1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% this is to be used for submission
3:
4: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
5:
6: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7:
8: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
9:
10: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
13: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
14: %% the \begin{document} command.
15: %%
16: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
17: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
18: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
19: %% for information.
20:
21: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
22: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
23:
24: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
25:
26: \slugcomment{accepted by ApJS}
27:
28: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
29: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
30: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
31: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
32: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
33: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
34:
35: \shorttitle{SXDS Optical Catalogs}
36: \shortauthors{Furusaswa et al.}
37:
38: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
39: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
44: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
45: %% you desire.
46:
47: \title{
48: The Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS) - II. Optical Imaging and Photometric Catalogs
49: \footnote{Based on data collected at Subaru Telescope, which is operated
50: by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.}
51: }
52:
53: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
54: %% author and affiliation information.
55: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
56: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
57: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
58: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
59:
60: \author{Hisanori Furusawa\altaffilmark{1},
61: George Kosugi\altaffilmark{2},
62: Masayuki Akiyama\altaffilmark{1},
63: Tadafumi Takata\altaffilmark{2},
64: Kazuhiro Sekiguchi\altaffilmark{2},
65: Ichi Tanaka\altaffilmark{1},
66: Ikuru Iwata\altaffilmark{3},
67: Masaru Kajisawa\altaffilmark{2},
68: Naoki Yasuda\altaffilmark{4},
69: Mamoru Doi\altaffilmark{5},
70: Masami Ouchi\altaffilmark{6,7},
71: Chris Simpson\altaffilmark{8},
72: Kazuhiro Shimasaku\altaffilmark{9,10},
73: Toru Yamada\altaffilmark{11},
74: Junko Furusawa\altaffilmark{1},
75: Tomoki Morokuma\altaffilmark{2},
76: Catherine M. Ishida\altaffilmark{1},
77: Kentaro Aoki\altaffilmark{1},
78: Tetsuharu Fuse\altaffilmark{1},
79: Masatoshi Imanishi\altaffilmark{2},
80: Masanori Iye\altaffilmark{2},
81: Hiroshi Karoji\altaffilmark{2},
82: Naoto Kobayashi\altaffilmark{5},
83: Tadayuki Kodama\altaffilmark{2},
84: Yutaka Komiyama\altaffilmark{1,2},
85: Yoshitomo Maeda\altaffilmark{12},
86: Satoshi Miyazaki\altaffilmark{1,2},
87: Yoshihiko Mizumoto\altaffilmark{2},
88: Fumiaki Nakata\altaffilmark{2},
89: Jun'ichi Noumaru\altaffilmark{1},
90: Ryusuke Ogasawara\altaffilmark{2},
91: Sadanori Okamura\altaffilmark{9,10},
92: Tomoki Saito\altaffilmark{13},
93: Toshiyuki Sasaki\altaffilmark{1},
94: Yoshihiro Ueda\altaffilmark{14},
95: and Michitoshi Yoshida\altaffilmark{3}
96: }
97: %\email{furusawa@subaru.naoj.org}
98:
99:
100: %\author{S. Djorgovski\altaffilmark{1,2,3} and Ivan R. King\altaffilmark{1}}
101: %\affil{Astronomy Department, University of California,
102: % Berkeley, CA 94720}
103: %
104: %\author{C. D. Biemesderfer\altaffilmark{4,5}}
105: %\affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85719}
106: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}
107: %
108: %\and
109: %
110: %\author{R. J. Hanisch\altaffilmark{5}}
111: %\affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
112:
113: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
114: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
115: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
116: %% affiliation.
117:
118:
119: \altaffiltext{1}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, %
120: 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720 USA; furusawa@subaru.naoj.org}
121: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588 Japan}
122: \altaffiltext{3}{Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, National
123: Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 3037-5 Honjo, Kamogata, Asakuchi, Okayama
124: 719-0232 Japan}
125: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwa-no-Ha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582 Japan}
126: \altaffiltext{5}{Institute of Astronomy, School of Science, %
127: University of Tokyo, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588 Japan}
128: \altaffiltext{6}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
129: \altaffiltext{7}{Carnegie Fellow}
130: \altaffiltext{8}{Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD UK}
131: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Astronomy, School of Science, %
132: University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan}
133: \altaffiltext{10}{Reseach Center for the Early Universe, School of Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan}
134: \altaffiltext{11}{Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science,
135: Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578 Japan}
136: \altaffiltext{12}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510 Japan}
137: \altaffiltext{13}{Physics Department, Graduate School of Science,
138: Ehime University, 2-5 Bunkyou, Matsuyama,Ehime 790-8577 Japan}
139: \altaffiltext{14}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502 Japan}
140:
141: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
142: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
143: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
144: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
145: %% editorial office after submission.
146:
147: \begin{abstract}
148: %Please read ``IMPORTANT NOTICE'' carefully before preparing a manuscript.
149: We present multi-waveband optical imaging data obtained from observations of
150: the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS). The survey field, centered at
151: R.A. = $02^{h}18^{m}00^{s}$, decl. = $-05^{\circ}00'00''$, has been the
152: focus of a wide range of multi-wavelength observing programs spanning
153: from X-ray to radio wavelengths.
154: A large part of the optical imaging observations are carried out with Suprime-Cam on
155: Subaru Telescope at Mauna Kea in the course of Subaru Telescope ``Observatory Projects''.
156: This paper describes our optical observations, data reduction and
157: analysis procedures employed, and the characteristics of the data products.
158: A total area of 1.22 deg$^{2}$ is covered in five contiguous sub-fields,
159: each of which corresponds to a single Suprime-Cam field of view
160: ($\sim34'\times 27'$ ), in five broad-band filters $B, V, R_c, i', z'$ to
161: the depths of $B=28.4, V=27.8, R_c=27.7, i'=27.7$ and $z'=26.6$ ($AB, 3\,\sigma, \phi=2''$).
162: The data are reduced and compiled into five multi-waveband photometric
163: catalogs, separately for each Suprime-Cam pointing. The $i'$-band catalogs contain about 900,000 objects, making the SXDS catalogs one of the largest multi-waveband catalogs in
164: corresponding depth and area coverage.
165: The SXDS catalogs can be used for an extensive range of astronomical
166: applications such as the number density of the Galactic halo stars to the
167: large scale structures at the distant universe.
168: The number counts of galaxies are derived and compared with those of existing deep
169: extragalactic surveys.
170: The optical data, the source catalogs, and configuration files used to
171: create the catalogs are publicly available via the SXDS web page ({\tt
172: http://www.naoj.org/Science/SubaruProject/SXDS/index.html}).
173: \end{abstract}
174:
175: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
176: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
177: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
178: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
179:
180: \keywords{cosmology: observations --- large-scale structure of universe
181: --- galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies: photometry}
182:
183: %===================================================================================%
184: %===================================================================================%
185: \section{INTRODUCTION}\label{sec:intro} % Section 1
186: Understanding the formation and evolution processes of the individual
187: galaxy and the growth of the large scale structures (LSSs) in the universe
188: is one of the major goals in extragalactic astronomy today.
189: In the scheme of a typical $\Lambda$-CDM model, the growth of structures is
190: governed by the gravitational growth of initial fluctuations of dark matter.
191: The baryonic material cools in these dark matter structures and
192: grows through hierarchical clustering to galaxies and clusters of galaxies.
193: The subsequent evolution of galaxies is closely connected to their environments,
194: which, of course, relate to the LSSs, where those galaxies are located.
195: The ultimate goal of extragalactic surveys is to trace these evolutionary processes
196: by well-defined statistical galaxy samples.
197:
198: Optical imaging is arguably the cornerstone of any extragalactic
199: survey, since it provides identifications and positions of celestial
200: objects for follow-up spectroscopy. In recent years, there have been a
201: number of deep imaging survey projects which devote significant amounts
202: of telescope time, such as Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey
203: (GOODS: Giavalisco et al. 2004) and Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS: HST treasury
204: project: Feldmann et al. 2006; Scoville et al. 2007).
205: These surveys provide multi-waveband galaxy samples at faint magnitude.
206: Then, the photometric redshift techniques (Furusawa et al. 2000;
207: Bolzonella et al. 2000; Feldmann et al. 2006) are
208: frequently used to pre-select candidates for spectroscopy.
209:
210: Although a great deal of information can be obtained from the optical
211: data alone, the value of the data set grows significantly as data at
212: other wavelengths from other facilities are added. We therefore elected
213: to use a multi-wavelength approach for the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey
214: (SXDS; Sekiguchi et al. 2007, in preparation) from the very start,
215: ensuring that our chosen field would be accessible and suitable for
216: observations at all wavelengths.
217: An equatorial field, centered at R.A. =
218: $02^{h}18^{m}00^{s}$, decl. = $-05^{\circ}00'00''$ is chosen to tie up
219: with the deep X-ray observations with XMM-Newton observatory
220: (Ueda et al. 2007), and also due to the accessibility by all major
221: observatories, both existing and planned.
222: The major multi-wavelength observation programs on the SXDS field
223: (hereafter SXDF) include deep radio imaging with the VLA (Simpson et
224: al. 2006), sub-mm mapping with SCUBA (Coppin et al. 2006; Mortier et al.,
225: 2005), mid-infrared observations with Spitzer Space Telescope (Lonsdale
226: et al. 2003), deep near-infrared imaging with the UKIRT/WFCAM (Foucaud
227: et al. 2006; Dye et al. 2006; Lawrence et al. 2007), and the X-ray
228: observations with XMM-Newton observatory. Importantly, the survey field
229: of an infrared ultra deep survey (UDS; Foucaud et al. 2006) covering 0.77
230: square degrees as part of the UKIDSS project (Lawrence et al. 2007) is
231: centered on the SXDF.
232: It is expected that our extensive multi-wavelength data set will provide photometric
233: redshifts accurate to $\Delta z\lesssim 0.1$ over a wide range of
234: redshift, as well as detailed spectral energy distributions for the vast
235: majority of the objects in the field.
236:
237: The SXDS has been undertaken as a part of the Subaru Telescope
238: ``Observatory Projects'', in which a large amount of observing times are
239: devoted to carry out intensive survey programs by combining observing
240: times rewarded to builders and observatory staff of the Subaru
241: Telescope.
242: Note that Subaru Deep Field (SDF; Kashikawa et al. 2004) is another
243: observatory project, which targets on a field different from the SXDF.
244: The data set of the SDF is slightly deeper than the SXDF, but concentrates
245: on one-fifth narrower field than the SXDF.
246: Thus, these surveys complement each other and they can be used for a
247: wide variety of studies.
248:
249: In this paper, we describe the observation details and data reduction
250: and analysis of our optical imaging survey with the prime-focus camera on Subaru Telescope,
251: as well as the resultant data products.
252: A detailed description of the survey strategies, scientific objectives,
253: and multi-wavelength survey plans is given in a companion paper
254: (Sekiguchi et al., 2007 - Paper I, in preparation).
255: In Section~2, we describe optical imaging observations by
256: Subaru Telescope, and in Section~3 we explain the data reduction procedure
257: employed. We present creation of multi-waveband photometric catalogs
258: including object detection and aperture photometry in Section~4, and
259: calibrations of photometry and astrometry in Section~5.
260: In Section~6, we discuss characteristics of the catalogs such as
261: limiting magnitude, detection completeness, and number counts of
262: galaxies. The summary is given in Section~7. Throughout this paper,
263: all the magnitudes are expressed in the AB system unless otherwise mentioned.
264:
265:
266: %===================================================================================%
267: %===================================================================================%
268: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA}\label{sec:data} % Section 2
269: The optical imaging observations of the SXDF are carried out using
270: the prime-focus camera (Suprime-Cam; Miyazaki et al. 2002)
271: on Subaru Telescope in the period from September 2002 to September 2005.
272: Suprime-Cam is a $5\times2$ mosaic of ten MIT/LL buttable 2k$\times$4k CCD camera.
273: It has a $34'\times 27'$ field of view with a projected pixel scale of
274: 0.202 arcsec.
275: The layout of the pointings is arranged as a cross shape so that each of
276: the North-South and the East-West directions has an extent of $\sim 1.3$
277: deg (Figure~\ref{fig:pseudo-img}).
278: This corresponds to a field span of a transverse dimension of $\sim 75$
279: Mpc at $z\sim 1$ and $\sim 145$ Mpc at $z\sim 3$ in the comoving scale
280: for ($h, \Omega_M, \Omega_\Lambda)=(0.7, 0.3, 0.7$).
281: The coverage of the comoving volume is $\sim3.2\times 10^{7}$ Mpc$^{3}$ for $z=0-3$.
282: Table~\ref{tab:coords} lists field center coordinates of the five pointings.
283: Hereafter, the five pointings are referred to as $C$ (Center), $N$ (North),
284: $S$ (South), $E$ (East), and $W$ (West), with respect to their relative positions
285: on the sky.
286:
287: Observations of the SXDF are performed using five broad-band filters,
288: $B$, $V$, $R_c$, $i'$, and $z'$ to cover the entire wavelength range
289: observable with Suprime-Cam.
290: The transmission curves of the five filters employed in the SXDS, convolved with
291: the CCD sensitivities, reflectivity of the primary mirror, transmissions
292: of corrector lenses, and atmospheric transmission, are given in
293: Figure~\ref{fig:band}.
294: Also, given in Figure~\ref{fig:band} are the redshifted spectral energy
295: distributions (SEDs) of an early-type galaxy at $z=0.5$ and $1.2$ and a
296: late-type galaxy at $z=0.5$ and $5.0$ for references.
297: With photometric data sampled in the 5 bands, we can investigate color
298: properties of red passively evolving galaxies to $z\sim 1$ (see Kodama
299: et al. 2004; Yamada et al. 2005) and young star-forming galaxies at high
300: redshift such as lyman break galaxies (LBG) (Ouchi et al. 2004, 2005).
301: The observations used in this paper span observing runs over a period of 3 years.
302: A total of 160 hours are allocated to the SXDF imaging
303: observations as a part of Subaru Telescope ``Observatory Projects'' (see
304: also Kashikawa et al. 2004) combined with observatory staff times.
305: In addition to these times, we use 14 hours of the observing times
306: offered by the Supernova Cosmology Project (Doi et al. 2003; Lidman et
307: al. 2005), which add the total exposure time of the center and the west
308: pointings in the $i'$ band ({\it $i'$-C} and {\it $i'$-W}). Moreover, in
309: the course of another survey program for Ly$\alpha$ emitting galaxies
310: (Ouchi et al. 2005, 2007), 3 hours are devoted to the $V$-band
311: imaging. In total, 133 hours are used for on-source exposures for the
312: final data set described in this paper. The complete log of the
313: observations is given in Table~\ref{tab:log}.
314:
315: The coordinates of the five pointings are carefully chosen so that
316: the resultant images uniformly cover the entire SXDF, though
317: we analyze each of the pointings separately in the present study.
318: Also, to eliminate bad pixels, gaps between individual CCD chips and cosmic ray events,
319: circular dithering pattern is used for each pointing.
320: This dithering pattern employs a circular motion with radii of 60
321: to 120 arcsec around the center position of each pointing, combined with
322: slight offsets to the center positions of the circular motion.
323: As an example, the dithering pattern for the $R_c$ band
324: is plotted for each pointing in Figure~\ref{fig:dither}.
325:
326:
327: \section{DATA REDUCTION}\label{sec:reduc} % Section 3
328: The SXDS images obtained are processed using an in-house pipeline
329: software package (See Ouchi 2003). We use it in almost the same way that
330: successfully used for the SDF (Kashikawa et al. 2004).
331: This pipeline is based on a software package developed for
332: Suprime-Cam data reduction (Yagi et al. 2002) and several IRAF
333: tasks (geomap, geotran, etc.) are used in the process of a geometrical
334: transformation and alignment of final stacked images.
335: We use a standard mosaic-CCD data reduction procedure, which is briefly
336: summarized below.
337:
338: First, we apply a bias correction to the raw data.
339: The median count of the overscan region is computed for each line,
340: which represents a typical bias level at that line,
341: and this median count is subtracted from the counts in all the pixels in that line.
342: The overscan regions are trimmed after the bias subtraction.
343: We assign a flag number (-32768) to the saturated or detected bad pixels, and
344: these pixels are ignored in the following reduction processes.
345: Since pixels in the outside edges of each frame are likely to be
346: affected by noises which can not be corrected by the following
347: flatfielding process, they are also masked with the flag number.
348:
349: Flat frames are constructed from the normalized object frames taken
350: during the same observing run. We use more than 150 object frames to
351: create flat frames.
352: If the number of object frames is less than 150 frames, object frames
353: taken in different observing runs within 3 months or twilight flat
354: frames taken in the same run are combined
355: to increase the signal-to-noise ratios (S/Ns) of the flat frames for
356: that period.
357: The median value of the each pixel is used to create the flat frames.
358: Pixels which could be affected by bright objects and vignetting by the
359: auto-guider probe are flagged out before processing the flat frames.
360: Then, object frames are divided by the flat frames.
361: The peak-to-peak ratios of background levels over the entire
362: flat fielded frames are less than $2\%$.
363: We do not expect any significant systematic errors by the
364: flatfielding that affect accuracies of the following analyses.
365:
366: After the flatfielding process is done, the distortion correction is
367: applied to each frame using the 5-th order polynomial transformation
368: formula derived from Miyazaki et al. (2002).
369: The changes in shapes and sizes of objects in the frames due to the
370: distortion are negligible compared with the size of PSFs.
371: Each pixel is transformed so that the surface brightness of the pixel
372: is conserved, since the relative flux in each pixel has been already
373: corrected by the flatfielding process.
374: Positional displacement of objects along the perpendicular orientation
375: due to the atmospheric effect is also corrected at the same time.
376:
377: The sky background is subtracted from each distortion-free frame,
378: We divide an image into temporary meshes with $64\times 64$ pixels,
379: corresponding to 12.9 arcsec in one direction.
380: The mode of counts in each mesh
381: is adopted as the sky background levels after smoothed by a median
382: filter with a $3\times 3$ kernel.
383: This global sky subtraction should not affect photometric accuracies
384: of compact objects such as galactic stars and faint galaxies.
385: However, caution must be taken when we apply these values to
386: extended objects such as nearby galaxies with low surface brightness.
387:
388: The stacking of the images is performed for each of the pointings
389: separately in the following way.
390: First, we choose 100 to 200 unsaturated stellar objects with a peak flux
391: of $>500$ADU in each frame distributing evenly over the entire frame.
392: Second, we determine a reference frame of all the reduced frames.
393: For the other frames, relative positions and rotation ($\Delta x,
394: \Delta y, \Delta \theta$) and flux ratios to the reference frame are
395: determined based on a least square method using these stellar objects
396: commonly detected in the frames.
397: Third, for all the frames, the positional shifts and rotations
398: are corrected.
399: Here, we do not use frames which have the flux ratios of less than
400: $30\%$ of that of the reference frame.
401: Finally, all the frames are co-added by calculating flux-weighted
402: average values in each pixel with a 3-$\sigma$ clipping process.
403: The clipping process effectively removes cosmic rays and bad or saturated
404: pixels, and satellite trails etc., and should not affect the resulting
405: total fluxes of objects because the difference in counts among
406: frames with various seeing sizes is mostly within the 3-$\sigma$
407: threshold.
408:
409: After the co-adding of each band images, all the five-band ($B, V, R_c,
410: i', z'$) images are registered into identical positional
411: coordinates as we intend to execute multi-waveband aperture photometry.
412: The positional registration is performed by the geometrical
413: transformation by 3-rd order polynomials fitting using the positions of stellar
414: objects common to the co-added stacked images.
415: The r.m.s. deviation of residuals of transformed positions with respect to the
416: reference positions in the $R_c$-band images is approximately 0.1-0.15 arcsec.
417:
418: For each pointing, the geometrically matched images are smoothed
419: with Gaussian filters iteratively so that the PSF sizes of all the
420: images become the same as that in the worst image used in this study.
421: The PSF sizes of the resultant images are $0.80, 0.84, 0.82, 0.82$, and
422: $0.82$ arcseconds in {\it SXDS-C, SXDS-N, SXDS-S, SXDS-E}, and {\it SXDS-W},
423: respectively.
424:
425: Finally, regions with low S/Ns or those affected by saturation or
426: overflow of electrons are carefully checked and assigned as flagged
427: regions which are indicated in photometric catalogs.
428: The resultant PSF sizes and total usable areas of each pointing is
429: summarized in Table~\ref{tab:stacked}.
430:
431:
432: \section{MULTI-WAVEBAND PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS} % Section 4
433: We construct multi-waveband photometric catalogs of the objects
434: identified in the SXDF.
435:
436: \subsection{Object Detection}\label{sec:object_detection}
437: Object detection and photometry are performed using SExtractor version
438: 2.3.2 (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996).
439: Before performing the object detection and photometry, the outskirts of
440: the stacked images are trimmed in order to eliminate any failure such as
441: inappropriate estimation of sky levels and memory overflow during extraction of
442: objects by SExtractor due to a high noise level.
443: After trimming the outskirts, each individual image has similar size
444: of approximately $10,800\times 8,100$ pixels.
445: We use the detection criteria that at least five pixels which have
446: values of $> 2\sigma$ of sky background r.m.s. noise must be connected
447: in order to be included in our object list. Positions of detected
448: objects are translated to sky coordinates based on the astrometric
449: calibration which will be discussed in Section~\ref{sec:astr_calib}.
450:
451: \subsection{Aperture Photometry}\label{sec:apphot}
452: After the object detection is completed in one of the five bands, which
453: we call `detection band', multi-waveband aperture photometry is
454: carried out with SExtractor for the other four bands using the same
455: apertures at the same positions as those in the detection band.
456: We perform aperture photometry with fixed circular apertures ({\tt MAG\_APER}) of
457: $2$ and $3$ arcseconds in diameter, and variable elliptical apertures
458: ({\tt MAG\_AUTO} and {\tt MAG\_BEST}) utilizing the Kron's first moment scheme with
459: apertures' radii of $2.5\, r_\mathrm{Kron}$ (Kron 1980).
460: Measured fluxes of objects are converted into magnitude using the
461: photometric zeropoints, which will be described in Section~\ref{sec:photo_calib}.
462: The extracted magnitude is considered to be the asymptotic
463: total magnitude of galaxies, which should sample at least $94\%$
464: of flux of a galaxy (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996).
465: Other useful parameters for objects including shape, size, and
466: stellarity and so on, are also extracted by SExtractor at the same time.
467: All the object parameters which are listed in the catalogs are
468: summarized in Table~\ref{tab:catalog}.
469:
470: In this procedure, $B$-, $V$-, $R_c$-, $i'$-, and $z'$-selected multi-waveband catalogs
471: are created for each pointing separately, which means that each object
472: has measurements in the five bands ($B, V, R_c, i', z'$) in each
473: catalog. Thus 25 catalogs (= 5 pointings times 5 detection bands) in
474: total are created.
475:
476: \subsection{Flagged Areas}\label{sec:flags}
477: Although we have flagged out bad pixels from the image frame in the
478: reduction procedure, there still remain (1) areas strongly affected mainly by
479: overflow of electrons or envelopes of extended objects, and (2) areas
480: weakly affected by large halos from very bright stars or noisy regions.
481: In our catalogs, the objects which are located in these areas are
482: flagged 1 and 2, respectively.
483: Otherwise, the objects located in the clean area have a flag value of 0.
484:
485: The basic parameters used in the object detection and aperture
486: photometry are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:sexparam}.
487: The complete configuration files for SExtractor can be found at {\tt
488: http://www.naoj.org/Science/SubaruProject/SXDS/index.html}.
489: Note that we adopt default parameters of SExtractor for the source
490: extraction unless we do not find any problem with the output
491: values. The parameters adopted are suitable for extraction of moderate
492: to faint compact galaxies, and not heavily optimized to extraction of
493: extended objects or very faint objects. Thus the reliability of the current
494: catalogs for those objects should be regarded with some caution.
495:
496: \section{CALIBRATIONS}\label{sec:calib} % Section 5
497: \subsection {Photometric Calibration}\label{sec:photo_calib}
498: Photometric zeropoints in all the five bands are determined in the following way.
499: First, we compare our observation with the earlier calibrated
500: observations for the same overlapping field, which were made by the
501: Suprime-Cam instrument development team (Ouchi et al. 2001, 2004).
502: The southern half of our center pointing ({\it SXDS-C}) is
503: overlapped with the northern half of the image obtained by Ouchi et al. (2001).
504: They determined the photometric zeropoints in the Suprime-Cam band
505: system based on observations of photometric standard stars SA92 and SA95
506: for $B, V$ and $R_c$ bands and a spectrophotometric standard star SA95-42 for
507: $i'$ and $z'$ bands.
508:
509: We estimate the photometric zeropoints for our center pointing ({\it SXDS-C})
510: by comparing magnitudes ({\tt MAG\_AUTO}) of $\sim 200$ objects which
511: are commonly detected in the two images and have FWHMs of smaller than
512: 1.2 arcsec with a magnitude range of 20.0 to 24.0.
513: Then, we extend these zeropoints to the surrounding four pointings by
514: using objects in the overlapping areas in the same manner as for the
515: determination of the zeropoint for the {\it SXDS-C}.
516: In our catalogs, we list the instrumental magnitude obtained
517: in the Suprime-Cam band system. Hence, no transformation of magnitude
518: considering color terms of band responses are conducted.
519: The color terms between the Suprime-Cam band system and the standard
520: system are basically small -- for the reddest stars, of order 0.1 in the
521: $B,V,i',z'$ bands, and slightly large ($\sim0.3$) in the $R_c$ band.
522:
523: To test internal consistency of our zeropoint calibrations,
524: we examine colors of stellar objects in our photometric
525: catalogs and those computed by convolving typical
526: stellar SEDs covering the complete ranges of spectral types (Gunn \&
527: Stryker 1983) with Suprime-Cam response curves.
528: We find that it is necessary to apply corrections to the zeropoints
529: of $\Delta V=+0.03$ and $\Delta z'=+0.03$ for all the five pointings,
530: and $\Delta i'=+0.05$ and $+0.02$ for the South and East pointings
531: ({\it $i'$-S} and {\it $i'$-E}), respectively.
532: After these corrections are applied, the colors of the stellar objects
533: in our catalogs agree with those computed for the SEDs from
534: Gunn \& Stryker (1983) within $0.03$ mag in all the five bands
535: (Figure~\ref{fig:ccplot_gs}).
536: The systematic errors adjusted here may be due to relatively small
537: number of stellar objects used in the determination of the photometric
538: zeropoints.
539:
540: To ensure the accuracy of our zeropoints, we conduct CCD photometric
541: observations of a part of the SXDF in $B, R_c, i'$ and $z'$ bands
542: with the UH88-inch telescope at Mauna Kea on October 9 and 10, 2002.
543: We compare magnitudes of objects in $B, R_c, i'$ and $z'$ bands obtained
544: by the UH88-inch observations with our catalog values. We find that our
545: catalog values agree within 0.05 mag r.m.s. for $B$ and $R_c$ bands
546: and within 0.1 mag r.m.s. for $i'$ and $z'$ bands.
547: The relatively large difference seen in $i'$ and $z'$ bands are probably due
548: to the difference in the band responses between the UH88-inch system and
549: the Suprime-Cam system, and low S/Ns of shallow SXDS images used for
550: comparison with the UH88-inch data.
551: To confirm accuracy of the photometric zeropoints in the
552: $i'$ and $z'$ bands in our catalogs, follow-up observations are made for
553: the two bands with the 1.0-m telescope at the United States Naval
554: Observatory (USNO).
555: The observations at the USNO were performed on the photometric night of
556: December 3, 2004 in the course of photometric calibration for a high-$z$
557: supernovae search (Yasuda et al. 2007, in preparation).
558: We find that a systematic difference between zeropoints in our catalogs
559: and those determined by the USNO observation is as small as $0.03$ mag
560: r.m.s.
561:
562: Thus we conclude that the uncertainties of calibrated photometric
563: zeropoints of the SXDS images are $0.03-0.05$ mag r.m.s. The adopted
564: photometric zeropoints are listed in Table~\ref{tab:log}.
565:
566: \subsection {Astrometric Calibration}\label{sec:astr_calib}
567: Astrometric calibration is performed using $\sim$200 stars
568: with magnitude of $J_\mathrm{vega}<16.5$ derived from 2-MASS point
569: source catalogs (PSC; Cutri et al. 2003), in each of the five stacked
570: $R_c$-band images.
571: Since images in the other bands have been geometrically transformed,
572: the positions of objects detected on the images should coincide with
573: those found in the $R_c$-band images (see Section~\ref{sec:reduc}).
574: The world coordinates for the images are calculated for the $R_c$-band
575: images and written in the FITS headers of all the stacked images
576: with the IRAF tasks CCMAP and CCSETWCS.
577: The r.m.s. uncertainties of the determined coordinates across the FOV
578: with respect to the PSC positions are on the order of 0.2 arcsec in both
579: RA and Dec in each pointing (Table~\ref{tab:astmt}).
580: The positional error of the PSC is reported as $\sim 0.07$ arcsec.
581:
582: We examine possible systematic differences in the calculated world
583: coordinates between different pointings by using objects in the
584: overlapping areas of two pointings. Figure~\ref{fig:astmt_diff1} and
585: Figure~\ref{fig:astmt_diff2} show the differences in RA and Dec of
586: point-like objects with FWHMs $<1.2$ arcsec in the magnitude
587: range $R=20.5-24.0$ detected both in the {\it SXDS-C} image and other
588: surrounding images.
589: From the figures, the world coordinates assigned to each of the five
590: pointing images are in good agreement with one another with accuracy of
591: about 1 arcsec at the edges of the images.
592: The differences of the world coordinates between two pointings
593: studied here are thought to be for the worst cases,
594: since they are derived based on only the objects in the overlapping
595: areas which are located at the edge of each image.
596: Slopes and offsets in the residuals are seen in each panel of the figures.
597: These disagreements in the positions of objects between two overlapping
598: images come from possible tilts, offsets and/or difference in
599: geometrical scale of the world coordinate systems between the two images.
600: Residuals of distortion in the images and the atmospheric effect, which
601: have not been completely removed in the reduction process, may cause
602: the errors in determination of the world coordinate systems.
603: Nevertheless, the SXDS catalogs have a good enough positional accuracy
604: to perform follow-up spectroscopy.
605:
606: The astrometrically and photometrically calibrated images of the SXDS
607: in five bands ( $B, V, R_c, i', z'$) described in this section are
608: released via SXDS Web Page ({\tt http://www.naoj.org/Science/SubaruProject/SXDS/}).
609: The data set described in this paper is based on the data release 1 (DR1).
610: A complete history of the data release is summarized in the web site.
611: The raw image data are also available to the public via Subaru Telescope ARchives System
612: (STARS: {\tt https://stars.naoj.org}).
613:
614: %===================================================================================%
615: %===================================================================================%
616:
617: \section{PROPERTIES OF THE CATALOGS}\label{sec:properties_catalog} % Section 6
618:
619: \subsection{Galactic Extinction}\label{sec:galactic_extinction}
620: All the magnitudes listed in the catalogs are not corrected
621: for the Galactic extinction. The magnitude attenuation in each band
622: estimated for the central position ($02^{h}18^{m}00^{s},
623: -05^{\circ}00'00''$; J2000) based on Schlegel et al. (1998), assuming an
624: extinction curve with $R_V=A_V/E(B-V)=3.1$ is as follows: $A_B=0.091,
625: A_V=0.070, A_{R_c}=0.056, A_{i'}=0.044$, and $A_{z'}=0.031$.
626: Table~\ref{tab:gal_ext} summaries the magnitude attenuation in each band for all the pointings.
627: The Galactic extinction above must be taken into account when studying
628: extragalactic objects.
629:
630: \subsection{Limiting Magnitudes}\label{sec:limmag}
631: We examine 3-$\sigma$ limiting magnitudes measured for the
632: $2''$-diameter apertures in all five bands ($m_{lim}$ column in
633: Table~\ref{tab:log}) in the following manner. First, counts in unit of
634: ADU fallen into the $2''$-diameter apertures are measured at approximately
635: 10,000 positions randomly selected and spreading over the entire image.
636: Next, a histogram of the counts is produced and only the faint side of
637: the histogram is fit by the Gaussian function, as the bright-side tail
638: is composed of not only the sky background but also photons from the objects.
639: The $\sigma$ of the best-fit Gaussian is regarded as the
640: 1-$\sigma$ sky fluctuation of the image for the $2''$-diameter apertures.
641: We find that limiting magnitude in each band is $B=28.4, V=27.8,
642: R_c=27.7, i'=27.7$ and $z'=26.6$ ($AB, 3\,\sigma, \phi = 2''$)
643: in the deepest images of the five pointings.
644:
645: \subsection{S/N Distribution Map}\label{sec:snmap}
646: To examine the homogeneity of S/Ns of the SXDS data across the
647: entire field, we investigate the S/N distribution map in the $R_c$-band
648: images.
649: First, we calculate the sky fluctuation per $2''$-diameter aperture
650: within a mesh with a size of $350\times 350$ pixels at each position in
651: the same manner as in estimation of the limiting magnitudes.
652: The mesh is shifted with a step of 175 pixels to cover the entire field
653: of view.
654: Then, the fluctuations for the 2''-diameter aperture are converted to
655: S/Ns for objects with an $R_c$ magnitude of 27.5 at each position.
656:
657: Figure~\ref{fig:snmap} shows the S/N distribution maps for 27.5-mag
658: objects thus obtained for each pointing.
659: The contour lines superimposed on the figures represent S/N=3 positions.
660: First, we see that the brightest sources on the images significantly affect
661: the S/Ns around the sources. These areas are flagged in the catalogs.
662: Second, each image shows almost an axisymmetric pattern of the S/N
663: distribution when we ignore the low S/N areas due to the brightest sources.
664: This pattern reflects the vignetting of the prime focus.
665: Third, the pattern is slightly distorted for each image, probably due
666: to bright sources, vignetting by the auto-guider probe, difference in
667: the quantum efficiency among CCDs, and so on. However, the difference
668: in S/Ns between in such distorted areas and in clean areas with higher
669: S/Ns is on the order of 20\% at the maximum. This difference is
670: negligible in most studies even for faint sources. Thus, we can
671: securely utilize the data with quite homogeneous S/Ns across the field
672: of view.
673:
674: \subsection{Completeness and False Detection Rate}\label{sec:comp_false}
675: Completeness of the object detection as a function of magnitude
676: for each band and for each pointing is estimated. The detection completeness is
677: determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation by adding artificial
678: objects which have Gaussian profiles with their Poisson photon noise
679: into a stacked image used to create the catalogs and then detect them
680: again in the same manner as in creating catalogs. The detection rate
681: thus obtained is regarded as the detection completeness.
682: Here the artificial objects are added to random positions in the effective
683: area of the image. The FWHMs of the Gaussian profiles are set to be the
684: same as the PSF sizes representative of the images which are derived
685: from Table~\ref{tab:stacked}. The artificial objects contaminated by any
686: neighbor sources listed in the catalogs are removed in calculation of
687: the detection rate. If such blended objects are not removed from the
688: sample, the detection rate should slightly decrease. However, since the
689: contamination by neighbor objects leads to misidentification of the
690: artificial objects in the object detection process, we adopt the
691: approach which excludes the blended artificial objects, which was also
692: employed in Kashikawa et al. (2004).
693:
694: The completeness determined by this procedure is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:comp}
695: for all of the five bands. For the five pointings, the curves of the detection
696: completeness drop similarly with increasing magnitude.
697: We can summarize that the detection completeness in each image
698: is at approximately $50\%$ for objects with the 5-$\sigma$ magnitude and
699: $30\%$ for objects with the 3-$\sigma$ magnitude, with a slight difference
700: depending on the band.
701:
702: On the other hand, rates of the false object detection are also
703: estimated as a function of magnitude.
704: We generate negative images of each pointing and in each band by
705: multiplying all the counts of the stacked images by $-1$, and then perform
706: object detection for the negative images in the same manner as in creating
707: the catalogs.
708: In this process, detected objects are considered to be spurious objects.
709: Thus we define the false detection rate as the number of the spurious objects
710: divided by the total number of objects in the catalogs
711: in each magnitude bin, i.e., $N_\mathrm{spurious}(m)/N_\mathrm{total}(m)$ (Figure~\ref{fig:false}).
712: It is seen that a contribution of the false detection is negligible,
713: which does not exceed 0.5\% if any, in the magnitude range brighter
714: than the 3-$\sigma$ limiting magnitude.
715:
716:
717: \subsection{Magnitude Differences among the Catalogs}\label{sec:magdiff}
718: In the areas where two images overlap with each other,
719: a large fraction of objects are detected and their magnitudes are
720: measured in both of the pointings.
721: We can check systematic difference in magnitude of those objects
722: between the two catalogs.
723: Since photometric zeropoints of the catalogs
724: are determined so that {\tt MAG\_AUTO} of objects in the overlapping
725: areas should coincide between any two catalogs (see
726: Section~\ref{sec:photo_calib}), the magnitude difference in {\tt MAG\_AUTO} is
727: negligible. {\tt MAG\_BEST} should be identical to {\tt MAG\_AUTO} for
728: isolated objects.
729: Therefore magnitude differences only for the $2''$- and $3''$-diameter aperture
730: magnitudes are investigated in the following manner.
731:
732: First, we choose only compact objects with FWHMs $<1.2$ arcsec
733: which are listed in both the $z'$-selected catalog for {\it SXDS-C} and
734: that for another pointing which overlap with each other, then measure
735: the difference in magnitude of the objects by subtracting magnitude in the {\it SXDS-C}
736: catalog by that in the other. Then, we determine the offset in the
737: magnitude difference, i.e., systematic magnitude difference, by fitting
738: the magnitude difference for a range of 21.0 to 23.5 mag by a least
739: square method.
740: Table~\ref{tab:diff_magap} lists the systematic magnitude difference
741: thus obtained for the $2''$- and $3''$- diameter aperture magnitudes in each
742: band for each pair of catalogs.
743: We note that $2''$- and $3''$-diameter aperture magnitudes indicate
744: small systematic differences of $\leq 0.05$ mag between the catalogs.
745: We think that this difference is probably due to difference in the PSF
746: shape of the stacked images among the pointings.
747:
748: In order to see the effects of the systematic difference in the aperture
749: magnitudes, we plot differences in colors of objects between the
750: catalogs measured with the $2''$-diameter aperture magnitude
751: (Figure~\ref{fig:colordiff}). In this figure, for each of the four pairs
752: of catalogs, the differences in colors ($B-V, V-R_c, R_c-i', i'-z'$) are
753: plotted. We see the systematic difference in the $2''$-diameter aperture
754: colors of objects, which is no larger than $0.1$ mag, due to the difference
755: in the aperture magnitude between the catalogs.
756: Since the magnitudes in the catalogs are not adjusted for this
757: difference, the magnitude difference between the catalogs should be
758: taken into account in the case that the $2''$- or $3''$-diameter
759: aperture magnitude is used. For {\tt MAG\_AUTO} and {\tt MAG\_BEST}, which are
760: considered as asymptotic total magnitude, the magnitude difference is
761: negligible.
762:
763: In the same manner as mentioned above, the r.m.s. of the magnitude
764: differences for each band are calculated as a function of {\tt
765: MAG\_AUTO}, which shows no systematic difference.
766: Here the detection band for catalogs are chosen to be the same as the
767: band for which the magnitude difference is investigated. For instance,
768: to obtain the magnitude difference in the $B$ band, the $B$-selected
769: catalogs are used.
770: Again, only the objects with FWHMs $<1.2$ arcsec are used for
771: measurement of the magnitude difference.
772: The r.m.s. of magnitude differences measured in the above way are shown
773: in Figure~\ref{fig:magdiff_random} for each band. It is seen that the
774: r.m.s. steadily increases with increasing magnitude.
775: The r.m.s. of the magnitude difference can be converted into random
776: magnitude error by dividing it by $\sqrt2$.
777: We find that the magnitude errors thus estimated are entirely consistent
778: with those expected from our calculation of the limiting magnitude
779: discussed in Section~\ref{sec:limmag}.
780: Note that the magnitude errors listed in our catalogs are computed
781: by SExtractor assuming the simple Poisson statistics for the sky
782: background fluctuations.
783: The sky background noises measured in photometry apertures for the
784: stacked images are likely to be larger than those estimated by
785: SExtractor. Therefore the magnitude errors in the catalogs are
786: underestimates and are not suitable for immediate analysis such as SED
787: fitting and photo-$z$ estimation.
788:
789: \subsection{Number Counts of Galaxies}\label{sec:nm}
790: To examine the characteristics of the catalogs we compare the number
791: counts of galaxies with data from previous surveys.
792:
793: We calculate the number counts of galaxies by correcting our
794: raw counts of detected objects against the detection completeness
795: estimated in Section~\ref{sec:comp_false}.
796: The detailed studies of density fluctuations of galaxies based on the
797: number counts or luminosity functions of galaxies can be
798: found in elsewhere (e.g., Yamada et al. 2005).
799: Star/galaxy separation is conducted based on FWHM and $2''$-diameter
800: fixed aperture magnitude of the objects, for which the effect of the
801: Galactic extinction (Table~\ref{tab:gal_ext}) is corrected. The
802: criteria for the separation is determined so that both objects which
803: have sizes as same as PSF of the images and saturated objects are
804: effectively removed.
805: For fainter magnitudes ($>22.5-23$ mag), no separation is performed
806: since a large fraction of galaxies have small sizes similar to those of
807: stars, and contribution to the number count by stars is small at
808: the faint magnitudes.
809: The criteria for the separation adopted is summarized in Table~\ref{tab:sgsep}.
810:
811: The results of the number counts of galaxies are as follows:
812: First, internal comparison of the number counts among the five pointings
813: of the SXDS are shown for each band in Figure~\ref{fig:nm_b} to Figure~\ref{fig:nm_z}.
814: In each figure, raw number counts of the galaxy samples extracted by
815: the star/galaxy separation process above are plotted with open symbols.
816: Effective areas used to calculate the number counts per unit area are
817: given in Table~\ref{tab:stacked}.
818: The number counts of galaxies which are corrected for the detection
819: completeness are also superimposed with filled symbols.
820: Here, the correction is performed by using the detection completeness as
821: a function of magnitude which has been estimated for the Gaussian
822: profiles, i.e.,
823: $N(m)_\mathrm{corrected}=N(m)_\mathrm{observed}/ completeness(m)$.
824: Error bars are calculated on the assumption of simple Poisson noise.
825: We can say that no large systematic difference is seen in
826: the superposition of the number counts of galaxies among the five
827: pointings in $B, V$, and $R_c$ bands down to the 3-$\sigma$ magnitudes.
828: Similarly, in the other two bands, the number counts are consistent
829: with one another among the five pointings within the Poisson
830: errors at magnitudes brighter than $\sim 25$ mag.
831: However, differences in the number counts
832: at fainter magnitudes are found by a factor of 1.4 in the $i'$ band and
833: 1.7 in the $z'$ band.
834: This might be partly due to the field-to-field variation in the number
835: counts of galaxies. However, since we have used only the Gaussian profiles
836: with FWHM$\sim 0.8$ arcsec in the simulation of the detection completeness,
837: the completeness is likely to be overestimated at a
838: faint magnitude range where most objects have extended profiles.
839: So, we cannot conclude that the differences in the number counts at
840: the faint end seen in the $i'$ and $z'$ bands indicates the
841: field-to-field variation.
842:
843: Next, the number counts in the SXDF are compared with results by previous
844: surveys (Figure~\ref{fig:nm_mean_b} to Figure~\ref{fig:nm_mean_z}).
845: Here, we calculate mean number counts of galaxies corrected for the
846: detection completeness for the entire SXDF using the above sample for
847: the five pointings, and plot them with filled circles with error
848: bars. The error bars are again based on the Poisson noise.
849: The results in other surveys are derived from Kashikawa et al. (2004),
850: Capak et al. (2007), and Metcalfe (2007)\footnote{\tt http://star-www.dur.ac.uk/\~{}nm/pubhtml/counts/counts.html} and the references cited therein.
851: A complete list of references compared in the figures is as follows:
852: SDF -- Kashikawa et al. 2004, HDFs/WHDFs -- Metcalfe et al. 2001,
853: Arnouts99 -- Arnouts et al. 1999, SDSS -- Yasuda et al. 2001, CADIS -- Huang
854: et al. 2001, Kummel\&Wagner01 -- K\"{u}mmel \& Wagner 2001, Tyson88 -- Tyson
855: 1988, Arnouts01 -- Arnouts et al. 2001, Capak04 -- Capak et al. 2004,
856: Smail95 -- Smail et al. 1995, SH93 -- Steidel \& Hamilton 1993, Hogg97 -- Hogg
857: et al. 1997, COSMOS -- Capak et al. 2007, Postman98 -- Postman et al. 1998,
858: Lilly91 -- Lilly, Cowie, \& Gardner 1991.
859:
860: From the comparison of the number counts among various surveys,
861: we understand that our sample is consistent with results in other
862: surveys for blank fields for the following reasons. First, the mean
863: number counts of the SXDS show a good agreement with those from
864: previous surveys down to magnitude where the number counts start to turn off.
865: Second, it reproduces the faint-end data points
866: derived from Hubble Deep Field (HDF). Again, the detection completeness
867: simulated with the Gaussian profiles might cause a slightly large
868: uncertainty of the corrected number counts at the faint end in each band.
869: Thus, we conclude that the SXDS catalogs in the present study have
870: characteristics similar to those in previous surveys and can be applied
871: to general statistical studies on faint objects ranging from Galactic
872: objects to high-redshift galaxies.
873:
874: We would like to mention how the Poisson error on the number counts is
875: decreased by increase of the survey area.
876: Figure~\ref{fig:poisson} shows a comparison of the Poisson error
877: associated with the number counts of galaxies among three surveys which
878: are based on different survey areas, namely the HDF-North (5.3 arcmin$^2$),
879: GOODS-North (170 arcmin$^2$) and Suprime-Cam 1 FOV (918 arcmin$^2$). The
880: uncertainty in the number counts due to the Poisson error is shown
881: with a pair of lines for each of the surveys. For reference, the number
882: count of SXDS is superimposed with a thick solid line.
883: From the figure, we clearly see that the Poisson error decreases with
884: increasing survey area. In particular, at the bright magnitudes of
885: $21-23$ mag, a large uncertainty by a factor of $>3$ in the number
886: count is found for the HDF-North area (dotted lines). For the same
887: magnitude range, the uncertainty for a field of view of Suprime-Cam
888: (dot-and-dash lines) is $8-15$ times as small as that for the HDF-North
889: area and $1.5-2.5$ times as small as that for the GOODS-North area.
890: Even at the faintest magnitudes of $>27$ mag, a significant difference
891: in the uncertainty from one to another survey area is seen.
892: Thus it is emphasized that the SXDS data, which consists of five
893: pointings of Suprime-Cam field of view, is a useful data set for studies
894: on celestial objects which dominate a large fraction of the number
895: counts without suffering from the Poisson error and the field-to-field
896: variation as well, e.g., a study of evolution of the LSSs.
897:
898: \section{SUMMARY} % Section 7
899: The optical imaging observations of the SXDS project are carried out using
900: the Suprime-Cam on Subaru Telescope in $B, V, R_c, i'$ and $z'$ bands.
901: The SXDF has a contiguous area coverage of $\sim$1.2 deg$^{2}$, which
902: consists of five Suprime-Cam pointings.
903:
904: The photometric zeropoints are determined with an absolute accuracy of
905: no larger than 0.05 mag r.m.s. in the photometry.
906: The r.m.s. of the astrometric accuracies across the field is
907: on the order of 0.2 arcsec in both RA and Dec. The systematic
908: differences in the adopted world coordinates between different pointings
909: are within about 1 arcsec at the outer edge of the field of view. Thus,
910: our SXDS catalogs have a good enough positional accuracies to perform
911: follow-up spectroscopy.
912:
913: Multi-waveband photometric catalogs of detected objects are created for
914: each band and for each pointing. Each of the catalogs contains more than
915: a hundred sixty thousand of objects. The catalogs have quite
916: homogeneous S/Ns across the field.
917: The achieved limiting magnitudes in each band are $B=28.4, V=27.8,
918: R_{c}=27.7, i'=27.7$ and $z'=26.6$ ($AB, 3\,\sigma, \phi = 2''$).
919:
920: The detection completeness as a function of magnitude is estimated by
921: a Monte-Carlo simulation assuming a Gaussian profile. The number counts
922: of galaxies in the SXDF in each band are computed by correcting
923: the detection completeness, which are consistent with each other among
924: the five pointings with a slight difference at faint magnitudes. The
925: mean number counts of galaxies averaged over the five pointings show
926: a good agreement with results from previous surveys down to the faint-end
927: magnitude.
928:
929: With the aid of the wide coverage area of SXDS data, the uncertainty of
930: the number counts of galaxies due to the Poisson error is greatly decreased.
931: It is emphasized that the SXDS data is extremely useful for pursuing
932: studies on celestial objects spreading in a wide field without suffering
933: from the Poisson error and the field-to-field variation.
934: The SXDS catalogs can be applied to studies, scientific objectives of
935: which range from the Galactic objects to the large scale structures of
936: the universe.
937:
938: The optical data, the compiled photometric catalogs, and configuration
939: files used to create the catalogs have been released to the
940: public and can be retrieved from the public data archives server of National
941: Astronomical Observatory of Japan, {\tt http://www.naoj.org/Science/SubaruProject/SXDS/index.html}.
942:
943:
944: \smallskip
945:
946: Acknowledgments
947:
948: We thank Dr. Masafumi Yagi for his kind suggestions in analyzing the data based
949: on the software package developed by himself. We thank Dr. Nobunari Kashikawa for
950: fruitful discussions. The anonymous referee would also be appreciated for his/her
951: constructive suggestions.
952: We would like to convey our gratitude to the Subaru Telescope
953: builders and staff for their invaluable help to complete the observing
954: run with Suprime-Cam.
955: Data reduction/analysis in this work was in part carried out on "sb"
956: computer system operated by the Astronomical Data Center (ADC) and
957: Subaru Telescope of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. Use
958: of the UH 2.2-m telescope for the observations is supported by NAOJ.
959:
960:
961: \begin{thebibliography}{}
962: \bibitem[Arnouts et al. (1999)]{Arnouts99}
963: Arnouts, S., D'Odorico, S., Cristiani, S., Zaggia, S., Fontana, A., \&
964: Giallongo, E. 1999, A\&A, {\bf 341}, 641
965:
966: \bibitem[Arnouts et al. (2001)]{Arnouts01}
967: Arnouts, S. et al. 2001, A\&A, {\bf 379}, 740
968:
969: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts (1996)]{Bertin96}
970: Bertin, E. \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, {\bf 117}, 393
971:
972: \bibitem[Bolzonella et al. (2000)]{Bolzonella00}
973: Bolzonella, M., Miralles, J.-M., Pell\'{o}, R. 2000, A\&A, {\bf 363}, 476
974:
975: \bibitem[Capak et al. (2004)]{Capak04}
976: Capak, P. et al. 2004, AJ, {\bf 127}, 180
977:
978: \bibitem[Capak et al. (2007)]{Capak07}
979: Capak, P. et al. 2007, \apjs, {\bf 172}, 99
980:
981: \bibitem[Coppin et al. (2006)]{Copping06}
982: Coppin, K. et al. 2006, MNRAS, {\bf 372}, 1621
983:
984: \bibitem[Cutri et al. (2003)]{Cutri03)}
985: Cutri, R. M. et al. 2003, VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246 (Originally published in University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC/California Institute of Technology))
986: %The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive
987:
988: \bibitem[Dye et al. (2006)]{Dye06}
989: Dye, S. et al. 2006, \mnras, {\bf 372}, 1227
990:
991: \bibitem[Doi (2003)]{Doi03}
992: Doi, M. et al. 2003, IAU Circ., {\bf 8119}, 1
993: % Edited by Green, D. W. E. 04/2003
994:
995: \bibitem[Feldmann et al. (2006)]{Feldmann06}
996: Feldmann, R. et al. 2006, \mnras, {\bf 372}, 565
997:
998: \bibitem[Foucaud et al. (2007)]{Foucaud07}
999: Foucaud, S. et al. 2007, \mnras, {\bf 376}, L20
1000:
1001: \bibitem[Furusawa et al. (2000)]{Furusawa00}
1002: Furusawa, H., Shimasaku, K., Doi, M., \& Okamura, S. 2000, \apj, {\bf 534}, 624
1003:
1004: \bibitem[Giavalisco et al. (2004)]{Giavalisco04}
1005: Giavalisco, M. et al. 2004, \apj, {\bf 600}, L93
1006:
1007: \bibitem[Gunn \& Stryker (1983)]{Gunn83}
1008: Gunn, J. E. \& Stryker, L. L. 1983, \apjs, {\bf 52}, 121
1009:
1010: \bibitem[Hogg et al. (1997)]{Hogg97}
1011: Hogg, D. W., Pahre, M. A., McCarthy, J. K., Cohen, J. G., Blandford, R., Smail, I., Soifer, B. T. 1997, \mnras, {\bf 288}, 404
1012:
1013: \bibitem[Huan et al. (2001)]{Huang01}
1014: Huang, J.-S. et al. 2001, A\&A, {\bf 368}, 787
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Kashikawa et al. (2004)]{Kashikawa04}
1017: Kashikawa, N. et al. 2004, PASJ, {\bf 56}, 1011
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Kodama et al. (2004)]{Kodama04}
1020: Kodama, T. et al. 2004, \mnras, {\bf 350}, 1005
1021:
1022: \bibitem[Kron (1980)]{Kron80}
1023: Kron, R. G. 1980, \apjs, {\bf 43}, 305
1024:
1025: \bibitem[Kummel \& Wagner (2001)]{Kummel01}
1026: K\"{u}mmel, M. W. \& Wagner, S. J. 2001, A\&A, {\bf 370}, 384
1027:
1028: \bibitem[Lawrence et al. (2007)]{Lawrence07}
1029: Lawrence, A. et al. 2007, \mnras, {\bf 379}, 1599
1030:
1031: \bibitem[Lidman et al. (2005)]{Lidman2005}
1032: Lidman, C. et al. 2005, A\&A, {\bf 430}, 843
1033:
1034: \bibitem[Lilly et al. (1991)]{Lilly91}
1035: Lilly, S. J., Cowie, L. L., \& Gardner, J. P. 1991, \apj, {\bf 369}, 79
1036:
1037: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al. (2003)]{Lonsdale03}
1038: Lonsdale, C. J. et al. 2003, \pasp, {\bf 115}, 897
1039:
1040: \bibitem[Metcalfe et al. (2001)]{Metcalfe01}
1041: Metcalfe, N., Shanks, T., Campos, A., McCracken, H. J., \& Fong, R. 2001, \mnras, {\bf 323}, 795
1042:
1043: \bibitem[Miyazaki et al. (2002)]{Miyazaki04}
1044: Miyazaki, S. et al. 2002, PASJ, {\bf 54}, 833
1045:
1046: \bibitem[Mortier et al. (2005)]{Mortier05}
1047: Mortier, A. M. J. et al. 2005, \mnras, {\bf 363}, 563
1048:
1049: \bibitem[Ouchi et al. (2001)]{Ouchi01}
1050: Ouchi, M. et al. 2001, \apj, {\bf 558}, L83
1051:
1052: \bibitem[Ouchi (2003)]{Ouchi03}
1053: Ouchi, M. 2003, PhD thesis, University of Tokyo
1054:
1055: \bibitem[Ouchi et al. (2004)]{Ouchi04}
1056: Ouchi, M. et al. 2004, \apj, {\bf 611}, 660
1057:
1058: \bibitem[Ouchi et al. (2005)]{Ouchi05}
1059: Ouchi, M. et al. 2005, \apj, {\bf 620}, L1
1060:
1061: \bibitem[Ouchi et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0707.3161O}
1062: Ouchi, M. et al. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 707, arXiv:0707.3161
1063: %\bibitem[Ouchi(2005b)]{key-6}
1064: % Ouchi, M. et al. 2005, \apj, {\bf 635}, L117
1065: %
1066:
1067: \bibitem[Postman et al. (1998)]{Postman98}
1068: Postman, M., Lauer, T. R., Szapudi, I., \& Oegerle, W. 1998, \apj, {\bf 506}, 33
1069:
1070: \bibitem[Schlegel et al. (1998)]{Schlegel98}
1071: Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, {\bf 500}, 525
1072:
1073: \bibitem[Scoville et al. (2007)]{Scoville07}
1074: Scoville, N. et al. 2007, \apjs, {\bf 172}, 38
1075:
1076: \bibitem[Simpson et al. (2006)]{Simpson06}
1077: Simpson, C. et al. 2006, \mnras, {\bf 372}, 741
1078:
1079: \bibitem[Smail et al. (1995)]{Smail95}
1080: Smail, I, Hogg, D. W., Yan, L., \& Cohen, J. G. 1995, \apj, {\bf 449}, L105
1081:
1082: \bibitem[Steidel \& Hamilton (1993)]{Steidel93}
1083: Steidel, C. C. \& Hamilton, D. 1993, AJ, {\bf 105}, 2017
1084:
1085: \bibitem[Tyson (1988)]{Tyson88}
1086: Tyson, J. A. 1988, AJ, {\bf 96}, 1
1087:
1088: \bibitem[Ueda et al. (2007)]{Ueda07}
1089: Ueda, Y. et al. 2007, \apjs, submitted
1090:
1091: \bibitem[Yagi et al. (2002)]{Yagi02}
1092: Yagi, M., Kashikawa, N., Sekiguchi, M., Doi, M., Yasuda, N., Shimasaku, K., \& Okamura, S. 2002, \aj, {\bf 123}, 66
1093:
1094: \bibitem[Yamada et al. (2005)]{key-10}
1095: Yamada, T. et al. 2005, \apj, {\bf 634}, 861
1096:
1097: \bibitem[Yasuda et al. (2001)]{key-10}
1098: Yasuda, N. et al. 2001, AJ, {\bf 122}, 1104
1099:
1100: \end{thebibliography}
1101:
1102: %
1103: % Figures
1104: %
1105:
1106: % Figure 1: Coordinates of Five Pointings
1107: \begin{figure}
1108: \epsscale{1}
1109: \plotone{f1.eps}
1110: \caption{Three color ($B$-, $R_c$- and $i'$-band) composite optical image of the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep survey Field (SXDF). The area consists of five Suprime-Cam pointings, corresponding to a 1.22 square degree field.}
1111: \label{fig:pseudo-img}
1112: \end{figure}
1113:
1114: \clearpage
1115:
1116: % Figure 2: band system and galaxy spectra
1117: \begin{figure}
1118: \epsscale{0.8}
1119: \plotone{f2.eps}
1120: \caption{Band response curves of the SXDS Suprime-Cam imaging observations (upper panel) and the typical spectra of an early-type galaxy (labeled as ``elliptical'') and a late-type galaxy (labeled as ``disk'') at the different redshifts (lower panel).}
1121: \label{fig:band}
1122: \end{figure}
1123:
1124: \clearpage
1125:
1126: % Figure 3: Dithering Pattern in Five Pointings
1127: \begin{figure}
1128: \epsscale{1}
1129: \plotone{f3.eps}
1130: \caption{Dithering patterns for the $R_c$-band observations for five
1131: pointings. The center $(0,0)$ position of each pointing corresponds the
1132: coordinates given in Table~\ref{tab:coords}.}
1133: \label{fig:dither}
1134: \end{figure}
1135:
1136: \clearpage
1137:
1138: % Figure 4: Color-color plots for stellar objects and Gunn/Stryker stars
1139: \begin{figure}
1140: \epsscale{1}
1141: \plotone{f4.eps}
1142: \caption{Color-color plots for the stellar objects in the SXDF (red dots) and Gunn-Stryker stars (blue triangles). The SXDF colors agree with the colors of Gunn-Stryker stars to the accuracy of 0.03 mag or better.}
1143: \label{fig:ccplot_gs}
1144: \end{figure}
1145:
1146: \clearpage
1147:
1148: % Figure 5: Difference in World Coordinates between images against RA.
1149: \begin{figure}
1150: \epsscale{1}
1151: \plotone{f5.eps}
1152: \caption{Residuals in the RA (filled circles) and in the Dec (crosses)
1153: of the World-Coordinate values in the RA direction in 4 overlapping
1154: areas between the center pointing ({\it SXDS-C}) and the north ({\it
1155: SXDS-N}: upper left panel), {\it SXDS-C} and the south ({\it SXDS-S}:
1156: upper right panel), {\it SXDS-C} and the east ({\it SXDS-E}: lower left
1157: panel), and {\it SXDS-C} and the west ({\it SXDS-W}: lower right
1158: panel). Only the objects with the FWHM$<1.2$ arcsec are plotted.}
1159: \label{fig:astmt_diff1}
1160: \end{figure}
1161:
1162: \clearpage
1163:
1164: % Figure 6: Difference in World Coordinates between images against Dec.
1165: \begin{figure}
1166: \epsscale{1}
1167: \plotone{f6.eps}
1168: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:astmt_diff1}, but the residuals in the Dec direction.}
1169: \label{fig:astmt_diff2}
1170: \end{figure}
1171:
1172: \clearpage
1173:
1174: % Figure 7: S/N map of five pointings
1175: \begin{figure}
1176: %\plotone{f7a.eps}
1177: %\plotone{f7b.eps}
1178: %\plotone{f7c.eps}
1179: %\plotone{f7d.eps}
1180: %\plotone{f7e.eps}
1181: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{f7a.eps}
1182: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{f7b.eps}
1183: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{f7c.eps}
1184: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{f7d.eps}
1185: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{f7e.eps}
1186: \caption{Contour maps of the sky S/N distribution in the $R_c$ band. The
1187: deviation (in ADU) of sky background fluctuations per $2''$-diameter
1188: aperture are measured and converted to the S/Ns for objects with a
1189: magnitude of $27.5$ at each position.}
1190: \label{fig:snmap}
1191: \end{figure}
1192:
1193: \clearpage
1194:
1195: % Figure 8: Detection Completeness vs. Magnitude
1196: \begin{figure}
1197: \epsscale{1}
1198: \plotone{f8.eps}
1199: \caption{Object detection completeness of the five pointings as a
1200: function of magnitude in each band.}
1201: \label{fig:comp}
1202: \end{figure}
1203:
1204: \clearpage
1205:
1206: % Figure 9: False Detection Rate vs. Magnitude
1207: \begin{figure}
1208: \epsscale{1}
1209: \plotone{f9.eps}
1210: \caption{False object detection rate for the five pointings as a
1211: function of magnitude in the five bands. The perpendicular dashed lines
1212: indicate the 3-sigma limiting magnitude measured in $2''$-diameter
1213: aperture in the center pointing ({\it SXDS-C}).}
1214: \label{fig:false}
1215: \end{figure}
1216:
1217: \clearpage
1218:
1219: %% Figure 10: Difference in colors between pointings
1220: \begin{figure}
1221: \epsscale{1}
1222: \plotone{f10.eps}
1223: \caption{Residuals in colors measured for the $2''$-diameter aperture
1224: magnitudes of the objects common in two separate pointing catalogs.}
1225: \label{fig:colordiff}
1226: \end{figure}
1227:
1228: \clearpage
1229:
1230: % Figure 11: random magnitude difference
1231: \begin{figure}
1232: \epsscale{1}
1233: \plotone{f11.eps}
1234: \caption{Random magnitude difference as a function of magnitude in each
1235: band. The random magnitude differences are computed by comparing fluxes
1236: of compact objects with FWHMs $<1.2$ arcsec between the central
1237: pointing and the four surrounding pointings.}
1238: \label{fig:magdiff_random}
1239: \end{figure}
1240:
1241: \clearpage
1242:
1243: % Figure 12: Number Counts -- Comparison among five pointings.
1244: \begin{figure}
1245: \epsscale{1}
1246: \plotone{f12.eps}
1247: \caption{$B$-band galaxy number counts for the five pointings. Open
1248: symbols are the raw numbers extracted using the star/galaxy separation
1249: process. Filled symbols are the numbers corrected for the detection
1250: completeness estimated with Gaussian artificial sources.}
1251: \label{fig:nm_b}
1252: \end{figure}
1253:
1254: \clearpage
1255:
1256: % Figure 13: Number Counts -- Comparison among five pointings.
1257: \begin{figure}
1258: \epsscale{1}
1259: \plotone{f13.eps}
1260: \caption{$V$-band galaxy number counts for the five pointings. Symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{fig:nm_b}.}
1261: \label{fig:nm_v}
1262: \end{figure}
1263: % Figure 14: Number Counts -- Comparison among five pointings.
1264: \begin{figure}
1265: \epsscale{1}
1266: \plotone{f14.eps}
1267: \caption{$R_c$-band galaxy number counts for the five pointings. Symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{fig:nm_b}.}
1268: \label{fig:nm_r}
1269: \end{figure}
1270: % Figure 15: Number Counts -- Comparison among five pointings.
1271: \begin{figure}
1272: \epsscale{1}
1273: \plotone{f15.eps}
1274: \caption{$i'$-band galaxy number counts for the five pointings. Symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{fig:nm_b}.}
1275: \label{fig:nm_i}
1276: \end{figure}
1277: % Figure 16: Number Counts -- Comparison among five pointings.
1278: \begin{figure}
1279: \epsscale{1}
1280: \plotone{f16.eps}
1281: \caption{$z'$-band galaxy number counts for the five pointings. Symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{fig:nm_b}.}
1282: \label{fig:nm_z}
1283: \end{figure}
1284:
1285: \clearpage
1286:
1287: % Figure 17: Number Counts -- Comparison with Previous Surveys
1288: \begin{figure}
1289: \epsscale{1}
1290: \plotone{f17.eps}
1291: \caption{Comparison of the galaxy number count of the SXDS (blue filled
1292: circles) with other major optical imaging surveys. The SXDS values are
1293: corrected for the detection completeness and the mean value for the
1294: five pointings is plotted.}
1295: \label{fig:nm_mean_b}
1296: \end{figure}
1297: % Figure 18: Number Counts -- Comparison with Previous Surveys
1298: \begin{figure}
1299: \epsscale{1}
1300: \plotone{f18.eps}
1301: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:nm_mean_b}, but for $V$-band data.}
1302: \label{fig:nm_mean_v}
1303: \end{figure}
1304: % Figure 19: Number Counts -- Comparison with Previous Surveys
1305: \begin{figure}
1306: \epsscale{1}
1307: \plotone{f19.eps}
1308: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:nm_mean_b}, but for $R_c$-band data.}
1309: \label{fig:nm_mean_r}
1310: \end{figure}
1311: % Figure 20: Number Counts -- Comparison with Previous Surveys
1312: \begin{figure}
1313: \epsscale{1}
1314: \plotone{f20.eps}
1315: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:nm_mean_b}, but for $i'$-band data.}
1316: \label{fig:nm_mean_i}
1317: \end{figure}
1318: % Figure 21: Number Counts -- Comparison with Previous Surveys
1319: \begin{figure}
1320: \epsscale{1}
1321: \plotone{f21.eps}
1322: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:nm_mean_b}, but for $z'$-band data.}
1323: \label{fig:nm_mean_z}
1324: \end{figure}
1325: \clearpage
1326:
1327: % Figure 22: Poisson noise
1328: \begin{figure}
1329: \epsscale{1}
1330: \plotone{f22.eps}
1331: \caption{$B$-band number count uncertainties of galaxies, due to the
1332: Poisson error, for the Hubble Deep Field (HDF), GOODS North field
1333: (GOODS-N), a single Suprime-Cam field (SPCAM) are plotted with the SXDS
1334: number count (solid line). The uncertainty for each survey is
1335: represented by a pair of lines plotted in the figure.}
1336: \label{fig:poisson}
1337: \end{figure}
1338:
1339: %%
1340: %% Tables
1341: %%
1342:
1343: \clearpage
1344: %%% Table 1
1345: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
1346: \tablecaption{COORDINATES OF SXDS FIVE POINTINGS\label{tab:coords}}
1347: \tablehead{
1348: \colhead{Pointing} &
1349: \colhead{RA (J2000)} &
1350: \colhead{Dec (J2000)} &
1351: \colhead{Position Angle of FOV}
1352: }
1353: \startdata
1354: Center & $02^h18^m00^s.000$ & $-05\degr00'00.''00$ & North is up \\
1355: North & $02^h18^m00^s.000$ & $-04\degr35'00.''00$ & North is up \\
1356: South & $02^h18^m00^s.000$ & $-05\degr25'00.''00$ & North is up \\
1357: East & $02^h19^m47^s.070$ & $-05\degr00'00.''00$ & East is up \\
1358: West & $02^h16^m12^s.930$ & $-05\degr00'00.''00$ & West is up \\
1359: \enddata
1360: \tablecomments{Field names for each pointing and their positional
1361: coordinates. PA, the orientation of the FOV on the sky are chosen so
1362: that the overhead time to rotate the position angle are minimized and
1363: effective area with high signal-to-ratios are is maximized.}
1364: \end{deluxetable}
1365:
1366: \clearpage
1367: %%% Table 2
1368: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccclccccccl}
1369: \rotate
1370: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1371: \tablecaption{SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS AND DATA OF THE SXDS\label{tab:log}}
1372: \tablehead{
1373: \colhead{} &
1374: \colhead{Exp. Time} &
1375: \colhead{PSF Size} &
1376: \colhead{Zeropts for Images} &
1377: \colhead{$m_{lim}$} &
1378: \colhead{} &
1379: \colhead{}\\
1380: \colhead{Band-Pointing} &
1381: \colhead{(min)} &
1382: \colhead{(arcsec)} &
1383: \colhead{(mag$_{\rm AB}$ADU$^{-1}$)} &
1384: \colhead{(mag$_{\rm AB}$)} &
1385: \colhead{$N_{\rm obj}$} &
1386: \colhead{Date of Observations}
1387: }
1388: \startdata
1389: {\it $B$-C} & 345 & 0.80 & 34.723 & 28.09 & 197,317 & {2002, Sep. 29/30, Oct. 01} \\
1390: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1391: {\it $B$-N} & 330 & 0.84 & 34.701 & 28.39 & 176,372 & {2002, Nov. 02/05/27, Dec. 01/07}\\
1392: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1393: {\it $B$-S} & 330 & 0.82 & 34.706 & 28.33 & 189,916 & {2002, Nov. 02/04/05/27, Dec. 01/07}\\
1394: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1395: {\it $B$-E} & 330 & 0.82 & 34.698 & 28.06 & 179,478 & {2002, Nov. 04/05, Dec. 01/07}\\
1396: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1397: {\it $B$-W} & 330 & 0.78 & 34.716 & 28.21 & 197,770 & {2002, Nov. 04/05/27, Dec. 01/07}\\
1398: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1399: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{} \\
1400: {\it $V$-C} & 319 & 0.72 & 33.639 & 27.78 & 213,851 & {2003, Oct. 02/24/26} \\
1401: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2004, Jan. 16, Oct. 09, Dec. 10/14/15} \\
1402: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2005, Jan. 05} \\
1403: {\it $V$-N} & 313 & 0.80 & 33.648 & 27.65 & 203,299 & {2003, Oct. 02/26, Nov. 17}\\
1404: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2004, Jan. 16, Dec. 10/14/15} \\
1405: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2005, Jan. 05, Sep. 28} \\
1406: {\it $V$-S} & 321 & 0.82 & 33.643 & 27.75 & 186,545 & {2003, Oct. 02/24/26}\\
1407: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2004, Jan. 16, Dec. 10/14/15} \\
1408: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2005, Jan. 05, Sep. 28} \\
1409: {\it $V$-E} & 291 & 0.76 & 33.639 & 27.77 & 192,951 & {2003, Oct. 02/26}\\
1410: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2004, Jan. 16, Dec. 10/14/15} \\
1411: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2005, Jan. 05, Sep. 28} \\
1412: {\it $V$-W} & 293 & 0.72 & 33.649 & 27.72 & 205,915 & {2003, Oct. 02/26, Nov. 17}\\
1413: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2004, Jan. 16, Dec. 10/14/15} \\
1414: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2005, Jan. 05, Sep. 28} \\
1415: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{} \\
1416: {\it $R_c$-C} & 248 & 0.76 & 34.315 & 27.57 & 188,079 & {2002, Sep. 30, Oct. 01/07}\\
1417: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1418: {\it $R_c$-N} & 232 & 0.78 & 34.276 & 27.74 & 174,365 & {2002, Nov. 01/09/30, Dec. 06}\\
1419: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1420: {\it $R_c$-S} & 232 & 0.74 & 34.219 & 27.67 & 178,416 & {2002, Nov. 01/09/30, Dec. 06}\\
1421: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1422: {\it $R_c$-E} & 232 & 0.76 & 34.259 & 27.51 & 173,586 & {2002, Nov. 02/09/30, Dec. 06}\\
1423: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1424: {\it $R_c$-W} & 232 & 0.82 & 34.247 & 27.53 & 186,648 & {2002, Nov. 02/09/30, Dec. 06}\\
1425: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Nov. 17} \\
1426: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{} \\
1427: {\it $i'$-C} & 647 & 0.78 & 34.055 & 27.62 & 181,352 & {2002, Sep. 29/30, Nov. 01/02/05/09/27/29, Dec. 06/07}\\
1428: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Oct. 20/21} \\
1429: {\it $i'$-N} & 440 & 0.76 & 34.042 & 27.66 & 176,394 & {2002, Sep. 29/30, Nov. 01/02/09/29, Dec. 07}\\
1430: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Sep. 22, Oct. 02/21} \\
1431: {\it $i'$-S} & 309 & 0.68 & 34.046 & 27.47 & 187,791 & {2002, Sep. 29/30, Nov. 01/02/09/29}\\
1432: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Sep. 22, Oct. 02} \\
1433: {\it $i'$-E} & 368 & 0.74 & 33.986 & 27.49 & 175,404 & {2002, Sep. 29/30, Nov. 01/02/09/29, Dec. 07}\\
1434: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Sep. 22, Oct. 02/21} \\
1435: {\it $i'$-W} & 598 & 0.82 & 34.087 & 27.58 & 178,543 & {2002, Sep. 29/30, Nov. 01/02/05/09/27/29, Dec. 06/07}\\
1436: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Oct. 20/21} \\
1437: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{} \\
1438: {\it $z'$-C} & 217 & 0.70 & 33.076 & 26.57 & 183,324 & {2002, Sep. 29/30, Oct. 01, Nov. 04/05} \\
1439: {\it $z'$-N} & 252 & 0.74 & 32.278 & 26.64 & 163,324 & {2002, Nov. 04/05/10}\\
1440: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Sep. 21/22, Oct. 01/02} \\
1441: {\it $z'$-S} & 184 & 0.76 & 32.258 & 26.39 & 167,779 & {2002, Nov. 04/05/10}\\
1442: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Sep. 21/22, Oct. 01} \\
1443: {\it $z'$-E} & 267 & 0.74 & 32.743 & 26.49 & 160,415 & {2002, Nov. 04/05/10}\\
1444: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Sep. 21/22, Oct. 01/02} \\
1445: {\it $z'$-W} & 311 & 0.74 & 32.776 & 26.60 & 167,748 & {2002, Nov. 04/05/10}\\
1446: {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{2003, Sep. 21/22, Oct. 01/02} \\
1447: \enddata
1448: \tablecomments{Explanations of columns: (column 1) Filter pass-band ($B, V, Rc, i'$, or $z'$) and the pointed field (center = C, north = N, south =S, east = E, and west =W). (2) Total exposure time in minutes. (3) The PSF size of the stacked image. (4) Photometric zeropoint. (5) A 3-sigma limiting magnitude in AB magnitude, measured by random sampling with $2''$-diameter aperture. (6) Number of objects detected in the image. (7) Date of observations.}
1449: \end{deluxetable}
1450:
1451: \clearpage
1452: %%% Table 3
1453: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
1454: \tablecaption{IMAGE SIZE AND THE AREA COVERED BY THE SXDS STACKED IMAGES\label{tab:stacked}}
1455: \tablehead{
1456: \colhead{} & \colhead{PSF Size} & \colhead{Area Covered} & \colhead{Effective Area} \\
1457: \colhead{Pointing} & \colhead{(arcsec)} & \colhead{(arcmin${}^2$)} & \colhead{(arcmin${}^2$)}
1458: }
1459: \startdata
1460: Center (C) & 0.80 & 1041.9 & 968.4 \\
1461: North (N) & 0.84 & 1011.7 & 951.8 \\
1462: South (S) & 0.82 & 1008.4 & 967.3 \\
1463: East (E) & 0.82 & 986.4 & 917.3 \\
1464: West (W) & 0.82 & 1017.7 & 913.9 \\
1465: Total & ... & 4404.4 & 4057.0 \\
1466: \enddata
1467: \tablecomments{Properties of stacked images of the SXDS. The table lists
1468: pointing field names, final PSF sizes, total areas covered by the
1469: stacked images, and effective usable areas after excluding the
1470: masked regions in each pointing. Five images in different bands in each
1471: pointing have the same PSF size. The total and effective areas covered by the 5
1472: pointings taking account of overlapping areas between each pointing are
1473: 4404.4 arcmin${}^2$ and 4057.0 arcmin${}^2$, respectively.}
1474: \end{deluxetable}
1475:
1476: \clearpage
1477: %%% Table 4
1478: \begin{deluxetable}{lcl}
1479: \tablecaption{LIST OF PARAMETERS IN THE SXDS OPTICAL IMAGING OBJECT CATALOGS\label{tab:catalog}}
1480: \tablehead{
1481: \colhead{Parameter Name} & {Unit} & {Description}
1482: }
1483: \startdata
1484: {ID}& {} & {sequential unique ID of the object in the catalog}\\
1485: {X} & {pixels} & {X coordinate of detection}\\
1486: {Y} & {pixels} & {Y coordinate of detection}\\
1487: {RA} & {h:m:s} & {right ascension of detection}\\
1488: {Dec} & {d:m:s} & {declination of detection}\\
1489: {KRON\_RADIUS} & {pixels} & {Kron radius $r_K$ defined in Bertin \& Arnouts 1996}\\
1490: {A\_IMAGE} & {pixels} & {2nd order moment along the major axis}\\
1491: {B\_IMAGE} & {pixels} & {2nd order moment along the minor axis}\\
1492: {ELLIPTICITY} & {} & {isophotal weighted ellipticity of the object (=A\_IMAGE/B\_IMAGE)}\\
1493: {THETA\_IMAGE} & {degree} & {position angle of the major axis, counter-clockwised, 0.0=X axis}\\
1494: {ISOAREA\_IMAGE} & {pixels} & {area of the lowest isophote}\\
1495: {IsophotalMag(B)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude in B}\\
1496: {IsophotalMag(V)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude in V}\\
1497: {IsophotalMag(R)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude in Rc}\\
1498: {IsophotalMag(i)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude in i'}\\
1499: {IsophotalMag(z)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude in z'}\\
1500: {IsophotCorMag(B)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude in B defined by Bertin \& Arnouts 1996}\\
1501: {IsophotCorMag(V)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude in V defined by Bertin \& Arnouts 1996}\\
1502: {IsophotCorMag(R)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude in Rc defined by Bertin \& Arnouts 1996}\\
1503: {IsophotCorMag(i)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude in i' defined by Bertin \& Arnouts 1996}\\
1504: {IsophotCorMag(z)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude in z' defined by Bertin \& Arnouts 1996}\\
1505: {2.0ApertureMag(B)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in B}\\
1506: {2.0ApertureMag(V)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in V}\\
1507: {2.0ApertureMag(R)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in Rc}\\
1508: {2.0ApertureMag(i)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in i'}\\
1509: {2.0ApertureMag(z)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in z'}\\
1510: {3.0ApertureMag(B)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in B}\\
1511: {3.0ApertureMag(V)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in V}\\
1512: {3.0ApertureMag(R)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in Rc}\\
1513: {3.0ApertureMag(i)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in i'}\\
1514: {3.0ApertureMag(z)} & {mag} & {$\phi\, 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude in z'}\\
1515: {MAG\_AUTO(B)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude in B}\\
1516: {MAG\_AUTO(V)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude in V}\\
1517: {MAG\_AUTO(R)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude in Rc}\\
1518: {MAG\_AUTO(i)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude in i'}\\
1519: {MAG\_AUTO(z)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude in z'}\\
1520: {MAG\_BEST(B)} & {mag} & {MAG\_AUTO(B) if there are no neighbors, or IsophotCorMag(B) otherwise}\\
1521: {MAG\_BEST(V)} & {mag} & {MAG\_AUTO(V) if there are no neighbors, or IsophotCorMag(V) otherwise}\\
1522: {MAG\_BEST(R)} & {mag} & {MAG\_AUTO(Rc) if there are no neighbors, or IsophotCorMag(R) otherwise}\\
1523: {MAG\_BEST(i)} & {mag} & {MAG\_AUTO(i') if there are no neighbors, or IsophotCorMag(i) otherwise}\\
1524: {MAG\_BEST(z)} & {mag} & {MAG\_AUTO(z') if there are no neighbors, or IsophotCorMag(z) otherwise}\\
1525: {Err(IsophotalMag)(B)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude rms error in B}\\
1526: {Err(IsophotalMag)(V)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude rms error in V}\\
1527: {Err(IsophotalMag)(R)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude rms error in Rc}\\
1528: {Err(IsophotalMag)(i)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude rms error in i'}\\
1529: {Err(IsophotalMag)(z)} & {mag} & {isophotal magnitude rms error in z'}\\
1530: {Err(IsophotCorMag)(B)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude rms error in B}\\
1531: {Err(IsophotCorMag)(V)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude rms error in V}\\
1532: {Err(IsophotCorMag)(R)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude rms error in Rc}\\
1533: {Err(IsophotCorMag)(i)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude rms error in i'}\\
1534: {Err(IsophotCorMag)(z)} & {mag} & {corrected isophotal magnitude rms error in z'}\\
1535: {Err(2.0ApertureMag)(B)} & {mag} & {$\phi 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in B}\\
1536: {Err(2.0ApertureMag)(V)} & {mag} & {$\phi 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in V}\\
1537: {Err(2.0ApertureMag)(R)} & {mag} & {$\phi 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in Rc}\\
1538: {Err(2.0ApertureMag)(i)} & {mag} & {$\phi 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in i'}\\
1539: {Err(2.0ApertureMag)(z)} & {mag} & {$\phi 2''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in z'}\\
1540: {Err(3.0ApertureMag)(B)} & {mag} & {$\phi 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in B}\\
1541: {Err(3.0ApertureMag)(V)} & {mag} & {$\phi 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in V}\\
1542: {Err(3.0ApertureMag)(R)} & {mag} & {$\phi 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in Rc}\\
1543: {Err(3.0ApertureMag)(i)} & {mag} & {$\phi 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in i'}\\
1544: {Err(3.0ApertureMag)(z)} & {mag} & {$\phi 3''$ fixed-aperture magnitude rms error in z'}\\
1545: {Err(MAG\_AUTO)(B)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude rms error in B}\\
1546: {Err(MAG\_AUTO)(V)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude rms error in V}\\
1547: {Err(MAG\_AUTO)(R)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude rms error in Rc}\\
1548: {Err(MAG\_AUTO)(i)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude rms error in i'}\\
1549: {Err(MAG\_AUTO)(z)} & {mag} & {automatic-aperture magnitude rms error in z'}\\
1550: {Err(MAG\_BEST)(B)} & {mag} & {MAG\_BEST magnitude rms error in B}\\
1551: {Err(MAG\_BEST)(V)} & {mag} & {MAG\_BEST magnitude rms error in V}\\
1552: {Err(MAG\_BEST)(R)} & {mag} & {MAG\_BEST magnitude rms error in Rc}\\
1553: {Err(MAG\_BEST)(i)} & {mag} & {MAG\_BEST magnitude rms error in i'}\\
1554: {Err(MAG\_BEST)(z)} & {mag} & {MAG\_BEST magnitude rms error in z'}\\
1555: {FLUX\_MAX(B)} & {ADU} & {peak surface brightness in B}\\
1556: {FLUX\_MAX(V)} & {ADU} & {peak surface brightness in V}\\
1557: {FLUX\_MAX(R)} & {ADU} & {peak surface brightness in Rc}\\
1558: {FLUX\_MAX(i)} & {ADU} & {peak surface brightness in i'}\\
1559: {FLUX\_MAX(z)} & {ADU} & {peak surface brightness in z'}\\
1560: {FWHM\_IMAGE(B)} & {pixels} & {FWHM of profile from a gaussian fit in B}\\
1561: {FWHM\_IMAGE(V)} & {pixels} & {FWHM of profile from a gaussian fit in V}\\
1562: {FWHM\_IMAGE(R)} & {pixels} & {FWHM of profile from a gaussian fit in Rc}\\
1563: {FWHM\_IMAGE(i)} & {pixels} & {FWHM of profile from a gaussian fit in i'}\\
1564: {FWHM\_IMAGE(z)} & {pixels} & {FWHM of profile from a gaussian fit in z'}\\
1565: {CLASS\_STAR(B)} & {} & {stellarity index in B: 0.0=Galaxy and 1.0=Star}\\
1566: {CLASS\_STAR(V)} & {} & {stellarity index in V: 0.0=Galaxy and 1.0=Star}\\
1567: {CLASS\_STAR(R)} & {} & {stellarity index in R: 0.0=Galaxy and 1.0=Star}\\
1568: {CLASS\_STAR(i)} & {} & {stellarity index in i': 0.0=Galaxy and 1.0=Star}\\
1569: {CLASS\_STAR(z)} & {} & {stellarity index in z': 0.0=Galaxy and 1.0=Star}\\
1570: {FLAGS(B)} & {} & {extraction flags in B defined by SExtractor}\\
1571: {FLAGS(V)} & {} & {extraction flags in V defined by SExtractor}\\
1572: {FLAGS(R)} & {} & {extraction flags in Rc defined by SExtractor}\\
1573: {FLAGS(i)} & {} & {extraction flags in i' defined by SExtractor}\\
1574: {FLAGS(z)} & {} & {extraction flags in z' defined by SExtractor}\\
1575: {FLAG\_AREA} & {} & {index for affected area: 0=Clean, 1=STRONG\_HALO, 2=WEAK\_HALO}\\
1576: \enddata
1577: \tablecomments{The list of fields listed in the optical
1578: multi-waveband catalogs. All the fields are commonly included
1579: in all the catalogs created for each detection and each pointing.}
1580: \end{deluxetable}
1581:
1582: \clearpage
1583: %%% Table 5
1584: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
1585: \tablecaption{THE SEXTRACTOR PARAMETERS USED TO CREATE THE SXDS CATALOGS\label{tab:sexparam}}
1586: \tablehead{
1587: \colhead{Parameter} &
1588: \colhead{Value}
1589: }
1590: \startdata
1591: DETECT\_MINAREA & 5 \\
1592: DETECT\_THRESH & 2.0 \\
1593: ANALYSIS\_THRESH & 2.0 \\
1594: FILTER & N \\
1595: DEBLEND\_NTHRESH & 32 \\
1596: DEBLEND\_MINCONT & 0.005 \\
1597: BACK\_SIZE & 32 \\
1598: BACK\_FILTERSIZE & 3 \\
1599: BACKPHOTO\_TYPE & GLOBAL \\
1600: BACKPHOTO\_THICK & 24 \\
1601: SATUR\_LEVEL & 50000.0 \\
1602: GAIN & 2.6 \\
1603: \enddata
1604: \tablecomments{Parameters for SExtractor used to create catalogs. The
1605: above values are common to all the SExtractor runs regardless of
1606: detection bandpasses.}
1607: \end{deluxetable}
1608:
1609: \clearpage
1610: %%% Table 6
1611: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
1612: \tablecaption{RESULT OF ASTROMETRIC CALIBRATION\label{tab:astmt}}
1613: \tablehead{
1614: \colhead{} & \colhead{rms (RA)} & \colhead{rms (Dec)} & \colhead{} \\
1615: \colhead{Pointing} & \colhead{(arcsec)} & \colhead{(arcsec)} & \colhead{Number of Stars}
1616: }
1617: \startdata
1618: Center & 0.160 & 0.151 & 233 \\
1619: North & 0.220 & 0.218 & 208 \\
1620: South & 0.251 & 0.207 & 194 \\
1621: East & 0.261 & 0.225 & 199 \\
1622: West & 0.217 & 0.201 & 218 \\
1623: \enddata
1624: \tablecomments{The resultant r.m.s. of astrometric calibration. The
1625: number of stars used for calculation of the world coordinates is shown
1626: in the far right column.}
1627: \end{deluxetable}
1628:
1629: \clearpage
1630: %%% Table 7
1631: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
1632: \tablecaption{THE GALACTIC EXTINCTION IN THE SXDF\label{tab:gal_ext}}
1633: \tablehead{
1634: \colhead{Pointing} &
1635: \colhead{$E(B-V)$} &
1636: \colhead{$A_B$} &
1637: \colhead{$A_V$} &
1638: \colhead{$A_{Rc}$} &
1639: \colhead{$A_{i'}$} &
1640: \colhead{$A_{z'}$}
1641: }
1642: \startdata
1643: {\it SXDS-C} & 0.021 & 0.091 & 0.070 & 0.056 & 0.044 & 0.031 \\
1644: {\it SXDS-N} & 0.019 & 0.083 & 0.064 & 0.052 & 0.040 & 0.029 \\
1645: {\it SXDS-S} & 0.023 & 0.100 & 0.077 & 0.062 & 0.048 & 0.034 \\
1646: {\it SXDS-E} & 0.021 & 0.091 & 0.070 & 0.056 & 0.044 & 0.031 \\
1647: {\it SXDS-W} & 0.021 & 0.091 & 0.070 & 0.057 & 0.044 & 0.031 \\
1648: \enddata
1649: \tablecomments{The magnitude attenuation due to the Galactic extinction in
1650: each band calculated for the central coordinates of each pointing based
1651: on Schlegel et al. (1998). Since magnitudes in the released catalogs are not corrected for the Galactic extinction, the above values must be taken into account when studying extragalactic objects.
1652: }
1653: \end{deluxetable}
1654: %
1655: \clearpage
1656: %%% Table 8
1657: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
1658: \tablecaption{THE SYSTEMATIC DIFFERENCES IN APERTURE MAGNITUDES BETWEEN
1659: THE DIFFERENT CATALOGS OF THE SXDS\label{tab:diff_magap}}
1660: \tablehead{
1661: \colhead{Pointing} &
1662: \colhead{$B(2'')$} &
1663: \colhead{$B(3'')$} &
1664: \colhead{$V(2'')$} &
1665: \colhead{$V(3'')$} &
1666: \colhead{$R_c(2'')$} &
1667: \colhead{$R_c(3'')$} &
1668: \colhead{$i'(2'')$} &
1669: \colhead{$i'(3'')$} &
1670: \colhead{$z'(2'')$} &
1671: \colhead{$z'(3'')$}
1672: }
1673: \startdata
1674: %{\it C-N} & -0.038 & -0.024 & -0.038 & -0.013 & -0.026 & -0.008 & +0.033 & +0.018 & -0.018 & -0.010 \\
1675: %{\it C-S} & -0.047 & -0.018 & -0.022 & -0.003 & -0.025 & 0.000 & +0.027 & +0.002 & +0.003 & +0.008 \\
1676: %{\it C-E} & -0.020 & -0.011 & -0.018 & -0.008 & -0.008 & -0.004 & +0.047 & +0.013 & -0.005 & -0.002 \\
1677: %{\it C-W} & +0.010 & +0.007 & -0.030 & -0.011 & +0.008 & +0.003 & -0.006 & -0.003 & -0.014 & -0.006 \\
1678: {\it C-N} & -0.04 & -0.02 & -0.04 & -0.01 & -0.03 & -0.01 & +0.03 & +0.02 & -0.02 & -0.01 \\
1679: {\it C-S} & -0.05 & -0.02 & -0.02 & -0.00 & -0.03 & 0.00 & +0.03 & +0.00 & +0.00 & +0.01 \\
1680: {\it C-E} & -0.02 & -0.01 & -0.02 & -0.01 & -0.01 & -0.00 & +0.05 & +0.01 & -0.01 & -0.00 \\
1681: {\it C-W} & +0.01 & +0.01 & -0.03 & -0.01 & +0.01 & +0.00 & -0.01 & -0.00 & -0.01 & -0.01 \\
1682: \enddata
1683: %\tablenotetext{1}{}
1684: \tablecomments{The systematic differences in aperture magnitudes of
1685: objects between the catalog of {\it SXDS-C} and that of another surrounding pointing. For
1686: each band, the magnitude differences in $2''$- and $3''$-diameter aperture magnitude are
1687: listed. The column of pointing denotes the pair of pointings
1688: compared. For instance, the line for {\it C-N} indicates magnitude
1689: differences calculated by magnitudes in {\it SXDS-C} minus those in {\it SXDS-N}. }
1690: \end{deluxetable}
1691: %%\placetable{tab-aaa}
1692:
1693: \clearpage
1694: %%% Table 9
1695: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
1696: \tablecaption{CRITERIA USED FOR STAR/GALAXY SEPARATION\label{tab:sgsep}}
1697: \tablehead{
1698: \colhead{Band} &
1699: \colhead{Criteria}
1700: }
1701: \startdata
1702: $B$ & $(m=19.5-23.0, \sigma>4.5, \sigma>-2.5\,(m-20.3)+4.5)$ or $(m>23.0)$ \\
1703: $V$ & $(m=19.5-23.0, \sigma>4.5, \sigma>-2.5\,(m-20.0)+4.5)$ or $(m>23.0)$ \\
1704: $R_c$ & $(m=19.5-22.5, \sigma>4.5, \sigma>-2.5\,(m-20.3)+4.5)$ or $(m>22.5)$ \\
1705: $i'$ & $(m=19.5-22.5, \sigma>4.5, \sigma>-2.5\,(m-20.1)+4.5)$ or $(m>22.5)$ \\
1706: $z'$ & $(m=18.5-22.5, \sigma>4.5, \sigma>-3.0\,(m-19.3)+4.5)$ or $(m>22.5)$ \\
1707: \enddata
1708: %\tablenotetext{1}{}
1709: \tablecomments{The criteria used in star/galaxy separation procedure.
1710: Objects satisfying these criteria are recognized as galaxies.
1711: In the criteria list, $m$ denotes 2''-diameter fixed aperture
1712: magnitude and $\sigma$ is FWHM of objects in the corresponding band. }
1713: \end{deluxetable}
1714: %
1715:
1716: \end{document}
1717:
1718: