1: % \documentclass[referee]{aa}
2: \documentclass{aa}
3: \usepackage{txfonts,graphicx}
4: \usepackage{natbib}
5: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,} % to follow the A&A style
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7: \newcommand{\kms}{${\rm km \, s^{-1}}$}
8: \newcommand{\teff}{$T_{\rm eff}$}
9: \newcommand{\hei}{He {\sc i}}
10: \newcommand{\heii}{He {\sc ii}}
11: \newcommand{\nai}{Na {\sc i}}
12: \newcommand{\masy}{${\rm mas\,yr^{-1}}$}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15: %
16: \title {{\sc\Large Letter to the Editor}\\[5mm]
17: LMC origin of the hyper-velocity star HE\,0437$-$5439\thanks{Based on
18: observations collected at the European Southern Obser\-vatory, Paranal, Chile
19: (DDT proposal 276.B-5024).}}
20: \subtitle{
21: Beyond the supermassive black hole paradigm}
22: %
23: \author {
24: N. Przybilla\inst{1} \and
25: M. F. Nieva\inst{1} \and
26: U. Heber\inst{1} \and
27: M. Firnstein\inst{1} \and
28: K. Butler\inst{2} \and
29: R. Napiwotzki\inst{3} \and
30: H. Edelmann\inst{1}}
31: %
32: \offprints{przybilla@sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de}
33: %
34: \institute{Dr. Remeis-Sternwarte Bamberg, Sternwartstr. 7, D-96049 Bamberg,
35: Germany \and Universit\"atssternwarte M\"unchen, Scheinerstr. 1, D-81679
36: M\"unchen, Germany \and Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire,
37: College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
38: }
39:
40: %
41: %
42: %
43: \date{Received... ; accepted ... }
44: %
45: \abstract
46: {Hyper-velocity stars move so fast that only a supermassive black hole
47: (SMBH) seems to be capable to accelerate them. Hence the Galactic centre (GC) is their
48: only suggested place of origin. Edelmann et al.~(2005) found the
49: early B-type star HE\,0437$-$5439 to be too
50: short-lived to have reached its current position in the Galactic halo if
51: ejected from the GC, except if being a blue straggler star.
52: Its proximity to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) suggested an origin from this galaxy.}
53: {The chemical signatures of stars at the GC are significantly
54: different from those in the LMC. Hence, an accurate measurement of the abundance
55: pattern of HE\,0437$-$5439 will yield a new tight constraint on the place of
56: birth of this hyper-velocity star.}
57: {High-resolution spectra obtained with UVES on the VLT are analysed using state-of-the-art
58: non-LTE modelling techniques.}
59: {We measured abundances of individual elements to very high accuracy in
60: HE\,0437$-$5439 as well as in two reference stars, from the LMC and the solar
61: neighbourhood, respectively. The abundance pattern is not consistent
62: at all with that observed in stars near the GC, ruling our an origin from the GC.
63: However, there is a high degree of consistency with the LMC abundance pattern.
64: Our abundance results cannot rule out an origin in the outskirts of the
65: Galactic disk. However, we find the life time of HE\,0437$-$5439 to be more
66: than~three times shorter than the time of flight to the edge of the disk,
67: rendering a Galactic origin unlikely.}
68: {Only one SMBH is known to be present in Galaxy and none in the LMC.
69: Hence the exclusion of an GC origin challenges the SMBH paradigm. We conclude
70: that there must be other mechanism(s) to accelerate stars to hyper-velocity
71: speed than the SMBH. We draw attention to dynamical ejection from dense massive
72: clusters, that has recently been proposed by Gvaramadze et al.~(2008).}
73: %
74: \keywords{Galaxy: halo -- Magellanic Clouds -- stars: abundances, distances,
75: early-type, individual (HE\,0437$-$5439)}
76: %
77: \titlerunning {LMC origin of the hyper-velocity star HE\,0437$-$5439}
78: \authorrunning {Przybilla et al.}
79: \maketitle
80: %
81: \section{Introduction}
82: Stars moving faster than the Galactic escape velocity were~first
83: predicted to exist by \citet{hills88}. The first such hyper-velocity
84: stars~(HVSs) were discovered serendipitously only recently
85: \citep[][E05: \object{HE\,0437$-$5439} at 723\,km\,s$^{-1}$
86: heliocentric radial velocity]{brown05,hirsch05,edelmann05}.
87: A systematic search for such objects has resulted in the discovery of seven
88: additional HVS up to now \citep[see][]{brown07}.
89:
90: \cite{hills88} predicted that the tidal disruption of a binary by a
91: supermassive black hole (SMBH) could lead to the ejection of
92: stars with velocities exceeding the escape velocity of our Galaxy. The Galactic
93: centre (GC) is the suspected place of origin of the HVSs as it hosts a SMBH.
94:
95: Both, the moderate rotational velocity ($v\sin i$\,$=$\,54\,\kms)
96: and the chemical composition (consistent with solar abundances within a
97: factor of a few from a LTE analysis of a spectrum with S/N\,$\approx$\,5)
98: were considered evidence for a main sequence nature of HE\,0437$-$5439 (E05).
99: This put the star at a distance of $\approx$60\,kpc.
100:
101: Numerical kinematical experiments were carried out to trace the trajectory
102: of HE\,0437$-$5439 from the GC to its present location in the Galactic halo.
103: However, its travel time (100\,Myrs)
104: was found to be much longer than its main sequence lifetime
105: ($\approx$\,25--35\,Myrs), rendering a GC origin unlikely, though possible if
106: HE\,0437$-$5439 would be a blue straggler star.
107: Alternatively the star could have originated from the Large Magellanic Cloud
108: (LMC) as it is much closer to this galaxy (18\,kpc) than to the~GC.
109:
110: An accurate determination of its elemental abundance pattern should allow to
111: distinguish between an origin in the LMC or in the GC because their chemical
112: compositions differ distinctively. HE\,0437$-$5439 is by far the brightest HVS known
113: \citep[$V$\,$=$\,16.36,][]{bonanos08} and therefore suited best
114: for a detailed analysis.
115: Hence we obtained high-resolution, high S/N spectra of HE\,0437$-$5439 at the ESO VLT
116: with UVES and performed a quantitative spectral analysis using
117: state-of-the-art non-LTE modelling techniques.
118:
119: \section{Observations and quantitative non-LTE analysis}
120: \begin{figure*}
121: \centering
122: \resizebox{.78\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hvs_linefits.eps}}
123: \caption{Comparison of spectrum synthesis for HE\,0437$-$5439 (full line)
124: with observation (grey). The main spectral features are identified.
125: Weak interstellar \ion{Ca}{ii} H \& K lines are due to the Galactic
126: foreground, indicative for only a small amount of reddening.}
127: \label{fits}
128: \end{figure*}
129:
130: Nine spectra of HE\,0437$-$5439 with a total integration time of $\sim$4\,h
131: were obtained on January 12, 2006, covering the range from 3750 to 4950\,{\AA} and
132: 5700 to 9400\,{\AA} at a resolving~power of $R$\,$\approx$\,35\,000.
133: The data reduction followed procedures described by \citet{koester01}.
134: We took a spectrum of the DC white dwarf \object{WD0123$-$262}, such that a
135: reliable continuum normalisation in the blue could be achieved, a region
136: containing many broad Balmer lines.
137: Moreover, the method removes fringes in the red reliably, improving
138: considerably on the standard UVES data reduction pipeline. A peak S/N of $\approx$80
139: per resolution element is measured for the coadded spectrum in the blue.
140:
141: Two comparison stars with similar atmospheric parameters are
142: considered: the LMC object \object{NGC\,2004-D15}
143: \citep[K02]{korn02} and \object{HR\,3468} in the solar neighbourhood
144: \citep[NP08]{NiPr08}. The same data reduction procedures as used for
145: HE\,0437$-$5439 are applied to the UVES spectrum of NGC\,2004-D15, obtained
146: from the ESO archive. A comparison with the LMC star allows for a
147: consistency test with the LMC baseline abundances determined from main
148: sequence B-type stars in previous studies \citep[e.g. K02;][]{Trundleetal07}.
149:
150: The quantitative analysis of the 3 stars was carried out following the methodology
151: discussed by \citet{NiPr07} and NP08. In brief, non-LTE line-formation
152: calculations were performed on the basis of line-blanketed model atmospheres,
153: using updated versions of {\sc Detail} and {\sc Surface} \citep{gid81,
154: butgid85}. State-of-the-art model atoms were employed~-- H: \citet{PrBu04};
155: \ion{He}{i}: \citet{Pr05}; \ion{C}{ii/iii}: \citet{NiPr06}, NP08;
156: \ion{N}{ii}: \citet{PrBu01}; \ion{O}{i}: \citet{Pretal00}; \ion{Mg}{ii}: \citet{Pretal01};
157: \ion{Fe}{iii} as adopted by \citet{Moetal07}; an updated model for
158: \ion{O}{ii}, originally by \citet{BeBu88}. Our extensions and improvements of the original
159: \ion{Si}{ii/iii/iv} model atom from \citet{BeBu90} were crucial for our
160: analysis as this ionization equilibrium is our primary temperature indicator.
161: Tests with high-S/N spectra of Galactic stars showed that the models allow the observed
162: spectra for these elements to be reproduced with high accuracy and therefore
163: atmospheric parameters and elemental abundances to be determined with small
164: uncertainties.
165:
166: \begin{table}
167: \caption{Stellar parameters of the programme stars \& elemental abundances
168: $\varepsilon(X)=\log\,(X/{\rm H})+12$ (number of lines
169: analysed in parentheses)}
170: \vspace{-2mm}
171: \label{tab_results}
172: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{2mm}
173: \begin{tabular}{lrrr}
174: \hline
175: \hline
176: & HE\,0437$-$5439 & NGC2004-D15 & HR\,3468\\
177: \hline
178: \teff\,(K) & 23\,000$\pm$1000 & 21\,500$\pm$1000 & 22\,900$\pm$400\\
179: $\log g$\,(cgs) & 3.95$\pm$0.10 & 3.70$\pm$0.10 & 3.60$\pm$0.05\\
180: $\xi$\,(km/s) & 1$\pm$1 & 1$\pm$1 & 5$\pm$1\\
181: $v \sin i$\,(km/s) & 55$\pm$2 & 48$\pm$3 & 11$\pm$2\\
182: $M$/M$_{\sun}$ & 9.1$\pm$0.8 & 9.5$\pm$0.8 & 11.6$\pm$0.5\\
183: Age\,(Myr) & 18$\pm$3 & 23$\pm$1 & 14.5$\pm$0.5\\
184: \hline
185: $\varepsilon$(\ion{C}{ii}) & 8.13$\pm$0.12\,~~(3) & 8.05$\pm$0.10\,~~(1) & 8.36$\pm$0.10\,(17)\\
186: $\varepsilon$(\ion{C}{iii}) & {\ldots} & {\ldots} & 8.47$\pm$0.04\,~~(2)\\
187: $\varepsilon$(\ion{N}{ii}) & 7.58$\pm$0.04\,~~(7) & 7.15$\pm$0.06\,~~(4) & 8.10$\pm$0.08\,(54)\\
188: $\varepsilon$(\ion{O}{i}) & 8.70$\pm$0.10\,~~(1) & {\ldots} & 8.82$\pm$0.02\,~~(4)\\
189: $\varepsilon$(\ion{O}{ii}) & 8.71$\pm$0.07\,(40) & 8.52$\pm$0.09\,(31) & 8.80$\pm$0.09\,(45)\\
190: $\varepsilon$(\ion{Mg}{ii}) & 7.40$\pm$0.10\,~~(1) & 7.25$\pm$0.10\,~~(1) & 7.67$\pm$0.03\,~~(2)\\
191: $\varepsilon$(\ion{Si}{ii}) & 7.20$\pm$0.10\,~~(3) & 7.37$\pm$0.15\,~~(3) & 7.47$\pm$0.09\,~~(7)\\
192: $\varepsilon$(\ion{Si}{iii}) & 7.26$\pm$0.05\,~~(4) & 7.30$\pm$0.12\,~~(3) & 7.43$\pm$0.06\,~~(5)\\
193: $\varepsilon$(\ion{Si}{iv}) & {\ldots} & {\ldots} & 7.52$\pm$0.05\,~~(2)\\
194: $\varepsilon$(\ion{Fe}{iii}) & 7.47$\pm$0.10\,~~(3) & 7.20$\pm$0.13\,~~(3) & 7.40$\pm$0.11\,(37)\\
195: \hline
196: \end{tabular}
197: \end{table}
198:
199: The atmospheric parameters (\teff, $\log g$) were determined from metal
200: ionization equilibria (mainly \ion{Si}{ii/iii/iv}, but also
201: \ion{O}{i/ii} and \ion{C}{ii/iii}, where available) and the
202: Stark-broadened Balmer lines. Microturbulence $\xi$ was
203: derived in the standard way by demanding that the line
204: equivalent widths within an ion be independent of abundance.
205: Elemental abundances were determined
206: from $\chi^2$-minimi\-sation of fits to individual metal line~profiles.
207:
208: \begin{figure}
209: \centering
210: \resizebox{.9\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{abusHVS_GS8_1.eps}}\\[-3.5mm]
211: \caption{Metal abundances in the three programme stars
212: (Table~\ref{tab_results}), rela\-tive to the
213: solar standard \citep{GrSa98}: HE\,0437$-$5439 (black symbols),
214: NGC\,2004-D15
215: (red symbols) and HR\,3468 (open symbols). Ionic species are encoded according
216: to the legend. Solar and half-solar values are indicated by dotted and
217: dashed lines, respectively.}
218: \label{abus}
219: \end{figure}
220:
221: Basic stellar parameters and metal abundances
222: for the programme stars are listed in Table~\ref{tab_results}.
223: Masses and evolutionary lifetimes were determined by comparison with
224: evolutionary tracks from \citet{schaller92} and \citet{schaerer93}, for solar
225: and LMC metallicity, respectively. Note that the actual metallicity of
226: HE\,0437$-$5439 is $Z$\,$\approx$\,0.013, which gives a significantly lower
227: age (18\,Myr) than found by E05 (25--35\,Myr). The corresponding distance to
228: HE\,0437$-$5439 is 61$\pm$9\,kpc, in perfect agreement with E05.
229:
230: The uncertainties in the atmospheric parameters were constrained by the quality of
231: the simultaneous fits to all diagnostic indicators: all hydrogen and helium
232: lines, and multiple metal ionization equilibria. Such a good match has been reported never
233: before in B-star analyses. The helium abundance in the three stars was found to be
234: consistent with the solar value.
235: Standard deviations $\sigma$ for metal abundances were calculated from
236: the individual line abundances in an ion. The derived uncertainties are extremely low
237: for B-stars analyses. We adopted $\sigma$\,$=$\,0.10\,dex for ions with only one observed line.
238: In addition, systematic errors need to be considered because of uncertainties in the stellar
239: parameters, atomic data and the quality of the spectra. In fact,
240: the precision of the analysis is limited mostly by the noise level of the spectra.
241: A laborious procedure to minimise systematics has been developed by NP08,
242: which allows us to estimate the systematic
243: uncertainties in elemental abundances to be 0.10\,dex for HR\,3468 and 0.15\,dex for the
244: other two stars. This significant improvement with respect to previous B
245: star analyses can be obtained only when major
246: sources of systematic errors are eliminated (NP08).
247: The resulting synthetic spectrum is compared with
248: observation of HE\,0437$-$5439 in Fig.~\ref{fits}, for many strategic spectral regions.
249: The match between theory and observation is excellent within the S/N
250: limitations.
251: The fits obtained for the other two~stars are of similar quality.
252:
253: Abundance patterns for the three programme stars are
254: visualised in Fig.~\ref{abus}, relative to the solar standard
255: \citep{GrSa98}\footnote{Similar conclusions are drawn in the following
256: if the revised solar abundances of \citet{GAS07} are used.}.
257: Note the small line-to-line-scatter and the agreement of abundances for
258: different ions of the elements,
259: {\em simultaneously} for all ionization equilibria. This can be achieved
260: only when the stellar parameters are constrained well and highly reliable
261: model atoms are employed in the non-LTE calculations.
262: Metal ionization equilibria show a much
263: higher sensitivity to parameter variations than the H/He %hydrogen/helium
264: lines alone. This explains part of the parameter offset with regard to the
265: LTE analysis of HE\,0437$-$5439 by E05. We derived a somewhat
266: lower \teff~and $\log g$ for NGC\,2004-D15 than K02, though
267: within the mutual~uncertainties.
268:
269: Elemental abundances in NGC\,2004-D15 are about half solar, except for
270: nitrogen, which is in general agreement with the baseline metallicity derived in
271: previous studies of early-type stars in the LMC.
272: Nitrogen is known to have a low pristine abundance in the LMC (e.g. K02).
273: We thus confirm NGC\,2004-D15 to be essentially
274: unaffected by mixing with CN-cycled material.
275: Abundances in the Galactic star HR\,3468 are
276: near-solar, except for enriched N. The abundances in
277: HE\,0437$-$5439 tend to be intermediate, with a solar N/C ratio.
278:
279: \section{Constraints on the origin of HE\,0437$-$5439 from its chemical signature}
280: We shall now compare the abundance pattern of HE\,0437$-$5439 to the
281: chemical signatures of the two suggested places of origin, the Galactic centre
282: on the one hand and the LMC on the~other.
283:
284: \paragraph{The Galactic centre.} A comparison of the abundance pattern of
285: HE\,0437$-$5439 to that of a sample of stars near the GC
286: \citep{cunha07,najarro08} is depicted in Fig.~\ref{abuscomp} (upper panel), for average
287: values over all ions of an element. The sum of carbon and nitrogen is
288: considered to remove signatures of mixing with nuclear-processed matter
289: from the individual abundances (as catalysts, their total number is
290: conserved in the CN-cycle). The $\alpha$-elements oxygen, magnesium, silicon,
291: and C$+$N are super-solar and enhanced relative to iron in the GC sample. In
292: HE\,0437$-$5439, however, they are subsolar and depleted with respect to iron.
293: This rules out HE\,0437$-$5439 to be of GC origin.\\[-8mm]
294: \paragraph{LMC.} A comparison of the abundance pattern in HE\,0437$-$5439
295: with the LMC reference star is made in the middle panel of Fig.~\ref{abuscomp}.
296: Both patterns are very similar as all
297: error bars overlap. There is a tendency for the abundances of
298: HE\,0437$-$5439 to be slightly higher than in NGC\,2004-D15
299: (from 0.04\,dex for C$+$N to 0.27\,dex for~Fe, with an exception in Si).
300: These abundances are fully
301: consistent with today's knowledge of the abundance
302: scatter within the LMC \citep[e.g.][]{LuLa92,hill95},
303: consistent with an origin of HE\,0437$-$5439 in this galaxy.\\[-8mm]
304: \paragraph{Galactic disk.} We are reluctant to accept the LMC origin before
305: having discussed other options for a Galactic disk origin. From
306: Fig.~\ref{abuscomp} (lower panel) it can be seen that HE\,0437$-$5439 and the
307: solar neighbourhood star HR\,3468 have similar abundances to
308: within error limits, when compared on an element-to-element basis. However,
309: there is a tendency for all elements except iron to be less abundant in
310: HE\,0437$-$5439, by 0.09\,dex (O) to 0.27\,dex (Mg). Such an
311: abundance pattern would restrict the place of birth of HE\,0437$-$5439
312: to outside the solar circle because of the Galactic abundance gradient.
313: Consequently, we cannot rule out an origin in the outskirts of the Galactic disk
314: from the chemical signature alone.
315:
316: \section{Kinematics revisited}
317: \citet{edelmann05} suggested the LMC as place of origin solely because of
318: the discrepancy between evolutionary life time and
319: time of flight. We have recalculated the kinematics on the basis of the
320: significantly reduced age of HE\,0437$-$5439, following the procedure of E05.
321: Such an estimate has also to account for the large
322: space motion of the LMC \citep[e.g.][]{piatek08} of about
323: 500\,pc/Myr in direction east-north-east. The total distance to travel by
324: HE\,0437$-$543 after ejection $\sim$18\,Myr ago is therefore
325: $\sim$19$^{+7}_{-3}$\,kpc. Hence, the total ejection
326: velocity should amount to $\sim$1000\,km\,s$^{-1}$,
327: if originating in the kinematic centre of the LMC.
328: Accounting for the extension of the LMC, ejection velocities may
329: vary by $\sim$100\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
330:
331: Flight times from the outer Galactic disk to the
332: current position of HE\,0437$-$5439 are depicted in Fig.~4 of E05, who
333: suggested that the age discrepancy could be overcome if the HVS
334: were a blue straggler formed by a merger of less massive stars.
335: Our revised mass would require a merger of two $\sim$5\,$M_{\sun}$ stars to
336: form a blue straggler with the observed parameters for HE\,0437$-$5439.
337: Their individual life times are about the same as the time of flight,
338: rendering an origin in the Galaxy very unlikely.
339:
340: \begin{figure}
341: \centering
342: \resizebox{.9\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{abusHVScomp3GC.eps}}\\[-2mm]
343: \caption{Comparison of metal abundances in HE\,0437$-$5439 (black dots) with
344: a sample of stars close to the GC (blue triangles), upper panel,
345: the LMC reference star NGC\,2004-D15 (red diamonds), middle pa\-nel, and
346: the solar neighbourhood reference star HR\,3468 (circles), low\-er panel.
347: Error bars account for statistic and systematic uncertainties.}
348: \label{abuscomp}
349: \end{figure}
350: %
351:
352: \section{Conclusion}
353: We have performed a quantitative spectral analysis of the HVS
354: HE\,0437$-$3954 and reference objects in the LMC and the solar neighbourhood.
355: Use of state-of-the-art non-LTE modelling techniques allowed precise
356: elemental abundances to be obtained.
357:
358: From the results of the spectroscopic analysis we can rule out a GC origin for
359: HE\,0437$-$3954 because its abundance pattern indicates neither high
360: metallicity nor $\alpha$-enrichment. On the other hand a high degree of
361: consistency with the LMC pattern is found when accounting for an abundance
362: scatter within the LMC\footnote{More comprehensive investigations than
363: presently available, using improved analysis techniques on larger samples of young stars covering
364: the entire region of the LMC are needed to draw definite
365: conclusions on the degree of chemical (in)homogeneity in that galaxy.}.
366: The observed abundance pattern could also be consistent with an origin
367: from the outskirts of the Galactic disk, in the case HE\,0437$-$3954 being a
368: blue straggler. However, a comparison of the time-of-flight
369: with the life time of the blue straggler practically rules out this scenario.
370: Hence, HE\,0437$-$3954 is unlikely of Galactic origin.
371:
372: \citet{edelmann05} suggested that HE\,0437$-$3954 was ejected from the LMC. Our spectroscopic
373: analysis lends strong support to this scenario. The abundance pattern is
374: consistent with that of our LMC reference star. An ejection velocity of about
375: 1000\,{\kms} is required for the star to have reached its position from the LMC.
376: Accurate proper motion measurements are needed to finally confirm the LMC
377: origin.
378:
379: Because no SMBH is known to exist in the LMC, the SMBH slingshot scenario or
380: other ejection models \citep[e.g.][]{baumgardt06} invoking a SMBH are ruled out.
381: Hence there must be an additional physical mechanism capable of accelerating
382: a massive star to a space velocity of 1000\,{\kms}.
383:
384: Two such alternative scenarios have been proposed.
385: {\sc i}) A close encounter of a binary with an intermediate-mass black
386: hole (IMBH) more massive than 10$^3$\,$M_{\sun}$ has been proposed as a viable
387: ejection mechanism by \citet{GPZ07}, who suggest the populous dense
388: clusters \object{NGC\,2004} or \object{NGC\,2100}\, in the LMC could harbour
389: such an~IMBH.
390: {\sc ii}) Dynamical ejection by interaction of massive binaries in
391: the cores of dense clusters is plausible \citep{GGPZ08}.
392: This process is more likely to occur in the LMC than in the Galaxy because the
393: LMC hosts a significant number of sufficiently massive and dense clusters.
394: From the list of \citet{mackay03}, eight young clusters can be identified to be
395: of the right age to qualify as candidate place of birth of HE\,0437$-$3954.
396: Primary candidates are NGC\,2100 and NGC\,2004, followed by \object{NGC\,1850} and
397: \object{NGC\,1847}.
398:
399: In consequence, hyper-velocity stars are not such simple probes
400: for the shape of the Galactic halo as suggested e.g. by \citet{gnedin05}.
401: The fundamental assumption of the exclusive origin of HVSs in the GC has to be
402: dropped, as acceleration may occur in clusters throughout the Galactic disk
403: as~well.
404:
405: \begin{acknowledgements}
406: We thank the Director General of ESO for making this study possible by granting
407: director's discretionary time and the staff of the ESO Paranal observatory for their valuable
408: support. M. F. N. and M. F. gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche
409: Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants HE\,1356/44-1 and PR\,685/3-1).
410: \end{acknowledgements}
411:
412:
413:
414:
415:
416:
417: \begin{thebibliography}{}
418:
419: \bibitem[Baumgardt et al.(2006)]{baumgardt06}
420: Baumgardt, H., Gualandris, A., \& Portegies Zwart, S.~2006, \mnras, 372, 174
421:
422: \bibitem[Becker \& Butler(1988)]{BeBu88}
423: Becker, S. R., \& Butler, K. 1988, \aap, 201, 232
424:
425: \bibitem[Becker \& Butler(1990)]{BeBu90}
426: Becker, S. R., \& Butler, K. 1990, \aap, 235, 326
427:
428: \bibitem[Bo\-nanos \& L\'opez-Morales(2008)]{bonanos08} Bonanos, A.~Z., \&
429: L\'opez-Morales, M. 2008, ApJ, submitted {\tt arXiv:\,0712.1825}
430:
431: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2005)]{brown05}
432: Brown, W. R., Geller, M. J., Kenyon, S. J., \& Kurtz, M. J. 2005, \apj, 622, L33
433:
434: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2007)]{brown07}
435: Brown, W. R., Geller, M. J., Kenyon, S. J., et al. 2007, \apj, 671, 1708
436:
437: \bibitem[Butler \& Giddings(1985)]{butgid85}
438: Butler, K. \& Giddings, J.R.~1985, in
439: Newsletter of Analysis of Astronomical Spectra, No. 9 (Univ. London)
440:
441: \bibitem[Cunha et al.(2007)]{cunha07}
442: Cunha, K., Sellgren, K., Smith, V. V., et al. 2007, \apj, 669, 1011
443:
444: \bibitem[Edelmann et al.(2005)]{edelmann05}
445: Edelmann, H., Napiwotzki, R., Heber, U., et al.~2005, \apj, 634, L181~(E05)
446:
447: \bibitem[Giddings(1981)]{gid81}
448: Giddings, J. R.~1981, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London
449:
450: \bibitem[Gnedin et al.(2005)]{gnedin05}
451: Gnedin, O. Y., Gould, A. Miralda-Escud\'e, J., Zentner, A. R.~2005, \apj, 634, 344
452:
453: \bibitem[Gre\-vesse \& Sau\-val(1998)]{GrSa98}
454: Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A. J. 1998, \ssr, 85, 161
455:
456: \bibitem[Grevesse et al.(2007)]{GAS07}
457: Grevesse, N., Asplund, M., \& Sauval, A. J.~2007, \ssr, 130, 105
458:
459: \bibitem[Gualandris \& Portegies Zwart(2007)]{GPZ07}
460: Gualandris, A., \& Portegies Zwart, S. 2007, \mnras, 376, L29
461:
462: \bibitem[Gvaramadze et al.(2008)]{GGPZ08}
463: Gvaramadze, V. V., Gualandris, A., \& Portegies Zwart, S. 2008,
464: preprint {\tt astro-ph/0702735}
465:
466: \bibitem[Hill et al.(1995)]{hill95}
467: Hill, V., Andrievsky, S., \& Spite, M. 1995, \aap, 293, 347
468:
469: \bibitem[Hills(1988)]{hills88} Hills, J.G. 1988, \nat, 331, 687
470:
471: \bibitem[Hirsch et al.(2005)]{hirsch05} Hirsch, H.A., Heber, U., O'Toole,
472: S.J., \& Bresolin, F., 2005, \aap, 444, L61
473:
474: \bibitem[Koester et al.(2001)]{koester01} Koester, D., Napiwotzki, R., Christlieb, N., et al. 2001, \aap, 378, 556
475:
476: \bibitem[Korn et al.(2002)]{korn02}
477: Korn, A. J., Keller, S. C., Kaufer, A., et al. 2002, \aap, 385, 143
478:
479: \bibitem[Luck \& Lambert(1992)]{LuLa92}
480: Luck, R. E., \& Lambert, D. L. 1992, \apjs, 79, 303
481:
482: \bibitem[Mackey \& Gilmore(2003)]{mackay03}
483: Mackey, A. D., \& Gilmore, G. F. 2003, \mnras, 338, 85
484:
485: \bibitem[Morel et al.(2007)]{Moetal07}
486: Morel, T., Butler, K., Aerts, C., Neiner, C., \& Briquet, M.~2007, \aap, 457, 651
487:
488: \bibitem[Najarro et al.(2008)]{najarro08}
489: Najarro, F., Figer, D. F., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2008, \apj, accepted
490:
491: \bibitem[Nieva \& Przybilla(2006)]{NiPr06}
492: Nieva, M. F., \& Przybilla, N. 2006, \apj, 639, L39
493:
494: \bibitem[Nieva \& Przybilla(2007)]{NiPr07}
495: Nieva, M. F., \& Przybilla, N. 2007, \aap, 467, 295
496:
497: \bibitem[Nieva \& Przybilla(2008)]{NiPr08}
498: Nieva, M. F., \& Przybilla, N. 2008, \aap, in press {\tt arXiv:0711.3783} (NP08)
499:
500: \bibitem[Piatek et al.(2008)]{piatek08}
501: Piatek, S., Pryor, C., \& Olszewski, E. W. 2008, \aj, accepted {\tt arXiv:0712.1764}
502:
503: \bibitem[Przybilla(2005)]{Pr05}
504: Przybilla, N. 2005, \aap, 443, 293
505:
506: \bibitem[Przybilla \& Butler(2001)]{PrBu01}
507: Przybilla, N., \& Butler, K.~2001, \aap, 379, 955
508:
509: \bibitem[Przybilla \& Butler(2004)]{PrBu04}
510: Przybilla, N., \& Butler, K.~2004, \apj, 609, 1181
511:
512: \bibitem[Przybilla et al.(2000)]{Pretal00}
513: Przybilla, N., Butler, K., Becker, S. R., et al. 2000, \aap, 359, 1085
514:
515: \bibitem[Przybilla et al.(2001)]{Pretal01}
516: Przybilla, N., Butler, K., Becker, S. R., \& Kudritzki, R. P. 2001, \aap, 369, 1009
517:
518: \bibitem[Schaller et al.(1992)]{schaller92}
519: Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., \& Maeder, A. 1992, \aaps, 96, 269
520:
521: \bibitem[Schaerer et al.(1993)]{schaerer93}
522: Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., Maeder, A., \& Schaller, G. 1993, \aaps, 98, 523
523:
524: \bibitem[Trundle et al.(2007)]{Trundleetal07}
525: Trundle, C., Dufton, P. L., Hunter, I., et al.~2007, \aap, 471, 625
526:
527: \end{thebibliography}
528:
529:
530: \end{document}
531:
532:
533:
534: