1: \documentclass[aps,prd,amsfonts,groupedaddress,showpacs,showkeys]{revtex4}

2: \usepackage{latexsym,epsfig,amsmath,amssymb}

3: 

4: \usepackage{epsfig}

5: \usepackage{amssymb}

6: \newcommand{\seq}{\begin{subequations}}

7: \newcommand{\sen}{\end{subequations}} 

8: \newcommand{\eq}{\begin{eqnarray}}

9: \newcommand{\en}{\end{eqnarray}}

10: \newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}

11: \newcommand{\la}{\langle}

12: \def\aprge{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}

13: \def\aprle{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}

14: \def\etal{{\it et.~al.}}

15: \def\ie{{\it i.e.}}

16: \def\eg{{\it e.g.}}

17: \def\bwt{\begin{widetext}}

18: \def\ewt{\end{widetext}}

19: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

20: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

21: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

22: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

23: \def\bean{\begin{eqnarray*}}

24: \def\eean{\end{eqnarray*}}

25: \def\bary{\begin{array}}

26: \def\eary{\end{array}}

27: \def\bi{\bibitem}

28: \def\bit{\begin{itemize}}

29: \def\eit{\end{itemize}}

30: \def\lra{\leftrightarrow}

31: \def\dash{\mbox{-}}

32: \def\ol{\overline}

33: \def\ub{\ol{u}}

34: \def\db{\ol{d}}

35: \def\sb{\ol{s}}

36: \def\cb{\ol{c}}

37: \def\re{\rm Re}

38: \def\im{\rm Im} 

39: \def \b{{\cal B}}

40: \def \ca{{\cal A}}

41: \def \ko{K^0}

42: \def \ok{\overline{K}^0}

43: \def \s{\sqrt{2}}

44: \def \st{\sqrt{3}}

45: \def \sx{\sqrt{6}}

46: 

47: 

48: \begin{document}

49: 

50: \title{Molecular structure of the 

51: $B_{s0}^{\ast}(5725)$ and $B_{s1}(5778)$ bottom-strange mesons} 

52: \author{

53: Amand Faessler,

54: Thomas Gutsche,

55: Valery E. Lyubovitskij

56: \footnote{On leave of absence from the

57: Department of Physics, Tomsk State University,

58: 634050 Tomsk, Russia},

59: Yong-Liang Ma

60: \vspace*{1.2\baselineskip}}

61: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,

62: Universit\"at T\"ubingen, \\ 

63: Auf der Morgenstelle 14, D--72076 T\"ubingen, Germany

64: \vspace*{0.3\baselineskip}\\}

65: 

66: \date{\today}

67: 

68: \begin{abstract} 

69: 

70: We discuss a possible interpretation of the 

71: scalar $B_{s0}^{\ast}(5725)$ and axial $B_{s1}(5778)$ 

72: bottom--strange mesons as hadronic molecules --- bound states 

73: of $B K$ and $B^\ast K$ mesons, respectively. 

74: Using a phenomenological Lagrangian approach we analyze 

75: the strong $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0$, 

76: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi^0$ and the radiative 

77: $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$, 

78: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$ 

79: decays. We give predictions for the decay properties: 

80: effective couplings and decay widths. 

81: \end{abstract}

82: 

83: \pacs{13.25.Hw,13.40.Hq,14.40.Nd } 

84: 

85: \keywords{bottom, charm and strange mesons, hadronic molecule, 

86: strong and radiative decay, isospin violation}

87: 

88: \maketitle

89: 

90: \newpage 

91: 

92: \section{Introduction}

93: 

94: Newly observed hadrons, in particular in the heavy flavor 

95: sector, have raised strong interest in treating and 

96: interpreting these states as hadronic bound states or, 

97: as commonly named, hadronic molecules (for overview see 

98: e.g. Ref.~\cite{Rosner:2006vc}). One of the main reasons 

99: to treat these observed states as molecules is that their 

100: masses are close to the thresholds of corresponding hadronic 

101: pairs. Canonical examples are the scalar $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)$

102: and axial $D_{s1}(2460)$ mesons. As stressed 

103: in~\cite{Barnes:2003dj} the scalar $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)$

104: and axial $D_{s1}(2460)$ mesons could be candidates for 

105: a scalar $DK$ and a axial $D^\ast K$ molecule because of 

106: a relatively small binding energy of $\sim 50$ MeV.

107: 

108: In a series of papers~\cite{Faessler:2007gv}-\cite{Dong:2007px} 

109: we developed the quantum field approach based on phenomenological 

110: Lagrangians for the treatment of hadrons as bound states of lighter 

111: hadrons --- hadronic molecules. In particular, we considered the 

112: strong, radiative and leptonic decays of $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)$ and 

113: $D_{s1}(2460)$ mesons~\cite{Faessler:2007gv}-\cite{Faessler:2007us}. 

114: A new feature related to the $DK$ and $D^\ast K$ molecular structure 

115: of the $D_{s0}^\ast$ and $D_{s1}$ mesons was that the 

116: presence of $u(d)$ quarks in the $D^{(\ast)}$ and $K$ mesons gives 

117: rise to direct strong isospin-violating transitions 

118: $D_{s0}^{\ast} \to D_s \pi^0$ and $D_{s1} \to D_s^\ast \pi^0$ in

119: addition to the decay mechanism induced by $\eta-\pi^0$ mixing, 

120: as considered previously. We showed that the direct transition

121: compares with and even dominates over the $\eta-\pi^0$ mixing 

122: transition in the isospin-violating decays of $D_{s0}^\ast$ and 

123: $D_{s1}$ mesons. The composite (molecular) structure of the 

124: $D_{s0}^\ast$ and $D_{s1}$ mesons was defined by the compositeness

125: condition $Z=0$~\cite{Weinberg:1962hj,Efimov:1993ei,Anikin:1995cf}

126: (see also Refs.~\cite{Baru:2003qq} 

127: and \cite{Faessler:2007gv}-\cite{Dong:2007px}). 

128: This condition implies that the renormalization constant of the hadron 

129: wave function is set equal to zero or that the hadron exists as 

130: a bound state of its constituents. The compositeness condition was 

131: originally applied to the study of the deuteron as a bound state of 

132: proton and neutron~\cite{Weinberg:1962hj}. Then it was extensively used

133: in low-energy hadron phenomenology as the master equation for the

134: treatment of mesons and baryons as bound states of light and heavy

135: constituent quarks (see e.g. Refs.~\cite{Efimov:1993ei,Anikin:1995cf}). 

136: We found that our theoretical framework gives numerical results 

137: which are consistent with both the experimental data and previous 

138: theoretical approaches. 

139: 

140: In this paper we extend our 

141: formalism~\cite{Faessler:2007gv}-\cite{Dong:2007px} to the 

142: scalar $B_{s0}^{\ast}(5725)$ and axial $B_{s1}(5778)$ 

143: bottom-strange mesons which have been considered 

144: before theoretically~\cite{Godfrey:1986wj}-\cite{Wang:2008bt} 

145: as the bottom partners of the charm mesons $D_{s0}^\ast$ and 

146: $D_{s1}$. In Ref.~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt} masses, strong and 

147: radiative decays of $B_{s0}^{\ast}$ and $B_{s1}$ states have been 

148: analyzed using heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory. In particular, 

149: the mass spectrum, strong and radiative decays widths have been 

150: calculated using quark models, QCD sum rules, effective field 

151: approaches based on chiral and heavy quark symmetry including 

152: coupled-channel unitarity. 

153: 

154: We assume that the $B_{s0}^{\ast}(5725)$ and $B_{s1}(5778)$ are bound 

155: states of $B K$ and $B^\ast K$ mesons, respectively. 

156: We adopt that the isospin, spin and parity quantum numbers of

157: the $B_{s0}^\ast$ ($\bar B_{s0}^\ast$) and $B_{s1}$ ($\bar B_{s1}$)  

158: are $I(J^P) = 0(0^+)$ and $I(J^P) = 0(1^+)$, while for their  masses 

159: we take the values $m_{B_{s0}^{\ast}} = 5725$ MeV and 

160: $m_{B_{s1}} = 5778$ MeV (the central values predicted in 

161: Refs.~\cite{Guo:2006fu,Guo:2006rp}). Note, that different approaches 

162: result in the following ranges  for the $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ 

163: masses: $m_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}$~= 5627 -- 5841 MeV and 

164: $m_{B_{s1}}$ = 5660 -- 5859 MeV. 

165: Using a phenomenological Lagrangian approach we analyze 

166: the strong $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0$, 

167: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi^0$ and the radiative 

168: $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$,

169: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$ 

170:  decays. We give predictions for the decay properties: 

171: effective couplings and decay widths.  

172: 

173: In the present manuscript we proceed as follows. First, in 

174: Sec.~\ref{Frame}, we outline our framework. We discuss the effective

175: mesonic Lagrangian for the treatment of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ 

176: mesons as $B K$ and $B^\ast K$ bound states, respectively. In Section~III 

177: we consider the matrix elements describing the strong and radiative decays 

178: of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons. We discuss our numerical results 

179: and perform a comparison with other theoretical approaches. 

180: In Section~IV we present a short summary of our results.

181: 

182: \section{Theoretical Framework}

183: \label{Frame}

184: 

185: \subsection{Molecular structure of the $B_{s0}^{\ast}(5725)$ 

186: and $B_{s1}(5778)$ mesons} 

187: 

188: In this section we discuss the formalism for the study of the

189: $B_{s0}^{\ast}(5725)$ and $B_{s1}(5778)$ mesons as hadronic 

190: molecules, represented by a $B K$ and $B^\ast K$ bound 

191: state, respectively. We adopt that their quantum numbers 

192: (isospin, spin and parity) are $I(J^P) = 0(0^+)$ 

193: for $B_{s0}^\ast$ ($\bar B_{s0}^\ast$) and $I(J^P) = 0(1^+)$ 

194: for $B_{s1}$ ($\bar B_{s1}$). For their masses we take the values 

195: $m_{B_{s0}^{\ast}} = 5725$ MeV and 

196: $m_{B_{s1}} = 5778$ MeV (the central values predicted in 

197: Refs.~\cite{Guo:2006fu,Guo:2006rp}). Our framework is based on an 

198: effective interaction Lagrangian describing the couplings of the 

199: $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons to their constituents:

200: \seq\label{Bs0_Bs1_L} 

201: \eq 

202: {\cal L}_{B_{s0}^{\ast}} &=& g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}} \, 

203: \bar{B}_{s0}^{\ast}(x)  \, \int\! dy \, \Phi_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}(y^2) \, 

204: B^T(x+\omega_{_{KB}}y) \bar K(x -\omega_{_{BK}} y) \, + \, {\rm H.c.} \,, \\

205: {\cal L}_{B_{s1}} &=& g_{_{B_{s1}}} \, \bar{B}_{s1}^{\mu}(x) 

206: \, \int\! dy \, \Phi_{B_{s1}}(y^2) \, 

207: B_\mu^{\ast \, T}(x+\omega_{_{KB^\ast}}y) \, \bar K(x - \omega_{_{B^\ast K}}y) 

208: \, + \, {\rm H.c.} \,, 

209: \end{eqnarray} 

210: \sen  

211: where the doublets of $B$, $B^\ast_\mu$ and $\bar K$ mesons are defined as 

212: \eq 

213: B = \left(

214:   \begin{array}{c}

215:     B^{+} \\

216:     B^{0} \\

217:   \end{array}

218: \right) \,, \,\,\,\,\, 

219: B_\mu^\ast = \left(

220:   \begin{array}{c}

221:     B^{\ast +} \\

222:     B^{\ast 0} \\

223:   \end{array}

224: \right)_\mu \,, \,\,\,\,\, 

225: \bar K = \left(

226:   \begin{array}{c}

227:     K^- \\

228:     \bar{K}^0 \\

229:   \end{array}

230: \right) \,. \label{Doublet}

231: \en 

232: The summation over isospin indices is understood and 

233: the symbol $T$ refers to the transpose of the doublets 

234: $B$ and $B^\ast$. The molecular structure of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ 

235: and $B_{s1}$ states is (we do not consider isospin mixing): 

236: $|B_{s0}^{\ast}\ra = |B^+K^-\ra + |B^0 \bar{K}^0\ra\,,$   

237: $|B_{s1}\ra = |B^{\ast +}K^-\ra + |B^{\ast 0}\bar{K}^0\ra$. 

238: In Eq.~(\ref{Bs0_Bs1_L}) we introduced the kinematical parameters 

239: $w_{ij} = m_i/(m_i + m_j)$, where $m_{i,j} = m_B$, $m_{B^\ast}$ and $m_K$ 

240: are the masses of $B$, $B^\ast$ and $K$ mesons. 

241: The correlation functions $\Phi_M$ with $M = B_{s0}^\ast$ or $B_{s1}$

242: characterize the finite size of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$

243: mesons as $BK$ and $B^\ast K$ bound states and depend on the relative

244: Jacobi coordinate $y$ with, in addition, $x$ being the center of mass

245: (CM) coordinate. Note, that the local limit corresponds to the substitution

246: of $\Phi_M$ by the Dirac delta-function: $\Phi_M(y^2) \to \delta^4 (y)$. 

247: A basic requirement for the choice of an explicit form of the correlation

248: function is that its Fourier transform vanishes sufficiently fast in the

249: ultraviolet region of Euclidean space to render the Feynman diagrams

250: ultraviolet finite. We adopt the Gaussian form,

251: $\tilde\Phi_M(p_E^2/\Lambda_M^2) \doteq \exp( - p_E^2/\Lambda_M^2)\,,$

252: for the Fourier transform of vertex function, where $p_{E}$ is the

253: Euclidean Jacobi momentum. Here $\Lambda_{B_{s0}^\ast}$

254: is a size parameter, which parametrizes the distribution of

255: $B$ and $K$ mesons inside the $B_{s0}^\ast$ molecule, while

256: $\Lambda_{B_{s1}}$ is the size parameter for the $B_{s1}$ molecule.

257: For simplicity we will use a universal scale parameter

258: $\Lambda_M = \Lambda_{B_{s0}^\ast} = \Lambda_{B_{s1}}$. 

259: 

260: The coupling constants $g_{B_{s0}^\ast}$ and $g_{B_{s1}}$ are determined

261: by the compositeness condition~\cite{Weinberg:1962hj,Efimov:1993ei},

262: which implies that the renormalization constant of the hadron

263: wave function is set equal to zero:

264: \seq

265: \eq 

266: Z_{B_{s0}^\ast} &=& 1 -

267: \Sigma^\prime_{B_{s0}^\ast}(m_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2) = 0 \,, 

268: \label{non-renorm-1}\\

269: Z_{B_{s1}} &=& 1 - \Sigma^\prime_{B_{s1}}(m_{B_{s1}}^2) = 0 \,.

270: \label{non-renorm-2}

271: \en 

272: \sen 

273: Here, $\Sigma^\prime_{B_{s0}^\ast}(m_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2) =

274: g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}}^2 \Pi^\prime_{B_{s0}^\ast}(m_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2)$

275: is the derivative of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ meson mass operator. 

276: In the case of the $B_{s1}$ meson we have

277: $\Sigma^\prime_{B_{s1}}(m_{B_{s1}}^2)

278: = g_{_{B_{s1}}}^2 \Pi^\prime_{B_{s1}}(m_{B_{s1}}^2)$, which is the

279: derivative of the transverse part of its mass operator

280: $\Sigma^{\mu\nu}_{B_{s1}}$, conventionally split into transverse

281: $\Sigma_{B_{s1}}$ and longitudinal $\Sigma^L_{B_{s1}}$  parts as:

282: \eq

283: \Sigma^{\mu\nu}_{B_{s1}}(p) =

284: g^{\mu\nu}_\perp \Sigma_{B_{s1}}(p^2) + \frac{p^\mu p^\nu}{p^2}

285: \Sigma^L_{B_{s1}}(p^2) \,,

286: \en

287: where

288: \eq

289: g^{\mu\nu}_\perp = g^{\mu\nu} - \frac{p^\mu p^\nu}{p^2}\,,

290: \hspace*{.5cm} g^{\mu\nu}_\perp p_\mu = 0\,.

291: \en

292: The mass operators of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons

293: are described by the diagrams of Fig.~\ref{fig:Mass}(a)  

294: and~\ref{fig:Mass}(b), respectively.

295: 

296: Following Eqs.~(\ref{non-renorm-1}) and (\ref{non-renorm-2})

297: the coupling constants $g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}}$ and $g_{_{B_{s1}}}$

298: can be expressed in the form:

299: \seq 

300: \eq

301: \frac{1}{g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}}^2} &=& \frac{2}{(4 \pi \Lambda_M)^2} \,

302: \int\limits_0^1 dx \int\limits_0^\infty

303: \frac{d\alpha \, \alpha \, P_0(\alpha, x)}{(1 + \alpha)^3}

304: \,\, \biggl[ - \frac{d}{dz_0} \tilde \Phi^2_M(z_0) \biggr] \,,

305: \label{coupling_Bs0}\\

306: \frac{1}{g_{_{B_{s1}}}^2} &=& \frac{2}{(4 \pi \Lambda_M)^2} \,

307: \int\limits_0^1 dx \int\limits_0^\infty

308: \frac{d\alpha \, \alpha \, P_1(\alpha, x)}{(1 + \alpha)^3}

309: \,\, \biggl[ \frac{1}{2 \mu_{B^\ast}^2 (1 + \alpha)}

310: - \frac{d}{dz_1} \biggr] \tilde \Phi^2_M(z_1)

311: \label{coupling_Bs1}

312: \en 

313: \sen 

314: where

315: \eq

316: P_0(\alpha, x)

317: &=& \alpha^2 x(1-x) + w_{_{BK}}^2 \alpha x + w_{_{KB}}^2 \alpha (1-x)

318: \,, \nonumber\\

319: P_1(\alpha, x)

320: &=& \alpha^2 x(1-x) + w_{_{B^\ast \! K}}^2 \alpha x

321: + w_{_{KB^\ast}}^2 \alpha (1-x) \,, \\

322: z_0 &=& \mu_B^2 \alpha x +  \mu_K^2 \alpha (1-x)

323:      - \frac{P_0(\alpha, x)}{1 + \alpha}  \, 

324: \mu_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2 \,, \nonumber\\

325: z_1 &=& \mu_{B^\ast}^2 \alpha x + \mu_K^2 \alpha (1-x)

326:    - \frac{P_1(\alpha, x)}{1 + \alpha}  \, \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 \,, \nonumber\\

327: \mu_M &=& \frac{m_M}{\Lambda_M} \,. \nonumber

328: \en

329: The above expressions are valid for any functional form of the correlation

330: function ${\widetilde{\Phi}}_M$. 

331: 

332: Note that the compositeness condition of the

333: type~(\ref{non-renorm-1}), (\ref{non-renorm-2}) was originally applied

334: to the study of the deuteron as a bound state of proton and

335: neutron~\cite{Weinberg:1962hj}. Then this condition was extensively used

336: in low-energy hadron phenomenology as the master equation for the

337: treatment of mesons and baryons as bound states of light and heavy

338: constituent quarks~\cite{Efimov:1993ei,Anikin:1995cf}. 

339: In Refs.~\cite{Baru:2003qq} and~\cite{Faessler:2007gv}-\cite{Dong:2007px} 

340: this condition was used in the application to hadronic molecule 

341: configurations of light and heavy mesons. 

342: 

343: \subsection{Effective Lagrangian for strong and radiative 

344: decays of $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons} 

345: 

346: In Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007gv,Faessler:2007us}, in the analysis of 

347: the strong isospin-violating decays $D_{s0}^\ast \to D_s \pi^0$  

348: and $D_{s1} \to D_s^\ast \pi^0$ in the molecular approach, we showed 

349: the existence of two possible  dynamical mechanisms. This included the 

350: so-called ``direct'' mechanism with $\pi^0$-meson emission from the 

351: $D \to D^\ast$ and $K \to K^\ast$ transitions and the ``indirect'' 

352: mechanism where a $\pi^0$ meson is produced via $\eta-\pi^0$ mixing.  

353: The mixing is due to the mass term of pseudoscalar mesons in the 

354: leading-order $O(p^2)$ Lagrangian of chiral perturbation 

355: theory (ChPT)~\cite{Gasser:1984gg,Cho:1994zu}.

356: Note, that the second mechanism based on $\eta-\pi^0$ mixing

357: was mainly considered before in the literature. Originally 

358: it was initiated by the analysis based on the use of chiral

359: Lagrangians~\cite{Cho:1994zu,Bardeen:2003kt,Colangelo:2003vg,Mehen:2004uj} 

360: where the leading-order, tree-level 

361: $D_{s0}^\ast D_s \pi^0$ ($D_{s1} D_s^\ast \pi^0$) coupling

362: can be generated only by virtual $\eta$-meson emission. 

363: In Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007us} we showed that the ``direct'' and 

364: ``mixing'' mechanisms can be combined together in the form of an 

365: effective coupling of $\pi^0$ to the mesonic pairs $DD^\ast$ or 

366: $KK^\ast$ with modified flavor structure. This modification occurs 

367: after the diagonalization of the mesonic mass term involving $\pi^0$ 

368: and $\eta$ meson fields~\cite{Gasser:1984gg} 

369: (see details in~\cite{Faessler:2007us}). 

370: In particular, instead of the $\tau_3 \, \pi^0$ coupling to

371: $DD^\ast$ or $KK^\ast$ we have

372: $\pi^0 \, ( \tau_3 \, \cos\varepsilon \, + \, \kappa \, I \,

373: \sin\varepsilon)$, where $\kappa = 1/\sqrt{3}$ or $\sqrt{3}$ is

374: the corresponding flavor-algebra factor for the $DD^\ast$ or 

375: $KK^\ast$ coupling, respectively. The $\pi^0-\eta$ mixing angle 

376: $\varepsilon$ is fixed as~\cite{Gasser:1984gg}:  

377: \eq  

378: \tan 2\varepsilon = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \frac{m_d - m_u}{m_s - \hat{m}} 

379: \simeq 0.02  \,, \hspace*{1cm} \hat{m} = \frac{1}{2} (m_u + m_d)\,, 

380: \en

381: where $m_u, m_d, m_s$ are the current quark masses. 

382: 

383: Below, in Eq.(\ref{L_strong}), 

384: we display the explicit form of the corresponding 

385: interaction Lagrangian. The lowest-order diagrams which contribute 

386: to the matrix elements of the strong isospin-violating decays 

387: $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s \pi^0$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0$ are shown 

388: in Figs.2 and 3. 

389: Note, that in the isospin limit ($m_u = m_d$), the $\eta-\pi^0$

390: mixing angle vanishes and the masses of the virtual $B^{(\ast)}$ and

391: $K^{(\ast)}$ mesons in the loops are degenerate. 

392: As a result the pairs of diagrams related to

393: Figs.2(a) and 2(b), Figs.2(c) and 2(d), 

394: Figs.3(a) and 3(b), Figs.3(c) and 3(d) compensate each other. Therefore,

395: in the calculation of the diagrams of Figs.2 and 3 we go beyond the isospin 

396: limit and use the physical meson masses.

397: 

398: The diagrams contributing to the radiative decays 

399: $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$, 

400: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$  

401: are shown in Figs.4, 5, 6 and 7.  

402: The diagrams of Figs.4(a), 4(b), 5(a) and 5(b) are generated by the 

403: direct coupling of the charged $K^-$ and $B^+ (B^{\ast +})$ mesons to 

404: the electromagnetic field after gauging the free Lagrangians related 

405: to these mesons. The diagrams of Figs.6(a)-6(d), 7(a) and 7(b) are 

406: generated by the coupling of a corresponding 

407: pair of vector and pseudoscalar mesons to the photon.  

408: The diagrams of Figs.4(c), 5(c), and 6(e) are generated 

409: after gauging the nonlocal strong Lagrangians~(\ref{Bs0_Bs1_L}) describing 

410: the coupling of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons to their 

411: constituents. The diagrams of Figs.4(d) 

412: and 5(d) arise after gauging the strong $B_s^{\ast} B^+ K^-$ and 

413: $B_s B^{\ast +} K^-$ interaction Lagrangian containing

414: derivatives acting on the pseudoscalar fields. 

415: Details of how to generate the effective couplings of the involved

416: mesons to the electromagnetic field will be discussed later.

417:  

418: After the preliminary discussion of the relevant diagrams, we are now 

419: in the position to write down the full effective Lagrangian for the 

420: study of the strong and radiative decays of the $B_{s0}^\ast$ and 

421: $B_{s1}$ mesons formulated in terms of mesonic degrees of freedom and 

422: of photons. We follow the procedure discussed in detail in 

423: Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2007gv}-\cite{Faessler:2007us}, where we 

424: considered the $D_{s0}^\ast$ and $D_{s1}$ meson decay properties. 

425: First, we write the Lagrangian ${\cal L}$, which includes the free 

426: mesonic parts ${\cal L}_{\rm free}$ and the strong interaction parts 

427: ${\cal L}_{\rm str}$: 

428: \eq\label{L_full} 

429: {\cal L}(x) \, = \, 

430: {\cal L}_{\rm free}(x) \, + \, {\cal L}_{\rm str}(x) \,,

431: \en 

432: with

433: \eq\label{L_free} 

434: {\cal L}_{\rm free}(x) &=& 

435: - \bar B_{s0}^{\ast\, +} (x) ( \Box + m_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2 )  

436: B_{s0}^{\ast}(x) 

437: + \bar B_{s1, \mu} (x) ( g^{\mu\nu} [\Box + m_{B_{s1}}^2] 

438: - \partial^\mu\partial^\nu ) B_{s1, \nu}(x) \nonumber\\[2mm]

439: &-&\frac{1}{2} \vec\pi(x) ( \Box + m_\pi^2 ) \vec{\pi}(x) 

440: + \frac{\delta_\pi}{2} \, [\pi^0(x)]^2 - 

441: \sum\limits_{P = K, B, B_s} P^\dag(x) ( \Box + m_P^2 ) P(x) 

442: + \sum\limits_{P = K, B} \delta_P \, \bar P^0(x) P^0(x) \nonumber\\[2mm]

443: &+&\sum\limits_{V = K^\ast, B^\ast, B_s^\ast}  

444: V^{\dagger}_\mu (x) ( g^{\mu\nu} [\Box + m_{V}^2] 

445: - \partial^\mu\partial^\nu ) V_\nu(x) 

446: - \sum\limits_{V = K^\ast, B^\ast} \delta_{V} \, \bar  V^0_\mu (x) 

447: V^{0 \, \mu} (x) \,, 

448: \en 

449: \eq\label{L_strong}   

450: {\cal L}_{\rm str}(x) & = & \frac{g_{_{B^\ast B \pi}}}{2\sqrt{2}} 

451: \, B^{\ast \, \dagger}_\mu(x) \, \hat{\pi}_B(x) \, 

452: i\!\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}^{\,\mu} \!\! B(x) 

453: + \frac{g_{_{K^\ast K \pi}}}{\sqrt{2}} \, K^{\ast \, \dagger}_\mu(x) \, 

454: \hat{\pi}_K(x) \, i\!\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}^{\,\mu}\!\! K(x) 

455: \nonumber\\[1mm]  

456: &+& g_{_{B_s B^\ast K}} \, B^{\ast \, \dagger}_\mu(x) \, K(x)

457: \, i\!\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}^{\,\mu} \!\! B_s^0(x) 

458: + g_{_{B_s B K^\ast}} \, K^{\ast \, \dagger}_\mu(x) \, B(x)

459: \, i\!\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}^{\,\mu} \!\! \bar B_s^0(x)

460: + g_{_{B^\ast_s B K}} 

461: B^{\ast \, 0}_{s, \mu}(x) \, B^\dagger(x)

462: \, i\!\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}^{\,\mu} \!\! K(x) 

463: \nonumber\\[1mm] 

464: &-& i g_{_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast}} \, 

465: \biggl[ B^{\ast \, 0 \, \mu\nu }_s(x) B^{\ast \, \dagger}_\mu(x) 

466: K^\ast_\nu(x) + B^{\ast \, \dagger}_{\mu\nu}(x) 

467: K^{\ast \, \mu}(x) B^{\ast \, 0 \, \nu}_{s}(x) + K^{\ast \, \mu\nu}(x) 

468: B^{\ast \, 0}_{s, \mu}(x) B^{\ast \, \dagger}_\nu(x) \biggr] 

469: \nonumber\\[1mm] 

470: &+& \frac{g_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K}}{4} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} 

471: B^{\ast}_{s \, \mu\nu}(x) B^{\ast \, \dagger}_{\alpha\beta}(x) K(x) 

472: + {\cal L}_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}(x) +  {\cal L}_{B_{s1}}(x) 

473: \, + \, {\rm H.c.} \,,  

474: \en 

475: where summation over isospin indices is understood, 

476: $\Box = \partial^\mu \partial_\mu$ and 

477: $A \stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial} B 

478: \equiv A \partial B - B \partial A$. Here, $\vec\pi = (\pi_1, \pi_2, \pi_3)$ 

479: is the triplet of pions, $\hat{\pi}_B = \pi_1 \tau_1 + \pi_2 \tau_2 

480: + \pi_3 (\tau_3 \cos\varepsilon + I \sin\varepsilon/\sqrt{3})$, 

481: $\hat{\pi}_K = \pi_1 \tau_1 + \pi_2 \tau_2 

482: + \pi_3 (\tau_3 \cos\varepsilon + I \sin\varepsilon \sqrt{3})$, 

483:  $B^{(\ast)}$ and $K^{(\ast)}$ are the doublets of pseudoscalar (vector) 

484: mesons, $B_s^\pm$ and $B_s^{\ast \, \pm}$ 

485: are the pseudoscalar and vector bottom-strange mesons, respectively, 

486: $V^{\ast \, \mu\nu} = \partial^\mu V^{\ast \, \nu} -   

487: \partial^\nu V^{\ast \, \mu}$ is the stress tensor of the 

488: vector meson field.   

489: 

490: In our convention the isospin-symmetric meson masses of the 

491: isomultiplets $m_\pi, m_P, m_V$ are identified with the masses 

492: of the charged partners. The quantities $\delta_{M}$ are the 

493: isospin-breaking parameters which are fixed by the difference of masses 

494: squared of the charged and neutral members of the isomultiplets as:

495: $\delta_M  = m_{M^\pm}^2 - m_{M^0}^2$ and

496: $m_{M^0} \equiv m_{\bar M^0}\,.$  

497: The set of mesonic masses is taken from data~\cite{Yao:2006px}. 

498: From Eq.~(\ref{L_strong}) it is evident that the couplings of $\pi^0$ 

499: to the $B^\ast B$ and $K^\ast K$ mesonic pairs contain two terms ---   

500: the ``dominant'' coupling (proportional to $\cos\varepsilon$) and 

501: the ``suppressed'' coupling (proportional to $\sin\varepsilon$). 

502: This means that the first coupling survives in the isospin limit, 

503: while the second one vanishes. 

504:   

505: The free meson propagators are given by the standard expressions 

506: \eq

507: i \, D_M(x-y) = \la 0 | T \, M(x) \, M^\dagger(y)  | 0 \ra 

508: \ = \

509: \int\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4i} \, e^{-ik(x-y)} \ \tilde D_M(k) 

510: \en 

511: for the scalar (pseudoscalar) fields, where 

512: $\tilde D_M(k) = (m_M^2 - k^2 - i\epsilon)^{-1}$

513: and 

514: \eq

515: i \, D_{M^\ast}^{\mu\nu}(x-y) = \la 0 | T \, M^{\ast \, \mu}(x) \,

516: M^{\ast \, \nu \, \dagger}(y) | 0 \ra \ = \

517: \int\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4i} \, e^{-ik(x-y)} \

518: \tilde D_{M^\ast}^{\mu\nu}(k)

519: \en 

520: for the vector (axial) fields, where

521: $\tilde D_{M^\ast}^{\mu\nu}(k) = ( - g^{\mu\nu} + k^\mu k^\nu/m_{M^\ast}^2) \, 

522: (m_{M^\ast}^2 - k^2 - i\epsilon)^{-1}\,.$ 

523: The choice for the strong meson couplings 

524: of the Lagrangian (\ref{L_strong}) will be discussed in Sec.III.    

525: 

526: The electromagnetic field is included in the Lagrangian (\ref{L_full}) 

527: using minimal substitution i.e. each derivative acting on a charged meson 

528: field is replaced by the covariant one:  

529: $\partial^\mu M^{(\ast) \pm} \, \to \, 

530: (\partial^\mu \mp ie A^\mu) \, M^{(\ast) \pm} \,.$

531: Note, that the strong interaction Lagrangians 

532: ${\cal L}_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}$ and ${\cal L}_{B_{s1}}$ should also be 

533: modified in order to restore electromagnetic gauge invariance. 

534: It proceeds in a way as suggested in Ref.~\cite{Mandelstam:1962mi} 

535: and is extensively used in 

536: Refs.~\cite{Anikin:1995cf,Faessler:2007gv,Faessler:2007us}. 

537: In particular, each charged constituent meson field $H^{\pm}$ 

538: (i.e. $B^{(\ast \pm)}$ and $K^{(\pm)}$) in 

539: ${\cal L}_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}$ and ${\cal L}_{B_{s1}}$ 

540: is multiplied by the gauge field exponential (see further details 

541: in~\cite{Anikin:1995cf,Faessler:2007gv,Faessler:2007us}): 

542: \eq\label{Subs_nonmin} 

543: H^{\pm}(y) \to e^{\mp i e I(y,x,P)} H^{\pm}(y) 

544: \en 

545: where

546: \eq\label{path}

547: I(x,y,P) = \int\limits_y^x dz_\mu A^\mu(z).

548: \en

549: For the derivative of $I(x,y,P)$ we use the

550: path-independent prescription suggested in~\cite{Mandelstam:1962mi}

551: which in turn states that the derivative of $I(x,y,P)$ does

552: not depend on the path $P$ originally used in the definition. 

553: The nonminimal substitution (\ref{Subs_nonmin}) is therefore 

554: completely equivalent to the minimal prescription. Expanding the 

555: exponential $e^{\mp i e I(y,x,P)} H^{\pm}(y)$ in powers of 

556: the electromagnetic field and keeping linear terms like 

557: the four-particle coupling $B_{s0}^\ast B^+ K^- \gamma$ and 

558: $B_{s1} B^{\ast +} K^- \gamma$ we generate the diagrams of 

559: Figs.4(c) and 5(c), 6(c), 6(d), respectively.  

560: 

561: Finally, we specify the electromagnetic Lagrangian describing the coupling 

562: of vector and pseudoscalar mesons to the photon: 

563: \eq\label{L_em}  

564: {\cal L}_{V P \gamma}(x) &=& \frac{e}{4} \, F_{\mu\nu}(x) 

565: \, \epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} \biggl( 

566:  g_{_{K^{\ast \, \pm} K^\pm \gamma}} 

567:  \, K^{\ast \, +}_{\alpha\beta}(x) \, K^-(x) 

568: + g_{_{K^{\ast \, 0} K^0 \gamma}} 

569:  \, K^{\ast \, 0}_{\alpha\beta}(x) \, \bar K^0(x)\nonumber\\  

570: &+& g_{_{B^{\ast \, \pm } B^\pm \gamma}} 

571:  \, B^{\ast \, +}_{\alpha\beta}(x) \, B^-(x) 

572: + g_{_{B^{\ast \, 0} B^0 \gamma}} 

573:  \, B^{\ast \, 0}_{\alpha\beta}(x) \, \bar B^0(x) \biggr)  

574:  \, + \, {\rm H.c.} 

575: \en 

576: Here the couplings $g_{_{V P \gamma}}$ can be extracted from the 

577: corresponding decay widths $V \to P + \gamma$. Presently we only 

578: have information about the decay width of $K^\ast$ mesons. 

579: Using the expressions for the $K^\ast \to K + \gamma$ decay widths 

580: \eq 

581: \Gamma(K^{\ast} \to K \gamma) = \frac{\alpha}{24} \, 

582: g_{_{K^\ast K^\gamma}}^2 \, m_{K^\ast}^3 \, 

583: \biggl( 1 - \frac{m_K^2}{m_{K^\ast}^2} \biggr)^3 \, 

584: \en 

585: and the data (central values) for 

586: $\Gamma(K^{\ast \, \pm} \to K^\pm \gamma) = 50.29$ keV and 

587: $\Gamma(K^{\ast \, 0} \to K^0 \gamma) = 116.19$ keV 

588: we deduce the coupling constants 

589: $g_{_{K^{\ast \, \pm} \to K^\pm \gamma}} = 0.836$ GeV$^{-1}$ 

590: and $g_{_{K^{\ast \, 0} \to K^0 \gamma}} = - 1.267$ GeV$^{-1}$. 

591: Note, that in the nonrelativistic SU(3) quark model 

592: the couplings $g_{_{K^{\ast \, \pm} \to K^\pm \gamma}}$ 

593: and $g_{_{K^{\ast \, 0} \to K^0 \gamma}}$ are proportional 

594: to the sum of the charges of the constituent quarks: 

595: $g_{_{K^{\ast \, \pm} \to K^\pm \gamma}} \sim (e_u + e_s) = 1/3$

596: and $g_{_{K^{\ast \, 0} \to K^0 \gamma}} \sim (e_d + e_s) = - 2/3$. 

597: This is the reason why the coupling of the neutral kaons is defined 

598: (by convention) with a negative sign. 

599: Also, the prediction of the nonrelativistic quark model for the ratio 

600: $g_{_{K^{\ast \, 0} \to K^0 \gamma}}/

601: g_{_{K^{\ast \, \pm} \to K^\pm \gamma}} = - 2$ is violated by relativistic 

602: corrections. For $D$ mesons the corresponding ratio is in precise 

603: agreement with data.   

604: In particular, taking the experimental values of 

605: $g_{_{D^{\ast \, \pm} \to D^\pm \gamma}} \simeq 0.5$ GeV$^{-1}$ 

606: and $g_{_{D^{\ast \, \pm} \to D^\pm \gamma}} \simeq 2.0$ GeV$^{-1}$ 

607: (see the discussion in Ref.~\cite{Dong:2008gb}) we 

608: get 

609: \eq 

610: \frac{g_{_{D^{\ast \, 0} \to D^0 \gamma}}}

611: {g_{_{D^{\ast \, \pm} \to D^\pm \gamma}}} = \frac{e_c + e_u}{e_c + e_d} 

612: = 4 \,. 

613: \en 

614: Therefore, one can expect that for bottom mesons the naive quark model 

615: should prediction should also be sufficient: 

616: \eq 

617: \frac{g_{_{B^{\ast \, 0} \to B^0 \gamma}}}

618: {g_{_{B^{\ast \, \pm} \to B^\pm \gamma}}} = \frac{e_b + e_d}{e_b + e_u} 

619: = - 2 \,. 

620: \en 

621: For our numerical estimates we will use typical values with

622: $g_{_{B^{\ast \, \pm} \to B^\pm \gamma}} =  0.5$ GeV$^{-1}$ 

623: and $g_{_{B^{\ast \, 0} \to B^0 \gamma}} =  - 1$ GeV$^{-1}$. 

624: These couplings correspond to the full width of $B^{\ast \, \pm}$ equal 

625: to 0.23 keV and and of $B^{\ast \, 0}$ equal to 0.91 keV (as usual 

626: we suppose that $B^\ast \to B \gamma$ is the dominant mode for the 

627: $B^\ast$ mesons). 

628: 

629: \section{Strong and radiative decays of the 

630: $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons} 

631: 

632: \subsection{Matrix elements and decay widths} 

633: 

634: The matrix elements describing the strong 

635: $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s \pi^0$, $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0$  

636: and radiative $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$ 

637: decays are defined as follows 

638: \seq\label{Minv_str} 

639: \eq 

640: M(B_{s0}^{\ast}(p) \to B_s(p^\prime) \pi^0(q)) 

641: &=& G_{B_{s0}^{\ast}B_s\pi} \,, \\

642: M(B_{s1}(p) \to B_s^\ast(p^\prime) \pi^0(q) ) &=&

643: \epsilon_\mu (p) \epsilon^{\ast}_\nu(p^\prime) \ 

644: ( g^{\mu\nu} \ G_{B_{s1}B_s^\ast\pi}

645: \ - \ v^{\prime\mu} v^\nu \ F_{B_{s1}B_s^\ast\pi} ) \,, 

646: \en 

647: \sen 

648: and 

649: \seq\label{Minv_em}   

650: \eq

651: M(B_{s0}^{\ast}(p) \to B_s^{\ast}(p^\prime) \gamma(q)) 

652: &=&e \ \epsilon_\mu^\ast(q)\epsilon_\nu^\ast(p^\prime)\, 

653: ( g_{\mu\nu} p^\prime q -

654: p^\prime_\mu q_\nu ) \ G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^{\ast} \gamma}

655: \,, \\ 

656: M( B_{s1}(p) \to B_s(p^\prime) \gamma(q) ) &=& 

657: e \ \epsilon_\mu(p)\epsilon^\ast_\nu(q) 

658: \ (g^{\mu\nu} \ pq \ - \ q^\mu p^\nu) \ G_{B_{s1}B_s\gamma}\,, \\

659: M( B_{s1}(p) \to B_s^\ast(p^\prime) \gamma(q) ) &=&

660: e \, \varepsilon^{m n\rho\sigma} \, \epsilon^\alpha(p)

661: \, \epsilon^{\ast \mu}(p^\prime) \, \epsilon_\rho^\ast(q) \, q_\sigma \, 

662: \biggl( G_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma} \, g_{\mu n} g_{\alpha m} \, p q 

663: \nonumber\\

664: &+& \, F_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma}  \, g_{\mu n} \,

665: p_m q_\alpha \, + \, H_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma}  \, 

666: g_{\alpha m} \, p_n q_\mu\biggr) \,,\\ 

667: M( B_{s1}(p) \to B_{s0}^\ast(p^\prime) \gamma(q) ) &=& 

668: e \ \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} \ \epsilon_\mu(p)\epsilon^\ast_\nu(q) 

669: \ p_\alpha \ q_\beta \ G_{B_{s1}B_{s0}\gamma}\,, 

670: \en 

671: \sen 

672: where $v = p/m_{B_{s1}}$ and $v^\prime = p^\prime/m_{B_s^\ast}$ 

673: are the four-velocities of the $B_{s1}$ and $B_s^\ast$ mesons, 

674: $G_{B_{s0}^{\ast}B_s\pi}$, $G(F)_{B_{s1}B_s^\ast\pi}$, 

675: $G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^{\ast} \gamma}$ and $G_{B_{s1}B_s\gamma}$, 

676: $G(F,H)_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma}$ and 

677: $G_{B_{s1}  B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma}$  

678: are the corresponding effective coupling constants.

679: The coherent sum of all the diagrams in Figs.4-7, contributing 

680: to the radiative decays of $B_{s0}^\ast$ and  

681: $B_{s1}$ mesons, is gauge invariant, while the contribution 

682: of each diagram is definitely not gauge

683: invariant. As done in Ref.~\cite{Faessler:2007gv}, for convenience we split 

684: each individual diagram into a gauge-invariant piece and a remainder, 

685: which is noninvariant. One can prove that the sum of the noninvariant 

686: terms vanishes due to gauge invariance. In the following discussion of 

687: the numerical results we will only deal with the gauge-invariant 

688: contribution of the separate diagrams of Figs.4-7. In Appendix A we present

689: the calculational technique for determining the effective couplings 

690: entering in the matrix elements of the strong and radiative transitions 

691: of $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons. 

692: 

693: Using Eqs.~(\ref{Minv_str}) and (\ref{Minv_em}) the strong 

694: $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s \pi^0$, $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0$ 

695: and radiative $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma$, 

696: $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \gamma$, 

697: $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^\ast \gamma$ decay widths are calculated according to 

698: the expressions: 

699: \seq 

700: \eq 

701: \Gamma(B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0) \, & = & \,

702: \frac{G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s \pi}^2}{8\pi m_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2} \, P_{\pi 1} \,, \\

703: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0) & = & \frac{P_{\pi 2}}{12 \pi

704: m_{B_{s1}}^2} \, \biggl\{ G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}^2 + \frac{1}{2}

705: \biggl( G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} \, w - F_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}

706: (w^2 - 1) \biggr)^2 \biggr\} \,,

707: \en 

708: \sen 

709: and 

710: \seq 

711: \eq

712: \Gamma(B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma) & = & \alpha \,

713: G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^{\ast} \gamma}^2 \, P_{\gamma 1}^3 \,, \\

714: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma) & = & \frac{ \alpha}{3} \, 

715: G_{B_{s1}B_s \gamma}^2 \, P_{\gamma 2}^{3} \,, \\

716: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \gamma) & = &

717: \frac{\alpha}{3} \, P_{\gamma 3}^5 \,

718: \biggl\{ \biggl(G_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma} 

719: + F_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma}  \biggr)^2 + 

720: \frac{m_{B_{s1}}^2}{m_{B_s^\ast}^2} \biggl( G_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma} 

721: + H_{B_{s1}  B_s^{\ast} \gamma} \biggr)^2 \biggr\} \,, \\

722: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^\ast \gamma) & = & \frac{ \alpha}{3} \, 

723: G_{B_{s1}B_{s0}^\ast \gamma}^2 \, P_{\gamma 4}^3 \,, 

724: \en 

725: \sen 

726: where $w = v v^\prime = (m_{B_{s1}}^2 + m_{B_s^\ast}^2 

727: - m_{\pi^0}^2)/(2 m_{B_{s1}} m_{B_s^\ast})$ and 

728: $P_{\pi i}$, $P_{\gamma i}$ are the corresponding 

729: three-momenta of the decay products. 

730: 

731: Note, the contribution of the effective 

732: coupling constant $F_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ to the 

733: $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0$ decay width is strongly suppressed. 

734: This is because the contribution of the matrix element with 

735: $F_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ is proportional to the suppressed factor 

736: $w^2 - 1 \simeq 4 \times 10^{-3}$ with $w \simeq 1$. Therefore, we have 

737: \eq 

738: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0) \ \simeq \ 

739: \frac{G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}^2}{8 \pi m_{B_{s1}}^2} \, P_{\pi 2} \, 

740: \en  

741: and 

742: \eq 

743: \frac{\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0)}

744: {\Gamma(B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0)} \ \simeq \  

745: \frac{P_{\pi 2}}{P_{\pi 1}} \, 

746: \biggl(\frac{m_{B_{s0}^\ast}}{m_{B_{s1}}}\biggr)^2 \, 

747: \biggl(\frac{G_{B_{s1}B_s^\ast\pi}}{G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s\pi}}\biggr)^2 \,. 

748: \en 

749: 

750: \subsection{Numerical results} 

751: 

752: First, we discuss the choice for the strong coupling constants in 

753: the Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{\rm str}$~(\ref{L_full}). 

754: In Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2007gv,Faessler:2007us} we used the set of

755: strong coupling constants $g_{_{D_1D_2L}}$ $(g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}}$, 

756: $g_{_{D_s D^\ast K}} = g_{_{D_s K^\ast D}}$ and 

757: $g_{_{D_s^\ast D K}} = g_{_{D_s^\ast D^\ast K^\ast}})$ 

758: defined in the charm sector,  

759: where index $L$ denotes a light meson, while $D_1$ and $D_2$ are the

760: respective charm states. The coupling $g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}} = 17.9$

761: was deduced using data for the corresponding strong decay 

762: width~\cite{Anastassov:2001cw}. The coupling constants 

763: $g_{_{D_s D^\ast  K}}$ and $g_{_{D_s^\ast D K}}$ have been estimated 

764: using two different variants of the QCD sum rule approach discussed in 

765: Refs.~\cite{Wang:2006id,Bracco:2006xf}, where similar results have 

766: been obtained. Both Refs.~\cite{Wang:2006id,Bracco:2006xf} point to a strong

767: suppression of these constants  

768: in comparison to the coupling $g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}}$.

769: An updated analysis for $g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}}$ in the context of 

770: a QCD sum rule approach gives a result close to data -- 

771: $g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}} = 14 \pm 1.5$~\cite{Navarra:2001ju}.  

772: We used the predictions of  

773: Ref.~\cite{Wang:2006id}: $g_{_{D^\ast D_s K}} = 2.02$ and 

774: $g_{_{D_s^\ast D K}} = 1.84$. 

775: For the unknown parameters $g_{_{D_s K^\ast D}}$ 

776: and $g_{_{D_s^\ast D^\ast K^\ast}}$ we used the approximative relations 

777: $g_{_{D_s K^\ast D}} \simeq g_{_{D_s D^\ast K}}$ and 

778: $g_{_{D_s^\ast D^\ast K^\ast}} \simeq g_{_{D_s^\ast D K}}$, which can 

779: be explained phenomenologically: the first relation -- 

780: by the universality of the coupling of the $D_s$ meson to 

781: $D^\ast K$ and $K^\ast D$ mesonic pairs (it is based on exact SU(4) flavor 

782: symmetry and we do not expect a substantial violation of this relation 

783: due to breaking of the SU(4) symmetry) and the second relation -- 

784: by the universality of the coupling of the $D_s^\ast$ meson to

785: two pseudoscalars and two vectors (like for $\rho\pi\pi$ and  

786: $\rho\rho\rho$ couplings: $g_{\rho\pi\pi} \simeq g_{\rho\rho\rho} 

787: \simeq 6$, and also for $J/\Psi D D$ and 

788: $J\Psi D^\ast D^\ast$: $g_{J/\Psi D D} \simeq  

789: g_{J/\Psi D^\ast D^\ast} \simeq 8$~\cite{Lin:1999ad}). For consistency, 

790: in the present manuscript we use the set of charmed hadronic couplings 

791: predicted by QCD sum rules (central values) with : 

792: \eq 

793: g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}} = 14\,, \hspace*{.5cm}

794: g_{_{D_s D^\ast K}} = g_{_{D_s K^\ast D}} = 2.02 \,, \hspace*{.5cm}

795: g_{_{D_s^\ast D K}} = g_{_{D_s^\ast D^\ast K^\ast}} = 1.84  \,. 

796: \en 

797: In particular, instead of $g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}} = 17.9$ we use 

798: $g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}} = 14$. Such a modification does not change the 

799: numerical results of Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2007gv,Faessler:2007us}, 

800: because the contribution of the corresponding diagrams containing 

801: the coupling $g_{_{D^\ast D \pi}}$ is strongly suppressed. 

802: A similar picture we also have in the bottom sector (see discussion below). 

803: 

804: In order to evaluate the corresponding bottom

805: couplings  $g_{_{B_1B_2L}}$ we use the arguments of heavy hadron

806: chiral perturbation theory (HHChPT)~\cite{Wise:1992hn,Casalbuoni:1996pg} 

807: which relates the bottom and charmed couplings containing the same 

808: light meson: 

809: \eq

810: g_{_{B_1B_2L}} = g_{_{D_1D_2L}} \, \displaystyle\frac{m_B}{m_D}

811: \en

812: where $m_B$ and $m_D$ are the masses of the bottom and charm mesons

813: identified e.g. with the masses of

814: $m_{B^\pm} = 5.279$~GeV and $m_{D^\pm} = 1.8693$~GeV. In other words,

815: to get the set of bottom meson couplings used in the strong

816: Lagrangian (\ref{L_strong}) we rescale the corresponding charm

817: meson couplings by a factor $m_{B^\pm}/m_{D^\pm} \simeq 2.82$.

818: In particular, we have:

819: \eq

820: g_{_{B^\ast B \pi}}  = 39.5 \,, \hspace*{.5cm}

821: g_{_{B_s B^\ast K}} \simeq g_{_{B_s K^\ast B}} = 5.70 \,, \hspace*{.5cm}

822: g_{_{B_s^\ast B K}} \simeq g_{_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast}} = 5.19  \,.

823: \en 

824: For the coupling $g_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K}$ we have no further input. 

825: From a dimensional analysis it should be of order 1 GeV$^{-1}$. 

826: The diagrams 6(e) and 6(f), however, where this coupling enters, are 

827: strongly suppressed, and we therefore do not need to have precise 

828: knowledge of this constant.  

829: 

830: The coupling $g_{_{K^\ast K \pi}}  = 4.61$ is fixed from 

831: data on the $K^\ast K \pi$ decay width~\cite{Yao:2006px}.

832: Finally, we fix the couplings $g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}}$ and $g_{_{B_{s1}}}$,

833: which are given by Eqs.~(\ref{coupling_Bs0}) and (\ref{coupling_Bs1})

834: in terms of the adjustable vertex function. Using the Gaussian vertex

835: function we obtain the result that these couplings are quite stable with

836: respect to a variation of the scale parameter $\Lambda_M$.

837: In particular, varying $\Lambda_M$ from 1 to 2~GeV,

838: we get a range of values for $g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}}$ from

839: 27.17 to 23.21~GeV and for $g_{_{B_{s1}}}$ from~25.64 to 22.14~GeV. 

840: Note that our predictions for these couplings are in agreement with 

841: the results of other theoretical approaches: 

842: $g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}} = g_{_{B_{s1}}} = 19.6 \pm 5.7$~GeV 

843: [light--cone QCD sum rules approach~\cite{Wang:2008tm}] and 

844: $g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}} = 23.572$~GeV and $g_{_{B_{s1}}} = 23.442$~GeV 

845: [effective chiral approach~\cite{Guo:2006fu,Guo:2006rp}]. 

846: 

847: Now we present the numerical results.  

848: First, we discuss the results for strong decays. 

849: Here the main contribution to the decay width comes, 

850: as expected, from the diagrams of Figs.2(a), (b) and 3(a), (b). 

851: On the other hand, the contribution of the direct mechanism is comparable 

852: to the one of the indirect mechanism (i.e. due to $\eta-\pi^0$ mixing). 

853: The contribution of the diagrams in Figs.2(c) and (d) is of order 0.1\% 

854: of the total contribution to the $G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}$ coupling and 

855: the contribution of Figs.3(c) and (d) is of order 1.6\% 

856: of the total contribution to the $G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ coupling. 

857: Therefore, the couplings $G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}$ and 

858: $G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ are not sensitive to a variation of the couplings  

859: $g_{_{B^\ast B \pi}}$, $g_{_{B_s^\ast B K}}$ and $g_{_{B_s B^\ast K}}$. 

860: They are only sensitive to the values of the couplings $g_{_{B_s K^\ast B}}$ 

861: and $g_{_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast}}$. The leading-order 

862: contributions from the diagrams in Figs.2(a), (b) and 3(a), (b) 

863: to the quantities $G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}$ and 

864: $G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ in terms of the couplings  

865: $g_{_{B_s K^\ast B}}$ and $g_{_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast}}$ 

866: are given by  

867: \eq 

868: G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi} = 65.9 \ g_{_{B_s K^\ast B}} \ {\rm MeV}\,, 

869: \hspace*{.5cm} 

870: G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} = 72.3 \ g_{_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast}} \ {\rm MeV} 

871: \en

872: for a typical value of the dimensional parameter $\Lambda_M = 1$ GeV.

873: Then, using the specific values of $g_{_{B_s K^\ast B}} = 5.70$ and 

874: $g_{_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast}} = 5.19$ we 

875: get the following predictions for the effective couplings and decay widths: 

876: \eq\label{GBs0Bs1}  

877: G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi} = 375.7 (375.6) \ {\rm MeV}\,, \hspace*{.5cm} 

878: G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} = 381.1 (376.3) \ {\rm MeV} 

879: \en 

880: and 

881: \eq 

882: \Gamma(B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s \pi^0) = 55.2 (55.1) \ {\rm keV}\,, \hspace*{.5cm}

883: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0) = 57.0 (55.6) \ {\rm keV} \,. 

884: \en 

885: In the brackets we indicate the results of the leading diagrams of

886: Figs.2(a), (b) and 3(a), (b). 

887: 

888: The strong decay couplings 

889: $G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}$, $G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ and the decay 

890: widths $\Gamma(B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi)$,  

891: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi)$ are practically degenerate, which 

892: can also be explained by heavy quark symmetry (HQS), 

893: which is a good symmetry  

894: for the heavy-light mesons with a bottom quark. Because of the 

895: infinitely heavy mass of the bottom quark the spins of the $\bar b$ 

896: antiquark and the $s$ quark decouple (spin symmetry), and, therefore, 

897: the properties of $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons become similar. 

898: This issue was also discussed in Refs.~\cite{Colangelo:2003vg,Mehen:2004uj} 

899: in the context of the charm partners ($D_{s0}^\ast$ and $D_{s1}$). 

900: In particular, it was shown that the corresponding coupling constants and 

901: widths are degenerate in the heavy quark limit. In our previous papers we also 

902: reproduced the same result. Moreover, for finite charmed meson masses 

903: the decay characteristics are nearly degenerate: 

904: \eq\label{GDs0Ds1} 

905: G_{D_{s0}^\ast D_s \pi} = 145.4 \ {\rm MeV}\,, \hspace*{.5cm} 

906: G_{D_{s1} D_s^\ast \pi} = 160.2 \ {\rm MeV} 

907: \en 

908: and 

909: \eq 

910: \Gamma(D_{s0}^\ast \to D_s \pi^0)   = 46.7 \ {\rm keV}\,, \hspace*{.5cm}

911: \Gamma(D_{s1} \to D_s^\ast \pi^0) = 50.1 \ {\rm keV} \,. 

912: \en 

913: The next point is a check of the flavor content of HQS. 

914: In our molecular approach the leading contributions to the 

915: couplings $G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s \pi}$ and $G_{H_{s1} H_s^\ast \pi}$, 

916: where $H=D$ or $B$, are defined by the pairs of diagrams in Figs.2(a,b) 

917: and 3(a,b), respectively: 

918: \seq 

919: \eq 

920: G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s \pi} &=& 

921: g_{_{H_{s0}^\ast}} \, g_{_{K^\ast K \pi}} \, 

922: g_{_{H_s H K^\ast}} \, I_{KK^\ast H} \,, \\

923: G_{H_{s1} H_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

924: g_{_{H_{s1}}} \, g_{_{K^\ast K \pi}} \, 

925: g_{_{H_s^\ast H^\ast K^\ast}} \, I_{KK^\ast H^\ast} \,, 

926: \en 

927: \sen 

928: where $I_{KK^\ast H}$ and $I_{KK^\ast H^\ast}$ are the structure 

929: integrals which are of order $O(1/m_Q)$ in the inverse heavy quark mass 

930: expansion -- $1/m_Q$. The hadronic couplings scale as: 

931: \eq 

932: g_{_{H_{s0}^\ast}}  \sim O(m_Q)\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

933: g_{_{H_{s1}}}       \sim O(m_Q)\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

934: g_{_{K^\ast K \pi}} \sim O(1)  \,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

935: g_{_{H_s H K^\ast}} \sim O(m_Q)\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

936: g_{_{H_s^\ast H^\ast K^\ast}} \sim O(m_Q)\,. 

937: \en  

938: Therefore, the strong couplings 

939: $G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s \pi}$ and $G_{H_{s1} H_s^\ast \pi}$  

940: scale as: 

941: $G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s \pi} \sim O(m_Q)$  and 

942: $G_{H_{s1} H_s^\ast \pi} \sim O(m_Q).$ 

943: For this scaling behavior the following relations result: 

944: \eq\label{ratios_fl}  

945: \frac{G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}}{G_{D_{s0}^\ast D_s \pi}} 

946: \sim \frac{m_b}{m_c}\,, 

947: \hspace*{.5cm} 

948: \frac{G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}}{G_{D_{s1} D_s^\ast \pi}} 

949: \sim \frac{m_b}{m_c}\,. 

950: \en 

951: With our results [see Eqs.~(\ref{GBs0Bs1}) and (\ref{GDs0Ds1})] 

952: we conclude that the constraints (\ref{ratios_fl}) are fulfilled very well. 

953: 

954: In Table~\ref{BsS} we present our results for the decay widths 

955: $\Gamma(B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0)$ and 

956: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi^0)$ including a variation of the 

957: scale parameter $\Lambda_M$ from $1$ to $2$ GeV (an increase of

958: $\Lambda_M$ leads to an increase of the widths) and compare them with 

959: known theoretical predictions~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt,Guo:2006fu,Guo:2006rp,%

960: Wang:2008ny}.  

961: Our results for the decay widths are larger in comparison 

962: to previous approaches~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt,Guo:2006fu,Guo:2006rp,Wang:2008ny} 

963: due to inclusion of the direct isospin-violating transitions 

964: $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0$.   

965: 

966: Now we turn to the discussion of the radiative decays 

967: $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$. 

968: The main contribution to the decay characteristics of 

969: the $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$

970: decays comes, 

971: as expected, from the diagrams of Figs.4(a) and 5(a).  

972: Our results for the effective coupling constants 

973: and decay widths for a typical value of $\Lambda_M= 1$ GeV are:  

974: \eq\label{couplings_bottom}  

975: G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^\ast \gamma} \ = \ 0.122 \ {\rm GeV}^{-1}\,, 

976: \hspace*{.5cm} 

977: G_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma} \ = \  0.115 \ {\rm GeV}^{-1}

978: \en 

979: and 

980: \eq\label{Gamm_rad} 

981: \Gamma(B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma) \ = \ 3.07 \ {\rm keV}\,, 

982: \hspace*{.5cm} 

983: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma) \ = \ 2.01 \ {\rm keV} \,. 

984: \en 

985: In Table~\ref{BsEM} we summarize our results for the radiative decay 

986: widths including a variation of the scale parameter $\Lambda_M$ from 

987: 1 to 2 GeV (an increase of $\Lambda_{B_M}$ leads to a larger value for 

988: the width). In comparison, we also display the predictions of other 

989: theoretical approaches~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt,Vijande:2007ke,Wang:2008bt}. 

990: The lower limit of the QCD sum rule results~\cite{Wang:2008bt} 

991: is consistent with our predictions. In our opinion the predictions 

992: of~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt,Vijande:2007ke} are overestimated. 

993: In particular, applying HQS (spin symmetry) 

994: we can relate the corresponding radiative coupling constants of the 

995: same flavor as  

996: \eq\label{const_HQL} 

997: G_{D_{s0}^{\ast} D_s^\ast \gamma} = G_{D_{s1} D_s \gamma}\,, 

998: \hspace*{.5cm}  

999: G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^\ast \gamma} =  G_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma} \,. 

1000: \en  

1001: The same relation was derived previously in HHChPT~\cite{Mehen:2004uj} 

1002: in the charm sector. Now we perform the same exercise  

1003: as done for the strong couplings in order to relate the radiative couplings 

1004: of different flavors. The leading contributions to the 

1005: couplings $G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s^\ast \gamma}$ and $G_{H_{s1} H_s \gamma}$, 

1006: are defined by the pairs of diagrams in Figs.4(a)  

1007: and 5(a), respectively: 

1008: \seq 

1009: \eq 

1010: G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s^\ast \gamma} &=& 

1011: g_{_{H_{s0}^\ast}} \, g_{_{K K \gamma}} \, 

1012: g_{_{H_s^\ast H K}} \, I_{KKH} \,, \\

1013: G_{H_{s1} H_s \gamma} &=& 

1014: g_{_{H_{s1}}} \, g_{_{K K \gamma}} \, 

1015: g_{_{H_s H^\ast K}} \, I_{KKH^\ast} \,, 

1016: \en  

1017: \sen 

1018: where $I_{KKH}$ and $I_{KKH^\ast}$ are the structure 

1019: integrals which are of order $O(1/m_Q^2)$. 

1020: The couplings $g_{_{K K \gamma}}$, $g_{_{H_s^\ast H K}}$ 

1021: and $g_{_{H_s H^\ast K}}$ scale as:   

1022: $g_{_{K K \gamma}}   \sim O(1)\,,$   

1023: $g_{_{H_s^\ast H K}} \sim O(m_Q)$ and  

1024: $g_{_{H_s  H^\ast K}} \sim O(m_Q).$  

1025: Therefore, the radiative couplings  

1026: $G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s^\ast \gamma}$ and $G_{H_{s1} H_s \gamma}$  

1027: are insensitive to the flavor of the heavy quark/meson:  

1028: $G_{H_{s0}^\ast H_s \gamma} \sim O(1)$ and 

1029: $G_{H_{s1} H \gamma} \sim O(1).$ 

1030: Finally, the radiative couplings obey both spin and 

1031: flavor symmetry in the heavy quark limit and we arrive at the 

1032: constraint: 

1033: \eq\label{ratios_rad_full}  

1034: G_{D_{s0}^{\ast} D_s^\ast \gamma} = G_{D_{s1} D_s \gamma} = 

1035: G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^\ast \gamma} = G_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma} \,. 

1036: \en 

1037: Recalling the results for the radiative 

1038: decay constants of charmed mesons~\cite{Faessler:2007gv,Faessler:2007us} 

1039: \eq\label{couplings_charm} 

1040: G_{D_{s0}^{\ast} D_s^\ast \gamma} \ = \ 0.093 \ {\rm GeV}^{-1}\,, 

1041: \hspace*{.5cm} 

1042: G_{D_{s1} D_s \gamma} \ = \  0.106 \ {\rm GeV}^{-1}

1043: \en 

1044: we conclude that relation (\ref{ratios_rad_full}) is approximately fulfilled 

1045: by our results, which are obtained for finite physical masses of the 

1046: heavy mesons. The constraint (\ref{ratios_rad_full}) 

1047: can also be used to deduce relations between the corresponding decay 

1048: widths:  

1049: \seq 

1050: \eq

1051: & &\frac{\Gamma(D_{s1} \to D_s \gamma)} 

1052:         {\Gamma(D_{s0}^\ast \to D_s^\ast \gamma)}

1053: = \frac{1}{3} \, 

1054: \biggl(\frac{m_{D_{s1}}^2 - m_{D_s}^2} 

1055:         {m_{D_{s0}^\ast}^2 - m_{D_s^\ast}^2}\biggr)^3

1056: \, \biggl(\frac{m_{D_{s0}^\ast}}{m_{D_{s1}}}\biggr)^3  \simeq 3.80 \,, 

1057: \label{Ds10}\\ 

1058: & &\frac{\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma)} 

1059:         {\Gamma(B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma)}

1060: = \frac{1}{3} \, \biggl(\frac{m_{B_{s1}}^2 - m_{B_s}^2} 

1061:         {m_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2 - m_{B_s^\ast}^2}\biggr)^3

1062: \, \biggl(\frac{m_{B_{s0}^\ast}}{m_{B_{s1}}}\biggr)^3  \simeq 0.74 \,, 

1063: \label{Bs10}

1064: \en 

1065: and

1066: \eq

1067: & &\frac{\Gamma(B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma)}

1068:         {\Gamma(D_{s0}^\ast \to D_s^\ast \gamma)}

1069: = \biggl(\frac{m_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2 - m_{B_s^\ast}^2}

1070:         {m_{D_{s0}^\ast}^2 - m_{D_s^\ast}^2}\biggr)^3

1071: \, \biggl(\frac{m_{D_{s0}^\ast}}{m_{B_{s0}^\ast}}\biggr)^3  \simeq 3.74 \,,

1072: \label{BDs0}\\

1073: & &\frac{\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma)}{\Gamma(D_{s1} \to D_s \gamma)}

1074: = \biggl(\frac{m_{B_{s1}}^2 - m_{B_s}^2}{m_{D_{s1}}^2 - m_{D_s}^2}\biggr)^3

1075: \, \biggl(\frac{m_{D_{s1}}}{m_{B_{s1}}}\biggr)^3 \simeq  0.73 \,. 

1076: \label{BDs1} 

1077: \en 

1078: \sen 

1079: Relation (\ref{Ds10}) is confirmed by the full analysis done 

1080: in our framework and in other theoretical approaches (see compilation 

1081: of the results in Refs.~\cite{Faessler:2007gv,Faessler:2007us}). 

1082: E.g. the relation explains why most of the approaches predict that 

1083: the decay width $\Gamma(D_{s1} \to D_s \gamma)$ is approximately 

1084: $3 - 5$ times larger than $\Gamma(D_{s0}^\ast \to D_s^\ast \gamma)$. 

1085: The other relations (\ref{Bs10})-(\ref{BDs1}) 

1086: help to give predictions for the decay widths of the bottom partners. 

1087: In particular, we arrive at the conclusion that our full predictions 

1088: for $\Gamma(B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma)$ and 

1089: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma)$ -- a few keV -- are well justified. 

1090: 

1091: Now we discuss the ratios of radiative and strong decay modes. 

1092: For both systems, $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$, we predict small ratios: 

1093: \seq  

1094: \eq 

1095: R_{B_{s0}^\ast} &=& \frac{B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma}

1096: {B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi} \simeq 0.05\,, \nonumber\\

1097: R_{B_{s1}} &=& \frac{B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma}

1098: {B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi} \simeq 0.03 \,. 

1099: \en 

1100: \sen 

1101: Note that similar results we also obtained in the charm sector: 

1102: $R_{D_{s0}^\ast} = 0.01$ and $R_{D_{s1}} = 0.05$. 

1103: The predicted ratio $R_{D_{s0}^\ast}$ is consistent with the present 

1104: experimental limit $R_{D_{s0}^\ast} < 0.059$, while the ratio $R_{D_{s1}}$ 

1105: is smaller than the result quoted by the Particle Data Group 

1106: $R_{D_{s1}} =  0.38 \pm 0.05$~\cite{Yao:2006px}. 

1107: We consider this experimental result 

1108: as preliminary, since it is not clear why the ratio for the axial 

1109: state $D_{s1}$ is much larger than for the scalar state $D_{s0}^\ast$. 

1110: At this point more precise data on the strong and radiative 

1111: decays of the $D_{s1}$ meson and their ratio would be very helpful. 

1112: 

1113: Finally, we give the predictions for the other two radiative decay 

1114: modes of $B_{s1}$ mesons --  

1115: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$. 

1116: These decay amplitudes are generated by the anomalous couplings 

1117: of two vectors and one pseudoscalar and one can expect that they 

1118: are suppressed. Moreover, there is an additional mechanism for their 

1119: suppression. The leading diagrams in the 

1120: process $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ are the ones of Figs.6(a) and (b). 

1121: The separate contribution of the diagrams in Figs.6(c)-(f) to the 

1122: corresponding decay width is of order 1\%. The diagrams of Figs.6(a) 

1123: and Figs.6(b) are subtracted from each other 

1124: because of the opposite sign of the anomalous couplings 

1125: $g_{_{K^{\ast \, \pm} \to K^\pm \gamma}} = 0.836$ GeV$^{-1}$ 

1126: and 

1127: $g_{_{K^{\ast \, 0} \to K^0 \gamma}} = -1.267$ GeV$^{-1}$. 

1128: In the case of the 

1129: $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$ decay we only have two diagrams 

1130: contributing to the matrix element. Again, due to the opposite sign of 

1131: the anomalous couplings 

1132: $g_{_{B^{\ast \, \pm} \to B^\pm \gamma}} = 0.5$ GeV$^{-1}$ 

1133: and $g_{_{B^{\ast \, 0} \to B^0 \gamma}} = -1$ GeV$^{-1}$ their total 

1134: contribution is given by the difference of the individual contributions. 

1135: Finally, as a full result we get values of 0.04 to 0.18 keV for

1136: the decay width of $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ 

1137: including a variation

1138: of the model parameter $\Lambda$ from 1 to 2 GeV. The result for the 

1139: decay width of $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$ is stable with respect 

1140: to a variation of  the model parameter $\Lambda$ in the same range and 

1141: is equal to 0.022 keV. 

1142: We also present the result for $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma)$

1143: in terms of the couplings $g_{_{B^{\ast \, \pm} \to B^\pm \gamma}}$ 

1144: and and $g_{_{B^{\ast \, 0} \to B^0 \gamma}}$: 

1145: \eq 

1146: \Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma) = 

1147: [ (g_{_{B^{\ast \, \pm} \to B^\pm \gamma}} 

1148: + g_{_{B^{\ast \, 0} \to B^0 \gamma}}) \times 1 \ {\rm GeV}]^2 

1149: \ 0.088 \ {\rm keV} \,. 

1150: \en 

1151: Recently, these radiative decay widths have also been 

1152: estimated using light-cone QCD sum rules~\cite{Wang:2008bt}: 

1153: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \gamma) = 0.3 - 6.1$ keV and 

1154: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma) = 0.002 - 0.008$ keV. 

1155: The decay width

1156: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma)$ is definitely strongly supressed 

1157: in both approaches. The decay width $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \gamma)$ 

1158: predicted in~\cite{Wang:2008bt} is also smaller in comparison to the other 

1159: two modes $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$

1160: (see Table~\ref{BsEM}).  

1161: 

1162: \newpage 

1163: 

1164: \section{Summary}

1165: 

1166: In this paper we studied the new bottom-strange mesons

1167: $B_{s0}^\ast(5725)$ and $B_{s1}(5778)$ in the hadronic molecule

1168: interpretation, i.e., we considered them as bound states of $BK$ and 

1169: $B^\ast K$ mesons using a phenomenological Lagrangian approach.  

1170: Our approach is based on the compositeness condition 

1171: with $Z=0$ (the renormalization constant of the molecular state equals zero). 

1172: This condition is crucial for weakly bound states. The compositeness

1173: condition is a self-consistent tool to evaluate for a hadronic molecule,

1174: once the mass of the bound state is fixed, its coupling to the intermediate

1175: hadronic state, which in turn feeds the accessible final states.

1176: Once the further hadronic couplings to generate the final states

1177: are known, this approach is fairly model-independent in the results

1178: for the observable decay modes.

1179: Furthermore, the Lagrangian method implied by the compositeness

1180: condition allows a fully Lorentz and gauge-invariant treatment of

1181: the problem. 

1182: 

1183: We calculated the strong $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0$, 

1184: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi^0$ and radiative 

1185: $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$, 

1186: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$, $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$ 

1187: decays. A new impact of the $B K$ and $B^\ast K$ 

1188: molecular structures of the $B_{s0}^\ast(5725)$ and

1189: $B_{s1}(5778)$ mesons is that the presence of $u(d)$ quarks in the

1190: $B^{(\ast)}$ and $K$ meson loops gives rise to direct strong

1191: isospin-violating transitions $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0$ and

1192: $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi^0$ in addition to the decay mechanism

1193: induced by $\eta-\pi^0$ mixing. We showed that the direct transition 

1194: is comparable with the $\eta-\pi^0$ mixing transition. As a consequence, 

1195: the presence of the direct mode makes our predictions larger than

1196: the ones of previous approaches.

1197: In the case of the radiative decays $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast}

1198: \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$, our results are considerably smaller 

1199: than in previous calculations. We also gave predictions for 

1200: the anomalous decays $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ and 

1201: $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^{\ast} \gamma$: their decay widths are 

1202: suppressed in comparison to the leading radiative modes 

1203: $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$. 

1204: 

1205: In series of papers~\cite{Faessler:2007gv}-\cite{Faessler:2007us} 

1206: we already studied in detail strong, electromagnetic and weak decays 

1207: of $D_{s0}^\ast$ and $D_{s1}$ states, as a consequence 

1208: of their possible molecular structure. At present we do not think that 

1209: the structure issue concerning the $D_{s0}^\ast$ and $D_{s1}$ mesons 

1210: is settled yet, in particular because the mass and the narrowness of these 

1211: states cannot be easily explained in the context of the standard $c \bar s$ 

1212: picture~\cite{Rosner:2006vc,Barnes:2003dj}. 

1213: A further direct consequence and analogy of possible hadronic molecules

1214: in the $D_s$ sector is also found in the $B_s$ system. If the $B_{s0}^\ast$ 

1215: and $B_{s1}$ mesons can possibly be experimentally established

1216: near the predicted mass values, then, because of their closeness to the

1217: $BK$ and $BK^\ast$ thresholds, they are clear candidates for hadronic 

1218: molecules. In the present approach we give clear predictions for the possible

1219: strong and radiative decay modes of $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons 

1220: accessible by experiment. Strong experimental deviations from our results 

1221: would discard the molecular interpretation of these states.        

1222: We hope that our results will be useful for future experiments, 

1223: where $B_{s0}^{\ast}$ and $B_{s1}$ could possibly be detected. 

1224: 

1225: \acknowledgments 

1226: 

1227: This work was supported by the DFG under Contract Nos. FA67/31-1 and

1228: GRK683. This research is also part of the EU

1229: Integrated Infrastructure Initiative Hadronphysics project under 

1230: Contract No. RII3-CT-2004-506078 and the President Grant of Russia

1231: ``Scientific Schools''  No. 871.2008.2 

1232: 

1233: \newpage 

1234: 

1235: \appendix\section{Effective couplings for

1236: strong and radiative transitions of $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons.}

1237: 

1238: Here we discuss the calculational technique of the matrix elements of 

1239: strong and radiative transitions of $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons. 

1240: 

1241: As an example for the calculation of diagrams presented in Figs.1-7 

1242: we consider a generic loop integral containing 

1243: a product of $n$ virtual momenta $k_{\mu_1} \cdots 

1244: k_{\mu_n}$, three meson propagators with masses $m_1$, $m_2$ and $m_3$ 

1245: and the correlation function of the molecular state 

1246: ($B_{s0}^\ast$ or $B_{s1}$ meson)

1247: \eq 

1248: I_{\mu_1 \cdots \mu_n}(p,p^\prime) = 

1249: \int\frac{d^4 k}{\pi^2 i} \tilde\Phi(-k^2) \ 

1250: \frac{k_{\mu_1} \cdots 

1251: k_{\mu_n}}{(m_1^2 - (k+p)^2) (m_2^2 - (k+p^\prime)^2) (m_3^2 - k^2)}\; . 

1252: \en 

1253: The three main ingredients are

1254: \begin{itemize}

1255: \item  use of the Laplace transform of the vertex function 

1256: $$

1257: \tilde \Phi(-z)=\int\limits_0^\infty\! ds\, \tilde \Phi_L(s)\, e^{sz}\;, 

1258: $$ 

1259: which is useful to proceed with vertex functions of any functional form, 

1260: \vspace{-0.2cm}

1261: \item the  $\alpha$-transform of the denominator

1262: $$

1263: \frac{1}{m_i^2-k_i^2}=\int\limits_0^\infty\! d\alpha \,  

1264: e^{-\alpha (m_i^2-k_i^2)}\; , 

1265: $$

1266: \vspace{-0.2cm}

1267: \item the differential representation of the numerator

1268: $$

1269: k_{\mu_i} \, e^{kR}=

1270: \frac{\partial}{\partial R^{\mu_i}} e^{kR}\; ,

1271: $$ 

1272: where $R$ is a linear combination of the external momenta. 

1273: \end{itemize} 

1274: The calculation  of the transition form factors amounts to a one-loop

1275: integration. Integration over the loop momentum is done analytically.

1276: One ends up with the integrals over $\alpha$ Feynman parameters 

1277: which are not difficult to evaluate 

1278: numerically. All calculations are done by using computer programs written 

1279: in FORM~\cite{Vermaseren:2000nd} and in FORTRAN for numerical 

1280: evaluations. 

1281: Also, for transparency we give explicit expressions for the leading 

1282: contributions to the effective couplings defining the structure 

1283: of the matrix elements of strong and radiative decays of 

1284: $B_{s0}^\ast$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons. 

1285: 

1286: \subsection{Decay $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s \pi^0$.}

1287: 

1288: The leading contribution to the coupling constant $G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}$ 

1289: coming from the diagrams in Figs.2(a) and 2(b) is defined by 

1290: \eq 

1291: G_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi} = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2} \

1292: g_{B_{s0}^\ast} \ g_{K^\ast K \pi} \ g_{B_s B K^\ast} \ 

1293: I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi} \,. 

1294: \en 

1295: Here $I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}$ is the structure integral 

1296: \eq 

1297: I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi} &=& \sum\limits_{i=1}^5 I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}^i 

1298: \,, \nonumber\\

1299: I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}^1 &=& 

1300: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1301: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^2} \, 

1302: \exp(A_1) \,  N_1 \,, \nonumber\\ 

1303: I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}^2 &=& 

1304: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1305: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2}{\Delta_2^2} \, 

1306: \exp(A_2) \,  N_2 \,, \nonumber\\

1307: I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}^3 &=& 

1308: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1309: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2}{\Delta_3^2} \, 

1310: \exp(A_3) \,  N_3 \,, \\

1311: I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}^4 &=& 

1312: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1313: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2}{\Delta_4^2} \, 

1314: \exp(A_4) \,  N_4 \,, \nonumber\\

1315: I_{B_{s0}^\ast B_s \pi}^5 &=& 

1316: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1317: \frac{d\alpha_1}{\Delta_5^2} \, 

1318: \exp(A_5) \,  N_5 \,, \nonumber 

1319: \en 

1320: where we introduce the set of notations: 

1321: \eq 

1322: \Delta_1 = 1 + \alpha_{123}\,, \hspace*{.25cm}   

1323: \Delta_2 = \Delta_3 = \Delta_4 = 1 + \alpha_{12}\,, \hspace*{.25cm}   

1324: \Delta_5 = 1 + \alpha_1\,, \nonumber 

1325: \en 

1326: \eq 

1327: A_1 &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_B^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \alpha_3 \mu_K^2 

1328: - \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 w_{BK} w_{KB} + \frac{1}{\Delta_1} 

1329: \biggl(\mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 \alpha_{1KB} \alpha_{3BK} 

1330: + \mu_{B_s}^2 \alpha_{1KB} \alpha_2 

1331: + \mu_\pi^2 \alpha_{3BK} \alpha_2 \biggr) \,,\nonumber\\ 

1332: A_2 &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_B^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 

1333: - \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 w_{BK} w_{KB} + \frac{1}{\Delta_2} 

1334: \biggl(\mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 \alpha_{1KB} w_{BK} 

1335: + \mu_{B_s}^2 \alpha_{1KB} \alpha_2 

1336: + \mu_\pi^2 w_{BK} \alpha_2 \biggr) \,,\nonumber\\

1337: A_3 &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_K^2 

1338: - \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 w_{BK} w_{KB} + \frac{1}{\Delta_3} 

1339: \biggl(\mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 \alpha_{2BK} w_{KB}  

1340: + \mu_{B_s}^2 w_{KB} \alpha_1 

1341: + \mu_\pi^2 \alpha_{2BK} \alpha_1 \biggr) \,, \nonumber \\

1342: A_4 &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_B^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_K^2 

1343: - \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 w_{BK} w_{KB} + \frac{1}{\Delta_4} 

1344: \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 \alpha_{1KB} \alpha_{2BK}  \,,\nonumber\\

1345: A_5 &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_{K^\ast}^2 

1346: - \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 w_{BK} w_{KB} + \frac{1}{\Delta_5} 

1347: \biggl( \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 w_{BK} w_{KB}   

1348: + \mu_{B_s}^2 w_{KB} \alpha_1 + \mu_\pi^2 w_{BK}\alpha_1 \biggr) 

1349: \,,\nonumber 

1350: \en 

1351: \eq 

1352: N_1 &=& \mu_B^2 + \mu_K - 2 \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 + \mu_{B_s}^2 

1353: +  \mu_\pi^2 -  \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 

1354: + \frac{\mu_K^2 - \mu_\pi^2}{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2} 

1355: (\mu_{B_s}^2 - \mu_B^2) \,,\nonumber\\ 

1356: N_2 &=& 1 + \frac{\mu_{B_s}^2 - \mu_B^2}{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2} \,,\nonumber\\ 

1357: N_3 &=& - 1 + \frac{\mu_{K}^2 - \mu_\pi^2}{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2} \,,

1358: \nonumber\\ 

1359: N_4 &=& 1\,, \nonumber\\

1360: N_5 &=& - \frac{1}{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2}\,,  \nonumber

1361: \en 

1362: \eq 

1363: w_{M_1M_2} = \frac{m_{M_1}  m_{M_2}}{m_{M_1} + m_{M_2}}\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1364: \alpha_{123} = \alpha_1 + \alpha_2 + \alpha_3\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1365: \alpha_{12} = \alpha_1 + \alpha_2\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1366: \alpha_{iM_1M_2} = \alpha_i + w_{M_1M_2}\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1367: \mu_M = \frac{m_M}{\Lambda}\,.  \nonumber 

1368: \en 

1369: 

1370: \subsection{Decay $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast \pi^0$.}

1371: 

1372: The leading contributions to the coupling constants 

1373: $G_{B_{s1}^\ast B_s^\ast \pi}$ and 

1374: $F_{B_{s1}^\ast B_s^\ast \pi}$

1375: coming from the diagrams in Figs.3(a) and 3(b) are defined by 

1376: \eq 

1377: G_{B_{s1}^\ast B_s^\ast \pi} 

1378: = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2} \

1379: g_{B_{s1}} g_{K^\ast K \pi} g_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast} 

1380: I^G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} 

1381: \en 

1382: and 

1383: \eq 

1384: F_{B_{s1}^\ast B_s^\ast \pi} 

1385: = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2} \

1386: g_{B_{s1}} g_{K^\ast K \pi} g_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast} 

1387: I^F_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} \,. 

1388: \en 

1389: Here $I^G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ and $I^F_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi}$ 

1390: are the structure integrals 

1391: \eq 

1392: I^G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} 

1393: &=& \sum\limits_{i=1}^5 I^{G,i}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} \,, 

1394: \nonumber\\

1395: I^{G,1}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

1396: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1397: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^2} \, 

1398: \exp(A_1^G) \,  N_1^G \,, \nonumber\\ 

1399: I^{G,2}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

1400: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1401: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2}{\Delta_2^2} \, 

1402: \exp(A_2^G) \,  N_2^G \,, \nonumber\\

1403: I^{G,3}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

1404: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1405: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2}{\Delta_3^2} \, 

1406: \exp(A_3^G) \,  N_3^G \,, \\ 

1407: I^{G,4}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

1408: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1409: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2}{\Delta_4^2} \, 

1410: \exp(A_4^G) \,  N_4^G \,, \nonumber\\

1411: I^{G,4}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

1412: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1413: \frac{d\alpha_1}{\Delta_5^2} \, 

1414: \exp(A_5^G) \,  N_5^G \,, \nonumber 

1415: \en 

1416: and 

1417: \eq 

1418: I^F_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} 

1419: &=& \sum\limits_{i=1}^2 I^{F.i}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} \,, \nonumber\\

1420: I^{F,1}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

1421: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1422: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^2} \, 

1423: \exp(A_1^F) \,  N_1^F \,, \\ 

1424: I^{F,2}_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \pi} &=& 

1425: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1426: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2}{\Delta_2^2} \, 

1427: \exp(A_2^F) \,  N_2^F \,, \nonumber 

1428: \en 

1429: where we introduce the set of notations: 

1430: \eq 

1431: A_1^G &=& A_1^F = - \alpha_1 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_K^2 

1432: - \alpha_3 \mu_{B^\ast}^2 

1433: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast} \frac{1}{\Delta_1} 

1434: \biggl(\mu_{D_{s1}}^2 \alpha_{1KB^\ast} \alpha_{3B^\ast K} 

1435: + \mu_{B_s}^2 \alpha_{1KB^\ast} \alpha_2 

1436: + \mu_\pi^2 \alpha_{3B^\ast K} \alpha_2 \biggr) \,,\nonumber\\ 

1437: A_2^G &=& A_2^F = - \alpha_1 \mu_B^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 

1438: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast } + \frac{1}{\Delta_2} 

1439: \biggl(\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 \alpha_{1KB^\ast } w_{B^\ast K} 

1440: + \mu_{B_s}^2 \alpha_{1KB^\ast} \alpha_2 

1441: + \mu_\pi^2 w_{B^\ast K} \alpha_2 \biggr) \,,\nonumber\\

1442: A_3^G &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \alpha_1 \mu_K^2 

1443: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast } + \frac{1}{\Delta_3} 

1444: \biggl(\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 \alpha_{2B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast }  

1445: + \mu_{B_s}^2 w_{KB^\ast} \alpha_1 

1446: + \mu_\pi^2 \alpha_{2B^\ast K} \alpha_1 \biggr) \,, \nonumber\\

1447: A_4^G &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_B^2 - \alpha_1 \mu_K^2 

1448: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast} + \frac{1}{\Delta_4} 

1449: \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 \alpha_{1KB^\ast} \alpha_{2B^\ast K}  \,,\nonumber\\

1450: A_5^G &=& - \alpha_1 \mu_{K^\ast}^2 

1451: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast} + \frac{1}{\Delta_5} 

1452: \biggl( 

1453: \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast} 

1454: + \mu_{B_s}^2 w_{KB^\ast } \alpha_1 + \mu_\pi^2 w_{B^\ast K}\alpha_1 \biggr) 

1455: \,,\nonumber 

1456: \en 

1457: \eq 

1458: N_1^G &=& 2 \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 - \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2 - \mu_{B^\ast}^2 

1459: + \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \mu_K^2 + \frac{\mu_K^2}{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2} 

1460: (  \mu_{B^\ast}^2 - \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2 ) - 

1461: \frac{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \mu_K^2 }

1462: { 2 \mu_{B^\ast}^2 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 \Delta_1} 

1463: (\mu_{B^\ast}^2 +  \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2) \,, 

1464: \nonumber\\ 

1465: N_2^G &=& \frac{\mu_{B_s^\ast}^2 +  \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \mu_{B^\ast}^2} 

1466: { \mu_{K^\ast}^2}  

1467: - \frac{\mu_{B^\ast}^2 +  \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 - \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2} 

1468: {2 \mu_{B^\ast}^2 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 \Delta_2} \,,\nonumber\\ 

1469: N_3^G &=& - 1 + \frac{1}{2 \mu_{B^{\ast}}^2 \Delta_3} \,, \nonumber\\ 

1470: N_4^G &=& \frac{ \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 -  \mu_K^2 }{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2 }\,, 

1471: \nonumber\\

1472: N_5^G &=& \frac{1}{\mu_{K^{\ast}}^2}\,,  \nonumber\\

1473: N_1^F &=& \frac{\mu_{B_{s1}} \mu_{B_s^\ast}}{\Delta_1} 

1474: \biggl( 4 (\alpha_{13} + w_{KB^\ast} ) 

1475: + \frac{\alpha_3}{\Delta_1} \frac{\alpha_{13} + w_{KB^\ast}} 

1476: {\mu_{B^\ast}^2  \mu_{K^\ast}^2} 

1477: (\mu_{B^\ast}^2 + \mu_{K^\ast}^2 - \mu_{B^\ast_s}^2) 

1478: (\mu_{K^\ast}^2 - \mu_K^2)\nonumber\\

1479: &-& \alpha_3 \frac{(\mu_{K^\ast}^2 + \mu_K^2)

1480: (\mu_{B^\ast_s}^2 - \mu_{K^\ast}^2) + \mu_{B^\ast}^2 

1481: (3 \mu_{K^\ast}^2 - \mu_K^2) } 

1482: {\mu_{B^{\ast}}^2 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2} \biggr) 

1483: \nonumber\\ 

1484: N_2^F &=& - \frac{\alpha_3}{\Delta_2}  \ 

1485: \frac{\mu_{B_{s1}} \mu_{B_s^\ast}}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2 \mu_{K^{\ast}}^2}  

1486: (\mu_{B^\ast}^2 + \mu_{K^\ast}^2 - \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2)

1487: \biggl( 1 - \frac{\alpha_{13} + w_{KB^\ast}} 

1488: {\Delta_2}  \biggr) \,. \nonumber

1489: \en 

1490: 

1491: \subsection{Decay $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma$.}

1492: 

1493: The leading contribution to the coupling constant 

1494: $G_{B_{s0} B_s^\ast \gamma}$

1495: comes from the diagram in Fig.4(a) and is defined by 

1496: \eq

1497: G_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^{\ast} \gamma} = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 \, \Lambda^2} \,

1498: g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}} g_{_{B_s^\ast BK}} \, 

1499: I_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^{\ast} \gamma} \,,

1500: \en

1501: where $I_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^{\ast} \gamma}$ is the structure integral 

1502: \eq

1503: I_{B_{s0}^{\ast} B_s^{\ast} \gamma} =  

1504: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1505: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^4} \, \exp(B_1) 

1506: \ \alpha_{1BK} \ \alpha_{3KB} \,, 

1507: \en

1508: where

1509: \eq

1510: B_1 = - \alpha_{12} \mu_K^2 - \alpha_3 \mu_B^2  

1511: - \mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 w_{BK} w_{KB} + \frac{\alpha_{3KB}}{\Delta_1} 

1512: (\mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 \alpha_{1BK} + \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2 \alpha_2 ) \,. 

1513: \en

1514: 

1515: 

1516: \subsection{Decay $B_{s1}^\ast \to B_s \gamma$.}

1517: 

1518: The leading contribution to the coupling constant 

1519: $G_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma}$ is due to

1520: the diagram in Fig.5(a) and is defined by 

1521: \eq

1522: G_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma} = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 \, \Lambda^2} \,

1523: g_{_{B_{s1}}} g_{_{B_s B^\ast K}} \, 

1524: I_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma} \,,

1525: \en

1526: where $I_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma}$ is the structure integral 

1527: \eq

1528: I_{B_{s1} B_s \gamma} =  

1529: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1530: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^3} \, \exp(B_2) \ 

1531: \alpha_{3KB^\ast} \ \biggl( 4 - \frac{2\alpha_1}{\Delta_1} 

1532: \biggl(1 + \frac{\mu_{D_s}^2 - \mu_K^2}{\mu_{D_s^\ast}^2} \biggr) 

1533: \biggr) 

1534: \,, 

1535: \en

1536: where

1537: \eq

1538: B_2 = - \alpha_{12} \mu_K^2 - \alpha_3 \mu_{B^\ast}^2 

1539: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast } 

1540: + \frac{\alpha_{3KB^\ast}}{\Delta_1} 

1541: (\mu_{B_{s0}^{\ast}}^2 \alpha_{1B^\ast K} + \mu_{B_s}^2 \alpha_2 ) \,. 

1542: \en

1543: 

1544: \subsection{Decay $B_{s1}^\ast \to B_s^\ast \gamma$.}

1545: 

1546: The leading contributions to the coupling constant 

1547: $G_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \gamma}$, 

1548: $F_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \gamma}$ and

1549: $H_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \gamma}$ coming from the diagrams 

1550: in Figs.6(a) and (b) are defined by 

1551: \eq 

1552: R_{B_{s1} B_s^\ast \gamma} = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 \, \Lambda^2} \ 

1553: g_{_{B_s^\ast B^\ast K^\ast}} g_{_{B_{s1}}} \  

1554: (g_{_{K^{\ast \pm} K^\pm \gamma}} + g_{_{K^{\ast 0} K^0 \gamma}} ) 

1555: \ I_R \,, 

1556: \en

1557: where $R = G, F$ or $H$ and $I_R$ are the structure integrals given by  

1558: \eq

1559: I_G &=&  

1560: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1561: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^3} \, \exp(B_3) \ L_1 \,, 

1562: \nonumber\\

1563: I_F &=&  

1564: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1565: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^2} \, \exp(B_3) \ L_2 \,, 

1566: \\ 

1567: I_H &=&  

1568: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty 

1569: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta_1^2} \, \exp(B_3) \ L_3 \,, 

1570: \nonumber 

1571: \en 

1572: \eq

1573: B_3 = - \alpha_1 \mu_K^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_{K^\ast}^2 - \alpha_3 \mu_{B^\ast}^2 

1574: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast } 

1575: + \frac{\alpha_{3KB^\ast}}{\Delta_1} 

1576: (\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 \alpha_{1B^\ast K} + \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2 \alpha_2 ) \,, 

1577: \en 

1578: and 

1579: \eq 

1580: L_1 &=& - \frac{1}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2 (\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 

1581: - \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2)} \biggl( (1 - \beta_{12}) 

1582: (\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 \beta_1 + \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2 (\beta_1 + \beta_2) )  

1583: + 3 (\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 - \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2) + \frac{3}{\Delta_1} \biggr) 

1584: \,,\nonumber\\ 

1585: L_2 &=& - \biggl(2 + \frac{1}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2 \Delta_1} \biggr) (1 - \beta_1)  

1586: + \beta_2 \biggl( 3 + \frac{5}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2 \Delta_1} \biggr) 

1587: - \beta_1 \beta_2 \biggl( 1 - \frac{\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 

1588: + \mu_{B^\ast}^2}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2} + \frac{4}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2 \Delta_1}

1589: \biggr) \nonumber\\

1590: &-&\beta_2^2 \biggl( 1 - 2 \frac{\mu_{B_s^\ast}^2}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2} 

1591: + \frac{4}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2 \Delta_1}\biggr) 

1592: - \beta_2^3 (3 - 4 \beta_2) \frac{\mu_{B_s^\ast}^2}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2}

1593: -2\beta_1 \beta_2^2 (1 - \beta_2) 

1594: \frac{\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 + 2\mu_{B_s^\ast}^2}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2} \nonumber\\

1595: &-&\beta_1^2\beta_2 (1 - \beta_2) 

1596: \frac{2\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 + \mu_{B_s^\ast}^2}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2} 

1597: + \beta_1^3 \beta_2 \frac{\mu_{2 B_{s1}}^2}{\mu_{B^\ast}^2} 

1598: \,,\nonumber\\ 

1599: L_3 &=& - \beta_1 (1 - \beta_{12})\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1600: \beta_1 \ = \ \frac{\alpha_{1B^\ast K}}{\Delta_1}\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1601: \beta_2 \ = \ \frac{\alpha_2}{\Delta_1}\,, \hspace*{.25cm} 

1602: \beta_{12} = \beta_1 + \beta_2 \,. 

1603: \en 

1604: 

1605: \subsection{Decay $B_{s1}^\ast \to B_{s0}^\ast \gamma$.}

1606: 

1607: The contribution to the coupling constant 

1608: $G_{B_{s1} B_{s0}^\ast \gamma}$, 

1609: coming from the diagrams 

1610: in Figs.7(a,b) is defined by 

1611: \eq 

1612: G_{B_{s1} B_{s0}^\ast \gamma} = \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 \, \Lambda^2} \,

1613: g_{_{B_{s1}}} g_{_{B_{s0}^\ast}} (g_{_{B^{\ast \pm} B^\pm \gamma}} 

1614: + g_{_{B^{\ast 0} B^0 \gamma}} ) \ I_{B_{s1} B_{s0}^\ast \gamma} \,, 

1615: \en

1616: where $I_{B_{s1} B_{s0}^\ast \gamma}$ is the structure integral  

1617: given by  

1618: \eq

1619: I_{B_{s1} B_{s0}^\ast \gamma} &=& 

1620: \int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty\int\limits_0^\infty  

1621: \frac{d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3}{\Delta^3} \, \exp(B_4) 

1622: (\alpha_3 + w_{B^\ast K} + w_{BK}) \,, \nonumber\\

1623: B_4 &=&  - \alpha_1 \mu_{B^\ast}^2 - \alpha_2 \mu_B^2 

1624: - \alpha_3 \mu_K^2 

1625: - \mu_{B_{s1}}^2 w_{B^\ast K} w_{KB^\ast } 

1626: - \mu_{B_{s0}^\ast }^2 w_{BK} w_{KB} \nonumber\\

1627: &+& \frac{\alpha_3 + w_{B^\ast K} + w_{BK}}{\Delta} 

1628: (\mu_{B_{s1}}^2 \alpha_{1KB^\ast } + \mu_{B_{s0}^\ast}^2 \alpha_{2KB} ) \,, 

1629: \nonumber\\  

1630: \Delta&=& 2 + \alpha_{123} \,. 

1631: \en 

1632: 

1633: \newpage 

1634:               

1635: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1636: %\cite{Rosner:2006vc} 

1637: \bibitem{Rosner:2006vc}

1638:   J.~L.~Rosner,

1639:   %``Effects of S-wave thresholds,''

1640:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 076006 (2006)

1641:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0608102].

1642:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0608102;%%

1643: %\cite{Barnes:2003dj}

1644: \bibitem{Barnes:2003dj}

1645:   T.~Barnes, F.~E.~Close and H.~J.~Lipkin,

1646:   %``Implications of a D K molecule at 2.32-GeV,''

1647:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054006 (2003)

1648:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0305025].

1649:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305025;%%

1650: %\cite{Faessler:2007gv} 

1651: \bibitem{Faessler:2007gv}

1652:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and Y.~L.~Ma,

1653:   %``Strong and radiative decays of the Ds0\ast (2317) meson 

1654:   %in the DK-molecule picture,''

1655:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 76}, 014005 (2007)

1656:   [arXiv:0705.0254 [hep-ph]].

1657:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,014005;%% 

1658: %\cite{Faessler:2007cu}

1659: \bibitem{Faessler:2007cu}

1660:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, S.~Kovalenko and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

1661:   %``D/s0*(2317) and D/s1(2460) mesons in two-body B-meson decays,''

1662:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 76}, 014003 (2007)

1663:   [arXiv:0705.0892 [hep-ph]].

1664:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,014003;%%

1665: %\cite{Faessler:2007us}

1666: \bibitem{Faessler:2007us}

1667:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and Y.~L.~Ma,

1668:   %``D* K molecular structure of the Ds1(2460) meson,'' 

1669:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 76}, 114008 (2007)  

1670:   [arXiv:0709.3946 [hep-ph]]. 

1671:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,114008;%%

1672: %\cite{Branz:2007xp}

1673: \bibitem{Branz:2007xp}

1674:   T.~Branz, T.~Gutsche and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

1675:   %``f0(980) meson as a K bar K molecule in a phenomenological Lagrangian

1676:   %approach,''

1677:   arXiv:0712.0354 [hep-ph].

1678:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0712.0354;%%

1679: %\cite{Dong:2007px}

1680: \bibitem{Dong:2007px}

1681:   Y.~B.~Dong, A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, 

1682:   in preparation. 

1683: %\cite{Weinberg:1962hj}\

1684: \bibitem{Weinberg:1962hj}

1685:   S.~Weinberg,

1686:   %``Elementary Particle Theory Of Composite Particles,''

1687:   Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 130}, 776 (1963);

1688:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,130,776;%%

1689: %\cite{Salam:1962ap}

1690: %\bibitem{Salam:1962ap}

1691:   A.~Salam,

1692:   %``Lagrangian Theory Of Composite Particles,''

1693:   Nuovo Cim.\  {\bf 25}, 224 (1962);

1694:   %%CITATION = NUCIA,25,224;%%

1695: %\cite{Hayashi:1967hk}

1696: %\bibitem{Hayashi:1967hk} 

1697:   K.~Hayashi, M.~Hirayama, T.~Muta, N.~Seto and T.~Shirafuji,

1698:   Fortsch.\ Phys.\ {\bf 15}, 625 (1967).

1699:   %%CITATION = FPYKA,15,625;%%

1700: %\cite{Efimov:1993ei}

1701: \bibitem{Efimov:1993ei}

1702:   G.~V.~Efimov and M.~A.~Ivanov,

1703:   {\it The Quark Confinement Model of Hadrons},

1704:   (IOP Publishing, Bristol $\&$ Philadelphia, 1993).

1705: %\cite{Anikin:1995cf}

1706: \bibitem{Anikin:1995cf}

1707:   I.~V.~Anikin, M.~A.~Ivanov, N.~B.~Kulimanova and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

1708:   %``The Extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with separable interaction:

1709:   %Low-energy pion physics and pion nucleon form-factor,''

1710:   Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 65}, 681 (1995);

1711:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C65,681;%%

1712: %\cite{Ivanov:1996pz}

1713: %\bibitem{Ivanov:1996pz}

1714:   M.~A.~Ivanov, M.~P.~Locher and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

1715:   %``Electromagnetic form factors of nucleons in a relativistic

1716:   %three-quark model,''

1717:   Few Body Syst.\  {\bf 21}, 131 (1996);

1718: %\cite{Ivanov:1996fj}

1719: %\bibitem{Ivanov:1996fj}

1720:   M.~A.~Ivanov, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, J.~G.~K\"orner and P.~Kroll,

1721:   %``Heavy baryon transitions in

1722:   %a relativistic three-quark model,''

1723:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 348 (1997)

1724:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9612463];

1725:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612463;%%

1726: %\cite{Ivanov:1999bk}

1727: %\bibitem{Ivanov:1999bk}

1728:   M.~A.~Ivanov, J.~G.~K\"orner, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and A.~G.~Rusetsky,

1729:   %``Strong and radiative decays of heavy flavored baryons,''

1730:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 094002 (1999)

1731:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9904421];

1732:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904421;%%

1733: %\cite{Faessler:2003yf}

1734: %\bibitem{Faessler:2003yf}

1735:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, M.~A.~Ivanov, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij and P.~Wang,

1736:   %``Pion and sigma meson properties in a relativistic quark model,''

1737:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 68}, 014011 (2003)

1738:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0304031];

1739:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,014011;%%

1740: %\cite{Faessler:2006ft}

1741: %\bibitem{Faessler:2006ft}

1742:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, M.~A.~Ivanov, J.~G.~Korner,

1743:   V.~E.~Lyubovitskij, D.~Nicmorus and K.~Pumsa-ard,

1744:   %``Magnetic moments of heavy baryons in the relativistic

1745:   %three-quark model,''

1746:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 094013 (2006)

1747:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0602193];

1748:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602193;%%

1749: %\cite{Faessler:2006ky}

1750: %\bibitem{Faessler:2006ky}

1751:   A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche, B.~R.~Holstein, V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

1752:   D.~Nicmorus and K.~Pumsa-ard,

1753:   %``Light baryon magnetic moments and N --> Delta gamma

1754:   %transition in a Lorentz covariant chiral quark approach,''

1755:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 074010 (2006)

1756:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0608015]. 

1757:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0608015;%%

1758: %\cite{Baru:2003qq}

1759: \bibitem{Baru:2003qq}

1760: V.~Baru, J.~Haidenbauer, C.~Hanhart, Yu.~Kalashnikova and A.~E.~Kudryavtsev,

1761:   %``Evidence that the a0(980) and f0(980) are not elementary particles,''

1762:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 586} (2004) 53

1763:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0308129]; 

1764:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,074015;%%

1765: %\cite{Hanhart:2007wa}

1766: %\bibitem{Hanhart:2007wa}

1767:   C.~Hanhart, Yu.~S.~Kalashnikova, A.~E.~Kudryavtsev and A.~V.~Nefediev,

1768:   %``Two-photon decays of hadronic molecules,''

1769:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 75}, 074015 (2007)

1770:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0701214]. 

1771: %\cite{Godfrey:1986wj}

1772: \bibitem{Godfrey:1986wj}

1773:   S.~Godfrey and R.~Kokoski,

1774:   %``The Properties of p Wave Mesons with One Heavy Quark,''

1775:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 43}, 1679 (1991).

1776:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D43,1679;%%

1777: %\cite{Eichten:1993ub}

1778: \bibitem{Eichten:1993ub}

1779:   E.~J.~Eichten, C.~T.~Hill and C.~Quigg,

1780:   %``Properties Of Orbitally Excited Heavy - Light Mesons,''

1781:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 71}, 4116 (1993)

1782:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9308337].

1783:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,71,4116;%% 

1784: %\cite{Falk:1995th}

1785: \bibitem{Falk:1995th}

1786:   A.~F.~Falk and T.~Mehen,

1787:   %``Excited heavy mesons beyond leading order in 

1788:   %the heavy quark expansion,''

1789:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 53}, 231 (1996)

1790:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9507311].

1791:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D53,231;%%

1792: %\cite{Ebert:1997nk}

1793: \bibitem{Ebert:1997nk}

1794:   D.~Ebert, V.~O.~Galkin and R.~N.~Faustov,

1795:   %``Mass spectrum of orbitally and radially excited 

1796:   %heavy-light mesons in  the relativistic quark model,''

1797:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 57}, 5663 (1998)

1798:   [Erratum-ibid.\  D {\bf 59}, 019902 (1998)]

1799:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9712318].

1800:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D57,5663;%%

1801: %\cite{Bardeen:2003kt}

1802: \bibitem{Bardeen:2003kt}

1803:   W.~A.~Bardeen, E.~J.~Eichten and C.~T.~Hill,

1804:   %``Chiral multiplets of heavy-light mesons,''

1805:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 68} (2003) 054024

1806:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0305049].

1807:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,054024;%%

1808: %\cite{Matsuki:2004db} 

1809: \bibitem{Matsuki:2004db}

1810:   T.~Matsuki, K.~Mawatari, T.~Morii and K.~Sudoh,

1811:   %``0+ and 1+ states of B and B/s mesons,''

1812:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 606} (2005) 329

1813:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0411034]; 

1814:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B606,329;%%

1815: %\cite{Matsuki:1997da}

1816: %\bibitem{Matsuki:1997da}

1817:   T.~Matsuki and T.~Morii,

1818:   %``Spectroscopy of heavy mesons expanded in 1/m(Q),''

1819:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 56}, 5646 (1997)

1820:   [Austral.\ J.\ Phys.\  {\bf 50}, 163 (1997)]

1821:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9702366].

1822:   %%CITATION = AUJPA,50,163;%%

1823: %\cite{Kolomeitsev:2003ac}

1824: \bibitem{Kolomeitsev:2003ac}

1825:   E.~E.~Kolomeitsev and M.~F.~M.~Lutz,

1826:   %``On heavy-light meson resonances and chiral symmetry,''

1827:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 582}, 39 (2004)

1828:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0307133].

1829:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B582,39;%% 

1830: %\cite{Matsuki:2005vs}

1831: \bibitem{Matsuki:2005vs}

1832:   T.~Matsuki, T.~Morii and K.~Sudoh,

1833:   %``Solution to trouble of D/sJ particles,''

1834:   AIP Conf.\ Proc.\  {\bf 814}, 533 (2006)

1835:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0510269].

1836:   %%CITATION = APCPC,814,533;%%

1837: %\cite{Guo:2006fu}

1838: \bibitem{Guo:2006fu}

1839:   F.~K.~Guo, P.~N.~Shen, H.~C.~Chiang and R.~G.~Ping,

1840:   %``Dynamically generated 0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary

1841:   %approach,''

1842:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 641} (2006) 278

1843:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0603072].

1844:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B641,278;%% 

1845: %\cite{Guo:2006rp}

1846: \bibitem{Guo:2006rp}

1847:   F.~K.~Guo, P.~N.~Shen and H.~C.~Chiang,

1848:   %``Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons,''

1849:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 647} (2007) 133

1850:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0610008].

1851:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B647,133;%%

1852: %\cite{Colangelo:2006kx}

1853: \bibitem{Colangelo:2006kx}

1854:   P.~Colangelo, F.~De Fazio and R.~Ferrandes,

1855:   %``Two topics for a discussion on the b anti-s 

1856:   %and b anti-q systems,''

1857:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 163}, 177 (2007)

1858:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0609072].

1859:   %%CITATION = NUPHZ,163,177;%%

1860: %\cite{Vijande:2007ke} 

1861: \bibitem{Vijande:2007ke}

1862:   J.~Vijande, A.~Valcarce and F.~Fernandez,

1863:   %``$B$ meson spectroscopy,''

1864:   arXiv:0711.2359 [hep-ph].

1865:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0711.2359;%% 

1866: %\cite{Wang:2007tu}

1867: \bibitem{Wang:2007tu}

1868:   Z.~G.~Wang,

1869:   %``Reanalysis of the (0^+,1^+) states B_{s0}^* and B_{s1} with QCD sum

1870:   %rules,''

1871:   arXiv:0712.0118 [hep-ph].

1872:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0712.0118;%% 

1873: %\cite{Guo:2007up}

1874: \bibitem{Guo:2007up}

1875:   F.~K.~Guo, S.~Krewald and U.~G.~Meissner,

1876:   %``Hadronic-loop induced mass shifts in scalar heavy-light mesons,''

1877:   arXiv:0712.2953 [hep-ph].

1878:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0712.2953;%% 

1879: %\cite{Wang:2008tm}

1880: \bibitem{Wang:2008tm}

1881:   Z.~G.~Wang,

1882:   %``Structure of the $(0^+,1^+)$ mesons $B_{s0}$ and $B_{s1}$, and the strong

1883:   %coupling constant $g_{B_{s0} B K}$ and $g_{B_{s1} B^* K}$,''

1884:   arXiv:0801.0267 [hep-ph].

1885:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0801.0267;%% 

1886: %\cite{Wang:2008ny}

1887: \bibitem{Wang:2008ny}

1888:   Z.~G.~Wang,

1889:   %``Strong decays $B_{s0} \to B_s \pi$ and $B_{s1} \to B^*_s \pi $ with

1890:   %light-cone QCD sum rules,''

1891:   arXiv:0801.1932 [hep-ph].

1892:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0801.1932;%% 

1893: %\cite{Wang:2008bt}

1894: \bibitem{Wang:2008bt}

1895:   Z.~G.~Wang,

1896:   %``Radiative decays of the strange-bottomed $(0^+,1^+)$ mesons,''

1897:   arXiv:0803.1223 [hep-ph].

1898:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0803.1222;%% 

1899: %\cite{Gasser:1984gg}

1900: \bibitem{Gasser:1984gg}

1901:   J.~Gasser and H.~Leutwyler,

1902:   %``Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions 

1903:   %In The Mass Of The Strange Quark,''

1904:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 250}, 465 (1985).

1905:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B250,465;%%

1906: %\cite{Cho:1994zu}

1907: \bibitem{Cho:1994zu}

1908:   P.~L.~Cho and M.~B.~Wise,

1909:   %``Comment On D(S)* $\to$ D(S) Pi0 Decay,''

1910:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 49}, 6228 (1994)

1911:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9401301].

1912:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,6228;%%

1913: %\cite{Colangelo:2003vg}

1914: \bibitem{Colangelo:2003vg}

1915:   P.~Colangelo and F.~De Fazio,

1916:   %``Understanding D/sJ(2317),''

1917:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 570}, 180 (2003)

1918:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0305140].

1919:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305140;%% 

1920: %\cite{Mehen:2004uj}

1921: \bibitem{Mehen:2004uj}

1922:   T.~Mehen and R.~P.~Springer,

1923:   %``Heavy-quark symmetry and the electromagnetic decays 

1924:   %of excited charmed strange mesons,''

1925:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 70}, 074014 (2004)

1926:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0407181].

1927:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,074014;%%

1928: %\cite{Yao:2006px}

1929: \bibitem{Yao:2006px}

1930:   W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.}  [Particle Data Group],

1931:   %``Review of particle physics,''

1932:   J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33} (2006) 1.

1933:   %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%

1934: %\cite{Mandelstam:1962mi} 

1935: \bibitem{Mandelstam:1962mi}

1936:  S.~Mandelstam,

1937:  %``Quantum Electrodynamics Without Potentials,''

1938:  Annals Phys.\  {\bf 19}, 1 (1962);

1939:  %%CITATION = APNYA,19,1;%%

1940:  %\cite{Terning:1991yt}

1941:  %\bibitem{Terning:1991yt}

1942:  J.~Terning,

1943:  %``Gauging nonlocal Lagrangians,''

1944:  Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 887 (1991).

1945:  %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,887;%% 

1946: %\cite{Dong:2008gb}

1947: \bibitem{Dong:2008gb}

1948:   Y.~Dong, A.~Faessler, T.~Gutsche and V.~E.~Lyubovitskij,

1949:   %``Estimate for the X(3872) to gamma J/psi decay width,''

1950:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 094013 (2008) [arXiv:0802.3610 [hep-ph]]. 

1951:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,094013;%% 

1952: %\cite{Anastassov:2001cw} 

1953: \bibitem{Anastassov:2001cw}

1954:   A.~Anastassov {\it et al.}  [CLEO Collaboration],

1955:   %``First measurement of Gamma(D*+) and precision

1956:   %measurement of m(D*+) - m(D0),''

1957:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 65}, 032003 (2002)

1958:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0108043].

1959:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D65,032003;%% 

1960: %%\cite{Wang:2006id}

1961: \bibitem{Wang:2006id}

1962:   Z.~G.~Wang and S.~L.~Wan,

1963:   %``Analysis of the vertexes D* D/s K, D/s* D K, D0 D/s K

1964:   %and D/s0 D K with the light-cone QCD sum rules,''

1965:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 014017 (2006)

1966:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0606002].

1967:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606002;%%

1968: %\cite{Bracco:2006xf}

1969: \bibitem{Bracco:2006xf}

1970:   M.~E.~Bracco, A.~J.~Cerqueira, M.~Chiapparini, A.~Lozea and M.~Nielsen,

1971:   %``D* D/s K and D/s* D K vertices in a QCD sum rule approach,''

1972:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 641}, 286 (2006)

1973:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0604167].

1974:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0604167;%% 

1975: %\cite{Navarra:2001ju}

1976: \bibitem{Navarra:2001ju}

1977:   F.~S.~Navarra, M.~Nielsen and M.~E.~Bracco,

1978:   %``D* D pi form factor revisited,''

1979:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 65}, 037502 (2002)

1980:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0109188].

1981:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D65,037502;%% 

1982: %\cite{Lin:1999ad}

1983: \bibitem{Lin:1999ad}

1984:   Z.~W.~Lin and C.~M.~Ko,

1985:   %``A model for J/psi absorption in hadronic matter,''

1986:   Phys.\ Rev.\  C {\bf 62}, 034903 (2000)

1987:   [arXiv:nucl-th/9912046]. 

1988:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,C62,034903;%% 

1989: %\cite{Wise:1992hn} 

1990: \bibitem{Wise:1992hn}

1991:   M.~B.~Wise,

1992:   %``Chiral Perturbation Theory For Hadrons Containing A Heavy Quark,''

1993:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 45}, R2188 (1992).

1994:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D45,2188;%%

1995: %\cite{Casalbuoni:1996pg}

1996: \bibitem{Casalbuoni:1996pg}

1997:   R.~Casalbuoni, A.~Deandrea, N.~Di Bartolomeo, 

1998:   R.~Gatto, F.~Feruglio and G.~Nardulli,

1999:   %``Phenomenology Of Heavy Meson Chiral Lagrangians,''

2000:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 281}, 145 (1997)

2001:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9605342].

2002:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,281,145;%%

2003: %\cite{Vermaseren:2000nd}

2004: \bibitem{Vermaseren:2000nd}

2005:   J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,

2006:   %``New features of FORM,''

2007:   arXiv:math-ph/0010025.

2008:   %%CITATION = MATH-PH/0010025;%%

2009: \end{thebibliography}

2010: 

2011: \newpage 

2012: 

2013: \begin{table}

2014: \vspace*{2cm}

2015: \begin{center}

2016: \caption{\label{BsS} Decay widths of $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi$

2017: and $B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi^0$ in keV. The range of values for our

2018: results is due to the variation of $\Lambda_M$ from 1 to 2 GeV.}

2019: 

2020: \vspace*{.25cm}

2021: 

2022: \def\arraystretch{1.2}

2023: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}

2024: \hline \hspace*{.5cm} Approach \hspace*{.5cm} & \hspace*{.5cm}

2025: $\Gamma(B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s \pi^0)$ \hspace*{.5cm}

2026: &\hspace*{.5cm} Approach \hspace*{.5cm}& \hspace*{.5cm}

2027: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s^{\ast} \pi^0)$  \hspace*{.5cm}\\

2028: \hline \,\,\,\,\, Ref.~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt} \,\,\,\,\, &

2029: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 21.5 \,\,\,\,\, &\,\,\,\,\,

2030: Ref.~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt} 

2031: \,\,\,\,\,& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 21.5 \,\,\,\,\, \\ 

2032: \hline \,\,\,\,\, 

2033: Ref.~\cite{Guo:2006fu}

2034: \,\,\,\,\, & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 1.54 \,\,\,\,\, &\,\,\,\,\, 

2035: Ref.~\cite{Guo:2006rp} \,\,\,\,\, & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 10.36 \,\,\,\,\,\\

2036: \hline \,\,\,\,\, 

2037: Ref.~\cite{Wang:2008ny} 

2038: \,\,\,\,\, & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 6.8 $-$ 30.7 \,\,\,\,\, &\,\,\,\,\, 

2039: Ref.~\cite{Wang:2008ny} 

2040: \,\,\,\,\, & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 5.3 $-$ 20.7\,\,\,\,\,\\

2041: \hline \,\,\,\,\, 

2042: Our results & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 55.2 $-$ 89.9 \,\,\,\,\, 

2043: & \,\,\,\,\, 

2044: Our results & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 57.0 $-$ 94.0 \,\,\,\,\,\\

2045: \hline

2046: \end{tabular}

2047: \end{center}

2048: \end{table}

2049: 

2050: 

2051: \begin{table}

2052: \vspace*{2cm}

2053: \begin{center}

2054: \caption{\label{BsEM} Decay widths of $B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast}

2055: \gamma$ and $B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma$ in keV. The range of values for our

2056: results is due to the variation of $\Lambda_M$ from 1 to 2 GeV.}

2057: 

2058: \vspace*{.25cm}

2059: 

2060: \def\arraystretch{1.2}

2061: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}

2062: \hline \hspace*{.5cm} Approach \hspace*{.5cm} & \hspace*{.5cm}

2063: $\Gamma(B_{s0}^{\ast} \to B_s^{\ast} \gamma)$ \hspace*{.5cm}

2064: &\hspace*{.5cm} Approach \hspace*{.5cm}& \hspace*{.5cm}

2065: $\Gamma(B_{s1} \to B_s \gamma)$ \hspace*{.5cm}\\

2066: \hline \,\,\,\,\, Ref.~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt} \,\,\,\,\, &

2067: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 58.3 \,\,\,\,\, &\,\,\,\,\,

2068: Ref.~\cite{Bardeen:2003kt}

2069: \,\,\,\,\,& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 39.1 \,\,\,\,\, \\

2070: \hline \,\,\,\,\, Ref.~\cite{Vijande:2007ke} \,\,\,\,\, &

2071: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 171.4 \,\,\,\,\, &\,\,\,\,\,

2072: Ref.~\cite{Vijande:2007ke} 

2073: \,\,\,\,\,& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 106.5 \,\,\,\,\, \\

2074: \hline \,\,\,\,\, Ref.~\cite{Vijande:2007ke} \,\,\,\,\, &

2075: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 31.9 \,\,\,\,\, &\,\,\,\,\,

2076: Ref.~\cite{Vijande:2007ke} 

2077: \,\,\,\,\,& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 60.7 \,\,\,\,\, \\

2078: \hline \,\,\,\,\, Ref.~\cite{Wang:2008bt} \,\,\,\,\, &

2079: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 1.3 $-$ 13.6 \,\,\,\,\, &\,\,\,\,\,

2080: Ref.~\cite{Wang:2008bt} 

2081: \,\,\,\,\,& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 3.2 $-$ 15.8 \,\,\,\,\, \\

2082: \hline \,\,\,\,\, 

2083: Our results & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 3.07 $-$ 4.06 \,\,\,\,\, 

2084: & \,\,\,\,\, 

2085: Our results & \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, 2.01 $-$ 2.67 \,\,\,\,\,\\

2086: \hline

2087: \end{tabular}

2088: \end{center}

2089: \end{table}

2090: 

2091: \begin{figure}

2092: \vspace*{2cm}

2093: \begin{center}

2094: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps, scale=.65}

2095: \vspace*{1cm}

2096: \caption{Mass operators of $B_{s0}^{\ast}$ and $B_{s1}$ mesons.}

2097: \label{fig:Mass} 

2098: \end{center}

2099: \end{figure}

2100: 

2101: \newpage 

2102: 

2103: \begin{figure}

2104: \begin{center}

2105: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps, scale=.65}

2106: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the strong transition 

2107: $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_s + \pi^0$.} 

2108: \label{fig:Bs0_str}

2109: \end{center}

2110: 

2111: \vspace*{.5cm}

2112: 

2113: \begin{center}

2114: \epsfig{file=fig3.eps, scale=.65}

2115: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the strong transition 

2116: $B_{s1} \to B_s^\ast + \pi^0$.} 

2117: \label{fig:Bs1_str}

2118: \end{center}

2119: \end{figure}

2120: 

2121: \newpage

2122: 

2123: \begin{figure}

2124: \begin{center}

2125: \epsfig{file=fig4.eps, scale=.65}

2126: \end{center}

2127: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the radiative transition

2128: $B_{s0}^\ast \to B_{s}^\ast + \gamma$.}

2129: \label{fig:Bs0_em}

2130: 

2131: \vspace*{.5cm}

2132: 

2133: \begin{center}

2134: \epsfig{file=fig5.eps, scale=.65}

2135: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the radiative transition

2136: $B_{s1} \to B_s + \gamma$.}

2137: \label{fig:Bs1_em}

2138: \end{center}

2139: \end{figure}

2140: 

2141: 

2142: \newpage

2143: 

2144: \begin{figure}

2145: \begin{center}

2146: \epsfig{file=fig6.eps, scale=.65}

2147: \end{center}

2148: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the radiative transition

2149: $B_{s1} \to B_{s}^\ast + \gamma$.}

2150: \label{fig:Bs0_em2}

2151: 

2152: \vspace*{.5cm}

2153: 

2154: \begin{center}

2155: \epsfig{file=fig7.eps, scale=.65}

2156: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the radiative transition

2157: $B_{s1} \to B_{s0}^\ast + \gamma$.}

2158: \label{fig:Bs1_em3}

2159: \end{center}

2160: \end{figure}

2161: 

2162: 

2163: 

2164: 

2165: \end{document}

2166: 

2167: