1:
2: % mn2esample.tex
3: %
4: % v2.1 released 22nd May 2002 (G. Hutton)
5: %
6: % The mnsample.tex file has been amended to highlight
7: % the proper use of LaTeX2e code with the class file
8: % and using natbib cross-referencing. These changes
9: % do not reflect the original paper by A. V. Raveendran.
10: %
11: % Previous versions of this sample document were
12: % compatible with the LaTeX 2.09 style file mn.sty
13: % v1.2 released 5th September 1994 (M. Reed)
14: % v1.1 released 18th July 1994
15: % v1.0 released 28th January 1994
16:
17: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
18: \usepackage{graphicx,amssym}
19: \citestyle{mn2e}
20:
21: % If your system does not have the AMS fonts version 2.0 installed, then
22: % remove the useAMS option.
23: %
24: % useAMS allows you to obtain upright Greek characters.
25: % e.g. \umu, \upi etc. See the section on "Upright Greek characters" in
26: % this guide for further information.
27: %
28: % If you are using AMS 2.0 fonts, bold math letters/symbols are available
29: % at a larger range of sizes for NFSS release 1 and 2 (using \boldmath or
30: % preferably \bmath).
31: %
32: % The usenatbib command allows the use of Patrick Daly's natbib.sty for
33: % cross-referencing.
34: %
35: % If you wish to typeset the paper in Times font (if you do not have the
36: % PostScript Type 1 Computer Modern fonts you will need to do this to get
37: % smoother fonts in a PDF file) then uncomment the next line
38: % \usepackage{Times}
39:
40: %%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42: % Bibliography and bibfile
43: \def\aj{AJ}%
44: % Astronomical Journal
45: \def\araa{ARA\&A}%
46: % Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys
47: \def\apj{ApJ}%
48: % Astrophysical Journal
49: \def\apjl{ApJ}%
50: % Astrophysical Journal, Letters
51: \def\apjs{ApJS}%
52: % Astrophysical Journal, Supplement
53: \def\ao{Appl.~Opt.}%
54: % Applied Optics
55: \def\apss{Ap\&SS}%
56: % Astrophysics and Space Science
57: \def\aap{A\&A}%
58: % Astronomy and Astrophysics
59: \def\aapr{A\&A~Rev.}%
60: % Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews
61: \def\aaps{A\&AS}%
62: % Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement
63: \def\azh{AZh}%
64: % Astronomicheskii Zhurnal
65: \def\baas{BAAS}%
66: % Bulletin of the AAS
67: \def\jrasc{JRASC}%
68: % Journal of the RAS of Canada
69: \def\memras{MmRAS}%
70: % Memoirs of the RAS
71: \def\mnras{MNRAS}%
72: % Monthly Notices of the RAS
73: \def\pra{Phys.~Rev.~A}%
74: % Physical Review A: General Physics
75: \def\prb{Phys.~Rev.~B}%
76: % Physical Review B: Solid State
77: \def\prc{Phys.~Rev.~C}%
78: % Physical Review C
79: \def\prd{Phys.~Rev.~D}%
80: % Physical Review D
81: \def\pre{Phys.~Rev.~E}%
82: % Physical Review E
83: \def\prl{Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}%
84: % Physical Review Letters
85: \def\pasp{PASP}%
86: % Publications of the ASP
87: \def\pasj{PASJ}%
88: % Publications of the ASJ
89: \def\qjras{QJRAS}%
90: % Quarterly Journal of the RAS
91: \def\skytel{S\&T}%
92: % Sky and Telescope
93: \def\solphys{Sol.~Phys.}%
94: % Solar Physics
95: \def\sovast{Soviet~Ast.}%
96: % Soviet Astronomy
97: \def\ssr{Space~Sci.~Rev.}%
98: % Space Science Reviews
99: \def\zap{ZAp}%
100: % Zeitschrift fuer Astrophysik
101: \def\nat{Nature}%
102: % Nature
103: \def\iaucirc{IAU~Circ.}%
104: % IAU Cirulars
105: \def\aplett{Astrophys.~Lett.}%
106: % Astrophysics Letters
107: \def\apspr{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.}%
108: % Astrophysics Space Physics Research
109: \def\bain{Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands}%
110: % Bulletin Astronomical Institute of the Netherlands
111: \def\fcp{Fund.~Cosmic~Phys.}%
112: % Fundamental Cosmic Physics
113: \def\gca{Geochim.~Cosmochim.~Acta}%
114: % Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta
115: \def\grl{Geophys.~Res.~Lett.}%
116: % Geophysics Research Letters
117: \def\jcp{J.~Chem.~Phys.}%
118: % Journal of Chemical Physics
119: \def\jgr{J.~Geophys.~Res.}%
120: % Journal of Geophysics Research
121: \def\jqsrt{J.~Quant.~Spec.~Radiat.~Transf.}%
122: % Journal of Quantitiative Spectroscopy and Radiative Trasfer
123: \def\memsai{Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Italiana}%
124: % Mem. Societa Astronomica Italiana
125: \def\nphysa{Nucl.~Phys.~A}%
126: % Nuclear Physics A
127: \def\physrep{Phys.~Rep.}%
128: % Physics Reports
129: \def\physscr{Phys.~Scr}%
130: % Physica Scripta
131: \def\planss{Planet.~Space~Sci.}%
132: % Planetary Space Science
133: \def\procspie{Proc.~SPIE}%
134: % Proceedings of the SPIE
135: \let\astap=\aap
136: \let\apjlett=\apjl
137: \let\apjsupp=\apjs
138: \let\applopt=\ao
139: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
140:
141: \newcommand{\bc}{\begin{center}}
142: \newcommand{\ec}{\end{center}}
143:
144: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
145: \title[AGN in High Mass Galaxies]
146: {Why are AGN found in High Mass Galaxies?}
147: \author[L.Wang, G.Kauffmann]
148: {Lan Wang$^{1,}$$^2$$\thanks{Email: wanglan@mpa-garching.mpg.de}$,
149: Guinevere Kauffmann$^2$
150: \\
151: $^1$Department of Astronomy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China\\
152: $^2$Max--Planck--Institut f\"ur Astrophysik,
153: Karl--Schwarzschild--Str. 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany}
154: \begin{document}
155:
156: \date{Accepted 2008 ???? ??.
157: Received 2008 ???? ??;
158: in original form 2008 ???? ??}
159:
160: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2008}
161:
162: \maketitle
163:
164: \label{firstpage}
165:
166: \begin{abstract}
167: We use semi-analytic models implemented in the {\it Millennium
168: Simulation} to analyze the merging histories of dark matter haloes
169: and of the galaxies that reside in them. We assume that supermassive
170: black holes only exist in galaxies that have experienced at least
171: one major merger. Only a few percent of galaxies with stellar masses
172: less than $M_* < 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ are predicted to have
173: experienced a major merger and to contain a black hole. The fraction
174: of galaxies with black holes increases very steeply at larger
175: stellar masses. This agrees well with the observed strong mass
176: dependence of the fraction of nearby galaxies that contain either
177: low-luminosity (LINER-type) or higher-luminosity (Seyfert or
178: composite-type) AGN. We then investigate when the major mergers that
179: first create the black holes are predicted to occur. High mass
180: galaxies are predicted to have formed their black holes at very
181: early epochs. The majority of low mass galaxies never experience a
182: major merger and hence do not contain a black hole, but a
183: significant fraction of the supermassive black holes that do exist
184: in low mass galaxies are predicted to have formed recently.
185: \end{abstract}
186:
187: \begin{keywords}
188: galaxies: interactions -- galaxies: haloes -- galaxies: nuclei
189: \end{keywords}
190:
191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
192: \section{Introduction}
193: \label{sec:intro}
194:
195: By studying active galactic nuclei (AGN), we learn about the physical
196: mechanisms that trigger accretion onto the central supermassive black
197: holes of galaxies. When a black hole accretes, it increases
198: in mass. By studying populations of AGN at low and at high redshifts,
199: we hope to infer the history of how black holes build up their mass.
200:
201: It has been established that supermassive black holes most occur in
202: galaxies with bulges \citep{kormendy1995}, and that the mass of the
203: black hole correlates with the luminosity and the stellar velocity
204: dispersion of the host bulge \citep{magorrian1998, ferrarese2000,
205: gebhardt2000}. This indicates that the formation of galaxies and
206: supermassive black holes are likely to be closely linked. In the
207: local Universe, the fraction of bulge-dominated galaxies hosting AGN
208: decreases at lower stellar masses \citep{ho1997, kauffmann2003}. In
209: order to form a black hole, it is necessary for gas to lose angular
210: momentum and sink to the centre of the galaxy \citep{haehnelt1993,
211: volonteri2003}. The gravitational torques that operate during
212: galaxy-galaxy mergers are known to be a very effective mechanism for
213: concentrating gas at the centers of galaxies \citep{mihos1996}.
214: Models for AGN evolution have often assumed that black holes are
215: formed and fuelled, and AGN activity is triggered during major
216: mergers of galaxies \citep{kauffmann2000, wyithe2003, croton2006}.
217:
218: At low and moderate redshifts, there is no conclusive observational
219: evidence that mergers play a significant role in triggering AGN
220: activity in galaxies. In the local Universe, \citet{li2006} have
221: shown that narrow line AGN do not have more close companions than
222: matched samples of inactive galaxies. Even at intermediate redshifts
223: (z $\sim 0.4-1.3$), moderate luminosity AGN hosts do not have
224: morphologies indicative of an ongoing merger or interaction
225: \citep{hasan2007}. The conclusion seems to be that although major
226: mergers may be responsible for AGN activity in some galaxies, other
227: fueling mechanisms are likely to be most important in the low
228: redshift Universe. It has also been established that high mass black
229: holes have largely stopped growing at early cosmic epochs, whereas
230: low mass black holes are still accreting at significant rates today
231: \citep{heckman2004}. X-ray observations show that very
232: high-luminosity AGN activity peaked at early cosmic epochs ($z \sim
233: 2$), while low-luminosity AGN activity peaks at lower redshifts
234: \citep{steffen2003,barger2005,hasinger2005}.
235:
236: It has been postulated that this so-called ``anti-hierarchical'' growth
237: of supermassive black holes can be explained if there are two modes of
238: accretion onto black holes that have very different efficiencies
239: \citep{merloni2004, mueller2007}. The early formation formation of ``new''
240: black holes may result in very luminous quasar-like events.
241: To form a supermassive black hole, a more violent process such as
242: a major merger may be required to funnel a large amount of gas into the
243: central region of the galaxy. Subsequent accretion of gas onto already
244: existing black holes may be an inefficient process and produce lower
245: luminosity AGN \citep{haehnelt1993, duschl2002}.
246: The history of accretion after the black hole is formed may not necessarily
247: be tightly linked to the dynamical history of the galaxy, but may be
248: controlled by the accretion and feedback processes occurring
249: in the vicinity of the black hole itself.
250:
251: In this work, we use the combination of the {\it Millennium
252: Simulation} and semi-analytic models of galaxy formation to study
253: the fraction of galaxies that have undergone major mergers as a
254: function of mass and cosmic epoch. We investigate whether this can
255: be related to the demographics of black holes in the local Universe
256: and to the apparent disappearance of the most luminous quasar
257: activity in massive galaxies %%
258: at late times.
259:
260: In Sec.~\ref{sec:simulation}, we briefly introduce the simulation we use
261: and explain how galaxy mergers are tracked in the simulation.
262: In Sec.~\ref{sec:merger}, we show that if we assume that black holes only
263: form when galaxies undergo major merging events, then most present-day
264: low mass galaxies are predicted not not to contain black holes and hence
265: will not host AGN. In Sec.~\ref{sec:firstmerger}, we use the simulations
266: to predict when galaxies of different masses have underdone their first
267: major merger. Conclusions and discussions are presented in the final section.
268:
269:
270:
271: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
272: \section{simulation and merger trees}
273: \label{sec:simulation}
274:
275: The \emph{Millennium Simulation}\citep{springel2005} is used in this
276: work to study the merging histories of dark matter haloes. The
277: merging histories of galaxies can be inferred when the simulation is
278: combined with semi-analytic models that follow gas cooling, star
279: formation, supernova and AGN feedback and other physical processes
280: that regulate how the baryons condense into galaxies.
281:
282: The \emph{Millennium Simulation} follows $N= 2160^3$ particles of mass
283: $8.6\times10^{8}\,h^{-1}{\rm M}_{\odot}$ from redshift $z=127$ to the
284: present day, within a comoving box of $500\, h^{-1}$Mpc on a side. The
285: cosmological parameters values in the simulation are consistent with the
286: determinations from a combined analysis of the 2dFGRS\citep{colless01} and
287: first year WMAP data \citep{spergel03}. A flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology is
288: assumed with $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.25$, $\Omega_{\rm b}=0.045$, $h=0.73$,
289: $\Omega_\Lambda=0.75$, $n=1$, and $\sigma_8=0.9$.
290:
291: Full particle data are stored at 64 output times. For each output,
292: haloes are identified using a friends-of-friends (FOF) group-finder.
293: Substructures (or subhaloes) within a FOF halo are located using the
294: SUBFIND algorithm of \citet{springel2001}. The self-bound part of
295: the FOF group itself also appear in the substructure list. This main
296: subhalo typically contains 90 percent of the mass of the FOF group.
297: After finding all substructures in all the output snapshots, subhalo
298: merging trees are built that describe in detail how these systems
299: merge and grow as the universe evolves. Since structures merge
300: hierarchically in CDM universes, for any given subhalo, there can be
301: several progenitors, but in general each subhalo only has one
302: descendant. Merger trees are thus constructed by defining a unique
303: descendant for each subhalo. We refer below {\em halo} to the main
304: substructure that can represent the FOF halo, while {\em subhalo}
305: refers to substructure other than the main one. Halo merger happens
306: when two FOF group merge into one group and one of the haloes
307: becomes a subhalo of the larger structure.
308:
309: The substructure merger trees form the basic input to the
310: semi-analytic model used to associate galaxies with haloes/subhaloes
311: \citep{delucia2007}. The semi-analytic galaxy catalogue we are using
312: in this study is publicly available. A description of the publicly
313: available catalogues, and a link to the database can be found at the
314: webpage: http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/millennium/. Once a halo
315: appears in the simulation, a (central) galaxy begins to form within
316: it. The central galaxy is located at the position of the most bound
317: particle of the halo. As the simulation evolves, the halo may merge
318: with a larger structure and become a subhalo. The central galaxy
319: then becomes a satellite galaxy in the larger structure. The
320: galaxy's position and velocity are specified by the position and
321: velocity of the most bound particle of its host halo/subhalo. Even
322: if the subhalo hosting the galaxy is tidally disrupted, the position
323: and velocity of the galaxy is still traced through this most bound
324: particle. Galaxies thus only disappear from the simulation if they
325: merge with another galaxy. The time taken for a galaxy without
326: subhalo to merge with the central object is given by the time taken
327: for dynamical friction to erode its orbit, causing it to spiral into
328: the centre and merge. This is calculated using the standard
329: Chandrasekhar formula. All the information about the formation and
330: merging history of galaxies is stored.
331:
332: By analyzing these halo and galaxy merger trees, we are able to
333: track when two haloes merge together and whether the galaxies within
334: them also merge into a single object by the present day. In this
335: study, we focus on mergers between satellite and central galaxies,
336: and exclude mergers between two satellites. These events are rare
337: \citep{springel2001} and neglecting them should not affect our
338: conclusions about the incidence and fueling of black holes in
339: galaxies.
340:
341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
342:
343: \section{halo and galaxy mergers }
344: \label{sec:merger}
345:
346: \begin{figure*}
347: \bc
348: \hspace{-1.6cm}
349: \resizebox{12.cm}{!}{\includegraphics{./halofrac.ps}}\\%
350: \caption{
351: Left panel: the average number of major mergers that a dark matter halo
352: of given mass has experienced over its lifetime.
353: Right panel: the fraction of haloes of given
354: mass that have had at least one major merger.}
355: \label{fig:halofrac}
356: \ec
357: \end{figure*}
358:
359: \begin{figure*}
360: \bc
361: \hspace{-1.6cm}
362: \resizebox{15.cm}{!}{\includegraphics{./haloGal.ps}}\\%
363: \caption{ Left panel: The relation between the stellar mass of the
364: central galaxy and the the mass of its host dark matter halo as
365: predicted by the semi-analytic models of De Lucia \& Blaizot (2007).
366: The error bars indicate the $95$ percentile range in stellar mass at
367: a given value of $M_{halo}$ . Middle panel: The solid line shows the
368: fraction of dark matter haloes that have experienced at least one
369: major merger as a function of the stellar mass of the central
370: galaxy. The dotted line shows the fraction of central galaxies of
371: given mass that have had at least one major merger. Right panel: The
372: solid line shows the average number of major mergers experienced by
373: a dark matter halo as a function of the stellar mass of its central
374: galaxy. The dashed line shows the average number of major mergers
375: experienced by the central galaxy itself.} \label{fig:haloGal} \ec
376: \end{figure*}
377:
378: \begin{figure}
379: \bc \hspace{-0.8cm}
380: \resizebox{9.cm}{!}{\includegraphics{./Galfrac.ps}}\\%
381: \caption{ The thick solid line (HMM) shows the fraction of central
382: galaxies whose progenitor haloes have had at least one major merger.
383: The other lines split this sample of central galaxies according to
384: the history of the central galaxy itself. The dotted line (GnoM)
385: shows the contribution from central galaxies that have not
386: experienced a mergers of any kind. The dashed line (GmM) shows the
387: contribution from central galaxies that have experienced only minor
388: mergers. The thin solid line (GMM) shows the contribution from
389: central galaxies that have experienced major majors.}
390: \label{fig:Galfrac} \ec
391: \end{figure}
392:
393: In this study, we assume that black holes form when a galaxy
394: undergoes a major merging event. Galaxies that have never
395: experienced a major merger do not have a black hole. We define major
396: mergers as events in which the mass ratio of the two progenitors is
397: greater than $0.3$. For halo merger, the mass ratio is the virial
398: mass ratio of two progenitor haloes. For galaxy merger, it is the
399: stellar mass ratio of two progenitor galaxies. When we track mergers
400: in the simulation, we include major mergers that occur in all
401: branches of the tree, not just the ``main branch''.
402:
403: Since galaxies reside in dark matter haloes and are able to merge
404: only once their host haloes have coalesced, we begin by analyzing
405: the merging histories of the dark matter haloes themselves. In the
406: left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:halofrac}, we plot the average number of
407: major mergers a present day dark matter halo has experienced over
408: its lifetime as a function of halo mass. Note that in this analysis
409: we track mergers down to an effective resolution limit of $20$
410: particles, which corresponds to a halo of mass $1.7 \times
411: 10^{10}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$.
412: %minimum virial mass of halo: 5.2*10^9M_{\odot}
413: We see that the number of major mergers (above the resolution limit)
414: experienced by a halo is a strongly increasing function of mass;
415: haloes with present-day masses of $10^{12} M_{\odot}$ have typically
416: experienced only one one major merger, whereas the progenitors of
417: present-day haloes with masses of $10^{15} M_{\odot}$ have merged
418: with each other close to 100 times.
419:
420: In the right panel, we show the fraction of haloes that have had at
421: least one major merger during their lifetime, as a function of halo
422: mass. The fraction of haloes that have had major mergers also
423: increases rapidly with halo mass. Almost all haloes more massive
424: than $10^{13}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$ have had at least one major merger and
425: this fraction drops to around 20 \% for haloes with masses of around
426: $10^{11}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$.
427:
428: We now investigate the fraction of {\em galaxies} that have had
429: major mergers. The results are shown as a dotted line in the middle
430: panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:haloGal}. Rather than rising steeply as a
431: function of mass, the galaxy major merger fraction remains close to
432: zero up to a stellar mass of $10^{10.5} M_{\odot}$ and then rises
433: sharply. This is somewhat surprising in view of the behaviour of the
434: same quantity for dark matter haloes, plotted in the right-hand
435: panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:halofrac}. For reference, we have plotted the
436: relation between the stellar mass of a central galaxy and the mass
437: of its host halo in the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:haloGal}, as
438: predicted by the semi-analytic models we use in this study
439: \citep{delucia2007}. This mean relation can be used to transform
440: between central galaxy mass and halo mass in an approximate way
441: (this conversion neglects scatter between the two quantities and the
442: fact that some galaxies are actually satellite systems). If the
443: fraction of galaxies with major mergers followed the relation
444: derived for their host haloes, this would yield the solid curve in
445: the middle panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:haloGal}. Why are the merging
446: histories of galaxies and their host haloes so different?
447:
448: Once two dark matter haloes merge, the galaxies inside them will
449: merge together over a timescale that is determined by dynamical
450: friction. Upon investigation, we find that nearly all galaxies that
451: have experienced major mergers are located in dark matter haloes
452: that have also experienced a major merger. There are almost no
453: galaxy major mergers that have occurred in a halo that has only
454: experienced a minor merger ($\sim 0.15$ percent). However, the
455: converse is not true; {\em we find that a substantial fraction of
456: halo major mergers give rise to galaxy minor mergers.} This is
457: illustrated in the right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:haloGal}. The
458: solid line shows the number of major mergers experienced by the
459: progenitor {\em haloes} of a present-day central galaxy as a
460: function of its mass. The dashed line shows the number of major
461: mergers experienced by their progenitor {\em galaxies}. As can be
462: seen, the number of major mergers experienced by the progenitor
463: galaxies is an order of magnitude smaller. Notice that the number of
464: galaxy mergers is less than $1$ for galaxies up to $\sim
465: 10^{11}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$, and increase steeply for massive galaxies.
466: This is in nice agreement with what is shown in Fig.9 of
467: \citet{lucia2006}, which shows the number of effective progenitors
468: as a function of the stellar mass for elliptical galaxies.
469:
470: In Fig.~\ref{fig:Galfrac}, we again plot the fraction of central
471: galaxies of a given mass whose progenitor haloes have had a major
472: mergers (thick solid line). The thin solid line shows the fraction
473: whose progenitor {\em galaxies} have had a major merger. The dashed
474: line shows the fraction of such galaxies that have had minor mergers
475: and the dotted line is the fraction that have had no merger of any
476: kind. The main conclusion that can be gleaned from this plot is that
477: the reason why the thick solid and thin solid curves differ in
478: shape, is because at lower stellar masses, major mergers between the
479: progenitor haloes often correspond to minor mergers between the
480: progenitor galaxies.
481:
482: How can we understand this? During the period of time between the
483: merger of the two haloes and the merger of the galaxies within them,
484: the stellar mass of the smaller ``satellite'' galaxy remains about
485: the same because ongoing star formation is quenched when the gas
486: surrounding the galaxy is shock--heated and no longer cools onto the
487: satellite. The central galaxy, however, will continue to increase in
488: mass as a result of cooling and star formation. The stellar mass
489: ratio of two galaxies therefore becomes smaller as a function of
490: time.
491:
492: This is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:massratio}. For every merging
493: event that occurs over the history of a galaxy, we record stellar
494: mass ratio information at the time when the progenitor haloes merge
495: and at the time when the galaxies themselves merge together. For
496: simplicity, we keep information for one randomly chosen merging
497: event in the history of each galaxy. In the left panel of
498: Fig.~\ref{fig:massratio}, we plot the average time that elapses
499: between the time when the two haloes merged and the time when the
500: galaxies themselves merged. Results are shown as a function of
501: galaxy stellar mass and the the error bars indicate 68 percentile
502: range in the distribution of delay times. As can be seen, the
503: typical delay time is around 2 Gyr, but individual time delays can
504: range between 1 and 5 Gyr. The delay times are typically shorter for
505: the progenitors of more massive galaxies.
506:
507: In the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:massratio}, we plot the average
508: stellar mass ratios of the galaxies at the time when their haloes
509: merge (solid curve) and at the time when the two galaxies themselves
510: merge (dashed line). Notice that the stellar mass ratio can
511: sometimes be larger than 1; this happens when the galaxy inside the
512: smaller halo is more massive than the galaxy in the larger halo. As
513: we expect, the mass ratio of galaxies at the time when the galaxies
514: merge is smaller than that it is at the time when the haloes merge.
515: This effect is somewhat larger for the mergers that give rise to the
516: most massive galaxies at the present day.
517:
518: \begin{figure*}
519: \bc \hspace{-1.6cm}
520: \resizebox{15.cm}{!}{\includegraphics{./massratio.ps}}\\%
521: \caption{ Some characteristics of the merging events with the
522: highest stellar mass ratios that take place during the history of a
523: galaxy: Left: the average time delay between the time that the
524: progenitor haloes merge and the time that the central galaxies
525: merge. Right: the stellar mass ratio of the galaxies at the time
526: that the haloes merge (solid line) and at the time when the central
527: galaxies merge (dashed line). All results are plotted as a function
528: of the stellar mass of the central galaxy and error bars show the 68
529: percentile dispersion around the mean value. } \label{fig:massratio}
530: \ec
531: \end{figure*}
532:
533: \begin{figure}
534: \bc \hspace{-0.8cm}
535: \resizebox{9.cm}{!}{\includegraphics{./sdss.ps}}\\%
536: \caption{ The solid curve shows the fraction of galaxies of given
537: stellar mass that are predicted to have experienced at least one
538: major merger. The red histogram shows the fraction of SDSS galaxies
539: with $z<0.06$ that are classified as AGN. The dotted and dashed
540: lines show the results from simulation when the mass ratio threshold
541: for defining major merger is changed to $0.2$ and $0.4$.}
542: \label{fig:sdss} \ec
543: \end{figure}
544:
545: \subsection {Comparison with Observations}
546:
547: In this section we have seen that the fraction of galaxies that have
548: experienced one or more major merging events is predicted to very
549: close to zero at stellar masses less than $\sim 10^{10} M_{\odot}$, but
550: a very steeply rising fraction of stellar mass for
551: $M_* > 10^{10} M_{\odot}$. We now compare this prediction with the
552: fraction of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies that contain an AGN.
553: We restrict the SDSS sample to redshifts $z< 0.06$ so that we are
554: still able to detect AGN with weak line emission (LINERs).
555: As shown by \citet{kauffmann2003}, weak-lined AGN become progressively
556: more difficult to identify at higher redshifts using SDSS spectra.
557: This is because these spectra are obtained through 3 arcsecond
558: diameter fibre apertures and the contribution from the stellar
559: population of the host galaxy becomes increasingly dominant in more
560: distant galaxies.
561:
562: The results of the comparison are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:sdss}. The
563: black curve shows the fraction of galaxies in the Millennium
564: Simulation of given stellar mass that have had at least one major
565: merger. The red histogram shows the fraction of galaxies in the SDSS
566: survey that are classified as AGN. As can be seen, both fractions
567: rise steeply from values close to zero at $M_* < 10^{10}
568: h^{-1}M_{\odot}$ to nearly unity at stellar masses greater than
569: $10^{11} h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. In Fig.~\ref{fig:sdss}, the dotted and
570: dashed lines show the results from simulation when the mass ratio
571: threshold for defining major merger is changed to $0.2$ and $0.4$.
572: Compared with the solid line where we use $0.3$ as the mass ratio
573: threshold to define a major merger, the increasing trends are about
574: the same for different thresholds in the range from $0.2$ to $0.4$.
575:
576: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
577: \section{first black holes}
578: \label{sec:firstmerger}
579:
580: \begin{figure*}
581: \bc
582: \hspace{-1.6cm}
583: \resizebox{16.cm}{!}{\includegraphics{./firstmerge.ps}}\\%
584: \caption{
585: Distribution of time when a galaxy experiences its first major merger
586: for galaxies in different stellar mass bins (solid lines).
587: Galaxy stellar mass is plotted in units of
588: $h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. The vertical dashed lines show the median value
589: of the distributions. In each panel, the dotted bar shows the
590: fraction of galaxies that have never experienced a major merger.}
591: \label{fig:firstmerge}
592: \ec
593: \end{figure*}
594:
595: In this section, we analyze when the first major merger that
596: produces the black hole in the galaxy is predicted to occur. In
597: Fig.~\ref{fig:firstmerge}, we plot the distribution of the times of
598: the first major merging events for galaxies with different
599: present-day stellar masses. The vertical dashed lines indicate the
600: median values of the distributions. The dotted bar in each panel
601: indicates the fraction of galaxies in each stellar mass bin that
602: have not experienced a major merger and are hence not included in
603: the distribution of merging times.
604:
605: As can be seen, massive galaxies experience their first major
606: merging event at earlier epochs than less massive galaxies. Almost
607: no new black holes form in massive galaxies at the present day. The
608: distribution of black hole formation times in low mass galaxies is
609: much flatter. If the bulk of the black hole mass is built up in a
610: short period following the first major merger, this would explain
611: why present-day massive black holes have stopped growing, while low
612: mass black holes are still growing at a significant rate
613: \citep{heckman2004}.
614:
615: We now assume that the black holes formed from the first major
616: mergers of galaxies can shine and be observed for $10^7$ years. By
617: counting the numbers of such events at different redshifts, we can
618: compute the evolution in the number density of newly formed black
619: holes. The result is plotted as diamonds in Fig.~\ref{fig:BHrate}.
620: The comoving number density of such events peaks at redshift of z
621: $\sim2-3$, consistent with the observed peak in the number density
622: of bright quasars \citep{richards2006}. The decrease in the number
623: density of newly formed black holes to high redshifts is less
624: pronounced than that found by \citet{fan2001}, who show that the
625: luminous quasar density decreases by a factor of $\sim 6$ from
626: redshift $3.5$ to $5$. Note that we have not attempted to model the
627: predicted luminosity of the quasars in this work, so a direct
628: comparison with the observations is not possible. As we have
629: discussed, it is well possible that processes other than mergers
630: contribute to the low-luminosity quasar population.
631:
632: \begin{figure}
633: \bc
634: \hspace{-0.8cm}
635: \resizebox{9.cm}{!}{\includegraphics{./Majormerger.ps}}\\%
636: \caption{ The number density of galaxies experiencing their first
637: major merger (diamonds) is plotted as a function of redshift. Each
638: merger is assumed to be visible for $10^7$ years. }
639: \label{fig:BHrate} \ec
640: \end{figure}
641:
642: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
643: \section{Conclusions}
644: \label{sec:discussions}
645:
646: We analyze the merger histories of dark matter haloes and galaxies
647: in the {\em Millennium Simulation} and use our results to try
648: to understand the demographics of black holes in nearby galaxies.
649: Black holes are assumed to form only if a major merger occurs.
650: Although a significant fraction of low mass ($< 10^{10} M_{\odot}$)
651: galaxies have experienced minor mergers, less than a few percent are
652: predicted to have experienced a major merger.
653: If our assumption that a major merger is required in
654: order to form a black hole is correct, the majority of low mass
655: galaxies are predicted not to contain black holes
656: at the present day. This is one possible explanation of the observed
657: lack of AGN in low mass galaxies \citep{ho1997, kauffmann2003}.
658:
659: We also investigate when galaxies of different stellar masses are predicted
660: to have formed their first black holes. High mass galaxies form their
661: first black holes at very early epochs. The distribution of formation
662: times is almost flat as a function of lookback time for
663: low mass galaxies. This means that if a low mass galaxy has a
664: black hole, there is a significant probability that it formed in the
665: last few Gigyears. We also compute the number density of newly formed
666: black holes as a function of redshift. We find that the peak number
667: density occurs at $z \sim2-3$, in good agreement with the observed peak
668: in the quasar space density. More detailed predictions for how AGN of
669: different luminosities are expected to evolve requires a more detailed
670: physical model for how the black holes accrete gas over the history of
671: the Universe. In addition, in certain wavebands AGN activity might be
672: obscured by gas and dust surrounding black hole \citep{hopkins2006}.
673: More detailed consideration of these issues will form the basis for
674: future work.
675:
676: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
677: \section*{Acknowledgements}
678: We are grateful to Zuhui Fan, Gabriella De Lucia, Roderik Overzier
679: and Qi Guo for their detailed comments and suggestions on our paper.
680: Lan Wang would like to acknowledge the supports from NSFC under
681: grants 10373001, 10533010, and 10773001, and 973 Program (No.
682: 2007CB815401). The simulation used in this paper was carried out as
683: part of the programme of the Virgo Consortium on the Regatta
684: supercomputer of the Computing Centre of the Max--Planck--Society in
685: Garching.
686:
687:
688: \bsp
689: \label{lastpage}
690:
691: \bibliographystyle{mn2e}
692: \bibliography{BH}
693:
694: \end{document}
695: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
696: