1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \shortauthors{Luhman et al.}
6: \shorttitle{Disk Population of Chamaeleon~I}
7:
8: \title{The Disk Population of the Chamaeleon~I Star-Forming
9: Region\altaffilmark{1}}
10:
11: \author{
12: K. L. Luhman\altaffilmark{2},
13: L. E. Allen\altaffilmark{3},
14: P. R. Allen\altaffilmark{2},
15: R. A. Gutermuth\altaffilmark{3},
16: L. Hartmann\altaffilmark{4},
17: E. E. Mamajek\altaffilmark{3},
18: S. T. Megeath\altaffilmark{5},
19: P. C. Myers\altaffilmark{3},
20: and G. G. Fazio\altaffilmark{3}}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}
23: {Based on observations performed with the Magellan Telescopes
24: at Las Campanas Observatory, Gemini Observatory, and the {\it Spitzer Space
25: Telescope}. Gemini Observatory is operated by AURA under a
26: cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the
27: NSF (United States), the Particle Physics and Astronomy
28: Research Council (United Kingdom), the National Research Council (Canada),
29: CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil)
30: and CONICET (Argentina). {\it Spitzer} is operated by the Jet Propulsion
31: Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407.
32: Support for this work was provided by NASA through contract 1256790 issued
33: by JPL. Support for the IRAC instrument was provided by NASA through
34: contract 960541 issued by JPL.
35: }
36:
37: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania
38: State University, University Park, PA 16802; kluhman@astro.psu.edu.}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge,
41: MA 02138.}
42:
43: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, The University of Michigan,
44: Ann Arbor, MI 48109.}
45:
46: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Toledo,
47: Toledo, OH 43606.}
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50:
51:
52:
53:
54: We present a census of circumstellar disks in the Chamaeleon~I star-forming
55: region. Using the Infrared Array Camera and the Multiband Imaging Photometer
56: onboard the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}, we have obtained images of
57: Chamaeleon~I at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24~\micron.
58: To search for new disk-bearing members of the cluster, we have performed
59: spectroscopy on objects that have red colors in these data.
60: Through this work, we have discovered four new members of Chamaeleon~I with
61: spectral types of M4, M6, M7.5, and L0.
62: The first three objects are highly embedded ($A_J\sim5$) and reside
63: near known protostars, indicating that they may be among the youngest
64: low-mass sources in the cluster ($\tau<1$~Myr).
65: The L0 source is the coolest known member of Chamaeleon~I.
66: Its luminosity implies a mass of 0.004-0.01~$M_\odot$, making it the least
67: massive brown dwarf for which a circumstellar disk has been reliably detected.
68: To characterize the disk population in Chamaeleon~I, we have
69: classified the infrared spectral energy distributions of the 203 known members
70: that are encompassed by the {\it Spitzer} images.
71: Through these classifications, we find that the disk fraction in Chamaeleon~I
72: is roughly constant at $\sim50$\% from 0.01 to 0.3~$M_\odot$. These data
73: are similar to the disk fraction of IC~348, which is a denser cluster
74: at the same age as Chamaeleon~I.
75: However, the disk fraction at $M\gtrsim1$~$M_\odot$ is significantly higher
76: in Chamaeleon~I than in IC~348 (65\% vs.\ 20\%), indicating
77: longer disk lifetimes in Chamaeleon~I for this mass range.
78: Thus, low-density star-forming regions like Chamaeleon~I may offer more time
79: for planet formation around solar-type stars than denser clusters.
80:
81:
82:
83:
84:
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87: \keywords{accretion disks -- planetary systems: protoplanetary disks -- stars:
88: formation --- stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: pre-main sequence}
89:
90: \section{Introduction}
91: \label{sec:intro}
92:
93:
94:
95:
96:
97:
98:
99: Low-mass stars and brown dwarfs are important sites for studies of
100: planet formation because most stars in the galaxy are low-mass stars
101: while brown dwarfs offer an opportunity to explore planet formation in
102: an extreme environment.
103: Planet formation around low-mass stars and brown dwarfs can be investigated
104: through observations of their primordial circumstellar disks.
105: These observations are most easily performed at mid-infrared
106: (IR) wavelengths ($\lambda\sim5$-20~\micron) because this wavelength range
107: provides the best combination of contrast of the disk relative to
108: stellar photosphere, disk brightness, and sensitivity of available telescopes.
109:
110:
111:
112:
113:
114:
115: Molecular clouds that contain ongoing star formation ($\tau\lesssim5$~Myr)
116: are the natural laboratories for observations of circumstellar disks.
117: Among these regions, Chamaeleon~I is arguably the best site for studying
118: disks around low-mass stars and brown dwarfs. It is one of the nearest
119: star-forming regions to the Sun \citep[$d=160$-170~pc,][]{whi97,wic98,ber99},
120: making its low-mass members relatively bright. The cluster is young enough
121: that it retains a significant population of primordial disks, but it is old
122: enough that most of its members are no longer highly obscured by dust
123: ($A_V\lesssim5$). Because of the relatively low extinction,
124: optical wavelengths are accessible for the spectral classification of
125: the stellar population \citep[][references therein]{com04,luh04cha}
126: and for measuring diagnostics of accretion \citep{moh05,muz05}.
127: Optical and near-IR imaging and spectroscopic surveys of Chamaeleon~I
128: have produced an extensive census of the stellar and substellar cluster
129: members \citep{luh07cha}. In particular, this census is unbiased in terms of
130: disks, which is essential for measuring the prevalence of disks.
131: With $\sim200$ known members at masses of 0.01-1~$M_\odot$,
132: Chamaeleon~I is sufficiently rich for a statistical analysis of disks around
133: low-mass stars and brown dwarfs.
134: This region is also well-suited for observations of disks at mid-IR
135: wavelengths. The stellar population is sparse enough that current
136: mid-IR telescopes can resolve individual members, while compact enough for
137: deep imaging of a large fraction of the cluster in a reasonable amount
138: of time. In addition, the cloud exhibits relatively little nebulosity
139: and extended emission at mid-IR wavelengths, which enables accurate
140: photometry of the faint, low-mass members.
141:
142:
143:
144:
145: Several studies have searched for evidence of disks in Chamaeleon~I
146: through near- and mid-IR photometry.
147: During pointed observations of known members, \citet{glass79} and
148: \citet{jay03} obtained photometry in the $JHKL$ bands
149: (1.2, 1.6, 2.2, 3.4~\micron) for 17 and 15 members with spectral
150: types as late as M4 and M8, respectively. Using a similar set of filters,
151: \citet{gk01} and \citet{kg01} performed wide-field imaging of a 0.5~deg$^2$
152: field that encompassed a large fraction of the Chamaeleon~I cloud.
153: Photometry at wavelengths longward of the $L$-band offers more reliable
154: detections of disks because of the better contrast of
155: cool circumstellar dust relative to warmer stellar photopsheres.
156: To obtain data of this kind for known young stars in Chamaeleon~I and
157: to search for new disk-bearing members of the cluster,
158: \citet{bau84} observed Chamaeleon~I with
159: the {\it Infrared Astronomical Satellite} ({\it IRAS}) at 12, 25, 60, and
160: 100~\micron. They detected 70 sources, half of which are cluster members.
161: A mid-IR survey with better sensitivity and spatial resolution
162: was later conducted with the {\it Infrared Space Observatory}
163: \citep[{\it ISO},][]{nor96,per00}, which provided photometry for 99 known
164: members, including a brown dwarf with a spectral
165: type near M8 \citep{nt01,apa02}. Mid-IR imaging also has been performed
166: toward smaller areas surrounding the three most prominent reflection nebulae
167: in the Chamaeleon~I cloud
168: using {\it IRAS} \citep{ass90,pru91} and {\it ISO} \citep{leh01}.
169:
170:
171:
172: The {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} \citep{wer04} is currently the most
173: advanced telescope operating at mid-IR wavelengths.
174: Because of its high spatial resolution, excellent sensitivity, and large
175: field of view, {\it Spitzer} is proficient at identifying
176: disk-bearing members of young clusters \citep{all04,gut04,meg04,muz04}.
177: This capability has been widely utilized through {\it Spitzer} surveys
178: of nearby star-forming regions and young associations ($\tau\lesssim10$~Myr),
179: including Taurus \citep{har05,luh06tau2,gui07},
180: Perseus \citep{luh05frac,lada06,jor06,mue07,reb07,gut07},
181: Lupus \citep{allen07}, Serpens \citep{har06,har07,win07},
182: $\sigma$~Ori \citep{her07,cab07,zap07,sch07b}, $\lambda$~Ori \citep{bar07},
183: Orion OB1b \citep{her06}, $\eta$~Cha \citep{meg05},
184: Chamaeleon~II \citep{you05,all06,por07}, NGC~2362 \citep{dahm07},
185: Upper Sco \citep{car06,sch07a}, Tr 37, and NGC~7160 \citep{sic06}.
186: Extensive {\it Spitzer} imaging has been performed in Chamaeleon~I as well.
187: Some of these data have been used to examine the properties of the
188: disk population of Chamaeleon~I \citep{luh05frac,dam07}, identify
189: low-mass brown dwarfs with disks \citep{luh05ots,luh05cha}, and
190: search for outflows \citep{bal06}.
191: In this paper, we present a comprehensive census of disks in Chamaeleon~I
192: using most of the {\it Spitzer} images between 3.6 and 24~\micron\ that have
193: been obtained in this region.
194: We begin by describing the collection and analysis of the
195: {\it Spitzer} images (\S~\ref{sec:images}) and the identification of
196: new disk-bearing members of the cluster with these data (\S~\ref{sec:new}).
197: We then use the {\it Spitzer} photometry of the known members of the cluster
198: to investigate the global properties of the disk population of Chamaeleon~I
199: (\S~\ref{sec:global}).
200:
201: \section{Infrared Images}
202: \label{sec:images}
203:
204: \subsection{Observations}
205:
206: For our census of the disk population in Chamaeleon~I, we use
207: images at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0~\micron\ obtained with
208: {\it Spitzer}'s Infrared Array Camera \citep[IRAC;][]{faz04a} and
209: images at 24~\micron\ obtained with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for
210: {\it Spitzer} \citep[MIPS;][]{rie04}.
211: The fields of view are $5.2\arcmin\times5.2\arcmin$ and
212: $5.4\arcmin\times5.4\arcmin$ for IRAC and the 24~\micron\ channel of MIPS,
213: respectively. The cameras produce images with FWHM=1.6-$1.9\arcsec$ from 3.6
214: to 8.0~\micron\ and FWHM=$5.9\arcsec$ at 24~\micron.
215:
216: In this paper, we consider all IRAC and MIPS 24~\micron\ observations
217: that have been performed within a radius of $3\arcdeg$ from
218: $\alpha=11^{\rm h}07^{\rm m}00^{\rm s}$, $\delta=-77\arcdeg10\arcmin00\arcsec$
219: (J2000) with the exception of the recently executed Legacy program of L. Allen,
220: which has a program identification (PID) of 30574. These data were obtained
221: through IRAC Guaranteed Time Observations (GTO) for PID=6, 36, and 37
222: (G. Fazio), IRAC and IRS GTO for PID=30540 (G. Fazio, J. Houck), IRS GTO for
223: PID=40302 (J. Houck), Director's Discretionary Time for PID=248 (S. Mohanty),
224: and Legacy programs for PID=139, 173 (N. Evans), and 148 (M. Meyer).
225: The characteristics of the IRAC and MIPS images are summarized in
226: Tables~\ref{tab:iraclog} and \ref{tab:mipslog}, respectively.
227: The boundaries of these images are indicated in the maps
228: of Chamaeleon~I in Figure~\ref{fig:map}.
229:
230:
231:
232:
233:
234: \subsection{Data Reduction}
235: \label{sec:reduction}
236:
237:
238: Initial processing of the IRAC images was performed with the Spitzer Science
239: Center (SSC) S14.0.0 pipeline. The resulting Basic Calibrated Data (BCD)
240: images were automatically treated for bright source artifacts
241: (jailbar, pulldown, muxbleed, and banding) with
242: customized versions of IDL routines developed by the IRAC instrument team
243: \citep{hor04,pip04}. Mosaicking of the treated BCDs was
244: performed using R. Gutermuth's WCSmosaic IDL package, which includes the
245: following features: a redundancy-based cosmic ray detection and rejection
246: algorithm; frame-by-frame distortion correction, derotation, and subpixel
247: offsetting in a single transformation (to minimize data smoothing); and
248: on-the-fly background matching. WCSmosaic was built with heavy dependence on
249: the FITS and WCS access and manipulation procedures provided by the IDL
250: Astronomy Users Library \citep{lan93}.
251: We selected a plate scale of $0.86\arcsec$~pixel$^{-1}$ for the reduced IRAC
252: mosaics, which is the native scale divided by $\sqrt{2}$.
253:
254: For the processing of the MIPS data, the SSC pipeline versions were S16.0.1
255: for Astronomical Observation Request (AOR) identifications of 5687040,
256: 5688064, 5688320, and 5688576 and S16.1.0 for all other AORs.
257: The resulting 24~\micron\ images were reduced further
258: with the MOPEX software from the SSC. The plate scale
259: of the final images was $2.45\arcsec$~pixel$^{-1}$.
260:
261: We used the IRAF task STARFIND to identify all point sources in the reduced
262: IRAC and MIPS images. From the initial list of 3.6~\micron\ detections from
263: STARFIND, we rejected sources that were not detected in the 4.5~\micron\ image
264: for areas that were imaged by both channels. Similarly, we rejected
265: STARFIND detections at 4.5~\micron\ that did not have a corresponding detection
266: at 3.6~\micron. For the data at 5.8 and 8.0~\micron, we retained only the
267: sources that were detected in the 3.6 and 4.5~\micron\ images, respectively.
268: We marked the sources produced by these criteria on the images and removed
269: remaining spurious detections through visual inspection.
270:
271: We measured aperture photometry for the IRAC and MIPS sources using the
272: IRAF task PHOT. We adopted zero point magnitudes ($ZP$) of 19.670, 18.921,
273: 16.855, 17.394, and 15.119 in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24~\micron\ bands,
274: where $M=-2.5 \log (DN/sec) + ZP$ \citep{rea05,eng07}.
275: For IRAC, we used an aperture radius of 4 pixels and inner and outer
276: radii of 4 and 5 pixels, respectively, for the sky annulus.
277: For MIPS, we adopted radii of 3, 3, and 4 pixels for the aperture and
278: the inner and outer boundaries of the sky annulus, respectively.
279: Using bright, isolated stars in the IRAC and MIPS images, we measured
280: aperture corrections between our adopted apertures and
281: the larger ones employed by \citet{rea05} and \citet{eng07}. For the MIPS
282: data, we combined our aperture correction with the one estimated by
283: \citet{eng07} between their aperture and an infinite one.
284: The total aperture corrections applied to our measurements are 0.18, 0.17,
285: 0.23, 0.48, and 0.8~mag for 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24~$\mu$m, respectively.
286: Smaller apertures (and the appropriate aperture corrections) were used for
287: sources that were near other stars, including the known members Hn~21W
288: and E, the new member 2MASS~J11062942$-$7724586 and its candidate companion
289: Cha~J11062788$-$7724543, and the new member 2MASS~J11084296$-$7743500, which is
290: close to the protostar IRN. Our quoted photometric errors
291: include the Poisson errors in the source and background emission
292: and the 2\% and 4\% uncertainties in the calibrations of IRAC and MIPS,
293: respectively \citep{rea05,eng07}.
294: The errors do not include an additional error of $\pm0.05$~mag due to
295: location-dependent variations in the IRAC calibration.
296:
297: To illustrate the detection and completeness limits of the IRAC data,
298: we consider the two shallow maps (AOR=3960320, 3651328) and two of the three
299: deep maps (AOR=3955968, 12620032) that are centered on the northern and
300: southern subclusters. The total exposure times at a given position in
301: these maps are 20.8 and 968~s, respectively. For each exposure time and filter,
302: we estimate the completeness limit by measuring the magnitude
303: at which the logarithm of the number of sources as a function of magnitude
304: departs from a linear slope and begins to turn over.
305: Based on the distributions of IRAC magnitudes, which are shown in
306: Figure~\ref{fig:limit}, we arrive at completeness limits of
307: 16.25, 16.25, 14.25, and 13.5 for the short exposures and
308: 17.0, 16.75, 16.0, and 15.25 for the long exposures at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and
309: 8.0~\micron, respectively.
310: The estimates for the short exposures are confirmed by the comparisons of
311: the histograms for the short and long exposures in Figure~\ref{fig:limit}.
312: The improvement in the completeness limits from the short exposures to
313: the long ones is smaller at 3.6 and 4.5~\micron\ than at 5.8 and
314: 8.0~\micron\ because the short exposures at 3.6 and
315: 4.5~\micron\ are already near the depth at which source confusion
316: begins to reduce completeness \citep{faz04b}.
317: Thus, the completeness limits of the longer exposures at 3.6 and
318: 4.5~\micron\ do not scale with $\sqrt{\tau}$ and instead are limited by
319: confusion. Our limits at 3.6 and 4.5~\micron\ are similar to those measured by
320: \citet{faz04b} for deeper images of extragalactic fields.
321: The short exposures at 8.0~\micron\ exhibit the brightest completeness
322: limit in our data, corresponding to a mass of $\sim$0.015~$M_\odot$
323: and a spectral type of $\sim$M9 for an age of 2~Myr and the distance of
324: Chamaeleon~I according to evolutionary models \citep{cha00}.
325: The fainter completeness limits of the other filters and exposure times are
326: equivalent to masses of $\sim$0.003-0.01~$M_\odot$ for members of Chamaeleon~I.
327:
328: \section{New Members of Chamaeleon I}
329: \label{sec:new}
330:
331: \subsection{Selection of Candidate Members}
332: \label{sec:select}
333:
334: As shown in the maps of Chamaeleon~I in Figure~\ref{fig:map}, most
335: of the star-forming region has been imaged by IRAC and MIPS.
336: Thus, we can use these data to search for new disk-bearing members of the
337: cluster through the presence of mid-IR emission in excess above that expected
338: from stellar photospheres. A color-color diagram constructed from
339: IRAC measurements is an efficient tool for identifying sources
340: of this kind \citep{all04,meg04}.
341: Because our images encompass a large fraction of the known stellar
342: population of Chamaeleon~I, we can use our photometry for these sources to
343: delineate the typical IRAC colors of young stars with disks.
344: In Figure~\ref{fig:1234}, we plot a diagram of $[3.6]-[4.5]$ versus
345: $[5.8]-[8.0]$ for all known members that are not saturated and that have
346: photometric uncertainties less than 0.1~mag in all of the IRAC bands,
347: which consists of 153 sources.
348: If an object has multiple measurements available in a given band, we
349: have adopted the average of those measurements.
350: As in other star-forming regions \citep{har05}, the known members of
351: Chamaeleon~I form two distinct populations in Figure~\ref{fig:1234},
352: stars clustering tightly near the origin and stars with much redder colors.
353: The former are consistent with stellar photospheres while the latter
354: indicate the presence of hot, optically-thick dust.
355: In surveys for new members of Taurus and Lupus, \citet{luh06tau2} and
356: \citet{allen07} used color criteria of $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.15$ and
357: $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.3$ for selecting stars that might have disks.
358: These colors bound the disk population in Chamaeleon~I as well.
359: Thus, we have applied these criteria to all sources in our photometric
360: catalog for Chamaeleon~I that have errors less than 0.1~mag in all four
361: bands, which are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:1234}. Stars classified as
362: nonmembers in previous studies have been omitted \citep{luh04cha,luh07cha}.
363: This process produced 350 candidate disk-bearing sources.
364: Although its photometric errors are larger than 0.1~mag, we have also
365: identified 2MASS~J11084296$-$7743500 as a promising candidate because of
366: its red IRAC colors and its close proximity to the protostar IRN.
367:
368:
369: We selected 17 candidates for spectroscopy to assess their membership,
370: focusing on sources that are within the two main subclusters of Chamaeleon~I
371: and that are bright enough for optical or near-IR spectroscopy.
372: The spectroscopic observations of eight of these candidates were described
373: by \citet{luh07cha} while the data for the remaining nine candidates
374: are presented in \S~\ref{sec:spectra}. Using these spectra, we classify
375: four candidates as new members and 13 candidates as nonmembers.
376: One of the nonmembers, 2MASS~J11081204$-$7622124, falls outside of the
377: boundaries of the color-color diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:1234}.
378: Three of the nonmembers, 2MASS J11085651$-$7645154, 2MASS J11105185$-$7642259,
379: and 2MASS J11105353$-$7726389, were identified as candidates because they
380: exhibited
381: excesses in preliminary photometric measurements that were used for selecting
382: candidates for spectroscopy. However, upon further data analysis, we found
383: that those apparent excesses were caused by contamination from cosmic rays,
384: and that the sources do not exhibit excesses in our final photometry.
385: For this reason, these three objects are excluded from Figure~\ref{fig:1234}.
386:
387:
388: \subsection{Spectroscopy of Candidates}
389: \label{sec:spectra}
390:
391: \subsubsection{Observations}
392:
393: We performed optical and near-IR spectroscopy on nine of the candidate
394: members of Chamaeleon~I that were selected in \S~\ref{sec:select}
395: using the Low Dispersion Survey Spectrograph (LDSS-3) on the Magellan~II
396: Telescope and the Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph (GNIRS) at
397: Gemini South Observatory. The GNIRS observations were conducted through
398: program GS-2005A-C-13. Table~\ref{tab:speclog} summarizes the observing
399: runs and instrument configurations for the spectra. In Table~\ref{tab:new},
400: we indicate the night on which each new member was observed.
401: We also observed known late-type members of Chamaeleon~I for comparison to the
402: candidates, obtaining LDSS-3 spectra of OTS~44 and Cha~J11091363$-$7734446
403: and GNIRS spectra of T50, Hn~12W, Cha~H$\alpha$~11, and CHSM~17173.
404: The procedures for the collection and reduction of the
405: LDSS-3 and GNIRS spectra were similar to those described by
406: \citet{luh04tau} and \citet{luh04ots}, respectively.
407:
408: \subsubsection{Nonmembers}
409:
410: Our spectroscopic targets are fainter than most of the known members of
411: Chamaeleon~I in the IRAC bands, which indicates that they should be
412: low-mass stars or brown dwarfs if they are members of the cluster.
413: Among the 17 candidates observed spectroscopically by \citet{luh07cha}
414: and in this work, 13 sources do not exhibit the molecular absorption bands
415: that characterize cool, low-mass objects. They also lack the hydrogen
416: emission lines that are often seen in young stars with disks.
417: Therefore, we classify these candidates as nonmembers.
418: The spectral classifications of eight of these nonmembers were presented by
419: \citet{luh04cha}. The remaining five sources
420: (Cha J11081724$-$7631107, Cha J11083029$-$7733067, Cha J11084006$-$7627085,
421: Cha J11090876$-$7626234, Cha J11120546$-$7631376)
422: are classified as $<$M0 based on the absence of molecular absorption bands.
423:
424: \subsubsection{New Member in Optical Sample}
425:
426: The remaining four candidates do show late-type spectral features and
427: evidence of membership in Chamaeleon~I.
428: One of these candidates is in the LDSS-3 sample and the other three objects
429: are in the GNIRS sample. We first discuss the source observed by LDSS-3,
430: Cha~J11070768$-$7626326 (hereafter Cha~1107$-$7626).
431: The optical spectrum of this candidate is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:op}.
432: The most obvious feature of this spectrum is the
433: strong H$\alpha$ emission line. The equivalent width of the line
434: is uncertain because the surrounding continuum is weak and poorly
435: measured, but it appears to have a value of several hundred angstroms.
436: The line is clearly stronger than the emission observed in active late-type
437: field dwarfs \citep{giz02} and indicates the presence of accretion.
438: The H$\alpha$ emission and the mid-IR excess emission together
439: demonstrate the youth of Cha~1107$-$7626, and thus we conclude that
440: it is a member of Chamaeleon~I.
441:
442: To measure its spectral type, we have compared Cha~1107$-$7626
443: to optically-classified late-type members of Chamaeleon~I
444: and other star-forming regions \citep{luh04cha,luh07cha} as well as standard
445: field dwarfs \citep{kir99}. The results of our classification are illustrated
446: in Figure~\ref{fig:op}, where we compare Cha~1107$-$7626 to the young
447: late-type objects KPNO~4, OTS~44, and Cha~J11091363$-$7734446 and the L0 field
448: dwarf 2MASS~J03454316+2540233 \citep{kir99}. KPNO~4 and OTS~44 have optical
449: spectral types of M9.5 \citep{bri02,luh07cha} and Cha~J11091363$-$7734446
450: was classified as $\geq$M9 with IR spectra \citep{luh07cha}.
451: We now classify the latter as M9.5$\pm$0.5 based on the similarity to KPNO~4
452: and OTS~44 in the optical data in Figure~\ref{fig:op}.
453: Compared to the three young M9.5 objects, Cha~1107$-$7626 exhibits
454: weaker TiO and VO absorption, which suggests a later spectral type.
455: Indeed, its spectrum agrees better with the L0 field dwarf, as shown in
456: Figure~\ref{fig:op}. Because the transition from M to L types is defined
457: by the disappearance of TiO absorption at 7000-7200~\AA\ \citep{kir99},
458: we need a spectrum with a higher signal-to-noise ratio at those wavelengths
459: to definitively classify Cha~1107$-$7626 as L-type. However, given
460: that its spectrum agrees significantly better with L0 than M9.5, we
461: tentatively classify it as L0.
462:
463: The comparison of Cha~1107$-$7626 to the field dwarf in Figure~\ref{fig:op}
464: indicates that it has negligible extinction ($A_J\lesssim0.3$).
465: By combining its $J$-band magnitude with a bolometric correction for L0
466: \citep{dah02} and a distance modulus of 6.05 \citep{luh08cha}, we
467: estimate a bolometric luminosity of $3.3\times10^{-4}$~$L_\odot$.
468: At this luminosity, Cha~1107$-$7626 is tied with Cha~J11083040$-$7731387
469: \citep{luh07cha} as the least luminous known member of Chamaeleon~I.
470:
471: To estimate the mass of Cha~1107$-$7626, we begin by examining its position
472: on the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram.
473: To do this, we must convert the spectral type of Cha~1107$-$7626 to an
474: effective temperature.
475: In our previous studies of young late-type objects, we have performed
476: conversions of this kind with the temperature scales from
477: \citet{luh99} and \citet{luh03ic}, which spanned M1 to M9.
478: The former scale was designed to produce coevality for the components of
479: the young quadruple system GG~Tau (K7-M7.5) on the model isochrones
480: from \citet{bar98}.
481: \citet{luh03ic} adjusted that scale at M8 and M9 to improve the coevality
482: between the coolest members of Taurus and IC~348 and the members at earlier
483: types. The resulting scale was then extrapolated to M9.25 and M9.5
484: as cooler objects were discovered in Taurus and Chamaeleon~I
485: \citep{bri02,luh04ots,luh07cha}. For the purposes of this study,
486: we continue this extrapolation to L0 for Cha~1107$-$7626,
487: arriving at a value of 2200~K.
488: Using this temperature and our luminosity estimate, we have
489: placed Cha~1107$-$7626 on the H-R diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:hr}.
490: We have included all other known low-mass members of Chamaeleon~I
491: \citep{luh07cha} as well as the three new members that we have found with
492: GNIRS (\S~\ref{sec:gnirs}).
493: Four of the previously known members have formal spectral types of $\geq$M9
494: because they were classified through H$_2$O absorption bands, and the
495: variation of these bands with optical spectral type is unknown for young
496: objects later than M9.5. However, the strengths of the H$_2$O bands in these
497: objects do agree with those of OTS~44 and KPNO~4, which have optical types
498: of M9.5. Thus, it is likely that they have spectral types near M9.5.
499:
500: The cluster sequence for Chamaeleon~I in Figure~\ref{fig:hr} is parallel to
501: the model isochrones for members earlier than M8, which is expected since the
502: adopted temperature scale was designed to produce coevality for the GG~Tau
503: system. However, the sequence does not remain parallel to the isochrones
504: at later types. Most members earlier than M8 appear between the isochrones for
505: 1 and 10~Myr, while the coolest brown dwarfs, including
506: Cha~1107$-$7626, are bracketed by 10 and 100~Myr.
507: It is unlikely that these old ages are valid.
508: For instance, the lifetimes of molecular clouds are too short
509: \citep[$\tau<10$~Myr,][]{har01} for the Chamaeleon~I clouds to have undergone
510: star formation across such an extended period of time.
511: In addition, objects with ages of 10-100~Myr would have dispersed from the
512: cloud long ago. Instead, the old isochronal ages are probably a reflection of
513: errors in the adopted temperature scale and/or the evolutionary models.
514: If the models are valid, then the temperature scale for young objects at
515: M9-L0 must be much cooler than the adopted one, which is already cooler than
516: the scale measured for field dwarfs \citep{kir05}.
517: Significant errors are probably present in both the temperature scale,
518: which is unconstrained at the latest types, and the predicted effective
519: temperatures, which are sensitive to various details of the models, such
520: as the treatment of convection \citep{bar02}.
521: Compared to effective temperature, bolometric luminosity appears to be
522: less sensitive to model uncertainties, at least for ages of $\tau\gtrsim1$~Myr
523: \citep{bar02}, and is easier to measure.
524: Therefore, we have chosen to estimate the mass of Cha~1107$-$7626 from its
525: luminosity. If we assume that it has an age in the range of values exhibited
526: by the stellar members of Chamaeleon~I \citep[$\tau=1$-6~Myr,][]{luh07cha},
527: then we arrive at a mass of 0.004-0.01~$M_\odot$ for Cha~1107$-$7626
528: based on the luminosities predicted by \citet{bur97} and \citet{cha00}.
529: \citet{zap07} and \citet{sch07b} have reported detections of disks for
530: brown dwarfs at comparable masses in the $\sigma$~Ori cluster using IRAC data.
531: However, because of the very large uncertainties in the 5.8 and
532: 8.0~\micron\ photometry in those studies (0.3-0.5~mag), their detections of
533: excess emission have low significance.
534: Thus, Cha~1107$-$7626 is the least massive brown dwarf that has definitive
535: evidence for a circumstellar disk.
536:
537: \subsubsection{New Members in Infrared Sample}
538: \label{sec:gnirs}
539:
540: In the GNIRS sample, the three candidates that show evidence of membership
541: in Chamaeleon~I are 2MASS J11084296$-$7743500, 2MASS J11062942$-$7724586, and
542: 2MASS J11070369$-$7724307 (hereafter 2M~1108$-$7743, 2M~1106$-$7724,
543: 2M~1107$-$7724).
544: The near-IR spectra of these objects exhibit strong H$_2$O absorption bands,
545: which indicates that they are low-mass stars or brown dwarfs rather
546: than galaxies. High levels of reddening in their spectra demonstrate that
547: they are not field stars in the foreground of the cluster and
548: they are too bright to be background field dwarfs. We also detect emission
549: in H$_{2}$~1-0~S(1) at 2.12~\micron\ in 2M~1108$-$7743, which is a signature
550: of very young stars.
551: Finally, the spectral features that are sensitive to surface gravity in
552: our data, such as the shape of the $H$- and $K$-band continua
553: \citep{luc01,luh04ots,kir06}, are inconsistent with field dwarfs and giants.
554: Instead, the spectra of 2M~1108$-$7743, 2M~1106$-$7724, and 2M~1107$-$7724
555: agree well with known cluster members observed with GNIRS in terms of the
556: gravity-sensitive features. Based on these properties and the presence of
557: mid-IR excess emission, we classify these sources as members of Chamaeleon~I.
558:
559: To measure the spectral types of 2M~1108$-$7743, 2M~1106$-$7724, and
560: 2M~1107$-$7724,
561: we have compared their H$_2$O and atomic absorption features to those of the
562: optically-classified members of Chamaeleon~I that we observed with GNIRS.
563: To facilitate this comparison, we dereddened the spectra of the new members
564: to give them the same slopes as the known members. We also smoothed the spectra
565: to a low resolution when comparing the broad H$_2$O absorption bands.
566: The dereddened, smoothed versions of the spectra are shown in
567: Figure~\ref{fig:ir}.
568: Each object is compared to the young standards that provide the closest
569: match to the strength of the H$_2$O absorption. Through this comparison
570: and a similar analysis of the atomic absorption lines, we classify
571: 2M~1108$-$7743, 2M~1106$-$7724, and 2M~1107$-$7724 as M4$\pm$1, M6$\pm$1, and
572: M7.5$\pm$1, respectively.
573: These spectral types correspond to masses of $\sim0.3$, 0.1, and 0.04~$M_\odot$,
574: respectively, according to the theoretical evolution models of \citet{bar98}
575: and \citet{cha00} and the temperature scale of \citet{luh03ic} for ages of
576: a few Myr.
577:
578: The process of dereddening the near-IR spectra of 2M~1108$-$7743,
579: 2M~1106$-$7724,
580: and 2M~1107$-$7724 to match the young standards, which have little if any
581: extinction \citep{luh07cha}, produces extinction estimates of
582: $A_J=5.6$, 5.6, and 4.7, respectively. It is not surprising that these
583: objects are highly obscured given their locations. 2M~1108$-$7743 is
584: only $14\arcsec$ from the protostar IRN while the other two sources
585: are within the group of embedded stars near Cederblad~110.
586: {\it Spitzer} and 2MASS images of 2M~1106$-$7724, 2M~1107$-$7724, and
587: the protostars in Cederblad~110 are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:image}.
588: Based on their high levels of extinction and their close proximity to known
589: protostars, 2M~1108$-$7743, 2M~1106$-$7724, and 2M~1107$-$7724 may be the
590: youngest known low-mass members of the cluster. By combining our extinction
591: estimates for these sources with their $H$ and $K_s$ magnitudes,
592: the appropriate bolometric corrections, and the distance of Chamaeleon~I,
593: we arrive at luminosities of 0.053, 0.035, and 0.020~$L_\odot$,
594: respectively. Because the $H$- and $K$-band spectra for these sources
595: do not show any evidence of continuum veiling, these luminosity estimates
596: should be uncontaminated by disk emission.
597:
598: The spectral types, extinctions, luminosities, membership evidence, and
599: near-IR photometry for the four new members of Chamaeleon~I are provided in
600: Table~\ref{tab:new}. The IRAC and MIPS photometry for these sources are
601: presented in the tabulation of {\it Spitzer} data for all known members
602: of the cluster in \S~\ref{sec:phot}. The IRAC and MIPS measurements for
603: the 13 nonmembers are listed in Table~\ref{tab:non}.
604:
605:
606:
607: \subsection{Remaining Candidates}
608: \label{sec:cand}
609:
610:
611: In the previous section, we obtained spectra for a small sample of
612: the candidate disk-bearing members of Chamaeleon~I that were
613: identified in \S~\ref{sec:select} with Figure~\ref{fig:1234}.
614: To investigate the nature of the remaining candidates,
615: we compare them to the known cluster members in {\it Spitzer} color-magnitude
616: and color-color diagrams in Figure~\ref{fig:14}.
617: Many of the candidates are as red as the reddest known members, indicating
618: that they are protostellar if they are members.
619: In addition, bona fide members are likely to be brown dwarfs given that
620: nearly all of the candidates are fainter than the stellar members of the
621: cluster, although stars with edge-on disks can also appear very faint.
622: For instance, Cha~J11081938$-$7731522 has a stellar mass according to
623: its spectral type, but it is the faintest and reddest known member in [3.6]
624: and $[3.6]-[24]$, respectively, which is explained by the presence of an
625: edge-on disk \citep{luh07cha}. However, rather than brown dwarfs or stars
626: with edge-on disks, the vast majority of the candidates are probably galaxies.
627:
628:
629: We can refine our sample of candidate members and remove some of the galaxy
630: contaminants by applying additional criteria.
631: The initial sample of candidates was defined by colors of $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.15$
632: and $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.3$. However, the sources with $[3.6]-[4.5]\lesssim0.7$ and
633: $[5.8]-[8.0]\gtrsim1.2$ within that sample have colors that differ
634: significantly from those of all known members of Chamaeleon~I,
635: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:1234}. These objects can be rejected as
636: likely galaxies. Because galaxy contamination increases with fainter
637: magnitudes, brighter candidates are less likely to be galaxies.
638: The probability of membership is also higher for candidates that are
639: close to known members of Chamaeleon~I. By applying these criteria,
640: we have identified the most promising candidate disk-bearing members,
641: which are listed in Table~\ref{tab:cand}.
642: The brightest candidate, 2MASS~J11085367$-$7521359,
643: is probably a solar-mass star if it is associated with Chamaeleon~I.
644: The magnitudes of the remaining candidates are indicative of brown dwarfs.
645: As noted in Table~\ref{tab:cand}, some of the candidates may be
646: class~I sources or companions to known members.
647: The new member 2M~1106$-$7724 and the candidate Cha~J11062788$-$7724543
648: could comprise the youngest low-mass binary system discovered to date.
649:
650:
651: In addition to revealing new candidate members of Chamaeleon~I, our
652: mid-IR measurements provide constraints on the membership of
653: sources that have been previously cited as possible members.
654: In a census of Chamaeleon~I, \citet{luh04cha} assigned membership to a few
655: objects that lacked spectroscopic classification but that exhibited
656: mid-IR excess emission. One of these objects is ISO~13 \citep{nor96,per00}.
657: The near-IR counterpart for ISO~13 was not positively identified in
658: previous studies because of uncertainties in the coordinates measured
659: with {\it ISO}. Based on a comparison of the photometry from {\it ISO}
660: to measurements from IRAC for sources in the vicinity of the {\it ISO}
661: coordinates, we conclude that ISO~13 corresponds to 2MASS~J11025579$-$7724304.
662: For this source, we measure magnitudes of 13.87, 13.68, 12.68, 9.87, and
663: 6.54 at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24~\micron, respectively.
664: When we combine these data with photometry from
665: the Two-Micron All-Sky Survey \citep[2MASS,][]{skr06}, we find that the
666: colors of ISO~13 are relatively blue at 1-5~\micron\ but become very red
667: at 8 and 24~\micron. These colors are inconsistent with those of
668: known members of Chamaeleon~I, as illustrated by the position
669: of ISO~13 in the IRAC color-color diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:1234}.
670: Therefore, we remove ISO~13 from our list of members of Chamaeleon~I because
671: it is probably a galaxy.
672: \citet{luh04cha} included ISO~206 in a list of candidate members
673: based on an apparent excess at 6.7~\micron\ in photometry from {\it ISO}.
674: However, mid-IR excess emission is not present in the IRAC data for this
675: source. As a result, there is no longer any reason to consider ISO~206 as
676: a possible member.
677: Finally, \citet{per01} identified three candidate class~I brown dwarfs
678: in the vicinity of Cederblad~110 through the presence of near-IR excess
679: emission. In our IRAC data, we find that one of these candidates, NIR72,
680: is a patch of nebulosity rather than a stellar source while the other
681: two objects, NIR84 and NIR89, do not exhibit excess emission, and thus
682: are not class~I sources.
683:
684:
685:
686:
687: \subsection{Completeness for Members with Disks}
688: \label{sec:complete}
689:
690:
691: We now use our mid-IR data to examine the completeness of the current
692: census of disk-bearing members of Chamaeleon~I.
693: We consider only the areas that have been imaged in all four bands of
694: IRAC, which encompass 170 of the 229 known members of the cluster.
695: Within these areas, 156 members have photometric errors less than 0.1~mag
696: in all IRAC bands, while the remaining 14 known members lack accurate
697: photometry in at least one band because they are saturated, extended, too
698: close to a brighter star, or below the detection limit of all four bands
699: (Cha-MMS1).
700: Thus, the photometric criteria that we used for selecting candidate members
701: with disks in \S~\ref{sec:select} recover all known members with disks
702: in the areas with 4-band coverage with the exception of the brightest stars,
703: faint companions, and the youngest protostars.
704: As a result, our sample of candidates should
705: be complete for disk-bearing members in the same range of magnitudes and
706: extinctions exhibited by the known stellar population.
707: To quantify the completeness limits of this candidate sample, we have plotted
708: the photometric completeness limits at 8~\micron\ for the shortest and longest
709: exposures in the color-magnitude diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:14}
710: (\S~\ref{sec:reduction}).
711: Meanwhile, to evaluate the completeness of the current census of confirmed
712: members with disks, we consider the remaining candidates that lack
713: spectroscopy. As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:14}, only one candidate is
714: present in the magnitude range of young stars in Chamaeleon~I
715: ($[3.6]\lesssim12$), which is in Table~\ref{tab:cand}.
716: Thus, the current census is nearly complete for stars with disks in the fields
717: imaged by all four bands of IRAC, which encompass most of the Chamaeleon~I
718: cloud (Figure~\ref{fig:map}). Our survey is not complete for brown dwarfs
719: with disks, as indicated by the large number of candidates lacking
720: spectroscopy in Figure~\ref{fig:14}. However, based on optical and
721: near-IR surveys, the census of substellar cluster members (both with and
722: without disks) is complete for specific fields and ranges of mass and
723: extinction that are described by \citet{luh07cha}.
724:
725:
726: \section{Global Properties of Disk Population}
727: \label{sec:global}
728:
729: \subsection{{\it Spitzer} Photometry for Known Members}
730: \label{sec:phot}
731:
732: We wish to use our mid-IR photometry from {\it Spitzer}
733: to investigate the properties of the disk population in Chamaeleon~I.
734: To do this, we begin by presenting a tabulation of these measurements
735: for all known members of the cluster.
736: The latest census of Chamaeleon~I from \citet{luh07cha} contained 226 sources.
737: ISO~13 was considered a cluster member in that study, but we now classify it
738: is as a probable galaxy (\S~\ref{sec:cand}).
739: The census from \citet{luh07cha} did not include protostellar sources
740: that have been detected only at far-IR wavelengths and longward, such as
741: Cha-MMS1 \citep{rei96}. Because this source is detected in our
742: 24~\micron\ data (see Figure~\ref{fig:image})\footnote{The detection
743: of Cha-MMS1 in the 24~\micron\ data was previously reported by \citet{bel06}.},
744: we include it in the list of members considered in this work.
745: Eight young stars from \citet{cov97} are within the area in which
746: we have reduced nearly all available IRAC and MIPS data, which has a radius
747: of $3\arcdeg$ centered at $\alpha=11^{\rm h}07^{\rm m}00^{\rm s}$,
748: $\delta=-77\arcdeg10\arcmin00\arcsec$ (J2000).
749: Three of these stars, RX~J1108.8$-$7519A and B and RX~J1129.2$-$7546,
750: have proper motions that are similar to those of known members of Chamaeleon~I,
751: while the other five stars are probably members of the
752: $\epsilon$~Cha association according to their proper motions (see Appendix).
753: We also find that four of the young stars from \citet{luh07cha}
754: have proper motions that favor membership in $\epsilon$~Cha rather than
755: Chamaeleon~I. Therefore, we deduct ISO~13 and these four stars from the
756: census of \citet{luh07cha} and add Cha-MMS1, RX~J1108.8$-$7519A and B,
757: and RX~J1129.2$-$7546.
758: When we include the four new members that we have discovered (\S~\ref{sec:new}),
759: we arrive at census of Chamaeleon~I that contains 229 sources.
760:
761:
762: The IRAC images encompass 198 of the 229 known members, all of which are
763: detected in at least one IRAC band, except for the protostar Cha-MMS1 and
764: six objects that are unresolved from brighter stars (ESO~H$\alpha$~281,
765: 2MASS~J11011926$-$7732383B, 2MASS~J11072022$-$7738111, CHXR~73B, T39B, T33B).
766: The MIPS 24~\micron\ images contain 199 members, 152 of which are detected.
767: Among the MIPS detections, seven stars are saturated and one
768: source, T41, is not measured because it is extended.
769: Thus, we have measured IRAC and MIPS photometry for 191 and 144 known
770: members, respectively. These data are presented in Table~\ref{tab:mem}.
771: Nondetections at 24~\micron\ are indicated for
772: members with IRAC measurements. Sources that lack measurements in both
773: IRAC and MIPS are not included in Table~\ref{tab:mem}, which consist of six
774: unresolved companions (2MASS~J11011926$-$7732383B, 2MASS~J11072022$-$7738111,
775: CHXR~73B, T39B, T33B, CHXR~68B), one member not detected by MIPS and outside
776: of IRAC (2MASS~J11155827$-$7729046), and 19 members outside of both the
777: IRAC and MIPS images. ESO~H$\alpha$~281 is unresolved from a brighter
778: background star in 2MASS \citep{luh07cha} but is comparable to the latter at
779: 8~\micron\ and is the dominant source at 24~\micron. Thus, we were able to
780: measure photometry for ESO~H$\alpha$~281 at 24~\micron\ but not in the IRAC
781: bands.
782:
783:
784:
785:
786:
787:
788: As mentioned in \S~\ref{sec:intro}, previous studies have measured
789: photometry for members of Chamaeleon~I from the {\it Spitzer} images
790: considered in this work. \citet{luh05ots,luh05frac,luh05cha} reported
791: IRAC photometry for known members with spectral types later than M6.
792: Those measurements are now superseded by the ones in Table~\ref{tab:mem},
793: which were performed with newer versions of the image processing software
794: described in \S~\ref{sec:reduction}.
795: More recently, \citet{dam07} measured IRAC photometry for 81 members from
796: the images for AORs 3960320 and 3651328 and MIPS 24~\micron\ photometry
797: for 59 members from the images for AORs 3661312 and 3962112.
798: To compare the IRAC photometry from \citet{dam07} to our measurements from
799: the same images, we plot the differences of the IRAC magnitudes from the
800: two studies as a function of magnitude in Figure~\ref{fig:dam1}.
801: The two sets of photometry differ by more than 0.1~mag in many cases,
802: particularly at fainter levels and at 5.8~\micron. Most of these differences
803: are within the errors quoted by \citet{dam07}, but those errors are much
804: larger than the ones that we estimate for our photometry.
805: We find errors of only a few percent for all of our measurements in
806: Figure~\ref{fig:dam1}, while the errors from \citet{dam07} are as large as
807: $\sim50$\%. To illustrate the relative accuracies of these measurements
808: without making use of the quoted errors, we compare the IRAC color-color
809: diagrams that are produced by the two studies in Figure~\ref{fig:dam2}.
810: Our colors form two distinct groups, a tight cluster near the origin and
811: a broader distribution of significantly redder colors, which are indicative
812: of stellar photospheres and stars with disks, respectively.
813: In comparison, the colors from \citet{dam07} exhibit a much larger scatter
814: and extend to significantly negative colors, which are unphysical for the
815: spectral types in question. Thus, according to both this comparison and the
816: formal error estimates, our measurements have significantly higher accuracies
817: than those from \citet{dam07}.
818:
819: \subsection{SED Classifications}
820: \label{sec:sed}
821:
822:
823: To classify the IR spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the members
824: of Chamaeleon~I, we use the spectral slope defined as
825: $\alpha= d$~log$(\lambda F_\lambda)/d$~log$(\lambda)$ \citep{lw84,adams87}.
826: This slope is normally measured between $\lambda\sim2$~\micron\ and
827: 10-20~\micron.
828: We have measured photometry at 8 and 24~\micron\ for 182 and 144 members,
829: respectively. At least one of these bands is available for 197 members.
830: At short wavelengths, data at 3.6~\micron\ are available for 164 members.
831: Slopes from 3.6~\micron\ to 8 or 24~\micron\ can be computed for 160 members.
832: Photometry at $K_s$ (2.2~\micron) is also useful as a short-wavelength
833: band for spectral slopes since it has been measured for all known members
834: \citep[2MASS;][]{luh07cha}.
835: Therefore, to provide a spectral slope for as many members as possible, we
836: have computed slopes between four pairs of bands, 2.2-8, 2.2-24, 3.6-8, and
837: 3.6-24~\micron. We have dereddened these slopes using the extinctions from
838: \citet{luh07cha} and the reddening law from \citet{fla07}, except for
839: 10 members that lack spectral types and extinction estimates.
840: As in \S~\ref{sec:select}, we have adopted the average measurement
841: in a given band if an object has been observed at multiple epochs.
842: The resulting values of $\alpha_{2-8}$, $\alpha_{2-24}$, $\alpha_{3.6-8}$,
843: and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$ are listed in Table~\ref{tab:alpha} for the
844: 196 known members of Chamaeleon~I that have photometry at 8 or
845: 24~\micron\ and at shorter wavelengths (i.e., excluding Cha-MMS1).
846:
847:
848:
849:
850:
851: The distributions of spectral slopes from Table~\ref{tab:alpha} are
852: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:alpha2}.
853: Like the colors in Figure~\ref{fig:1234}, the slopes form
854: two distinct populations that are well-separated from each other.
855: The narrow group of bluer objects corresponds to stellar photospheres
856: while the broader distribution of redder sources represents stars with disks.
857: We investigate these data in greater detail by plotting the slopes
858: as a function of spectral type in Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1}.
859: The widths of the photospheric sequences for $\alpha_{2-24}$ and
860: $\alpha_{3.6-24}$ increase at later spectral types because of the larger
861: photometric errors at 24~\micron\ for cooler, fainter objects.
862: Most photospheres later than M6 are below the detection limit
863: at 24~\micron. Because of the close proximity and low background of
864: Chamaeleon~I, this detection limit of M6 for stellar photospheres is
865: significantly cooler than the limits typically achieved in
866: MIPS 24~\micron\ surveys of other star-forming regions.
867: In the two slopes based on 8~\micron, the separations between the
868: two populations are smaller than in $\alpha_{2-24}$ and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$,
869: but the photospheric sequences are also tighter
870: because of the higher photometric accuracies at 8~\micron\ relative to
871: 24~\micron. The distributions of dereddened slopes in Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1}
872: are nearly identical to the distributions of observed values except that
873: the sequences of stellar photospheres are slightly tighter after dereddening.
874:
875:
876: In Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1}, $\alpha_{2-8}$ and $\alpha_{3.6-8}$ are
877: approximately constant for stellar photospheres with types of B through K,
878: but they change noticeably at later spectral types.
879: As a result, we should not use fixed thresholds in $\alpha_{2-8}$ and
880: $\alpha_{3.6-8}$ for identifying stars with disks.
881: Instead, our adopted thresholds are fits to the photospheric sequences that
882: have been offset by 0.3 so that they are significantly greater than the scatter
883: in each sequence.
884: A constant threshold of $-2.2$ is sufficient for identifying
885: stars with disks for both $\alpha_{2-24}$ and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$,
886: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1}.
887: Following the standard classification scheme for SEDs of young stars
888: \citep{lada87,gre94}, we classify stars with slopes below the thresholds in
889: Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1} as class~III while redder stars with
890: $\alpha<-0.3$, $-0.3\leq\alpha\leq0.3$, and $\alpha>0.3$ are designated as
891: class~II, flat-spectrum, and class~I, respectively.
892: We cannot classify Cha-MMS1 with our data because it is not detected at
893: wavelengths shorter than 24~\micron, but it is probably in the class~0 stage
894: or an earlier, prestellar phase \citep{rei96,leh01,bel06}.
895:
896:
897: The SED classifications produced by $\alpha_{2-8}$, $\alpha_{2-24}$,
898: $\alpha_{3.6-8}$, and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$ disagree for a small number of sources.
899: The classes from three of the four slopes agree for T14A,
900: C1-2, Ced~110-IRS4, ISO~97, ISO~217, ISO~237,
901: Hn10E, C1-25, and Cha~H$\alpha$~1.
902: For each of these stars, we assign the classification from the three slopes
903: that agree.
904: ISO~86 and Ced~110-IRS6 are class~I by $\alpha_{2-8}$ and $\alpha_{2-24}$
905: and are class~II by $\alpha_{3.6-8}$ and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$. We adopt the latter
906: classification for these stars because of the possibility of variability
907: during the time between the $K_s$ and {\it Spitzer} observations.
908: For the same reason, we adopt the classification from $\alpha_{3.6-8}$
909: over the one from $\alpha_{2-8}$ for T29.
910: Because the 8~\micron\ slopes of CHSM~15991 indicate a flat-spectrum class
911: while the 24~\micron\ slopes are only slightly below the flat/II threshold,
912: we adopt the former classification for this star.
913: The SEDs of T11, CHXR~22E, and CHXR~71 are consistent with stellar photospheres
914: at $\lambda\leq8$~\micron\ but are much redder at 24~\micron.
915: SEDs of this kind are indicative of disks with inner holes, which are
916: also known as transitional disks \citep{cal02,cal05,dal05,esp07a,esp07b,fur07}.
917: CHXR~76 may have a transitional disk as well, although the size of the
918: 24~\micron\ excess is small and the star is slightly below the
919: adopted II/III thresholds for $\alpha_{2-24}$ and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$.
920: We classify these four stars as class~II rather than class~III since they
921: exhibit disk emission at 24~\micron.
922: The SEDs of Cha~J11081938$-$7731522 and ESO~H$\alpha$~569 also become
923: more steeply rising at longer wavelengths. For these stars, the data
924: at 8 and 24~\micron\ indicate classes~II and I, respectively.
925: Both Cha~J11081938$-$7731522 and ESO~H$\alpha$~569 show evidence of edge-on
926: disks \citep{luh07cha}, which is consistent with the distinctive shapes of
927: their SEDs. Thus, we conclude that they are probably edge-on class~II systems.
928: Hn~21E and the new member near IRN, 2M~J1108$-$7743, have different
929: classifications according to $\alpha_{2-8}$ and $\alpha_{3.6-8}$.
930: For these two stars, we assign the classifications from $\alpha_{3.6-8}$
931: because the 3.6 and 8~\micron\ data were measured with the same apertures
932: and at the same time. Both stars are too close to brighter stars for useful
933: constraints on their 24~\micron\ fluxes.
934: Our final SED classifications are provided in Table~\ref{tab:alpha}.
935:
936:
937:
938:
939:
940:
941:
942:
943:
944: Finally, we examine the SEDs of the seven known members of Chamaeleon~I that
945: are within the {\it Spitzer} images but have not been classified with
946: the spectral slopes in Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1} because they lack photometry
947: at 8 and 24~\micron. These measurements are unavailable because the
948: stars are outside of the images, below the detection limits,
949: saturated, or extended, as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:mem} for
950: T6, T27, T41, CHXR~54, 2MASS~J11112249$-$7745427, and 2MASS~J11080609$-$7739406.
951: The seventh member, 2MASS~J11155827$-$7729046, is outside of the
952: IRAC images and is not detected by MIPS, and thus is not present in
953: Table~\ref{tab:mem}. The absence of a detection at 24~\micron\ is sufficient
954: to demonstrate that this star is class~III. To classify the other six
955: objects, we measured spectral slopes from $K_s$ and the available IRAC
956: data and applied thresholds similar to those developed in
957: Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1}. We find that T6, T27, and 2MASS~J11112249$-$7745427
958: are class~II and T41, CHXR~54, and 2MASS~J11080609$-$7739406 are class~III.
959:
960: Table~\ref{tab:class} summarizes the SED classifications for the known
961: members of Chamaeleon~I that are within the {\it Spitzer} images,
962: with the exception of the protostar Cha-MMS1.
963:
964:
965:
966:
967: \subsection{Disk Fraction}
968:
969:
970: We can use our SED classifications to measure the fraction of stars
971: and brown dwarfs in Chamaeleon~I that harbor circumstellar disks.
972: For the disk fraction to be meaningful, it must be measured from
973: a sample of cluster members that is unbiased in terms of disks.
974: Although some of the early studies of Chamaeleon~I identified members by
975: signatures related to disks, recent surveys at X-ray, optical, and
976: near-IR wavelengths have been sensitive to both
977: class~II and class~III sources \citep{fl04,stel04,luh07cha}.
978: The resulting census is unbiased in terms of SED class for most of the cloud
979: \citep{luh07cha}. The major exception is at high extinctions, where
980: class~I and II stars are readily found through mid-IR excesses (such as
981: three of the new members in this work) while their class~III counterparts
982: are much more difficult to identify. However, in a cloud like Chamaeleon~I
983: that has relatively low extinction ($A_V<4$), any members that are highly
984: embedded ($A_V>10$) are probably very young stars in their parent cores,
985: and thus are likely to have disks. In other words, it is unlikely that
986: Chamaeleon~I contains a significant number of heavily obscured class~III
987: stars. This conclusion is supported by the X-ray surveys of \citet{fl04}
988: and \citet{stel04}, which were capable of detecting sources of this kind.
989: Therefore, we include all known members of Chamaeleon~I in our disk
990: fraction measurement with the exception of the new substellar
991: member Cha~1107$-$7626 and the protostar Cha-MMS1. The former is excluded
992: because it was found through its disk emission, but it is not within the
993: detection limits of previous unbiased surveys. As for Cha-MMS1,
994: sources that are less evolved than class~I are generally not
995: included in disk fraction measurements.
996:
997:
998:
999:
1000:
1001: We have computed the fraction of members that are class~I or class~II
1002: as a function of spectral type, which is a good proxy for stellar mass.
1003: We selected the boundaries of the spectral type bins to correspond
1004: approximately to intervals of 0.5 in the logarithm of mass
1005: based on the temperature
1006: scale of \citet{luh03ic} and the evolutionary models of \citet{bar98}
1007: and \citet{cha00}. For members that lack spectral classifications, we
1008: estimate masses and spectral types by combining their photometry, the
1009: evolutionary models, and an assumed age of 2~Myr, which should be sufficiently
1010: accurate for identifying the bins in which they belong.
1011: To compare the disk fractions of Chamaeleon~I and the young cluster
1012: IC~348, we have applied our SED classification criteria to
1013: the IRAC data for IC~348 from \citet{lada06}. The resulting disk fractions
1014: as a function of mass for Chamaeleon~I and IC~348 are listed in
1015: Table~\ref{tab:diskfraction} and are plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:diskfraction}.
1016:
1017:
1018: Through an earlier analysis of a subset of the {\it Spitzer} images,
1019: \citet{luh05frac} found that low-mass stars and brown dwarfs in Chamaeleon~I
1020: exhibit similar disk fractions. We arrive at the same result with our
1021: expanded set of images. Other young clusters like IC~348 and $\sigma$~Ori
1022: also have disk fractions that are roughly unchanged from low-mass
1023: stars to brown dwarfs \citep{luh05frac,her07,cab07}.
1024: As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:diskfraction}, the disk fractions at low masses
1025: in Chamaeleon~I and IC~348 have similar values.
1026: However, the disk fractions of the two clusters diverge significantly
1027: above $\sim0.3$~$M_\odot$.
1028: This difference is particularly striking since similar ages have been
1029: reported for the two clusters \citep{luh03ic,luh07cha}. To compare their
1030: ages in detail, we have estimated the ages of members of
1031: Chamaeleon~I and IC~348 between 0.1 and 1~$M_\odot$ by combining the
1032: temperatures and luminosities from \citet{luh03ic} and \citet{luh07cha}
1033: with the evolutionary models of \citet{bar98}. The resulting distributions
1034: of isochronal ages are indistinguishable, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:ages}.
1035: Thus, the relative disk fractions indicate that the typical lifetime of disks
1036: around solar-mass stars is shorter in IC~348 than in Chamaeleon~I.
1037: The higher stellar density of IC~348 relative to Chamaeleon~I is the
1038: only obvious potential source of this difference in disk lifetimes.
1039: The low-mass stars in IC~348 are segregated toward the outer regions of
1040: the cluster where the density is lower \citep{mue03}, which might explain why
1041: their disk fraction is similar to that of low-mass stars in Chamaeleon~I.
1042: Several clusters and associations that are slightly older than
1043: IC~348 and Chamaeleon~I, such as Upper Sco, NGC~2362, and $\sigma$~Ori
1044: ($\tau\sim5$~Myr), exhibit disk fractions that decrease at higher
1045: stellar masses in the same manner observed for IC~348
1046: \citep{car06,dahm07,her07}, which suggests that
1047: more massive stars have shorter disk lifetimes than low-mass stars in
1048: most clusters. The solar-mass stars in Chamaeleon~I must have unusually long
1049: disk lifetimes, or their disks must be on the verge of rapidly dissipating.
1050:
1051:
1052:
1053:
1054:
1055:
1056:
1057:
1058:
1059: \subsection{Spatial Distributions of SED Classes}
1060: \label{sec:spatial}
1061:
1062: In the previous section, we investigated the dependence of the disk
1063: fraction in Chamaeleon~I on stellar mass. We now consider the
1064: spatial distribution of disk-bearing stars, which may provide additional
1065: insight into disk evolution.
1066:
1067: As shown in Table~\ref{tab:class}, the southern subcluster exhibits
1068: a slightly higher disk fraction and contains more class~I and flat-spectrum
1069: sources than the northern subcluster, which suggests that the southern
1070: population is slightly less evolved. A small age difference of this kind is
1071: also implied by the H-R diagrams of the two subclusters
1072: and the relative levels of extinction \citep{luh07cha}.
1073: The spatial distributions of the members of Chamaeleon~I within the
1074: {\it Spitzer} images are compared in the maps in Figure~\ref{fig:mapclass}
1075: according to their SED classes.
1076: Because the protostellar population of Chamaeleon~I is smaller than ones
1077: in younger and richer star-forming regions, the distribution of class~I
1078: and flat-spectrum sources in Figure~\ref{fig:mapclass} is not particularly
1079: informative. We simply find that they are highly clustered and are concentrated
1080: near dense molecular gas, which are typical properties of class~I objects in
1081: embedded clusters \citep{har02,lada00,lada04,teix06,mue07,all07,gut07,win07}.
1082:
1083: The large samples of class~II and III members are more amenable to a
1084: detailed comparison than the class~I and flat-spectrum objects.
1085: In Figure~\ref{fig:mapclass}, we find that the
1086: distributions of these two classes are indistinguishable in the southern
1087: subcluster, but differ significantly in the northern one.
1088: In comparison, \citet{dam07} concluded that stars with disks share the same
1089: distribution as diskless stars in both subclusters. They did not detect
1090: the difference in the distributions of classes II and III in the northern
1091: subcluster because their sample of members was three times smaller and
1092: was less complete for class~III objects than the one we are considering.
1093: The wider class~III distribution in the north can be explained as a
1094: combination of the segregation of northern low-mass stars to larger radii
1095: \citep{luh07cha} and the lower disk fraction of low-mass stars
1096: relative to solar-type stars (Figure~\ref{fig:diskfraction}).
1097:
1098:
1099:
1100:
1101:
1102: \subsection{Transitional Disks}
1103:
1104: As mentioned in \S~\ref{sec:sed}, transitional disks are characterized
1105: by the presence of large inner holes and gaps. These disks are noteworthy
1106: because their holes may represent evidence of forming giant planets.
1107: A transitional disk is identified through the shape of its SED, which
1108: exhibits photospheric colors at shorter IR wavelengths followed by a sudden
1109: onset of excess emission from the disk at longer wavelengths.
1110: In \S~\ref{sec:sed}, we classified T11, CHXR~22E, CHXR~71, and possibly
1111: CHXR~76 as transitional disks because their spectral slopes showed excess
1112: emission at 24~\micron\ but not at $\leq8$~\micron. The distinctive SEDs
1113: of these stars are also illustrated in the color-color diagram
1114: in Figure~\ref{fig:14}, where they have colors of $[3.6]-[8.0]\sim0.2$ and
1115: $[3.6]-[24]>1$. The transitional disk for T11 (also known as CS~Cha)
1116: has already been studied in detail through mid-IR spectroscopy with
1117: {\it Spitzer} \citep{esp07a}.
1118: Meanwhile, a few other cluster members, such as C7-1 and T35, exhibit excess
1119: emission at both 8 and 24~\micron, but the excess is smaller at 8~\micron.
1120: In other words, the spectral slopes ending at 8~\micron\ are bluer
1121: than the ones ending at 24~\micron. These stars may possess
1122: transitional disks, as previously noted by \citet{dam07}.
1123: Edge-on disks also produce redder slopes at longer wavelengths, as in
1124: Cha~J11081938$-$7731522 and ESO~H$\alpha$~569 (\S~\ref{sec:sed}).
1125: However, unlike a transitional disk, an edge-on disk makes the star
1126: appear much fainter at optical and near-IR wavelengths than unocculted
1127: stars at the same spectral type, which is not the case for stars
1128: discussed in this section.
1129:
1130: \subsection{Disk Variability}
1131:
1132: Our {\it Spitzer} survey has produced high-precision
1133: mid-IR photometry at multiple epochs for a large fraction of a young
1134: stellar population. As a result, we have a rare opportunity to characterize
1135: the variability of young stars and brown dwarfs at mid-IR wavelengths.
1136:
1137: We have measured photometry at multiple epochs for 27, 30, 70, and 61 members
1138: at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0~\micron, respectively. The errors are less than
1139: 0.06~mag for 26, 29, 64, and 54 members, respectively.
1140: Fewer members have multiple measurements at shorter wavelengths because
1141: the saturation limit is fainter at 3.6 and 4.5~\micron.
1142: To quantify the variability of these data, we have computed the
1143: difference between each magnitude and the average magnitude for a given
1144: object and wavelength. We then constructed histograms of these magnitude
1145: differences, which are weighted by the inverse of the number
1146: of measurements so that all members contribute equally to the distribution.
1147: In Figure~\ref{fig:var}, the resulting histograms are shown separately for
1148: each IRAC band and for stars with and without disks.
1149: In all four bands, nearly all sources with $\Delta m>0.05$~mag have disks,
1150: which indicates that disks are responsible for these large photometric
1151: variations, either directly through fluctuations in the disk emission
1152: or indirectly through the effect of the disk on the emergent flux from
1153: the stellar photosphere. Based on Figure~\ref{fig:var},
1154: the frequency of large photometric variations appears to be similar among
1155: the four IRAC bands.
1156: A comparison of this kind between diskless and disk-bearing stars at
1157: 24~\micron\ is problematic because of the larger photometric errors,
1158: particularly for the fainter class~III sources.
1159:
1160:
1161: \section{Conclusions}
1162:
1163: We have performed a thorough census of the circumstellar disk population of the
1164: Chamaeleon~I star-forming region using mid-IR images obtained with the
1165: {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}.
1166: After analyzing most of the images that have been collected in Chamaeleon~I
1167: with IRAC (3.6-8~\micron) and MIPS (24~\micron) onboard {\it Spitzer},
1168: we have searched for new disk-bearing members of the cluster
1169: by identifying sources with red colors in these data. Through spectroscopy
1170: of a small sample of the resulting candidates, we have confirmed the
1171: membership of four objects, which we classify as M4, M6, M7.5, and L0.
1172: The first three sources are located in highly embedded areas ($A_J\sim5$)
1173: near known protostars, indicating that they may be among the youngest
1174: low-mass members of the cluster.
1175: The L0 source is the coolest known member of Chamaeleon~I and has a mass
1176: of 0.004-0.01~$M_\odot$ according to the luminosities predicted by
1177: theoretical evolutionary models \citep{bur97,cha00}, making it the
1178: least massive brown dwarf for which a disk has been reliably detected.
1179: With the exception of stars with edge-on disks, our survey demonstrates
1180: that the current census of disk-bearing members of Chamaeleon~I is complete
1181: at stellar masses for areas covered by all four bands of IRAC, which
1182: encompass most of the cloud. At faint magnitudes that correspond to
1183: substellar cluster members, the {\it Spitzer} images detect hundreds of red
1184: sources. Most of these objects are probably galaxies, but we have
1185: identified a sample of the most promising candidate members,
1186: which include possible low-mass companions and protostellar sources.
1187:
1188: We have presented a tabulation of IRAC and MIPS photometry for 191 and 144
1189: known members of Chamaeleon~I, respectively. We have used these data to
1190: classify the SEDs of the 203 members that are encompassed by the IRAC and
1191: MIPS images and that are detected by IRAC (i.e., excluding the protostar
1192: Cha-MMS1), arriving at 4, 10, 94, and 95 members
1193: that are class~I, flat spectrum, class~II, and class~III, respectively.
1194: The disk fraction (I+flat+II/I+flat+II+III) is roughly constant at
1195: $\sim50$\% from 0.01 to 0.3~$M_\odot$, which closely resembles measurements
1196: in IC~348. The disk fraction in Chamaeleon~I increases with higher stellar
1197: masses to a value of $\sim65$\% at 1-2~$M_\odot$, whereas disks in IC~348 are
1198: much less common in this mass range ($\sim20$\%).
1199: Because the two clusters have the same
1200: age, this comparison indicates that solar-type stars in Chamaeleon~I have
1201: longer disk lifetimes than their counterparts in IC~348. The high stellar
1202: density of the more massive stars in IC~348 may have contributed to
1203: their shorter disk lifetimes.
1204: We have also examined the spatial distribution of disk-bearing members of
1205: Chamaeleon~I. The distributions of classes II and III are similar in
1206: the southern subcluster, while the class~III sources have a wider
1207: distribution in the northern one. We interpret the relative distributions
1208: in the north as a reflection of the segregation of low-mass stars to larger
1209: radii in the northern subcluster \citep{luh07cha} combined with the lower
1210: disk fraction of low-mass stars relative to members at higher masses.
1211: Finally, we have identified possible transitional disks around several
1212: cluster members, and have used our multi-epoch measurements to demonstrate that
1213: stars with disks exhibit greater mid-IR variability than diskless stars.
1214:
1215: \acknowledgements
1216:
1217: We thank Eric Feigelson for comments on the manuscript
1218: and Gus Muench for helpful discussions.
1219: K.~L. and P.~A. were supported by grant AST-0544588 from the National Science
1220: Foundation. This publication makes use of data products from 2MASS, which
1221: is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared
1222: Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded
1223: by NASA and the NSF.
1224:
1225: \appendix
1226:
1227: \section{Membership of Young Stars Surrounding the Chamaeleon~I Cloud}
1228: \label{sec:app}
1229:
1230: \citet{fri98} demonstrated that the stars in the vicinity of Chamaeleon~I
1231: consist of two kinematic subgroups: a rich group of young stars
1232: associated with the Chamaeleon~I cloud, and a more dispersed, older group
1233: with larger motion. The latter has been referred to as the $\epsilon$~Cha
1234: group \citep{mam00} because it is centered on $\epsilon$~Cha and
1235: the Herbig Ae star HD~104237. The group appears to have an age of
1236: $\sim6$~Myr and a distance of $d\simeq114$~pc \citep{fei03,luh04eta}.
1237: Proper motions with accuracies of $\sim$5 mas/yr (e.g., UCAC2) are
1238: sufficient for distinguishing between the two populations.
1239: Therefore, to clarify the membership status of the young stars at distances of
1240: $\sim1$-3$\arcdeg$ from the center of the Chamaeleon~I cloud
1241: \citep{cov97,luh07cha}, we compare their proper
1242: motions to those of Chamaeleon~I and the $\epsilon$~Cha group.
1243:
1244: The median proper motion for the 61 of the 226 sources in the census of
1245: Chamaeleon~I from \citet{luh07cha} that have UCAC2 proper
1246: motions \citep{zac04} is $\mu_{\alpha}, \mu_{\delta}= -21$, +2~mas/yr.
1247: The median proper motion of the members of the $\epsilon$~Cha
1248: group proposed by \citet{mam00} and \citet{zs04} is
1249: $\mu_{\alpha}, \mu_{\delta}=-40$, $-$7 mas/yr. The uncertainties in
1250: these median proper motions are at the level of $\sim$1~mas/yr.
1251: We first consider the eight young stars from \citet{cov97} that are
1252: within $3\arcdeg$ from Chamaeleon~I.
1253: The UCAC2 proper motions of RX~J1108.8$-$7519A and B and RX~J1129.2$-$7546
1254: are consistent with membership in Chamaeleon~I. \citet{mam00} classified
1255: RX~J1158.5$-$7754A (= DW~Cha) as a member of the $\epsilon$~Cha group,
1256: and we assume that its companion (for which a reliable proper motion
1257: is not available) is a member of that group as well.
1258: RX~J1150.4$-$7704 was classified as a ``Cha-Near" member by
1259: \citet[][``Cha-Near" is ostensibly the same as the $\epsilon$ Cha group]{zs04},
1260: and the UCAC2 proper motion corroborates membership in the $\epsilon$~Cha
1261: group. The UCAC2 proper motion for RX~J1149.8$-$7850 (= DZ~Cha)
1262: also indicates membership in $\epsilon$~Cha rather than Chamaeleon~I.
1263: For the final star from \citet{cov97}, RX~J1123.2$-$7924,
1264: the proper motion from \citet{duc06} is inconsistent with
1265: both Chamaeleon~I and $\epsilon$ Cha. However, RX~J1123.2$-$7924
1266: was incorrectly matched to 2MASS~J11231052$-$7924434 in \citet{duc06}.
1267: By examining the finder chart from \citet{alc95},
1268: we find that RX~J1123.2$-$7924 is instead 2MASS~J11225562$-$7924438.
1269: The UCAC2 proper motion for
1270: this star is $\mu_{\alpha}, \mu_{\delta}=-32$, $-$12 mas/yr
1271: (errors of 6 mas/yr in each component). Thus, we classify it is a likely
1272: member of $\epsilon$~Cha. We also have examined the proper motions of
1273: young stars from \citet{luh07cha} that are between $\epsilon$~Cha
1274: and the Chamaeleon~I cloud.
1275: Using proper motions from UCAC2 and from available optical and IR sky surveys,
1276: we find that 2MASS~J11183572$-$7935548, 2MASS~J11432669$-$7804454,
1277: 2MASS~J11404967$-$7459394, and 2MASS~J11334926$-$7618399 are more likely to
1278: be members of $\epsilon$~Cha than Chamaeleon~I.
1279: Other young stars from \citet{luh07cha} that are between these two
1280: populations have the proper motions that indicate membership, are
1281: inconclusive, or are unavailable.
1282:
1283: We present the IRAC and MIPS data, spectral slopes, and SED classifications
1284: for the probable members of the $\epsilon$~Cha association in
1285: Tables~\ref{tab:eps} and \ref{tab:eps2}.
1286: We note that one of the $\epsilon$~Cha stars has a flat-spectrum SED,
1287: which is surprising for a population as old as $\epsilon$~Cha
1288: \citep[$\tau\sim6$~Myr,][]{luh04eta}.
1289:
1290:
1291:
1292: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1293:
1294: \bibitem[Adams et al.(1987)]{adams87}
1295: Adams, F. C., Lada, C. J., \& Shu, F. H. 1987, \apj, 213, 788
1296:
1297:
1298: \bibitem[Alcal\'a et al.(1995)]{alc95}
1299: Alcal\'a, J. M., Krautter, J., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Covino, E., Wichmann, R.,
1300: \& Mundt, R. 1995, \aaps, 114, 109
1301:
1302: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{all04}
1303: Allen, L. E., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
1304:
1305: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2007)]{all07}
1306: Allen, L. E., et al. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt,
1307: and K. Keil (eds.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 361
1308:
1309: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2007)]{allen07}
1310: Allen, P. R., Luhman, K. L., Myers, P. C., Megeath, S. T., Allen, L. E.,
1311: Hartmann, L., \& Fazio, G. G. 2007, \apj, 655, 1095
1312:
1313: \bibitem[Allers et al.(2006)]{all06}
1314: Allers, K. N., Kessler-Silacci, J. E., Cieza, L. A., \& Jaffe, D. T. 2006,
1315: \apj, 644, 364
1316:
1317: \bibitem[Apai et al.(2002)]{apa02}
1318: Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Henning, Th., Sterzik, M. F., Klein, R., Semenov, D.,
1319: G\"unther, E., \& Stecklum, B. 2002, \apj, 573, L115
1320:
1321:
1322:
1323: \bibitem[Assendorp et al.(1990)]{ass90}
1324: Assendorp, R., Wesselius, P. R., Prusti, T., \& Whittet, D. C. B. 1990, \mnras,
1325: 247, 624
1326:
1327: \bibitem[Bally et al.(2006)]{bal06}
1328: Bally, J., Walawender, J., Luhman, K. L., \& Fazio, G. 2006, \aj, 132, 1923
1329:
1330: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{bar98}
1331: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
1332:
1333: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(2002)]{bar02}
1334: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2002, \aap, 382, 563
1335:
1336: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu\'es et al.(2007)]{bar07}
1337: Barrado y Navascu\'es, D., et al. 2007, \apj, 664, 481
1338:
1339: \bibitem[Baud et al.(1984)]{bau84}
1340: Baud, B., et al. 1984, \apj, 278, L53
1341:
1342: \bibitem[Belloche et al.(2006)]{bel06}
1343: Belloche, A., Parise, B., van der Tak, F. F. S., Schilke, P., Leurini, S.,
1344: et al. 2006, \aap, 454, L51
1345:
1346: \bibitem[Bertout et al.(1999)]{ber99}
1347: Bertout, C., Robichon, N., \& Arenou, F. 1999, \aap, 352, 574
1348:
1349:
1350:
1351:
1352:
1353:
1354:
1355:
1356:
1357:
1358: \bibitem[Brice\~no et al.(2002)]{bri02}
1359: Brice\~{n}o, C., Luhman, K. L., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J. R., \& Kirkpatrick,
1360: J. D. 2002, \apj, 580, 317
1361:
1362: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(2003)]{bur03}
1363: Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Reid, I. N., Brown, M. E., Miskey, C. L.,
1364: \& Gizis, J. E. 2003, \apj, 586, 512
1365:
1366: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(1997)]{bur97}
1367: Burrows, A., et al. 1997, \apj, 491, 856
1368:
1369: \bibitem[Caballero et al.(2007)]{cab07}
1370: Caballero, J. A., et al. 2007, \aap, 470, 903
1371:
1372: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2002)]{cal02}
1373: Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., \& Sitko, M.
1374: 2002, \apj, 568, 1008
1375:
1376: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005)]{cal05}
1377: Calvet, N., et al. 2005, \apj, 630, L185
1378:
1379: \bibitem[Cambr\'esy et al.(1997)]{cam97}
1380: Cambr\'esy, L., Epchtein, N., Copet, E., de Batz, B., Kimeswenger, S.,
1381: Le Bertre, T., Rouan, D., \& Tiphene, D. 1997, \aap, 324, L5
1382:
1383:
1384: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2006)]{car06}
1385: Carpenter, J. M., Mamajek, E. E., Hillenbrand, L. A., \& Meyer, M. R. 2006,
1386: \apj, 651, L49
1387:
1388: \bibitem[Chabrier et al.(2000)]{cha00}
1389: Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. 2000, \apj, 542, L119
1390:
1391:
1392:
1393: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n et al.(2004)]{com04}
1394: Comer\'{o}n, F., Reipurth, B., Henry, A., \& Fern\'{a}ndez, M. 2004, \aap, 417,
1395: 583
1396:
1397:
1398: \bibitem[Covino et al.(1997)]{cov97}
1399: Covino, E., Alcal\'a, J. M., Allain, S., Bouvier, J., Terranegra, L., \&
1400: Krautter, J. 1997, \aap, 328, 187
1401:
1402:
1403: \bibitem[Dahm \& Hillenbrand(2007)]{dahm07}
1404: Dahm, S. E., \& Hillenbrand, L. A. 2007, \aj, 133, 2072
1405:
1406: \bibitem[Dahn et al.(2002)]{dah02}
1407: Dahn, C. C., et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 1170
1408:
1409: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005)]{dal05}
1410: D'Alessio, P., et al. 2005, \apj, 621, 461
1411:
1412: \bibitem[Damjanov et al.(2007)]{dam07}
1413: Damjanov, I., Jayawardhana, R., Scholz, A., Ahmic, M., Nguyey, D. C.,
1414: Brandeker, A., \& van Kerkwijk, M. H. 2007, \apj, in press
1415:
1416:
1417:
1418: \bibitem[Ducourant et al.(2006)]{duc06}
1419: Ducourant, C., et al. 2006, \aap, 448, 1235
1420:
1421:
1422: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2007)]{eng07}
1423: Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, \pasp, 119, 994
1424:
1425:
1426: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007a)]{esp07a}
1427: Espaillat, C., et al. 2007a, \apj, 664, L111
1428:
1429: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007b)]{esp07b}
1430: Espaillat, C., et al. 2007b, \apj, 670, L135
1431:
1432: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004a)]{faz04a}
1433: Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004a, \apjs, 154, 10
1434:
1435: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004b)]{faz04b}
1436: Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004b, \apjs, 154, 39
1437:
1438: \bibitem[Feigelson \& Lawson(2004)]{fl04}
1439: Feigelson, E. D., \& Lawson, W. A. 2004, \apj, 614, 267
1440:
1441: \bibitem[Feigelson et al.(2003)]{fei03}
1442: Feigelson, E. D., Lawson, W. A., \& Garmire, G. P. 2003, \apj, 599, 1207
1443:
1444:
1445: \bibitem[Flaherty et al.(2007)]{fla07}
1446: Flaherty, K. M., Pipher, J. L., Megeath, S. T., Winston, E. M.,
1447: Gutermuth, R. A., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L. E., \& Fazio, G. G. 2007, \apj, 663,
1448: 1069
1449:
1450: \bibitem[Frink et al.(1998)]{fri98}
1451: Frink, S., Roeser, S., Alcal\'a, J. M., Covino, E., \& Brandner, W. 1998, \aap,
1452: 338, 442
1453:
1454: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2007)]{fur07}
1455: Furlan, E., et al. 2007, \apj, 644, 1176
1456:
1457:
1458:
1459: \bibitem[Gizis et al.(2002)]{giz02}
1460: Gizis, J. E., Reid, I. N., \& Hawley, S. L. 2002, \aj, 123, 3356
1461:
1462: \bibitem[Glass(1979)]{glass79}
1463: Glass, I. S. 1979, \mnras, 187, 305
1464:
1465: \bibitem[G\'{o}mez \& Kenyon(2001)]{gk01}
1466: G\'{o}mez, M., \& Kenyon, S. J. 2001, \aj, 121, 974
1467:
1468:
1469:
1470: \bibitem[Greene et al.(1994)]{gre94}
1471: Greene, T. P., Wilking, B. A., Andr\'{e}, P., Young, E. T., \& Lada, C. J.
1472: 1994, \apj, 434, 614
1473:
1474: \bibitem[Guieu et al.(2007)]{gui07}
1475: Guieu, S., et al. 2007, \aap, 465, 855
1476:
1477: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2004)]{gut04}
1478: Gutermuth, R. A., Megeath, S. T., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L. E., Pipher, J. L.,
1479: Myers, P. C., \& Fazio, G. G. 2004, \apjs, 154, 374
1480:
1481: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2007)]{gut07}
1482: Gutermuth, R. A., et al. 2007, \apj, in press
1483:
1484:
1485:
1486:
1487: \bibitem[Hartmann(2002)]{har02}
1488: Hartmann, L. 2002, \apj, 578, 914
1489:
1490: \bibitem[Hartmann, Ballesteros-Paredes, \& Bergin(2001)]{har01}
1491: Hartmann, L., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., \& Bergin, E. 2001, \apj, 562, 852
1492:
1493: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{har05}
1494: Hartmann, L., Megeath, S. T., Allen, L., Luhman, K., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P.,
1495: Franco-Hernandez, R., \& Fazio, G. 2005, \apj, 629, 881
1496:
1497:
1498: \bibitem[Harvey et al.(2006)]{har06}
1499: Harvey, P. M., et al. 2006, \apj, 644, 307
1500:
1501: \bibitem[Harvey et al.(2007)]{har07}
1502: Harvey, P. M., et al. 2007, \apj, 663, 1139
1503:
1504: \bibitem[Hern\'andez et al.(2006)]{her06}
1505: Hern\'andez, J., Brice\~{n}o, C., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Muzerolle, J., \&
1506: Quintero, A. 2006, \apj, 652, 472
1507:
1508: \bibitem[Hern\'andez et al.(2007)]{her07}
1509: Hern\'andez, J., et al. 2007, \apj, 662, 1067
1510:
1511:
1512:
1513:
1514: \bibitem[Hora et al.(2004)]{hor04}
1515: Hora, J. L., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5487, 77
1516:
1517:
1518: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(2003)]{jay03}
1519: Jayawardhana, R., Ardila, D. R., Stelzer, B., \& Haisch, K. E. 2003, \aj,
1520: 126, 1515
1521:
1522: \bibitem[J\o rgensen et al.(2006)]{jor06}
1523: J\o rgensen, J. K., et al. 2006, \apj, 645, 1246
1524:
1525: \bibitem[Kenyon \& G\'{o}mez(2001)]{kg01}
1526: Kenyon, S. J., \& G\'{o}mez, M. 2001, \aj, 121, 2673
1527:
1528: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick(2005)]{kir05}
1529: Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2005, \araa, 43, 195
1530:
1531: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick et al.(2006)]{kir06}
1532: Kirkpatrick, J. D., Barman, T. S., Burgasser, A. J., McGovern, M. R.,
1533: McLean, I. S., Tinney, C. G., \& Lowrance, P. J. 2006, \apj, 639, 1120
1534:
1535: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick et al.(1999)]{kir99}
1536: Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 1999, \apj, 519, 802
1537:
1538: \bibitem[Lada(1987)]{lada87}
1539: Lada, C. J. 1987, in IAU Symp. 115, Star Forming Regions, ed. M. Peimbert \&
1540: J. Jugaku (Dordrecht: Reidel), 1
1541:
1542: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2000)]{lada00}
1543: Lada, C. J., Muench, A. A., Haisch, K. E., Lada, E. A., Alves, J. F.,
1544: Tollestrup, E. V., \& Willner, S. P. 2000, \apj, 120, 3162
1545:
1546: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2004)]{lada04}
1547: Lada, C. J., Muench, A. A., Lada, E. A., \& Alves, J. F. 2004, \aj, 128, 1254
1548:
1549: \bibitem[Lada \& Wilking(1984)]{lw84}
1550: Lada, C. J., \& Wilking, B. A. 1984, \apj, 287, 610
1551:
1552: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{lada06}
1553: Lada, C. J., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1574
1554:
1555: \bibitem[Landsman et al.(1993)]{lan93}
1556: Landsman, W.B. 1993, ASP Conf. Ser. 52: Astronomical Data Analysis Software
1557: and Systems II, 52, 246
1558:
1559:
1560:
1561:
1562: \bibitem[Lehtinen et al.(2001)]{leh01}
1563: Lehtinen, K., Haikala, L. K., Mattila, K., \& Lemke, D. 2001, \aap, 367 311
1564:
1565:
1566:
1567:
1568: \bibitem[Lucas et al.(2001)]{luc01}
1569: Lucas, P. W., Roche, P. F., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2001,
1570: \mnras, 326, 695
1571:
1572:
1573:
1574:
1575: \bibitem[Luhman(1999)]{luh99}
1576: Luhman, K. L. 1999, \apj, 525, 466
1577:
1578: \bibitem[Luhman(2004a)]{luh04cha}
1579: Luhman, K. L. 2004a, \apj, 602, 816
1580:
1581:
1582: \bibitem[Luhman(2004b)]{luh04eta}
1583: Luhman, K. L. 2004b, \apj, 616, 1033
1584:
1585: \bibitem[Luhman(2004c)]{luh04tau}
1586: Luhman, K. L. 2004c, \apj, 617, 1216
1587:
1588: \bibitem[Luhman(2007)]{luh07cha}
1589: Luhman, K. L. 2007, \apjs, 173, 104
1590:
1591: \bibitem[Luhman(2008)]{luh08cha}
1592: Luhman, K. L. 2008, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, ASP Conference Series,
1593: submitted
1594:
1595:
1596: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005c)]{luh05cha}
1597: Luhman, K. L., Adame, L., D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Megeath,
1598: S. T., \& Fazio, G. G. 2005c, \apj, 635, L93
1599:
1600: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005a)]{luh05ots}
1601: Luhman, K. L., D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Allen, L. E., Hartmann, L.,
1602: Megeath, S. T. Myers, P. C., \& Fazio, G. G. 2005a, \apj, 620, L51
1603:
1604: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2004)]{luh04ots}
1605: Luhman, K. L., Peterson, D. E., \& Megeath, S. T. 2004, \apj, 617, 565
1606:
1607:
1608:
1609: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{luh03ic}
1610: Luhman, K. L., Stauffer, J. R., Muench, A. A., Rieke, G. H., Lada, E. A.,
1611: Bouvier, J., \& Lada, C. J. 2003, \apj, 593, 1093
1612:
1613: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2006)]{luh06tau2}
1614: Luhman, K. L., Whitney, B. A., Meade, M. R., Babler, B. L., Indebetouw, R.,
1615: Bracker, S., \& Churchwell, E. B. 2006, \apj, 647, 1180
1616:
1617:
1618: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005b)]{luh05frac}
1619: Luhman, K. L., et al. 2005b, \apj, 631, L69
1620:
1621:
1622: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(2000)]{mam00}
1623: Mamajek, E., Lawson, W. A., \& Feigelson, E. D. 2000, \apj, 544, 356
1624:
1625: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2005)]{meg05}
1626: Megeath, S. T., Hartmann, L., Luhman, K. L., \& Fazio, G. G. 2005, \apj, 634,
1627: L113
1628:
1629: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{meg04}
1630: Megeath, S. T., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 367
1631:
1632:
1633: \bibitem[Mohanty et al.(2005)]{moh05}
1634: Mohanty, S., Jayawardhana, R., \& Basri, G. 2005, \apj, 626, 498
1635:
1636: \bibitem[Muench et al.(2007)]{mue07}
1637: Muench, A. A., Lada, C. J., Luhman, K. L., Muzerolle, J., \& Young, E. 2007,
1638: \aj, 134, 411
1639:
1640: \bibitem[Muench et al.(2003)]{mue03}
1641: Muench, A. A., et al. 2003, \aj, 125, 2029
1642:
1643: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2005)]{muz05}
1644: Muzerolle, J., Luhman, K. L., Brice\~{n}o, C., Hartmann, L., \& Calvet, N.
1645: 2005, \apj, 625, 906
1646:
1647: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2004)]{muz04}
1648: Muzerolle, J., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 379
1649:
1650: \bibitem[Natta \& Testi(2001)]{nt01}
1651: Natta, A., \& Testi, L. 2001, \aap, 376, L22
1652:
1653:
1654: \bibitem[Nordh et al.(1996)]{nor96}
1655: Nordh, L., et al. 1996, \aap, 315, L185
1656:
1657:
1658:
1659:
1660:
1661:
1662:
1663:
1664: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2001)]{per01}
1665: Persi, P., Marenzi, A. R., G\'{o}mez, M., \& Olofsson, G. 2001, \aap, 376, 907
1666:
1667: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2000)]{per00}
1668: Persi, P., et al. 2000, \aap, 357, 219
1669:
1670: \bibitem[Pipher et al.(2004)]{pip04}
1671: Pipher, J. L., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5487, 234
1672:
1673: \bibitem[Porras et al.(2007)]{por07}
1674: Porras, A., et al. 2007, \apj, 656, 493
1675:
1676:
1677: \bibitem[Prusti et al.(1991)]{pru91}
1678: Prusti, T., Clark, F. O., Whittet, D. C. B., Laureijs, R. J., \& Zhang, C. Y.
1679: 1991, \mnras, 251, 303
1680:
1681:
1682: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2005)]{rea05}
1683: Reach, W. T., et al. 2005, \pasp, 117, 978
1684:
1685: \bibitem[Rebull et al.(2007)]{reb07}
1686: Rebull, L. M., et al. 2007, \apjs, 171, 447
1687:
1688:
1689:
1690: \bibitem[Reipurth et al.(1996)]{rei96}
1691: Reipurth, B., Nyman, L.-\AA., \& Chini, R. 1996, \aap, 314, 258
1692:
1693:
1694: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rie04}
1695: Rieke, G. H. et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
1696:
1697: \bibitem[Scholz \& Jayawardhana(2007)]{sch07b}
1698: Scholz, A., \& Jayawardhana, R. 2007, \apj, in press
1699:
1700: \bibitem[Scholz et al.(2007)]{sch07a}
1701: Scholz, A., Jayawardhana, R., Wood, K., Meeus, G., Stelzer, B., Walker, C.,
1702: \& O'Sullivan, M. 2007, \apj, 660, 1517
1703:
1704:
1705: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{sic06}
1706: Sicilia-Aguilar, A., et al. 2006, \apj, 638, 897
1707:
1708:
1709:
1710: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06}
1711: Skrutskie, M., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
1712:
1713:
1714:
1715: \bibitem[Stelzer et al.(2004)]{stel04}
1716: Stelzer, B., Micela, G., \& Neuh\"{a}user, R. 2004, \aap, 423, 1029
1717:
1718: \bibitem[Teixeira et al.(2006)]{teix06}
1719: Teixeira, P. S., et al. 2006, \apj, 636, L45
1720:
1721:
1722: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{wer04}
1723: Werner, M. W., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
1724:
1725:
1726: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1997)]{whi97}
1727: Whittet, D. C. B., Prusti, T., Franco, G. A. P., Gerakines, P. A.,
1728: Kilkenny, D., Larson, K. A., \& Wesselius, P. R. 1997, \aap, 327, 1194
1729:
1730:
1731: \bibitem[Wichmann et al.(1998)]{wic98}
1732: Wichmann, R., Bastian, U., Krautter, J., Jankovics, I., \& Ruci\'nski, S. M.
1733: 1998, \mnras, 301, L39
1734:
1735: \bibitem[Winston et al.(2007)]{win07}
1736: Winston, E., et al. 2007, \apj, 669, 493
1737:
1738: \bibitem[Young et al.(2005)]{you05}
1739: Young, K. E., et al. 2005, \apj, 628, 283
1740:
1741: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2004)]{zac04}
1742: Zacharias, N., Urban, S. E., Zacharias, M. I., Wycoff, G. L., Hall, D. M.,
1743: Monet, D. G., \& Rafferty, T. J., 2004, \aj, 127, 3043
1744:
1745: \bibitem[Zapatero Osorio et al.(2007)]{zap07}
1746: Zapatero Osorio, M. R., et al. 2007, \aap, 472, L9
1747:
1748: \bibitem[Zuckerman \& Song(2004)]{zs04}
1749: Zuckerman, B., \& Song, I. 2004, \araa, 42, 685
1750:
1751: \end{thebibliography}
1752:
1753: \clearpage
1754:
1755: \LongTables
1756:
1757: \begin{deluxetable}{rrcclrrl}
1758: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1759: \tablewidth{0pt}
1760: \tablecaption{IRAC Observing Log\label{tab:iraclog}}
1761: \tablehead{
1762: \colhead{} &
1763: \colhead{} &
1764: \colhead{3.6/5.8 Center} &
1765: \colhead{4.5/8.0 Center} &
1766: \colhead{Dimensions} &
1767: \colhead{Angle\tablenotemark{a}} &
1768: \colhead{Exp Time\tablenotemark{b}} &
1769: \colhead{Date} \\
1770: \colhead{AOR} &
1771: \colhead{PID} &
1772: \colhead{(J2000)} &
1773: \colhead{(J2000)} &
1774: \colhead{(arcmin)} &
1775: \colhead{(deg)} &
1776: \colhead{(s)} &
1777: \colhead{(UT)}
1778: }
1779: \startdata
1780: 6526208 & 36 & 11 08 46 $-$77 37 19 & 11 06 45 $-$77 39 37 & 20 $\times$ 15 & 72 & 968 & 2004 Feb 19 \\
1781: 5662720 & 173 & 11 02 59 $-$77 36 25 & 11 01 38 $-$77 31 09 & 13 $\times$ 7 & 142 & 20.8 HDR & 2004 May 1 \\
1782: 5663232 & 173 & 11 24 06 $-$79 27 30 & 11 22 21 $-$79 22 40 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 135 & 20.8 HDR & 2004 May 1 \\
1783: & & 11 17 50 $-$80 31 00 & 11 15 56 $-$80 26 09 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 135 & 20.8 HDR & \\
1784: 5663744 & 173 & 11 50 46 $-$77 07 50 & 11 49 55 $-$77 01 33 & 12 $\times$ 6 & 148 & 20.8 HDR & 2004 May 26 \\
1785: & & 12 05 00 $-$77 34 30 & 12 04 04 $-$77 28 30 & 12 $\times$ 6 & 148 & 20.8 HDR & \\
1786: & & 12 17 30 $-$77 56 30 & 12 16 28 $-$77 50 40 & 12 $\times$ 6 & 148 & 20.8 HDR & \\
1787: 3960320 & 37 & 11 07 44 $-$77 34 46 & 11 07 48 $-$77 28 03 & 33 $\times$ 29 & 3 & 20.8 HDR & 2004 Jun 6 \\
1788: 5663488 & 173 & 11 58 52 $-$77 58 00 & 11 58 28 $-$77 51 15 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 170 & 20.8 HDR & 2004 Jun 6 \\
1789: & & 11 49 48 $-$78 54 10 & 11 49 25 $-$78 47 23 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 170 & 20.8 HDR & \\
1790: 3651328 & 6 & 11 09 26 $-$76 36 26 & 11 10 16 $-$76 30 20 & 33 $\times$ 29 & 28 & 20.8 HDR & 2004 Jul 4 \\
1791: 5105920 & 139 & 11 02 02 $-$77 42 47 & 11 03 01 $-$77 36 43 & 19 $\times$ 10 & 120 & 41.6 & 2004 Jul 4 \\
1792: 5662976 & 173 & 11 08 15 $-$75 21 43 & 11 09 25 $-$75 16 38 & 12 $\times$ 6 & 43 & 20.8 HDR & 2004 Jul 21 \\
1793: & & 11 28 41 $-$75 49 00 & 11 29 49 $-$75 43 35 & 12 $\times$ 6 & 43 & 20.8 HDR & \\
1794: & & 11 10 16 $-$76 47 22 & 11 11 35 $-$76 42 16 & 12 $\times$ 6 & 43 & 20.8 HDR & \\
1795: 3955968 & 36 & 11 06 41 $-$77 39 09 & 11 08 47 $-$77 37 55 & 20 $\times$ 15 & 80 & 968 & 2004 Sep 2 \\
1796: 12620032 & 36 & 11 10 38 $-$76 34 35 & 11 09 23 $-$76 29 21 & 25 $\times$ 15 & 131 & 968 & 2005 May 9 \\
1797: 12620544 & 36 & 11 02 00 $-$77 35 17 & 11 00 43 $-$77 29 58 & 12 $\times$ 5 & 144 & 52 & 2005 May 9 \\
1798: 18373888 & 30540 & 11 18 24 $-$79 39 16 & 11 18 50 $-$79 32 34 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 12 & 52 & 2006 Jul 6 \\
1799: 18373376 & 30540 & 11 02 12 $-$75 06 00 & 11 02 41 $-$74 59 26 & 12 $\times$ 5 & 18 & 10.4 & 2006 Jul 7 \\
1800: 18366720 & 30540 & 11 12 07 $-$77 18 08 & 11 12 41 $-$77 11 37 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 18 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1801: 18366976 & 30540 & 11 01 14 $-$77 21 38 & 11 01 54 $-$77 15 10 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 18 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1802: 18367232 & 30540 & 11 12 16 $-$76 56 50 & 11 12 50 $-$76 50 19 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 19 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1803: 18367488 & 30540 & 11 19 44 $-$75 08 11 & 11 20 12 $-$75 01 37 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1804: 18367744 & 30540 & 11 03 53 $-$76 16 03 & 11 04 30 $-$76 09 35 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1805: 18368000 & 30540 & 11 06 17 $-$76 28 37 & 11 06 52 $-$76 22 08 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 19 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1806: 18368256 & 30540 & 11 06 47 $-$76 14 12 & 11 07 22 $-$76 07 43 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 19 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1807: 18368512 & 30540 & 11 07 30 $-$76 18 33 & 11 08 05 $-$76 12 04 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 19 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1808: 18368768 & 30540 & 11 14 11 $-$77 36 20 & 11 14 45 $-$77 29 50 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1809: 18369024 & 30540 & 11 17 23 $-$76 49 37 & 11 17 54 $-$76 43 04 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 19 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1810: 18369280 & 30540 & 11 00 55 $-$77 25 52 & 11 01 35 $-$77 19 27 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1811: 18369536 & 30540 & 10 57 46 $-$77 15 04 & 10 58 28 $-$77 08 38 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1812: 18369792 & 30540 & 11 09 13 $-$77 02 34 & 11 09 48 $-$76 56 04 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1813: 18370048 & 30540 & 11 18 20 $-$76 46 20 & 11 18 50 $-$76 39 48 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1814: 18370304 & 30540 & 11 19 29 $-$76 26 52 & 11 19 59 $-$76 20 16 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1815: 18370816 & 30540 & 11 24 00 $-$76 34 02 & 11 24 27 $-$76 27 27 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1816: 18371072 & 30540 & 11 43 19 $-$78 08 08 & 11 43 39 $-$78 01 24 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 9 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1817: 18371328 & 30540 & 11 40 42 $-$75 03 00 & 11 41 00 $-$74 56 19 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 12 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1818: 18371584 & 30540 & 11 07 23 $-$75 56 08 & 11 07 57 $-$75 49 40 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1819: 18371840 & 30540 & 11 24 18 $-$75 57 42 & 11 24 45 $-$75 51 07 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1820: 18372096 & 30540 & 11 33 39 $-$76 22 00 & 11 34 03 $-$76 15 20 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1821: 18372352 & 30540 & 11 33 13 $-$76 25 33 & 11 33 37 $-$76 18 50 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1822: 18372608 & 30540 & 11 06 44 $-$75 34 11 & 11 07 18 $-$75 27 44 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 19 & 134 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1823: 18372864 & 30540 & 11 02 03 $-$75 40 11 & 11 02 39 $-$75 33 44 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1824: 18373120 & 30540 & 10 52 19 $-$74 43 39 & 10 52 58 $-$74 37 20 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 23 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1825: 18373632 & 30540 & 11 05 45 $-$75 10 39 & 11 06 19 $-$75 04 10 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1826: 18374400 & 30540 & 11 02 24 $-$77 27 40 & 11 03 03 $-$77 21 12 & 13 $\times$ 6 & 20 & 52 & 2006 Jul 10 \\
1827: \enddata
1828: \tablenotetext{a}{Position angle of the long axis of the maps.}
1829: \tablenotetext{b}{Total exposure time for each position and filter.
1830: ``HDR" indicates that 0.4~s exposures were also obtained.}
1831: \end{deluxetable}
1832:
1833: \begin{deluxetable}{rrclrrl}
1834: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1835: \tablewidth{0pt}
1836: \tablecaption{MIPS 24~\micron\ Observing Log\label{tab:mipslog}}
1837: \tablehead{
1838: \colhead{} &
1839: \colhead{} &
1840: \colhead{Center} &
1841: \colhead{Dimensions} &
1842: \colhead{Angle\tablenotemark{a}} &
1843: \colhead{Exp Time} &
1844: \colhead{Date} \\
1845: \colhead{AOR} &
1846: \colhead{PID} &
1847: \colhead{(J2000)} &
1848: \colhead{(arcmin)} &
1849: \colhead{(deg)} &
1850: \colhead{(s)} &
1851: \colhead{(UT)}
1852: }
1853: \startdata
1854: 5706752 & 173 & 11 09 13 $-$77 29 10 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 55 & 220 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
1855: & & 11 12 09 $-$77 21 22 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 55 & 480 & \\
1856: & & 11 07 00 $-$77 32 30 & 7 $\times$ 6 & 55 & 160 & \\
1857: 4549376 & 72 & 11 58 29 $-$77 54 29 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 61 & 280 & 2004 Feb 22 \\
1858: & & 12 01 46 $-$77 47 39 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 61 & 600 & \\
1859: 5707008 & 173 & 11 10 52 $-$76 44 20 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 115 & 140 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
1860: & & 11 14 15 $-$76 48 39 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 115 & 360 & \\
1861: 9410304 & 139 & 11 02 31 $-$77 39 46 & 17 $\times$ 8 & 28 & 37 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
1862: & & 11 06 09 $-$77 44 34 & 13 $\times$ 10 & 118 & 500 & \\
1863: 3661312 & 6 & 11 10 31 $-$76 35 30 & 56 $\times$ 32 & 119 & 80 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
1864: 5686784 & 173 & 11 02 24 $-$77 33 33 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 15 & 37 & 2004 Jun 22 \\
1865: & & 11 01 41 $-$77 45 45 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 15 & 31 & \\
1866: 5687296 & 173 & 11 12 24 $-$76 37 07 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 29 & 37 & 2004 Jul 8 \\
1867: & & 11 10 53 $-$76 48 22 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 29 & 120 & \\
1868: 5200128 & 148 & 11 11 45 $-$76 20 10 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 53 & 73 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
1869: & & 11 09 07 $-$76 28 24 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 53 & 240 & \\
1870: 5687808 & 173 & 11 23 09 $-$79 25 00 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 50 & 73 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
1871: & & 11 19 55 $-$79 33 40 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 50 & 360 & \\
1872: 3962112 & 37 & 11 08 29 $-$77 30 36 & 56 $\times$ 32 & 73 & 80 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
1873: 5687040 & 173 & 11 08 54 $-$75 19 37 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 72 & 110 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
1874: & & 11 11 54 $-$75 14 46 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 72 & 360 & \\
1875: 5688576 & 173 & 11 50 30 $-$77 04 36 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 62 & 73 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
1876: & & 11 53 35 $-$76 57 50 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 62 & 360 & \\
1877: 5688064 & 173 & 11 29 14 $-$75 46 25 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 73 & 140 & 2005 Mar 6 \\
1878: & & 11 32 22 $-$75 41 53 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 73 & 360 & \\
1879: 5688320 & 173 & 11 49 46 $-$78 50 51 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 67 & 110 & 2005 Mar 6 \\
1880: & & 11 53 36 $-$78 45 19 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 67 & 360 & \\
1881: 12663040 & 37 & 11 10 10 $-$76 32 20 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 110 & 37 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
1882: & & 11 13 37 $-$76 35 27 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 110 & 120 & \\
1883: 13468416 & 248 & 11 06 39 $-$77 43 14 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 143 & 420 & 2005 May 11 \\
1884: 13472000 & 248 & 11 07 38 $-$77 35 34 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 150 & 420 & 2005 May 17 \\
1885: 21916928 & 40302 & 11 04 11 $-$76 12 50 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 155 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1886: & & 11 05 55 $-$76 23 40 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 155 & 120 & \\
1887: 21917184 & 40302 & 11 09 29 $-$76 59 20 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 153 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1888: & & 11 11 25 $-$77 09 57 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 153 & 120 & \\
1889: 21917440 & 40302 & 11 18 34 $-$76 43 07 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 151 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1890: & & 11 20 34 $-$76 53 28 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 151 & 120 & \\
1891: 21917696 & 40302 & 11 19 43 $-$76 23 36 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 151 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1892: & & 11 21 40 $-$76 33 56 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 151 & 120 & \\
1893: 21918208 & 40302 & 11 07 38 $-$75 52 56 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 154 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1894: & & 11 09 23 $-$76 03 39 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 154 & 120 & \\
1895: 21918464 & 40302 & 11 24 30 $-$75 54 27 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 150 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1896: & & 11 26 27 $-$76 04 38 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 150 & 120 & \\
1897: 21918720 & 40302 & 11 33 50 $-$76 18 43 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 147 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1898: & & 11 35 57 $-$76 28 36 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 147 & 120 & \\
1899: 21918976 & 40302 & 11 33 24 $-$76 22 12 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 147 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1900: & & 11 35 31 $-$76 32 07 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 147 & 120 & \\
1901: 21919488 & 40302 & 11 19 57 $-$75 04 57 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 152 & 120 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
1902: & & 11 21 43 $-$75 15 20 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 152 & 120 & \\
1903: 21917952 & 40302 & 11 40 49 $-$74 59 40 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 9 & 120 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
1904: & & 11 40 35 $-$75 12 09 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 9 & 120 & \\
1905: 21919232 & 40302 & 11 02 19 $-$75 37 00 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 18 & 120 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
1906: & & 11 01 32 $-$75 49 07 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 18 & 120 & \\
1907: 21919744 & 40302 & 10 52 37 $-$74 40 32 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 21 & 120 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
1908: & & 10 51 44 $-$74 52 29 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 21 & 120 & \\
1909: 21920000 & 40302 & 11 02 25 $-$75 02 44 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 18 & 120 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
1910: & & 11 01 40 $-$75 14 49 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 18 & 120 & \\
1911: 21920256 & 40302 & 11 06 00 $-$75 07 27 & 8 $\times$ 7 & 17 & 120 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
1912: & & 11 05 17 $-$75 19 37 & 8 $\times$ 5 & 17 & 120 & \\
1913: \enddata
1914: \tablenotetext{a}{Position angle of the long axis of the maps.}
1915: \end{deluxetable}
1916:
1917: \begin{deluxetable}{clllll}
1918: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1919: \tablewidth{0pt}
1920: \tablecaption{Spectroscopy Observing Log\label{tab:speclog}}
1921: \tablehead{
1922: \colhead{} &
1923: \colhead{} &
1924: \colhead{} &
1925: \colhead{} &
1926: \colhead{$\lambda$} &
1927: \colhead{} \\
1928: \colhead{Night} &
1929: \colhead{Date} &
1930: \colhead{Telescope + Instrument} &
1931: \colhead{Disperser} &
1932: \colhead{($\mu$m)} &
1933: \colhead{$\lambda/\Delta \lambda$}
1934: }
1935: \startdata
1936: 1 & 2005 Mar 23 & Gemini + GNIRS & 31.7 cross-dispersed & 1-2.5 & 2000 \\
1937: 2 & 2005 Mar 24 & Gemini + GNIRS & 31.7 cross-dispersed & 1-2.5 & 2000 \\
1938: 3 & 2006 Feb 9 & Magellan~II + LDSS-3 & VPH red grism & 0.68-1.1 & 1300 \\
1939: 4 & 2006 Feb 10 & Magellan~II + LDSS-3 & VPH red grism & 0.58-1 & 1300 \\
1940: 5 & 2006 Feb 11 & Magellan~II + LDSS-3 & VPH red grism & 0.58-1 & 1300 \\
1941: \enddata
1942: \end{deluxetable}
1943:
1944:
1945: \clearpage
1946:
1947: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllll}
1948: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1949: \tablewidth{0pt}
1950: \tablecaption{New Members of Chamaeleon I\label{tab:new}}
1951: \tablehead{
1952: \colhead{} &
1953: \colhead{} &
1954: \colhead{$T_{\rm eff}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
1955: \colhead{} &
1956: \colhead{$L_{\rm bol}$} &
1957: \colhead{Membership} &
1958: \colhead{} &
1959: \colhead{} &
1960: \colhead{} &
1961: \colhead{} \\
1962: \colhead{Name} &
1963: \colhead{Spectral Type} &
1964: \colhead{(K)} &
1965: \colhead{$A_J$} &
1966: \colhead{($L_\odot$)} &
1967: \colhead{Evidence\tablenotemark{b}} &
1968: \colhead{$J$\tablenotemark{c}} &
1969: \colhead{$H$\tablenotemark{c}} &
1970: \colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{c}} &
1971: \colhead{Night}}
1972: \startdata
1973: 2M J11062942$-$7724586 & M6$\pm$1 & 2990 & 5.6 & 0.035 & $A_V$,H$_2$O,ex & \nodata & 15.20$\pm$0.10 & 13.81$\pm$0.06 & 1 \\
1974: 2M J11070369$-$7724307 & M7.5$\pm$1 & 2795 & 4.7 & 0.020 & $A_V$,H$_2$O,ex & \nodata & 15.26$\pm$0.12 & 13.95$\pm$0.07 & 1 \\
1975: Cha J11070768$-$7626326 & L0$\pm$1 & 2200 & 0 & 0.00033 & e,ex & 17.61$\pm$0.03 & 16.80$\pm$0.03 & 15.91$\pm$0.02 & 4,5 \\
1976: 2M J11084296$-$7743500 & M4$\pm$1 & 3270 & 5.6 & 0.053 & $A_V$,e,ex & \nodata & 14.87$\pm$0.10 & 13.48$\pm$0.05 & 2 \\
1977: \enddata
1978: \tablenotetext{a}{Temperature scale from \citet{luh03ic}.
1979: For Cha J11070768$-$7626326, that scale has been extrapolated to L0.}
1980: \tablenotetext{b}{Membership in Chamaeleon is indicated by $A_V\gtrsim1$ and
1981: a position above the main sequence for the distance of Chamaeleon (``$A_V$"),
1982: strong emission lines (``e"), IR excess emission (``ex"),
1983: or the shape of the gravity-sensitive H$_2$O bands (``H$_2$O").}
1984: \tablenotetext{c}{From the 2MASS Point Source Catalog for 2M J11062942$-$7724586
1985: and 2M J11070369$-$7724307 and from the ISPI images of \citet{luh07cha} for
1986: Cha J11070768$-$7626326.}
1987: \end{deluxetable}
1988:
1989: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
1990: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1991: \tablewidth{0pt}
1992: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} Photometry for Nonmembers\label{tab:non}}
1993: \tablehead{
1994: \colhead{Name} &
1995: \colhead{[3.6]} &
1996: \colhead{[4.5]} &
1997: \colhead{[5.8]} &
1998: \colhead{[8.0]} &
1999: \colhead{[24]}
2000: }
2001: \startdata
2002: Cha J11055362$-$7638533 & 14.59$\pm$0.03 & 13.82$\pm$0.03 & 12.90$\pm$0.05 & 12.19$\pm$0.06 & 8.89$\pm$0.06 \\
2003: 2M J11081204$-$7622124 & 14.16$\pm$0.03 & 13.73$\pm$0.03 & 13.48$\pm$0.05 & 11.29$\pm$0.04 & 8.31$\pm$0.05 \\
2004: Cha J11081724$-$7631107 & 15.04$\pm$0.03 & 14.78$\pm$0.04 & 14.76$\pm$0.04 & 13.55$\pm$0.04 & \nodata \\
2005: Cha J11083029$-$7733067 & 14.49$\pm$0.03 & 14.28$\pm$0.03 & 14.33$\pm$0.04 & 13.59$\pm$0.06 & \nodata \\
2006: Cha J11084006$-$7627085 & 15.81$\pm$0.02 & 15.51$\pm$0.02 & 15.58$\pm$0.06 & 14.97$\pm$0.08 & \nodata \\
2007: 2M J11085651$-$7645154 & 12.47$\pm$0.02 & 12.48$\pm$0.02 & 12.46$\pm$0.05 & 12.34$\pm$0.08 & \nodata \\
2008: Cha J11090876$-$7626234 & 16.22$\pm$0.02 & 15.89$\pm$0.02 & 15.64$\pm$0.06 & 14.55$\pm$0.08 & 10.75$\pm$0.17 \\
2009: 2M J11105185$-$7642259 & 13.79$\pm$0.02 & 13.77$\pm$0.03 & 13.70$\pm$0.07 & 13.43$\pm$0.11 & \nodata \\
2010: 2M J11105353$-$7726389 & 12.44$\pm$0.02 & 12.38$\pm$0.02 & 12.33$\pm$0.05 & 12.29$\pm$0.05 & \nodata \\
2011: Cha J11112420$-$7637434 & 14.97$\pm$0.03 & 14.20$\pm$0.03 & 13.34$\pm$0.04 & 12.58$\pm$0.05 & 9.58$\pm$0.10 \\
2012: Cha J11114773$-$7642167 & 14.02$\pm$0.02 & 13.19$\pm$0.02 & 12.42$\pm$0.04 & 11.60$\pm$0.05 & 7.90$\pm$0.05 \\
2013: Cha J11120546$-$7631376 & 15.00$\pm$0.02 & 13.89$\pm$0.02 & 12.92$\pm$0.04 & 11.82$\pm$0.04 & 8.28$\pm$0.05 \\
2014: Cha J11130714$-$7638575 & 15.04$\pm$0.03 & 14.20$\pm$0.04 & 13.56$\pm$0.07 & 12.62$\pm$0.06 & 8.79$\pm$0.06 \\
2015: \enddata
2016: \end{deluxetable}
2017:
2018: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllll}
2019: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2020: \tablewidth{0pt}
2021: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} Photometry for Candidate Members of
2022: Chamaeleon I\label{tab:cand}}
2023: \tablehead{
2024: \colhead{Name} &
2025: \colhead{[3.6]} &
2026: \colhead{[4.5]} &
2027: \colhead{[5.8]} &
2028: \colhead{[8.0]} &
2029: \colhead{Date} &
2030: \colhead{[24]} &
2031: \colhead{Date}
2032: }
2033: \startdata
2034: 2M J11020610$-$7718079 & 13.42$\pm$0.02 & 13.10$\pm$0.02 & 12.84$\pm$0.03 & 12.34$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2035: 2M J11025374$-$7722561\tablenotemark{a} & 13.93$\pm$0.02 & 13.63$\pm$0.02 & 13.43$\pm$0.03 & 13.07$\pm$0.05 & 2006 Jul 10 & 9.80$\pm$0.07 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2036: Cha J11062788$-$7724543\tablenotemark{b,c} & 15.57$\pm$0.05 & 14.45$\pm$0.05 & 13.37$\pm$0.07 & 12.41$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.89$\pm$0.20 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2037: Cha J11062854$-$7618039 & 14.21$\pm$0.02 & 13.89$\pm$0.02 & 13.62$\pm$0.03 & 13.15$\pm$0.05 & 2006 Jul 10 & 10.27$\pm$0.15 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2038: Cha J11080397$-$7730382\tablenotemark{c} & 15.31$\pm$0.02 & 14.50$\pm$0.02 & 13.80$\pm$0.03 & 12.72$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & 7.82$\pm$0.03 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2039: & 15.28$\pm$0.03 & 14.48$\pm$0.02 & 14.03$\pm$0.08 & 12.80$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2040: 2M J11085367$-$7521359\tablenotemark{d} & 8.70$\pm$0.02 & 8.48$\pm$0.02 & 8.32$\pm$0.03 & 7.96$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 21 & 4.98$\pm$0.03 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2041: 2M J11100336$-$7633111\tablenotemark{c,e} & 12.74$\pm$0.02 & 11.98$\pm$0.02 & 11.51$\pm$0.04 & 10.94$\pm$0.08 & 2004 Jul 4 & 5.28$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2042: & 12.67$\pm$0.02 & 11.91$\pm$0.02 & 11.28$\pm$0.03 & 10.67$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & 5.33$\pm$0.10 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2043: 2M J11291470$-$7546256\tablenotemark{f} & 12.91$\pm$0.02 & 12.29$\pm$0.02 & 11.56$\pm$0.03 & 10.60$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 21 & 7.34$\pm$0.10 & 2005 Mar 6 \\
2044: \enddata
2045: \tablenotetext{a}{[LES2004] 424.}
2046: \tablenotetext{b}{$7\arcsec$ from 2M~J11062942$-$7724586.}
2047: \tablenotetext{c}{Possible class I source.}
2048: \tablenotetext{d}{$2\arcmin$ from RX~J1108.8$-$7519A and B.}
2049: \tablenotetext{e}{OTS 32. $18\arcsec$ from Hn 11.}
2050: \tablenotetext{f}{$8\arcsec$ from RX~J1129.2$-$7546.}
2051: \end{deluxetable}
2052:
2053:
2054: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllll}
2055: %\rotate
2056: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2057: \tablewidth{0pt}
2058: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} Photometry for Known Members of
2059: Chamaeleon I\label{tab:mem}}
2060: \tablehead{
2061: \colhead{2MASS\tablenotemark{a}} &
2062: \colhead{Name} &
2063: \colhead{[3.6]} &
2064: \colhead{[4.5]} &
2065: \colhead{[5.8]} &
2066: \colhead{[8.0]} &
2067: \colhead{Date} &
2068: \colhead{[24]} &
2069: \colhead{Date}
2070: }
2071: \startdata
2072: J10523694$-$7440287 & \nodata & 10.19$\pm$0.02 & 10.11$\pm$0.02 & 10.08$\pm$0.03 & 10.14$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 9.44$\pm$0.15 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
2073: J10580597$-$7711501 & \nodata & 11.70$\pm$0.02 & 11.45$\pm$0.02 & 11.26$\pm$0.03 & 10.75$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2074: J10581677$-$7717170 & T6 & sat & out & 6.41$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2075: J11011370$-$7722387 & \nodata & 11.69$\pm$0.02 & 11.61$\pm$0.02 & 11.60$\pm$0.03 & 11.56$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2076: J11011926$-$7732383 & \nodata & out & 10.87$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.77$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2004 Jun 22 \\
2077: & & 11.00$\pm$0.02 & 10.86$\pm$0.02 & 10.81$\pm$0.03 & 10.76$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2078: & & 11.00$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.78$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & & \\
2079: J11013205$-$7718249 & ESO H$\alpha$ 554 & 13.05$\pm$0.02 & 12.97$\pm$0.02 & 12.89$\pm$0.03 & 12.88$\pm$0.05 & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2080: J11021927$-$7536576 & \nodata & 10.89$\pm$0.02 & 10.79$\pm$0.02 & 10.78$\pm$0.03 & 10.80$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 10.30$\pm$0.30 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
2081: J11022491$-$7733357 & T11 & 8.15$\pm$0.02 & 8.14$\pm$0.02 & 8.03$\pm$0.03 & 7.87$\pm$0.03 & 2004 May 1 & 2.56$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2082: & & out & sat & out & 7.88$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 2.59$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 22 \\
2083: & & sat & out & 7.97$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & 2.56$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2084: J11022610$-$7502407 & \nodata & 10.55$\pm$0.02 & 10.48$\pm$0.02 & 10.41$\pm$0.05 & 10.38$\pm$0.05 & 2006 Jul 7 & 9.79$\pm$0.19 & 2007 Jul 16 \\
2085: J11023265$-$7729129 & CHXR 71 & 9.78$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.53$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 May 1 & 7.50$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2086: & & 9.78$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.50$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & & \\
2087: J11024183$-$7724245 & [LES2004] 423 & 11.20$\pm$0.02 & 11.10$\pm$0.02 & 11.05$\pm$0.03 & 11.10$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2088: J11025504$-$7721508 & T12 & 9.78$\pm$0.02 & bad & 9.20$\pm$0.03 & 8.65$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & 5.90$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2089: J11034186$-$7726520 & ISO 28 & 11.23$\pm$0.02 & 11.20$\pm$0.02 & 11.06$\pm$0.03 & 11.03$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2090: J11034764$-$7719563 & Hn 2 & 9.69$\pm$0.02 & 9.61$\pm$0.02 & 9.55$\pm$0.03 & 9.62$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.38$\pm$0.13 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2091: & & out & 9.64$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.63$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & & \\
2092: J11035682$-$7721329 & CHXR 12 & 9.63$\pm$0.02 & 9.46$\pm$0.02 & 9.37$\pm$0.03 & 9.43$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.19$\pm$0.08 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2093: J11040425$-$7639328 & CHSM 1715 & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 4.89$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2094: J11040909$-$7627193 & T14 & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 2.44$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2095: J11041060$-$7612490 & CHSM 1982 & 11.69$\pm$0.02 & 11.59$\pm$0.02 & 11.56$\pm$0.03 & 11.53$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2096: J11042275$-$7718080 & T14A & 10.06$\pm$0.02 & 9.23$\pm$0.02 & 8.25$\pm$0.03 & 6.97$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.47$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2097: J11044258$-$7741571 & ISO 52 & out & sat & out & 8.84$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 5.28$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2098: & & 9.92$\pm$0.02 & 9.71$\pm$0.02 & 9.48$\pm$0.03 & 8.93$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 5.40$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2099: & & 9.82$\pm$0.02 & 9.49$\pm$0.02 & 9.29$\pm$0.03 & 8.79$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & & \\
2100: & & sat & out & 9.60$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2101: J11045100$-$7625240 & CHXR 14N & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 9.26$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2102: J11045285$-$7625514 & CHXR 14S & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 8.66$\pm$0.08 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2103: J11045701$-$7715569 & T16 & out & 9.57$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.72$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & out & \nodata \\
2104: J11051467$-$7711290 & Hn 4 & out & 9.14$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.11$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & out & \nodata \\
2105: J11052472$-$7626209 & \nodata & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 9.98$\pm$0.21 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2106: & & & & & & & 10.49$\pm$0.11 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2107: J11054300$-$7726517 & CHXR 15 & 9.86$\pm$0.02 & 9.70$\pm$0.02 & 9.66$\pm$0.03 & 9.69$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.41$\pm$0.08 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2108: J11055261$-$7618255 & T20 & sat & out & 9.02$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & 8.77$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2109: J11055780$-$7607488 & HD 96675 & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 7.05$\pm$0.11 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2110: J11060010$-$7507252 & \nodata & 11.14$\pm$0.02 & 11.05$\pm$0.02 & 11.01$\pm$0.03 & 10.98$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2007 Jul 16 \\
2111: J11061540$-$7721567 & Ced 110-IRS2/T21 & 6.26$\pm$0.02 & 6.16$\pm$0.02 & 6.09$\pm$0.03 & 6.10$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 5.55$\pm$0.07 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2112: J11061545$-$7737501 & Cam 2-19 & sat & sat & 9.53$\pm$0.03 & 9.55$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 9.50$\pm$0.09 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2113: & & 9.76$\pm$0.02 & 9.71$\pm$0.02 & 9.58$\pm$0.03 & 9.60$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2114: & & sat & sat & 9.58$\pm$0.03 & 9.53$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2115: J11062554$-$7633418 & ESO H$\alpha$ 559 & 10.83$\pm$0.02 & 10.42$\pm$0.02 & 10.07$\pm$0.03 & 9.38$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 5.34$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2116: & & 10.64$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.90$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & & \\
2117: J11062877$-$7737331 & CHXR 73A & sat & sat & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & 9.58$\pm$0.14 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2118: & & 10.29$\pm$0.02 & 10.23$\pm$0.02 & 10.18$\pm$0.03 & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2119: & & sat & sat & 10.15$\pm$0.03 & 10.13$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2120: J11062942$-$7724586 & \nodata & 12.18$\pm$0.02 & 11.63$\pm$0.02 & 11.14$\pm$0.03 & 10.59$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.73$\pm$0.20 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2121: J11063276$-$7625210 & CHSM 7869 & out & 12.22$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.29$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & 8.57$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2122: & & 12.52$\pm$0.02 & 12.21$\pm$0.02 & 11.94$\pm$0.03 & 11.30$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 8.42$\pm$0.06 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2123: \nodata & Cha-MMS1 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.86$\pm$0.09 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2124: J11063799$-$7743090 & Cha H$\alpha$ 12 & sat & sat & 11.18$\pm$0.03 & 11.12$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 11.17$\pm$0.16 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2125: & & 11.34$\pm$0.02 & 11.25$\pm$0.02 & bad & 11.20$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 10.61$\pm$0.22 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2126: & & sat & sat & 11.17$\pm$0.03 & 11.13$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & 10.77$\pm$0.10 & 2005 May 11 \\
2127: J11063945$-$7736052 & ISO 79 & sat & sat & 10.41$\pm$0.03 & 9.78$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 6.21$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2128: & & 11.44$\pm$0.02 & 10.76$\pm$0.02 & 10.34$\pm$0.03 & 9.71$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.37$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2129: & & sat & sat & 10.36$\pm$0.03 & 9.71$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & 6.35$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 17 \\
2130: J11064180$-$7635489 & Hn 5 & 9.15$\pm$0.02 & 8.58$\pm$0.02 & 8.03$\pm$0.03 & 7.06$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 4.71$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2131: J11064346$-$7726343 & T22 & 9.10$\pm$0.02 & 9.05$\pm$0.02 & 9.00$\pm$0.03 & 9.01$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.59$\pm$0.06 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2132: J11064510$-$7727023 & CHXR 20 & 8.51$\pm$0.02 & 8.36$\pm$0.02 & 7.93$\pm$0.03 & 6.94$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 4.45$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2133: J11064658$-$7722325 & Ced 110-IRS4 & 11.12$\pm$0.06 & 10.00$\pm$0.04 & 9.34$\pm$0.03 & 8.46$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 2.10$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2134: J11065733$-$7742106 & CHXR 74 & sat & sat & 9.75$\pm$0.03 & 9.79$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 9.60$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2135: & & 9.90$\pm$0.02 & 9.81$\pm$0.02 & 9.80$\pm$0.03 & 9.74$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.57$\pm$0.11 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2136: & & sat & sat & 9.74$\pm$0.03 & 9.76$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & 9.75$\pm$0.07 & 2005 May 11 \\
2137: J11065803$-$7722488 & ISO 86 & 10.21$\pm$0.02 & 8.93$\pm$0.02 & 8.27$\pm$0.03 & 7.54$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.58$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2138: J11065906$-$7718535 & T23 & 9.84$\pm$0.02 & 9.55$\pm$0.02 & 9.19$\pm$0.03 & 8.25$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 5.25$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2139: J11065939$-$7530559 & \nodata & 12.16$\pm$0.02 & 11.88$\pm$0.02 & 11.64$\pm$0.03 & 11.06$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2140: J11070324$-$7610565 & \nodata & 12.27$\pm$0.02 & 12.15$\pm$0.02 & 12.10$\pm$0.03 & 12.13$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2141: \nodata & ESO H$\alpha$ 281 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Jul 4 & 6.93$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2142: J11070369$-$7724307 & \nodata & 12.86$\pm$0.02 & 12.35$\pm$0.02 & 11.84$\pm$0.04 & 10.99$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.26$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2143: \nodata & Cha J11070768$-$7626326 & 14.98$\pm$0.03 & 14.56$\pm$0.03 & 14.22$\pm$0.11 & 13.30$\pm$0.11 & 2004 Jul 4 & 10.43$\pm$0.18 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2144: & & out & 14.54$\pm$0.02 & out & 13.46$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2145: & & 14.93$\pm$0.02 & 14.54$\pm$0.02 & 14.02$\pm$0.06 & 13.47$\pm$0.06 & 2006 Jul 10 & & \\
2146: J11070919$-$7723049 & Ced 110-IRS6 & 7.95$\pm$0.02 & 6.92$\pm$0.02 & 6.36$\pm$0.03 & 5.50$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 1.63$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2147: J11070925$-$7718471 & ISO 91 & 10.08$\pm$0.02 & 9.54$\pm$0.02 & 9.23$\pm$0.03 & 8.44$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 5.27$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2148: J11071148$-$7746394 & CHXR 21 & sat & sat & 9.19$\pm$0.03 & 9.21$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 9.04$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2149: & & 9.34$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.23$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.50$\pm$0.07 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2150: & & & & & & & 9.08$\pm$0.05 & 2005 May 11 \\
2151: J11071181$-$7625501 & CHSM 9484 & 11.98$\pm$0.02 & 11.78$\pm$0.02 & 11.60$\pm$0.03 & 11.05$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 9.34$\pm$0.08 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2152: & & out & 11.69$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.06$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2153: & & 12.00$\pm$0.02 & 11.76$\pm$0.02 & 11.56$\pm$0.03 & 11.09$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & & \\
2154: J11071206$-$7632232 & T24 & 8.65$\pm$0.02 & 8.38$\pm$0.02 & 8.02$\pm$0.03 & 7.42$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 4.48$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2155: J11071330$-$7743498 & CHXR 22E & sat & sat & 9.36$\pm$0.03 & 9.37$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & 6.80$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2156: & & 9.60$\pm$0.02 & 9.46$\pm$0.02 & 9.40$\pm$0.03 & 9.38$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.85$\pm$0.05 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2157: & & sat & sat & 9.32$\pm$0.03 & 9.38$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & 6.91$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 11 \\
2158: J11071622$-$7723068 & ISO 97 & 9.57$\pm$0.02 & 8.84$\pm$0.02 & 8.23$\pm$0.03 & 7.47$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.83$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2159: J11071668$-$7735532 & Cha H$\alpha$ 1 & sat & sat & 10.66$\pm$0.03 & 9.61$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 6.01$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2160: & & 11.54$\pm$0.02 & 11.18$\pm$0.02 & 10.74$\pm$0.03 & 9.83$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.01$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 17 \\
2161: & & sat & sat & 10.74$\pm$0.03 & 9.78$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2162: J11071860$-$7732516 & Cha H$\alpha$ 9 & sat & sat & 10.11$\pm$0.03 & 9.59$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 7.01$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2163: & & 10.96$\pm$0.02 & 10.54$\pm$0.02 & 10.17$\pm$0.03 & 9.61$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.10$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2164: & & sat & sat & 10.16$\pm$0.03 & 9.58$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & 7.02$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 17 \\
2165: J11071915$-$7603048 & T25 & out & 9.60$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.48$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2166: J11072040$-$7729403 & ISO 99 & 9.97$\pm$0.02 & 9.90$\pm$0.02 & 9.93$\pm$0.03 & 9.88$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 10.04$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2167: & & & & & & & 9.94$\pm$0.10 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2168: J11072074$-$7738073 & T26 & sat & sat & 4.69$\pm$0.03 & 4.16$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 1.09$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2169: & & & & & & & 0.99$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 17 \\
2170: J11072142$-$7722117 & B35 & 9.50$\pm$0.02 & 8.86$\pm$0.02 & 8.21$\pm$0.03 & 7.26$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.61$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2171: J11072443$-$7743489 & [LES2004] 429 & sat & sat & 11.07$\pm$0.03 & 11.08$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & 11.06$\pm$0.24 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2172: & & 11.35$\pm$0.02 & 11.19$\pm$0.02 & 11.11$\pm$0.03 & 11.11$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 11.06$\pm$0.37 & 2005 May 11 \\
2173: & & sat & sat & 11.10$\pm$0.03 & 11.12$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2174: \nodata & Cha J11072647$-$7742408 & 14.78$\pm$0.02 & 14.63$\pm$0.03 & 14.47$\pm$0.04 & 14.40$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2175: & & 14.81$\pm$0.02 & 14.62$\pm$0.02 & 14.42$\pm$0.06 & 14.34$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2176: J11072825$-$7652118 & T27 & 9.02$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.37$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Jul 4 & out & \nodata \\
2177: J11073519$-$7734493 & CHXR 76 & sat & sat & 10.38$\pm$0.03 & 10.37$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 9.22$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2178: & & 10.54$\pm$0.02 & 10.43$\pm$0.02 & 10.37$\pm$0.03 & 10.46$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.11$\pm$0.08 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2179: & & sat & sat & 10.41$\pm$0.03 & 10.39$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & 9.13$\pm$0.08 & 2005 May 17 \\
2180: J11073686$-$7733335 & CHXR 26 & sat & sat & 8.58$\pm$0.03 & 8.60$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 8.21$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2181: & & 8.77$\pm$0.02 & 8.66$\pm$0.02 & 8.60$\pm$0.03 & 8.54$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.43$\pm$0.06 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2182: & & sat & sat & 8.64$\pm$0.03 & 8.61$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & 8.34$\pm$0.05 & 2005 May 17 \\
2183: J11073775$-$7735308 & Cha H$\alpha$ 7 & 11.88$\pm$0.02 & 11.75$\pm$0.02 & 11.68$\pm$0.03 & 11.66$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2184: & & 11.87$\pm$0.02 & 11.68$\pm$0.02 & 11.77$\pm$0.04 & 11.66$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2185: & & sat & sat & 11.68$\pm$0.03 & 11.58$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2186: J11073832$-$7747168 & ESO H$\alpha$ 560 & 10.68$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.57$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.63$\pm$0.09 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2187: & & & & & & & 9.60$\pm$0.22 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2188: J11073840$-$7552519 & \nodata & 11.48$\pm$0.02 & 11.37$\pm$0.02 & 11.36$\pm$0.03 & 11.36$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2189: J11074245$-$7733593 & Cha H$\alpha$ 2 & sat & sat & 9.20$\pm$0.03 & 8.60$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 5.98$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2190: & & 9.96$\pm$0.02 & 9.58$\pm$0.02 & 9.22$\pm$0.03 & 8.61$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.10$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2191: & & sat & sat & 9.17$\pm$0.03 & 8.58$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & 6.17$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 17 \\
2192: J11074366$-$7739411 & T28 & 7.34$\pm$0.02 & 7.01$\pm$0.02 & 6.82$\pm$0.03 & 6.20$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.32$\pm$0.05 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2193: & & & & & & & 3.09$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 17 \\
2194: J11074610$-$7740089 & Cha H$\alpha$ 8 & sat & sat & 10.90$\pm$0.03 & 10.82$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2195: & & 11.03$\pm$0.02 & 10.90$\pm$0.02 & 10.90$\pm$0.03 & 10.81$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2196: & & sat & sat & 10.87$\pm$0.03 & 10.89$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2197: J11074656$-$7615174 & CHSM 10862 & 11.47$\pm$0.02 & 11.10$\pm$0.02 & 10.75$\pm$0.03 & 10.21$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 7.00$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2198: J11075225$-$7736569 & Cha H$\alpha$ 3 & sat & sat & 10.47$\pm$0.03 & 10.48$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & 10.01$\pm$0.26 & 2005 May 17 \\
2199: & & 10.70$\pm$0.02 & 10.57$\pm$0.02 & 10.47$\pm$0.03 & 10.49$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2200: & & sat & sat & 10.57$\pm$0.03 & 10.50$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2201: J11075588$-$7727257 & CHXR 28 & 7.47$\pm$0.02 & 7.49$\pm$0.02 & 7.47$\pm$0.03 & 7.43$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.22$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2202: J11075730$-$7717262 & CHXR 30B & out & 7.88$\pm$0.02 & out & 6.96$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.88$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2203: J11075792$-$7738449 & T29 & 6.03$\pm$0.02 & 5.21$\pm$0.02 & 4.49$\pm$0.03 & 3.62$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & sat & 2005 May 17 \\
2204: J11075809$-$7742413 & T30 & 8.58$\pm$0.02 & 8.16$\pm$0.02 & 7.93$\pm$0.03 & 7.29$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 4.53$\pm$0.11 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2205: & & & & & & & 4.41$\pm$0.11 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2206: J11075993$-$7715317 & ESO H$\alpha$ 561 & out & 10.60$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.58$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2207: J11080002$-$7717304 & CHXR 30A & out & 8.38$\pm$0.02 & out & 7.63$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 5.22$\pm$0.11 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2208: J11080148$-$7742288 & T31 & 6.20$\pm$0.02 & 5.83$\pm$0.02 & 5.66$\pm$0.03 & 5.09$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 1.89$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2209: & & & & & & & 1.83$\pm$0.11 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2210: J11080234$-$7640343 & [LES2004] 717 & 11.51$\pm$0.02 & 11.39$\pm$0.02 & 11.41$\pm$0.03 & 11.31$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2211: J11080297$-$7738425 & ISO 126 & 6.79$\pm$0.02 & 6.12$\pm$0.02 & 5.47$\pm$0.03 & 4.72$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & sat & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2212: J11080329$-$7739174 & T32 & sat & sat & 3.87$\pm$0.03 & 2.72$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & sat & 2005 May 17 \\
2213: J11080609$-$7739406 & \nodata & 14.37$\pm$0.18 & 14.15$\pm$0.20 & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2214: & & 13.77$\pm$0.06 & 13.81$\pm$0.07 & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2215: & & 14.24$\pm$0.08 & 14.52$\pm$0.16 & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2216: J11081509$-$7733531 & T33A & sat & sat & 4.17$\pm$0.03 & 3.19$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & sat & 2005 May 17 \\
2217: J11081648$-$7744371 & T34 & sat & sat & 9.73$\pm$0.03 & 9.71$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2218: & & 9.78$\pm$0.02 & 9.75$\pm$0.02 & 9.68$\pm$0.03 & 9.78$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2219: & & sat & sat & 9.76$\pm$0.03 & 9.73$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2220: J11081703$-$7744118 & Cha H$\alpha$ 13 & sat & sat & 10.12$\pm$0.03 & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2221: & & 10.25$\pm$0.02 & 10.18$\pm$0.02 & 10.13$\pm$0.03 & 10.15$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2222: & & sat & sat & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 10.08$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2223: J11081850$-$7730408 & ISO 138 & 12.51$\pm$0.02 & 12.22$\pm$0.02 & 12.06$\pm$0.03 & 11.39$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & 7.94$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2224: & & 12.50$\pm$0.02 & 12.20$\pm$0.02 & 11.92$\pm$0.04 & 11.51$\pm$0.11 & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.11$\pm$0.06 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2225: & & out & 12.15$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.26$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2226: J11081896$-$7739170 & Cha H$\alpha$ 4 & sat & sat & 10.50$\pm$0.03 & 10.50$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2227: & & 10.67$\pm$0.02 & 10.59$\pm$0.02 & 10.48$\pm$0.04 & \nodata & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2228: & & sat & sat & 10.51$\pm$0.04 & bad & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2229: \nodata & Cha J11081938$-$7731522 & 16.18$\pm$0.02 & 15.87$\pm$0.02 & 15.65$\pm$0.05 & 14.76$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Feb 19 & 6.79$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2230: & & 16.11$\pm$0.07 & 15.76$\pm$0.11 & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.78$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2231: & & 16.13$\pm$0.02 & 15.79$\pm$0.03 & 15.80$\pm$0.10 & 14.69$\pm$0.09 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2232: J11082238$-$7730277 & ISO 143 & sat & sat & 9.50$\pm$0.03 & 8.78$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 6.17$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2233: & & 10.31$\pm$0.02 & 9.85$\pm$0.02 & 9.56$\pm$0.03 & 8.78$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.21$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2234: J11082404$-$7739299 & Cha H$\alpha$ 10 & 12.75$\pm$0.02 & 12.62$\pm$0.02 & 12.59$\pm$0.04 & 12.59$\pm$0.08 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2235: & & 12.79$\pm$0.02 & 12.63$\pm$0.02 & 12.43$\pm$0.06 & 12.56$\pm$0.11 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2236: & & 12.76$\pm$0.02 & 12.60$\pm$0.02 & 12.54$\pm$0.04 & 12.62$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2237: J11082410$-$7741473 & Cha H$\alpha$ 5 & sat & sat & 10.08$\pm$0.03 & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2238: & & 10.30$\pm$0.02 & 10.14$\pm$0.02 & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 10.13$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2239: & & sat & sat & 10.08$\pm$0.03 & 10.10$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2240: J11082570$-$7716396 & \nodata & out & 13.01$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.98$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.72$\pm$0.10 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2241: J11082650$-$7715550 & ISO 147 & out & 11.27$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.33$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.60$\pm$0.05 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2242: J11082927$-$7739198 & Cha H$\alpha$ 11 & 12.94$\pm$0.02 & 12.69$\pm$0.02 & 12.45$\pm$0.04 & 11.97$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2243: & & 12.91$\pm$0.02 & 12.76$\pm$0.02 & 12.24$\pm$0.08 & 12.16$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2244: & & 12.98$\pm$0.02 & 12.73$\pm$0.02 & 12.49$\pm$0.04 & 12.29$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2245: \nodata & Cha J11083040$-$7731387 & 15.11$\pm$0.02 & 14.94$\pm$0.02 & 14.68$\pm$0.04 & 14.59$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2246: & & 15.14$\pm$0.03 & 14.85$\pm$0.04 & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2247: & & 15.14$\pm$0.02 & 14.95$\pm$0.02 & 14.95$\pm$0.04 & 14.71$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2248: J11083896$-$7743513 & IRN & 7.37$\pm$0.04 & 6.31$\pm$0.02 & 5.22$\pm$0.03 & 3.66$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & sat & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2249: J11083905$-$7716042 & T35 & out & 8.11$\pm$0.02 & out & 7.89$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 4.45$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2250: J11083952$-$7734166 & Cha H$\alpha$ 6 & sat & sat & 9.86$\pm$0.03 & 9.32$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 6.69$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2251: & & 10.41$\pm$0.02 & 10.09$\pm$0.02 & 9.93$\pm$0.03 & 9.36$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.77$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 17 \\
2252: & & sat & sat & 9.77$\pm$0.03 & 9.35$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2253: J11084069$-$7636078 & CHXR 33 & 9.05$\pm$0.02 & 8.98$\pm$0.02 & 8.94$\pm$0.03 & 8.96$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 8.82$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2254: & & sat & sat & 8.89$\pm$0.03 & 8.94$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2255: J11084296$-$7743500 & \nodata & \nodata & 11.68$\pm$0.13 & 10.98$\pm$0.11 & 9.54$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2256: & & 12.34$\pm$0.15 & 11.65$\pm$0.15 & 11.01$\pm$0.10 & 9.43$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2257: & & 12.39$\pm$0.14 & 11.55$\pm$0.10 & \nodata & \nodata & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2258: J11084952$-$7638443 & \nodata & 13.61$\pm$0.02 & 13.22$\pm$0.02 & 12.86$\pm$0.05 & 12.12$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 9.79$\pm$0.08 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2259: & & 13.70$\pm$0.02 & 13.21$\pm$0.02 & 12.88$\pm$0.03 & 12.29$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2260: J11085090$-$7625135 & T37 & 10.68$\pm$0.02 & 10.34$\pm$0.02 & 9.96$\pm$0.03 & 9.41$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 7.06$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2261: & & sat & sat & 9.98$\pm$0.03 & 9.39$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2262: J11085176$-$7632502 & [LES2004] 737 & 12.43$\pm$0.02 & 12.29$\pm$0.02 & 12.27$\pm$0.05 & 12.32$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2263: & & 12.42$\pm$0.02 & 12.31$\pm$0.02 & 12.19$\pm$0.03 & 12.26$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2264: J11085242$-$7519027 & RX J1108.8$-$7519B & 8.96$\pm$0.02 & 8.70$\pm$0.02 & 8.54$\pm$0.03 & 7.93$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 21 & 5.27$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2265: J11085326$-$7519374 & RX J1108.8$-$7519A & 8.62$\pm$0.02 & 8.56$\pm$0.02 & 8.51$\pm$0.03 & 8.50$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 21 & 8.46$\pm$0.06 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2266: J11085421$-$7732115 & CHXR 78C & sat & sat & 10.63$\pm$0.03 & 10.65$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 10.17$\pm$0.19 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2267: & & 10.80$\pm$0.02 & 10.65$\pm$0.02 & 10.59$\pm$0.03 & 10.63$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 10.98$\pm$0.52 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2268: & & sat & sat & 10.61$\pm$0.03 & 10.60$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2269: J11085464$-$7702129 & T38 & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 4.09$\pm$0.04 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2270: J11085497$-$7632410 & ISO 165 & 10.66$\pm$0.02 & 10.34$\pm$0.02 & 9.96$\pm$0.03 & 9.52$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 7.07$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2271: & & sat & sat & 9.96$\pm$0.03 & 9.50$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2272: J11085596$-$7727132 & ISO 167 & 11.07$\pm$0.02 & 10.95$\pm$0.02 & 10.85$\pm$0.03 & 10.89$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 10.29$\pm$0.16 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2273: J11091172$-$7729124 & T39A & sat & out & 8.50$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Feb 19 & 8.08$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2274: & & 8.64$\pm$0.02 & 8.60$\pm$0.02 & 8.59$\pm$0.03 & 8.54$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.18$\pm$0.06 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2275: \nodata & Cha J11091363$-$7734446 & 14.58$\pm$0.02 & 14.33$\pm$0.02 & 14.09$\pm$0.04 & 13.58$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2276: & & 14.61$\pm$0.03 & 14.33$\pm$0.04 & 13.96$\pm$0.08 & 13.42$\pm$0.09 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2277: & & 14.62$\pm$0.02 & 14.28$\pm$0.02 & 14.05$\pm$0.03 & 13.57$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2278: J11091380$-$7628396 & CHXR 35 & 10.55$\pm$0.02 & 10.44$\pm$0.02 & 10.40$\pm$0.03 & 10.40$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 10.09$\pm$0.20 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2279: & & sat & sat & 10.37$\pm$0.03 & 10.37$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & 10.23$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2280: J11091769$-$7627578 & CHXR 37 & 8.44$\pm$0.02 & 8.45$\pm$0.02 & 8.33$\pm$0.03 & 8.32$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 8.19$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2281: & & sat & sat & 8.34$\pm$0.03 & 8.38$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & 8.22$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2282: J11091812$-$7630292 & CHXR 79 & 7.92$\pm$0.02 & 7.43$\pm$0.02 & 7.15$\pm$0.03 & 6.50$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.57$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2283: & & & & & & & 3.55$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2284: & & & & & & & 3.57$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2285: J11092266$-$7634320 & C1-6 & 7.22$\pm$0.02 & 6.51$\pm$0.02 & 6.03$\pm$0.03 & 5.17$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 1.46$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2286: & & & & & & & 1.80$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2287: J11092379$-$7623207 & T40 & 7.11$\pm$0.02 & 6.56$\pm$0.02 & 6.22$\pm$0.03 & 5.56$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.33$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2288: J11092855$-$7633281 & ISO 192 & 8.47$\pm$0.02 & 6.97$\pm$0.02 & 5.86$\pm$0.03 & 4.58$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 0.39$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2289: J11092913$-$7659180 & [LES2004] 602 & 11.73$\pm$0.02 & 11.62$\pm$0.02 & 11.59$\pm$0.03 & 11.59$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2290: J11093543$-$7731390 & \nodata & 13.80$\pm$0.02 & out & 13.55$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Feb 19 & \nodata & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2291: & & 13.82$\pm$0.02 & 13.63$\pm$0.03 & 13.52$\pm$0.07 & 13.39$\pm$0.09 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2292: & & out & 13.68$\pm$0.02 & out & 13.57$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2293: J11094006$-$7628391 & CHXR 40 & 8.76$\pm$0.02 & 8.76$\pm$0.02 & 8.70$\pm$0.03 & 8.67$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 8.43$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2294: & & sat & sat & 8.75$\pm$0.03 & 8.72$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & 8.33$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2295: J11094192$-$7634584 & C1-25 & 8.53$\pm$0.02 & 7.95$\pm$0.02 & 7.38$\pm$0.03 & 6.66$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.26$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2296: & & & & & & & 3.13$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2297: J11094260$-$7725578 & C7-1 & 9.60$\pm$0.02 & 9.18$\pm$0.02 & 9.08$\pm$0.03 & 8.90$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.66$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2298: & & & & & & & 6.57$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2299: J11094525$-$7740332 & ESO H$\alpha$ 566 & sat & sat & 10.36$\pm$0.03 & 10.35$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 9.82$\pm$0.18 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2300: & & 10.55$\pm$0.02 & 10.40$\pm$0.02 & 10.39$\pm$0.03 & 10.39$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2301: & & sat & sat & 10.42$\pm$0.03 & 10.37$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2302: J11094621$-$7634463 & Hn 10E & 9.49$\pm$0.02 & 8.92$\pm$0.02 & 8.46$\pm$0.03 & 7.59$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.70$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2303: & & sat & sat & 8.41$\pm$0.03 & sat & 2005 May 9 & 3.58$\pm$0.07 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2304: J11094742$-$7726290 & B43 & 9.04$\pm$0.02 & 8.50$\pm$0.02 & 8.37$\pm$0.03 & 7.82$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 4.65$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2305: & & & & & & & 4.21$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2306: J11094866$-$7714383 & ISO 209 & out & 10.89$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.86$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.08$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2307: J11094918$-$7731197 & KG 102 & sat & out & 11.09$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Feb 19 & 10.70$\pm$0.38 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2308: & & 11.22$\pm$0.02 & 11.06$\pm$0.02 & 11.09$\pm$0.03 & 11.05$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 10.13$\pm$0.14 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2309: & & out & 11.08$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.00$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2310: J11095003$-$7636476 & T41 & 7.08$\pm$0.02 & 7.05$\pm$0.02 & 6.72$\pm$0.08 & extended & 2004 Jul 4 & extended & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2311: J11095215$-$7639128 & ISO 217 & 10.80$\pm$0.02 & 10.29$\pm$0.02 & 9.83$\pm$0.03 & 9.16$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 6.71$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2312: & & sat & sat & 8.95$\pm$0.03 & 8.30$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2313: J11095262$-$7740348 & CHSM 15991 & 12.67$\pm$0.02 & 11.97$\pm$0.02 & 11.13$\pm$0.03 & 10.06$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 19 & 7.21$\pm$0.05 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2314: & & 11.98$\pm$0.02 & 11.37$\pm$0.02 & 10.71$\pm$0.03 & 9.87$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2315: & & 12.64$\pm$0.02 & 11.88$\pm$0.02 & 11.10$\pm$0.03 & 10.10$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2316: J11095336$-$7728365 & ISO 220 & sat & out & 10.75$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Feb 19 & 7.25$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2317: & & 11.39$\pm$0.02 & 10.98$\pm$0.02 & 10.64$\pm$0.03 & 10.01$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.25$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2318: J11095340$-$7634255 & T42 & sat & sat & 3.72$\pm$0.03 & 3.04$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & sat & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2319: J11095407$-$7629253 & T43 & 8.55$\pm$0.02 & 8.14$\pm$0.02 & 7.62$\pm$0.03 & 6.83$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.76$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2320: & & & & & & & 3.58$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2321: & & & & & & & 3.74$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2322: J11095437$-$7631113 & ISO 225 & 11.22$\pm$0.02 & 10.35$\pm$0.02 & 9.61$\pm$0.03 & 8.70$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 4.85$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2323: & & sat & sat & 9.60$\pm$0.03 & 8.58$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & 5.02$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2324: J11095505$-$7632409 & C1-2 & 7.90$\pm$0.02 & 7.15$\pm$0.02 & 6.75$\pm$0.03 & 5.96$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 2.19$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2325: & & & & & & & 2.14$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2326: J11095873$-$7737088 & T45 & 6.99$\pm$0.02 & 6.50$\pm$0.02 & 6.16$\pm$0.03 & 5.52$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.17$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2327: J11100010$-$7634578 & T44 & sat & sat & 3.70$\pm$0.03 & 3.15$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & sat & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2328: J11100192$-$7725451 & [LES2004] 419 & 11.46$\pm$0.02 & 11.24$\pm$0.02 & 11.24$\pm$0.03 & 11.22$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2329: J11100369$-$7633291 & Hn 11 & 8.18$\pm$0.02 & 7.52$\pm$0.02 & 6.84$\pm$0.03 & 6.04$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.23$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2330: & & & & & & & 3.20$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2331: J11100469$-$7635452 & T45A & 8.70$\pm$0.02 & 8.41$\pm$0.02 & 8.10$\pm$0.03 & 7.55$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 4.58$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2332: & & sat & sat & 8.37$\pm$0.03 & sat & 2005 May 9 & 4.38$\pm$0.05 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2333: J11100658$-$7642486 & \nodata & 14.47$\pm$0.03 & 14.27$\pm$0.03 & 14.29$\pm$0.11 & \nodata & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2334: & & 14.41$\pm$0.02 & 14.29$\pm$0.02 & 14.08$\pm$0.03 & 14.15$\pm$0.06 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2335: J11100704$-$7629376 & T46 & 7.69$\pm$0.02 & 7.29$\pm$0.02 & 6.82$\pm$0.03 & 5.97$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.54$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2336: & & & & & & & 3.64$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2337: J11100785$-$7727480 & ISO 235 & 10.48$\pm$0.02 & 10.05$\pm$0.02 & 9.60$\pm$0.03 & 8.86$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 6.38$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2338: & & & & & & & 6.38$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2339: J11100934$-$7632178 & OTS 44 & 13.69$\pm$0.02 & 13.22$\pm$0.02 & 12.68$\pm$0.05 & 12.10$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jul 4 & 8.81$\pm$0.11 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2340: & & 13.67$\pm$0.02 & 13.17$\pm$0.02 & 12.65$\pm$0.03 & 12.03$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & 9.65$\pm$0.20 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2341: J11101141$-$7635292 & ISO 237 & 8.07$\pm$0.02 & 7.55$\pm$0.02 & 7.04$\pm$0.03 & 6.18$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 2.33$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2342: & & & & & & & 2.27$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2343: J11101153$-$7733521 & \nodata & sat & out & 10.37$\pm$0.03 & out & 2004 Feb 19 & 10.27$\pm$0.20 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2344: & & 10.47$\pm$0.02 & 10.47$\pm$0.02 & 10.36$\pm$0.03 & 10.39$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & & \\
2345: & & out & sat & out & 10.37$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Sep 2 & & \\
2346: J11102226$-$7625138 & CHSM 17173 & 11.97$\pm$0.02 & 11.87$\pm$0.02 & 11.78$\pm$0.04 & 11.82$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2347: & & 11.95$\pm$0.02 & 11.84$\pm$0.02 & 11.73$\pm$0.03 & 11.79$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2348: J11102852$-$7716596 & Hn 12W & out & 10.23$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.26$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 10.00$\pm$0.09 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2349: J11103481$-$7722053 & [LES2004] 405 & 9.60$\pm$0.02 & 9.43$\pm$0.02 & 9.42$\pm$0.03 & 9.42$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 9.19$\pm$0.10 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2350: J11103644$-$7722131 & ISO 250 & 10.15$\pm$0.02 & 9.94$\pm$0.02 & 9.88$\pm$0.03 & 9.94$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2351: J11103801$-$7732399 & CHXR 47 & 7.66$\pm$0.02 & 7.39$\pm$0.02 & 6.95$\pm$0.03 & 6.26$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 3.52$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2352: J11104006$-$7630547 & \nodata & 12.84$\pm$0.02 & 12.72$\pm$0.02 & 12.64$\pm$0.05 & 12.63$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2353: & & 12.83$\pm$0.02 & 12.65$\pm$0.02 & 12.60$\pm$0.03 & 12.66$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2354: J11104141$-$7720480 & ISO 252 & 11.45$\pm$0.02 & 11.02$\pm$0.02 & 10.57$\pm$0.03 & 9.75$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.05$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2355: J11104959$-$7717517 & T47 & out & 8.13$\pm$0.02 & out & 6.37$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 2.96$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2356: J11105076$-$7718031 & ESO H$\alpha$ 568 & out & 10.26$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.22$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jun 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2357: J11105333$-$7634319 & T48 & 9.14$\pm$0.02 & 8.56$\pm$0.02 & 8.25$\pm$0.03 & 7.33$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 4.52$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2358: & & sat & sat & 8.30$\pm$0.03 & sat & 2005 May 9 & 4.66$\pm$0.05 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2359: J11105359$-$7725004 & ISO 256 & 9.50$\pm$0.02 & 8.93$\pm$0.02 & 8.61$\pm$0.03 & 7.74$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 4.89$\pm$0.11 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2360: J11105597$-$7645325 & Hn 13 & 9.26$\pm$0.02 & 8.84$\pm$0.02 & 8.45$\pm$0.03 & 7.86$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 5.02$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2361: & & 9.29$\pm$0.02 & 8.90$\pm$0.02 & 8.53$\pm$0.03 & 7.93$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 21 & 5.06$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2362: & & sat & out & 8.52$\pm$0.03 & out & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2363: J11111083$-$7641574 & ESO H$\alpha$ 569 & 14.21$\pm$0.03 & 13.76$\pm$0.03 & 13.23$\pm$0.06 & 12.50$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jul 4 & 7.12$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 8 \\
2364: & & 13.92$\pm$0.02 & 13.48$\pm$0.03 & 13.08$\pm$0.08 & 12.19$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jul 21 & 7.30$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2365: & & 14.16$\pm$0.02 & out & 13.17$\pm$0.03 & out & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2366: J11112249$-$7745427 & [LES2004] 436 & 13.57$\pm$0.02 & out & 12.80$\pm$0.05 & out & 2004 Jun 10 & out & \nodata \\
2367: J11112260$-$7705538 & ISO 274 & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 10.34$\pm$0.29 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2368: J11113474$-$7636211 & CHXR 48 & 9.50$\pm$0.02 & 9.47$\pm$0.02 & 9.41$\pm$0.03 & 9.41$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 9.15$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2369: & & sat & sat & 9.47$\pm$0.03 & 9.43$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & 9.74$\pm$0.20 & 2004 Jul 8 \\
2370: J11113965$-$7620152 & T49 & out & 7.92$\pm$0.02 & out & 6.86$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.75$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2371: & & & & & & & 3.72$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2372: J11114533$-$7636505 & [LES2004] 743 & 13.31$\pm$0.02 & 12.92$\pm$0.02 & 12.70$\pm$0.05 & 12.15$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jul 4 & 9.71$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2373: & & 13.32$\pm$0.02 & 12.98$\pm$0.02 & 12.65$\pm$0.03 & 12.20$\pm$0.03 & 2005 May 9 & 9.01$\pm$0.13 & 2004 Jul 8 \\
2374: J11114632$-$7620092 & CHX 18N & out & 6.74$\pm$0.02 & out & 6.26$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.88$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2375: & & & & & & & 3.72$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2376: J11115400$-$7619311 & CHXR 49NE & out & 8.90$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.85$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 8.54$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2377: J11120288$-$7722483 & \nodata & 12.05$\pm$0.02 & 11.93$\pm$0.02 & 11.91$\pm$0.04 & 11.80$\pm$0.05 & 2004 Jun 10 & \nodata & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2378: & & 12.07$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.89$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & & \\
2379: J11120327$-$7637034 & CHXR 84 & 10.39$\pm$0.02 & 10.27$\pm$0.02 & 10.23$\pm$0.03 & 10.29$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 9.81$\pm$0.15 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2380: & & out & 10.28$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.29$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 21 & 9.81$\pm$0.14 & 2004 Jul 8 \\
2381: & & sat & sat & 10.22$\pm$0.03 & 10.29$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & & \\
2382: J11120351$-$7726009 & ISO 282 & 10.74$\pm$0.02 & 10.44$\pm$0.02 & 10.19$\pm$0.03 & 9.63$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.02$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2383: J11120984$-$7634366 & T50 & 9.35$\pm$0.02 & 9.03$\pm$0.02 & 8.74$\pm$0.03 & 8.09$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 5.17$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2384: & & sat & sat & 8.80$\pm$0.03 & 8.13$\pm$0.04 & 2005 May 9 & 5.10$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 8 \\
2385: J11122250$-$7714512 & \nodata & 13.86$\pm$0.02 & 13.71$\pm$0.02 & 13.53$\pm$0.04 & 12.93$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 10.13$\pm$0.15 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2386: J11122441$-$7637064 & T51 & 7.28$\pm$0.02 & 6.72$\pm$0.02 & 6.29$\pm$0.03 & 5.30$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 3.40$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2387: & & out & 6.75$\pm$0.02 & out & 5.32$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 21 & 3.45$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 8 \\
2388: J11122772$-$7644223 & T52 & 5.93$\pm$0.02 & 5.57$\pm$0.02 & 5.24$\pm$0.03 & 4.56$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 1.19$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2389: J11123092$-$7644241 & T53 & 8.19$\pm$0.02 & 7.73$\pm$0.02 & 7.42$\pm$0.03 & 6.54$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2390: J11123099$-$7653342 & [LES2004] 601 & 12.58$\pm$0.02 & 12.48$\pm$0.02 & 12.45$\pm$0.03 & 12.39$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2391: J11124210$-$7658400 & CHXR 54 & sat & out & 9.35$\pm$0.03 & out & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2392: J11124268$-$7722230 & T54 & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 4.81$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 3 \\
2393: & & & & & & & 4.84$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2394: J11124299$-$7637049 & CHXR 55 & 9.20$\pm$0.02 & 9.19$\pm$0.02 & 9.17$\pm$0.03 & 9.14$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 8.94$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2395: & & out & 9.14$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.09$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 21 & 9.12$\pm$0.13 & 2004 Jul 8 \\
2396: & & sat & out & 9.08$\pm$0.03 & out & 2005 May 9 & 8.98$\pm$0.07 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2397: J11124861$-$7647066 & Hn 17 & out & 10.35$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.30$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 7.00$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2398: J11132446$-$7629227 & Hn 18 & 10.07$\pm$0.02 & 9.70$\pm$0.02 & 9.40$\pm$0.03 & 8.86$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 5.95$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2399: J11132737$-$7634165 & CHXR 59 & 9.47$\pm$0.02 & 9.41$\pm$0.02 & 9.37$\pm$0.03 & 9.39$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 9.24$\pm$0.07 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2400: & & & & & & & 9.27$\pm$0.08 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2401: J11132970$-$7629012 & CHXR 60 & 10.29$\pm$0.02 & 10.18$\pm$0.02 & 10.15$\pm$0.03 & 10.26$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 10.14$\pm$0.17 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2402: J11133356$-$7635374 & T55 & 10.41$\pm$0.02 & 10.35$\pm$0.02 & 10.30$\pm$0.03 & 10.34$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & 10.06$\pm$0.17 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2403: & & sat & out & 10.28$\pm$0.03 & out & 2005 May 9 & 9.76$\pm$0.10 & 2005 Apr 9 \\
2404: J11141565$-$7627364 & CHXR 62 & 9.81$\pm$0.02 & 9.77$\pm$0.02 & 9.76$\pm$0.03 & 9.72$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jul 4 & 9.03$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2405: J11142454$-$7733062 & Hn 21W & 10.06$\pm$0.04 & 9.84$\pm$0.04 & 9.54$\pm$0.04 & 8.96$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 6.42$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2406: J11142611$-$7733042 & Hn 21E & 11.01$\pm$0.04 & 10.89$\pm$0.04 & 10.79$\pm$0.06 & 10.57$\pm$0.08 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2407: J11142906$-$7625399 & ESO H$\alpha$ 571 & out & 11.20$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.22$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 4 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2408: J11145031$-$7733390 & B53 & 9.35$\pm$0.02 & 9.28$\pm$0.02 & 9.26$\pm$0.03 & 9.24$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & 9.06$\pm$0.05 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2409: J11152180$-$7724042 & ESO H$\alpha$ 572 & out & 10.39$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.37$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & 10.37$\pm$0.16 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2410: J11173792$-$7646193 & \nodata & 12.21$\pm$0.02 & 12.09$\pm$0.02 & 12.07$\pm$0.03 & 12.03$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2004 Apr 11 \\
2411: J11182024$-$7621576 & CHXR 68A & out & out & out & out & \nodata & 8.38$\pm$0.11 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2412: J11183379$-$7643041 & \nodata & 10.01$\pm$0.02 & 9.90$\pm$0.02 & 9.90$\pm$0.03 & 9.86$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & 9.87$\pm$0.15 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2413: J11194214$-$7623326 & \nodata & 11.42$\pm$0.02 & 11.31$\pm$0.02 & 11.30$\pm$0.03 & 11.34$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2414: J11195652$-$7504529 & \nodata & 12.47$\pm$0.02 & 12.36$\pm$0.02 & 12.32$\pm$0.03 & 12.39$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2415: J11241186$-$7630425 & \nodata & 11.56$\pm$0.02 & 11.40$\pm$0.02 & 11.33$\pm$0.03 & 10.88$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2416: J11242980$-$7554237 & \nodata & 9.61$\pm$0.02 & 9.54$\pm$0.02 & 9.54$\pm$0.03 & 9.50$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & 9.36$\pm$0.11 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2417: J11291261$-$7546263 & RX J1129.2$-$7546 & 8.78$\pm$0.02 & 8.76$\pm$0.02 & 8.79$\pm$0.03 & 8.72$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jul 21 & 8.27$\pm$0.20 & 2005 Mar 6 \\
2418: J11332327$-$7622092 & \nodata & 9.44$\pm$0.02 & 9.36$\pm$0.02 & 9.33$\pm$0.03 & 9.31$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & 9.15$\pm$0.10 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2419: \enddata
2420: \tablecomments{Entries of ``$\cdots$", ``sat", ``out", and ``bad"
2421: indicate measurements that are absent because of non-detection,
2422: saturation, a position outside the field of view of the filter, and
2423: contamination by a cosmic ray or a ghost from a bright star, respectively.}
2424: \tablenotetext{a}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
2425: \end{deluxetable}
2426:
2427: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}
2428: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2429: \tablewidth{0pt}
2430: \tablecaption{Spectral Slopes for Known Members of
2431: Chamaeleon I\label{tab:alpha}}
2432: \tablehead{
2433: \colhead{Name} &
2434: \colhead{$\alpha$(2-8~\micron)} &
2435: \colhead{$\alpha$(2-24~\micron)} &
2436: \colhead{$\alpha$(3.6-8~\micron)} &
2437: \colhead{$\alpha$(3.6-24~\micron)} &
2438: \colhead{SED Class}
2439: }
2440: \startdata
2441: 2M J10523694$-$7440287 & $-$2.60 & $-$2.51 & $-$2.81 & $-$2.58 & III \\
2442: 2M J10580597$-$7711501 & $-$1.76 & \nodata & $-$1.78 & \nodata & II \\
2443: 2M J11011370$-$7722387 & $-$2.45 & \nodata & $-$2.73 & \nodata & III \\
2444: 2M J11011926$-$7732383 & $-$2.24 & \nodata & $-$2.62 & \nodata & III \\
2445: 2M J11013205$-$7718249 & $-$2.31 & \nodata & $-$2.65 & \nodata & III \\
2446: 2M J11021927$-$7536576 & $-$2.55 & $-$2.56 & $-$2.77 & $-$2.66 & III \\
2447: 2M J11022491$-$7733357 & $-$2.57 & $-$0.72 & $-$2.54 & $-$0.24 & II \\
2448: 2M J11022610$-$7502407 & $-$2.51 & $-$2.50 & $-$2.67 & $-$2.57 & III \\
2449: 2M J11023265$-$7729129 & \nodata & $-$1.91 & \nodata & $-$1.84 & II \\
2450: 2M J11024183$-$7724245 & $-$2.53 & \nodata & $-$2.79 & \nodata & III \\
2451: 2M J11025504$-$7721508 & $-$1.50 & $-$1.13 & $-$1.55 & $-$1.05 & II \\
2452: 2M J11034186$-$7726520 & $-$2.41 & \nodata & $-$2.66 & \nodata & III \\
2453: 2M J11034764$-$7719563 & $-$2.63 & $-$2.70 & $-$2.82 & $-$2.80 & III \\
2454: 2M J11035682$-$7721329 & $-$2.62 & $-$2.70 & $-$2.64 & $-$2.73 & III \\
2455: 2M J11040425$-$7639328 & \nodata & $-$0.62 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2456: 2M J11040909$-$7627193 & \nodata & $-$0.51 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2457: 2M J11041060$-$7612490 & $-$2.38 & \nodata & $-$2.67 & \nodata & III \\
2458: 2M J11042275$-$7718080 & 0.96 & 0.49 & 0.69 & 0.25 & I \\
2459: 2M J11044258$-$7741571 & $-$1.56 & $-$0.84 & $-$1.70 & $-$0.72 & II \\
2460: 2M J11045100$-$7625240 & \nodata & $-$2.77 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2461: 2M J11045285$-$7625514 & \nodata & $-$2.48 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2462: 2M J11045701$-$7715569 & $-$1.81 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2463: 2M J11051467$-$7711290 & $-$2.55 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2464: 2M J11052472$-$7626209 & \nodata & $-$2.89 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2465: 2M J11054300$-$7726517 & $-$2.41 & $-$2.58 & $-$2.66 & $-$2.72 & III \\
2466: 2M J11055261$-$7618255 & \nodata & $-$2.67 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2467: 2M J11055780$-$7607488 & \nodata & $-$2.92 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2468: 2M J11060010$-$7507252 & $-$2.50 & \nodata & $-$2.69 & \nodata & III \\
2469: 2M J11061540$-$7721567 & $-$2.70 & $-$2.62 & $-$2.73 & $-$2.62 & III \\
2470: 2M J11061545$-$7737501 & $-$2.71 & $-$2.82 & $-$2.82 & $-$2.89 & III \\
2471: 2M J11062554$-$7633418 & $-$1.43 & $-$0.59 & $-$1.36 & $-$0.35 & II \\
2472: 2M J11062877$-$7737331 & $-$2.64 & $-$2.60 & $-$2.77 & $-$2.64 & III \\
2473: 2M J11062942$-$7724586 & $-$1.31 & $-$1.37 & $-$1.40 & $-$1.42 & II \\
2474: 2M J11063276$-$7625210 & $-$1.58 & $-$1.12 & $-$1.46 & $-$0.96 & II \\
2475: 2M J11063799$-$7743090 & $-$2.34 & $-$2.50 & $-$2.64 & $-$2.66 & III \\
2476: 2M J11063945$-$7736052 & $-$1.03 & $-$0.63 & $-$0.94 & $-$0.49 & II \\
2477: 2M J11064180$-$7635489 & $-$0.64 & $-$0.82 & $-$0.46 & $-$0.79 & II \\
2478: 2M J11064346$-$7726343 & $-$2.67 & $-$2.65 & $-$2.82 & $-$2.72 & III \\
2479: 2M J11064510$-$7727023 & $-$1.56 & $-$1.26 & $-$1.12 & $-$1.00 & II \\
2480: 2M J11064658$-$7722325\tablenotemark{a} & 0.90 & 1.56 & 0.22 & 1.44 & I \\
2481: 2M J11065733$-$7742106 & $-$2.55 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.73 & $-$2.88 & III \\
2482: 2M J11065803$-$7722488\tablenotemark{a} & 1.44 & 0.92 & 0.24 & 0.28 & flat \\
2483: 2M J11065906$-$7718535 & $-$1.53 & $-$1.05 & $-$1.02 & $-$0.71 & II \\
2484: 2M J11065939$-$7530559 & $-$1.64 & \nodata & $-$1.59 & \nodata & II \\
2485: 2M J11070324$-$7610565 & $-$2.36 & \nodata & $-$2.69 & \nodata & III \\
2486: Cha J11070350$-$7631460 & \nodata & $-$1.16 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2487: 2M J11070369$-$7724307 & $-$1.36 & $-$0.67 & $-$1.02 & $-$0.35 & II \\
2488: Cha J11070768$-$7626326 & $-$1.03 & $-$0.77 & $-$1.13 & $-$0.74 & II \\
2489: 2M J11070919$-$7723049\tablenotemark{a} & 1.11 & 0.71 & $-$0.03 & 0.13 & flat \\
2490: 2M J11070925$-$7718471 & $-$1.28 & $-$0.85 & $-$1.27 & $-$0.73 & II \\
2491: 2M J11071148$-$7746394 & $-$2.62 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.77 & $-$2.84 & III \\
2492: 2M J11071181$-$7625501 & $-$1.85 & $-$1.71 & $-$1.82 & $-$1.66 & II \\
2493: 2M J11071206$-$7632232 & $-$1.48 & $-$1.04 & $-$1.48 & $-$0.93 & II \\
2494: 2M J11071330$-$7743498 & $-$2.55 & $-$1.80 & $-$2.69 & $-$1.67 & II \\
2495: 2M J11071622$-$7723068\tablenotemark{a} & 0.24 & 0.15 & $-$0.43 & $-$0.15 & flat \\
2496: 2M J11071668$-$7735532 & $-$1.04 & $-$0.50 & $-$0.78 & $-$0.25 & II \\
2497: 2M J11071860$-$7732516 & $-$1.44 & $-$1.16 & $-$1.38 & $-$1.07 & II \\
2498: 2M J11071915$-$7603048 & $-$2.65 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2499: 2M J11072040$-$7729403 & $-$2.52 & $-$2.80 & $-$2.74 & $-$2.97 & III \\
2500: 2M J11072074$-$7738073 & $-$1.42 & $-$0.92 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2501: 2M J11072142$-$7722117\tablenotemark{a} & $-$0.15 & $-$0.05 & $-$0.26 & $-$0.08 & flat \\
2502: 2M J11072443$-$7743489 & $-$2.43 & $-$2.67 & $-$2.65 & $-$2.83 & III \\
2503: Cha J11072647$-$7742408 & $-$1.95 & \nodata & $-$2.38 & \nodata & III \\
2504: 2M J11073519$-$7734493 & $-$2.50 & $-$2.23 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.27 & III \\
2505: 2M J11073686$-$7733335 & $-$2.58 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.79 & $-$2.79 & III \\
2506: 2M J11073775$-$7735308 & $-$2.26 & \nodata & $-$2.60 & \nodata & III \\
2507: 2M J11073832$-$7747168 & \nodata & $-$2.40 & \nodata & $-$2.45 & III \\
2508: 2M J11073840$-$7552519 & $-$2.51 & \nodata & $-$2.73 & \nodata & III \\
2509: 2M J11074245$-$7733593 & $-$1.46 & $-$1.23 & $-$1.36 & $-$1.13 & II \\
2510: 2M J11074366$-$7739411 & $-$1.51 & $-$0.99 & $-$1.63 & $-$0.91 & II \\
2511: 2M J11074610$-$7740089 & $-$2.38 & \nodata & $-$2.67 & \nodata & III \\
2512: 2M J11074656$-$7615174 & $-$1.33 & $-$0.86 & $-$1.43 & $-$0.78 & II \\
2513: 2M J11075225$-$7736569 & $-$2.45 & $-$2.52 & $-$2.66 & $-$2.62 & III \\
2514: 2M J11075588$-$7727257 & $-$2.83 & $-$2.83 & $-$2.92 & $-$2.86 & III \\
2515: 2M J11075730$-$7717262 & $-$1.11 & $-$0.79 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2516: 2M J11075792$-$7738449 & $-$0.66 & \nodata & $-$0.15 & \nodata & flat \\
2517: 2M J11075809$-$7742413 & $-$1.11 & $-$0.91 & $-$1.44 & $-$1.00 & II \\
2518: 2M J11075993$-$7715317 & $-$2.47 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2519: 2M J11080002$-$7717304 & $-$2.18 & $-$1.63 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2520: 2M J11080148$-$7742288 & $-$1.56 & $-$0.98 & $-$1.63 & $-$0.86 & II \\
2521: 2M J11080234$-$7640343 & $-$2.35 & \nodata & $-$2.63 & \nodata & III \\
2522: 2M J11080297$-$7738425 & $-$0.41 & \nodata & $-$0.56 & \nodata & II \\
2523: 2M J11080329$-$7739174 & $-$0.58 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2524: 2M J11081509$-$7733531 & $-$0.23 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & flat \\
2525: 2M J11081648$-$7744371 & $-$2.63 & \nodata & $-$2.83 & \nodata & III \\
2526: 2M J11081703$-$7744118 & $-$2.44 & \nodata & $-$2.72 & \nodata & III \\
2527: 2M J11081850$-$7730408 & $-$1.56 & $-$0.91 & $-$1.50 & $-$0.72 & II \\
2528: 2M J11081896$-$7739170 & $-$2.45 & \nodata & $-$2.67 & \nodata & III \\
2529: Cha J11081938$-$7731522 & $-$1.76 & 0.75 & $-$1.26 & 1.60 & II \\
2530: 2M J11082238$-$7730277 & $-$1.29 & $-$1.07 & $-$1.16 & $-$0.96 & II \\
2531: 2M J11082404$-$7739299 & $-$2.37 & \nodata & $-$2.70 & \nodata & III \\
2532: 2M J11082410$-$7741473 & $-$2.44 & \nodata & $-$2.67 & \nodata & III \\
2533: 2M J11082570$-$7716396 & $-$1.16 & $-$1.13 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2534: 2M J11082650$-$7715550 & $-$1.44 & $-$1.10 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2535: 2M J11082927$-$7739198 & $-$1.73 & \nodata & $-$1.84 & \nodata & II \\
2536: Cha J11083040$-$7731387 & $-$1.84 & \nodata & $-$2.24 & \nodata & III \\
2537: 2M J11083896$-$7743513\tablenotemark{a} & 0.84 & \nodata & 1.44 & \nodata & I \\
2538: 2M J11083905$-$7716042 & $-$2.11 & $-$1.19 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2539: 2M J11083952$-$7734166 & $-$1.63 & $-$1.26 & $-$1.65 & $-$1.18 & II \\
2540: 2M J11084069$-$7636078 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.81 & $-$2.83 & $-$2.86 & III \\
2541: 2M J11084296$-$7743500 & $-$0.79 & \nodata & 0.06 & \nodata & flat \\
2542: 2M J11084952$-$7638443 & $-$1.11 & $-$1.05 & $-$1.17 & $-$1.06 & II \\
2543: 2M J11085090$-$7625135 & $-$1.44 & $-$1.25 & $-$1.38 & $-$1.18 & II \\
2544: 2M J11085176$-$7632502 & $-$2.37 & \nodata & $-$2.70 & \nodata & III \\
2545: 2M J11085242$-$7519027 & $-$1.77 & $-$1.31 & $-$1.66 & $-$1.14 & II \\
2546: 2M J11085326$-$7519374 & $-$2.58 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.71 & $-$2.86 & III \\
2547: 2M J11085421$-$7732115 & $-$2.45 & $-$2.52 & $-$2.70 & $-$2.65 & III \\
2548: 2M J11085464$-$7702129 & \nodata & $-$0.88 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2549: 2M J11085497$-$7632410 & $-$1.50 & $-$1.25 & $-$1.57 & $-$1.21 & II \\
2550: 2M J11085596$-$7727132 & $-$2.52 & $-$2.51 & $-$2.76 & $-$2.61 & III \\
2551: 2M J11091172$-$7729124 & $-$2.54 & $-$2.57 & $-$2.76 & $-$2.67 & III \\
2552: Cha J11091363$-$7734446 & $-$1.37 & \nodata & $-$1.69 & \nodata & II \\
2553: 2M J11091380$-$7628396 & $-$2.47 & $-$2.65 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.79 & III \\
2554: 2M J11091769$-$7627578 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.77 & $-$2.81 & $-$2.85 & III \\
2555: 2M J11091812$-$7630292 & $-$1.23 & $-$0.91 & $-$1.34 & $-$0.88 & II \\
2556: 2M J11092266$-$7634320 & $-$0.75 & $-$0.49 & $-$0.70 & $-$0.40 & II \\
2557: 2M J11092379$-$7623207 & $-$0.95 & $-$1.03 & $-$1.10 & $-$1.12 & II \\
2558: 2M J11092855$-$7633281\tablenotemark{a} & 1.86 & 1.23 & 1.65 & 0.99 & I \\
2559: 2M J11092913$-$7659180 & $-$2.48 & \nodata & $-$2.73 & \nodata & III \\
2560: 2M J11093543$-$7731390 & $-$2.22 & \nodata & $-$2.58 & \nodata & III \\
2561: 2M J11094006$-$7628391 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.69 & $-$2.82 & $-$2.74 & III \\
2562: 2M J11094192$-$7634584\tablenotemark{a} & $-$0.39 & $-$0.23 & $-$0.69 & $-$0.31 & II \\
2563: 2M J11094260$-$7725578 & $-$1.89 & $-$1.53 & $-$2.18 & $-$1.57 & II \\
2564: 2M J11094525$-$7740332 & $-$2.39 & $-$2.46 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.60 & III \\
2565: 2M J11094621$-$7634463 & $-$1.17 & $-$0.46 & $-$0.72 & $-$0.09 & II \\
2566: 2M J11094742$-$7726290 & $-$1.39 & $-$0.91 & $-$1.60 & $-$0.87 & II \\
2567: 2M J11094866$-$7714383\tablenotemark{a} & $-$1.02 & $-$0.86 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2568: 2M J11094918$-$7731197 & $-$2.34 & $-$2.51 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.70 & III \\
2569: 2M J11095215$-$7639128 & $-$0.67 & $-$0.96 & $-$0.51 & $-$0.97 & II \\
2570: 2M J11095262$-$7740348 & $-$0.01 & $-$0.31 & $-$0.11 & $-$0.42 & flat \\
2571: 2M J11095336$-$7728365 & $-$1.44 & $-$1.09 & $-$1.37 & $-$0.97 & II \\
2572: 2M J11095340$-$7634255 & $-$0.55 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2573: 2M J11095407$-$7629253 & $-$1.27 & $-$0.87 & $-$0.96 & $-$0.64 & II \\
2574: 2M J11095437$-$7631113 & 0.26 & 0.16 & 0.04 & 0.04 & flat \\
2575: 2M J11095505$-$7632409\tablenotemark{a} & $-$0.12 & 0.03 & $-$0.61 & $-$0.14 & flat \\
2576: 2M J11095873$-$7737088 & $-$1.11 & $-$1.07 & $-$1.19 & $-$1.10 & II \\
2577: 2M J11100010$-$7634578 & $-$0.88 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2578: 2M J11100192$-$7725451 & $-$2.52 & \nodata & $-$2.71 & \nodata & III \\
2579: 2M J11100369$-$7633291 & $-$0.66 & $-$0.64 & $-$0.52 & $-$0.58 & II \\
2580: 2M J11100469$-$7635452 & $-$1.66 & $-$1.05 & $-$1.57 & $-$0.86 & II \\
2581: 2M J11100658$-$7642486 & $-$2.13 & \nodata & $-$2.52 & \nodata & III \\
2582: 2M J11100704$-$7629376 & $-$1.17 & $-$1.11 & $-$0.94 & $-$1.00 & II \\
2583: 2M J11100785$-$7727480 & $-$1.36 & $-$1.16 & $-$1.14 & $-$1.01 & II \\
2584: 2M J11100934$-$7632178 & $-$0.95 & $-$0.96 & $-$0.99 & $-$0.98 & II \\
2585: 2M J11101141$-$7635292 & $-$1.32 & $-$0.58 & $-$0.80 & $-$0.17 & II \\
2586: 2M J11101153$-$7733521 & $-$2.59 & $-$2.73 & $-$2.79 & $-$2.86 & III \\
2587: 2M J11102226$-$7625138 & $-$2.33 & \nodata & $-$2.67 & \nodata & III \\
2588: 2M J11102852$-$7716596 & $-$2.42 & $-$2.58 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2589: 2M J11103481$-$7722053 & $-$2.64 & $-$2.71 & $-$2.78 & $-$2.79 & III \\
2590: 2M J11103644$-$7722131 & $-$2.61 & \nodata & $-$2.77 & \nodata & III \\
2591: 2M J11103801$-$7732399 & $-$1.55 & $-$1.16 & $-$1.33 & $-$0.97 & II \\
2592: 2M J11104006$-$7630547 & $-$2.39 & \nodata & $-$2.69 & \nodata & III \\
2593: 2M J11104141$-$7720480 & $-$1.12 & $-$0.95 & $-$0.95 & $-$0.83 & II \\
2594: 2M J11104959$-$7717517 & $-$0.95 & $-$0.57 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2595: 2M J11105076$-$7718031 & $-$2.54 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2596: 2M J11105333$-$7634319 & $-$0.86 & $-$0.82 & $-$0.76 & $-$0.76 & II \\
2597: 2M J11105359$-$7725004 & $-$0.58 & $-$0.59 & $-$0.99 & $-$0.77 & II \\
2598: 2M J11105597$-$7645325 & $-$1.38 & $-$1.01 & $-$1.28 & $-$0.88 & II \\
2599: 2M J11111083$-$7641574 & $-$1.28 & $-$0.05 & $-$0.87 & 0.43 & II \\
2600: 2M J11112260$-$7705538 & \nodata & $-$2.79 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2601: 2M J11113474$-$7636211 & $-$2.56 & $-$2.88 & $-$2.78 & $-$3.06 & III \\
2602: 2M J11113965$-$7620152 & $-$1.39 & $-$0.92 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2603: 2M J11114533$-$7636505 & $-$1.44 & $-$0.93 & $-$1.56 & $-$0.86 & II \\
2604: 2M J11114632$-$7620092 & $-$1.74 & $-$1.34 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2605: 2M J11115400$-$7619311 & $-$2.54 & $-$2.63 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2606: 2M J11120288$-$7722483 & $-$2.39 & \nodata & $-$2.60 & \nodata & III \\
2607: 2M J11120327$-$7637034 & $-$2.44 & $-$2.51 & $-$2.74 & $-$2.65 & III \\
2608: 2M J11120351$-$7726009 & $-$1.35 & $-$1.10 & $-$1.64 & $-$1.16 & II \\
2609: 2M J11120984$-$7634366 & $-$1.56 & $-$1.06 & $-$1.42 & $-$0.87 & II \\
2610: 2M J11122250$-$7714512 & $-$1.71 & $-$1.22 & $-$1.77 & $-$1.12 & II \\
2611: 2M J11122441$-$7637064 & $-$0.86 & $-$1.13 & $-$0.58 & $-$1.08 & II \\
2612: 2M J11122772$-$7644223 & $-$1.21 & $-$0.73 & $-$1.30 & $-$0.65 & II \\
2613: 2M J11123092$-$7644241 & $-$1.05 & \nodata & $-$1.00 & \nodata & II \\
2614: 2M J11123099$-$7653342 & $-$2.31 & \nodata & $-$2.63 & \nodata & III \\
2615: 2M J11124268$-$7722230 & \nodata & $-$1.75 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2616: 2M J11124299$-$7637049 & $-$2.71 & $-$2.79 & $-$2.78 & $-$2.84 & III \\
2617: 2M J11124861$-$7647066 & $-$1.44 & $-$1.27 & \nodata & \nodata & II \\
2618: 2M J11132446$-$7629227 & $-$1.42 & $-$1.02 & $-$1.47 & $-$0.94 & II \\
2619: 2M J11132737$-$7634165 & $-$2.64 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.77 & $-$2.84 & III \\
2620: 2M J11132970$-$7629012 & $-$2.57 & $-$2.72 & $-$2.82 & $-$2.87 & III \\
2621: 2M J11133356$-$7635374 & $-$2.52 & $-$2.51 & $-$2.77 & $-$2.62 & III \\
2622: 2M J11141565$-$7627364 & $-$2.56 & $-$2.49 & $-$2.78 & $-$2.57 & III \\
2623: 2M J11142454$-$7733062 & $-$1.69 & $-$1.31 & $-$1.63 & $-$1.19 & II \\
2624: 2M J11142611$-$7733042 & $-$2.21 & \nodata & $-$2.38 & \nodata & II \\
2625: 2M J11142906$-$7625399 & $-$2.54 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2626: 2M J11145031$-$7733390 & $-$2.57 & $-$2.70 & $-$2.72 & $-$2.79 & III \\
2627: 2M J11152180$-$7724042 & $-$2.53 & $-$2.74 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2628: 2M J11173792$-$7646193 & $-$2.37 & \nodata & $-$2.65 & \nodata & III \\
2629: 2M J11182024$-$7621576 & \nodata & $-$2.71 & \nodata & \nodata & III \\
2630: 2M J11183379$-$7643041 & $-$2.39 & $-$2.67 & $-$2.69 & $-$2.87 & III \\
2631: 2M J11194214$-$7623326 & $-$2.55 & \nodata & $-$2.77 & \nodata & III \\
2632: 2M J11195652$-$7504529 & $-$2.37 & \nodata & $-$2.77 & \nodata & III \\
2633: 2M J11241186$-$7630425 & $-$2.10 & \nodata & $-$2.12 & \nodata & II \\
2634: 2M J11242980$-$7554237 & $-$2.55 & $-$2.70 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.82 & III \\
2635: 2M J11291261$-$7546263 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.65 & $-$2.79 & $-$2.69 & III \\
2636: 2M J11332327$-$7622092 & $-$2.51 & $-$2.67 & $-$2.71 & $-$2.79 & III \\
2637: \enddata
2638: \tablenotetext{a}{Spectral slopes are the observed values without a
2639: correction for extinction.}
2640: \end{deluxetable}
2641:
2642: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrr}
2643: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2644: \tablewidth{0pt}
2645: \tablecaption{SED Classes in Chamaeleon~I\label{tab:class}}
2646: \tablehead{
2647: \colhead{Class} &
2648: \colhead{North\tablenotemark{a}} &
2649: \colhead{South\tablenotemark{b}} &
2650: \colhead{Total}}
2651: \startdata
2652: I & 1 & 3 & 4 \\
2653: flat & 2 & 8 & 10 \\
2654: II & 43 & 51 & 94 \\
2655: III & 44 & 51 & 95 \\
2656: \enddata
2657: \tablenotetext{a}{$\delta>-77\arcdeg$.}
2658: \tablenotetext{b}{$\delta<-77\arcdeg$.}
2659: \end{deluxetable}
2660:
2661: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
2662: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2663: \tablewidth{0pt}
2664: \tablecaption{Disk Fractions\label{tab:diskfraction}}
2665: \tablehead{
2666: \colhead{Spectral Type} &
2667: \colhead{Chamaeleon I} &
2668: \colhead{IC 348}}
2669: \startdata
2670: $<$K6 & 14/19 = $0.74^{+0.08}_{-0.12}$ & 7/35 = $0.20^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ \\
2671: $\geq$K6 and $\leq$M3.5 & 42/66 = $0.64\pm0.06$ & 41/94 = $0.44\pm0.05$ \\
2672: $>$M3.5 and $<$M6 & 36/83 = $0.43\pm0.05$ & 62/130 = $0.48\pm0.04$ \\
2673: $\geq$M6 and $\leq$M8 & 10/24 = $0.42^{+0.1}_{-0.09}$ & 13/23 = $0.57\pm0.1$ \\
2674: $>$M8 & 5/10 = $0.50^{+0.14}_{-0.15}$ & 5/12 = $0.42^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$ \\
2675: \enddata
2676: \tablecomments{The statistical errors in the disk fractions are computed in the
2677: manner described by \citet{bur03}.}
2678: \end{deluxetable}
2679:
2680: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllll}
2681: %\rotate
2682: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2683: \tablewidth{0pt}
2684: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} Photometry for Probable Members of
2685: $\epsilon$~Cha\label{tab:eps}}
2686: \tablehead{
2687: \colhead{ID\tablenotemark{a}} &
2688: \colhead{2MASS\tablenotemark{b}} &
2689: \colhead{Name} &
2690: \colhead{[3.6]} &
2691: \colhead{[4.5]} &
2692: \colhead{[5.8]} &
2693: \colhead{[8.0]} &
2694: \colhead{Date} &
2695: \colhead{[24]} &
2696: \colhead{Date}
2697: }
2698: \startdata
2699: 13 & J11183572$-$7935548 & \nodata & 9.31$\pm$0.02 & 9.15$\pm$0.02 & 9.06$\pm$0.03 & 8.50$\pm$0.04 & 2006 Jul 6 & out & \nodata \\
2700: 14 & J11225562$-$7924438 & RX J1123.2$-$7924 & 9.45$\pm$0.02 & 9.46$\pm$0.02 & 9.42$\pm$0.03 & 9.40$\pm$0.03 & 2004 May 1 & 9.53$\pm$0.10 & 2004 Aug 3 \\
2701: 15 & J11334926$-$7618399 & \nodata & 10.92$\pm$0.02 & 10.84$\pm$0.02 & 10.82$\pm$0.03 & 10.79$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & 9.95$\pm$0.27 & 2007 Jun 6 \\
2702: 16 & J11404967$-$7459394 & \nodata & 11.38$\pm$0.02 & 11.28$\pm$0.02 & 11.24$\pm$0.03 & 11.17$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & \nodata & 2007 Jul 16 \\
2703: 17 & J11432669$-$7804454 & \nodata & 10.08$\pm$0.02 & 9.87$\pm$0.02 & 9.67$\pm$0.03 & 9.26$\pm$0.03 & 2006 Jul 10 & out & \nodata \\
2704: 18 & J11493184$-$7851011 & RX J1149.8$-$7850 & 7.96$\pm$0.02 & 7.53$\pm$0.02 & 7.01$\pm$0.03 & 5.81$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 1.75$\pm$0.04 & 2005 Mar 6 \\
2705: 19 & J11502829$-$7704380 & RX J1150.4$-$7704 & 8.86$\pm$0.02 & 8.86$\pm$0.02 & 8.85$\pm$0.03 & 8.82$\pm$0.04 & 2004 May 26 & 8.76$\pm$0.06 & 2005 Feb 27 \\
2706: 20 & J11582681$-$7754450 & RX J1158.5$-$7754B & 9.25$\pm$0.02 & 9.20$\pm$0.02 & 9.16$\pm$0.03 & 9.15$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Jun 10 & 8.61$\pm$0.06 & 2004 Feb 22 \\
2707: 21 & J11582816$-$7754294 & RX J1158.5$-$7754A & 7.31$\pm$0.02 & 7.27$\pm$0.02 & 7.28$\pm$0.03 & 7.22$\pm$0.03 & 2004 Jun 10 & 7.14$\pm$0.04 & 2004 Feb 22 \\
2708: \enddata
2709: \tablenotetext{a}{Identifications assigned in this work, which conform to
2710: the ones used for previously known members of $\epsilon$~Cha
2711: \citep{fei03,luh04eta}.}
2712: \tablenotetext{b}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
2713: \end{deluxetable}
2714:
2715: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}
2716: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2717: \tablewidth{0pt}
2718: \tablecaption{Spectral Slopes for Probable Members of
2719: $\epsilon$~Cha\label{tab:eps2}}
2720: \tablehead{
2721: \colhead{ID\tablenotemark{a}} &
2722: \colhead{$\alpha$(2-8~\micron)} &
2723: \colhead{$\alpha$(2-24~\micron)} &
2724: \colhead{$\alpha$(3.6-8~\micron)} &
2725: \colhead{$\alpha$(3.6-24~\micron)} &
2726: \colhead{SED Class}
2727: }
2728: \startdata
2729: 13 & $-$1.99 & \nodata & $-$1.92 & \nodata & II \\
2730: 14 & $-$2.60 & $-$2.83 & $-$2.80 & $-$2.97 & III \\
2731: 15 & $-$2.54 & $-$2.43 & $-$2.71 & $-$2.47 & III \\
2732: 16 & $-$2.37 & \nodata & $-$2.62 & \nodata & III \\
2733: 17 & $-$1.87 & \nodata & $-$1.92 & \nodata & II \\
2734: 18 & $-$0.86 & $-$0.28 & $-$0.37 & 0.08 & flat \\
2735: 19 & $-$2.68 & $-$2.80 & $-$2.80 & $-$2.88 & III \\
2736: 20 & $-$2.59 & $-$2.57 & $-$2.74 & $-$2.62 & III \\
2737: 21 & $-$2.66 & $-$2.78 & $-$2.75 & $-$2.85 & III \\
2738: \enddata
2739: \tablenotetext{a}{Identifications from Table~\ref{tab:eps}.}
2740: \end{deluxetable}
2741:
2742: \clearpage
2743:
2744: \begin{figure}
2745: \epsscale{1}
2746: \plotone{f1.eps}
2747: \caption{
2748: Fields in the Chamaeleon~I star-forming region that have been imaged
2749: with IRAC ({\it top}) and MIPS ({\it bottom}). The known members of the
2750: cluster are indicated ({\it points}). We also have measured
2751: IRAC and MIPS photometry for young stars near Chamaeleon~I that we have
2752: identified as probable members of the $\epsilon$~Cha young association
2753: (\S~\ref{sec:app}, {\it filled triangles}).
2754: The original members of $\epsilon$~Cha are located $3\arcdeg$ southeast
2755: of the Chamaeleon~I clouds \citep[{\it open triangles},][]{fei03,luh04eta}.
2756: The contours represent the extinction map of \citet{cam97} at intervals
2757: of $A_J=0.5$, 1, and 2.
2758: }
2759: \label{fig:map}
2760: \end{figure}
2761:
2762: \begin{figure}
2763: \epsscale{1}
2764: \plotone{f2.eps}
2765: \caption{
2766: Distributions of IRAC magnitudes for images of Chamaeleon~I that have
2767: short ({\it solid lines}) and long ({\it dotted lines}) total exposure times.
2768: }
2769: \label{fig:limit}
2770: \end{figure}
2771:
2772: \begin{figure}
2773: \epsscale{0.6}
2774: \plotone{f3.eps}
2775: \caption{
2776: {\it Spitzer} IRAC color-color diagrams for the survey fields in the
2777: Chamaeleon~I star-forming region that are indicated in Figure~\ref{fig:map}.
2778: {\it Top}: The previously known members of Chamaeleon~I ({\it circles})
2779: exhibit either neutral colors consistent with stellar photospheres or
2780: significantly redder colors that are indicative of circumstellar disks.
2781: {\it Bottom}: Among the other point sources in the IRAC data,
2782: we selected a sample of candidate disk-bearing members based on colors
2783: of $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.3$ and $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.15$ ({\it dashed line}) and
2784: obtained spectra of them. The candidates classified as
2785: new members ({\it crosses}) and nonmembers ({\it triangles}) are listed in
2786: Tables~\ref{tab:new} and \ref{tab:non}, respectively.
2787: Most of the remaining red sources are probably galaxies based on their faint
2788: magnitudes (see Fig.~\ref{fig:14}).
2789: Only objects with photometric errors less than 0.1~mag in all four bands
2790: are shown in these diagrams, with the exception of the new member
2791: 2M~J1108$-$7743.
2792: The reddening vector is based on the extinction law from \citet{fla07}.
2793: }
2794: \label{fig:1234}
2795: \end{figure}
2796:
2797: \begin{figure}
2798: \epsscale{0.6}
2799: \plotone{f4.eps}
2800: \caption{
2801: Optical spectrum of a new member of Chamaeleon~I, Cha~J1107$-$7626,
2802: compared to data for the young M9.5 objects KPNO~4, OTS~44, and
2803: Cha~J11091363$-$7734446 \citep{bri02,luh07cha} and the L0 field
2804: dwarf 2MASS~J03454316+2540233 \citep[{\it dotted line},][]{kir99}.
2805: The spectrum of Cha~J11091363$-$7734446 has been dereddened by $A_J=0.28$
2806: \citep{luh07cha}.
2807: The data are displayed at a resolution of 18~\AA\ and are normalized at
2808: 7500~\AA.
2809: }
2810: \label{fig:op}
2811: \end{figure}
2812:
2813: \begin{figure}
2814: \epsscale{1}
2815: \plotone{f5.eps}
2816: \caption{
2817: H-R diagram for all known low-mass stars and brown dwarfs in Chamaeleon~I
2818: \citep[][\S~\ref{sec:new}]{luh07cha}.
2819: These data are shown with the theoretical evolutionary models of
2820: \citet{bar98} ($0.1<M/M_\odot\leq1$) and \citet{cha00} ($M/M_\odot\leq0.1$),
2821: where the mass tracks ({\it dotted lines}) and isochrones ({\it solid lines})
2822: are labeled in units of $M_\odot$ and Myr, respectively.
2823: The four stars that are below the main sequence (ISO~225, CHSM~15991,
2824: Cha~J11081938$-$7731522, ESO~H$\alpha$~569) are probably detected primarily
2825: in scattered light, which precludes the measurement of accurate luminosities.
2826: }
2827: \label{fig:hr}
2828: \end{figure}
2829:
2830: \begin{figure}
2831: \epsscale{0.6}
2832: \plotone{f6.eps}
2833: \caption{
2834: Near-IR spectra of three new members of Chamaeleon~I,
2835: 2M~J1108$-$7743, 2M~J1106$-$7724, and 2M~J1107$-$7724,
2836: compared to data for previously known members with optical spectral types,
2837: T50 (M5), Hn~12W (M5.5), Cha~H$\alpha$~11 (M7.25), and CHSM~17173 (M8).
2838: The spectra of the new members have been dereddened to match the slopes
2839: of the young optical standards.
2840: The spectra are displayed at a resolution of $R=200$ and are normalized at
2841: 1.68~\micron.
2842: }
2843: \label{fig:ir}
2844: \end{figure}
2845:
2846: \begin{figure}
2847: \epsscale{0.8}
2848: \plotone{f7.eps}
2849: \caption{
2850: 2MASS and {\it Spitzer} images of the region surrounding
2851: the Cederblad~110 reflection nebula in Chamaeleon~I ($5\arcmin\times5\arcmin$).
2852: 2M~1106$-$7724 and 2M~1107$-$7724 are highly reddened, low-mass disk-bearing
2853: sources discovered in this work. A redder and fainter candidate member
2854: of Chamaeleon~I appears $7\arcsec$ northwest of 2M~1106$-$7724
2855: (Table~\ref{tab:cand}). The protostar Cha-MMS1 is detected at 24~\micron.
2856: The faint source in the middle of the 24~\micron\ image (southeast of
2857: Ced~110-IRS4) is a latent image from Ced~110-IRS6.
2858: }
2859: \label{fig:image}
2860: \end{figure}
2861:
2862: \begin{figure}
2863: \epsscale{0.6}
2864: \plotone{f8.eps}
2865: \caption{
2866: {\it Spitzer} color-magnitude and color-color diagrams for the survey fields
2867: in the Chamaeleon~I star-forming region that are indicated in
2868: Figure~\ref{fig:map}. We show the previously known members of Chamaeleon~I
2869: ({\it circles}) and objects that have red colors in Figure~\ref{fig:1234} and
2870: that have been spectroscopically classified as new members
2871: ({\it crosses}, Table~\ref{tab:new}) and nonmembers ({\it triangles},
2872: Table~\ref{tab:non}). We also include the remaining
2873: sources from Figure~\ref{fig:1234} that have red colors
2874: ($[3.6]-[4.5]>0.15$, $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.3$) and lack spectroscopy ({\it points}),
2875: most of which are probably galaxies based on their faint magnitudes.
2876: Only objects with photometric errors less than 0.1~mag in all four bands
2877: are shown in these diagrams, with the exception of the new member
2878: 2M~J1108$-$7743.
2879: The 8~\micron\ completeness limits for the shortest and longest exposures
2880: are shown in the color-magnitude diagram ({\it dashed lines},
2881: Fig.~\ref{fig:limit}). The reddening vectors are based on the extinction
2882: law from \citet{fla07}.
2883: }
2884: \label{fig:14}
2885: \end{figure}
2886:
2887: \begin{figure}
2888: \epsscale{1}
2889: \plotone{f9.eps}
2890: \caption{
2891: Comparison of the IRAC magnitudes from \citet{dam07}
2892: to our measurements of the same objects from the same images considered
2893: in that study. The errors reported by \citet{dam07} are indicated.
2894: Nearly all of our measurements have errors of 0.02-0.04~mag.
2895: }
2896: \label{fig:dam1}
2897: \end{figure}
2898:
2899: \begin{figure}
2900: \epsscale{0.6}
2901: \plotone{f10.eps}
2902: \caption{
2903: Comparison of the IRAC colors from \citet{dam07} ({\it bottom})
2904: to our measurements of the same objects from the same images considered
2905: in that study ({\it top}).
2906: }
2907: \label{fig:dam2}
2908: \end{figure}
2909:
2910: \begin{figure}
2911: \epsscale{1}
2912: \plotone{f11.eps}
2913: \caption{
2914: Distributions of spectral slopes for members of Chamaeleon~I
2915: (Table~\ref{tab:alpha}).
2916: }
2917: \label{fig:alpha2}
2918: \end{figure}
2919:
2920: \begin{figure}
2921: \epsscale{1}
2922: \plotone{f12.eps}
2923: \caption{
2924: Spectral slopes as function of spectral type for members of Chamaeleon~I
2925: (Table~\ref{tab:alpha}).
2926: Our adopted boundaries for separating SED classes II and III are indicated
2927: ({\it dashed lines}).
2928: }
2929: \label{fig:alpha1}
2930: \end{figure}
2931:
2932: \begin{figure}
2933: \epsscale{0.6}
2934: \plotone{f13.eps}
2935: \caption{
2936: Disk fraction as a function of mass and spectral type for members of
2937: Chamaeleon~I based on the SED classifications from Figure~\ref{fig:alpha1}.
2938: For comparison, we include the disk fraction of IC~348 computed in the same
2939: manner using data from \citet{luh05frac} and \citet{lada06}.
2940: }
2941: \label{fig:diskfraction}
2942: \end{figure}
2943:
2944: \begin{figure}
2945: \epsscale{0.6}
2946: \plotone{f14.eps}
2947: \caption{
2948: Distributions of isochronal ages for members of Chamaeleon~I ({\it top})
2949: and IC~348 ({\it bottom}) with masses between 0.1 and 1~$M_\odot$
2950: \citep{luh03ic,luh07cha}.
2951: }
2952: \label{fig:ages}
2953: \end{figure}
2954:
2955: \begin{figure}
2956: \epsscale{1}
2957: \plotone{f15.eps}
2958: \caption{
2959: Spatial distributions of members of Chamaeleon~I in the SED classes
2960: from Table~\ref{tab:alpha}.
2961: The contours represent the extinction map of \citet{cam97} at intervals
2962: of $A_J=0.5$, 1, and 2.
2963: }
2964: \label{fig:mapclass}
2965: \end{figure}
2966:
2967: \begin{figure}
2968: \epsscale{1}
2969: \plotone{f16.eps}
2970: \caption{
2971: Variability of IRAC magnitudes for members of Chamaeleon~I that have
2972: disks (class~I through class~II, {\it dotted histograms}) and
2973: members without disks (class~III, {\it solid histograms}).
2974: The histograms represent distributions of differences between a magnitude
2975: and the average magnitude for a given source and band. Each magnitude
2976: difference is weighted by the inverse of the number of measurements so that
2977: all members contribute equally.
2978: }
2979: \label{fig:var}
2980: \end{figure}
2981:
2982: \end{document}
2983: