent the 1-$\sigma$ uncertainties of the
774: best-fit parameters. In addition, we estimate a cosmic scatter of
775: $\sigma_c=0.25$ dex. The best-fit isothermal model is presented in
776: Figure 4 (solid curve).
777:
778: \begin{figure}
779: \begin{center}
780: %\includegraphics[scale=0.75]{w_rhom.pdf}
781: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{f4.eps}
782: \caption{Comparison of the rest-frame absorption equivalent width
783: $W(2796)$ versus galaxy impact parameter $\rho$ scaled by galaxy
784: $B$-band luminosity. Symbols are the same as those in Figure 3. The
785: solid curve represents the best-fit model based on an isothermal
786: density profile of the Mg$^+$ ions, while the dotted curve shows the
787: expectation from an NFW density profile. The errorbar in the
788: upper-right corner represents the intrinsic scatter of the best-fit
789: model, in comparison to the observations, as defined in Equation (5).}
790: \end{center}
791: \end{figure}
792:
793: The results of our maximum likelihood analysis indicate that the
794: extent of Mg\,II gaseous halo scales with galaxy $B$-band luminosity
795: according to $(L_B/L_{B_*})^\beta$ and $\beta=0.35\pm 0.05$, and that
796: typical $L_*$ galaxies possess an extended Mg\,II halo of radius
797: $R_{\rm gas}\approx 91\ h^{-1}$ kpc. It is worth noting that the
798: best-fit $91_{-8}^{+3}\ h^{-1}$ kpc characterizes the gaseous extent
799: of $L_*$ galaxies, beyond which no Mg$^+$ ions are found to the limit
800: of $W_r(2796)=0.01$ \AA. Adopting the best-fit scaling relation, the
801: gaseous extent of $0.1\,L_*$ galaxies is expected to be $\approx 41 \
802: h^{-1}$ kpc. Figure 4 shows the relation of $W_r(2796)$ vs.\
803: luminosity scaled $\rho$, in which seven galaxies at $> 100\ h^{-1}$
804: kpc do not have a corresponding Mg\,II absorption feature to the limit
805: of $W(2796)=0.01$ Ang. These non-detections provide the strongest
806: constraints on $R_{{\rm gas}*}$.
807:
808: To examine possible bias in $R_{{\rm gas}*}$ as a result of the
809: initial sample definition that consider only galaxies at $\rho \apll
810: r_0=100\ h^{-1}$ kpc, we repeat the likelihood analysis adopting
811: $r_0=80\ h^{-1}$ kpc and find that the best-fit results remain the
812: same. Choosing a smaller $r_0$ reduces the sample substantially and
813: the parameters become poorly constrained. Furthermore, we note that
814: the results are also insensitive to the choice of model gaseous
815: profile. We obtain similar results, adopting a Navarro-Frenk-White
816: (NFW) profile commonly used for describing the profiles of dark matter
817: halos (Navarro \etal\ 1997). The best-fit NFW profile is also
818: presented in Figure 4 (dotted curve). Comparisons of observations and
819: different model profiles show that an isothermal model profile of the
820: underlying gaseous halo provides a good fit to the observed $W(2796)$
821: vs.\ $\rho$ relation.
822:
823: In summary, Figure 4 demonstrates that accounting for the scaling
824: relation of gaseous extent with galaxy luminosity, the scatter in the
825: $W(2796)$ versus $\rho$ relation is substantially reduced.
826: Furthermore, the $W(2796)$ versus $\rho$ relation scaled by galaxy
827: intrinsic luminosity allows us to estimate a mean covering factor of
828: Mg$^+$ ions average across galaxies of a wide range of luminosity. We
829: find $\langle\kappa\rangle=80-86$ \% within $R_{\rm gas}$, including
830: the uncertainty in $R_{{\rm gas}*}$ from Equation (7).
831:
832: \section{DISCUSSION}
833:
834: Using the sample of 13 galaxy--Mg\,II absorber pairs and 10 galaxies
835: at $\rho\apll 100\ h^{-1}$ kpc that do not give rise to Mg\,II
836: absorption to a sensitive upper limit, we find that galaxies at larger
837: impact parameters produce on average weaker Mg\,II absorbers. This
838: anti-correlation is substantially improved, when accounting for the
839: intrinsic luminosity of individual galaxies. In addition, there
840: exists a distinct boundary at $\rho=R_{\rm gas}$, beyond which no
841: Mg\,II absorbers with $W(2796)\ge 0.01$ \AA\ are found. A maximum
842: likelihood analysis shows that the observations are best described by
843: an isothermal density profile of the gas and a scaling relation
844: $R_{\rm gas}=91_{-8}^{+3}\times (L_B/L_{B_*})^{(0.35\pm 0.05)}\
845: h^{-1}$ kpc with a mean covering factor of
846: $\langle\kappa\rangle=80-86$ \% at $\rho\le R_{\rm gas}$. The
847: best-fit profile applies to galaxies of $0.03\,L_{B_*}$ to
848: $1.6\,L_{B_*}$ and therefore predominantly cold-mode halos. For
849: higher mass halos, we expect from TC08 that the corresponding
850: absorption strength for a given $\rho$ is reduced, namely a smaller
851: $\bar{W}_0$ in Equation (1). In this section, we discuss the
852: implications drawn from the results of our analysis.
853:
854: \subsection{Comparisons with Previous Studies}
855:
856: Adopting the best-fit scaling relation and the gaseous profile
857: described in Equation (1), we derive a corresponding halo size of
858: $\rho\approx 69\ h^{-1}$ physical kpc for galaxies of
859: $M_B-5\,log\,h=-19.8$ at $W(2796)=0.3$ \AA. This halo size is
860: consistent with the finding of Lanzetta \& Bowen (1990) and the
861: expectation inferred from known Mg\,II frequency function (Nestor
862: \etal\ 2005; see the descriptions in \S\ 5.2), but is larger than what
863: was reported in Steidel (1995). Steidel (1995) reported a
864: characteristic size of Mg\,II halo of $R_*\approx 35\ h^{-1}$ kpc for
865: $L_*$ (corresponding to $M_{B_*}-5\,\log\,h=-19.7$ for the cosmology
866: adopted in this paper) galaxies, but it is not clear at what $W(2796)$
867: limit the halo size was estimated. At $\rho=35\ h^{-1}$ kpc, we
868: expect $\bar{W}(2794)=0.9$ \AA\ from the best-fit model.
869:
870: The high gas covering factor derived from our analysis is consistent
871: with what is inferred from the sample of Kacprzak \etal\ (2008).
872: Applying the best-fit luminosity scaling relation of gaseous extent,
873: we find that four of the 28 galaxies within the expected gaseous
874: extent for $W_r(2796)> 0.3$ \AA\ absorbers in the Kacprzak \etal\
875: sample have a corresponding Mg\,II weaker than the 0.3 \AA\ threshold.
876: The inferred covering fraction is $\approx 86$\%. At the same time,
877: this high covering fraction disagrees with the value reported in Tripp
878: \& Bowen (2005), the only other on-going survey program designed to
879: constrain gas covering fraction by searching for corresponding Mg\,II
880: absorbers at the locations of known {\it field} galaxies\footnote{We
881: note two earlier surveys by Bechtold \& Ellingson (1992) and Bowen
882: \etal\ (1995) that include a dominant fraction of galaxies in dense
883: cluster environment. Both studies reported a substantially lower
884: covering fraction, $\langle\kappa\rangle\apll 20$ \% for $W(2796)>0.1$
885: absorbers. The low covering fraction of strong absorbers is
886: understood, because galaxies clusters reside in massive dark matter
887: halos of $M_h> 10^{14}\,\hmsol$ and the fraction of ``cold'' gas in
888: these massive halos is expected to be reduced (see TC08).}. The
889: authors obtained follow-up spectra of background QSOs that are located
890: within $\rho=10-39\ h^{-1}$ physical kpc of 20 known galaxies at
891: $z_{\rm gal}=0.31-0.55$. They found that 10 of the 20 galaxies do not
892: produce Mg\,II absorbers to within a 2-$\sigma$ upper limit of
893: $W(2796)=0.1$ \AA, and concluded that the incidence of Mg$^+$ ions is
894: $\approx\,50$ \% at $\rho\apll 40\ h^{-1}$ kpc in individual galactic
895: halos.
896:
897: Because more luminous galaxies have larger extended Mg\,II halos
898: according to the scaling relation presented in Equations (2), (6), and
899: (7), this discrepancy can be understood if many of the galaxies in
900: Tripp \& Bowen are located at impact parameters that are larger than
901: their expected $R_{\rm gas}$. Recall that we obtained a similar
902: estimate of $\langle\kappa\rangle\approx 57$ \% at $\rho< 100\ h^{-1}$
903: kpc (or $\langle\kappa\rangle\approx 50$ \% at $\rho< 45\ h^{-1}$
904: kpc), {\it prior to} accounting for the scaling relation between
905: $R_{\rm gas}$ and $L_B$ in individual galaxies (\S\ 4).
906:
907: In addition, the sample in Tripp \& Bowen includes galaxies of
908: luminosity ranging from $0.3\,L_*$ to $5\,L_*$. Those galaxies that
909: are more luminous than $L_*$ are also expected to reside in more
910: massive halos. At $z=0$, $5\,L_*$ galaxies are expected to reside in
911: $> 10^{13}\,\hmsol$ halos (Tinker \etal\ 2007). If the host dark
912: matter halos are substantially more massive than $10^{12.0}\,\hmsol$,
913: then we expect from the halo occupation analysis in TC08 that they do
914: not contribute significantly to strong Mg\,II absorbers. In summary,
915: further inspections of the properties of these galaxies and estimates
916: of the gas covering fraction $\kappa$ as a function of radius and
917: $W(2796)$ are crucial for resolving this discrepancy.
918:
919: \subsection{The Origin of Mg\,II Absorbers}
920:
921: The scaling relation and the constraint of $\langle\kappa\rangle$
922: together also allow us to test whether the Mg\,II absorbers trace a
923: significant and representative portion of the galaxy population or
924: merely a special class such as those galaxies undergoing a starburst
925: episode. If extended Mg\,II halos are a generic feature of
926: field\footnote{We define field galaxies as those that are not
927: associated with a known cluster.} galaxies at all epochs, then we can
928: derive the expected number density of Mg\,II absorbers by combining
929: known space density of galaxies (versus luminosity) and the product of
930: the cross section and covering factor of the Mg$^+$ ions. An
931: agreement with observational results from surveys of Mg\,II absorbers
932: would challenge the scenario that attributes a large fraction of these
933: absorbers to starburst systems\footnote{However, we will not to able
934: to rule out a scenario in which the blow-out winds are common in most
935: galaxy histories. Given enough time, long-lived outflowing gas gets
936: mixed in with existing halo gas and newly accreted material from the
937: IGM. There is little distinction at this point between outflows and
938: accreted clouds. It is also not clear whether the outflow material
939: would maintain the same degree of complex gas kinematics as those that
940: are closer to the parent starburst regions.}.
941:
942: The predicted number density of Mg\,II absorption systems arising in
943: the extended gaseous halos of galaxies may be evaluated according to
944: %\begin{equation}
945: \begin{eqnarray}
946: \frac{d\,{\cal N}(W\ge W_{lim})}{d\,z} & = & \frac{c}{H_0} \frac{(1 + z)^2}{\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm M}\,(1+z)^3 + \Omega_{\rm \Lambda}}} \\
947: & & \times \int_0^\infty
948: d\left(\frac{L_B}{L_{B_*}}\right)\,\Phi(L_B,z)\,\sigma(L_B,W_{lim})\,\kappa, \nonumber
949: \end{eqnarray}
950: where $c$ is the speed of light, $\Phi(L_B,z)$ is the galaxy
951: luminosity function, $\sigma$ is the gas cross section for producing
952: Mg\,II absorbers of $W(2796)\ge W_{lim}$ that scales with galaxy $B$-band
953: luminosity, and $\kappa$ is the halo covering factor. Substituting
954: the scaling relationship according to Equations (2), (6), and (7), we
955: find
956: \begin{eqnarray}
957: \frac{d\,{\cal N}(W\ge W_{lim})}{d\,z} & = & \frac{c}{H_0}\frac{\pi\,\langle\kappa\rangle\,[R'_{{\rm gas}*}(W_{lim})]^2\,(1 + z)^2}{\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm M}\,(1+z)^3 + \Omega_{\rm \Lambda}}} \\
958: & & \times\int_0^\infty d\left(\frac{L_B}{L_{B_*}}\right)\,\left(\frac{L_B}{L_{B_*}}\right)^{2\,\beta}\,\Phi(L_B,z)\,, \nonumber
959: \end{eqnarray}
960: where $R'_{{\rm gas}*}(W_{lim})$ is the extent of Mg\,II halos that
961: corresponds to $W(2796)=W_{lim}$.
962:
963: To evaluate Equation (9), we adopt the luminosity function of the
964: blue galaxy population at $z_{\rm gal}=0.3-0.5$ from Faber \etal\
965: (2007), which is characterized by $M_{B_*}-5\,\log=-19.8$,
966: $\phi_*=9.6\times 10^{-3}\ h^{3}$ Mpc$^{-3}$, and a faint-end slope
967: $\alpha=-1.3$. Including galaxies of $L_B\ge 0.01\,L_{B_*}$ and our
968: best-fit $R_{{\rm gas}*}$ and $\langle\kappa\rangle$, Equation (9)
969: yields $d\,{\cal N}/dz=0.028-0.03$ for $W(2796)\ge 2$ \AA\ absorbers,
970: $d\,{\cal N}/dz=0.21-0.23$ for $W(2796)\ge 1$ \AA\ absorbers, and
971: $d\,{\cal N}/dz=0.88-1.07$ for $W(2796)\ge 0.3$ \AA\ absorbers at
972: $z=0.5$. The predictions based on galaxies more luminous than
973: $0.01\,L_*$ agree well with the observed $d\,{\cal N}/d\,z$ from
974: Nestor \etal\ (2005), lending strong support for the hypothesis that
975: the Mg\,II absorbers trace a significant and representative portion,
976: rather than a sub-class, of the galaxy population.
977:
978: The model profile of Equation (1) has been proved to be a good
979: representation of the galaxy and absorber pairs at $\rho=16.3-100\
980: h^{-1}$ kpc, when the scaling relation of Equations (2), (6), and (7)
981: is accounted for. An important test is to examine whether the model
982: remains a good fit at smaller $\rho$ and strong absorbers.
983: Identifying galaxy--absorber pairs at small impact parameters is
984: difficult, because the glare of the background QSO often prohibits
985: identification of faint galaxies at angular distances $\theta<2''$
986: that corresponds to $\sim 10\ h^{-1}$ physical kpc at $z\apll 0.5$.
987:
988: Recent studies of intervening absorption-line systems along the
989: lines of sight toward the optical afterglows of distant $\gamma$-ray
990: bursts (GRB) have uncovered a number of strong Mg\,II absorbers (e.g.\
991: Prochter \etal\ 2006b). Unlike QSOs, GRB afterglows disappear after a
992: while, permitting exhaustive searches of faint galaxies at
993: $\theta<2''$ that give rise to strong Mg\,II absorbers along the lines
994: of sight. A redshift survey of galaxies along the sightline toward
995: GRB\,060418 ($z_{\rm GRB}=1.491$) has uncovered the absorbing galaxies
996: for three strong Mg\,II absorbers at $z=0.603-1.107$ (Pollack \etal\
997: 2008, in preparation), similar to the redshift range covered by our
998: sample. The rest-frame $B$-band magnitudes of the galaxies range from
999: $M_B-5\,\log\,h=-16.8$ to $M_B-5\,\log\,h=-18.3$; Impact parameters of
1000: the galaxies range from $\rho=7.5\ h^{-1}$ kpc to $\rho=16.5\ h^{-1}$
1001: kpc. Adopting the best-fit scaling relation, we include the three
1002: galaxy--Mg\,II absorber pairs in the $W(2796)$ versus $\rho$ plot for
1003: comparison (star points in Figure 5). The good agreement between the
1004: best-fit model and the absorbers found along GRB sightlines provides
1005: further support for our model at small impact parameters.
1006:
1007: \begin{figure}
1008: %\begin{center}
1009: %\includegraphics[scale=0.75]{w_rhom_mod.pdf}
1010: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{f5.eps}
1011: \caption{The $W(2796)$ versus $\rho$ correlation scaled by galaxy
1012: $B$-band luminosity presented in Figure 4, but including pairs from
1013: Pollack \etal\ (2008; star points) and Bouch\'e \etal\ (2007; points
1014: with horizontal errorbars) for comparisons. The solid curves
1015: represent the best-fit model based on an isothermal density profile,
1016: with $a_h=0.1\,R_{\rm gas}$ (top curve) and $a_h=0.2\,R_{\rm gas}$
1017: (bottom curve). The pairs of Pollack \etal\ are for galaxies and
1018: Mg\,II absorbers identified at $z=0.6-1$ along the sightline toward
1019: GRB\,060418. The errorbars in these data points are smaller than the
1020: size of the symbols. The pairs of Bouch\'e \etal\ are galaxies found
1021: at the positions of known Mg\,II absorbers based on the presence of
1022: H$\alpha$ emission lines. Errorbars represent the uncertainties of
1023: the inferred $M_B$ from the $M_B$ versus $L(\ha)$ correlation
1024: published in Tresse \etal\ (2002). Crosses represent the absorbers in
1025: the Bouch\'e sample that are likely ($\apg 40$ \% probability) to be a
1026: damped \lya\ absorber of $N(\hI)\ge 2\times 10^{20}$ \cmjj\ based on
1027: the presence of strong Fe\,II and Mg\,I transitions (Rao \etal\
1028: 2006).}
1029: %\end{center}
1030: \end{figure}
1031:
1032: \subsection{Are Strong [$W(2796)>1$ \AA] Absorbers at $z\sim 1$ Produced Primarily in Starburst Outflows?}
1033:
1034: As described in \S\ 1, the large line width of $W(2796)>1$ \AA\
1035: Mg\,II absorbers has recently been interpreted as due to outflow
1036: motions in starburst driven winds. This scenario was initially
1037: motivated by the observed inverse correlation between $W(2796)$ and
1038: the clustering amplitude of Mg\,II absorbers at $\langle z\rangle=0.6$
1039: (Bouch\'e \etal\ 2006). In TC08, we have shown that this inverse
1040: correlation can be understood as due to an elevated clustering
1041: amplitude of $W(2796)\apll 1$ \AA\ absorbers from contributions of
1042: survived cold clouds in massive hot halos, rather than a suppressed
1043: clustering strength of $W(2796)\apg 2$ \AA\ absorbers. In addition,
1044: we have shown in \S\S\ 4, 5.1, and 5.2 that extended Mg\,II halos are
1045: a generic feature of field galaxies over a wide luminosity range. The
1046: predicted number density of the absorbers from adopting the scaling
1047: relation, Equations (2), (6), and (7), and the galaxy luminosity
1048: function agrees well with observations. Specifically, we expect
1049: $d\,{\cal N}/dz\approx 0.03$ for $W(2796)\ge 2$ \AA\ absorbers, in
1050: comparison to the observed $d\,{\cal N}/dz=0.03-0.04$ for $W(2796)\ge
1051: 2$ \AA\ absorbers at $z\approx 0.5$ from Nestor \etal\ (2005). While
1052: there is no clear indicator one can apply to unambiguously distinguish
1053: between gas inflows and outflows in the distant universe, we discuss
1054: several caveats related to the starburst outflow scenario.
1055:
1056: If the absorbers are produced in starburst driven outflows, then a
1057: large fraction of the absorbing galaxy population might be expected to
1058: exhibit disturbed morphology (Mobasher \etal\ 2004). The Mg\,II
1059: absorbing galaxies in our sample exhibit regular disk morphologies in
1060: the HST images shown in Figure 2. In particular, the strong absorber
1061: found with $W(2796)=1.55$ \AA\ at $z=0.892$ toward 3C336 is associated
1062: with an edge-on disk galaxy at $\rho= 16.3\ h^{-1}$ kpc. The three
1063: Mg\,II absorbers of $W(2796)>1$ \AA\ found toward GRB\,060418 also
1064: exhibit regular disk structures in high-resolution images obtained
1065: both in space using HST and on the ground using LGAO on the Keck
1066: telescopes (Pollack \etal\ 2008, in preparation). Kacprzak \etal\
1067: (2007) also showed that there is little correlation between
1068: $W_r(2796)$ and galaxy asymmetry for Mg\,II absorbers of
1069: $W_r(2796)>1.4$ \AA. While some strong Mg\,II absorbers have been
1070: presented to show evidence of arising in expanding superbubble shells
1071: (Bond \etal\ 2001), available high-resolution images of other strong
1072: Mg\,II absorbers do not support outflow being principally responsible
1073: for the observed strong absorbers. This conclusion is also consistent
1074: with the spectral properties of Mg\,II-selected galaxies published by
1075: Guillemin \& Bergeron (1997)
1076:
1077: On the other hand, Bouch\'e \etal\ (2007) presented new observations
1078: from a targeted search for corresponding H$\alpha$ emission in the
1079: vicinity of known Mg\,II absorbers. These authors successfully
1080: identified H$\alpha$ emission near 14 of 21 Mg\,II absorbers with
1081: $W(2796)>1.9$ \AA\ at $z\sim 1$. The integrated raw\footnote{No
1082: extinction correction is applied to $L(\ha)$ in our analysis, because
1083: the dust content is expected to vary substantially in $z\sim 1$
1084: galaxies (e.g.\ Tresse \etal\ 2002) and is unknown for galaxies in the
1085: Bouch\'e \etal\ sample. Bouch\'e \etal\ (2007) applied a constant
1086: correction to all observed \ha\ flux in their calculation, resulting
1087: in a simple scaling of the observed values. The scatter in their
1088: measurements induced by dust remains the same. For consistency, we
1089: consider in the following discussion only observed values without
1090: extinction correction both for the absorbing galaxies and for
1091: comparison results, such as the \ha\ luminosity function and the
1092: $M_B-L(\ha)$ correlation, from the literature.} \ha\ luminosities
1093: range from $L_{\ha}=6.8\times 10^{40}\ h^{-2}$ erg s$^{-1}$ to
1094: $L_{\ha}=8.4\times 10^{41}\ h^{-2}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The impact
1095: parameters range from $\rho=1.4\ h^{-1}$ kpc to $\rho=35\ h^{-1}$ kpc.
1096: Adopting a mean extinction correction $A_V=0.8$ mag, the authors
1097: inferred a mean star formation rate of $\langle{\rm SFR}\rangle=5.9\
1098: h^{-2}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ for these galaxies.
1099:
1100: The \ha\ luminosity function at $z\sim 1$ has been studied by a
1101: number of groups (see Doherty \etal\ 2006 for a list of references).
1102: It is characterized by a Schechter function of $L_{{\ha}_*}=5\times
1103: 10^{41}\ h^{2}$ erg s$^{-1}$, $\phi_*=0.013\ h^3\,{\rm Mpc}^{-3} $,
1104: and $\alpha=-1.3$. The galaxies detected in \ha\ by Bouch\'e \etal\
1105: correspond to $0.14-1.68\,L_{\ha_*}$ at $z\sim 1$, and therefore have
1106: only modest $L(\ha)$. Integrating the \ha\ luminosity function, we
1107: obtain a mean space density of 0.034 $h^{3}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ for galaxies
1108: of brighter than $0.1\,L_{{\ha}_*}$. This is already 50\% of all
1109: galaxies more luminous than $0.01\,L_{B_*}$ at $z\sim 1$, according to
1110: the best-fit luminosity function of the blue galaxy population from
1111: Faber \etal\ (2007). This exercise shows that \ha\ emission is
1112: commonly seen in $z\sim 1$ galaxies and the presence of modest
1113: $L(\ha)$ does not argue for the presence of starburst outflows, unless
1114: the outflow material is long-lived.
1115:
1116: For comparison, we include the 14 galaxy and absorber pairs from
1117: Bouch\'e \etal\ (2007) in the $W(2796)$ versus $\rho$ plot in Figure
1118: 5, applying the same scaling relation described in Equations (2), (6),
1119: and (7). We estimate $M_B$ of these galaxies based on the published
1120: $M_B-L(\ha)$ correlation in Tresse \etal\ (2002). We adopt the
1121: observed $L(\ha)$ and the scaling relation
1122: $M_B=73.5-2.27\times\log\,L_(\ha)$ that best describes the data in
1123: Tresse \etal\ (2002). At small impact parameters, the model
1124: predictions depend sensitively on the choice of $a_h$ in Equation (1).
1125: In addition to the fiducial model, we also include in the figure a
1126: model with $a_h=0.1\,R_{\rm gas}$.
1127:
1128: Nine of the 14 Mg\,II absorbers are considered likely ($>40$ \%)
1129: damped \lya\ absorbers (DLAs) of $N(\hI)\ge 2\times 10^{20}$ \cmjj\
1130: based on the presence of strong Fe\,II and Mg\,I transitions (Rao
1131: \etal\ 2006). DLAs are the high-redshift analog of neutral gas
1132: regions that resembles the disks of nearby luminous galaxies (e.g.\
1133: Wolfe \etal\ 2005). We therefore expect that the impact parameter
1134: distribution of galaxy-DLA pairs represents the typical extent of H\,I
1135: disks at high redshifts. We highlight the potential DLAs in the
1136: Bouch\'e \etal\ sample as crosses in Figure 5. After applying the
1137: best-fit scaling relation for Mg\,II absorbers, we find that the
1138: impact parameters of these galaxy and potential DLA pairs range from
1139: $8\ h^{-1}$ kpc to as high as $38\ h^{-1}$ kpc. The three largest
1140: separation pairs have $\rho'>28\ h^{-1}$ kpc, where $\rho'$ is the
1141: luminosity scaled projected distance. The scaling of impact parameter
1142: is justified, because smaller/fainter galaxies have on average smaller
1143: \hI\ disks (e.g.\ Cayatte \etal\ 1994). The large impact parameters,
1144: together with the likely high $N(\hI)$, suggest that the galaxies
1145: responsible for these absorbers (presumably at smaller angular
1146: distances from the QSOs) may still be missing. For the remaining
1147: sample, our model is in reasonably good agreement with their data.
1148:
1149: In summary, we find a lack of empirical measurements that argue for
1150: starburst outflows to be a dominant mechanism for producing the
1151: observed strong Mg\,II absorbers at $z\sim 1$. On the other hand,
1152: both the observed number density of Mg\,II absorbers and the $W(2796)$
1153: versus $\rho$ correlation can be explained by extended Mg\,II halos
1154: around typical field galaxies. The fraction of Mg\,II absorbers
1155: originating in starburst outflows is therefore expected to be small at
1156: $z\sim 1$, unless starburst outflows are a common feature in field
1157: galaxies. We caution, however, that the same conclusion cannot be
1158: automatically applied to absorbers at $z\sim 2$ before a similar
1159: analysis is performed.
1160:
1161: \subsection{Constraints on the Extended Gaseous Halos Around Galaxies}
1162:
1163: The sharp decline of $W(2976)$ found at $\rho\approx 90\ h^{-1}$ kpc
1164: in Figure 4 clearly indicates that Mg$^+$ ions have a finite extent in
1165: the extended gaseous halos around galaxies. This is reminiscent of
1166: the sharp boundary between the C\,IV absorbing and non-absorbing
1167: regions around $\langle z\rangle=0.4$ galaxies reported in Chen \etal\
1168: (2001b).
1169:
1170: Given the nature of a photo-ionized gas (Bergeron \& Stas\'inska
1171: 1986; Hamann 1997), we examine whether the finite extent of Mg$^+$
1172: ions can be understood as due to photo-ionization of the absorbing
1173: clouds at large radii. In a two-phase halo model (e.g.\ Mo \&
1174: Miralda-Escud\'e 1996), cold clouds that are responsible for producing
1175: the absorption features are pressure confined in a hot medium. As the
1176: total gas density declines toward larger radii, the density of the
1177: cold clouds also decreases and the clouds become optically thin to the
1178: ultraviolet photons that can quickly ionize the Mg$^+$ ions
1179: (I.P.\,$=$\,15.035 eV). With a known background radiation field, the
1180: location where the ionization transition occurs may be adopted to
1181: constrain the density of cold gas at large radii.
1182:
1183: We carry out the photo-ionization analysis, using the Cloudy
1184: software (Ferland \etal\ 1998; version 06.02), and calculate the
1185: ionization fractions of Mg$^+$ ions for a grid of models with
1186: different total gas density and metallicity. We adopt the spectral
1187: shape of the UV background radiation field of Haardt \& Madau in
1188: Cloudy for the incident ionizing flux, and scale the radiation
1189: intensity to the background UV radiation field inferred from QSO
1190: proximity effect (Scott \etal\ 2002). We adopt a plane parallel
1191: geometry for the clouds with a thickness of 100 pc, which is motivated
1192: by the observed coherent length of Mg\,II absorbers toward lensed QSOs
1193: (Rauch \etal\ 2002). The slab of gas is illuminated by the ionization
1194: radiation field on both sides.
1195:
1196: \begin{figure}
1197: \begin{center}
1198: %\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{photoion.pdf}
1199: \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{f6.eps}
1200: \caption{Ionization fractions of Mg$^+$ ions and H$^0$ atoms versus
1201: total gas density $n_{\rm H}$ for photo-ionized gas. The values are
1202: calculated using the Cloudy software (Ferland \etal\ 1998; version
1203: 06.02) for gaseous clouds of plane parallel geometry and 100 pc
1204: thickness. The input ionizing radiation intensity is set to be
1205: $J_\nu(912\AA)=7\times 10^{-23}$ erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
1206: Sr$^{-1}$ suitable for the $z<1$ universe (Scott \etal\ 2002). We
1207: perform the calculations, assuming solar (dotted curve for Mg and
1208: dot-dashed curve for H) and $1/10$ solar metallicity (solid curve for
1209: Mg and dashed curve for H).}
1210: \end{center}
1211: \end{figure}
1212:
1213: Figure 6 shows the expected fractions of Mg$^+$ ions (solid and
1214: dotted curves) as a function of the total gas density $n_{\rm H}$. We
1215: include the calculated fraction of H$^0$ atoms (dashed and dash-dotted
1216: curves) for comparison. The solid and dashed curves are for gas of
1217: $1/10$ solar metallicity, while the dotted and dash-dotted curves are
1218: for gas of solar metallicity. Our photo-ionization calculations
1219: indicate that indeed the fraction of Mg$^+$ declines linearly at
1220: $n_{\rm H}\apll 0.025\ {\rm cm}^{-3}$ for a mean radiation intensity of
1221: $J_\nu(912\AA)=7\times 10^{-23}$ erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
1222: Sr$^{-1}$ (which is appropriate for the observed background radiation
1223: field at $z<1$ Scott \etal\ 2002). However, the transition is not as
1224: sharp as what is seen for hydrogen atoms. Including the estimated
1225: ionization fraction from the Cloudy models and adopting the density
1226: profile parameterized in Equation (1), we derive the expected
1227: correlation between $W_r(2796)$ and $\rho$ and find that
1228: photo-ionization is insufficient for explaining the presence of the
1229: sharp decline in the observed Mg\,II absorption strength.
1230:
1231: This extent of Mg\,II gaseous halos ($\approx 90\ h^{-1}$ kpc around
1232: typical $L_*$ galaxies) is remarkably similar to the extent of C\,IV
1233: gaseous halo ($\approx 110\ h^{-1}$ kpc around typical $L_*$ galaxies,
1234: after correcting for the $\Lambda$-cosmology) reported by Chen \etal\
1235: (2001b). On the basis of 14 galaxy and C\,IV absorber pairs and 36
1236: galaxies that do not produce corresponding C\,IV absorption lines to
1237: within sensitive upper limits, these authors find that the extent of
1238: C\,IV-absorbing gas around galaxies scales with galaxy $B$-band
1239: luminosity as $R_{\rm gas}({\rm C\,IV}) \propto 110 \times L_B^{0.5
1240: \pm 0.1}\ h^{-1}$ kpc (corrected for the $\Lambda$ cosmology). In
1241: addition, there exists a sharp boundary between C\,IV absorbing and
1242: non-absorbing regions at $R_{\rm gas}({\rm C\,IV})$. But the scatter
1243: in the observed C\,IV absorption strengths at $\rho< R_{\rm gas}({\rm
1244: C\,IV})$ between different galaxies appears to be significantly larger
1245: than what is seen in Figure 4, and there is a lack of anti-correlation
1246: between the observed C\,VI absorbing strength and galaxy impact
1247: parameter.
1248:
1249: Given the distinct ionization potentials of the C$^{3+}$ and Mg$^+$
1250: ions, {\it the location where the abrupt transition between absorbing
1251: and non-absorbing regions occurs can be understood as a critical
1252: radius below which cool clouds can form and stablize in an otherwise
1253: hot halo}. This two-phase model to interpret QSO absorption line
1254: systems was formulated in Mo \& Miralda-Escud\'e (1996) and later
1255: re-visited by Maller \& Bullock (2004).
1256:
1257: Taking into account the appropriate photo-ionization condition of
1258: the cold clouds, Mo \& Miralda-Escud\'e presented the expected Mg\,II
1259: and C\,IV absorption strength versus radius for halos of different
1260: mass. Their models showed a lack of radial dependence on the C\,IV
1261: absorption strength and a tight correlation between Mg\,II $W_r(2796)$
1262: and $\rho$ for halos of a wide range of mass. The differences in the
1263: radial dependence of different ions is understood as being due to the
1264: photo-ionization condition of cold clouds in the UV background
1265: radiation field. These model expectations agree with observational
1266: findings very well.
1267:
1268: The agreement between observations and a simple two-phase model is
1269: encouraging, although it is not clear how the two-phase model applies
1270: to cold-mode halos (e.g.\ Dekel \& Birnboim 2006). Measurements of
1271: the relative abundances between C$^{3+}$ and Mg$^+$ as a function of
1272: radius will provide additional support for the origin of these
1273: metal-line absorbers, further constraining the metallicity and density
1274: of halo gas around galaxies.
1275:
1276:
1277: \subsection{Implications for the Halo Occupation Analysis and Future Work}
1278:
1279: Our initial halo occupation analysis (TC08) included two principal
1280: assumptions for the extent of Mg$^+$. First, we assumed that the
1281: extent of the cold gaseous halo is $R_{\rm gas,12}=50\,h^{-1}$
1282: physical kpc for $M_h=10^{12}\,\hmsol$ halos, which is roughly $1/3$
1283: of the halo radius $R_{200}$ at $z=0.6$. Recall that the standard
1284: definition of a dark matter halo is an object with a mean interior
1285: density of 200 times the background density. Second, the gaseous
1286: extent scaled with the halo mass as $M_h^{t}$ and $t=1/3$, following
1287: the expectation of the scaling relation between halo mass and the
1288: corresponding virial radius. The results presented in \S\ 4 offer a
1289: direct test of these assumptions.
1290:
1291: To compare the empirical constraints of Equations (6) \& (7) with our
1292: initial model assumptions, we first derive the corresponding dark
1293: matter halo mass $M_h$ and their halo radius $R_{200}$ for galaxies of
1294: known absolute $B$-band magnitudes. The adopted $M_{\rm B_*}$ for the
1295: analysis in \S\ 4 corresponds to a magnitude of $M_{\rm
1296: b_J}-5\,\log\,h=-19.7$ in the bandpass of the Two-Degree Field Galaxy
1297: Redshift Survey (2dFGRS, Colless \etal\ 2001). The 2dFGRS probes
1298: galaxies at $z\sim 0.1$. Excluding galaxies that exist as satellites
1299: in a cluster environment\footnote{We note that the fraction of
1300: satellite galaxies is $\lesssim 15$ \% for $L_*$ galaxies (Tinker
1301: \etal\ 2007; ZCZ07). In addition, none of the galaxies in our sample
1302: are observed to be part of a larger group or cluster. Here we carry
1303: out our calculations, assuming that most of galaxies in our sample are
1304: central galaxies in their dark matter halos.}, the mean halo mass for
1305: $M_{\rm B_*}$ galaxies is $10^{12.5}\,h^{-1}\,\hmsol$ at $z\sim 0.1$
1306: (Tinker \etal\ 2007; van den Bosch \etal\ 2007). At $z\sim 1$,
1307: galaxies of this magnitude on average reside in $10^{11.9}\,\hmsol$
1308: halos (ZCZ07). Interpolating in $\log\,(1+z)$, we find that galaxies
1309: of $M_{\rm B_*}-5\,\log\,h=-19.8$ are expected to reside in halos of
1310: $M_h=10^{12.3}\,\hmsol$ at $z=0.4$ and that the halo radius for
1311: $M_{\rm B_*}$ galaxies is $R_{200}=212\,h^{-1}$ physical kpc. The
1312: best-fit $R_{\rm gas*}$ from Equation (7) therefore implies $R_{\rm
1313: gas}\approx 0.4\,R_{200}$.
1314:
1315: Next, we derive the expected scaling relation between $R_{\rm gas}$
1316: and halo mass $M_h$. The halo occupation analysis of 2dFGRS galaxies
1317: from Tinker \etal\ (2007) showed that the relationship between $M_h$
1318: and luminosity for galaxies of $L_{b_J}\lesssim L_{*}$ at $z\sim 0.1$
1319: is $M_h = 10^{12.5}\,(L_B/L_{B_*})^{1.3}\,\hmsol$. this monotonic
1320: relationship is appropriate for galaxies that reside at the {\it
1321: centers} of their dark matter halos and are the brightest galaxy in
1322: the halo. A similar scaling relation was obtained from DEEP2 data by
1323: ZCZ07 for galaxies at $z\sim 1$. Because there is a
1324: monotonic relationship between halo mass and galaxy luminosity, the
1325: scaling relation of $R_{\rm gas}$ with $L_B$ in Equation (2) is
1326: equivalent to a scaling relation between $M_h$ and $R_{200}$ that are
1327: related by $M_h\propto R_{200}^3$. Adopting $\beta=0.35$ from
1328: Equation (6), we derive $R_{\rm gas}=R_{\rm gas*}\times
1329: [M_h/(10^{12.3}\,\hmsol)]^{0.3}$ $h^{-1}$ kpc at $z\sim 0.4$.
1330:
1331: The calculations above show that observations support the initial
1332: assumptions in TC08 that the gaseous radius is a constant fraction of
1333: the halo radius for all halos and that the gaseous radius scales with
1334: halo mass according to $M_h^{t}$ with $t\approx 1/3$. We note that
1335: our galaxy sample therefore probes halo mass range from
1336: $10^{10.5}\,\hmsol$ to $10^{12.8}\,\hmsol$, and that the best-fit
1337: scaling relation is driven by galaxies in the cold-hot transition
1338: regime. Next, we compare the observed covering fraction of Mg\,II
1339: absorbers with the predicted mean of TC08.
1340:
1341: As summarized in \S\ 1, we find in the halo occupation analysis of
1342: TC08 that dark matter halos of $M_h=10^{11.5-12.5}$ \hmsol\ on average
1343: have a covering fraction of unity $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle=1$ at
1344: $R_{\rm gas}\le R_{\rm 200}/3$ for Mg$^+$ and
1345: $\langle\kappa(M_h)\rangle=0$ at larger radii. This halo mass range
1346: corresponds to a luminosity range of $L_B=0.2-1.4\,L_{B_*}$ at $z\sim
1347: 0.4$, following the mass-to-light scaling relation discussed above.
1348: Sixteen galaxies in our sample have $L_B\ge 0.2\,L_{B_*}$, eleven of
1349: which are at $\log\,\rho +0.14\times (M_B-M_{B_*}) < \log\,R_{\rm
1350: gas*}$. We identify a corresponding Mg\,II absorber for every one of
1351: these galaxies, indicating a mean covering fraction of
1352: $\langle\kappa\rangle=100$ \% at $R<R_{\rm gas}$. This empirical
1353: result agrees with our model expectation. To assess the significance
1354: of detecting a Mg\,II absorber in every galaxy in the sample of
1355: eleven, we adopt the binomial distribution function and find that we
1356: can constrain the underlying mean covering factor at
1357: $\langle\kappa\rangle>0.76$ with greater than 95\% confidence level.
1358:
1359: Three of the seven remaining $L_B<0.2\,L_{B_*}$ galaxies in our sample
1360: have $\log\,\rho +0.14\times (M_B-M_{B_*}) < \log\,R_{\rm gas*}$. Two
1361: of them do not have corresponding Mg\,II absorbers identified to a
1362: sensitive upper limit, implying $\langle\kappa\rangle=33$ \% at
1363: $R<R_{\rm gas}$ for fainter galaxies (presumably lower-mass halos).
1364: This is also consistent with the expectation of TC08, where we found a
1365: quickly declining $\langle\kappa\rangle$ for halos of $M_h<10^{11.5}$
1366: \hmsol, although the observations have a much lower statistical
1367: significance. In addition, we note that there exists an intrinsic
1368: scatter in the fiducial scaling relation between $M_h$ and $L_B$.
1369: This intrinsic scatter is expected to smear out the exact edge of
1370: gaseous halos, particularly when considering an ensemble of objects
1371: with a wide range of luminosity.
1372:
1373: In summary, the initial results from the on-going survey of Mg\,II
1374: absorbers in the vicinity of known galaxies close to QSO lines of
1375: sight have allowed us to study in detail the properties of extended
1376: gas around galaxies. The best-fit scaling relation between the extent
1377: of Mg$^+$ and galaxy luminosity and the observed mean gas covering
1378: fraction together provide strong empirical evidence to support the
1379: halo occupation model of TC08. To improve the statistical
1380: significances of various empirical parameters and to obtain a better
1381: understanding of the incidence of cold gas in dark matter halos, such
1382: as $\kappa$ vs.\ $M_h$ and $\kappa$ vs.\ $\rho$, a larger sample of
1383: galaxy and Mg\,II absorber pairs established for a wide range of
1384: galaxy luminosity and morphology is necessary. In particular, only
1385: three galaxies in our current sample would be considered in a
1386: ``cold-mode'' halo based on their luminosity and none shows a
1387: corresponding Mg\,II absorber. Deep surveys targeting at fainter
1388: dwarfs are necessary to probe these ``cold-mode'' halos. Finally, we
1389: encourage observations of Mg\,II absorbers along the lines of sight
1390: toward close QSO pairs for obtaining a direct measure of the incidence
1391: of Mg$^+$ in individual halos.
1392:
1393: \acknowledgments
1394:
1395: We thank J.-R.\ Gauthier, J.\ O'Meara, M.\ Rauch and G.\ Becker for
1396: assistance on obtaining part of the MIKE spectra presented in this
1397: paper. We thank N.\ Gnedin and M.\ Rauch for helpful comments on an
1398: early version of the paper. This research has made use of the
1399: NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet
1400: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under
1401: contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
1402: H.-W.C. acknowledges partial support from NASA Long Term Space
1403: Astrophysics grant NNG06GC36G and an NSF grant AST-0607510.
1404:
1405:
1406: %\bibliography{ovi-statistics}
1407: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
1408:
1409: \begin{references}
1410:
1411: \vskip 0.2in
1412:
1413: %\reference{} Abraham, R.G. \etal\ 1996, ApJS, 107, 1
1414:
1415: \reference{} Bajtlik, S., Duncan, R. C., \& Ostriker, J. P. 1988, 327, 570
1416:
1417: \reference{} Bechtold, J. \& Ellingson, E. 1992, ApJ, 396, 20
1418:
1419: \reference{} Bergeron, J. 1986, A\&A, 155, L8
1420:
1421: \reference{} Bergeron, J. \& Stas\'inska, G. 1986, A\&A, 169, 1
1422:
1423: \reference{} Bernstein, R. \etal\ 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 1694, Shectman, S.~A., Gunnels, S.~M., Mochnacki, S., \& Athey, A.~E. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 1694
1424:
1425: \reference{} Birnboim, Y. \& Dekel, A. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 349
1426:
1427: \reference{} Birnboim, Y., Dekel, A., \& Neistein, E. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 339
1428:
1429: \reference{} Bond, N. A., Churchill, C. W., \& Charlton, J. C. 2001, ApJ, 562, 641
1430:
1431: \reference{} Bowen, D. V., Blades, J. C., \& Pettini, M. 1995, ApJ, 448, 634
1432:
1433: \reference{} Bouch{\'e}, N., Murphy, M.~T., \& P{\'e}roux, C. 2004, MNRAS, 354, L25
1434:
1435: \reference{} {Bouch{\'e}}, N., {Murphy}, M.~T., {P{\'e}roux}, C., {Csabai}, I., \& {Wild},
1436: V. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 495
1437:
1438: \reference{} Cayatte, V., Kotanyi, C., Balkowski, C., \& van Gorkom, J.H.
1439: 1994, AJ, 107, 1003
1440:
1441: \reference{} {Chelouche}, D., {M{\'e}nard}, B., {Bowen}, D.~V., \& {Gnat}, O. 2007, ApJ in press, (astro-ph/0706.4336)
1442:
1443: \reference{} Chen, H.-W. \etal\ 1998, ApJ, 498, 77, Lanzetta, K. M., Webb, J. K., \& Barcons, X. 1998,
1444: ApJ, 498, 77
1445:
1446: \reference{} \ibid\ 2001a, ApJ, 559, 654
1447:
1448: \reference{} Chen, H.-W., Lanzetta, K. M., \& Webb, J. K. 2001b, ApJ, 556, 158
1449:
1450: \reference{} {Churchill}, C.~W., {Mellon}, R.~R., {Charlton}, J.~C., {Jannuzi}, B.~T.,
1451: {Kirhakos}, S., {Steidel}, C.~C., \& {Schneider}, D.~P. 2000, ApJS, 130, 91
1452:
1453: \reference{} Colless \etal\ 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1039
1454:
1455: \reference{} {Dav{\'e}}, R., {Hernquist}, L., {Katz}, N., \& {Weinberg}, D.~H. 1999, ApJ,
1456: 511, 521
1457:
1458: \reference{} {Dekel}, A. \& {Birnboim}, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2
1459:
1460: \reference{} D'Odorico, S., Cristiani, S., Dekker, H., et~al. 2000, in SPIE 4005,Discoveries and Research Prospects from 8- to 10-Meter-Class Telescopes, ed. J. Bergeron, 121
1461:
1462: \reference{} Doherty, M., Bunker, A., Sharp, R., Dalton, G., Parry, I., \& Lewis, I. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 331
1463:
1464: \reference{} Doyle, M. T. \etal\ 2005, MNRAS, 361, 34
1465:
1466: \reference{} Ellingson, E., Green, R. F., \& Yee, H. K. C. 1991, ApJ, 378, 476
1467:
1468: %\reference{} Ellis, R. S. 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 389
1469:
1470: \reference{} Faber, S. M. \etal\ 2007, ApJ, 665, 265
1471:
1472: \reference{} Ferland, G. J. \etal\ 1998, PASP, 110, 761
1473:
1474: \reference{} Guillemin, P. \& Bergeron J.\ 1997, A\&A, 328,, 499
1475:
1476: \reference{} {Hamann}, F. 1997, ApJS, 109, 279
1477:
1478: %\reference{} Juneau, S., et al.\ 2005, ApJ, 619, L135
1479:
1480: \reference{} {Kacprzak}, G.~G., {Churchill}, C.~W., {Steidel}, C.~C., {Murphy}, M.~T., \& {Evans}, J.~L. 2007, ApJ, 662, 909
1481:
1482: \reference{} {Kere{\v s}}, D., {Katz}, N., {Weinberg}, D.~H., \& {Dav{\'e}}, R. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 2
1483:
1484: \reference{} Kravtsov, A. V. 2003, ApJ, 590, L1
1485:
1486: \reference{} {Lanzetta}, K.~M. \& {Bowen}, D. 1990, ApJ, 357, 321
1487:
1488: \reference{} Lanzetta, K. M., Bowen, D. V., Tytler, D., \& Webb, J. K. 1995, ApJ, 442, 538
1489:
1490: \reference{} {Maller}, A.~H. \& {Bullock}, J.~S. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 694
1491:
1492: \reference{} {Mo}, H.~J. \& {Miralda-Escud\'e}, J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 589
1493:
1494: \reference{} Mobasher, B. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 600, L143
1495:
1496: \reference{} Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., \& White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ, 490, 493
1497:
1498: \reference{} {Nestor}, D.~B., {Turnshek}, D.~A., \& {Rao}, S.~M. 2005, ApJ, 628, 637
1499:
1500: \reference{} {Nestor}, D.~B., {Turnshek}, D.~A., {Rao}, S.~M., \& {Quider}, A.~M. 2007, ApJ, 658, 185
1501:
1502: \reference{} {Petitjean}, P. \& {Bergeron}, J. 1990, A\&A, 231, 309
1503:
1504: \reference{} {Prochter}, G.~E., {Prochaska}, J.~X., \& {Burles}, S.~M. 2006a, ApJ, 639, 766
1505:
1506: \reference{} {Prochter}, G.~E., {Prochaska}, J.~X., \& {Chen}. H.-W. \etal\ 2006b, ApJ, 648, L93
1507:
1508: \reference{} {Rao}, S.~M., {Turnshek}, D.~A., \& {Nestor}, D.~B. 2006, ApJ, 636, 610
1509:
1510: \reference{} Rauch, M., Sargent, W. L. W., Barlow, T. A., \& Simcoe, R. A. 2002, ApJ, 576, 45
1511:
1512: \reference{} Scott, J., Bechtold, J., Morita, M., Dobrzycki, A., \& Kulkarni, V. P. 2002, ApJ, 571, 665
1513:
1514: \reference{} {Steidel}, C.~C. 1995, in QSO Absorption Lines, Proceedings of the ESO Workshop
1515: Held at Garching, Germany, 21 - 24 November 1994, edited by Georges Meylan.
1516: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. Also ESO Astrophysics Symposia,
1517: 1995., p.139, ed. G.~{Meylan}, 139
1518:
1519: \reference{} {Steidel}, C.~C., {Dickinson}, M., \& {Persson}, S.~E. 1994, ApJL, 437, L75
1520:
1521: \reference{} Steidel, C. C., Dickinson, M., Meyer, D. M., Adelberger, K. L., \& Sembach, K. R., 1997, ApJ, 480, 568
1522:
1523: \reference{} {Sternberg}, A., {McKee}, C.~F., \& {Wolfire}, M.~G. 2002, ApJS, 143, 419
1524:
1525: \reference{} Thilker, D. A. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 601, L39
1526:
1527: \reference{} Tinker, J. L., Norberg, P., Weinberg, D. H., \& Warren, M. S. 2007, ApJ, 659, 877
1528:
1529: \reference{} Tinker, J. L. \& Chen, H.-W. 2008, ApJ submitted (arXiv:0709.1470)
1530:
1531: \reference{} Tresse, L., Maddox, S. J.;, Le F\`evre, O., \& Cuby, J.-G. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 396
1532:
1533: \reference{} {Tripp}, T.~M. \& {Bowen}, D.~V. 2005, in IAU Colloq. 199: Probing Galaxies through Quasar Absorption Lines, ed. P.~{Williams}, C.-G. {Shu}, \& B.~{Menard}, 5--23
1534:
1535: \reference{} van den Bosch, F. C., Yang, X., Mo, H. J., Weinmann, S. M., Macci\`o, A. V., More, S., Cacciato, M., Skibba, R., \& Kang, X. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 841
1536:
1537: \reference{} Veilleux, C., Cecil, G., \& Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARA\&A, 43, 769
1538:
1539: \reference{} {Wang}, B. 1993, ApJ, 415, 174
1540:
1541: \reference{} Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2005, ARA\&A, 43, 861
1542:
1543: \reference{} {Zheng}, Z., {Coil}, A.~L., \& {Zehavi}, I. 2007, ApJ, 667, 760 (ZCZ07)
1544:
1545: %\reference{} Zheng, X. Z., Bell, E. F., Papovich, C., Wolf, C., Meisenheimer, K., Rix, H.-W., Rieke, G. H., \& Somerville, R. 2007, ApJ, 661, L41
1546:
1547: \reference{} {Zibetti}, S., {M{\'e}nard}, B., {Nestor}, D., \& {Turnshek}, D. 2005, ApJL, 631, L105
1548:
1549: \end{references}
1550:
1551: \end{document}
1552: