1: % For ApJ submission -----------------------------------------
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{/home/cheongho/LatexStyle/AAS5.02/aastex}
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4:
5: \documentclass{emulateapj}
6: \usepackage{apjfonts}
7: \lefthead{HAN}
8: \righthead{PLANETS WITH TWO SUNS}
9:
10: %==== CUSTOMIZED LATEX MACROS ========================================
11:
12: \newcommand{\vect}[1]{\ensuremath{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}}
13: \newcommand{\zetavec}{\mbox{\boldmath $\zeta$}}
14:
15:
16: \newcommand{\te}{t_{\rm E}}
17: \newcommand{\re}{r_{\rm E}}
18: \newcommand{\rh}{r_{\rm H}}
19: \newcommand{\retilde}{\tilde{r}_{\rm E}}
20: \newcommand{\thetae}{\theta_{\rm E}}
21:
22:
23:
24: % Equation align
25: \def\eqalign#1{\null\,\vcenter{\openup\jot
26: \ialign{\strut\hfil$\displaystyle{##}$&$
27: \displaystyle{{}##}$\hfil \crcr#1\crcr}}\,}
28:
29: %=======================================================================
30:
31:
32: \begin{document}
33: \title{Microlensing Search for Planets with Two Simultaneously Rising Suns}
34:
35: \author{Cheongho Han}
36: \affil{Program of Brain Korea 21, Department of Physics,
37: Chungbuk National University, Chongju 361-763, Korea;
38: cheongho@astroph.chungbuk.ac.kr}
39:
40:
41:
42:
43: % ==================================================================
44:
45: %\submitted{Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal}
46:
47: \begin{abstract}
48: Among more than 200 extrasolar planet candidates discovered to
49: date, there is no known planet orbiting around normal binary
50: stars. In this paper, we demonstrate that microlensing is a
51: technique that can detect such planets. Microlensing discoveries
52: of these planets are possible because the planet and host binary
53: stars produce perturbations at a common region around center of
54: mass of the binary stars and thus the signatures of both planet
55: and binary can be detected in the light curves of high-magnification
56: microlensing events. The ranges of the planetary and binary
57: separations of systems for optimal detection vary depending on
58: the planet mass. For a Jupiter-mass planet, we find that high
59: detection efficiency is expected for planets located in the range
60: of $\sim$ 1 AU -- 5 AU from the binary stars which are separated
61: by $\sim$ 0.15 AU -- 0.5 AU.
62: \end{abstract}
63:
64: \keywords{gravitational lensing -- planets and satellites: general}
65:
66: %{\small {\tt Preprint Version}}
67:
68:
69:
70: \section{Introduction}
71:
72: Since the first discovery by \citet{wolszczan92}, more than 200
73: extrasolar planet candidates have been discovered. Among the
74: currently known extrasolar planet-hosting stars, approximately 20\%
75: are members of binaries or multiple systems \citep{haghighipour06}.
76: Nearly all of the planets in these systems revolve around only one
77: of the stars. The only exception is the planetary system PSR B1620-26
78: \citep{lyne88, backer93}, but this system consists of not normal
79: stars but a pulsar and a white dwarf.
80:
81:
82: Besides the orbital configuration of the known planets in binaries
83: where the planet revolves around one of the widely separated binary
84: members, a planet can stay in a stable orbit if the planet is
85: located well outside the binary stars and thus seeing the two stars
86: as approximately a single object. However, such planets, which were
87: imagined as a planet with two simultaneously rising suns in the
88: {\it Star Wars} saga (Tatooine), have not been seen in planet searches
89: using the radial velocity technique because the search programs avoid
90: short-period binary stars. The chance to detect such planets via the
91: transit technique is also very low because these planets tend to have
92: wide orbits.
93:
94:
95: Planets in binary stellar systems can be detected by using the
96: microlensing technique. Such a possibility was first mentioned by
97: \citet{bennett99}. They reported a candidate planet orbiting around
98: a binary system from the observation and light-curve modeling of a
99: microlensing event MACHO-97-BLG-41. However, their interpretation of
100: this event is very special in the sense that the source trajectory
101: is precisely aligned with the line connecting the planet and
102: the center of mass of the binary. Besides, the interpretation of
103: the signal was rejected because a rotating binary-lens model
104: provides an excellent fit to the observed data \citep{albrow00}.
105: \citet{lee08} also investigated the lensing signal of planets in
106: binary systems. However, their analysis is restricted to planets
107: orbiting around one of the binary members. In this paper, we
108: investigate the feasibility of detecting planets with two
109: simultaneously rising suns by using the microlensing technique.
110:
111:
112: %The paper is organized as follows. In \S\ 2, we briefly mention
113: %basics of microlensing. In \S\ 3, we describe the lensing behavior
114: %of events produced by close binary stars with planets orbiting
115: %around them. We introduce the channel for which one can efficiently
116: %identify both signatures of the planet and the binarity of the host
117: %stars. We illustrate the signatures for various lens configurations.
118: %We also estimate the ranges of binary and planetary separations for
119: %which the microlensing technique is efficient. In \S\ 4, we discuss
120: %about the feasibility of detecting signals of planets around binaries
121: %in current lensing experiments and possible complications in the
122: %interpretation of the signals. In \S\ 5, we summarize the result
123: %and conclude.
124:
125:
126:
127:
128: % Figure 1 --------------------------------------------------------------
129: \begin{figure}[ht]
130: \epsscale{1.2}
131: \plotone{f1.eps}
132: \caption{\label{fig:one}
133: Lensing geometry of a planet revolving around close binary stars.
134: The big dashed circle represents the Einstein ring of a mass
135: corresponding to the total mass of the binary stars. The angle
136: $\phi$ denotes the position angle of the planet as measured
137: counterclockwise from the binary axis and $d_b$ and $d_p$ denote
138: the projected separations between the binary stars and between
139: the planet and the binary center of mass, respectively. The right
140: panel shows the enlarged view of the region around the binary stars.
141: The figure drawn in red color represents the lensing caustic produced
142: by the lens system.
143: }\end{figure}
144: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
145:
146:
147:
148:
149: % Figure 2 --------------------------------------------------------------
150: \begin{figure*}[ht]
151: \epsscale{0.7}
152: %\plotone{f2.eps}
153: \caption{\label{fig:two}
154: Lensing magnification patterns of triple lens systems composed of
155: a planet revolving around binary stars. The labels above and on
156: the right represent the projected separations between binary stars
157: ($d_b$) and between the planet and the center of mass of the binary
158: ($d_p$), respectively. In each map, the coordinates are centered
159: at the position of the center of mass of the binary stars and the
160: $x$-axis is aligned with the binary axis. The heavier star is on
161: the right. The planets have a common position angle of $\phi=
162: 45^\circ$ as measured counterclockwise from the binary axis (see
163: Figure~\ref{fig:one}). The grey-scale is drawn such that brighter
164: tone represents the region of higher magnification. The figures
165: drawn in solid curves represent the lensing caustics. The presented
166: patterns are for a Saturn-mass planet revolving around binary stars
167: with a total mass of $0.5\ M_\odot$ and a companion/primary mass
168: ratio of 0.5. The light curves resulting from the source trajectories
169: marked by straight lines with arrows in the individual panels are
170: presented in the corresponding panels of Figure~\ref{fig:three}
171: (thick solid curves in black color). The panels blocked by thick
172: black solid lines show the cases where the planet dominates the
173: perturbation pattern, while the panels blocked by thick white
174: solid lines show the opposite cases where the binary stars dominate
175: the pattern.
176: }\end{figure*}
177: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
178:
179:
180:
181: \section{Lensing Behavior}
182:
183: The general geometry of a planet revolving around the stars of
184: a close binary is such that the separation between the stars is
185: much smaller than the star-planet separation (see Figure 1).
186: Under this geometry, the lensing behavior of the triple lens
187: system can be greatly simplified because the close stellar binary
188: pair and the planet can be separately treated.
189:
190:
191: The lensing behavior of the close stellar binary pair is mostly
192: described by the single mass lens located at the center of the
193: mass of the binary system with a mass equal to the total mass of
194: the binary. A small deviation occurs around the caustic which
195: forms close to the center of mass. The caustic represents the
196: set of source positions at which the magnification of a point
197: source becomes infinite. For a close binary, the caustic has
198: the shape of an asymmetric hypocycloid with four cusps and the
199: asymmetry increases as the mass ratio between the stars, $q_b
200: =m_2/m_1$, decreases. Here $m_1$ and $m_2$ represent the masses
201: of the heavier and lighter binary components, respectively.
202: The caustic size depends weakly on the mass ratio, but it decreases
203: rapidly with the decrease of the stellar separation. For a close
204: binary, then, the perturbation region is confined to a small
205: region around the center of mass of the binary.
206:
207:
208: The planet, on the other hand, causes formation of two sets of
209: disconnected caustics. One set is located away from the host star.
210: The other set is located close to the planet-hosting star, which
211: coincides with the region of the binary-induced perturbation.
212: The latter caustic (central caustic) has an elongated wedge-like
213: shape. The size of the planet-induced central caustics depends
214: both on the star-planet separation and the planet/star mass ratio
215: \citep{chung05}. The planet-induced caustic is small due to the
216: small mass ratio of the planet. However, its size becomes
217: non-negligible when the planetary separation is equivalent to
218: the Einstein radius \citep{mao91, gould92}.
219:
220:
221: The small sizes of the deviation regions induced by the planet and
222: the host binary stars greatly simplify the description of the
223: lensing behavior of the system. This is because each deviation can
224: be treated as a perturbation and thus the lensing behavior of the
225: triple lens system is approximated as the superposition of those
226: of the two sets of binary lenses composed of the binary star pair
227: and the pair composed of the planet and a virtual star located at
228: the center of the mass of the binary stars with a mass equal to
229: the total mass of the binary. In addition, the coincidence of the
230: individual perturbation regions might enable to detect both signatures
231: of the planet and host binary stars from high magnification events
232: for which the source trajectory passes close to the common region of
233: perturbation.
234:
235:
236:
237:
238: % Figure 3 --------------------------------------------------------------
239: \begin{figure*}[ht]
240: \epsscale{0.7}
241: \plotone{f3.eps}
242: \caption{\label{fig:three}
243: Light curves of lensing events caused by triple lens systems
244: composed of a planet revolving around binary stars. The lens
245: system geometry and the source star trajectories responsible
246: for the individual events are presented in the corresponding
247: panels of Figure~\ref{fig:two}. In each panel, there exist
248: three light curves. The thick black solid light curve is for the
249: triple-lens event, while the curves drawn in red and blue colors
250: are for the cases where there is no planet and the planet-hosting
251: star is a single object, respectively.
252: }\end{figure*}
253: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
254:
255:
256:
257:
258: \section{Magnification Pattern}
259:
260: With the possible approximation of binary superposition in mind,
261: we investigate the magnification pattern in the central region of
262: various triple lens systems composed of a planet around binary
263: stars. For this, we construct magnification map, which represents
264: the map of lensing magnification as a function of the source star
265: position. For the construction of the map, we use the ray-shooting
266: method. %\citep{schneider86, kayser86, wambsganss90}.
267: We choose this method because it allows not only simple procedure
268: of multiple-lensing magnification computation but also easy
269: incorporation of the finite-source effect.
270:
271:
272: Figure 2 shows the maps for a Saturn-mass planet revolving around
273: binary stars with a total mass of $M=0.5\ M_\odot$ and a mass ratio
274: of $q_b=0.5$. The labels above and on the right side of the figure
275: represent the projected separations between binary stars (binary
276: separation, $d_b$) and between the planet and the center of mass of
277: the binary (planetary separation, $d_p$), respectively. In each map,
278: the coordinates are centered at the position of the center of mass
279: of the binary stars and the $x$-axis is aligned with the binary axis,
280: where the heavier star is on the right. For all tested cases, the
281: planets have a common position angle of $\phi=45^\circ$ as measured
282: counterclockwise from the binary axis (see Figure~\ref{fig:one}).
283: The grey-scale is drawn such that brighter tone represents the region
284: of higher magnification. The figures drawn in solid curves represent
285: the caustics. Since the caustics induced by the planet and binary
286: stars are small, finite-source effect would be important in
287: magnification pattern \citep{bennett96}. We consider the effect by
288: assuming that the source star has a radius equivalent to that of the
289: Sun. We assume that events are observed toward the Galactic bulge
290: field and the distances to the lens and source are $D_L=6$ kpc and
291: $D_S=8$ kpc, respectively, by adopting those of a typical Galactic
292: bulge event \citep{han95}. Then, the corresponding Einstein radius
293: is $r_{\rm E}=(4GM/c^2)^{1/2}[D_L(D_S-D_L)/D_S]^{1/2}\sim 2.5$ AU
294: and the source size normalized by the Einstein radius is $\rho=
295: 1.5\times 10^{-3}$.
296:
297:
298: In Figure~\ref{fig:three}, we also present the light curves
299: resulting from the source trajectories marked by straight lines on
300: the maps. In each panel, there exist three light curves. The thick
301: solid light curve is for the triple-lens event, while the curves
302: drawn in red and blue colors are for the cases where there is no
303: planet and the planet-hosting star is a single object, respectively.
304:
305:
306:
307: From Figure 2 and 3, we find that the influence of the planet and
308: binary stars on the pattern of perturbation varies depending on the
309: binary and planetary separations. When the binary separation is small
310: and the planetary separation is equivalent to the Einstein radius,
311: the planet dominates the perturbation pattern. These correspond to
312: the cases blocked by thick black solid lines in Figure 2. On the
313: contrary, the binary dominates the perturbation pattern when the
314: binary separation is considerable and the planetary separation is
315: either too large or too small compared to the Einstein radius.
316: These correspond to the cases enclosed by thick white solid lines
317: in Figure~\ref{fig:two}. For events produced by these lens systems,
318: then, the resulting perturbation would be well described by a binary
319: lens of either star-planet or binary star pair. However, for lens
320: systems with separations located in the neutral region of the
321: $d_b$--$d_p$ parameter space, the influences of the planet and stellar
322: binary are equivalent and thus it would be possible to detect both
323: signals of the planet and binary stars.
324:
325:
326:
327:
328: % Figure 4 --------------------------------------------------------------
329: \begin{figure}[ht]
330: \epsscale{1.2}
331: %\plotone{f4.eps}
332: \caption{\label{fig:four}
333: The optimal ranges of binary and planetary separations for which
334: microlensing technique is sensitive to the detections of planets
335: orbiting around binary stars.
336: }\end{figure}
337: % --------------------------------------------------------------------
338:
339:
340:
341:
342:
343: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
344: \tablecaption{Optimal Separation Ranges\label{table:one}}
345: \tablewidth{0pt}
346: \tablehead{
347: \multicolumn{1}{c}{planet} &
348: \multicolumn{1}{c}{planetary} &
349: \multicolumn{1}{c}{binary} \\
350: \multicolumn{1}{c}{type} &
351: \multicolumn{1}{c}{separation} &
352: \multicolumn{1}{c}{separation}
353: }
354: \startdata
355: Jupiter-mass & $1.0\ {\rm AU}\lesssim d_{\rm p}\lesssim 5.0\ {\rm AU}$ & $0.15\ {\rm AU}\lesssim d_{\rm b} \lesssim 0.5\ {\rm AU}$ \\
356: Saturn-mass & $1.6\ {\rm AU}\lesssim d_{\rm p}\lesssim 3.8\ {\rm AU}$ & $0.15\ {\rm AU}\lesssim d_{\rm b} \lesssim 0.5\ {\rm AU}$ \\
357: \smallskip
358: Uranus-mass & $2.0\ {\rm AU}\lesssim d_{\rm p}\lesssim 3.0\ {\rm AU}$ & $0.15\ {\rm AU}\lesssim d_{\rm b} \lesssim 0.5\ {\rm AU}$
359: \enddata
360: %\tablecomments{
361: %The optimal ranges of the binary and planetary
362: %separations for which the microlensing technique is sensitive
363: %to the detections of planets orbiting around binary stars.
364: %}
365: \end{deluxetable}
366:
367:
368:
369:
370: \section{Optimal Binary and Planetary Separations}
371:
372: Then, what are the optimal ranges of the binary and planetary
373: separations for which the microlensing technique is sensitive
374: to the detections of planets orbiting around binary stars.
375: In this section, we investigate these optimal ranges.
376:
377:
378:
379: The size of the perturbation region is proportional to the
380: size of the caustic. We, therefore, determine the optimal
381: region in the $d_b$--$d_p$ parameter space as the one within
382: which the sizes of the planet and binary-induced caustics
383: become equivalent. Figure~\ref{fig:four} shows the regions
384: found under this approximation for three different types of
385: Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus-mass planets. For lens systems
386: with planetary and binary separations located in the shaded
387: region, the size ratio between the two types of caustic is
388: in the range of $1/5\leq \Delta\xi_p/\Delta\xi_b\leq 5.0$,
389: where $\Delta\xi_p$ and $\Delta\xi_b$ represent the sizes
390: of the planet and binary-induced caustics, respectively.
391: We apply two exceptions to this rule. The first is that if
392: both caustics are too small, we assume that the signal
393: detection would be difficult due to severe finite-source
394: effect. To account for the finite-source effect, we set the
395: lower limit of the caustic size for signal detection as two
396: times of the source size. The second exception is that if
397: both caustics are greater than a certain value, we assume
398: that the chance to detect both planet and stellar binary is
399: not small. We set this threshold caustics size as 10 times
400: of the source size. From the comparison of the optimal ranges
401: determined in this way with those of the neutral region judged
402: based on eye inspection of the maps in Figure~\ref{fig:two},
403: we find good agreement. The optimal ranges vary depending on
404: the planet mass. For a Jupiter-mass planet, we find that
405: high detection efficiency is expected for planets located in
406: the range of $1\ {\rm AU} \lesssim d_p \lesssim 5\ {\rm AU}$
407: orbiting around binaries with separations of $0.15\ {\rm AU}
408: \lesssim d_b\lesssim 0.5\ {\rm AU}$. The range of the planetary
409: separation shrinks as the planet mass decreases. However, the
410: range of the binary separation remains nearly the same regardless
411: of the planet mass. In Table~\ref{table:one}, we summarize the
412: optimal ranges for various types of planets.
413:
414:
415: It might be that planets located in some portions of the tested
416: $d_b$--$d_p$ parameter space might be dynamically unstable and
417: thus the estimated optimal region is overestimated. At present,
418: however, the possible extent of the planet separation around
419: stars of a close binary system is an open question and is
420: subject to be tested from observation. In this sense, the
421: constraint of the stable region of the planetary separation
422: that will be provided by the microlensing method is very
423: important.
424:
425:
426:
427: \section{Discussion}
428:
429: Interpreting the signals of triple-lens systems is not an easy
430: task. With more complete understanding of lensing behavior and
431: the development of efficient modelling codes, however, such
432: analysis is being started for the analysis of observed lensing
433: events (A. Gould private communication). Not long ago, binary-lens
434: modelling was considered to be a difficult task, but now it is
435: routinely conducted for binary events. Considering this,
436: triple-lens modelling would be possible in future lensing analysis.
437:
438:
439: Nevertheless, one might think of several possible degenerate
440: cases to the signal of the planet orbiting a close binary stars.
441: One possible case is a triple lens system where a planet orbits
442: around one of widely separated binary stars. In this case,
443: the binary-produced caustic is located also close to the
444: planet-induced caustic, causing potential degeneracy. However,
445: the caustic produced by the wide-separation binary has a very
446: symmetric hypocycloid shape, while the shape of the caustic
447: produced by close binary stars is in general asymmetric.
448: Therefore, the resulting patterns of the two cases are different
449: and thus it would not be difficult to distinguish the two cases.
450: Another possible case is a star with multiple planets \citep{gaudi98}.
451: Here the perturbations in the central region are produced by the
452: individual planets. The planet-induced caustics are much more
453: elongated than binary-induced caustic. Therefore, it would not
454: be difficult to distinguish this case, either.
455:
456:
457: Planets around close binary stars will be detected through the
458: channel of high-magnification events. Current microlensing
459: follow-up observations \citep{beaulieu06, gould06} are focusing
460: on these events due to their high efficiency in planet detections
461: \citep{griest98}. By using multiple telescopes located at different
462: locations, these observations enable dense and continuous coverage
463: of events which is required to detect the short-lasting signature
464: of the planet in binary stars. In addition, greatly enhanced source
465: brightness of high-magnification events enables precision photometry
466: which is essential for the characterization of the signature.
467: Therefore, we predict that planets with two simultaneously rising
468: suns would be detected in the near future.
469:
470:
471:
472:
473:
474: \section{Conclusion}
475:
476: We investigated the feasibility of detecting planets orbiting
477: close binary stars by using the microlensing technique. We
478: presented the channel for which one can identify the signatures
479: of such planetary systems. We illustrated the signatures for
480: various planet-binary configurations and explained the tendencies
481: of the signatures. We also estimated the ranges of the binary
482: and planetary separations for which the microlensing method is
483: efficient in detecting these planetary systems. Discovering
484: planets orbiting around close binary stars is difficult by
485: using the radial velocity or transit technique. Therefore,
486: microlensing is an important technique that can provide
487: information about these planetary systems, which is very
488: important for our understanding of planet formation.
489:
490:
491:
492:
493: \acknowledgments
494:
495: This work was supported by the Science Research Center (SRC)
496: program.
497:
498: %This work was supported by the grant (KRF-2006-311-C00072) of the
499: %Korea Research Foundation.
500:
501:
502:
503: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
504: \frenchspacing
505:
506: \bibitem[Albrow et al.(2000)]{albrow00}
507: Albrow, M.\ D., et al.\ 2000, \apj, 534, 894
508:
509: \bibitem[Backer et al.(1993)]{backer93}
510: Backer, D.\ C., Foster, R.\ S., \& Sallmen, S.\ 1993, Nature, 365, 817
511:
512: \bibitem[Beaulieu et al.(2006)]{beaulieu06}
513: Beaulieu, J.-P., et al.\ 2006, Nature, 439, 437
514:
515: \bibitem[Bennett et al.(1999)]{bennett99}
516: Bennett, D.\ P., et al.\ 1999, Nature, 402, 57
517:
518: \bibitem[Bennett \& Rhie(1996)]{bennett96}
519: Bennett, D.\ P., \& Rhie, S.\ H.\ 1996, \apj, 472, 660
520:
521: \bibitem[Chung et al.(2005)]{chung05}
522: Chung, S.-J., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 630, 535
523:
524: %\bibitem[Gaudi \& Gould(1997)]{gaudi97}
525: %Gaudi, B.\ S., \& Gould, A.\ 1997, \apj, 482, 83
526:
527: \bibitem[Gaudi et al.(1998)]{gaudi98}
528: Gaudi, B. S., Naber, R. M., \& Sackett, P. D. 1998, \apj, 502, L33
529:
530: \bibitem[Gould et al.(2006)]{gould06}
531: Gould, A., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 644, L37
532:
533: \bibitem[Gould \& Loeb(1992)]{gould92}
534: Gould, A. \& Loeb, A.\ 1992 \apj, 396, 104
535:
536: \bibitem[Griest \& Safizadeh(1998)]{griest98}
537: Griest, K., \& Safizadeh, N.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 37
538:
539: \bibitem[Haghighipour(2006)]{haghighipour06}
540: Haghighipour, N. 2006, \apj, 644, 543
541:
542: \bibitem[Han \& Gould(1995)]{han95}
543: Han, C., \& Gould, A.\ 1995, \apj, 447, 53
544:
545: %\bibitem[Kayser, Refsdal \& Stabell(1986)]{kayser86}
546: %Kayser R., Refsdal S., \& Stabell R.\ 1986, \aap, 166, 36
547:
548: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2008)]{lee08}
549: Lee, D.-W., Lee, C.-U., Park, B.-G., Chung, S.-J., Kim, Y.-S.,
550: Kim, H.-I., \& Han, C.\ 2009, \apj, 672, 000
551:
552: \bibitem[Lyne et al.(1988)]{lyne88}
553: Lyne, A.\ G., Biggs, J.\ D., Brinklow, A., McKenna, J., \& Ashworth, M.\
554: 1988, Nature, 332, L45
555:
556: \bibitem[Mao \& Paczy\'nski(1991)]{mao91}
557: Mao, S. \& Paczy\'nski, B.\ 1991, \apj, 374, L37
558:
559: %\bibitem[Paczy\'nski(1986)]{paczynski86}
560: %Paczy\'nski, B.\ 1986, \apj, 304, 1
561:
562: %\bibitem[Schneider \& Weiss(1986)]{schneider86}
563: %Schneider P., \& Weiss A.\ 1986, \aap, 164, 237
564:
565: %\bibitem[Wambsganss, Paczy\'nski \& Schneider(1990)]{wambsganss90}
566: %Wambsganss J., Paczy\'nski B., \& Schneider P.\ 1990, \apj, 358, L33
567:
568: %\bibitem[Witt(1990)]{witt90}
569: %Witt, H.\ J.\ 1990, \aap, 236, 311
570:
571: %\bibitem[Witt \& Mao(1995)]{witt95}
572: %Witt, H.\ J., \& Mao, S.\ 1995, \apj, 447, L105
573:
574: \bibitem[Wolszczan \& Frail(1992)]{wolszczan92}
575: Wolszczan, A., \& Frail, D.\ A.\ 1992, Nature, 355, 145
576:
577: %\bibitem[Rhie(1997)]{rhie97}
578: %Rhie, S.\ H.\ 1997, \apj, 484, 63
579:
580:
581: \end{thebibliography}
582:
583: \clearpage
584:
585:
586:
587:
588: \end{document}
589: