1: % aa.dem
2: % AA vers. 6, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % demonstration file
4: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
5: % revised by EDP Sciences
6: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7: %
8: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
9: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa} % for a paper on 1 column
10: %\documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the long lists of affiliations
11: %\documentclass[rnote]{aa} % for the research notes
12: %
13: \documentclass{aa}
14: %
15: \usepackage{graphicx}
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: \usepackage{txfonts}
18: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20: %
21: \begin{document}
22: %%
23: %
24: \title{Ground-based CCD astrometry with wide field imagers.}
25: %
26: \subtitle{II. A star catalogue for M~67: $WFI@2.2$m~$MPG/ESO$
27: astrometry, $FLAMES@VLT$ radial velocities.\thanks{Based on
28: observations with the MPG/ESO 2.2m and ESO/VLT telescopes, located
29: at La Silla and Paranal Observatory, Chile, under DDT program
30: 278.D-5027, and the archive material.}$^,$ \thanks{This is paper 33
31: of the WIYN Open Cluster Study (WOCS)} }
32: %
33:
34: \author{ R.\ K.\ S.\ Yadav\inst{1,}\thanks{
35: present affiliation:
36: Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences,
37: Manora Peak, Nainital 263 129, India
38: {\sf email:} rkant@aries.ernet.in},
39: L.\ R.\ Bedin\inst{2},
40: G.\ Piotto\inst{1},
41: J.\ Anderson\inst{2},
42: S.\ Cassisi\inst{3},
43: S.\ Villanova\inst{4},
44: I.\ Platais\inst{5},
45: L.\ Pasquini\inst{6},
46: Y.\ Momany\inst{7}, and
47: R.\ Sagar\inst{8}.}
48:
49: \institute{
50: Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita di Padova, Vicolo dell' Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, EU\\
51: \email{[giampaolo.piotto; sandro.villanova]@unipd.it}
52: \and
53: Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA\\
54: \email{[bedin; jander]@stsci.edu}
55: \and
56: INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Collurania, via M. Maggini, I-64100 Teramo, EU\\
57: \email{cassisi@oa-teramo.inaf.it}
58: \and
59: Grupo de Astronom\'ia, Departamento de F\'isica, Universidad de Concepci\'on, Casilla 160-C, Concepci\'on, Chile.\\
60: \email{svillanova@astro-udec.cl}
61: \and
62: Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA\\
63: \email{imants@pha.jhu.edu}
64: \and
65: European Southern Observatory, Garching, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str.\ 2, D-85748, EU\\
66: \email{lpasquin@eso.org}
67: \and
68: INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35132, EU\\
69: \email{yazan.almomany@oapd.inaf.it}
70: \and
71: Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences,
72: Manora Peak, Nainital 263 129, India \\
73: \email{sagar@aries.ernet.in}
74: }
75:
76: \date{Received 13 December 2007 / Accepted 25 February 2008}
77:
78: % \abstract{}{}{}{}{}
79: % 5 {} token are mandatory
80: \abstract
81: % context heading (optional)
82: % {} leave it empty if necessary
83: {The solar-age open cluster M~67 (C0847$+$120, NGC~2682) is a
84: touchstone in studies of the old Galactic disk. Despite its
85: outstanding role, the census of cluster membership for M~67 at
86: fainter magnitudes and their properties are not
87: well-established.}
88: % % aims heading (mandatory)
89: { Using the proprietary and archival ESO data, we have obtained
90: astrometric, photometric, and radial velocities of stars in a
91: 34$\times$33 arcmin$^2$ field centered on the old open cluster
92: M~67. }
93: % % methods heading (mandatory)
94: {The two-epoch archival observations separated by 4 years and
95: acquired with the Wide Field Imager at the 2.2m MPG/ESO
96: telescope have been reduced with our new astrometric techniques,
97: as described in the first paper of this series. The same
98: observations served to derive calibrated $BVI$ photometry in
99: M~67. Radial velocities were measured using the archival and
100: new spectroscopic data obtained at VLT. }
101: % % results heading (mandatory)
102: {We have determined relative proper motions and membership
103: probabilities for $\sim$2,400 stars. The precision of proper
104: motions for optimally exposed stars is 1.9 mas~yr$^{-1}$,
105: gradually degrading down to $\sim$5 mas~yr$^{-1}$ at $V=20$. Our
106: relatively precise proper motions at $V>16$ are first obtained in
107: this magnitude range for M~67. Radial velocities are measured
108: for 211 stars in the same field. We also present a detailed
109: comparison with recent theoretical isochrones from several
110: independent groups. }
111: % % conclusions heading (optional), leave it empty if necessary
112: {For M~67 area we provide positions, calibrated $BVI$ photometry,
113: relative proper motions, membership probabilities, and radial
114: velocities. We demonstrate that the ground-based CCD mosaic
115: observations just a few years apart are producing proper motions,
116: allowing a reliable membership determination. We produced a
117: catalogue that is made electronically available to the
118: astronomical community.}
119: % %
120: \keywords{
121: Galaxy: open clusters and associations: individual: M~67 - astrometry - catalogs
122: }
123:
124: \titlerunning{Astrometry of M~67}
125: \authorrunning{Yadav et al.}
126: \maketitle
127:
128:
129:
130:
131: %________________________________________________________________
132: %
133: %
134: \section{Introduction}
135: \label{INTR}
136: %________________________________________________________________
137: %
138:
139: Open clusters are at the basis of our understanding of stellar
140: evolution. Among them, M~67 (C0847+120) has a unique and special
141: role. Due to their dynamical evolution and inevitable dissolution,
142: old open clusters are rare. Only a handful open clusters are presently
143: known with ages comparable to or older than the Sun. M~67 is one of
144: them and having a solar chemical composition, being relatively nearby
145: ($\sim$900~pc) and with a low interstellar reddening is one of the
146: most studied open clusters (see Tab.~\ref{fparameters} for fundamental
147: parameters). Among these studies we recall determination of the
148: cluster proper-motion membership (Sanders 1977, Girard et al.\ 1989,
149: Zhao et al.\ 1993), photometry (Montgomery et al.\ 1993, Sandquist
150: 2004, Momany, Y., et al.\ 2001, Balaguer-N\'{u}\~{n}ez et al.\ 2007),
151: high resolution spectroscopy to determine chemical composition
152: (Tautvai\v{s}iene et al.\ 2000, Randich et al.\ 2006).
153:
154: In addition, M~67 harbors an array of interesting objects including
155: blue stragglers (Shetrone \& Sandquist 2000); one AM Her star
156: (Gilliland et al.\ 1991, Pasquini et al.\ 1994); several X-ray active
157: stars, detected as coronal sources by ROSAT (Pasquini \& Belloni 1998,
158: van den Berg et al.\ 1999); a red straggler and two sub-subgiants
159: (Mathieu et al.\ 2003). Other studies have been devoted to the white
160: dwarf cooling sequence (Richer et al. 1998), the evolution of
161: chromospheric activity along the RGB (Dupree et al.\ 1999) and in
162: solar-type stars (Pace \& Pasquini 2004), and the evolution of angular
163: momentum of stars close to the turnoff (Melo et al.\ 2001). The
164: behavior of light elements such as lithium and beryllium and their
165: implications for mixing theories have been studied by Pasquini et al.\
166: (1997), Jones et al.\ (1999) and Randich et al.\ (2007). Extensive
167: radial velocity surveys have been carried out, resulting in discovery
168: of many binaries (e.g., Mathieu et al.\ 1997). The attempts were made
169: to determine stellar oscillations through a multi site accurate
170: photometry (Gilliland et al.\ 1991, Stello et al.\ 2007). Given the
171: uniqueness of this cluster and the similarity of its key properties to
172: the Sun, new studies are under way to explore spectroscopically the
173: main sequence stars, as it has been done in the other clusters (Pace
174: et al.\ 2007, Biazzo et al.\ 2007).
175:
176: Despite of the wealth of accumulated data on M~67, a fundamental
177: question of complete cluster membership is still open. The existing
178: high-quality proper motion surveys carried out by Sanders (1977),
179: Girard et al.\ (1989), and Zhao et al.\ (1993) are based on
180: photographic plates limited to $V$$\sim$16. This is only three
181: magnitudes below the main-sequence turnoff. However, dedicated and/or
182: archival multi-epoch observations with wide-field CCD imagers offer
183: new opportunities to derive precise proper motions within a short,
184: few-year time-span, that are also deeper by several magnitudes than
185: the photographic surveys. The techniques of ground-based CCD
186: astrometry (and photometry) have been developed and validated on two
187: nearby globular clusters using the observations with the MPG/ESO 2.2m
188: telescope and its wide-field $WFI@2.2$m camera (Anderson et al.\ 2006;
189: hereafter Paper~I). With this setup, just a 2.7 year time baseline
190: yields proper motions as precise as $\sim$2 mas~yr$^{-1}$. The
191: existing archival $WFI@2.2$m CCD frames for M~67 made this open
192: cluster a prime target for deep proper motions based on this
193: techniques. There is one report on proper motions in M~67 for stars
194: fainter than $V=16$ by Lattanzi (1993). No catalogues of data ever
195: followed, therefore we consider this conference paper of little
196: contribution to the membership studies in M~67. In this study we
197: enlarge the number of stars with known proper motion determination by
198: a factor of $\sim$2 over a 0.3 deg$^2$ area down to $V\sim21$ which is
199: 5 magnitudes deeper than the existing proper-motion studies of M~67.
200:
201: In addition, we analyzed a large number of FLAMES$+$\-GIRAFFE\-@VLT
202: high resolution spectra and determined radial velocities for 211 stars
203: in the M~67 field good to $\sim$0.5 km s$^{-1}$, the accuracy which is
204: suitable for reliable RV membership and identification of short-period
205: binary systems.
206: %
207: All new observational data are provided to the astronomical community
208: with the aim of convenient access to these data for the follow-up
209: studies.
210:
211: The main goal of this study is to extend the membership analysis to
212: much fainter magnituds and present a catalogue of objects in a
213: wide-field ($\sim$$30'\times30'$) centered on the old open cluster
214: M~67. The catalogue provides new positions, multi-band photometry,
215: proper motions, membership probabilities, and radial velocities.
216:
217: The structure of the paper is as follows. In Sect. \ref{OBS} we
218: describe observations and data reduction of both, the images and
219: spectra. In Section \ref{PM} and \ref{MP} we present the cluster
220: proper motion membership analysis in two different ways. In Section
221: \ref{CMP} we provide comparison with other photometric data available
222: in the literature. In Sect.\ \ref{ISO} a detailed comparison with
223: available models from different groups is given. Finally, in Sect.\
224: \ref{CAT} we present and describe the electronic catalogue and how to
225: use it.
226:
227: \begin{table}
228: \caption{Fundamental parameters of M~67. }
229: \centering
230: \label{par}
231: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
232: \hline\hline Parameter & Value & Reference \\
233: \hline
234: $\alpha$(J2000) & 08$^h$ 51$^m$ 23.$^s$3 & {\sf this work } \\
235: $\delta$(J2000) & +11$^\circ$ 49$'$ 02$''$ & {\sf this work } \\
236: $l$ & 215.$^\circ$688 & {\sf this work } \\
237: $b$ & 31.$^\circ$923 & {\sf this work } \\
238: $\rm [Fe/H]$ & $+0.03 \pm 0.01$ & {\sf Randich et al.\ (2006)}\\
239: $E(B-V) $ & 0.041 & {\sf Taylor (2007) } \\
240: $(m-M)_{\circ}$ & 9.56-9.72 & {\sf this work } \\
241: Age[Gyr] & 3.5-4.8 & {\sf this work } \\
242: \hline
243: \end{tabular}
244: \label{fparameters}
245: \end{table}
246: %__________________________________________________ % %
247:
248:
249:
250:
251: %________________________________________________________________
252: %
253: %
254:
255:
256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
258: \begin{table}[h]
259: \caption[]{Description of the $WFI$ data sets used for this work.}
260: \label{log}
261: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
262: \hline
263: \hline
264: Filters & Exposure Time & Seeing & Airmass \\
265: \hline
266: \multicolumn{4}{c}{ first epoch:\ Feb. 16, 2000}\\
267: \hline
268: $B$&9$\times$30s&$\sim$1$''$.0&1.4 \\
269: $V$&9$\times$20s; 11$\times$30s; 3$\times$120s &$\sim$1$''$.0&1.5 \\
270: $I$&9$\times$30s&$\sim$1$''$.0&1.4 \\
271: \hline
272: \multicolumn{4}{c}{second epoch:\ Feb. 12, 2004} \\
273: \hline
274: $V$&1$\times$60s; 1$\times$300s&$\sim$1$''$.2&1.3 \\
275: \hline
276: \end{tabular}
277: \end{table}
278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280:
281: \section{Observational Data and Reductions}
282: \label{OBS}
283: %________________________________________________________________
284: %
285:
286: \subsection{Astrometric and Photometric Reductions}
287:
288: All the images used in this study were obtained with the Wide Field
289: Imager (hereafter simply $WFI$) at the MPG/ESO 2.2m telescope at La
290: Silla, Chile. The $WFI$ consists of eight 2048$\times$4096 EEV CCDs
291: with a pixel scale of 238 milliarcsec (mas) which provides a total
292: field-of-view 34$\arcmin \times 33\arcmin$. More details on the
293: instrumental setup are given in Paper~I.
294:
295: In order to calculate proper motions, we searched the MPG/ESO 2.2m
296: telescope archive for suitable CCD imager frames providing deep images
297: obtained at separate epochs. We found that the open cluster M~67 was
298: observed in 2000 and 2004 during the technical nights. Some details
299: of the $WFI$ data-set used in this work are given in Table~\ref{log}.
300: These observations contain short and long exposures, allowing to
301: sample both the red giant branch (RGB) and the relatively faint
302: main-sequence (MS) stars. It should be noted that these archival
303: datasets have not been taken with the goal of obtaining proper motions
304: or well-calibrated photometry. The second epoch is represented only
305: by two images and individual frames have not been properly dithered.
306: As the result, the distribution of registered stars is not contiguous.
307: Additional CCD imaging is planned, however its success is dependent
308: upon a proven record of publications.
309:
310: We closely followed the prescription on reductions of $WFI$ images
311: given in Paper~I. This include standard manipulations with the pixel
312: data such as de-biasing, flat-fielding, and correction for cosmic
313: rays. At the core of fitting the star positions and fluxes is the {\em
314: empirical} Point Spread Function. In this concept, the PSF is
315: represented by a look-up table on a very fine grid. It is
316: well-documented that the shape of PSF changes with position on a chip.
317: This variability can be captured by an array of PSFs across the chip.
318: A fully automated code is developed to find appropriate stars which
319: can adequately represent the PSF. For practical purposes the number of
320: PSF stars per chip can vary from 1 to 15, depending on the richness of
321: a star-field. An iterative process is designed to work from the
322: brightest down to the faintest stars and find their precise position
323: and instrumental flux. A reasonably bright star can be measured with
324: a precision of $\sim$0.03 pixel ($\sim$7~mas) from a single
325: exposure. In this step of empirical PSF fitting we obtained precise
326: instrumental magnitudes in $B,V,I$ filters.
327:
328: Another issue in astrometry with reflectors is a large geometric
329: distortion in the focal plane that effectively changes the pixel scale
330: across the field-of-view. There are different ways to derive this
331: geometric distortion. We opted for a $9\times17$ element look-up table
332: of corrections for each chip, derived from multiple optimally-dithered
333: observations of the Galactic Bulge in Baade's Window (Paper~I). This
334: look-up table provides the best currently available characterization
335: of geometrical distortions for the $WFI@2.2$m. At any given location
336: on the detector, a bi-linear interpolation between the four closest
337: grid points from a look-up table provided the corrections for the
338: target point. The derived look-up table may have a lower accuracy of
339: the edges of a field because of the way the self-calibration frames
340: were dithered (see Paper~I). An additional source of uncertainty is
341: related to a possible instability of distortions for the $WFI@2.2$m
342: reported earlier. This prompted us to use the local-transformation
343: method to derive proper motions (see Paper~I for details).
344:
345: In the local transformation approach (a linear adjustment with six
346: parameters -- three in each of the two coordinates) a small set of
347: local reference stars is selected around each target object. It is
348: advantageous to use pre-selected cluster members to form a local
349: reference frame because of a much lower intrinsic velocity dispersion
350: among the cluster members (see Sect. 2.1.2). Then, a least-squares
351: adjustment is used to translate the coordinates from one frame into
352: another, taken at different epochs. The residuals of this
353: transformation are characterizing relative proper motions convolved
354: with measurement errors. In essence, this is a classical ``plate
355: pair'' method but extended to all possible combinations of the first
356: and second epoch frames. Relative proper motion of a target object is
357: an average of all displacement measurements in its local reference
358: frame. The last step is to estimate the measurement errors from
359: intra-epoch observations where proper motions have a zero
360: contribution. A complete description of all steps leading to proper
361: motions is given in Paper~I. We did not consider the effect of
362: differential chromatic refraction because all CCD frames have been
363: obtained within a narrow range of zenith distance (see Sect.\ \ref{ac}
364: for details).
365:
366: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
367: \begin{figure}
368: \centering
369: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f1.ps}
370: \caption{Plot of error in magnitudes as a function of magnitude.}
371: \label{error_mag}
372: \end{figure}
373: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
374:
375: \subsubsection{Photometric Calibration}
376:
377: Initially, we transformed our instrumental magnitudes obtained in
378: $B,V,I$ filters into the standard Johnson Kron-Cousins magnitudes
379: using standard stars from
380: Stetson's\footnote{http://cadcwww.hia.nrc.ca/standards/} secondary
381: standard star catalogue (Stetson 2000, 2005).
382: %
383: Unfortunately, the color and magnitude intervals covered by these
384: secondary standards are not ideal to properly calibrate our
385: sample. Our RGB stars are saturated and the faint MS stars are not
386: present in the secondary standard catalogue, thus confining us to a
387: narrow range of colors for calibrations. Therefore for our
388: calibrations, we chose the high-precision $BVI$ photometry of M~67 by
389: Sandquist (2004). This photometry covering the entire color range of
390: stars in M~67, is calibrated using the observations of Landolt's
391: standards (Landolt 1992) and, to some extent, also Stetson's secondary
392: standards. Sandquist (2004) also made use of photometric and
393: spectroscopic data to select the objects most likely to be single
394: stars. For these reasons and the ones outlined in Section \ref{ISO}
395: we link our photometry to that of Sandquist
396: (2004)\footnote{http://\-www.blackwell\-publishing\-.com\-/products\-/journals\-/
397: suppmat\-/MNR7174\-/MNR7174sm.htm}. This calibrated photometry covers
398: only the inner four $WFI@2.2$m CCD chips. We used the common stars in
399: dithered frames between the pairs of adjacent CCD chips to obtain
400: individual photometric zero-points in magnitude. Then, we solved for
401: the global zero-point and color term using one of the following
402: transformation equations:
403: %
404: $$ B_{\rm std} = B_{\rm ins} + C_b*(B_{\rm ins} - V_{\rm ins}) + Z_b $$
405: $$ V_{\rm std} = V_{\rm ins} + C_v*(V_{\rm ins} - I_{\rm ins}) + Z_v $$
406: $$ I_{\rm std} = I_{\rm ins} + C_i*(V_{\rm ins} - I_{\rm ins}) + Z_i $$
407: %
408: where $X_{\rm ins}$ is the instrumental magnitude and $X_{\rm std}$ is
409: the Sandquist's calibrated magnitude; $C_b, C_v, C_i$ are the color
410: terms (constants); and $Z_b, Z_v, Z_i$ are the global zero-points.
411: The quadratic color terms are negligible. Our color terms are
412: consistent with those posted on the $WFI@2.2$m
413: webpage\footnote{http://www.ls.eso.org/lasilla/sciops/2p2/E2p2M/WFI/zeropoints/}.
414: A comparison of our photometry with the Sandquist and Stetson
415: catalogues is presented in Sec.~\ref{CMP}.
416:
417: In Figure \ref{error_mag} we show our photometric errors for each
418: filter, as function of the corresponding calibrated magnitude.
419: %
420: The photometric errors (standard deviation) have been computed from
421: multiple observations, all reduced to the common photometric reference
422: frame in the chosen bandpass.
423: %
424: On average, the errors are larger than $\sim$0.03 mag for stars
425: fainter than $V$$\sim$19 mag. The stars brighter than $V$$\sim$12.5
426: mag show higher dispersion because of the image saturation.
427:
428:
429: \subsubsection{Proper Motions}
430:
431: We first photometrically selected likely cluster members in the
432: color-magnitude diagram and used only these stars as a local reference
433: frame to transform the coordinates from one image into the system of
434: the other image at different epoch and, thus derive relative proper
435: motions. By using predominantly the cluster stars, we ensure that
436: proper motions will be measured relative to the bulk motion of cluster
437: stars. According to Girard et al.\ (1989), the intrinsic velocity
438: dispersion in M~67 is 0.2 mas~yr$^{-1}$. Over the four-year epoch
439: difference that would result in a displacement of only 0.8 mas which
440: is by a factor of 10 smaller than the random measurement
441: errors. Conversely, the tangential velocity dispersion of field stars
442: is by a factor of $\sim40$ larger than the cluster's intrinsic
443: velocity dispersion. For field stars, proper motions are clearly
444: dominating over the measurement errors and this has an adverse effect
445: on the coordinate transformations. We iteratively removed some stars
446: from the preliminary photometric member list that had proper motions
447: clearly inconsistent with cluster membership, even though their colors
448: placed them near the fiducial cluster sequence.
449:
450: In order to minimize the influence of any unaccounted for residual
451: distortion and refraction effects on proper motions, we used local
452: transformations based on the nearest $\sim$20 reference stars,
453: typically extending over $\sim$300 arcsec. These are well-measured
454: cluster stars of any magnitude selected on the same CCD chip, as long
455: as their preliminary proper motion is consistent with cluster
456: membership. No systematics larger than our random errors are visible
457: close to the corners or edges of chips.
458: %
459: In order to avoid possible filter-dependent systematic errors, we
460: measured proper motions in the $V$ bandpass only, for which the
461: geometrical distortion corrections were originally derived (Paper~I).
462: Individual errors of proper motions for single stars have been
463: estimated as described in Section 7.3 of Paper~I.
464:
465: In a nutshell, we estimate the intra-epoch rms error from all
466: first-epoch plates locally transformed into the same reference frame.
467: Due to the lack of adequate statistics (too few images) we assumed
468: that the second epoch frames have the same errors for a given
469: instrumental magnitude. The proper motions errors have been computed
470: as the rms of the proper motion, obtained from solving locally each
471: first-epoch frame into second-epoch frame. These errors, however, are
472: not totally independent because the same frame is used for a second
473: epoch. Therefore, to obtain our best estimate of the proper motion
474: standard error we added in quadrature initial proper motion error and
475: the adopted error of the second epoch image.
476: %
477:
478: Figure \ref{error_pm} shows the distribution of standard errors
479: ($\sigma$) in proper motions for both coordinates as a function of $V$
480: magnitude. The precision of our proper motion measurement is
481: $\lesssim$ 0.05 $WFI$ pixels in 4 yrs down to $V\sim$18 mag (i.e.,\
482: $\sigma$$\lesssim$ 3 mas~yr$^{-1}$). At fainter magnitudes the errors
483: gradually increase, reaching $\sim$6 mas~yr$^{-1}$ at $V$=20. The
484: stars brighter than $V\sim$ 12.5 mag show a higher dispersion because
485: of the image saturation.
486:
487:
488: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
489: \begin{figure}[h]
490: \centering
491: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f2.ps}
492: \caption{Plots of proper motions and their standard deviations versus
493: visual magnitude in mas~yr$^{-1}$.}
494: \label{error_pm}
495: \end{figure}
496: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
497:
498:
499:
500: \subsubsection{Astrometric Calibration}
501: \label{ac}
502:
503:
504: One of our goals is to provide in the area of M~67 an astrometric
505: frame on the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS). Our
506: astrometric reductions leads us to the distortion-free cartesian
507: coordinates of all objects. The positions of stars in each frame have
508: been corrected for geometric distortion using a look-up table from
509: Paper~I, and then averaged into a common reference frame using a
510: six-parameter linear transformation. The astrometric {\it positions}
511: of this catalogue are still affected by differential chromatic
512: refraction (DCR) effects and the limitations on the stability of
513: derived geometrical distortions, as described in Sect.\ 5.2 of
514: Paper~I.
515:
516:
517:
518: To link the present M~67 catalogue to ICRS, we used the UCAC2
519: catalogue (Zacharias et al.\ 2004) as a reference frame. It was
520: trimmed down to the stars with positional accuracies better than 75
521: mas. Owing to the excellent geometric distortion solution and a
522: reasonable stability of the intra-chip positions it was possible to
523: apply a single plate model involving linear and quadratic terms and a
524: small but significant cubic term in each coordinate.
525: %
526: This solution also absorbes effects caused by differential refraction
527: but not its chromatic component.
528: %
529: The standard error of equatorial solution is only 30 mas in each
530: coordinate, thus indicating a great potential of the WFI for
531: astrometry.
532:
533: A total of 489 reference stars were used in this solution. The
534: provided J2000 coordinates in Table ~\ref{catalogT} are on the epoch
535: 2000.13.
536:
537: A compilation of kinematic and photometric data from a variety of
538: sources (Platais, unpublished) allowed us to pre-select a fairly clean
539: list of cluster members down to $V\sim16$, which then was used to
540: derive a better geometrical center of M~67. The marginal distributions
541: of cluster members along right ascension and declination were fit with
542: a Gaussian. This fit yielded a cluster center listed in Table~1,
543: accurate to about $3\arcsec$.
544:
545: The proper motions in this work have not been corrected for
546: differential chromatic refraction effects (DCRE) as done in Paper~I.
547: Nonetheless, we verified the differential chromatic refraction effect
548: and found it to be negligible in this data set owing to the very
549: similar observing conditions at both epochs.
550:
551: The only determination of absolute proper motion for M~67 is that from
552: using two Hipparcos stars (HIP 43465, 43491) -- apparent members of
553: the cluster (Baumgardt et al.\ 2000). According to this study the
554: absolute proper motion for M~67 is $\mu_{\alpha} \cos \delta = -6.5$
555: and $\mu_{\delta} = -6.3$ mas~yr$^{-1}$. Although a few background
556: galaxies are visible in our images, they are not suitable for deriving
557: the correction needed to convert our relative proper motions into the
558: absolute proper motions.
559:
560: %________________________________________________________________
561: %
562: %
563: \subsection{Radial Velocities: Reduction and Calibration}
564: \label{rv}
565: %________________________________________________________________
566: %
567:
568:
569: With the aim of obtaining additional membership information for stars
570: in the region of M~67, we searched the ESO archive
571: (http://archive.eso.org/) for sets of FLAMES\-+\-GIRAFFE\-@VLT (MEDUSA
572: mode) observations taken simultaneously with calibration lamp. The
573: MEDUSA mode allows obtaining about 130 spectra at once over a
574: field-of-view of $25$ arcmin in diameter. We found observations
575: performed with three different set-ups (HR02, HR14, HR15).
576:
577: In addition to these data sets, we used the data (HR15N) obtained for
578: a different project\ in DDT time (278.D-5027). They were collected to
579: determine bona fide possible single solar-type members in M~67,
580: closely resembling the Sun. The aim of this program is to find solar
581: analogues among the M~67 solar type stars. Full analysis of the data
582: is in progress and will be reported elsewhere (Biazzo et al., in
583: preparation).
584:
585: The instrumental set-up for each run is given in Table\ \ref{HRconf},
586: indicating the wavelength range, resolution, the number of plates, and
587: the date of observations.
588:
589: \begin{table}[t]
590: \caption{Radial velocity observations.}
591: \centering
592: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c}
593: \hline\hline
594: Set-up & $\Delta \lambda$ (\AA)& R & plates & OBS-DATE \\
595: \hline
596: HR02 & 3854-4049 & 19600 & 2 & 19/12/2002 \\
597: HR14 & 6383-6626 & 28800 & 5 & 26-28/02/03 \\
598: HR15 & 6607-6965 & 19300 & 6 & 26-28/02/03 \\
599: HRN15 & 6470-6790 & 17000 & 3 & 06-11-23/02/07 \\
600: \hline
601: \end{tabular}
602: \label{HRconf}
603: \end{table}
604:
605: %
606: % Rv1
607: %______________________________________________________________
608: \begin{figure}[ht!]
609: \centering
610: \includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{f3.ps}
611: \caption{Heliocentric radial velocities (top panel) and their
612: pipeline-errors (bottom panel) of stars from the spectroscopic sample,
613: plotted as a function of $V$ magnitude.}
614: \label{vr1}
615: \end{figure}
616:
617: %_________________________________________________________________
618: %
619: %
620:
621: The spectroscopic data were reduced using the GIRAFFE pipeline
622: GIRBLDRS\footnote{Blecha et al.\ (2000). See {\sf
623: http://\-girbldrs.sourceforge.net/}, for GIRAFFE pipeline, software
624: and documentation.}, in which the spectra have been de-biased,
625: flat-field corrected, extracted, and wavelength-calibrated, using both
626: prior and simultaneous calibration-lamp spectra.
627:
628: We also used the {\sf gyCrossC.py} utility of the GIRAFFE pipeline to
629: measure heliocentric radial velocity ($\rm V_R$). For each set-up, we
630: used an appropriate K0 type template spectra developed by the GIRAFFE
631: pipeline team.
632:
633: The formal errors reported in the catalogue are merely the output of
634: pipeline which is clearly underestimating the true errors.
635: Nevertheless these estimates retain the information on the goodness of
636: the fit of cross-correlation function.
637:
638: There are signs of systematic errors in $\rm V_R$, if repeated
639: measurements of radial velocity from different set-ups are considered.
640: To estimate the amount of such errors, we computed the r.m.s. for all
641: determinations of $\rm V_R$ of the same star and averaged that
642: estimate for all multiple measurements of radial velocity. As the
643: result, a single measurement of radial velocity could be affected by
644: systematics reaching up to $\sim$0.6 km s$^{-1}$. Perhaps, this is an
645: upper limit of systematic offsets because some stars may have a
646: physical explanation of $\rm V_R$ variations. To estimate the real
647: uncertainty in radial velocities, we suggest to sum up in quadrature
648: this estimate and the formal fitting error.
649:
650: The heliocentric radial velocities and relative errors, are shown in
651: Fig.~\ref{vr1} as a function of $V$ magnitude. Several stars have a
652: radial velocity very different from the cluster's mean velocity. This
653: can be due to the field stars contaminating the spectroscopic sample,
654: or short-period spectroscopic binaries which are bona fide cluster
655: members. We determined the median $\rm V_R$ of our sample of radial
656: velocities and then estimated the dispersion around this median $\rm
657: V_R$, assuming a Gaussian distribution and considering the 68$^{\rm
658: th}$ percentile from the median. Then we iteratively used a
659: 3.5-$\sigma$ clipping to achieve a convergence. The final mean
660: heliocentric radial velocity for M~67 estimated from 141 cluster
661: members is $\overline{V_{R}}=33.67\pm0.09\ $ km s$^{-1}$.
662:
663: As indicated by Tab.\ \ref{VRtab}, our value of $\overline{\rm V_{R}}$
664: is consistent with those derived by the other authors.
665:
666: \begin{table}[h]
667: \caption[]{Mean weighted radial velocities for M~67 derived from the
668: data in {\sf WEBDA}.}
669: \label{r_velocity}
670: \begin{tabular}{ccl}
671: %
672: \hline
673: \hline
674: $\overline{\rm V_{R}}$ [km $s^{-1}$] & $N_s$ & Reference\\
675: \hline
676: 34.07 $\pm$ 0.10 & 144 & Mathieu et al. (1986) \\
677: 34.77 $\pm$ 0.21 & 50 & Glushkova et al. (1990) \\
678: 33.54 $\pm$ 0.13 & 27 & Glushkova, unpublished \\
679: 32.89 $\pm$ 0.18 & 10 & Shetrone et al. (2000) \\
680: 33.85 $\pm$ 0.16 & 26 & Melo et al. (2001) \\
681: %
682: 33.67 $\pm$ 0.09 & 141 & this work \\
683: \hline
684: \hline
685: \label{VRtab}
686: \end{tabular}
687: \end{table}
688:
689:
690: \section{Cluster CMD decontamination}
691: \label{PM}
692: %
693:
694: In this section we probe the effectiveness of our proper motions in
695: separating clusters stars from the field stars using a vector-point
696: diagram (VPD) in combination with a color-magnitude diagram (CMD).
697:
698: For stars with $BV$ photometry, in Fig.\ \ref{cmd_inst} we show the
699: vector-point diagram (top panels), and the CMDs in the $(B-V),~V$
700: plane (bottom panels).
701: %
702: In the left panels there is the whole sample of stars; the middle
703: panels display what we consider to be probable cluster members; the
704: right panels show predominantly the field stars.
705:
706: In vector-point diagrams around the cluster centroid we draw a circle
707: with the radius of 6 mas~yr$^{-1}$. Provisionally, we define as
708: cluster members all points in VPD within this circle. The chosen
709: radius is a compromise between loosing cluster members with poor
710: proper motions and including field stars sharing the cluster's mean
711: proper motion. Even this crude division into cluster and field stars
712: is demonstrating the power of proper motions derived in this study. A
713: formal determination of membership probability is given in Sect.\
714: \ref{MP}.
715:
716: As expected, the fainter stars have less well measured proper motions
717: because of rapidly decreasing signal-to-noise ratio.
718: Figure~\ref{cmd_II} illustrates this fact in the $(V-I),~I$ plane
719: binned along the magnitude axis. We note that an acceptable
720: membership is established even for saturated stars at
721: $V\lesssim$12.5. Note that photometry for bright stars is derived only
722: from short exposures and then adjusted via the zero-point correction
723: to photometry from long exposures.
724:
725: %________________________________________________________________
726: %
727: \begin{figure*}[!ht]
728: \centering
729: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f4.ps}
730: \caption{
731: % %
732: {\em (Top panels)} Proper motion vector-point diagram.
733: Zero point in VPD is the mean motion of cluster stars.
734: % %
735: {\em (Bottom panels)} Calibrated $(B-V)$, $V$ color-magnitude
736: diagram.
737: % %
738: {\em (Left)} The entire sample;
739: % %
740: {\em (Center)} stars in VPD with proper motions within 6 mas~yr$^{-1}$
741: around the cluster mean.
742: % %
743: {\em (right)} Probable background/foreground field stars in the area
744: of M~67 studied in this paper.
745: % %
746: All plots show only stars with proper motion
747: $\sigma$ smaller than $\sim$20 mas~yr$^{-1}$ in each
748: coordinate. }
749: % %
750: \label{cmd_inst}
751: \end{figure*}
752: %________________________________________________________________
753: %
754:
755: %________________________________________________________________
756: %
757: \begin{figure*}[!ht]
758: \centering
759: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f5.ps}
760: \caption{
761: % %
762: {\em (Left:)} Color-magnitude diagram for stars with proper
763: motions.
764: % %
765: {\em (Middle:)} Vector-point diagram for the same stars in
766: corresponding magnitude intervals. A circle in each plot
767: shows the adopted membership criterion at 6 mas~yr$^{-1}$.
768: % %
769: {\em (Right:)} Color-magnitude diagram for stars assumed
770: to be cluster members.
771: % %
772: }
773: \label{cmd_II}
774: \end{figure*}
775: %________________________________________________________________
776: %
777:
778: The separation between the cluster members and field stars is not as
779: obvious as it is for the globular clusters presented in Paper~I. In
780: the case of M~67 the distributions of cluster and field proper motions
781: have a substantial overlap, separated only by $\sim$8
782: mas~y$^{-1}$. Therefore it is not surprising that at the faint
783: magnitudes where proper motion errors are large, the separation
784: between the cluster and field is poor.
785:
786: Finally, we note that our field star CMD (right lower panel in Fig.\
787: \ref{cmd_inst}) shows no trace of the anomalous clump detected by
788: Balaguer-N\'{u}\~{n}ez et al.\ (2007) in in the $V,b-y$ and $V,v-y$
789: color-magnitudes diagrams . Perhaps, this is not surprising because
790: these authors cover a larger area around M~67 than our study and,
791: according to Balaguer-N\'{u}\~{n}ez et al., the stars in this clump
792: mysteriously avoid the central parts of M~67.
793:
794: %________________________________________________________________
795: %
796: \section{Determination of Membership Probability}
797: \label{MP}
798: %________________________________________________________________
799: %
800:
801: The vector-point diagram (Fig.\ \ref{cmd_inst}) of our proper motions
802: clearly shows two populations:\ a tight clump at $\mu_{\alpha} \cos
803: \delta$ $=$ $\mu_{\delta}$ $=$ 0.0 mas~yr$^{-1}$ mainly representing
804: the cluster stars and an overlapping broad distribution of field
805: stars. Vasilevskis et al. (1958) were the first one to formulate the
806: proper-motion membership probability as
807:
808: \begin{equation}
809: P_\mu=\frac{\Phi_c}{\Phi_c+\Phi_f},
810: \end{equation}
811:
812: \noindent where $\Phi_c$ is the distribution of cluster stars and
813: $\Phi_f$ -- the distribution of field stars in the vector-point
814: diagram. Usually, these distributions are represented by elliptical
815: normal frequency distributions, i.e., Gaussians, although in some
816: special cases the field star distribution can locally be adopted as
817: non-Gaussian (Jones 1997, Platais et al.\ 2001). There are numerous
818: papers discussing various aspects of calculating the parameters of
819: these distributions and membership probabilities in general, e.g.,
820: Jones (1997), Girard et al.\ 1989, Balaguer-N\'{u}\~{n}ez et al.\
821: (2007) and references therein. For membership probability
822: calculations, we have chosen the local sample method, which is equally
823: reliable in rich open clusters such as NGC~188 (Platais et al.\ 2003)
824: as well as in sparse clusters like IC~2391 (Platais et al.\ 2007). In
825: this method, a local sample of stars is selected to represent the
826: properties of a target star as close as possible. It assures a smooth
827: transition of calculated membership probabilities as a function of
828: magnitude and also accounts for the changes in the magnitude dependent
829: cluster-to-field star ratio. It has been recognized that a star's
830: brightness and spatial location are the two critical parameters to be
831: considered in the membership probability calculations (Girard et al.\
832: 1989, Jones 1997). To counter the effect of a changing
833: cluster-to-field star ratio, we chose a sliding 2.5-mag-wide magnitude
834: bin centered onto the target. The exception are the extremes of the
835: magnitude range where a magnitude bin is fixed at 2.5 mag. The spatial
836: distribution was ignored due to the relatively small size of our field
837: ($\sim$$30\arcmin\times30\arcmin$) with respect to the radial extent
838: of M~67 out to at least one degree (Sanders 1977). Another component
839: of our approach is to parameterize the magnitude dependence of proper
840: motion dispersions for cluster and field stars. That can be done
841: using photometrically selected samples of cluster and field stars
842: (Fig.\ \ref{cmd_II}). Finally, the center of proper-motion
843: distribution for cluster stars was adopted at $\mu_{\alpha} \cos
844: \delta$ $=$ $\mu_{\delta}$ $=$ 0.0 mas~yr$^{-1}$ but for field stars
845: it was estimated from the photometrically selected field stars and
846: also parameterized as a function of magnitude. It should be noted that
847: in $\mu_{\alpha} \cos \delta$-coordinate the center of field star
848: distribution in the VPD is at $\sim$$+6$ mas~yr$^{-1}$ which is
849: significantly larger than that reported by Girard et al.\ (1989). We
850: made no effort to account for the individual proper-motion
851: uncertainties other than the parameterizations mentioned above.
852: Poorly measured proper motions, i.e, with uncertainties exceeding
853: $\sim$10 mas~yr$^{-1}$ are insufficient for reliable membership
854: determination in M~67. Nevertheless, we kept these stars for the sake
855: of demonstration the achieved accuracies over the entire magnitude
856: range.
857:
858: Calculation of the two remaining parameters (heights of Gaussian
859: peaks) needed to fully characterize the cluster and field
860: distributions in the VPD is straightforward (Platais et al.\ 2003). We
861: note that the distribution of field stars appears to be nearly
862: circular that further simplifies the calculations. The distribution of
863: membership probabilities (Fig.\ \ref{VvsMP}) in effect reflects the
864: degree of reliability of our proper motions. Thus, the separation
865: between the cluster and field is convincing for $V<18$. In the range
866: $18<V<20$ the decreasing maximum $P_\mu$ indicates a steadily growing
867: contamination by field stars. The unexpected rise of maximum $P_\mu$
868: at $V>20$ is an artifact caused by a nearly total blending of both
869: cluster and field proper motion distributions. In other words, in this
870: magnitude range the accuracy of proper motions is inadequate for
871: reliable calculations of membership probability.
872:
873: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
874: \begin{figure}[!ht]
875: \centering
876: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{f6.ps}
877: \caption{Membership Probabilities as function of the $V$ magnitude,
878: for all the stars in our catalogue.}
879: \label{VvsMP}
880: \end{figure}
881: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
882:
883:
884: %________________________________________________________________
885: %
886: \section {Comparison with existing photometric data}
887: \label{CMP}
888: %________________________________________________________________
889: %
890:
891: In Figure \ref{comp}, we show color-magnitude diagram in the
892: [$(B-V),V$], and [$(V-I),I$] planes for the stars of our sample which
893: have a membership probability $P_{\mu} > 60\%$ (see Sect.~\ref{MP} for
894: details).
895: %
896: The saturation level of deep $V$ exposures is indicated by the dotted
897: line.
898: %
899: The stars from the secondary standard catalogue by Stetson (2000,
900: 2005) are over-plotted as red asterisks. The cyan color-coded circles
901: show the location of the Sandquist (2004) single stars. As expected,
902: the location of main sequence from our photometry and that by
903: Sandquist is nearly identical because our photometry was calibrated
904: using Sandquist's data. The upper main sequence and giant branch in
905: [$(B-V),V$] have some small offsets, if different sources are
906: considered. In part, that can be explained by retaining single stars
907: only in the Sandquist photometry.
908:
909: In Fig.~\ref{comp_san} we show the photometric residuals as a function
910: of magnitude and color for the common stars between Sandquist and our
911: data.
912: %
913: Sandquist (2004) presented extensive comparisons with other
914: photometric data from the literature, in particular, with Montgomery
915: et al.\ (1993). We refer the reader to this study for detailed
916: comparisons.
917: %
918: The referee suggested to make a request for the Ben Taylor's new
919: improved $VRI$ photometry and perform a direct comparison with this
920: new catalogue. Ben Taylor kindly released his photmetry to us and
921: this comparison is shown in Fig.~\ref{comp_tay}, in the sense
922: `ours-Taylor' photometry. If there are any offsets, then certainly
923: less than 0.01 mag in both, $V$ magnitude and $V-I$ color.
924: %
925:
926: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
927: \begin{figure*}[ht!]
928: \centering
929: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f7.ps}
930: \caption{Comparison of our photometry (filled circles) with that
931: from Stetson (2000, 2005; marked by asterisks) and from Sandquist (2004;
932: marked by the open circles). }
933: \label{comp}
934: \end{figure*}
935: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
936:
937: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
938: \begin{figure}[ht!]
939: \centering
940: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{comp_sand.ps}
941: \caption{Star-by-star comparison of our photometry with that
942: from Sandquist (2004).}
943: \label{comp_san}
944: \end{figure}
945: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
946:
947: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
948: \begin{figure}[ht!]
949: \centering
950: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{comp_taylor.ps}
951: \caption{Comparison of our photometry with the one by Taylor (2008,
952: in press). }
953: \label{comp_tay}
954: \end{figure}
955: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
956:
957: %________________________________________________________________
958: %
959: \section {Comparison with theoretical isochrones}
960: \label{ISO}
961: %________________________________________________________________
962: %
963:
964: \begin{figure*}
965: \centering
966: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f8.ps}
967: \caption{
968: %%%
969: Comparison of our empirical data with theoretical isochrones from
970: independent libraries of stellar models (see the text for more
971: details). The fit between theory and observations has been performed
972: by adopting the labeled values for the true distance modulus and
973: reddening.}
974: \label{cmd_teo}
975: \end{figure*}
976:
977:
978: CMDs of Galactic open clusters have long been used as a tests of
979: stellar models for intermediate-mass stars. The most important issue
980: is related to the long-standing problem of the real extension of the
981: convective core during the central H-burning stage.
982: %
983: How much larger the convective core extension is with respect to the
984: canonical prediction provided by the classical Schwarzschild
985: criterion? [i.e.\ which is the amount of convective core
986: overshooting, see e.g.\ Sandquist (2004), Cassisi (2002), and
987: references therein].
988:
989: Open cluster studies have shown that stellar models must allow for the
990: occurrence of convective core overshooting in order to provide a
991: satisfactory match to the observed CMDs (see Kalirai et al.\ 2001 and
992: references therein).
993: %
994: On the other hand, a still unsettled issue is related to how
995: convective core overshooting has to decrease in real stars when the
996: size of the canonical convective core decreases with the decreasing
997: total stellar mass (e.g., Woo \& Demarque 2001).
998: %
999: In the majority of Galactic open clusters this is not an important
1000: problem. However, an age difference exceeding $\pm 1$Gyr with respect
1001: to the age of M~67 is sufficient for stars to enter the evolutionary
1002: phase with a very extended convective core, even encroaching the mass
1003: range normally having a radiative core.
1004: %
1005: In the case of M~67, the mass of stars at the main sequence turnoff
1006: (TO) is $\sim$1.2M$_\odot$, which is in the critical mass interval
1007: where the amount of overshooting is decreasing with mass. Therefore,
1008: M~67 is crucial for exploring the efficiency of convective core
1009: overshoot in stars whose mass is large enough to have a convective
1010: core but not so large to allow the presence of a quite extended
1011: convective core.
1012:
1013: For this reason, M~67 has been the subject of many detailed studies
1014: such as those recently performed by Sandquist (2004), Vandenberg \&
1015: Stetson (2004), and Vandenberg et al. (2007).
1016: %
1017: The work of VandenBerg \& Stetson (2004) was specifically devoted to
1018: constraint the efficiency of convective core overshooting in stars
1019: whose mass is similar to that of the stars currently at the TO of
1020: M~67. Their main conclusion --also supported by the results shown by
1021: Pietrinferni et al.\ (2004)-- is that the extension of overshooting
1022: region has to be very small but not zero for masses of about
1023: $1.2M_\odot$, at least for solar metallicity.
1024:
1025: A detailed discussion of this issue is clearly out of the scope of
1026: this paper. Nonetheless, a comparison of our observational data for
1027: M~67 and the theoretical isochrones available in various independent
1028: libraries of stellar models should provide further insights about the
1029: capability of commonly-used sets of stellar models in reproducing
1030: empirical constraints by CMD of the old Galactic open clusters. For
1031: this purpose, we adopted the following sets of theoretical tracks:\
1032: the BaSTI models provided by Pietrinferni et al.\ (2004, see also
1033: Cordier et al.\ 2007); the Padova models published by Girardi et al.\
1034: (2000); the Yonsei-Yale isochrones provided by Yi et al.\ (2001) in
1035: their second release; and the Victoria-Regina models published by
1036: VandenBerg, Bergbusch \& Dowler (2006). In the case of the
1037: Yonsei-Yale isochrones, we apply their set of isochrones transformed
1038: into the observational plane using the $T_{\rm eff}$-to-color
1039: transformation tables provided by Green, Demarque \& King (1987).
1040:
1041: The comparison among various fits of theoretical isochrones to
1042: observational CMDs is shown in Fig.\ \ref{cmd_teo}. Before discussing
1043: this figure, it is necessary to briefly review the best estimates of
1044: metallicity, reddening and distance of M~67. The metallicity of M~67
1045: is essentially the solar or maybe slightly lower (Taylor 2007). This
1046: result is well-established on the basis of both high-
1047: (Tautvai\v{s}iene et al.\ 2000) and low-resolution spectroscopy (Friel
1048: \& Janes 1993). The existing estimates of interstellar extinction in
1049: the direction of M~67 have been recently re-analyzed by Taylor (2007).
1050: The most likely mean value of $E(B-V)=0.041\pm0.004$ derived by Taylor
1051: is slightly larger than the value suggested by Schlegel et al.\ (1998)
1052: and those provided by the fits between theoretical isochrones and
1053: empirical data (e.g, VandenBerg \& Clem 2003). Given the intrinsic
1054: uncertainties in calibration of $E(B-V)$, the true reddening of M~67
1055: could be anywhere between 0.02 and 0.04 mag.
1056:
1057: As for the distance to M~67, Percival \& Salaris (2003) measured the
1058: distance modulus at $(m - M)_\circ = 9.60 \pm 0.09$, adopting $E(B -
1059: V) = 0.04 \pm 0.02$ and [Fe/H] $=$ $0.02 \pm 0.06$.
1060: %
1061: Their measurement has been obtained by applying the MS-fitting
1062: technique to the CMD from Montgomery et al.\ (1993) data by using a
1063: sample of local G and K dwarfs with accurate Hipparcos parallaxes and
1064: a near-solar metallicity. The Percival \& Salaris's (2003) estimate
1065: was subsequently confirmed by Sandquist (2004), who obtained the same
1066: distance modulus using new photometric data.
1067:
1068: The comparison shown in Fig.\ \ref{cmd_teo} is quite informative:\
1069: within the errors the BaSTI (Pietrinferni et al.\ 2004) isochrones
1070: with [Fe/H] $=$0.06 reproduce nicely the CMD with $E(B - V) = 0.02$
1071: and $(m - M)_\circ = 9.64$, in agreement with previous determinations.
1072: %
1073: Both isochrones with and without convective core overshoot are shown.
1074: The adopted metallicity appears to be the upper limit of any existing
1075: estimate of [Fe/H] in M~67.
1076: %
1077: The MS and the red giant branch appear to match both, a canonical and
1078: the isochrone with overshoot.
1079: %
1080: We note that the brightness and color of He-burning clump stars are
1081: very-well reproduced by the BaSTI isochrones for the adopted reddening
1082: and distance modulus.
1083:
1084: The best fit of main sequence using the Victoria-Regina isochrones
1085: (VandenBerg et al.\ 2006) can be achieved with a distance modulus
1086: equal to 9.56 mag and a reddening of 0.03. The Victoria-Regina
1087: isochrones do not follow through the phase of core He burning, hence
1088: we cannot test a match to the red clump stars.
1089:
1090: Sandquist (2004) has shown that a number of isochrones from the
1091: literature are unable to fit the location of MS at $V$ $>$ 15.5. This
1092: result is confirmed by a fit of Padova (Girardi et al.\ 2000) and
1093: Yonsei-Yale isochrones (Yi et al.\ 2001) to our data shown in Fig.\
1094: \ref{cmd_teo}. As suggested by Sandquist (2004) the available $T_{\rm
1095: eff}$-color transformations are poor for main sequence stars at
1096: $T_{\rm eff}$ $<$ 5000 K. This deficiency is corrected for
1097: Victoria-Regina isochrones by applying semi-empirical color
1098: transformations (VandenBerg \& Clem 2003). We note that in the same
1099: $T_{\rm eff}$ range the theoretical isochrones do not follow well the
1100: MS stars in metal-poor globular clusters as well (Bedin et al.\ 2001).
1101: %
1102: This can largely be attributed to the same problem in the adopted
1103: $T_{\rm eff}$-color relations.
1104:
1105: The main result of our isochrone fit to the new color-magnitude
1106: diagram for M~67 is the confirmation of a small convective core
1107: overshoot required to achieve a close match to the features near the
1108: main sequence turnoff region.
1109: %
1110: This result is in very good agreement with the earlier results by
1111: Sandquist (2004) and VandenBerg \& Stetson (2004). We wish to note
1112: that in this study we have performed comparisons between the theory
1113: and observations by employing four independent and updated libraries
1114: of stellar models.
1115:
1116: %________________________________________________________________
1117: %
1118: \section{The Catalogue}
1119: \label{CAT}
1120: %________________________________________________________________
1121: %
1122:
1123:
1124: %________________________________________________________________
1125: %
1126: \begin{figure*}[!ht]
1127: \centering
1128: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f9.ps}
1129: \caption{
1130: % %
1131: This plot is a summary of the quantities listed in the catalogue.
1132: Positions ($\alpha$, $\delta$), photometry (in $B$, $V$, and $I$),
1133: radial velocities (V$_{\rm R}$), proper motions ($\mu_{\alpha}
1134: \cos{\delta}$, $\mu_{\delta}$) and membership probabilities
1135: (P$_\mu$). Thin dots are stars with a P$_\mu \le 60\%$, for thick
1136: dots P$_\mu > 60\%$. Red circles are stars for which $\| V_{\rm R}-
1137: \overline{V_{\rm R }}\| ~ < ~ 5 \ \sigma_{V_{\rm R }}$, if not they
1138: are marked in cyan. Note that many of those are potentially, short
1139: period binaries.
1140: % %
1141: }
1142: \label{summary}
1143: \end{figure*}
1144: %________________________________________________________________
1145: %
1146:
1147: The catalogue is available electronically at Astronomy \& Astrophysic
1148: (or also under request to the authors).
1149:
1150: Description of the catalogue: column (1) contains the running number;
1151: columns (2) and (3) give the J2000 equatorial coordinates in decimal
1152: degrees for the epoch J2000.13, while columns (4) and (5) provide the
1153: pixel coordinates $x$ and $y$ in a distortion-corrected reference
1154: frame. Columns (6) to (11) give photometric data, i.e., $B,V,I$
1155: magnitudes and their errors. If photometry in a specific band is not
1156: available, a flag equal to {\sf 99.999} is set for the magnitude, and
1157: {\sf 0.999} -- for the error. Next four columns (12)-(15), give
1158: relative proper motions and their standard errors. Column (16) gives
1159: the proper-motion membership probability $P_\mu$. The last two
1160: columns (17) and (18) give radial velocity (V$_{\rm R}$) and its
1161: error, if available, otherwise the table reports {\sf 999.999}.
1162:
1163: Figure \ref{summary} shows a summary of the basic properties of stars
1164: in the catalogue. Here we plotted a histogram of radial velocities,
1165: the spatial distribution of all stars, color-magnitude diagrams, the
1166: distribution of membership probabilities, and a vector-point
1167: diagram. They provide additional information over similar plots in the
1168: previous figures.
1169:
1170:
1171: \begin{sidewaystable*}
1172: \begin{minipage}[t][180mm]{\textwidth}
1173: \caption{First lines of the catalogue available electronically.}
1174: \label{catalog}
1175: \centering
1176: \begin{tabular}{cccccccccccccccccc}
1177: \hline
1178: \hline
1179: %%%%%%
1180: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
1181: ID & $\alpha$ & $\delta$ & $x$ & $y$ &
1182: $B$ & $\sigma_B$ & $V$ & $\sigma_V$ & $I$ & $\sigma_I$ &
1183: $\mu_\alpha\cos{\delta}$ & $\sigma_{\mu_{\alpha}\cos{\delta}}$ & $\mu_{\delta}$ & $\sigma_{\mu_{\delta}}$ &
1184: $P_{\mu}$ & $V_{\rm R}$ & $\sigma_{V_{\rm R}}$ \\
1185: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
1186: %%%%%%
1187: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) & (12) & (13) & (14) & (15) & (16) & (17) & (18) \\
1188: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
1189: %%%%%%
1190: %{[}\#{]}&[ $^{\rm h}$ ~ $^{\rm m}$ ~ $^{\rm s}$ ]&[ $^{\circ}$ ~ $'$ ~ $''$ ]
1191: %
1192: {[}\#{]} & [ $^\circ$ ] & [ $^\circ$ ]
1193: &[pixel]&[pixel]&
1194: [mag]&[mag]&[mag]&[mag]&[mag]&[mag]&
1195: [mas/yr]&[mas/yr]&[mas/yr]&[mas/yr]&
1196: [$\%$]&[km/s]&[km/s]\\
1197: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
1198: %%%%%%
1199: \hline
1200: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
1201: %
1202: %#
1203: %# ID RA DEC X Y B e_B V e_V I e_I mu_x e_mu_x mu_y e_mu_y P_m Vrh eVrh IDS77
1204: %#
1205: %# (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19)
1206: %#
1207: 1 & 132.897815 & 11.575597 & 3524.156 & -246.966 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 16.064 & 0.009 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 1.73 & 3.51 & 1.73 & 1.25 & 95 & 34.251 & 0.116 \\
1208: 2 & 132.867489 & 11.576494 & 3973.470 & -233.047 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 20.236 & 0.040 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 0.06 & 3.21 & -1.25 & 3.57 & 39 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1209: 3 & 133.092502 & 11.576703 & 639.898 & -230.841 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 21.698 & 0.118 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 13.86 & 36.24 & -5.12 & 13.92 & 29 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1210: 4 & 132.874183 & 11.577474 & 3874.268 & -218.312 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 18.996 & 0.013 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 7.14 & 6.31 & -7.26 & 5.00 & 2 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1211: 5 & 133.093782 & 11.577612 & 620.936 & -217.087 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 21.452 & 0.260 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 22.37 & 7.79 & -22.55 & 13.39 & 2 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1212: 6 & 132.773239 & 11.578593 & 5369.865 & -199.708 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 17.234 & 0.010 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 25.23 & 6.43 & -29.33 & 28.44 & 0 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1213: 7 & 132.614021 & 11.578638 & 7728.562 & -194.667 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 18.647 & 0.008 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 5.41 & 0.24 & -2.62 & 2.38 & 28 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1214: 8 & 133.035261 & 11.579114 & 1487.807 & -194.539 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 20.867 & 0.046 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 15.05 & 24.16 & 5.71 & 2.32 & 7 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1215: 9 & 132.949617 & 11.579316 & 2756.606 & -191.207 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 15.411 & 0.009 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 18.39 & 1.25 & 2.32 & 5.06 & 0 & 90.264 & 0.060 \\
1216: 10 & 132.829375 & 11.579519 & 4538.135 & -186.755 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 19.515 & 0.042 & 99.999 & 0.999 & 6.31 & 6.19 & -13.15 & 10.00 & 0 & 999.999 & 999.999 \\
1217: %
1218: %0000 & 00 00 00.0 & 00 00 00.0 & 0000.000 & 0000.000 & 00.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 00.00 & 00.00 & 00.00 & 0.00 \\
1219: ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... \\
1220: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
1221: \hline
1222: \label{catalogT}
1223: \end{tabular}
1224: \vfill
1225: \end{minipage}
1226: \end{sidewaystable*}
1227:
1228: \section{Conclusions}
1229:
1230: In this paper, we applied the techniques developed by Anderson et al.\
1231: (2006, Paper~I) to a cornerstone open cluster M~67. We demonstrate
1232: that the CCD observations taken just four years apart can provide
1233: accurate proper motions, aiding to decontaminate the cluster CMD down
1234: to $V$$\sim$20. An open issue with the open clusters is the
1235: intrinsically low spatial density of cluster members, especially in
1236: the outer parts of clusters, that makes it difficult to apply
1237: rigorously the local-transformation approach. We believed that with a
1238: geometrically stable CCD mosaic (the $WFI@2.2$m apparently is not
1239: such) it is possible to use the global plate solutions for astrometry
1240: and avoid the problem of inadequate local reference frame.
1241:
1242: The high precision of our astrometry and $B,V,I$ photometry once again
1243: underscores the importance of accurate representation of PSF across
1244: the entire field-of-view, exemplified by the concept of empirical PSF
1245: (Paper~I).
1246:
1247: Our new photometry confirm that in M~67 the convective core overshoot
1248: should be small, as already pointed out by Sandquist (2004), and
1249: Vandenberg \& Stetson (2004).
1250:
1251: A substantial addition to the existing data sets are our proper
1252: motions at $V$$>$16, by up to 5 magnitudes deeper than the published
1253: proper motion catalogues. High-precision radial velocities for 211
1254: stars down to $V=16$ are further helping to establish a list of bona
1255: fide cluster members in M~67. One of the goals of this paper is to
1256: share the new data with the astronomical community prior to
1257: comprehensive analysis and finalizing of cluster membership at faint
1258: magnitudes.
1259:
1260:
1261:
1262: %_____________________________________________________________________
1263: %
1264: \begin{acknowledgements}
1265: R.~K.~S.~Yadav is grateful to University of Padova for the Grant that
1266: made possible this Indo-Italian collaboration.
1267: %
1268: I.~Platais gratefully acknowledges support from the National Science
1269: Foundation through grant AST 04-06689 to Johns Hopkins University.
1270: %
1271: We thank the anonymous referee for careful reading and useful
1272: suggestions. We also thank Ben Taylor for providing us with their new
1273: unpublished catalogue in electronic format.
1274:
1275: \end{acknowledgements}
1276: %_____________________________________________________________________
1277: %
1278:
1279: %_____________________________________________________________________
1280: %
1281:
1282: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1283:
1284: \bibitem[2006]{anderson} Anderson, J., Bedin, L. R., Piotto, G., Yadav, R. K. S.,
1285: Bellini, A. 2006, A\&A, 454, 1029, [Paper~I]
1286: %
1287: \bibitem[2007]{bal} Balaguer-N\'{u}\~{n}ez, L., Galad\'{i}-Enr\'{i}quez, D.,
1288: \& Jordi, C. 2007, A\&A, 470, 585
1289: %
1290: \bibitem[2000]{baumgart} Baumgart H., Dettbarn C., Wielen R., 2000, A\&AS, 146, 251
1291: %
1292: \bibitem[2001]{bedin} Bedin, L. R., Anderson, J., King, I. R., Piotto, G., 2001, ApJ, 560, L75
1293: %
1294: \bibitem[2007]{bia} Biazzo, K., Pasquini, L., Girardi, L., et al. 2007, A\&A, 475, 981
1295: %
1296: \bibitem[2000]{ble} Blecha, A., Cayatte, V., North, P., Royer, F., \&
1297: Simond, G. 2000, Proc.\ SPIE, 4008, 467
1298: %
1299: \bibitem[2002]{cas} Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., \& Bono, G. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1231
1300: %
1301: \bibitem[2007]{cor} Cordier, D., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., \& Salaris, M. 2007, AJ, 133, 468
1302: %
1303: \bibitem[1999]{dup} Dupree, A. K., Whitney, B. A., \& Pasquini, L. 1999, ApJ, 520, 751
1304: %
1305: \bibitem[1993]{fri} Friel, E. D., \& Janes, K. A. 1993, A\&A, 267, 75
1306: %
1307: \bibitem[1991]{gil} Gilliland, R. L., Brown, T. M., Duncan, D. K., et al. 1991, AJ, 101, 541
1308: %
1309: \bibitem[1989]{girard} Girard, T. M., Grundy, W. M., L\'{o}pez, C. E., van Altena W. F., 1989, AJ, 98, 227
1310: %
1311: \bibitem[2000]{gir00} Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., Chiosi, C. 2000, A\&AS, 141, 371
1312: %
1313: \bibitem[1990]{glu} Glushkova, E. V., \& Rastorguev, A. S. 1990, AZh, 34, 674
1314: %
1315: \bibitem[1987]{green} Green, E. M., Demarque, P., \& King, C. R. 1987, The Revised Yale Isochrones and Luminosity Functions (New Haven: Yale Univ. Obs.)
1316: %
1317: \bibitem[1997]{jon97} Jones, B. F. 1997, Mem. SAI, 68, 833
1318: %
1319: \bibitem[1999]{jon99} Jones, B. F., Fischer, D., \& Soderblom, D. R. 1999, AJ, 117, 330
1320: %
1321: \bibitem[2001]{kal} Kalirai, J. S., Richer, H. B., Fahlman, G. G., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 266
1322: %
1323: \bibitem[1992]{land} Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340
1324: %
1325: \bibitem[1993]{latt} Lattanzi, M. G. 1993, in Workshop on Databases for Galactic Structure, ed. A. G. Davis Philip, B. Hauck, \& A. R. Upgren, 173
1326: %
1327: \bibitem[1986]{mat86b} Mathieu, R. D., Latham, D. W., Griffin, R. F., Gunn J. E. 1986, AJ, 92, 1100
1328: %
1329: \bibitem[1997]{mat97} Mathieu, R. D., Latham, D. W., \& Milone, A. E. 1997, in ASP Conf. Ser. 130: The Third Pacific Rim Conference on Recent Development of Binary Star Research, ed. K.-C. Leung, 113
1330: %
1331: \bibitem[2003]{mat} Mathieu, R. D., van den Berg, M., Torres, G., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 246
1332: %
1333: \bibitem[2001]{melo} Melo, C. H. F., Pasquini, L., \& De Medeiros, J. R. 2001, A\&A, 375, 851
1334: %
1335: \bibitem[Momany et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...379..436M} Momany, Y., et al.\ 2001, \aap, 379, 436
1336: %
1337: \bibitem[1993]{montgomery} Montgomery, K. A., Marschall, L. A., \& Janes, K. A., 1993, AJ, 106, 181
1338: %
1339: \bibitem[2004]{pace} Pace, G., \& Pasquini, L. 2004, A\&A, 426, 1021
1340: %
1341: \bibitem[1994]{pas94} Pasquini, L., Belloni, T., \& Abbott, T. M. C. 1994, A\&A, 290, L17
1342: %
1343: \bibitem[1997]{pas97} Pasquini, L., Randich, S., Pallavicini, R. 1997, A\&A, 325, 535
1344: %
1345: \bibitem[1998]{pasquini} Pasquini, L., \& Belloni, T., 1998, A\&A, 336, 902
1346: %
1347: \bibitem[2003]{per} Percival, S. M. \& Salaris, M. 2003, MNRAS, 343 539
1348: %
1349: \bibitem[]{} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., Castelli, F. 2004, ApJ, 612, 168
1350: %
1351: \bibitem[2001]{pla01} Platais, I., Kozhurina-Platais, V., Barnes, S., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1486
1352: %
1353: \bibitem[2003]{pla03} Platais, I., Kozhurina-Platais, V., Mathieu, R. D., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2922
1354: %
1355: \bibitem[2007]{pla07} Platais, I., Melo, C., Mermilliod, J.-C., et al. 2007, A\&A, 461, 509
1356: %
1357: \bibitem[2006]{ran06} Randich, S., Sestito, P., Primas, F., Pallavicini, R.,
1358: \& Pasquini, L. 2006, A\&A, 450, 557
1359: %
1360: \bibitem[2007]{ran07} Randich, S., Primas, F., Pasquini, L., Sestito, P., \& Pallavicini, R. 2007, A\&A, 469, 163
1361: %
1362: \bibitem[1998]{ric} Richer, H. B., Fahlman, G. G., Rosvick, J., \& Ibata, R. 1998, 504, L91
1363: %
1364: \bibitem[1977]{sanders} Sanders, W. L. 1977, A\&AS, 27, 89
1365: %
1366: \bibitem[2004]{sandquist} Sandquist, E. L., 2004, MNRAS, 347, 101
1367: %
1368: \bibitem[1998]{schle} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M. 1998, 500, 525
1369: %
1370: \bibitem[2000]{} Shetrone, M. D., \& Sandquist, E. L. 2000, AJ, 120, 1913
1371: %
1372: \bibitem[2007]{stello} Stello, D., Bruntt, H., Kjeldsen, H., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 584
1373: %
1374: \bibitem[2000]{Stetson00} Stetson, P. B., 2000 PASP 112, 925.
1375: %
1376: \bibitem[2005]{Stetson05} Stetson, P. B., 2005 PASP 117, 563
1377: %
1378: \bibitem[2000]{taut} Tautvai\v{s}iene, G., Edvardsson, B., Tuominen, I., \& Ilyin, I. 2000, A\&A, 360, 499
1379: %
1380: \bibitem[]{} Taylor, B.J. 2007, AJ, 133, 370
1381: %
1382: \bibitem[]{} Taylor, B. J., Joner, M. D., \& Jeffery, E. J. 2008, ApJS, 176 (in press).
1383: %
1384: \bibitem[1958]{vasilevskis} Vasilevskis, S., Klemola, A. \& Preston, G., 1958, AJ, 63, 387
1385: %
1386: \bibitem[2003]{van03} VandenBerg, D. A., \& Clem, J. L. 2003, AJ, 126, 778
1387: %
1388: \bibitem[]{} VandenBerg, D.A., Stetson, P.B. 2004, PASP, 116, 997
1389: %
1390: \bibitem[2006]{van06} VandenBerg, D. A., Bergbusch, P. A., \& Dowler, P. D. 2006, ApJS, 162, 375
1391: %
1392: \bibitem[]{van07} VandenbenBerg, D.A., Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B.,
1393: Eriksson, K., \& Ferguson, J. 2007, ApJL, 666, L105
1394: %
1395: \bibitem[1999]{van} van den Berg, M., Verbunt, F., Mathieu, R. D. 1999, A\&A, 347, 866
1396: %
1397: \bibitem[2001]{woo} Woo, J.-H., \& Demarque, P. 2001, AJ, 122, 1602
1398: %
1399: \bibitem[2001]{yi} Yi, S., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., et al. 2001, ApJS, 136, 417
1400: %
1401: \bibitem[2004]{zac} Zacharias, N., Urban, S. E., Zacharias, M. I., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 3043
1402: %
1403: \bibitem[]{} Zhao, J. L., Tian, K. P., Pan, R. S., He, Y. P., \& Shi, H. M. 1993, A\&AS, 100, 243
1404: %
1405:
1406: \end{thebibliography}
1407:
1408: %_____________________________________________________________________
1409: %
1410:
1411: \end{document}
1412: