1: % \documentclass[12pt,manuscript]{aastex}
2: % \voffset=-0.7truein % remove for submission
3: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
4: % \voffset=-0.8truein % remove for submission
5: \usepackage{ulem}
6:
7: \slugcomment{}
8:
9: \shorttitle{Eclipsing CV Lanning 386}
10:
11: \shortauthors{Brady et al.}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14: \title{The Eclipsing Cataclysmic Variable Lanning 386:
15: Dwarf Nova, SW Sextantis Star, or Both?\footnote{Dedicated to Howard
16: Lanning, who died in 2007 December.}}
17:
18: \author{Steve Brady}
19: \email{sbrady10@verizon.net}
20: \affil{AAVSO, 25 Birch Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
21:
22: \author{John R. Thorstensen}
23: \email{john.thorstensen@dartmouth.edu}
24: \affil{Dartmouth College, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 6127 Wilder Lab,
25: Hanover, NH 03755}
26:
27: \author{Michael D. Koppelman}
28: \email{michael@aps.umn.edu}
29: \affil{University of Minnesota, Department of Astronomy, 116 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455}
30:
31: \author{Jose Luis Prieto}
32: \email{prieto@astronomy.ohio-state.edu}
33: \affil{Ohio State University, Department of Astronomy, 140 W. 18th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210}
34:
35: \author{Peter M. Garnavich, Alec Hirschauer, and Michael Florack}
36: \email{pgarnavi@nd.edu; ahirsch1@nd.edu; mflorack@nd.edu}
37: \affil{University of Notre Dame, Physics Department, 225 Nieuwland Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556}
38:
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41:
42: We present photometry and spectroscopy of the suspected cataclysmic
43: variable (CV) Lanning 386. We confirm that it is a CV, and
44: observe deep eclipses, from which we determine the
45: orbital period $P_{\rm orb}$ to be $0.1640517 \pm 0.0000001$ d (= 3.94 h).
46: Photometric monitoring over two observing seasons shows a
47: very active system with frequent outbursts
48: of variable amplitude, up to $\sim 2$ mag. The spectrum in quiescence is
49: typical of dwarf novae, but in its high state the system
50: shows strong \ion{He}{2} emission and a broad \ion{C}{4} Wolf-Rayet feature.
51: This is unusual for dwarf novae in outburst and indicates a high excitation.
52: In its high state the system shows some features reminiscent of an
53: SW Sextantis-type CV, but lacks others. We discuss the classification
54: of this puzzling object.
55:
56: %The \ion{He}{2} line is absent in the
57: %quiescent state. The Balmer and helium lines show a complex and time-varying
58: %relation between absorption and emission lines, suggesting that this is a new
59: %member of the SW~Sex class of CV.
60:
61: \end{abstract}
62:
63: \keywords{Stars}
64:
65: %\section*{}
66: %\begin{quote}
67: %\textit{Dedicated to Howard Lanning, who died in 2007 December.
68: %}
69: %\end{quote}
70:
71:
72:
73: \section{Introduction}
74:
75: Cataclysmic variables (CVs) are close binary stars in which a
76: white dwarf primary accretes matter via Roche lobe overflow from
77: a secondary, which usually resembles a lower main-sequence star
78: \citep{warner}.
79: In most CVs an accretion disk encircles the white dwarf. Optical
80: emission can come from several locations in the system. The gas
81: stream from the secondary star strikes the outer rim of the
82: accretion disk producing a rapidly fluctuating bright spot (or
83: hot spot). The accretion disk often dominates the light, and
84: instabilities in the disk can produce large variations in the
85: system brightness. Strong white-dwarf magnetic fields can
86: truncate or even entirely disrupt the accretion disk, allowing
87: material to fall directly onto the white dwarf. In many systems
88: the accumulated hydrogen-rich material can undergo a
89: thermonuclear runaway, creating a classical nova outburst. The
90: range of phenomena seen in CVs means that determining the subclass
91: of any example can require extensive photometric and spectroscopic
92: study.
93:
94: H. H. Lanning (\citealt{lanning1973} and subsequent papers)
95: conducted a search for ultraviolet-bright (UV) sources in the
96: galactic plane by visually examining plates taken with the Palomar
97: Oschin Schmidt. To date, six supplements
98: have been published, revealing a total of 724 UV sources. Six of
99: these are included in the {\it Catalog and Atlas of
100: Cataclysmic Variables} \citep{downes2001} as confirmed
101: or suspected CVs; they are listed in Table \ref{lanningtable}.
102:
103: \citet{eracleous2002} presented a spectrum of Lanning
104: 386 which showed apparent CV features -- a blue continuum,
105: He I absorption lines, and broad Balmer emission lines.
106: The extensive
107: photometric and spectroscopic observations we present here
108: establish that
109: Lanning~386 is indeed a deeply-eclipsing CV with $P_{\rm orb} =
110: 0.1640517 \pm 0.0000001$ d. Intriguingly, it shares characteristics
111: of both the dwarf novae -- CVs that undergo occasional eruptions
112: thought to be caused by a disk instability -- and the SW Sextantis
113: stars \citep{thorstensen1991}, a subclass of the persistently-bright
114: novalike variables.
115:
116: \section{Observations}
117:
118: \subsection{Photometry}
119:
120: We began routine monitoring of Lanning
121: 386 on 2005 June 25, with a 0.25 m robotic survey
122: telescope at the lead author's
123: private observatory in southern New Hampshire. The system was
124: programmed to automatically monitor a list of poorly-studied
125: CV candidates and to initiate time series photometry if
126: and when an outburst was detected. The first outburst of
127: %Lanning 386 was detected 2005 September 2, after eleven
128: % ... not consistent with date in table.
129: Lanning 386 was detected 2005 September 12 UT, after eleven
130: weeks of monitoring. Time series observations (detailed
131: in Table \ref{photsumtable}) began
132: immediately, and revealed two
133: eclipses separated by $\sim 3.9$ hr, about 1.5 mag deep.
134: Thereafter, time series observations were obtained
135: every clear night for 5 months in 2005 and
136: another 5 months in 2006, yielding over
137: 3,000 photometric observations.
138: A 0.4 m telescope at the same observatory was used along
139: with the 0.25 m, and all observations were
140: unfiltered due to the star's faintness.
141: Integration times were 300 sec with the 0.25 m telescope and 180
142: sec with the 0.4 m. All images were bias subtracted and
143: flat-field corrected. Ensemble photometry was performed using 12
144: relatively isolated comparison stars.
145: We established a rough zero point using $V$ magnitudes of four of
146: these stars (Figure \ref{finder_wide}) measured with the MDM 2.4m
147: telescope (see below); Table \ref{cmptable} gives their positions
148: and magnitudes.
149: The mean scatter of the differential photometry
150: was $\sim 1$ percent. The unfiltered photometry has a
151: significant color term, and the zero points of the two filter
152: photometry sessions described below were slightly discrepant,
153: so we estimate the uncertainty in the
154: photometric zero point to be $\pm 0.1$ mag.
155:
156: Our filter photometry is from the 2.4 m Hiltner telescope at MDM
157: Observatory on Kitt Peak. A $2048^2$ SITe CCD detector,
158: cropped to $1024^2$ to minimize read time, gave a 4.7 arcmin
159: square field of view. We obtained single sets of short
160: (60 - 120 s) exposures through $UBVI$ filters on 2005 September 15 and
161: 2007 June 24 UT, measured them using the
162: IRAF\footnote[0]{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
163: Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for
164: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
165: Science Foundation.} implementation of
166: DAOPHOT \citep{stetsondao}, and derived transformations to the
167: Johnson/Cousins photometric system using observations of
168: \citet{landolt92} standard-star fields. The zero points for the
169: two sets of observations differed by $\sim 0.06$ mag in $V$.
170: The 2005 September 15 observations show
171: Lanning 386 at $V = 15.20$, $B-V = +0.08$,
172: $U-B = -0.63$, and $V-I = +0.29$, while the 2007 June 24 observation
173: yields $V = 17.28$, $B-V = +0.27$, $U - B = -0.87$, and $V-I =
174: +1.07$.
175:
176: \subsection{Spectroscopy}
177:
178: Our spectra come from three different instruments on two different
179: telescopes, as listed in Table \ref{specjournal}.
180:
181: Our most extensive spectroscopy is from the Hiltner telescope,
182: equipped with the MDM Modular spectrograph, a 600 line mm$^{-1}$
183: grating, and the same $2048^2$ SITe detector used for the filter
184: photometry. The Modspec
185: observations were taken by one of us (JRT) without awareness that
186: eclipses had been discovered, and were therefore aimed largely at
187: determining $P_{\rm orb}$.
188: The spectra cover from 4200 to 7500 \AA\ , with 2 \AA\
189: pixel$^{-1}$ sampling and $\sim 3.5$ \AA\ resolution (FWHM). The
190: observing and reduction procedures were as described in
191: \citet{sheets07}.
192:
193: We also obtained time-series spectra of Lanning~386 in its
194: bright state using the Kitt Peak
195: National Observatory (KPNO) Mayall 4 m telescope and RC spectrograph.
196: The T2KB CCD detector, KPC10a grating, and a 1~arcsec
197: slit provided an average dispersion of 2.8 \AA\ pixel$^{-1}$ and a useful
198: range between 3700 and 8000 \AA , with some
199: order overlap beyond 7400 \AA . The slit was rotated to the parallactic angle to
200: prevent differential slit losses.
201: The spectra were bias subtracted, flat-field corrected using images of
202: an internal quartz lamp, extracted using the IRAF {\it twodspec} package,
203: and wavelength calibrated against HeNeAr lamp exposures taken from
204: time to time as the telescope tracked. We applied
205: a flux calibration derived from observations
206: of the spectrophotometric standard BD +28$^\circ$ 4211.
207:
208: Finally, we have two 600-s exposures of Lanning~386 taken during
209: twilight on 2006 Dec 8 UT, using the MDM Hiltner telescope and
210: OSU Boller and Chivens CCD spectrograph (CCDS). The spectra
211: were reduced in the same way as the KPNO data described
212: above. The 5000-6000 \AA\ continuum is $\sim 2.4$ mag fainter than
213: in the KPNO spectra, confirming that the system was in quiescence.
214:
215: %spectrograph (CCDS) beginning at 01:24 UT which corresponds to an
216: %orbital phase of 0.08, so the star was just coming out of eclipse at
217: %the start of the exposures. The spectra were reduced in the same way
218: %as the KPNO data and is also plotted in Figure \ref{spec1plot}. The
219: %continuum between 500 and 600~nm in the MDM spectrum was 2.4 mag
220: %fainter than the continuum of the KPNO spectrum at the same phase,
221: %confirming that the MDM spectrum was obtained during a quiescent
222: %phase.
223:
224: \section{Analysis}
225:
226: \subsection{Ephemeris}
227:
228: %We investigated the periodic behavior of the system using Fourier analysis
229: %tools and the CLEANest algorithm \citep{foster1995}. Because this was an
230: %eclipsing system, with eclipses roughly $0.16^d$ apart, our search was
231: %conducted between $0.05^d < P < 0.33^d$ and produced a strong signal at $P =
232: %0.164059^{d} \pm 0.000004$ (Figure \ref{power}) and at harmonic frequencies.
233: Table \ref{eclipsestable} lists the observed times of mid-eclipse.
234: These yield a unique ephemeris,
235: \begin{equation}\label{eqn1}
236: %\begin{array}{r@{}r@{}l}
237: %{\rm Min.~I = HJD~}2453625.58669 & {} + 0.1640517 & {} \times E \\
238: %\pm 0.0004 & {} \pm 0.0000001, & \\
239: %\end{array}
240: \hbox{Minimum light} = \hbox{Heliocentric JD } 2453625.5867(4) + 0.1640517(1) E,
241: \end{equation}
242: where $E$ is an integer and the parentheses give uncertainties in the
243: last digits.
244: Radial velocities of the H$\alpha$ emission line (discussed below)
245: give essentially the same period, namely 0.1640530(11) d, without
246: ambiguity caused by uncertainty in the number of cycles elapsed
247: between observing runs. All phases in this paper refer to the
248: eclipse ephemeris.
249:
250: % If it's not convincing, it is almost certainly not real -- JRT
251: %
252: %A search for shorter period signals showed a peak at $P=0.0279 \pm 0.0005$
253: %which might be due to quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) that are common in
254: %SW~Sex type CV \cite{patterson02}. The semi-amplitude of the short period
255: %signal is $A=0.018\pm0.028$ but visual inspection of the data folded on this
256: %period is not convincing. Future observations with higher photometric
257: %precision, finer time resolution and longer observing sessions would aid in
258: %the investigation of the high-frequency content of the light curve.
259: %
260: \subsection{Light Curve and Long-Term Variations}
261:
262: In Figures \ref{quietobplot} and \ref{outburstplot} we show
263: representative lights curves in quiescence and outburst, constructed
264: by folding two consecutive observation sessions using the ephemeris
265: (Eqn.~\ref{eqn1}). The quiescent plot, from observations made between
266: 2005 September 27 and October 1 UT, shows a pre-eclipse hump; this
267: feature usually arises from the ``hot spot'' where gas streaming from
268: the secondary star strikes the disk. The hot spot contribution is not
269: evident in the outburst plot, made from observations taken 2006 July
270: 16 and 17 UT. The eclipse depth is roughly the same in each state.
271:
272: Figure \ref{allplot} shows all the photometry folded on the ephemeris
273: and makes evident the long term variations in the mean magnitude.
274: The histogram of the median magnitude for each of the dates in
275: Table \ref{photsumtable}, shown in Figure \ref{histplot}, suggests an
276: quiescent state near $m=17.2$ (with some variability), an intermediate stage at
277: $m=15.9$ and an outburst state at $m=15.3$. This range of brightness
278: is also evident from visual inspection of Figure \ref{allplot}.
279: Figure \ref{detailplot} shows a typical portion of the long-term
280: light curve,
281: from the 2006 observing season.
282:
283: %At first, this may appear to be simply a dwarf nova (DN) system, but
284: %Lanning~386 is very active spends much of its time in a bright or intermediate
285: %state. The light curve here is more similar to a very active VY~Scl object,
286: %for example MV~Lyr \citep{leach1999}. These are bright nova-like stars that
287: %undergo fading that can last days to months. In particular, a number of SW~Sex
288: %type stars, such as DW~UMa \citep{honeycutt1993} show VY~Scl behavior. The
289: %long-term light curve of LS~Peg (S193; Garnavich and Szkody 1992) for example,
290: %displayed periods of very rapid oscillations between bright and faint states
291: %that might be a sign of a transition from a low accretion rate state to a
292: %steady nova-like system.
293:
294:
295: \subsection{Spectral Appearance and Analysis}
296:
297: The top trace of Fig.~\ref{decompspec} shows the mean of the low-state
298: Modspec spectra. The mean spectrum is typical of dwarf novae at
299: minimum light; Table \ref{emissionlines} gives identifications and
300: measurements of the emission features. The synthetic magnitude is $V
301: = 17.5$, using the passband given by \citet{bessell}, which is
302: roughly consistent with the low state photometry
303: outside of eclipse. At the red end,
304: the absorption bands of an M dwarf are visible. We estimated the
305: spectral class and flux contribution of the M dwarf by subtracting
306: scaled M-dwarf library spectra from the low-state spectrum and judging
307: how well the M-dwarf features were accounted for; this yielded a
308: spectral type M3.3 $\pm$ 0.8 and a contribution to the total light
309: corresponding to $V = 20.3 \pm 0.6$ (including estimated calibration
310: uncertainty). Using (1) the measured $P_{\rm orb}$, (2)
311: the condition that the secondary fill the Roche lobe, and (3) a broad
312: range of plausible secondary star masses $M_2$ (from 0.2 to 0.5
313: M$_{\odot}$; \citealt{baraffe}), we estimate that the secondary's
314: scaled M-dwarf library spectra from the low-state spectrum and judging
315: how well the M-dwarf features were accounted for; this yielded a
316: spectral type M3.3 $\pm$ 0.8 and a contribution to the total light
317: corresponding to $V = 20.3 \pm 0.6$ (including estimated calibration
318: uncertainty). Using (1) the measured $P_{\rm orb}$, (2)
319: the condition that the secondary fill the Roche lobe, and (3) a broad
320: range of plausible secondary star masses $M_2$ (from 0.2 to 0.5
321: M$_{\odot}$; \citealt{baraffe}), we estimate that the secondary's
322: radius $R_2 = 0.4 \pm 0.07$ R$_{\odot}$ -- fortunately, $R_2$ at a
323: fixed $P_{\rm orb}$ depends only weakly on $M_2$, roughly as
324: $M_2^{1/3}$. Finally, using the calibration of the relation between
325: spectral type and $V$-band surface brightness given by
326: \citet{beuermann06}, we estimate $M_V = 11.1 \pm 1.0$ for the
327: secondary, giving an apparent distance modulus $m - M = 9.1 \pm 1.2$.
328: At Galactic latitude $b = -5.8$ there is likely to be substantial dust
329: extinction; \citet{schlegel} estimate that extragalactic objects in
330: this direction undergo reddening $E(B-V) = 0.54$. The actual
331: reddening appears to be considerably less than this upper limit; most
332: dwarf novae in outburst have $B - V = 0$, within $\pm 0.1$ mag or so
333: \citep{bruch94}, so our outburst color suggests $E(B-V) < 0.2$ or so.
334: If so, the nominal distance would be $\sim 500$ pc.
335:
336: The bright state KPNO spectra cover both eclipse and out-of-eclipse phases.
337: As shown in Figure \ref{spec1plot}, the average spectrum in
338: the bright state shows broad Balmer emission lines on a continuum that is
339: considerably bluer than in the low state.
340: Several \ion{He}{1} emission lines such as $\lambda\lambda 6678, 5876, 5016, 4922$ are
341: clearly seen, but the strongest non-hydrogen feature is the bright \ion{He}{2}
342: $\lambda4686$ line, which is blended with the \ion{C}{3}/\ion{N}{3} Bowen
343: complex. \ion{He}{2} is so prominent in this star that the usually weak line
344: at $\lambda5412$ is also easily detected.
345: A broad feature in the spectrum at $\lambda5806$ is evidently a
346: \ion{C}{4} feature which is common in Wolf-Rayet stars, but unusual in
347: cataclysmic variables.
348: \citet{schmidtobreick2003} found the line in the old nova V840~Oph and
349: suggested the star had a carbon over-abundance. However, \citet{groot2000}
350: identified \ion{C}{4} in SW~Sex and attributed it to a particularly
351: high-excitation state for the star.
352: In eclipse, the continuum remains blue, but its slope is greatly reduced.
353: Between 6000 \AA\ and 4000 \AA\ the continuum rises by a factor of 2.9 (in
354: $f_\lambda$) out of eclipse but only by a factor of 1.6 in eclipse. However, in eclipse the
355: \ion{He}{2} emission remains one of the strongest lines in the spectrum. The
356: ratio of fluxes between \ion{He}{2} $\lambda 4686$ and H$\beta$ is 1.2 out of eclipse
357: and 0.64 during eclipse.
358:
359: If Lanning 386 is a dwarf nova, its high-state spectrum
360: is unusual; we comment on this more extensively in the Discussion.
361:
362: %The Balmer lines in dwarf novae typically become much weaker or go into absorption
363: %in outburst. Even more strikingly, \ion{He}{2} emission is generally weak or
364: %absent, indicating a much lower excitation than seen here. We discuss this
365: %points more thoroughly later.
366:
367: %In quiescence, Balmer and \ion{He}{1} emission lines are prominent. But in
368: %this low state the continuum slope matches that of the star in eclipse and
369: %there is no detectable \ion{He}{2} emission. The equivalent width (EW) of the
370: %Balmer emission lines shows large variations in and out of eclipse and during
371: %quiescence. The average EW of H$\beta$ outside of eclipse in the bright
372: %state is 8~\AA\footnote[1]{Here we are using positive equivalent widths to denote
373: %emission lines.} while at mid-eclipse the EW reaches 34~\AA , comparable
374: %to the faint state.
375:
376: %The average KPNO bright-state spectrum out of eclipse (phases 0.4 to nearly 1.0) shows
377: %\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$4471 in absorption, while the redward \ion{He}{1} lines are in
378: %emission.
379: %The low resolution of the spectra make it difficult to check for the
380: %zero-velocity absorption on the Balmer lines at phase 0.5 which is
381: %characteristic of SW~Sex stars.
382: %But the \ion{He}{1} $\lambda$4471 absorption moves from blue to red
383: %between phase 0.4 to 0.6 and,
384: %\ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$ has a central absorption over this phase range.
385:
386: Figure~\ref{singletrail} shows phase-resolved greyscale representations of our
387: high- and low-state spectra. To construct these, the spectra were first divided
388: by the continuum and cleaned of residual cosmic rays; then for each orbital
389: phase we averaged spectra whose phases were close to the target phase, using
390: a Gaussian in phase for the weighting function. Finally, all the spectra
391: were stacked together to form a two-dimensional image, with a second cycle
392: repeated for continuity. We created separate images from the high-state
393: KPNO data and the low-state MDM Modspec data.
394:
395: Examination of Fig.~\ref{singletrail} shows a host of interesting differences
396: between the two states. In the low state (top two panels), the emission lines
397: have two approximately equal peaks, while in the high state (lower two panels)
398: show more complex behavior; in particular, phase-dependent absorption is seen in
399: \ion{He}{1} $\lambda\lambda$4921, 5015, and 5876, and in the metal feature
400: near $\lambda 5175$. In H$\beta$ (and in H$\alpha$, which is not shown here)
401: there is a sharp component that moves approximately in antiphase to the bulk
402: of the line. The phasing of the sharp component's motion is approximately
403: as expected for emission from the heated face of the
404: secondary. The high-state image has good coverage across the eclipse at
405: phase $\phi = 0$; because the emission lines are eclipsed less strongly than the
406: continuum, the continuum division used in this representation causes an
407: increase in the apparent emission strength. This is artificial, but the
408: sharp red-to-blue swing in the line's central wavelength is evidently
409: real (see below).
410:
411: % Figure \ref{spec2plot} we average four spectra taken near phase 0.75
412: %showing inverse P-Cygni absorption for all the \ion{He}{1} lines and for
413: %Balmer lines starting with H$\delta$. Complex interaction between emission and
414: %absorption components like this are characteristic of SW~Sex stars
415: %\citep{thorstensen1991}. In particular, the inverse P-Cygni profile of
416: %\ion{He}{1} $\lambda$4471 is similar to V795~Her \citep{casares96},
417: %although the \ion{He}{2} emission in Lanning~386 is stronger than in V795~Her.
418: %The unusual variable absorption feature at $\lambda$5175 noted in the SW~Sex star
419: %PX And (=PG0027+260; \citealt{thorstensen1991}) and identified as \ion{Mg}{1} is also
420: %present in Lanning~386.
421:
422:
423: \section{Radial Velocities}
424:
425: We measured radial velocities of the H$\alpha$ emission in the
426: Modspec and KPNO spectra using a convolution algorithm described by
427: \citet{schyo} and \citet{shaf}. For the low-state Modspec data the
428: convolving function consisted
429: of positive and negative Gaussians with a full-width at half
430: maximum (FWHM) of 550 km s$^{-1}$, separated
431: by 1920 km s$^{-1}$, which emphasized the steep sides of the line profile.
432: The corresponding figures for the slightly narrower line profile
433: in the high-state data were respectively 365 and 1645 km s$^{-1}$.
434:
435: We searched the velocity time series for periods; this exercise
436: independently reproduced the same
437: period found in the eclipses, with no cycle-count ambiguity on any
438: time scale. Remarkably, the high- and low-state velocities
439: agreed very well in phase, amplitude, and zero point, despite
440: differences in instrumentation as well as photometric state.
441: The modulation is accurately sinusoidal, {\it except} for
442: a rapid swing redward and then blueward across the eclipse --
443: the classic signature of the eclipse of a rapidly-rotating
444: object. Excluding the velocities affected by the rotational
445: disturbance, holding $P$ fixed at $0.1640517$ d,
446: and fitting a sinusoid of the form
447: $v(t) = \gamma + K \sin [2 \pi (t - T_0)/ P]$
448: yields
449: \begin{eqnarray}
450: T_0 &=& \hbox{HJD } 2453980.6815 \pm 0.0010, \\
451: K &=& 152 \pm 5\ {\rm km\ s^{-1}}, \\
452: \gamma &=& -51 \pm 4\ {\rm km\ s^{-1}}, \hbox{ and}\\
453: \sigma &=& 18\ {\rm km\ s^{-1}},
454: \end{eqnarray}
455: where $\sigma$ is the RMS scatter about the best fit.
456: Fig.~\ref{folvel} shows the velocities folded on the eclipse
457: ephemeris.
458:
459: The sinusoid fitted to the velocities is defined so that
460: $T_0$ is the time at which $v(t)$ crosses the system
461: velocity $\gamma$ from blue to red. If the emission lines trace the
462: motion of the white dwarf, this must occur opposite
463: the eclipse, at phase $\phi = 0.5$. The fitted
464: $T_0$ corresponds to $\phi = 0.530 \pm 0.006$, or a phase lag of
465: $11^{\circ} \pm 2^{\circ}$ compared to this expectation. This suggests that the
466: emission line velocities do not trace the white dwarf motion precisely.
467:
468: \section{Discussion}
469:
470: Our photometry shows Lanning~386 to be an active, eclipsing CV, with $P_{\rm orb} =
471: 3.94$ h and an eclipse depth of $\sim 1.5$ mag.
472: Monitoring over many months shows bright outbursts reaching $V\approx 15.2$
473: from a quiescent state with $V\approx 17.2$.
474: %But the star has been caught
475: %between this range and may spend some time in a intermediate state around
476: %$V\approx$15.5 mag.
477: %The behavior of the light curve is not like that of dwarf
478: %novae, but appears to similar to rapid oscillations seen in VY~Scl and some
479: %SW~Sex stars like LS~Peg.
480:
481: Lanning 386 does not fit neatly into any CV subclass.
482: The long-term variability resembles that of a dwarf nova, and at
483: minimum light the spectrum is typical of that class.
484: However, when most dwarf novae outburst, their Balmer emission
485: becomes very weak, and broad absorption wings appear
486: (e.g., \citealt{thorstensen98});
487: it is also unusual (though not unknown) for \ion{He}{2} to
488: become prominent (e.g., \citealt{hessman84}).
489: The high-state spectrum seen here is very much unlike this,
490: resembling instead that of a novalike variable.
491: The \ion{He}{1} line profiles, and the unusual strength of
492: \ion{He}{2}, are reminiscent of an SW Sextantis star \citep{thorstensen1991}.
493: In addition, Lanning 386 is similar to other SW Sex stars in that
494: the emission lines are eclipsed much more shallowly than the continuum,
495: indicating a spatially extended source. The
496: rotational disturbance around eclipse is also seen in some
497: other SW Sex stars (e.g., \citealt{rodriguez04}).
498: However, other canonical SW Sex characteristics are missing here.
499: The emission line radial-velocity phase in SW Sex stars lags
500: far behind (by $> 45^{\circ}$) the phase expected for the white
501: dwarf motion, based on the eclipse ephemeris, but in Lanning 386
502: the phase lag is only $\sim 11^\circ \pm 2^\circ$.
503: In addition, while the \ion{He}{1} lines do appear in absorption
504: for part of the orbit, in other SW Sex stars the absorption appears
505: near phase 0.5, whereas it appears somewhat later here.
506:
507: Nonetheless, the unusual maximum-light spectrum suggests that we should
508: consider carefully whether the long-term light curve in Fig.~\ref{detailplot}
509: forces us to classify this star as a dwarf nova. Might another mechanism
510: explain the variability in a manner more consistent with the maximum-light
511: spectrum?
512:
513: Many novalike variables, and many SW Sex stars in particular, are
514: also VY Scl stars -- novalike variables that occasionally fade deeply for
515: varying amounts of time, for reasons that are not entirely understood. Might
516: Lanning 386 be a VY Scl star masquerading as a dwarf nova? This seems
517: unlikely, for two reasons. First, the long-term light curves of VY Scl stars
518: tend to look quite different from those of dwarf novae -- VY Scl stars
519: typically remain in a high state for months or years, and only occasionally
520: fade by large amounts, up to 5 mag (see examples in \citealt{honeycutt04}).
521: The light curve here, by contrast, consists of frequent, moderate-amplitude
522: outbursts from a faint state. Second, the spectra of VY Scl stars in their
523: faint states look as if accretion has nearly stopped, with the Balmer emission
524: lines typically becoming very narrow and the underlying stars becoming evident
525: \citep{shafter1983, schneider81}. This is very different from the essentially
526: normal dwarf nova spectrum seen here.
527:
528: The DQ Her stars, also called intermediate polars, are
529: magnetic systems \citep[for a review, see][]{patterson94}; some of these
530: undergo outbursts that at least superficially resemble dwarf nova
531: outbursts.
532: Typically, DQ Her outbursts are infrequent compared to those of most
533: dwarf novae; they also tend to decay rapidly \citep{hellier97}.
534: For this reason, there is little spectroscopy available for outbursts
535: of these systems. However, spectra do exist for EX Hya in outburst, which,
536: show strong emission lines with interesting
537: velocity structure, reminiscent of the SW Sex stars
538: \citep{hellier89,hellier00}. In this way, EX Hya resembles
539: Lanning 386, but the morphological fit is
540: imperfect -- the brightenings we see in Lanning 386 appear
541: to be more frequent than those seen in most DQ Her stars.
542: Also, we have (as of yet) no direct evidence that Lanning 386 is
543: a magnetic system, because we are unaware of any
544: searches for the coherent pulsations and/or
545: circular polarization that would prove the case.
546:
547: It has been suggested that the outbursts seen in some magnetic systems are
548: due to mass-transfer bursts rather than the disk instabilities that are
549: thought to cause normal dwarf nova outbursts
550: \footnote{It is possible that mass-transfer bursts could be triggered
551: by an event in the disk.}. During a period of increased mass transfer,
552: material overflowing the disk could give rise to enhanced emission --
553: there is evidence for this in EX Hya \citep{hellier00}.
554: It may be that the outbursts seen in Lanning 386, whatever their
555: trigger, involve enhanced mass transfer -- which may or may not
556: be exclusive to magnetic systems.
557:
558: We can summarize the morphological conundrum presented by Lanning 386 as
559: follows: Its minimum-light spectrum and the light curve suggest it
560: is a dwarf nova with frequent, relatively low-amplitude outbursts,
561: while at maximum light it resembles a novalike variable, with some
562: (but not all) the characteristics of an SW Sex star. EX Hya,
563: a magnetic system, shows a similar set of symptoms, but the
564: presentation is not identical.
565:
566:
567: %While a physical
568: %model of the system is outside the scope of this paper, we speculate
569: %that the white dwarf in the system
570: %might be somewhat magnetic -- enough to disrupt
571: %the inner disk in outburst, but not enough to disrupt the disk
572: %entirely and suppress the dwarf-nova instability. Although it is
573: %not at all clear that SW Sex stars are magnetic, magnetism has
574: %been invoked to explain certain SW Sex features (see, e.g.
575: %\citealt{patterson02}, \citealt{hoard03}). A search for coherent pulsations and
576: %a detailed X-ray study might help
577: %test this idea. If this is confirmed, Lanning 386 may be {\it both}
578: %a dwarf nova {\it and} a magnetic CV -- classes that have heretofore
579: %been thought to overlap very little.
580:
581: %The variability in Fig.~\ref{detailphot} resembles that of a
582: %dwarf nova with frequent out
583:
584: %The spectrum in the bright state shows a blue continuum and strong Balmer
585: %emission along with very high excitation lines of \ion{He}{2} and \ion{C}{4}.
586: %Surprisingly, low ionization features, such as \ion{Mg}{1}, are also
587: %identified in our spectra. In the faint state the \ion{He}{2} is not detected
588: %and a cooler continuum is present.
589:
590: %The spectrum outside of eclipse also shows narrow absorption features in
591: %hydrogen and helium lines that become prominent at blue wavelengths. These
592: %are similar to features seen in SW~Sex stars. Indeed, the nearly 4 hour
593: %orbital period, the ``V''-shaped eclipse, and the general spectrum in the %bright state all support the classification as a SW~Sex type CV (Thorstensen
594: %et al. 1991). However, more detailed spectroscopic study is needed to show the
595: %radial velocity phase-lag associated with this interesting class of variables.
596:
597: %Recently \citet{rodriguez2007} suggested that SW~Sex type stars are the most
598: %common type of CV with periods between 3 and 4 hours. Lanning~386 adds another
599: %object to this growing list. But Lanning~386 appears unusual in that it is
600: %undergoing a phase of rapid brightness variations. Detailed study of this new
601: %member of the class may help determine the nature of SW~Sex stars.
602:
603: \section{Acknowledgments}
604:
605: While this paper was in production we learned that H. Lanning had died
606: in 2007 December; we thank him posthumously
607: for encouraging us to get spectra of this star and dedicate this
608: paper to his memory. JRT
609: acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation through
610: awards AST-0307413 and AST-0708810. We thank the KPNO and MDM staffs
611: for their conscientious support, and the Tohono O'odham Nation for
612: letting us use their mountain for a while to explore the universe we
613: all share. Finally, we thank the referee for a careful
614: reading and numerous helpful suggestions.
615:
616: \begin{thebibliography}{}
617:
618:
619: \bibitem[Baraffe \& Kolb(2000)]{baraffe} Baraffe, I., \& Kolb, U.\ 2000, \mnras, 318, 354
620:
621: \bibitem[Bessell(1990)]{bessell} Bessell, M. S. 1990, \pasp, 102, 1181
622:
623: \bibitem[Beuermann(2006)]{beuermann06} Beuermann, K.\ 2006, \aap, 460, 78
624:
625: \bibitem[Bruch \& Engel(1994)]{bruch94} Bruch, A., \& Engel,
626: A.\ 1994, \aaps, 104, 79
627:
628: %\bibitem[Casares et al.(1996)]{casares96} Casares, J., Martinez-Pais, I.G., Marsh, T. R., Charles, P.A., Lazaro, C. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 219
629:
630: \bibitem[Downes et al.(2001)]{downes2001} Downes, G. et al. 2001, PASP, 113, 764
631:
632: \bibitem[Eracleous et al.(2002)]{eracleous2002} Eracleous, M. et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 207E
633:
634: % \bibitem[Foster (1995)]{foster1995} Foster, G. 1995, AJ, 109, 1889
635:
636: % \bibitem[Garnavich \& Szkody(1992)]{garnavich1992}Garnavich, P.M. and Szkody, P. 1992, AAVSOJ, 21, 81
637:
638: \bibitem[Groot et al.(2000)]{groot2000} Groot, P. J., Rutten, R. G. M., and van Paradijs, J. 2000, New Astro. Rev., 44, 137
639:
640: \bibitem[Hellier et al.(2000)]{hellier00} Hellier, C., Kemp, J.,
641: Naylor, T., Bateson, F.~M., Jones, A., Overbeek, D., Stubbings, R., \&
642: Mukai, K.\ 2000, \mnras, 313, 703 % EX Hya outburst
643:
644: \bibitem[Hellier et al.(1989)]{hellier89} Hellier, C., Mason,
645: .~O., Smale, A.~P., Corbet, R.~H.~D., O'Donoghue, D., Barrett, P.~E., \&
646: Warner, B.\ 1989, \mnras, 238, 1107 % EX Hya outburst spectra
647:
648: \bibitem[Hellier et al.(1997)]{hellier97} Hellier, C., Mukai, K.,
649: \& Beardmore, A.~P.\ 1997, \mnras, 292, 397
650:
651: \bibitem[Hessman et al.(1984)]{hessman84} Hessman, F.~V.,
652: Robinson, E.~L., Nather, R.~E., \& Zhang, E.-H.\ 1984, \apj, 286, 747
653:
654: %\bibitem[Hoard et al.(2003)]{hoard03} Hoard, D.~W., Szkody, P.,
655: %Froning, C.~S., Long, K.~S., \& Knigge, C.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 2473
656:
657: %\bibitem[Honeycutt, Livio, \& Robertson(1993)]{honeycutt1993}Honeycutt, R. K., Livio, M., \& Robertson, J. W. 1993, PASP, 105 922
658:
659: \bibitem[Honeycutt \& Kafka(2004)]{honeycutt04} Honeycutt, R.~K.,
660: \& Kafka, S.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 1279 % many VY Scl light curves.
661:
662: \bibitem[Horne et al.(1982)]{Horne1982}Horne, K., Lanning, H.H., and Gomer, R.H. 1982, Ap. J. 252, 681
663:
664: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{landolt92} Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340
665:
666: \bibitem[Lanning(1973)]{lanning1973} Lanning, H.H. 1973, PASP, 85 70
667:
668: \bibitem[Lanning \& Meakes(1998)]{lanning1998} Lanning, H.H. and Meakes, M. 1998, PASP, 110, 586
669:
670: \bibitem[Lanning \& Meakes(2000)]{lanning2000} Lanning, H.H. and Meakes, M. 2000, PASP, 112, 251
671:
672: %\bibitem[Leach et al.(1999)]{leach1999}Leach, R., Hessman, F. V., King, A.R., Stehle, R., \& Mattei, J. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 225
673:
674: \bibitem[Liu \& Hu(2000)]{liu00} Liu, W., \& Hu, J.~Y.\ 2000, \apjs, 128, 387
675:
676: %\bibitem[Martinez-Pais et al.(1999)]{martinez99} Martinez-Pais, I.G., Rodriguea-Gil, P., Casares, J. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 661
677:
678: %\bibitem[Norsworthy(1991)]{norsworthy1991} Norsworthy, J.E. 1991, AJ, 102, 272
679:
680: %\bibitem[Patterson et al.(2002)]{patterson02} Patterson, J., Fenton, W. H., Thorstensen, J.R., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 1364
681:
682: \bibitem[Patterson(1994)]{patterson94} Patterson, J.\ 1994, \pasp,
683: 106, 209
684:
685: %\bibitem[Patterson et al.(2002)]{patterson02} Patterson, J., et
686: %al.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 1364 % SWs may be magnetic
687:
688: \bibitem[Rodr{\'{\i}}guez-Gil et al.(2004)]{rodriguez04}
689: Rodr{\'{\i}}guez-Gil, P., G{\"a}nsicke, B.~T., Barwig, H., Hagen, H.-J., \&
690: Engels, D.\ 2004, \aap, 424, 647
691:
692: %\bibitem[Rodriguez-Gil et al.(2007)]{rodriguez2007}Rodriguez-Gil, P., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 1747
693:
694: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schlegel} Schlegel, D.~J.,
695: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
696:
697: \bibitem[Schmidtobreick(2003)]{schmidtobreick2003} Schmidtobreick, L., Tappert, C., Bianchini, A., and Mennickent, R. E. 2003, A\&A, 410, 943
698:
699: \bibitem[Schneider \& Young(1980)]{schyo} Schneider, D.~P.~\&
700: Young, P.\ 1980, \apj, 238, 946
701:
702: \bibitem[Schneider et al.(1981)]{schneider81} Schneider, D.~P.,
703: Young, P., \& Shectman, S.~A.\ 1981, \apj, 245, 644
704:
705: \bibitem[Shafter(1983)]{shaf} Shafter, A.~W.\ 1983, \apj, 267, 222
706:
707: \bibitem[Shafter et al.(1983)]{shafter1983} Shafter A.W., Lanning, H.H., Ulrich R.K 1983, PASP, 95, 206
708:
709: %\bibitem[Shafter et al.(1985)]{shafter85} Shafter, A.~W., Szkody,
710: %P., Liebert, J., Penning, W.~R., Bond, H.~E., \& Grauer, A.~D.\ 1985, \apj,
711: %290, 707
712:
713: \bibitem[Sheets et al.(2007)]{sheets07} Sheets, H.~A.,
714: Thorstensen, J.~R., Peters, C.~J., Kapusta, A.~B., \& Taylor, C.~J.\ 2007, \pasp, 119, 494
715:
716: %\bibitem[{\v S}imon(2000)]{simon00} {\v S}imon, V.\ 2000, \aap,
717: %360, 627 % DO Dra outburst stats
718:
719: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{stetsondao} Stetson, P.~B.\ 1987, \pasp,
720: 99, 191
721:
722: \bibitem[Thorstensen et al.(1991)]{thorstensen1991} Thorstensen, J.R., Ringwald, F. A.,
723: Wade, R. A., Schmidt, G.D., and Norsworthy, J.E. 1991, AJ, 102, 272
724:
725: \bibitem[Thorstensen et al.(1998)]{thorstensen98} Thorstensen, J.~R.,
726: Taylor, C.~J., \& Kemp, J.\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 1405
727:
728: \bibitem[Warner(1995)]{warner} Warner, B.\ 1995, Cambridge
729: Astrophysics Series, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press,
730: |c1995
731:
732: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2004)]{zacharias04} Zacharias, N., Urban,
733: S.~E., Zacharias, M.~I., Wycoff, G.~L., Hall, D.~M., Monet, D.~G., \&
734:
735: \end{thebibliography}
736:
737: %
738: % Begin tables
739: %
740:
741: \begin{deluxetable}{lcl}
742: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
743: \tablecaption{Known or Suspected Lanning CVs\label{lanningtable}}
744: \tablecolumns{13}
745: \tablewidth{0pt}
746: \tablehead{
747: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{Classification} & \colhead{Source}\\
748: }
749: \startdata
750: Lanning 10 & nl/ux & \citet{Horne1982}\\
751: Lanning 17 & n: & \citet{lanning1973}\\
752: Lanning 90 & ux & \citet{shafter1983}\\
753: Lanning 159\tablenotemark{a} & nl: & \citet{eracleous2002}\\
754: Lanning 302 & n: & \citet{lanning1998}\\
755: Lanning 386 & CV: & \citet{eracleous2002}\\
756: Lanning 420 & n: & \citet{lanning2000}\\
757: \enddata
758: \tablenotetext{a}{\citet{liu00} obtained a spectrum of Lanning
759: 159 that did not support a CV classification; one of us (JRT)
760: also obtained a
761: spectrum with the MDM 2.4 m, using the same MDM modspec
762: setup described in this paper, which at low signal-to-noise
763: shows H$\alpha$ in absorption with a profile resembling
764: a DA white dwarf.}
765: \end{deluxetable}
766:
767: % REVISED table from Steve -- 2007 Aug 22
768:
769: \begin{deluxetable}{crrc}
770: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
771: \tablecaption{Comparison Stars for Lanning 386\label{cmptable}}
772: \tablecolumns{4}
773: \tablewidth{0pt}
774: \tablehead{
775: \colhead{Star} &
776: \colhead{$\alpha_{2000}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
777: \colhead{$\delta_{2000}$} &
778: \colhead{V} \\
779: \colhead{} & \colhead{[hh:mm:ss]} & \colhead{[$^{\circ}$:$'$:$''$]} & \colhead{} \\
780: }
781: \startdata
782: A & 21:08:29.82 & 39:04:43.7 & 14.633 \\
783: B & 21:08:31.94 & 39:04:47.1 & 15.759 \\
784: C & 21:08:32.53 & 39:05:44.0 & 16.983 \\
785: D & 21:08:40.15 & 39:05:06.6 & 15.976 \\
786: \enddata
787: \tablenotetext{a}{Celestial coordinates are measured from MDM 2.4m images,
788: using a coordinate solution based on numerous UCAC2 stars \citep{zacharias04}.}
789: \end{deluxetable}
790:
791:
792: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccl}
793: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
794: \tablecaption{Log of Photometric Observations\label{photsumtable}}
795: \tablecolumns{13}
796: \tablewidth{0pt}
797: \tablehead{
798: \colhead{UT Date} & \colhead{Duration(hr)} & \colhead{Avg mag outside eclipse} & \colhead{Eclipse depth} & \colhead{Comments}\\
799: }
800: \startdata
801: % Data have been edited to add 0.4 to each magnitude -- JRT 2007 Aug 30
802: 2005 Sep 12 & 5.8 & 15.4 & 1.4 & Large amplitude outburst \\
803:
804: 2005 Sep 13 & 5.2 & 15.4 & 1.4 & Large amplitude outburst \\
805:
806: 2005 Sep 14 & 6.6 & 15.5 & 1.5 & Large amplitude outburst, Small hump?? \\
807:
808: 2005 Sep 22 & 6.6 & 17.3 & 1.2 & Quiet, Strong 0.3 mag hump \\
809:
810: 2005 Sep 24 & 6.0 & 17.3 & 1.4 & Quiet, Strong 0.4 mag hump \\
811:
812: 2005 Sep 25 & 6.6 & 17.4 & 1.2 & Quiet, Strong 0.4 mag hump \\
813:
814: 2005 Sep 28 & 6.5 & 17.4 & 1.5 & Quiet, Small 0.3 mag hump \\
815:
816: 2005 Oct 02 & 6.4 & 17.5 & 1.3 & Quiet, Strong 0.4 mag hump \\
817:
818: 2005 Nov 03 & 3.9 & 16.1 & 2.0 & Minor outburst \\
819:
820: 2005 Nov 08 & 3.7 & 17.4 & 1.6 & Quiet \\
821:
822: 2005 Nov 13 & 4.1 & 16.3 & 1.6 & Minor outburst, 0.3 mag hump \\
823:
824: 2006 Jul 10 & 5.8 & 16.9 & 2.0 & Quiet \\
825:
826: 2006 Jul 17 & 6.0 & 15.2 & 1.4 & Major outburst \\
827:
828: 2006 Jul 18 & 5.8 & 15.2 & 1.6 & Major outburst \\
829:
830: 2006 Jul 20 & 6.4 & 15.5 & 1.7 & Major outburst, fading \\
831:
832: 2006 Jul 24 & 5.7 & 17.0 & 2.1 & Quiet \\
833:
834: 2006 Aug 09 & 4.6 & 16.0 & 2.3 & Minor outburst \\
835:
836: 2006 Aug 10 & 7.4 & 16.2 & 2.0 & Minor outburst \\
837:
838: 2006 Aug 31 & 2.2 & 17.2 & 1.8 & Quiet \\
839:
840: 2006 Sep 01 & 5.8 & 17.2 & 1.2 & Quiet, 0.4 mag hump \\
841:
842: 2006 Sep 09 & 6.9 & 16.8 & 1.6 & Minor flare up or fading \\
843:
844: 2006 Sep 12 & 7.3 & 17.4 & 1.5 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
845:
846: 2006 Sep 13 & 6.7 & 17.3 & 1.5 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
847:
848: 2006 Sep 21 & 6.4 & 15.9 & 2.0 & Minor outburst \\
849:
850: 2006 Sep 22 & 6.4 & 16.3 & 1.9 & Minor outburst, fading \\
851:
852: 2006 Sep 25 & 6.7 & 17.5 & 1.3 & Quiet, Strong 0.5 mag hump \\
853:
854: 2006 Sep 27 & 4.3 & 17.4 & 1.4 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
855:
856: 2006 Sep 30 & 6.0 & 16.2 & 2.1 & Minor outburst \\
857:
858: 2006 Oct 03 & 6.6 & 16.8 & 1.9 & Minor outburst/ fading \\
859:
860: 2006 Oct 09 & 5.8 & 17.5 & 1.4 & Quiet, Strong 0.4 mag hump \\
861:
862: 2006 Oct 13 & 3.9 & 17.5 & 1.4 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
863:
864: 2006 Oct 22 & 6.0 & 17.7 & 1.0 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
865:
866: 2006 Nov 18 & 3.5 & 15.1 & 2.2 & Large amplitude outburst \\
867:
868: 2006 Nov 21 & 4.8 & 15.2 & 1.5 & Large amplitude outburst \\
869:
870: 2006 Nov 24 & 5.2 & 15.6 & 1.8 & Large amplitude outburst, fading \\
871:
872: 2006 Dec 03 & 4.3 & 17.2 & 1.4 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
873:
874: 2006 Dec 08 & 3.4 & 17.2 & 1.5 & Quiet \\
875:
876: 2006 Dec 09 & 3.0 & 17.2 & 1.5 & Quiet \\
877:
878: 2006 Dec 10 & 4.1 & 17.2 & 1.5 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
879:
880: 2006 Dec 11 & 3.1 & 17.2 & 1.5 & Quiet, 0.3 mag hump \\
881:
882: 2006 Dec 17 & 2.4 & 16.0 & 1.8 & Minor outburst \\
883:
884: 2006 Dec 19 & 2.6 & 17.3 & 1.4 & Quiet \\
885:
886: 2006 Dec 20 & 2.0 & 17.2 & 1.4 & Quiet, 0.2 mag hump \\
887:
888: 2006 Dec 21 & 2.0 & 17.2 & 1.4 & Quiet \\
889:
890: 2006 Dec 25 & 2.8 & 17.1 & 1.6 & Quiet
891:
892: \enddata
893: \end{deluxetable}
894:
895:
896: %\begin{deluxetable}{rrr}
897: %\tabletypesize{\normalsize}
898: %\tablecaption{Dominant frequencies from Fourier analysis.\label{freqs}}
899: %\tablecolumns{13}
900: %\tablewidth{0pt}
901: %\tablehead{
902: %\colhead{Frequency} & \colhead{Period} & \colhead{Amplitude}\\
903: %}
904: %\startdata
905: %$6.09537 \pm 0.00016$ & $0.164059 \pm 0.000004$ & $0.247 \pm 0.041$\\
906: %$12.19128 \pm 0.00016$ & $0.082026 \pm 0.000001$ & $0.254 \pm 0.041$\\
907: %$3.08371 \pm 0.00014$ & $0.324284 \pm 0.000015$ & $0.285 \pm 0.041$\\
908: %\enddata
909: %\end{deluxetable}
910:
911: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcccr}
912: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
913: \tablewidth{0pt}
914: \tablecolumns{6}
915: \tablecaption{Journal of Spectroscopic Observations\label{specjournal}}
916: \tablehead{
917: \colhead{Date} &
918: \colhead{$N$} &
919: \colhead{HA start} &
920: \colhead{HA end} &
921: \colhead{Instrument\tablenotemark{a}} &
922: \colhead{state} \\
923: \colhead{(UT)} &
924: \colhead{ } &
925: \colhead{[hh:mm]} &
926: \colhead{[hh:mm]} &
927: \colhead{ } &
928: \colhead{ } \\
929: }
930: \startdata
931: 2005 Jul 01 & 2 & $-$0:15 & $-$0:04 & mod & low\\
932: 2005 Sep 09 & 5 & +1:42 & +2:27 & mod & high\\
933: 2006 Aug 31 & 5 & $-$0:17 & +4:35 & mod & low\\
934: 2006 Sep 01 & 11 & $-$1:15 & +5:58 & mod & low\\
935: 2006 Sep 02 & 7 & $-$2:57 & $-$0:38 & mod & low\\
936: 2006 Nov 18 & 25 & $+$1:28 & $+$4:20 & RC & high\\
937: 2006 Dec 08 & 2 & +1:55 & +2:07 & CCDS & low \\ % HA is faked sligktly.
938: 2007 Mar 30 & 2 & $-$4:01 & $-$3:50 & mod & low\\
939: 2007 Apr 01 & 2 & $-$4:00 & $-$3:49 & mod & low\\
940: \enddata
941: \tablenotetext{a}{mod = MDM 2.4m Hiltner + modspec; RC = KPNO 4m Hiltner +
942: RC spectrograph; CCDS = MDM 2.4m Hiltner + CCDS}
943: \label{tab:obsjournal}
944: \end{deluxetable}
945:
946: \begin{deluxetable}{lccl}
947: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
948: \tablecaption{Observed Eclipses of Lanning 386\label{eclipsestable}}
949: \tablecolumns{13}
950: \tablewidth{0pt}
951: \tablehead{
952: \colhead{HJD(+2,450,000)} & \colhead{Epoch} & \colhead{O-C (sec)} & \colhead{UT Date}\\
953: }
954: \startdata
955: 3625.58669 $\pm$ 0.00044 & 0 & 0 & 2005 Sep 12 \\
956: 3625.75074 $\pm$ 0.00091 & 1 & 27 & 2005 Sep 12 \\
957: 3626.73505 $\pm$ 0.00041 & 7 & 59 & 2005 Sep 13 \\
958: 3627.55531 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 12 & 53 & 2005 Sep 14 \\
959: 3627.71936 $\pm$ 0.00044 & 13 & 40 & 2005 Sep 14 \\
960: 3635.59385 $\pm$ 0.00049 & 61 & 42 & 2005 Sep 22 \\
961: 3635.75790 $\pm$ 0.00156 & 62 & 31 & 2005 Sep 22 \\
962: 3637.56247 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 73 & 135 & 2005 Sep 24 \\
963: 3637.72652 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 74 & 77 & 2005 Sep 25 \\
964: 3641.66376 $\pm$ 0.00067 & 98 & 80 & 2005 Sep 28 \\
965: 3645.60100 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 122 & 15 & 2005 Oct 02 \\
966: 3677.59108 $\pm$ 0.00058 & 317 & 39 & 2005 Nov 03 \\
967: 3682.51263 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 347 & 77 & 2005 Nov 08 \\
968: 3687.59823 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 378 & 63 & 2005 Nov 13 \\
969: 3933.67578 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 1878 & 53 & 2006 Jul 17 \\
970: 3934.66010 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 1884 & 53 & 2006 Jul 18 \\
971: 3934.82415 $\pm$ 0.00021 & 1885 & 22 & 2006 Jul 18 \\
972: 3936.62872 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 1896 & 27 & 2006 Jul 20 \\
973: 3936.79277 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 1897 & 21 & 2006 Jul 20 \\
974: 3940.73001 $\pm$ 0.00352 & 1921 & 104 & 2006 Jul 24 \\
975: 3956.80707 $\pm$ 0.00159 & 2019 & 44 & 2006 Aug 09 \\
976: 3957.62733 $\pm$ 0.00098 & 2024 & 20 & 2006 Aug 10 \\
977: 3957.79138 $\pm$ 0.00056 & 2025 & 26 & 2006 Aug 10 \\
978: 3979.77431 $\pm$ 0.00067 & 2159 & 22 & 2006 Sep 01 \\
979: 3987.64879 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 2207 & -30 & 2006 Sep 09 \\
980: 3990.60172 $\pm$ 0.00002 & 2225 & 20 & 2006 Sep 12 \\
981: 3991.58603 $\pm$ 0.00517 & 2231 & -30 & 2006 Sep 113\\
982: 3991.75009 $\pm$ 0.00076 & 2232 & 39 & 2006 Sep 13 \\
983: 3999.62457 $\pm$ 0.00048 & 2780 & 302 & 2006 Sep 21 \\
984: 4000.60888 $\pm$ 0.00145 & 2286 & 18 & 2006 Sep 22 \\
985: 4003.56181 $\pm$ 0.0016 & 2304 & 36 & 2006 Sep 25 \\
986: 4003.72586 $\pm$ 0.00145 & 2305 & 40 & 2006 Sep 25 \\
987: 4005.53043 $\pm$ 0.00074 & 2316 & 79 & 2006 Sep 27\\
988: 4005.69448 $\pm$ 0.00123 & 2317 & 53 & 2006 Sep 27\\
989: 4008.64741 $\pm$ 0.00076 & 2335 & 36 & 2006 Sep 30\\
990: 4011.60034 $\pm$ 0.00087 & 2353 & 35 & 2006 Oct 03\\
991: 4017.50620 $\pm$ 0.00058 & 2389 & 46 & 2006 Oct 09\\
992: 4017.67026 $\pm$ 0.00102 & 2390 & 44 & 2006 Oct 09\\
993: 4022.59181 $\pm$ 0.0009 & 2420 & 48 & 2006 Oct 13\\
994: 4030.63034 $\pm$ 0.0018 & 2469 & -37 & 2006 Oct 22\\
995: 4057.53482 $\pm$ 0.00156 & 2633 & -3 & 2006 Nov 18\\
996: 4064.58904 $\pm$ 0.00035 & 2676 & 30 & 2006 Nov 24\\
997: 4072.46352 $\pm$ 0.00083 & 2724 & 72 & 2006 Dec 03\\
998: 4078.53344 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 2761 & 60 & 2006 Dec 09\\
999: 4079.51775 $\pm$ 0.00096 & 2767 & 29 & 2006 Dec 10\\
1000: 4089.52490 $\pm$ 0.002 & 2828 & 64 & 2006 Dec 20\\
1001: 4090.50921 $\pm$ 0.00107 & 2834 & 10 & 2006 Dec 21\\
1002: 4091.49352 $\pm$ 0.00091 & 2840 & 115 & 2006 Dec 21\\
1003: 4094.44645 $\pm$ 0.00077 & 2858 & 60 & 2006 Dec 24\\
1004: \enddata
1005: \end{deluxetable}
1006:
1007:
1008: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcc}
1009: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1010: \tablewidth{0pt}
1011: \tablecolumns{4}
1012: \tablecaption{Emission Lines in Quiescence}
1013: \tablehead{
1014: &
1015: \colhead{E.W.\tablenotemark{a}} &
1016: \colhead{Flux} &
1017: \colhead{FWHM \tablenotemark{b}} \\
1018: \colhead{Feature} &
1019: \colhead{(\AA )} &
1020: \colhead{(10$^{-16}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{1}$)} &
1021: \colhead{(\AA)} \\
1022: }
1023: \startdata
1024:
1025: H$\gamma$ & $ 27$ & $166$ & 28 \\
1026: HeI $\lambda 4471$ & $ 6$ & $ 31$ & 36 \\
1027: H$\beta$ & $ 46$ & $196$ & 30 \\
1028: HeI $\lambda 4921$\tablenotemark{c} & $ 8$ & $ 32$ & 36 \\
1029: HeI $\lambda 5015$\tablenotemark{c} & $ 7$ & $ 32$ & 46 \\
1030: FeII$\lambda 5169$ & $ 4$ & $ 17$ & 38 \\
1031: HeI $\lambda 5876$ & $ 10$ & $ 39$ & 26 \\
1032: H$\alpha$ & $ 65$ & $227$ & 32 \\
1033: HeI $\lambda 6678$ & $ 6$ & $ 20$ & 33 \\
1034: HeI $\lambda 7067$ & $ 6$ & $ 20$ & 37 \\
1035: \label{emissionlines}
1036: \enddata
1037:
1038: \tablenotetext{a}{Emission equivalent widths are counted as positive.}
1039: \tablenotetext{b}{From Gaussian fits.}
1040: \tablenotetext{c}{The $\lambda 4921$ and 5015 features are generally
1041: ascribed to HeI, but may include a contribution from \ion{Fe}{2}
1042: $\lambda\lambda 4924$ and 5018.}
1043:
1044: \end{deluxetable}
1045:
1046: \clearpage
1047:
1048: %
1049: % Begin figures
1050: %
1051:
1052: %\begin{figure}
1053: %\plotone{f1.eps}
1054: %\caption{Finder chart for Lanning 386 taken near maximum light with
1055: %the 0.25 m survey telescope. North is up and east to the left, and
1056: %the field of view is 5 arcmin square.}
1057: %\label{finder_close} \end{figure}
1058:
1059: \begin{figure}
1060: \plotone{f1.eps}
1061: \caption{
1062: A 60-second $V$-band image of Lanning 386 taken with the 2.4m MDM Hiltner telescope,
1063: 2007 June 24.93 UT, with Lanning 386 in quiescence. The scale and orientation are
1064: as indicated. A coordinate solution for this image based on numerous UCAC-2 stars
1065: \citep{zacharias04}
1066: puts Lanning 386 at $\alpha = 21^{\rm h} 08^{\rm m} 33^{\rm s}.97, +39^{\circ} 05' 35''.3$,
1067: referred to the ICRS (equinox 2000).}
1068: %are labeled as in Table \ref{cmptable}. North is up and east to the left in the figure.}
1069: %A POSS2 blue image covering 15'x15' field-of-view with Lanning 386 marked. The comparison stars
1070: %are labeled as in Table \ref{cmptable}. North is up and east to the left in the figure.}
1071: \label{finder_wide}
1072: \end{figure}
1073:
1074: \begin{figure}
1075: \plotone{f2.eps}
1076: \caption{Two nights of quiescent-state photometry folded on the orbital period.
1077: Note the prominent pre-eclipse hump. The observations are unfiltered, but calibrated
1078: to the Johnson $V$-band.}
1079: \label{quietobplot}
1080: \end{figure}
1081:
1082: \begin{figure}
1083: \plotone{f3.eps}
1084: \caption{Two nights in outburst folded on the orbital period.
1085: The observations are unfiltered, but calibrated to the Johnson $V$-band.}
1086: \label{outburstplot}
1087: \end{figure}
1088:
1089: \begin{figure}
1090: \plotone{f4.eps}
1091: \caption{All photometric observations folded on the orbital period. Note how the
1092: eclipse depth does not vary significantly with brightness. Lanning~386 could be
1093: found at nearly any brightness between $V=17.4$ and 15.2 in 2005-2006. }
1094: \label{allplot}
1095: \end{figure}
1096:
1097: \begin{figure}
1098: \plotone{f5.eps}
1099: \caption{Histogram of the median magnitude for each date with observations in 2005-2006.
1100: The star is most often found in a broad quiescent state between $V\approx 17.4$ and 16.7 mag,
1101: but there are frequent bright outbursts to $V\approx 15.2$ mag. Eclipse data are included,
1102: and on a few nights the median magnitude corresponds to eclipse (see Figure \ref{detailplot}).
1103: }
1104: \label{histplot}
1105: \end{figure}
1106:
1107: \begin{figure}
1108: \plotone{f6.eps} % provisional -- from PDF. Need a real postscript.
1109: \caption{Nightly median magnitudes of Lanning 386, showing the irregular outbursts
1110: and intermediate states of Lanning~386. The computation of the medians excluded
1111: individual magnitudes taken in eclipse.}
1112: \label{detailplot}
1113: \end{figure}
1114:
1115: \begin{figure}
1116: %\plotone{../decompspec.eps}
1117: \plotone{f7.eps}
1118: \caption{{\it Top trace: } The mean spectrum of Lanning 386 in the low
1119: state, from MDM Modspec observations. {\it Bottom trace:} A spectrum
1120: of the M3.5e dwarf Gliese 388, scaled to
1121: $f_\lambda (6500\ {\rm \AA}) = 6 \times 10^{-17}$
1122: erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \AA $^{-1}$ to approximately
1123: match the M-dwarf contribution in Lanning 386. {\it Middle trace}
1124: The difference of the top trace and the bottom trace.}
1125: \label{decompspec}
1126: \end{figure}
1127:
1128:
1129: \begin{figure}
1130: \plotone{f8.eps}
1131: \caption{{\it Top two traces:} The average of KPNO spectra taken outside eclipse
1132: (top) plotted with the spectrum during eclipse (middle) and an MDM CCDS spectrum
1133: taken at quiescence (bottom). The spectrum in the bright state shows a
1134: very blue continuum outside of eclipse. In the bright state, Balmer
1135: emission lines, emission lines of \ion{He}{1} and \ion{He}{2} and
1136: broad emission from \ion{C}{4} are visible. In quiescence, no high
1137: excitation lines are detected. }
1138: \label{spec1plot}
1139: \end{figure}
1140:
1141: \begin{figure}
1142: % \epsscale{0.70}
1143: \epsscale{0.68}
1144: %\plotone{singletrail.eps}
1145: \plotone{f9.eps}
1146: \caption{
1147: Phase-averaged greyscale representations of the MDM Modspec low-state
1148: spectra (top two panels) and the KPNO high-state spectra (lower two panels).
1149: In the top of each image pair the greyscale is selected to make the details of
1150: the strong lines visible, while the lower image is scaled to show the fainter
1151: features. The procedure used
1152: to create this is described in the text. Blank horizontal bars appear
1153: where there are no spectra close enough in phase to include, and other
1154: horizontal features are mostly from inadequate phase coverage, except for the
1155: eclipse, which is the low signal-to-noise stripe at phase 1. The
1156: apparent increase of the emission strength through eclipse is an artifact of the
1157: normalization used.
1158: }
1159: \label{singletrail}
1160: \end{figure}
1161:
1162: \begin{figure}
1163: \epsscale{1.0}
1164: %\plotone{../velfolpl.eps}
1165: \plotone{f10.eps}
1166: \caption{Radial velocities of H$\alpha$ from the MDM Modpsec and KPNO
1167: 4m, folded using the eclipse ephemeris. The solid triangles are the
1168: KPNO high-state data; the X-crosses are from 2005 Sep high-state
1169: spectra; the remainder were all taken in the low state, and the
1170: symbols denote different observing runs as follows: plus-signs = 2005
1171: July; solid squares = 2006 Aug/Sep; open circles = 2007 Mar/Apr. All
1172: the velocities are re-plotted for a second cycle to preserve
1173: continuity. Note the prominent rotational disturbance around the
1174: eclipse phase.
1175: }
1176: \label{folvel}
1177: \end{figure}
1178:
1179:
1180:
1181: %
1182: %\begin{figure}
1183: %\plotone{f4.eps}
1184: %\caption{Power spectrum for $3.0 < f < 20.0$ cycles/day from the CLEANest algorithm \citep{foster1995}.
1185: %The arrows mark the orbital period at 6.095 cycles/day and harmonic frequencies
1186: %at 12.19 and 3.084 cycles/day.}
1187: %\label{power}
1188: %\end{figure}
1189: %
1190: %\begin{figure}
1191: %\plotone{f10.eps}
1192: %\caption{Average of four spectra taken near phase 0.75 showing inverse P-Cygni absorption for
1193: %all the \ion{He}{1} lines and for Balmer lines starting with H$\delta$. The feature at 517.5~nm
1194: %identified as \ion{Mg}{1} is present in the spectrum at this phase.}
1195: %\label{spec2plot}
1196: %\end{figure}
1197: %
1198: \end{document}
1199: