1: \relax 

2: \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}

3: \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces (a): The correlation between the X-ray luminosity (2-10 keV) and the optical luminosity ($\lambda = 5100\mskip \thickmuskip \mathop {\rm  {A}}\limits ^ \circ $ ) for sub-sample 2. The point in the left-down corner is NGC 4395, which is a dwarf Seyfert galaxy. The value of the correlation coefficient is not significantly influenced by whether this point is included or not (see the text for details). (b): The data of the normalized excess variances and the X-ray luminosities (2-10 keV). (c): The data of the normalized excess variances and black holes masses. The values of black hole masses are in units of ${\rm  {M}}_ \odot $. The data are obtained from O' Neill et al. (2005) and the references therein.}}{2}}

4: \newlabel{FigVibStab}{{1}{2}}

5: \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Data analysis}{2}}

6: \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Partial correlation analysis}{2}}

7: \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Ordinary least squares regression}{2}}

8: \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}K-S tests}{2}}

9: \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Discussions and conclusions}{2}}

10: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

11: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

12: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

13: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

14: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

15: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

16: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

17: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

18: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

19: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

20: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

21: \bibcite{baker}{1966}

22: \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces The results of the correlation analysis.}}{3}}

23: \newlabel{table:1}{{1}{3}}

24: \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces The results of the regression. The significance of the linear correlation is obtained by the $F$ statistic. The value of $\chi ^2 $ is calculated from the regression result to estimate the goodness of the regression.}}{3}}

25: \newlabel{table:2}{{2}{3}}

26: \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces The comparison between the values of $\sigma _{rms}^2 $ predicted by the results of the regression and the observed ones. The results from the full sample are shown in (a). (b): The same as (a) but for the sub-sample 1. (c): The same as (a) but for the sub-sample 2.}}{3}}

27: \newlabel{FigVibStab}{{2}{3}}

28: \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces The cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of the black hole mass (a), the X-ray luminosity (b) and $\sigma _{rms}^2 $ (c). The solid lines are the data of the sub-sample 1, and the dashed lines are the data of the sub-sample 2. The value of black hole mass is in units of ${\rm  {M}}_ \odot $.}}{3}}

29: \newlabel{FigVibStab}{{3}{3}}

30: