1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}% for a referee versione
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
4: %\input riviste
5: % Bibliography and bibfile
6: %% astronomical journals da aa.cls Astronomy and Astrophysics class
7: \def\aplett{Astrophys.~Lett.\,}%Astrophysics Letters
8: \def\apj{ApJ\,}%% Astrophysical Journal
9: \def\apjl{ApJ\,}%% Astrophysical Journal, Letters
10: \def\aap{A\&A\,}%% Astronomy and Astrophysics
11: \def\mnras{MNRAS\,}%% Monthly Notices of the RAS
12: \def\pasj{PASJ\,}%% Publications of the ASJ
13: \def\solphys{Sol.~Phys.\,}%% Solar Physics
14: \def\aj{AJ}%% Astronomical Journal
15: \def\aaps{A\&AS}% % Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement
16: \def\araa{ARA\&A}% Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys
17: \def\apjs{ApJS}%% Astrophysical Journal, Supplement
18: \def\cjaa{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys.}% Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
19: \def\jaa{J. Astrophys. Astr.}% (Indian) Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy Astrophysics
20: \def\planss{Planet.~Space~Sci.}% Planetary Space Science
21: \def\apss{Astrophysics and Space Science}%Astrophysics and Space Science
22: \def\jrasc{JRASC} %journal Royal Astronomical Society Canada
23: %% physical journal
24: \def\pasp{PASP}% % Publications of the ASP
25: \def\JPG{J. Phys. G\,}%Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics
26: \def\POF{Physics of Fluids}
27: \def\physrep{Phys.~Rep.\,}% % Physics Reports
28: \def\nat{Nature\,}%% Nature
29: \def\pre{Phys.~Rev.~E}% % Physical Review E
30: \def\pra{Phys.~Rev.~A}% % Physical Review A
31: \def\physa{Physica A}% % Physica A
32: \def\rpp{Rep.Prog.Phys.}%%Reports on Progress in Physics
33: %% end bib file
34: %\addtolength {\hoffset } {-1 cm } % togliere nell'ultima versione
35: %\addtolength {\voffset } {-1. cm } % magnificare a 1600 pdf
36: %\addtolength {\textheight} {-8 cm } % magnificare a 1600 pdf
37: %\addtolength {\textwidth } {-5.0 cm} % togliere nell'ultima versione
38: \begin{document}
39: \shorttitle {Luminosity function for galaxies}
40: \shortauthors{Zaninetti}
41: \title{A new luminosity function for galaxies as given
42: by the mass-luminosity relationship }
43: \author{Zaninetti Lorenzo }
44:
45: \affil {Dipartimento di Fisica Generale, Via Pietro Giuria 1,\\
46: 10125 Torino, Italy}
47:
48: \email {zaninetti@ph.unito.it \\
49: \url {http://www.ph.unito.it/$\tilde{~}$zaninett}}
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52: The search for a luminosity function for galaxies both alternative
53: or companion to a Schechter function is a key problem
54: in the reduction of data from catalogs of galaxies.
55: Two luminosity functions for galaxies can be built starting from
56: two distributions of mass as given by the fragmentation.
57: A first overall distribution function is the Kiang function
58: that represents a useful description
59: of the area and volume distribution
60: of the Poisson Voronoi diagrams.
61: The second distribution, that covers the case of low mass
62: galaxies, is the
63: truncated Pareto distribution : in this model we
64: have a natural bound due to the minimum mass/luminosity
65: observed and an upper bound ( function of the
66: considered environment) represented
67: by the boundary with the observed mass/luminosity overall
68: behaviour.
69: The mass distribution is then converted into a
70: luminosity distribution through a standard mass-luminosity
71: relationship.
72: The mathematical rules to convert the probability density
73: function are used and the two
74: new functions are normalised to the total number of galaxies
75: per unit volume.
76: The test of the two new luminosity functions for galaxies
77: that cover different ranges in magnitude
78: was made on
79: the Sloan Digital Sky
80: Survey (SDSS)
81: in five different bands;
82: the results are comparable to those of
83: the Schechter function.
84: A new parameter that indicates
85: the stellar content is derived.
86: The joint distribution in red-shift and flux ,
87: the mean
88: red-shift and the number density connected with
89: the first
90: luminosity function for galaxies are obtained by analogy
91: with the Schechter function.
92: A new formula
93: that allows us to express the mass as a function of the
94: absolute magnitude is derived.
95: \end {abstract}
96: \keywords{Galaxies: fundamental parameters --- Galaxies: statistics ---
97: Galaxies: luminosity function, mass function }
98:
99:
100:
101: \section{Introduction}
102:
103: Over the years the search for a luminosity function
104: for galaxies has played a relevant role in
105: the analysis of data from catalogs.
106: A model for the luminosity of galaxies
107: is the Schechter function
108: \begin{equation}
109: \Phi (L) dL = (\frac {\Phi^*}{L^*}) (\frac {L}{L^*})^{\alpha}
110: \exp \bigl ( {- \frac {L}{L^*}} \bigr ) dL \quad ,
111: \label{equation_schechter}
112: \end {equation}
113: where $\alpha$ sets the slope for low values of $L$ , $L^*$ is the
114: characteristic luminosity and $\Phi^*$ is the normalisation.
115: This
116: function was suggested by \citet{schechter} in order to
117: substitute other analytical expressions, see for example
118: formula~(3) in~\citet{kiang1961}.
119: Over the years this function has also been applied
120: to describe physical quantities related to the optical
121: luminosity , such as the CO luminosity
122: for galaxies , \cite{Keres2003}, and the
123: barionic mass function of galaxies , \cite{Bell2003b}.
124:
125: An astronomical form of
126: equation~(\ref{equation_schechter}) can be deduced by introducing the
127: distribution in absolute magnitude
128: \begin{eqnarray}
129: \Phi (M)dM=&&(0.4 ln 10) \Phi^* 10^{0.4(\alpha +1 ) (M^*-M)}\nonumber\\
130: && \times \exp \bigl ({- 10^{0.4(M^*-M)}} \bigr) dM \quad ,
131: \label{equation_schechter_M}
132: \end {eqnarray}
133: where $M^*$ is the characteristic magnitude as derived from the
134: data.
135: This distribution has a maximum at
136: \begin{equation}
137: M_{p,max} =
138: {\it M^*}- 1.085\,\ln \left( \alpha+ 1.0 \right)
139: \quad ,
140: \label{maximummag}
141: \end {equation}
142: where ${p,max}$ means position of the maximum.
143: In approaching this value the function will progressively flatten.
144:
145: At present this function is widely used and
146: Table~\ref{parameters} reports , as an example ,
147: the parameters
148: from three catalogs
149: \begin{itemize}
150: \item The 2dF Galaxy
151: Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) based on a sample of 75589 galaxies,
152: see first line of Table~3 in \cite{Madgwick_2002}.
153:
154: \item The $r^\ast$-band luminosity function for a sample of 147986
155: galaxies at $z=0.1$ from the Sloan Digital Sky
156: Survey (SDSS) , see~\cite{Blanton_2003}.
157: \item The galaxy luminosity function
158: for a sample of 10095 galaxies
159: from the Millennium Galaxy Catalogue (MGC)
160: , see~\cite{Driver2005}.
161: \end{itemize}
162:
163: \begin{table}
164: \caption[]{The parameters of the Schechter function from
165: 2dFGRS , SDSS and MGC . }
166: \label{parameters}
167: \[
168: \begin{array}{lccc}
169: \hline
170: \hline
171: \noalign{\smallskip}
172: parameter & 2dFGRS & SDSS~(r^*)~ band & MGC \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
173: M^* ~ [mags] & -19.79 \pm 0.04 & -20.44 \pm 0.01 & -19.60 \pm 0.04 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
174: \alpha & -1.19 \pm 0.01 & -1.05 \pm 0.01 & -1.13 \pm 0.02 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
175: \Phi^* ~[h~Mpc^{-3}] & (1.59 \pm 0.1)10^{-2} &(1.49 \pm 0.04)10^{-2} & (1.77 \pm 0.15)10^{-2} \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
176: \hline
177: \hline
178: \end{array}
179: \]
180: \end {table}
181: %tabella1
182:
183:
184:
185: Over the years many modifications have been made
186: to the standard Schechter function in order to improve its fit:
187: we report three of them.
188: When the fit of the rich clusters luminosity function
189: is not satisfactory
190: a two-component Schechter-like function is introduced
191: , see~\cite{Driver1996}.
192: %
193: %\begin{eqnarray}
194: %L_{max} > L > L_{Dwarf} : \quad
195: %\Phi (L) dL = (\frac {\Phi^*}{L^*}) (\frac {L}{L^*})^{\alpha}
196: %\exp \bigl ( {- \frac {L}{L^*}} \bigr ) dL \quad ,
197: %\nonumber \\
198: % \\
199: %L_{Dwarf} > L > L_{min} : \quad
200: %\Phi (L) dL = (\frac {\Phi_{Dwarf}}{L^*}) (\frac {L}{L_{Dwarf}})^{\alpha_{
201: %Dwarf}}
202: % dL \quad ,
203: %\label{eqndwarf}
204: %\nonumber
205: %\end {eqnarray}
206: %where
207: %\begin{eqnarray}
208: %\Phi_{Dwarf} = \Phi^* (\frac {L_{Dwarf} }{L^*})^{\alpha}
209: %\exp \bigl ( {- \frac {L_{Dwarf} }{L^*}} \bigr )
210: %\quad .
211: %\nonumber
212: %\end{eqnarray}
213: This two-component function is the Schechter function when
214: $ L_{Dwarf} < L < L_{max} $
215: and has $(\frac{L}{L_{Dwarf}})^{\alpha_{Dwarf}}$ dependence
216: when $ L_{min} < L < L_{Dwarf} $: $L_{Dwarf}$ represents the magnitude where
217: dwarfs first dominate over giants , ${\alpha_{Dwarf}}$ the faint
218: slope parameter for the dwarf population , the index {\it min}
219: and {\it max} denote the minimum and the maximum.
220:
221: Another example is
222: the hybrid Schechter+power-law fit
223: to fit the faint-end of the K-band, see~\cite{Bell2003}.
224:
225: Another function introduced in order to fit the case of
226: extremely low luminosity galaxies is the double Schechter
227: function , see~\citet{Blanton_2005} , where the parameters
228: $\Phi^*$ and $\alpha$ that characterise the Schechter function
229: have been doubled in $\phi_{\ast,1},\phi_{\ast,2}$ and
230: $\alpha_1,\alpha_2$.
231: %modifica4
232: %modifica4
233: The previous efforts bring the attention toward
234: two ranges in luminosity for galaxies : an overall zone
235: from high luminosity to low luminosity and the
236: low luminosity zone.
237: This situation remembers the case of the stars in which three zones
238: are considered , see \cite{Scalo1986},
239: \cite{Kroupa1993}, and \cite{Binney1998} ;
240: in this case the range of existence
241: of the zones as well as the exponent that
242: characterises the power law behaviour
243: are functions of the investigated environment.
244: These three zones in the mass distribution of the stars
245: have been investigated
246: at the light of the physical processes
247: in \cite{Elmegreen2004}; they correspond to
248: brown dwarf masses $\approx~0.02\mathcal {M}_{\sun}$,
249: to intermediate mass stars and high mass stars.
250: %modifica4
251: %modifica4
252: %
253: %\begin{equation}
254: %\Phi(L) dL = \frac{dL}{L_\ast}
255: % \exp(-L/L_{\ast}) \left[
256: %\phi_{\ast,1}
257: %\left( \frac{L}{L_{\ast}} \right)^{\alpha_1} +
258: %\phi_{\ast,2}
259: %\left( \frac{L}{L_{\ast}} \right)^{\alpha_2}
260: % \right]
261: %\quad ,
262: %\label{eqndouble}
263: %\end{equation}
264:
265: The starting point of this paper is a statistical distribution in
266: the mass of the galaxies , $\mathcal { M }$ as given by a a
267: standard gamma variate with a range of existence $ 0 < \mathcal
268: { M } < \infty $ . This distribution describes the area of
269: the irregular Voronoi polygons. This distribution in mass can be
270: converted in a new statistical distribution for the luminosity of
271: galaxies through an analogy with the physics of the stars. This
272: new distribution in luminosity ,$L$ ,is characterised by a range of
273: existence $ 0 < { L } < \infty $ and a local maximum , named
274: mode. A second distribution in the masses starts from a truncated
275: Pareto distribution , after~\cite{Pareto} , with a range of
276: existence $ \mathcal {M}_{min} < \mathcal { M } < \mathcal
277: {M}_{max} $ . The standard procedure of conversion from from
278: mass to luminosity allows us to derive a truncated Pareto type
279: luminosity function that has a range of existence $ L_{min} < { L }
280: < L_{max} $ . In this distribution the mode is at $L_{min}$.
281:
282: Section~\ref{luminosity_my}
283: first introduces the 2D Voronoi diagrams
284: and then describes
285: the mathematical details
286: that allow us to deduce two new physical functions
287: for luminosity of galaxies and
288: Section~\ref{test} reports a first test
289: based on the SDSS photometric catalog.
290:
291: In Section~\ref{secz} the red-shift dependence
292: of the Schechter function and the
293: first new function are explored in detail.
294: Section~\ref{secmass} reports the mass
295: evaluation for galaxies based
296: on the first luminosity function as well as a new formula
297: for the limiting mass.
298: Section~\ref{conclusions} summarises the results.
299:
300: \section{From the mass to the magnitude}
301: The first paragraph briefly introduces the 2D Voronoi diagrams as
302: produced by two types of seeds. These two statistical
303: distributions adopted to fit the area
304: of the irregular Voronoi
305: polygons can be taken as a starting point to construct two
306: luminosity functions for galaxies.
307: \subsection{The Voronoi Diagrams}
308: %modifica7
309: %modifica7
310: When the seeds are randomly and
311: uncorrelated distributed, are
312: called Poisson Voronoi diagrams.
313: A great number of natural phenomena are
314: described by Poisson Voronoi diagrams , we cite some of them :
315: lattices in quantum field theory ,
316: see \cite{Drouffe1984} ;
317: conductivity and
318: percolation in granular composites ,
319: see \cite{Jerauld1984_a} and \cite{Jerauld1984_b};
320: modelling growth of metal clusters on amorphous
321: substrates , see \cite{Dicenzo1989};
322: the statistical mechanics of simple glass
323: forming systems in 2D , see \cite{Hentschel2007};
324: modelling of material interface evolution
325: in grain growth of polycrystalline
326: materials , see ~\cite{Lee2006}.
327: %%modifica7
328: %%modifica7
329: When the seeds are randomly and
330: uncorrelated distributed, are
331: called Poisson Voronoi diagrams.
332: A great number of natural phenomena are
333: described by Poisson Voronoi diagrams , we cite some of them :
334: lattices in quantum field theory ,
335: see \cite{Drouffe1984} ;
336: conductivity and
337: percolation in granular composites ,
338: see \cite{Jerauld1984_a} and \cite{Jerauld1984_b};
339: modelling growth of metal clusters on amorphous
340: substrates , see \cite{Dicenzo1989};
341: the statistical mechanics of simple glass
342: forming systems in 2D , see \cite{Hentschel2007};
343: modelling of material interface evolution
344: in grain growth of polycrystalline
345: materials , see ~\cite{Lee2006}.
346: %%modifica7
347: %%modifica7
348: %modifica3
349: %modifica3
350: A review of the Voronoi diagrams applied
351: to the spatial distribution of the galaxies
352: can be found in~\cite{Zaninetti2006}.
353: %modifica3
354: %modifica3
355: Here we are interested in the fragmentation of a 2D
356: layer of thickness negligible in respect
357: to the main dimension.
358: A typical dimension of the layer can be found as follows.
359: The averaged observed diameter of the galaxies is
360: \begin{equation}
361: \overline{D^{obs}} \approx 0.6 {D_{max}^{obs}} = 2700 \frac{Km}{sec}
362: = 27~Mpc
363: \quad ,
364: \label{dobserved}
365: \end {equation}
366: where $D_{max}^{obs}=4500~\frac{Km}{sec}$ corresponds to the
367: extension of the maximum void visible on the CFA2 slices. In the
368: framework of the theory of the primordial explosions
369: ,see~\citet{charlton} and \citet{ferraro}, this means that the
370: mean observed area of a bubble ,$\overline{A^{obs}} $, is
371: \begin{equation}
372: \overline{A^{obs}} \approx 4 \pi (\frac{D_{max}^{obs}}{2})^2
373: =2290 Mpc^2
374: \quad .
375: \label{aobserved}
376: \end {equation}
377: The averaged area of a face of Voronoi polyhedra ,
378: $\overline{A_V} $, is
379: \begin{equation}
380: \overline{A_V} = \frac{\overline{A^{obs}}} {\overline{N_F}}
381: \quad ,
382: \end {equation}
383: where ${\overline{N_F}}$ is the averaged number of irregular
384: faces of the Voronoi polyhedra,
385: i.e. ${\overline{N_F}}$=16 , see~\citet{okabe,Zaninetti2006}.
386: The averaged side of a face of a irregular polyhedron , $L_V$ ,
387: is
388: \begin{equation}
389: \overline{L_V} \approx \sqrt {\overline{A^{obs}}} \approx 12~Mpc
390: \quad .
391: \end {equation}
392: The thickness of the layer , $\delta$ ,
393: can be derived from the shock theory
394: , see~\cite{deeming}, and is 1/12 of the radius
395: of the advancing shock ,
396: \begin{equation}
397: \delta = \frac { {D_{max}^{obs}} } {2 \times 12 } \approx 1.12 Mpc
398: \quad .
399: \end{equation}
400: The number of galaxies in this typical layer , $N_G$, can be found
401: by
402: multiplying $n_*\approx 0.1$ , the density of galaxies , for the
403: volume of the cube of side 12~$Mpc$ : i.e. $N_G \approx 172 $.
404:
405: The more common way to insert the seeds of the Voronoi polygons
406: is a random sequence in the $X$ and $Y$ direction ,
407: see Figure~\ref{area2D_random}.
408: %begin figure area2D_random
409: \begin{figure}
410: \begin{center}
411: \plotone{f01.eps}
412: \end {center}
413: \caption {
414: The Voronoi--diagram in 2D when random seeds are used.
415: The selected region comprises 77 seeds and
416: $c=5.1$ .
417: }
418: \label{area2D_random}
419: \end{figure}
420: %end figure area2D_random
421:
422: The distribution of the area of the irregular Voronoi polygons is
423: fitted with a Kiang function, see formula~(\ref{kiang}) in
424: Appendix~\ref{appendixa},:
425: \begin{equation}
426: H (x ;c ) = \frac {c} {\Gamma (c)} (cx )^{c-1} \exp(-cx)
427: \quad ,
428: \label{kianglum}
429: \end{equation}
430: and the captions of
431: Figure~\ref{area2D_random} also report the value of $c$
432: as deduced from the parameters of the sample.
433:
434: Another way to insert the seeds is through a
435: truncated Pareto distribution , see Appendix~\ref{appendixb};
436: %modifica9
437: %modifica9
438: this is an example of non-Poissonian seeds.
439: %modifica9
440: %modifica9
441:
442: In polar coordinates the radial distribution of seeds
443: $ p(r) $
444: will vary according to
445: \begin{equation}
446: p(r) \propto \frac {1}{r^{d+1}}
447: \quad ,
448: \end {equation}
449: where $r$ is the distance from the center of the box
450: ,
451: see Figure~\ref{area2D_pareto}.
452: %begin figure area2D_pareto
453: \begin{figure}
454: \begin{center}
455: \plotone{f02.eps}
456: \end {center}
457: \caption {
458: The Voronoi--diagram in 2D when truncated Pareto seeds are used.
459: The selected region comprises 124 seeds and
460: $d=0.27$ as deduced from MLE ,
461: see Appendix~\ref{appendixb} .
462: }
463: \label{area2D_pareto}
464: \end{figure}
465: %end figure area2D_pareto
466:
467: %siamoqui
468: \subsection{A first main physical luminosity distribution}
469: \label{luminosity_my}
470:
471: In order to start, we briefly review how a
472: probability density function ( in the following pdf) $f(x)$ changes to
473: $g(y)$ when a new variable $y (x)$ is introduced~. We limit ourselves
474: to the case in which $y(x)$ is a unique transformation.
475: The rule for
476: transforming a pdf is
477: \begin{equation}
478: g(y) = \frac {f(x) } {\vert\frac {dy } {dx} \vert} \label{trans}
479: \quad.
480: \end{equation}
481: We start by assuming that the masses of the galaxies are distributed like
482: a Kiang function, see formula~(\ref{kiang}) in Appendix~\ref{appendixa}
483: or the previous paragraph.
484: This assumption is justified by the fact that
485: the various processes that lead to the formation
486: of a galaxy can follow a random fragmentation in 2D.
487: The first
488: transformation is
489: \begin{equation}
490: x = \frac {\mathcal M} {\mathcal M^*} \label {first} \quad ,
491: \end{equation}
492: and therefore equation~(\ref{kiang}) changes to
493: \begin{equation}
494: \Psi ({\mathcal M }) d{\mathcal M }
495: = \frac {\left ( \frac {\mathcal M }{\mathcal M^*} \right )^ {c-1}
496: e ^{-\frac {\mathcal M}{\mathcal M^*}} } {\Gamma (c)}
497: d\frac {\mathcal M }{\mathcal M^*}
498: \label{psi} \quad.
499: \end {equation}
500:
501: This is a gamma distribution with a scale parameter ${\mathcal M^*}$
502: and a shape parameter {\it c},
503: and its averaged value
504: is
505: \begin{equation}
506: {\langle{\mathcal M}\rangle}=c {\mathcal M^*}
507: \quad .
508: \label{massamedia}
509: \end{equation}
510:
511: The mass-luminosity relationship in the case of the stars
512: is well established both from a theoretical point of view,
513: $L \propto M^3 $ or $L \propto M^4 $ ,see ~\cite{lang}, and
514: from an observational point of view , $L \propto M^{3.43} $
515: in the case of MAIN,V , see~\cite{zaninetti05} for further
516: details.
517: A power law which is introduced by analogy
518: regulates the relationship between mass and luminosity
519: of galaxies, but in this case the regulating parameter $a$
520: does not have a theoretical counterpart.
521: The second transformation is
522: \begin{equation}
523: \frac {\mathcal M }{\mathcal M^*} = \left ( \frac {L }{L^*}
524: \right ) ^{\frac{1}{a} } \quad ,
525: \label{massa}
526: \end{equation}
527: where 1/a is an exponent that connects the mass to the
528: luminosity. The pdf (\ref{psi} ) is therefore transformed into
529: the
530: following:
531: \begin{eqnarray}
532: \Psi (L) dL =&& (\frac{1}{a \Gamma(c) } ) (\frac {\Psi^*}{L^*})
533: \left (\frac {L}{L^*} \right )^{\frac{c-a}{a}} \nonumber\\
534: &&\times \exp \left ( {-
535: \left ( \frac {L}{L^*}\right )^{\frac{1}{a}}} \right ) dL \quad
536: , \label{equation_schechter_mia}
537: \end {eqnarray}
538: where $\Psi^*$ is a normalisation factor which defines the
539: overall density of galaxies , a number per cubic $Mpc$.
540: The mathematical range of existence is $ 0 \leq L < \infty $
541: ; conversely the astronomical range is $ L_{\mathrm{min}} \leq L <
542: L_{\mathrm{max}} $.
543:
544: The relationship connecting the absolute magnitude, $M$ ,
545: of a
546: galaxy with its luminosity is
547: \begin{equation}
548: \frac {L}{L_{\sun}} =
549: 10^{0.4(M_{bol,\sun} - M)}
550: \quad ,
551: \label{mlrelation}
552: \end {equation}
553: where $M_{bol,\sun}$ is the bolometric luminosity
554: of the sun , which according to \cite{cox}
555: is $M_{bol,\sun}$=4.74.
556:
557: The third
558: and last transformation connects the luminosity with the absolute
559: magnitude
560: \begin{eqnarray}
561: \Psi (M) dM = && (0.4 ln 10 \frac {1}{a \Gamma(c)}) \Psi^*
562: 10^{0.4(\frac{c}{a}) (M^*-M)} \nonumber \\
563: && \times \exp \bigl ({-
564: 10^{0.4(M^*-M)(\frac{1}{a})}} \bigr) dM \quad.
565: \label{equation_mia}
566: \end {eqnarray}
567: This data oriented function contains the parameters $M^*$ ,{\it a},
568: {\it c}
569: and $\Psi^*$ which can be derived from the operation of fitting
570: the observational data.
571: Other interesting quantities are the mean
572: luminosity per unit volume,
573: $j$ ,
574: \begin{equation}
575: \label{eqnj}
576: j = \int ^{\infty}_0 L \Psi(L) dl = L^* \Psi^* \frac {\Gamma
577: (c +a)} {\Gamma (c)} \quad ,
578: \end{equation}
579: and the averaged luminosity ,${ \langle L \rangle }$ ,
580: \begin{equation}
581: \label{lmedia}
582: \langle L \rangle =\frac{j}{\Psi^*}= L^* \frac {\Gamma
583: (c +a)} {\Gamma (c)}
584: \quad.
585: \end{equation}
586:
587: The density of galaxies is
588: \begin{equation}
589: n_* = \frac {j}{L^*}
590: \quad ,
591: \end{equation}
592: and the mean separation between galaxies ,
593: \begin{equation}
594: d_* = n_*^{- 1/3}
595: \quad.
596: \end{equation}
597: The symbols $ j$, $n_*$ and $d_*$ are introduced as in \citet{pad}.
598:
599: Another way to compute the density of galaxies , now $n_{**}$,
600: of the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function is
601: \begin{equation}
602: n_{**} = \Psi^*
603: \quad .
604: \end{equation}
605: The position of the maximum in magnitudes is at
606: \begin{equation}
607: M_{p,max} =
608: {\it M^*}
609: - 1.085\,\ln \left( c \right) a
610: \quad .
611: \end{equation}
612:
613: \subsection{The luminosity distribution for low luminosity galaxies}
614: %%modifica5
615: %modifica5
616: The Pareto distribution
617: can model
618: nonnegative data with a power law probability tail.
619: In many practical applications, it is natural to consider an
620: upper bound that
621: truncates the tail \cite{Cohen1988,Devoto1998,Aban2006}.
622: The truncated Pareto distribution has a wide range of applications ,
623: we list some of them :
624: data analysis~\cite{Aban2006}and \cite{Rehfeldt1992};
625: forest fire area in the Australian Capital Territory,
626: fault offsets in the
627: Vernejoul coal field,
628: hydrocarbon volumes in the Frio Strand Plain
629: exploration play and fault lengths on Venus, see \cite{Burroughs2001}.
630: %modifica5
631: %%modifica5
632:
633: In the case of the stars , the low mass
634: distribution of masses , see~\cite{Salpeter1955}, can be represented
635: by a law of the type
636: $p ( {\mathcal{M_S}}) \propto {\mathcal{M_S}}^{-2.35}$,
637: where $p ( {\mathcal{M_S}})$ represents the probability
638: of having a mass between $ {\mathcal{M_S}}$ and
639: $ {\mathcal{M_S}}+d{\mathcal{M}}$~.
640: By analogy we introduce a truncated Pareto distribution,
641: see Appendix~\ref{appendixb} ,
642: for the mass of galaxies
643: \begin{equation}
644: \Psi_{LL} ({\mathcal M }) d{\mathcal M }
645: = \frac {C}
646: {
647: (\frac {\mathcal M }{\mathcal M^*})^{d+1}
648: }
649: d (\frac {\mathcal M }{\mathcal M^*})
650: \label{psill} \quad ,
651: \end {equation}
652: where the index $LL$ stands for Low Luminosity
653: and the range of existence is
654: $ {\mathcal M_{min} } \leq {\mathcal M } \leq {\mathcal M_{max} } $
655: where $min$ and $max$ denote the minimum and maximum mass.
656: Once the constant $C$ is computed as in
657: Appendix~\ref{appendixb} we obtain
658: \begin{equation}
659: \Psi_{LL} ({\mathcal M }) d{\mathcal M }
660: =
661: \frac{d }
662: {
663: \left( \left( {\frac {{\it {\mathcal M_{min} }}}{{\it {\mathcal M^*}}}} \right) ^{-d}- \left(
664: {\frac {{\it {\mathcal M_{max} }}}{{\it {\mathcal M^*}}}} \right) ^{-d} \right)
665: \left( {\frac { {\mathcal M }}{{\it {\mathcal M^*}}}} \right) ^{d+1}
666: }
667: d (\frac {\mathcal M }{\mathcal M^*})
668: \label{psilldue} \quad .
669: \end {equation}
670: Exactly as in the previous case we introduce the
671: transformation represented by
672: equation~(\ref{massa})
673: that connects the mass with the luminosity and
674: the distribution in luminosity is
675: \begin{equation}
676: \Psi_{LL} (L) dL
677: =\Psi_{LL}^*
678: \frac
679: {
680: d \left( {\frac {L}{{\it L^*}}} \right) ^{-{\frac {d+a}{a}}}
681: }
682: {
683: \left( \left( {\frac {{\it L_{min}}}{{\it L^*}}} \right) ^{-{\frac
684: {d}{a}}}- \left( {\frac {{\it L_{max}}}{{\it L^*}}} \right) ^{-{\frac {
685: d}{a}}} \right) a
686: }
687: d (\frac { L}{L^*})
688: \quad ,
689: \label{lum_pareto}
690: \end{equation}
691: with the range of existence as
692: $ {L_{min} } \leq { L } \leq {L_{max} } $
693: and $\Psi_{LL}^*$ representing the normalisation.
694: %Compare the previous formula with the second part
695: %of equation~(\ref{eqndwarf}) that represent
696: %the low luminosities galaxies in rich clusters
697: %and with the second part of the
698: %double Schechter function, see equation~(\ref{eqndouble})~.
699: The mean
700: luminosity per unit volume,
701: $j$ ,
702: \begin{equation}
703: \label{eqnjpareto}
704: j = \int ^{L_{max}}_{L_{min}} L \Psi_{LL} (L) dl =
705: \Psi_{LL}^*
706: \frac
707: {
708: d \left( -{{\it {L_{max}}}}^{2} \left( {\frac {{\it {L_{max}}}}{{\it L^*}}}
709: \right) ^{-{\frac {d+a}{a}}}+{{\it {L_{min}}}}^{2} \left( {\frac {{\it
710: {L_{min}}}}{{\it L^*}}} \right) ^{-{\frac {d+a}{a}}} \right)
711: }
712: {
713: \left( d-a \right) \left( \left( {\frac {{\it {L_{min}}}}{{\it L^*}}}
714: \right) ^{-{\frac {d}{a}}}- \left( {\frac {{\it {L_{max}}}}{{\it L^*}}}
715: \right) ^{-{\frac {d}{a}}} \right) {\it L^*}
716: }
717: \quad.
718: \end{equation}
719: The distribution in magnitude is
720: \begin{equation}
721: \Psi_{LL} (M) dM =\Psi^*_{LL}
722: \frac
723: {
724: 0.4\,d{10}^{- 0.4\,{\frac {d \left( {\it
725: M^*}- \,{\it am} \right) }{a}}}\ln \left( 10 \right)
726: }
727: {
728: \left( {10}^{- 0.4\,{\frac { \left( {\it M^*}- \,{\it {M_{max}}}
729: \right) d}{a}}}- \,{10}^{- 0.4\,{\frac { \left( {
730: \it M^*}- \,{\it {M_{min}}} \right) d}{a}}} \right) a
731: }
732: dM \quad ,
733: \label{equation_miapareto}
734: \end {equation}
735: with the range of existence as
736: $ {M_{min} } \leq { M } \leq {M_{max} } $.
737: This distribution in magnitude contains the parameters ${M_{min}
738: }$ and ${M_{max} }$ which are the minimum and maximum magnitude of
739: the considered catalog and the parameters $a$ , $d$ , and
740: $\Psi_{LL}$ which are derived from the fitting of the data.
741:
742: \section{Application to a real sample of galaxies }
743: \label{test}
744:
745: The data of the luminosity function for galaxies
746: in five bands of the SDSS are available at
747: http://cosmo.nyu.edu/blanton/lf.html
748: and are discussed from an astronomical point view
749: in~\citet{blanton}.
750:
751: The analysis of the new luminosity function
752: was split in two.
753: The case from high luminosities
754: to low luminosities was fitted by
755: $\Psi (M) $ , equation~(\ref{equation_mia}) .
756: The data have been processed
757: through the Levenberg--Marquardt method ( subroutine
758: MRQMIN in \citet{press})
759: in order
760: to find the three parameters {\it a}, $M^*$ , $\Psi^*$
761: ; {\it c} conversely is introduced by hand.
762: In order to associate a statistical probability
763: to each fit we have chosen a range in magnitude
764: such as $M< M_{max}$ where $M_{max}$ represents
765: the selected maximum magnitude of the sample.
766:
767: The results are reported in Table~\ref{para_physical_SDSS_data}
768: together with the derived quantities
769: $ j$, $n_*$ , $d_*$ and their uncertainties.
770: Table~\ref{para_physical_SDSS_data} also reports
771: $M_{max}$ ,
772: the number of elements $N$ belonging to the sample ,
773: the merit function $\chi^2$ and
774: the associated $p$--value
775: that has to be understood as the
776: maximum probability to obtain a better fitting,
777: see formula~(15.2.12) in \citet{press}:
778: \begin{equation}
779: p=1- GAMMQ (\frac{N-3}{2},\frac{\chi^2}{2} )
780: \quad ,
781: \end{equation}
782: where GAMMQ is a subroutine for the incomplete gamma function.
783: %tabella
784: \clearpage
785: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrr}
786: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
787: \rotate
788: \tablecaption{Parameters of Fits to Luminosity
789: Function in SDSS Galaxies through the
790: $\mathcal {M}-L$ function .\label{para_physical_SDSS_data} }
791: \tablewidth{0pt}
792: \tablehead{
793: \colhead{Band } &
794: \colhead{$u^*$} &
795: \colhead{$g^*$} &
796: \colhead{$r^*$} &
797: \colhead{$i^*$} &
798: \colhead{$z^*$}
799: }
800: \startdata
801: c & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.2
802: & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.2
803: & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.2
804: & 2 $\pm$ 0.2
805: & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.2
806: \\
807: $M^*$ $[mags]$ & -16.58 $\pm$ 0.018
808: & -18.29 $\pm$ 0.008
809: & -18.77 $\pm$ 0.007
810: & -18.26 $\pm$ 0.01
811: & -18.79 $\pm$ 0.004
812: \\
813: %u
814: %g
815: %r
816: %i
817: %z
818: $\Psi^*$ $[h~Mpc^{-3}]$ & 0.069 $\pm$ 0.001
819: & 0.043 $\pm$ 0.0003
820: & 0.043 $\pm$ 0.000
821: & 0.032 $\pm$ 0.0002
822: & 0.034 $\pm$ 0.003
823: \\
824: a & 1.40 $\pm$ 0.007
825: & 1.32 $\pm$ 0.003
826: & 1.5 $\pm$ 0.002
827: & 1.74 $\pm$ 0.003
828: & 1.70 $\pm$ 0.014
829: \\
830: %u
831: %g
832: %r
833: %i
834: %z
835: j [mags] & 1.40 $L^* \Psi^*$
836: & 1.18 $L^* \Psi^*$
837: & 1.50 $L^* \Psi^*$
838: & 4.39 $L^* \Psi^*$
839: & 3.2 $L^* \Psi^*$
840: \\
841: $n_*$ [$Mpc^{-3}]$ & 0.097 $\pm$ 0.022
842: & 0.051 $\pm$ 0.012
843: & 0.066 $\pm$ 0.016
844: & 0.14 $\pm$ 0.02
845: & 0.11 $\pm$ 0.04
846: \\
847: d [Mpc] & 2.17 $\pm$ 0.16
848: & 2.67 $\pm$ 0.21
849: & 2.47 $\pm$ 0.19
850: & 1.91 $\pm$ 0.09
851: & 2.06 $\pm$ 0.14
852: \\
853: %u
854: %g
855: %r
856: %i
857: %z
858: $M_{max}$ $[mags]$ & -15.78
859: & -18.2
860: & -19
861: & -19.3
862: & -20
863: \\
864: N & 483
865: & 404
866: & 400
867: & 471
868: & 442
869: \\
870: %u
871: %g
872: %r
873: %i
874: %z
875: $\chi^2$ & 321
876: & 386
877: & 233
878: & 325
879: & 649
880: \\
881: $p=1- GAMMQ(\frac{N-3}{2},\frac{\chi^2}{2} ) $& 0
882: & 0.31
883: & 0
884: & 1.19 $10^{-7}$
885: & 1.0
886: \\
887: \enddata
888: \end{deluxetable}
889: %tabella
890:
891:
892:
893:
894:
895: The uncertainties are found by implementing the error
896: propagation equation (often called law of errors of Gauss).
897: The low luminosities range conversely was fitted
898: through $\Psi_{LL} (M)$ , equation~(\ref{equation_miapareto}) and
899: the results are reported in Table~\ref{para_physical_SDSS_LL}.
900:
901: \clearpage
902: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrr}
903: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
904: \rotate
905: \tablecaption{Parameters of Fits to Luminosity
906: Function in SDSS Low Luminosities Galaxies through the
907: $\Psi_{LL}$ function~.
908: \label{para_physical_SDSS_LL} }
909: \tablewidth{0pt}
910: \tablehead{
911: \colhead{Band } &
912: \colhead{$g^*$} &
913: \colhead{$r^*$} &
914: \colhead{$i^*$} &
915: \colhead{$z^*$}
916: }
917: \startdata
918: d & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1
919: & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1
920: & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.1
921: & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1
922: \\
923:
924: $M^*$ $[mags]$ & -17.2 $\pm$ 0.1
925: & -18.8 $\pm$ 0.1
926: & -17.39 $\pm$ 0.1
927: & -19.3 $\pm$ 0.1
928: \\
929: %g
930: %r
931: %i
932: %z
933: $\Psi^*_{LL}$ $[h~Mpc^{-3}]$ & 0.043 $\pm$ 0.0043
934: & 0.040 $\pm$ 0.0040
935: & 0.026 $\pm$ 0.0032
936: & 0.035 $\pm$ 0.003
937: \\
938: a & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.1
939: & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.1
940: & 2.7 $\pm$ 0.1
941: & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1
942: \\
943: %g
944: %r
945: %i
946: %z
947: range [mags] & -18.2 $\leq$ M $\leq$ 16.33
948: & -19.0 $\leq$ M $\leq$ 16.31
949: & -19.3 $\leq$ M $\leq$ 17.22
950: & -20.0 $\leq$ M $\leq$ 17.48
951: \\
952: N & 194
953: & 273
954: & 237
955: & 297
956: \\
957: %g
958: %r
959: %i
960: %z
961: $\chi^2$ & 204
962: & 379
963: & 476
964: & 313
965: \\
966: \enddata
967: \end{deluxetable}
968: %tabella
969:
970:
971:
972:
973:
974: The Schechter function, conversely fits all the range
975: in luminosities and
976: Table~\ref{para_Schechter_SDSS_data} reports
977: the data that come out from the fitting procedure.
978: Table~\ref{para_Schechter_SDSS_data} also reports
979: $M_{p,max} $ , the value in magnitude where the
980: Schechter function peaks ; this value is defined
981: when $\alpha \> -1 $ , otherwise
982: we leave the box blank.
983: %tabella3
984: \clearpage
985: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrr}
986: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
987: \rotate
988: \tablecaption{Parameters of Fits to Luminosity
989: Function in SDSS through the
990: Schechter function~.
991: \label{para_Schechter_SDSS_data}}
992: \tablewidth{0pt}
993: \tablehead{
994: \colhead{Band } &
995: \colhead{$u^*$} &
996: \colhead{$g^*$} &
997: \colhead{$r^*$} &
998: \colhead{$i^*$} &
999: \colhead{$z^*$}
1000: }
1001: \startdata
1002: $\alpha$
1003: & -0.90 $\pm$ 0.01
1004: & -0.88 $\pm$ 0.007
1005: & -1.04 $\pm$ 0.004
1006: & -0.99 $\pm$ 0.005
1007: & -1.07 $\pm$ 0.02
1008: \\
1009: $M^*$ $[mags]$
1010: & -17.92 $\pm$ 0.006
1011: & -19.38 $\pm$ 0.004
1012: & -20.43 $\pm$ 0.003
1013: & -20.81 $\pm$ 0.004
1014: & -21.18 $\pm$ 0.017
1015: \\
1016: $M_{p,max} $ $[mags]$
1017: & -17.92
1018: & -19.38
1019: & ~
1020: & -20.81
1021: & ~
1022: \\
1023: %u
1024: %g
1025: %r
1026: %i
1027: %z
1028: $\Phi^*$ $[h~Mpc^{-3}]$
1029: & 0.030 $\pm$ 0.0003
1030: & 0.021 $\pm$ 0.0001
1031: & 0.015 $\pm$ 0.00008
1032: & 0.0147 $\pm$ 0.00008
1033: & 0.0135 $\pm$ 0.00006
1034: \\
1035: j [mags]
1036: & 0.95 $L^* \Phi^*$
1037: & 0.92 $L^* \Phi^*$
1038: & 1.02 $L^* \Phi^*$
1039: & 0.99 $L^* \Phi^*$
1040: & 1.04 $L^* \Phi^*$
1041: \\
1042: %u
1043: %g
1044: %r
1045: %i
1046: %z
1047: %Band & $u^*$ & $g^*$ & $r^*$ & $i^*$ & $z^*$ \\
1048: $n_*$ [$Mpc^{-3}]$
1049: & 0.029 $\pm$ 0.0003
1050: & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.0001
1051: & 0.015 $\pm$ 0.00007
1052: & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.00008
1053: & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.00007
1054: \\
1055: d [Mpc]
1056: & 3.24 $\pm$ 0.013
1057: & 3.64 $\pm$ 0.006
1058: & 4.02 $\pm$ 0.006
1059: & 4.08 $\pm$ 0.008
1060: & 4.12 $\pm$ 0.007 \\
1061: %u
1062: %g
1063: %r
1064: %i
1065: %z
1066: N & 483
1067: & 599
1068: & 674
1069: & 709
1070: & 740
1071: \\
1072:
1073: $\chi^2$ & 330
1074: & 753
1075: & 2260
1076: & 2282
1077: & 3245
1078: \\
1079: $p=1- GAMMQ(\frac{N-3}{2},\frac{\chi^2}{2} ) $ & 5.96 $10^{-8}$
1080: & 0.99
1081: & 1.0
1082: & 1.0
1083: & 1.0
1084: \\
1085: \enddata
1086: \end{deluxetable}
1087: %tabella3
1088:
1089:
1090: Table~\ref{chisquare_data} reports the
1091: $\chi^2$ of the two zones of the new physical function,
1092: their sum and $\chi^2$ of the
1093: Schechter luminosity function.
1094:
1095: %tabella
1096: \clearpage
1097: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrr}
1098: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1099: \rotate
1100: \tablecaption{
1101: Synoptic $\chi^2$~.
1102: \label{chisquare_data} }
1103: \tablewidth{0pt}
1104: \tablehead{
1105: \colhead{Band } &
1106: \colhead{$u^*$} &
1107: \colhead{$g^*$} &
1108: \colhead{$r^*$} &
1109: \colhead{$i^*$} &
1110: \colhead{$z^*$}
1111: }
1112: \startdata
1113: $\chi^2$ ~physical~luminosity~function & 321 & 386 & 233 & 325 & 649 \\
1114: $\chi^2$ ~luminosity~function~low~luminosities & 0 & 204 & 379 & 476 & 313 \\
1115: $\chi^2$ ~sum~of~two~zones & 321 & 590 & 612 & 801 & 962 \\
1116: $\chi^2$ ~Schechter~luminosity~function & 330 & 753 & 2260 & 2282 & 3245 \\
1117: \enddata
1118: \end{deluxetable}
1119: %tabella
1120:
1121:
1122: The Schechter function , the new function and the data are
1123: reported in
1124: Figure~\ref{due_u} ,
1125: Figure~\ref{due_g} ,
1126: Figure~\ref{due_r} ,
1127: Figure~\ref{due_i} ,
1128: and Figure~\ref{due_z}
1129: when the $u^*$,$g^*$ ,$r^*$ , $i^*$ and $z^*$
1130: bands are considered;
1131: Figure~\ref{residui_u} ,
1132: Figure~\ref{residui_g} ,
1133: Figure~\ref{residui_r} ,
1134: Figure~\ref{residui_i} ,
1135: and Figure~\ref{residui_z}
1136: report the residuals of the
1137: $u^*$,$g^*$ ,$r^*$ , $i^*$ and $z^*$ band.
1138: We have used $H_0 = 100 h$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, with $h=1$
1139: in all the numerical evaluations.
1140: Due to the testing phase of the new $\mathcal {M}-L$ function,
1141: we have omitted the propagation of
1142: other values of $h$ on the derived quantities ,
1143: see the discussion in~\citet{blanton}.
1144:
1145: \clearpage
1146:
1147: % beginning figure due_u
1148: \begin{figure}
1149: \centering
1150: \plotone{f03.eps}
1151: \caption {The luminosity function data of
1152: SDSS($u^*$) are represented through the error bar.
1153: The fitting continuous line represents our two luminosity functions
1154: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1155: and the dotted
1156: line represents the Schechter function.
1157: }
1158: \label{due_u}
1159: \end{figure}
1160:
1161: \clearpage
1162: % end figure due_u
1163:
1164:
1165: % beginning figure due_g
1166: \begin{figure}
1167: \centering
1168: \plotone{f04.eps}
1169: \caption {The luminosity function data of
1170: SDSS($g^*$) are represented through the error bar.
1171: The fitting continuous line represents our two luminosity functions
1172: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1173: and the dotted
1174: line represents the Schechter function.
1175: }
1176: \label{due_g}
1177: \end{figure}
1178:
1179: \clearpage
1180: % end figure due_g
1181:
1182: % beginning figure due_r
1183: \begin{figure}
1184: \centering
1185: \plotone{f05.eps}
1186: \caption {The luminosity function data of
1187: SDSS($r^*$) are represented through the error bar.
1188: The fitting continuous line represents our two luminosity functions
1189: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1190: and the dotted
1191: line represents the Schechter function.
1192: }
1193: \label{due_r}
1194: \end{figure}
1195:
1196: \clearpage
1197: % end figure due_r
1198:
1199: % beginning figure due_i
1200: \begin{figure}
1201: \centering
1202: \plotone{f06.eps}
1203: \caption {The luminosity function data of
1204: SDSS($i^*$) are represented through the error bar.
1205: The fitting continuous line represents our two luminosity functions
1206: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1207: and the dotted
1208: line represents the Schechter function.
1209: }
1210: \label{due_i}
1211: \end{figure}
1212:
1213: \clearpage
1214: % end figure due_i
1215:
1216: % beginning figure due_z
1217: \begin{figure}
1218: \centering
1219: \plotone{f07.eps}
1220: \caption {The luminosity function data of
1221: SDSS($z^*$) are represented through the error bar.
1222: The fitting continuous line represents our two luminosity functions
1223: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1224: and the dotted
1225: line represents the Schechter function.
1226: }
1227: \label{due_z}
1228: \end{figure}
1229:
1230: \clearpage
1231: % end figure due_z
1232:
1233: % beginning figure residui_u
1234: \begin{figure}
1235: \centering
1236: \plotone{f08.eps}
1237: \caption {The residuals of the fits to
1238: SDSS($u^*$) data.
1239: The empty stars represent our
1240: two luminosity functions
1241: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1242: and the filled points
1243: represent the Schechter function.
1244: }
1245: \label{residui_u}
1246: \end{figure}
1247:
1248: \clearpage
1249: % end figure residui_u
1250:
1251:
1252: % beginning figure residui_g
1253: \begin{figure}
1254: \centering
1255: \plotone{f09.eps}
1256: \caption {The residuals of the fits to
1257: SDSS($g^*$) data.
1258: The empty stars represent our
1259: two luminosity functions
1260: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1261: and the filled points
1262: represent the Schechter function.
1263: }
1264: \label{residui_g}
1265: \end{figure}
1266:
1267: \clearpage
1268: % end figure residui_g
1269:
1270:
1271: % beginning figure residui_r
1272: \begin{figure}
1273: \centering
1274: \plotone{f10.eps}
1275: \caption {The residuals of the fits to
1276: SDSS($r^*$) data.
1277: The empty stars represent our
1278: two luminosity functions
1279: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1280: and the filled points
1281: represent the Schechter function.
1282: }
1283: \label{residui_r}
1284: \end{figure}
1285:
1286: \clearpage
1287: % end figure residui_r
1288:
1289:
1290:
1291: % beginning figure residui_i
1292: \begin{figure}
1293: \centering
1294: \plotone{f11.eps}
1295: \caption {The residuals of the fits to
1296: SDSS($i^*$) data.
1297: The empty stars represent our
1298: two luminosity functions
1299: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1300: and the filled points
1301: represent the Schechter function.
1302: }
1303: \label{residui_i}
1304: \end{figure}
1305:
1306: \clearpage
1307: % end figure residui_i
1308:
1309:
1310: % beginning figure residui_z
1311: \begin{figure}
1312: \centering
1313: \plotone{f12.eps}
1314: \caption {The residuals of the fits to
1315: SDSS($z^*$) data.
1316: The empty stars represent our
1317: two luminosity functions
1318: ((\ref{equation_mia}) and (\ref{equation_miapareto}) )
1319: and the filled points
1320: represent the Schechter function.
1321: }
1322: \label{residui_z}
1323: \end{figure}
1324:
1325: \clearpage
1326: % end figure residui_z
1327:
1328:
1329:
1330: The value
1331: obtained for the parameter {\it a } should be
1332: compared with that of the normal stars which is 3 or 4 as suggested
1333: by the theory, see for example
1334: \citet{lang},
1335: or $\approx$ 3.8 as suggested by the observations
1336: for ${\mathcal M}~>~0.2{\mathcal M}_{\sun}$, see
1337: for example \citet{cox}.
1338: When the three
1339: classes of stars are considered we have
1340: {\it a} =3.43 (MAIN),{\it a} =2.79 (GIANTS) and {\it a}=2.43 (SUPERGIANTS),
1341: see~\citet{zaninetti05} for further details.
1342:
1343: The variation of $j$ when the range in magnitude is finite
1344: rather than infinite can be evaluated by coupling
1345: together formula~(\ref{mlrelation}) and
1346: (\ref{equation_mia})
1347: \begin{equation}
1348: j = \int_{-21}^{-15.78} 10^{0.4(M_{bol,\sun} - M)}
1349: \Psi (M) dM
1350: \quad .
1351: \label{jfinite}
1352: \end{equation}
1353: %siamoqui
1354: On inserting the parameters of SDSS band $u^*$ (
1355: which is the case in which the $\mathcal {M}-L$ function
1356: covers all the range in magnitude of the data
1357: , see Table~\ref{para_physical_SDSS_data} )
1358: and ${M}_{bol,\sun}$=${M}_{u^*\sun}$=6.39
1359: , $j=1.4\;10^{8}\; L_{\sun} $ is obtained.
1360: This value increases by $5.63\;\%$ when the range is infinite;
1361: see a similar discussion concerning
1362: Schechter's function around formula~(33) in \citet{lin}.
1363:
1364:
1365: In absence of observational data
1366: that represent the luminosity function,
1367: we can generate them
1368: through Schechter's parameters, see Table~\ref{parameters}.
1369: This is done, for example for
1370: the 2dF Galaxy
1371: Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) ,see~\cite{Cross2001}
1372: and data of the Schechter function in Table~\ref{parameters}.
1373: The parameters of the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function
1374: are reported in Table~\ref{para_physical}
1375: where the requested errors on the
1376: values of luminosity are the same as the considered value.
1377: %tabella4
1378: \begin{table}
1379: \caption[]{The parameters of the ${\mathcal M}-L$ luminosity function \\
1380: based on 2dFGRS data
1381: ( triplets generated by the author) }
1382: \label{para_physical}
1383: \[
1384: \begin{array}{lc}
1385: \hline
1386: ~ & 2dFGRS \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1387: \hline
1388: \noalign{\smallskip}
1389: c & 0.1 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1390: M^* [mags] & -19 \pm 0.1 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1391: \Psi^* [h~Mpc^{-3}] & 0.4 \pm 0.01 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1392: a & 1.3 \pm 0.1 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1393: \hline
1394: \hline
1395: \end{array}
1396: \]
1397: \end {table}
1398: %tabella4
1399: \section{Tests involving z}
1400: \label{secz}
1401: Some useful formulae connected with the
1402: Schechter function in a Euclidean ,non-relativistic
1403: and homogeneous universe
1404: are reviewed ;
1405: by analogy new formulae for
1406: the first part of the
1407: ${\mathcal M}-L $ function are derived.
1408:
1409: \subsection{The behaviour of the Schechter function}
1410:
1411: The flux of radiation , {\it f} , is introduced
1412: \begin{equation}
1413: f = \frac{L}{4 \pi r^2}
1414: \quad ,
1415: \end{equation}
1416: where {\it r} represents the distance of the galaxy .
1417: The joint distribution in {\it z} and {\it f} for galaxies ,
1418: see formula~(1.104) in~\cite{pad} ,
1419: is
1420: \begin{equation}
1421: \frac{dN}{d\Omega dz df} = 4 \pi
1422: \bigl ( \frac {c}{H_0} \bigr )^5 z^4 \Phi (\frac{z^2}{z_{crit}^2})
1423: \label{nfunctionz}
1424: \quad ,
1425: \end {equation}
1426: where $d\Omega$ , $dz$ and $ df $ represent the differential of
1427: the solid angle , the red-shift and the flux respectively.
1428: The $L^*$ of difference between the previous formula
1429: and formula~(1.104) in~\cite{pad} is due to the small difference
1430: in the definition of $\Phi$.
1431:
1432: The formula for $z_{crit}$ is
1433: \begin{equation}
1434: z_{crit}^2 = \frac {H_0^2 L^* } {4 \pi f c_L^2}
1435: \quad ,
1436: \end{equation}
1437: where $c_L$ represents the light velocity;
1438: the CODATA recommends $c_L = 299792.458 \frac{km}{s} $ .
1439: The mean red-shift of galaxies with a flux $f$
1440: ,
1441: see formula~(1.105) in~\cite{pad} ,
1442: is
1443: \begin{equation}
1444: \langle z \rangle = z_{crit} \frac {\Gamma (3 +\alpha)} {\Gamma (5/2 +\alpha)}
1445: \quad .
1446: \end{equation}
1447: The number density of galaxies per unit flux interval,
1448: see formula~(1.106) in~\cite{pad} , is
1449: \begin{equation}
1450: \frac {dN}{d ln f } = \frac {\Phi^*}{2}
1451: \bigl ( \frac {L^*}{4\pi f} \bigr )^{3/2} \Gamma (\frac{5}{2} + \alpha)
1452: \quad .
1453: \end{equation}
1454: The number of galaxies in {\it z} and {\it f} as given by
1455: formula~(\ref{nfunctionz}) has a maximum at $z=z_{max}$ ,
1456: where
1457: \begin{equation}
1458: z_{max} = z_{crit} \sqrt {\alpha +2 }
1459: \quad .
1460: \end{equation}
1461: The value of $z_{max}$ can be derived from the
1462: histogram of the observed number of galaxies expressed as a function
1463: of $z$ .
1464: %%modifica1
1465: %%modifica1
1466: For practical purposes we analysed
1467: the 2dFGRS data release
1468: available at the web site: http://msowww.anu.edu.au/2dFGRS/.
1469: In particular we added together the file parent.ngp.txt that
1470: contains 145652 entries for NGP strip sources and
1471: the file parent.sgp.txt that
1472: contains 204490 entries for SGP strip sources.
1473: Once the heliocentric red-shift was selected
1474: we processed 219107 galaxies with
1475: $0.001 \leq z \leq 0.25$ .
1476: %%fine modifica1
1477: %%fine modifica1
1478: A comparison between the observed and theoretical number of galaxies
1479: as a function of $z$ is reported in Figure~\ref{maximum}.
1480:
1481: %begin figure maximum
1482: \begin{figure}
1483: \plotone{f13.eps}
1484: \caption{
1485: %%modifica2
1486: %%modifica2
1487: The galaxies of the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey with
1488: $ 15.08 \leq bJmag \leq 15.81 $
1489: ( with $bJmag$ representing the
1490: relative magnitude used in object selection),
1491: are isolated
1492: in order to represent a chosen value of $f$
1493: and then organised in frequencies versus
1494: heliocentric redshift
1495: , (empty circles);
1496: the error bar is given by the square root of the frequency.
1497: The theoretical curve generated by
1498: the Schechter function of luminosity
1499: (formula~(\ref{nfunctionz}) and parameters
1500: as in column 2dFGRS of Table~\ref{parameters})
1501: is drawn (full line).
1502: The theoretical curve generated by
1503: the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function for luminosity (
1504: formula~(\ref{nfunctionz_mia})
1505: and parameters as in column 2dFGRS of Table~\ref{para_physical})
1506: is drawn (dashed line);
1507: $\chi^2$= 320 for the Schechter function and $\chi^2$= 283
1508: for the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function.
1509: %%modifica2
1510: %%modifica2
1511: }
1512: \label{maximum}%
1513: \end{figure}
1514:
1515: \clearpage
1516: % end figure maximum
1517:
1518: Another interesting catalog is the
1519: 6dF Galaxy Survey that has measured
1520: around 150000 redshifts and 15000
1521: peculiar velocities from galaxies over the southern sky ,
1522: see~\cite{Jones2006}.
1523: It is available at the following address
1524: http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR?-source=VII/249
1525: ; we selected the re-calibrated $bJ$ magnitude and
1526: the recession velocity cz.
1527: Figure~\ref{maximum_6d} reports the observed
1528: and theoretical number of galaxies
1529: as a function of $z$ for the 6dF Galaxy Survey.
1530:
1531: %begin figure maximum_6d
1532: \begin{figure}
1533: \plotone{f14.eps}
1534: \caption{The galaxies of the 6dF Galaxy Survey with
1535: $ 14.15 \leq bJmag \leq 14.9 $
1536: ( with $bJmag$ representing the
1537: relative magnitude used in object selection),
1538: are isolated
1539: in order to represent a chosen value of $f$
1540: and then organised in frequencies versus
1541: redshift
1542: , (empty circles);
1543: the error bar is given by the square root of the frequency.
1544: The theoretical curve generated by
1545: the Schechter function of luminosity
1546: (formula~(\ref{nfunctionz}) and parameters
1547: as in column 2dFGRS of Table~\ref{parameters})
1548: is drawn (full line).
1549: The theoretical curve generated by
1550: the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function for luminosity (
1551: formula~(\ref{nfunctionz_mia})
1552: and parameters in column 2dFGRS of Table~\ref{para_physical})
1553: is drawn (dashed line);
1554: $\chi^2$= 1373 for the Schechter function and $\chi^2$= 1197
1555: for the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function.
1556: }
1557: \label{maximum_6d}%
1558: \end{figure}
1559:
1560: \clearpage
1561: % end figure maximum_6d
1562:
1563:
1564:
1565: \subsection{The behaviour of the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function}
1566:
1567: The joint distribution in $z$ and $f$ ,
1568: in presence of the ${\mathcal M}-L$
1569: luminosity (equation~(\ref{equation_schechter_mia})) is
1570: \begin{equation}
1571: \frac{dN}{d\Omega dz df} = 4 \pi
1572: \bigl ( \frac {c}{H_0} \bigr )^5 z^4 \Psi (\frac{z^2}{z_{crit}^2})
1573: \label{nfunctionz_mia}
1574: \quad .
1575: \end {equation}
1576: The mean red-shift is
1577: \begin{equation}
1578: \langle z \rangle = z_{crit}
1579: \frac {2\;\;{4}^{-{\frac {2\,a+{\it c}}{a}}}\Gamma
1580: \left( 2\,a+{\it c}
1581: \right) {2}^{{\frac {2\,{\it c}+3\,a}{a}}} }{ \Gamma \left( {
1582: \it c}+3/2\,a \right) }
1583: \quad .
1584: \label{zmediomia}
1585: \end{equation}
1586: The number density of galaxies per unit flux interval is
1587: \begin{equation}
1588: \frac {dN}{d ln f } =
1589: \frac{1}{16} \,{\frac {{{\it L_*}}^{3/2}{\it \Psi_*}\,\Gamma \left( {\it c
1590: }+\frac{3}{2}\,a \right) }{{\pi }^{3/2}{f}^{3/2}\Gamma \left( {\it c}
1591: \right) }}
1592: \quad .
1593: \end{equation}
1594: The number of galaxies as given
1595: by formula~(\ref{nfunctionz_mia}) has a maximum at
1596: $z_{max}$ where
1597: \begin{equation}
1598: z_{max} = z_{crit}
1599: \left( {\it c}+a \right) ^{a/2}
1600: \quad .
1601: \end{equation}
1602: A comparison between the observed and theoretical number of galaxies
1603: as given by the ${\mathcal M}-L$ function
1604: is reported in Figure~\ref{maximum} where the
1605: 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey is considered
1606: and in Figure~\ref{maximum_6d} where the
1607: 6dF Galaxy Survey is considered.
1608:
1609: \section{Mass evaluation}
1610: \label{secmass}
1611:
1612: One method to deduce the mass of a star by its absolute visual
1613: magnitude is presented; the mass of a galaxy is deduced by
1614: analogy. In the case of the galaxies,
1615: the bolometric correction of
1616: the stars will be replaced by the sun's absolute magnitude and
1617: mass-luminosity ratio different in each selected band.
1618:
1619: \subsection{The case of the stars}
1620:
1621: In the case of the stars it is possible to parameterise
1622: the mass of the star , ${\mathcal M_S}$ ,
1623: as a function of the observable colour $(B-V)$
1624: , see~\cite{zaninetti05} ~.
1625: The first equation connects
1626: the $(B-V)$ colour with the temperature
1627: \begin{equation}
1628: (B-V)= K_{\mathrm{BV}} + \frac {T_{\mathrm{BV}}}{T}
1629: \quad,
1630: \label{bvt}
1631: \end {equation}
1632: here $T$ is the temperature, $K_{\mathrm{BV}}$ and $T_{\mathrm{BV}}$
1633: are two parameters that can be derived by implementing
1634: the least square method on a series of calibrated data.
1635: The second equation describes the bolometric
1636: correction , $BC$,
1637: \begin {equation}
1638: BC = M_{\mathrm{bol}} -M_{\mathrm{V}} =
1639: -\frac{T_{\mathrm{BC}}}{T} - 10~\log_{10}~T + K_{\mathrm {BC}}
1640: \quad,
1641: \label{bct}
1642: \end {equation}
1643: where $M_{\mathrm{bol}}$ is the absolute bolometric magnitude,
1644: $M_{V}$ is the absolute visual magnitude,
1645: $T_{\mathrm {BC}}$ and $K_{\mathrm{BC}}$ are two parameters that can be derived
1646: through the general linear least square method
1647: applied to a series of calibrated data.
1648: The third equation is
1649: the usual formula for the luminosity
1650: \begin{equation}
1651: \log_{10}(\frac {L}{L_{\sun}}) = 0.4 (4.74 -M_{\mathrm{bol}})
1652: \quad,
1653: \end {equation}
1654: where $L$ is the luminosity of the star and
1655: ${L_{\sun}}$ the luminosity of the sun.
1656: The fourth equation is the usual mass-luminosity
1657: relationship for stars
1658: \begin{eqnarray}
1659: \log_{10}(\frac {L}{L_{\sun}}) = a_{\mathrm {LM}} +b_{\mathrm {LM}}\log_{10}(\frac {{\mathcal
1660: M}_S}
1661: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}}) \\
1662: for~{\mathcal M} > 0.2 {\mathcal {M}}_{\sun} \nonumber
1663: \quad,
1664: \end {eqnarray}
1665: where $\mathcal{M}_S$ is the mass of the star and
1666: $\mathcal{M}_{\sun}$ is the mass of the sun.
1667:
1668: With these four equations the mass of the star is
1669: \begin{eqnarray}
1670: \log_{10} \frac {{\mathcal M}_S}
1671: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}}= \nonumber
1672: \end{eqnarray}
1673: \begin{eqnarray}
1674: \frac {- 0.4\,{\it M_{\mathrm V}}- 0.4\,{\it K_{\mathrm {BC}}}+ 4.0\,
1675: \ln
1676: \left( {\frac {{\it T_{\mathrm{BV}}}}{{\it (B-V)}-{\it K_{\mathrm{BV}}}}} \right) \left( \ln
1677: \left( 10 \right) ^{-1}
1678: \right )}{b_{\mathrm {LM}}} \nonumber
1679: \end{eqnarray}
1680: \begin{eqnarray}
1681: -\frac{
1682: \ 0.4\,{\frac {{\it T_{\mathrm {BC}}}\,
1683: \left( {\it -(B-V)}+{\it K_{\mathrm{BV}}} \right)}{{\it T_{\mathrm{BV}}}}}+
1684: 1.896-{\it a_{\mathrm {LM}}
1685: }} {b_{\mathrm {LM}}}
1686: \label{mass_analytical}
1687: \quad,
1688: \end {eqnarray}
1689: with the various coefficients as given by Table~1
1690: in~\cite{zaninetti05}.
1691: As an example, the mass of a star belonging
1692: to MAIN SEQUENCE V is
1693: \begin{equation}
1694: \log_{10} \frac {{\mathcal M_S}}
1695: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}}=
1696: - 7.769+ 0.8972\,\ln \left( \frac{ 7361} {{\it (B-V)}+
1697: 0.6411 } \right)
1698: \quad .
1699: \end{equation}
1700:
1701: We can now express the colour $(B-V)$ as a function of the
1702: absolute visual magnitude $M_{V}$
1703: and the following formula for the mass of the star is obtained
1704: \begin{eqnarray}
1705: \log_{10} \frac {{\mathcal M_S}}
1706: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}}=
1707: - 7.769+ 0.8972\,\ln \left( \frac { 9378} { {\it
1708: W} \left( 9378\,{e^{- 8.496+ 0.2972\,{\it
1709: M_V}}} \right) } \right)
1710: \\
1711: MAIN~SEQUENCE~V~ when ~-5.8 < M_V < 11.8
1712: \quad , \nonumber
1713: \end{eqnarray}
1714: where $W$ is the Lambert~W-function, after~\cite{Lambert_1758}. A test
1715: of the previous formula can be done at the two boundaries: when
1716: $M_V$ =-0.58 , $ \log_{10} \frac {{\mathcal M_S}}{{\mathcal
1717: M}_{\sun}}=1.63$ against the calibrated value $\log_{10} \frac
1718: {{\mathcal M_S}}{{\mathcal M}_{\sun}}=1.6$ and when $M_V$ =11.8 ,
1719: $ \log_{10} \frac {{\mathcal M_S}}{{\mathcal M}_{\sun}}=-0.56$
1720: against the calibrated value $\log_{10} \frac {{\mathcal
1721: M_S}}{{\mathcal M}_{\sun}}=-0.66$, see Table~3.1
1722: in~\cite{deeming}.
1723:
1724: \subsection{The case of the galaxies}
1725:
1726: The mass of a galaxy can be evaluated once the mass luminosity
1727: ratio , $R$ is given
1728: \begin{equation}
1729: R = \langle \frac{M}{L} \rangle
1730: \quad .
1731: \end{equation}
1732: Some values of $R$ are now reported :
1733: $ R \leq 20$ by~\cite{kiang1961} and \cite{Persic_1992} ,
1734: $R =20$ by~\cite{pad} ,
1735: $R =5.93 $ by~\cite{vandermarel1991}.
1736: Further on \cite{Bell2001}, demonstrated (amongst others) that
1737: $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L} $
1738: varies as a function of galaxy colour, and therefore, type.
1739: If the bright end of the luminosity function is dominated
1740: by massive, evolved, red galaxies,
1741: and the faint end by low mass, blue galaxies, then
1742: $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L}\propto L^{-0.64}$ (GIANTS III)
1743: at the bright end and
1744: $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L}\propto L^{-0.7}$ (MAIN SEQUENCE V)
1745: at the faint end , see coefficients of Table~1 in~\cite{zaninetti05}.
1746: Then $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L} $
1747: will almost certainly not be constant due to different prevailing
1748: populations of stars at the boundaries of the luminosity function.
1749: The scatter in the models by \cite{Bell2001}
1750: is a starting point when evaluating the validity of
1751: assuming a constant $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L} $.
1752: Generally, near-infrared $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L} $ ratios
1753: are more constant than optical passband, but still vary with luminosity.
1754: In our framework ,
1755: we made $R$ a function of the passband ,
1756: in order to have the same results for the
1757: masses of the galaxies once the absolute magnitude is given,
1758: see Figure~\ref{masse}.
1759: %$R =5 $ in the optical for ~\cite{Bell_2001}.
1760: In our framework $R$ can be expressed as
1761: \begin{equation}
1762: R = \frac { \langle{\mathcal M}\rangle }{ \langle L \rangle }
1763: \quad .
1764: \end{equation}
1765: On inserting formula~(\ref{massamedia})
1766: and formula (\ref{lmedia}) in the previous ratio
1767: the following formula for ${\mathcal M^*}$ is found
1768: \begin{equation}
1769: {\mathcal M}^* = R L^* \frac{\Gamma (c+a)}{\Gamma(c)}
1770: \frac { {\mathcal M}_{\sun}} {L_{\sun}}
1771: \label{mstar}
1772: \quad .
1773: \end {equation}
1774: From equations~(\ref{massa}) and~(\ref{mstar})
1775: a formula for the mass of the galaxy is found
1776: \begin{equation}
1777: \mathcal{M} =
1778: {\frac {R{10}^{( 0.4\,{\it M_{bol,\sun}}- 0.4\,{\it M^*})}\Gamma
1779: \left( c+a \right) \left( {10}^{- 0.4\,{\it M}+ 0.4\,{\it M^*}} \right) ^{{a}^{-1}}}{c\Gamma \left( c \right) }}
1780: { {\mathcal M}_{\sun}}
1781: \quad .
1782: \label{massgalaxy}
1783: \end{equation}
1784:
1785: An application of the previous
1786: formula is reported in Figure~(\ref{masse}) ,
1787: where the mass of galaxies as a function of the absolute
1788: magnitude in the five bands of SDSS is drawn.
1789: In this Figure ${M}_{bol,\sun}$ is different
1790: for each selected band and equal to the value
1791: suggested in equation~(16) of~\cite{blanton}.
1792: %begin figure masse
1793:
1794: \clearpage
1795:
1796: \begin{figure}
1797: \begin{center}
1798: \plotone{f15.eps}
1799: \end {center}
1800: \caption {
1801: Logarithm of the mass of the galaxy as a function of the absolute magnitude.
1802: The SDSS bands are
1803: $u^*$ with ${M}_{bol,\sun}$=${M}_{u^*\sun}$=6.39
1804: and $R=6$ (full line) ,
1805: $g^*$ with ${M}_{bol,\sun}$=${M}_{g^*\sun}$=5.07
1806: and $R=13$ (dashed),
1807: $r^*$ with ${M}_{bol,\sun}$=${M}_{r^*\sun}$=4.62
1808: and $R=16$ (dot-dash-dot-dash),
1809: $i^*$ with ${M}_{bol,\sun}$=${M}_{i^*\sun}$=4.52
1810: and $R=15$ (dotted),
1811: $z^*$ with ${M}_{bol,\sun}$=${M}_{z^*\sun}$=4.48
1812: and $R=14$
1813: (dash-dot-dot-dot).
1814: }
1815: \label{masse}%
1816: \end{figure}
1817:
1818: \clearpage
1819:
1820: % end figure masse
1821: The new formula~(\ref{massgalaxy}) allows us to deduce
1822: the mass of the galaxy from its absolute magnitude
1823: and can be easily particularized in different pass-bands.
1824: As an example , with the data of SDSS in the
1825: five bands reported in Table~\ref{para_physical_SDSS_data}
1826: , ${M}_{bol,\sun}$ as
1827: in equation~(16) of~\cite{blanton}
1828: and $R$ as in Figure~\ref{masse},
1829: we have
1830: \begin{eqnarray}
1831: \mathcal{M}=&
1832: 215234\,{e^{- 0.6579\,{\it M}}}
1833: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}} & ~u^*~band
1834: ~when -20.6 \leq M \leq -15.7
1835: \nonumber \\
1836: \mathcal{M}=&
1837: 97216\,{e^{- 0.6978\,{\it M}}}
1838: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}} & ~g^*~band
1839: ~when -22.0 \leq M \leq -18.2
1840: \nonumber \\
1841: \mathcal{M}=&
1842: 490000\,{e^{- 0.6141\,{\it M}}}
1843: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}} & ~r^*~band
1844: ~when -23.0 \leq M \leq -19
1845: \label{massparticular}
1846: \\
1847: \mathcal{M}=&
1848: 2691000\,{e^{- 0.5294\,{\it M}}}
1849: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}} & ~i^*~band
1850: ~when -23.5 \leq M \leq -19.3
1851: \nonumber \\
1852: \mathcal{M}=&
1853: 3434000\,{e^{- 0.5175\,{\it M}}}
1854: {{\mathcal M}_{\sun}} & ~z^*~band
1855: ~when -23.7 \leq M \leq -20.0
1856: \nonumber \quad .
1857: \end{eqnarray}
1858: The method here suggested to deduce the mass of the galaxy
1859: can be compared with the formula that comes out
1860: from the Tully-Fisher relation , see \cite{Tully1977}
1861: and \cite{Tully1998}.
1862: In the Tully-Fisher framework the mass of a rotating
1863: galaxy can be parameterised
1864: as
1865: \begin{equation}
1866: \mathcal{M}= 50 {V_f}^4 { {\mathcal M}_{\sun}} \frac{s^4}{Km^4}
1867: \quad ,
1868: \label{eqnfisher}
1869: \end{equation}
1870: where $V_f$ is the rotational velocity expressed in
1871: $\frac{Km}{s}$, see~\cite{McGaugh2005}.
1872: %%siamoqui
1873: The mass to light ratio in our framework scales
1874: $\propto L^{(1/a) -1}$ with $a$
1875: depending on the selected catalog and band.
1876: This ratio oscillates , referring to the SDSS data,
1877: between a minimum
1878: dependence in the $g^*$ band ,
1879: $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L}\propto L^{-0.24}$
1880: and a maximum dependence in the
1881: $i^*$ band , $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L}\propto L^{-0.42}$.
1882: A comparison should be made with
1883: $\frac{\mathcal{M}}{L}\propto L^{0.35}$
1884: in \cite{vandermarel1991} for a sample of
1885: 37 bright elliptical galaxies ; this result was
1886: obtained by implementing axisymmetric dynamical models.
1887: The completeness of the mass sample of the galaxies belonging to a given catalog
1888: can be evaluated
1889: in the following way.
1890: The limiting apparent magnitude
1891: is known,
1892: and is different for each catalog.
1893: In the case of the SDSS ($r^*$ band)
1894: is $m$=17.6, see~\cite{blanton}.
1895:
1896: The corresponding absolute limiting magnitude is computed
1897: and inserted in equation~(\ref{massgalaxy}).
1898: The limiting
1899: mass for galaxies , ${\mathcal M}_L$ ,is
1900: \begin{equation}
1901: {\mathcal M}_L =
1902: R \frac{{10}^{( 0.4\,{\it M_{bol,\sun}}- 0.4\,{\it M^*}\/)}\Gamma \left( c+a
1903: \right) \left({10}^{- 0.4\,{\it m }+ 2.0\,{\it Log10}
1904: \left({\frac{{\it c_L z}}{H_{{0}}}} \right) + 10.0+ 0.4\,{\it
1905: M^*}} \right) ^{{a}^{-1}} }
1906: {{c} \left( \Gamma \left( c
1907: \right) \right) }
1908: {\mathcal M_{\sun}}
1909: \quad ,
1910: \label{limitingmass}
1911: \end{equation}
1912: where $c_Lz$ is the radial distance expressed in
1913: $km/s$.
1914: In order to see how the parameter $z$ influences
1915: the limiting mass,
1916: Table~\ref{para_limiting} reports the range of observable
1917: masses as a function of $z$.
1918:
1919: \begin{table}
1920: \caption [] {The limiting mass for the SDSS catalog ,$u^*$ band,
1921: when $R$ and $M_{bol,\sun}$
1922: are those of Figure~\ref{masse}.
1923: The limiting apparent magnitude is $m$=17.6.}
1924: \label{para_limiting}
1925: \[
1926: \begin{array}{lc}
1927: \hline
1928: mass~range & z \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1929: \hline
1930: \noalign{\smallskip}
1931: 1.41 10^8{\mathcal M}_{\sun} <{\mathcal M} < 1.7~10^{11}{\mathcal M}_{\sun} &
1932: 0.001 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1933: 3.79 10^{9}{\mathcal M}_{\sun} <{\mathcal M} < 1.7~10^{11}{\mathcal M}_{\sun} &
1934: 0.01 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1935: 1.0 10^{11}{\mathcal M}_{\sun} <{\mathcal M} < 1.7~10^{11}{\mathcal M}_{\sun} &
1936: 0.1 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1937: 1.4 10^{11}{\mathcal M}_{\sun} <{\mathcal M} < 1.7~10^{11}{\mathcal M}_{\sun} &
1938: 0.13 \\ \noalign{\smallskip}
1939: \hline
1940: \hline
1941: \end{array}
1942: \]
1943: \end{table}
1944:
1945: \section{Conclusions}
1946:
1947: \label{conclusions}
1948: We have split the analysis of the luminosity function in
1949: two .
1950: The analysis of the main new luminosity function ,
1951: formula~(\ref{equation_mia}),
1952: from
1953: low luminosities up to maximum magnitude
1954: shows that , see Table~\ref{para_physical_SDSS_data},
1955: \begin{enumerate}
1956: \item The parameter {\it c } varies between 0.1 and 2.
1957: It must be remembered that the theory predicts
1958: 2 , 4 and 6 for
1959: the 1D,2D and 3D fragmentation respectively.
1960: \item Parameter {\it a } varies between 1.32 and 1.74.
1961: The numerical mass-luminosity relationship
1962: for the stars gives values of the parameter {\it a}
1963: comprised between 2.43 and 3.43.
1964: \item The ${\mathcal M} -L$ function
1965: represents a better fit of the observational data
1966: in comparison with the Schechter function once the concept
1967: of maximum magnitude of the sample is introduced.
1968: Without this limiting magnitude the situation is inverted.
1969: \end {enumerate}
1970:
1971: The case of low luminosities galaxies was
1972: describe by a truncated Pareto type luminosity
1973: function , see formula~(\ref{equation_miapareto}).
1974: This new luminosity function is described by two
1975: physical parameters , $d$ , and $a$ denoting
1976: respectively the distribution in mass and
1977: the mass-luminosity connection.
1978: The analysis of the data
1979: for low luminosities galaxies
1980: as reported in Table~\ref{para_physical_SDSS_LL}
1981: shows that
1982: \begin{enumerate}
1983: \item The parameter $d$ varies between 0.3 and 0.9~.
1984: This value should be compared with
1985: $d$ of the stars which is $2.3 -1=1.3$ ,
1986: see~\cite{Kroupa2001}.
1987: \item The parameter $a$ varies between 1.3 and 2.7.
1988: \end{enumerate}
1989:
1990: The theoretical number of galaxies as a function of the red-shift
1991: presents a maximum that is a function
1992: of $\alpha$ and $f$ for the
1993: Schechter function
1994: and $c$ , $a$ and $f$
1995: for the first ${\mathcal M}-L$ function ;
1996: the agreement with the maximum in the observed
1997: number of galaxies
1998: is acceptable.
1999:
2000: The observable range in masses can be parameterised as a function
2001: of $z$ and the ratio between maximum and minimum luminosity
2002: is 232 at $z$ =0.001 but drops to 1.1 at $z$ =0.15~,
2003: see Table~\ref{para_limiting}.
2004:
2005: Perhaps a more comprehensive way of comparing the mass estimates
2006: of equation~(\ref{eqnfisher})
2007: ( Tully-Fisher relation )
2008: with those given here (equation~(\ref{massgalaxy})
2009: and equation~(\ref{massparticular})
2010: ) would be as follows.
2011: We take the same sample of galaxies for which the luminosity function was
2012: computed in Section~\ref{test}
2013: and compute their mass function according to a given
2014: value of $R$ .
2015: This mass function
2016: can be compared with those of other galaxies in a common passband
2017: and, also in this case, the distribution is expressed
2018: through a Schechter function. Three cases are now analysed
2019: \begin{enumerate}
2020: \item The Bell case , see \cite{Bell2003b},
2021: where $\Phi^* =0.01 Mpc^{-3}/Log_{10}({\mathcal M})$,
2022: ${\mathcal M}^*=5.3~10^{10}{\mathcal M_{\sun}}$
2023: and $\alpha=-1.21$.
2024: \item The Bottema case , see \cite{Bottema1997},
2025: where $\Phi^* =0.014 Mpc^{-3}/Log_{10}({\mathcal M})$,
2026: ${\mathcal M}^*=2.24~10^{10}{\mathcal M_{\sun}}$
2027: and $\alpha=-1.20$.
2028: \item Kennicutt-Kroupa case , see \cite{Kennicutt1983,Kroupa1993},
2029: where $\Phi^* =0.011 Mpc^{-3}/Log_{10}({\mathcal M})$,
2030: ${\mathcal M}^*=3.78~10^{10}{\mathcal M_{\sun}}$
2031: and $\alpha=-1.22$.
2032: \end{enumerate}
2033: Figure~\ref{massedis} reports the already cited standard
2034: distributions as well as our
2035: $\Psi ({\mathcal M })/Log_{10}({\mathcal M})$
2036: when the range in masses is that given by the conversion
2037: from luminosity to masses.
2038:
2039: % inizio figure massedis
2040: \begin{figure}
2041: \begin{center}
2042: \plotone{f16.eps}
2043: \end {center}
2044: \caption {
2045: Barionic Mass function of galaxies:
2046: our $\Psi ({\mathcal M })/Log_{10}({\mathcal M})$ (full line) ,
2047: Bell case (dashed),
2048: Bottema case (dot-dash-dot-dash)
2049: and Kennicutt-Kroupa case (dotted).
2050: In our case we considered the SDSS band
2051: $u^*$ with ${M}_{bol,\sun}$=${M}_{u^*\sun}$=6.39
2052: and $R$=6.0~.
2053: }
2054: \label{massedis}%
2055: \end{figure}
2056:
2057: \clearpage
2058: % end figure massedis
2059: %modifica8
2060: %modifica8
2061: The analysis of the two new functions for the luminosity for galaxies
2062: here derived gives a marginally better fit but certainly
2063: the Schechter function for it's simplicity and fewer parameters
2064: still represents a good model for the luminosity function
2065: for galaxies.
2066: At present the study of the Schechter function
2067: is not yet terminated and two new equations were derived:
2068: equation~(\ref{maximummag}) that represents the maximum
2069: in magnitude distribution and equation~(\ref{nfunctionz})
2070: that gives the value of $z$ at which the observed number
2071: of galaxies is maximum.
2072: %modifica8
2073: %modifica8
2074: \appendix
2075:
2076:
2077:
2078: \section{On the Kiang Function}
2079: \label{appendixa}
2080:
2081: The starting point is the distribution in length , $s$ ,
2082: of a segment in a random fragmentation
2083: \begin{equation}
2084: p(s) = \lambda \exp {(-\lambda s)} ds
2085: \quad ,
2086: \end{equation}
2087: where $\lambda$ is the hazard rate of the exponential distribution.
2088: Given the fact that the sum , $u$ , of two exponential
2089: distributions is
2090: \begin{equation}
2091: p(u)= \lambda^2 u \exp{(- \lambda u)} du
2092: \quad .
2093: \end{equation}
2094: The distribution of 1D Voronoi segments , $l$,
2095: ( the midpoint of the sum of two segments) can be found
2096: from the previous formula by inserting $u=2l$
2097: \begin{equation}
2098: p(l) = 2 \lambda l \exp{(-2 \lambda l)} d (2 \lambda l)
2099: \quad .
2100: \end{equation}
2101: On transforming in normalised units $x=\frac{l}{\lambda}$
2102: we obtain
2103: \begin{equation}
2104: p(x) = 2 x \exp{(-2 x) } d (2 x)
2105: \quad .
2106: \end{equation}
2107: After one century of studies on the Voronoi diagrams
2108: , see the two memories \cite{voronoi_1907} and \cite{voronoi} ,
2109: the law of the segments in 1D
2110: is the unique analytical result on the field.
2111: When this result is expressed as a gamma variate
2112: we obtain formula(5) of \cite{kiang}
2113: \begin{equation}
2114: H (x ;c ) = \frac {c} {\Gamma (c)} (cx )^{c-1} \exp(-cx)
2115: \quad ,
2116: \label{kiang}
2117: \end{equation}
2118: where $ 0 \leq x < \infty $ , $ c~>0$
2119: and $\Gamma (c)$ is the gamma function with argument c;
2120: in the case of 1D Voronoi diagrams $c=2$.
2121: It was conjectured that the area in 2D and the volumes
2122: in 3D of the Voronoi diagrams may be approximated
2123: as the sum of two and three gamma variate of argument 2.
2124: Due to the fact that the sum of n independent gamma
2125: variates with shape parameter $c_i$ is a gamma variate with
2126: shape parameter $c = \sum_{i}^{n} c_i$,
2127: the area and the volumes are supposed to follow a gamma variate
2128: of argument 4 and 6.
2129: This hypothesis was later named
2130: "Kiang's conjecture", and the equation (\ref{kiang}) used as
2131: a fitting function , see \citet{kumar,Zaninetti2006},
2132: or as an hypothesis to accept or to reject using the standard
2133: procedures of the data analysis,
2134: see~\citet{Tanemura1988,Tanemura2003}.
2135: %modifica6
2136: %modifica6
2137: A new way to parametrise the 1D, 2D and 3D cells on the
2138: base of the considered dimensionality has been introduced ,
2139: see formula~(12) in \cite{Ferenc_2007}.
2140: %modifica6
2141: %modifica6
2142: \section{On the Truncated Pareto Distribution}
2143: \label{appendixb}
2144:
2145:
2146:
2147: The starting pdf (probability density function)
2148: is the Pareto distribution~\cite{Pareto,evans}, P,
2149: \begin {equation}
2150: P(x;a,c) = \frac {c a^c}{x^{c+1}} \quad ,
2151: \label{pareto}
2152: \end {equation}
2153: where $ a \leq x < \infty $ , $ a~>0$ , $ c~>0$.
2154: The average value is
2155: \begin{equation}
2156: \overline {x}=
2157: \frac {ca} {c-1}
2158: \quad ,
2159: \end{equation}
2160: which is defined for $c >1$,
2161: and the variance is
2162: \begin{equation}
2163: \sigma^2 =
2164: {\frac {{a}^{2}c}{ \left(c -2 \right) \left(c -1 \right) ^{2}}}
2165: \quad ,
2166: \end{equation}
2167: which is defined for $c >2$.
2168: The presence of an upper bound ,$b$, allows us to
2169: introduce the following pdf , named truncated Pareto $P_T$ ,
2170:
2171: \begin {equation}
2172: P_T(x;a,b,c ) = \frac {1}{1-(\frac{a}{b})^c} \frac {c
2173: a^c}{x^{c+1}} \quad , \label{eq:pdf}
2174: \end {equation}
2175:
2176: here $ a \leq x \leq b $ , $ a~>0$ ,$b~>0$, $b>a$ and $ c~>0$.
2177: The distribution function of the truncated Pareto
2178: is
2179: \begin{equation}
2180: F(x;a,b,c) =
2181: \frac {1 -(\frac {a}{x})^c} {1-(\frac{a}{b})^c}
2182: \quad .
2183: \end{equation}
2184:
2185: The average value of the truncated Pareto pdf is
2186: \begin{equation}
2187: \overline {x} =
2188: \frac {ca} {c-1}
2189: \frac {1 -(\frac{a}{b})^{c-1} } {1-(\frac{a}{b})^c}
2190: \quad ,
2191: \end {equation}
2192: and the variance of the truncated Pareto pdf is
2193: \begin {equation}
2194: \sigma^2 = \frac {numerator}{denominator}
2195: \quad ,
2196: \end {equation}
2197: with
2198: \begin{equation}
2199: denominator =
2200: \left( c-2 \right) \left( c-1 \right) ^{2} \left(
2201: {a}^{2\,c}-2\,{b}^{c}{a}^{c}+{b}^{2\,c} \right)
2202: \quad ,
2203: \nonumber
2204: \end {equation}
2205:
2206: \begin{eqnarray}
2207: numerator = \nonumber \\
2208: c{b}^{2}{a}^{2\,c}+2\,{a}^{2+c}{c}^{2}{b}^{c}-4\,{c}^{2}{a}^{c+1}{b}^{
2209: c+1}+2\,{c}^{2}{b}^{2+c}{a}^{c}-{a}^{2+c}c{b}^{c}
2210: \nonumber \\
2211: +2\,{c}^{3}{a}^{c+1}{
2212: b}^{c+1}-{a}^{2+c}{c}^{3}{b}^{c}-{c}^{3}{b}^{2+c}{a}^{c}-c{b}^{2+c}{a}
2213: ^{c}+c{a}^{2}{b}^{2\,c}
2214: \quad .
2215: \nonumber
2216: \end {eqnarray}
2217:
2218: The variance of the truncated Pareto
2219: is always defined for every value of $c >$ 0;
2220: conversely the variance of the
2221: Pareto distribution can be defined only when $c >$ 2.
2222: The parameter $c$ can be derived through the maximum
2223: likelihood estimator (MLE).
2224: The likelihood function is defined as the probability
2225: we would have obtained a given set of observations
2226: if given a
2227: particular set of values of the distribution parameters,$c_i$,
2228: \begin{equation}
2229: L(c) = f (x_1 \ldots x_n | c_1 \ldots c_n)
2230: \quad .
2231: \end {equation}
2232: If we assume that the n random variables
2233: are independently and
2234: identically distributed,
2235: then we may write the likelihood function as
2236: \begin{equation}
2237: L(c) = f (x_1 | c_1 \ldots c_p) \ldots
2238: f (x_n| c_1 \ldots c_p) =
2239: \prod_{i=1}^n f (x_i | c_1 \ldots c_p)
2240: \quad .
2241: \end {equation}
2242:
2243: The maximum likelihood estimates for the
2244: $c_i$ are
2245: obtained by maximising
2246: the likelihood function, L(c).
2247: Equivalently, we may find it easier to
2248: maximise $ln f(x_i)$ ,
2249: termed the log-likelihood.
2250: So, for a random sample $x_1 \ldots x_n$
2251: from a truncated Pareto distribution, the
2252: likelihood function is
2253: given by
2254: \begin{equation}
2255: L(c) =
2256: \prod_{i=1}^n
2257: c \left( \left( {a}^{c} \right) ^{-1}- \left( {b}^{c} \right) ^{-1}
2258: \right) ^{-1} \left( {x_i}^{c+1} \right) ^{-1}
2259: \quad .
2260: \end {equation}
2261: In this model we have assumed
2262: that $a$= min($x_1 \ldots x_n$) and
2263: $b$= max($x_1 \ldots x_n$).
2264:
2265: Using logarithms, we obtain the log-likelihood
2266: \begin {equation}
2267: \ln L(c) =
2268: nc \ln (a) + n \ln \frac {c}{1 - (\frac{a}{b})^c}
2269: - \sum _{i=1}^n \ln x_i
2270: \quad .
2271: \end {equation}
2272: Taking the first derivative , we get
2273: \begin {eqnarray}
2274: \frac {\partial }{\partial c} \ln L(c) = 0 \nonumber \\
2275: n \ln a +
2276: \frac {n} {c} +
2277: \frac {n (\frac {a}{b})^c \ln (\frac{a}{b}) } { 1-(\frac {a}{b})^c }
2278: - \sum_{i=1}^n \ln x_i
2279: = 0
2280: \quad .
2281: \end {eqnarray}
2282: The parameter $c$ can be found by solving numerically
2283: the previous non-linear equation.
2284:
2285:
2286:
2287: \begin{acknowledgements}
2288: I thank Massimo Ramella , Tao Kiang and the
2289: anonymous referee for comments.
2290:
2291: \end{acknowledgements}
2292: %\bibliography{biblio}
2293:
2294: \begin{thebibliography}{59}
2295: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
2296:
2297: \bibitem[{{Aban} {et~al.}(2006){Aban}, {Meerschaert}, \& {Panorska}}]{Aban2006}
2298: {Aban}, I., {Meerschaert}, M., \& {Panorska}, A. 2006, Journal of the American
2299: Statistical Association, 101, 270
2300:
2301: \bibitem[{{Bell} \& {de Jong}(2001)}]{Bell2001}
2302: {Bell}, E.~F., \& {de Jong}, R.~S. 2001, \apj, 550, 212
2303:
2304: \bibitem[{{Bell} {et~al.}(2003{\natexlab{a}}){Bell}, {McIntosh}, {Katz}, \&
2305: {Weinberg}}]{Bell2003b}
2306: {Bell}, E.~F., {McIntosh}, D.~H., {Katz}, N., \& {Weinberg}, M.~D.
2307: 2003{\natexlab{a}}, \apjl, 585, L117
2308:
2309: \bibitem[{{Bell} {et~al.}(2003{\natexlab{b}}){Bell}, {McIntosh}, {Katz}, \&
2310: {Weinberg}}]{Bell2003}
2311: ---. 2003{\natexlab{b}}, \apjs, 149, 289
2312:
2313: \bibitem[{{Binney} \& {Merrifield}(1998)}]{Binney1998}
2314: {Binney}, J., \& {Merrifield}, M. 1998, {Galactic astronomy} (Princeton, NJ:
2315: Princeton University Press)
2316:
2317: \bibitem[{{Blanton} {et~al.}(2001){Blanton}, {Dalcanton}, {Eisenstein},
2318: {Loveday}, {Strauss}, {SubbaRao}, {Weinberg}, {Anderson}, {Annis}, {Bahcall},
2319: {Bernardi}, {Brinkmann}, \& {Brunner}}]{blanton}
2320: {Blanton}, M.~R., {Dalcanton}, J., {Eisenstein}, D., {Loveday}, J., {Strauss},
2321: M.~A., {SubbaRao}, M., {Weinberg}, D.~H., {Anderson}, J.~E., {Annis}, J.,
2322: {Bahcall}, N.~A., {Bernardi}, M., {Brinkmann}, J., \& {Brunner}, R.~J. 2001,
2323: \aj, 121, 2358
2324:
2325: \bibitem[{{Blanton} {et~al.}(2003){Blanton}, {Hogg}, {Bahcall}, {Brinkmann},
2326: {Britton}, {Connolly}, {Csabai}, {Fukugita}, {Loveday}, {Meiksin}, {Munn},
2327: {Nichol}, {Okamura}, {Quinn}, {Schneider}, {Shimasaku}, {Strauss}, {Tegmark},
2328: {Vogeley}, \& {Weinberg}}]{Blanton_2003}
2329: {Blanton}, M.~R., {Hogg}, D.~W., {Bahcall}, N.~A., {Brinkmann}, J., {Britton},
2330: M., {Connolly}, A.~J., {Csabai}, I., {Fukugita}, M., {Loveday}, J.,
2331: {Meiksin}, A., {Munn}, J.~A., {Nichol}, R.~C., {Okamura}, S., {Quinn}, T.,
2332: {Schneider}, D.~P., {Shimasaku}, K., {Strauss}, M.~A., {Tegmark}, M.,
2333: {Vogeley}, M.~S., \& {Weinberg}, D.~H. 2003, \apj, 592, 819
2334:
2335: \bibitem[{{Blanton} {et~al.}(2005){Blanton}, {Lupton}, {Schlegel}, {Strauss},
2336: {Brinkmann}, {Fukugita}, \& {Loveday}}]{Blanton_2005}
2337: {Blanton}, M.~R., {Lupton}, R.~H., {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Strauss}, M.~A.,
2338: {Brinkmann}, J., {Fukugita}, M., \& {Loveday}, J. 2005, \apj, 631, 208
2339:
2340: \bibitem[{{Bottema}(1997)}]{Bottema1997}
2341: {Bottema}, R. 1997, \aap, 328, 517
2342:
2343: \bibitem[{{Bowers} \& {Deeming}(1984)}]{deeming}
2344: {Bowers}, R.~L., \& {Deeming}, T. 1984, {Astrophysics. I and II} (Boston:
2345: {Jones and Bartlett })
2346:
2347: \bibitem[{{Burroughs} \& {Tebbens}(2001)}]{Burroughs2001}
2348: {Burroughs}, S.~M., \& {Tebbens}, S.~F. 2001, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 158,
2349: 741
2350:
2351: \bibitem[{{Charlton} \& {Schramm}(1986)}]{charlton}
2352: {Charlton}, J.~C., \& {Schramm}, D.~N. 1986, \apj, 310, 26
2353:
2354: \bibitem[{{Cohen} \& {Whitten}(1988)}]{Cohen1988}
2355: {Cohen}, A., \& {Whitten}, B. 1988, Parameter Estimation in reliability and
2356: Life Span Models (New York: Marcel Dekker)
2357:
2358: \bibitem[{{Cox}(2000)}]{cox}
2359: {Cox}, A.~N. 2000, {Allen's astrophysical quantities} (New York: Springer)
2360:
2361: \bibitem[{{Cross} {et~al.}(2001){Cross}, {Driver}, {Couch}, {Baugh},
2362: {Bland-Hawthorn}, {Bridges}, {Cannon}, {Cole}, {Colless}, {Collins},
2363: {Dalton}, {Deeley}, {De Propris}, {Efstathiou}, {Ellis}, {Frenk},
2364: {Glazebrook}, {Jackson}, {Lahav}, {Lewis}, {Lumsden}, {Maddox}, {Madgwick},
2365: {Moody}, {Norberg}, {Peacock}, {Peterson}, {Price}, {Seaborne}, {Sutherland},
2366: {Tadros}, \& {Taylor}}]{Cross2001}
2367: {Cross}, N., {Driver}, S.~P., {Couch}, W., {Baugh}, C.~M., {Bland-Hawthorn},
2368: J., {Bridges}, T., {Cannon}, R., {Cole}, S., {Colless}, M., {Collins}, C.,
2369: {Dalton}, G., {Deeley}, K., {De Propris}, R., {Efstathiou}, G., {Ellis},
2370: R.~S., {Frenk}, C.~S., {Glazebrook}, K., {Jackson}, C., {Lahav}, O., {Lewis},
2371: I., {Lumsden}, S., {Maddox}, S., {Madgwick}, D., {Moody}, S., {Norberg}, P.,
2372: {Peacock}, J.~A., {Peterson}, B.~A., {Price}, I., {Seaborne}, M.,
2373: {Sutherland}, W., {Tadros}, H., \& {Taylor}, K. 2001, \mnras, 324, 825
2374:
2375: \bibitem[{{Devoto} \& {Martínez}(1998)}]{Devoto1998}
2376: {Devoto}, D., \& {Martínez}, S. 1998, Mathematical Geology, 30, 661
2377:
2378: \bibitem[{{Dicenzo} \& {Wertheim}(1989)}]{Dicenzo1989}
2379: {Dicenzo}, S.~B., \& {Wertheim}, G.~K. 1989, \prb, 39, 6792
2380:
2381: \bibitem[{{Driver} {et~al.}(2005){Driver}, {Liske}, {Cross}, {De Propris}, \&
2382: {Allen}}]{Driver2005}
2383: {Driver}, S.~P., {Liske}, J., {Cross}, N.~J.~G., {De Propris}, R., \& {Allen},
2384: P.~D. 2005, \mnras, 360, 81
2385:
2386: \bibitem[{{Driver} \& {Phillipps}(1996)}]{Driver1996}
2387: {Driver}, S.~P., \& {Phillipps}, S. 1996, \apj, 469, 529
2388:
2389: \bibitem[{{Drouffe} \& {Itzykson}(1984)}]{Drouffe1984}
2390: {Drouffe}, J.~M., \& {Itzykson}, C. 1984, Nuclear Physics B, 235, 45
2391:
2392: \bibitem[{{Elmegreen}(2004)}]{Elmegreen2004}
2393: {Elmegreen}, B.~G. 2004, \mnras, 354, 367
2394:
2395: \bibitem[{{Evans} {et~al.}(2000){Evans}, {Hastings}, \& B.}]{evans}
2396: {Evans}, M., {Hastings}, N., \& B., P. 2000, Statistical Distributions - third
2397: edition (New York: John Wiley \& Sons Inc)
2398:
2399: \bibitem[{{Ferenc} \& {N{\'e}da}(2007)}]{Ferenc_2007}
2400: {Ferenc}, J.-S., \& {N{\'e}da}, Z. 2007, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and
2401: its Applications, 385, 518
2402:
2403: \bibitem[{{Hentschel} {et~al.}(2007){Hentschel}, {Ilyin}, {Makedonska},
2404: {Procaccia}, \& {Schupper}}]{Hentschel2007}
2405: {Hentschel}, H.~G.~E., {Ilyin}, V., {Makedonska}, N., {Procaccia}, I., \&
2406: {Schupper}, N. 2007, \pre, 75, 050404
2407:
2408: \bibitem[{{Jerauld} {et~al.}(1984{\natexlab{a}}){Jerauld}, {Hatfield},
2409: {Scriven}, \& {Davis}}]{Jerauld1984_a}
2410: {Jerauld}, G.~R., {Hatfield}, J.~C., {Scriven}, L.~E., \& {Davis}, H.~T.
2411: 1984{\natexlab{a}}, Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics, 17, 1519
2412:
2413: \bibitem[{{Jerauld} {et~al.}(1984{\natexlab{b}}){Jerauld}, {Scriven}, \&
2414: {Davis}}]{Jerauld1984_b}
2415: {Jerauld}, G.~R., {Scriven}, L.~E., \& {Davis}, H.~T. 1984{\natexlab{b}},
2416: Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics, 17, 3429
2417:
2418: \bibitem[{{Jones} {et~al.}(2006){Jones}, {Peterson}, {Colless}, \&
2419: {Saunders}}]{Jones2006}
2420: {Jones}, D.~H., {Peterson}, B.~A., {Colless}, M., \& {Saunders}, W. 2006,
2421: \mnras, 369, 25
2422:
2423: \bibitem[{{Kennicutt}(1983)}]{Kennicutt1983}
2424: {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C. 1983, \apj, 272, 54
2425:
2426: \bibitem[{{Keres} {et~al.}(2003){Keres}, {Yun}, \& {Young}}]{Keres2003}
2427: {Keres}, D., {Yun}, M.~S., \& {Young}, J.~S. 2003, \apj, 582, 659
2428:
2429: \bibitem[{{Kiang}(1961)}]{kiang1961}
2430: {Kiang}, T. 1961, \mnras, 122, 263
2431:
2432: \bibitem[{{Kiang}(1966)}]{kiang}
2433: ---. 1966, Zeitschrift fur Astrophysics, 64, 433
2434:
2435: \bibitem[{{Kroupa}(2001)}]{Kroupa2001}
2436: {Kroupa}, P. 2001, \mnras, 322, 231
2437:
2438: \bibitem[{{Kroupa} {et~al.}(1993){Kroupa}, {Tout}, \& {Gilmore}}]{Kroupa1993}
2439: {Kroupa}, P., {Tout}, C.~A., \& {Gilmore}, G. 1993, \mnras, 262, 545
2440:
2441: \bibitem[{{Kumar} {et~al.}(1992){Kumar}, {Kurtz}, {Banavar}, \& M.G.}]{kumar}
2442: {Kumar}, S., {Kurtz}, S.~K., {Banavar}, J.~R., \& M.G., S. 1992, Journal of
2443: Statistical Physics, 67, 523
2444:
2445: \bibitem[{{Lambert}(1758)}]{Lambert_1758}
2446: {Lambert}, J.~H. 1758, Acta Helvitica,
2447: physico-mathematico-anatomico-botanico-medica, 3, 128
2448:
2449: \bibitem[{{Lang}(1999)}]{lang}
2450: {Lang}, K.~R. 1999, {Astrophysical formulae} (New York: Springer)
2451:
2452: \bibitem[{{Lee} \& {Chen}(2006)}]{Lee2006}
2453: {Lee}, T.-Y., \& {Chen}, J.~S. 2006, International Journal for Computational
2454: Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics, 7, 475
2455:
2456: \bibitem[{{Lin} {et~al.}(1996){Lin}, {Kirshner}, {Shectman}, {Landy}, {Oemler},
2457: {Tucker}, \& {Schechter}}]{lin}
2458: {Lin}, H., {Kirshner}, R.~P., {Shectman}, S.~A., {Landy}, S.~D., {Oemler}, A.,
2459: {Tucker}, D.~L., \& {Schechter}, P.~L. 1996, \apj, 464, 60
2460:
2461: \bibitem[{{Madgwick} {et~al.}(2002){Madgwick}, {Lahav}, {Baldry}, {Baugh},
2462: {Bland-Hawthorn}, {Bridges}, {Cannon}, {Cole}, {Colless}, {Collins}, {Couch},
2463: {Dalton}, {De Propris}, {Driver}, {Efstathiou}, {Ellis}, {Frenk},
2464: {Glazebrook}, {Jackson}, {Lewis}, {Lumsden}, {Maddox}, {Norberg}, {Peacock},
2465: {Peterson}, {Sutherland}, \& {Taylor}}]{Madgwick_2002}
2466: {Madgwick}, D.~S., {Lahav}, O., {Baldry}, I.~K., {Baugh}, C.~M.,
2467: {Bland-Hawthorn}, J., {Bridges}, T., {Cannon}, R., {Cole}, S., {Colless}, M.,
2468: {Collins}, C., {Couch}, W., {Dalton}, G., {De Propris}, R., {Driver}, S.~P.,
2469: {Efstathiou}, G., {Ellis}, R.~S., {Frenk}, C.~S., {Glazebrook}, K.,
2470: {Jackson}, C., {Lewis}, I., {Lumsden}, S., {Maddox}, S., {Norberg}, P.,
2471: {Peacock}, J.~A., {Peterson}, B.~A., {Sutherland}, W., \& {Taylor}, K. 2002,
2472: \mnras, 333, 133
2473:
2474: \bibitem[{{McGaugh}(2005)}]{McGaugh2005}
2475: {McGaugh}, S.~S. 2005, \apj, 632, 859
2476:
2477: \bibitem[{{Okabe} {et~al.}(1992){Okabe}, {Boots}, \& {Sugihara}}]{okabe}
2478: {Okabe}, A., {Boots}, B., \& {Sugihara}, K. 1992, {Spatial tessellations.
2479: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi diagrams} ({Chichester, New York}: {
2480: Wiley})
2481:
2482: \bibitem[{{Padmanabhan}(1996)}]{pad}
2483: {Padmanabhan}, T. 1996, Cosmology and Astrophysics through Problems (Cambridge:
2484: Cambridge University Press)
2485:
2486: \bibitem[{{Pareto}(1896)}]{Pareto}
2487: {Pareto}, V. 1896, Cours d' economie politique (Lausanne: Rouge)
2488:
2489: \bibitem[{{Persic} \& {Salucci}(1992)}]{Persic_1992}
2490: {Persic}, M., \& {Salucci}, P. 1992, \mnras, 258, 14P
2491:
2492: \bibitem[{{Press} {et~al.}(1992){Press}, {Teukolsky}, {Vetterling}, \&
2493: {Flannery}}]{press}
2494: {Press}, W.~H., {Teukolsky}, S.~A., {Vetterling}, W.~T., \& {Flannery}, B.~P.
2495: 1992, {Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing}
2496: (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
2497:
2498: \bibitem[{{Rehfeldt} {et~al.}(1992){Rehfeldt}, {Boggs}, \&
2499: {Gelhar}}]{Rehfeldt1992}
2500: {Rehfeldt}, K., {Boggs}, J.~M., \& {Gelhar}, L.~W. 1992, Water Resour. Res.,
2501: 28, 3309
2502:
2503: \bibitem[{{Salpeter}(1955)}]{Salpeter1955}
2504: {Salpeter}, E.~E. 1955, \apj, 121, 161
2505:
2506: \bibitem[{{Scalo}(1986)}]{Scalo1986}
2507: {Scalo}, J.~M. 1986, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 11, 1
2508:
2509: \bibitem[{{Schechter}(1976)}]{schechter}
2510: {Schechter}, P. 1976, \apj, 203, 297
2511:
2512: \bibitem[{{Tanemura}(1988)}]{Tanemura1988}
2513: {Tanemura}, M. 1988, J. Microscopy, 151, 247
2514:
2515: \bibitem[{{Tanemura}(2003)}]{Tanemura2003}
2516: ---. 2003, Forma, 18, 221
2517:
2518: \bibitem[{{Tully} \& {Fisher}(1977)}]{Tully1977}
2519: {Tully}, R.~B., \& {Fisher}, J.~R. 1977, \aap, 54, 661
2520:
2521: \bibitem[{{Tully} {et~al.}(1998){Tully}, {Pierce}, {Huang}, {Saunders},
2522: {Verheijen}, \& {Witchalls}}]{Tully1998}
2523: {Tully}, R.~B., {Pierce}, M.~J., {Huang}, J.-S., {Saunders}, W., {Verheijen},
2524: M.~A.~W., \& {Witchalls}, P.~L. 1998, \aj, 115, 2264
2525:
2526: \bibitem[{{van der Marel}(1991)}]{vandermarel1991}
2527: {van der Marel}, R.~P. 1991, \mnras, 253, 710
2528:
2529: \bibitem[{{Voronoi}(1907)}]{voronoi_1907}
2530: {Voronoi}, G. 1907, Z. Reine Angew. Math, 133, 97
2531:
2532: \bibitem[{{Voronoi}(1908)}]{voronoi}
2533: ---. 1908, Z. Reine Angew. Math, 134, 198
2534:
2535: \bibitem[{{Zaninetti}(2005)}]{zaninetti05}
2536: {Zaninetti}, L. 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 754
2537:
2538: \bibitem[{{Zaninetti}(2006)}]{Zaninetti2006}
2539: ---. 2006, \cjaa, 6, 387
2540:
2541: \bibitem[{{Zaninetti} \& {Ferraro}(1990)}]{ferraro}
2542: {Zaninetti}, L., \& {Ferraro}, M. 1990, \aap, 239, 1
2543:
2544: \end{thebibliography}
2545:
2546: \end{document}
2547:
2548:
2549: