1: % version dated September 10, 2007: JDF 

2: 

3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

4: %\documentstyle[11pt,aaspp4]{article}

5: %\documentclass[preprint,11pt]{aastex}

6: \usepackage{graphicx}

7: 

8: %\documentclass{emulateapj}

9: % General purpose macros

10: \newcommand{\dij}{\bf}

11: \newcommand{\ee}[1]{\mbox{${} \times 10^{#1}$}}% scientific number format

12: \newcommand{\eten}[1]{\mbox{$10^{#1}$}}% power of ten

13: 

14: %macros for RA and Dec

15: %\newcommand{\h}{\mbox{{$^h$}}

16: %\newcommand{\m}{\mbox{{$^m$}}

17: %\newcommand{\s}{\mbox{{$^s$}}

18: \newcommand{\degree}{\mbox{$^{\circ}$}}

19: \newcommand{\am}{\mbox{\arcmin}}

20: \newcommand{\as}{\mbox{\arcsec}}

21: 

22: %macros for distance, volume, speed

23: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km s$^{-1}$}}% km/s

24: \newcommand\cmv{\mbox{cm$^{-3}$}}

25: \newcommand\cmc{\mbox{cm$^{-2}$}}

26: \newcommand\cmdv{\mbox{cm$^{-2}$ (\kms)$^{-1}$}}

27: \newcommand{\um}{$\mu$m}

28: %\newcommand{\micron}{$\mu$m}

29: 

30: %macros for commonly used symbols

31: \newcommand{\x}{\mbox{${}\times{}$}}

32: \def\lsim {$\rlap{\raise.4ex\hbox{$<$}}\lower.55ex\hbox{$\sim$}\,$}

33: \def\to {$\rightarrow$}

34: \def\about {$\sim$}

35: 

36: %macros to avoid typing headache and needless acronyms simultaneously

37: \newcommand{\iras}{\mbox{\it IRAS}}

38: \newcommand{\iso}{\mbox{\it ISO}}

39: \newcommand{\mm}{millimeter}

40: \newcommand\submm{submillimeter}

41: \newcommand\smm{submillimeter}

42: \newcommand\fir{far-infrared}

43: \newcommand\mir{mid-infrared}

44: \newcommand\nir{near-infrared}

45: \newcommand{\sfr }{\mbox{$\dot M_{\star}$}}

46: \newcommand\sed{spectral energy distribution}

47: \newcommand{\lsun}{\mbox{L$_\odot$}}% Lsun

48: \newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{M$_\odot$}}% Msun

49: \newcommand{\ta}{{$T_A^*$}}

50: \newcommand{\tex}{\mbox{$T_{\rm ex}$}}

51: \newcommand{\tmb}{\mbox{$T_{\rm mb}$}}

52: \newcommand{\tr}{\mbox{$T_R$}}

53: \newcommand{\tk}{\mbox{$T_K$}}

54: \newcommand{\td}{\mbox{$T_d$}}

55: \newcommand{\lbol}{\mbox{$L_{bol}$}} % bolometric luminosity

56: \newcommand{\tbol}{\mbox{$T_{bol}$}} % bolometric temperature

57: \newcommand{\dv}{\mbox{$\Delta v$}}

58: \newcommand{\n}{\mbox{$n$}}

59: \newcommand{\nbar}{\mbox{$\overline{n}$}}

60: \newcommand{\nc}{\mbox{$n_c(jk)$}}

61: \newcommand{\mv}{\mbox{$M_V$}} % virial mass

62: \newcommand{\mc}{\mbox{$M_N$}} % column density mass

63: \newcommand{\mn}{\mbox{$M_n$}} % density mass

64: \newcommand{\meanl}{\mbox{$\langle l \rangle$}} % mean size

65: \newcommand{\meanar}{\mbox{$\langle a/b \rangle$}} % mean aspect ratio

66: \newcommand{\mean}[1]{\mbox{$\langle#1\rangle$}} %generic mean for defined qu.

67: \newcommand{\opacity}{\mbox{$\kappa(\nu)$}} % opacity as func. of freq.

68: \newcommand{\av}{\mbox{$A_V$}} % Visual Extinction

69: \newcommand{\bperp}{\mbox{$B_{\perp}$}} % Projection of B on plane of sky

70: \newcommand{\rinf}{\mbox{$r_{inf}$}} % infall radius

71: \newcommand{\fsmm}{\mbox{$L_{smm}/L_{bol}$}} % submm lum over bol. luminosity

72: \newcommand{\lsmm}{\mbox{$L_{smm}$}} % luminosity longward of 350 mic.

73: \newcommand{\alphanir}{\mbox{$\alpha_{NIR}$}} % spectral index 2-20 mic.

74:  

75: %macros for molecule names

76: \newcommand{\hh}{\mbox{{\rm H}$_2$}}

77: \newcommand{\form}{H$_2$CO}

78: \newcommand{\water}{H$_2$O}

79: \newcommand{\ammonia}{\mbox{{\rm NH}$_3$}}

80: \newcommand{\coo}{$^{13}$CO}

81: \newcommand{\cooo}{C$^{18}$O}

82: \newcommand{\coooo}{C$^{17}$O}

83: \newcommand{\hcop}{HCO$^+$}

84: \newcommand{\hcopi}{H$^{13}$CO$^+$}

85: \newcommand{\dcop}{DCO$^+$}

86: \newcommand{\nthp}{N$_2$H$^+$}

87:  

88: %%% macros for figures in postscript format

89: %   syntax: \psfig{vertical size}{ps file name}{caption}

90: \input{epsf}

91: \newcommand{\psfig}[3]

92:            {{\begin{figure}[tbp]

93:              \vbox to#1{\epsfxsize=\textwidth\epsfbox{#2.ps}}

94:              \caption{#3}

95:              \end{figure}}}

96: \newcommand{\psscaledfig}[4]

97:            {{\begin{figure}[tbp]

98:              \centerline{\vbox to#1{\epsfxsize=#2\epsfbox{#3.ps}}}

99:              \caption{#4}

100:              \end{figure}}}

101:  

102: %Macros for this paper

103: \newcommand{\Inu}{\mbox{$I_{\nu}(b)$}}

104: \newcommand{\Snu}{\mbox{$S_{\nu}$}}

105: \newcommand{\Bnu}{\mbox{$B_{\nu}(\Td)$}}

106: \newcommand{\nInu}{\mbox{$I_{\nu}(b)/I_{\nu}(0)$}}

107: \newcommand{\kappanu}{\mbox{$\kappa_{\nu}$}}

108: \newcommand{\Td}{\mbox{$T_{d}$}}

109: \newcommand{\Tdr}{\mbox{$T_{d}(r)$}}

110: \newcommand{\rhor}{\mbox{$\rho (r)$}}

111: \newcommand{\ppc}{pre-protostellar core}

112: \newcommand{\m}{\mbox{$m$}}

113: \newcommand{\p}{\mbox{$p$}}

114: \newcommand{\beam}{\mbox{$\theta_{mb}$}}

115: 

116: \def\sun{$_{\odot}$}

117: \def\um {$\mu$m}

118: %\def\as {{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

119: %\def\am {{$^\prime$}}

120: \def\deg{{$^\circ$}}

121: %\slugcomment{\footnotesize {\LaTeX}ed at \number\time\ min., \today}

122: 

123: \begin{document}

124: 

125: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% title %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

126: 

127: \title{\bf The SCUBA Legacy Catalogues:\\

128: Submillimetre Continuum Objects Detected by SCUBA}

129: %\slugcomment{Last edit James: March 29, 2007}

130: \author {

131: James Di Francesco\altaffilmark{1,2}, 

132: Doug Johnstone\altaffilmark{1,2},

133: Helen Kirk\altaffilmark{1,2},\\

134: Todd MacKenzie\altaffilmark{3},

135: and Elizabeth Ledwosinska\altaffilmark{4}

136: }

137: \altaffiltext{1}{National Research Council of Canada, Herzberg Institute 

138: of Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC, V9E 2E7, Canada}

139: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Elliot Bldg., 3800

140: Finnerty Road, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada}

141: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, University of Prince Edward Island,

142: 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 4P3, Canada}

143: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics, Ernest Rutherford Physics Bldg.,

144: McGill University, 3600 rue University, Montr\'eal, QC, H3A 2T8, Canada}

145: 

146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

147: 

148: \begin{abstract}

149: We present the SCUBA Legacy Catalogues, two comprehensive sets of continuum 

150: maps (and catalogues) using data at 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m of the various 

151: astronomical objects obtained with the Submillimetre Common User Bolometer 

152: Array (SCUBA).  The Fundamental Map Dataset contains data only where superior 

153: atmospheric opacity calibration data were available.  The Extended Map Dataset 

154: is comprised of data regardless of the quality of the opacity calibration.  

155: Each Dataset contains 1.2\deg\ $\times$ 1.2\deg\ maps at locations where data 

156: existed in the JCMT archive, imaged using the matrix inversion method.  The 

157: Fundamental Dataset is comprised of 1423 maps at 850 $\mu$m and 1357 maps at 

158: 450 $\mu$m.  The Extended Dataset is comprised of 1547 maps at 850 $\mu$m.  

159: Neither Dataset includes high sensitivity, single chop SCUBA maps of 

160: ``cosmological fields" nor solar system objects.  Each Dataset was used to 

161: determine a respective Object Catalogue, consisting of objects identified 

162: within the respective 850 $\mu$m maps using an automated identification 

163: algorithm.  The Fundamental and Extended Map Object Catalogues contain 5061

164: and 6118 objects respectively.  Objects are named based on their respective 

165: J2000 position of peak 850 $\mu$m intensity.  The Catalogues provide for each 

166: object the respective maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity, estimates of total 850 

167: $\mu$m flux and size, and tentative identifications from the SIMBAD Database.  

168: Where possible, the Catalogues also provide for each object its maximum 450 

169: $\mu$m intensity and total 450 $\mu$m flux, and flux ratios.  

170: \end{abstract}

171: \keywords{submillimeter --- atlases --- catalogs --- techniques: image processing}

172: 

173: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% text %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

174: 

175: \section{INTRODUCTION}

176: 

177: In 1996, the Submillimetre Common User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) was mounted

178: on the 15~m diameter James Clerk Maxwell Telescope\footnote{The James Clerk

179: Maxwell Telescope is operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the

180: Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council of the UK, the Netherlands

181: Association for Scientific Research, and the National Research Council of

182: Canada} (JCMT) near the summit of Mauna Kea, HI.  Since its commissioning, 

183: SCUBA allowed sensitive, widefield imaging of the submillimeter sky using the 

184: world's largest submillimetre telescope, itself located at one of the world's 

185: best submillimetre observing sites.  During its lifetime, SCUBA was used 

186: extensively by astronomers from the three JCMT partner countries (the UK, 

187: Canada and the Netherlands) and Hawaii, but also by many astronomers from 

188: other countries.  SCUBA operated for almost 9 years; in early 2005, it was 

189: removed from the JCMT after cryogenics and gas handling system failures.  A 

190: large part of the decision to remove SCUBA, rather than repair it, was that

191: a powerful successor instrument, SCUBA-2 (see Holland et al. 2006) will be 

192: installed on the JCMT in late-2007.

193: 

194: Throughout its productive lifetime, SCUBA was used to probe submillimeter

195: continuum emission from a host of various astrophysical phenomena across the 

196: sky observable from Mauna Kea, from objects within the Solar System to distant 

197: galaxies at high redshift.  SCUBA data were made available to observers of 

198: approved projects immediately after their acquisition and were subject to a 

199: proprietary period of one year after the end of the semester of observation.  

200: After this period, however, the data were archived at the Canadian Astronomy 

201: Data Centre\footnote{The Canadian Astronomical Data Centre is operated at the 

202: Dominion Astrophysical Observatory for the National Research Council of Canada} 

203: (CADC) and made available to the public.  (Students working on dissertations 

204: with JCMT data could have this period extended.)  SCUBA data are stored raw 

205: at the CADC, although preview images (made with a simple reduction) are 

206: available for individual files, allowing quick appraisals for data quality 

207: or source detection.  Over $\sim$9 years, however, many objects were observed 

208: over several epochs by different observers and the data spread over several 

209: projects and files.  Submillimeter continuum maps could be significantly 

210: improved by optimally combining these separate data prior to forming final 

211: images.

212: 

213: In this paper, we describe a project to image almost all SCUBA datasets, 

214: using raw data from all epochs, to provide an archive of images at 850 $\mu$m 

215: and 450 $\mu$m that were reduced consistently by a single method (i.e., the 

216: ``matrix inversion" method described by Johnstone et al. 2000a) and using the 

217: most current calibrations (i.e., extinction corrections and Flux Conversion 

218: Factors or FCFs).  The images are themselves available for download at the 

219: CADC as FITS files (see \S 8 for access instructions).  We provide here, 

220: however, examples of some of the spectacular maps produced by SCUBA over 

221: its lifetime.  In addition, we present catalogues drawn from these images 

222: of submillimeter continuum objects mapped by SCUBA, found using an automated 

223: object identification program (based on the ``Clumpfind" algorithm of Williams, 

224: de Geus \& Blitz 1994).  No catalogue of objects at submillimeter wavelengths 

225: akin to the the extremely useful catalogues at near- to far-infrared 

226: wavelengths (e.g., the Catalog of Infrared Observations by Gezari, Schmitz 

227: \& Mead 1984, 1988 or the IRAS Catalogues (see Beichman et al. 1988) currently 

228: exists.  Since the maps produced here are derived from previous SCUBA data, 

229: only a relatively limited amount of sky is covered; the resulting catalogues 

230: are not ``all sky."  Many well-known objects and regions were mapped 

231: extensively with SCUBA, however.  The catalogues provide a context for 

232: understanding the voluminous maps that will be produced by SCUBA-2, and are 

233: themselves a useful planning tool for future observations with new 

234: submillimeter and millimeter interferometers (e.g., SMA, CARMA, ALMA).  The 

235: catalogues discussed here will be linked with other catalogues at the CADC.  

236: 

237: In the following, we describe SCUBA in \S 2, our uniform reduction procedure 

238: in \S 3, and a global description of the resulting maps in \S 4.   In addition,

239: we describe our object identification algorithm in \S 5, the SCUBA map object 

240: catalogues and their contents in \S 6, and several example regions in \S 7.  

241: A description of the available data products is provided in \S 8.  Finally, a 

242: summary is provided in \S 9.

243: 

244: \section{A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SCUBA}

245: 

246: A full description of the instrumental characteristics of SCUBA was made by 

247: Holland et al. (1999).  Here we describe the instrument in brief to provide

248: the context for the maps and catalogues.  SCUBA was built by the Royal 

249: Observatory Edinburgh for the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope.  It consisted 

250: of 128 bolometers arranged into two hexagonally packed arrays, the Long-Wave 

251: (LW) array with 37 bolometers and the Short-Wave (SW) array with 91 bolometers, 

252: as well as three additional bolometers surrounding the LW array.  Simultaneous 

253: illumination of the LW and SW arrays was achieved by dichroic beamsplitting, 

254: allowing for sampling at two wavelengths across 2.3\am\ of sky in a single 

255: pointing.  SCUBA's original filter set allowed for simultaneous observations 

256: in the LW and SW arrays either at 750 $\mu$m and 350 $\mu$m or at 850 $\mu$m 

257: and 450 $\mu$m.  (The 3 additional bolometers surrounding the LW array allowed 

258: for single-pixel observations at 1100 $\mu$m, 1300 $\mu$m and 2000 $\mu$m.)  

259: Most SCUBA observations, however, were made at 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m, in 

260: part because the filter wheel became stuck at this pair in 1997.  All SCUBA 

261: bolometers were cooled to $<$1 K, allowing sky background noise sensitivity 

262: levels to be achieved.  Subtraction of the sky was enabled by sampling 

263: off-target locations repeatedly during observations using the chopping 

264: sub-reflector of the JCMT.  Note that chopping has a profound effect on SCUBA 

265: data, as emission on angular scales larger than the chop throw effectively is 

266: spatially filtered out of the resulting maps.  At 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m, 

267: the resolutions of SCUBA data were represented to first order by Gaussians 

268: of $\sim$14\as\ and $\sim$9\as\ FWHM respectively, although significant 

269: ``error beams" were also present, especially at 450 $\mu$m (Hogerheijde \& 

270: Sandell 2000; see also \S 3.1 below).  These ``error beams" must be taken 

271: into account when determining fluxes (see \S 4 and \S 5 below).

272: 

273: SCUBA was used to observe the submillimeter sky in three specific modes.  

274: As mentioned above, at all times the contaminating sky emission was removed

275: via chopping with the sub-reflector.  The first was a ``photometry" mode used 

276: for maximum sensitivity at the location of the central bolometer, i.e., the 

277: telescope effectively stared at a fixed location to maximize received signal 

278: from a single target.  The second was a ``jiggle" mode, used to make 

279: Nyquist-sampled maps across the SCUBA field-of-view, i.e., the telescope 

280: was moved in a fixed pattern to positions offset from each other by fractions 

281: of the beam to fill in spaces between the individual bolometers.  The third 

282: was a ``scan" mode used to make larger-scale maps at the expense of sensitivity 

283: at any given position, i.e., the telescope was slewed over relatively large 

284: distances (typically 10 arcminutes) producing strips along the sky which 

285: could be stitched together. By carefully choosing the angle with respect to 

286: the bolometer array that the telescope moved, the spacing between measurements 

287: Nyquist-sampled the sky.  All three modes allowed differential continuum 

288: intensities to be measured.  Polarized continuum emission, however, could 

289: also be observed across the arrays by using a rotating quartz half waveplate, 

290: but only in photometry or jiggle mode. 

291: 

292: \section{MAP DATA PROCESSING}

293: 

294: Since the goal of this project was to make maps and then catalogue objects 

295: therein, all raw jiggle and scan data from SCUBA available in the JCMT archive 

296: were downloaded from the CADC in May 2006.  (Photometry and polarimetry data

297: were ignored.)  In addition, SCUBA data taken at wavelengths other than 850 

298: $\mu$m or 450 $\mu$m were not retrieved.  The downloaded data consisted 

299: of 35455 ``SCUBA Data Files" describing for each bolometer the time of 

300: measurement, the location observed on the sky, and the measured voltage 

301: difference between that position and a specified off-position.  The 850 $\mu$m 

302: and 450 $\mu$m map data retrieved should have comprised all those normally 

303: available to the public at these wavelengths, since the instrument had ceased 

304: operations $>$1 year earlier.  In total size, the raw data were only 78.7 GB. 

305: 

306: Further culling of the raw data ensemble was necessary.  Data of objects in 

307: the Solar System (e.g., planets, asteroids, comets) were removed since these 

308: objects have time varying positions, angular sizes, and brightnesses.  Such 

309: files were located by visually inspecting the list of unique ``target names" 

310: attached to each.  (Those interested in SCUBA maps of Solar System objects at 

311: particular epochs can download them directly from the CADC.)  In addition, a 

312: small number of data attached to peculiar target names (e.g., ``whatever" or 

313: ``reflector") were also removed from the ensemble.  Only 28534 SCUBA Data Files 

314: remained after culling Solar System and peculiar objects.  In size, these 

315: culled data were 69.9 GB.  Figure 1 shows the locations on the sky of all the 

316: SCUBA maps described in this paper; well-sampled areas such as the Galactic 

317: Plane and nearby molecular clouds like Orion and Ophiuchus are clearly visible.

318: 

319: Atmospheric attenuation dominates the raw voltage difference measurements

320: and the effect of such attenuation must be calibrated out in the data to 

321: obtain proper voltage levels for observed sources.  The SCUBA data were 

322: calibrated separately at 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m using the standard 

323: ORAC-DR program, part of the STARLINK package (Economou et al. 1999).  

324: Overall, 99.98\% of the raw files could be calibrated with ORAC-DR without 

325: error, and the remaining were discarded.  The baseline atmospheric opacity 

326: data for SCUBA calibration were obtained from a combination of skydips 

327: made with SCUBA itself and contemporaneous tipping scans made by a 

328: dedicated 225 GHz radiometer (the ``CSO 225 GHz Dipper") located at the 

329: nearby Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO).\footnote{For the first 

330: half of 2003 the NRAO dipper was used as a substitute for the CSO 225 

331: GHz Dipper due to complications with the CSO instrument.} See Archibald 

332: et al. (2002) and Weferling (2005) for wide discussions of SCUBA calibration 

333: and how these data were tabulated for use in reducing SCUBA observations. 

334: Superior atmospheric correction utilizes a low-order polynomial fit in 

335: time to a combination of the two opacity determinations but was available 

336: for only 77.77\% of the SCUBA map dataset. For the rest of the data, the 

337: CSO 225 GHz Dipper measurement, stored in the observation header, could 

338: be used to estimate the sky opacity at 450 $\mu$m and 850 $\mu$m, although 

339: with much larger uncertainty in the conversion.

340: 

341: Given the importance of proper opacity correction, 850 $\mu$m and 450 

342: $\mu$m maps were first made with only the $\sim$78\% of data where superior 

343: atmospheric correction data were available.  These maps comprise the 

344: ``Fundamental Map Dataset" and these should be referred to when interested 

345: in the most accurate fluxes.  To expand the scope of the maps, additional 

346: 850 $\mu$m maps were made using {\it all} available data.  These latter data 

347: comprise the ``Extended Map Dataset" and these should be referred to when 

348: interested in the widest areal coverage.  The Extended Map Dataset does not 

349: include 450 $\mu$m maps because of the greater importance of accurate opacity 

350: calibration at shorter submillimeter wavelengths.  In the following, we treat 

351: the Fundamental and Extended Map Datasets equally, and provide catalogues 

352: derived from each.

353: 

354: With a nine-year lifetime, the weather conditions when SCUBA was used varied 

355: significantly of course.  Figure 2 shows histograms of opacity values at 850 

356: $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m from data within the Fundamental Dataset, demonstrating

357: the spread of opacity values when SCUBA observed.

358: %{(\dij This information should also be included in the information associated

359: % with each map.)}

360: 

361: As well as calibrating the sky opacity corrections, the conversion between

362: voltage difference and flux must be determined. Jenness et al. (2002) showed

363: that over extended periods (typically semesters) during which no significant

364: changes to the telescope and electronics were performed, the Flux Conversion

365: Factor (FCF) was essentially constant with an uncertainty of approximately 

366: $10\%$ and $25\%$ at 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m respectively.  Most of the 

367: uncertainty is caused by changes in the telescope surface, due to temperature 

368: and gravity deformations, producing changes in the beam profile.  The 

369: corresponding FCF values are tabulated and available for use in data 

370: reduction.

371: 

372: To facilitate the creation of useful maps, the sky was divided into 

373: square-degree regions (actually each was 1.2\deg\ $\times$ 1.2\deg\ in 

374: extent, with 0.1\deg\ overlap with neighboring fields) using galactic 

375: coordinates and the individual observations comprising the Datasets 

376: were sorted into bins corresponding to these regions. The maps themselves, 

377: however, are stored in J2000 equatorial coordinates.  

378: 

379: Maps of each square-degree region were then made individually using the 

380: ``mapfits" program using the respectively sorted calibrated map data as 

381: inputs.  Mapfits is based on the matrix inversion scheme described by 

382: Johnstone et al. (2000a), which produces better images from chopped data 

383: than techniques such as the Fourier deconvolution (e.g., Emerson et al. 

384: 1979; Emerson 1995).  In addition, the matrix inversion method allows the 

385: combination of data taken with different observing setups, such as jiggle 

386: and scan observations.  Furthermore, data from specific bolometers are 

387: weighted appropriately by their respective associated noise levels.  

388: Finally, the image fidelity and dynamic ranges achieved by the matrix 

389: inversion method are good; see Johnstone et al. (2000a) for examples 

390: where sources of known brightness are artificially included into maps.

391: 

392: Previously published examples of SCUBA maps made via matrix inversion 

393: include those of molecular clouds in Ophiuchus (Johnstone et al. 2000b, 

394: Johnstone, Di Francesco \& Kirk 2004), Perseus (Kirk et al. 2006), and 

395: Orion (Johnstone et al. 2001; Johnstone, Matthews \& Mitchell 2006; 

396: Johnstone \& Bally 2006).  Additionally, L1551 in Taurus (Moriarty-Schieven 

397: et al. 2006) explicitly demonstrates the power of the ``mapfits" algorithm 

398: for bringing together heterogeneous SCUBA observations.  

399: 

400: Pixel sizes for the 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m maps were defined at 6\as\ 

401: and 3\as\ respectively.  For each square-degree region, 3 maps were created 

402: at each wavelength: an emission map with sky intensity pixels in Jy 

403: beam$^{-1}$, an error map with standard deviation values at each pixel, 

404: and a coverage map with each pixel containing the number of times its 

405: position was observed with SCUBA.  The resulting maps are projected onto 

406: a tangent plane associated with the center of each square-degree field.

407:  

408: A small amount of data had problems that required their respective files to 

409: be excised from the various square-degree regions.  These problems included: 

410: i) data listed as ``not a number" (NaN), ii) data that caused segmentation 

411: faults when running mapfits, iii) data associated with a ``wrong number of 

412: bolometers" and iv) data with pixels of extremely high (``infinite") noise. 

413: After discarding these files, the corresponding square-degree maps were 

414: remade using mapfits. 

415: 

416: Each square-degree map was further processed to remove artifacts.  First, 

417: noisy edges in each map were clipped.  Since such edges resulted from there

418: being relatively few observations at the associated pixels, the coverage 

419: maps were used to find pixels in the data maps at locations with less than 15 

420: observations, and these were clipped.  (The number maps were first smoothed 

421: with a Gaussian kernel of $\sigma_G$ = 7 pixels to minimize pixel-to-pixel 

422: variations.  Note that the square-degree maps may contain data of different

423: sensitivities due to differing integration times or opacity conditions during

424: separate observations of nearby targets.)  Second, the data maps themselves 

425: were smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of $\sigma_{G}$ = 1 pixel to minimize 

426: pixel-to-pixel noise; in effect, this increased the expected resolutions of 

427: the maps to $\sim$19\as\ FWHM at 850 $\mu$m and $\sim$11\as\ at 450 $\mu$m 

428: (but see \S 3.1 below).  Third, the data maps were flattened to remove the 

429: large spatial scale variations that occurred due to imperfect cancellation 

430: of sky signal through chopping.  Flattening was performed by first filtering 

431: and smoothing the original clipped data map with a Gaussian of large kernel 

432: size, and then subtracting this map from the smoothed and clipped data map.  

433: To prevent excessive bowling around bright sources, pixels with values $>5 

434: \times$ the median noise in the original clipped map were replaced by pixels 

435: with values equal to $5 \times$ the median noise.  Filtering was effective in 

436: reducing common artifacts where bright emission is surrounded by a bowl of 

437: negative pixels.  For smoothing, the filtered data map was smoothed with a 

438: Gaussian kernel of $\sigma_G$ = 20 pixels for the 850 $\mu$m data and 40 

439: pixels for the 450 $\mu$m data.  (After subtraction, edge pixels that had been 

440: previously clipped were reclipped.) 

441: 

442: To improve flux calibration, processed maps that contained three point-like 

443: objects, HL Tau, CRL 618 (PN G166.4-06.5) and CRL 2688 (the Egg Nebula), were 

444: examined.  The 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m continuum maximum intensities and 

445: total fluxes of these three objects were well determined by JCMT staff for 

446: better calibration of SCUBA data.  The comparison between the expected maximum 

447: intensities and those found in the processed maps at both wavelengths yielded 

448: correction factors that were applied respectively to all 850 $\mu$m and 450 

449: $\mu$m processed maps.  Table 1 lists the expected maximum intensities of all 

450: three objects at both wavelengths, and the maximum intensities and total fluxes 

451: found in the processed maps after the respective correction was made.  Small 

452: differences between the expected and ``observed" maximum intensities and fluxes 

453: still persist, but these are likely due to small variations in intrinsic source 

454: structure, non-centering of the object maximum intensities in a single pixel, 

455: and variations of observing conditions between objects.  As described below 

456: in \S 3, the absolute flux uncertainties of SCUBA data have been historically 

457: $\sim$20\% at 850 $\mu$m and $\sim$50\% at 450 $\mu$m.

458: 

459: Each flux-corrected and processed square-degree map was visually inspected

460: for quality.  In some maps containing jiggle data, periodic structures (i.e., 

461: ripples) were seen.  Such ripples can be introduced to maps when data obtained 

462: with non-standard set-ups or during times of instrumental failure are included. 

463: (Data were not placed into the JCMT Archive with a quality flag.)  In addition, 

464: such ripples may arise when jiggle data are obtained with only one chop throw 

465: and angle, which precludes the kind of interconnectivity between data points 

466: that benefits maps made by matrix inversion.  Such data are susceptible to 

467: amplification of the chop signal during reconstruction.  This effect typically 

468: does not occur over the spatial scale of a single jiggle map, but when many 

469: jiggle maps are combined to make a larger map, each with a single chop throw 

470: and angle, the opportunity increases for amplification due to degeneracy 

471: in reconstruction.  Unfortunately, many fields that were observed for high 

472: sensitivity to detect faint high-redshift galaxies, including the Hubble Deep 

473: Field, the Groth Strip, and the SHADES fields (the Subaru/XMM Deep Field and 

474: the Lockman Hole) were observed with a single chop throw and angle, and we were 

475: unable to produce satisfactory maps of these regions.  All square-degree maps 

476: entirely containing such periodic structure, including these ``cosmological" 

477: fields, were removed from the ensembles after visual inspection.  (Those 

478: interested in such fields should look at the respective papers where the data 

479: have been very carefully processed, e.g., see Coppin et al. 2006 for the SHADES 

480: fields.)  Square-degree maps containing regions of reasonable quality but 

481: localized regions with periodic structure (e.g., one with good scan or jiggle 

482: data in some locations but rippled jiggle data in other locations) were 

483: retained, however.  Objects found from these maps at locations of periodic 

484: structure were removed from catalogues after further visual inspection (see

485: \S 4 below).

486: 

487: \section{MAP RESULTS}

488: 

489: In the Fundamental Map Dataset, 1423 square-degree maps contain SCUBA map data 

490: at 850 $\mu$m and 1357 square-degree maps contain SCUBA map data at 450 $\mu$m.

491: (Note that 214 of the Fundamental 850 $\mu$m maps and 213 of the Fundamental 

492: 450 $\mu$m maps contain data only in the outer 0.1\deg\ of each 1.2\deg\ 

493: $\times$ 1.2\deg\ field; these locations are also found within the central 

494: square degree in other maps of adjacent fields.)  In total, the 850 $\mu$m 

495: Fundamental maps contain $\sim$7.06 $\times$ 10$^{6}$ pixels for a total areal 

496: coverage of 19.6 square degrees.  The 450 $\mu$m Fundamental maps contain a 

497: total of 23.6 $\times$ 10$^{6}$ pixels for a total areal coverage of 16.4 

498: square degrees.  The smaller areal coverage of the 450 $\mu$m maps reflects 

499: the fact that at times only the 850 $\mu$m data from the telescope was stored 

500: during observations.  (Often this occurred during fast-scans, where the 

501: telescope was slewed at an accelerated rate and any 450 $\mu$m observations 

502: were significantly undersampled.)  In the Extended Map Dataset, 1547 

503: square-degree maps contain SCUBA map data at 850 $\mu$m.  (Note that 234 of 

504: these maps contain data only in the outer 0.1\deg\ of each 1.2\deg\ $\times$ 

505: 1.2\deg\ field.)  These maps contain a total of 10.6 $\times$ 10$^{6}$ pixels 

506: for a total areal coverage of 29.3 square degrees, i.e., $\sim$50\% larger than 

507: in the Fundamental Map Dataset at 850 $\mu$m.  

508: 

509: Figures 3-6 show examples of maps assembled from the data processed in this 

510: effort, for low-mass star-forming regions, high-mass star-forming regions, 

511: nearby galaxies, and debris disks respectively.  These data, as with all 

512: data described here, are available for public use at the CADC. 

513:  

514: Figure 7 shows 1-D profiles of the JCMT beams at 850 $\mu$m (bottom) and 450 

515: $\mu$m (top), clipped to highlight the relative magnitude of the departure 

516: from Gaussian profiles, i.e., the error beams.  These profiles were obtained 

517: from slices across Fundamental Dataset data of the point-like source CRL 618

518: (PN G166.4-06.5).  As a common SCUBA calibrator, CRL 618 was observed numerous 

519: times over SCUBA's lifetime, and the data shown in Figure 7 are composites 

520: of all the map data of CRL 618 in the archive with proper flux calibration.  

521: Figures 7a and 7b show the 1-D profiles at 450 $\mu$m and 850 $\mu$m 

522: respectively that were obtained from maps of CRL 618 made with 1\as\ pixels.  

523: Figures 7c and 7d show 1-D profiles of the same object again at 450 $\mu$m 

524: and 850 $\mu$m respectively but obtained from maps made with 3\as\ and 6\as\ 

525: pixels, as in both Datasets.  In each case, the beams show clear non-Gaussian 

526: features but can be effectively represented by a sum of two Gaussians, a 

527: narrow ``primary" beam of FWHM approximately that of the expected resolution 

528: of the telescope at a given wavelength and smoothing and a wide ``error beam" 

529: of 40\as\ FWHM independent of wavelength.  For the 1\as\ maps, the 450 $\mu$m 

530: beam contains a primary beam of 8.5\as\ FWHM and 0.90 relative peak and the 

531: 850 $\mu$m beam contains a primary beam of 13.5\as\ FWHM and 0.96 relative 

532: peak.  The values we obtain are consistent with those obtained by Hogerheijde 

533: \& Sandell (2000) who used data of Uranus from 1997 September, although they 

534: included a third, very wide, low amplitude Gaussian in their beam models at 

535: each wavelength.  For the 6\as\ maps, the 450 $\mu$m beam contains a primary 

536: beam of 11\as\ FWHM and 0.88 relative peak and the 850 $\mu$m beam contains 

537: a primary beam of 19.5\as\ FWHM and 0.88 relative peak.  (At both wavelengths, 

538: the secondary beam is of 40\as\ FHWM and 0.12 relative peak.)  These larger 

539: values are due to the effective smoothing that comes with using larger pixels 

540: but also due to the additional smoothing by $\sigma_{G}$ = 1-pixel applied to 

541: each map to reduce pixel-to-pixel noise.  The effective FWHMs of the beams 

542: in each Dataset are 17.3\as\ at 450 $\mu$m and 22.9\as\ at 850 $\mu$m.  These 

543: beam values are used in the computation of the observed fluxes below (see \S 

544: 6). 

545: 

546: Since the maps were taken over a variety of different weather conditions and

547: methods, there is no common noise level representative of the entire dataset.  

548: Also, some maps are composites of several different observing runs, and so 

549: the noise level within any given map may not be uniform.  Figure 8 presents a 

550: histogram showing the distributions of 1~$\sigma$ rms across pixels in the 

551: Fundamental and Extended maps.  The 850 $\mu$m distributions have Poissonian 

552: characters, i.e., peaks at small values ($\sim$40 mJy beam$^{-1}$) and long 

553: tails to large values.  The median values of the rms at 850 $\mu$m are 71.0 

554: mJy beam$^{-1}$ and 76.2 mJy beam$^{-1}$ for the Fundamental and Extended maps 

555: respectively.   The 450 $\mu$m distribution has two peaks, however, a narrow 

556: one at $\sim$50 mJy beam$^{-1}$ and a broad one at $\sim$380 mJy beam$^{-1}$.  

557: The median value of the rms at 450 $\mu$m is 820 mJy beam$^{-1}$.  Note that 

558: the pixels oversample the beam at both wavelengths, so that the noise at a 

559: given pixel is larger than the noise within a fixed beam.  Also, for object 

560: identification (see \S 5 below), we use the median noise per pixel associated 

561: with the individual objects under investigation and not the median noise 

562: values of each entire square-degree map. 

563: 

564: Absolute flux uncertainties in the SCUBA maps were dominated by fluctuations 

565: of opacity above the telescope during observations and calibration.  Typical 

566: absolute flux uncertainties of SCUBA maps have been historically $\sim$20\% 

567: at 850 $\mu$m and $\sim$50\% at 450 $\mu$m (Matthews 2003), reflecting almost 

568: equal contributions from flux calibration and beam-shape uncertainty.  We 

569: adopt these uncertainties for the Catalogues in this paper.  As seen in Table 

570: 1, the maximum intensities and fluxes of the three point-like calibrators 

571: HL Tau, CRL 618 (PN G166.4-06.5) and CRL 2688 (the Egg Nebula) have values 

572: within these uncertainties.  For further discussion of the uncertainties in 

573: object fluxes, see \S 7.2.

574: 

575: Each map was made using positional data that accompanied the respective 

576: SCUBA Data Files.  Pointing accuracy for SCUBA was typically $\sim$3\as\ 

577: and tracking accuracy was typically $\sim$1.5\as\ (H. Matthews, private 

578: communication).  Larger pointing offsets did occur during observations

579: occasionally.  For example, SCUBA data of the young stellar cluster NGC 

580: 1333 required positional corrections of $\sim$6\as\ to line up peaks with 

581: data from other wavelengths (Sandell \& Knee 2001).  Given the lack of 

582: common positional references at other wavelengths across all map areas,

583: however, we have performed no positional fine-tuning on the maps.  For

584: further discussion of the uncertainties in positions, see \S 7.3.

585: 

586: Despite the care given to improving the maps here, they still may retain 

587: defects.  For example, some bright objects can still be surrounded by negative 

588: ``bowls" that are obviously artificial.  In addition, map edges may still 

589: contain extended (positive or negative) artifacts from proper removal of sky 

590: emission that remain despite flattening the map. Higher accuracy determination

591: of fluxes and source morphologies requires significant user interaction when

592: map-making. The maps presented here should not be used when the highest 

593: precision is required, rather for such regions extreme consideration of the 

594: calibrations, etc., should be performed.  We expected, however, that the 

595: vast majority of information contained in the archival SCUBA data has been 

596: efficiently presented in these maps.

597: 

598: \section{OBJECT IDENTIFICATION}

599: 

600: We describe here the methods used to extract information about the objects 

601: detected in the 850 $\mu$m SCUBA maps.  We did not utilize the 450 $\mu$m 

602: maps to define objects given the lower accuracy of its flux calibration and 

603: the smaller number of 450 $\mu$m maps.  The identification of objects from 

604: submillimeter continuum emission is tricky because the emission itself can 

605: range in maps from being quite compact (e.g., on the order of the beam size) 

606: to quite extended (e.g., beyond the chop throw angular distance, although on 

607: these scales it becomes attenuated by the observing techniques).  In addition, 

608: such objects can be themselves either bright or dim and can be arranged in 

609: compact or diffuse associations.  

610: 

611: To identify objects, we applied to every 850 $\mu$m square-degree map the 

612: 2-D ``Clumpfind" algorithm, developed first for 3-D cubes of molecular line 

613: data by Williams, de Geus \& Blitz (1994) and adapted for use on SCUBA 

614: continuum maps.  Clumpfind works by following isointensity contours within 

615: maps, defining objects by emission within a closed contour either 2~$\sigma$ 

616: below a pre-defined sensitivity limit (e.g., 5~$\sigma$) or higher if a 

617: neighboring object is encountered at a higher contour level.  Since objects 

618: are defined only in terms of closed contours, Clumpfind does not presuppose 

619: a particular source structure for its identifications, e.g., Gaussians.  

620: Since the noise level will significantly vary across any map comprised of 

621: observations of separate objects at different epochs, the 3 $\times$ the 

622: minimum noise levels of a given map were used first to define objects.  For 

623: each object candidate, Clumpfind returns its peak intensity and the position 

624: of peak intensity, as well as its total flux density and size based on the 

625: number of pixels within the closed contour of definition.  Clumpfind also 

626: produces a ``object map" that identifies pixels with specific objects.  By 

627: using a minimum noise threshold in every map, the algorithm was driven in a

628: first pass to include as many object candidates as possible; many of these 

629: had maximum intensities not more than a few times their local median noise 

630: levels, however. 

631: 

632: After initial identification, three criteria were applied to each object 

633: candidate to determine its reality as an astronomical source and improve 

634: the robustness of the object lists.  First, objects were discarded if their 

635: peak pixel values were less than 3 times the median of the noise in the pixels 

636: that defined it.  Second, objects were discarded if their sizes were less 

637: than the areal size of the effective beams (e.g., $\leq$8 pixels at 850 

638: $\mu$m).  Third, objects were removed if they were located near the edges 

639: of maps, where large scale fluctuations tended to remain even after flattening. 

640: For scan maps, identified objects with peaks within 25 pixels along the 

641: cardinal directions to the map edges were discarded if they were adjacent 

642: other sources that adjoined the map edge.  For jiggle maps, no such removals 

643: were done, given their innately smaller sizes.  Identified objects adjoining 

644: jiggle map edges, however, were identified as such (see \S 6), since it is 

645: likely they have been incompletely sampled or characterized (if indeed such 

646: objects are real).

647: 

648: Note that since Clumpfind depends on the noise characteristics of a given 

649: map to define objects, the objects found in the Fundamental and Extended Map 

650: Datasets may differ.  For example, an extended object identified as single in 

651: one Dataset may be identified as multiple objects in the other Dataset.  This 

652: dependence on noise is the reason why two object lists have been provided, 

653: rather than a single hybrid object list.  As an example, Figure 9 illustrates

654: differences between objects identified in L1688 of Ophiuchus in the Fundamental 

655: and Extended Datasets.

656: 

657: Clumpfind is by no means the perfect method for identifying objects in SCUBA 

658: maps.  It has, however, an attractive simplicity and generality that allowed 

659: it to be used on large map datasets (Johnstone et al. 2000b, etc.)  Other 

660: methods used to identify objects in (sub)millimeter continuum maps include 

661: various wavelet decomposition schemes (e.g., see Motte, Andr\'e \& Neri 1998

662: or Knudsen et al. 2006) or peak finding algorithms related to CLEAN-style 

663: deconvolution (e.g., see Enoch et al. 2006 or Young et al. 2006).  As described 

664: by Enoch et al., Clumpfind recovers well total flux densities in crowded 

665: regions of compact sources where blind aperture photometry is inappropriate.  

666: In addition, the Clumpfind algorithm does not unnecessarily divide up extended 

667: emission into multiple objects.  Clumpfind, however, likely underestimates the 

668: total flux densities for isolated or faint sources since significant source 

669: flux may reside below the pre-defined signal threshold limit.  (See \S 7.1

670: below for further discussions about the limitations of this technique.)

671: 

672: \section{THE CATALOGUES}

673: 

674: In this section, we describe the Catalogues based on the Fundamental and 

675: Extended Datasets.  Tables 2 and 3 list the Fundamental Map Object Catalogue 

676: (FMOC) and the Extended Map Object Catalogue (EMOC) respectively.  The FMOC 

677: and EMOC contain objects identified at 850 $\mu$m from the Fundamental and 

678: Extended Map Datasets respectively (see \S 4).  Again, the Fundamental Map 

679: Dataset includes only the 77.77\% of SCUBA map data where proper opacity data 

680: from both skydips and the CSO radiometer were available while the Extended 

681: Map Dataset includes all SCUBA map data deemed useable, i.e., data where only 

682: radiometer data were stored in the header.  (The Extended Map Dataset only 

683: includes maps at 850 $\mu$m, however.)  In total, the FMOC contains 5061 

684: objects and the EMOC contains 6118 objects, 20.4\% more than the FMOC.  

685: 

686: The following description of the Columns of Tables 2 and 3 applies to their 

687: electronic versions.  Columns 4 and 15-26 described below are not present in 

688: the printed versions of Tables 2 and 3.

689: 

690: Column 1 lists the object name, based on the position of its pixel of maximum 

691: brightness at 850 $\mu$m in J2000 coordinates.  The convention used is 

692: ``JCMTS{\it n}\_JHHMMSS.S$\pm$DDMMSS" where ``JCMTS" is short for JCMT/SCUBA 

693: and {\it n} is either ``F" or ``E" depending on whether the object is in the 

694: Fundamental or Extended Catalogues respectively.  In addition, ``J" indicates

695: that the following coordinates are in the J2000.0 epoch.  HHMMSS.S denotes the 

696: hours, minutes and seconds in Right Ascension and $\pm$DDMMSS is the degrees, 

697: minutes and seconds in declination of the pixel of maximum intensity.  Columns 

698: 2 and 3 list respectively the galactic coordinates\footnote{To convert from 

699: J2000 to galactic coordinates, the J2000.0 position of the North Galactic Pole 

700: was assumed to be (12$^{h}$51$^{m}$26.28$^{s}$, +27$^{\circ}$07\am 41.7\as) 

701: and the galactic longitude of the ascending node of the Galactic Equator was 

702: assumed to be 32.93192\deg, following the ICRS system values of these provided 

703: in the Hipparcos Catalogue (1997)} $l$ and $b$ for each object, based on the 

704: J2000 coordinates from Column 1.  Column 4 lists the name of the FITS file 

705: containing the 850 $\mu$m square-degree map from which the object was 

706: identified.  

707: 

708: Columns 5-9 list some 850 $\mu$m characteristics for each object.  Column 5

709: lists the object maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity in Jy beam$^{-1}$.  Column 6 

710: lists the object ``effective radius" in arcseconds, determined from the square 

711: root of the area of the object found by Clumpfind divided by $\pi$.  (Note 

712: that this is {\it not} the FWHM of a given object.)  Column 7 lists the median 

713: 850 $\mu$m noise in Jy beam$^{-1}$ of all pixels associated with the object 

714: (defined by Clumpfind).  Column 8 lists the signal-to-noise ratio of the 

715: detection, i.e., the ratio of the maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity (see Column 5) 

716: to the median 850 $\mu$m noise (see Column 7).  Column 9 lists the object 

717: 850 $\mu$m flux in Jy, derived as the flux of the object over its area defined 

718: by Clumpfind (i.e., down to a level equal to 3 $\times$ the minimum noise 

719: of the map of origin).  To determine 850 $\mu$m fluxes, a Gaussian beam of 

720: 22.9\as\ FWHM was assumed (see \S 4).  

721: 

722: Columns 10-14 provide other 850 $\mu$m characteristics for each object.  

723: Column 10 lists an alternative 850 $\mu$m flux in Jy, derived as the flux 

724: within an alternative area, i.e., that defined by a contour of 3 $\times$ 

725: 30 mJy beam$^{-1}$ = 90 mJy beam$^{-1}$ for all possible objects.  Determining 

726: fluxes for all objects within a common intensity threshold allows fluxes 

727: between objects to be compared more easily.  The common threshold of 30 mJy 

728: beam$^{-1}$ was chosen to be representative of typical noise levels of the 

729: 850 $\mu$m maps, as seen in Figure 8.  Column 11 lists an effective radius 

730: of an alternative area for each object, i.e.,  where pixels had 850 $\mu$m 

731: intensities $\geq$ 90 mJy beam$^{-1}$.  Column 12 is a flag for the 850 

732: $\mu$m data.  If the maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity (Column 5) is $\geq$ 5 

733: $\times$ 30 mJy beam$^{-1}$ = 150 mJy beam$^{-1}$, Column 12 is blank.  If

734: otherwise, Column 12 lists "c" and Columns 10 and 11 list the dummy values

735: ``-99.99" and ``-99.9" respectively.  Columns 13 and 14 list respectively 

736: the minimum and median noise values at 850 $\mu$m from the square-degree 

737: map from which the object was identified (i.e., Column 4).

738: 

739: Columns 15-19 list, if available, the 450 $\mu$m characteristics for each 

740: object.  Again, Clumpfind was not used on the 450 $\mu$m maps to define 

741: objects; instead 450 $\mu$m characteristics for each object are determined 

742: using the alternative area described above, i.e., the angular extent where 

743: their 850 $\mu$m intensities $\geq$ 90 mJy beam$^{-1}$.  Column 15 lists the 

744: median 450 $\mu$m noise in Jy beam$^{-1}$ over the alternative area of the 

745: object.  If the maximum 450 $\mu$m intensity within the alternative area 

746: (Column 11) is $>$3$\times$ the median 450 $\mu$m noise, Column 16 (a flag)

747: is blank, Column 17 lists the maximum 450 $\mu$m intensity in Jy beam$^{-1}$, 

748: Column 18 (another flag) is blank and Column 19 lists the 450 $\mu$m flux 

749: of the object in Jy, assuming a Gaussian beam of 17.3\as\ FWHM (see \S 4).  

750: Otherwise, Columns 16 and 18 list ``$<$," Column 17 lists an upper limit 

751: equal to 3 $\times$ the median 450 $\mu$m noise and Column 19 lists a 450 

752: $\mu$m flux upper limit determined by assuming each pixel within the 

753: alternative area (Column 11) contains a value equal to 3 $\times$ the 

754: median 450 $\mu$m noise.  

755: 

756: Columns 20-23 list, if available, the ratios of two wavelength data for each

757: object.  For these ratios, the 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m maps were convolved 

758: with beams from the other respective wavelength, to produce maps at each 

759: wavelength with a common beam size.  (After this convolution, both maps are 

760: at the same resolution and have common ``error beams.")  If an upper limit 

761: to the maximum 450 $\mu$m intensity is {\it not} given, Column 20 (a flag) 

762: is blank, Column 21 lists the ratio of maximum intensity at 450 $\mu$m to 

763: that at 850 $\mu$m for each object, Column 22 (a flag) is blank and Column 

764: 23 lists the ratio of flux at 450 $\mu$m to 850 $\mu$m for each object, 

765: determined over the alternative area described.  If the maximum 450 $\mu$m 

766: intensity (Column 17) is an upper limit, Columns 20 and 22 list ``$<$" and

767: Column 21 lists an upper limit to the intensity ratio where the maximum 450 

768: $\mu$m intensity upper limit is equal to 3 $\times$ the median 450 $\mu$m 

769: noise, corrected to take into account the larger beam size of the convolved 

770: 450 $\mu$m map.  Further, Column 23 lists in this case an upper limit to the 

771: flux ratio where the 450 $\mu$m flux upper limit is equal to that determined 

772: assuming each pixel in the convolved map within the alternative area contains 

773: a value equal to 3 $\times$ the beam-corrected median 450 $\mu$m noise.  

774: Note that the large uncertainties of the 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m fluxes 

775: make the uncertainties in their ratios accordingly large, i.e., $>$60\%. 

776: 

777: Column 24 provides further flags for the 450 $\mu$m data.  If the actual 

778: median 450 $\mu$m noise (Column 15) was $>$999 Jy beam$^{-1}$, Column 24 

779: lists ``n."  In addition, if no 450 $\mu$m data are present at the location 

780: of the object, Column 24 lists ``M."  Finally, if the maximum 850 $\mu$m 

781: intensity of the object is not $\geq$ 150 mJy beam$^{-1}$, Column 24 lists 

782: ``c," as for Column 12.  In all these cases, Columns 15-19 list the dummy 

783: values ``-99.99."

784: 

785: Column 25 indicates the proximity of the object to the edge of its respective 

786: mapped area.  The maximum intensities and fluxes of an identified object can 

787: be considered accurate only if it has been sampled in its entirety across the 

788: sky.  To provide a sense of this accuracy, Column 19 lists either ``clear" or 

789: ``edge" for each object.  If the former, the object was defined without any 

790: pixel extending to an area of the sky not mapped by SCUBA.  If the latter, the 

791: object extends to a map edge, and the determined fluxes should be considered

792: only as lower limits.

793: 

794: Column 26 lists potential identifications of the catalogued objects from other 

795: catalogues.  These were obtained from the SIMBAD astronomical database using a

796: bulk request for objects in the literature that were located within an 11.5\as\

797: radius (i.e., half the effective FWHM of the 850 $\mu$m beam) of the position 

798: of maximum brightness at 850 $\mu$m, as defined in Column 1.  The object chosen 

799: for Column 26 was that which was closest to the position of maximum 850 $\mu$m 

800: intensity.  Given that many astronomical objects have several names, we 

801: prioritized the identification of objects based on their name, or if not named, 

802: identification within the NGC, IC, 3C, HD, SAO, BD, or IRAS catalogues.  

803: (In cases of identification in several of these catalogues, the entry in Column 

804: 26 was decided in order of how these catalogues were just listed.)  Many 

805: objects, however, are not found within these specific catalogues but were 

806: identified in various other studies.  Following the nomenclature of the SIMBAD 

807: database, we include in Column 26 the bibliographical abbreviation of these 

808: studies, along with the identification in that study.  If the SIMBAD database 

809: did not contain an identified object within an 11.5\as\ radius, Column 26 lists 

810: instead ``noMatch."  Note that extended objects can have very poorly defined 

811: positions (e.g., dark nebulae with positions determined from extinction maps) 

812: and in some cases these have been listed as ``noMatch" when its SIMBAD position 

813: is separated from the SCUBA 850 $\mu$m position by $>$11.5\as.  For interest, 

814: Figure 10 shows histograms of the numbers of objects above signal-to-noise 

815: thresholds of 3, 5 and 10 (see Column 8) with galactic latitude (see Column 3) 

816: that are listed as ``noMatch" in Column 26 in the FMOC and EMOC.  At $|b|$ $>$ 

817: 30, 343, 189 and 75 unidentified objects are seen in the FMOC and 374, 217 and 

818: 99 such objects are seen in the EMOC at signal-to-noise levels $\geq$ 3, 5 and 

819: 10 respectively (see \S 7.1 for further discussion of object identification).

820: 

821: In the FMOC, the object with the largest maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity seen by 

822: SCUBA was the ``Large Molecular Heimat" associated with Sgr B2 with 242.68 Jy 

823: beam$^{-1}$.  Also, the object with the largest 850 $\mu$m flux seen by SCUBA 

824: was ``SMA 1", associated with the Orion BN/KL region at 599.6 Jy.  The total 

825: 850 $\mu$m flux of all objects identified in the FMOC is 20868.08 Jy. 

826: 

827: Figure 11 shows histograms of the number of sources as a function of size 

828: (arcseconds), maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity (Jy beam$^{-1}$), and total 850

829: $\mu$um flux (Jy) for objects from the FMOC given a common sensitivity 

830: threshold (i.e., size determined at the 90 mJy beam$^{-1}$ level; see Columns 

831: 10 and 11).  Figure 11a (upper left) shows that a majority of the sources have 

832: sizes (as measured by Clumpfind) that are resolved, with a peak in the 

833: distribution at $\sim$30\as.  Figure 11b (upper right) shows the maximum 

834: 850 $\mu$m intensities.  These rise steeply toward small values, and have 

835: a turnover at $\sim$0.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$ likely due to the intrinsic 

836: sensitivities of the maps.  Figure 11c (lower left) shows the total 850 

837: $\mu$m fluxes with a peak near 2 Jy.  This distribution likely suffers from 

838: incompleteness at smaller fluxes since Clumpfind only searches out to a fixed 

839: intensity limit and thus underestimates the true flux of sources with low 

840: peak values and extents.  Figure 11d (lower right) plots the cumulative flux 

841: for all sources.  The integrated flux rises rapidly with lower total flux 

842: sources until reaching the point where the histogram turns over.  In both 

843: the FMOC and EMOC, the mean 850 $\mu$m flux per source is $\sim$4 Jy, while 

844: the median 850 $\mu$m flux is $\sim$1 Jy.

845: 

846: \section{ROBUSTNESS OF THE CATALOGUES}

847: 

848: In this section, we demonstrate the robustness of the Catalogues by comparing 

849: examples of Catalogue entries to various published data.  In addition, we show

850: by example several caveats that must be considered when interpreting data from

851: the SCUBA Legacy Catalogues.

852: 

853: \subsection{Object Identification}

854: 

855: Our object identification strategy identifies well locations of emission 

856: in each image.  For example, Johnstone al. (2002) found that most of the 67 

857: objects identified by Clumpfind in 850 $\mu$m maps of Orion B were largely the 

858: same as those identified subjectively (by eye) in the same maps by Mitchell 

859: et al. (2001), with differences seen only for a few very faint objects.  

860: Figure 12 shows the number of objects of signal-to-noise level greater than

861: or equal to a nominal signal-to-noise level in each Catalogue.  The number 

862: of objects in each Catalogue with signal-to-noise levels $\geq$3 is of course 

863: equal to the number of objects in each respective Catalogue, and these numbers 

864: drop dramatically with ever higher thresholds.  We have chosen the minimum 

865: local signal-to-noise level as 3 for each Catalogue since this level allows 

866: the inclusion of emission that appears subjectively real (by eye) in their 

867: parent maps.  Although this minimum signal-to-noise level is arguably low, 

868: recall that the objects were identified not as single pixels above this level 

869: but were identified from closed positive contours enclosing an area at least 

870: as large as the beam.  Note, however, that the Catalogues can be easily 

871: altered to include only objects above certain levels of signal-to-noise by 

872: using Column 8 of Tables 2 or 3 as a filter.

873: 

874: Despite its effectiveness, our object identification stratagy is not perfect.

875: {\bf Any judgement about a given object in the Catalogues, regardless of its 

876: respective signal-to-noise level, should not be made without first examining 

877: carefully its parent map.}  Although we have attempted to remove artifacts by 

878: imposing size, signal-to-noise and edge proximity criteria to all objects, 

879: artifacts may still remain in some maps.  The inherent heterogeneity of the 

880: SCUBA data means that applying uniform criteria is difficult.  Regardless of 

881: whatever practical criteria are applied, some artifacts will be misidentified 

882: as objects and some real emission will be not identified as objects. 

883: 

884: To illustrate our object identification strategy and demonstrate its limits, we 

885: provide three examples of maps from the Fundamental Map Dataset.  Figures 13-15

886: show 850 $\mu$m maps of L1551, M51 and NGC 7538 respectively with contours that 

887: delineate the boundaries of objects identified in each image by the Clumpfind 

888: algorithm that have passed our criteria.  Each example map shows emission that 

889: can be associated with actual astronomical objects.  In Figures 13 and 14, we 

890: see examples of low surface brightness emission that has been divided into 

891: multiple objects and weak objects that may be misidentified image artifacts.  

892: In Figures 14 and 15, we see examples of emission that remained unidentified 

893: as objects due to criteria imposed on each map.

894: 

895: In the 850 $\mu$m map of L1551 (Figure 13), 22 objects are identified.  The

896: three brightest are L1551 IRS 5, HL Tau and L1551-NE, located at the image 

897: center.  These have signal-to-noise ratios $>$70 and were easily identified 

898: by Clumpfind.  Another source is seen 2\am\ directly south of HL Tau with a

899: signal-to-noise ratio of 6.  This source corresponds to HH 30, and is seen 

900: because the local rms level is unusually low (i.e., 5 mJy beam$^{-1}$ ) in 

901: the $\sim$2\am\ diameter region around HL Tau, as this region was observed 

902: repeatedly as a calibrator throughout SCUBA's lifetime (see Moriarty-Schieven 

903: et al. 2006).  About 5\am\ northeast of L1551-NE and $\sim$2-5\am\ west of 

904: IRS 5, nine objects were identified with signal-to-noise ratios of 3-11, real

905: features that are likely associated with dust compressed by the strong outflows 

906: from L1551-NE or IRS 5.  Given the relatively lower surface brightness of 

907: these features and thus the greater influence of noise on their structure, 

908: Clumpfind has divided them into multiple objects.  A similar division into 

909: three objects is found towards the the diffuse, lower surface brightness 

910: feature known as L1551-MC (see Swift et al. 2005) located $\sim$7\am\ 

911: northwest of IRS5.  Towards the map edges, i.e., $\sim$10\am\ southwest and 

912: $\sim$10\am\ east of IRS5, three objects were identified respectively, all 

913: with low signal-to-noise ratios of 3-4.  Given the proximity of these to 

914: the map edge and to obvious bright artifacts at the edge (induced by imperfect 

915: image flattening), these objects are likely themselves artifacts.  Since it 

916: is difficult to know from the map alone that these latter objects are {\it 

917: not} artifacts, however, we retain such features as objects, leaving their 

918: inclusion or exclusion for further analysis up to individuals.

919: 

920: In the 850 $\mu$m maps of M51 (Figure 14), five objects are identified.  The 

921: brightest two, each with signal-to-noise ratios of $\sim$13, are located at the

922: galaxy nucleus in the center of the map.  The next brightest object, with a 

923: signal-to-noise ratio of $\sim$6, is located 5\am\ north-by-northeast of the 

924: M51 nucleus, and is associated with the nucleus of NGC 5195.  A fourth object, 

925: with a signal-to-noise ratio of $\sim$5, is associated with a bright clump to 

926: the southwest of the M51 nucleus along a spiral arm near the position of the 

927: HII region CCM 72.  Although faint emission from the spiral arms of M51 is 

928: clearly seen in the image, no other locations in the arms were bright enough 

929: relative to the local noise in this image to have been identified as objects.  

930: The fifth ``object" in Figure 13 with a signal-to-noise of $\sim$4, however, 

931: consists of a large low surface brightness feature that is likely an artifact 

932: of imperfect flattening in the image, similar to those seen near the edges 

933: of the L1551 map.  (Note the extreme high and low amplitudes seen at the map 

934: edges to the east and west respectively; a custom background subtraction to 

935: remove the edge problems and improve the detection of extended emission from 

936: M51 itself, was done by Meijerink et al. 2005.) 

937: 

938: In the 850 $\mu$m maps of NGC 7538 (Figure 15), 17 objects are identified.  

939: In comparison, Reid \& Wilson (2005) located 77 objects in their 850 $\mu$m

940: map of this region because this map had smaller pixels (2\as) and a smaller 

941: beam (15.3\as\ FWHM).  In addition, they constructed their map using a  

942: different technique (``Emerson2" reconstruction).  (Of the three examples 

943: discussed here, only this region had objects identified within using Clumpfind 

944: by other authors.)  All objects in Figure 14 are comprised of several objects 

945: identified by Reid \& Wilson.  The brightest three, located at the map center, 

946: correspond to IRS 1-3, IRS 11 and IRS 9 (respectively the SMMs 46, 48 and 

947: 60 of Reid \& Wilson), and have signal-to-noise ratios of $>$70.  The next 

948: brightest object, located $\sim$2\am\ northwest of IRS 1-3 and with a 

949: signal-to-noise ratio of $\sim$35, is adjacent to IRS 4.  Twelve of the

950: remaining 13 objects have signal-to-noise ratios of $\sim$7-23 and each 

951: appears associated with real emission.  The last object, $\sim$2\am\ 

952: southeast of IRS 9 and with a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, also arguably 

953: appears associated with real emission; for example, Reid \& Wilson 

954: identified this emission with their objects SMM 69, SMM 70 and SMM 71. 

955: Unlike the previous two maps, no objects are identified towards the map edges 

956: that may be artifacts.  Notably, the map contains much weaker large-amplitude

957: artifacts near the edge than noted in the previous two maps.  Conversely, 

958: however, emission that is likely real has been not identified as an object 

959: given its proximity to the map edge, i.e., the emission seen $\sim$6\am\ 

960: west of IRS1 that is associated with SMMs 1-7 of Reid \& Wilson.  

961: 

962: Regarding the completeness of the Clumpfind algorithm, we stress that object 

963: candidates in various maps were identified down to very low noise levels in 

964: each map and then we used other criteria (maximum intensity vs. local median 

965: noise, relative location within maps) to preclude candidates from the Object 

966: Catalogues.  We have not attempted, however, to quantify the completeness of 

967: the Clumpfind algorithm, e.g., by inserting artificial sources into the maps 

968: to determine how well Clumpfind recovers such sources.  The objects identified 

969: in the Catalogues encompass a large variation of size and morphology, and the 

970: maps themselves can have large differences in noise both within themselves and 

971: between maps.  Such variety makes it difficult to make definitive tests for 

972: completeness across all maps.  For reference, however, we note that Enoch 

973: et al. (2006) performed empirical tests for completeness using Monte Carlo 

974: simulations of the identification of artificial Gaussian sources of various 

975: size in empty regions of their wide-field 1.3 mm continuum map of the Perseus 

976: cloud, which had a reasonably small noise level across the map ($\sim$15\%).  

977: Such tests defined completeness limits in mass and size, and the $\sim$100 

978: actual objects they identified by Clumpfind in their maps study were bounded 

979: on the mass-size plane by an empirically determined 10\% completeness limit, 

980: i.e., the level where 10\% of their artificial sources were recovered.

981: 

982: In summary, we believe our object identification algorithm does an effective

983: job of locating real emission within the 850 $\mu$m maps but it cannot be 

984: considered perfect.  The reality of any given object as an astronomical 

985: source in the Fundamental or Extended Catalogues must be considered 

986: carefully by those interested in these data.

987: 

988: \subsection{Flux Comparison}

989: 

990: As described earlier in \S 3, flux calibration was performed on the SCUBA 

991: maps using the most recent Flux Conversion Factors available in the JCMT 

992: archive.  In addition, we modified slightly the flux scale of all maps to 

993: bring the intensities of the point-source calibrators HL Tau, CRL 618 and 

994: CRL 2688 in line with those reported on the JCMT website (see Table 1).  In 

995: this section, we compare intensities obtained from our reprocessed maps with 

996: those from published maps that were processed by others.  In particular, we 

997: compare the maximum intensities of objects in the Fundamental Catalogue with 

998: those found in published maps after smoothing by a Gaussian of $\sigma$ = 6\as, 

999: binning to 6\as\ pixels, and regridding to the same pixels positions as in 

1000: our maps using various tasks in the MIRIAD software package (Sault, Teuben 

1001: \& Wright 1995).

1002: 

1003: Following the discussion above, we compared our Fundamental Dataset 850

1004: $\mu$m maps of L1551 and NGC 7538 to published data of the same, provided

1005: kindly by G. Schieven and M. Reid respectively.  From each region, a total 

1006: of 10 or 14 objects were chosen respectively by eye from the smoothed, 

1007: rebinned and regridded maps and the maximum intensities measured.  Figure 

1008: 16 shows the comparision between our maximum intensities and those from the 

1009: published data at 0-3 Jy beam$^{-1}$.  For L1551 and NGC 7538, the median 

1010: percent differences between maximum intensities of objects in the published 

1011: data and their counterparts in the Fundamental Catalogue are 16.2\% and 

1012: -12.8\%, i.e., within the 20\% uncertainties expected for 850 $\mu$m SCUBA 

1013: data (see \S 3 above).  The smallest maximum intensity differences (i.e., 

1014: $<$2\%) are found for the brightest objects in both regions (i.e., $>$3 Jy 

1015: beam$^{-1}$; not shown in Figure 16).

1016: 

1017: Beyond different flux calibration approaches, a major component of the 

1018: difference between the intensities in these maps is likely the difference 

1019: between how large-scale flux variations are removed by different authors.  

1020: As described in \S 3, the Legacy Catalogue maps have been ``flattened" by 

1021: subtracting a very smoothed map from the original map, but different authors 

1022: have different approaches to the problem of establishing a ``zero point" to 

1023: SCUBA maps.  Note, however, that our technique explicitly excluded brighter

1024: sources from smoothing prior to flattening, which may account for the smaller

1025: differences in intensities between maps for these sources described above.

1026: 

1027: To compare the fluxes between objects, the published and Fundamental Dataset

1028: maps were clipped according to the extents of the objects defined in the 

1029: Fundamental Catalogues.  The percent differences in total fluxes at 850 $\mu$m 

1030: for L1551 and NGC 7538 between the former and latter maps were 24\% and -29\% 

1031: respectively.  Accordingly, the absolute uncertainties of fluxes at 850 $\mu$m 

1032: of objects in the FMOC may be as large as $\pm$30\%.  Correspondingly, the 

1033: absolute uncertainties of fluxes at 450 $\mu$m of objects in the FMOC may be 

1034: as large as $\pm$100\%, since sky subtraction and flattening are even more 

1035: difficult at that wavelength.

1036: 

1037: \subsection{Pointing Differences}

1038: 

1039: Pointing corrections for SCUBA were determined from short observations of 

1040: bright, point-like calibrators.  Given variations in weather and dish surface 

1041: conditions over the nine years SCUBA was in operation, it is thus difficult 

1042: to assign a specific pointing uncertainty to the entire SCUBA Datasets.  

1043: Moreover, different observers may have used different schemes over time.  

1044: For example, note the $\sim$6\as\ offset evident in our map of NGC 1333 

1045: relative to those made by Sandell \& Knee (2001) from early SCUBA data.

1046: 

1047: To determine a pointing uncertainty, we compare the J2000 positions of the 

1048: three point-like calibrators, HL Tau, CRL 618 (PN G166.4-06.5) and CRL 2688 

1049: (the Egg Nebula) as provided by SIMBAD to the J2000 position of the pixel of 

1050: maximum intensity at 850 $\mu$m for each respective source from our Datasets.  

1051: Not only are these particular objects compact with well defined maxima, they 

1052: also have bright optical counterparts with fairly well established positions.  

1053: (Note that relatively few objects detected at submillimeter wavelengths have 

1054: optical counterparts and correspondingly have relatively poorly determined 

1055: positions.)  Figure 17 shows the difference between the expected positions 

1056: at (0,0) and the location of the pixel of maximum intensities.  Note that 

1057: there is no consistent directional offset between the expected positions and 

1058: positions of maximum intensity.  The mean magnitude of the angular offset 

1059: between these positions is 2.7\as, or less than half the 6\as\ pixel size of 

1060: the 850 $\mu$m maps in the Datasets, and $\sim$14\% of the 19.5\as\ FWHM 

1061: of the narrow Gaussian component of the 850 $\mu$m beam (see Figure 7).  

1062: (Note that 6\as\ is also equal to 1 $\sigma$ of the Gaussian representing 

1063: the narrow component of the {\it unsmoothed} JCMT beam at 850 $\mu$m; see 

1064: the bold dashed circle in Figure 17.)  Furthermore, the angular offsets shown 

1065: in Figure 17 are only to the positions of the respective pixel of maximum 

1066: intensity, which were used to identify objects in the Catalogues.  Gaussian 

1067: fits to the 850 $\mu$m emission of each point-like source (where Gaussians 

1068: are particularly effective) yield even closer positional coincidence.  For 

1069: example, a mean angular offset magnitude of only 0.93\as\ is found between 

1070: the expected positions and those of the peaks of the Gaussian fits to these 

1071: particular objects.

1072: 

1073: \subsection{Associations with Known Objects}

1074: 

1075: Column 26 in both Catalogues (Tables 2 or 3) lists tentative associations of 

1076: each object with those found in the SIMBAD astronomical database (i.e., known 

1077: objects located $<$11.5\as\ from the position of maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity.)

1078: Given the low resolution of the Dataset maps relative to optical or infrared

1079: observations, which comprise the bulk of the SIMBAD entries, we stress that 

1080: these associations are tentative.  For the Fundmental Catalogue, our original 

1081: search through SIMBAD of 7031 object candidates\footnote{Note: SIMBAD source 

1082: association was performed prior to some final culling of object candidates.

1083: Hence the number of objects that was examined for the Fundamental Dataset was 

1084: 7031 rather than the final 5061.} resulted in potential associations with 7882 

1085: SIMBAD objects; sometimes many SIMBAD objects were found within 11.5\as\ of

1086: the FMOC position.  To differentiate between multiple potential associations, 

1087: we chose objects in SIMBAD that were closest to the position of maximum 850 

1088: $\mu$m intensity.  Of these objects, an identifier in Column 26 was chosen 

1089: based on a either a name or entry within 8 catalogues (NGC, IC, 3C, HD, SAO, 

1090: BD, or IRAS in decending order of priorty.)  Out of the 7031 objects, only 

1091: 1592 had associations with SIMBAD objects.

1092: 

1093: To test for false associations, all 7031 positions in the early FMOC were 

1094: shifted north or south by 5\am\ and these new positions were run through 

1095: SIMBAD.  These new positions resulted in only 430 or 383 potential SIMBAD

1096: associations respectively, much less than the 7882 found earlier.  Also, out 

1097: of the 7031 positions shifted north or south, only 356 or 322 respectively 

1098: had associations with SIMBAD objects, again much less than the 1592 found 

1099: earlier.  From these numbers, we surmise that the probability for false 

1100: association in the Catalogues is relatively low, i.e., only $\sim$20\% (i.e., 

1101: 340/1600).  We note, however, that the SIMBAD database is not itself an 

1102: all-sky survey, but rather a collection of known objects.  What is listed 

1103: in Column 26 only indicates tentative association with previously found 

1104: objects.

1105: 

1106: \section{DATA PRODUCTS}

1107: 

1108: The 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m square-degree maps from the Fundamental Dataset 

1109: and the 850 $\mu$m maps from the Extended Dataset are available for download 

1110: from the SCUBA Legacy Catalogues repository at the Canadian Astronomical 

1111: Data Centre (CADC) at:

1112: 

1113: http://www.cadc.hia.nrc.gc.ca/community/scubalegacy. 

1114: 

1115: \noindent

1116: Each emission map is in the standard FITS format projected onto the tangent 

1117: plane from its center position.  Each map file is named by the galactic 

1118: coordinates of its center position.  For example, the FITS file 

1119: ``scuba$\_$F$\_$178d6$\_$-19d8$\_$850um.emi.fits" contains the square-degree 

1120: SCUBA 850 $\mu$m emission map from the Fundamental Dataset (F) centered at 

1121: ($l,b$) = (178.6, -19.8).  (This particular map contains a nice 850 $\mu$m 

1122: image of L1551; see Figures 3c and 13.)  Note that files of maps from the 

1123: Extended Dataset are identified with an ``E" instead of an ``F."

1124: 

1125: In addition to the emission maps, the repository contains other useful files, 

1126: including the error map and coverage map corresponding to each 850 $\mu$m 

1127: emission map.  These files are named as above but the names end in 

1128: ``850um.err.fits" or ``850um.cov.fits" respectively instead, e.g., 

1129: ``scuba$\_$F$\_$178d6$\_$-19d8$\_$850um.err.fits" or 

1130: ``scuba$\_$F$\_$178d6$\_$-19d8$\_$850um.cov.fits."

1131: Also, the repository contains the error map corresponding to each 450 $\mu$m 

1132: emission map.

1133: 

1134: The repository contains additional information about the objects identified in 

1135: the 850 $\mu$m maps of the Fundamental or Extended Datasets.  For example, it

1136: has ASCII text files containing the FMOC and EMOC, e.g., ``scuba$\_$FMOC.txt" 

1137: and ``scuba$\_$EMOC.txt" respectively.  Finally, the repository contains object 

1138: maps where the pixels give the numerical identifications made by Clumpfind for 

1139: each object in respective 850 $\mu$m emission maps.  No such map was produced 

1140: if no objects were found in the respective emission map.  These files are named 

1141: as above but the names end in ``850um.obj.fits" instead, e.g., 

1142: ``scuba$\_$F$\_$178d6$\_$-19d8$\_$850um.obj.fits."

1143: 

1144: \section{CONCLUSIONS}

1145: 

1146: In this paper, we described the bulk processing of SCUBA map data in the JCMT

1147: public archive, done to provide a resource of reduced 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m 

1148: continuum data for the community and to aid future work at submillimeter and 

1149: millimeter wavelengths.  The maps are comprised of a Fundamental Map Dataset 

1150: at 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m and an Extended Map Dataset at only 850 $\mu$m.  

1151: In the former Dataset, only data with superior atmospheric correction data were 

1152: included, and in the latter, almost all available data were included.  Due to 

1153: the specific way in which their data were collected, we do not include single

1154: chop data from deep surveys for high-redshift galaxies, since the matrix 

1155: inversion process did not generate satisfactory maps.  In addition, we 

1156: described two catalogues of objects identified in the Fundamental Map and 

1157: Extended Map Datasets, each determined using the automated ``Clumpfind" 

1158: identification algorithm.  Maps of 850 $\mu$m and 450 $\mu$m emission as 

1159: well as respective error, coverage, and object identification maps, 

1160: and the catalogues, will be available for download from the CADC at 

1161: http://www1.cadc-ccda.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/jcmt/.

1162: 

1163: \acknowledgements

1164: We thank David Bohlender and Severin Gaudet of the CADC for help with 

1165: extracting the SCUBA map data from the JCMT archive.  We thank Wayne 

1166: Holland, Walter Gear and Ian Robson for their assistance in placing

1167: SCUBA on the JCMT, and we thank G\"oran Sandell, Gerald Schieven, and 

1168: Henry E. Matthews for their assistance with SCUBA over its lifetime.

1169: In addition, we thank Gary Davis, Director JCMT, Antonio Chrysostomou,

1170: Deputy Director JCMT, the staff at the JAC and ROE, PPARC, many JCMT 

1171: observers and Telescope Support Specialists over the years for their

1172: support.  Finally, we thank Russell Redman, John Ouellette, Pat Dowler 

1173: and Sharon Goliath for assistance in ingesting the data into CADC for

1174: wide distribution.  This research has made extensive use of the SIMBAD 

1175: database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. 

1176:  

1177: \begin{references}

1178: 

1179: \reference{}

1180: Archibald, E. N., Dunlop, J. S., Jimenez, R., Fria\c ca, A. C. S., McLure, R.

1181: J. \& Hughes, D. H. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 353

1182: 

1183: \reference{}

1184: Beichman, C. A., Helou, G., \& Walker, D. W. 1988, ``Infrared Astronomical

1185: Satellite (IRAS): Catalogues and Atlases, vol. 1, Explanatory Supplement" NASA 

1186: Reference Publication 1190 (Washington, DC: GPO)

1187: 

1188: \reference{}

1189: Coppin, K., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1621

1190: 

1191: \reference{}

1192: Economou, F., Bridger, A., Wright, G. S., Jenness, T., Currie, M. J. \&

1193: Adamson, A. 1999, in ``Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VIII,"

1194: eds. D. M. Mehringer, R. L. Plante, \& D. A. Roberts, ASP Conf. Series, Vol.

1195: 172 (San Francisco: ASP), 11

1196: 

1197: \reference{}

1198: Emerson, D. T. 1995, in ``Multi-Feed Systems for Radio Telescopes," ed. D. T.

1199: Emerson \& J. M. Payne, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 75, (San Francisco: ASP), 309

1200: 

1201: \reference{}

1202: Emerson, D. T., Klein, U. \& Haslam, C. G. T. 1979, A\&A, 76, 92

1203: 

1204: \reference{}

1205: Enoch, M., Young, K. E., Glenn, J., Evans, N. J., II, Golwala, S., Sargent, 

1206: A. I., Harvey, P. M., Aguirre, J., Goldin, A., Haig, D., Huard, T. L., Lange,

1207: A., Laurent, G., Maloney, P., Mauskopf, P., Rossinot, P., \& Sayers, J. 2006,

1208: ApJ, 638, 293

1209: 

1210: \reference{}

1211: Gezari, D. Y., Schmitz, M., \& Mead, J. M. 1984, ``Catalog of Infrared 

1212: Observations, First Edition," NASA Reference Publication 1118 (Washington, 

1213: DC: GPO)

1214: 

1215: \reference{}

1216: Gezari, D. Y., Schmitz, M., \& Mead, J. M. 1988, ``Far Infrared Supplement:

1217: Catalog of Infrared Observations, Second Edition," NASA Reference Publication

1218: 1205 (Washington, DC: GPO)

1219: 

1220: \reference{}

1221: The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues 1997, ESA SP-1200

1222: 

1223: \reference{}

1224: Hogerheijde, M. R., \& Sandell, G. 2000, ApJ, 534, 880

1225: 

1226: \reference{}

1227: Holland, W. S., MacIntosh, M., Fairley, A., Kelly, D., Montgomery, D., Gostick, 

1228: D., Atad-Ettedgui, E., Ellis, M., Robson, I., Hollister, M., Woodcraft, A., Ade,

1229: P., Walker, I., Irwin, K., Hilton, G., Duncan, W., Reintsema, C., Walton, A., 

1230: Parkes, W., Dunare, C., Fich, M., Kycia, J., Halpern, M., Scott, D., Gibb, A., 

1231: Molnar, J., Chapin, E., Bintley, D., Craig, S., Chylek, T., Jenness, T., 

1232: Economou, F. \& Davis, G. 2006, in ``Millimeter and Submillimeter Detectors and

1233: Instrumentation for Astronomy III," eds. J. Zmuidzinas, W. S. Holland, S. 

1234: Withington \& W. D. Duncan, Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 6275, p. 62751E

1235: 

1236: \reference{}

1237: Holland, W. S., Robson, E. I., Gear, W. K, Cunningham, C. R., Lightfoot, J. F.,

1238: Jenness, T., Ivison, R. J., Stevens, J. A., Ade, P. A. R., Griffin, M. J., 

1239: Duncan, W. D., Murphy, J. A. \& Naylor, D. A. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 659

1240: 

1241: \reference{}

1242: Jenness, T., Stevens, J. A., Archibald, E. N., Economou, F., Jessop, N. E.,

1243: \& Robson, E. I. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 14

1244: 

1245: \reference{}

1246: Johnstone, D., \& Bally, J. 2006, ApJ, 653, 383

1247: 

1248: \reference{}

1249: Johnstone, D., Di Francesco, J., \& Kirk, H. M. 2004, ApJ, 611, L45

1250: 

1251: \reference{}

1252: Johnstone, D., Fich, M., Mitchell, G. F. \& Moriarty-Schieven, G. 2001, ApJ, 

1253: 559, 307

1254: 

1255: \reference{}

1256: Johnstone, D., Matthews, H., \& Mitchell, G. F. 2006, ApJ, 639, 259

1257: 

1258: \reference{}

1259: Johnstone, D., Wilson, C. D., Moriarty-Schieven, G., Giannakopoulou-Creighton,

1260: J., \& Gregersen, E. 2000a, ApJS, 131, 505

1261: 

1262: \reference{}

1263: Johnstone, D., Wilson, C. D., Moriarty-Schieven, G., Joncas, G., Smith, G., 

1264: Gregersen, E., \& Fich, M. 2000b, ApJ, 545, 327

1265: 

1266: \reference{}

1267: Kirk, H. M., Johnstone, D., \& Di Francesco, J. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1009

1268: 

1269: \reference{}

1270: Knudsen, K. K., Barnard, V. E., van der Werf, P. P., Vielva, P., Kneib, J.-P.,

1271: Blain, A. W., Barreiro, R. B., Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., \& Peacock, J. A. 2006

1272: MNRAS, 368, 487

1273: 

1274: \reference{}

1275: Matthews, H. E. 2003, ``The James Clerk Maxwell Telescope: A Guide for the 

1276: Prospective User," JCMT community documentation

1277: 

1278: \reference{}

1279: Meijerink, R., Tilanus, R. P. J., Dullemond, C. P., Israel, F. P., \& van der

1280: Werf, P. P. 2005, A\&A, 430, 427

1281: 

1282: \reference{}

1283: Mitchell, G., Johnstone, D., Moriarty-Schieven, G., Fich, M. \& Tothill, N. F. 

1284: H. 2001, ApJ, 556, 215

1285: 

1286: \reference{}

1287: Moriarty-Schieven, G. H., Johnstone, D., Bally, J., \& Jenness, T. 2006, ApJ,

1288: 645, 357

1289: 

1290: \reference{}

1291: Motte, F., Andr\'e, P., \& Neri, R. 1998, A\&A, 336, 150

1292: 

1293: \reference{}

1294: Reid, M. A., \& Wilson, C. D. 2005, ApJ, 625, 891

1295: 

1296: \reference{}

1297: Sandell, G., \& Knee, L. B. G. 2001, ApJ, 546, L49

1298: 

1299: \reference{}

1300: Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J. \& Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in ``Astronomical Data

1301: Analysis Software and Systems IV," eds., R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne \& J. J. E.

1302: Hayes, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 77, (San Francisco: ASP), 433

1303: 

1304: \reference{}

1305: Swift, J. J., Welch, W. J. \& Di Francesco, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 823

1306: 

1307: \reference{}

1308: Weferling, B. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 263

1309: 

1310: \reference{}

1311: Williams, J. P., de Geus, E. J., \& Blitz, L. 1994, ApJ, 428, 693

1312: 

1313: \reference{}

1314: Young, K. E., Enoch, M. L., Evans, N. J., II, Glenn, J., Sargent, A. I., Huard,

1315: T. L., Aguirre, J., Golwala, S., Haig, D., Harvey, P. M., Laurent, G., Mauskopf,

1316: P., \& Sayers, J. 2006, ApJ, 644, 326

1317: 

1318: \end{references}

1319: 

1320: \clearpage

1321: 

1322: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}

1323: \tablecolumns{7}

1324: \footnotesize

1325: \tablecaption{\bf Expected vs. Observed Fluxes of Point-like Calibrators

1326: \label{tab1}}

1327: \tablewidth{0pt}

1328: \tablehead{

1329: \colhead{} & 

1330: \colhead{Expected} & 

1331: \colhead{Observed} &

1332: \colhead{Observed} &

1333: \colhead{Expected} & 

1334: \colhead{Observed} &

1335: \colhead{Observed} \\

1336: \colhead{} & 

1337: \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & 

1338: \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & 

1339: \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & 

1340: \colhead{450 $\mu$m} & 

1341: \colhead{450 $\mu$m} & 

1342: \colhead{450 $\mu$m} \\

1343: \colhead{Name} & 

1344: \colhead{Peak} & 

1345: \colhead{Peak} &

1346: \colhead{Flux} &

1347: \colhead{Peak} & 

1348: \colhead{Peak} &

1349: \colhead{Flux} \\

1350: \colhead{} & 

1351: \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & 

1352: \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & 

1353: \colhead{(Jy)} & 

1354: \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & 

1355: \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & 

1356: \colhead{(Jy)}

1357: }

1358: \startdata

1359: %\tableline

1360: HL Tau     & 2.35 $\pm$ 0.08 & 2.4 & 2.1\tablenotemark{a} / 1.9\tablenotemark{b}  & 9.4 $\pm$ 1.3  & 12. & 8.6 \\

1361: CRL 618    & 4.6 $\pm$ 0.2   & 4.4 & 5.0\tablenotemark{a} / 4.1\tablenotemark{b} & 10.9 $\pm$ 0.9 & 8.2 & 8.9 \\

1362: %16293-2422 & 15.1 $\pm$ 0.8  & 20. & 29.\tablenotemark{a} / 29.\tablenotemark{b} & 62.7 $\pm$ 9.4 & 110 & 190 \\

1363: CRL 2688   & 5.9 $\pm$ 0.2   & 5.8 & 5.2\tablenotemark{a} / 5.1\tablenotemark{b} & 22.0 $\pm$ 2.7 & 24. & 19. \\

1364: %\tableline

1365: \enddata

1366: \tablenotetext{a}{Flux calculated from full area of object.}

1367: \tablenotetext{b}{Flux calculated from area within 90 mJy beam$^{-1}$ contour.}

1368: \end{deluxetable}

1369: 

1370: \clearpage

1371: 

1372: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccc} 

1373: \rotate

1374: \tablecolumns{13}

1375: \tablewidth{0pt}

1376: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1377: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.02in}

1378: \tablecaption{Fundamental Map Object Catalogue} 

1379: \tablehead{ 

1380:  & & & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & & & \colhead{Alternative} & \colhead{Alternative} & & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} \\

1381: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{Galactic} & \colhead{Galactic} & \colhead{Maximum} & \colhead{Object} & \colhead{Median} & \colhead{Peak} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & \colhead{Object} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m}& \colhead{Minimum} & \colhead{Median} \\

1382: \colhead{Identifier}  &  \colhead{Longitude}  &  \colhead{Latitude} &  \colhead{Intensity}  &  \colhead{Size}  &  \colhead{RMS}  &  \colhead{S/N}  &  \colhead{Flux}  &  \colhead{Flux}  &  \colhead{Size}  & Flag & \colhead{Map RMS}  & \colhead{Map RMS} \\

1383: & \colhead{(\degree)} & \colhead{(\degree)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(\as)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & & \colhead{(Jy)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(\as)} & & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)}}

1384: \startdata 

1385: JCMTSF\_J000134.7$+$231250 & 108.3034 & -38.2374 & 0.06 &  18.2 &  0.02 &  3.0   & 0.08  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1386: JCMTSF\_J000136.0$+$231308 & 108.3111 & -38.2338 & 0.08 &  16.6 &  0.02 &  4.0   & 0.07  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1387: JCMTSF\_J000136.8$+$231056 & 108.3035 & -38.2701 & 0.27 &  10.7 &  0.02 &  16.2  &  0.06 &   0.05 &   6.8 & &  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1388: JCMTSF\_J000137.3$+$231332 & 108.3193 & -38.2286 & 0.08 &  14.3 &  0.02 &  4.0   & 0.05  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1389: JCMTSF\_J000137.7$+$231232 & 108.3160 & -38.2451 & 0.06 &  30.7 &  0.02 &  3.8   & 0.17  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1390: JCMTSF\_J000138.6$+$231050 & 108.3115 & -38.2734 & 0.11 &   8.3 &  0.02 &  6.2   & 0.02  &   0.01 &   3.4 & &  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1391: JCMTSF\_J000138.9$+$233102 & 108.4172 & -37.9472 & 0.55 &  12.7 &  0.07 &  7.9   & 0.18  &   0.16 &   9.6 & &  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1392: JCMTSF\_J000141.5$+$232944 & 108.4227 & -37.9706 & 0.04 &  12.2 &  0.01 &  5.0   & 0.03  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1393: JCMTSF\_J000141.6$+$231044 & 108.3251 & -38.2778 & 0.23 &  10.7 &  0.02 &  10.0  &  0.04 &   0.02 &   4.8 & &  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1394: JCMTSF\_J000142.9$+$231138 & 108.3360 & -38.2645 & 0.06 &  28.9 &  0.02 &  3.3   & 0.14  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1395: JCMTSF\_J000146.8$+$232914 & 108.4451 & -37.9836 & 0.73 &  10.1 &  0.01 &  70.0  &  0.14 &   0.12 &   7.6 & &  0.006 & 0.019  \\

1396: JCMTSF\_J000358.6$+$683507 & 118.6019 &   6.1135 & 0.86 &  33.0 &  0.07 &  11.7  &  1.91 &   1.91 &  33.0 & &  0.048 & 0.076  \\

1397: JCMTSF\_J000522.7$+$671751 & 118.4975 &   4.8232 & 0.36 &  39.8 &  0.08 &  4.4   & 1.24  &   1.05 &  33.5 & &  0.023 & 0.040  \\

1398: JCMTSF\_J000754.5$+$352220 & 113.0128 & -26.6597 & 0.06 &   8.3 &  0.01 &  4.3   & 0.02  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.008 & 0.021  \\

1399: JCMTSF\_J000953.3$+$255525 & 111.3672 & -36.0133 & 0.06 &  12.2 &  0.01 &  5.0   & 0.04  & -99.99 & -99.9 &c&  0.011 & 0.019  \\

1400: JCMTSF\_J000955.1$+$255356 & 111.3693 & -36.0389 & 0.69 &  11.2 &  0.09 &  7.3   & 0.17  &  0.15  & 8.3   & &  0.011 & 0.019  \\

1401: \enddata 

1402: \tablecomments{Table 2 is published in its entirety in the electronic edition 

1403: of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.  A portion is shown here for guidance 

1404: regarding its form and content.  The online only version contains more columns,

1405: including the names of the source map of each entry and the 450 $\mu$m data.}

1406: \end{deluxetable} 

1407: 

1408: %% 

1409: %% End of file `table.tex'. 

1410: \clearpage

1411: 

1412: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccc} 

1413: \rotate

1414: \tablecolumns{13}

1415: \tablewidth{0pt}

1416: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1417: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.02in}

1418: \tablecaption{Extended Map Object Catalogue} 

1419: \tablehead{ 

1420:  & & & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & & & \colhead{Alternative} & \colhead{Alternative} & & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} \\

1421: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{Galactic} & \colhead{Galactic} & \colhead{Maximum} & \colhead{Object} & \colhead{Median} & \colhead{Peak} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m} & \colhead{Object} & \colhead{850 $\mu$m}& \colhead{Minimum} & \colhead{Median} \\

1422: \colhead{Identifier}  &  \colhead{Longitude}  &  \colhead{Latitude} &  \colhead{Intensity}  &  \colhead{Size}  &  \colhead{RMS}  &  \colhead{S/N}  &  \colhead{Flux}  &  \colhead{Flux}  &  \colhead{Size}  & Flag & \colhead{Map RMS}  & \colhead{Map RMS} \\

1423: & \colhead{(\degree)} & \colhead{(\degree)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(\as)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & & \colhead{(Jy)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(\as)} & & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)}}

1424: \startdata 

1425: JCMTSE\_J000134.7$+$231250 & 108.3034 & -38.2374 & 0.06 &  18.2 &  0.02  &   3.0  &  0.08 &  -99.99 & -99.9 & c &  0.006 & 0.019 \\ 

1426: JCMTSE\_J000136.0$+$231308 & 108.3111 & -38.2338 & 0.06 &  16.6 &  0.02  &   3.0  &  0.07 &  -99.99 & -99.9 & c &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1427: JCMTSE\_J000136.8$+$231056 & 108.3035 & -38.2701 & 0.27 &  10.7 &  0.02  &  16.2  &  0.06 &    0.05 &   6.8 &   &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1428: JCMTSE\_J000137.3$+$231332 & 108.3193 & -38.2286 & 0.08 &  14.3 &  0.02  &   4.0  &  0.05 &  -99.99 & -99.9 & c &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1429: JCMTSE\_J000137.7$+$231232 & 108.3160 & -38.2451 & 0.06 &  30.7 &  0.02  &   3.8  &  0.17 &  -99.99 & -99.9 & c &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1430: JCMTSE\_J000138.6$+$231050 & 108.3115 & -38.2734 & 0.11 &   8.3 &  0.02  &   6.2  &  0.02 &    0.01 &   3.4 &   &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1431: JCMTSE\_J000138.9$+$233102 & 108.4172 & -37.9472 & 0.55 &  12.7 &  0.07  &   7.9  &  0.18 &    0.16 &   9.6 &   &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1432: JCMTSE\_J000141.5$+$232944 & 108.4227 & -37.9706 & 0.04 &  12.2 &  0.01  &   5.0  &  0.03 &  -99.99 & -99.9 & c &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1433: JCMTSE\_J000141.6$+$231044 & 108.3251 & -38.2778 & 0.23 &  10.7 &  0.02  &  10.0  &  0.04 &    0.02 &   4.8 &   &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1434: JCMTSE\_J000142.9$+$231138 & 108.3360 & -38.2645 & 0.06 &  28.3 &  0.02  &   3.3  &  0.13 &  -99.99 & -99.9 & c &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1435: JCMTSE\_J000146.8$+$232914 & 108.4451 & -37.9836 & 0.73 &  10.7 &  0.01  &  58.3  &  0.16 &    0.14 &   8.3 &   &  0.006 & 0.019 \\

1436: JCMTSE\_J000358.6$+$683507 & 118.6019 &   6.1135 & 0.82 &  42.1 &  0.06  &  14.4  &  3.16 &    3.16 &  42.1 &   &  0.055 & 0.078 \\

1437: JCMTSE\_J000401.6$+$683901 & 118.6184 &   6.1765 & 0.27 &  30.8 &  0.06  &   4.5  &  1.03 &    1.03 &  30.8 &   &  0.055 & 0.078 \\

1438: JCMTSE\_J000402.9$+$683619 & 118.6120 &   6.1319 & 0.48 &  46.4 &  0.06  &   7.9  &  3.14 &    3.14 &  46.4 &   &  0.055 & 0.078 \\

1439: JCMTSE\_J000411.6$+$683837 & 118.6322 &   6.1672 & 0.46 &  41.6 &  0.06  &   7.6  &  2.24 &    2.24 &  41.6 &   &  0.055 & 0.078 \\

1440: JCMTSE\_J000413.9$+$683619 & 118.6286 &   6.1289 & 0.44 &  52.2 &  0.06  &   7.2  &  4.34 &    4.34 &  52.2 &   &  0.055 & 0.078 \\

1441: \enddata 

1442: \tablecomments{Table 3 is published in its entirety in the electronic edition 

1443: of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.  A portion is shown here for guidance 

1444: regarding its form and content.  The online only version contains more columns,

1445: including the names of the source map of each entry and the 450 $\mu$m data.}

1446: \end{deluxetable} 

1447: %% 

1448: %% End of file `table.tex'. 

1449: 

1450: \clearpage

1451: 

1452: \begin{figure}

1453: \figurenum{1}

1454: \epsscale{1.0}

1455: \vspace*{-4.0cm}

1456: %\includegraphics*[scale=0.7,angle=90]{fig1.ps}

1457: \caption{Distribution of SCUBA mapping locations across the sky, excluding

1458: observations of Solar System objects (see text), where each J2000 position

1459: observed is denoted by a cross.  Some crosses are darker than others because

1460: they are the superposition of several observations made in close proximity.}

1461: \end{figure}

1462: 

1463: \clearpage

1464: 

1465: \begin{figure}

1466: \figurenum{2}

1467: \epsscale{1.0}

1468: \vspace*{-2.0cm}

1469: %\plotone{fig2.ps}

1470: \vskip -4.0cm

1471: \caption{Histograms of optical depth (``tau") values measured at 850 $\mu$m 

1472: (upper panel) and 450 $\mu$m (lower panel) for data within the Fundamental 

1473: Dataset.  Note that the histograms show only the majority of measured values

1474: and the bins at the extreme right contain the totals at values greater than 

1475: or equal to the respective extremes.}

1476: \end{figure}

1477: 

1478: \clearpage

1479: 

1480: \begin{figure}

1481: \figurenum{3}

1482: \epsscale{1.0}

1483: \vspace*{-2.0cm}

1484: %\includegraphics[scale=0.6]{fig3.ps}

1485: \caption{Examples of SCUBA 850 $\mu$m observations of low-mass star-forming

1486: regions from the Extended Dataset.  Greyscale ranges are chosen to bring out 

1487: low level features in the maps.  a) The L1688 cluster region in the central 

1488: part of the Ophiuchus molecular cloud with greyscale ranging from -0.2 Jy 

1489: beam$^{-1}$ to 1.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$.  b) A central part of the Taurus molecular 

1490: cloud with greyscale ranging from -0.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 0.6 Jy beam$^{-1}$.

1491: c) The L1551 cloud, south of the Taurus molecular cloud with greyscale ranging

1492: from -0.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 0.6 Jy beam$^{-1}$.  d) A region of young star 

1493: formation south of IC 348 in the Perseus molecular cloud with greyscale ranging 

1494: from -0.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 0.6 Jy beam$^{-1}$.  e) The isolated starless 

1495: core Barnard 68 with greyscale ranging from -0.04 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 0.21 Jy 

1496: beam$^{-1}$.  f) The bright, clustered protostellar sources of the Serpens 

1497: molecular cloud with greyscale ranging from -0.6 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 3.2 Jy 

1498: beam$^{-1}$}.

1499: \end{figure}

1500: 

1501: \clearpage

1502: 

1503: \begin{figure}

1504: \figurenum{4}

1505: \epsscale{1.0}

1506: \vspace*{-1.0cm}

1507: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{fig4.ps}

1508: \vskip -1.0cm

1509: \caption{Examples of SCUBA 850 $\mu$m observations of high-mass star-forming

1510: regions from the Extended Dataset.  Greyscale ranges are chosen to bring out

1511: low level features in the maps.  a) Inner part of the W3 molecular cloud with 

1512: greyscale ranging from -0.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 1.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$.  b) The NGC 

1513: 2068 region of the Orion B molecular cloud (including the Horsehead Nebula) 

1514: with greyscale ranging from -0.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 1.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$.  c) 

1515: The NGC 6334 filament with greyscale ranging from -2.0 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 11 

1516: Jy beam$^{-1}$.  d) The DR 21 region with greyscale ranging from -0.4 Jy 

1517: beam$^{-1}$ to 2.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$}.

1518: \end{figure}

1519: 

1520: \clearpage

1521: 

1522: \begin{figure}

1523: \figurenum{5}

1524: \epsscale{1.0}

1525: \vspace*{-1.0cm}

1526: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{fig5.ps}

1527: \caption{Examples of SCUBA 850 $\mu$m observations of nearby galaxies from

1528: the Extended Dataset.  In all panels, the greyscale ranges from -0.1 Jy 

1529: beam$^{-1}$ to 0.32 Jy beam$^{-1}$. a) The Whirlpool Galaxy (M51).  b) The 

1530: central part of the colliding Antennae galaxies (NGC 4038/4039). c) The 

1531: nearby galaxy NGC 1068.  d) The peculiar galaxy Arp 220.}

1532: \end{figure}

1533: 

1534: \clearpage

1535: 

1536: \begin{figure}

1537: \figurenum{6}

1538: \epsscale{1.0}

1539: \vspace*{-3.0cm}

1540: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{fig6.ps}

1541: \caption{Examples of SCUBA 850 $\mu$m observations of debris disks around main

1542: sequence stars.  In all panels, the greyscale ranges from -0.006 to 0.04 Jy

1543: beam$^{-1}$. a) $\alpha$ PsA (Fomalhaut).  b) $\beta$ Pic.  c) AU Mic.  d)

1544: $\alpha$ Lyr (Vega).  e) $\epsilon$ Eri.  f) $\eta$ Crv.}

1545: \end{figure}

1546: 

1547: \clearpage

1548: 

1549: \begin{figure}

1550: \figurenum{7}

1551: \epsscale{1.0}

1552: \vspace*{-4.0cm}

1553: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{fig7.ps}

1554: \caption{The low-level structure in the JCMT beams at 450 $\mu$m (upper two 

1555: panels) and at 850 $\mu$m (lower two panels), from numerous observations of 

1556: the calibrator source CRL 618 (PN G166.4-06.5).  In each plot, the dots show 

1557: pixel values normalized to the peak intensity.  Solid lines show Gaussian 

1558: profiles fit to the profile by eye from the summation of the two other Gaussian 

1559: profiles shown as dashed lines.  Panels on the left are from images of CRL 618 

1560: made with 1\as\ pixels while panels on the right are taken from Fundamental 

1561: Dataset images (i.e., 3\as\ pixels at 450 $\mu$m and 6\as\ pixels at 850 

1562: $\mu$m.)} 

1563: \end{figure}

1564: 

1565: \clearpage

1566: 

1567: \begin{figure}

1568: \figurenum{8}

1569: \epsscale{1.0}

1570: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1571: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{fig8.ps}

1572: \caption{Histograms showing the distribution of 1 $\sigma$ rms per pixel from

1573: all pixels in the 850 $\mu$m Extended maps (dotted bold line), 850 $\mu$m 

1574: Fundamental maps (solid bold line) and the 450 $\mu$m Fundamental maps (solid 

1575: normal line).  The distributions have been truncated at 1.0 Jy beam$^{-1}$.}

1576: \end{figure}

1577: 

1578: \clearpage

1579: 

1580: \begin{figure}

1581: \figurenum{9}

1582: \epsscale{1.0}

1583: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1584: %\plotone{fig9.ps}

1585: \vskip -2.0cm

1586: \caption{Differences in L1688 objects in the Fundamental (top) and Extended 

1587: (bottom) Datasets where different objects in each Dataset are shown by 

1588: different shades of grey.} 

1589: \end{figure}

1590: 

1591: \clearpage

1592: 

1593: \begin{figure}

1594: \figurenum{10}

1595: \epsscale{1.0}

1596: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1597: %\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig10.ps}

1598: %\vskip -2.0cm

1599: \caption{Logarithmic histograms of the numbers of unidentified objects with 

1600: galactic latitude in the FMOC (upper panel) and the EMOC (lower panel).  Such 

1601: objects are those labelled ``noMatch" in Column 26 of Tables 2 and 3.}

1602: \end{figure}

1603: 

1604: \clearpage

1605: 

1606: \begin{figure}

1607: \figurenum{11}

1608: \epsscale{1.0}

1609: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1610: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{fig11.ps}

1611: \caption{Summary plots of the FMOC.  The top left panel is a histogram of 

1612: the logarithmic distribution of the alternative effective sizes in arcseconds 

1613: of all objects down to the 90 mJy beam$^{-1}$ contour (Column 11 of Table 2).  

1614: The top right panel is a histogram of the logarithmic distribution of the 

1615: alternative 850 $\mu$m fluxes in Jy of these objects (Column 10 of Table 2). 

1616: The bottom left panel is a histogram of the logarithmic distribution of 

1617: maximum 850 $\mu$m intensities in Jy beam$^{-1}$ of these objects (Column 5 

1618: of Table 2).  The bottom right panel is a cumulative logarithmic distribution 

1619: of the alternative 850$\mu$m flux in Jy of these objects.}

1620: 

1621: \end{figure}

1622: 

1623: \clearpage

1624: 

1625: \begin{figure}

1626: \figurenum{12}

1627: \epsscale{1.0}

1628: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1629: %\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig12.ps}

1630: \caption{Histogram of the numbers of Objects in either the Fundamental or 

1631: Extended Map Object Catalogues at a given signal-to-noise level or above.}

1632: \end{figure}

1633: 

1634: \clearpage

1635: 

1636: \begin{figure}

1637: \figurenum{13}

1638: \epsscale{1.0}

1639: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1640: %\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig13.ps}

1641: \caption{850 $\mu$m map of the LDN 1551 cloud from the Fundamental Dataset.  

1642: Intensities at 850 $\mu$m range from -0.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 0.42 Jy 

1643: beam$^{-1}$ (greyscale).  Squares denote positions of maximum intensity 

1644: for each object in this map listed in the Fundamental Map Object Catalogue 

1645: (Table 2); these positions correspond to the identifiers of each object 

1646: (Column 1 of Table 2).  The labels denote for each object, the maximum 

1647: signal-to-noise ratio of each object (Column 8 of Table 2).  Dark contours 

1648: delineate the outer boundaries of each object.}

1649: \end{figure}

1650: 

1651: \clearpage

1652: 

1653: \begin{figure}

1654: \figurenum{14}

1655: \epsscale{1.0}

1656: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1657: %\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig14.ps}

1658: \caption{850 $\mu$m map of the galaxy M 51 from the Fundamental Dataset.  

1659: Intensities at 850 $\mu$m range from -0.1 Jy beam$^{-1}$ to 0.32 Jy 

1660: beam$^{-1}$ (greyscale).  Symbols, labels and contours are defined as

1661: for Figure 13.}

1662: \end{figure}

1663: 

1664: \clearpage

1665: 

1666: \begin{figure}

1667: \figurenum{15}

1668: \epsscale{1.0}

1669: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1670: %\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig15.ps}

1671: \caption{850 $\mu$m map of the NGC 7538 massive star-forming region from 

1672: the Fundamental Dataset.  Intensities at 850 $\mu$m range from -0.1 Jy 

1673: beam$^{-1}$ to 3.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$ (greyscale).  Symbols, labels and 

1674: contours are defined as for Figure 13.}

1675: \end{figure}

1676: 

1677: \clearpage

1678: 

1679: \begin{figure}

1680: \figurenum{16}

1681: \epsscale{1.0}

1682: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1683: %\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig16.ps}

1684: \caption{Comparison of maximum 850 $\mu$m intensities in LDN 1551 (crosses) 

1685: and NGC 7538 (triangles) between objects in the Fundamental Dataset maps and 

1686: those in smoothed and rebinned maps by Moriarty-Schieven et al., and Reid \& 

1687: Wilson respectively.  The dashed line denotes the line of equality.}

1688: \end{figure}

1689: 

1690: \clearpage

1691: 

1692: \begin{figure}

1693: \figurenum{17}

1694: \epsscale{1.0}

1695: \vspace*{-0.1cm}

1696: %\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig17.ps}

1697: \caption{Relative offsets between expected positions of the point-like 

1698: calibrators HL Tau, CRL 618, and CRL 2688 (at center) and the positions of

1699: the pixel of maximum 850 $\mu$m intensity for the corresponding object in

1700: Fundamental Map Object Catalogue (squares).  The dashed circles denote 

1701: angular offsets starting at 1\as\ radius and increasing in steps of 1\as\ 

1702: radius.  The bold dashed circle denotes an angular offset of 6\as, equal 

1703: to 1 $\sigma$ of the narrow component of the {\it unsmoothed} JCMT beam 

1704: at 850 $\mu$m.} 

1705: \end{figure}

1706: 

1707: \end{document}

1708: