1: %auto-ignores
2: \chapter{Observations and Data Reduction}
3: \label{data_reduction}
4: In this chapter, we shall review the steps taken by us to produce images from the \chandra\ datasets obtained from the archive.
5: \section{Motivation}
6: To study the global morphology of clusters, we want images for all the clusters in our sample to be processed in a consistent manner, and to have the most up-to-date calibration applied. Provided there is no ``pileup,'' --where several photons are counted as one X-ray event -- X-ray CCDs like those onboard \chandra\ register each individual photon as a separate event signal. X-ray CCDs differ from optical CCDs in this behavior. Each pixel of an optical CCD records the integrated flux from all the photons incident on it before readout. Optical sources -- such as nearby stars, galaxies, and nebulae -- generally have much higher photon counts than extended X-ray sources. To start our data reduction, a list of X-ray events registered by the \chandra\ ACIS instrument in each pixel -- called an events file -- was used.
7:
8: Events files are essentially tables specifying the number of X-ray photons registered by the detector in each CCD pixel. A ``level=1'' events file contains information recorded directly from telemetry. After telemetry is collected, a new ``level=1'' events file is produced at the \chandra\ X-Ray Center (CXC) using Standard Data Processing (SDP)\footnote{\texttt{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/data/sdp.html}} before being distributed to users via the \chandra\ archive. We use this ``level=1'' events file data product from the archive as the starting point for creating an X-ray image.
9:
10: We produced images from these events files in the 0.3-7.0 keV band, following the choice made by \protect\citet{2005ApJ...624..606J}. We reduced the data according to the guidelines found in the standard \chandra\ data-reduction threads\footnote{\texttt{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/threads/index.html}}.
11: %
12: \section{Image Preparation}
13: \label{sec:image_prep}
14: Here we shall review the steps taken to prepare images for use in our study.
15: \subsection{Software Used}
16: The script \Xchan, version 1.5, provided by Dr. Philip Humphrey, was used. \Xchan\ is not publicly-available. \Xchan\ implements the \chandra\ standard data-reduction procedure. The use of \Xchan\ is featured in, \eg, \protect\citet{2006ApJ...646..899H}.
17:
18: The software tools run by \Xchan\ comprise the \chandra\ Interactive Analysis of Observations (\ciao) suite, version 3.3.0.1. Functions of the various \ciao\ tools were supported in part by information from the data products located in the \chandra\ Calibration Database (\caldb). \caldb\ version 3.2.1 was used for our study. The \ciao\ software suite along with the \caldb\ are provided by the \chandra\ X-Ray Center\footnote{\texttt{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/intro/tools.html}}.
19: \subsection{Initial Steps}
20: \label{sec:initial_steps}
21: When processing a given \chandra\ observation, we work with data products produced during Standard Data Processing (SDP), which is run on all telemetered data upon reception at the CXC. We start with the ``level=1'' events file as downloaded from the archive. We applied several corrections to the ``level=1'' events file, including a correction for bad pixels and afterglows. Next, we created a ``level=2'' events file by applying several other calibrations, such as a charge-transfer inefficiency (CTI) and time- and position-dependent gain correction, among others. Following this step, a lightcurve was extracted from source-free regions of an image in order to remove ``flaring'' by filtering on count rate in good time intervals (GTIs; see \S~\ref{sec:lightcurves}). Finally, point sources were detected and filled in, since our focus is on analyzing the global morphology of clusters. Point sources in the image bias measurements of morphology (see \S~\ref{sec:image_extraction_and_preparation}). Here, we review these steps and our procedures for doing so.
22: \subsubsection{Bad-Pixel and Afterglow Corrections}
23: First, we accounted for bad pixels, also known as either ``hot pixels'' or ``warm pixels'' -- and afterglows. Bad pixels are certain pixels in the \chandra\ detector which do not function properly. Such pixels register signal with no source photons. A \caldb\ product, the bad pixel map, indicates where on the detector these pixels lie.
24:
25: Afterglows are residual charge from the interaction of a cosmic ray in a CCD. Some of the excess charge is captured during the chip readout process and shows up as spurious ``detections'' of faint sources. The \ciao\ tool \texttt{acis\_run\_hotpix} detects afterglows as well as bad pixels, and produces maps of the afterglows and bad pixels. We removed the afterglow correction applied during SDP and applied our own to ensure the most up-to-date calibration was used. We created a new ``level=1'' events file using the \ciao\ tool \texttt{acis\_process\_events} by applying the bad pixel maps and afterglow corrections.
26:
27: \subsubsection{Level 2 Processing}
28: After applying corrections for bad pixels and afterglows, we ran several more corrections on the ``level=1'' events file. Among these are corrections for the charge-transfer inefficiency (CTI) -- whereby only a fraction of the charge produced in a given CCD pixel is actually recorded after readout -- and corrections for changes in the gain over time and across the detector. Pixel randomization, or random reassignments of the origination sky coordinates of photons incident in the same pixel, was applied during SDP. To improve the spatial resolution of the image, this randomization was removed. Finally, we removed all events originating from pixels flagged as ``bad'' using various event grades and status codes. To accomplish these steps, we used the \ciao\ tools \texttt{acis\_process\_events} and \texttt{dmcopy}. The result is a ``level=2'' events file, suitable for use in extracting an image. Here, we briefly review the various corrections applied in order to produce a ``level=2'' events file.
29:
30: Our first step was to apply a correction for the CTI. When a photon is incident with the semiconducting layers of a CCD, an electron cloud is produced. An electric field is applied to the pixel via connecting electrodes, which serves to confine the electron cloud to a localized region. After exposure for a given length of time (called a frame), the chip is read out; i.e. the onboard hardware and software determines how many events were recorded in which pixels, in order to produce the events list. A fraction (given by CTI values) of the charge originally produced after absorption of incident photons is received upon readout. This is due to the loss of charge in a CCD as the image is shifted from one pixel to the next as the image data is read out of the chip. Tables of CTI values used for our correction are provided by the CTI correction table, a data product distributed in the \caldb.
31:
32: Next, corrections were applied to the events file to account for variation of the gain, both in time and over the detector. The gain affects the mapping between incident photons' intrinsic energies and the energies at which they are registered by the CCD. This gain varies in time as well as over the face of the detector. The gain variation is also affected by the CTI. Information on the time-dependence of the gain, and up-to-date maps showing how the gain varies over the detector, are provided in data files located in the \caldb\ and applied by the \ciao\ software.
33:
34: We also corrected for pixel randomization lest the image have a distorted, ``gridded,'' appearance. For photons incident in the same pixel, a step of the SDP re-assigns the photons' sky positions of origin randomly. The sizes of pixels sets the limit on the spatial resolution of the CCDs. This can have a deleterious effect on the spatial resolution of our image and can affect the detected morphology of extended emission, such as is being done in the present study. This is because artifacts due to randomization can appear as small, faint ``sources'' in the CCD if photons are not corresponded with the correct sky positions. Tables in the \caldb\ assist us in using \texttt{acis\_process\_events} to correct the pixel randomization.
35:
36: For our study, we desire to have in our image only genuine X-ray events corresponding to the emission from extended sources. To this end, events with \asca\ grades of 0,2,3,4, and 6 and a status\footnote{\texttt{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/dictionary/status.html}} of 0 were removed from the event list obtained from the archive. This choice is standard practice, and was also made by \protect\citet{2005ApJ...624..606J}. A grade is a code corresponding to a particular pattern of pixels surrounding the local charge maximum whose charges are above a certain threshold. Grades aid in distinguishing between genuine X-ray events and spurious detections or pileup.
37:
38: Status flags are stored in 32-bit values in a separate column of the events file. These flags are set in order to encode extra information about the state of the detector. Based on the value of the 32 bits, each of which is a status flag, an overall status code of 0 or 1 is assigned. Status codes of zero are used for events all of whose 32 bits of the status value are equal zero, denoting no extraneous detector state or deleterious occurrence of, \eg, pileup or hot pixels for that event and pixel. Pixels unsuitable for use -- in which any of the 32 status flags are set -- in analysis have a status code of 1.
39:
40: \subsubsection{Background Lightcurves and GTI Filtering}
41: \label{sec:lightcurves}
42: The final stage of the initial processing done to ready the events file to be used to produce an X-ray image is to filter the events to exclude time intervals during which the background is excessively high. Such high background (\ie, above some mean or constant baseline) is commonly referred to as ``flaring.'' To accomplish this, we first measured the received intensity (number of photons/sec or count rate) from background regions containing no obvious diffuse emission or point sources. These values are put into bins which correspond to specific intervals of observation time. To obtain a lightcurve, the final step is to plot the measured intensity in each of these bins as a function of time. Such a plot assists us in determining in which time intervals the data is to be kept and where data is to be excluded. Time intervals during which observation data are used are known as good time intervals (GTIs).
43:
44: The lightcurve was produced using events from the background; \ie, regions of the image not containing extended diffuse emission or bright point sources. Once lightcurves were extracted, time intervals during which the background rate is larger than a certain threshold value were excluded from our analysis. Enhanced background seriously degrades the signal-to-noise (S/N) of galaxy clusters and other extended sources.
45:
46: High background count rate may come from bright, unresolved point sources in the field. Enhancement in the background may also result from the incidence of cosmic rays with the detector, high-energy particles from the solar wind, or light from within the Solar System (such as the bright Earth limb) entering the detector.
47:
48: Figures~\ref{ideal_lightcurve} and~\ref{flaring_lightcurve} illustrate two examples of lightcurves. Figure~\ref{ideal_lightcurve} shows a lightcurve with little flaring. This lightcurve is extracted from \chandra\ observation ID 1645, of the source 4C55. Note the consistency of this curve with a constant. For a comparison, Figure~\ref{flaring_lightcurve} displays the lightcurve of \chandra\ observation 4931, of the cluster CLJ1216+2633. The lightcurve initially extracted for the observation, shown in the top panel of Figure~\ref{flaring_lightcurve}, contains significant low-level flaring. After we remove time intervals where the count rate exceeds $\sim 1.1$ counts sec$^{-1}$, we obtain the curve shown in the bottom panel of Figure~\ref{flaring_lightcurve}.
49: \begin{figure}[h]
50: \plotonetwoseventy{1645Xchan_noflar_gti.eps}
51: \caption[An extracted lightcurve with little flaring.]{An extracted lightcurve with little flaring. Object 4C55, \chandra\ observation ID: 1645.\label{ideal_lightcurve}}
52: \end{figure}
53: %
54: \begin{figure}[p]
55: \columnwidth=0.85\columnwidth
56: \plotonetwoseventy{4931Xchan_nosrcx.eps}
57: \vspace{0.3in}
58: \plotonetwoseventy{4931Xchan_noflar.eps}
59: \caption[An extracted lightcurve with low-level flaring.]{An extracted lightcurve with low-level flaring. Object CLJ1216+2633, \chandra\ observation ID: 4931. {\sl Top:} Lightcurve with original flaring. {\sl Bottom:} Lightcurve with flaring removed. Both plots are shown with axes scaled identically.\label{flaring_lightcurve}}
60: \end{figure}
61: %
62: Removal of high-intensity time intervals is done by setting an upper limit on the count rate (intensity) value of time intervals we want to keep, and removing all time intervals with intensity above this threshold. A filter on intensity was determined from the included time intervals by using the tool \texttt{xmmextract\_noflaregtidrive}, provided by Dr. Philip Humphrey, which is not currently publicly-available. \texttt{xmmextract\_noflaregtidrive} analyzes the flaring in the lightcurve and determines an appropriate upper limit on intensity to use for filtering the lightcurve.
63:
64: The basic idea behind the approach used in \texttt{xmmextract\_noflaregtidrive} is to assume that the counts are Poisson-distributed, and to use a cumulative Poisson distribution to estimate the mean count rate after rejecting some fraction (default is 10\%) of the bins which have the smallest count rate. Once this mean count rate is determined, the tool determines the expected maximum of the Poisson distribution and, after converting this maximum counts value to a count rate, uses this rate value as the intensity cut. This differs from a $3\sigma$ clipping, which is the standard practice.
65:
66: After this filtering is completed, the amount of the total observation exposure time is reduced. More exposure time is typically lost when there is more flaring present in the lightcurve. The final exposure times for each observation are listed in Table~\ref{the_sample}.
67:
68: \subsection{Image Extraction}
69: After the initial processing and intensity filtering, an image was extracted in the 0.3-7.0 keV band with the \ciao\ tool \texttt{dmcopy}. Here, we review the treatment of an image once extracted, including source detection and removal, flat-fielding, and estimation of the constant background level.
70: %
71: \subsection{Detection, Removal of Point Sources}
72: \label{sec:image_extraction_and_preparation}
73: \label{sec:point_sources}
74: We want to examine only the diffuse emission. Point sources in the image distort the observed morphology. Bright point sources distort measurements of ellipticity (see \S~\ref{sec:ellipticity}). This happens especially if said sources lie near the edge of the region used for ellipticity calculation. Point sources also introduce spurious substructure picked up by the power ratios (see \S~\ref{sec:power_ratios}). Therefore, we desire to detect where in the image bright point sources appear and then fill sources in with pixel values corresponding to the local background immediately surrounding each source.
75: \subsubsection{Source Detection}
76: To find sources in the image, one approach is to verify sources by eye and enclose them in regions for later removal. Alternatively, one may identify a larger fraction of the point sources in an image with software that implements a numerical source-finding algorithm. Depending on the algorithm used, numerical methods are often more sensitive and discriminating than the human eye. We choose this approach. After detecting sources in this fashion, the image is displayed on screen and we verify detected sources by eye.
77:
78: To aid us in locating point sources in the image, the \texttt{wavdetect} software by \protect\citet{2002ApJS..138..185F} is used. \texttt{wavdetect} is included as part of \ciao. This software tool consists of two parts, \texttt{wtransform} and \texttt{wrecon}. The algorithm in \texttt{wavdetect} is based on wavelets, which are symmetric mathematical functions from which an orthogonal basis can be generated by means of tranlsations and compressions. Wavelet functions -- such as the 2-D Gaussians used by \protect\citet{2002ApJS..138..185F} -- differ significantly from zero only in a localized region. Wavelets of differing widths, or scales, are convolved with the image by \texttt{wtransform}. One would expect relatively high values of the resulting correlation coefficients in the vicinity of bright point sources. The higher pixel values within source images correlate with the localized large values of the wavelet function. After determining where in the image sources are likely to be located, \texttt{wavdetect} runs the \texttt{wrecon} script, which identifies the specific regions on the image which may contain point sources, and puts together lists of these regions for use, \eg, in viewing the image and filling in sources.
79:
80: For our detection purposes, we specified scales of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 pixels. Adjacent scales differ by factors of two because of the mathematical properties of the particular wavelet functions chosen by \protect\citet{2002ApJS..138..185F}. When a wavelet function's width is comparable to the size of a given point source, the likelihood that genuine sources of comparable size are detected increases. Frequently, random fluctuations of the background can cause localized regions of the image to be mistakenly detected as ``sources.'' To ensure that only 1 such spurious source detection by chance is registered per CCD, a detection threshold of $10^{-6}$ is specified. When using \texttt{wavdetect}, we provide the exposure map so that the variation of quantum efficiency over the face of the detector can be accounted for.
81: \subsubsection{Source Removal}
82: After we identify where point sources are located, the next step is to fill them with the local background. This serves to reveal the morphology of the underlying diffuse emission, for the purposes of our study. To accomplish removal of sources, the \ciao\ tool \texttt{dmfilth} was used. The X-ray events are assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. Our approach is to determine the mean of the intensity values of all pixels within a local background annulus surrounding each detected source. Next, we sample values from the Poisson distribution with the same mean, replacing the source pixel intensity values with the sampled values. The \texttt{POISSON} mode of \texttt{dmfilth} implements these steps.
83: \subsection{Exposure-Correction}
84: \label{sec:exposure_correction}
85: After point sources were detected and removed, the image was then flat-fielded to account for variations in exposure across the detector. Several factors produce variations in exposure, not the least of which is detector shape and chip layout. The quantum efficiency -- the fraction of incident photons that end up actually getting registered as X-ray events -- varies over the detector. A flat field -- in the form of a data product known as an exposure map -- is a uniform field produced to match the detector shape and exposure variation, in which each pixel is assigned a faction of the total exposure time according to the effective area values listed in files provided in the \caldb.
86:
87: To accomplish this flat-fielding, we first generated exposure maps to match the 0.3-7.0 keV image and weighted at 5.0 keV to follow the choice of \protect\citet{2005ApJ...624..606J}. We then divided each pixel of the image by the corresponding exposure map pixel and multiplied the result by the cleaned exposure time.
88: %
89: \section{Merging of Multiple Datasets}
90: \label{sec:merging}
91: For some of the systems in our sample (21 -- see Table~\ref{the_sample}) multiple observations were available in the archive. To obtain the best available signal-to-noise (S/N), we merge multiple observations whenever they are available. The events files for each observation list the number of events in each detector pixel. The merging is accomplished by matching corresponding pixels in each observation's events file and adding the counts. We then extract images from these merged events lists and the results are similar to those we would obtain if we added corresponding pixels imaging the same sky locations.
92:
93: We first cleaned the events files of each individual observation before merging them. Images were extracted and added from the merged events lists, and the corresponding exposure maps were generated from the appropriate information in \caldb. If $I_1,I_2$ are the individual images and $E_1,E_2$ are the individual exposure maps for each of, \eg, two observations, we exposure-corrected the merged image $I_1+I_2$ with the merged exposure map $E_1+E_2$. The result is an image with an effective exposure time equal to the sum of the exposures of the individual observations from whence it comes.
94: %
95: \section{Background Estimation}
96: \label{sec:bkg_est}
97: Background in X-ray images accumulated with the \chandra\ ACIS come from three main sources. The Cosmic X-ray Background (CXB) is a faint, diffuse glow from distant, unresolved X-ray sources in the field. A portion of the CXB resolves into detected point sources given sufficient exposure. There is also a component of the background deriving from hot ($\sim 0.3$ keV) gas within the Galaxy. The unresolved CXB from distant X-ray sources appears to have a similar spectrum to the Galactic component. Another component of the background is contributions to accumulated pixel charge due to the incidence of cosmic rays or neutral particles. Finally, since the efficiency with which charge is read out of the pixels is not ideal, additional background is generated by the shifting of charge across the detector during readout.
98:
99: We are conducting a study of the morphology of diffuse X-ray emission from clusters. Therefore, the CXB is the most important component of the background for our study. We assume the background level to be uniform. The background level is higher for the ACIS-S than the ACIS-I because the ability to reject background events in ACIS-S is less than ACIS-I as a consequence of their different architectures. The primary difference in architecture of the two detectors is the side of the chip substrate on which the electrodes are placed.
100:
101: The value of the constant background in the image biases the values of the power ratios we calculate on images (see \S~\ref{sec:power_ratios}). For a given ratio, $P_m/P_0$, it is the monopole power, $P_0$, that is most sensitive to the background. By definition, $P_0$ is a function of the number of image counts within a circular aperture (see Chapter~\ref{morph_stats_chapter}). A relatively-high unsubtracted background level decreases the values of the power ratios (since $P_0$, the denominator, is increased), making it less likely substructure that is actually present will be detected. Likewise, a background level that is too low will bias the value of $P_0$ in the other direction, increasing the value of $P_m/P_0$ and making clusters look more disturbed than they truly are. Generally, the bias to power ratios from the background level is very small. Typically, a factor-of-two change in the background level fails to produce even a $1\sigma$ change in any of a cluster's measured power ratios.
102:
103: \subsection{Radial Profiles and Models}
104: Here we review our procedure for extracting radial surface brightness profiles from images and the models used to fit them for estimating the constant background level, which we then subtract from the image when calculating the power ratios (see \S~\ref{sec:power_ratios}).
105: \subsubsection{Radial Profile Extraction}
106: In order to estimate the background level, we fit models to the extracted profiles of azimuthally-averaged surface-brightness. These profiles were extracted from the 0.3-7.0 keV images obtained from the processing described in \S~\ref{sec:image_extraction_and_preparation}. A radial profile is made up of the number of counts per second per unit area as a function of radius (in projection). This is put together using a series of concentric annuli.
107:
108: Obvious point sources and chip gaps are excluded from the extraction through the use of exclude regions laid down on the image before extraction. We also exclude detector chips that we are not interested in. The effective area, as given by the exposure map, is taken into account. We finish by dividing the value of each bin by the area of its corresponding annulus. The results are written to a FITS file, the Radial Point Spread Function (RPSF).
109: %
110: %
111: \subsubsection{Models}
112: \label{subsec:models}
113: We chose to fit the radial surface-brightness profiles with the isothermal King $\beta$-model \protect\citep{1976A&A....49..137C}. These models assume that the intracluster medium (ICM) constitutes an isothermal sphere; i.e. $T\left(r\right)\equiv$const. Recent, high-resolution observations \protect\citep[etc.]{2001ApJ...563...95M,2001ApJ...546..100M,2003astro.ph..1476F,2004ApJ...605..695G} of clusters with \chandra\ and \xmm\ have shown clusters to possess radial variation of temperature. However, these models still offer convenient parameterizations of the shape of the radial profiles of clusters. The models, hereafter referred to as the ``single-beta model'' and ``double-beta model'' contained one and two King components, respectively, with an added term for the background level. Descriptions of the particular models used and their parameters follow.
114: \subsubsection{Single-Beta Model}
115: \label{beta_models}
116: The single-beta model specifies one King component plus a constant. It has a functional form as follows:
117: \begin{equation}
118: \label{eq:single_beta}
119: S_X\left(R\right) = S_0\left[1+\left(R/R_c\right)^2\right]^{\left(-3\beta+1/2\right)}+B
120: \end{equation}
121: where $S_X$ is the X-ray surface brightness in counts sec$^{-1}$ arcmin$^{-2}$ and $R$ is distance (in projection) from the center of extraction. $R$ is measured in $\hseventy$ kpc, as is the core radius, $R_c$. $S_0$ is the profile value evaluated at $R=0$, in counts sec$^{-1}$ arcmin$^{-2}$. $B$ is the background level in counts sec$^{-1}$ arcmin$^{-2}$. $B$ is constant. $\beta$ is related to the logarithmic slope of the background-subtracted profile, which goes as:
122: \begin{equation}
123: \label{eq:slope}
124: \frac{d~{\rm ln}\left(S_X-B\right)}{d~{\rm ln} R} = -6\beta+1
125: \end{equation} for $R \gg R_c$. We derive this as follows. Starting with Equation~\ref{eq:single_beta} and setting $B=0$, we differentiate $S_X$ with respect to $R$ and obtain:
126: \begin{equation}
127: \label{eq:first_derivative}
128: \frac{dS_X}{dR}=\left(-3\beta+1/2\right)\frac{S_X}{1+\left(R/R_c\right)^2}\frac{2R}{{R_c}^2}
129: \end{equation}
130: We multiply both sides of Equation~\ref{eq:first_derivative} by $R/R$ and divide both the LHS and RHS by $S_X$ to obtain:
131: \[
132: \frac{R~dS_X}{S_X~dR}=2\left(-3\beta+1/2\right)\frac{R^2/{R_c}^2}{1+\left(R/R_c\right)^2}
133: \]
134: We recognize the LHS above as $d~{\rm ln}~S_X/d~{\rm ln}~R$. We obtain (now including $B$ again):
135: \begin{equation}
136: \label{eq:single_beta_result}
137: \frac{d~{\rm ln}\left(S_X-B\right)}{d~{\rm ln} R} = \left(-6\beta+1\right)\frac{R^2/{R_c}^2}{1+\left(R/R_c\right)^2}
138: \end{equation} We recover Equation~\ref{eq:slope} for $R \gg R_c$.
139: \subsubsection{Double-beta Model}
140: For some systems, the radial profile values at $R<0.1$\arcmin\ display an excess over the level of the emission outside this central region. \protect\citet{1999ApJ...517..627M} notes that this tends to decrease the value of $R_c$ and $\beta$ in a single-beta model. To better model clusters with enhanced central emission, we make use of a double-beta model. The model we used has the functional form as follows:
141: \begin{equation}
142: \label{eq:dbl_beta}
143: S_X \left( R \right) = S_0\left[{\left({1+\left({R/R_{c,1}}\right)^2}\right)^{-3\beta+1/2}+\gamma\left({1+\left({R/R_{c,2}}\right)^2}\right)^{-3\beta+1/2}}\right] + B
144: \end{equation}
145: where the parameters are as above, with $R_{c,1},R_{c,2}$ being core radii for each component, $S_0$ is related to the central value of the profile by $S_0 = \left({S_X\left({R=0}\right)-B}\right)/\left({1+\gamma}\right)$. $\gamma$ is the relative central value between the two model components. In the fitting of a double-beta model, the $\beta$ values for the two components are tied, following the approach of \protect\citet{1999ApJ...517..627M}, who note that tying $\beta$ between the components of a double beta-model serve to ``allow the fit to transition between the region containing the central excess and the outer regions of the cluster.'' This is because $\beta$ and $R_c$ are correlated, so the degeneracy between the two is broken by fixing $\beta$, allowing each double-beta model component to assume a different size scale appropriate to the regions of the cluster possessing different levels of surface brightness.
146: \subsection{Fit Results}
147: \label{sec:fit_results}
148: Table~\ref{table:bkg_est} lists the values fitted for the parameters of the models in Equations~\ref{eq:single_beta} and~\ref{eq:dbl_beta} above.
149: We chose to examine the value of $\chi_\nu^2 \equiv \chi^2/{\nu}$, with $\nu$ being the number of degrees of freedom, as the measure of our goodness-of-fit. For each value of $\chi_\nu^2$ we computed the chi square probability, which we call $Q$ after \protect\citet[\S~15.1]{1992nrfa.book.....P}. $Q\equiv Q\left( {\left. {\chi^2 } \right|\nu} \right)$ gives the probability at which we can reject the null hypothesis; \ie, that we could have obtained a higher value of $\chi^2$ by chance with $\nu$ degrees of freedom; and is defined by \protect\citet[Eq. 6.2.18]{1992nrfa.book.....P}. Its complement, $P\left( {\left. {\chi^2 } \right|\nu} \right) \equiv 1-Q\left( {\left. {\chi^2 } \right|\nu} \right)$, gives the probability at which we can reject the alternative hypothesis. We use $P=0.05$ as our significance level. If $P<0.05$ for a particular fit, we reject the null hypothesis. Table~\ref{table:bkg_values} lists the values of $B$, the constant background level, its error, the value of $\chi^2/\nu$ for the fit, and the null-hypothesis probability, $P\equiv 1-Q$.
150:
151: In this chapter, we outlined our procedure for producing images from \chandra\ datasets. In the following chapter, we review the particular morphology measurements -- \eg, ellipticities and power ratios -- chosen for use in this study and how they are calculated. In the chapters thereafter, we present our results and discuss our conclusions.
152: \input{bkg_est_table.tex}
153: \input{bkg_values.tex}
154: