1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% Version 1...Began writing Observations section MLB 10.18.06.
3: %% Started workind on Figures and discussion section 11.3.06
4: %%
5: %% Version 2...More!! MLB 03.13.07
6: %% Version 3...Some changes made while not getting data at Magellan,
7: %% mostly with figures & adding some of iain's procedures to the text.
8: %% Version 4...Working on words mainly. waiting for final photometry
9: %% to redo the figures. Added 70 micron stuff & fixed some variability stuff.
10: %% Version 5...Fixing up stellar population figures with final
11: %% catalog, cutting out ICM SEDs, updating text, incorporating
12: %% comments from coauthors
13: %% Version 6...Still updating text. We redid the photometry, so that
14: %% section needed some changes.
15: %% Version 7...Includes changes made while at Keele & AKARI-inspired stuff.
16: %% Version 8...Fixing figures & text for submission
17: %% Version 9...Incorporating comments...
18: %% Version 10..heavily edited intro + other edits
19: %% Version 11..Minor edits from collaborators... & submitted
20: %% Version 12..Referee Report. Major changes to photometry & text!
21: %% BAH!
22: %% Version 13..Few minor comments & re-submitted.
23: %%
24: %% dvips -P pdf ocen_v13.dvi -o ocen_v13.ps
25: %% ps2pdf13 ocen_v13.ps ocen_v13.pdf
26: %% psnup -pletter -2 ocen_v13.ps ocen_v13_2.ps
27: %% ps2pdf13 ocen_v13_2.ps ocen_v13_2.pdf
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29:
30: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
31:
32: \received{}
33: \revised{}
34: \accepted{}
35:
36: \usepackage[dvips,width=6.5in,height=9in,top=1in,left=1in]{geometry}
37:
38: \shortauthors{Boyer et al.}
39: \shorttitle{``{\it Spitzer} Observations of $\omega$ Cen''}
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43:
44: \title{A \textit {Spitzer Space Telescope} Atlas of $\boldmath{\omega}$\,Centauri:
45: The Stellar Population, Mass Loss, and the Intracluster Medium}
46:
47:
48: \author{
49: Martha L. Boyer\altaffilmark{1}, Iain McDonald\altaffilmark{2},
50: Jacco Th. van Loon\altaffilmark{2}, Charles E. Woodward\altaffilmark{1},
51: Robert D. Gehrz\altaffilmark{1}, A. Evans\altaffilmark{2},
52: A. K. Dupree\altaffilmark{3}}
53:
54: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, 116
55: Church Street, S.E., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
56: 55455 USA; mboyer@astro.umn.edu}
57: \altaffiltext{2}{Astrophysics Group, School of Physical \& Geographical
58: Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK}
59: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60
60: Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA}
61:
62:
63: %\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 340 50 translate 20 rotate
64: % /Times-Roman findfont 30 scalefont setfont 0 0 moveto 0.9 setgray
65: % (V10/20.August.2007) show grestore}def end}
66:
67: \begin{abstract}
68: We present a {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} imaging survey of the most
69: massive Galactic globular cluster, $\omega$\,Centauri, and investigate
70: stellar mass loss at low metallicity and the
71: intracluster medium (ICM). The survey covers approximately 3.2$\times$
72: the cluster half-mass radius at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8, and 24~\micron{},
73: resulting in a catalog of over 40,000 point-sources in the
74: cluster. Approximately 140 cluster members ranging 1.5 dex in
75: metallicity show a red excess at 24~\micron{}, indicative of
76: circumstellar dust. If all of the dusty sources are experiencing mass
77: loss, the cumulative rate of loss is estimated at 2.9 -- 4.2 $\times$
78: 10$^{-7}~M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, 63\% -- 66\% of which is supplied by
79: three asymptotic giant branch stars at the tip of the Red Giant Branch
80: (RGB). There is little evidence for strong mass loss lower on the
81: RGB. If this material had remained in the cluster center, its dust
82: component ($\gtrsim$ 1 $\times$ 10$^{-4}~M_\odot$) would be
83: detectable in our 24 and 70~\micron{} images. While no dust cloud
84: located at the center of $\omega$\,Cen is apparent, we do see four
85: regions of very faint, diffuse emission beyond two half-mass radii at
86: 24~\micron{}. It is unclear whether these dust clouds are foreground
87: emission or are associated with $\omega$\,Cen. In the latter case,
88: these clouds may be the ICM in the process of escaping from the
89: cluster.
90:
91: \end{abstract}
92:
93: \keywords{globular clusters: individual
94: ($\omega$\,Centauri)---infrared: general---stars: AGB and
95: post-AGB---stars: mass loss---stars: variables---ISM: evolution}
96:
97: \clearpage
98: \vfill\eject
99: \section{{\sc Introduction}}
100: \label{sec:intro}
101:
102: Despite their old age and low metal content, Galactic globular
103: clusters (GCs) are now known to be dust factories \citep{ramdani01,
104: origlia02, evans03, boyer06, jaccoea06a, lebzelter06, ita07}. This has
105: important implications for our understanding of mass loss from
106: low-mass and metal-poor stars and for the replenishment of the
107: interstellar medium (ISM) within old, metal-poor stellar systems, such
108: as GCs, dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies, and galactic halos.
109:
110: All stars more massive than $\simeq~0.8~M_\odot$ lose a significant
111: fraction of their mass before they deflagrate or leave a compact
112: remnant \citep[see reviews by][]{iben83,chiosi86}. In the final
113: stages of evolution, most stars enter higher stages of nuclear
114: burning, and the products of this nucleosynthesis are transported to
115: the stellar surface through convection or rotation. The chemically
116: enriched mass that is recycled (with some delay) into the ISM has a
117: significant impact on any further star formation, and drives the
118: chemical evolution within galaxies. In particular, the enrichment of
119: the ISM by dust is of great importance, as grains play important roles
120: in many ISM processes, including the formation of molecular hydrogen
121: \citep{gould63} and planet formation. The winds of low and
122: intermediate-mass stars on the upper red giant and asymptotic giant
123: branches (RGB and AGB) and massive red supergiants are prolific dust
124: producers \citep{gehrz89}. The dust is an integral part of the driving
125: mechanism of the most massive winds \citep[e.g.,][]{gehrz71, jura85,
126: gail87}, and our understanding of red giant mass loss relies heavily
127: on the details of the dust condensation process
128: \citep[e.g.,][]{salpeter74,gauger90,hofner97} --- which is poorly
129: understood in particular at low metallicity \citep[for a review,
130: see][]{jacco06}.
131:
132: GCs are exquisite laboratories in which to study stellar winds because
133: they represent the closest match to a single stellar population at
134: metallicities that span over two orders of magnitude down to $\lesssim$
135: 1\% solar \citep[cf.][]{gratton04}. Mass loss remains important
136: throughout the history of a GC \citep{jaccomc07}; even in old GCs,
137: stars lose $\sim$30\% of their mass, most or all of which is removed
138: from the cluster via a host of mechanisms including ram-pressure
139: stripping during Galactic plane crossings. RGB mass loss may be
140: responsible for the blue horizontal branches observed in metal-poor
141: GCs \citep{rood73}, and evidence for mass loss is seen in the line
142: profiles of chromospherically active or pulsating red giants in GCs
143: \citep{dupree84,cacciari04,mcdonald07,meszaros08}.
144:
145: There is mounting evidence for mass loss from GC red giants in
146: the form of dusty winds \citep{ramdani01, origlia02}. The first
147: spectroscopic identifications of silicate dust are in the tip-AGB star
148: V1 in the massive GC 47\,Tucanae \citep{jaccoea06a} and subsequent
149: identification of minerals in other AGB stars in 47\,Tuc with {\it
150: Spitzer} IRS observations \citep{lebzelter06}. With [Fe/H]~$=-0.7$,
151: 47\,Tuc is a metal-rich GC, providing an environment similar to that
152: found, for instance, in the Small Magellanic Cloud. To probe uncharted
153: terrain, it is important to study dust in GCs at lower
154: metallicity. The surprising detection of both interstellar and
155: circumstellar dust and gas in the metal-poor GC M\,15
156: \citep{evans03,boyer06,jaccoea06b} demonstrates that dust forms even
157: in extremely metal-deficient environments.
158:
159: \subsection{{\it $\omega$\,Centauri}}
160: \label{sec:ocen}
161:
162: The most massive Galactic GC, $\omega$\,Centauri, contains enough
163: stars in the dusty wind phase for an empirical
164: reconstruction of the evolution of mass loss. Its gravitational well
165: \citep[$v_{\rm esc}~=~44$ km s$^{-1}$;][]{gnedin02} could retain
166: interstellar matter if winds are slow. $\omega$\,Cen is located
167: approximately 15\degr{} out of the Galactic plane at a distance of
168: $\approx$5 kpc \citep{lub02,vandeven06,reddening}, so it is possible
169: to probe the stellar population to the cluster core.
170:
171: The bulk of the stars in $\omega$\,Cen have [Fe/H] $=-1.7$
172: \citep{norris96,smith00}, a metallicity much lower than the
173: environments in which circumstellar dust has traditionally been
174: studied. Complications arise because $\omega$\,Cen also harbors a
175: small fraction of stars up to an order of magnitude more metal-rich
176: \citep{lee99, pancino00, pancino02} and an intermediate population of
177: stars with an abnormally high helium content \citep{norris96,
178: norris04}. Red giants in $\omega$\,Cen display a range in surface
179: abundances, from oxygen-rich, M-type stars with titanium oxides, stars
180: enhanced in CH or in cyanide (CN), to genuine carbon stars with
181: molecular carbon \citep[C$_2$;][]{jacco07}. These disparate
182: populations cause difficulties in stellar evolution studies of
183: $\omega$\,Cen, but since stars from the metal-rich and metal-poor
184: populations can be distinguished by means of optical spectroscopy,
185: $\omega$\,Cen presents us with a unique opportunity to study the dust
186: and mass loss within a single environment as a function of atmospheric
187: chemistry.
188:
189: Consensus has yet to be reached regarding the formation history of the
190: different subpopulations \citep{sollima05,
191: stanford06,villanova07}. The spread and peculiarities in elemental
192: abundances in $\omega$\,Cen have been interpreted as evidence that
193: this GC may be the remnant nucleus of a tidally disrupted dSph
194: \citep{zinnecker88, freeman93}. If so, $\omega$\,Cen may offer us
195: insight into the mass loss and chemical enrichment in the much more
196: distant nucleated dSphs, and perhaps dSphs in general.
197:
198: Here, we present NASA {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} \citep{werner04,
199: gehrz07} images of $\omega$\,Cen and a catalog including the
200: magnitudes of over 40,000 point-sources from 3.6 to
201: 70~\micron{}. The 24~\micron{} mosaic, which enables reliable
202: detection of individual circumstellar dust shells near the peak
203: wavelength of their spectral energy distributions (SEDs), provides
204: the most dramatic improvement over previous data. We make use of
205: proper motion \citep{vanleeuwen00} and radial velocity
206: \citep{jacco07} measurements to separate cluster members from the
207: substantial foreground stellar and background galaxy populations.
208: Optical spectroscopic information permits us to compare the
209: contributions from stars of different composition and evolutionary
210: status to their infrared (IR) emission and dust production. Our
211: observations are discussed in \S\,\ref{sec:obs}, photometry and
212: the $\omega$\,Cen point-source catalog are described in
213: \S\,\ref{sec:phot}. The color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs), stellar
214: populations, mass loss, and the intracluster medium
215: (ICM) dust are discussed in \S\,\ref{sec:disc}, and our
216: conclusions are presented in \S\,\ref{sec:concl}.
217:
218: \section{{\sc Observations}}
219: \label{sec:obs}
220:
221: We used the NASA {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} to obtain image maps of
222: the GC $\omega$ Cen (Program Identification [PID] 20648, PI: van Loon)
223: with the Infrared Array Camera \citep[IRAC;][]{fazio04} and the
224: Multiband Imaging Photometer for {\it Spitzer}
225: \citep[MIPS;][]{rieke04}. Observations are centered at R.A. =
226: 13$^{\mbox{\scriptsize{h}}}$26$^{\mbox{\scriptsize{m}}}$45\fs9,
227: decl. = --47\degr28\arcmin37\farcs0 [J2000.0] and map the cluster to
228: at least 3.2 times the half-mass radius \citep[$r_{\rm hm}$ $=$
229: 4.8\arcmin{};][]{harris96} at each wavelength. Observation details are
230: summarized in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.
231:
232: Images centered at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8~\micron{} were obtained with
233: IRAC on 2006 March 26 UT. We observed in high dynamic range mode,
234: enabling us to correct saturated sources in the long exposures (10.4
235: s) with their counterparts in the short exposures (0.4 s) while still
236: achieving a high signal-to-noise ratio for the fainter sources.
237: Images were taken at nine dither positions in a cycling pattern to
238: build redundancy against outliers and artefacts. The resulting image
239: map contains a total of 441 images and covers an area approximately
240: 35\arcmin{} $\times$ 35\arcmin{} around the cluster center.
241:
242: MIPS images at 24 and 70~\micron{} were obtained on 2006 February 22
243: UT and 2006 March 02 UT with seven scan legs of approximately
244: 0.5\degr{} in length. The resulting mosaics combine 4,620 images for
245: each wavelength and cover a total area of approximately 35\arcmin{}
246: $\times$ 55\arcmin{}. We designed our MIPS observing campaign with the
247: intention of obtaining only 24~\micron{} data, and the MIPS 70 and
248: 160~\micron{} data were obtained automatically \citep[see][]{rieke04}.
249: Due to the non-functioning half of the 70~\micron{} array, the
250: 70~\micron data do not have complete coverage. The warm state of the
251: telescope during the observations saturated the 160~\micron{} array,
252: rendering the 160~\micron{} data useless. MIPS observation details are summarized
253: in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.
254:
255: Raw MIPS and IRAC data were processed with the {\it Spitzer} Science
256: Center (SSC) pipeline, version
257: S13.2.0\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/archanaly/plhistory/}. The
258: Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) were post-processed with portions of the
259: 2006 March 01 version of the SSC Legacy MOPEX software
260: \citep{makovoz05}. For IRAC, after applying an array distortion
261: correction, we implemented the MOPEX background-matching routine to
262: minimize pixel offsets in overlapping areas of the mosaics and the
263: MOPEX mosaicker to eliminate cosmic rays and other outliers. No
264: further cosmetic corrections were applied to the BCDs before
265: performing point-spread-function (PSF) photometry. The final
266: mosaics have a pixel size of 1\farcs22~pix$^{-1}$. A three-color image
267: of the first three IRAC bands is presented in
268: Figure~\ref{fig:3color}a, in which very few sources appear with a red
269: or blue excess.
270:
271: For the MIPS 24~\micron{} data, we created and applied
272: scan-mirror-dependent and scan-mirror-independent flat fields for all
273: images excluding the bias boost images, any image within 10\arcmin{}
274: of the cluster center, and any image containing a very bright
275: source. A 2-degree polynomial fit was applied over the entire image to
276: subtract the zodiacal background. At 70~\micron{}, we first performed
277: pixel time-filtering and column filtering with SSC contributed
278: software from D. Fadda and
279: D. Frayer\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/filter/}. We
280: then implemented the MOPEX background-matching and mosaic routines at
281: both 24 and 70~\micron{} before proceeding with point-source
282: extraction. An IRAC and MIPS three-color image is presented in
283: Figure~\ref{fig:3color}b, in which several cool dusty objects appear
284: green at 8~\micron{} and red at 24~\micron{}.
285:
286: \section{{\sc Photometry}}
287: \label{sec:phot}
288:
289: \subsection{{\it Point-Source Extraction}}
290: \label{sec:extraction}
291:
292: Point-source extraction for 3.6 -- 24~\micron{} was done with the
293: DAOphot II photometry package \citep{stetson87}. PSFs were created
294: using a minimum of 20 isolated stars. Sources brighter than 4
295: $\sigma$ over the background were chosen for extraction from the
296: mosaic image. Any remaining outliers and other extended objects were
297: eliminated from the sample with a sharpness cut-off, which identifies
298: sources broader or narrower than the PSF. Photometric completeness at
299: each wavelength was determined through false star tests; 50\% and 90\%
300: completeness limits are listed in Table~\ref{tab:comp}.
301:
302: The final fluxes and flux uncertainties are color-corrected according
303: to the IRAC and MIPS Data Handbooks versions 3.0 and 3.2.1,
304: respectively \citep{idh,mdh}, using a 5000~K blackbody, which is the
305: approximate temperature of a typical RGB star. Fluxes in the
306: point-source catalog described in \S\,\ref{sec:catalog} have {\it not}
307: been corrected for reddening. Where the reddening correction has been
308: applied for analysis of the data, $A_{\lambda}$ values are taken from
309: \citet{indebetouw05} and $E$($B-V$) $=$ 0.11 \citep{lub02}. The
310: pixel-phase-dependent photometric correction described by
311: \citet{reach05} was also applied to 3.6~\micron{} fluxes and their
312: uncertainties. This correction was applied only to 3.6~\micron{}
313: because it is not well defined for the other {\it Spitzer}
314: wavelengths. The flux uncertainties that we report in the {\it
315: Spitzer} catalog described in section \S\,\ref{sec:catalog} include
316: both the uncertainties quoted by DAOphot and the calibration
317: uncertainties specified by \citet{reach05} for IRAC and
318: \citet{engelbracht07} for 24~\micron{}. All fluxes were converted to
319: stellar magnitudes using the zero fluxes reported in the {\it Spitzer}
320: Data Handbooks. The photometric uncertainty as a function of source
321: magnitude is given in Figure~\ref{fig:photerr}.
322:
323:
324: \subsection{{\it The Point-Source Catalog}}
325: \label{sec:catalog}
326:
327: We have created a point-source catalog of $>$ 40,000 $\omega$\,Cen
328: objects detected at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8, and 24~\micron{}. An extraction
329: from this catalog is given in Table~\ref{tab:cat}, where column one is
330: the source number, column two is the source ID, columns 3 -- 7 are
331: {\it Spitzer} magnitudes, column 8 is the membership probability
332: \citep{vanleeuwen00}, columns 9 and 10 list
333: source type labels, and column 11 lists the Leiden identifiers (LEID)
334: from \citet{vanleeuwen00}. The source ID follows the standard {\it
335: Spitzer} naming convention, giving the truncated (J2000)
336: coordinates. The complete {\it Spitzer} catalog is available
337: electronically through the Centre Donn\'{e}es de Strasbourg (CDS).
338:
339: Cluster members and non-members were identified by cross-correlating
340: the {\it Spitzer} source coordinates with those in the
341: \citet{vanleeuwen00} proper motion catalog. The \citet{vanleeuwen00}
342: catalog is not as deep as our survey nor is the coverage as wide, so
343: many {\it Spitzer} sources do not have proper motion
344: measurements. \citet{vanleeuwen00} derived positions and proper
345: motions by cross-referencing with the International Celestial
346: Reference Frame as defined by the Hipparcos catalog and extended to a
347: denser grid of stars by the Tycho-2 catalog. The coordinates of the
348: {\it Spitzer} sources are systematically offset from the
349: \citet{vanleeuwen00} sources, with mean offsets of $\Delta \alpha =
350: +0.40$\arcsec{} and $\Delta \delta =+0.25$\arcsec{} and standard
351: deviations of 0.15\arcsec{} and 0.10\arcsec, respectively. Coordinates
352: in the {\it Spitzer} catalog are not corrected for this offset.
353:
354: If a source in any IRAC band was not associated with another IRAC,
355: MIPS, or \citet{vanleeuwen00} object, we considered it a false
356: detection and dropped it from the {\it Spitzer} catalog. MIPS
357: 24~\micron{} sources that do not have IRAC or optical counterparts remain in the
358: catalog since the very red SEDs of many MIPS sources peak in the
359: mid-IR and are thus fainter than the sensitivity limits in the bluer
360: {\it Spitzer} bandpasses.
361:
362: Also included in the {\it Spitzer} catalog are notes in columns 9 and
363: 10 indicating if the source is a galaxy, AGB, anomalous RGB (RGB-a),
364: or Horizontal Branch (HB) star, based on its locations on the CMDs
365: (see \S\,\ref{sec:cmd}). The catalog also indicates sources that are
366: super-Ba- or CN-rich and/or are M-type (M), carbon (C), or post-AGB
367: stars (P), as identified by \citet{jacco07}.
368:
369: The differing resolution between IRAC and MIPS has caused some sources
370: that are isolated in IRAC to be blended in the 24~\micron{} mosaic, which
371: produces an artificially red [8] -- [24] color. To
372: determine which sources are potentially affected by blending, we convolved the
373: 8~\micron{} mosaic with the 24~\micron{} PSF and identified sources
374: with elevated fluxes in the convolved mosaic compared to the unaltered
375: mosaic (Fig.~\ref{fig:blend}). These sources are marked with ``B24'', for ``blended at
376: 24~\micron{}'', in column 10 of the {\it Spitzer} catalog.
377:
378: \subsection{{\it Luminosity Functions and Completeness}}
379: \label{sec:lumfunc}
380:
381: Luminosity functions for epoch two are displayed in
382: Figure~\ref{fig:lumfnc}. The distance modulus used to determine
383: absolute magnitudes is 13.58, given a distance of 5.2~kpc
384: \citep{reddening}. In the top panels, known non-members are excluded
385: and of the remaining sources, only those that are in at least two
386: adjacent wavebands are included. The IRAC luminosity functions show a
387: strong change in slope near an absolute magnitude of --2 that may be
388: the RGB bump or the RGB clump, both of which are located at absolute
389: magnitudes of $\approx$$-$2 -- 0 in the near-IR data of several GCs
390: \citep{valenti07}, depending on the metallicity of the cluster. The HB
391: is also visible at 3.6, 4.5, and 5.8~\micron{} just beyond an absolute
392: magnitude of zero as either a bump or change in slope.
393:
394: The tip of the RGB (tRGB) is difficult to determine from the
395: luminosity functions, as the source counts are low at absolute
396: magnitudes brighter than $-$5. The sparse population of AGB stars
397: above the tRGB is expected in GCs since this phase of stellar
398: evolution is particularly short-lived and also because the very low
399: mass of stars in GCs ($M_{\rm AGB}~\simeq~0.6 - 0.8~$$M_\odot$)
400: prevents AGB luminosity from climbing much above the tRGB.
401: Nevertheless, the source counts of known cluster members (lower panels
402: of Fig.~\ref{fig:lumfnc}) do drop by a factor of 3 to 4 past the bins,
403: which are 0.2 magnitudes wide, centered at absolute magnitudes of
404: $-5.9$, $-6.1$, $-6.1$, $-6.1$, and $-6.3$ at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8, and
405: 24~\micron{}, respectively. The K-band tRGB for $\omega$\,Cen is
406: located at $\approx$$-$6.04 $\pm$ 0.16 magnitudes
407: \citep{bellazzini04}. At 3.6~\micron{}, the tRGB location is $-$6
408: magnitudes for many stellar populations, including the Large
409: Magellanic Cloud \citep[LMC;][]{jacco05} and smaller stellar
410: populations such as the Local Group dwarf irregular galaxy WLM
411: \citep{jackson07}.
412:
413:
414: Photometric completeness in each waveband was determined by performing
415: false star tests, for which 2\% of the total stellar population that
416: mimicked the luminosity function was added to each mosaic at random
417: positions and PSF photometry was performed to attempt to recover these
418: false stars. The test was carried out 100 times for each
419: wavelength. Dotted lines mark the 50\% completeness limits in the
420: upper panels of Figure~\ref{fig:lumfnc}, which are listed in
421: Table~\ref{tab:comp}. The dashed line in Figure~\ref{fig:lumfnc}
422: marks the sensitivity limit at each bandpass, and shows that the
423: photometry is the most incomplete at 3.6 and 4.5~\micron{}, which is
424: likely due to severe stellar crowding in the cluster core at these
425: wavelengths. Photometry at 5.8 -- 24~\micron{} is 50\% complete to
426: within two magnitudes of the 3 $\sigma$ sensitivity limits.
427:
428: \section{{\sc Discussion}}
429: \label{sec:disc}
430:
431: \subsection{{\it The Color-Magnitude Diagrams}}
432: \label{sec:cmd}
433:
434: Figure~\ref{fig:cmd1} displays the optical \citep{vanleeuwen00}, the
435: near-IR \citep{sollima04}, and our mid-IR CMDs. The CMDs are corrected
436: for reddening, as discussed in \S~\ref{sec:phot}, with $A_B$ values
437: from \citet{rieke85}, but the effect of reddening on the mid-IR
438: magnitudes is minimal. The IRAC and MIPS CMDs shows very little
439: structure aside from the RGB, and at longer wavelengths, a very broad,
440: faint red plume. Mid-IR isochrones that include all known RGB/AGB
441: properties, molecular bands, and dust considerations have yet to be
442: developed. For reference, the brightest IRAC sources are labeled with
443: large filled circles in Figure~\ref{fig:cmd1}, and the three brightest
444: M-type stars are also labeled with their LEID numbers. Bright IRAC
445: sources that are not labeled are not cluster
446: members. Figure~\ref{fig:cmd2} shows the same CMDs with different
447: source types labeled in color. Black points are confirmed cluster
448: members (confirmed non-members are not plotted) and gray points, which
449: are mostly located at the faint end of the RGB, do not have matches in
450: the proper motion catalog.
451:
452: Absorption in molecular bands may be responsible for some of the
453: spread towards red colors on the RGB, but cannot cause colors as red
454: as those of the dustiest stars. However, while many of the very red
455: stars on the mid- to lower-RGB in Figure~\ref{fig:cmd1} may be dusty,
456: it is very likely that some of the these sources are red due either to
457: mismatches across bands, photometric errors, or contamination from
458: cluster non-members.
459:
460: The $B$ -- [3.6] CMD clearly displays the RGB, AGB, and HB. Also visible
461: as a sparsely populated branch to the red of the RGB is the RGB-a
462: (magenta points). The plume of stars that falls intermediate to the
463: RGB and the HB is mostly due to foreground contamination
464: \citep{bellazzini04}, however the brighest cluster members in this
465: plume ($B \lesssim$ 13, 1 $\gtrsim B$ -- [3.6] $\gtrsim$ 3) include
466: post-AGB stars such as LEID 16018, 30020, 32015, 32029, and 43105. Note
467: that while \citet{vanleeuwen00} found that 16018 and 32029 are cluster
468: non-members, \citet{jacco07} determined through optical spectroscopy
469: that they do in fact belong to $\omega$\,Cen. As such, their membership
470: probabilities have been set to 100\% in the {\it Spitzer} catalog.
471:
472: We identified HB stars (blue points) by their positions on the
473: optical CMD \citep{vanleeuwen00}. At IR wavelengths, the HB becomes indistinct from the
474: RGB. The stellar density profile shown in Figure~\ref{fig:denprof} shows a
475: paucity of HB stars in the center of the cluster. The non-central peak
476: of the HB density profile is explained by the dominance of the cluster
477: luminosity by bright AGB and RGB stars in the most crowded regions.
478:
479: RGB-a stars are those located on the red branch of the RGB in optical
480: and near-IR CMDs \citep[see Fig. 5 of][]{sollima04}. The offset of the
481: RGB-a from the main RGB in optical and near-IR CMDs has been
482: attributed to a metallicity difference between the RGB-a and the
483: regular RGB \citep{lee99,pancino00,pancino02,origlia03}. Except for a
484: slight blue excess in the [3.6] -- [4.5] colors, no metallicity
485: separation is evident in the {\it Spitzer} CMDs.
486:
487: \subsection{{\it The Asymptotic and Red Giant Branches}}
488: \label{sec:agb}
489:
490: Inspection of the luminosity functions (Fig.~\ref{fig:lumfnc})
491: suggests that the stellar count begins to decrease at an accelerated
492: rate near an absolute magnitude of $-$5 at each wavelength. We chose
493: this magnitude as the divide at all {\it Spitzer} wavelengths between
494: mass-losing AGB candidates and the rest of the stellar population. We
495: identify 75 mass-losing AGB candidates, several of which have a red
496: excess, although mass-loss can occur even without a dusty
497: circumstellar envelope \citep{mcdonald07}. The AGB population is
498: slightly more centrally concentrated than the total stellar population
499: (Fig.~\ref{fig:denprof}), which is probably due to decreasing
500: completeness of fainter sources towards the core.
501:
502: The locations on the CMD of stars that are identified as CN- and
503: super-Ba-rich by optical spectroscopy \citep{jacco07} are marked in
504: Figure~\ref{fig:populations}a. The term super-Ba-rich distinguishes
505: stars with enhanced Ba through pre-enrichment from those that are
506: enriched beyond this, probably due to internal mixing processes. The
507: super-Ba-rich stars dominate the stars brighter than [24] $\approx$
508: 8.5, supporting the suggestion by \citet{jacco07} that these stars are
509: enriched in Barium due to third-dredge up, and therefore delineate the
510: thermal pulsating AGB. The super-Ba-rich stars may also be enriched
511: in carbon, but not so much as to warrant their classification as
512: genuine carbon stars.
513:
514: Figure~\ref{fig:indiv} shows the [8] -- [24] CMD for cluster members,
515: non-members, and sources without proper motion measurements. Sources
516: affected by blending at 24~\micron{} are not plotted. The location on
517: the CMD of the majority of sources without proper motion measurements
518: suggests that most are likely galaxies. Stars brighter than [24]
519: $\approx$ 10 with [8] -- [24] $>$ 0.1 likely harbor dust, while
520: sources fainter than [24] $\approx$ 10 are dusty if [8] -- [24]
521: $>$ 0.2. Also marked in Figure~\ref{fig:indiv} and listed in
522: Table~\ref{tab:type} are 16 stars of interest, identified by
523: \citet{jacco07} as six M-type stars (open squares), five carbon stars
524: that show C$_2$ bands (open triangles), and five post-AGB stars
525: (closed circles), including Fehrenbach's star \citep{fehrenbach62}
526: near [24] = 9.25.
527:
528: \citet{jacco07} obtained optical spectra for five of the extremely red
529: faint cluster members ([24] $>$ 10 and [8] -- [24] $>$ 0.8); these stars
530: range from [Fe/H] $=$ $-$1.5 to [Fe/H] $=$ $-$2, and two of the stars
531: are abnormally hot ($T \approx$ 7000 K). The remaining three stars
532: appear to be normal RGB stars. Visual inspection suggests that none of
533: these five sources are affected by blending at 24~\micron{}, however,
534: it is possible that HB stars or RGB stars that have little or no
535: emission at 24~\micron{} are spatially coincident with background
536: galaxies, causing them to appear to have red colors. This may also be
537: the case for the other $\approx$10 faint, extremely red stars that are
538: matched to cluster members.
539:
540: {\it Spitzer} studies of GCs that do not have proper motion or radial
541: velocity unambiguous confirmation of membership will suffer from
542: contamination from red field stars mistaken for dusty cluster
543: stars. Many of the bright 24~\micron{} sources in our images are field
544: stars, including a variable M-type star with a period of 509 days
545: (LEID 34041). Proper motion measurements allowed us to identify almost
546: all bright and red cluster members in Figure~\ref{fig:indiv} against
547: field stars, with only one bright star remaining for which no proper
548: motion information is available. This bright source is most likely
549: LEID 55017, which is a confirmed cluster non-member. The proper
550: motion of LEID 55017 is large enough that the {\it Spitzer}
551: coordinates are $\approx$4\arcsec{} different from the
552: \citet{vanleeuwen00} coordinates.
553:
554: It is expected that metal-rich stars form more dust in their winds
555: than their low metallicity counterparts due to the higher abundance of
556: condensable material. We have metallicity information from
557: \citet{jacco07} for 32 of the $\approx$140 dusty stars in
558: Figure~\ref{fig:indiv}. The brightest potentially dusty stars in the
559: cluster range $-$2.25 $<$ [Fe/H] $<$ $-$1.25, i.e.\ nearly the entire
560: breadth of metallicities encountered in $\omega$\,Cen. In fact, of
561: this small sample, the reddest stars have [Fe/H] $\leq$ $-$1.5
562: (Fig.~\ref{fig:dusty}) and two of the three brightest dusty stars
563: (LEID 33062, 44262, 35250) have [Fe/H] $\leq$ -2.0, which suggests
564: that dust production is not inhibited at these low metallicities.
565:
566:
567: \subsection{{\it Mass-Loss Rates}}
568: \label{sec:mlr}
569:
570: Since mass-loss rates ($\dot{M}$) scale directly with dust optical depth
571: ($\tau$), all dusty stars have the potential to drive a wind
572: \citep{ivezic95}. However, the value for $\dot{M}$ derived from the
573: optical depth also scales with the square root of the luminosity, so
574: the brightest stars contribute a larger fraction of the cluster's
575: cumulative mass-loss rate than the fainter stars. Of the $\approx$140
576: red cluster members that remain after eliminating blends and non-members
577: such as LEID 34041, which, as a bright M-type star with a period of
578: 509 days, would dominate the cumulative mass-loss rate of the cluster
579: if included. We used the AGB models computed by \citet{groenewegen06}
580: to determine the mass-loss rates corresponding to the color of the red
581: member stars with 0.15 $\gtrsim$ [8] -- [24] $\gtrsim$
582: 3.1. Luminosities were determined by scaling to the
583: \citet{groenewegen06} mass-loss tracks for AGB stars with temperatures
584: of 3297 and 3850~K and with silicate and AlO$_{\rm x}$ dust
585: compositions, however differing bolometric corrections for stars with
586: different temperatures and metallicities are not taken into
587: account. For reference, the colors corresponding to two sample optical
588: depths are marked on the CMD in Figure~\ref{fig:indiv} and listed in
589: Table~\ref{tab:tau}. The final mass-loss rates ($\dot{M}_{\rm Final}$)
590: were scaled according to the following relationship:
591:
592: \begin{equation}
593: \left(\frac{\dot{M}_{\rm{Final}}}{\dot{M}_{\rm G}}\right) = \left(\frac{v}{10~\rm{km~s}^{-1}}\right) \left(\frac{0.005}{\psi}\right) \left(\frac{L}{3000~L_\odot}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}},
594: \end{equation}
595:
596: \noindent where $\dot{M}_{\rm G}$ is the unscaled mass-loss rate from
597: \citet{groenewegen06}, $v$ is the wind velocity, $\rm \psi$ is
598: the dust-to-gas mass ratio ($\psi~\approx$ 0.005 at solar
599: metallicity), and $L$ is the luminosity. Following \citet{jacco00} and
600: \citet{marshall04}, the velocity scales approximately as:
601:
602: \begin{equation}
603: \left(\frac{v}{10~\rm{km~s}^{-1}}\right) = \left(\frac{\psi}{0.005}\right)^\frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{L}{10,000~L_\odot}\right)^\frac{1}{4}.
604: \end{equation}
605:
606: \noindent From equation (2), the wind velocities of even the strongest
607: mass-losing stars in $\omega$\,Cen are slow ($v\ <\ 2\ \rm{km\
608: s^{-1}}$). Winds this slow may have difficulty driving a massive wind;
609: it is possible that the wind is driven by some other mechanism and
610: that the dust is a by-product. \citet{mcdonald07} suggest wind
611: velocities of 5 -- 10~km~s$^{-1}$ for AGB stars in GCs; if wind
612: velocities are 5$\times$ higher, the mass-loss rates would increase by
613: the same factor.
614:
615: The \citet{groenewegen06} models were calculated assuming spherical
616: circumstellar dust shells, a constant mass-loss rate, and photospheres
617: with solar metallicity. The last of these assumptions affects the
618: stellar colors, which we used to determine the mass-loss rates. While
619: we do take metallicity into account in the dust-to-gas ratio,
620: increasing the mass-loss rates by a factor of seven, the metallicity
621: dependence is not yet well established. The mass-loss rates computed
622: using the \citet{groenewegen06} models should therefore be considered
623: a rough estimate. Bolometric luminosities of the $\omega$\,Cen sources
624: can be estimated through fitting the SED or spectrum of each star,
625: facilitating a better estimate of the real mass-loss rates
626: (I. McDonald et al., in preparation).
627:
628: Assuming that all stars have the metallicity that comprises the
629: majority of the population and that $\psi$ scales with metallicity
630: \citep[][$\rm{[Fe/H]}$ = --1.7, $\psi$ $\sim$
631: 10$^{-4}$]{jacco00,jacco06}, we find that the three brightest M-type
632: stars (Fig.~\ref{fig:indiv}) contribute a total of $\dot{M}$\,(gas $+$
633: dust) $=$ 1.8 -- 2.8 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, depending
634: on the temperature and dust composition. The combined mass-loss rate
635: of these three stars is an order of magnitude less than the mass-loss
636: rate measured for V1 in 47 Tuc with IR spectroscopy
637: \citep{jaccoea06a}, suggesting either that we have underestimated the
638: mass-loss rates or that the variance of $\dot{M}$ with metallicity is not a
639: linear relation. Figure~\ref{fig:mlr} and Table~\ref{tab:mlr} shows
640: that the cumulative mass-loss rate ($\Sigma\,\dot{M}$) of the
641: $\approx$140 dusty stars together is less than twice the combined
642: mass-loss rate of the three brightest M-type stars (LEID 33062, 44262,
643: 35250). However, the fainter stars may be contributing more to the
644: total mass-loss rate of the cluster if their dust-to-gas ratios are
645: smaller.
646:
647: To compare $\Sigma\,\dot{M}$ to the number of dusty stars present at
648: each magnitude, we also plot the percentage of stars that are dusty
649: ($f_{D}$) in Figure~\ref{fig:mlr}, binned by half magnitudes. $f_{D}$
650: remains roughly constant at 10\% -- 20\% for [24] $>$ 9.5, causing the
651: cumulative mass-loss rate to slowly increase at [24] $>$ 8. The
652: increase in $\Sigma\,\dot{M}$ at [24] $\approx$ 11 is due to the very
653: red sources ([8] -- [24] $>$ 1.0) at these magnitudes. It is possible
654: that many of the faint stars with red excess are not truly dusty (see
655: \S\ref{sec:agb}). Since the cumulative mass-loss rate does not
656: increase much over more than 2 magnitudes on the upper-RGB, it is
657: unlikely that even fainter stars, which are generally warmer and do
658: not pulsate strongly, contribute significantly to the dust-traced mass
659: loss.
660:
661: In a {\it Spitzer} study of 47 Tuc, \citet{origlia07} find that red
662: stars occupy the CMD from the tRGB down to the HB and conclude that
663: mass-loss is occurring at a significant rate along the entire
664: RGB. However, at least 25\% of the red sources in $\omega$\,Cen have
665: proven to have red colors because of blending effects at 24~\micron{}
666: (see \S~\ref{sec:catalog}). Figure~\ref{fig:mlr} shows that these
667: blended sources can increase the cumulative mass-loss rate by up to
668: 17\%. In more crowded clusters like 47 Tuc, blending will affect an
669: even larger percentage of red stars. Indeed, it is evident in Figure
670: 2 of \citet{origlia07} that the CMD covering the central region of the
671: cluster is affected by blending, since the many red sources claimed to
672: exist between --2 $< M_{\rm{bolometric}}$ $<$ 0 have no equivalent
673: in the CMD for the outer regions of the cluster. By eliminating these
674: blends, we find that significant dusty mass loss occurs only at or
675: near the tRGB.
676:
677: Two previous mid-IR studies of GCs detected several very red, faint
678: sources \citep{boyer06,ita07}. Both studies offer the possibility
679: that these sources are dusty, mass-losing stars. While the nature of
680: the sources has yet to be established, we find that after weeding out
681: pesky field stars and background galaxies via proper motion
682: information, very few of the confirmed $\omega$\,Cen cluster members
683: reside in this region of the CMD (Fig.~\ref{fig:indiv}), and
684: significant dusty mass loss occurs only near the very tip of the RGB
685: or AGB. In the case of NGC 362 \citep{ita07}, these faint, red sources
686: may be background AGB stars belonging to the Small Magellanic Cloud,
687: however in other GCs, these sources are more likely to be background
688: galaxies.
689:
690: If the current population in $\omega$\,Cen is representative of the
691: cluster's population at all times, then the cluster has lost at least
692: 1 -- 2 $M_\odot$ of material (1 -- 2 $\times$ 10$^{-4}~M_{\odot}$ of
693: dust) through stellar mass loss since its last Galactic plane
694: crossing, which occurred more than 3.4 $\times$ 10$^6$ years ago
695: \citep{tayler75}. \citet{jacco07} find a few post-AGB stars in
696: $\omega$\,Cen. Assuming a post-AGB lifetime of several $10^4$ yr and
697: 0.1 $M_\odot$ of mass shed on the AGB, this could have produced up to
698: 100 $M_\odot$ of lost mass. This comparison suggests that either
699: these AGB stars lose on average less than 0.1 $M_\odot$ on the AGB, or
700: that our mass-loss rate estimates are too low (for instance because
701: the wind velocity is actually higher and/or the dust-to-gas ratio is
702: lower than assumed here).
703:
704: \subsection{{\it Background Galaxies}}
705: \label{sec:galaxies}
706:
707: Background galaxies (green points in Fig.~\ref{fig:cmd1}) dominate the
708: faint, red plume in the [3.6] -- [8] CMD due to strong PAH emission at
709: 8~\micron{} \citep{blum06,bolatto07}. The coverage overlap between the
710: 3.6~\micron{} and 8~\micron{} mosaics is $\approx$0.3 deg$^2$,
711: yielding a density of 2823 galaxies/deg$^2$. This number increases to
712: 3174 galaxies/deg$^2$ if we consider undetected galaxies behind the
713: cluster center (an area of $\approx$11 arcmin$^2$, see
714: Fig.~\ref{fig:denprof}). The red and faint region of the [3.6] -- [24]
715: CMD is also heavily populated with sources. If these
716: 24~\micron{} sources are all background galaxies, the galaxy density
717: derived from this CMD is 2681 galaxies/deg$^2$, which increases to
718: 3015 galaxies/deg$^2$ when considering sources located behind the
719: cluster core. When including all sources with very red colors and
720: faint magnitudes at all wavelengths, we find a total background galaxy
721: density of $\approx$1~$\times$~10$^{4}$ galaxies/deg$^2$
722: (Fig.~\ref{fig:denprof}).
723:
724: To determine the expected background galaxy density, we queried the
725: SWIRE extragalactic database \citep{lonsdale04} for sources located in
726: the same region of the CMD as our galaxy candidates. In the six SWIRE
727: fields, there are $\approx$900 -- 2200 sources/deg$^2$ in the [3.6] --
728: [8] CMD and 900 -- 1900 sources/deg$^2$ in the [3.6] -- [24] CMD. Our
729: images are slightly more sensitive than the SWIRE data, but when
730: comparing identical regions of the CMD, the galaxy densities in our
731: CMDs fall within the range of the SWIRE galaxy densities,
732: strengthening the argument that the sources we have identified as
733: galaxy candidates are indeed background galaxies. It is also possible
734: that the faintest sources in the red [3.6] -- [8] and [3.6] -- [24]
735: plumes are either stellar blends or regular RGB stars whose fluxes are
736: poorly determined due to their proximity to the completion limit,
737: causing them to have a non-zero color.
738:
739: \subsection{{\it 70~\micron{} Sources}}
740: \label{sec:70micron}
741:
742: Nine point-sources appear in the 70~\micron{} mosaic, although none
743: are the red, possibly dusty cluster members discussed in
744: \S\,\ref{sec:agb} and \S\,\ref{sec:mlr}. One of these sources is resolved
745: at the shorter wavelengths and appears to be a background spiral
746: galaxy (2MASX J13272621--4746042; Fig.~\ref{fig:gal}). This galaxy
747: shows a ring of PAH emission at 8~\micron{} that is reminiscent of the
748: famous star-forming ``Ring of Fire'', seen in M31
749: \citep{barmby06,gordon06}. Two of 70~\micron{} sources are near
750: confirmed cluster members \citep{vanleeuwen00,jacco07}; source 1 is
751: 3.7\arcsec{} from LEID 27094, a distance that is within the
752: half-width, half-maximum of the 70~\micron{} PSF, and source 4 is
753: 1.0\arcsec{} from LEID 46055. Optical spectra for both LEID stars are
754: reported by \citet{jacco07} and reveal that both stars have [Fe/H]
755: $\simeq$ --1.25 and $T_{\rm eff}$ $\simeq$ 5000~K. LEID 27094 is
756: CH strong and appears to be a normal RGB star, while LEID 46055 is CH
757: and CN strong, and is Ba-rich, suggesting that it may be enriched in
758: carbon from third dredge-up. Despite the proximity in position between
759: these two LEID sources and sources 1 and 4, the LEID sources may be
760: associated with warmer stars that appear in the IRAC mosaics as
761: secondary stars blended with sources 1 and 4, and not with the
762: corresponding 70~\micron{} source. The remaining six 70~\micron{}
763: sources are not near any known cluster members.
764:
765: We measured 70~\micron{} fluxes for the eight point-sources with the
766: aperture feature of {\it Imexamine} in version 2.12.2 of
767: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
768: Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities
769: for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the
770: National Science Foundation.}. Aperture radii were initially set to
771: 3$\times$ the FWHM of each source and three iterations were performed
772: to find the optimal radius. The median of the background was
773: subtracted from the flux and the appropriate MIPS aperture correction
774: was applied. Fluxes are listed in Table~\ref{tab:70flux} and the 3.6
775: to 70~\micron{} SEDs are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:70sed}. Aside from
776: sources 1 and 4, all of the sources appear to be unaffected by blends
777: at all IRAC wavelengths.
778:
779: For each 70~\micron{} source, we performed a reduced-$\chi^2$ fit of a
780: two-component blackbody curve that include 2MASS $JHK$ fluxes to better
781: define the warmer blackbody. Source 8 falls off of our IRAC images, so
782: its IRAC fluxes were determined by using an earlier epoch of data from
783: the Gehrz Guaranteed Time Observing Program with {\it Spitzer} (PID
784: 132) with data reduction identical to that described in
785: \S\,\ref{sec:obs}. The fits take the photometric errors into
786: account. Sources 3, 5, 7, and 8 are underconstrained for this fitting
787: technique when we exclude the anomalously bright 5.8 and 8~\micron{}
788: points from the fit; for these sources, we decreased the number of
789: fitting parameters by fixing the temperatures to 1000 to 14,000~K and
790: 40 to 90~K for the blue and red blackbodies, respectively, and
791: choosing the temperatures that gave the best reduced-$\chi^2$. The
792: IRAC and MIPS color corrections were applied by iterating the fit
793: until the corrections remained constant within 1\%. While a
794: dual-blackbody fits well with most of the 70~\micron{} sources, we
795: point out that the dust around these sources may be emitting over a
796: range of temperatures.
797:
798: Better fits were obtained by excluding the 8~\micron{} point, which is
799: above the blue blackbody for all eight sources. To a lesser degree,
800: the 5.8~\micron{} point is also systematically brighter than the blue
801: blackbody component, suggesting that there is a range of dust
802: temperatures causing warm dust to radiate above the blackbody at
803: 5.8~\micron{} and perhaps also at 8~\micron{}. However, the
804: 5.8~\micron{} points are still included in the fit for source 3 in
805: order to keep the fit properly constrained. The resulting blackbodies
806: are overplotted in Figure~\ref{fig:70sed} and fitting results are
807: shown in Table~\ref{tab:bb70}.
808:
809: The emission features at 5.8 and 8~\micron{}, where PAH emission
810: dominates, and the relatively flat SEDs of the non-blended sources
811: suggests that all or most of these sources are background galaxies
812: \citep[for examples of {\it Spitzer} galaxy SEDs, see][]{dale05}. For
813: comparison, an SED of the resolved spiral galaxy is shown in
814: Figure~\ref{fig:galsed}. We determined the flux by placing square
815: apertures of roughly 45\arcsec{} $\times$ 50\arcsec{} on the galaxy
816: and subtracting the median background. As with source 8, the galaxy
817: falls off of our IRAC coverage, so data from PID 132 is used to
818: determine its IRAC fluxes. This SED is similar to the other eight,
819: except that it lacks the slight excess emission at 5.8~\micron{} that
820: many of the other sources exhibit.
821:
822: The cold dust component of the blackbody fits for the eight
823: unidentified sources range in temperature from $\approx$50~K to 68~K
824: -- a temperature commensurate with these objects being post-thermal
825: pulse stars, stars suffering from episodic mass loss on the RGB, or
826: post-AGB stars. However, the temperatures of all eight sources are
827: also consistent with dust in star forming regions that dominate the
828: galactic far-IR emission. At a temperature of 48.8 $\pm$ 0.8~K, the
829: cold blackbody component of the resolved galaxy is colder than the
830: other eight 70~\micron{} sources, which may suggest that the warmer
831: sources are of a different nature. Although, with so few constraints
832: in the blackbody fits, one might argue that the temperatures of all
833: nine sources are consistent with each other.
834:
835: If the 70~\micron{} sources are dusty AGB stars, the flux at
836: 8~\micron{} may be included in the wing of a broad emission feature
837: centered at 9.5~\micron{} due to amorphous silicate grains that
838: overlaps with the IRAC 8~\micron{} bandpass. The 9.5~\micron{} feature
839: is also detected in the 8 -- 13~\micron{} spectrum of a particularly
840: red, large-amplitude variable star in 47~Tuc \citep{jaccoea06a,
841: lebzelter06}. The positions of the 70~\micron{} sources on the [8] --
842: [24] CMD are marked in Figure~\ref{fig:populations}b. All sources lie
843: redward of the RGB and near the brighter end of the CMD. However, the
844: 3.6 and 4.5~\micron{} magnitudes of sources 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8
845: (triangles) are fainter than 12.5 magnitudes, suggesting that these
846: sources are indeed galaxies. Sources 1 and 4 lie on the brighter end
847: of the RGB, but they are blended with the aforementioned LEID
848: sources at the shorter wavelengths, which will cause an artificial
849: increase in brightness. While near-IR redshift measurements or radial
850: velocity measurements would conclusively determine the nature of these
851: sources, analysis of the {\it Spitzer} data strongly suggests that
852: they are all background galaxies.
853:
854: \subsection{{\it The Intracluster Medium}}
855: \label{sec:icm}
856:
857: Despite ongoing stellar mass loss in $\omega$\,Cen, there are no known
858: detections of any phase of ICM material in the cluster. The wind
859: velocities discussed in \S\,\ref{sec:mlr} are $\ll$ 10 km s$^{-1}$ for
860: metal-poor, dust-driven winds from low-mass AGB stars. Such velocities
861: are much less than the escape velocity of $\omega$\,Cen at 1 r$_{\rm
862: hm}$ \citep[$v_{\rm esc}$ $=$ 44 km s$^{-1}$;][]{gnedin02}, but if the
863: dust and gas are not well coupled, then the dust velocity may be
864: higher. RGB and AGB wind velocities measured from H$\alpha$ emission
865: wings can be as high as the cluster escape velocity, however it is
866: likely that H$\alpha$ wings are due to pulsation and/or chromospheric
867: activity instead of the circumstellar shells of stars. Core
868: velocities originate in the chromospheres and are typically lower ($<$
869: 15 km s$^{-1}$), but there have been at least two observations of
870: high velocities from the IR \ion{He}{1} line \citep{dupree92,
871: smith04}.
872:
873: If the winds are indeed slow and the total mass-loss rate discussed in
874: \S\,\ref{sec:mlr} has been constant since the last Galactic plane
875: crossing, then, barring any ICM removal mechanisms and assuming that
876: all stars belong to the population with the lowest metallicity, 1 -- 2
877: $M_\odot$ of material should have accumulated in the cluster. This
878: mass estimate includes only dusty mass loss on the RGB and AGB; mass loss from
879: non-dusty stars on the RGB and from stars that lose significant mass
880: in such a brief period of time that it may easily have been missed
881: (e.g., associated with the formation of a planetary nebula) may cause
882: this estimate to increase by a factor of two or three. Based on the
883: total amount of AGB mass loss, which is the only source of dust, we
884: expect a dust mass of $M_{\rm d}$ = $\psi\,M_{\rm gas}$ $\sim$ 1 -- 2
885: $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ $M_\odot$ of dust. Since the estimate of the time
886: since the last Galactic plane crossing is a lower limit \citep[$>$ 3.4
887: $\times$ 10$^6$ yr;][]{tayler75}, the predicted ICM dust mass may be
888: higher.
889:
890: The average 1 $\sigma$ sensitivity of our 24~\micron{} mosaic is
891: $\approx$2.5 $\times$ 10$^{-2}$ MJy/str. Following \citet{evans03},
892: the relationship between the dust mass and the expected
893: IR flux density is:
894:
895: \begin{equation}
896: \frac{M_d}{M_\odot} = 4.79\times 10^{-17}\ f_\nu ({\rm mJy})\
897: \frac{D^{2}_{\rm kpc}}{\kappa_\nu B(\nu,T_d)},
898: \end{equation}
899:
900: \noindent where $D_{\rm kpc}$ is the distance to $\omega$\,Cen,
901: $\kappa_\nu$ is the dust absorption coefficient (cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$),
902: $T_{d}$ is the dust temperature (K), and $B(\nu,T_{d}$) is
903: the Planck function in cgs units. Assuming a standard
904: Mathis-Rumpl-Nordsieck dust distribution \citep{mathis77} and an
905: ISM-type dust composition of graphite and silicate grains,
906: $\kappa_\nu$ is taken to be 56 $\pm$ 11 cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$
907: \citep{ossenkopf94}, although this value could be up to a decade
908: larger. A cloud with 1 -- 2 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ $M_\odot$ of dust and
909: an equilibrium temperature of 70~K would yield a 24~\micron{} flux
910: density of 23 -- 45 mJy. With our sensitivity, we are capable of
911: detecting 23 mJy to the 3 $\sigma$ level in our 24~\micron{} mosaic
912: if all of the dust is uniformly distributed within an area of
913: 2\arcmin{} $\times$ 2\arcmin{}, or a radius of
914: $\approx1/4~r_{\rm hm}$ A small, centrally located cloud
915: at the 3 $\sigma$ level would be detectable over the
916: background stellar emission in the 24 and 70~\micron{}
917: mosaics. However, unlike in M15 \citep{boyer06}, our MIPS images do
918: not show a large dust cloud located at the center of $\omega$\,Cen.
919:
920: While there is no central ICM dust cloud in $\omega$\,Cen, there is
921: faint, diffuse emission covering nearly the entire 24~\micron{} image
922: to the south of the cluster center, including several small regions of
923: concentrated extended emission on the outskirts of the cluster that
924: appear near the 3 $\sigma$ limit (Figs.~\ref{fig:icm}
925: and~\ref{fig:abcd}). Feature A (Fig.~\ref{fig:icma}) appears at 8, 24,
926: and 70~\micron{}, features B and C appear at 8 and 24~\micron{}, and
927: feature D appears only at 24~\micron{}, as the coverage is not
928: identical across all bands. The probability that these features are
929: artefacts is quite low as they each appear in more than 95\% of the
930: BCD images at various array positions.
931:
932: It is uncertain whether features A -- D are associated with the
933: cluster or are part of the foreground. The morphology of feature A
934: provides the strongest evidence for cluster association, as the warmer
935: 8~\micron{} emission lies closer to the cluster center than the cooler
936: 24 and 70~\micron{} emission (Figs.~\ref{fig:abcd} and~\ref{fig:icma}). Moreover, the
937: warmer portion is approximately perpendicular to the direction towards
938: the cluster center. This configuration suggests the possibilities
939: that either a warm wind is pushing the ICM out of the cluster or that
940: the 8~\micron{} arc is optically thick and is being irradiated by the
941: cluster's stellar radiation field with cold dust in its shadow. A determination of the dust temperature would aid in ascertaining the
942: origin of feature A. Unfortunately, only very small portions of
943: feature A are present in the {\it Spitzer} mosaics at all wavebands
944: (Fig.~\ref{fig:icma}), and the limited coverage makes it impossible to
945: reliably determine the temperature of the dust from an SED.
946:
947: The case for an ICM origin for features A -- D is strengthened by our
948: discovery of an unreported \ion{H}{1} cloud near the velocity of
949: $\omega$\,Cen (Fig.~\ref{fig:hipass}) in public data from the
950: \ion{H}{1} Parkes All-Sky Survey \citep[HIPASS; ][]{hipass}, which may
951: have also been detected by \citet{smith90} in earlier observations.
952: The center of this \ion{H}{1} feature is not spatially coincident with
953: any of the dust features, but rather lies $\approx$15\arcmin{} to the
954: southeast of the cluster center, just on the edge of the coverage of
955: our MIPS mosaic (Fig.~\ref{fig:icm}). The velocity of the \ion{H}{1}
956: feature ($v_{\rm LSR}~\sim$ 190 km s$^{-1}$) suggests a connection to
957: $\omega$\,Cen ($v_{\rm LSR}~\simeq$ 230 km s$^{-1}$). \citet{smith90}
958: argue instead that, because the feature is detected on only one side
959: of the cluster, it is more likely to be a small high-velocity cloud
960: that is part of the Magellanic Stream \citep[][$v_{\rm LSR}$
961: = 200 km s$^{-1}$]{bajaja85}. While an association between the \ion{H}{1}
962: feature and the Magellanic Stream is a possibility, similar offset
963: \ion{H}{1} clouds have been discovered in larger dSph galaxies
964: \citep{bouchard03,bouchard06,young06}, so finding a cloud that is
965: associated with $\omega$\,Cen may not come as a surprise. In M15,
966: dust and \ion{H}{1} trace each other in the ICM \citep{jaccoea06b}.
967: Therefore, if the \ion{H}{1} feature is indeed associated with
968: $\omega$\,Cen, it is reasonable to assume that dust is also present.
969: Since both the dust and the \ion{H}{1} feature are located well
970: outside 1 $r_{\rm hm}$, it is possible that we are seeing the ICM
971: in the process of escaping the cluster.
972:
973:
974:
975: \section{{\sc Conclusions}}
976: \label{sec:concl}
977:
978: Our {\it Spitzer} multi-wavelength and dual-epoch study of the most
979: massive Galactic globular cluster, $\omega$\,Cen, and the resulting
980: point-source catalog provide the most complete mid- to far-IR
981: atlas of any GC to date. Despite $\omega$\,Cen's rather unusual
982: stellar population, the {\it Spitzer} CMDs show little structure beyond the division
983: between the RGB stars belonging to the cluster and background
984: galaxies. The HB stars and RGB-a stars are not separated from the RGB,
985: except for a slightly blue [3.6] -- [4.5] color for the RGB-a.
986:
987: Nine sources are detected at 70~\micron{}, one of which is a resolved
988: spiral galaxy, and two of which are spatially coincident with optical
989: sources that are known cluster members. If emission at 5.8 and
990: 8~\micron{} in the SEDs of the eight point sources is PAH emission,
991: then these sources are background galaxies.
992:
993: By cross-referencing with a catalog of optical spectra
994: \citep{jacco07}, we confirm that super-Ba-rich stars delineate the tip
995: of the AGB, likely due to a third dredge-up, and find that three
996: M-type stars not only have strong red excess, but are brighter than
997: the 24~\micron{} tRGB. Attributing the excess IR luminosity to dust
998: suggests that the three bright M-type stars dominate the cluster's
999: cumulative mass-loss rate (gas $+$ dust) of 2.9 -- 4.2 $\times$
1000: 10$^{-7}$ $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. If the cluster mass-loss rate has
1001: remained constant since the last Galactic plane crossing, then the
1002: cluster has lost at least 1 -- 2 $M_\odot$ of dust-traced material
1003: over the last 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{6}$ years.
1004:
1005: The dusty stars in our sample range over $\approx$1.5 dex in metallicity,
1006: suggesting that dust production is not inhibited even in stars with
1007: very low metal contents. In addition, our results show that, in
1008: $\omega$\,Cen, significant dusty mass loss occurs near the very tip of
1009: the RGB or AGB, concentrated in only a few individual stars, with
1010: little evidence for such mass loss lower on the RGB.
1011:
1012: While our images are sensitive enough to detect the amount of dust
1013: expected in $\omega$\,Cen based on the current mass-loss rate, no
1014: obvious ICM dust clouds are apparent in the cluster center at 24 or
1015: 70~\micron{}. We do find several regions of faint extended
1016: 24~\micron{} emission on the outskirts of the cluster, but it is
1017: unclear whether these clouds are associated with the ICM or are in the
1018: foreground. If the dust features are associated with the cluster, they
1019: are well outside the cluster half-mass radius, and could therefore be
1020: ICM material that is in the process of escaping the cluster.
1021:
1022:
1023:
1024: \acknowledgments
1025:
1026:
1027: We thank the anonymous referee for his/her careful reading of the
1028: manuscript and his/her valuable comments, which much improved the
1029: presentation of these data. This publication makes use of data
1030: products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project
1031: of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and
1032: Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the
1033: National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science
1034: Foundation. M.~.L.~B. is supported in part by the University of
1035: Minnesota Louise T. Dosdall Fellowship. M.~L.~B., C.~E.~W., and
1036: R.~D.~G. are supported in part by NASA through \textit{Spitzer}
1037: contracts 1276760, 1256406, and 1215746 issued by JPL/Caltech to the
1038: University of Minnesota. I.~M. is supported by a STFC/PPARC
1039: studentship. A.~K.~D. acknowledges research support from {\it Spitzer}
1040: contract 1279224.
1041:
1042:
1043:
1044:
1045: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1046: %%%% Bibliography
1047: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1048:
1049: \newpage
1050:
1051: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1052:
1053:
1054: \bibitem[Bajaja et al.(1985)]{bajaja85} Bajaja, E., Cappa de
1055: Nicolau, C.~E., Cersosimo, J.~C., Martin, M.~C., Loiseau, N., Morras, R.,
1056: Olano, C.~A., \& Poeppel, W.~G.~L.\ 1985, \apjs, 58, 143
1057:
1058: \bibitem[Barmby et al.(2006)]{barmby06} Barmby, P., et al. \ 2006,
1059: \apjl, 650, L45
1060:
1061: \bibitem[Barnes et al.(2001)]{hipass} Barnes, D.~G., et al.\ 2001,
1062: \mnras, 322, 486
1063:
1064: \bibitem[Bellazzini et al.(2004)]{bellazzini04} Bellazzini, M.,
1065: Ferraro, F. R., Sollima, A., Pancino, E., \& Origlia, L. \ 2004,
1066: \aap, 424, 199
1067:
1068: \bibitem[Blum et al.(2006)]{blum06} Blum, R.~D., et al.\ 2006,
1069: \aj, 132, 2034
1070:
1071: \bibitem[Bolatto et al.(2007)]{bolatto07} Bolatto, A.~D., et al.\
1072: 2007, \apj, 655, 212
1073:
1074: \bibitem[Bouchard et al.(2003)]{bouchard03} Bouchard, A., Carignan,
1075: C., \& Mashchenko, S.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 1295
1076:
1077: \bibitem[Bouchard et al.(2006)]{bouchard06} Bouchard, A., Carignan,
1078: C., \& Staveley-Smith, L.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 2913
1079:
1080: \bibitem[Boyer et al.(2006)]{boyer06} Boyer, M.~L., Woodward,
1081: C.~E., van Loon, J.~Th., Gordon, K.~D., Evans, A., Gehrz, R.~D., Helton,
1082: L.~A., \& Polomski, E.~F.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 1415
1083:
1084: \bibitem[Cacciari et al.(2004)]{cacciari04} Cacciari, C. et al. \ 2004,
1085: \aap, 413, 343
1086:
1087: \bibitem[Chiosi \& Maeder(1986)]{chiosi86} Chiosi, C., \& Maeder, A.\ 1986, \araa, 24, 329
1088:
1089: %\bibitem[Clement(1997)]{clement97} Clement, C.\ 1997, VizieR Online
1090: % Data Catalog, 5097, 0
1091:
1092: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2005)]{dale05} Dale, D.~A., et al.\ 2005, \apj,
1093: 633, 857
1094:
1095: \bibitem[Del Principe et al.(2006)]{reddening} Del Principe, M.,
1096: et al.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 362
1097:
1098: %\bibitem[Diolaiti et al.(2000)]{diolaiti00} Diolaiti, E., Bendinelli,
1099: %O., Bonaccini, D., Close, L., Currie, D., \& Parmeggiani, G.\ 2000,
1100: %\aaps, 147, 335
1101:
1102: \bibitem[Dupree et al.(1984)]{dupree84} Dupree, A. K., Hartmann, L.,
1103: \& Avrett, E.H.\ 1984, \apj, 281, L37
1104:
1105: \bibitem[Dupree et al.(1992)]{dupree92} Dupree, A.~K., Sasselov,
1106: D.~D., \& Lester, J.~B.\ 1992, \apjl, 387, L85
1107:
1108: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2007)]{engelbracht07} Engelbracht, C.~W.,
1109: et al.\ 2007, \pasp, submitted
1110:
1111: \bibitem[Evans et al.(2003)]{evans03} Evans, A., Stickel, M., van
1112: Loon, J. Th., Eyres, S. P. S., Hopwood, M. E. L., \& Penny, A. J.\ 2003, \aap, 408, L9
1113:
1114: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio04} Fazio, G.~G., et al.\
1115: 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
1116:
1117: \bibitem[Fehrenbach \& Duflot(1962)]{fehrenbach62} Fehrenbach,
1118: C.~H. \& Duflot, M.\ 1962, ESO Comm., No.~2
1119:
1120: \bibitem[Freeman(1993)]{freeman93} Freeman, K.~C.\ 1993, The
1121: Globular Cluster-Galaxy Connection, 48, 608
1122:
1123: \bibitem[Gail \& Sedlmayr(1987)]{gail87} Gail, H.-P., \& Sedlmayr,
1124: E.\ 1987, \aap, 177, 186
1125:
1126: %\bibitem[Gallart et al.(2004)]{gallart04} Gallart, C., Aparicio, A.,
1127: % Freedman, W.~L., Madore, B.~F., Mart{\'{\i}}nez-Delgado, D., \&
1128: % Stetson, P.~B.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 1486
1129:
1130:
1131:
1132: \bibitem[Gauger et al.(1990)]{gauger90} Gauger, A., Sedlmayr, E., \&
1133: Gail, H.-P.\ 1990, \aap, 235, 345
1134:
1135: \bibitem[Gehrz(1989)]{gehrz89} Gehrz, R. D.\ 1989, in: Interstellar
1136: Dust. Eds. L. J. Allamandola \& A. G. G. M. Tielens. IAUS 135, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p.445
1137:
1138: \bibitem[Gehrz \& Woolf(1971)]{gehrz71} Gehrz, R.~D., \& Woolf, N.~J.\ 1971, \apj, 165, 285
1139:
1140: \bibitem[Gehrz et al.(2007)]{gehrz07} Gehrz, R.~D., et al.\ 2007,
1141: Review of Scientific Instruments, 78, 011302
1142:
1143: \bibitem[Gnedin et al.(2002)]{gnedin02} Gnedin, O.~Y., Zhao, H.,
1144: Pringle, J.~E., Fall, S.~M., Livio, M., \& Meylan, G.\ 2002, \apj,
1145: 568, L23
1146:
1147: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2006)]{gordon06} Gordon, K.~D., et al.\ 2006,
1148: \apjl, 638, L87
1149:
1150: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2007)]{gordon07} Gordon, K.~D., et al.\ 2007,
1151: \pasp, in press
1152:
1153: \bibitem[Gould \& Salpeter(1963)]{gould63} Gould, R. J., \& Salpeter, E. E.\ 1963, \apj, 138, 393
1154:
1155: \bibitem[Gratton et al.(2004)]{gratton04} Gratton, R., Sneden, C., \& Carretta, E.\ 2004, \araa, 42, 385
1156:
1157: \bibitem[Groenewegen(2006)]{groenewegen06} Groenewegen, M.~A.~T.\ 2006, \aap, 448, 181
1158:
1159: \bibitem[Harris(1996)]{harris96} Harris, W.~E.\ 1996, \aj, 112, 1487
1160:
1161: \bibitem[H\"ofner \& Dorfi(1997)]{hofner97} H\"ofner, S., \& Dorfi, E. A.\ 1997, \aap, 319, 648
1162:
1163: \bibitem[Iben \& Renzini(1983)]{iben83} Iben, I. Jr., \& Renzini, A.\ 1983, \araa, 21, 271
1164:
1165: \bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2005)]{indebetouw05} Indebetouw, R., et
1166: al.\ 2005, \apj, 619, 931
1167:
1168: \bibitem[Ita et al.(2007)]{ita07} Ita, Y., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, in press
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Ivezi\'c \& Elitzur(1995)]{ivezic95} Ivezi\'c, \v{Z}., \& Elitzur,
1171: M.\ 1995, \apj, 445, 415
1172:
1173: \bibitem[Jackson et al.(2007)]{jackson07} Jackson, D.~C., Skillman,
1174: E.~D., Gehrz, R.~D., Polomski, E., \& Woodward, C.~E.\ 2007, \apj, 656, 818
1175:
1176: \bibitem[Jura \& Morris(1985)]{jura85} Jura, M., \& Morris, M.\ 1985,
1177: \apj, 292, 487
1178:
1179: %\bibitem[Krist(2002)]{krist02} Krist, J.\ 2002, Tiny Tim/SIRTF User's
1180: % Guide (Pasadena: {\it Spitzer} Sci. Center)
1181:
1182: %\bibitem[Le Bertre(1992)]{lebertre92} Le Bertre, T.\ 1992, \aaps, 94, 377
1183:
1184: \bibitem[Lebzelter et al.(2006)]{lebzelter06} Lebzelter, Th., Posch,
1185: Th., Hinkle, K., Wood, P. R., \& Bouwman, J.\ 2006, \apj, 653, L145
1186:
1187: \bibitem[Lee et al.(1999)]{lee99} Lee, Y.-W., Joo, J.-M., Sohn, Y.-J.,
1188: Rey, S.-C., Lee, H.-C., \& Walker, A. R.\ 1999, \nat, 402, 55
1189:
1190: \bibitem[Leinert et al.(2002)]{leinert02} Leinert, C.,
1191: {\'A}brah{\'a}m, P., Acosta-Pulido, J., Lemke, D., \& Siebenmorgen,
1192: R.\ 2002, \aap, 393, 1073
1193:
1194: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al.(2004)]{lonsdale04} Lonsdale, C., et al.\ 2004,
1195: \apjs, 154, 54
1196:
1197: \bibitem[Lub(2002)]{lub02} Lub, J.\ 2002, Omega Centauri, A
1198: Unique Window into Astrophysics, 265, 95
1199:
1200: \bibitem[Makovoz \& Marleau(2005)]{makovoz05} Makovoz, D., \&
1201: Marleau, F.~R.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 1113
1202:
1203: \bibitem[Marshall et al.(2004)]{marshall04} Marshall, J.~R., van Loon,
1204: J.~Th., Matsuura, M., Wood, P.~R., Zijlstra, A.~A. \& Whitelock,
1205: P.~A.\ 2004, \mnras, 355, 1348
1206:
1207: \bibitem[Mathis et al.(1977)]{mathis77} Mathis, J.~S., Rumpl,
1208: W., \& Nordsieck, K.~H.\ 1977, \apj, 217, 425
1209:
1210: \bibitem[McDonald \& van Loon(2007)]{mcdonald07} McDonald, I., \& van
1211: Loon, J. Th.\ 2007, \aap, 476, 1261
1212:
1213: \bibitem[Meszaros et al.(2008)]{meszaros08} Meszaros, S., Dupree,
1214: A. K., \& Szentgyorgyi, A. 2008, AJ, in press
1215:
1216: %\bibitem[McQuinn et al.(2007)]{mcquinn07} McQuinn, K.~B.~W., et al.\
1217: % 2007, \apj, 664, 850
1218:
1219: \bibitem[Norris(1996)]{norris96} Norris, J. E.\ 1996, \apj, 462, 241
1220:
1221: \bibitem[Norris(2004)]{norris04} Norris, J. E.\ 2004, \apj, 612, L25
1222:
1223: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(2003)]{origlia03} Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R.,
1224: Bellazzini, M., \& Pancino, E.\ 2003, \apj, 591, 9160
1225:
1226: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(2002)]{origlia02} Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R.,
1227: Fusi Pecci, F., \& Rood, R. T.\ 2002, \apj, 571, 458
1228:
1229: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(2007)]{origlia07} Origlia, L., Rood, R.~T.,
1230: Fabbri, S., Ferraro, F.~R., Fusi Pecci, F., \& Rich, R.~M.\ 2007,
1231: \apjl, 667, L85
1232:
1233: \bibitem[Ossenkopf \& Henning(1994)]{ossenkopf94} Ossenkopf, V., \&
1234: Henning, Th.\ 1994, \aap, 291, 943
1235:
1236: \bibitem[Pancino et al.(2000)]{pancino00} Pancino, E., Ferraro, F. R.,
1237: Bellazzini, M., Piotto, G., \& Zoccali, M.\ 2000, \apj, 534, L83
1238:
1239: \bibitem[Pancino et al.(2002)]{pancino02} Pancino, E., Pasquini, L.,
1240: Hill, V., Ferraro, F. R., \& Bellazzini, M.\ 2002, \apj, 568, L101
1241:
1242: \bibitem[Ramdani \& Jorissen(2001)]{ramdani01} Ramdani A., \&
1243: Jorissen, A.\ 2001, \aap, 372, 85
1244:
1245: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{reach05} Reach, W.~T., et al.\ 2005,
1246: \pasp, 117, 978
1247:
1248: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{rieke85} Rieke, G.~H., Lebofsky, M.~J.\ 1985,
1249: ApJ, 288, 618
1250:
1251: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rieke04} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\
1252: 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
1253:
1254: \bibitem[Rood(1973)]{rood73} Rood, R. T.\ 1973, \apj, 184, 815
1255:
1256: \bibitem[Salpeter(1974)]{salpeter74} Salpeter, E. E. 1974, \apj, 193, 579
1257:
1258: %\bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skrutskie06} Skrutskie, M.~F., et
1259: %al.\ 2006, \aj, 161, 1163
1260:
1261: %\bibitem[Smith \& Dupree(1988)]{smith88} Smith, G.~H., \& Dupree, A.~K.\ 1988, \aj, 95, 1547
1262:
1263: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2004)]{smith04} Smith, G.~H., Dupree, A.~K., \&
1264: Strader, J.\ 2004, \pasp, 116, 819
1265:
1266: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1990)]{smith90} Smith, G.~H., Wood,
1267: P.~R., Faulkner, D.~J., \& Wright, A.~E.\ 1990, \apj, 353, 168
1268:
1269: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2000)]{smith00} Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N. B.,
1270: Cunha, K., Gallino, R., Busso, M., Lambert, D. L., \& Straniero,
1271: O.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 1239
1272:
1273: \bibitem[Sollima et al.(2004)]{sollima04} Sollima, A., Ferraro,
1274: F.~R., Origlia, L., Pancino, E., \& Bellazzini, M.\ 2004, \aap, 420,
1275: 173
1276:
1277: \bibitem[Sollima et al.(2004)]{sollima_cat} Sollima, A., Ferraro,
1278: F.~R., Origlia, L., Pancino, E., \& Bellazzini, M.\ 2004, VizieR
1279: Online Data Catalog, 342, 173
1280:
1281: \bibitem[Sollima et al.(2005)]{sollima05} Sollima, A., Pancino, E.,
1282: Ferraro, F. R., Bellazzini, M., Straniero, O., \& Pasquini, L.\ 2005,
1283: \apj, 634, 332
1284:
1285: \bibitem[{\it Spitzer} Science Center(2006a)]{idh} {\it Spitzer}
1286: Science Center.\ 2006a, Infrared Array Camera Data Handbook (Pasadena:
1287: SSC), http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/dh/
1288:
1289: \bibitem[{\it Spitzer} Science Center(2006b)]{mdh} {\it Spitzer}
1290: Science Center.\ 2006b, Multiband Imaging Photometer for {\it Spitzer}
1291: (MIPS) Data Handbook (Pasadena: SSC),
1292: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/dh/
1293:
1294: \bibitem[Stanford et al.(2006)]{stanford06} Stanford, L. M., Da Costa,
1295: G. S., Norris, J. E., \& Cannon, R. D.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 1075
1296:
1297: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{stetson87} Stetson, P. B.\ 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
1298:
1299: \bibitem[Tayler \& Wood(1975)]{tayler75} Tayler, R.~J., \& Wood,
1300: P.~R.\ 1975, \mnras, 171, 467
1301:
1302: \bibitem[Valenti et al.(2007)]{valenti07} Valenti, E., Ferraro, F.~R.,
1303: \& Origlia, L.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 1287
1304:
1305: \bibitem[van de Ven et al.(2006)]{vandeven06} van de Ven, G., van
1306: den Bosch, R.~C.~E., Verolme, E.~K., \& de Zeeuw, P.~T.\ 2006, \aap, 445,
1307: 513
1308:
1309: \bibitem[van Leeuwen et al.(2000)]{vanleeuwen00} van Leeuwen, F., Le
1310: Poole, R.~S., Reijns, R.~A., Freeman, K.~C., \& de Zeeuw, P.~T.\ 2000,
1311: \aap, 360, 472
1312:
1313: \bibitem[van Loon(2000)]{jacco00} van Loon, J.~Th.\ 2000, \aap, 354,
1314: 125
1315:
1316: \bibitem[van Loon(2006)]{jacco06} van Loon, J. Th.\ 2006, in: Stellar
1317: Evolution at Low Metallicity: Mass Loss, Explosions,
1318: Cosmology. Eds. H. J. G. L. M. Lamers, N. Langer, T. Nugis \&
1319: K. Annuk. ASP Conf.Ser.\ 353, p.211
1320:
1321: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(1999)]{vanloon99} van Loon, J.~Th.,
1322: Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., de Koter, A., Trams, N.~R., Waters, L.~B.~F.~M.,
1323: Zijlstra, A.~A., Whitelock, P.~A., \& Loup, C.\ 1999, \aap, 351, 559
1324:
1325: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2005)]{jacco05} van Loon, J.~Th., Marshall,
1326: J.~R., \& Zijlstra, A.~A.\ 2005, \aap, 442, 597
1327:
1328: \bibitem[van Loon \& McDonald(2008)]{jaccomc07} van Loon, J. Th., \&
1329: McDonald, I.\ 2007, in: Mass loss from stars and the evolution of
1330: stellar clusters. Eds. A. de Koter, L. Smith \&
1331: L. B. F. M. Waters. ASP Conf.Ser., in press
1332:
1333: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2006a)]{jaccoea06a} van Loon, J.~Th., McDonald,
1334: I., Oliveira, J.~M., Evans, A., Boyer, M.~L., Gehrz, R.~D.,
1335: Polomski, E., \& Woodward, C.,~E.\ 2006a, \aap, 450, 339
1336:
1337: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2006b)]{jaccoea06b} van Loon, J.~Th.,
1338: Stanimirovi{\'c}, S., Evans, A., \& Muller, E.\ 2006b, \mnras, 365, 1277
1339:
1340: \bibitem[van Loon et al.(2007)]{jacco07} van Loon, J.~Th., van
1341: Leeuwen, F., Smalley, B., Smith, A.~W., Lyons, N.~A., McDonald, I.,
1342: \& Boyer, M.~L.\ 2007, \mnras, 382, 1353
1343:
1344: %\bibitem[van Loon et al.(1998)]{jacco98} van Loon, J.~Th., et al.\
1345: % 1998, \aap, 329, 169
1346:
1347: \bibitem[Villanova et al.(2007)]{villanova07} Villanova, S., et
1348: al.\ 2007, \apj, 663, 296
1349:
1350: %\bibitem[Weldrake et al.(2006)]{weldrake06} Weldrake, D.~T.~F.,
1351: % Sackett, P.~D., \& Bridges, T.~J.\ 2006, \aj, 133, 1447
1352:
1353: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{werner04} Werner, M.~W., et al.\ 2004,
1354: \apjs, 154, 1
1355:
1356: \bibitem[Young et al.(2006)]{young06} Young, L.~M., Skillman, E.~D.,
1357: Weisz, D.~R., \& Dolphin, A.~E.\ 2007, \apj, 659, 331
1358:
1359: \bibitem[Zinnecker et al.(1988)]{zinnecker88} Zinnecker, H.,
1360: Keable, C.~J., Dunlop, J.~S., Cannon, R.~D., \& Griffiths, W.~K.\ 1988, The
1361: Harlow-Shapley Symposium on Globular Cluster Systems in Galaxies, 126, 603
1362:
1363: \end{thebibliography}
1364: \clearpage
1365:
1366: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1367: %%%%% Figures
1368: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1369:
1370: % Fig 1: 3-color Image
1371: \begin{figure}[h!]
1372: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{f1}
1373: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{f1.jpg} \figcaption{Three-color images
1374: of $\omega$ Cen. Upper panel: Blue is 3.6~\micron{}, green is
1375: 4.5~\micron{} and red is 5.8~\micron{}. Lower Panel: Blue is
1376: 3.6~\micron{}, green is 8~\micron{} and red is 24~\micron{}. The
1377: black ``X'' marks the cluster center. Dusty stars and/or background
1378: galaxies become visible at 8 and 24~\micron{} and appear red in the
1379: lower panel. No obvious intracluster medium dust clouds are
1380: visible. \label{fig:3color} }
1381: \end{figure}
1382: \clearpage
1383:
1384: % Fig 2: Photometry Errors
1385: \begin{figure}[h!]
1386: %\epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f2}
1387: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=90]{f2.jpg} \figcaption{Photometric
1388: errors. The x-axis is binned by 0.1 magnitudes, and the y-axis is
1389: binned by 0.2 percentage points. The dashed lines mark the limit
1390: where photometry is 50\% complete (see Table.~\ref{tab:comp}). The
1391: errors for the bulk of the stellar population are low, but climb
1392: steadily at the faintest magnitudes. \label{fig:photerr} }
1393: \end{figure}
1394: \clearpage
1395:
1396: % Fig 3: Blending
1397: \begin{figure}[h!]
1398: %\epsscale{0.75}\plotone{f3}
1399: \includegraphics[scale=0.75,angle=0]{f3.jpg} \figcaption{Color-color
1400: diagram showing which individual sources are affected by blending at
1401: 24~\micron{}. We convolved the 8~\micron{} image with the
1402: 24~\micron{} PSF and extracted point sources from the resulting
1403: image. Each panel shows the entire population in small points, with
1404: the 8~\micron{} magnitude range indicated in each panel plotted in
1405: large, filled circles. Sources that have red [8] -- [convolved 8]
1406: colors are affected by blending, whereas sources with red [8] --
1407: [24] colors and [8] -- [convolved 8] $\approx$ 0 are truly red and
1408: likely harbor dust. We find that up to 25\% of the population with
1409: [8] -- [24] $>$ 0.1 is affected by blending. \label{fig:blend} }
1410: \end{figure}
1411: \clearpage
1412:
1413: % Fig 4: Luminosity Function
1414: \begin{figure}[h!]
1415: %\epsscale{.9} \plotone{Figures/lumfunc_fin.ps}
1416: \includegraphics[scale=0.65,angle=90]{f4.jpg} \figcaption{Luminosity
1417: functions for 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8, and 24~\micron. The bin size is 0.2
1418: magnitudes and fluxes are corrected for reddening \citep[$E(B-V) =
1419: 0.11$; ][]{lub02}. In the upper panels, only sources detected in
1420: at least two bands are plotted and known non-members are
1421: excluded. In the lower panels, only known cluster members are
1422: plotted \citep{vanleeuwen00}. The dashed lines show the 3 $\sigma$
1423: sensitivity limit for each band (at 3.6 and 4.5~\micron{}, the
1424: sensitivity limit is fainter than the plot area shown), and the
1425: dotted lines mark the 50\% completeness limits. The photometry is
1426: nearly complete down to the 3 $\sigma$ sensitivity limit at 5.8 --
1427: 24~\micron{}, but is less complete at the shortest wavelengths due
1428: to severe stellar crowding in the cluster core. In the upper
1429: panels, the arrows indicate changes of slope that show the position
1430: of the RGB Bump/Clump and the HB. In the lower panels, the tRGB is
1431: marked as the point where the source counts drop by a factor of
1432: $\approx$4. \label{fig:lumfnc} }
1433:
1434: \end{figure}
1435: \clearpage
1436:
1437:
1438: % Fig 5: CMDs for 3.6 microns
1439: \begin{figure}[h!]
1440: \begin{center}
1441: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{Figures/cmds.ps}
1442: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{f5.jpg} \figcaption{CMDs for $\omega$
1443: Cen. Fluxes are corrected for reddening \citep[$E(B-V) = 0.11$;
1444: ][]{lub02}. $B$ magnitudes are from \citet{vanleeuwen00} and $J$
1445: magnitudes are from \citet{sollima04}. The solid lines mark where
1446: the photometry is 50\% complete in the case of {\it Spitzer} or mark
1447: the detection limit from \citet{vanleeuwen00} and
1448: \citet{sollima04}. The brightest confirmed cluster members at IRAC
1449: wavelengths are marked with large filled circles in each panel to
1450: show their evolution over color-magnitude space (non-members remain
1451: small dots). The three most extreme M-type stars are labeled with
1452: their LEID numbers. \label{fig:cmd1} }
1453: \end{center}
1454: \end{figure}
1455: \clearpage
1456:
1457: % Fig 6: Color CMDs for 3.6 microns
1458: \begin{figure}[h!]
1459: \begin{center}
1460: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{Figures/cmds-color.ps}
1461: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{f6.jpg} \figcaption{CMDs for $\omega$
1462: Cen. Same as Figure~\ref{fig:cmd1}, with different source types
1463: plotted in colors. Black points are confirmed cluster members
1464: \citep{vanleeuwen00}, gray points are not included in the
1465: \citet{vanleeuwen00} proper motion (PM) catalog, green points are
1466: possible background galaxies, blue points are HB stars, and magenta
1467: points are sources belonging to the RGB-a. HB and RGB-a stars were
1468: identified by their positions on the $B$ -- [3.6] CMD. At {\it
1469: Spitzer} wavelengths, the HB does not separate from the RGB as in
1470: optical CMDs, nor does the RGB-a except for a trend towards slightly
1471: blue [3.6] -- [4.5] colors. Background galaxies are identified by
1472: their [3.6] -- [8] and [8] -- [24] colors and appear very red at
1473: 8~\micron{} due to PAH emission and at 24~\micron{} due to dust
1474: emission. \label{fig:cmd2} }
1475: \end{center}
1476: \end{figure}
1477: \clearpage
1478:
1479:
1480: % Fig 7: Stellar Density Profile
1481: \begin{figure}[h!]
1482: %\epsscale{0.65} \plotone{f7}
1483: \includegraphics[scale=0.65,angle=0]{f7.jpg} \figcaption{Source density
1484: profiles for $\omega$\,Cen. The thick line shows possible HB stars
1485: in the top panel, AGB stars in the middle panel, and galaxy
1486: candidates in the lower panel. For comparison, the density profile
1487: for all cluster members is shifted down to match each profile at $r
1488: =$ 8.5\arcmin{} and plotted in arbitrary units (a.u.) as a thin
1489: line. The AGB stars appear to be slightly more centrally
1490: concentrated than the general $\omega$\,Cen population, and there is
1491: a paucity of HB stars and galaxy candidates in the cluster
1492: center. The HB and AGB profiles might be explained by the lower and
1493: higher flux densities of HB and AGB stars, respectively, than the
1494: general stellar population rather than a real difference between the
1495: profiles. \label{fig:denprof} } \end{figure}
1496: \clearpage
1497:
1498: % Fig 8: Populations CMD
1499: \begin{figure}[h!]
1500: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{Figures/populations.ps}
1501: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{f8.jpg} \figcaption{[8] -- [24] CMDs
1502: showing the location of various stellar populations. Panel (a)
1503: shows super-Ba-rich and CN-rich stars as identified by their optical
1504: spectra \citep{jacco07}; super-Ba-rich stars delineate the upper
1505: part of the AGB possibly due to third dredge-up. Panel (b) shows
1506: the 70~\micron{} sources. Two of these are spatially coincident
1507: with cluster members (LEID sources), and one is a resolved spiral
1508: galaxy (2MASX J13272621--4746042). The numbers to the right of each
1509: symbol correspond to the source numbers in Tables~\ref{tab:70flux}
1510: and~\ref{tab:bb70}. All sources show excess 24~\micron{} emission.
1511: \label{fig:populations}}
1512: \end{figure}
1513: \clearpage
1514:
1515: % Fig 9: [8]-[24] CMD
1516: \begin{figure}[h!]
1517: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{Figures/indiv.ps}
1518: \includegraphics[scale=0.65,angle=90]{f9.jpg} \figcaption{[8] -- [24] CMDs
1519: for $\omega$\,Cen. Cluster members are plotted in the left panel,
1520: non-members are plotted in the lower right panel, and sources
1521: lacking proper motion measurements are plotted in the upper right
1522: panel. Sources that are potentially blended at 24~\micron{} (see
1523: \S\,\ref{sec:catalog}) are not plotted. Regions including AGB
1524: mass-losing stars and dusty RGB stars are separated by dashed lines
1525: in the left panel. The colors corresponding to two sample optical
1526: depths ($\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$) are also marked on the left. See
1527: Table~\ref{tab:tau} for the values of $\tau$ for different dust
1528: compositions. M-type stars, carbon stars, and post-AGB stars
1529: identified by their optical spectra \citep{jacco07} are also
1530: labeled, and the most extreme examples are also labeled with their
1531: LEID numbers. Almost all bright and red cluster members in this CMD
1532: have been identified against field stars, with only one bright star
1533: remaining for which no proper motion information is available. This
1534: source may be LEID 55017, which has a large proper motion and is not
1535: a cluster member. The bright luminosities and red colors of the
1536: three brightest M-type stars suggest that these three stars dominate
1537: the cluster mass-loss rate. All stars to the right of the vertical
1538: dashed line are included in the cumulative mass-loss rate
1539: (Fig.~\ref{fig:mlr}).\label{fig:indiv}}
1540: \end{figure}
1541: \clearpage
1542:
1543:
1544:
1545: % Fig 10: MLRs
1546: \begin{figure}[h!]
1547: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{Figures/mlr_trend.ps}
1548: \includegraphics[scale=0.9,angle=0]{f10.jpg} \figcaption{Metallicity
1549: versus average [8] -- [24] color. The color is a weighted average of
1550: all stars with a particular metallicity. Metallicities are
1551: determined by optical spectroscopy \citep{jacco07}. Dust production
1552: does not appear to be inhibited at low
1553: metallicity.\label{fig:dusty}}
1554: \end{figure}
1555: \clearpage
1556:
1557:
1558: % Fig 11: MLRs
1559: \begin{figure}[h!]
1560: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{Figures/cum_mlr2.ps}
1561: \includegraphics[scale=0.65,angle=90]{f11.jpg} \figcaption{Cumulative
1562: mass-loss rate ($\Sigma~\dot{M}$) for $\omega$\,Cen. The upper panel
1563: shows the ratio of dusty to non-dusty stars ($f_{D}$). The dotted
1564: line includes all observed members, while the solid line excludes
1565: potential source blends. The bin size is 0.5 magnitudes, but the
1566: large bin between 4.5 $<$ [24] $<$ 7 includes only the 3 brightest
1567: M-type stars, all of which are dusty. In the lower panel, individual
1568: mass-loss rates are derived from \citet{groenewegen06} models scaled
1569: to reflect the luminosity and metallicity dependence of the
1570: dust-to-gas ratio, and consequently, the wind speed. Sources to the
1571: right of the vertical dashed line in Figure~\ref{fig:indiv} are
1572: included in the summation and plotted with a solid line. The
1573: mass-loss rates are computed for four dust composition/temperature
1574: combinations, the most extreme of which are plotted; colder silicate
1575: and warmer AlO$_{\rm x}$ grains fall intermediate to the plotted
1576: lines. The dashed line shows the cumulative mass-loss rate obtained
1577: if potential blends are included, which can increase the total
1578: mass-loss rate by 12\% -- 17\% even in the relatively sparse
1579: environment of $\omega$\,Cen compared to other GCs. The sharp
1580: increases in $\Sigma~\dot{M}$ beyond [24] $\approx$ 10.5 are due to
1581: a few extremely red sources ([8] -- [24] $>$ 2). The total mass-loss
1582: rate for the cluster is 2.9 -- 4.2 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ $M_\odot$
1583: yr$^{-1}$, 63\% -- 66\% of which comes solely from the three
1584: brightest M-type stars, depending on the dust temperature and
1585: composition.
1586: \label{fig:mlr}}
1587: \end{figure}
1588: \clearpage
1589:
1590:
1591: % Fig 12: Resolved galaxy 3-color image
1592: \begin{figure}[h!]
1593: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{f12}
1594: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{f12.jpg} \figcaption{Three-color
1595: images of a resolved spiral galaxy (2MASX J13272621--4746042). {\it
1596: Left:} Blue is 3.6~\micron{}, green is 4.5~\micron{}, and red is
1597: 8~\micron{}. {\it Right:} Blue is 3.6~\micron{}, green is
1598: 8~\micron{}, and red is 24~\micron{}. 8~\micron{} PAH emission
1599: appears red in the left panel and green in the right panel. Dust
1600: appears red in the right panel. The SED of this galaxy
1601: (Fig.~\ref{fig:galsed}) resembles the SEDs of the other 70~\micron{}
1602: sources (Fig.~\ref{fig:70sed}).\label{fig:gal} } \end{figure}
1603: \clearpage
1604:
1605: % Fig 13: 70 micron source SEDs
1606: \begin{figure}[h!]
1607: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{f13}
1608: \includegraphics[scale=.65,angle=0]{f13.jpg} \figcaption{SEDs of
1609: 70~\micron{} sources. Fluxes are corrected for reddening
1610: \citep[$E(B-V) = 0.11$; ][]{lub02}. Sources 1 and 4 are spatially
1611: coincident with known cluster members and are potentially affected
1612: by blending between the known source and a fainter source that is
1613: the real counterpart of the 70~\micron{} emission. The 5.8 and/or
1614: 8~\micron{} emission in sources 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 lies significantly
1615: above the blackbody and is excluded from the fit. Fitting results
1616: are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:bb70}. While the cold blackbody
1617: temperatures are consistent with a detached dust envelope such as
1618: those seen around post-AGB stars, they are also typical of the dust
1619: in star forming regions that dominate the galactic far-IR
1620: emission. The strong excess at 8~\micron{} and the slight excess at
1621: 5.8~\micron{} could be due to either silicate emission or PAH
1622: emission. \label{fig:70sed} }
1623: \end{figure}
1624: \clearpage
1625:
1626: % Fig 14: Resolved galaxy SED
1627: \begin{figure}[h!]
1628: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{f14}
1629: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{f14.jpg} \figcaption{SED of galaxy
1630: 2MASX J13272621--4746042. The 8~\micron{} excess is suggestive of
1631: PAH emission. Blackbody fitting results are summarized in
1632: Table~\ref{tab:bb70}. This SED resembles the SEDs of the other eight
1633: 70~\micron{} sources, suggesting that they are also
1634: galaxies. \label{fig:galsed} } \end{figure}
1635: \clearpage
1636:
1637:
1638: % Fig 15: Possible ICM in 24 micron map
1639: \begin{figure}[h!]
1640: %\epsscale{0.9} \plotone{f15}
1641: \includegraphics[scale=0.9,angle=0]{f15.jpg} \figcaption{ 24~\micron{}
1642: image showing the locations of four regions of extended
1643: emission. The boxed regions are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:abcd}
1644: overlain with contours. Region A is shown in more detail in
1645: Figure~\ref{fig:icma}. An \ion{H}{1} feature is marked with an ``X''
1646: (Fig.~\ref{fig:hipass}). Low-level diffuse emission is also visible
1647: covering most of the image south of the cluster center. All dust
1648: clouds are outside of the cluster half-mass radius, suggesting that
1649: if they are part of the ICM, they may be in the process of leaving
1650: the cluster.\label{fig:icm}}
1651: \end{figure}
1652: \clearpage
1653:
1654: % Fig 16: Possible ICM in 24 micron map
1655: \begin{figure}[h!]
1656: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{Figures/abcd.ps}
1657: \includegraphics[scale=.8,angle=90]{f16.jpg} \figcaption{ Residual
1658: 24~\micron{} image showing several regions of extended
1659: emission. Contours smoothed with a 25 pixel ($\approx$60\arcsec{})
1660: window are overlaid to show the morphology of each region. The
1661: bright region on the edge of the frame in panel C is a data
1662: artefact. \label{fig:abcd}}
1663: \end{figure}
1664: \clearpage
1665:
1666:
1667:
1668: % Fig 17: Possible ICM
1669: \begin{figure}[h!]
1670: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{f17}
1671: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{f17.jpg} \figcaption{(a) Residual
1672: 8~\micron{} mosaic. (b) Residual 24~\micron{} mosaic. (c)
1673: 70~\micron{} mosaic. Each panel shows a close-up of possible ICM
1674: feature A located $\approx$20\arcmin{} from the cluster center. The
1675: arrows point towards the center of the cluster. The warm 8~\micron{}
1676: feature lies closer to the cluster center than the cooler feature at
1677: 70~\micron{}. Both features appear at 24~\micron{}. This morphology
1678: suggests a possible association with the cluster. Note that the
1679: region of bright emission to the lower left of feature A at
1680: 8~\micron{} is strongly affected by residual emission from an
1681: extremely bright source, and is not likely a real extended
1682: feature. \label{fig:icma} }
1683: \end{figure}
1684: \clearpage
1685:
1686:
1687:
1688: % Fig 18: HIPASS Feature
1689: \begin{figure}[h!]
1690: %\epsscale{1} \plotone{f18}
1691: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{f18.jpg} \figcaption{\ion{H}{1}
1692: detection near the velocity of $\omega$\,Cen ($v_{\rm
1693: LSR}~\sim~230~\rm km~s^{-1}$) in the HIPASS survey. This feature
1694: is located $\approx$15\arcmin{} southeast of the cluster center (see
1695: Fig.~\ref{fig:icm}). The presence of \ion{H}{1} suggests that dust
1696: might also be present in the ICM of the cluster. \label{fig:hipass}
1697: }
1698: \end{figure}
1699: \clearpage
1700:
1701:
1702:
1703: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1704: %%%%% Tables
1705: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1706:
1707: %Table 1
1708: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
1709: \tablewidth{0pc}
1710: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1711: \tablecolumns{6}
1712: \tablecaption{{\sc Observational Summary} \label{tab:obs}}
1713: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} &
1714: \colhead{IRAC} && \colhead{MIPS}}
1715: \startdata
1716:
1717: $\lambda$ (\micron) & 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8 && 24 and 70 \\
1718:
1719:
1720: Program ID & 20648 && 20648 \\
1721:
1722: Date (UT)& 2006 Mar 26 && 2006 Feb 22 and Mar 02\\
1723:
1724: AORkey & 14955264 && (1495)5520, 5776, 6032, 6288,\\
1725:
1726: & && 6544, and 6800\\
1727:
1728: Coverage & 35\arcmin{} $\times$ 35\arcmin{} && 24~\micron{}: 35\arcmin{} $\times$ 55\arcmin{} \\
1729:
1730: & && 70~\micron{}: 21\arcmin{} $\times$ 55\arcmin{}\\
1731:
1732: Single Frame Exposure Time (s) & 10.4 && 24~\micron{}: 9.96\\
1733:
1734: & && 70~\micron{}: 10.49 \\
1735:
1736: Average Depth (no. frames) & 10 && 24~\micron{}: 67 \\
1737:
1738: & && 70~\micron{}: 36 \\
1739:
1740: Pixel Size (arcsec pixel$^{-1}$) & 1.22 && 24~\micron{}: 1.25 $\times$ 1.30\\
1741:
1742: & && 70~\micron{}: 4.93 $\times$ 5.03\\
1743:
1744: PSF size & 3.6~\micron{}: 1.7\arcsec{} $\times$ 1.6\arcsec{} && 24~\micron{}: 5.3\arcsec{} $\times$ 5.9\arcsec{}\\
1745:
1746: & 4.5~\micron{}: 1.6\arcsec{} $\times$ 1.6\arcsec{} && \\
1747: & 5.8~\micron{}: 1.6\arcsec{} $\times$ 1.7\arcsec{} && \\
1748: & 8~\micron{}: 1.8\arcsec{} $\times$ 1.8\arcsec{} && \\
1749:
1750:
1751:
1752: \enddata
1753: \tablecomments{ \ Observations are centered at R.A. =
1754: 13$^{\mbox{\scriptsize{h}}}$26$^{\mbox{\scriptsize{m}}}$58\fs4,
1755: decl. = --47\degr45\arcmin21\farcs8 [J2000.0]}
1756: \end{deluxetable}
1757:
1758:
1759: \clearpage
1760:
1761: %Table 4
1762: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
1763: \tablewidth{0pc}
1764: \tabletypesize{\small}
1765: \tablecolumns{4}
1766: \tablecaption{{\sc Completeness Limits for Different Cluster Radii} \label{tab:comp}}
1767: \tablehead{\colhead{Wavelength}&\colhead{50\% Complete}&\colhead{90\% Complete}\\\colhead{(\micron{})}&\colhead{(mag)}&\colhead{(mag)}}
1768: \startdata
1769:
1770: 3.6 & 16.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 15.9 $\pm$ 0.1\\
1771: 4.5 & 16.7 $\pm$ 0.1& 15.9 $\pm$ 0.1\\
1772: 5.8 & 16.0 $\pm$ 0.1& 14.5 $\pm$ 0.1\\
1773: 8 & 15.8 $\pm$ 0.1& 14.3 $\pm$ 0.1\\
1774: 24 & 11.9 $\pm$ 0.1& 11.6 $\pm$ 0.1\\
1775:
1776:
1777: \enddata
1778: \tablecomments{ \ Completeness limits were determined from false star
1779: tests. These limits reflect the average over the entire cluster coverage;
1780: photometry is less complete in the core than on the outskirts of the
1781: cluster.}
1782: \end{deluxetable}
1783:
1784: \clearpage
1785:
1786:
1787: %Table 2
1788: \begin{deluxetable}{rlrrrrrcllr}
1789: \tablewidth{0pc}
1790: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1791: %\rotate
1792: \tablecolumns{14}
1793: \tablecaption{{\sc Sample Source Catalog} \label{tab:cat}}
1794: \tablehead{\colhead{No.} & \colhead{Source ID\tablenotemark{a}}&\multicolumn{5}{c}{Apparent Magnitude} &
1795: \colhead{Member-} & \colhead{Cand-} &
1796: \colhead{Note\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{LEID\tablenotemark{e}} \\ & &
1797: \colhead{3.6~\micron{}} & \colhead{4.5~\micron{}} & \colhead{5.8~\micron{}} & \colhead{8~\micron{}} &
1798: \colhead{24~\micron{}} & \colhead{ship (\%)\tablenotemark{b}} &\colhead{idate\tablenotemark{c}}& &\\
1799: \colhead{(1)}&\colhead{(2)}&\colhead{(3)}&\colhead{(4)}&\colhead{(5)}&\colhead{(6)}&\colhead{(7)}& \colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)}&\colhead{(10)}&\colhead{(11)}}
1800:
1801: \startdata
1802:
1803:
1804: 18562&J132626.28$-$472520.06& 8.49(05)& 8.52(06)& 8.53(04)& 8.47(04)& 8.48(05)& 100&\nodata& CN& 35090\\
1805: 18563&J132626.28$-$473229.59&14.04(09)&14.16(07)&14.24(07)&14.32(07)& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1806: 18564&J132626.28$-$471144.58&16.58(08)&16.37(09)&15.86(13)& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1807: 18565&J132626.28$-$474102.18&16.77(09)&16.68(16)&16.33(18)& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1808: 18566&J132626.29$-$473737.68&17.51(12)&17.71(46)& \nodata& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1809: 18567&J132626.29$-$471200.23&17.20(11)&17.13(20)& \nodata& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1810: 18568&J132626.29$-$473049.11&13.59(05)&13.58(07)&13.68(06)& \nodata& \nodata& 100& HB&\nodata& 47097\\
1811: 18569&J132626.29$-$472651.06&13.23(05)&13.20(06)&13.18(05)&13.16(10)& \nodata& 98&\nodata&\nodata& 39111\\
1812: 18570&J132626.30$-$471915.97&17.04(09)&17.00(22)& \nodata& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1813: 18571&J132626.30$-$473515.89&17.30(14)&17.55(27)& \nodata& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1814: 18572&J132626.30$-$471416.24&16.00(06)& \nodata&16.21(19)& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1815: 18573&J132626.30$-$474159.18&13.22(06)&13.24(06)&13.28(04)& \nodata& \nodata& 86&\nodata& CN& 72019\\
1816: 18574&J132626.31$-$471627.20& 9.34(04)& 9.28(06)& 9.31(05)& 9.29(04)& 9.30(06)& 18&\nodata& P& 16018\\
1817: 18575&J132626.31$-$473111.71&14.94(08)&15.06(11)& \nodata& \nodata& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1818: 18576&J132626.31$-$472320.08&13.98(06)&13.99(05)&14.00(05)&14.02(06)& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1819: 18577&J132626.31$-$474246.15&17.80(20)&17.95(52)& \nodata&16.08(35)& \nodata&\nodata& Galaxy&\nodata&\nodata\\
1820: 18578&J132626.32$-$473543.47&13.12(04)&13.18(09)&13.11(08)&13.18(08)& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1821: 18579&J132626.32$-$472534.32&10.13(05)&10.15(06)&10.15(05)&10.16(04)&10.18(09)& 100&\nodata&\nodata& 36061\\
1822: 18580&J132626.32$-$474718.12& \nodata&15.72(08)& \nodata&15.67(26)& \nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata\\
1823: 18581&J132626.33$-$473132.57&12.23(08)&12.28(07)&12.24(06)&12.02(06)& \nodata& 100& RGB-a&\nodata& 49082\\
1824:
1825: \enddata
1826:
1827: \tablecomments{ \ Magnitude uncertainties are quoted in
1828: parentheses. For example, a magnitude of 8.49 $\pm$ 0.05 is listed
1829: as 8.49(05).} \tablenotetext{a}{ \ To save space, the Source ID is
1830: truncated to show only the source coordinates. The full electronic
1831: catalog, available through CDS, includes the {\it Spitzer} prefix
1832: (SSTOCEN).} \tablenotetext{b}{ \ Membership likelihoods are quoted
1833: as a percentage from \citet{vanleeuwen00}.} \tablenotetext{c}{ \
1834: Candidate AGB, RGB-a, and HB stars and candidate galaxies are
1835: identified by their positions on optical and {\it Spitzer} CMDs.}
1836: \tablenotetext{d}{ \ The Note column specifies whether a source is
1837: CN- or super-Ba-rich and/or is a M-type (M), carbon (C), or post-AGB (P)
1838: star, as indicated by optical spectra \citep{jacco07}. The note also
1839: indicates if a source is potentially affected by blending at
1840: 24~\micron{} (B24, see \S\,\ref{sec:catalog}).} \tablenotetext{e}{ \ The LEID
1841: identification numbers are assigned to {\it Spitzer} sources via
1842: cross-identification with \citet{vanleeuwen00}. }
1843: \end{deluxetable}
1844:
1845:
1846: \clearpage
1847:
1848: %Table 5
1849: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrrrl}
1850: \tablewidth{0pc}
1851: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1852: \tablecolumns{8}
1853: \tablecaption{{\sc {\it Spitzer} Magnitudes of M-Type, Carbon, and post-AGB Stars identified by \citet{jacco07}}\label{tab:type}}
1854: \tablehead{\colhead{LEID} & \colhead{Source ID\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{m$_{3.6}$} &
1855: \colhead{m$_{4.5}$} & \colhead{m$_{5.8}$} & \colhead{m$_{8}$} &
1856: \colhead{m$_{24}$} & \colhead{Source Type}}
1857: \startdata
1858:
1859:
1860: 14043&J132750.37$-$471542.79& 11.75(06)& \nodata& 11.77(04)& \nodata& \nodata&Carbon Star\\
1861: 16018\tablenotemark{b}&J132626.31$-$471627.20& 9.34(04)& 9.28(06)& 9.31(05)& 9.29(04)& 9.30(06)&Post-AGB\\
1862: 30020&J132549.95$-$472259.76& 12.62(05)& 12.62(06)& 12.61(06)& 12.66(04)& \nodata&Post-AGB\\
1863: 32015&J132538.44$-$472401.79& 10.26(05)& 10.23(07)& 10.22(07)& 10.27(04)& 10.27(09)&Post-AGB\\
1864: 32029&J132605.17$-$472342.43& 9.11(05)& 8.96(05)& 8.82(04)& 8.81(04)& 8.48(05)&Post-AGB\\
1865: 32059&J132628.13$-$472340.56& 8.45(05)& 8.52(06)& 8.52(04)& 8.40(05)& 8.40(05)&Carbon Star\\
1866: 33062&J132630.19$-$472427.89& 6.96(05)& 6.88(06)& 6.74(05)& 6.27(04)& 4.98(05)& M-Type\\
1867: 35094&J132628.81$-$472523.60& 8.43(05)& 8.56(07)& 8.48(05)& 8.50(05)& 8.43(05)& M-Type\\
1868: 35250&J132737.72$-$472517.37& 7.39(05)& 7.45(06)& 7.35(05)& 7.23(04)& 6.61(05)& M-Type\\
1869: 35252&J132738.29$-$472505.60& 14.21(04)& 14.07(10)& 14.49(08)& 14.15(10)& \nodata& M-Type\\
1870: 41071&J132614.42$-$472805.39& 9.82(04)& 9.93(06)& 9.89(05)& 9.81(04)& 9.97(08)&Carbon Star\\
1871: 42044&J132605.35$-$472820.80& 7.59(04)& 7.74(06)& 7.67(04)& 7.55(05)& 7.33(05)& M-Type\\
1872: 43105&J132627.22$-$472847.47& 9.56(04)& 9.54(06)& 9.46(04)& 9.44(04)& \nodata&Post-AGB\\
1873: 44262&J132646.37$-$472930.35& 7.05(05)& 6.85(05)& 6.68(04)& 6.42(04)& 5.85(05)& M-Type\\
1874: 44484&J132726.37$-$472916.93& 8.44(06)& 8.63(05)& 8.53(05)& 8.51(05)& 8.44(05)& M-Type\\
1875: 52030&J132601.59$-$473306.08& 7.40(05)& 7.48(06)& 7.44(05)& 7.32(04)& 7.33(05)&Carbon Star\\
1876: 53019&J132544.03$-$473324.79& 13.03(05)& 13.07(06)& 13.03(04)& 12.77(10)& \nodata&Carbon Star\\
1877:
1878:
1879: \enddata
1880: \tablecomments{ \ Magnitude uncertainties are quoted in
1881: parentheses. For example, a magnitude of 11.75 $\pm$ 0.06 is listed
1882: as 11.75(06).}
1883: \tablenotetext{a}{ \ To save space, the Source ID is truncated to show only the
1884: source coordinates. The full electronic catalog (available through
1885: CDS) includes the {\it Spitzer} prefix (SSTOCEN).}
1886: \tablenotetext{b}{ \ Fehrenbach's Star \citep{fehrenbach62}.}
1887: \end{deluxetable}
1888:
1889: \clearpage
1890:
1891: %Table 6
1892: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
1893: \tablewidth{0pc}
1894: \tabletypesize{\small}
1895: \tablecolumns{5}
1896: \tablecaption{{\sc Sample Optical Depths Corresponding to [8] -- [24] =
1897: 0.25 and 1.7} \label{tab:tau}}
1898: \tablehead{&&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Silicate Dust} &
1899: \multicolumn{2}{c}{AlO$_{\rm x}$ Dust} \\ Optical Depth& [8] -- [24]
1900: &\colhead{$T$ =
1901: 3297~K}&\colhead{$T$ = 3850~K} & \colhead{$T$ =
1902: 3297~K}&\colhead{$T$ = 3850~K}}
1903: \startdata
1904:
1905: $\tau_{1}$ & 0.25 & 0.013 & 0.001 & 0.030 & 0.021 \\
1906:
1907: $\tau_{2}$ & 1.70 & 0.120 & 0.056 & 0.220 & 0.090 \\
1908:
1909: \enddata
1910: \tablecomments{ \ $\tau_{1}$ and $\tau_{2}$ are examples of optical
1911: depth from \citet{groenewegen06} that correspond to [8] -- [24] colors of 0.25 and 1.7. These colors are marked in Figure~\ref{fig:indiv}.}
1912: \end{deluxetable}
1913:
1914: \clearpage
1915:
1916:
1917: %Table 7
1918: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccc}
1919: \tablewidth{0pc}
1920: \tabletypesize{\small}
1921: \tablecolumns{6}
1922: \tablecaption{{\sc Mass-Loss Rates of the Three Brightest M-type Stars}\label{tab:mlr}}
1923: \tablehead{&&\multicolumn{4}{c}{$\dot{M}$ ($M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$)}\\ &&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Silicate Dust} &
1924: \multicolumn{2}{c}{AlO$_{\rm x}$ Dust} \\ \colhead{LEID} &
1925: \colhead{Source ID}& \colhead{\textit{T} =
1926: 3297~K}&\colhead{$T$ = 3850~K} & \colhead{$T$ =
1927: 3297~K}&\colhead{$T$ = 3850~K}}
1928: \startdata
1929:
1930: 33062&SSTOCEN J132630.19$-$472427.89 & 1.7 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ & 1.3 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ & 2.1 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ & 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ \\
1931: 44262&SSTOCEN J132646.37$-$472930.35 & 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ & 2.8 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ & 4.4 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ & 3.5 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ \\
1932: 35250&SSTOCEN J132737.72$-$472517.37 & 2.3 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ & 1.8 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ & 2.8 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ & 2.2 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ \\
1933: &Total $\dot{M}$ for all dusty members & 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ & 2.9 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ & 4.2 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ & 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{-7}$ \\
1934:
1935: \enddata
1936:
1937: \end{deluxetable}
1938:
1939: \clearpage
1940:
1941:
1942: %Table 8
1943: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrr}
1944: \tablewidth{0pc}
1945: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1946: \tablecolumns{8}
1947: %\rotate
1948: \tablecaption{{\sc Fluxes of 70~\micron{} Sources} \label{tab:70flux}}
1949: \tablehead{& & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Flux (mJy)} \\ \colhead{Source \#} &
1950: \colhead{Source ID} & \colhead{3.6~\micron{}} & \colhead{4.5~\micron{}} & \colhead{5.8~\micron{}} & \colhead{8~\micron{}} & \colhead{24~\micron{}} & \colhead{70~\micron{}}}
1951: \startdata
1952:
1953: 1&SSTOCEN J132723.86$-$472130.00 &15.94(0.32)& 10.23(0.20)& 6.66(0.13)& 5.59(0.11)& 2.42(0.05)& 75.79(17.31)\\
1954: 2&SSTOCEN J132521.01$-$472623.43 & 1.96(0.04)& 1.49(0.03)& 1.96(0.04)& 12.33(0.25)& 14.33(0.29)&226.70(8.18)\\
1955: 3&SSTOCEN J132523.57$-$472813.61 & \nodata & 0.17(0.00)& 0.16(0.00)& 0.79(0.02)& 2.82(0.06)&246.73(18.94)\\
1956: 4&SSTOCEN J132615.23$-$473024.56 &46.46(0.93)& 30.02(0.60)& 19.52(0.39)& 11.56(0.23)& 10.74(0.47)&158.02(7.96)\\
1957: 5&SSTOCEN J132426.26$-$473905.88 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 0.74(0.05)& 82.01(9.44)\\
1958: 6&SSTOCEN J132714.06$-$474112.83 & 0.93(0.02)& 0.63(0.01)& 0.60(0.01)& 2.60(0.05)& 3.54(0.07)& 53.04(11.19)\\
1959: 7&SSTOCEN J132655.87$-$474445.02 & 0.12(0.01)& 0.11(0.01)& 0.12(0.01)& 0.69(0.01)& 3.81(0.08)&131.46(23.81)\\
1960: 8&SSTOCEN J132712.89$-$474739.59 & 0.07(0.01)& 0.05(0.01)& 0.05(0.01)& 0.06(0.01)& 0.75(0.02)&107.50(23.54)\\
1961: 9\tablenotemark{a}&2MASX J13272621$-$4746042& 2.92(0.07)& 3.38(0.09)& 3.06(0.08)& 9.27(0.21)& 5.20(0.21)&617.08(73.84)\\
1962:
1963:
1964:
1965: \enddata
1966: \tablecomments{ \ Fluxes for 3.6 -- 24~\micron{} were determined
1967: by PRF fitting with DAOphot and 70~\micron{} fluxes were determined
1968: by aperture photometry with IRAF. Flux uncertainties are quoted in
1969: parentheses. For example, a flux of 15.94 $\pm$ 0.32 mJy is listed
1970: as 15.94(0.32).}
1971: \tablenotetext{a}{ \ Source 9 is a resolved spiral
1972: galaxy (see Fig.~\ref{fig:gal}), while sources 1 through 8 are point
1973: sources.}
1974: \end{deluxetable}
1975:
1976: \clearpage
1977:
1978: %Table 9
1979: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrll}
1980: \tablewidth{0pc}
1981: \tabletypesize{\small}
1982: \tablecolumns{5}
1983: \tablecaption{{\sc Fitting Results for 70~\micron{} Sources} \label{tab:bb70}}
1984: \tablehead{\colhead{Source \#} & \colhead{Source ID} &
1985: \colhead{$\chi^2/\rm dof$} & \colhead{$T_1$ (K)} & \colhead{$T_2$ (K)}}
1986: \startdata
1987:
1988: 1 & SSTOCEN J132723.86$-$472130.00&35.8 & 4664 $\pm$ 19 & 58.5 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
1989: 2 & SSTOCEN J132521.01$-$472623.43& 3.3 & 2688 $\pm$ 25 & 67.5 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
1990: 3 & SSTOCEN J132523.57$-$472813.61&199.7& 1100 $\pm$ 200\tablenotemark{a}& 55.0 $\pm$ 10\tablenotemark{a} \\
1991: 4 & SSTOCEN J132615.23$-$473024.56&40.1 & 4329 $\pm$ 16 & 66.5 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
1992: 5 & SSTOCEN J132426.26$-$473905.88&75.0 & \nodata & 50.0 $\pm$ 10\tablenotemark{a} \\
1993: 6 & SSTOCEN J132714.06$-$474112.83&15.4 & 2901 $\pm$ 28 & 68.0 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
1994: 7 & SSTOCEN J132655.87$-$474445.02&52.2 & 1800 $\pm$ 200\tablenotemark{a}& 60.0 $\pm$ 10\tablenotemark{a} \\
1995: 8 & SSTOCEN J132712.89$-$474739.59&15.7 & 4000 $\pm$ 200\tablenotemark{a}& 50.0 $\pm$ 10\tablenotemark{a} \\
1996: 9\tablenotemark{b} & 2MASX J13272621$-$4746042&2.5 & 1084 $\pm$ 29 & 48.8 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
1997:
1998: \enddata
1999: \tablenotetext{a}{ \ The marked uncertainties represent twice the
2000: temperature increment in the range of fixed temperatures used for
2001: the underconstrained fits.}
2002: \tablenotetext{b}{ \ Source 9 is a resolved spiral
2003: galaxy (see Fig.~\ref{fig:gal}), while sources 1 through 8 are point
2004: sources.}
2005: \end{deluxetable}
2006:
2007:
2008: \end{document}
2009:
2010:
2011: