1: %\documentclass[oldversion, referee]{aa}
2: \documentclass[oldversion]{aa}
3: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
4:
5: %\usepackage{psfig}
6: %\topmargin 0.0cm % togliere quando non c'e` il [referee]
7: %\documentstyle[psfig]{l-aa}
8: %\topmargin 2.5cm
9: %
10: \usepackage{rotating}
11: \usepackage{longtable}
12: \usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
13: %\usepackage{amssymb}
14: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
15: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
16: \usepackage{latexsym}
17: %\usepackage{psfig}
18: %\usepackage{epsfig}
19: %\usepackage{amsbsy}
20: \sloppy
21:
22:
23: \newcommand{\simless}{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
24: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'074$}}\mathchar"7218$}}} %< or of order
25: \newcommand{\simgreat}{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
26: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'076$}}\mathchar"7218$}}} %> or of order
27:
28: \newcommand{\mcu}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
29: \newcommand{\mcd}[1]{\multicolumn{2}{c}{#1}}
30: \newcommand{\mcq}[1]{\multicolumn{4}{c}{#1}}
31: \newcommand{\sori}{$\sigma$~Ori}
32: \newcommand{\roph} {$\rho$~Oph}
33: \newcommand{\Msun}{M$_\odot$}
34: \newcommand{\Lsun}{L$_\odot$}
35: \newcommand{\Ha}{H$\alpha$}
36: \newcommand{\Pab}{Pa$\beta$}
37: \newcommand{\Pag}{Pa$\gamma$}
38: \newcommand{\Brg}{Br$\gamma$}
39: \newcommand{\Lpag}{L(Pa$\gamma$)}
40: \newcommand{\Teff}{T$_{eff}$}
41: \newcommand{\Lstar}{L$_\ast$}
42: \newcommand{\Rstar}{R$_\ast$}
43: \newcommand{\Mstar}{M$_\ast$}
44: \newcommand{\Lacc}{L$_{acc}$}
45: \newcommand{\Macc}{$\dot M_{acc}$}
46:
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: \title{Accretion properties of T Tauri stars in $\sigma$~Ori
50: \thanks{
51: Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory, Chile.
52: Program 078.C-0382.}
53: }
54:
55: \author{
56: T. Gatti\inst{1,2},
57: A. Natta\inst{1},
58: S. Randich \inst{1},
59: L. Testi\inst{1,3}
60: \and
61: G. Sacco \inst{4}
62: }
63:
64: \institute{
65: Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, INAF, Largo E.Fermi 5,
66: I-50125 Firenze, Italy
67: \and
68: Universit\`a di Firenze, Dipartimento di Astronomia, Largo E.Fermi 5,
69: I-50125 Firenze, Italy
70: \and
71: ESO, Karl-Schwarschild Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei M\"unchen, Germany
72: \and
73: Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, INAF, Piazza del Parlamento 1, 90134 Palermo, Italy
74: }
75:
76: \offprints{natta@arcetri.astro.it}
77: \date{Received ...; accepted ...}
78:
79: \authorrunning{Natta et al.}
80: \titlerunning{Accretion in $\sigma$~Ori}
81:
82:
83: \abstract
84: {Accretion disks around young stars evolve in time with time scales of few million years. We present here a study of the accretion properties of a sample of
85: 35 stars in the $\sim 3$ million year old star-forming region $\sigma$~Ori. Of these,
86: 31 are objects with evidence of disks, based on their IR excess emission.
87: We use near-IR hydrogen recombination lines (Pa$\gamma$) to measure their
88: mass accretion rate. We find that the accretion rates are
89: significantly lower
90: in $\sigma$~Ori than in younger regions, such as $\rho$~Oph, consistently
91: with viscous disk evolution. The He~I 1.083 $\mu$m line is detected (either in
92: absorption or in emission) in 72\% of the stars with disks, providing evidence
93: of accretion-powered activity also in very low accretors, where other accretion
94: indicators dissapear.}
95: %{bb}
96: %{cc}
97: %{dd}
98: %{ee}
99:
100: \keywords{Stars: formation - Accretion, accretion disks }
101:
102: \maketitle
103:
104: \section {Introduction}
105:
106: At the time of their birth, circumstellar disks are present around most (if not all) stars of mass lower than few solar masses.
107: The fraction of
108: stars with disks decreases with time, from being close to 100\% in the youngest
109: regions to less than few percent after $\sim 5-7$ Myr (e.g., Hern\'andez et al.~\cite{Hea07} and references therein).
110: By the time a region is 10 Myr old, all the ``classical" (i.e., gas-rich, optically thick) disks have disappeared.
111: On similar timescales, all other indications of accretion-powered activity, such
112: as accretion and ejection of matter, disappear as well (e.g.,
113: Kenyon et al.~\cite{Kea05}; Mohanty et al.~\cite{Mea05}; Barrado y Navascu\'es
114: and Mart\'in \cite{BNM03}).
115: These time scales are consistent to zero order with viscous disk evolution
116: (Hartmann et al.~\cite{Hea98}),
117: although many other processes may play a role in disk dissipation
118: (e.g., Hollenbach et al.~\cite{Hol00}).
119:
120: Recently, the discussion on how disks evolve has gained new momentum
121: from the large surveys of star forming regions obtained with {\it Spitzer},
122: which provide measurements of the fraction of stars with disks based on well-defined, statistically significant samples. Particularly interesting is
123: the new class of
124: ``evolved" disks, of which very few were known from ground-based
125: photometry (Skrutskie et al.~\cite{Skea90}). They are objects with IR excess emission weaker than
126: typical classical T Tauri stars (CTTS); a fraction of these are
127: so-called transitional disks,
128: i.e., objects with no near-IR excess, but excess emission at longer wavelengths.
129: The fraction of evolved disks is
130: larger in older regions (Hern\'andez et al.~\cite{Hea07}). The weak emission
131: of evolved disks may be the result
132: of grain coagulation and settling (D'Alessio et al.~\cite{Dal06}, Dullemond and
133: Dominik~\cite{Dul05}). Transitional objects are likely disks where small grains have been
134: cleared from the inner regions, and the discussion on their relevance for disk
135: evolution (do all disks disappear from inside out?)
136: is open.
137:
138: Another indication of the presence of disks is given
139: by the accretion-powered phenomena that go under the label of accretion
140: activity (UV veiling, line emission and absorption from infalling and ouflowing gas, etc.).
141: From them, it is possible to measure the mass accretion rate from the disk
142: onto the central object, a crucial quantity for constraining the physical properties of accretion disks.
143: Recently,
144: Sicilia-Aguilar
145: et al.~(\cite{SAea06b}) measured the mass accretion rate in a number of stars of different age
146: from Taurus, \roph, Cha I, TW Hya and Tr~37
147: and found that \Macc\ decreases steadily with time, roughly as $t^{-1.5}$.
148: Such a trend is consistent with the expectations of viscous disk evolution
149: (Hartmann et al.~\cite{Hea98}).
150:
151: The sample used by
152: Sicilia-Aguilar et al.~(\cite{SAea06b}) is based on individual stellar ages
153: and
154: includes only few stars in each region, with the
155: exception of Tr~37, which contributes more than half of the total.
156: The mass range of the stars with measured accretion rate in Tr~37
157: (which has a distance of $\sim$ 900 pc) is shifted toward higher mass than the other, closer regions.
158: We think that it is important to
159: measure mass accretion rates in large numbers of stars in different
160: regions over a large range of average ages.
161: This is because
162: there is evidence that, in addition to the time dependence,
163: other parameters, not identified so far, are likley to affect disk evolution,
164: as shown by the Muzerolle et al.~({\cite{Mea03}) and Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06})
165: studies of accretion in Taurus and Ophiuchus. These authors have
166: shown that, firstly,
167: the accretion rate depends on the mass of the central
168: object and that, at the same time,
169: there is a large range of disk and accretion properties even for
170: stars of similar mass and age in the same star forming region.
171: % which can have accretion rate and disk masses that vary by orders of magnitude.
172: Moreover, there is evidence that the disk lifetime is shorter for more
173: massive stars (Hillenbrand et al.~\cite{Hil98};
174: Carpenter et al.~\cite{Cea06}; Lada et al.~\cite{Lea06};
175: Hern\'andez et al.~\cite{Hea07}; Dahm and Hillenbrand \cite{DH07}).
176: %The relation between this
177: %and the accretion dependence on mass is not known.
178:
179: We are interested in extending the studies of the accretion properties of young stars to older regions, to see how they change with time and, more specifically, if both the correlation between accretion rate and central mass and the
180: large spread of accretion rates remain unchanged in time.
181: In this paper, we present the first results of a study of the
182: accretion properties of CTTS in \sori.
183: The \sori\ cluster is
184: located at a distance of $\sim 350$ pc and has an age of
185: $\sim 3$ Myr. It contains more than 300 stars, ranging in mass from the
186: bright, massive multiple system \sori\ itself (spectral type O9.5)
187: to brown dwarfs.
188: The \sori\ region has been extensively studied over the last
189: few years in the optical, X-ray and infrared (e.g., Kenyon et al.~\cite{Kea05};
190: Zapatero-Osorio et al.~\cite{Zea02}; Franciosini et al.~\cite{Fea06};
191: Oliveira et al.~\cite{Oea04}, \cite{Oea06}; Caballero \cite{C07};
192: Caballero et al.~\cite{Cea07}).
193: {\it Spitzer} has recently produced a complete census
194: of the stellar population down to the brown dwarf regime (Hern\'andez et al.~\cite{Hea07}). These authors
195: find that the fraction of stars that retain classical (i.e., flared, gas-rich) disks (i.e., bona-fide Class II objects)
196: vary from about 10\% for stars with mass $>2$ \Msun\ to about 35\% for T Tauri stars (TTS) and brown dwarfs (BDs).
197: A relatively large
198: fraction of TTS, about 15\%, have evolved disks;
199: 7 of these are
200: candidate transitional disks. The large and well characterized sample of
201: Class II and evolved disks in
202: \sori\ makes it particularly suited to study the properties of accretion and disks for an intermediate age stellar population.
203:
204: We determine the accretion rate from the
205: luminosity of the IR hydrogen recombination lines, \Pab\ and \Pag\ in
206: particular. The reliability of this method has been discussed
207: by Muzerolle et al.~(\cite{Mea98}), Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea04}) and Calvet et
208: al.(\cite{Cea04}) and
209: applied by Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06}) to a complete sample of IR-selected Class II stars in the young, embedded star forming region \roph.
210: Although for the optically visible objects in \sori\ other methods of measuring
211: the accretion rate could (and should) be used, we consider that
212: the comparison between different regions is more significant if the same method
213: is used in all cases.
214:
215: We discuss the properties of our \sori\ sample in \S 2, which also presents
216: details of the observations and data reduction. The results are presented in \S 3. The accretion rate measurements and their implications are discussed in \S 4. Summary and conclusions follow in \S 5.
217:
218: \section{Sample, observations and data Reduction}
219:
220: \subsection{The sample}
221:
222: Our sample contains 35 TTS with evidence of accretion and/or disks.
223: We selected them from two different sources. The first
224: is Oliveira et al.~(\cite{Oea04}, \cite{Oea06}), who
225: detected a
226: K-L' color excess, very likely due to
227: a circumstellar disk, in about 25 \sori\ TTS. The other source is the high spectral resolution spectral survey of
228: Sacco et al.~(\cite{Sea07}), who detected a total of 28
229: stars with
230: broad H$\alpha$ lines (10\%FW$>$200 km/s), indicative of accretion.
231: We imposed a limiting magnitude J$<$14.5, to achieve the required signal-to-noise.
232: Our sample includes 18 of the 23 Oliveira et al.
233: %~(\cite{Oea04}, \cite{Oea06})
234: sources above the J limit, and 22/28 of the broad \Ha\ stars; 5 stars
235: (number \#5, \#6, \#8, \#14 and \#22 in Table~\ref{table_1}) are in common
236: (they have both K-L' color excess and strong
237: H$\alpha$), for a total of 35 objects.
238: Sacco et al.~(\cite{Sea07})
239: confirm the membership of the
240: 22 stars in their sample;
241: none is found to be binary.
242:
243: After completion of our observations,
244: Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}), published the results of their
245: {\it Spitzer} survey of the \sori\ region.
246: Of our 35 objects, 32 lie in the surveyed field.
247: Based on the shape of their spectral energy distribution (SED) in the near and mid-IR, 26 of them are classified
248: as Class II, or classical TTS (CTTS), i.e., objects with gas-rich, flared disks
249: extending close to the star;
250: 4 are Class III (i.e., TTS with no evidence of disk)
251: and 2 (\#28 and \#29) are evolved disks, i.e.,
252: objects with IR excess weaker than typical CTTS.
253: In the following, we will analyze them together with the Class II objects
254: and use the definition of Class II for the whole disk sample
255: (but see \S 4.4).
256: The SED classification is given in Table \ref{table_1}.
257: %the 28, a transitional disk candidate classified as Evolved Disk, the 29, a Class II classified as Evolved Disk and the 30, a Class II classified as Class I in ***.
258: Three stars, \#1, \#13, and \#33, are not in the fields observed by Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}). We classify them as Class II based on the presence of a K-L'
259: excess (Oliveira et al.~\cite{Oea04}; \cite{Oea06}); in one case (\#1) the excess is at the 2.5$\sigma$ level, and the classification uncertain.
260:
261: Within our J-magnitude limit (J$\leq$14.5),
262: our sample of disk objects contains about 30\% of the \sori\ members with evidence of disks from the {\it Spitzer} survey.
263: Their distribution in color and magnitude is very similar to that
264: of the parental population (see Fig.~\ref{fig_1}), so that
265: we consider our total sample of 31 Class II
266: objects to be representative of the whole disk population.
267: %Results derived from our sample should be valid in general.
268: % to be used in the study of accretion properties of the whole star forming region, from a statistical point of view.
269:
270: \begin{table*}
271: \caption {Stellar Parameters and Observed Properties}
272: %\begin{tiny}
273: \begin{center}
274: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccccc}
275: \hline
276: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Obj} &
277: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Spitz.} &
278: \multicolumn{1}{c}{RA} &
279: \multicolumn{1}{c}{DEC} &
280: \multicolumn{1}{c}{J} &
281: \multicolumn{1}{c}{ST} &
282: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Cl.} &
283: \multicolumn{1}{c}{L$_{*}$} &
284: \multicolumn{1}{c}{M$_{*}$} &
285: \multicolumn{1}{c}{T$_{eff}$} &
286: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Pa$\beta$} &
287: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Pa$\gamma$} &
288: \multicolumn{1}{c}{HeI} &
289: \multicolumn{1}{c}{L$_{acc}$} &
290: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\dot{M_{acc}}$}\\
291:
292:
293: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\#} &
294: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\#} &
295: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(2000)} &
296: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(2000)} &
297: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(mag)} &
298: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
299: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
300: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(L$_{\odot}$)} &
301: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(M$_{\odot}$)} &
302: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(K)} &
303: \multicolumn{1}{c}{($\AA$)} &
304: \multicolumn{1}{c}{($\AA$)} &
305: \multicolumn{1}{c}{($\AA$)} &
306: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(L$_{\odot}$)} &
307: \multicolumn{1}{c}{($M_{\odot}/yr$)}\\
308:
309:
310: \hline \hline
311:
312:
313:
314: 1 & -- & 5:37:56.1& -2:09:26.7 & 13.90& M4.5 & II & 0.04 & 0.16 & 3075 & $<$0.5 & $<$0.6 & $-$ & $<$-3.5 & $<$-10.4 \\
315: 2 & 283 &5:37:58.4& -2:41:26.2& 13.28&M5.0 & III & 0.07 & 0.12 & 3000 & $<$0.5 & $<$0.4 & $-$ & $<$-3.4 & $<$-10.0 \\
316: 3 & 451&5:38:18.9& -2:51:38.8 & 12.83& M3.0 & II & 0.12 & 0.25 & 3350 & $<$0.5 & 2.0$\pm$0.4 & 1.7$\pm$0.3 & -2.2 & -9.1 \\
317: 4 & 462& 5:38:20.5& -2:34:09.0 & 12.65& M4.0 & II & 0.13 & 0.16 & 3150 & $<$0.4 & $<$0.3 & $-$ & $<$-3.2 & $<$-9.8 \\
318: 5 & 518& 5:38:27.3& -2:45:09.7 & 11.95& K8.0 & II & 0.42 & 0.5 & 3900 & 9.4$\pm$0.5 & 6.7$\pm$0.6 & 7.3$\pm$0.5 & -1.0 & -8.1 \\
319: 6 & 520 & 5:38:27.5& -2:35:04.2 &12.83& M3.5 & II & 0.12 & 0.2 & 3250 & $<$0.6 & 0.8$^c$ & $-$ & -2.8 & -9.6 \\
320: 7 & 562& 5:38:31.4& -2:36:33.8 & 12.17& M3.0 & II & 0.19 & 0.2 & 3350 & 4.9$\pm$0.4 & 3.6$\pm$0.3 & 4.7$\pm$0.3 & -1.5 & -8.2 \\
321: 8 & 563 & 5:38:31.6& -2:35:14.9 & 11.52& M2.0 & II & 0.23 & 0.3 & 3500 & $<$0.5 & $<$0.5 & 1.8$\pm$0.5 & $<$-2.3 & $<$-9.2 \\
322: 9 & 592& 5:38:34.3& -2:35:00.1 & 11.22& K0.0 & III & 0.16 & 0.8 & 5250 & $<$0.4 & $<$0.4 & $-$ & $<$-2.3 & $<$-10.0 \\
323: 10 & 598 & 5:38:34.6& -2:41:08.8& 13.10& M4.5 & II & 0.11 & 0.14 & 3075 & $<$0.6 & $<$0.7 & -0.8$^c$ & $<$-3.0 & $<$-9.6 \\
324: 11 & 611& 5:38:35.5& -2:31:51.7 & 11.30& K7.0 & III & 0.57 & 0.5 & 4000 & $<$0.7 & $<$0.7 & $-$ & $<$-2.0 & $<$-9.0 \\
325: 12 & 646& 5:38:39.0& -2:45:32.2 & 12.91& M3.5 & II & 0.10 & 0.2 & 3225 & $<$0.4 & 0.8$\pm$0.3 & -1.8$\pm$0.4 & -2.8 & -9.6 \\
326: 13 & -- & 5:38:39.8& -2:56:46.2& 11.43& M0.5 & II & 0.45 & 0.4 & 3725 & $<$0.7 & $<$0.4 & 2.8$\pm$0.3 & $<$-2.4 & $<$-9.3 \\
327: 14 & 662& 5:38:40.3& -2:30:18.5 & 11.51& M0.5 & II & 0.44 & 0.4 & 3725 & $<$0.7 & 0.7$^c$ & -0.7$^c$ & -2.1 & -9.0 \\
328: 15 & 669 & 5:38:41.3& -2:37:22.6& 11.46& M0.0 & III & 0.44 & 0.45 & 3800 & $<$0.7 & $<$0.4 & 0.7$^c$ & $<$-2.4 & $<$-9.4 \\
329: 16 & 682 & 5:38:42.3& -2:37:14.7& 11.77& M1.5 & II & 0.35 & 0.3 & 3575 & $<$0.4 & $<$0.5 & -1.2 $\pm$0.4 & $<$-2.5 & $<$-9.3 \\
330: 17 & 694 & 5:38:43.9& -2:37:06.8& 12.84& M4.5 & II & 0.1 & 0.14 & 3075 & $<$0.4 & $<$0.4 & 1.0$\pm$0.3 & $<$-3.2 & $<$-9.8 \\
331: 18 & 697 & 5:38:44.2& -2:40:19.7& 11.36& K7.5 & II & 0.63 & 0.45 & 3950 & $<$0.5 & $<$0.3 & 2.1$\pm$0.3 & $<$-2.5 & $<$-9.5 \\
332: 19 & 710& 5:38:45.4& -2:41:59.4& 11.99& M2.5 & II & 0.25 & 0.25 & 3425 & $<$0.6 & 1.3$\pm$0.3 & 0.3$^d$ & -2.0 & -8.8 \\
333: 20 & 723 & 5:38:47.2& -2:34:36.8& 12.56& M3.5 & II & 0.09 & 0.2 & 3250 & 3.4$\pm$0.5 & 2.1$\pm$0.4 & $-$ & -2.0 & -8.9 \\
334: 21 & 726& 5:38:47.5& -2:35:25.2 & 11.74& M1.5 & II & 0.42 & 0.3 & 3575 & 1.1$\pm$0.3 & 1.4$\pm$0.3 & $0.0^e$ & -1.8 & -8.6 \\
335: 22 & 733 & 5:38:47.9& -2:37:19.2& 12.02& M2.5 & II & 0.36 & 0.25 & 3425 & $<$0.4 & 1.3$\pm$0.3 & 0.6$^c$ & -2.0 & -8.7 \\
336: 23 & 736 & 5:38:48.0& -2:27:14.2& 10.16& K8.0 & II & 0.83 & 0.45 & 3950 & $<$0.6 & $<$0.5 & -1.5$\pm$0.4 & $<$-1.6 & $<$-8.5 \\
337: 24 & 750 &5:38:49.3& -2:23:57.6& 14.36& M4.5 & II & 0.03 & 0.16 & 3075 & $<$1.2 & $<$1.2 & $-$ & $<$-3.4 & $<$-10.3 \\
338: 25 & 762 &5:38:50.6& -2:42:42.9& 13.84& M5.0 & II & 0.04 & 0.12 & 3000 & $<$0.5 & $<$0.7 & 2.9$\pm$0.4 & $<$-3.4 & $<$-10.1 \\
339: 26 & 774 & 5:38:52.0& -2:46:43.7 & 11.52& K8.0 & II & 0.44 & 0.5 & 3900 & $<$0.5 & 1.6$\pm$0.5 & 5.2$\pm$0.5 & -1.6 & -8.7 \\
340: 27 & 871 & 5:39:04.6& -2:41:49.4& 13.96& M2 & II & 0.1 & 0.3 & 3500 & $<$1.2 & $<$1.0 & 8.5$\pm$1.0 & $<$-3.2 & $<$-10.3 \\
341: 28 & 897 & 5:39:07.6& -2:32:39.1& 11.30& K8.0 & II$^a$& 0.6& 0.5& 3900 & $<$0.7 & $<$0.6 & 1.2$^c$ & $<$-2.1 & $<$-9.1 \\
342: 29 & 908 & 5:39:08.8& -2:31:11.5&13.07& M4.5 & II$^b$& 0.07& 0.16& 3075 & 1.3$\pm$0.4 & 0.8$\pm$0.3 & -1.3$\pm$0.3 & -2.9 & -9.6 \\
343: 30 & 927 & 5:39:11.5& -2:31:06.6& 11.99& M0.5 & II& 0.24 &0.5 &3725 & $<$0.8 & $<$0.7 & $-$ & $<$-2.4 & $<$-9.5 \\
344: 31 & 984 & 5:39:18.8& -2:30:53.1& 11.40& K9.0 & II & 0.52 & 0.45 & 3850 & $<$0.6 & $<$0.4 & -1.1$\pm$0.3 & $<$-2.4 & $<$-9.4 \\
345: 32 &1152 & 5:39:39.4& -2:17:04.5& 11.67& M1.5 & II & 0.29 & 0.35 & 3575 & $<$0.6 & $<$0.5 & -2.4$\pm$0.5 & $<$-2.4 & $<$-9.3 \\
346: 33 & -- & 5:39:41.0& -2:16:24.4& 12.91& M4.5 & II & 0.10 & 0.14 & 3075 & $<$0.4 & $<$0.4 & $-$ & $<$-3.2 & $<$-9.8 \\
347: 34 &1230 & 5:39:49.4& -2:23:45.9& 13.44& M4.0 & II & 0.07 & 0.18 & 3150 & $<$0.8 & $<$0.8 &0.8 $^c$ & $<$-3.1 & $<$-9.9 \\
348: 35 &1248 &5:39:51.7& -2:22:47.2& 12.60& M5.0 & II & 0.13 & 0.12 & 3000 & $<$0.5 & $<$0.6 & $-$ & $<$-2.8 & $<$-9.3 \\
349:
350: \hline
351: %\hline
352: %\end{tiny}
353: \label{table_1}
354: \end{tabular}
355: %\linespread{1.0}
356: \end{center}
357: Notes: $a$, $b$: Transition disk and evolved disk, respectively, in Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}). $c$: tentative (2$\sigma$) detection. $d$: Type IVr P-Cygni profile: EW(em)=1.2$\pm$0.3, EW(abs)=-0.9$\pm$0.3. $e$: tentative type IVr P-Cygni profile (0.6, -0.6).
358: \end{table*}
359: %\end{sidewaystable}
360:
361: %\begin{sidewaystable}
362:
363:
364:
365:
366:
367: \begin{figure}
368: \centering
369: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_colors.eps}}
370: \caption{ \label{fig_1} [J-H] versus H-[8] color diagram for
371: \sori\ cluster members with J$<$ 14.4. Empty circles and squares are Class II/transitional disks
372: and Class III objects respectively. Red filled circles show the location of our \sori\ sample with Spitzer observations (32 objects in total).
373: The histograms at the bottom show the distribution in H-[8] of all cluster members
374: (empty) and of our sample (dashed), respectively. All Class II disks have
375: H-[8] $> 1.5$.
376: }
377: \label {fig_colors}
378: \end{figure}
379:
380:
381: \begin{figure}
382: \centering
383: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_hr.eps}}
384: \caption{ \label{fig_2} Location of the \sori\ targets
385: on the HR diagram. Evolutionary tracks from D'Antona and Mazzitelli (\cite{DM97}), labelled with the stellar mass. Isochrones for 0.5, 1 and 5 Myr are shown
386: by the dashed lines. }
387: \label {fig_hr}
388: \end{figure}
389:
390:
391:
392: %%\end{sidewaystable}
393:
394:
395:
396:
397: \subsection{Stellar parameters}
398:
399: Spectroscopically determined spectral types exist for a small fraction of
400: \sori\ objects only (e.g., Franciosini et al.~\cite{Fea06} and references therein). To ensure homogeneity, we determine the effective temperature of each object from its visual photometry, adopting the
401: relation between color indexes, \Teff\ and spectral types
402: of Bessell~(\cite{Bes91}) for M dwarfs stars, and from Bessell~(\cite{Bes79}) and Bessell and Brett~(\cite{Bes_bret88}) for stars of earlier spectral type. We assume negligible extinction in all bands (Brown et al.~\cite{Bro94}; B\'ejar et al.~\cite{Bej99}), and compute
403: \Teff\ independently from the three
404: color indexes (V-R), (V-I), (R-I). The optical photometry is
405: from Sherry et al.~(\cite{She04}), Zapatero-Osorio et al.~(\cite{Zea02}), Kenyon et al.~(\cite{Kea05}), B\'ejar et al.~(\cite{Bej01}) and Wolk (\cite{Wolk96}).
406: The differences between the different determinations
407: of \Teff\ are generally
408: less than $\pm$ 150 K, and often much smaller.
409: The adopted values of \Teff\ and spectral types
410: are given in Table \ref{table_1}.
411: The comparison with the spectroscopic determinations of spectral types
412: of Zapatero-Osorio et al.~(\cite{Zea02})
413: for the 8 objects in common shows differences of 1/2 to 1 subclass.
414:
415:
416: %The stellar properties (i.e., effective temperature, spectral type, luminosity and mass) of our sample have been obtained from the optical photometry of $\sigma$ Ori available (Sherry et al. 2004, Zapatero Osorio 2002, Kenyon et al. 2005, Bejar et al. 2001, Wolk 1996). In column 4, 5 and 6 of Table\ref{tab1} there are respectively I, V and R magnitude, while magnitude in the Near InfraRed bands (J, H, Ks) are taken from 2 Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) and they are shown in column 7, 8 and 9. Last 5 columns of Table\ref{tab1} contain 3.6 $\mu$m, 4.5 $\mu$m, 5.8 $\mu$m, 8 $\mu$m, and 24 $\mu$m photometries from $\textit{Spitzer}$ observations (Hernandez et al. 2007). Then we have computed R-I, V-I and V-R, obtaining effective Temperature (T$_{eff}$) of our stars comparing measured color indexs with those from Bessel 1991, for M dwarfs stars, and from Bessel 1979, Bessel and Bret 1988, Schmidt-Kaler 1982, and Koornneef 1983, for stars of earlier spectral type.\\
417: %In left pannel of Fig.\ref{fig3} is shown the comparison of T$_{eff}$ obtained with V-R (T$_{eff}$(V-R)), with those obtained from R-I (T$_{eff}$(R-I)), while in right pannel there is T$_{eff}$(V-R) vs T$_{eff}$(V-I). The greatest discrepancies $\Delta$T in T$_{eff}$(V-R) vs T$_{eff}$(V-I) diagram are $\le$ 150 K, except for 3 objects, 5, 7 and 16, where $\Delta$T are 175 K, 200 K and 225 K respectively; however, for many objects $\Delta$T is a few ten K. In T$_{eff}$(V-R) vs T$_{eff}$(R-I) diagram $\Delta$T $\le$ 200 K for all our stars, except for 5 targets (7, 10, 12, 16,21), where $\Delta$T are 250 K, 325 K, 285 K, 360 K and 270 K respectively. We can assume these $\Delta$T as uncertainties on T$_{eff}$ measures, and we report in column 6 of Tab.\ref{tab2} T$_{eff}$=T$_{eff}$(V-I), which is not affected by InfraRed excess produced by interstellar disks, and observed at greather longwaves.
418:
419: %Starting from the same references seen before, we have computed bolometric correction in I band, (BC$_I$), and bolometric luminosities L$_{*}$ of all the stars of our sample (column 4 of Tab.\ref{tab2}), which uncertanties $\Delta$L$_{*}$, obtained from $\Delta$T, ranges between 0.2 dex of L$_{*}$ and 0.3 dex of L$_{*}$ of 16. Spectral classification which came from these results (column 2 of Fig.\ref{tab2}) is in good agreement with pre-existent (see Zapatero-Osorio 2002??) within half subclass, except for 3 objects (5, 11, 23), where the discrepancy is a subclass.
420:
421: Stellar luminosities have been computed from the I magnitude, using the
422: bolometric correction appropriate for the spectral type (Kenyon and Hartmann ~\cite{KH95}),
423: no extinction and a distance D=350 pc.
424: The location of the stars on the HR diagram is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_hr},
425: together with the evolutionary tracks of D'Antona and Mazzitelli (DM97;
426: \cite{DM97}).
427: The distribution of the stars is
428: consistent with a typical age of $\sim 3$ Myr (Oliveira et al.~\cite{Oea04}),
429: with the exception of \#9,
430: a Class III object with color indexes consistent with an early K
431: spectral type but very low luminosity.
432: %In general,
433: %the uncertainties on \Lstar\ are dominated by the uncertainty on the \sori\ distance.
434: %If the region is at a distance of 440 pc, as adopted, e.g.,
435: %by Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}), the luminosities will be higher for all objects by
436: %0.2 dex, and the age of the region closer to 1 Myr.
437:
438: The stellar masses range from
439: $\sim 0.5$ to $\sim 0.1$ \Msun.
440: Note that the exact values of \Mstar\ depend on the adopted
441: evolutionary tracks, especially around 0.5-1 \Msun. We use DM97
442: for homogeneity with the analysis of Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06})
443: of the mass accretion rates in \roph.
444: The lower mass limit is determined by our selection criterion that J$<$14.5 mag; the lack of more massive stars reflects the strong
445: decrease of the fraction of Class II objects for increasing J magnitude
446: observed by Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}).
447: This trend, seen in other star forming regions
448: (e.g., Hillenbrand et al.~\cite{Hil98};
449: Carpenter et al.~\cite{Cea06}; Lada et al.~\cite{Lea06};
450: Hern\'andez et al.~\cite{Hea07}; Dahm and Hillenbrand \cite{DH07}), is
451: particularly strong in \sori, where only 4 (7\%) stars brighter than J=11 mag are classified as Class II. One of them is included in our sample (\#23),
452: and has an estimated spectral type K8 and mass $\sim 0.5$ \Msun.
453: The fact that no higher-mass member
454: has an associated Class II disk is confirmed
455: by Caballero (\cite{C07}): of the
456: 18 very bright stars (spectral type G0 and earlier)
457: in the \sori\ cluster studied by him
458: and included in the list of cluster members by
459: Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}), 3 have
460: transitional or debris disks, all the others are Class III.
461:
462:
463:
464: %Finally we have put our objects in the HR diagram and we have obtained masses for all our stars, except for 27, from D'antona Mazzitelli evolutionary tracks (see Fig.\ref{fig4}). The result is a sample of stars covering omogenuosly the range 0.1 M$_{\odot}$ 0.5 M$_{\odot}$, where all the members, except the 24, range in age between 0.5 Myr and 5 Myr, where most objects are along the 3 Myr isochron, as the age commonly indicated for this star forming region (Ref).
465:
466:
467: %%\end{sidewaystable}
468:
469:
470:
471:
472:
473: \subsection{Observations}
474:
475: Near-infrared spectra in the J band were obtained for all our targets using SOFI near-infrared camera and spectrograph at the ESO-NTT telescope. The observations of \sori\ were carried out in Visitor Mode on December 1-4, 2006. The 0.6 arcsec slit and the Blue low resolution grism have been used, resulting in a spectral resolution $\lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim$ 1000 and a spectral coverage from $\sim$0.95 to $\sim$1.64$\mu$m. Integration time was 40 minutes for all the targets;
476: standard calibrations (flats and lamps) and telluric standards spectra were obtained for each observation. Wavelength calibration was performed using the lamp observations.
477:
478: The mean seeing during the three nights was 0.7 arcsec, with many hours below 0.5 arcsec.
479: % so we have employed the 0.6 arcsec slit without important flux losses.
480: All target objects and telluric standards have been observed at airmass values z$<$2.
481:
482: With the goal of observing as many objects as possible, the targets have been observed in pairs, choosing stars with angular separations which allow a 20 arcsec nodding and a 6 arcsec jitter with the 4.71 arcmin slit, and orienting the slit at
483: appropriate position angles. In total, we have observed in this way
484: 24 targets, while 11 have been observed individually.
485: %We have been able to make 12 "double pointments" (24 targets), we have observed 12 single stars, and all the telluric standards many times during every night.
486: %These continuum fluxes have
487: %uncertainties of 20\% at least, deriving from the fact that, in order to maximize the number of objects we observed, we have not aligned the slit along the
488: %parallactic axys.
489: %During the acquisitions, the counting level $N$ achieved has been monitored continuosly, and $N$ values has been always below 10000, the limit at which the
490: %SOFI response becomes non-linear.
491:
492: The spectra have been reduced using standard procedures in IRAF.
493: We are interested in this paper in the three lines indicative of accretion powered activity which fall in the J band, namely
494: the HeI line at 1.083 $\mu$m and the two hydrogen recombination lines
495: \Pag\ at 1.094 $\mu$m and \Pab\ at 1.282 $\mu$m; the portions of the spectra which contain these lines are shown in
496: Fig.~\ref{fig_pag} and \ref{fig_pab}.
497: Their equivalent widths are given in Table \ref{table_1} (positive values for emission lines). Upper limits to
498: \Pab\ and \Pag\ assume that the lines are in emission;
499: they have been estimated from the peak-to-peak noise in the spectral region
500: of the lines, under the assumption that the lines are not resolved.
501: Since the He line can be either in emission or in absorption or both, we do not explicitely give upper limits in Table \ref{table_1},
502: they are similar to those of the adjacent \Pag\ line.
503: %was measured
504: % by fitting Gaussian profiles to the spectra using standard IRAF routines
505: %upper limits are the bigger of the peak-to-peak
506: %noise of the continuum adjacent to the
507: %line and the equivalent width of the noise features, in a manner similar to
508: %what had been done for \roph\ by Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06}).
509: %The results are given in Table ??.
510:
511:
512:
513: \section {Results}
514:
515: The presence of the hydrogen lines in emission and of the He~I
516: line, often with P-Cygni profiles clearly seen in high resolution spectra, (Edwards et al.~\cite{Eea06})
517: is evidence of accretion related activity. In fact,
518: inspection of Table \ref{table_1}
519: shows that none of the three
520: lines is detected in Class III stars, with the possible exception of
521: \#15, where we have a tentative detection of He~I in emission.
522: Of the 31 Class II, we detect at least one of the three lines in 26 cases.
523: The hydrogen lines are detected in emission in 12 Class II stars, but only in 5 we do detect both of them; in 7 cases, only \Pag\ is clearly seen.
524: The hydrogen line detection is confirmed in 10/12 cases by the presence of the He~I
525: line, either in absorption or in emission.
526:
527: \begin{figure*}
528: \centering
529: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_pag.eps}}
530: \caption{ Normalized observed spectra in the HeI and \Pag\ region.
531: The dotted lines show the wavelengths of the two lines.}
532: \label {fig_pag}
533: \end{figure*}
534:
535: \begin{figure*}
536: \centering
537: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_pab.eps}}
538: \caption{Normalized observed spectra in the \Pab\ region. The wavelengtth of \Pab\ is shown by the dotted line. }
539: \label {fig_pab}
540: \end{figure*}
541:
542: Our spectral resolution ($\sim$ 300 km/s) is too low to resolve the
543: lines. However, some lines appear to be marginally resolved. It is
544: possible that weak lines look broad due to noise spikes in the adjacent continuum, as we think is the case of \Pag\ in object \#3, which has an unrealistic FWHM of 950 km/s; we did not try to correct
545: for this effect the equivalent width in Table \ref{table_1}, which is hence
546: very likely overestimated by a factor of $\sim$2.
547: In two stars (\#19 and \#21), the He~I line has an inverse P-Cygni profile, with redshifted absorption; the line is strong in \#19, but
548: barely detected in \#21.
549: Table \ref{table_1} gives the total equivalent width of the line, while the values of the absorption and emission components are given in the notes to the table.
550:
551: We have been surprised by the number of objects where \Pag\ is detected while
552: \Pab\ is not.
553: The ratio of the \Pag\ to \Pab\ fluxes has been recently measured for a group of CTTS in Taurus by
554: Bary and Matt (\cite{Bea07}), who find a tight correlation with a ratio
555: 0.86$\pm 0.10$.
556: %{\bf
557: Magnetospheric accretion models (Muzerolle et al.~\cite{Mea01})
558: predict ratios $\sim 0.7-0.9$ for \Macc $\simgreat 10^{-8}$ \Msun/yr,
559: increasing to $\sim 1.2-1.4$ at \Macc $\sim 10^{-9}$ \Msun/yr
560: (J. Muzerolle, private communication).
561: %}
562: Considering that for TTS the ratio of the continuum
563: at the two line wavelengths is $\sim 1.2-1.4$, we expect in any case comparable
564: equivalent widths,
565: and, in fact, this is the case in the
566: five \sori\ objects where both lines are detected.
567: All stars with \Pag\ but no \Pab\ have relatively weak \Pag; however, in several cases we should have detected \Pab\ if the equivalent widths were
568: similar and the lines unresolved.
569: We have checked the observational and data reduction procedures, and found no
570: obvious explanation for the absence of \Pab. It is possible that the upper
571: limits to \Pab, derived assuming that the line is not resolved, are
572: in fact underestimated, and, indeed, some objects with very low limits
573: to the ratio of the \Pab/\Pag\ equivalent width (e.g., \#3, \#22, \#26)
574: have broad \Pag\ (see
575: Fig.~\ref{fig_pag}). Also, in some cases \Pab\ may have a P-Cygni profile
576: with deeper absorption than
577: \Pag, and this could reduce the ratio of the unresolved equivalent widths.
578: This kind of profile, however, is quite rare in Taurus TTS (e.g., Edwards et al.~\cite{Eea06}, Folha \& Emerson \cite{FE01}).
579: Note that the two lines \Pag\ and \Pab\ are observed simultaneously, so that
580: variability cannot affect their ratio.
581: %However, as we will discuss in the following, none of our conclusions depends
582: %on it.
583:
584: \begin{figure}
585: \centering
586: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_lacc_comp.eps}}
587: \caption{Comparison of the accretion luminosity computed from \Pag\
588: and that computed from \Pab\ for all objects with \Pag\ detection.
589: Dots are actual measurements, arrow 3$\sigma$
590: upper limits. The dotted lines show the locus of \Lacc (\Pag)=\Lacc(Pab) and
591: the $\pm 0.5$ range.
592: }
593: \label {fig_lacc_comp}
594: \end{figure}
595:
596: \begin{figure}
597: \centering
598: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_lacc.eps}}
599: \caption{Accretion luminosity as function of the stellar luminosity
600: for the Class II objects. Dots are actual measurements, arrow 3$\sigma$
601: upper limits. The dotted lines show the location of the \Lacc/\Lstar=1.0, 0.1
602: and 0.01 ratios, respectively.}
603: \label {fig_lacc}
604: \end{figure}
605:
606:
607:
608: The HeI 1.083$\mu$m line is seen in 23/31 Class II stars, in absorption (8 cases), in emission (14 cases), or with a P-Cygni profile (2 cases).
609: This variety of profiles is known to occurr in TTS
610: (Edwards et al.~\cite{Eea06}), and will be discussed in \S ~4.2.
611:
612:
613: \section {Discussion}
614:
615: \subsection {Accretion luminosities and mass accretion rates}
616:
617: We use the hydrogen recombination lines to measure the accretion luminosity \Lacc, following the
618: procedure described in detail by Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06}).
619:
620: Firstly, we compute line fluxes from the equivalent widths and the flux of the
621: continuum near each line, calibrated with the 2MASS value of the J magnitude
622: and A$_J$=0. We apply a correction of a factor 1.3 to the continuum at 1.09 $\mu$m, to account for the typical slope of the J-band continuum in late K -- M stars.
623:
624: % We have estimated the continuum flux using the 2MASS values of the J magnitudes (see column 7 of Tab.\ref{table_1}), assuming extinction A$_V$=0 (ref), integrating the spectra over the 2MASS J filter profile (obtaining $<N_{2MASS}>$) and scaling to the measured 2MASS value. So we have obtained the fluxes for Pa$\beta$ and Pa$\gamma$ line by means of the following relations:
625: %
626: %
627: %
628: %\be \label{eq1} F(Pa\beta)=F_{0,J}\times 10^{\frac{-J}{2.5}}\frac{N}{<N_{2MASS}>}\times \frac{c}{\lambda^{2}_{Pa\beta}}\times Ew(Pa\beta) \ee
629: %
630: %and
631: %
632: %\be \label{eq2} F(Pa\gamma)=F_{0,J}\times 10^{\frac{-J}{2.5}}\frac{N}{<N_{2MASS}>}\times \frac{c}{\lambda^{2}_{Pa\gamma}}\times Ew(Pa\gamma) \ee
633: %
634:
635: %In the same way we have computed the line fluxes of HeI ($\lambda$=10830$\AA$): results for Pa$\beta$, Pa$\gamma$ and HeI luminosities are shown respectively in column 11, 12 and 13 of Table \ref{tab2}. In the same table last column we have shown the mass accretion rate, $\dot{M}_{acc}$, computed from the luminosity of Pa$\gamma$, L(Pa$\gamma$), using the relation between L(Pa$\gamma$) and the accretion luminosity L$_{acc}$:
636:
637: Line luminosities are computed from the line fluxes for the adopted distance
638: D=350 pc.
639: We use them to derive a measurement of the accretion luminosity \Lacc,
640: using the empirical correlation between the luminosity of the near-IR hydrogen
641: recoombination lines and \Lacc\ first noticed by Muzerolle et al.(\cite{Mea98})
642: and used to study the accretion properties of TTS in Ophiuchus by Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06}).
643: The correlation has been established quantitatively for the two lines \Pab\ and \Brg\ in a sample
644: of TTS in Taurus for which reliable measurements of the accretion luminosity from veiling were available
645: (Muzerolle et al.~\cite{Mea98}; Calvet et al.~\cite{Cea04}), and extended in the case of \Pab\ to the brown dwarf regime by Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea04}).
646: We adopt here a relation between \Lacc\ and \Pag\ luminosity obtained
647: from the Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea04}) correlation between \Lacc\ and the
648: \Pab\ luminosity and the
649: ratio of \Pag\ to \Pab\ fluxes of $0.86\pm 0.1$
650: (Bary and Matt \cite{Bea07}):
651:
652: \be \label{eq3} Log \frac{L_{acc}}{L_{\odot}}=1.36 \times Log \frac{L(Pa\gamma)}{L_{\odot}} +4.1 \ee
653:
654: %{\bf
655: Eq.(1) does not depend on any
656: assumption on the line origin, but only on the known empirical
657: relation between \Lacc\ and the \Pab\ luminosity and the
658: adopted value of the \Pag/\Pab\ ratio.
659: As discussed at the end of \S 3, in several of our \sori\ objects the observed
660: ratio \Pag/\Pab\ is higher than the Bary and Matt one and the values
661: (or upper limit) of \Lacc\ computed from L(\Pab) are correspondingly lower
662: (see Fig.~\ref{fig_lacc_comp}). We decided to use in the following
663: \Lacc\ derived from \Pag\ to maximize
664: the number of actual measurements; since \Lacc (\Pab) $\simless$ \Lacc (\Pag),
665: deriving \Lacc\ from L(\Pab) would just strengthen our conclusions.
666: %}
667: %Values of \Lacc\ can be computed independently from the \Pab\ luminosity.
668: %
669: %For the 5 objects where both lines are detected, and for 3 additional ones with
670: %\Pab\ upper limits, the accretion luminosities agree within a factor of 3, i.e.,
671: %within our estimated uncertainties.
672:
673: %\begin{figure}
674: % \centering
675: % \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_ewratio.eps}}
676: % \caption{Ratio of \Pab\/\Pag\ equivalent widht as function of the
677: %\Pag\ equivalent width. Only objects with \Pag\ detections are included.}
678: %\label {fig_ewratio}
679: %\end{figure}
680:
681: %a version suited for Pa$\gamma$ line of the relation $Log \frac{L_{acc}}{L_{\odot}}=1.36 \times Log \frac{L(Pa\beta)}{L_{\odot}} +4$, taken from Muzerolle et al. 1998b and Natta et al. 2002. So we have used L$_{acc}$ computed with Pa$\gamma$, because we have got a larger (12) number of detections respect to Pa$\beta$ line detecitons (5, see also Tab.\ref{tab2}).\\
682:
683: The mass accretion rate $\dot{M}_{acc}$ is then been computed from $L_{acc}$:
684: \be \label{eq4} \dot{M}_{acc}= \frac{ L_{acc}R_*}{GM_*} \ee
685: where \Mstar\ and \Rstar\ are the stellar mass and radius, respectively.
686:
687: The uncertainties on \Lacc\ and \Macc\ are difficult to estimate, but they are
688: certainly not small. In addition to the measurement errors on the line
689: equivalent widths, there are continuum calibration uncertainties, since our
690: spectra have not been photometrically calibrated. Variability in the lines
691: is a well known phenomenon in TTS, and snap-shot estimates of their
692: strength can differ from the long-term average values by large factors.
693: Moreover,
694: the relation between L(\Pag) and \Lacc\ has an intrinsic,
695: non-negligible scatter, and the determination of the stellar mass/radius depends on a
696: number of assumptions, among them the adopted evolutionary tracks.
697: The final uncertainties on $\dot{M}_{acc}$ can easily be of $\pm 0.5$ dex,
698: as discussed, e.g., by Calvet et al.~(\cite{Cea04})
699: and Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06}).
700: In spite of all that, snap-shot accretion values of a large number of stars in
701: any given star formation region provide very significant information on the
702: typical accretion properties of the region and on its evolutionary stage.
703:
704: The results for \sori\ are summarized in Fig.~\ref{fig_lacc} and \ref{fig_macc}, top panel.
705: Fig.~\ref{fig_lacc} plots the accretion luminosity as a function of the stellar
706: luminosity for all Class II objects. It shows clearly that very few stars
707: have \Lacc\ larger than 0.1~\Lstar, and that most of them have values well below
708: this limit. This is different from the results obtained in younger star
709: forming regions, such as Taurus and Ophiuchus (see summary in Natta et al.~\cite{Nea06}), where a large fraction of stars has \Lacc/\Lstar $>0.1$.
710:
711: Fig.~\ref{fig_macc} shows the mass accretion rate
712: as function of the stellar mass for the same 31 objects.
713: The values of \Macc\ are all smaller than $\sim 10^{-8}$ \Msun/yr, and
714: 23/31 stars have accretion rates lower than $10^{-9}$ \Msun/yr.
715: When compared to stars with similar mass in Taurus and Ophiuchus,
716: these are very low values, as we will discuss in \S~4.5.
717:
718:
719: \subsection {He line}
720:
721: Edwards et al.~(\cite{Eea06}) have recently published a study
722: of the \Pag\ and He~I profiles in a sample of 39 Taurus TTS; they found that
723: the strength of both lines correlate with the J-band veiling, i.e., with the
724: accretion luminosity. Although with a large spread, objects with low veiling have on average not only weaker but also
725: narrower \Pag.
726: He~I lines have very often P-Cygni profiles, with blue-shifted absorption
727: caused by outflowing gas and red-shifted absorption due to infalling material.
728: On average, strong accretors have the He~I line in emission; red-shifted and blue-shifted absorption features are present in high and low accretors, but,
729: if unresolved, the He~I equivalent width would turn from strong emission in
730: high accretors to net absorption in low accretors.
731: In these objects, the blue-shifted absorption features due to outflowing matter, very likely a non-collimated wind, dominate the profile.
732:
733: Fig.~\ref{fig_he} plots the equivalent width of the He~I line as function of the
734: accretion luminosity \Lacc\ for our sample.
735: If we consider objects with measured \Lacc,
736: we find a good correlation between the two quantities, with He~I in net absorption in low accretors and in emission in high accretors, as in the Edwards et al.~(\cite{Eea06}) sample.
737: Note that Edwards et al.~ use in their analysis
738: the ``activity index" of the He~I line,
739: i.e., the sum of the absolute values of the
740: emission and absorption equivalent widths,
741: while our unresolved profiles give the net equivalent width only.
742: The trend of decreasing emission, increasing net absorption
743: for decreasing \Lacc\
744: %{\bf
745: is weaker
746: %}
747: if we include objects with \Lacc\ upper limits;
748: as in Taurus, there are some objects with strong He~I emission
749: but low \Lacc (e.g., \#27), which it would be interesting to investigate further.
750:
751: The Taurus sample includes CTTS with mass accretion rates \Macc\ between
752: $\sim 5\times 10^{-6}$ and $5\times 10^{-10}$ \Msun/yr, with a large fraction
753: (29/38) of objects accreting at rates higher than the highest values of the \sori\ sample.
754: Edwards et al.~(\cite{Eea06}) divide their sample of CTTS into four
755: groups according to the 1$\mu$m veiling. The median values of Log~\Macc\ of the first and second group (high and medium veiling) are -5.8 and -7 \Msun/yr, while the third and fourth (low 1$\mu$m veiling, narrow and broad
756: \Pag, respectively) have median -8.2 \Msun/yr. The low veiling, broad \Pag\ group
757: has, on average, He~I lines with net negative equivalent widths. The \sori\ sample
758: overlaps with the low veiling objects and extends it to even lower values of
759: \Macc. In fact, there are no objects with
760: the very strong He~I emission lines of some Group I Taurus stars, while
761: the fraction of objects with net He~I absorption is higher than
762: in the Edwards et al.~(\cite{Eea06}) group IV.
763:
764: An interesting aspect of these results is that absorption He~I lines can be detected even in objects with very low \Macc, where direct accretion signatures
765: (e.g., hydrogen line emission, veiling) can be hard to measure. Accretion-powered winds may be the longest lasting tracers of disk activity.
766:
767:
768: \subsection {Evolved Disks}
769:
770: The \sori\ cluster contains a relatively high fraction of evolved disks, i.e., objects
771: with IR excess emission lower than the median of CTTS. Some of them
772: are classified by Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}) as transitional disks,
773: i.e., objects with a very low excess in the near-IR but a normal excess at longer
774: wavelengths.
775: Our sample includes two such objects.
776: One (\#28, S897) is classified as a transitional disk; it has
777: no \Pab\ or \Pag\ lines above the detection limit (the corresponding mass
778: accretion rate is $<10^{-9}$ \Msun/yr), but a tentative detection
779: of He~I, and a rather broad \Ha\ (10\%FW=504 km/s; Sacco et al.~\cite{Sea07}).
780: The other object (\#29, S908) is classified as an evolved disk,
781: but shows both \Pab\ and \Pag\ in emission and the He~I line in absorption.
782: Also for this object, Sacco et al.~(\cite{Sea07}) measure a broad \Ha, with
783: a 10\%FW=401 km/s.
784: Its accretion rate is similar to that of the Class II \sori\ stars.
785:
786: It is possible that in these objects (\#29 in particular)
787: the low IR excess is due to the disk orientation on the
788: plane of the sky. However, some transitional disks are known to have
789: relatively large \Macc\ (see summary in Chiang and Murray-Clay (\cite{CM07})
790: and references therein), and the discussion on how long accretion can be
791: sustained once disks start to evolve is still open.
792: The relatively large sample of evolved and transitional disks in \sori\ is
793: well suited to study the accretion properties of transition and evolved
794: disks. However, the sample discussed in this paper
795: includes too few such objects to provide any answer.
796:
797: \subsection {Accretion Evolution}
798:
799: %In addition, the 2MASS J magnitudes are not measured simultaneously to our
800: %spectra, so that line fluxes are not just a
801: %time snapshot of the stellar activity, but also the product of two quantities
802: %that may vary independently.
803:
804: %\be \label{eq4} dot{M}_{acc}=L_{acc} \times \frac{R_*}{GM_*} \ee
805:
806: \begin{figure}
807: \centering
808: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_macc.eps}}
809: \caption{Mass accretion rate as function of \Mstar\
810: for \sori\ (top) and \roph\ (bottom; from Natta et al.~\cite{Nea06}).
811: Dots are actual measurements, arrows 3$\sigma$ upper limits. The dotted line
812: (same in both panels) shows the $\log{M_{acc}} = -7.3 + 1.8\times \log{M_\star}$ locus,
813: that we take as a fiducial line to define "high accretors" (see text).
814: }
815: \label {fig_macc}
816: \end{figure}
817:
818: \begin{figure}
819: \centering
820: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_he.eps}}
821: \caption{HeI equivalent width as function of \Lacc\ for Class
822: II objects. Dots are objects with an actual measurements of \Lacc, while arrows
823: are upper limits. For clarity, we do not plot the objects with \Lacc\ upper limits and non-detection of the He~I line.
824: For the two cases where we resolve the P-Cygni profile
825: of the HeI line, we show (connected by a line) the corresponding unresolved
826: equivalent width and the HeI activity index (sum of absolute values of absorption and emission equivalent widths; Edwards et al.~\cite{Eea06}).}
827: \label {fig_he}
828: \end{figure}
829:
830: \begin{figure}
831: \centering
832: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_leo.eps}}
833: \caption{Distribution of simulated fraction of high accretors in samples extracted from a parent distribution ias measured in \roph.
834: %Number of runs as function of the fraction of high accretors
835: %(see text for the definition) in each run.
836: The dashed line shows the
837: fraction of high accretors in \roph, the dot-dashed line that in \sori. }
838: \label {fig_2pop}
839: \end{figure}
840:
841: \begin{figure}
842: \centering
843: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[]{fig_macc_old.eps}}
844: \caption{\Macc\ vs. \Mstar\ for \sori (dots and arrows; same as Fig.~\ref{fig_macc}) and Tr37 (from Sicilia-Aguilar et al.~\cite{SAea06b}).
845: Squares shows value of \Macc\ derived from U-band photometry, triangles at
846: $\log$\Macc=-9 \Msun/yr are objects with no U-band excess but broad \Ha, triangles at
847: $\log$\Macc=-11 are objects with no U-band excess and narrow \Ha. Note that
848: for this group Sicilia-Aguilar et al.~ estimate $\log$\Macc$<-12$, we plot them at -11 for convenience. }
849: \label {fig_mold}
850: \end{figure}
851:
852:
853:
854:
855:
856: %As indicated in \S~4.1, \sori\ TTS have accretion rates lower on average than
857: %their counterparts in younger star forming regions, such as Taurus and
858: %\roph.
859: The relevance of the \sori\ results for the understanding of the accretion
860: evolution can be better understood in comparison with other regions of star formation, both younger and older.
861:
862: The comparison with the \roph\ star forming region is particularly
863: interesting. Mass accretion rates in \roph\ have been derived by Natta
864: et al.~(\cite{Nea06}) for an IR-selected sample of Class II complete
865: to a limiting mass of about 0.03 \Msun, using the luminosity of near-IR
866: hydrogen recombination lines as a proxy of the accretion luminosity.
867: Because the selection criteria and methods are similar, the comparison
868: between these two regions is more meaningful than in other cases.
869:
870: The major difference between the two regions is the lack in \sori\
871: of objects with high accretion rates. If we restrict the comparison
872: to the mass range 0.1--0.5 \Msun, where the two samples overlap,
873: and take as a reference the line
874: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_macc}, which is the best fit to the \roph\
875: sample of measured \Macc\ over the whole mass interval, we find that
876: only 1 star in \sori\ lies above this line (3\%), while the fraction is
877: $\sim$30\% in \roph.
878:
879: %A more quantitative check is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_2pop}, which shows the
880: %probability that the two samples are extracted from the same parent population.
881: %The probability is very low, and can be ruled out.{\bf details: check that
882: %the fiducial line is the same as in the figure; did LT select J<14.5 mag
883: %objects? did LT consider only the restricted range of masses?}
884:
885: %
886: % Text for MC simulations
887: %
888:
889: Because the \sori\ sample is small (much smaller than the \roph\ one),
890: we performed a
891: simplified Monte Carlo simulation
892: to assess the statistical significance of this difference.
893: The goal of our simulation is to evaluate
894: whether the number of high accretors we observe in the \sori\ sample is
895: consistent with being drawn from a distribution of rates as derived from the
896: \roph\ Class~II objects observations.
897: We take the \roph\ stars in the interval
898: 0.1--1 \Msun\
899: %{\bf
900: (the sample 0.1--0.5 \Msun\ would have too few sources
901: to derive a reliable \Macc\ distribution)
902: %}
903: and use the relationship between accretion rates and
904: stellar mass derived by Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06}) to scale all measurements to
905: a fiducial stellar mass of 1~M$_\odot$;
906: we then compute the fraction of high
907: accretors as the ratio of objects with measurements above the fiducial line
908: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_macc}
909: to the total (measurements plus upper limits). Within the chosen
910: mass range, the fractions of high accretors in \roph\ and \sori\
911: are 29\%\ and 3\%\ respectively.
912:
913: Using a Monte Carlo method, we extract a large number of samples of 31
914: accretion rates. For each sample we randomly remove a number of objects
915: based on the
916: fraction of upper limits in \roph\ ($\sim$52\%), while
917: for the remaining objects we simulate measurements using
918: the distribution of measured rates.
919: Figure~\ref{fig_2pop} summarizes the results:
920: % of our simulations of the number of high accretors:
921: the histogram plots the distribution of the fraction of high accretors
922: in the simulations, the dashed line shows the value for the \roph\
923: sample while the dashed-dotted line shows the value observed in our \sori\ sample.
924: The value observed in \sori\ is lower than the 0.1 percentile of the
925: Monte Carlo simulations, suggesting that it is very unlikely
926: that the two samples are two different realizations of the same population.
927:
928: The lack of strong accretors in \sori\ is very likely an age effect, as
929: in viscous disks
930: the mass accretion rate is expected to decrease with time (roughly as
931: $t^{-1.5}$; Hartmann et al.~\cite{Hea98}).
932: On average, this means approximately a factor $10$
933: from the young (less than 1 Myr) \roph\ population to the older ($\sim$ 3 Myr)
934: \sori\ one, consistent with the results shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_macc}.
935: One way of looking at this is to compute the fraction of high accretors
936: in \sori\ not with respect to the ``younger" \roph\ \Macc-\Mstar\ fiducial
937: line, but
938: with respect to an ``aged" version, where
939: \Macc\ has decreased by the
940: same factor 10 for each \Mstar. Then, the fraction of \sori\ high accretors
941: will be of $\sim$30\%, identical to the fraction of
942: high accretors in \roph.
943:
944: Fig.~\ref{fig_mold} shows a comparison between mass accretion rates
945: in \sori\ and in the $\sim$4 Myr old star forming region Tr~37. This region, located at a distance of $\sim 900$ pc, has been extensively studied by
946: Sicilia-Aguilar et al.~(\cite{SAea04}, \cite{SAea05}, \cite{SAea06a}, \cite{SAea06b}), who have
947: classified disk properties from {\it Spitzer} IRAC and MIPS data and measured
948: \Macc\ from U band excess and \Ha\ profiles.
949: The methods of deriving
950: \Macc\ are different in the two regions, but probably any systematic
951: effect is within the uncertainties, since both correlations between
952: the U-band excess and \Lacc\ and between the hydrogen IR line luminosity
953: and \Lacc\ have been empirically calibrated using the same sample of TTS in
954: Taurus with good measurements of \Lacc\ from veiling
955: (e.g., Calvet and Gullbring \cite{CG98}; Muzerolle et al.~\cite{Mea98}).
956:
957: Fig.~\ref{fig_mold} plots all the
958: stars with disks (bone-fide Class II and transition disks) with measured stellar mass and \Macc, as reported by Siciliar-Aguilar et al.~(\cite{SAea06b}).
959: We have not included any of the
960: very young ($\sim 1$ Myr)
961: Class II objects, probably an episode of triggered star formation, found
962: in the TR~37 ``globule".
963: Because of its larger distance,
964: the Tr~37 sample covers a mass range between $\sim 0.4$ and 1.8 \Msun, with
965: one star of 2.5 \Msun (whose \Macc\ is very uncertain);
966: there is practically no overlap with the \sori\ lower-mass sample.
967: However,
968: the accretion properties of the two regions look very similar.
969: The trend of higher \Macc\ for higher \Mstar\ is confirmed, with good merging between the two samples. More importantly, both \sori\ and
970: Tr~37 lack high accretors to a similar degree. If we define, as before,
971: high accretors to be those stars with values of \Macc\ above the fiducial line s
972: hown in Fig.~\ref{fig_macc}, the fraction of high accretors in Tr~37 is 6\%,
973: similar, within the uncartinties, to the 3\% found in \sori,
974: and certainly much lower than the 30\% fraction of high accretors in \roph.
975: %It should be noticed that the
976: %Tr~37 sample includes a small fraction of much younger stars (age $\sim 1$ Myr; the so-called globule), which are probably an episode of triggered star formation. Only 5 of them are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig_mold}, as
977: %there are no information on \Macc\ and/or \Mstar\ for the others; only
978: %one of them is above the fiducial line, so that excluding them would not change the results.
979:
980: The continuity in the \Macc--\Mstar\ behaviour between the two regions
981: seems to extends to stars more massive than
982: about 1--1.2 \Msun. In other star-forming regions, as discussed in \S 1,
983: stars more massive than $\sim 1$ \Msun\
984: loose evidence of disks and accretion much faster than less massive stars, and one could expect to see a drop
985: in the fraction of Class II stars
986: among the more massive members of Tr~37.
987: However, this does not seem to be the case,
988: because Tr~37 has a relatively high fraction of Class II (8 with respect to 5 Class III among stars more massive than 1.2 \Msun), even when the globule
989: population is not taken into account. Of these, 6 have evidence of accretion.
990: %It would be of great interest to study the accretion properties across
991: %the mass spectrum of other, relatively old regions, such as, e.g.,
992: %U Sco or NGC~2362, where the fraction of disks decreases
993: %significantly among massive stars (Carpenter et al.~\cite{Cea07};
994: %Dahm and Hillenbrand \cite{DH07}).
995: The case of Tr~37 shows that the evolution of disks and accretion
996: as function of the stellar mass is still an open problem, that needs to be addressed in more detail in the future.
997:
998: %The results of these two relatively old regions confirm that
999: %the accretion rate decreases with time, roughly as expected
1000: %from viscous disk models, over a rather large range of masses.
1001: %This decrease occurs steadily as disks
1002: %age, for a time comparable with the lifetime of the dusty disks themselves.
1003:
1004:
1005:
1006: %\subsection {The effect of the bright \sori\ star}
1007:
1008: \section {Summary and conclusions}
1009: This paper presents J-band spectra of 35 stars in the star-forming region
1010: \sori. We concentrate our attention on the three lines that are indicative of
1011: accretion-related activity, namely the two hydrogen recombination line
1012: \Pab\ and \Pag\ and the He~I line at 1.083 $\mu$m.
1013:
1014: The stars range in mass from $\sim 0.1$ to $\sim 0.5$ \Msun.
1015: Four have no evidence of disks (Class III), according
1016: to the classification of Hern\'andez et al.~(\cite{Hea07}) based on
1017: {\it Spitzer} near and mid-IR photometry. None of the three lines is detected
1018: in their spectra, with the possible exception of one star which has a
1019: tentative detection of He~I emission. The other 31 objects have associated disks (Class II and
1020: evolved disks), and we detect \Pag\ in 12 of them and \Pab\ in 5.
1021: The He~I line is seen in 23 disk objects, either in emission or in absorption or both.
1022: Even at the low spectral resolution of our spectra ($\sim 300$ km/s), in 2 cases
1023: the He~I has a P-Cygni profile with redshifted absorption.
1024:
1025: We derive accretion luminosities and mass accretion rates from the \Pag\
1026: luminosity;
1027: %, as discussed in Muzerolle et al.~(\cite{Mea98}), Calvet et al.~(\cite{Cea04}), Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea04}) and used in the large survey of
1028: %\roph\ pre-main sequence objects by Natta et al.~(\cite{Nea06}).
1029: the results for \sori\ indicate values much lower than in stars of similar
1030: mass in the younger regions Taurus and \roph. In particular, a statistical
1031: analysis shows that the \roph\ and \sori\ populations cannot be drawn
1032: from the same parent population. TTS in \sori\ are statistically
1033: identical to those
1034: in \roph\ only if we take into account their age, i.e., that
1035: any \roph\ object will have, at \sori\ age, a value of \Macc\ lower by
1036: a factor of about 10 (\Macc$\propto t^{-1.5}$), as expected if viscosity controls disk evolution.
1037:
1038: The HeI is detected (in net absorption or emission) in more stars than either
1039: of the hydrogen lines. Its behaviour agrees qualitatively
1040: with what found by
1041: Edwards et al.~(\cite{Eea06}) in a sample of TTS in Taurus;
1042: namely, strong HeI emission characterizes on average high accretors, while
1043: net absorption, probably due to a wind, is typical of low accretors.
1044: We extend this result to objects of very low \Macc\ and suggest that the He~I
1045: line may be used to detect weak accretors when other methods become unfeasible.
1046:
1047: The \sori\ region, with its well studied disk population and wealth of data at all available wavelengths,
1048: large number of member stars extending over a broad
1049: mass range and moderate distance, is particularly well suited for a number
1050: of follow-up studies. Among them, we want to mention that it will be relatively
1051: easy to obtain near-IR spectra of the complete sample of Class II objects,
1052: down to the brown dwarf regime, to check, e.g., if the accretion rate
1053: evolves differently in brown dwarf disks.
1054: The comparison of \sori\ with the region Tr~37, which has similar age
1055: and a comparable fraction of high accretors,
1056: but a surprisingly high fraction of disks among stars more massive than about 1 \Msun,
1057: shows that the dependence of disk and accretion evolution with the mass
1058: of the central object is still an open and intriguing problem.
1059:
1060: Our results on the two evolved/transition disks in our sample
1061: confirm that accretion is still going on in some of them
1062: and suggest that near-IR spectroscopy and high resolution spectra of the
1063: hydrogen and He~I lines may help to clarify the last stages of the
1064: history of accretion disks.
1065:
1066: \begin{acknowledgements}
1067: We thank James Muzerolle for providing us with unpublished results of his magnetospheric accretion models and for very useful discussions.
1068: It is a pleasure to acknowledge the continuous, competent
1069: and friendly support of the ESO staff during the preparation
1070: and execution of the observations at
1071: La Silla observatory.
1072: This project was partially supported by MIUR grant
1073: 2004025227/2004 and by the INAF 2006 grant ``From Disks to Planetary Systems".
1074: \end{acknowledgements}
1075:
1076: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1077:
1078: \bibitem[2003]{BNM03}
1079: Barrado y Navascu\'es D., Mart\'in E.L. 2003, AJ 126, 2997
1080:
1081: \bibitem[2007]{Bea07}
1082: Bary J.S., Matt S.P. 2007, ``Star-disk Interaction in Young Stars", IAU
1083: Symp.243, J. Bouvier \& I. Appenzeller eds., in press
1084:
1085: \bibitem[1999]{Bej99}
1086: B\'ejar V.J.S., Zapatero-Osorio M.R., Rebolo R. 1999, ApJ 521, 671
1087:
1088: \bibitem[1979]{Bes79}
1089: Bessell M.S. 1979, PASP 91, 543
1090:
1091: \bibitem[1988]{Bes_bret88}
1092: Bessell M.S., Brett J.M. 1988, PASP 100, 1134
1093:
1094: \bibitem[1991]{Bes91}
1095: Bessell M.S. 1991, AJ 101, 662
1096:
1097: \bibitem[2001]{Bej01}
1098: B\'ejar V.J.S. et al. 2001, ApJ 556, 830
1099:
1100: \bibitem[1994]{Bro94}
1101: Brown A.G.A., de Geus E.J., de Zeeuw P.T. 1994, A\&A 289, 101
1102:
1103: \bibitem[2007]{C07}
1104: Caballero J.A. 2007, A\&A 466, 917
1105:
1106: \bibitem[2007]{Cea07}
1107: Caballero J.A., B\'ejar V.J.S., Rebolo R., Eisl\"offel J., Zapatero Osorio M.R.
1108: et al. 2007, A\&A 470, 903
1109:
1110: \bibitem[1998]{CG98}
1111: Calvet N., Gullbring E. 1998, ApJ 509, 802
1112:
1113: \bibitem[2004]{Cea04}
1114: Calvet N., Muzerolle J., Brice\~no C.,Hern\'andez J., Hartmann L.
1115: 2004, AJ 128, 1294
1116:
1117: \bibitem[2006]{Cea06}
1118: Carpenter J.M., Mamajek E.E., Hillenbrand L.A., Meyer M.R. 2006, ApJ 651, L49
1119:
1120: \bibitem[2007]{CM07}
1121: Chiang E.I., Murray-Clay R.A. 2007, NatPhys 3, 604
1122:
1123: \bibitem[2007]{DH07}
1124: Dahm S.E., Hillenbrand L.A. 2007, AJ 133, 2072
1125:
1126: \bibitem[2006]{Dal06}
1127: D'Alessio P., Calvet N., Hartmann L., Franco-Hern\'andez R.,
1128: Serv\'in H. 2006, ApJ 638, 314
1129:
1130: \bibitem[1997]{DM97}
1131: D'Antona F., Mazzitelli I. 1997, Mem.S.A.It. 68, 807
1132:
1133: \bibitem[2005]{Dul05}
1134: Dullemond C.P., Dominik C. 2005, A\&A 434, 971
1135:
1136: \bibitem[2006]{Eea06}
1137: Edwards S., Fischer W., Hillenbrand L., Kean J. 2006, ApJ 646, 319
1138:
1139: \bibitem[2006]{Fea06}
1140: Franciosini E., Pallavicini R., Sanz-Forcada J. 2006, A\&A 446, 501
1141:
1142: \bibitem[2001]{FE01}
1143: Folha D.F.M \& Emereso J.P. 2001, A\&A 365, 90
1144:
1145: \bibitem[1998]{Hea98}
1146: Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring E., D'Alessio P. 1998, ApJ 495, 385
1147:
1148: \bibitem[2007]{Hea07}
1149: Hern\'andez, J., Hartmann L., Megeath T., Gutermuth R., Muzerolle J.,
1150: and 7 others 2007, ApJ 662, 1067
1151: % Calvet, N.; Vivas, A. K.; Briceño, C.; Allen, L.; Stauffer, J.; and 2 coauthors
1152:
1153: \bibitem[1998]{Hil98}
1154: Hillenbrand L.A., StromE.S., Calvet N., Merrill K.M., Gatley I. et al.
1155: 1998, AJ 116, 1816
1156:
1157: \bibitem[2000]{Hol00}
1158: Hollenbach D.J., Yorke H.W., Johnstone D. 2000, in "Protostars and Planets IV", V. Mannings, A.P. Boss and S.S. Russel eds., The University of Arizona Press, p.410
1159:
1160: %\bibitem[2004]{Hol04}
1161: %Hollenbach, D.; Adams, F. C., 2004, Star Formation in the Interstellar Medium:
1162: %In Honor of David Hollenbach, Chris McKee and Frank Shu, ASP Conference Proceedings,
1163: %Vol. 323. Edited by D. Johnstone, F.C. Adams, D.N.C. Lin, D.A. Neufeld, and E.C.
1164: %Ostriker. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2004., p.3
1165:
1166: \bibitem[1995]{KH95}
1167: Kenyon S.J., Hartmann L. 1995, ApJS 101, 117
1168:
1169: \bibitem[2005]{Kea05}
1170: Kenyon M.J., Jeffries R.D., Naylor T., Oliveira J.M., Maxted P.F.L.
1171: 2005, MNRAS 356, 89
1172:
1173: \bibitem[2006]{Lea06}
1174: Lada C.J., Muench A.A., Luhman K.L., Allen L., Hartmann L. et al.
1175: % Megeath, Tom; Myers, Philip; Fazio, Giovanni; Wood, Kenneth; Muzerolle, James; and 3 coauthors
1176: 2006, AJ 131, 1574
1177:
1178: \bibitem[2005]{Mea05}
1179: Mohanty S., Jayawardanha J., Basri G. 2005, ApJ 626, 948
1180:
1181: \bibitem[2003]{Mea03}
1182: Muzerolle J., Hillenbrand L., Calvet N., Brice\"no C.,
1183: Hartmann L. 2003, ApJ 592, 266
1184:
1185: \bibitem[2001]{Mea01}
1186: Muzerolle J., Calvet N., Hartmann L. 2001, ApJ 550, 944
1187:
1188: \bibitem[1998]{Mea98}
1189: %IR lines
1190: Muzerolle J., Hartmann L., Calvet N. 1998, AJ 116, 2965
1191:
1192: \bibitem[2004]{Nea04}
1193: Natta A., Testi L.,Muzerolle J., Randich S.,
1194: Comer\'on F., Persi P. 2004, A\&A 424, 603
1195:
1196: \bibitem[2006]{Nea06}
1197: Natta A., Testi L., Randich S., 2006, A\&A 452, 245
1198:
1199: \bibitem[2004]{Oea04}
1200: Oliveira J.M., Jeffries R.D., van Loon J.Th. 2004,
1201: MNRAS 347, 1327
1202:
1203: \bibitem[2006]{Oea06}
1204: Oliveira J.M., Jeffries R.D., van Loon J.Th., Rushton M.T. 2006,
1205: MNRAS 369, 272
1206:
1207:
1208: \bibitem[2007]{Sea07}
1209: Sacco G., Franciosini E., Randich S., Pallavicini R. 2007, A\&A, to be submitted
1210:
1211: \bibitem[2004]{She04}
1212: Sherry W.H., Walter F. M., Wolk S. J. 2004, AJ 128, 2316
1213:
1214: \bibitem[2004]{SAea04}
1215: Sicilia-Aguilar A., Hartmann L.W., Brice\"no C., Muzerolle J.,
1216: Calvet N. 2004, AJ 128, 805
1217:
1218: \bibitem[2005]{SAea05}
1219: Sicilia-Aguilar A., Hartmann L.W., Hern\'andez J., Brice\"no C.,
1220: Calvet N. 2005, AJ 130, 188
1221:
1222: \bibitem[2006]{SAea06a}
1223: Sicilia-Aguilar A., Hartmann L.W., Calvet N., Megeath S.T., Muzerolle J., et al. 2006, ApJ 638, 897
1224:
1225: \bibitem[2006]{SAea06b}
1226: Sicilia-Aguilar A., Hartmann L.W., F\"ur\'esz G., Henning Th., Dullemond C.,
1227: Brandner W. 2006, AJ 132, 2135
1228:
1229: \bibitem[1990]{Skea90}
1230: Skrutskie M.F., Dutkevitch D., Strom S.E., Edwards S., Strom K.M., et al.
1231: %Shure M.A.
1232: 1990, AJ 99, 1187
1233:
1234: \bibitem[1996]{Wolk96}
1235: Wolk S.J. 1996, PhD thesis, State Univ. New York, Stony Brook
1236:
1237: \bibitem[2002]{Zea02}
1238: Zapatero Osorio M.R., B\'ejar V.J.S., Pavlenko Ya., Rebolo R.,Allende Prieto C., et al. 2002, A\&A 384, 937
1239:
1240: \end{thebibliography}{}
1241:
1242:
1243:
1244: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1245:
1246:
1247: %\begin{table*}
1248: %\begin{tiny}
1249: %\begin{center}
1250: %\begin{tabular}{l|l|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
1251: %%\begin{tiny}
1252: %%\begin{center}
1253: %\hline
1254: %\multicolumn{1}{l|}{Obj.} &
1255: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{A.R.} &
1256: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{Dec.} &
1257: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{I} &
1258: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{V} &
1259: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{R} &
1260: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{J} &
1261: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{H} &
1262: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{K} &
1263: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{3.6 $\mu$m} &
1264: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{4.5 $\mu$m} &
1265: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{5.8 $\mu$m} &
1266: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{8 $\mu$m} &
1267: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{24 $\mu$m} &
1268: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{K-L'}\\
1269: %
1270: %\multicolumn{1}{l|}{} &
1271: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{} &
1272: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{} &
1273: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1274: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1275: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1276: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1277: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1278: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1279: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1280: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1281: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1282: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1283: %\multicolumn{1}{c|}{(mag)} &
1284: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{(mag)}\\
1285: %
1286: %
1287: %\hline \hline
1288: %
1289: %
1290: %
1291: %1 -- & 5:37:56.14 & -2:09:26.70 & 15.68 & 18.92 & 17.49 & 13.90 & 13.29 & 13.04 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & 0.28$\pm$0.12 \\
1292: %2 283 & 5:37:58.40 & -2:41:26.20 & 15.31 & 18.63 & 17.26 & 13.28 & 12.70 & 12.43 & 12.06 & 11.96 & 11.90 & 11.96 & -- & 0.43$\pm$0.12 \\
1293: %3 451 & 5:38:18.86 & -2:51:38.80 & 14.25 & 16.81 & 15.65 & 12.83 & 12.05 & 11.74 & 11.13 & 10.78 & 10.36 & 9.72 & 7.24 & 0.30$\pm$0.13 \\
1294: %4 462 & 5:38:20.50 & -2:34:09.00 & 14.38 & 17.29 & 16.07 & 12.65 & 11.92 & 11.65 & 11.03 & 10.63 & 10.14 & 8.97 & 5.70 & 0.43$\pm$0.04 \\
1295: %5 518 & 5:38:27.26 & -2:45:09.69 & 12.82 & 14.56 & 13.64 & 11.95 & 10.79 & 9.94 & 8.75 & 8.36 & 7.98 & 7.18 & 4.62 & 0.98$\pm$0.05 \\
1296: %6 520 & 5:38:27.51 & -2:35:04.18 & 14.41 & 17.09 & 15.83 & 12.83 & 12.11 & 11.86 & 11.43 & 11.16 & 10.68 & 9.73 & 6.62 & 0.22$\pm$0.06 \\
1297: %7 562 & 5:38:31.41 & -2:36:33.80 & 13.80 & 16.30 & 15.09 & 12.17 & 11.47 & 10.99 & 10.32 & 9.88 & 9.51 & 8.50 & 5.57 & -- \\
1298: %8 563 & 5:38:31.58 & -2:35:14.86 & 13.49 & 15.64 & 14.60 & 11.52 & 10.70 & 10.35 & 9.71 & 9.30 & 8.90 & 8.30 & 6.05 & 0.78$\pm$0.06 \\
1299: %9 592 & 5:38:34.31 & -2:35:00.09 & 13.88 & 14.73 & 14.31 & 11.22 & 10.56 & 10.35 & 10.26 & 10.36 & 10.22 & 10.23 & -- & -- \\
1300: %10 598 & 5:38:34.60 & -2:41:08.79 & 14.72 & 17.76 & 16.18 & 13.10 & 12.45 & 12.12 & 11.77 & 11.62 & 11.48 & 10.88 & 8.56 & -- \\
1301: %11 611 & 5:38:35.47 & -2:31:51.66 & 12.45 & 14.02 & 13.24 & 11.30 & 10.63 & 10.46 & 10.34 & 10.33 & 10.28 & 10.23 & -- & -- \\
1302: %12 646 & 5:38:39.03 & -2:45:32.17 & 14.58 & 17.26 & 15.92 & 12.91 & 12.19 & 11.89 & 11.19 & 10.86 & 10.50 & 9.92 & 7.98 & -- \\
1303: %13 --& 5:38:39.82 & -2:56:46.20 & 12.76 & 14.62 & 13.72 & 11.43 & 10.76 & 10.44 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & 0.50$\pm$0.07 \\
1304: %14 662 & 5:38:40.27 & -2:30:18.54 & 12.80 & 14.65 & 13.74 & 11.51 & 10.76 & 10.40 & 9.84 & 9.42 & 8.88 & 8.08 & 5.51 & 0.45$\pm$0.07 \\
1305: %15 669 & 5:38:41.29 & -2:37:22.57 & 12.77 & 14.58 & 13.64 & 11.46 & 10.80 & 10.59 & 10.41 & 10.40 & 10.35 & 10.34 & -- & -- \\
1306: %16 682 & 5:38:42.28 & -2:37:14.75 & 13.06 & 15.12 & 14.04 & 11.77 & 10.99 & 10.77 & 10.44 & 10.24 & 9.83 & 9.19 & 6.71 & -- \\
1307: %17 694 & 5:38:43.87 & -2:37:06.84 & 14.80 & 17.93 & 16.59 & 12.84 & 12.15 & 11.77 & 11.23 & 10.93 & 10.60 & 9.84 & 6.86 & -- \\
1308: %18 697 & 5:38:44.23 & -2:40:19.70 & 12.33 & -- & 13.12 & 11.36 & 10.69 & 10.44 & 9.83 & 9.41 & 8.90 & 7.81 & 5.20 & 0.60$\pm$0.04 \\
1309: %19 710 & 5:38:45.38 & -2:41:59.42 & 13.46 & 15.73 & 14.62 & 11.99 & 11.33 & 11.04 & 10.55 & 10.28 & 9.95 & 8.91 & 6.15 & -- \\
1310: %20 723 & 5:38:47.19 & -2:34:36.84 & 14.64 & 17.36 & 16.13 & 12.56 & 11.77 & 11.29 & 10.46 & 10.24 & 9.98 & 9.32 & -- & -- \\
1311: %21 726 & 5:38:47.46 & -2:35:25.25 & 12.86 & 14.90 & 13.85 & 11.74 & 10.97 & 10.72 & 10.23 & 9.92 & 9.53 & 8.65 & -- & -- \\
1312: %22 733 & 5:38:47.92 & -2:37:19.24 & 13.02 & 15.24 & 14.20 & 12.02 & 11.24 & 10.78 & 9.83 & 9.44 & 8.95 & 7.99 & 5.79 & 0.53$\pm$0.07 \\
1313: %23 736 & 5:38:48.04 & -2:27:14.20 & 12.08 & -- & 12.90 & 10.16 & 9.46 & 9.19 & 8.62 & 8.34 & 8.03 & 7.49 & 5.53 & 0.44$\pm$0.08 \\
1314: %24 750 & 5:38:49.29 & -2:23:57.60 & 16.27 & -- & 18.01 & 14.36 & 13.70 & 13.20 & 12.79 & 12.47 & 12.01 & 11.57 & 9.50 & 0.54$\pm$0.11 \\
1315: %25 762 & 5:38:50.61 & -2:42:42.90 & 15.90 & -- & 17.76 & 13.84 & 13.25 & 12.96 & 12.44 & 12.15 & 11.71 & 11.03 & 8.16 & 0.25$\pm$0.08 \\
1316: %26 774 & 5:38:52.01 & -2:46:43.67 & 12.78 & 14.48 & 13.58 & 11.52 & 10.77 & 10.42 & 10.18 & 9.95 & 9.57 & 8.42 & 5.02 & -- \\
1317: %27 871 & 5:39:04.59 & -2:41:49.37 & -- & -- & -- & 13.96 & 12.91 & 12.22 & 10.96 & 10.66 & 10.27 & 9.57 & 7.23 & -- \\
1318: %28 897 & 5:39:07.61 & -2:32:39.15 & 12.63 & 14.30 & 13.44 & 11.30 & 10.57 & 10.26 & 9.75 & 9.65 & 9.58 & 9.31 & 4.98 & 0.5 \\
1319: %29 908 & 5:39:08.78 & -2:31:11.52 & 14.97 & 17.91 & 16.60 & 13.07 & 12.17 & 11.73 & 11.07 & 10.91 & 10.81 & 10.35 & 6.72 & 0.16 \\
1320: %30 927 & 5:39:11.52 & -2:31:06.55 & 13.45 & 15.32 & 14.40 & 11.99 & 11.19 & 10.73 & 9.62 & 9.03 & 8.35 & 7.18 & 4.64 & 0.5 \\
1321: %31 984 & 5:39:18.83 & -2:30:53.14 & 12.58 & 14.34 & 13.42 & 11.40 & 10.64 & 10.34 & 9.94 & 9.53 & 9.27 & 8.52 & 5.82 & -- \\
1322: %32 1152 & 5:39:39.38 & -2:17:04.50 & 13.24 & 15.35 & 14.29 & 11.67 & 10.72 & 10.21 & 9.34 & 9.00 & 8.60 & 8.15 & 6.09 & 0.72$\pm$0.07 \\
1323: %33 -- & 5:39:40.98 & -2:16:24.40 & 14.75 & 18.01 & 16.54 & 12.91 & 12.16 & 11.76 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & 0.28$\pm$0.08 \\
1324: %34 1230 & 5:39:49.45 & -2:23:45.90 & 15.12 & 18.15 & 16.86 & 13.44 & 12.75 & 12.45 & 12.07 & 11.91 & 11.61 & 10.99 & 8.58 & 0.11$\pm$0.06 \\
1325: %35 1248 & 5:39:51.73 & -2:22:47.20 & 14.59 & -- & 16.50 & 12.60 & 12.01 & 11.68 & 11.17 & 10.81 & 10.35 & 9.55 & 7.03 & 0.21$\pm$0.05 \\
1326: %
1327: %\hline
1328: %%\hline
1329: %%\end{tiny}
1330: %\end{tabular}
1331: %%\linespread{1.0}
1332: %\caption { \label{tab1} \footnotesize{}}
1333: %
1334: %\end{center}
1335: %\end{tiny}
1336: %\end{table*}
1337:
1338: \end{document}
1339:
1340:
1341:
1342: