1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{graphicx}
3: %\usepackage{graphicx}
4: \slugcomment{}
5: \shorttitle{}
6: \bibliographystyle{apj}
7: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
8: \shortauthors{Cieza et al.}
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{\emph{Spitzer} observations of the Hyades: \\
11: Circumstellar debris disks at 625\,Myr of age}
12:
13: \author{Lucas Cieza\altaffilmark{1,2,3},
14: William D. Cochran\altaffilmark{1}, and
15: Jean-Charles Augereau\altaffilmark{4}}
16:
17:
18: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Department and McDonald Observatory,
19: University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712}
20: \altaffiltext{2}{Now at the Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822}
21: \altaffiltext{3}{\emph{Spitzer} Fellow}
22: \altaffiltext{4}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Grenoble, CNRS, Universit\'e Joseph-Fourier, UMR 5571, Grenoble, France}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: We use the \emph{Spitzer} Space Telescope to search for infrared excess at
26: 24, 70, and 160\,$\mu$m due to debris disks around a sample of 45 FGK-type
27: members of the Hyades cluster.
28: We supplement our observations with archival 24 and 70\,$\mu$m
29: \emph{Spitzer} data of an
30: additional 22 FGK-type and 11 A-type Hyades members in order to provide
31: robust statistics on the incidence of debris disks at 625\,Myr of age,
32: an era corresponding to the late heavy bombardment in the Solar System.
33: We find that none of the 67 FGK-type stars in our sample show evidence for
34: a debris disk, while 2 out of the 11 A-type stars do so.
35: This difference in debris disk detection rate is likely to be
36: due to a sensitivity bias in favor of early-type stars. The fractional disk
37: luminosity, $L_{DUST}/L_*$, of the disks around the two A-type
38: stars is $\sim$4$\times$10$^{-5}$, a level that is below the
39: sensitivity of our observations toward the FGK-type stars.
40: However, our sensitivity limits for FGK-type stars are able to
41: exclude, at the 2-$\sigma$ level, frequencies higher than 12\% and 5\%
42: of disks with $L_{DUST}/L_* > $1$\times$10$^{-4}$ and
43: $L_{DUST}/L_* > $5$\times$10$^{-4}$, respectively.
44: We also use our sensitivity limits and debris disk models
45: to constrain the maximum mass of dust, as a function of distance
46: from the stars, that could remain undetected around our targets.
47:
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \keywords{open clusters and associations: individual (\objectname{Hyades})
51: --- circumstellar matter}
52:
53: \section{Introduction}\label{intro}
54:
55: Soon after IRAS discovered cold circumstellar disks around main-sequence
56: (MS) stars \citep{AuBeGi84}, it was realized that these disks could not be
57: made of primordial material. Followup CO observations \citep[e.g.][]{YaHaOm93}
58: showed that molecular gas was highly depleted around these disks.
59: Since, in the absence of gas, the survival time of dust
60: due to dissipation processes such as radiation/wind pressure and the
61: Poynting-Robertson effect is much shorter than the ages of MS stars,
62: these systems are believed to be debris disks where dust is continuously
63: replenished by collisions between planetesimals, the building blocks of
64: planets. Because of their probable connection with the formation of
65: planetary systems, debris disks rapidly became the subject of many studies.
66: However, IRAS was only sensitive enough to study bright nearby objects and
67: most of the pre-\emph{Spitzer}
68: statistics come from surveys performed by IRAS's successor, the ISO satellite.
69: \citet{HaDoJM01} studied 84 nearby ($\mathrm{d} < 25$\,pc) A,F,G, and K stars
70: for which ISO was sensitive to photospheric fluxes and detected 60\,$\mu$m
71: excess in $\sim$50\% of the stars younger than 400\,Myr and in 10\% of
72: the stars older than 400\,Myr. They suggest that this sudden decrease
73: in the fraction of stars with disks around 400\,Myr is related to the lifetime
74: of planetesimals that replenish the dust.
75: \citet{SpSaSi01} observed $\sim$150 pre-main sequence stars and young
76: main sequence stars and detected 60\,$\mu$m excess in $\sim$ 25\% of
77: the objects. Their observations do not confirm a sudden decrease in
78: the disk fraction around 400\,Myr but rather suggest a power law
79: relationship (index $\sim$ --2) between the age of the star and the
80: fractional dust luminosity, $L_{DUST}/L_*$.
81: They argue that such a power law naturally arises in collisionally
82: replenished debris disks. The discrepancies in the results from
83: these ISO surveys can probably be traced back to the different
84: target selection criteria and observing strategies and to small
85: number statistics. However, since conclusions from \citet{HaDoJM01}
86: and \citet{SpSaSi01} were not totally consistent, ISO was unable
87: to provide a clear picture for the evolution of debris disks.
88:
89: Fortunately, \emph{Spitzer}'s unprecedented sensitivity has recently
90: allowed many studies of large samples of pre-MS and MS stars in the mid- and
91: far-IR. These studies are rapidly providing important clues on the evolution
92: of debris disks. Rieke et al. (2005) studied over 250 A-type stars and
93: concluded that, even though the incidence of 24 $\mu$m excess clearly decreases
94: with increasing stellar age, a very large dispersion on the magnitude
95: of the IR-excesses is seen at every age.
96: Su et al. (2006) finds that A-type stars show a similar qualitative
97: behavior at 70 $\mu$m. However, at this wavelength, the IR excess declines
98: more slowly with time than at 24 $\mu$m. The decay timescale is
99: estimated to be $\sim$150 Myr for the 24 $\mu$m excess and $\sim$850 Myr for
100: the 70 $\mu$m excess. Trilling et al. (2007) studied field
101: FGK-type stars and found that $\sim$4$\%$ and $\sim$16$\%$ of
102: them show detectable IR excesses at 24 and 70$\mu$m, respectively.
103: These disk frequencies are roughly a
104: factor of two lower than those found for A-type stars at the same
105: wavelengths. They also find that solar-type stars have an almost
106: constant disk frequency beyond 1 Gyr and hence conclude that the
107: their debris disk decay timescale is significantly larger than
108: for A-type star. Gautier et al. (2007) studied a sample of nearby M-type stars
109: but detected no significant far-IR excesses. However, given the sensitivity of
110: their survey, they conclude that the average MIPS excesses, measured
111: in photospheric flux units, of the M-type stars are at least a factor
112: of four lower than those of solar-type stars
113:
114: The \emph{Spitzer} study of the Hyades presented in this paper is intended
115: to provide additional clues by giving robust statistics on the frequency of
116: debris disks at 625\,Myr of age for a homogeneous sample of MS stars.
117: At 46\,pc, the Hyades is the nearest star cluster to the Sun, and represent
118: a sample of stars formed at the same epoch with the same heavy element abundance
119: ($[\rm{Fe/H}] = 0.13 \pm 0.01$) \citep{PaSnCo03}.
120:
121: The 625\,Myr age of the Hyades places them at an extremely
122: interesting era in the evolution of planetary systems.
123: This age corresponds almost exactly to the era of the late heavy
124: bombardment (LHB) in our Solar System about 3.9\,Gyrs ago
125: \citep{TePaWa73}.
126: The cratering record of the Moon,
127: Mars, and Mercury all indicate that the inner planets experienced
128: intense bombardment by large bodies at that time. There is still intense
129: debate as to whether the LHB represented
130: merely the end of an exponential decrease in the impact rate from the
131: formation of the terrestrial planets \citep{We75,We77,NeIv94},
132: or was instead a short intense spike in the bombardment rate
133: when the Solar System was about 600\,Myr old \citep{Ry90,Cohen02}.
134: In either case, the LHB of our Solar System clearly
135: indicates that at an age of $\sim$600 My there was still a major debris disk
136: present that was undergoing a rapid evolution. Large, asteroid-size bodies
137: had been built up during the early planet building era, but not all of
138: these bodies had been incorporated into the planets.
139: At the time of the LHB, these bodies were undergoing
140: an era of significant collisions with the inner planets,
141: and presumably with each other as well.
142: These collisions would have generated large amounts of smaller particles,
143: ranging all of the way down to dust particles.
144: If most planetary systems go through a LHB-type event at a similar age,
145: it is quite reasonable to assume that other stellar systems might have
146: also similar remnant debris disks at $\sim$600 Myr of age. However,
147: it has been recently argued that events such that of the LHB can be triggered
148: by sudden dynamical interactions between planets after a long
149: quiescent period of time (Gomes et al. 2005). In that case, the incidence
150: of debris disks on Hyades members is not expected to be significantly
151: different from that of stars that are somewhat older (or younger) than them.
152:
153: Here, we analyze deep MIPS 24 and 70 $\mu$m observations for a sample
154: of 78 Hyades stars, enough to provide robust statistics on the status of
155: debris disks at 625\,Myr of age. In Section ~\ref{oba_data}, we describe the
156: sample of Hyades stars, our observations, and the data reduction procedures.
157: In Section ~\ref{results}, we establish our disk identification criteria
158: and present our detection statistics. In Section ~\ref{Discussion}, we
159: compare our detection statistics to recent \emph{Spitzer} results,
160: use our sensitivity limits and debris disk models to constrain
161: the maximum mass of dust that could remain undetected around our targets,
162: and discuss the implications of our results for debris disk evolution models
163: and the late heavy bombardment in the Solar System.
164:
165: \section{Observations}\label{oba_data}
166:
167: \subsection{\emph{Spitzer} Sample and Observations}
168:
169: The majority of the 78 targets discussed in this paper were observed
170: at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m with the Infrared Array Camera
171: (IRAC) and at 24, 70, and 160\,$\mu$m with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for
172: \emph{Spitzer} (MIPS) as part of our General Observer (GO) program 3371.
173: This program contains 45 FGK-type Hyades members from the high-precision
174: radial velocity (RV) survey discussed by \citet{CoHaPa02} and \citet{PaCoHa04}.
175: We have also included MIPS 24 and 70\,$\mu$m observations of Hyades
176: members from the FEPS \emph{Spitzer} Legacy Project (PID=148, 21 FGK-type
177: stars), and two Guaranteed Time Observation (GTO) programs (PID=40,
178: 11 A-type stars and PID = 71, 1 K0 star). Even though the MIPS photometry
179: for some of the targets has already been discussed in the context
180: of their respective programs \citep{SuRiSt06,MeHiBa06}, we have
181: retrieved the MIPS data from the \emph{Spitzer} archive and processed
182: them ourselves for consistency. The Astronomical Observation Requests
183: (AORs) keys, Program IDs, spectral types from the literature,
184: and near-IR photometry (from 2MASS) for our entire sample
185: of Hyades stars are listed in Table~\ref{tab:sample}.
186:
187: Given the extreme near-IR brightness of the sample, the IRAC observations
188: of our GO program were acquired in the subarray mode (e.g., 0.02 sec
189: $\times$ 64 frames). The IRAC data were requested to try to better
190: constrain the stellar photospheres of our targets; however, they did not
191: fulfill their intended purpose and were not utilized in our
192: study (see Section 3.1).
193: All the MIPS observations discussed in this paper were obtained using
194: the MIPS pointed imaging mode. At 24 $\mu$m, 1 or 2 cycles of 3-sec
195: frames were enough to detect the stellar photospheres of the entire
196: sample with high signal to noise ratio (S/N $>$ 40).
197: At 70 $\mu$m, the observations were designed for the 1-$\sigma$
198: \emph{detector} sensitivities to match the predicted stellar
199: photospheres of the targets. Thus, in the absence of background
200: noise, an IR excess 4 times larger than the photospheric flux would be
201: detected at a 5-$\sigma$ level. However, at the distance of the
202: Hyades, the 70 $\mu$m photospheric emission of most FGK-type stars
203: falls below the extragalactic confusion level (see Section 3.2)
204: and the observations become background limited beyond 24 $\mu$m for
205: most of the sample.
206:
207: \subsection{Data Reduction}
208:
209: We processed the IRAC data (available only for the GO program 3371)
210: and MIPS 24\,$\mu$m data using the mosaicing and source extraction
211: software c2dphot, which was developed as part of the the \emph{Spitzer} Legacy
212: Project ``From Molecular Cores to Planet Forming Disks'' Evans et al. (2006).
213: This program is based on the mosaicking program MOPEX (MOsaicker
214: and Point source EXtractor), developed by the \emph{Spitzer} Science
215: Center (SSC) and on the source extractor program DoPHOT \citep{ScMaSa93}.
216: The IRAC and MIPS 24\,$\mu$m measurements for our entire sample are
217: listed in Tables ~\ref{tab:IRAC} and ~\ref{tab:MIPS}, respectively.
218:
219: For the 70\,$\mu$m and 160\,$\mu$m data, we used MOPEX to create mosaiced
220: images. We started from the SSC pipeline version S14.4 of the
221: median-filtered BCDs (basic calibrated data), which are
222: optimized for point-source photometry. For each source, we created two
223: versions of the 70\,$\mu$m mosaic, one resampled to 8$\arcsec$\,pixels
224: (close to the original size of the pixels in the detector) and the
225: other resampled to 4$\arcsec$\,pixels. We used the former to obtain the
226: aperture photometry and the latter to visually inspect the images
227: for background contamination (See section~\ref{res_70}). The 160\,$\mu$m
228: data were resampled to mosaics with 16$\arcsec$\,pixels.
229:
230: For the 70\,$\mu$m data, we use an aperture of 16$\arcsec$ in radius and a sky
231: annulus with an inner and an outer radius of 48$\arcsec$ and 80$\arcsec$,
232: respectively.
233: From high S/N 70\,$\mu$m point source observations we derive a multiplicative
234: aperture correction, $AC$, of 1.8.
235: This AC is in good agreement with the 1.74 value suggested by the
236: \emph{Spitzer} Science Center for observations with the same aperture size
237: and similar sky annulus\footnote{See htt/ss.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/apercorr.}.
238: Thus, we calculate the observed flux,
239: F$_{70}$, as F$_{70}$=FA$_{70} \times AC$, where FA$_{70}$ is the flux within
240: the aperture. We estimate the 1-$\sigma$ photometric uncertainty as
241: $\sigma = AC \times$ RMS$_{SKY}$ $\times$ $n^{1/2}$, where $RMS_{SKY}$
242: is the flux RMS of the pixels in the sky annulus, and $n$ is the number
243: of pixels in our aperture. The 70\,$\mu$m measurements for our entire
244: sample are listed in Table~\ref{tab:MIPS}. For the 160\,$\mu$m data,
245: we used an aperture with a radius of 32$\arcsec$ and a sky annulus with
246: an inner and an outer radius of 48$\arcsec$ and 80$\arcsec$, respectively.
247: The fluxes and uncertainty were calculated in the same way as for the
248: 70\,$\mu$m data, but adopting an aperture correction of 2.0, appropriate
249: for the size of the aperture and sky annulus used$^4$.
250: The 160\,$\mu$m measurements for the entire sample of FGK-type stars from
251: program ID=3371 are also listed in Table~\ref{tab:MIPS} (the 160\,$\mu$m
252: data are not available for the Hyades stars from the other programs).
253:
254: \section{Results}\label{results}
255:
256: \subsection{MIPS 24\,$\mu$m results}\label{res_24}
257:
258: At 24\,$\mu$m, all of our targets are detected with very high
259: signal to noise ratios (S/N $\sim$50-300). In order to establish
260: whether or not our targets show IR-excess at a given wavelength, we
261: first need to estimate the expected photospheric fluxes at that wavelength.
262: We do so by normalizing NextGen Models \citep{HaAlBa99}, corresponding to
263: published spectral types of our Hyades stars, to the near-IR data from 2MASS
264: listed in Table~\ref{tab:sample}. We decided not to include the IRAC data
265: in the normalization of the stellar photospheres for two reasons. First,
266: the IRAC data are only available for the stars from program 3371, and second
267: because we found that including IRAC fluxes does not provide a better
268: photospheric constraint than using the 2MASS data alone. This is probably because, even
269: for bright sources with formal errors $<$1$\%$, there is a random error floor to
270: the best uncertainty possible with our IRAC and MIPS 24 $\mu$m observing techniques
271: and data reduction process of $\sim$0.05 mag (Evans et al. 2006). The IRAC photometry for
272: all the targets in our GO program 3371 is presented for completeness only (see Table 2).
273: The expected 24\,$\mu$m photospheric fluxes for our entire sample, obtained as
274: described above, are listed in Table~\ref{tab:MIPS}.
275:
276: The magnitude of the smallest 24\,$\mu$m excess emission that we can
277: identify depends on both the uncertainty of our photometry and on
278: our ability to predict the photospheric flux. In Figure~\ref{fig:24micron},
279: we plot the distribution of observed 24\,$\mu$m fluxes relative to predicted
280: photospheric fluxes. After excluding a single outlier, this distribution
281: can be characterized as a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 0.99 and a
282: 1-$\sigma$ dispersion of 0.06. The mean of the distribution is consistent with the
283: absolute \emph{Spitzer} calibration uncertainty at 24 $\mu$m.
284: The dispersion of the distribution is identical to that found by \citet{BrBeTr06}
285: for FGK-type field stars,
286: smaller than that obtained by \citet{BeFrTr07} for FGK, and M stars, and only slightly
287: larger than the uncertainty floor of 0.05 mag expected for 24 $\mu$m photometry obtained
288: with \emph{c2dphot} (Evans et al. 2006). However, we note that our 1-$\sigma$ dispersion
289: in the distribution of measured to predicted flux ratios is significantly larger
290: than the $\sim$0.03 mag value achieved by Su et al. (2006) for A-type stars and
291: by Thrilling et al. (2007) for FGK-type stars.
292: Based on the analysis of Figure~\ref{fig:24micron}, we conclude that only one of the Hyades stars
293: in our sample shows a significant ($>$ 3-$\sigma$) 24 $\mu$m excess.
294: This object is HD28355, an A-type star that was already identified by
295: \citet{SuRiSt06} as having a debris disk. According to the values listed in
296: Table~\ref{tab:MIPS}, we find that the 24\,$\mu$m flux of HD28355 is
297: 1.24 times the expected photospheric level, in good agreement with the
298: 1.27 value found by \citet{SuRiSt06}.
299:
300: \subsection{MIPS 70\,$\mu$m results}\label{res_70}
301:
302: By extrapolating the \emph{predicted} 24\,$\mu$m photospheric fluxes, listed
303: in Table~\ref{tab:MIPS}, we estimated the fluxes of the
304: stellar photosphereres that are expected at 70\,$\mu$m. These
305: predicted 70\,$\mu$m photospheric fluxes are also listed in
306: Table~\ref{tab:MIPS}.
307: Unlike at 24\,$\mu$m, the expected photospheric flux at 70\,$\mu$m of all
308: our solar-type Hyades stars is at or below the noise of the observations.
309: This noise is dominated by the sky pixel to pixel variations due to
310: extragalactic source confusion and cirrus contamination. Bryden et al.
311: (2006) present a detailed analysis of the sources of noise in deep
312: 70 $\mu$m observations. They analyze the noise of images constructed
313: by combining an increasing number of cycles (each cycle consisting of
314: ten 10-sec frames). They show that beyond 4 cycles (a total exposure
315: time of 400 sec), the total noise becomes dominated by the extragalactic
316: background noise. The low spatial resolution of \emph{Spitzer}, combined with the
317: high instrumental sensitivity of MIPS, implies a high incidence of
318: extragalactic sources per beam.
319: This extragalactic source confusion sets a firm limit
320: (1-$\sigma$ $\sim$2 mJy) to the sensitivity that can be achieved with MIPS at 70
321: $\mu$m. This limit \emph{can not} be reduced with longer integration times.
322: Any contamination from galactic cirrus decreases the sensitivity that can
323: be achieved at any given field. Most of the 70 $\mu$m observations discussed
324: in this paper amount to at least 500 sec (and up to 1200 sec in many cases)
325: and hence can be characterized as ``background limited''.
326: Since the background noise is highly non-Gaussian, a simple 3-$\sigma$
327: threshold is inappropriate to prevent spurious detections.
328: Thus, the first step in our analysis is to establish a different detection criterion.
329: In Figure~\ref{fig:SNR70micronflux}, we plot the signal to noise ratio
330: as a function of the measured 70\,$\mu$m flux.
331: We find that a similar number of negative and
332: positive fluctuations exist at the 5-$\sigma$ level; therefore, we
333: consider objects with S/N ratios $<$\,5 to be non-detections.
334: We find that only two objects, HD28266 and HD28355, are unambiguously
335: detected. In order to establish that the 70\,$\mu$m emission is in fact
336: associated with the Hyades targets, we inspect their mosaics, shown in
337: Figure~\ref{fig:HD28226}, and verify that the emission is centered
338: on the targets. HD28266 and HD28355 are both A-type stars, which have
339: been already identified by \citet{SuRiSt06} as having a debris disk.
340: As mentioned in Section~\ref{res_24}, HD28355 also shows significant
341: 24\,$\mu$m excess.
342:
343: Three objects, HD27962, HD29488, and HD33524, have S/N just above 5.
344: We consider these objects to be possible detections that need further
345: consideration. We inspect their high resolution (4$\arcsec$ pixel) mosaics
346: (Figures~\ref{fig:HD27962} and \ref{fig:HD28527}) to establish the
347: spatial distribution of the 70\,$\mu$m emission.
348: In the three cases we find that even though there seems
349: to be a source near the aperture, there is a significant offset
350: ($\sim$10-15$\arcsec$) between the center of the 70\,$\mu$m emission and the
351: location of the Hyades target. Therefore, we conclude that the
352: 70\,$\mu$m emission within these apertures are likely to be due to
353: background contamination.
354:
355: We note that one of these objects, HD33524, has been identified by
356: \citet{SuRiSt06} as having a weak 70\,$\mu$m excess. For this object, they
357: report a 70\,$\mu$m flux of $21.46\pm2.17$ mJy as opposed to our
358: $18.5\pm3.2$5 mJy (i.e., the fluxes agree very well within the uncertainties).
359: A similar situation occurs for HD28527. \citet{SuRiSt06}
360: report a 70\,$\mu$m flux of $37.36\pm5.94$ mJy, which also is in
361: relative agreement with our $25.1\pm5.08$ measurement (within $\sim2\sigma$).
362: However, since the 70\,$\mu$m emission does not seem to be
363: centered at the target (Figure~\ref{fig:HD28527}), we do not consider
364: this detection to be real either.
365: An independent reanalysis and inspection of the 70 $\mu$m data
366: of HD 33254 and HD 28527 confirms that the 70 $\mu$m fluxes within
367: the apertures are no likely to be associated with the Hyades stars
368: (Su 2008, private communications).
369: Our conservative detection criterion
370: is also supported by the presence of negative background fluctuations at
371: the $5$-$7\sigma$ level at the location of some of the targets, such as HD28430
372: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:HD28430}.
373:
374: We conclude that none of the 67 FGK-type Hyades stars in our sample are
375: detected at 70\,$\mu$m, while 2 of the 11 A-type stars are. The measured
376: 70\,$\mu$m fluxes for these two objects, HD28266 and HD28355, are 13.9 and
377: 11.5 times the values predicted for their respective photospheres
378: (see Table~\ref{tab:MIPS}). We attribute these excesses, as \citet{SuRiSt06}
379: did, to the presence of debris disks around both of these sources.
380:
381: \subsection{MIPS 160\,$\mu$m results}
382:
383: At 160\,$\mu$m, the expected photospheric levels are significantly below the
384: noise of the observations (which are only available for the 45 FGK-type
385: stars from the program ID=3371).
386: In order to establish the detection of any of our targets, we follow the
387: same approach as for the 70\,$\mu$m data. In Figure~\ref{fig:SNR160micronflux},
388: we plot the the signal to noise ratio as a function of the measured
389: 160\,$\mu$m flux. As for the 70\,$\mu$m observations, we find that a similar
390: number of negative and positive fluctuations exist at the 5-$\sigma$ level;
391: therefore, we considered all the 160\,$\mu$m measurements to be non-detections.
392:
393: \section{Discussion}\label{Discussion}
394:
395: \subsection{Comparison to Recent Spitzer Results}
396:
397: Recent \emph{Spitzer} surveys have provided robust statistics on
398: the debris disk frequencies around nearby stars against which our
399: results can be compared. In order to make more meaningful
400: comparisons, we divide the sample into FGK-type stars (67 objects)
401: and A-type stars (11 objects). There are two motivations
402: for doing so. First, most of the previous studies are restricted
403: to either one of these groups. Second, given the strong luminosity
404: dependence on spectral type, the 70\,$\mu$m
405: observations are sensitive to much smaller 70\,$\mu$m excesses
406: (in units of photospheric fluxes) and $L_{DUST}/L_*$ values
407: for A-type stars than for FGK-type stars.
408:
409: \subsubsection{FGK-type vs A-type stars}\label{A-type}
410:
411: To estimate the sensitivity difference between the 70\,$\mu$m
412: observations of A-type stars and FGK-type stars, we calculate the
413: ratio of 5 times the flux uncertainties to the estimated photospheric
414: values (from Table~\ref{tab:MIPS}). A cumulative histogram of this
415: ratio is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:70micronCDF}
416: for FGK and A-type stars. For A-type stars, the 70\,$\mu$m observations
417: can detect fluxes that are $\sim$1-2$\times$ those of the expected
418: photospheres. However, for most of the FGK-type stars, the 70\,$\mu$m
419: observations are only sensitive enough to detect fluxes that are
420: $\sim$15$\times$ the expected photospheric values.
421: As discussed in Section 3.2, this sensitivity limitation
422: is mostly due to the fact that the stellar photospheres of
423: solar-type stars, at the distance of the Hyades, fall below the
424: 70 $\mu$m extragalactic confusion limit for MIPS
425: (1-$\sigma$ $\sim$2 mJy, Bryden et al. 2006).
426:
427: The difference in 70\,$\mu$m sensitivity is even larger when it is
428: calculated in terms of minimum detectable disk luminosity, $L_{DUST}/L_*$.
429: Following Bryden et al. (2006), we calculate minimum disk luminosity
430: as a function of 70\,$\mu$m excess flux by setting the emission peak
431: at 70\,$\mu$m (T$_{DUST} = 52.5 K)$, according to:
432:
433: \begin{equation}\label{FDL}
434: \frac{L_{DUST}}{L_*}(minimum)
435: = 10^{-5}\left(\frac{5600 K}{T_{*}}\right)^3\frac{F_{DUST,70}}{F_{*,70}}
436: \end{equation}
437: where $F_{DUST,70}$ is the flux of the dust and $F_{*,70}$ is the flux of
438: the stars, both at 70\,$\mu$m.
439: By setting $F_{DUST,70} = 5\sigma_{70}-F_{*,70}$, we calculate the minimum
440: $L_{DUST}/L_*$ values that are detectable for A-type and FGK-type stars.
441: The results are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:70micronCDF2}, which demostrates that
442: the 70\,$\mu$m observations of A-type stars are sensitive enough to detect
443: disk with $L_{DUST}/L_*$ values in the 10$^{-6}$-10$^{-5}$ range.
444: However for most of the FGK-type stars, the 70\,$\mu$m observations are only
445: sensitive enough to detect disks with
446: $L_{DUST}/L_{STAR} \gtrsim$1-2$\times$10$^{-4}$.
447: We also use equation ~\ref{FDL} to estimate $L_{DUST}/{L_*}$ values
448: of 3.4$\times$10$^{-5}$ and 4.7$\times$10$^{-5}$ for the debris disks
449: around HD28226 and HD28355, respectively.
450: Since there are only 2 FGK-type objects for which the 70\,$\mu$m
451: observations are sensitive enough to detect disks fainter than
452: $L_{DUST}/{L_*} \sim 4.0 \times$10$^{-5}$, we conclude that
453: the difference in the detection rate of debris disks around
454: A-type stars and FGK-type stars is the result of a
455: sensitivity bias rather than a real effect.
456:
457: \subsubsection{Comparison to FGK-type field stars}
458:
459: \citet{BrBeTr06} present 24 and 70\,$\mu$m observations for 69~FGK
460: nearby (distance $\sim$10-30\,pc) field stars with a median age of
461: $\sim$4\,Gyrs.
462: They find 24\,$\mu$m excess around only one of their targets. This is
463: consistent with the 24\,$\mu$m excess rate of 0$\%$ we find for our 67
464: FGK-type stars.
465: %Later Include Beichman et al. (2006, astro-ph)
466: At 70\,$\mu$m, they identify 7 debris disks. This excess rate ($\sim$10$\%$),
467: if taken at face value, seems inconsistent with our results.
468: However, given the smaller distances to the stars involved, their
469: survey was more sensitive than ours to faint disks.
470: Since the stellar photospheres of their targets are above
471: the 70 $\mu$m confusion limit of MIPS, they were able to detect
472: the stellar photosphere of most of them and identify very faint
473: disks ($L_{DUST}/L_* \geq 10^{-5}$).
474: They also find that the disk frequency increases from 2$\%\pm2\%$
475: for disks with $L_{DUST}/L_*\geq 10^{-4}$ to $12\%\pm5\%$ for
476: disks with $L_{DUST}/L_* \geq 10^{-5}$. Recent results by Trilling et al. (2008)
477: confirm that the frequency of debris disks with $L_{DUST}/L_* \geq 10^{-4}$ around
478: solar type stars is $\sim$2$\%$.
479:
480: Figure~\ref{fig:70micronCDF2} shows that there are only 22 objects for which
481: our 70\,$\mu$m observations are sensitive enough to
482: detect a debris disk with $L_{DUST}/L_* \geq 10^{-4}$.
483: We use binomial statistics to show that if the incidence of disks
484: brighter than $L_{DUST}/L_* = 10^{-4}$ is in fact 2\%
485: as found by \citet{BrBeTr06} and Trilling et al. (2007),
486: there was a 26$\%$ probability that our survey would find zero disks.
487: Also, given the cumulative
488: distribution of sensitivities shown in Figure~\ref{fig:70micronCDF2},
489: we use binomial statistics to calculate the minimum disk frequencies,
490: as a function of $L_{DUST}/L_*$, that would be \emph{excluded}
491: at the 1- and 2-$\sigma$ level
492: (i.e., the disk frequencies that would give
493: our survey a 32\% and 5\% chance to result in zero detections).
494: These disk frequencies are tabulated in Table~\ref{tab:disklimits}.
495:
496: Based on the statistics for disks with $L_{DUST}/L_* \geq 10^{-4}$,
497: Table~\ref{tab:disklimits} suggests that a debris disk fraction in the Hyades
498: $\sim$2.5 and $\sim$6 times larger than in the field can be excluded at the
499: 1-$\sigma$ and 2-$\sigma$ level, respectively. Thus, we conclude that the
500: debris disk fraction of the FGK-type Hyades stars
501: (age $\sim$625\,Myr) is consistent with that in the field (age $\sim$~4~Gyrs),
502: but that $\sim$6$\times$ higher values cannot excluded from the currently
503: available data.
504:
505: \subsection{Comparison to debris disk models}
506:
507: In this section, we use the debris disk model developed by Augereau et al. (1999)
508: to constrain the location and mass of the circumstellar material around
509: HD 28266 and HD 28355, the two A-type stars identified in section ~\ref{res_70}
510: as having real 70 $\mu$m excesses. We also use this model to estimate the
511: maximum encompassed mass of dust, as a function of distance from the stars, that
512: could remain undetected around the A-type and FGK-type stars in our sample that
513: do not show significant IR excesses.
514:
515: \subsubsection{The debris disks around HD 28266 and HD 28355}
516:
517: We limit the exploration of the parameter space to the disk parameters that affect
518: most the global shape of an SED, namely the minimum grain size $a_{\rm min}$, the peak surface
519: density position $r_0$ and the total dust mass $M_{\rm dust}$ (or, equivalently, the
520: surface density at $r_0$).
521: We adopted a differential grain size distribution proportional to $a^{-3.5}$ between
522: $a_{\rm min}$ and $a_{\rm max}$, with $a_{\rm max} = 1300\,\mu$m, a value sufficiently
523: large to not affect the SED fitting in the wavelength range we consider.
524: Following Augereau et al. (1999), the disk surface density $\Sigma(r)$ is parametrized by a
525: two power-law radial profile
526: $\Sigma(r) = \Sigma(r_0) \sqrt{2} \left(x^{-2\alpha_{\rm in}}+x^{-2\alpha_{\rm out}} \right)^{-1/2}$
527: with $x = r/r_0$, and where $\alpha_{\rm in} = 10$ and $\alpha_{\rm out} = -3$ to
528: simulate a disk peaked around $r_0$, with a sharp inner edge, and a density profile decreasing
529: smoothly with the distance from the star beyond $r_0$. The optical properties of the grains
530: were calculated for astronomical silicates (optical constants from Weingartner $\&$ Draine (2001)),
531: and with the Mie theory valid for hard spheres. The grain temperatures were obtained by assuming the
532: dust particles are in thermal equilibrium with the central star. NextGen model atmosphere spectra
533: (Hauschildt et al. 1999) scaled to the observed K-band magnitudes, were used to model the
534: stellar photospheres.
535:
536: For each of the stars with 70 $\mu$m excess, HD 28266 and HD 28355, we calculated $15000$ SEDs
537: ($0.3\,\mu$m$\leq \lambda \leq 950\,\mu$m), for $75$, logarithmically-spaced values of $a_{\rm min}$
538: between $0.05\,\mu$m and $100\,\mu$m, and for $200$ values of $r_0$,
539: logarithmically-spaced between $10$\,AU and $500$\,AU. For each model, the dust mass
540: was adjusted by a least-squares method, assuming purely photospheric emission in the 2MASS
541: bands and by fitting the measured MIPS $24\,\mu$m and $70\,\mu$m flux densities.
542: The results are summarized in Table 5, and the SEDs are displayed in Figure~\ref{SEDs}.
543: Results in Table 7 are listed for two different regimes of minimal grain sizes, namely,
544: $a_{\rm min}$ $>$ 10 $\mu$m and $a_{\rm min}$ $<$ 0.5 $\mu$m in order to illustrate the
545: strong dependence of $r_0$ and M$_{dust}$ on the assumed grain size distribution.
546:
547: Even though neither the position of the peak surface density $r_0$, nor the minimum
548: grain size $a_{\rm min}$, can be uniquely determined with so few observational constraints,
549: some models can be eliminated. In particular, given the large luminosity of A-type
550: stars, the small or nonexistent excess at 24 $\mu$m implies that the disks of
551: HD 28226 and HD 28355 are significantly dust-depleted within \emph{at least} $\sim$40 AU from the star.
552: However, ``inner-holes'' larger than 300 AU can not be excluded if
553: very small grains are present (i.e., a$_{\rm min}$ $<$ 0.5 $\mu$m).
554: Similarly, even though the best-fit disk models imply
555: dust masses of the order 10$^{-2}$M$_{\oplus}$, disk masses $\sim$0.1M$_{\oplus}$
556: could be accomodated for both stars.
557:
558: \subsubsection{Limits on dust masses as a function of radius}
559:
560: In section ~\ref{A-type}, we found that the 70 $\mu$m observations of the Hyades
561: were sensitive to
562: significantly lower fractional disk luminosities for A-type stars than
563: for FGK-type stars. However, since the 70 $\mu$m observations probe larger
564: radii around A-type stars than around FGK-stars, this implies that the mass
565: of the grains needed to produce a given fractional luminosity, as calculated in
566: section~\ref{A-type}, is \emph{larger} around A-type stars than it is around FGK-type
567: stars (see Gautier et al. 2007 for a discussion of origin of the dependence of dust mass
568: sensitivity on stellar luminosity). Therefore, the degree to which the MIPS observations
569: are sensitive to smaller amounts of dust around A-type stars than around FGK-type stars
570: is not immediately obvious. In order to explore this last point, we estimate the maximum
571: encompassed mass of dust, as a function of distance from the stars, that could remain
572: undetected around the A-type and FGK-type stars in our sample that do not show
573: significant IR excesses.
574:
575: Following Cieza et al. (2007), we use the optically thin disk models discussed above
576: to constrain the maximum amount of dust that could be present within 300 AU of
577: the A-type and FGK-type stars in our sample.
578: Using the 70 $\mu$m 5-$\sigma$ upper limits (and the 160 $\mu$m limits, when available),
579: we calculated $15000$ models analogous to those calculated for HD 28266 and HD 28355
580: for each of the stars in our sample. For each model, we calculated the mass encompassed
581: within a radius $r$, as a function of this radius. With this approach, we
582: estimate the maximum dust mass in the circumstellar regions of the Hyades stars with no
583: detectable emission in excess to the photospheric emission. The results for A-type and
584: FGK-type stars, for two different minimal grain size regimes (a$_{\rm min}$ $>$ 10 $\mu$m
585: in blue and a$_{\rm min}$ $<$ 0.5 $\mu$m in red), are shown in Figure \,\ref{MvsR}.
586: This figure shows that the absence of IR excess at 24 and 70 $\mu$m constrains the total
587: mass of dust within 10 AU of the solar type stars to be $<$ 10$^{-4}$ M$_{Earth}$.
588: This limit is an order of magnitude lower for A-type stars.
589: The range of encompassed dust masses as a function of radius for the best-fit disk models
590: of HD 28355 corresponding to the case where a$_{\rm min}$ $>$ 10 $\mu$m is shown for
591: comparison (green region). The fact that, for FGK-type stars, the green region
592: lies below the blue region (i.e., the case corresponding to the same grain size
593: distribution), implies that disks similar to that found around HD 28355 would not
594: be detectable by our observations if they were also present around the
595: FGK-type Hyades members. Given the similarities of the inferred disk properties
596: of HD 28355 and HD 28266 (see Table 5), the same conclusion applies for HD 28266.
597: Thus, Figure \,\ref{MvsR} strengthen our conclusion from section ~\ref{A-type} stating that the
598: difference in detection rate of debris disks around A-type and FGK-type stars
599: is due to a sensitivity bias rather than to a real difference in the
600: incidence or properties of debris disks around stars of different spectral types.
601:
602:
603: \subsection{Debris disk evolution and the Late Heavy Bombardment}
604:
605: \subsubsection{Steady State vs. Stochastic Evolution}
606:
607: \citet{RiSuSt05} studied a sample of 266 A-type stars with
608: \emph{Spitzer}, ISO, or IRAS 24 $\mu$m/25 $\mu$m data.
609: They used this very large sample to establish statistically significant
610: trends of IR-excess with age. They find that: (1) at all ages, the
611: population is dominated by stars with little or no IR excess,
612: (2) stars with a wide range of excesses are seen at every age,
613: and (3) both the frequency and the magnitude of the IR excess decreases
614: with time. In particular, they find that the upper envelope of the
615: evolution of the excess ratio with time can be fitted
616: by $t_o/t$, with $t_o\sim$150\,Myr. Similar trends are seen in the 70\,$\mu$m
617: excesses of A-type stars \citep{SuRiSt06},
618: with the difference that the decay time seems to be considerably larger,
619: $t_o \gtrsim$400\,Myr, suggesting inside-out disk clearing.
620:
621: Based on these results, \citet{RiSuSt05} argue that the evolution of
622: debris disks is the convolution of a stochastic and a steady component.
623: They suggest that, at any given age, the debris disks detected are those
624: that have experienced large planetesimal collisions in the
625: recent past. This stochastic evolution is on top of steady decrease in the
626: number of parent bodies in the belts of planetesimals where the dust is
627: produced, which would explain the overall decrease of IR excess with age.
628: However, it has also been argued that a stochastic component in the evolution
629: of debris disk is not necessary to explain the diversity of disk properties
630: observed at a given age.
631: \citet{WySmSu07} construct a simple collisional model, where the mass
632: of planetesimals is constant until the largest ones reach collisional
633: equilibrium, at which point mass falls as 1/time.
634: They propose that the large spread in IR properties observed at
635: any given age can be explained in terms of the initial distributions
636: of masses and temperatures of the planetesimal belts
637: producing the dust. They argue that their simple model can account for the
638: 24 and 70\,$\mu$m statistics presented by \citet{RiSuSt05} and
639: \citet{SuRiSt06} using realistic belt parameters, and thus that
640: transient events are not \emph{required} to explained the observations.
641: Given the limited observational constraints available, the models presented
642: by \citet{WySmSu07} do not rule out the possibility that
643: stochasticity plays an important role in the evolution
644: of most debris disks. Our results could provide additional constrains to
645: these kinds of models because, unlike the studies by
646: \citet{RiSuSt05} and \citet{SuRiSt06}, our study provides
647: robust statistics for the debris disks at a single, well defined age.
648:
649: \subsubsection{Implications for the Late Heavy Bombardment in the Solar
650: System}\label{LHB}
651:
652: The 625\,Myr age of the Hyades corresponds almost exactly to the era of the
653: late heavy bombardment \citep[LHB,][]{TePaWa73,GoLeTs05}.
654: Thus, \emph{if} the Solar-type (FGK) Hyades stars resemble the Sun at
655: 625\,Myr of age, our statistics could provide valuable clues
656: on this important event in the history of the Solar System.
657:
658: The cause and the duration of the LHB is still a matter of debate.
659: Proposed causes for a intense spike in the impact rate include the
660: formation of Uranus and Neptune \citep{LeDoCh01}, the presence
661: of a fifth terrestrial planet in a low-eccentricity orbit which
662: became dynamically unstable at an age of about 600\,Myr
663: \citep{ChLi02}, or impacts by bodies left over from
664: planetary accretion \citep{MoPeGl01}.
665: More recently, \citet{GoLeTs05} propose that the LHB was triggered
666: by the sudden migration of the giant planets that occurred after
667: a long quiescent period of time. In their model, soon after the
668: dissipation of the solar nebula, the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn
669: started to slowly diverge due to the interaction with the massive
670: disk of planetesimals that was still present. They argue
671: that $\sim$700\,Myr later, when Jupiter and Saturn crossed their 1:2
672: mean motion resonance, their orbits became eccentric and temporally
673: destabilized those of Uranus and Neptune. The reconfiguration of
674: the orbits of the giant planets resulted in the perturbation and
675: massive delivery of planetesimals to the inner Solar System, which
676: according to their models, lasted between 10-150\,Myr.
677:
678: The observational signatures of a LHB-type event as seen from a distance of
679: 46 pc are not known, but it as been suggested that they could be those of a
680: family of rare Solar-type stars characterized by the presence of a bright
681: ``hot disk'' around an object hundreds of million years old.
682: These objects present excess IR emission, originating in the
683: terrestrial planet regions, with $F_{DUST}/F_* > 10^{-4}$,
684: a level that is $>1000$ times larger than steady state evolution models
685: can explain \citep{WySmGr07}.
686: There are currently only 5 known objects that fall into this category of
687: ``hot transient disks'':
688: BD~+20~307 \citep[age $\sim$300\,Myr,][]{SoZuWe05},
689: HD72905 \citep[age $\sim$400\,Myr,][]{BeBrSt06}),
690: $\eta$ Corvi \citep[age $\sim$1\,Gyr,][]{WyGrDe05},
691: HD69830 \citep[age $\sim$2\,Gyr,][]{BeBrRi05},
692: and $\tau$ Ceti (age $\sim$10 Gyr, Di Folco et al. 2007)
693: which represent $\sim$2$\%$ of all the Solar-type stars surveyed.
694: \emph{If} this group of objects corresponds to those that are currently
695: experiencing events similar to the LHB and the Hyades stars resemble
696: the Sun at 625\,Myr of age, then the fact that none of the 67 Solar-type
697: stars in our Hyades sample has a ``hot transient disk'' implies one of
698: two possibilities: (1) the likelihood of an event similar to the LHB
699: is not significantly higher at $\sim$625\,Myr than it is at any other age,
700: or (2) events like the LHB are very short spikes with a duration much closer
701: to the lower limit of 10\,Myr suggested by \citet{GoLeTs05} than to their
702: 150\,Myr upper limit. If the likelihood of a LHB-type event is approximately
703: constant with time, then a 2$\%$ incidence in the Solar neirghborwood
704: (median age $\sim$4000\,Myr) would imply a total duration of $\sim$80\,Myr.
705: However, if such an event is more likely to occur around an age of
706: $\sim$625\,Myr, then our non detections would only be consistent with a
707: much shorter duration. Thus, the implication of our results
708: on the LHB could depend on the age distribution of these ``hot transient
709: disks'', which still remains largely unconstrained since only 5 of such
710: examples are currently known. Fortunately, as more \emph{Spitzer}
711: observations are reported, this distribution will become better constrained.
712:
713: Understanding the debris disk phenomenon has been a high priority of the
714: \emph{Spitzer}'s mission. As a result, the number of debris disk studies
715: has increased dramatically over the last few years. Each of these studies
716: is providing new clues and constraints, from which it will eventually
717: emerge a much clearer picture of the evolution of debris disks
718: and its connection to the history of the Solar System.
719:
720: \acknowledgements
721: We thank the anonymous referee for his/her many comments
722: and suggestions, which have helped to improve the paper significantly.
723: We are deeply grateful to Diane Paulson for helping to stimulate this work
724: and for valuable assistance in preparing the target lists.
725: This work is based on observations and on archival data obtained with the
726: Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
727: California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.
728: Support for this work was provided by NASA through an award issued by
729: JPL/Caltech and through the Spitzer Space Telescope
730: Fellowship Program. This publication makes use of the data products from the
731: Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts
732: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of
733: Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and
734: the National Science Foundation.
735:
736: \clearpage
737: \bibliography{/home/syrah/rv/wdc/tex/bib/master.bib}
738:
739:
740: \clearpage
741: %%%%%%%%%%%% NON_SST_DATA %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
742: \input{tab1}
743: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
744:
745: %%%%%%%%%%%%% HYADES_IRAC %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
746: \input{tab2}
747: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
748:
749: %%%%%%%%%%%% RESULTS_ALL_24 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
750: \input{tab3}
751: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
752:
753: %%%%%%%%%%%% MAX_D_L %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
754: \input{tab4}
755: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
756:
757: %
758: \begin{table*}
759: %\begin{table*}[btp]
760: \label{dds_table}
761: %\begin{center}
762: \caption{Optically thin disk properties, for two different regimes of minimal grain sizes $a_{\rm min}$.}
763: \label{nominal}
764: %\noalign{\mediumskip}
765: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
766: \noalign{\smallskip}
767: \noalign{\smallskip}
768: \noalign{\smallskip}
769: \noalign{\smallskip}
770: \hline
771: %
772: \hline
773: %
774: \noalign{\smallskip}
775: %
776: %
777: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$a_{\rm min} > 10\,\mu$m} & & \multicolumn{2} {c}{$a_{\rm min} < 0.5\,\mu$m}\\
778: %
779: %
780: \noalign{\smallskip}
781: %
782: \cline{2-3} \cline{5-6}
783: %
784: %
785: \noalign{\smallskip}
786: %\noalign{\smallskip}
787: %
788: %
789: %
790: Star Name & $r_0$\,(AU) & $M_{\rm dust}$\,($10^{-3}$\,M$_{\oplus}$) & & $r_0$\,(AU) & $M_{\rm dust}$\,($10^{-3}$\,M$_{\oplus}$)\\
791: %
792: \noalign{\smallskip}
793: \hline
794: \noalign{\smallskip}
795: %
796: \input{tab5.tex}
797: %
798: %
799: \hline
800: \end{tabular}
801: %\end{center}
802: %
803: %
804: %\end{table*}
805: \end{table*}
806: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
807:
808: \clearpage
809: \begin{figure}
810: \plotone{f1.eps}
811: %\includegraphics{f1.pdf}
812: \caption{Distribution of the observed 24\,$\mu$m fluxes
813: in units of the expected photospheric fluxes. A Gaussian
814: distribution centered at 0.99 and with a 1-$\sigma$
815: dispersion of 0.06 (dotted line)
816: is shown for comparison. Only one object, HD28355,
817: shows a significant ($>$ 3-$\sigma$) 24\,$\mu$m excess
818: above the predicted stellar photosphere. HD28355
819: is an A-type star whose excess was already identified by
820: \citet{SuRiSt06}. \label{fig:24micron}}
821: \end{figure}
822:
823: \clearpage
824:
825: \begin{figure}
826: \scalebox{.7}{\includegraphics{f2.eps}}
827: \caption{The signal to noise ratio versus the measured 70\,$\mu$m flux for
828: our sample of Hyades stars. Two objects shown as filled circles,
829: HD28226 and HD28355, clearly stand out as robust detections.
830: The horizontal dotted lines delimit the 5 $>$ S/N $>$ --5 interval.
831: For the deep 70\,$\mu$m observations considered in this paper, the noise
832: is dominated by the sky background variations. This variations are highly
833: none Gaussian and primarily due to extragalactic source confusion and
834: cirrus
835: contamination. As a result, there is a similar number of objects
836: with S/N $\sim$ 5 and with S/N $\sim$ --5 and we consider objects S/N $<$ 5
837: to be none detections.
838: Three objects, HD27962, HD29488, and HD33524, have
839: S/N just above 5. We consider these objects to be possible
840: detections that need further consideration. \label{fig:SNR70micronflux}}
841: \end{figure}
842:
843: \clearpage
844: \begin{figure}
845: \plotone{f3a.eps}
846: \plotone{f3b.eps}
847: \caption{The 70\,$\mu$m \emph{inverted} grayscale mosaics of HD28226 (top) and HD28355 (bottom).
848: North is up and East is to the left in all the images.
849: The images on the left correspond to the mosaics with 8$\arcsec$ pixels
850: (close to the physical size of the detector). The image on the right
851: correspond to the mosaics resampled to 4$\arcsec$ pixels
852: ($\sim$half the physical size).
853: The 70\,$\mu$m emissions are centered at the positions of the objects
854: (marked by the concentric circles) and are detected with signal to noise
855: ratios $\sim$20-30. Both objects are A-type stars already identified by
856: \citet{SuRiSt06} as having debris disks. \label{fig:HD28226}}
857: \end{figure}
858:
859: \clearpage
860:
861: \begin{figure}
862: \plotone{f4a.eps}
863: \plotone{f4b.eps}
864: \caption{The 70\,$\mu$m \emph{inverted} grayscale mosaics of HD27962 (top) and HD29488 (bottom)
865: resampled to 4$\arcsec$ pixels in order to gain spatial resolution.
866: North is up and East is to the left in both images.
867: We find that 70 emission is detected at a S/N level $\sim$6-7 within the
868: our aperture (radius=16$\arcsec$). However, since the emissions are not
869: centered at the positions of the targets (marked by the
870: concentric circles), we conclude that they are not likely to be associated
871: with them. \label{fig:HD27962}}
872: \end{figure}
873:
874: \clearpage
875: \begin{figure}
876: \plotone{f5a.eps}
877: \plotone{f5b.eps}
878: \caption{The 70\,$\mu$m \emph{inverted} grayscale
879: mosaics of HD28527 (top) and HD33254 (bottom)
880: resampled to 4$\arcsec$ pixels in order to gain spatial resolution.
881: North is up and East is to the left in both images.
882: Both objects are A-type stars identified by \citet{SuRiSt06} as
883: having small 70\,$\mu$m excess (FLUX$_{70}$ /L$_{*,70}$ $\sim$2.7-2.9).
884: However, since we detect these objects at a marginal level
885: (S/N = 4.9 and 5.6, respectively) and the emissions are not
886: centered at the locations of the objects (marked by the concentric circles),
887: we do not consider the detections to be real. \label{fig:HD28527}}
888: \end{figure}
889:
890: \clearpage
891:
892:
893: \begin{figure}
894: \plotone{f6.eps}
895: \caption{The 70\,$\mu$m \emph{inverted} grayscale mosaic of HD28430 resampled
896: to 4$\arcsec$ pixels. North is up and East is to the left.
897: Within the aperture centered at the target (marked by the concentric circles), there is a flux deficit
898: that is significant at the 6.9-$\sigma$ level. The existence of this
899: kind of minima strongly suggests that ``detections'' at the 5-7-$\sigma$
900: level should be interpreted with caution. \label{fig:HD28430}}
901: \end{figure}
902:
903: \clearpage
904:
905: \begin{figure}
906: \plotone{f7.eps}
907: \caption{
908: The signal to noise ratio versus the measured 160\,$\mu$m flux for
909: our sample of Hyades stars. We find no obvious 160\,$\mu$m detections.
910: At 160\,$\mu$m, as at 70\,$\mu$m, the noise is dominated by the extragalactic
911: source confusion and cirrus contamination. Thus, positive and negative
912: fluctuations at the $\sim$5-$\sigma$ level are not uncommon.
913: \label{fig:SNR160micronflux}}
914: \end{figure}
915:
916: \clearpage
917:
918: \begin{figure}
919: \plotone{f8.eps}
920: \caption{Cumulative distribution of 70\,$\mu$m 5-$\sigma$
921: sensitivities in units of the expected photospheric fluxes for
922: FGK-type Hyades stars (dotted line) and A-type Hyades stars
923: (solid line). For A-type stars, the 70\,$\mu$m observations
924: can detect, at the 5-$\sigma$ level, fluxes that are
925: $\sim$1-2$\times$ that of the expected photospheres. In contrast,
926: for most of the FGK-type stars, the 70\,$\mu$m observations
927: are only sensitive enough to detect fluxes that are
928: $\sim$15$\times$ the expected photospheric values.
929: \label{fig:70micronCDF}}
930: \end{figure}
931:
932: \clearpage
933: \begin{figure}
934: \plotone{f9.eps}
935: \caption{Cumulative distribution of 70\,$\mu$m 5-$\sigma$
936: sensitivities translated into fractional disk luminosities
937: for FGK-type Hyades stars (dotted line) and A-type Hyades stars
938: (solid line). For A-type stars, the 70\,$\mu$m observations
939: are sensitive to disks with fractional disk luminosities,
940: L$_{DUST}$/L$_{STAR}$,
941: $\sim$5$\times$10$^{-6}$. In contrast,
942: for most of the FGK-type stars, the 70\,$\mu$m observations
943: are only sensitive enough to detect disks with
944: L$_{DUST}$/L$_{STAR}$ $\gtrsim$ 2$\times$10$^{-4}$.
945: \label{fig:70micronCDF2}}
946: \end{figure}
947:
948:
949: \begin{figure}[tbp]
950: \centering
951: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=\columnwidth,origin=bl]{f10.eps}
952: \caption{Hyades A-type stars with 70 $\mu$m excess. On each plot, the darkest regions
953: correspond to the most likely fits
954: to the SEDs. The dashed line shows the thermal emission for the best-fit model,
955: while the dotted line corresponds to the total disk emission (i.e. including scattered light emission).}
956: \label{SEDs}
957: \end{figure}
958:
959:
960:
961: \begin{figure}[h]
962: \plottwo{f11a.eps}{f11b.eps}
963: \epsscale{1.5}
964: \caption{Maximum encompassed dust mass as a function of the distance from the star for
965: the FGK and A-type stars without \emph{Spitzer} excesses
966: (respectively left and right panels). The red area corresponds to mass upper limits
967: when minimum grain sizes $a_{\rm min}$ between $0.05\,\mu$m and $0.5\,\mu$m are
968: considered, while the blue area corresponds to $10\, \mu$m$ < a_{\rm min}
969: < 100\, \mu$m. The solid black line corresponds to the mass as a function
970: of radius for the best-fit model of HD 28355 corresponding to the case where
971: a$_{\rm min}$ $>$ 10 $\mu$m (see Table 5). The green region
972: indicates the 1-$\sigma$ limits of the best-fit model.}
973: \label{MvsR}
974: \end{figure}
975:
976: \end{document}
977: