1: % iaus2esa.tex -- sample pages for Proceedings IAU Symposium document class
2: % (based on v1.0 cca2esam.tex)
3: % v1.04 released 17 May 2004 by TechBooks
4: %% small changes and additions made by KAvdH/IAU 4 June 2004
5: % Copyright (2004) International Astronomical Union
6:
7: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
8:
9: \documentclass{iaus}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11:
12: \title[JD 11.~~First stars and cosmic infrared background] %% give here short title %%
13: {Imprint of first stars era in the cosmic infrared backround
14: fluctuations }
15:
16: \author[A. Kashlinsky] %% give here short author list %%
17: {A. Kashlinsky
18: %% \thanks{Present address: Fluid Mech Inc., 24 The Street, Lagos, Nigeria.},
19: }
20:
21: \affiliation{SSAI and Observational Cosmology Lab, Code 665,
22: Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A. \\email:
23: {\tt Alexander.Kashlinsky.1@nasa.gov}}
24:
25: \pubyear{2008}
26: \volume{250} %% insert here IAU Symposium No.
27: \pagerange{xxx--xxx}
28: % \date{?? and in revised form ??}
29: \setcounter{page}{1} \jname{Massive stars as cosmic engines}
30: \editors{Fabio Bresolin, Paul Crowther \& Joachim Puls, eds.}
31: \begin{document}
32:
33: \maketitle
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: We present the latest results on CIB fluctuations from early
37: epochs from deep Spitzer data. The results show the existence of
38: significant CIB fluctuations at the IRAC wavelengths (3.6 to 8
39: $\mu$m) which remain after removing galaxies down to very faint
40: levels. These fluctuations must arise from populations with a
41: significant clustering component, but only low levels of the shot
42: noise. There are no correlations between the source-subtracted
43: IRAC maps and the corresponding fields observed with the {\it HST}
44: ACS at optical wavelengths. Taken together, these data imply that
45: 1) the sources producing the CIB fluctuations are individually
46: faint with $S_\nu<$ a few nJy at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m; 2) have
47: different clustering pattern than the more recent galaxy
48: populations; 3) are located within the first 0.7 Gyr (unless these
49: fluctuations can somehow be produced by - so far unobserved -
50: local galaxies of extremely low luminosity and with the unusual
51: for local populations clustering pattern), 4) produce contribution
52: to the net CIB flux of at least 1-2 nW/m$^2$/sr at 3.6 and 4.5
53: $\mu$m and must have mass-to-light ratio significantly below the
54: present-day populations, and 5) they have angular density of
55: $\sim$ a few per arcsec$^2$ and are in the confusion of the
56: present day instruments, but can be individually observable with
57: {\it JWST}. \keywords{(cosmology:) diffuse radiation, early
58: universe, large-scale structure of universe }
59: %% add here a maximum of 10 keywords, to be taken form the file <Keywords.txt>
60: \end{abstract}
61:
62: \firstsection % if your document starts with a section,
63: % remove some space above using this command.
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66: The cosmic infrared background (CIB) is a repository of emissions
67: throughout the entire history of the Universe. The recent years
68: have seen significant progress in CIB studies, both in identifying
69: and/or constraining its mean level (isotropic component) and
70: fluctuations (see Kashlinsky 2005 for a recent review). The CIB
71: contains emissions also from objects inaccessible to current (or
72: even future) telescopic studies and can, therefore, provide unique
73: information on the history of the Universe at very early times.
74: One particularly important example of such objects, of particular
75: reference to this conference, concerns Population III stars
76: (hereafter Pop~III), the still elusive zero-metallicity stars
77: expected to have been much more massive than the present stellar
78: populations (see Bromm \& Larson 2004 for a recent review).
79: Herebelow I will use the term "era of the first stars", or
80: "Pop~III era", with the understanding that the actual era may be
81: composed of objects of various nature from purely zero-metallicity
82: stars, to low- metallicity stars to even possibly mini-quasars
83: whose contribution to the CIB is driven by energy released by
84: gravitational accretion, as opposed to stellar nucleosynthesis.
85:
86: Extensive numerical investigations of collapse and fragmentation
87: of the first objects forming out of density fluctuations specified
88: by the standard $\Lambda$CDM model suggest that Pop III stars were
89: quite massive and lived at $z> 10$, well within the first Gyr of
90: the Universe's evolution. If predominantly massive, they are
91: expected to have left a significant level of diffuse radiation
92: redshifted today into the IR, and it has been suggested that the
93: CIB contains a detectable contribution from Pop~III in the
94: near-IR, manifest in both its mean level and its anisotropies
95: (e.g. Bond et al 1986, Santos et al 2002, Salvaterra \& Ferrara
96: 2003, Cooray et al 2004, Kashlinsky et al 2004).
97:
98: In the past several years a group of us (Kashlinsky, Arendt,
99: Mather \& Moseley 2005, 2007a,b,c - hereafter KAMM1, KAMM2, KAMM3,
100: KAMM4) have used deep-integration {\it Spitzer} data to measure
101: the CIB fluctuations component arising from early populations.
102: These provide first observational insights into the global
103: evolution of the Universe at early cosmic epochs. Our measurements
104: revealed significant CIB fluctuations at the IRAC wavelengths (3.6
105: to 8 $\mu$m) which remain after removing galaxies down to very
106: faint levels (KAMM1, KAMM2). These fluctuations must arise from
107: populations that have a significant clustering component, but only
108: low levels of the shot noise (KAMM3). Furthermore, there are no
109: correlations between the source-subtracted IRAC maps and the
110: corresponding fields observed with the {\it HST} ACS at optical
111: wavelengths (KAMM4). Taken together, these data imply that 1) the
112: sources producing the CIB fluctuations have a very different
113: clustering pattern than galaxies at intermediate redshifts and are
114: individually faint with $S_\nu<$ a few nJy at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m;
115: 2) are located within the first $\simeq 0.7$ Gyr (unless these
116: fluctuations can somehow be produced by - so far unobserved -
117: local galaxies of extremely low luminosity and with the unusual
118: for local populations clustering pattern), 3) they produce
119: contribution to the net CIB flux of at least 1-2 nW/m$^2$/sr at
120: 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m and must have mass-to-light ratio significantly
121: below the present-day populations, and 4) their angular density is
122: $\sim$(a few) arcsec$^{-2}$, so they are in the confusion of the
123: current instruments, but can be individually observable with {\it
124: JWST}.
125:
126: Below, I will discuss the latest measurements of the fluctuations
127: in the CIB by our team (Kashlinsky, Arendt, Mather \& Moseley -
128: KAMM) and explore their implications for the nature of the sources
129: contributing to these anisotrpies, specifically in the era of the
130: first stars. Following the Introduction, Sec. 2 reviews the
131: current measurements at both near-IR (IRAC) and optical (ACS)
132: wavelengths and Sec. 3 discusses the nature of the cosmological
133: populations producing these CIB anisotropies.
134:
135: \section{Source subtracted CIB fluctuations vs optical galaxies}
136:
137: Before we discuss the interpretation of the KAMM measurements, it
138: is important to review the steps done in the analysis leading to
139: the measured CIB fluctuations. The data have been assembled from
140: the individual AORs using the self-calibration method from
141: \cite{fixsen}. The exposure times ranged from $\sim 8-9$
142: hours/pixel for the initial $5^\prime\times 10^\prime$ QSO 1700
143: field (KAMM1) to $\sim 23-25$ hours/pixel in each of the four
144: GOODS fields of $10^\prime \times 15^\prime$ (KAMM2) The latter
145: have been observed at two different epochs separated by $\sim 6$
146: months allowing us to better handle zodiacal gradients and
147: possible instrument systematics. The images have been cleaned of
148: foreground galaxies and stars in two steps: 1) all pixels with
149: flux fluctuations exceeding a fixed number of standard deviations
150: of the image were iteratively blanked, and 2) the residual faint
151: parts of the sources were removed iteratively using a modified
152: CLEAN algorithm (Hogbom 1974) where the maximum pixel intensity is
153: located and the wide PSF is then scaled to half of this intensity
154: and subtracted from the image. In the first step, which defines
155: the final mask, it is important to remain in the regime when the
156: fraction of the removed pixels is small enough to allow a reliable
157: computation of the power spectrum using FFTs. The second step
158: allows us removal of progressively fainter foreground populations
159: and enables a better characterization of the remaining (and
160: removed) populations.
161:
162: Left panels of Fig. \ref{fig1} show the source-subtracted CIB
163: fluctuations (the instrument noise has been subtracted) for four
164: GOODS fields at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m adopted from KAMM2. The
165: detected signal is significantly higher than the instrument noise
166: and the various systematics effects cannot account for it.
167: Similarly, fluctuations due to emissions in the Solar System and
168: the Galaxy are too weak, except at 8 $\mu$m where Galactic cirrus
169: may contribute to the measured signal. There was a statistically
170: significant correlation between the channels for the regions of
171: overlap meaning that the same population is responsible for the
172: fluctuations. The correlation function at deeper clipping cuts,
173: when too few pixels were left for Fourier analysis, remains the
174: same and is consistent with the power spectrum numbers (KAMM1).
175: The signal is to a good accuracy isotropic on the sky, as required
176: by its extragalactic origin, and must thus contain contributions
177: from the ``ordinary" galaxies and from unresolved populations at
178: high $z$.
179:
180: The extragalactic signal is made of two components: 1) shot noise
181: from the remaining faint galaxies (shown with dotted lines in Fig.
182: \ref{fig1}), and 2) on arcminute scales the fluctuations are
183: produced by clustering of the emitters. It is important to
184: emphasize that as fainter foreground galaxies are removed so that
185: the remaining shot noise is reduced the details of the
186: fluctuations change. This is due to the varying contribution from
187: the remaining foreground galaxies. The large-scale part of the
188: fluctuations remains as the foreground sources are removed down to
189: the lowest shot-noise levels. Left panels of Fig. \ref{fig2} show
190: the decrease in the shot-noise power, $P_{\rm SN}$, as
191: progressively higher iterations in the source removal are reached.
192: The final shot noise reached by us with the GOODS data is shown
193: with horizontal lines and is a factor of $\sim 2$ lower than in
194: the QSO 1700 data (KAMM1). The right panels of Fig. \ref{fig2}
195: compare the final shot noise with that produced by the observed
196: galaxy counts (which at these wavelengths are confusion limited at
197: $m_{\rm AB} > 21-22$ for IRAC beam). The figure shows that galaxy
198: removal is efficient to $m_{\rm AB} > 26-27$ and the signal in
199: Fig. \ref{fig1} comes from very faint sources.
200:
201: \begin{figure}[ht]
202: % \vspace*{-2.0 cm}
203: \begin{center}
204: \includegraphics[width=5in]{fig1.eps}
205: % \vspace*{-1.0 cm}
206: \caption{{\it Left}: Source-subtracted CIB
207: fluctuations from KAMM2 at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m. Four sets of
208: symbols correspond to the four GOODS fields. Dotted lines show the
209: shot-noise contribution. Solid line shows the slope of sources at
210: high-$z$ with the $\Lambda$CDM model spectrum of the same
211: amplitude at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m. {\it Right}: CIB fluctuations due
212: to ACS galaxies for the $972\times 972$ 0.6$^{\prime\prime}$ pixel
213: field at HDFN-Epoch2 region for the ACS B and z-bands. Filled
214: circles correspond to ACS galaxies fainter than $m_0=21$ with the
215: mask defined by the clipping. Filled diamonds, triangles and
216: squares correspond to fluctuations produced by sources fainter
217: than $m_0+2,m_0+ 4, m_0+6$.}
218: \label{fig1}
219: \end{center}
220: \end{figure}
221:
222: \begin{figure}[ht]
223: % \vspace*{-2.0 cm}
224: \begin{center}
225: \includegraphics[width=5in]{fig2.eps}
226: % \vspace*{-1.0 cm}
227: \caption{{\it Left}: Decrease of the shot noise
228: power vs the iteration number of the source cleaning. Horizontal
229: lines show the levels reached in \cite{kamm2}, which are a factor
230: of $\sim 2$ below those in \cite{kamm1}. Four sets of symbols
231: correspond to the four GOODS fields. Horizontal lines mark the
232: shot noise levels of KAMM2. {\it Right}: Shot noise power $P_{\rm
233: SN}$ estimated by integrating the counts. Symbols identical to
234: those on the left denote the four GOODS fields; open circles
235: correspond to counts for the QS1700 field. Solid line shows
236: $P_{\rm SN}$ according to the fit to IRAC counts of \cite{fazio}
237: used in KAMM1.}
238: \label{fig2}
239: \end{center}
240: \end{figure}
241:
242: GOODS fields have also been observed at optical wavelengths with
243: the {\it Hubble} ACS instruments reaching source detection levels
244: fainter than 28 AB mag. This allowed us to further test the origin
245: of the source-subtracted CIB fluctuations. If the latter come from
246: local populations there should be a strong correlation between the
247: source-subtracted IRAC maps and the ACS sources. Conversely, there
248: should be no such correlations if the CIB signal arises at at
249: epochs where the Lyman break (at rest $\sim 0.1\mu$m) gets shifted
250: passed the longest ACS z-band at $\simeq 0.9\mu$m. To test for
251: this in KAMM4 we have constructed synthetic maps, overlapping with
252: the GOODS fields, using sources in the ACS B, V, i, z bands from
253: the ACS sources catalog of \cite{goods}. These maps were then
254: convolved with the IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m beams. Finally, we
255: applied the clipping mask from the IRAC maps and computed the
256: fluctuations spectrum produced by the ACS sources and their
257: correlations with the IRAC-based maps.
258:
259: The fluctuations in the diffuse light produced by the ACS galaxies
260: are shown in the right panels of Fig. \ref{fig1}. The contrast
261: between the spectrum of the source-subtracted CIB fluctuations and
262: those produced by the optical galaxies is obvious. The former has
263: the power spectrum such that the fluctuations are flat to slowly
264: rising with increasing angular scale, whereas the latter have
265: power spectrum with fluctuation amplitude decreasing with
266: increasing scale in agreement with CIB measurements from deep
267: 2MASS data arising from galaxies at $z\sim$1-2 (Kashlinsky et al
268: 2002). This by itself shows that the populations producing the
269: source-subtracted CIB fluctuations are not in the ACS source
270: catalog.
271:
272: More importantly, Fig. \ref{fig3} shows that the correlations
273: between the ACS galaxies and the source-subtracted CIB maps are
274: very small and on arcminute scales are within the statistical
275: noise. Thus, at most, the remaining ACS sources contribute to the
276: shot-noise levels in the residual KAMM maps, but not to the large
277: scale correlations. At the same time, there are excellent
278: correlations (shown with open symbols) between the ACS source maps
279: and the sources {\it removed} by KAMM prior to computing the
280: remaining CIB fluctuations.
281:
282:
283: \begin{figure}[ht]
284: % \vspace*{-2.0 cm}
285: \begin{center}
286: \includegraphics[width=5in]{fig3.eps}
287: % \vspace*{-1.0 cm}
288: \caption{{\it Left}: Correlation coefficient
289: between clipped/masked ACS and KAMM data. Large and small symbols
290: correspond to the IRAC Ch 1 and Ch 2; the four sets of symbols
291: correspond to the four GOODS fields. Open symbols correspond to
292: correlations with the maps of the removed sources and filled
293: symbols with the residual KAMM maps which contain the fluctuations
294: shown in Fig. 1. {\it Right}: Solid lines show the dimensionless
295: correlation function between the diffuse light in the ACS and KAMM
296: maps for $B,V,i,z$-bands in order of increasing thickness. Dotted
297: line shows the dimensionless correlation function of the KAMM
298: maps, $C_{\rm KAMM}(\theta)/\sigma_{\rm KAMM}^2$, which remains
299: positive out to $\sim 100^{\prime\prime}$ and is better viewed in
300: log-log plots as in Fig. SI-4 of KAMM1.}
301: \label{fig3}
302: \end{center}
303: \end{figure}
304:
305: The excess source-subtracted CIB fluctuation on arcminute scales
306: in the 3.6 $\mu$m channel is $\sim 0.1$ nW/m$^2$/sr; KAMM measure
307: a similar amplitude in the longer IRAC bands indicating that the
308: energy spectrum of the arcminute scale fluctuations is flat to
309: slowly rising with increasing wavelength at least over the IRAC
310: range of wavelengths. This is illustrated with the solid line in
311: the left panels of Fig. \ref{fig1}.
312:
313:
314:
315: \section{Cosmological implications}
316:
317: Any interpretation of the KAMM results must reproduce three major
318: aspects:
319:
320: $\bullet$ The sources in the KAMM data were removed to a certain
321: (faint) flux limit, so the CIB fluctuations arise in populations
322: with magnitudes fainter than the corresponding magnitude limit,
323: $m_{\rm lim}$. Furthermore, these sources are not present among
324: the optical ACS galaxies as demonstrated by the absence of
325: correlations between these galaxies and the IRAC source-subtracted
326: CIB maps.
327:
328: $\bullet$ These sources must reproduce the excess CIB fluctuations
329: by KAMM on scales $> 0.5^\prime$. They must also reproduce the
330: measured spectrum of the CIB fluctuations, which is different from
331: the observed clustering pattern of ordinary galaxies at
332: intermediate $z$.
333:
334: $\bullet$ Lastly, the populations fainter than the above magnitude
335: limit must account not only for the correlated part of the CIB,
336: but - equally important - they must reproduce the (low) shot-noise
337: component of the KAMM signal, which dominates the power at
338: $<$0.5$^\prime$. The discussion below by-and-large follows KAMM3:
339:
340: 1) {\bf Magnitude limits and epochs}. Since the ACS galaxies do
341: not contribute to the source-subtracted CIB fluctuations, the
342: latter must arise at $z>7$ as is required by the Lyman break at
343: rest $\sim 0.1 \mu$m getting redshifted past the ACS $z$-band of
344: peak wavelength $\simeq 0.9 \mu$m. This would place the sources
345: producing the KAMM signal within the first 0.7 Gyr. If the KAMM
346: signal were to originate in lower $z$ galaxies which escaped the
347: ACS GOODS source catalog because they are below the catalog flux
348: threshold, they would have to be extremely low-luminosity systems
349: ($< 2\times 10^7 h^{-2}L_\odot$ at $z$=1) and these galaxies would
350: also have to cluster very differently from their ACS counterparts.
351:
352: 2) {\bf Clustering component}. Solid lines in Fig. \ref{fig1}
353: show the expected CIB fluctuations from sources with the (biased)
354: concordance $\Lambda$CDM power spectrum at $z>5$. The fit is
355: reasonably good making such sources a plausible candidate for
356: producing the observed signal. At the same time, the observed
357: galaxy populations out to $z\sim 2-3$ cluster very differently.
358: Thus any model attempting to assign the KAMM signal to more recent
359: sources will have to account for this {\it observed} difference in
360: the clustering patterns.
361:
362: 3) {\bf Net CIB levels from the new sources}: The angle of
363: $1^\prime$ in the concordance cosmology subtends comoving scales
364: of 2.2-3 Mpc at 5$\leq z \leq$20. For $\Lambda$CDM density fields
365: with reasonable biasing one can reach relative arcminute-scale
366: fluctuations of $\sim$5-10\% meaning that the net CIB from sources
367: contributing to the KAMM signal at 3.6 $\mu$m is at least 1-2
368: nW/m$^2$/sr, which is well within the uncertainties of the recent
369: CIB measurements of Thompson et al (2007).
370:
371: 4) {\bf Shot noise constraints}. The amplitude of the shot-noise
372: power gives a particularly strong indication of the epochs of the
373: sources contributing to the KAMM signal. This can be seen from the
374: expressions for the shot noise (Kashlinsky 2005a):
375: \begin{equation}
376: P_{\rm SN} = \int_{m_{\rm AB}>m_{\rm lim}}f(m) dF(m) \equiv
377: f(\bar{m}) F_{\rm tot}(m_{\rm AB} > m_{\rm lim})\label{shotnoise}
378: \end{equation}
379: where $f(m)$ is the flux in Jy of a source of magnitude $m$ and
380: $F_{\rm tot}(m_{\rm AB} > m_{\rm lim})$ is the net CIB flux
381: produced by the remaining sources. Above it was shown that the
382: sources contributing to the fluctuations must have CIB flux
383: greater than a few nW/m$^2$/sr and combining this with the values
384: for $P_{\rm SN}\sim 10^{-11}$nW$^2$/m$^4$/sr, reached in the KAMM2
385: analysis, leads via eq. \ref{shotnoise} to these sources having
386: typical magnitudes $m_{\rm AB} < 29-30$ or individual fluxes $< 4$
387: nJy. {\it Such faint sources are expected to lie at very high
388: $z$.}
389:
390: 5) {\bf Mass/light ratio of the new populations}: This information
391: on the nature of the populations responsible for these CIB
392: fluctuations, can be obtained from the fact that the significant
393: amount of flux ($>$1-2 nW/m$^2$/sr) required to explain the
394: amplitude of the fluctuations must be produced within the short
395: time available at these high $z$ (cosmic times $<$0.5-1 Gyr). The
396: implied comoving luminosity density associated with these
397: populations is related to the fraction of baryons locked in these
398: objects with the additional assumption of their $\Gamma\equiv
399: M/L$. The smaller the value of $\Gamma$, the fewer baryons are
400: required to explain the CIB fluctuations detected in the KAMM
401: studies. It turns out that in order not to exceed the baryon
402: fraction observed in stars, the populations producing these CIB
403: fluctuations had to have $\Gamma$ much less than the solar value,
404: typical of the present-day populations (KAMM3). This is consistent
405: with the general expectations of the first stars being very
406: massive.
407:
408:
409: 6) {\bf Resolving the new sources}: In order to directly detect
410: the faint sources responsible for the CIB fluctuations with fluxes
411: below a few nJy, their individual flux must exceed the confusion
412: limit. If such sources were to contribute to the CIB required by
413: KAMM data, at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m they had to have the average
414: surface density of $\bar{n} \sim F_{\rm CIB}^2/P_{\rm SN} \sim 5
415: \; {\rm arcsec}^{-2}$. In order to avoid the confusion limit and
416: resolve these sources individually at, say, 5-sigma level
417: ($\alpha=5$) one would need a beam of the area $\omega_{\rm beam}
418: \leq \alpha^{-2}/\bar{n} \sim 5\times 10^{-3}{\rm arcsec}^2$ or of
419: circular radius below $\sim$0.04 arcsec. This is clearly not in
420: the realm of the currently operated instruments, but the {\it
421: JWST} could be able to resolve these objects given its sensitivity
422: and resolution.
423:
424:
425: {\bf Acknowledgements} I thank my collaborators, Rick Arendt, John
426: Mather and Harvey Moseley for many contributions to the KAMM
427: results, and the NSF AST-0406587 grant for support.
428:
429: \begin{thebibliography}{}
430:
431: \bibitem [Bond et al 1986]{bond}{Bond, J.R., Carr, B.J., \& Hogan, C.J. 1986, \textit{Ap.J.}, 306, 428}
432:
433:
434: \bibitem [Bromm \& Larson 2004]{bromm_araa}{Bromm, V. \& Larson, R.
435: 2004, \textit{ARA\&A}, 42, 79}
436:
437:
438: \bibitem[Cooray et al (2004)]{cooray} Cooray, A. et al 2004,
439: \textit{Ap.J.}, 606, 611
440:
441: \bibitem [Fazio et al (2004)]{fazio}{Fazio, G. et al 2004,
442: \textit{Ap.J.Suppl.}, 154, 39}
443:
444: \bibitem[Fixsen et al (2000)]{fixsen} Fixsen, D., Moseley, S.H. \&
445: Arendt, R.G. 2000, \textit{Ap.J.Suppl.}, 128, 651
446:
447: \bibitem[Giavilsco et al (2004)]{goods} Giavilsco, M. et al 2004,
448: \textit{Ap.J.}, 600, L93
449:
450: \bibitem[Hogbom (1974)]{clean} Hogbom, J. 1974, \textit{A\&AS}, 15, 417
451:
452: \bibitem[Kashlinsky (2005)]{review} Kashlinsky, A. 2005, \textit{Phys. Rep.},
453: 409, 361
454:
455: \bibitem[Kashlinsky (2005)]{grb} Kashlinsky, A. 2005, \textit{Ap.J.}, 633
456: L5
457:
458: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2002)]{2mass} Kashlinsky, A., Odenwald,
459: S., Mather, J., Skrutskie, M. \& Cutri, R. 2002, \textit{Ap.J.},
460: 579, L53
461:
462: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2004)]{kagmm} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt,
463: R.G., Gardner, J.P., Mather, J. \& Moseley, S.H. 2004,
464: \textit{Ap.J.}, 608, 1
465:
466: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2005)]{kamm1} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H. 2005,
467: \textit{Nature}, 438, 45 (KAMM1)
468:
469: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2007)]{kamm2} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H.
470: 2007, \textit{Ap.J.}, 654, L5 (KAMM2)
471:
472: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2007)]{kamm3} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H.
473: 2007, \textit{Ap.J.}, 654, L1 (KAMM3)
474:
475: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2007)]{kamm4} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H.
476: 2007, \textit{Ap.J.}, 666, L1 (KAMM4)
477:
478: \bibitem[Santos et al (2002)]{santos} Santos, M., Bromm, V. \&
479: Kamionkowski, M. 2002, \textit{MNRAS}, 336, 1082
480:
481: \bibitem[Thomspon et al (2005)]{thompson} Thompson, R.,
482: Eisenstein, D., Fan, X., Rieke, M. \& Kennicutt, R. 2007,
483: \textit{Ap.J.}, 659, 667
484:
485: \bibitem[Thomspon et al (2005)]{thompson2} Thompson, R.,
486: Eisenstein, D., Fan, X., Rieke, M. \& Kennicutt, R. 2007,
487: \textit{Ap.J.}, 666, 658
488:
489: \end{thebibliography}
490:
491:
492: \end{document}
493: