1: % For ApJ submission -----------------------------------------
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\def\baselinestretch{1.3}
4:
5: \documentclass{emulateapj}
6: \usepackage{apjfonts}
7: \lefthead{PARK \& HAN}
8: \righthead{MICROLENING COLOR SHIFT}
9:
10:
11: %==== CUSTOMIZED LATEX MACROS ========================================
12:
13: \newcommand{\vect}[1]{\ensuremath{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}}
14:
15:
16: % Equation align
17: \def\eqalign#1{\null\,\vcenter{\openup\jot
18: \ialign{\strut\hfil$\displaystyle{##}$&$
19: \displaystyle{{}##}$\hfil \crcr#1\crcr}}\,}
20:
21: %=======================================================================
22:
23: %\lefthead{HAN}
24: %\righthead{SEVERE BINARY DEGENERACY}
25:
26: \begin{document}
27: \title{Color-Shift Measurement in Microlensing-Induced Stellar
28: Variation from Future Space-Based Surveys}
29:
30: \author{Byeong-Gon Park}
31: \affil{
32: Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 838 Daedeok-Rho,
33: Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-348, Korea;\\
34: bgpark@kasi.re.kr}
35:
36: \and
37:
38:
39: \author{Cheongho Han\footnote{corresponding author}}
40: \affil{Program of Brain Korea 21, Astrophysical Research Center
41: for the Structure and Evolution of the Cosmos, SRC, \\Department of Physics,
42: Chungbuk National University, Chongju 361-763, Korea;\\
43: cheongho@astroph.chungbuk.ac.kr}
44:
45:
46:
47:
48: \submitted{Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal}
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51:
52: If a microlensing event is caused by a star, the event can
53: exhibit change in color due to the light from the lens. In
54: the previous and current lensing surveys, the color shift
55: could not be used to constrain the lens population because
56: the blended light responsible for the color shift is mostly
57: attributed to nearby background stars rather than the lens.
58: However, events to be observed in future space-based surveys
59: do not suffer from blending and thus the color information can
60: be used to constrain lenses. In this paper, we demonstrate
61: the usefulness of future surveys in measuring color shifts.
62: By conducting simulation of galactic lensing events based on
63: the specification of a proposed space-based lensing survey,
64: we estimate that the shift in the color of $R-H$ will be
65: measured at 5$\sigma$ level for $\sim 12\%$ of events that
66: occur on source stars with apparent magnitudes brighter
67: than $J=22.5$. Color-shifted events tend to have high
68: magnifications and the lenses will have brightnesses equivalent
69: to those of source stars. The time scales of the color-shifted
70: events tend to be longer than those without color shifts. From
71: the mass distribution of lenses, we find that most of the
72: color-shifted events will be produced by stellar lenses with
73: spectral types down to mid M-type main sequence stars.
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \keywords{gravitational lensing}
77:
78: % ==================================================================
79:
80:
81: \section{Introduction}
82:
83: One important characteristic of a microlensing event is that
84: the color of the lensed star does not change during the lensing
85: magnification. However, events observed in actual lensing
86: surveys can exhibit color shift. This color shift occurs when
87: the flux from the lensed source star is blended with the flux
88: from other stars located in the seeing disk of the star. The
89: lensed and blended stars generally have different colors.
90: Then, color shift occurs as the source/blend relative brightness
91: changes during lensing magnification.
92:
93:
94: \citet{kamionkowski95} and \citet{buchalter96} pointed out that
95: if the object responsible for a lensing event is a star, it is
96: possible to obtain information about the lens from the measured
97: color shift. However, this idea could not be implemented for
98: the actual analysis of lens population. The most important reason
99: for this is that under the previous and current lensing surveys
100: conducted by using ground-based telescopes, the blended flux is
101: mostly attributed to nearby background stars rather than the lens.
102:
103:
104: However, the situation will be different in future space-based
105: lensing surveys, such as the {\it Microlensing Planet Finder}
106: ({\it MPF}). The {\it MPF} is a proposed space mission to NASA's
107: Discovery Program exclusive for microlensing and it will be
108: equipped with a 1.1 m aperture telescope \citep{bennett02, bennett04}.
109: Such a survey is ideal for the measurement of the color shift in
110: lensing events due to the following reasons. First, thanks to
111: the high resolution provided from space observation, the survey
112: does not suffer from blending caused by background stars. Then,
113: one can safely attribute the observed color shift to the lens.
114: Second, the fraction of color-shifted events would be higher in
115: the space-based survey because it will monitor much fainter stars
116: than current surveys. As the monitored star becomes fainter,
117: the relative flux of the lens to the source star increases and
118: thus the event is more likely to produce large color shift.
119: Third, with high photometric precision, the survey can detect
120: much smaller color shift than ground-based surveys. With the
121: increased fraction of large color-shifted events and higher
122: sensitivity to small color shift combined with nearly an order
123: higher event rate, the future space-based lensing survey would
124: be able to detect color shifts for a large number of events.
125:
126:
127: In this paper, we demonstrate the usefulness of future space-based
128: lensing surveys in measuring color shifts of lensing events.
129: For this, we estimate the fraction of events with measurable
130: color shifts among the events to be detected from the proposed
131: {\it MPF} survey. We also investigate the properties of the
132: color-shifted events by conducting detailed simulation of
133: galactic lensing events under realistic observational conditions.
134: The fraction of color-shifted events was previously estimated
135: by \citet{buchalter96}. However, their work was intended as
136: a template for general comparison with various observational
137: assumptions and thus is not focused on a specific survey.
138: In addition, they did not provide information about the properties
139: of color-shifted events.
140:
141:
142: The paper is organized as follows. In \S\ 2, we introduce
143: formalism used for the description of the color shift in general
144: cases and under various limiting cases. In \S\ 3, we describe
145: the simulation conducted to estimate the fraction of color-shift
146: events and their properties. In \S\ 4, we present the resulting
147: distribution of color shift. We probe the properties of the
148: color-shifted events by investigating the distributions of various
149: quantities related to the events including the source and lens
150: brightness, lens light fraction, magnification, lens mass, and
151: event time scale. In \S\ 5, we summarize and conclude.
152:
153:
154:
155:
156: \section{Formalism}
157:
158: The difference between the colors of a lensing event measured
159: during and before lensing magnification is expressed as
160: \begin{equation}
161: \Delta(R-H)=-2.5 \log \left( {F_R/F_H\over F_{R,0}/F_{H,0}}
162: \right),
163: \label{eq1}
164: \end{equation}
165: where $F$ represents the observed flux, the subscript `0'
166: denotes the measured quantity without lensing magnification,
167: and the other subscripts $k=R$ and $H$ denote the observed
168: passbands.\footnote{We choose $R$ and $H$ passbands because
169: the {\it MPF} survey plans to observe in these bands. See
170: details in \S\ 4.} The ratio between the observed fluxes
171: measured in the individual passbands are
172: \begin{equation}
173: {F_R\over F_H}=
174: {AF_{R,{\rm S}}+F_{R,{\rm L}}\over AF_{H,{\rm S}}+F_{H,{\rm L}} },
175: \qquad {F_{R,0}\over F_{H,0}}=
176: {F_{R,{\rm S}}+F_{R,{\rm L}}\over F_{H,{\rm S}}+F_{H,{\rm L}} },
177: \label{eq2}
178: \end{equation}
179: where $F_{k,{\rm S}}$ and $F_{k,{\rm L}}$ represent the fluxes
180: from the source star and lens, respectively. With some algebra,
181: the color shift is represented as
182: \begin{equation}
183: \Delta(R-H)=-2.5 \log \left[
184: {(A+\eta_R)/(A+\eta_H)\over (1+\eta_R)/(1+\eta_H) } \right],
185: \label{eq3}
186: \end{equation}
187: where $\eta_k$ denotes the ratio between the fluxes from the
188: lens and source, i.e.
189: \begin{equation}
190: \eta_R={F_{R,{\rm L}}\over F_{R,{\rm S}}},\qquad
191: \eta_H={F_{H,{\rm L}}\over F_{H,{\rm S}}}.
192: \label{eq4}
193: \end{equation}
194: The sign of the color shift is such that it becomes negative
195: when the apparent source star becomes bluer during lensing
196: magnification and vice versa.
197:
198:
199: In the limiting case of a very low magnification ($A\rightarrow 1.0$),
200: the amount of the color shift is approximated as
201: \begin{equation}
202: \Delta(R-H)\sim -2.5\log\left[1-\epsilon{\eta_R-\eta_H\over
203: (1+\eta_R)(1+\eta_H)}\right],
204: \label{eq5}
205: \end{equation}
206: where $\epsilon = A-1.0$. As $A\rightarrow 1.0$, $\epsilon
207: \rightarrow 0$, and thus $\Delta(R-H)\rightarrow 0$, implying
208: that the color shift expected from a low-magnification event
209: is small.
210:
211:
212: In the opposite limiting case of a very high-magnification
213: event ($A\gg 1.0$), the numerator on the right side of
214: equation~(\ref{eq3}) become $(A+\eta_R)/(A+\eta_H)\rightarrow 1$,
215: and the color shift is approximated as
216: \begin{equation}
217: \Delta(R-H)\sim 2.5 \log \left( {1+\eta_R\over 1+\eta_H} \right).
218: \label{eq6}
219: \end{equation}
220: If the lens is very faint (i.e., $\eta_k\ll 1.0$),
221: equation~(\ref{eq6}) is further simplified as
222: \begin{equation}
223: \Delta(R-H)\sim 2.5 \log [1+(\eta_R-\eta_H)].
224: \label{eq7}
225: \end{equation}
226: Considering that the lens/source flux ratio is small, $\eta_R-
227: \eta_H \ll 1.0$ and thus the expected color shift is also
228: small. This implies that high magnification is not a sufficient
229: condition to produce noticeable color shift. To produce noticeable
230: color shift, it is additionally required that the lens should
231: be bright. In the limiting case where the lens dominates over
232: the source star in brightness (i.e., $\eta_k\gg 1.0$), the
233: color shift is represented as
234: \begin{equation}
235: \Delta(R-H)\sim 2.5 \log \left( {\eta_R\over \eta_H}\right)
236: \equiv (R-H)_{\rm S} - (R-H)_{\rm L},
237: \label{eq8}
238: \end{equation}
239: where $(R-H)_{\rm L}$ and $(R-H)_{\rm S}$ represent the colors
240: of the lens and source, respectively. This implies that the
241: color shift corresponds to the difference between the colors
242: of the lens and source. Under this condition, the color shift
243: is maximized.
244:
245:
246:
247:
248: \section{Simulation}
249:
250: We estimate the color-shift distribution of events expected
251: from future space-based lensing surveys by conduction Bayesian
252: simulation of galactic microlensing events under the observational
253: conditions of the {\it MPF} survey. For this simulation, it is
254: required to model of the physical parameters including the mass
255: density and velocity distributions of matter along the line of
256: sight toward the field, lens mass function, and luminosity
257: function of source stars and lenses. We conduct the simulation
258: according to the following procedure.
259:
260:
261: The survey is assumed to be conducted toward the galactic bulge
262: field and the locations of the source and lens along the line
263: of sight are allocated based on the spatial mass density distribution.
264: Following the specification of the {\it MPF} survey, we set
265: the center of the survey field at $(l,b)=(1^\circ\hskip-2pt.2,
266: -2^\circ\hskip-2pt.4)$. The spatial mass density distribution
267: is modeled by adopting that of \citet{han03}. In the model,
268: the density distribution of bulge matter is based on the deprojected
269: infrared light density profile of \citet{dwek95}, specifically model
270: G2 with $R_{\rm max}=5$ kpc from their Table 2. The disk density
271: distribution is modeled by a double-exponential disk, i.e.
272: \begin{equation}
273: \rho(R,z) =\rho_0
274: \exp \left[-\left( {R-R_0\over h_R}+{|z|\over h_z}\right)\right],
275: \label{eq9}
276: \end{equation}
277: where $(R,z)$ are the galactocentric cylindrical coordinates,
278: $R_0=8$ kpc is the distance of the Sun from the galactic center,
279: $\rho_0= 0.06\ M_\odot \ {\rm pc}^{-3}$ is the local mass density,
280: and $h_R=3.5$ kpc and $h_z=325$ pc are the radial and vertical
281: scale heights, respectively.
282:
283:
284: Once the locations of the lens and source star are set, we then
285: assign their velocities based on the velocity distribution model.
286: The model velocity distribution has a gaussian form. The mean
287: and dispersion of the bulge velocity distribution are deduced
288: from the tensor virial theorem. The disk velocity distribution
289: is assumed to have a flat rotation speed of $v_{\rm c} = 220\
290: {\rm km}\ {\rm s}^{-1}$ and velocity dispersions along and
291: normal to the disk plane of $\sigma_\parallel=30\ {\rm km} \
292: {\rm s}^{-1}$ and $\sigma_\perp = 20\ {\rm km}\ {\rm s}^{-1}$,
293: respectively. The resulting distribution of the lens-source
294: transverse velocity from the combinations of the bulge and disk
295: velocities is listed in Table 1 of \citet{han95}, specifically
296: the non-rotating barred bulge model.
297:
298:
299: We assign the source star brightness by using the luminosity
300: function of \citet{holtzman98}. The Holtzman luminosity
301: function is expressed in terms of $V$ band. Once the $V$-band
302: absolute magnitude of each star is chosen from the luminosity
303: function, we determine the $R$ and $H$ band magnitude by using
304: the color information listed in \citet{cox99}. The apparent
305: magnitudes are then determined considering the distance to
306: the source star and extinction. The extinction is determined
307: such that the source star flux decreases exponentially with
308: the increase of the dust column density. The dust column
309: density is computed on the basis of an exponential dust
310: distribution model with a scale height of $h_z=100\ {\rm pc}$,
311: i.e.\ $\propto \exp(-|z|/h_z)$ \citep{drimmel01}. We set the
312: normalization of the extinction in the individual passbands
313: such that $A_R=1.8$ and $A_H=0.8$ for a star located at a
314: distance $D_{\rm S}=8$ kpc toward the target field.
315:
316:
317: The mass of the lens is assigned based on the mass function
318: of \cite{gould00}. The model mass function is composed of not
319: only stars but also brown dwarfs (BDs) and stellar remnants of
320: white dwarfs (WDs), neutron stars (NSs), and black holes (BHs).
321: The model is constructed under the assumption that bulge stars
322: formed initially according to a double power-law distribution
323: of the form
324: \begin{equation}
325: {dN\over dM} = k \left( {M\over 0.7\ M_\odot}\right)^\gamma,
326: \label{eq10}
327: \end{equation}
328: where $\gamma=-2.0$ for $M\geq 0.7\ M_\odot$ and $\gamma=-1.3$
329: for $M<0.7\ M_\odot$. These slopes are consistent with
330: \citet{zoccali00} except that the profile is extended below
331: their lower limit of $0.15\ M_\odot$ down to a BD cutoff of
332: $M=0.03\ M_\odot$. Based on this initial mass function,
333: remnants are modeled by assuming that the stars with initial
334: masses $1\ M_\odot< M <8\ M_\odot$, $8\ M_\odot < M < 40\
335: M_\odot$, and $M > 40\ M_\odot$ have evolved into WDs (with
336: a mean mass $\langle M\rangle\sim 0.6\ M_\odot$), NSs (with
337: $\langle M\rangle \sim 1.35 \ M_\odot$), and BHs (with $\langle
338: M\rangle\sim 5\ M_\odot$), respectively. Then, the resulting
339: mass fractions of the individual lens populations are
340: ${\rm stars}:{\rm BD}:{\rm WD}:{\rm NS}:{\rm BH}=62:7:22:6:3$.
341: Once the mass of the lens is set, its brightnesses in $R$ and
342: $H$ bands are determined by using the mass-$M_V$ relation and
343: the color information presented in \citet{cox99}. We note
344: that BD and remnant lenses are dark and thus events caused by
345: them do not produce color shift.
346:
347:
348: With all the assigned physical parameters of the lens and
349: source, we then produce lensing events. We do this under
350: the assumption that the impact parameters of the
351: lens-source encounter are randomly distributed. Since the
352: lens flux does not participate in lensing magnification,
353: it lowers the apparent magnification of the event, i.e.
354: \begin{equation}
355: A_{\rm app}={AF_{\rm S}+F_{\rm L}\over F_{\rm S}+F_{\rm L}};
356: \qquad
357: A={u_0+2\over u_0(u_0+4)^{1/2}},
358: \label{eq11}
359: \end{equation}
360: where $u_0$ is the impact parameter of the lens-source
361: encounter normalized by the Einstein radius of the lens.
362: We define detectable events as those with apparent
363: magnifications higher than a threshold value of $A_{\rm th}
364: =3/5^{1/2}$, that corresponds to the magnification when the
365: source star just enters the Einstein ring of the lens, i.e.
366: $u_0=1.0$. The apparent magnification varies depending on
367: the observed passband. We use the apparent magnification
368: measured in $J$ band as the criterion for event detectability
369: because it is the main passband of the {\it MPF} observation
370: (see below). We assume that there is no blended flux other
371: than the flux from the lens. We restrict that the survey
372: monitors stars with apparent magnitudes brighter than $J=22.5$,
373: which corresponds to early M-type main-sequence stars.
374:
375:
376: Once events are produced, the rate of the individual events
377: are weighted by the factor
378: \begin{equation}
379: \Gamma \propto \rho(D_{\rm S})D_{\rm S}^2 \rho(D_{\rm L})
380: r_{\rm E} v,
381: \label{eq12}
382: \end{equation}
383: where $\rho(D)$ is the matter density, $D_{\rm L}$ and
384: $D_{\rm S}$ are the distances to the lens and source,
385: respectively, the factor $D_{\rm S}^2$ is included to
386: account for the increase of the number of source stars with
387: the increase of distance, $r_{\rm E}$ is the Einstein radius
388: which corresponds to the cross-section of the lens-source
389: encounter, and $v$ is the lens-source transverse speed.
390: The Einstein radius is related to the physical parameters
391: of the lens and source by
392: \begin{equation}
393: r_{\rm E}=\left[ {4GM\over c^2}
394: {D_{\rm L}(D_{\rm S}-D_{\rm L})\over D_{\rm S}}\right]^{1/2}.
395: \label{eq13}
396: \end{equation}
397: From the simulation, we find that 66\% and 34\% of the total
398: events are caused by the lenses located in the bulge and disk,
399: respectively. We also find that events caused by stellar
400: lenses comprise 48\% and others are produced by dark lens
401: components.
402:
403:
404: The {\it MPF} survey plans to observe in the wavelength range
405: $\sim 600$ -- 1700 nm in three passbands. These consist of
406: a very wide passband spanning the full 600 -- 1700 nm range
407: and the other two narrow bands at each end of the range
408: \citep{bennett04}. The very wide filter has no equivalence
409: in standard filter, but we assume it corresponds to $J$ filter
410: because the central wavelength matches that of the $J$ filter.
411: The two narrow filters are approximated by the $R$ and $H$
412: filters. The observing strategy for {\it MPF} is to do most
413: of the observations with the very wide filter and a small
414: number of observations in the $R$ and $H$ filters. We choose
415: color is measured on the images taken in $R$ and $H$ filters
416: because larger color shift is expected as the wavelength gap
417: between the filters becomes wider. We assume that {\it MPF}
418: can detect 14.3 and 5.0 photons ${\rm s}^{-1}$ for a 22 magnitude
419: star in the $R$ and $H$ bands, respectively \citep{bessel79,
420: campins85}.
421:
422:
423: For the individual events, we calculate the maximum color shift
424: by using equation~(\ref{eq3}). The {\it MPF} plans to take
425: images with 100 sec exposure at a 2 min interval and combine
426: the images to make a 10 min exposure image, resulting in a
427: data acquisition rate of $\sim 3$--5 images ${\rm hr}^{-1}$ or
428: $\sim 100$ images ${\rm day}^{-1}$. If 20\% of the observations
429: are done in the narrow filters, each of the $R$ and $H$-band
430: image is obtained every 2.4 hrs. This rate is frequent enough
431: to cover the peak of nearly all lensing events during which
432: the color shift is maximized. We assume that color shift is
433: detectable only if the color shift measured at the peak of
434: the event is five times greater than the uncertainty in the
435: color-shift measurement, i.e.\ 5$\sigma$ detection.
436:
437:
438: We determine the uncertainty of the color shift measurement
439: as follows. Let us define ${\cal R}_F$ as the ratio between
440: the flux ratios of an event measured in two passbands during
441: and before lensing, i.e.,
442: \begin{equation}
443: {\cal R}_F={F_R/F_H\over F_{R,0}/F_{H,0}}.
444: \label{eq14}
445: \end{equation}
446: According to the standard error analysis, the fractional
447: uncertainty in the measurement of ${\cal R}$ is estimated as
448: \begin{equation}
449: {\sigma_{{\cal R}_F}\over {\cal R}_F} \simeq
450: \left[
451: \left({\sigma_{F_{R}/F_{H}}\over F_{R}/F_{H}}\right)^2 +
452: \left({\sigma_{F_{R,0}/F_{H,0}}\over F_{R,0}/F_{H,0}}\right)^2
453: \right]^{1/2},
454: \label{eq15}
455: \end{equation}
456: where the individual terms on the right side are
457: \begin{equation}
458: \left( {\sigma_{F_{R}/F_{H}}\over F_{R}/F_{H} } \right)^2
459: \simeq
460: \left( {\sigma_{F_R} \over F_R}\right)^2 +
461: \left({\sigma_{F_H} \over F_H}
462: \right)^2,
463: \label{eq16}
464: \end{equation}
465: and
466: \begin{equation}
467: \left( {\sigma_{F_{R,0}/F_{H,0}}\over F_{R,0}/F_{H,0} } \right)^2
468: \simeq
469: \left( {\sigma_{F_{R,0}} \over F_{R,0}}\right)^2 +
470: \left({\sigma_{F_{H,0}} \over F_{H,0}}
471: \right)^2.
472: \label{eq17}
473: \end{equation}
474: Under the assumption that the photometry is photon dominated,
475: i.e. $\sigma_F=F^{1/2}$, equations~(\ref{eq16}) and (\ref{eq17})
476: are approximated as
477: \begin{equation}
478: \left( {\sigma_{F_{R}/F_{H}}\over F_{R}/F_{H} }\right)^2 \sim
479: {1\over F_R}+{1\over F_H} =
480: {F_R+F_H \over F_R F_h},
481: \label{eq18}
482: \end{equation}
483: and
484: \begin{equation}
485: \left( {\sigma_{F_{R,0}/F_{h,0}}\over F_{R,0}/F_{H,0} } \right)^2
486: \sim {1\over F_{R,0}}+{1\over F_{H,0}} =
487: {F_{R,0}+F_{H,0} \over F_{R,0} F_{H,0}}.
488: \label{eq19}
489: \end{equation}
490: Then, from equation~(\ref{eq15}), (\ref{eq18}), and (\ref{eq19}),
491: one finds
492: \begin{equation}
493: {\sigma_{{\cal R}_F}\over {\cal R}_F} \simeq
494: \left( {F_R+F_H \over F_R F_H} +
495: {F_{R,0}+F_{H,0} \over F_{R,0} F_{H,0}} \right)^{1/2}.
496: \label{eq20}
497: \end{equation}
498: The uncertainty in units of magnitude is related to the
499: fractional uncertainty $\sigma_{{\cal R}_F}/
500: {\cal R}_F$ by
501: \begin{equation}
502: \sigma_{\Delta(R-H)}=2.5 \log e
503: \left( { \sigma_{{\cal R}_F}\over {\cal R}_F} \right)
504: \sim 1.1 \left( { \sigma_{{\cal R}_F}\over {\cal R}_F} \right).
505: \label{eq21}
506: \end{equation}
507: Then, the color-shift uncertainty is expressed as
508: \begin{equation}
509: \sigma_{\Delta(R-H)} \sim 1.1
510: \left( {F_R+F_H \over F_R F_H} +
511: {F_{R,0}+F_{H,0} \over F_{R,0} F_{H,0}} \right)^{1/2}.
512: \label{eq22}
513: \end{equation}
514:
515:
516:
517:
518: % Figure 1 ----------------------------------------------------
519: %\begin{figure*}[ht]
520: \begin{figure}[t]
521: \epsscale{1.18}
522: \plotone{fig1.eps}
523: \caption{\label{fig:one}
524: Color shift distribution of events expected to be detected from
525: the future {\it MPF} lensing survey. Darker shade region represents
526: the distribution for events where the color shift can be detected
527: at 5$\sigma$ level.
528: %}\end{figure*}
529: }\end{figure}
530: % -------------------------------------------------------------
531:
532:
533:
534:
535: \section{Result}
536:
537: In Figure~\ref{fig:one}, we present the color shift distribution
538: of events expected to be detected from the {\it MPF} survey.
539: From the distribution, we find that color shift can be measured
540: for $\sim 12\%$ of the total events. Considering that events
541: produced by stellar lenses comprise $\sim 48\%$ of the total event,
542: this corresponds to $\sim 23\%$ of all events produced by stellar
543: lenses. We find that the fractions of color-shifted events among
544: the disk and bulge events are $\sim 18\%$ and 9\%, respectively.
545: The fraction for the disk-lens events is higher because the lenses
546: are located closer to the observer and thus they are brighter.
547:
548:
549:
550: % Figure 2 ----------------------------------------------------
551: %\begin{figure*}[ht]
552: \begin{figure}[th]
553: \epsscale{1.18}
554: \plotone{fig2.eps}
555: \caption{\label{fig:two}
556: Top panel shows the distribution of the apparent brightness
557: of the combined image of the source star and lens. Second
558: and third panels are the brightness distributions of the
559: separate source stars and lenses, respectively. Bottom
560: panel shows the distribution of the $H$-band lens light
561: fraction. The lens light fraction is 1.0 when the observed
562: flux is purely from the lens. Dark shade regions represent
563: the distributions for events where the color shift is detectable
564: at 5$\sigma$ level.
565: %}\end{figure*}
566: }\end{figure}
567: % -------------------------------------------------------------
568:
569:
570:
571: We investigate the properties of the color-shifted events.
572: First, we examine the brightness of the source stars and lenses.
573: In Figure~\ref{fig:two}, we present the $H$-band brightness
574: distributions of the source+lens combined images (top panel),
575: and separate source stars and lenses (second and third panels,
576: respectively). From the distributions, we find that the
577: color-shifted events have apparent brightness distributed in
578: the range of $17\lesssim H\lesssim 21$. We also find that
579: the source and lens stars of color-shifted events have similar
580: brightness ranges of $18\lesssim H\lesssim 22$. This implies
581: that color shift occurs when the lens brightness is equivalent
582: to that of the source star. This can also be seen in the bottom
583: panel of Figure~\ref{fig:two}, where we present the distribution
584: of the $H$-band lens light fraction. We find that $\sim 45\%$
585: of the color-shifted events will be produced by lenses brighter
586: than source stars in the $H$ band and $\sim 11\%$ of them will
587: have lens light fractions greater than $F_{H,{\rm L}}/(F_{H,{\rm S}}
588: + F_{H,{\rm L}})=0.9$.
589:
590:
591: Second, we investigate the magnifications of the color-shifted
592: events. For this, we construct the distribution of the impact
593: parameters of the lens-source encounter. The distribution is
594: presented in the top panel of Figure~\ref{fig:three}. From
595: the distribution, we find, as expected, that color-shifted
596: events tend to have high magnifications. We estimate that the
597: fraction of the color-shifted events with impact parameters
598: less than $u_0=0.1$ (or $A\gtrsim 10$) is $\sim 31\%$. On the
599: other hand, the fraction of the color-shifted events among
600: those with $u_0> 0.5$ (or $A<2.4$) is merely $\sim 10\%$.
601: These results imply that color shifts will be detected mainly
602: from high-magnification events.
603:
604:
605:
606: % Figure 3 ----------------------------------------------------
607: %\begin{figure*}[ht]
608: \begin{figure}[t]
609: \epsscale{1.18}
610: \plotone{fig3.eps}
611: \caption{\label{fig:three}
612: Distributions of the normalized impact parameters of the
613: lens-source encounter (top), event time-scale (middle), and
614: lens masses (bottom) of events to be detected by the future
615: {\it MPF} lensing survey. Dark shade region represents
616: the distribution for events where the color shift is detectable
617: at 5$\sigma$ level.
618: %}\end{figure*}
619: }\end{figure}
620: % -------------------------------------------------------------
621:
622:
623:
624:
625: Third, we investigate the event time scales. The event time
626: scale is defined as the time required for the source star to
627: cross the Einstein radius of the lens, i.e.\ $t_{\rm E}=r_{\rm E}/v$.
628: The middle panel of Figure~\ref{fig:three} shows the distribution
629: of the time scale. By comparing the distribution with that of
630: all events, we find that the time scales of the color-shifted
631: events tend to be longer than the events without color shifts.
632: The most frequent value of the time scale for the color-shifted
633: events is $\sim 18$ days. On the other hand, the mode value of
634: all events is $\sim 6$ days. We find this tendency is because
635: the lenses of the color-shifted events tend to be brighter and
636: thus heavier than the lenses of events without color shifts.
637: We find that the lenses responsible for the color-shifted events
638: have masses located in the range of $0.2\ M_\odot\lesssim M
639: \lesssim 1.0\ M_\odot$. These correspond to stars with spectral
640: types from G down to mid M-type main-sequence stars. Color shift
641: measurement for events produced by late spectral-type lens stars
642: is possible because the {\it MPF} survey will observe in near
643: infrared through which the lens/source flux ratio is not negligible.
644:
645:
646:
647: The selection effect of color-shift measurements that favors
648: events with higher magnifications and longer time scales
649: implies that the fraction of planetary microlensing events
650: with color-shift measurements would be substantially higher
651: than the average value of all events. This is because planet
652: detection has a similar selection effect of preferring events
653: with higher magnifications and longer time scales \citep{han07}.
654: Therefore, it would be possible to characterize the host stars
655: of planets from color-shift measurements for an important
656: fraction of planetary events. For some cases, the source and
657: lens stars may have similar colors resulting in small color
658: shifts. In this case, the lens stars can still be detectable
659: with space-based follow-up observations conducted several years
660: after the event \citep{bennett07}.
661:
662:
663: \section{Conclusion}
664:
665: We investigated the usefulness of future space-based lensing
666: surveys in measuring color shifts of microlening events caused
667: by the flux from the lens. By conducting simulation of galactic
668: microlensing events based on the specification of the proposed
669: {\it MPF} survey, we estimated that the shift in the color of
670: $R-H$ would be measured at 5$\sigma$ level for $\sim 12\%$ of
671: events that would occur on source stars with apparent magnitudes
672: brighter than $J=22.5$. Color-shifted events tend to have high
673: magnifications and the lenses would have brightnesses equivalent
674: to those of source stars. We estimated that $\sim 31\%$ of the
675: color-shifted events would have magnifications $A > 10$ and the
676: lenses of $\sim 45\%$ of the color-shifted events would be
677: brighter than source stars. The time scales of the color-shifted
678: events would be longer than those without color shifts because
679: these events tend to be brighter and thus heavier than those
680: without color shifts. We estimated that the most frequent time
681: scale of the color-shifted events would be $\sim 18$ days, while
682: the mode value of all events would be $\sim 6$ days. The spectral
683: type of the lens stars of the color-shifted events would extend
684: down to mid M type because the {\it MPF} survey will observe in
685: near infrared through which the lens/source flux ratio is not
686: negligible. Being able to extract information about the lens
687: from the measured color shift, future space-based lensing surveys
688: would be able to better constrain the lens population of galactic
689: microlensing events.
690:
691:
692:
693:
694:
695: \acknowledgments
696: This work was supported by the Basic Research Fund of Chungbuk
697: National University.
698:
699:
700:
701:
702: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
703: \frenchspacing
704: \bibitem[Bennett et al.(2004)]{bennett04}
705: Bennett, D.\ P., et al.\ 2004, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 5487, 1453
706:
707: \bibitem[Bennett, Anderson \& Gaudi]{bennett07}
708: Bennett, D.\ P., Anderson, J., \& Gaudi, B. S.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 781
709:
710: \bibitem[Bennett \& Rhie(2002)]{bennett02}
711: Bennett, D.\ P., \& Rhie, S.\ H.\ 2002, \apj, 574, 985
712:
713: \bibitem[Bessel(1979)]{bessel79}
714: Bessel, M.\ S. 1979, \pasp, 91, 589
715:
716: \bibitem[Buchalter et al.(1996)]{buchalter96}
717: Buchalter, A., Kamionkowski, M., \& Rich, R.\ M.\ 1996, \apj, 469, 676
718:
719: \bibitem[Campins et al.(1985)]{campins85}
720: Campins, H., Reike, G.\ H., \& Lebofsky, M.\ J.\ 1985, \aj, 90, 896
721:
722: \bibitem[Cox(1999)]{cox99}
723: Cox, A.\ N., 1999, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities
724: (4th Ed.; New York: Springer)
725:
726: \bibitem[Drimmel \& Spergel(2001)]{drimmel01}
727: Drimmel, R., \& Spergel, D.\ N.\ 2001, \apj, 556, 181
728:
729: \bibitem[Dwek et al.(1995)]{dwek95}
730: Dwek, E., et al.\ 1995, \aj, 445, 716
731:
732: \bibitem[Gould(2000)]{gould00}
733: Gould, A.\ 2000, \apj, 535, 928
734:
735: \bibitem[Han(2007)]{han07}
736: Han, C.\ 2007, \apj, 661, 1202
737:
738: \bibitem[Han \& Gould(1995)]{han95}
739: Han, C., \& Gould, A.\ 1995, \apj, 447, 53
740:
741: \bibitem[Han \& Gould(2003)]{han03}
742: Han, C., \& Gould, A.\ 2003, \apj, 592, 172
743:
744: \bibitem[Holtzman et al.(1998)]{holtzman98}
745: Holtzman, J.\ A., Watson, A.\ M., Baum, W.\ A., Grillmair, C.\ J.,
746: Groth, E.\ J., Light, R.\ M., Lynds, R., \& O'Neil, E.\ J.\ 1998, \aj,
747: 115, 1946
748:
749: \bibitem[Kamionkowski(1995)]{kamionkowski95}
750: Kamionkowski, M.\ 1995, \apj, 442, L9
751:
752: \bibitem[Sumi(2004)]{sumi04}
753: Sumi, T.\ 2004, \mnras, 349, 193
754:
755: \bibitem[Zoccalli et al.(2000)]{zoccali00}
756: Zoccali, M.\ S., Cassisi, S., Frogel, J.\ A., Gould, A., Ortolani, S.,
757: Renzini, A., Rich, R.\ M. 1999, \& Stephens, A.\ 2000, \apj, 530, 418
758:
759: \end{thebibliography}
760:
761: \end{document}
762: