1: %\documentstyle[epsfig]{aastex}
2:
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4:
5: \documentclass[]{emulateapj}
6:
7: %\usepackage{showkeys}
8: %\documentclass{aa}
9: %\usepackage{epsfig}
10: %\usepackage{graphicx}
11: %\usepackage{longtable}
12: \usepackage{rotating}
13: %\documentclass[12pt]{article}
14: %\usepackage{psfig}
15: %\usepackage{palatino, multicol}
16: %\usepackage{natbib}
17: \usepackage{latexsym}
18: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
19: %posat per mi:
20: %\usepackage{subfigure}
21:
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \journalinfo{Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal.}
26:
27: \title{Timing and spectral properties of the accreting millisecond pulsar SWIFT~J1756.9--2508}
28:
29:
30: \author{Manuel Linares\altaffilmark{1}, Rudy Wijnands\altaffilmark{1}, Michiel van der Klis\altaffilmark{1}, Hans Krimm\altaffilmark{2,3}, Craig B. Markwardt\altaffilmark{2,4}, Deepto Chakrabarty\altaffilmark{5}}
31:
32:
33: \date{}
34:
35: \def\rem#1{{\bf (#1)}}
36: \def\hide#1{}
37:
38: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomical Institute ``Anton Pannekoek'', University of Amsterdam and Center for High-Energy Astrophysics, Kruislaan 403, NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam, Netherlands.}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{2}{CRESST and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
41: \altaffiltext{3}{Universities Space Research Association, 10211 Wincopin Circle, Suite 500, Columbia, MD 21044}
42: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742}
43: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139}
44:
45: \keywords{binaries: close --- pulsars: individual (SWIFT~J1756.9-2508) --- stars: neutron --- X-rays: binaries}
46:
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49:
50: SWIFT~J1756.9-2508 is one of the few accreting millisecond pulsars
51: (AMPs) discovered to date. We report here the results of our analysis
52: of its aperiodic X-ray variability, as measured with the Rossi X-ray
53: Timing Explorer during the 2007 outburst of the source. We detect
54: strong ($\sim$35\%) flat-topped broadband noise throughout the
55: outburst with low characteristic frequencies ($\sim$0.1~Hz). This
56: makes SWIFT~J1756.9-2508 similar to the rest of AMPs and to other low
57: luminosity accreting neutron stars when they are in their hard states,
58: and enables us to classify this AMP as an atoll source in the extreme
59: island state. We also find a hard tail in its energy spectrum
60: extending up to 100~keV, fully consistent with such source and state
61: classification.
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \maketitle
66:
67: \section{Introduction}
68: \label{sec:intro}
69:
70: Nine years after the discovery of the first accreting millisecond
71: pulsar (AMP), the number and variety of this type of neutron star
72: low-mass X-ray binary (NS-LMXB) continues to grow. The idea that a
73: neutron star could be spun up by accretion torques in the bosom of a
74: LMXB \citep{Alpar82, BhatHeuv91} was confirmed in 1998, when the first
75: millisecond pulses were seen from a LMXB \citep{Wijnands98}. Besides
76: coherent pulsations, two types of quasi-periodic millisecond X-ray
77: variability have been seen in AMPs: twin kilohertz quasi-periodic
78: oscillations (kHz QPOs) in SAX~J1808.4--3658 and XTE~J1807--294
79: \citep[][]{Wijnands03,Linares05} and burst oscillations also in
80: SAX~J1808.4--3658 and in XTE~J1814--338
81: \citep[][]{Chakrabarty03,Strohmayer03}. Together, these phenomena
82: place important constraints on kHz QPO and type I X-ray burst models,
83: offering a new insight onto accretion physics \citep[][for a recent
84: review]{vanderKlis06}. As far as low frequency variability is
85: concerned, the fastest spinning AMP, IGR~J00291+5934, showed the
86: strongest broadband noise with the lowest characteristic frequencies
87: observed to date in a NS-LMXB \citep{Linares07}.
88:
89: Even though AMPs have provided new input to better understand
90: accretion onto low magnetic field NSs, important questions about their
91: physics remain open. For instance, if the magnetic field of the
92: neutron star in AMPs disrupts and channels the accretion flow, thereby
93: producing the observed pulsations, it is not clear yet why the
94: strength or configuration of such magnetic field should differ
95: drastically from that of non-pulsating NS-LMXBs \citep[see][for a
96: possible explanation]{Cumming01}. In this context it is interesting to
97: note that in three systems millisecond X-ray pulsations have been seen
98: to appear in and disappear from the persistent emission, producing
99: predominant \citep[HETE~J1900.1-2455;][]{Galloway07} intermittent
100: \citep[SAX~J1748.9-2021;][]{Altamirano08} or very rare
101: \citep[Aql~X-1;][]{Casella08} episodes of pulsations. This implies that
102: the AMP within them is only active or visible during a relatively
103: small fraction of the time, which may provide a link with
104: non-pulsating NS-LMXBs.
105:
106: On June $7^{th}$, 2007, a new X-ray transient was discovered
107: \citep{Krimm07a} with the burst alert telescope (BAT)
108: onboard {\it Swift}. Subsequent {\it RXTE} observations revealed that
109: this was the eighth discovered AMP, with a pulse frequency of
110: $\sim$182~Hz and an orbital period of $\sim$54~minutes
111: \citep{Markwardt07a,Markwardt07b, Krimm07c}. The outburst lasted about two
112: weeks and a possible infrared counterpart was identified
113: \citep{Burderi07}. No radio pulsations were found in quiescence at
114: 8.7 and 1.4~GHz \citep[][]{Possenti07,Hessels07}.
115:
116: In the present work we analyze the aperiodic variability of the source
117: and compare it with other AMPs and with atoll sources \citep[a
118: low-luminosity class of NS-LMXB, see][]{HK89}. Using both PCA and
119: HEXTE data we also measure its 2-200~keV energy spectrum. We are
120: thereby able to classify SWIFT~J1756.9-2508 as an atoll source and to
121: characterize its accretion state.
122:
123: \begin{table}[h]
124: \center
125: \tiny
126: \caption{Log of the observations.}
127: \begin{minipage}{0.5\textwidth}
128: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c}
129: \hline\hline
130: Set & ObsID & Date\footnote{Observation start date in MJD} & Detectors\footnote{Average number of active detectors} & Count Rate \footnote{Average and standard deviation of the $\sim$2-35 keV PCA count rate, including all active detectors and not corrected for background (which we estimate from set E to be $\sim$22.3 c/s/PCU; see Section~\ref{sec:data})} & 512-s PDS\footnote{Number of power density spectra extracted from the observation, each of them 512 s long} \\
131: & & & & (c/s) & \\
132: \hline
133: A & 93065-01-01-02 & 54265.2 & 2.0 & 111.0$\pm$1.4 & 6 \\
134: & 93065-01-02-00 & 54266.0 & 2.0 & 102.3$\pm$3.8 & 16 \\
135: \hline
136: B & 93065-01-02-01 & 54267.0 & 2.0 & 95.3$\pm$0.9 & 4 \\
137: & 92050-01-01-01 & 54267.1 & 3.0 & 136.7$\pm$1.0 & 6 \\
138: & 92050-01-01-00 & 54267.4 & 1.7 & 75.3$\pm$21.1 & 24 \\
139: & 92050-01-01-02 & 54268.1 & 2.5 & 109.3$\pm$20.9 & 12 \\
140: \hline
141: C & 92050-01-01-03 & 54269.0 & 2.0 & 71.3$\pm$1.3 & 6 \\
142: & 92050-01-01-04 & 54269.2 & 2.0 & 68.8$\pm$4.2 & 5 \\
143: \hline
144: D & 92050-01-01-06 & 54270.2 & 2.0 & 46.0$\pm$2.2 & 10 \\
145: & 92050-01-01-07 & 54270.6 & 2.4 & 62.4$\pm$12.6 & 20 \\
146: \hline
147: E & 92050-01-01-10 & 54271.6 & 2.0 & 49.4$\pm$0.9 & 3 \\
148: & 92050-01-01-11 & 54271.8 & 2.0 & 50.0$\pm$2.2 & 4 \\
149: & 92050-01-01-12 & 54271.9 & 3.0 & 67.0$\pm$1.6 & 5 \\
150: & 92050-01-01-09 & 54271.9 & 1.0 & 20.9$\pm$0.3 & 5 \\
151: & 92050-01-01-08 & 54272.4 & 1.3 & 28.6$\pm$11.1 & 19 \\
152: & 92050-01-01-13 & 54273.0 & 2.0 & 47.4$\pm$1.2 & 5 \\
153: & 92050-01-02-00 & 54273.5 & 1.0 & 21.8$\pm$0.6 & 11 \\
154: \hline\hline
155: \end{tabular}
156: \end{minipage}
157: \label{table:obs}
158: \end{table}
159:
160:
161:
162: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
163: \label{sec:data}
164:
165: We used all pointed {\it RXTE} observations of SWIFT~J1756.9-2508
166: (Table~\ref{table:obs}). The observations started on June $14^{th}$,
167: 2007, and were all performed with an $\sim$0.3$^{\circ}$ pointing
168: offset in order to avoid contamination from the nearby
169: ($\sim$0.9$^{\circ}$ away) bright source GX~5-1. After applying
170: standard screening criteria\footnote{See {\it
171: http://heasarc.nasa.gov/docs/xte/abc/screening.html}. A conservative
172: filter on the time after SAA passage ($>$15 min) and the ELECTRON2
173: rate ($<$0.1~c/s) was applied before extracting the energy spectra.}
174: we extracted energy spectra from PCA (using only PCU2) and HEXTE
175: (using cluster B) data and power spectra from PCA data, using all
176: active PCUs.
177:
178: After checking that no strong source falls within the field of view of
179: HEXTE-cluster B\footnote{{\it According to HEXTErock:\linebreak
180: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/Tools/HEXTErock/HEXTErock.pl}},
181: we extracted source and background spectra from standard mode
182: data. The background spectrum was obtained by averaging both rocking
183: positions. We applied dead-time correction and created response
184: matrices taking into account the above mentioned pointing offset.
185:
186: A first estimate of the PCU2 background was given by the PCA
187: background model for faint sources. Given that the source lies in the
188: direction of the Galactic bulge and from the observed flux in the last
189: part of the outburst (or ``tail'', set E, see below) it is clear that
190: there is additional (non-instrumental) background flux, most likely
191: originating in the Galactic ridge \citep[note that the source was not
192: detected by][with the {\it Swift}-XRT on June $21^{st}$, within set
193: E]{Campana07}. The presence of an iron line at $\sim$6.5~keV whose
194: energy, width and flux remained constant as the overall flux decreased
195: also suggests that the Galactic ridge is the main source of
196: contaminating flux. In order to take this into account and under the
197: assumption that both instrumental and astronomical backgrounds remain
198: constant during the observations, we obtained the average spectrum of
199: the tail of the outburst and subtracted it from every PCU2
200: spectrum. This final empirical background estimation is independent of
201: PCA background modelling. The iron line was not present in the
202: resulting spectra. We created response matrices for the
203: $\sim$0.3$^{\circ}$ off-axis pointing.
204:
205: A detailed modelling of the energy spectra is beyond the scope of this
206: paper, and probably difficult due to the faintness of the source, so
207: we opted for the following phenomenological approach. We fitted the
208: joint PCA+HEXTE spectra with an absorbed blackbody plus power law
209: model using XSPEC v.11 \citep{Arnaud96}, allowing for a constant
210: factor (weighted mean 0.68$\pm$0.03) to account for the difference in
211: effective areas between PCA and HEXTE. The equivalent hydrogen column
212: density was fixed to 5.4$\times 10^{22}$ $cm^{-2}$, the value
213: measured by \citet{Krimm07c} from the {\it Swift} X-ray telescope
214: (XRT) spectrum. Figure \ref{fig:lc} displays the evolution of the
215: 2-200~keV unabsorbed flux and the BAT 15-50~keV lightcurve, showing
216: the rise, decay, duration and peak flux of the outburst as well as the
217: data sets used in the timing analysis (see below).
218:
219: In order to study the low-frequency variability, we performed fast
220: Fourier transforms (FFTs) on 512~s event mode data segments keeping
221: the original 125 $\mu$s time resolution. The power spectra thereby
222: cover the $\sim$0.02-4000~Hz frequency range. We used PCA channels 0
223: to 79 ($\sim$2.0-35.0 keV) excluding the highest
224: (background-dominated) channels to increase the signal-to-noise ratio,
225: and averaged all power spectra within each observation. No dead time
226: nor background correction was made before the FFTs and the Poisson
227: noise level was subtracted according to \citet{Kleinwolt04}
228: \citep[using the][formula and shifting the resulting level to match
229: the 2000--4000~Hz range, where no intrinsic power is
230: expected]{Zhang95}. When looking for changes in frequency and power of
231: the broadband noise (see Sec.\ref{sec:results}) we averaged
232: observations successive in time and with power spectra consistent
233: within errors in order to improve the statistics. The outburst was
234: divided into five contiguous data sets (labeled A-E; see
235: Table~\ref{table:obs} and Figure~\ref{fig:lc}). In set C low
236: statistics only allows us to constrain the break frequency and the
237: flat-top power level. In data set D the source was too faint to
238: measure accurately its energy or power spectrum (about 2.5 c/s/PCU),
239: and as discussed above data set E is background dominated. Power
240: spectra were ``rms-normalized'' \citep{vanderklis95b} using the count
241: rate observed in set E as background count rate.
242:
243: We fitted the broadband power spectra with a sum of four Lorentzians
244: in ${\nu}_{max}$ representation
245: \citep{Belloni02}\footnote{$\nu_{max}=\sqrt{\nu_0^2+\Delta^2}$ gives
246: the characteristic frequency of the variability feature, where $\nu_0$
247: is the Lorentzian's centroid frequency and $\Delta$ its HWHM. The
248: quality factor $Q=\nu_0/2\Delta$ is a measure of the coherence of the
249: feature. Its strength is given by the integral power (0--$\infty$)
250: whose square root, in the normalization we use, is the fractional rms
251: amplitude of the variability.}, three of which were
252: zero-centered. Following previous notation
253: \citep{Belloni02,Straaten03,Linares07}, we call the different
254: Lorentzians $L_i$ and refer to their characteristic frequencies as
255: ${\nu}_i$, where the label ``i'' identifies the variability feature
256: (see Section \ref{sec:results}).
257:
258: \section{Results and Discussion}
259: \label{sec:results}
260:
261: Figure \ref{fig:ps} shows the broadband power spectrum of
262: SWIFT~J1756.9-2508. Its overall shape is typical of island and extreme
263: island states (IS/EIS) of atoll sources \citep[see
264: e.g.][]{Barret00,Belloni02}, as well as similar to low (luminosity)
265: and hard (spectrum) states of black hole X-ray binaries
266: (e.g. XTE~J1118+480; \citealt{Revni00}, XTE~J1550--564;
267: \citealt{Cui99}). Furthermore, the integrated (0.01-100~Hz) fractional
268: rms variability was very high ($\sim$35\%), also characteristic of
269: such low-hard (Comptonized) states. This allows us to classify this
270: AMP as an atoll source, something common to all the other AMPs known
271: to date \citep{Wijnands05}. The low characteristic frequencies of the
272: variability (see below) indicate that SWIFT~J1756.9-2508 was in the
273: EIS during its 2007 outburst \citep[see][for an overview of
274: states]{vanderKlis06}.
275:
276: \begin{table}[h]
277: \center
278: \tiny
279: \caption{Parameters of the 4-Lorentzian fits to sets A and B.}
280: \begin{minipage}{0.5\textwidth}
281: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c r}
282: \hline\hline
283: Parameter & $L_b$ & $L_h$ & $L_{\ell ow}$ & $L_u$ & $\chi^2$/d.o.f. \\
284: \hline
285: Set A & & & & & \\
286: \hline
287: ${\nu}_{max}$ (Hz) & 0.12$\pm$0.01 & 0.45$\pm$0.03 & 3.1$\pm$0.9 & 53$\pm$30 & 167/150 \\
288: rms (\%) & 17.7$\pm$0.8 & 13.1$\pm$1.6 & 17.9$\pm$1.3 & 21$\pm$3 & \\
289: Q & 0 (fixed) & 0.9$\pm$0.3 & 0 (fixed) & 0 (fixed) & \\
290: \hline
291: Set B & & & & & \\
292: \hline
293: ${\nu}_{max}$ (Hz) & 0.09$\pm$0.01 & 0.39$\pm$0.02 & 3.1$\pm$0.6 & 141$\pm$41 & 142/150 \\
294: rms (\%) & 18.3$\pm$0.8 & 15.1$\pm$1.5 & 21.0$\pm$0.9 & 34$\pm$3 & \\
295: Q & 0 (fixed) & 0.7$\pm$0.2 & 0 (fixed) & 0 (fixed) & \\
296: \hline\hline
297: \footnotetext{See Section~\ref{sec:data} for details of the fit function and notation. All errors are 1$\sigma$.}
298: \end{tabular}
299: \end{minipage}
300: \label{table:psfits}
301: \end{table}
302:
303: The most prominent variability feature is a strong, band-limited and
304: flat-topped noise component ($L_b$, for ``break''), with a break or
305: cutoff at a frequency ${\nu}_b$$\sim$0.1~Hz. This break frequency lies
306: in the low frequency end of the range usually observed in NS-LMXBs. We
307: also detect a narrower (Q$\sim$0.8) component at higher frequencies
308: ($\sim$0.4~Hz). The correlations between characteristic frequencies of
309: power spectral features are a useful tool to identify such features
310: \citep{WK99,PBK99,Straaten05}. The narrow component at $\sim$0.4~Hz
311: follows the correlation found by \citet{WK99} between $\nu_b$ and the
312: frequency of the ``hump'' ($L_h$) present above $L_b$ in both black
313: hole and neutron star systems (see Figure~\ref{fig:bhwk}), and we
314: therefore identify it as $L_h$. The next component in order of
315: increasing frequency has a characteristic frequency of 3.1~Hz, close
316: to (but a bit lower than) what we would expect from extrapolating the
317: relation between $L_{\ell ow}$ and $L_b$ found in atoll sources
318: \citep{Straaten02,Straaten03}. This leads us to tentatively identify
319: it as $L_{\ell ow}$. The highest frequency component that we find in
320: the power spectrum of SWIFT~J1756.9-2508 is most likely $L_u$, also
321: present also present in the same frequency range in IS/EIS of atoll
322: sources. A less likely candidate is the so-called ``hecto-Hertz''
323: Lorentzian, as that component seems to be present only when the
324: variability is at higher frequencies, with $\nu_b$ more than one order
325: of magnitude higher \citep{Straaten02}. All parameters from the fits
326: to sets A and B are shown in Table~\ref{table:psfits}.
327:
328: In disk accreting X-ray binaries as the flat-topped noise shifts down
329: in frequency its flat top becomes higher. In other words, the rms
330: level at the break of the power spectrum is anticorrelated with the
331: frequency of that break. This was found by \citet{BH90} in Cyg~X-1 and
332: extended to other BH and NS systems by
333: \citet{Belloni02}. SWIFT~J1756.9-2508 also follows this
334: anticorrelation, as can be clearly seen from Figure~\ref{fig:bhwk}.
335:
336: The broadband 2-200~keV spectra from all observations within sets A, B
337: and C were reasonably well fitted (reduced $\chi^2 <$ 1.5 for 61
338: degrees of freedom) with the adopted (Sec.~\ref{sec:data}) model (see
339: Figure~\ref{fig:spec}). The resulting parameters are shown in
340: Table~\ref{table:spfits}. A hard tail extending up to $\sim$100~keV was
341: present in the energy spectra during most of the outburst, similar to
342: island states of other atoll sources \citep{DiSalvo04}. As can be seen
343: from Figure~\ref{fig:tev}, the resulting power law index increases
344: when the outburst decays. Several models have been proposed for the
345: emission process at work in the transition from outburst to
346: quiescence, including pulsar shock emission and thermal emission from
347: the neutron star \citep[][for a review]{Campana98}. Our data are not
348: sensitive enough to yield precise tests of such models, and in general
349: sensitivity limits and time constrains make this task a difficult one.
350:
351: \begin{table}[h]
352: %\center
353: \tiny
354: \caption{Parameters of the spectral fits.}
355: \begin{minipage}{0.5\textwidth}
356: \begin{tabular}{l c c c r r}
357: \hline\hline
358: ObsID & Ph.I. & P.L. & kT & $\chi^2$/d.o.f. & 2-200~keV unabs.\\
359: & & norm & (keV) & & Flux ($erg/s/cm^2$)\\
360: \hline
361: Set A & & & & &\\
362: \hline
363: 93065-01-01-02 & 1.85$\pm$0.02 & (13.0$\pm$0.6)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.5$\pm$0.2 & 43/61 & (13.0$\pm$0.4)$\times 10^{-10}$ \\
364: 93065-01-02-00 & 1.84$\pm$0.02 & (11.0$\pm$0.6)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.7$\pm$0.1 & 53/61 & (11.7$\pm$0.2)$\times 10^{-10}$ \\
365: \hline
366: Set B & & & & &\\
367: \hline
368: 93065-01-02-01 & 1.92$\pm$0.04 & (11.0$\pm$0.9)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.5$\pm$0.1 & 59/61 & (9.7$\pm$0.5)$\times 10^{-10}$\\
369: 92050-01-01-01 & 1.94$\pm$0.04 & (11.0$\pm$1.1)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.6$\pm$0.4 & 61/61 & (8.7$\pm$0.4)$\times 10^{-10}$\\
370: 92050-01-01-00 & 1.88$\pm$0.02 & (9.6$\pm$0.5)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.6$\pm$0.1 & 70/61 & (8.0$\pm$0.2)$\times 10^{-10}$\\
371: 92050-01-01-02 & 1.90$\pm$0.03 & (9.1$\pm$0.6)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.7$\pm$0.1 & 83/61 & (6.8$\pm$0.3)$\times 10^{-10}$\\
372: \hline
373: Set C & & & & &\\
374: \hline
375: 92050-01-01-03 & 2.03$\pm$0.05 & (6.4$\pm$0.6)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.5$\pm$0.1 & 73/61 & (2.8$\pm$0.3)$\times 10^{-10}$\\
376: 92050-01-01-04 & 1.98$\pm$0.06 & (4.7$\pm$0.7)$\times 10^{-2}$ & 0.4$\pm$0.2 & 41/61 & (2.8$\pm$0.3)$\times 10^{-10}$\\
377: \hline\hline
378: \footnotetext{NOTE.-- In all fits the column density was fixed to 5.4$\times 10^{22}$ $cm^{-2}$ \citep{Krimm07c}. The power law (P.L.) is characterized by the photon index (Ph.I.) and the normalization, which corresponds to the photon flux density at 1~keV. In five cases the B.B. normalization was not significant but in all 8 observations it gave a $2-4~\sigma$ improvement in the fit, according to the f-test for additional terms. All errors are 1$\sigma$.}
379: \end{tabular}
380: \end{minipage}
381: \label{table:spfits}
382: \end{table}
383:
384:
385: We do not detect a significant change in the fractional rms of $L_b$
386: with energy in the studied energy range, suggesting that the spectrum
387: of this component is flat. Previous work has shown that in LMXBs the
388: X-ray luminosity does not uniquely determine the characteristic
389: frequencies of the variability \citep{Ford00,Straaten05,vanderKlis06}
390: so that another parameter must act to decouple luminosity and
391: variability frequencies. Figure~\ref{fig:tev} shows that as the
392: outburst decays and the inferred mass accretion rate drops the
393: fractional rms variability seems to increase, whereas the frequency of
394: the break decreases. The same behavior has been observed e.g. in
395: IGR~J00291+5934 \citep{Linares07}. A successful model for broadband
396: noise in LMXBs should explain both this short-term correlation between
397: luminosity and break (or ``cutoff'') frequency and the long-term
398: luminosity-frequency decoupling discussed above.
399:
400:
401: \textbf{Acknowledgments:}
402:
403: {\it Swift}-BAT transient monitor results provided by the {\it Swift}-BAT team \newline ({\it http://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/swift/results/transients/}).
404:
405: \clearpage
406: %\newpage
407:
408: \bibliographystyle{aa}
409: \bibliography{biblio}
410:
411: \begin{thebibliography}{37}
412: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
413: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
414: \def\url#1{{\tt #1}}\fi
415: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
416:
417: \bibitem[{{Alpar} et~al.(1982){Alpar}, {Cheng}, {Ruderman}, \&
418: {Shaham}}]{Alpar82}
419: {Alpar} M.A., {Cheng} A.F., {Ruderman} M.A., {Shaham} J., 1982, \nat, 300, 728
420:
421: \bibitem[{{Altamirano} et~al.(2008){Altamirano}, {Casella}, {Patruno},
422: {Wijnands}, \& {van der Klis}}]{Altamirano08}
423: {Altamirano} D., {Casella} P., {Patruno} A., {Wijnands} R., {van der Klis} M.,
424: 2008, ApJL, accepted
425:
426: \bibitem[{{Arnaud}(1996)}]{Arnaud96}
427: {Arnaud} K.A., 1996, In: {Jacoby} G.H., {Barnes} J. (eds.) Astronomical Data
428: Analysis Software and Systems V, vol. 101 of Astronomical Society of the
429: Pacific Conference Series, 17--+
430:
431: \bibitem[{{Barret} et~al.(2000){Barret}, {Olive}, {Boirin} et~al.}]{Barret00}
432: {Barret} D., {Olive} J.F., {Boirin} L., et~al., 2000, \apj, 533, 329
433:
434: \bibitem[{{Belloni} \& {Hasinger}(1990)}]{BH90}
435: {Belloni} T., {Hasinger} G., 1990, \aap, 227, L33
436:
437: \bibitem[{{Belloni} et~al.(2002){Belloni}, {Psaltis}, \& {van der
438: Klis}}]{Belloni02}
439: {Belloni} T., {Psaltis} D., {van der Klis} M., 2002, \apj, 572, 392
440:
441: \bibitem[{{Bhattacharya} \& {van den Heuvel}(1991)}]{BhatHeuv91}
442: {Bhattacharya} D., {van den Heuvel} E.P.J., 1991, \physrep, 203, 1
443:
444: \bibitem[{{Burderi} et~al.(2007){Burderi}, {Testa}, {Menna} et~al.}]{Burderi07}
445: {Burderi} L., {Testa} V., {Menna} M.T., et~al., 2007, The Astronomer's
446: Telegram, 1132, 1
447:
448: \bibitem[{{Campana} et~al.(1998){Campana}, {Colpi}, {Mereghetti}, {Stella}, \&
449: {Tavani}}]{Campana98}
450: {Campana} S., {Colpi} M., {Mereghetti} S., {Stella} L., {Tavani} M., 1998,
451: \aapr, 8, 279
452:
453: \bibitem[{{Campana} et~al.(2007){Campana}, {Romano}, {Kennea}
454: et~al.}]{Campana07}
455: {Campana} S., {Romano} P., {Kennea} J., et~al., 2007, The Astronomer's
456: Telegram, 1117, 1
457:
458: \bibitem[{{Casella} et~al.(2008){Casella}, {Altamirano}, {Wijnands}, \& {van
459: der Klis}}]{Casella08}
460: {Casella} P., {Altamirano} D., {Wijnands} R., {van der Klis} M., 2008, ApJL, accepted
461:
462: \bibitem[{{Chakrabarty} et~al.(2003){Chakrabarty}, {Morgan}, {Muno}
463: et~al.}]{Chakrabarty03}
464: {Chakrabarty} D., {Morgan} E.H., {Muno} M.P., et~al., 2003, \nat, 424, 42
465:
466: \bibitem[{{Cui} et~al.(1999){Cui}, {Zhang}, {Chen}, \& {Morgan}}]{Cui99}
467: {Cui} W., {Zhang} S.N., {Chen} W., {Morgan} E.H., 1999, \apjl, 512, L43
468:
469: \bibitem[{{Cumming} et~al.(2001){Cumming}, {Zweibel}, \&
470: {Bildsten}}]{Cumming01}
471: {Cumming} A., {Zweibel} E., {Bildsten} L., 2001, \apj, 557, 958
472:
473: \bibitem[{{di Salvo} et~al.(2004){di Salvo}, {Santangelo}, \&
474: {Segreto}}]{DiSalvo04}
475: {di Salvo} T., {Santangelo} A., {Segreto} A., 2004, Nuclear Physics B
476: Proceedings Supplements, 132, 446
477:
478: \bibitem[{{Ford} et~al.(2000){Ford}, {van der Klis}, {M{\'e}ndez}
479: et~al.}]{Ford00}
480: {Ford} E.C., {van der Klis} M., {M{\'e}ndez} M., et~al., 2000, \apj, 537, 368
481:
482: \bibitem[{{Galloway} et~al.(2007){Galloway}, {Morgan}, {Krauss}, {Kaaret}, \&
483: {Chakrabarty}}]{Galloway07}
484: {Galloway} D.K., {Morgan} E.H., {Krauss} M.I., {Kaaret} P., {Chakrabarty} D.,
485: 2007, \apjl, 654, L73
486:
487: \bibitem[{{Hasinger} \& {van der Klis}(1989)}]{HK89}
488: {Hasinger} G., {van der Klis} M., 1989, \aap, 225, 79
489:
490: \bibitem[{{Hessels} \& {Stappers}(2007)}]{Hessels07}
491: {Hessels} J.W.T., {Stappers} B.W., 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram, 1129, 0
492:
493: \bibitem[{{Klein-Wolt}(2004)}]{Kleinwolt04}
494: {Klein-Wolt} M., 2004, Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam
495:
496: \bibitem[{{Krimm} et~al.(2007{\natexlab{a}}){Krimm}, {Barthelmy}, {Barbier}
497: et~al.}]{Krimm07a}
498: {Krimm} H.A., {Barthelmy} S.D., {Barbier} L., et~al., 2007{\natexlab{a}}, The
499: Astronomer's Telegram, 1105, 1
500:
501: \bibitem[{{Krimm} et~al.(2007{\natexlab{b}}){Krimm}, {Markwardt}, {Deloye}
502: et~al.}]{Krimm07c}
503: {Krimm} H.A., {Markwardt} C.B., {Deloye} C.J., et~al., 2007{\natexlab{b}},
504: \apjl, 668, L147
505:
506: \bibitem[{{Linares} et~al.(2005){Linares}, {van der Klis}, {Altamirano}, \&
507: {Markwardt}}]{Linares05}
508: {Linares} M., {van der Klis} M., {Altamirano} D., {Markwardt} C.B., 2005, \apj,
509: 634, 1250
510:
511: \bibitem[{{Linares} et~al.(2007){Linares}, {van der Klis}, \&
512: {Wijnands}}]{Linares07}
513: {Linares} M., {van der Klis} M., {Wijnands} R., 2007, \apj, 660, 595
514:
515: \bibitem[{{Markwardt} \& {Krimm}(2007)}]{Markwardt07b}
516: {Markwardt} C.B., {Krimm} H.A., 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram, 1114, 1
517:
518: \bibitem[{{Markwardt} et~al.(2007){Markwardt}, {Krimm}, \&
519: {Swank}}]{Markwardt07a}
520: {Markwardt} C.B., {Krimm} H.A., {Swank} J.H., 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram,
521: 1108, 1
522:
523: \bibitem[{{Possenti} et~al.(2007){Possenti}, {Murgia}, {Reynolds}
524: et~al.}]{Possenti07}
525: {Possenti} A., {Murgia} M., {Reynolds} J., et~al., 2007, The Astronomer's
526: Telegram, 1128, 1
527:
528: \bibitem[{{Psaltis} et~al.(1999){Psaltis}, {Belloni}, \& {van der
529: Klis}}]{PBK99}
530: {Psaltis} D., {Belloni} T., {van der Klis} M., 1999, \apj, 520, 262
531:
532: \bibitem[{{Revnivtsev} et~al.(2000){Revnivtsev}, {Sunyaev}, \&
533: {Borozdin}}]{Revni00}
534: {Revnivtsev} M., {Sunyaev} R., {Borozdin} K., 2000, \aap, 361, L37
535:
536: \bibitem[{{Strohmayer} et~al.(2003){Strohmayer}, {Markwardt}, {Swank}, \& {in't
537: Zand}}]{Strohmayer03}
538: {Strohmayer} T.E., {Markwardt} C.B., {Swank} J.H., {in't Zand} J., 2003, \apjl,
539: 596, L67
540:
541: \bibitem[{{van der Klis}(1995)}]{vanderklis95b}
542: {van der Klis} M., 1995, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on
543: the Lives of the Neutron Stars, held in Kemer, Turkey, August 19-September
544: 12, 1993. Editor(s), M. A. Alpar, U. Kiziloglu, J. van Paradijs; Publisher,
545: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Boston, Massachusetts, 301
546:
547: \bibitem[{{van der Klis}(2006)}]{vanderKlis06}
548: {van der Klis} M., 2006, in "Compact Stellar X-ray Sources", ed. W. H. G. Lewin
549: \& M. van der Klis (Cambridge Univ. Press) (astro-ph/0410551), 39--112
550:
551: \bibitem[{{van Straaten} et~al.(2002){van Straaten}, {van der Klis}, {di
552: Salvo}, \& {Belloni}}]{Straaten02}
553: {van Straaten} S., {van der Klis} M., {di Salvo} T., {Belloni} T., 2002, \apj,
554: 568, 912
555:
556: \bibitem[{{van Straaten} et~al.(2003){van Straaten}, {van der Klis}, \& {M{\'
557: e}ndez}}]{Straaten03}
558: {van Straaten} S., {van der Klis} M., {M{\' e}ndez} M., 2003, \apj, 596, 1155
559:
560: \bibitem[{{van Straaten} et~al.(2005){van Straaten}, {van der Klis}, \&
561: {Wijnands}}]{Straaten05}
562: {van Straaten} S., {van der Klis} M., {Wijnands} R., 2005, \apj, 619, 455
563:
564: \bibitem[{{Wijnands}(2005)}]{Wijnands05}
565: {Wijnands} R., 2005, astro-ph/0501264
566:
567: \bibitem[{{Wijnands} \& {van der Klis}(1998)}]{Wijnands98}
568: {Wijnands} R., {van der Klis} M., 1998, \nat, 394, 344
569:
570: \bibitem[{{Wijnands} \& {van der Klis}(1999)}]{WK99}
571: {Wijnands} R., {van der Klis} M., 1999, \apj, 514, 939
572:
573: \bibitem[{{Wijnands} et~al.(2003){Wijnands}, {van der Klis}, {Homan}
574: et~al.}]{Wijnands03}
575: {Wijnands} R., {van der Klis} M., {Homan} J., et~al., 2003, \nat, 424, 44
576:
577: \bibitem[{{Zhang} et~al.(1995){Zhang}, {Jahoda}, {Swank}, {Morgan}, \&
578: {Giles}}]{Zhang95}
579: {Zhang} W., {Jahoda} K., {Swank} J.H., {Morgan} E.H., {Giles} A.B., 1995, \apj,
580: 449, 930
581:
582: \end{thebibliography}
583:
584: \begin{figure}[b]
585: \begin{center}
586:
587: \resizebox{0.6\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[]{./f1.eps}}}
588:
589: \caption{Light curve of the outburst of SWIFT~J1756.9--2508, showing 2-200~keV and 15-50~keV fluxes measured with {\it RXTE}-PCA\&HEXTE and {\it Swift}-BAT, respectively. Filled circles show fluxes after removing the Galactic ridge contribution (see Section~\ref{sec:data} for details), while for open squares only the instrumental background was subtracted. The upward arrow indicates the discovery date \citep[June $7^{th}$, 2007;][]{Krimm07a} and the downward arrow the date of the first non-detection with {\it Swift}-XRT \citep[June $21^{st}$, 2007;][]{Campana07}. Data sets A-E used in this work are shown with their corresponding labels along the bottom axis.}
590: \label{fig:lc}
591: \end{center}
592: \end{figure}
593:
594: \begin{figure}[b]
595: \begin{center}
596:
597: \resizebox{0.5\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics[]{./f2.eps}}}
598:
599: \caption{Average power spectrum of sets A and B in Power vs. Frequency representation, together with the four Lorentzians function used in the fits.}
600: \label{fig:ps}
601: \end{center}
602: \end{figure}
603:
604: \begin{figure}[b]
605: \begin{center}
606:
607: \resizebox{0.6\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[]{./f3.eps}}}
608:
609: \caption{{\it Upper panel:} Correlation between the characteristic frequencies of $L_b$ and $L_h$, after \citet{WK99} \citep[see][for a discussion and extension of this correlation]{Belloni02}. {\it Lower panel:} Correlation between the frequency of the break in the power spectrum and the power level at the break frequency \citep{BH90}. SWIFT~J1756.9--2508 follows both of them (see Sec.~\ref{sec:results} for details).}
610: \label{fig:bhwk}
611: \end{center}
612: \end{figure}
613:
614:
615: \begin{figure}[b]
616: \begin{center}
617:
618: \resizebox{0.6\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[]{./f4.eps}}}
619:
620: \caption{PCA+HEXTE energy spectrum of observation 93065-01-02-00, in set A, together with its fit function. Residuals are shown in the lower panel.}
621: \label{fig:spec}
622: \end{center}
623: \end{figure}
624:
625:
626: \begin{figure}[b]
627: \begin{center}
628:
629: \resizebox{0.5\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics[]{./f5.eps}}}
630:
631: \caption{Time evolution of spectral index {\it (top)}, integrated (0.01-100~Hz) fractional rms {\it (middle)} and frequency of the break in the power spectrum {\it (bottom)}. The BAT light curve is shown in grey and the data sets used are indicated along the bottom axis.}
632: \label{fig:tev}
633: \end{center}
634: \end{figure}
635:
636:
637: \end{document}
638: