1: %% LyX 1.5.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
3: \documentclass[a4paper,english,prb,aps,twocolumn,floatfix,showpacs,tightenlines,superscriptaddress,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
4: \pdfoutput=1
5: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
6: \usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
7: \usepackage{verbatim}
8: \usepackage{amsmath}
9: \usepackage{graphicx}
10: \usepackage{amssymb}
11:
12: \makeatletter
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
14: \newcommand{\ie}{\mbox{i.\ e.\ }}
15: \newcommand{\eg}{\mbox{e.\ g.\ }}
16: \newcommand{\nb}{\mbox{N.\ B.\ }}
17: \newcommand{\cf}{\mbox{c.\ f.\ }}
18: \newcommand{\etc}{\mbox{etc.}}
19: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{\it et al.\ }}
20: \newcommand{\ca}{\mbox{ca.\ }}
21:
22: \newcommand{\vs}{\mbox{\large \boldmath $\sigma$}}
23: \newcommand{\s}{\mbox{\large \boldmath $\sigma$}}
24: \newcommand{\hc}{\mathrm{h.c.}}
25: \newcommand{\tr}{\mathrm{tr}}
26: \newcommand{\sign}{\mathrm{sign}}
27: \newcommand{\e}{\epsilon}
28:
29: \newcommand{\1}{\leavevmode{\rm 1\ifmmode\mkern -4.8mu\else\kern -.3em\fi I}}
30: %\newcommand{\1}{1\negthickspace{\mathrm{I}}}
31:
32: \usepackage{babel}
33: \makeatother
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \title{The fidelity approach to the Hubbard model}
38:
39:
40: \author{L. Campos Venuti}
41:
42:
43: \affiliation{ISI Foundation for Scientific Interchange, Villa Gualino, Viale Settimio
44: Severo 65, I-10133 Torino, Italy}
45:
46:
47: \author{M. Cozzini}
48:
49:
50: \affiliation{ISI Foundation for Scientific Interchange, Villa Gualino, Viale Settimio
51: Severo 65, I-10133 Torino, Italy}
52:
53:
54: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi
55: 24, I-10129 Torino, Italy}
56:
57:
58: \author{P. Buonsante}
59:
60:
61: \affiliation{CNISM, Unit� di Ricerca Torino Politecnico, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi
62: 24, I-10129 Torino, Italy}
63:
64:
65: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi
66: 24, I-10129 Torino, Italy}
67:
68:
69: \author{F. Massel}
70:
71:
72: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi
73: 24, I-10129 Torino, Italy}
74:
75:
76: \author{N. Bray-Ali}
77:
78:
79: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California
80: Los Angeles, California 90089-0484, USA}
81:
82:
83: \author{P. Zanardi}
84:
85:
86: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California
87: Los Angeles, California 90089-0484, USA}
88:
89:
90: \affiliation{ISI Foundation for Scientific Interchange, Villa Gualino, Viale Settimio
91: Severo 65, I-10133 Torino, Italy}
92:
93:
94: \pacs{64.60.-i, 03.65.Ud, 05.70.Jk, 05.45.Mt.}
95:
96: \begin{abstract}
97: We use the fidelity approach to quantum critical points to study the
98: zero temperature phase diagram of the one-dimensional Hubbard model.
99: Using a variety of analytical and numerical techniques, we analyze
100: the fidelity metric in various regions of the phase diagram, with
101: particular care to the critical points. Specifically we show that
102: close to the Mott transition, taking place at on-site repulsion $U=0$
103: and electron density $n=1$, the fidelity metric satisfies an hyper-scaling
104: form which we calculate. This implies that in general, as one approaches
105: the critical point $U=0,\, n=1$, the fidelity metric tends to a limit
106: which depends on the path of approach. At half filling, the fidelity
107: metric is expected to diverge as $U^{-4}$ when $U$ is sent to zero.
108: \end{abstract}
109:
110: \date{\today}
111:
112: \maketitle
113:
114: \section{Introduction}
115:
116: Recently a novel characterization of phase transitions has been advocated
117: \citep{PZ-PK06}. This is the so called fidelity approach to critical
118: phenomena \citep{ZB,ZCG07,CGZ07,CIZ07,YLG,GKNL,zhou,buonsante07,hamma-lidar07,ZZL,chen07,ZZWL,zhu07,yang07,ZCG07PRL}
119: that relies solely on the state of the system and does not require
120: the knowledge of the model Hamiltonian and its symmetry breaking mechanism.
121: Two states of the system at nearby points in parameter space are compared
122: by computing their overlap (the fidelity). Since quantum phase transitions
123: are major changes in the structure of the ground state, it is natural
124: to expect that, when one crosses a transition point the fidelity will
125: drop abruptly. To make the analysis more quantitative one considers
126: the second derivative of the fidelity with respect to the displacement
127: in parameter space. Remarkably this second derivative, more in general
128: the Hessian matrix, defines a metric tensor (the fidelity metric hereafter)
129: in the space of pure states \citep{ZCG07PRL}. A super-extensive scaling
130: of the fidelity metric corresponds to the intuitive idea of a fidelity
131: drop. Indeed, it was shown in \citep{lcv07} that, at regular points
132: the fidelity metric scales extensively with the system size, and a
133: super-extensive behavior implies criticality. However the converse
134: is not true in general; in order to observe a divergence in the fidelity
135: metric a sufficiently relevant perturbation (in the renormalization
136: group sense) is needed \citep{lcv07}. Loosely speaking the more relevant
137: the operator the stronger the divergence of the fidelity metric. The
138: Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition is peculiar in this
139: respect as it is driven by a marginally relevant perturbation, i.e.~with
140: the smallest possible scaling dimension capable of driving a transition.
141: This gives rise to an infinite order transition and as such the BKT
142: does not rigorously fit in the simple scaling argument given in \citep{lcv07}.
143:
144: Surprisingly, contrary to the na\"ive expectation, Yang has shown
145: \citep{yang07} that in the particular instance of BKT transition
146: provided by the XXZ model, the fidelity metric diverges algebraically
147: as a function of the anisotropy. This is an appealing feature since
148: observing a singularity at a BKT transition is generally a difficult
149: task%
150: \footnote{An almost standard route is that of adding an electric/magnetic field
151: and to measure the corresponding stiffness which experiences a jump
152: at the transition (see i.e.~\citep{laf01})%
153: }.
154:
155: In this paper we analyzed, with a variety of analytical and numerical
156: techniques, the one dimensional Hubbard model primarily aiming at
157: assessing the power and limitations of the fidelity approach for infinite
158: order QPT ($n=1,\, U\rightarrow0$). We believe it is useful to list
159: here the main accomplishment of our analysis: i) An exact calculation,
160: on the free gas line $U=0$, shows that the fidelity metric $g$ presents
161: a cusp at half filling and a $1/n$ divergence at low density $n$
162: respectively. ii) Using Bosonization techniques, we observe a divergence
163: of the form $g\sim n^{-2}$ in the regime $U\ll n$ when $n\rightarrow0$.
164: iii) Resorting to Bethe Ansatz we are able to interpolate between
165: the regime where the Luttinger liquid parameter $K$ approaches the
166: BKT value $1/2$ and that where $K\to1$, which describes the free-Dirac
167: point. We show that the fidelity metric satisfies an hyper-scaling
168: equation which can also be extended to finite sizes. iv) We calculate
169: the hyper-scaling function in the thermodynamic limit by solving Bethe-Ansatz
170: integral equations while at half filling by resorting to exact diagonalization.
171: As a consequence, when approaching the transition point $U=0,\, n=1$
172: the fidelity metric tends to a limit which depends on the path of
173: approach. On the particular path $U\to0,\, n=1$, an algebraic divergence
174: of the form $g\sim U^{-4}$ is expected, on the basis of numerical
175: results.
176:
177: In the 1D Hubbard model the BKT transition %
178: \footnote{The term BKT is justified in the sense that the underlying effective
179: theory is the sine-Gordon model (see later). In the condensed matter
180: literature the term Mott transition is more commonly used. %
181: } occurs exactly at half filling as soon as the on site interaction
182: $U$ is switched on, inducing a gap in the charge excitation spectrum.
183: Away from half filling instead all modes are gapless for any $U$
184: and the system is a Luttinger liquid. Since at half filling, the only
185: gapless point is at $U=0$, the kind of BKT transition offered by
186: the Hubbard model is different from that featured by the XXZ model.
187: In that case one continuously arrives at the transition point from
188: a gapless phase by tuning the anisotropy parameter. This difference,
189: in turn, makes more difficult the analysis of the fidelity metric
190: in the Hubbard model.
191:
192:
193: \section{Preliminaries}
194:
195: The one dimensional Hubbard model is given by\begin{equation}
196: H=-t\sum_{i,\sigma}\left(c_{i,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{i+1,\sigma}+\mathrm{h.c.}\right)+U\sum_{i}n_{i,\uparrow}n_{i,\downarrow}-\mu\sum_{i}n_{i}\,,\label{eq:ham-hubbard}\end{equation}
197: where $n_{i,\sigma}=c_{i,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{i,\sigma}$ , $n_{i}=n_{i,\uparrow}+n_{i,\downarrow}$
198: and we will be concerned with the repulsive / free gas case when $U\ge0$.
199: Due to the symmetries of the model \citep{HubbBook} it is sufficient
200: to limit the analysis to filling smaller or equal to one half i.e.~$n\equiv\langle n_{i}\rangle\le1$.
201: It is well known \citep{solyom79,voit95} that for $n<1$ the model
202: is in the Luttinger liquid universality class for any value of the
203: interaction $U$. Spin and charge degrees of freedom separate and
204: their respective excitations travel at distinct velocities $v_{s}$
205: and $v_{c}$. Both charge and spin modes are therefore gapless. Exactly
206: at half filling ($n=1$) the system becomes an insulator and develops
207: a charge gap $\Delta E_{c}=\mu_{+}-\mu_{-}=E\left(N+1\right)-2E\left(N\right)+E\left(N-1\right)$,
208: where $E\left(N\right)$ is the ground state energy with $N$ particles.
209: The gap opens up exponentially slow from $U=0$, and the point $U=0,\, n=1$
210: is a transition of BKT type \citep{itzykson}. The length scale $\xi=2v_{c}/\Delta E_{c}$
211: describes the size of soliton-antisoliton pairs, in the insulator.
212: As we approach the critical point at $U=0,\, n=1$, these pairs unbind
213: and proliferate, allowing the system to conduct.
214:
215: In the fidelity approach one is interested in the overlap between
216: ground states at neighboring points of the coupling constants (say
217: a vector $\lambda$): $F\left(\lambda\right)=\left|\langle\psi\left(\lambda\right)|\psi\left(\lambda+d\lambda\right)\rangle\right|$.
218: Remarkably, the second order term in the expansion of the fidelity
219: defines a metric in the space of (pure) states:\[
220: F\left(\lambda\right)=1-\frac{1}{2}G_{\mu,\nu}d\lambda^{\mu}d\lambda^{\nu}+O\left(d\lambda^{3}\right)\,,\]
221: where\[
222: G_{\mu,\nu}=\mathrm{Re}\left[\langle\partial_{\mu}\psi_{0}|\partial_{\nu}\psi_{0}\rangle-\langle\partial_{\mu}\psi_{0}|\psi_{0}\rangle\langle\psi_{0}|\partial_{\nu}\psi_{0}\rangle\right],\]
223: and $\psi_{0}=\psi\left(\lambda\right)$ and $\partial_{\mu}=\partial/\partial\lambda^{\mu}$.
224: Actually, at regular points $\lambda$ of the phase diagram, $G_{\mu,\nu}$
225: is an extensive quantity \citep{lcv07} so that it is useful to define
226: the related intensive metric tensor $g_{\mu,\nu}\equiv G_{\mu,\nu}/L$.
227: With reference to Hamiltonian (\ref{eq:ham-hubbard}) it is natural
228: to investigate the behavior of the fidelity under variations of the
229: interaction parameter $U$. The possibility of analyzing variations
230: of the chemical potential, though appealing does not fit in the fidelity
231: approach as the ground states at different $\mu$ belong to different
232: super-selection sectors. Hence now on we will solely be interested
233: in $g_{U,U}$ and we will simply write $g$ in place of $g_{U,U}$.
234: In Ref.~\citep{ZCG07PRL} it was shown that it can be written in
235: the following form\begin{equation}
236: g=\frac{1}{L}\sum_{n>0}\frac{\left|V_{n,0}\right|^{2}}{\left(E_{n}-E_{0}\right)^{2}},\quad V=\sum_{i}n_{i,\uparrow}n_{i,\downarrow}\label{eq:g}\end{equation}
237: where $E_{n},\,|n\rangle$ are the eigen-energies and corresponding
238: eigenstates of the Hamiltonian \eqref{eq:ham-hubbard} (with repulsion
239: $U$ and filling $n$), $|0\rangle$ corresponds then to the ground
240: state and $V_{i,j}=\langle i|V|j\rangle$. In passing, we would like
241: to notice that despite the apparent similarity between Eq.~\eqref{eq:g}
242: and the second derivative of the energy $E''\left(\lambda\right)$
243: (a similarity stressed in Ref.~\citep{chen08}), it is possible to
244: show -- using the Rayleigh-Schr\"odinger series -- that the metric
245: tensor is in fact related to the third (and first) energy derivative,
246: via\[
247: G=\frac{1}{V_{0,0}}\sum_{i,j>0}\frac{V_{0,i}V_{i,j}V_{j,0}}{\left(E_{i}-E_{0}\right)\left(E_{j}-E_{0}\right)}-\frac{E'''}{E'}.\]
248: Moreover, in cases where $E'''\left(\lambda\right)$ is bounded in
249: the thermodynamic limit, one obtains the interesting kind of factorization
250: relation $\langle0|V|0\rangle\langle0|V\mathcal{G}\left(E_{0}\right)^{2}V|0\rangle=\langle0|V\mathcal{G}\left(E_{0}\right)V\mathcal{G}\left(E_{0}\right)V|0\rangle$
251: valid in the thermodynamic limit, where $\mathcal{G}$ is the resolvent
252: $\mathcal{G}\left(E\right)$=$\left(\1-|0\rangle\langle0|\right)\left(H-E\right)^{-1}\left(\1-|0\rangle\langle0|\right)$.
253:
254: In the rest of the paper we will be concerned with the analysis of
255: the metric tensor with special care to the BKT transition point. The
256: phase diagram of the Hubbard model is depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:phase_diagram}.
257: The model has been solved by Bethe Ansatz in Ref.~\citep{lieb_wu68}.
258: We will tackle the problem using a variety of techniques. On the free-gas
259: $U=0$ line, an explicit calculation is possible at all fillings.
260: Around the region $U=0$ and filling away from $n=0$ and $n=1$ bosonization
261: results apply. Instead, close to the points $U=0$ and $n=1$ we will
262: cross results from bosonization with Bethe-Ansatz in order to extend
263: bosonization results up to the transition points. We will show that
264: the behavior of the metric is encoded in a scaling function. Away
265: from half filling the scaling function is computed integrating Bethe-Ansatz
266: equation, while at half filling by resorting to exact diagonalization.
267:
268: \begin{center}
269: %
270: \begin{figure}[th]
271: \begin{centering}
272: \includegraphics[width=70mm,keepaspectratio]{hubbard_phase_diagram}
273: \par\end{centering}
274:
275: \caption{Phase diagram of the repulsive Hubbard model. The region $0<n<1$
276: is in the Luttinger liquid (LL) universality class. The hatched area
277: corresponds to the condition $\delta\xi\left(U\right)<1$, where $\xi\left(U\right)$
278: is the correlation length at half filling. Approaching the critical
279: point $\left(n=1,U=0\right)$ from within (the complementary of) this
280: region the LL parameter $K_{c}$ approaches $1/2$, the BKT value
281: ($1$, the free-Dirac value). \label{fig:phase_diagram}}
282:
283: \end{figure}
284:
285: \par\end{center}
286:
287:
288: \section{Exact analysis at $U=0$}
289:
290: At $U=0$ the complete set of eigenfunctions of Hamiltonian (\ref{eq:ham-hubbard})
291: is given by a filled Fermi sea and particle-hole excitations above
292: it. It is then possible to apply directly Eq.~(\ref{eq:g}).
293:
294:
295: \subsection{Half filling\label{sub:Half-filling}}
296:
297: We first treat the half filled case $n=1$, where the Fermi momentum
298: lies at $k_{F}=\pi/2$. Writing the interaction in Fourier space as
299: $V=L^{-1}\sum_{k,k',q}c_{k'-q,\downarrow}^{\dagger}c_{k+q,\uparrow}^{\dagger}c_{k,\uparrow}c_{k',\downarrow},$and
300: going to the thermodynamic limit, Eq.~(\ref{eq:g}) becomes\begin{equation}
301: g=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{3}}\int_{\left[-\pi,\pi\right]^{3}}\frac{n_{k}\left(1-n_{k+q}\right)n_{k'}\left(1-n_{k'-q}\right)}{\left(\epsilon_{k+q}-\epsilon_{k}+\epsilon_{k'-q}-\epsilon_{k'}\right)^{2}}dkdk'dq,\label{eq:start}\end{equation}
302: where $\epsilon_{k}=-2t\cos\left(k\right)$ is the $U=0$ single particle
303: dispersion and $n_{k}=\vartheta\left(-\epsilon_{k}\right)$ ($=n_{k,\uparrow}=n_{k,\downarrow}$
304: in absence of magnetic field) are the fermionic, zero-temperature,
305: filling factors. Using $\epsilon\left(k,q\right)\equiv\epsilon_{k+q}-\epsilon_{k}=4\sin\left(q/2\right)\sin\left(k+q/2\right)$
306: and substituting $k'\rightarrow-k'$ we obtain\begin{multline*}
307: g=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{3}}\int_{0}^{\pi}dq\frac{1}{8\sin\left(q/2\right)^{2}}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}dk\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}dk'\\
308: \times\frac{n\left(k,q\right)n\left(k',q\right)}{\left[\sin\left(k+q/2\right)+\sin\left(k'+q/2\right)\right]^{2}}.\end{multline*}
309: Changing variables to $p=k+q/2$, $p'=k'+q/2$ and making a shift
310: of $\pi/2$ we obtain finally\begin{equation}
311: g=\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{3}}\int_{0}^{\pi}dq\frac{J\left(q\right)}{8\sin\left(q/2\right)^{2}}=\frac{1}{24\pi^{2}}=0.00422\label{eq:gn1}\end{equation}
312: where we defined\begin{eqnarray*}
313: J\left(q\right) & = & 4\int_{0}^{q/2}dp\int_{0}^{q/2}dp'\frac{1}{\left[\cos\left(p\right)+\cos\left(p'\right)\right]^{2}}\\
314: & = & -2+8\frac{\ln\left(\cos\left(q/2\right)\right)}{\cos\left(q\right)-1},\end{eqnarray*}
315: and correctly $J\left(q\right)=J\left(-q\right)>0$.
316:
317: A related interesting issue is that of the finite size scaling of
318: the metric tensor $g$ i.e.~the way in which $g_{L}$ at length $L$
319: converges to its thermodynamic value (see also \citep{YLG}). In Ref.~\citep{lcv07}
320: it was shown that in a gapless regime scaling analysis predicts $g_{L}\sim L^{-\Delta_{g}}$
321: apart from regular contributions which scale extensively (and contribute
322: to $g$ with a constant). Here $\Delta_{g}=2\Delta_{V}-2\zeta-1$
323: where $\Delta_{V}$ is the scaling dimension of $V$ in the renormalization
324: group sense and $\zeta$ is the dynamical critical exponent. On the
325: line $U=0$ one has $\Delta_{V}=2$ as $V$ is a product of two independent
326: free fields, while $\zeta=1$ when $n\neq0$ due to the linear dispersion
327: of excitations at low momenta. This implies that at leading order
328: $g_{L}\sim A+BL^{-1}$. One should however be careful that logarithmic
329: corrections are not captured by the scaling analysis of Ref.~\citep{lcv07}
330: and they might be present due to the BKT transition occurring at this
331: point. Let us try to clarify this issue. Looking at Eq.~\eqref{eq:gn1},
332: as a first approximation, we might think that the finite size $g_{L}$
333: is well approximated by the Riemann sum of $F\left(q\right)\equiv J\left(q\right)/\sin\left(q/2\right)^{2}$:\[
334: g_{L}\simeq\frac{S_{L}}{\left(2\pi\right)^{3}8},\quad S_{L}=\frac{2\pi}{L}\sum_{n=1}^{L/2}F\left(\frac{2\pi}{L}n\right).\]
335: Now $F\left(q\right)$ diverges logarithmically around $\pi^{-}$:
336: $F\left(q\right)=-4\ln\left(\frac{\pi-q}{2}\right)+O\left(\left(\pi-q\right)^{2}\right)$,
337: and since the Riemann sum of the logarithm converges to its integral
338: as $\left(A+B\ln L\right)/L+O\left(L^{-2}\right)$ we would conclude\begin{equation}
339: g_{L}-\frac{1}{24\pi^{2}}=\frac{A+B\ln L}{L}+\frac{C}{L^{2}}+O\left(L^{-4}\right).\label{eq:g_FSS}\end{equation}
340: However, a detailed analysis of the finite size $g_{L}$ reveals that
341: a \emph{cancellation} occurs between two logarithmic corrections so
342: that actually $B=0$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:g_FSS}). The exact finite size
343: $g_{L}$ is composed of two terms. One term is a triple sum which,
344: in the thermodynamic limit, corresponds to the triple integral in
345: Eq.~(\ref{eq:start}). The other term is a double sum which originates
346: from zero transferred momentum contribution and vanishes when $L\rightarrow\infty$.
347: We numerically verified that both terms contain a $\ln L/L$ part
348: when $L\rightarrow\infty$, but their contribution is equal and opposite
349: so as to cancel out exactly from $g_{L}$. The absence of logarithmic
350: corrections can clearly be seen in the inset of Fig.~\ref{fig:g_vs_density}
351: where the finite size $g_{L}$ is plotted against $1/L$.
352:
353:
354: \subsection{Away from half filling}
355:
356: Similar considerations can be done away from half-filling. Eq.~(\ref{eq:start})
357: still holds, simply in this case $k_{F}\neq\pi/2$. We assume $k_{F}=n\pi/2<\pi/2$
358: (anyway a particle hole transformation implies $g\left(n\right)=g\left(2-n\right)$).
359: First note that the integral over $q$ can be recast as $2\int_{0}^{\pi}dq$.
360: The filling factors constrain the momenta to $\left|k\right|<k_{F}$
361: and $\left|k+q\right|>k_{F}$. If $q<2k_{F}$ this implies $k_{F}-q<k<k_{F}$.
362: Instead if $q>2k_{F}$ the sum over $k$ is unconstrained: $-k_{F}<k<k_{F}$.
363: Thus we obtain\begin{multline*}
364: g=\frac{2}{\left(2\pi\right)^{3}}\left\{ \int_{0}^{2k_{F}}dq\int_{k_{F}-q}^{k_{F}}dk\int_{k_{F}-q}^{k_{F}}dk'\right.\\
365: \left.+\int_{2k_{F}}^{\pi}dq\int_{{-k}_{F}}^{k_{F}}dk\int_{-k_{F}}^{k_{F}}dk'\right\} \\
366: \times\frac{1}{16\sin\left(q/2\right)^{2}\left[\sin\left(k+q/2\right)+\sin\left(k'+q/2\right)\right]^{2}}.\end{multline*}
367: Changing variables as before and defining \[
368: J\left(a,b\right)\equiv\int_{a}^{b}dp\int_{a}^{b}dp'\frac{1}{\left[\sin\left(p\right)+\sin\left(p'\right)\right]^{2}},\]
369: we obtain \begin{multline*}
370: g=\frac{1}{64\pi^{3}}\left\{ \int_{0}^{2k_{F}}dq\frac{J\left(k_{F}-q/2,k_{F}+q/2\right)}{\sin\left(q/2\right)^{2}}\right.\\
371: \left.+\int_{2k_{F}}^{\pi}dq\frac{J\left({-k}_{F}+q/2,k_{F}+q/2\right)}{\sin\left(q/2\right)^{2}}\right\} .\end{multline*}
372: In Fig.~\ref{fig:g_vs_density} one can see a plot of $g\left(n,U=0\right)$
373: as a function of the total density $n=N_{\mathrm{tot}}/L=2k_{F}/\pi$.
374: It is possible to show that in the very dilute regime $n\rightarrow0$,
375: the fidelity metric $g$ diverges in a simple algebraic way \[
376: g\left(n\rightarrow0,U=0\right)\sim\frac{1}{n}.\]
377: This divergence can also be simply understood by resorting to the
378: scaling arguments reported in \citep{lcv07}. There it was shown that,
379: in the thermodynamic limit $g\sim\left|\mu-\mu_{c}\right|^{\Delta_{g}/\Delta_{\mu}}$
380: where now $\Delta_{\mu}$ is the scaling dimension of the field $\mu$.
381: On the line $U=0$ as already noticed $\Delta_{V}=2$ while now $\zeta=2$
382: as $n\rightarrow0$ to account for the parabolic dispersion. The chemical
383: potential scaling exponent is $\Delta_{\mu}=2$ in the dilute Fermi
384: gas \citep{sachdevQPT}. All in all we obtain $g\sim\left|\mu-\mu_{c}\right|^{-1/2}\sim n^{-1}$
385: since $n\sim\left|\mu-\mu_{c}\right|^{1/2}$ which agrees with the
386: explicit calculation.
387:
388: The finite size scaling of $g_{L}$ for different filling $0<n<1$
389: is the same as that observed at $n=1$ and is dictated by Eq.~\eqref{eq:g_FSS}
390: with $B=0$, as can bee seen in the inset of Fig.~\ref{fig:g_vs_density}.
391:
392: Finally note that, since $g\left(n,U=0\right)$ is symmetric around
393: $n=1$, $g\left(n\right)$ has a local maximum at that point with
394: a cusp. The origin of this discontinuity is not well understood at
395: the moment but reveals a signature of the transition occurring at
396: this point.
397:
398: \begin{center}
399: %
400: \begin{figure}[th]
401: \begin{centering}
402: \includegraphics[width=78mm,keepaspectratio]{gn_U0}
403: \par\end{centering}
404:
405: \caption{Fidelity metric $g$ as a function of the total density at $U=0$.
406: The singularity at $n\rightarrow0$ is of the form $n^{-1}$. In the
407: inset the finite size scaling of $g_{L}$ for some different fillings
408: is shown. The approach to the thermodynamic value is given by Eq.~\eqref{eq:g_FSS}
409: with $B=0$. In fact fitting the data points with Eq.~\eqref{eq:g_FSS}
410: gives values of $B/A$ of the order of $10^{-4}$ and a chi-square
411: of the same order as the one obtained with $B=0$.\label{fig:g_vs_density}}
412:
413: \end{figure}
414:
415: \par\end{center}
416:
417:
418: \section{Bosonization approach}
419:
420: It is well known \citep{solyom79,emery79,HubbBook} that for $U\ge0$
421: and away from half filling ($n=1$), the low energy, large distance
422: behavior of the Hubbard model, up to irrelevant operators, is described
423: by the Hamiltonian\begin{eqnarray}
424: H & = & H_{s}+H_{c}\label{eq:ham-eff}\\
425: H_{\nu} & = & \frac{v_{\nu}}{2}\int d^{2}x\left[K_{\nu}\Pi_{\nu}\left(x\right)^{2}+\frac{1}{K_{\nu}}\left(\partial_{x}\Phi_{\nu}\right)^{2}\right],\,\,\nu=s,\, c\,.\nonumber \end{eqnarray}
426: Charge and spin degrees of freedom factorize and are described respectively
427: by $H_{c}$ and $H_{s}$. The Luttinger liquid parameters $K_{c,s}$
428: are related to the long distance, algebraic decay of correlation functions,
429: while $v_{c,s}$ are the speed of elementary (gapless) charge and
430: spin excitations. From bosonization, and setting the lattice constant
431: $a=1$, one finds, for small $U$, \begin{equation}
432: K_{c}=1-\frac{U}{{2\pi v}_{F}}+\cdots,\label{eq:K-bosoniz}\end{equation}
433: where the Fermi velocity is $v_{F}=2t\sin\left(k_{F}\right)$ and
434: $k_{F}=\pi n/2$. Instead the Luttinger parameter $K_{s}$ is fixed
435: to $K_{s}=1$ due to spin rotation invariance. Exactly at $n=1$ there
436: appears another term (an Umklapp term) in the charge sector which
437: is marginally relevant and is responsible for the opening of a mass
438: gap. In this case the effective theory is the sine-Gordon model.
439:
440: Since the fidelity of two independent theories factorizes the metric
441: tensor $g$ is additive and we obtain $g=g_{s}+g_{c}$. In Ref.~\citep{yang07}
442: the fidelity metric of a free boson theory has been calculated to
443: be given by \begin{equation}
444: g_{\nu}=\frac{1}{8}\left(\frac{1}{K_{\nu}}\frac{dK_{\nu}}{dU}\right)^{2}.\label{eq:g-free-bosons}\end{equation}
445: In our case $g_{s}=0$ as $K_{s}$ does not vary so that $g=g_{c}+g_{s}=g_{c}$.
446: Using Eq.~(\ref{eq:K-bosoniz}) one obtains a formula valid up to
447: zeroth order in $U$: \begin{equation}
448: g=\frac{1}{2\left(4\pi v_{F}\right)^{2}}+O\left(U\right).\label{eq:g-bosoniz}\end{equation}
449: Some comments are in order. The expansion \eqref{eq:K-bosoniz} is
450: actually an expansion around $U=0$ valid when $U\ll v_{F}$. When
451: we move toward the BKT critical point one has $v_{F}\rightarrow2$
452: and $g\rightarrow1/\left(128\pi^{2}\right)$. This value is $3/16$
453: the number calculated directly at $U=0$ in Sec.~\ref{sub:Half-filling}.
454: We believe that this discrepancy is due to lattice corrections which
455: are neglected in formula \eqref{eq:g-free-bosons}. Approaching the
456: low density critical point $U=0,\, n=0$ Eq.~\eqref{eq:g-bosoniz}
457: predicts that, in a narrow region $U\ll n$, the fidelity metric diverges
458: as $g\sim n^{-2}$. This contrasts with the result $g\sim n^{-1}$
459: obtained at $U=0$, as one would expect since $U$ is a relevant perturbation.
460: In fact, in the diluted regime, the low-energy effective theory is
461: that of a spinful non-relativistic gas with delta interactions \citep{HubbBook}.
462: There one still has $n\sim\left|\mu-\mu_{c}\right|^{1/2}$ and dynamical
463: exponent $\zeta=2$. Thus if we take $\Delta_{\mu}=1$, then using
464: the conventional scaling analysis we would find $g\sim n^{-2}$, consistent
465: with the bosonization result.
466:
467:
468: \section{Hyper-scaling of fidelity metric near the Metal-Insulator critical
469: point\label{sec:Luttinger-parameter}}
470:
471: The bosonization expression Eq.~\eqref{eq:K-bosoniz} is an expansion
472: of $K_{c}\left(n,U\right)$ around $U=0$ where $K_{c}$ reaches its
473: free Dirac value 1. In the whole stripe $U\ge0$, $0\le n\le1$, $K_{c}\left(n,U\right)$
474: is a bounded function ranging between $1/2$ and $1$ \citep{schluz90}.
475: The maximal value $K_{c}=1$ is obtained in the segment $U=0$. Instead
476: the minimal value $K_{c}=1/2$ is attained at the lines $n=0$ and
477: $n=1$ and in the strong coupling limit, i.e.~$K_{c}\rightarrow1/2$
478: for $U\gg\left|t\right|$. This considerations show that, from Eq.~\eqref{eq:g-free-bosons},
479: $g$ can be infinite only at the points $U=0$ and $n=0,\,\mbox{or}\,1$
480: where $K_{c}$ is discontinuous. In particular we are interested to
481: the vicinity of the transition point $U=0,\, n=1$ which we will call
482: simply (with some abuse) BKT point. Calling $\xi\left(U\right)$ the
483: correlation length at half filling, and $\delta=1-n$ the doping concentration,
484: it can be shown (see later) that the Luttinger liquid parameter $K_{c}$
485: tends to $1/2$ when the BKT point is approached from the region $\delta\xi\left(U\right)\ll1$.
486: Instead $K_{c}\to1$ when the BKT point is approached from $\delta\xi\left(U\right)\gg1$.
487: Given this discontinuity of $K_{c}$ it seems difficult to interpolate
488: between the two regimes $\delta\xi\left(U\right)\ll1$ and $\delta\xi\left(U\right)\gg1$.
489: However we will show that such an interpolation is indeed possible
490: and that the fidelity metric $g$ satisfies an hyper-scaling relation
491: valid when $\delta\xi$ ranges over many order of magnitudes (see
492: figure \ref{fig:g_scaling}).
493:
494: In Refs.~\citep{kawakami90,frahm90} an efficient characterization
495: of the Luttinger liquid parameter $K_{c}$ in terms of Bethe Ansatz
496: results has been found. $K_{c}$ is related to the so called dressed
497: charge function $Z_{k}$ through \begin{equation}
498: K_{c}=Z_{Q}^{2}/2,\label{eq:K_dressedcharge}\end{equation}
499: where the wave vector $Q$ is a generalization of the Fermi wave-vector
500: in the interacting regime, and has to be determined by Bethe-Ansatz
501: equations. We will now argue that, in the metallic phase, the dressed
502: charge function $Z_{Q}$ satisfies the following scaling relation:\begin{equation}
503: Z_{Q}\left(U,\delta\right)=\Phi_{Z}\left(\xi\left(U\right)\delta\right).\label{eq:Z_scaling}\end{equation}
504: Here $\xi\left(U\right)$ is the correlation length at half filling
505: ($\delta=0$) defined via $\xi=v_{c}/\Delta E_{c}$ where $v_{c}$
506: is the charge carries (holons) velocity and $\Delta E_{c}$ is the
507: (charge) gap, and $\Phi_{Z}$ is a scaling function. Obviously a similar
508: scaling relation holds for the Luttinger parameter $K_{c}$ through
509: Eq.~\eqref{eq:K_dressedcharge}. The scaling relation holds as long
510: as the interaction is not too strong, say $U\lesssim1$. A similar
511: scaling relation has been conjectured in Ref.~\citep{stafford93}
512: for the charge stiffness.
513:
514: Using equation \eqref{eq:g-free-bosons} we obtain the following scaling
515: relation for the fidelity metric of the Hubbard model in the metallic
516: phase close to the BKT point\begin{equation}
517: g\left(U,\delta\right)=\left(\frac{d\ln\xi}{dU}\right)^{2}\Phi_{g}\left(\xi\delta\right),\label{eq:g_scaling}\end{equation}
518: where we introduced the scaling function $\Phi_{g}\left(x\right)=\left(1/2\right)\left(x\Phi_{Z}'\left(x\right)/\Phi_{Z}\left(x\right)\right)^{2}$.
519: Following Ref.~\citep{stafford93} it is natural to conjecture a
520: more general hyper-scaling relation for the fidelity metric valid
521: also at finite size. Building the other dimensionless quantity with
522: the correlation length $\xi$ and the size $L$, we obtain\begin{equation}
523: g\left(U,\delta,L\right)=\left(\frac{d\ln\xi}{dU}\right)^{2}Y\left(\xi\delta,\xi/L\right).\label{eq:g_hyper-scaling}\end{equation}
524:
525:
526: \begin{center}
527: %
528: \begin{figure}[th]
529: \begin{centering}
530: \includegraphics[width=78mm]{phi_g_vs_x}
531: \par\end{centering}
532:
533: \caption{(color online). Scaling function $\Phi_{g}$ for the fidelity metric
534: as a function of the scaling parameter $\xi\delta$. Data are obtained
535: by solving numerically the integral equations for the dressed charge
536: at different interaction strength $U$. The dashed line is obtained
537: expanding the Bethe-Ansatz equations for the Luttinger parameter in
538: the regime $\xi\delta\ll1$ up to second order in $\delta$. The solid
539: line results from integrating the RG BKT equations and is valid when
540: $\xi\delta\gg1$. \label{fig:g_scaling}}
541:
542: \end{figure}
543:
544: \par\end{center}
545:
546: We will now verify the hyper-scaling relation Eq.~\eqref{eq:g_hyper-scaling}
547: away from half-filling in the thermodynamic limit ($\xi/L=0$) using
548: various analytical techniques and at finite size resorting to exact,
549: Lanczos, diagonalization.
550:
551:
552: \subsection{Away from half filling}
553:
554: The scaling relation Eq.~(\ref{eq:g_scaling}) (and implicitly Eq.\eqref{eq:Z_scaling})
555: can be verified analytically in the two limits $x=\xi\delta\to0$
556: and $x\to\infty$. We present the results in terms of the Luttinger
557: parameter $K_{c}$ which has more physical relevance. In Refs.~\citep{frahm90,schad91},
558: the Bethe Ansatz equations for the dressed charge have been solved
559: around $\delta=0$. At leading order in $\delta$, they found for
560: the Luttinger parameter\begin{equation}
561: K_{c}=\frac{1}{2}+a\left(U\right)\delta+\frac{1}{2}\left[a\left(U\right)\delta\right]^{2}+O\left(\delta^{3}\right).\label{eq:kappac}\end{equation}
562: The function $a\left(U\right)$ is studied in the appendix and is
563: approximately given by the following expansion, for $U/2\pi\ll1$\[
564: a\left(U\right)\approx\frac{\ln\left(2\right)}{\sqrt{U}}e^{2\pi/U}.\]
565: Not surprisingly, this has the same form as the soliton length, $\xi\left(U\right)$.
566: In fact, for the regime of interest, $U/2\pi\lesssim1$, $v_{c}\to2$
567: and $\xi\left(U\right)=\pi a\left(U\right)/2\ln\left(2\right)$ \citep{stafford93}.
568: This implies that in the region $x\ll1$, the metric scaling function
569: behaves, at leading order, as \[
570: \Phi_{g}\left(x\right)=\left(\frac{\ln4}{\sqrt{2}\pi}x\right)^{2}+O\left(x^{3}\right).\]
571:
572:
573: Conversely, in the opposite regime $\xi\delta\gg1$ (i.e.~$U\to0$,
574: $\delta$ small) integrating the renormalization-group BKT equations
575: \citep{kolomeisky96}, one is able to improve the bosonization result
576: Eq.~\eqref{eq:K-bosoniz} and we obtain \begin{eqnarray*}
577: K_{c} & = & 1-\frac{U/\left(4\pi\right)}{1-U/\left(2\pi\right)\ln\left(1/\pi\delta\right)}\\
578: & = & 1-\frac{1}{2}\left[\ln\left(\pi\xi\delta\right)\right]^{-1}+\ldots.\end{eqnarray*}
579: Accordingly, the scaling function $\Phi_{g}\left(x\right)$ has the
580: following asymptotic behavior when $x\to\infty$\[
581: \Phi_{g}\left(x\right)\simeq\frac{1}{32}\left[\ln\left(\pi x\right)\right]^{-4}.\]
582: In the limit $U\to0$ we recover bosonization's result $g\to1/128\pi^{2}$.
583:
584: To verify the scaling relation Eq.~\eqref{eq:g_scaling} also in
585: the intermediate regime $\xi\delta\approx1$, we solved numerically
586: the Bethe-Ansatz equations for the dressed charge \citep{HubbBook}.
587: To obtain the dressed charge function $Z_{k}$ we need also the density
588: of wave numbers $\rho_{k}$. They are solutions of the following integral
589: equations\begin{align}
590: \rho_{k} & =1-\cos\left(k\right)\!\!\int_{-Q}^{Q}\!\! dq\cos qR\left(\sin k-\sin q\right)\rho_{q}\label{eq:Z-int}\\
591: Z_{k} & =1+\int_{-Q}^{Q}\!\! dq\cos qR\left(\sin k-\sin q\right)Z_{q}\label{eq:rho-int}\end{align}
592: with $R\left(x\right)$ given by\[
593: R\left(x\right)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\omega\frac{e^{i\omega x}}{1+e^{U\left|\omega\right|/2}}.\]
594: The wave-vector $Q$ is determined by fixing the electronic density
595: $n=\int_{-Q}^{Q}\rho_{k}dk$. Integrating numerically Eqs.~\eqref{eq:Z-int}
596: and \eqref{eq:rho-int} for different value of the coupling strength
597: and doping fraction, we are able to verify the scaling relation Eq.~\eqref{eq:g_scaling}
598: over many order of magnitudes. The result is plotted in figure \ref{fig:g_scaling}.
599:
600: We would like to point out that, since close to the BKT point the
601: relevant variable is $\xi\left(U\right)\delta$, the limit of the
602: fidelity metric when $U\to0,\, n\to1$ depends on the path of approach.
603: However, as we have shown, the combination $g\left(d\ln\xi/dU\right)^{-2}$is
604: a perfectly well defined function of $\xi\delta$.
605:
606: %
607: \begin{comment}
608: The small doping expansion Eq.~\eqref{eq:kappac} is valid when $\delta\ll a^{-1}$
609: which defines a very narrow region \begin{equation}
610: \delta\ll\frac{\sqrt{U}}{\ln2}e^{-2\pi/U},\label{eq:region1}\end{equation}
611: marked with a hatched pattern in Fig.~\ref{fig:phase_diagram}. Using
612: again Eq.~\eqref{eq:g-free-bosons} we obtain for the metric tensor\begin{equation}
613: g=\frac{1}{2}\left[a'\left(U\right)\right]^{2}\delta^{2}+O\left(\delta^{3}\right),\label{eq:g-delta}\end{equation}
614: where now\[
615: \left[a'\left(U\right)\right]^{2}\approx\frac{4\pi^{2}\ln\left(2\right)^{2}}{U^{5}}e^{4\pi/U}.\]
616: Thus we see that in the region given by Eq.~\eqref{eq:region1} and
617: depending on the way we approach $U=0,\,\delta=0$, the fidelity metric
618: $g$ can diverge. For instance on the line given by $\gamma\left(t\right)=\left(U,\delta\right)=\left(t,\lambda\sqrt{t}e^{-2\pi/t}\right)$,
619: $\lambda\ll1$, $g$ diverges as\[
620: g\left(\gamma\left(t\right)\right)\sim t^{-4}.\]
621: Note however that from Eq.~\eqref{eq:g-delta} $g$ can tend to a
622: constant if the BKT point is reached by sending $\delta$ to $0$
623: faster than $\delta\left(U\right)\sim U^{5/2}e^{-2\pi/U}$.
624:
625: The complementary region $\delta\gg a^{-1}$ is amenable to a perturbative
626: renormalization group approach \citep{kolomeisky96}. The Luttinger
627: parameter takes the following form in the regime where $u\ln\left(Cn/\delta\right)\ll1$
628: and $u\ll1$:\[
629: K_{c}=1-\frac{u/2}{1-u\ln\left(Cn/\delta\right)}.\]
630: Here $u=U/2\pi$ and $C$ is a constant. Again using Eq\@.~\eqref{eq:g-free-bosons}
631: we find $g\sim u^{-2}\left[1-u\ln\left(Cn/\delta\right)\right]^{-4}\sim u^{-2}+$
632: smaller terms.
633:
634: Similar considerations can be drawn around $n=0$. In the low density
635: limit we have an expansion similar to Eq.~\eqref{eq:kappac} with
636: $\delta$ replaced by $n$ and $a\left(U\right)=4\ln2/U$ . The expansion
637: now works in the dotted region of Fig.~\eqref{fig:phase_diagram}
638: which corresponds roughly to $n\ll U$. In this case the divergence
639: around $n=0$ is dictated by\[
640: \left(a'\right)^{2}=\frac{4\left(\ln2\right)^{2}}{U^{4}}.\]
641: A path where a divergence can be observed is given by $\gamma\left(t\right)=\left(\lambda t,t\right)$,
642: $\lambda\ll1$, where one has $g\left(\gamma\left(t\right)\right)\sim t^{-2}$
643: as $t\rightarrow0$. Again the divergence cannot be observed if the
644: line $n=0$ is approached too fast.
645: \end{comment}
646: {}
647:
648: %
649: \begin{figure}[b]
650: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{Y_vs_y}
651:
652: \caption{(color online). Finite-size scaling function $Y\left(0,y\right)$
653: as a function of the normalized correlation length $\xi/L$. The solid
654: line is obtained by requiring consistency with the non-interacting
655: value at $U=0.$ The constant $C$ is obtained by a best fit with
656: the numerical data (symbols). Boundary conditions are antiperiodic
657: when system size $L$ is a multiple of four, periodic otherwise. \label{fig:numerics}}
658:
659: \end{figure}
660:
661:
662:
663: \subsection{Numerical Analysis at half filling}
664:
665: To study the scaling behavior of the metric at half-filling, we turned
666: to exact, Lanczos, diagonalization. We find that the metric obeys
667: the scaling form Eq.~\eqref{eq:g_hyper-scaling} with the scaling
668: function $Y\left(0,y\right)$ plotted in Fig.~\eqref{fig:numerics},
669: for values of its argument ranging over six order of magnitudes.
670:
671: After calculating the ground state $\Psi_{0}\left(U\right)$ of Hamiltonian
672: \eqref{eq:ham-hubbard} with the Lanczos algorithm, the intensive
673: fidelity metric $g$ is obtained from the fidelity $F(U,U+\delta U)=|\langle\Psi_{0}(U)|\Psi_{0}(U+\delta U)\rangle|$
674: using \begin{equation}
675: g_{L}=\frac{2}{L}\frac{1-F(U,U+\delta U)}{\delta U^{2}}\ ,\end{equation}
676: with $\delta U=10^{-3}$. The above equation is a good approximation
677: to the limit $\delta U\rightarrow0$ as long as $\delta U\ll1/\sqrt{Lg}$
678: which was confirmed to be the case in all simulations. The function
679: $Y\left(0,y\right)$ is then obtained via $Y=g_{L}\left(d\ln\xi/dU\right)^{-2}$.
680: In order to have as many data points as possible, we analyzed sizes
681: of length $L=4n+2$ with periodic boundary conditions (BC's), while
682: for length $L=4n$ antiperiodic boundary conditions were used. Choosing
683: such boundary conditions at half filling, assures that the ground
684: state is non-degenerate even at $U=0$ %
685: \footnote{Note also that both these classes of fermionic systems with different
686: boundary conditions, can be mapped onto an interacting systems of
687: hard-core bosons with periodic boundary conditions. This clarifies
688: further why it is possible to compare data obtained with different
689: boundary conditions.%
690: }.
691:
692: The behavior at large $y=\xi/L$ can be obtained by requiring consistency
693: with the value obtained in the free case $U=0$. Then the scaling
694: function must have the following limiting form\[
695: Y\left(0,y\right)=\frac{1}{6}\left[\ln\left(Cy\right)\right]^{-4},\quad y\to\infty,\]
696: where $C$ is a constant. Since when $y\to\infty$ $\ln\xi\sim2\pi/U$
697: the divergence in $\left(d\ln\xi/dU\right)^{2}$ cancels with the
698: logarithm above, and one obtains\begin{eqnarray*}
699: g\left(U\to0,L\right) & = & \frac{1}{24\pi^{2}}\left(\frac{\ln\left(\xi\right)}{\ln\left(C\xi/L\right)}\right)^{4}\\
700: & = & \frac{1}{24\pi^{2}}.\end{eqnarray*}
701:
702:
703: Having computed the scaling function $Y\left(x,y\right)$ we could
704: ask what happens to the metric tensor as one approaches the BKT point
705: from the particular path $U\to0,\, n=1$. The smallest values of $y$
706: at our disposal are of the order of $y\sim10^{-1}$. Looking at Figure
707: \ref{fig:numerics}, on the basis of these data, it seems that the
708: function $Y$ approaches a non-zero value $\lim_{y\to0}Y\left(0,y\right)$
709: as $y$ goes to zero. If this is the case, after taking $L\to\infty$
710: and $U$ small we would have\[
711: \lim_{L\to\infty}g\left(U,n=1,L\right)=\frac{4\pi^{2}}{U^{4}}Y\left(0,0\right).\]
712: Note however, that observing this divergence numerically can be very
713: hard as we must be in the region $L\gg\xi\left(U\right)$ which requires
714: huge sizes when the coupling $U$ is small.
715:
716:
717: \section{Conclusions}
718:
719: In this article we analyzed the \emph{fidelity metric} in the zero-temperature
720: phase diagram of the 1D Hubbard model, with particular care at the
721: phase transition points. The fidelity metric quantifies the degree
722: of distinguishablity between a state and its neighbors in the space
723: of states, and as such it is expected to increase (or diverge) at
724: transition points. Special attention has been drawn to assess whether
725: the fidelity metric reveals signatures of the Mott-insulator transition
726: occurring at on site repulsion $U\to0$ and filling factor $n=1$.
727: Being a transition of infinite order, it is particularly difficult
728: to pin down since typical thermodynamic quantities are smooth (although
729: not analytic) at the transition. The point $U=0,\, n=1$ is particularly
730: singular in that it represents the limit of two completely different
731: physical regimes. On the line $U=0$ it is simply the half-filling
732: limit of a gapless free system, whereas fixing $n=1$ it represents
733: the limit of a complicated interacting massive system. Surprisingly,
734: we have shown that it is possible to interpolate between these two
735: regimes, and the fidelity metric defines a hyper-scaling function
736: which depends only on $x=\xi\left(U\right)$$\left(1-n\right)$. The
737: two regimes roughly correspond to $x\gg1$and $x\ll1$ respectively.
738:
739: Away from half filling we have been able to compute the scaling function
740: integrating numerically Bethe-Ansatz equations, and we obtained analytic
741: expressions for the limits $x\to0,\infty$. The result implies that,
742: as a function of $U$ and $n$ separately, the fidelity metric has
743: no precise limit when $U\to0,\, n\to1$, but the scaling function
744: is well defined in term of the scaling variable $x$.
745:
746: Precisely at half filling we computed the scaling function resorting
747: to exact diagonalization and upon introduction of another scaling
748: variable $y=\xi\left(U\right)/L$. With the numerical data at our
749: disposal, the scaling function appears to be smooth and non-zero around
750: $y=0$. As a a consequence, approaching the Mott point from the half-filling
751: line, the fidelity metric would display a singularity of the form
752: $U^{-4}$. A singularity of algebraic type has been observed also
753: in another instance of Kosterlitz-Thouless transition given by the
754: $XXZ$ model.
755:
756: LCV would like to thank Cristian Degli Esposti Boschi for a critical
757: reading of the manuscript. The work of P.B.~has been partially carried
758: out in the framework of the PRIN project \emph{Microscopic description
759: of fermionic quantum devices}.
760:
761: \begin{appendix}
762:
763:
764: \section{\label{sub:asymptotic}}
765:
766: Following Ref.~\citep{frahm90} the coefficient $a$ in Eq.~\eqref{eq:kappac}
767: is given by\[
768: a\left(U\right)=\frac{4\ln\left(2\right)}{Uf\left(U\right)}\]
769: where \[
770: f\left(U\right)\equiv1-2\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{J_{0}\left(x\right)}{1+e^{Ux/2}}dx,\]
771: and $J_{0}$ is a Bessel function. Using the following results \begin{eqnarray*}
772: \frac{1}{1+e^{\alpha x}} & = & \sum_{n=0}\left(-1\right)^{n}e^{-\left(n+1\right)\alpha x}\\
773: \int_{0}^{\infty}J_{0}\left(x\right)e^{-\beta x}dx & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\beta^{2}}},\quad\alpha,\beta>0,\end{eqnarray*}
774: we arrive at \[
775: f\left(U\right)=1+2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(-1\right)^{n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+n^{2}U^{2}/4}}.\]
776: Using the formalism of the Remnant Functions defined in Ref.~\citep{fisher72}
777: one realizes that $f\left(U\right)$ is related to $R_{1/2,0}^{\left(-\right)}\left(4U^{-2}\right)$.
778: With the help of the expansions in Ref.~\citep{fisher72} we obtain
779: the following expression
780:
781: \[
782: f\left(U\right)=\frac{8}{U}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}K_{0}\left(\frac{2\pi}{U}\left(2n+1\right)\right).\]
783: It is now easy to obtain the desired expression, using the asymptotic
784: of the Bessel function\[
785: K_{0}\left(1/x\right)=e^{-1/x}\sqrt{\frac{\pi x}{2}}\left(1-\frac{1}{8}x+\frac{9}{128}x^{2}+O\left(x^{3}\right)\right).\]
786: Collecting the results together, we obtain at leading order \[
787: a\left(U\right)=\frac{\ln\left(2\right)}{\sqrt{U}}e^{2\pi/U}\left(1+O\left(U\right)\right).\]
788:
789:
790: \end{appendix}
791:
792: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
793: \bibliography{fid_hub}
794:
795: \end{document}
796: