1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %%\documentclass[12pt]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{natbib}
4: \bibliographystyle{apj}
5:
6: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
7: %\usepackage{latexsym}
8:
9: \shorttitle{Interferometric mapping of magnetic fields}
10: \shortauthors{P. C. Cortes}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14:
15: \title{Interferometric Mapping of Magnetic Fields: The massive star forming region G34.4+0.23 MM}
16: \author{P. C. Cortes}
17: \affil{Departamento de Astronom\'ia, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D Santiago, Chile }
18: \author{R. M. Crutcher}
19: \affil{Astronomy Department, University of Illinois at
20: Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA}
21: \author{D. S. Shepherd\altaffilmark{1}}
22: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, 1003
23: Lopezville Rd, Socorro, NM 87801.}
24: \altaffiltext{1}{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a
25: facility of the National Science Foundation operated under
26: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}
27: \author{L. Bronfman}
28: \affil{Departamento de Astronom\'ia, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D Santiago, Chile }
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: We report millimeter interferometric observations of polarized
32: continuum and line emission
33: from the massive star forming region G34.4.
34: Polarized thermal dust emission
35: at 3 mm wavelength and CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ line emission
36: were observed using
37: the Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland
38: Association (BIMA) array.
39: Our results show
40: a remarkably uniform polarization pattern in both dust and
41: in CO J=$1 \rightarrow 0$ emission. In addition, the line emission presents
42: a consistent uniform polarization pattern over most of the velocity channel maps.
43: These uniform polarization patterns are aligned with the north-south main axis
44: of the filament between the main millimeter source (MM) and the ultra-compact
45: H {\scriptsize II} region, which are the central sources in G34.4,
46: suggesting a magnetic field orthogonal to this axis. This morphology is consistent with a magnetically supported disk seen roughly edge-on.
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{ISM: magnetic fields — ISM:polarization — stars: formation}
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52:
53: It is generally accepted that magnetic fields play
54: an important role in the process of star formation; magnetic fields are involved in
55: cloud support, fragmentation, and transfer of angular momentum.
56: However, the magnetic field is the least observed physical quantity
57: involved in such process.
58: Magnetic field observations of molecular clouds
59: are divided into measurements of the line-of-sight component
60: of the magnetic field strength through the Zeeman effect
61: and observations of the field in the plane of the sky through linear polarization
62: of dust emission and spectral-line emission.
63: The alignment of dust grains by a magnetic field is physically complicated and is still a
64: matter of intense research. It is accepted, though, that aligned dust
65: grains will produce polarized emission perpendicular to the projection of the magnetic
66: field onto the plane of the sky.
67: For a recent review of
68: alignment theories see \citet{Lazarian2007}.
69:
70:
71: Spectral-line linear polarization has been suggested to arise
72: from molecular clouds under
73: anisotropic conditions, like large velocity gradients (or LVGs)
74: \citep{Goldreich1981}.
75: The prediction suggests that a few percent of
76: linearly polarized radiation should be detected from molecular clouds and
77: circumstellar envelopes in the presence of a magnetic field. This polarization
78: will be either parallel or perpendicular to the projection of the field onto the
79: plane of the sky.
80: To obtain a qualitative understanding about this effect,
81: consider the CO molecule emitting unpolarized radiation.
82: Under a magnetic field, a
83: CO molecule will develop a small splitting in its rotational, $J$,
84: energy levels.
85: These magnetic
86: sub-levels will produce radiation components
87: labeled $\sigma$ for the $\left| M-M \acute{} \right|
88: $ $=1$ transitions, and
89: $\pi$ for the $\left| M-M
90: \acute{} \right| $ $=0$ transitions, where both components can be
91: linearly polarized either
92: perpendicular or parallel to the magnetic field.
93: If the gas behaves under isotropic
94: conditions (e.g. no velocity gradients)
95: for any direction the $\sigma$ and $\pi$ will populate equally, so the
96: radiation components emerging from the radiative decays of these states will combine
97: to give zero net polarization.
98: Now on the other hand,
99: large velocity gradients
100: present in molecular clouds will produce anisotropies in the optical
101: depths for the CO molecular transitions at different directions.
102: If the
103: velocity gradients are smaller in directions parallel to the magnetic field
104: than in those perpendicular to the field, the optical depths parallel
105: to the field
106: will be larger than the optical depths
107: perpendicular to them. Therefore, the escape of radiation involved in
108: de-exciting the upper $J$ state will be then
109: reduced more in directions along the field lines than in directions
110: perpendicular to them, which will lead to populations of the
111: magnetic $\sigma$ sub-states that are larger than the populations of the $\pi$
112: sub-states due to the difference in the angular distributions of both
113: radiation components. The angular distribution of the $\sigma$ component
114: peaks in directions along the field lines whereas
115: the $\pi$ component peaks in directions perpendicular to the
116: magnetic field.
117: In this way, the rate of de-excitation for $\sigma$ will have a larger
118: decrease, due to photon trapping, than the rate of de-excitation for the
119: $\pi$ radiation component. Because, in this picture, the $\sigma$ component
120: will have a larger population, its emission will be stronger relative to
121: the $\pi$ component giving raise to a small amount of linear polarization
122: in the CO emission
123: with the polarization of the $\sigma$ component, or perpendicular
124: to the magnetic field.
125: The effect was first detected by \citet{Glenn1997} for
126: the CS molecules while \citet{Greaves1999} detected CO polarized emission
127: for $(J=2 \rightarrow 1)$ and $(J=3 \rightarrow 2)$ transitions.
128:
129:
130: In order to efficiently map polarized emission and infer detailed
131: information about the magnetic field morphology, high resolution
132: observations are required. The BIMA millimeter interferometer
133: has been used previously to obtain high-resolution polarization maps
134: in several star forming cores \citep{Lai2001,Lai2002,
135: Lai2003,Cortes2005,Cortes2006a,Cortes2006b}.
136: These previous results show fairly uniform polarization morphologies
137: over the main continuum sources, suggesting that magnetic fields
138: are strong, and therefore cannot be
139: ignored by star formation theory. However, the number of star formation
140: regions with maps of magnetic fields remains small, and every new
141: result is statistically significant.
142: In this work we present polarization maps of
143: the massive star forming region G34.4, obtained
144: with the BIMA array. We measured continuum polarization at 3 mm and
145: CO $J=1\rightarrow 0$ line polarization, obtaining interferometric maps for both line and
146: continuum.
147: The remainder of this paper is divided into five sections. Section 2 reviews
148: information about the source, section 3 describes the observation
149: procedure, section 4 presents the results, section 5 gives the discussion,
150: and section 6 the conclusions and summary.
151:
152:
153: \section{Source Description}
154:
155: G34.4 is a newly discovered massive star forming region.
156: It is associated with the IRAS 18507+0121 point source, which is located
157: at 3.9 kpc from the Sun, having a $v_{\mathrm{lsr}}=57$ km s$^{-1}$.
158: Towards the IRAS 18507+0121
159: point source, \citet{Bronfman1996} detected strong CS$(J=2 \rightarrow 1)$ emission
160: with broad line wings that suggested massive star formation.
161: The source is roughly 11$^{\prime}$ from the
162: H {\scriptsize {II}} region complex G34.3+0.2 \citep{Molinari1996}.
163: Observations with the 45-m Nobeyama radio telescope at a resolution of 16$^{\prime \prime}$
164: of HCO$^{+}$, H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$, CS, and C$^{34}$S were
165: presented by \citet{Ramesh1997}.
166: Their modeling showed that
167: the observed line profiles are representative of a collapsing
168: warm (22 K) core with a mass of
169: 800 $M_{\sun}$, hidden behind a $\approx 4$ K cold screen
170: of about 200 $M_{\sun}$. This region is also associated with H$_{2}$O
171: maser emission \citep{Scalise1989,Palla1991,Miralles1994} and CH$_{3}$OH maser
172: emission \citep{Schutte1993,Szymczak2000}. \citet{Faundez2004} observed this region
173: in the continuum at 1.2 mm with
174: the SEST telescope and derived a mass of 2$\times 10^{3}$ M$_{\sun}$.
175: \citet{Shepherd2004} performed the first interferometric observations with OVRO of the 3-mm
176: continuum, H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$($J=1\rightarrow0$), and
177: SiO($v=0,J=2\rightarrow1$). They detected two compact molecular cores
178: along a north-south filament, separated by $\sim 40^{\prime \prime}$ (see Figure \ref{1}).
179: They also presented
180: near-infrared observations at J, H, and K$^{\prime}$ ($\lambda_{c}=1.25$, 1.65, and
181: 2.1 $\mu m$, respectively). The central source in Figure \ref{2} (labeled G34.4+0.23 MM)
182: showed no trace of NIR emission, but the southern source
183: seemed to be associated with a NIR cluster of young stars and an ultra-compact
184: H {\scriptsize{II}} region. Based on the emission from warm dust and the lack of
185: NIR emission, the central source was suggested to be a massive
186: proto-star. From the VLA
187: archive, marginal emission (0.7 mJy)
188: of 6-cm radio continuum was detected from this source \citep{Shepherd2004}.
189: \citet{Rathborne2005} made a multi-wavelength study of this region. They observed continuum
190: emission at 1.2 mm, 850 $\micron$, 450 $\micron$, and 350 $\micron$ by using
191: IRAM, JCMT, and the CSO observatories respectively. They also obtained
192: archival data from the SPITZER telescope at 2.4 $\micron$, 8 $\micron$, 4.5 $\micron$, and
193: 3.6 $\micron$ and produced combined maps of infrared continuum emission. Their data agree
194: well with previous observations and positioned the infrared sources at the center
195: of the mm and submillimeter emission. In a recent study, \citet{Shepherd2007} presented
196: a detailed study of the G34.4 region. They discovered five massive outflows from two
197: of the existing cloud cores in G34.4. Three outflows are centered near the ultra-compact
198: H {\scriptsize II} region while the remaining two are centered at the MM core.
199: By using mid-IR data from the Spitzer telescope, \citet{Shepherd2007} identified a total
200: of 31 YSO in the G34.4 complex with a combined mass of $\sim$ 127 M$_{\sun}$ plus an additional
201: 22 sources that might be cluster members based on strong 24 $\mu$m emission.
202:
203:
204: \section{Observation Procedure}
205:
206: We observed G34.4+0.23 MM in May 2004 in the
207: 3-mm continuum and the CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ molecular line (at 115 GHz);
208: one track with the BIMA array in D configuration (at a resolution of
209: 16$^{\prime \prime}$) was obtained.
210: The digital correlator was set up
211: to observe both the continuum and the CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ line
212: simultaneously. The 750 MHz wide lower side band was combined
213: with 700 MHz from the upper side band to
214: map the continuum emission, leaving a
215: 50 MHz window for the CO line observation (at a resolution of 2.06 km s$^{-1}$).
216: The 50 MHz window for CO was cut from the continuum window to
217: avoid contamination of the continuum by the CO line and reduced independently.
218: In order to detect circular polarization, a quarter-wave plate was placed in
219: front of the single receiver at each BIMA antenna to select either right (R) or
220: left (L) circular polarization. A second quarter-wave plate grooved orthogonally
221: to the first was alternately switched into the signal path to observe sequentially
222: both circular polarizations. Switching between polarizations was sufficiently
223: rapid (every 11.5 seconds) to give essentially identical uv-coverage.
224: Cross-correlating the R and L circularly polarized signals
225: from the sky gave RR, LL, LR, and RL correlations for each interferometer baseline,
226: from which maps of the four Stokes parameters were produced.
227: The quasars 1751+096 and 1743-038 were used as calibrators for G34.4.
228: The instrumental polarization was calibrated by observing the
229: 3C279 quasar, and the ``leakages'' solutions were calculated from this observation.
230: The calibration procedure is described by \citet{Lai2001}.
231: The Stokes images I, U, Q and V were obtained by Fourier transforming
232: the visibility data using a robust weighting scheme \citep{Briggs1999}.
233: Deconvolution in the Stokes I cube was done by applying a maximum entropy
234: algorithm to every channel.
235: The MIRIAD \citep{MIRIAD1995} package was used for data reduction.
236:
237:
238: \section{Observational Results}
239:
240: \subsection{3-mm Continuum}
241:
242: The 3-mm continuum results are shown in
243: Figure \ref{2}. The beam has a major axis of
244: 17.6$^{\prime \prime}$ and a minor axis of 15.7$^{\prime \prime}$.
245: The significance level cutoff chosen for the polarization results is $3 \sigma$, where
246: $\sigma$ refers the noise level in the polarized flux image, values below $3 \sigma$
247: are blanked in the data analysis process.
248: The strongest feature of the 3 mm continuum result is the
249: main compact source centered at $(\alpha,\delta)=(18:53:18,01:25:25)$; this structure is
250: in agreement with the 3 mm continuum result of \citet{Shepherd2004} at
251: higher resolution and corresponds to their MM (millimeter) core.
252: Some additional structure is seen along the north-south axis of the cloud.
253: However, interferometric observations of equatorial sources can produce {\em ghost} structures along
254: the north-south axis, due to the strong side-lobes that appear in the synthesized beam
255: at such declinations. In the case of our source, the emission seen
256: south of the MM core appears to be
257: associated with IRAS 18507+0121 (or the UC H {\scriptsize II} region with a peak
258: emission centered at $(\alpha,\delta)$=(18:53:19.5, 01:24:45)), a
259: source that is clearly seen in Figure \ref{1}.
260:
261: The polarization observed in our continuum map is within the MM core
262: and the UC H {\scriptsize II} region, with the highest polarized flux at the MM core.
263: This source has a peak flux of 273 mJy beam$^{-1}$, an integrated flux
264: of 290 mJy (calculated over a box of $15^{\prime \prime}
265: \times 15^{\prime \prime}$ centered at the reference position), and a
266: peak polarized flux P of 83 mJy beam$^{-1}$; the I and P peaks approximately coincide.
267: The Stokes I image shows some filamentary structure along the north-south axis
268: between the MM core and the UC H {\scriptsize II} region,
269: consistent with the general cloud morphology (see Figure \ref{1});
270: while the polarized flux is concentrated around the cores.
271: The
272: average P.A. of the polarized continuum map is -8$^{\circ} \pm 5^{\circ}$;
273: suggesting polarization along the north-south axis of the filament. The fractional polarization seems uniform over both cores, with an average value of 0.3 $\pm 0.07$.
274: However, interferometric observations that do not fully sample the u-v plane do not produce reliable fractional polarization results, often overstating the fractional
275: polarization, but not significantly affecting the polarization position angle.
276:
277: The \citet{Shepherd2004} continuum
278: observations, centered at 90 GHz, yielded a total flux of 56 mJy, about 4 times less
279: than our value.
280: Our observations have an rms noise level of 6 mJy beam$^{-1}$ with an uncertainty
281: in the calibration of 25\%, while \citet{Shepherd2004} achieved an rms noise level of 3 mJy beam$^{-1}$
282: with a calibration uncertainty of 15\%. Assuming an error of $3\sigma$ and taking into account
283: the uncertainty in the calibration, the lower limit for our measured flux is 200 mJy.
284: By the same argument,
285: the upper limit for the flux measured by \citet{Shepherd2004} is 75 mJy. The remaining ratio of 2.2
286: between the two measurements is due mainly to the different frequencies. Emission from a blackbody
287: will produce larger values at higher frequencies in the millimeter part of the electromagnetic spectrum;
288: for example, the flux at 115 GHz will be about twice that at 90 GHz for a 50 K source.
289: The small remaining difference could be explained by missing flux
290: in the higher resolution interferometric observations of \citet{Shepherd2004} due to missing
291: short spacings in u-v space. Our compact BIMA D array observations have fairly good short-spacing coverage, with shortest baselines of $\sim 9$ meters, which provides sensitivity
292: up to structures $\sim 60^{\prime \prime}$ in size.
293:
294: Emission in the continuum at 3 mm may be contaminated by free-free emission, but
295: it appears not to be the case here.
296: \citet{Shepherd2004} found marginal free-free continuum emission in the 6 cm band that is estimated to be 0.52 mJy at 3 mm. This free-free emission is unpolarized and negligible when
297: compared with our total flux at 3 mm. However,
298: synchrotron emission, which is strongly
299: linearly polarized, could be present. The polarization of synchrotron radiation
300: in the case of a homogeneous magnetic field can achieve a level of 72\% for a
301: power law emission of $n=0.75$ \citep{Rohlfs2004}. The total level of emission found
302: at 6 cm was only 0.7 mJy, which would yield linearly polarized radiation about 0.5 mJy.
303: However, due to the $\nu^{-n}$ scaling law for synchrotron emission, its contribution to the polarized flux at the 3 mm band is negligible.
304: Therefore, the contamination in
305: our polarized flux appears to be minimal. This strongly suggests that we are
306: seeing only polarized emission from dust.
307:
308:
309:
310: \subsection{CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$}
311:
312: The \citet{Rathborne2005} work featured spectra with broad line widths, suggesting evidence
313: for outflow emission towards the MM core; this was later confirmed
314: by \citet{Shepherd2007}, who discovered 5 massive outflows.
315: Our CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ emission shows similar
316: features for outflow emission;
317: the composite plot in Figure \ref{3} shows the blue and red lobes
318: of the CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ emission. We used, approximately, the same
319: velocity ranges used by \citet{Shepherd2007} to define the outflow lobes (60 to
320: 80 km s$^{-1}$ for the red lobe and 38 to 54 km s$^{-1}$ for the blue
321: lobe). Individual channel maps are shown in Figures \ref{4} and \ref{5} (including the polarization).
322: Considering the larger beam of our BIMA D-array observations, which will smear out
323: the emission, our results are in agreement with the higher resolution observations of \citet{Shepherd2007}.
324: Although, we did not resolve all of the individual outflows detected by their work, it appears that
325: the massive outflow in the MM core (outflow A) is dominating the emission
326: in our observations. Our peak CO flux is calculated around the MM source, centered at
327: ($\alpha,\delta$)=(18:53:17.3, 01:25:15), and taking a value of $\sim 14$ Jy beam$^{-1}$.
328: Table \ref{T1} presents the average P.A. for all channels associated with polarized CO
329: emission. From Table \ref{T1} we see polarized emission at higher velocities
330: (105 to 97 km s$^{-1}$) and at more intermediate velocities associated with the MM outflow.
331: The polarization is observed to be quite uniform,
332: with an orientation mostly along the north-south axis of the filament, in all
333: velocity channels shown in Figures \ref{4} and \ref{5}. The peaks in polarized flux
334: and polarization coverage is around 64 to 62 km s$^{-1}$, which coincides with the
335: peaks in CO emission. This uniform polarization pattern is similar to the polarization
336: orientation of our 3 mm continuum results. Taking into consideration that molecular
337: line polarization can be either
338: parallel or orthogonal to the magnetic field, these results
339: reinforce the polarized dust emission results -- a magnetic field orthogonal to the main axis of the filament.
340:
341:
342: \section{Analysis}
343:
344:
345: \subsection{Core Mass Estimation}
346:
347:
348: The G34+0.23 MM column density and mass are estimated from dust emission.
349: We follow the derivation made by \citet{Mezger1994}. This
350: derivation uses a parametrized representation of the dust absorption
351: cross section per H-atom.
352: This parametrization follows $\tau_{\nu}/N_{\mathrm{H}} = \sigma^{\mathrm{H}}_{\lambda}$
353: in cm$^2$/H-atom, where
354:
355: \begin{equation}
356: \sigma^{\mathrm{H}}_{\lambda}=Z/Z_{\sun} b (7 \times 10^{-21} \lambda_{\mu m}^{-2}) \\
357: \mbox{ } \lambda_{\mu m} \ge 100.
358: \end{equation}
359:
360: \noindent $Z/Z_{\sun}=1$ is the relative metalicity,
361: $\lambda_{\mu \mathrm{m}}$ is the wavelength in $\mu$m, and
362: $b$ is parameter used to introduce the grain dependence on gas density
363: \citep{Mezger1994}.
364: The $b$ parameter usually takes values of
365: $b=1.9$ for n$_{\mathrm{H}} \le 10^{6}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $b=3.4$ for
366: higher densities. With these considerations, the expressions for the cloud mass and
367: column density are calculated using the expressions derived by \citet{Mooney1995}
368:
369: \begin{equation}
370: \label{cd}
371: N_{\textnormal{\scriptsize H}}/{\textnormal{cm}}^{-2}=1.93 \times 10^{15}
372: \frac{(S_{\nu ,int}/\textnormal{\scriptsize Jy})\lambda^{4}_{\mu \textnormal{m}}}
373: {(\theta_{s}/\textnormal{\scriptsize arcsec})^{2}(Z/Z_{\sun})bT}
374: \frac{e^{x} - 1}{x}
375: \end{equation}
376: \begin{equation}
377: M_{\textnormal{\scriptsize H}}/{\textnormal{M}}_\sun=4.1 \times 10^{-10}
378: \frac{(S_{\nu ,int}/\textnormal{\scriptsize Jy})\lambda^{4}_{\mu \textnormal{m}}
379: D^{2}_{\textnormal{\scriptsize kpc}}} {(Z/Z_{\sun})bT} \frac{e^{x} - 1}{x},
380: \end{equation}
381:
382: \noindent where $N_{\textnormal{\scriptsize H}}=N(\textnormal{H}) + 2N(\textnormal{H}_{2})$ is
383: the total hydrogen column density, $S_{\nu ,int}$ is the integrated flux density from the source,
384: $\theta_{s}= \sqrt{\theta_{s,min} \times \theta_{s,max}}$ is the
385: angular source size, $x=\frac{1.44 \times 10^{4}} {\lambda_{\mu m} T}$
386: is the $\frac{hc}{\lambda kT}$ factor for the Planck
387: function, $D_{\textnormal{\scriptsize{kpc}}}$ is the distance to the source in kpc,
388: $T$ is the dust temperature, and
389: $b$ is taken to be $b=3.4$ to reflect the massive MM core.
390: \citet{Shepherd2004} estimated $T=50$ K as the most
391: likely dust temperature for the MM core, the value that we use here.
392: Using the flux of 290 mJy estimated from our 3 mm continuum emission, we obtain a
393: column density of 6$\times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and a
394: total mass of 520 M$_{\sun}$. \citet{Shepherd2004} obtained
395: a mass of 250 M$_{\sun}$ (their masses varied up to 650 M$_{\sun}$ for different
396: values of dust temperature and emissivity).
397:
398:
399: \subsection{Field Direction}
400:
401:
402: The general morphology of the G34.4 massive star forming region is of
403: a filament, where all sources are embedded along the main axis of the
404: cloud (see Figure \ref{1} and maps in \citet{Rathborne2005,Shepherd2007}).
405: This type of morphology appears to be widespread in the ISM
406: \citep{Faundez2004}. How this elongated cloud morphology is produced
407: is still an open question; one avenue of research is to understand the dynamical effect
408: of magnetic fields on the gas and dust in these regions.
409: Our dust polarized emission results show a uniform pattern over both
410: the MM core and the UC H {\scriptsize II} region, with an average
411: P.A. of -8$^{\circ} \pm 5^{\circ}$ aligned with the main axis (north-south) of the filament,
412: between the MM core and the UC H {\scriptsize II} region (see Figure \ref{2}).
413: Polarized emission from dust grains suggests alignment of
414: grains by a magnetic field; the aligned grains will produce polarized emission with P.As. orthogonal to the projection of the field onto the plane of the sky.
415: Therefore, our observations suggest a magnetic field morphology
416: with field lines
417: orthogonal to the main axis of the filament between the MM core and
418: the UC H {\scriptsize II} region.
419:
420: A similar interpretation applies for our
421: CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ observations, shown in Figures
422: \ref{4} and \ref{5} in velocity channel maps.
423: Table \ref{T1} shows the average values for the P.A. for all channel maps with
424: their corresponding spatial dispersion.
425: A P.A. average of -2$^{\circ} \pm 8^{\circ}$ is calculated for all channels.
426: Figure \ref{6} shows the same plot than Figure \ref{3}, but with the polarization
427: map overplotted.
428: The image to the left shows an average of channels from
429: 80 to 60 km s$^{-1}$ for the red lobe, while the image to the right shows
430: an average of channels from 54 to 38 km s$^{-1}$ representing the blue lobe.
431: The average P.A. angle in the red lobe is -3$^{\circ} \pm 7^{\circ}$, while
432: in the blue lobe it is -3$^{\circ} \pm 9^{\circ}$, consistent with the average and
433: overall values shown in Table \ref{1}.
434: Figure \ref{7} shows panels with spectra from the most intense CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$
435: emission points. These two spectra were obtained from averages of 8$^{\prime \prime}$
436: boxes around the points ($\alpha,\delta$)=(18:53:17.3, 01:25:15) and (18:53:19.2, 01:24:41)
437: which can be easily spotted in
438: Figure \ref{4} at channel map number 30$^{\mathrm{th}}$, or at
439: $V=62$ km s$^{-1}$, corresponding to the main emission peaks on the map.
440: Superposed on to each spectrum are
441: fractional polarization and P.A. values which are also consistent with
442: Table \ref{T1} and with the previous CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ Figures. Interesting is to
443: see how the fractional polarization values are fairly constant over most of the
444: CO emission at both spectra, while the P.A. values are well clustered around $0^{\circ}$.
445: The large fractional CO ($J=1 \rightarrow 0$) polarization values obtained in our observations can be explained,
446: most likely, by missing flux in the Stokes I emission due to incomplete u-v coverage
447: at the shorter baselines of the BIMA D array configuration.
448:
449: As with the polarized dust emission results, the polarization line segments
450: seem to be well aligned with the filament axis, showing little spatial dispersion
451: over all relevant channels. \citet{Cortes2005} showed that
452: strong large velocity gradients will produce polarization perpendicular
453: to the magnetic field even if
454: a weak continuum source is present, which seems to be the case in our observations.
455: Therefore, our results for both polarized dust and CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ results suggest a magnetic
456: field orthogonal to the main axis of the filament.
457: Flattened filamentary cores with magnetic field lines perpendicular to their main axis
458: have been observed before. The \citet{Schleuning1998}
459: map of 8$^{\prime} \times 8^{\prime}$ of the OMC-1 region shows
460: a magnetic field that is not only orthogonal to the main axis of the cloud
461: but also has an hourglass shape. \citet{Cortes2006b} made interferometric
462: observations with BIMA towards the NGC2071IR star forming region, finding
463: a magnetic field orthogonal to the main axis of an elongated structure.
464:
465: It has been also
466: suggested that CO line polarization will, most likely, trace a
467: different environment from dust polarization.
468: \citet{Cortes2005} showed that radiation from the CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ transition
469: will present a maximum amount of fractional polarization
470: when emitted from densities n$_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} \sim 100$ cm$^{-3}$
471: which will, most likely, correspond to
472: cloud envelopes, like the proposed cold screen by \citet{Ramesh1997},
473: or to outflow extended regions. In the case of G34.4, the data support a magnetic field
474: aligned with the main axis of the cloud even at regions dynamically dominated
475: by the outflows. However,
476: polarized line emission tracing outflows aligned with magnetic fields has
477: been observed \citep{Girart1999b,Cortes2006b}. This apparent discrepancy might
478: be explained by the difference in spatial resolution between this work
479: and previous findings; while \citet{Cortes2006b} interferometric observations
480: achieved a resolution of 4$^{\prime \prime}$ from NGC2071IR (at a much closer
481: distance than G34.4), this work is presenting observations at a coarser resolution
482: of $16^{\prime \prime}$. A larger beam may smear out the polarization P.As.
483: erasing the outflow signature which will produce a more uniform polarization
484: pattern.
485:
486: Taking into account that dust emission will trace regions at
487: higher densities ( n$_{\mathrm{H_{2}}} \ge 10^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$),
488: which in this case corresponds to the MM core and the
489: UC H {\scriptsize II} region. Both polarization results suggest a magnetic
490: field perpendicular to the filament at different densities.
491: Interesting would be to have
492: higher resolution observations to map the polarized emission from the outflows
493: in this region.
494:
495: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
496:
497: The G34.4+0.23 MM massive star forming core was observed in the 3 mm band in polarized continuum and
498: in CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$ polarized line emission with the BIMA array. The
499: data show a uniform polarization pattern in both emissions. The P.A. obtained from the
500: continuum data has an average value of $<\phi> = -8^{\circ} \pm 5^{\circ}$,
501: and from the CO polarization
502: $<\phi> = -2^{\circ} \pm 8^{\circ}$.
503: These results suggest a magnetic field perpendicular
504: to the main axis of
505: the filament, between the MM source and the UC H {\scriptsize II} region,
506: in G34.4.
507: The morphology suggests a flattened disk with the magnetic field along the minor axis, as predicted by the theory of magnetically supported molecular clouds.
508: From our 3 mm continuum observations, we estimate a total core mass
509: of 400 $M_{\sun}$, in agreement with previous observations.
510: Both line and continuum emission agrees in morphology with previous work by
511: \citet{Shepherd2004,Shepherd2007}. Finally, additional observations, particularly
512: higher resolution interferometric mapping along the filament (including the most
513: northern source seen in Figure \ref{1}), will help
514: to constrain, in greater detail, the morphology of the field and to obtain estimates
515: of its strength in the plane of the sky.
516:
517: P. C. Cortes acknowledges support from the ALMA-CONICYT fund for development
518: of Chilean Astronomy through grant 31050003.
519: P. C. Cortes would also like to acknowledge the support given by NCSA and the
520: Laboratory for Astronomical Imaging at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
521: during this research.
522: Finally, P. C. Cortes would like to acknowledge the
523: contribution by Patricio Sanhueza in making Figure \ref{1}.
524: R. M. Crutcher acknowledges support from NSF grants AST 05-40459 and 06-06822.
525: L. Bronfman acknowledges support from the Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP 15010003.
526:
527: \altaffiltext{1}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, 1003
528: Lopezville Rd, Socorro, NM 87801.}
529: \altaffiltext{2}{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a
530: facility of the National Science Foundation operated under
531: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}
532:
533: \bibliography{biblio}
534:
535: \clearpage
536:
537: \input{tab1.tex}
538:
539: \clearpage
540:
541: \begin{figure}
542: \figurenum{1}
543: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{f1.ps}
544: \epsscale{0.4}
545: \caption{ The Figure shows the filament which includes the G34.4+0.23 MM source. This
546: Figure was taken from \citet{Faundez2004}, who observed the region at 1.2 mm with
547: the SEST telescope. We can clearly see the flattened and elongated morphology of the cloud.
548: }
549: \label{1}
550: \end{figure}
551:
552: \begin{figure}
553: \figurenum{2}
554: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.7]{f2.ps}
555: \epsscale{0.4}
556: \caption{
557: The Figure shows the continuum polarization map at 3 mm. This map consists of
558: an intensity only map (or Stokes I) shown by contours at levels of -3$\sigma$,
559: 3$\sigma$, 6$\sigma$, 10$\sigma$, 15$\sigma$, 20$\sigma$, 25$\sigma$, $30\sigma$, 35$\sigma$, and 40$\sigma$ where $\sigma=6$
560: mJy beam$^{-1}$. The beam is indicated by the black circle at the bottom rigth
561: corner of the map. The gray scale map
562: indicates the polarized flux ($\sqrt{U^{2} + Q^{2}}$), also measured in Jy beam$^{-1}$.
563: The line segments show the polarization P.A. and the fractional polarization,
564: which is indicated by the length of the line. The bar at the bottom right, below
565: the beam, shows
566: a fractional polarization scale of 0.4. The crosses indicate the location of the MM and the
567: UC H {\scriptsize II} regions.
568: }
569: \label{2}
570: \end{figure}
571:
572: \begin{figure}
573: \figurenum{3}
574: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f3.ps}
575: \caption{A composite plot which superpose the averaged blue shifted lobe (in blue contours) and the red shifted lobe
576: (in red contours), plotted as $-3\sigma, 3\sigma, 6\sigma, 9\sigma,$ and $12\sigma$
577: where $\sigma=0.6$ Jy beam$^{-1}$.
578: The thick lines represent the positive emission, while the negatives are
579: given by the small gray circle in between both sources. The beam is plotted as a black
580: oval at the bottom right corner.
581: The lobes are calculated using the velocity interval $v=60$ to $v=80$ km
582: s$^{-1}$ for the red lobe and $v=38$ to $v=54$ km s$^{-1}$ for the blue lobe.
583: As in previous Figures, the crosses represent the MM core and the UC
584: H {\scriptsize II} region.
585: }
586: \label{3}
587: \end{figure}
588:
589:
590: \begin{figure}
591: \figurenum{4}
592: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.8]{f4.ps}
593: \caption{Velocity channel maps showing the red-shifted velocity component of the emission. The channel maps
594: have velocity and channel number written at the top left corner of each map; the beam is plotted at
595: the bottom right. The Stokes I emission is plotted as contours of
596: $-3\sigma, 3\sigma, 6\sigma, 9\sigma, 12\sigma, 15\sigma,$ and $18\sigma$
597: where $\sigma=0.7$ Jy beam$^{-1}$. Polarized flux is shown as gray scale and the line segments represent
598: fractional polarization and P.A. The bar below the beam is the fractional polarization
599: scale of 0.26 and the crosses show the position of the MM core and of the UC H {\scriptsize II} region.
600: }
601: \label{4}
602: \end{figure}
603:
604: \begin{figure}
605: \figurenum{5}
606: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.7]{f5.ps}
607: \caption{Velocity channel maps showing the blue shifted component of the emission. The channel maps
608: have velocity and channel number written at the top left corner of each map; the beam is plotted at
609: the bottom right. As for Figure \ref{4}, the Stokes I emssion is shown as contours of
610: $-3\sigma, 3\sigma, 6\sigma, 9\sigma, 12\sigma, 15\sigma,$ and $18\sigma$
611: where $\sigma=0.7$ Jy beam$^{-1}$. Polarized flux is shown as gray scale and the line segments
612: represent fractional polarization and P.A. The bar below the beam is the fractional polarization
613: scale of 0.26 and the crosses show the position of the MM core and of the UC H {\scriptsize II} region.
614: }
615: \label{5}
616: \end{figure}
617:
618:
619: \begin{figure}
620: \figurenum{6}
621: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.5]{f6a.ps}\\
622: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.5]{f6b.ps}
623: \caption{The Figure shows two panels with the red shifted (top panel) and blue shifted (bottom panel)
624: emission as shown by Figure \ref{3}, but with polarization maps superposed. The Figure shows
625: Stokes I as contours of $-3\sigma, 3\sigma, 6\sigma, 9\sigma,$ and $12\sigma$,
626: where $\sigma=0.6$ Jy beam$^{-1}$.
627: The small
628: bar below the beam represents the fractional polarization scale in the map, corresponding to 0.22
629: for the red lobe and 0.25 for the blue lobe. The crosses represent the positions of the MM core and
630: the UC H {\scriptsize II} region.
631: }
632: \label{6}
633: \end{figure}
634:
635: \begin{figure}
636: \figurenum{7}
637: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.35]{f7a.ps}
638: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.35]{f7b.ps}
639: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.35]{f7c.ps}
640: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.35]{f7d.ps}
641: \caption{Panels show two different spectra from the most intense CO $J=1 \rightarrow 0$
642: emission points, which are averages taken in 8$^{\prime \prime}$ boxes centered at
643: ($\alpha,\delta$)=(18:53:17.3, 01:25:15) and at (18:53:19.2, 01:24:41).
644: The left panels have superposed the average fractional
645: polarization values, while the right panels have average P.A. values.
646: }
647: \label{7}
648: \end{figure}
649:
650: \end{document}
651:
652:
653: