1: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
2:
3: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
4: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
5: %% any data that comes before this command.
6:
7: %% The command below calls the preprint style
8: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
9: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
10: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
11: %%
12: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
13:
14: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
15:
16: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
17:
18: %%preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
19:
20: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
21:
22: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
23: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
24: %% use the longabstract style option.
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
27:
28:
29: %%\usepackage{natbib}
30: \usepackage{rotating}
31:
32: \newcommand{\degree}{\ensuremath{^{\circ}}}
33: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
34: \newcommand{\myemail}{d.dicken@sheffield.ac.uk}
35: \newcommand{\moo}{\rm $\mu$m}
36:
37:
38: \shorttitle{New MFIR and radio observation of the 2Jy sample}
39: \shortauthors{Dicken et al.}
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43:
44: \title{The origin of the infrared emission in radio galaxies I: \\ new mid- to far-infrared and radio observations of the 2Jy sample}
45:
46:
47:
48: \author{D. Dicken\altaffilmark{1}, C. Tadhunter\altaffilmark{1}, R.
49: Morganti\altaffilmark{2,3}, C. Buchanan\altaffilmark{4}, T. Oosterloo\altaffilmark{2,3},
50: D. Axon\altaffilmark{5} }
51:
52: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
53: Sheffield, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield, S3 7RH;
54: d.dicken@sheffield.ac.uk, c.tadhunter@sheffield.ac.uk}
55: \altaffiltext{2}{ASTRON, P.O. Box 2,
56: 7990 AA Dwingeloo, Netherlands; morganti@astron.nl, oosterloo@astron.nl}
57: \altaffiltext{3}{Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen Postbus 800, 9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands}
58: \altaffiltext{4}{School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia; clb@physics.unimelb.edu.au}
59: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester Institute of Technology, 84 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester NY 14623; djasps@rit.edu}
60:
61:
62: \begin{abstract}
63: As part of a large study to investigate the nature of the longer
64: wavelength continuum emission of radio-loud AGN, we present new mid to
65: far-infrared (MFIR) and high frequency radio observations for a
66: complete sample of 2Jy powerful, southern radio galaxies at
67: intermediate redshifts ($0.05<z<0.7$). Utilizing the sensitivity of
68: the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope, we have made deep {\it MIPS} observations at
69: the wavelengths of 24, 70 and 160\moo, detecting 100\% of our sample
70: at 24\moo\, and 90\% at 70\moo. This high detection rate at MFIR
71: wavelengths is unparallelled in samples of intermediate redshift radio
72: galaxies. Complementing these results, we also present new high
73: frequency observations (15 to 24Ghz) from the Australia Telescope
74: Compact Array ({\it ATCA}) and the Very Large Array ({\it VLA}), which are used to
75: investigate the potential contamination of the MFIR continuum by
76: non-thermal synchrotron emission. With the latter observations we
77: detect the compact cores in 59\% of our complete sample, and deduce
78: that non-thermal contamination of the MFIR continuum is significant in
79: a maximum of 30\% of our total sample. MFIR fluxes, radio fluxes and
80: spectral energy distributions for the complete sample are presented
81: here, while in a second paper we will analyse these data and discuss
82: the implications for our understanding of the heating mechanism for
83: the warm/cool dust, star formation in the host galaxies, and the
84: unified schemes for powerful radio sources.
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87: \keywords{galaxies:active--infrared:galaxies--radio:galaxies}
88:
89: \section{Introduction}
90: \label{sec:intro}
91:
92: The mid to far-infrared (MFIR) is one of the most profitable
93: wavelength ranges for investigating AGN and associated phenomena. This
94: is primarily because AGN emission suffers less from effects of
95: obscuration at these wavelengths. Moreover, the thermal infrared
96: samples the emission that is absorbed and then re-radiated by dust,
97: indirectly sampling the radiative power of the active core and any
98: starburst component that may be present. Therefore this wavelength
99: range is crucial both for testing the unified schemes for AGN
100: (e.g. \citealp{barthel89}), and investigating the link between AGN and
101: starburst activity as part of the evolution of the host galaxies
102: (\citealp{rowan95}, \citealp{haas98}, \citealp{archibald01}).
103:
104: In terms of testing unified schemes, radio-loud samples of AGN have
105: the advantage that their extended radio emission is isotropic,
106: allowing samples to be selected free from the orientation bias that
107: affects samples selected at X-ray, optical and near-IR
108: wavelengths. However, in order to fully realize the potential of MFIR
109: observations for studies of radio galaxies it is important to obtain
110: observations of carefully selected samples that attain a high level of
111: completeness in terms of detections. Unfortunately, observing in the
112: MFIR is technically more challenging than at near-infrared
113: wavelengths. Therefore, although the {\it IRAS} observatory made many
114: significant contributions to our understanding of the MFIR infrared
115: properties of radio-loud AGN (\citealp{neugebauer86},
116: \citealp{golombek88}, \citealp{knapp90}, \citealp{impey93},
117: \citealp{heckman92,heckman94} \citealp{hes95}), it had a relatively
118: low sensitivity, resulting in a typical MFIR detection rate of less
119: than 30\%, even for radio galaxies in the local universe ($z<0.3$).
120:
121: Subsequent attempts were made to observe samples of radio galaxies
122: with the {\it ISO} observatory (\citealp{haas98,haas04},
123: \citealp{polletta00}, \citealp{bemmel00},
124: \citealp{meisenheimer01}). However, meager, sometimes heterogeneous
125: samples, and the modest sensitivity of the observatory, only allowed
126: for a small improvement on the achievements of {\it IRAS}. Studies of
127: samples of radio-loud AGN with {\it ISO} have typical detection rates of no
128: more than 50\%\ in the far-IR, impeding attempts to understand the
129: MFIR emission.
130:
131: The launch of {\it Spitzer} in 2003, brought an opportunity to make
132: observations with orders of magnitude improved sensitivity at MFIR
133: wavelengths. However, published {\it Spitzer} studies of radio loud
134: AGN are either based on heterogeneous samples (e.g. \citealp{shi05}),
135: or on samples that are relatively faint and distant, resulting in a
136: low detections rates at 70\moo\ (e.g. \citealp{cleary07},
137: \citealp{seymour07}).
138:
139: A further problem is that many previous MFIR studies of radio-loud AGN
140: samples are selected from the 3C radio catalogue, which are hampered by
141: the lack of published high quality optical spectroscopic observations
142: for many of the objects. In contrast, the southern 2Jy sample
143: \citep{tadhunter93} is unique in the sense that deep spectra have been
144: published for the whole sample
145: (\citealp{tadhunter93,tadhunter98,tadhunter02}; \citealp{wills02},
146: \citealp{holt07}). Measured emission line luminosities for this sample
147: provide information about the intrinsic power of the AGN
148: \citep{tadhunter98}. Moreover, careful modelling of the continuum
149: spectra provides key information about the stellar populations in the
150: host galaxies and, in particular, in the presence of young stellar
151: populations (\citealt{tadhunter02}; \citealt{wills04}). The 2Jy
152: sample has also been extensively observed at radio wavelengths
153: (\citealp{morganti93,morganti97,morganti99}), allowing links to be
154: made between radio and optical properties and independent estimates of
155: the orientation of the sources to the line of sight. In view of its
156: completeness and the availability of deep spectroscopic and radio
157: data, which makes it well suited to investigating the nature of the
158: MFIR emission and testing the unified schemes, we have undertaken a
159: program of deep imaging with {\it Spitzer/MIPS} of the 2Jy sample.
160:
161: Given that we are interested in the thermal emission and heating
162: mechanism of the warm/cool dust sampled through the MFIR fluxes,
163: possible contamination from non-thermal synchrotron sources could
164: potentially bias our conclusion. Therefore, to complement the MFIR
165: observations, we have also undertaken high frequency observations at
166: radio wavelengths (15 to 22 GHz) using {\it ATCA} and the {\it VLA}, with the aim
167: of investigating the potential degree of non-thermal contamination.
168:
169: A preliminary analysis of the results from this program was presented in
170: \citet{tadhunter07}. Here we present the MFIR and radio core data, and
171: discuss the potential non-thermal contamination of the MFIR
172: continuum. A second paper comprises an in-depth analysis of these
173: data (Dicken et al. 2008, in preparation).
174:
175: \section{Sample selection}
176: \label{sec:sample}
177: The sample for this study comprises a complete sub-sample of all 46
178: steep-spectrum powerful radio galaxies and quasars with redshifts 0.05
179: $<$ z $<$ 0.7, and flux densities $S_{2.7GHz}>$ 2Jy from the sample of
180: \citet{tadhunter93}. We define the the steep spectrum selection as
181: $\alpha^{4.8}_{2.7} > 0.5$ ($F_{\nu} \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$), which
182: excludes 16 objects within the redshift range. We also include
183: \object{PKS0347$+$05}, which has since proved to fulfil the same
184: selection criteria \citep{diserego94}. The lower redshift limit has
185: been set to ensure that these galaxies are genuinely powerful sources,
186: and the steep spectrum selection for the quasars rules out objects
187: dominated by emission from the beamed relativistic jet and core
188: components. Overall, the full sample of 46 objects included a mixture
189: of broad line radio galaxies/radio loud quasars (BLRG/Q: 35\%),
190: narrow line radio galaxies (NLRG: 43\%) and weak line radio galaxies
191: (WLRG: 22\%). In terms of radio morphology classification, our
192: complete sample includes 72\% FRII sources, 13\% FRI sources and 15\%
193: compact steep spectrum/gigahertz peak spectrum objects.
194:
195: For comparison purposes we also observed or collected data from the
196: {\it Spitzer/IRAS} archive, for the flat spectrum, core dominated
197: objects \object{3C273}, \object{PKS0521$-$36} and
198: \object{PKS1549$-$79}. Note that \object{PKS1549$-$79} is a
199: particularly interesting source, because it a rare example of a
200: powerful, flat spectrum radio source that is classified as a galaxy at
201: optical wavelengths; the nature of this object is discussed in detail
202: in \citet{holt06}. However, these objects are not part of what we
203: refer to as our complete sample. Our complete sample of 46 objects
204: comprises the 49 objects with {\it Spitzer} or {\it IRAS} observations
205: presented below, minus the 3 comparison flat spectrum objects.
206:
207: \section{MFIR observations and reduction}
208: \label{sec:infrared}
209: \subsection{Observations}
210: We have obtained new observations for 43 objects using the {\it Spitzer}
211: Space Telescope and, for 37 of these, we have obtained the very first
212: MFIR detections. In addition, we include results from data
213: obtained for 5 other targets from the {\it Spitzer} archive Reserved
214: Observations Catalogue (ROC): \object{PKS0915-11} (3C218),
215: \object{PKS1226$+$02} (3C273), \object{PKS1559$+$02} (3C327),
216: \object{PKS1648$+$05} (3C348) and \object{PKS2221-02} (3C445). The
217: observations were carried out between August 2005 and Jan 2007, and
218: the ROC targets were observed between March and November 2004.
219:
220: All targets were observed with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for
221: {\it Spitzer} ({\it MIPS}: \citealp{rieke04}) at wavelengths of 24, 70
222: and 160\moo, apart from 5 targets that were not observed at 160\moo\
223: due to scheduling reasons. Details of the observations are shown in
224: Table \ref{tbl-1}.
225:
226: \subsection{Reduction}
227:
228: The {\it MIPS} instrument on board {\it Spitzer} takes short exposure images in a
229: dither pattern. These are then combined to make a final `mosaiked'
230: image. Rather than use the pipeline processed data, we have re-reduced
231: data for all the 48 objects in the sample starting from the Basic
232: Calibrated Data (BCD) files to produce final mosaiked images for
233: analysis. The reduction was carried out at Rochester Institute of
234: Technology and The University of Sheffield using the MOPEX software
235: reduction package \citep{makovoz06} provided by the {\it Spitzer} Science
236: Center (SSC). Due to the different nature of the detectors and
237: sensitivities at the 3 wavelengths observed, the reduction method we
238: have selected is different for each. Thus we discuss the 3 bands
239: separately below.
240:
241:
242: \begin{figure*}
243: \epsscale{1.5}
244: \plotone{f1.eps}
245: \caption{Example of a {\it MIPS} mosaiked images of PKS1814$-$63. Left:
246: 24\moo\ image with an example aperture. Top Right: 70\moo\ image with
247: an example aperture. Bottom Right: 160\moo\ image. The white circles
248: indicate the apertures used for the object flux measurements, while
249: the yellow circles delimit the annuli used to estimate the background
250: sky flux. The bar in the top right hand corner of each image is of
251: length 1 arcmin. \label{1814}}
252: \end{figure*}
253:
254:
255: \begin{deluxetable}{c@{\hspace{-2mm}}l@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}r@{\hspace{-3mm}}c@{\hspace{-3mm}}c@{\hspace{-1mm}}c@{\hspace{-1mm}}c@{\hspace{-3mm}}r@{\hspace{-3mm}}r@{\hspace{-3mm}}r}
256: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
257: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} Sample and Observational Data \label{tbl-1}}
258: \tablewidth{0pt}
259: \tablehead{
260: \colhead{PKS Name}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Other}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{RA(J2000)}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Dec(J2000)}{\hspace{-3mm}} &\colhead{Opt. Class}{\hspace{-3mm}} & \colhead{Rad. Class}{\hspace{-1mm}} &
261: \colhead{z}{\hspace{-1mm}} & \colhead{Obs. Date}{\hspace{-3mm}} & \colhead{$t_{int}$24(s)}{\hspace{-3mm}} & \colhead{$t_{int}$70(s)}{\hspace{-3mm}} & \colhead{$t_{int}$160(s)}
262: }
263: \startdata
264: 0023$-$26 & \phantom{a} & 00 25 49.18 & -26 02 12.8 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & CSS & 0.322 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
265: 0034$-$01 & \phantom{a} 3C015 & 00 37 04.14 & -01 09 08.2 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRII & 0.073 & Jan-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
266: 0035$-$02 & \phantom{a} 3C17 & 00 38 20.51 & -02 07 40.1 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & (FRII) & 0.220 & Jul-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
267: 0038$+$09 & \phantom{a} 3C18 & 00 40 50.53 & +10 03 26.8 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.188 & Jan-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
268: 0039$-$44 & \phantom{a} & 00 42 09.03 & -44 14 01.3 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.346 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
269: 0043$-$42 & \phantom{a} & 00 46 17.75 & -42 07 51.4 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRII & 0.116 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
270: 0105$-$16 & \phantom{a} 3C32 & 01 08 16.90 & -16 04 20.6 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.400 & Jul-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
271: 0117$-$15 & \phantom{a} 3C38 & 01 20 27.16 & -15 20 17.8 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.565 & Jul-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
272: 0213$-$13 & \phantom{a} 3C62 & 02 15 37.50 & -12 59 30.5 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.147 & Jan-07 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
273: 0235$-$19 & \phantom{a} OD-159 & 02 37 43.45 & -19 32 33.3 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.620 & Feb-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
274: 0252$-$71 & \phantom{a} & 02 52 46.26 & -71 04 35.9 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & CSS & 0.566 & Aug-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
275: 0347$+$05 & \phantom{a} & 03 49 46.50 & +05 51 42.3 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.339 & Feb-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
276: 0349$-$27 & \phantom{a} & 03 51 35.81 & -27 44 33.8 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.066 & Aug-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
277: 0404$+$03 & \phantom{a} 3C105 & 04 07 16.49 & +03 42 25.8 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.089 & Sep-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & none \phantom{aa} \\
278: 0409$-$75 & \phantom{a} & 04 08 48.49 & -75 07 19.3 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.693 & Aug-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
279: 0442$-$28 & \phantom{a} & 04 44 37.67 & -28 09 54.6 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.147 & Feb-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
280: 0521$-$36 & \phantom{a} & 05 22 58.94 & -36 27 31.2 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & C/J & 0.055 & Dec-05 & 92.3 \phantom{aa} & 230.7 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
281: 0620$-$52 & \phantom{a} & 06 21 43.29 & -52 41 33.3 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRI & 0.051 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
282: 0625$-$35 & \phantom{a} OH-342 & 06 27 06.65 & -35 29 16.3 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRI & 0.055 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
283: 0625$-$53 & \phantom{a} & 06 26 20.44 & -53 41 35.2 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRII & 0.054 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
284: 0806$-$10 & \phantom{a} 3C195 & 08 08 53.64 & -10 27 40.2 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.110 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
285: 0859$-$25 & \phantom{a} & 09 01 47.50 & -25 55 19.0 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.305 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
286: 0915$-$11 & \phantom{a} Hydra A & 09 18 05.67 & -12 05 44.0 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRI & 0.054 & May-04 & 165.7 \phantom{aa} & 125.8 \phantom{aa} & 83.9 \phantom{aa} \\
287: 0945$+$07 & \phantom{a} 3C227 & 09 47 45.15 & +07 25 20.4 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.086 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
288: 1136$-$13 & \phantom{a} & 11 39 10.75 & -13 50 43.1 \phantom{aa} & Q & FRII & 0.554 & Jun-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
289: 1151$-$34 & \phantom{a} & 11 54 21.79 & -35 05 29.1 \phantom{aa} & Q & CSS & 0.258 & Feb-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 543.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
290: 1226$+$02 & \phantom{a} 3C273 & 12 29 06.70 & +02 03 08.6 \phantom{aa} & Q & C/J & 0.158 & Jun-04 & 48.2 \phantom{aa} & 37.7 \phantom{aa} & 41.9 \phantom{aa} \\
291: 1306$-$09 & \phantom{a} & 13 08 39.17 & -09 50 32.6 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & CSS & 0.464 & Feb-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
292: 1355$-$41 & \phantom{a} & 13 59 00.23 & -41 52 54.1 \phantom{aa} & Q & FRII & 0.313 & Feb-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
293: 1547$-$79 & \phantom{a} & 15 55 21.66 & -79 40 36.3 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.483 & Aug-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
294: 1559$+$02 & \phantom{a} 3C327 & 16 02 27.38 & +01 57 55.7 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.104 & Mar-04 & 165.7 \phantom{aa} & 125.8 \phantom{aa} & 83.9 \phantom{aa} \\
295: 1602$+$01 & \phantom{a} 3C327.1 & 16 04 45.35 & +01 17 50.8 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.462 & Aug-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
296: 1648$+$05 & \phantom{a} Herc A & 16 51 08.16 & +04 59 33.8 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRI & 0.154 & Mar-04 & 165.7 \phantom{aa} & 125.8 \phantom{aa} & 83.9 \phantom{aa} \\
297: 1733$-$56 & \phantom{a} & 17 37 35.80 & -56 34 03.4 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.098 & Aug-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
298: 1814$-$63 & \phantom{a} & 18 19 34.96 & -63 45 48.1 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & CSS & 0.063 & Aug-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
299: 1839$-$48 & \phantom{a} & 18 43 14.64 & -48 36 23.3 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRI & 0.112 & Oct-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & none \phantom{aa} \\
300: 1932$-$46 & \phantom{a} & 19 35 56.56 & -46 20 40.7 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.231 & May-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
301: 1934$-$63 & \phantom{a} & 19 39 24.99 & -63 42 45.6 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & GPS & 0.183 & May-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
302: 1938$-$15 & \phantom{a} & 19 41 15.15 & -15 24 30.9 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.452 & Nov-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & none \phantom{aa} \\
303: 1949$+$02 & \phantom{a} 3C403 & 19 52 15.77 & +02 30 23.1 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.059 & Nov-05 & 92.3 \phantom{aa} & 230.7 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
304: 1954$-$55 & \phantom{a} & 19 58 16.06 & -55 09 37.5 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRI & 0.060 & May-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
305: 2135$-$14 & \phantom{a} & 21 37 45.18 & -14 32 55.5 \phantom{aa} & Q & FRII & 0.200 & Nov-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
306: 2135$-$20 & \phantom{a} OX-258 & 21 37 50.00 & -20 42 31.7 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & CSS & 0.635 & Nov-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
307: 2211$-$17 & \phantom{a} 3C444 & 22 14 25.76 & -17 01 36.2 \phantom{aa} & WLRG & FRII & 0.153 & Dec-06 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & none \phantom{aa} \\
308: 2221$-$02 & \phantom{a} 3C445 & 22 23 49.57 & -02 06 12.4 \phantom{aa} & BLRG & FRII & 0.057 & Nov-04 & 92.3 \phantom{aa} & 69.2 \phantom{aa} & none \phantom{aa} \\
309: 2250$-$41 & \phantom{a} & 22 53 03.16 & -40 57 46.2 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.310 & Nov-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
310: 2314$+$03 & \phantom{a} 3C459 & 23 16 35.21 & +04 05 18.2 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.220 & Nov-05 & 92.3 \phantom{aa} & 230.7 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
311: 2356$-$61 & \phantom{a} & 23 59 04.50 & -60 54 59.1 \phantom{aa} & NLRG & FRII & 0.096 & Dec-05 & 180.4 \phantom{aa} & 545.3 \phantom{aa} & 167.8 \phantom{aa} \\
312:
313: \enddata
314:
315: \tablecomments{Table\ref{tbl-1} Column 5: broad line radio galaxy (BLRG), narrow line radio galaxy (NLRG), quasar (Q), weak line radio galaxy (WLRG, also known as low excitation galaxies). Column 6: Fanaroff-Riley class 1 (FRI), Fanaroff-Riley class 2 (FRII), compact steep spectrum type (CSS), core/jet (C/J), gigahertz peaked spectrum (GPS). Uncertain classification in brackets.}
316:
317: \end{deluxetable}
318:
319: \begin{deluxetable}{c@{\hspace{0mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{0mm}}r@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{0mm}}r@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{0mm}}r@{\hspace{0mm}}r}
320: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
321: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} Data Results \label{tbl-2}}
322: \tablewidth{0pt}
323: \tablehead{
324: \colhead{PKS Name}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{Other name}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{z}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$S_{24}$ (mJy)}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$\sigma$}{\hspace{0mm}} &
325: \colhead{$S_{70}$ (mJy)}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$\sigma$}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$S_{160}$ (mJy)}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$\sigma$}
326: }
327: \startdata
328: 0023$-$26 & \phantom{aa} & 0.322 & 2.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 26.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.1 & 83.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 16.7 \\
329: 0034$-$01 & \phantom{aa} 3C015 & 0.073 & 7.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 17.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.1 & $<$ 43.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 14.4 \\
330: 0035$-$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C17 & 0.220 & 12.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 23.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.8 & 97.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 9.1 \\
331: 0038$+$09 & \phantom{aa} 3C18 & 0.188 & 25.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 32.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.8 & $<$ 37.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 12.6 \\
332: 0039$-$44 & \phantom{aa} & 0.346 & 33.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & 68.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.6 & 84.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 13.5 \\
333: 0043$-$42 & \phantom{aa} & 0.116 & 11.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 9.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.0 & $<$ 24.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 8.3 \\
334: 0105$-$16 & \phantom{aa} 3C32 & 0.400 & 9.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 &$<$ 11.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.9 & $<$ 22.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 7.5 \\
335: 0117$-$15 & \phantom{aa} 3C38 & 0.565 & 6.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 20.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.8 & $<$ 46.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 15.5 \\
336: 0213$-$13 & \phantom{aa} 3C62 & 0.147 & 40.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 37.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.9 & $<$ 51.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 17.0 \\
337: 0235$-$19 & \phantom{aa} OD-159 & 0.620 & 11.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 14.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.5 & $<$ 23.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 7.9 \\
338: 0252$-$71 & \phantom{aa} & 0.566 & 2.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 &$<$ 9.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.0 & $<$ 37.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 12.5 \\
339: 0347$+$05 & \phantom{aa} & 0.339 & 3.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 30.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.3 & $<$ 52.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 17.4 \\
340: 0349$-$27 & \phantom{aa} & 0.066 & 8.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 41.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.3 & $<$ 31.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 10.4 \\
341: 0404$+$03 & \phantom{aa} 3C105 & 0.089 & 30.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 70.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.0 & - \phantom{aaaaa} & - \\
342: 0409$-$75 & \phantom{aa} & 0.693 & 1.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 11.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.9 & $<$ 36.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 12.1 \\
343: 0442$-$28 & \phantom{aa} & 0.147 & 22.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 31.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.5 & $<$ 25.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 8.6 \\
344: 0521$-$36 & \phantom{aa} & 0.055 & 204.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 526.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 6.0 & 950.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 13.3 \\
345: 0620$-$52 & \phantom{aa} & 0.051 & 4.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 47.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.4 & $<$ 24.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 8.1 \\
346: 0625$-$35 & \phantom{aa} OH-342 & 0.055 & 24.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 44.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.3 & 131.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 11.2 \\
347: 0625$-$53 & \phantom{aa} & 0.054 & 1.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 &$<$ 10.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.6 & $<$ 52.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 17.5 \\
348: 0806$-$10 & \phantom{aa} 3C195 & 0.110 & 258.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & 489.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.3 & 308.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 7.1 \\
349: 0859$-$25 & \phantom{aa} & 0.305 & 9.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & 8.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.8 & $<$ 52.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 17.4 \\
350: 0915$-$11 & \phantom{aa} Hydra A & 0.054 & 8.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 115.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.8 & 164.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 7.3 \\
351: 0945$+$07 & \phantom{aa} 3C227 & 0.086 & 47.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 19.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.5 & $<$ 44.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 14.7 \\
352: 1136$-$13 & \phantom{aa} & 0.554 & 13.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 23.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.8 & $<$ 23.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 7.7 \\
353: 1151$-$34 & \phantom{aa} & 0.258 & 16.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 51.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.0 & $<$ 46.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 15.4 \\
354: 1226$+$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C273 & 0.158 & 499.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.8 & 414.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.9 & 402.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 11.9 \\
355: 1306$-$09 & \phantom{aa} & 0.464 & 4.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 21.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.1 & $<$ 29.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 9.7 \\
356: 1355$-$41 & \phantom{aa} & 0.313 & 53.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 66.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.0 & $<$ 55.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 18.6 \\
357: 1547$-$79 & \phantom{aa} & 0.483 & 7.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 19.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.7 & $<$ 50.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 16.7 \\
358: 1559$+$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C327 & 0.104 & 242.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 470.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.7 & 262.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 21.4 \\
359: 1602$+$01 & \phantom{aa} 3C327.1 & 0.462 & 7.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 12.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.5 & $<$ 32.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 10.8 \\
360: 1648$+$05 & \phantom{aa} Herc A & 0.154 & 2.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 &$<$ 18.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 6.3 & 134.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 15.8 \\
361: 1733$-$56 & \phantom{aa} & 0.098 & 29.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 151.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.3 & 318.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 10.9 \\
362: 1814$-$63 & \phantom{aa} & 0.063 & 60.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & 142.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.1 & 202.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 13.1 \\
363: 1839$-$48 & \phantom{aa} & 0.112 & 3.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 10.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.5 & - \phantom{aaaaa} & - \\
364: 1932$-$46 & \phantom{aa} & 0.231 & 2.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 17.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.6 & $<$ 36.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 12.2 \\
365: 1934$-$63 & \phantom{aa} & 0.183 & 17.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 19.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.2 & $<$ 33.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 11.1 \\
366: 1938$-$15 & \phantom{aa} & 0.452 & 6.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 19.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.2 & - \phantom{aaaaa} & - \\
367: 1949$+$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C403 & 0.059 & 193.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 348.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.7 & 251.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 7.1 \\
368: 1954$-$55 & \phantom{aa} & 0.060 & 2.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 8.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.9 & $<$ 34.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 11.4 \\
369: 2135$-$14 & \phantom{aa} & 0.200 & 104.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 113.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.8 & 118.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 20.5 \\
370: 2135$-$20 & \phantom{aa} OX-258 & 0.635 & 4.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 37.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.4 & 127.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 10.3 \\
371: 2211$-$17 & \phantom{aa} 3C444 & 0.153 & 0.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 &$<$ 9.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.1 & - \phantom{aaaaa} & - \\
372: 2221$-$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C445 & 0.057 & 232.1 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 186.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 5.2 & - \phantom{aaaaa} & - \\
373: 2250$-$41 & \phantom{aa} & 0.310 & 11.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.1 & 22.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.5 & $<$ 27.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 9.2 \\
374: 2314$+$03 & \phantom{aa} 3C459 & 0.220 & 49.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & 511.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.9 & 490.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 19.1 \\
375: 2356$-$61 & \phantom{aa} & 0.096 & 41.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.2 & 74.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.2 & $<$ 35.4 \phantom{aaaaa} & 11.8 \\
376:
377: \enddata
378:
379:
380: \tablecomments{Table\ref{tbl-2}: All images reduced were from the BCD files, {\it Spitzer} Science Center pipeline version 14.4.0, Fluxes presented for 2135-20 are the mean fluxes of two identical observations see \S \ref{sec:MFIRnotes}.}
381:
382: \end{deluxetable}
383:
384:
385: \subsection{24\moo\ Reduction}
386: As the shortest wavelength band, the 24\moo\ channel of {\it MIPS} is also the most
387: sensitive, and has the highest spatial resolution (6$''$ FWHM). Integration times for our targets were in the range 48.2
388: to 180.4 seconds, where over 80\% have the longer exposure time (see Table \ref{tbl-1}).
389:
390: Minimal processing to the 24\moo\ SSC pipeline product is required
391: for most general science objectives. However, we re-processed the data
392: by mosaiking the BCD files using the MOPEX software and adding an
393: additional flatfield and overlap correction. The flatfield script is
394: part of the MOPEX software package. It computes a flat field from the
395: median of all the dithered frames, normalizes this to an average of 1
396: and divides into all the input BCD files. In contrast, the overlap
397: correction interpolates the input images onto a common grid and then
398: the cumulative pixel-by-pixel difference between the overlapping areas
399: is minimized. The final mosaic pixel size was set to 2.45 arsecs. This
400: was deliberately chosen to match the pipeline post-BCD products for
401: purposes of comparison. Examples of the images can be seen in Figure
402: \ref{1814}.
403:
404: The 24\moo\ fluxes were extracted using aperture photometry in the
405: GAIA package. Aperture corrections were derived from an empirically
406: determined average curve of growth of flux vs. aperture diameter
407: derived from observations of bright sources in our sample with
408: $S_{24}>50$mJy (\object{PKS0521-36}, \object{PKS1226$+$02},
409: \object{PKS1949$+$02}, \object{PKS2221-02},
410: \object{PKS2314$+$03}). These aperture corrections are broadly
411: consistent with those published by the SSC. For most objects the
412: aperture was set to a standard radius of 15$''$ corresponding to an
413: aperture correction of 1.08. However, for a few objects an aperture of
414: half this size (7.5$''$) was used to avoid contamination from the flux
415: of objects close to the source. In the latter cases the applied
416: aperture correction was 1.52.
417:
418: The standard deviation of 6 aperture flux measurements of background
419: sky patches, obtained using an identical aperture to the object flux
420: measurements, was used to derive the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties presented
421: in Table \ref{tbl-2}. These 1$\sigma$ values represent the
422: fluctuations in the sky background due to photon counting noise, as
423: well as mosaiking and flat fielding artifacts. Given that most of the
424: sources are faint relative to the background, these 1$\sigma$
425: measurements give a realistic estimate of the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties
426: in the flux measurement for the fainter sources in the sample. In
427: addition there is an estimated $\pm$4\% flux calibration uncertainty
428: \citep{engelbracht07}, which is likely to dominate for the brightest
429: sources in the sample. Overall, at 24\moo\ we detect 100\% of our
430: sample at the $>5\sigma$ level.
431:
432: \subsection{70\moo\ Reduction}
433: The 70\moo\ waveband is less sensitive than the 24\moo\ band and uses
434: an entirely different Ge:Ga detector technology, which is not as
435: stable as the Si:As detectors used at 24\moo. The spatial resolution
436: of {\it Spitzer}/{\it MIPS} at 70\moo\ is 18$''$(FWHM). Integration times for our targets
437: were in the range 37.7 to 545.3 seconds, where over 80\% have the longer exposure time (see Table
438: \ref{tbl-1}). The 70\moo\ data were also reduced with the MOPEX
439: package. In addition to the basic mosaiking process we used a column
440: filtering process from the SSC contributed software pages (IDL program
441: BCD column filter.pro), which calculates the median value for each
442: column and subtracts that from each column for each BCD. This process
443: significantly improves artifacts in the images with minimal loss of
444: flux from the source. The final mosaic pixel size is 3.9$''$, again
445: chosen to match that of the pipeline mosaic products.
446:
447: The fluxes at 70\moo\ were also measured using aperture photometry,
448: with an aperture radius of 24$''$ for the majority of sources. Aperture
449: corrections and 1$\sigma$ uncertainties were derived in the same
450: manner as for the 24\moo\ images\footnote{N.B. In the case of 70\moo\
451: and 160\moo, in addition to the photon counting and instrumental
452: induced fluctuations, there will be an additional contribution to the
453: fluctuations in the background from sources close to the detection
454: limit. This will be reflected in the 1$\sigma$ estimates tabulated in
455: Table \ref{tbl-2}.}. Again these aperture corrections are broadly
456: consistent with those published by the SSC. In this case the aperture
457: correction factor is 1.33. A smaller aperture of half the size (22$''$)
458: was used for fainter sources to obtain better S/N for detections, with
459: a correction factor of 2.04. There is also an additional $\pm$10 \%
460: calibration error at 70\moo\ \citep{gordon07}. For undetected sources
461: upper limits were derived using the standard deviation of background
462: measurements to obtain $\sigma$. For these sources the values
463: presented in Table \ref{tbl-2} are the 3$\sigma$ upper limits, of
464: which there are 5.
465:
466: Overall, we detect 90\% of our sample at 70\moo\ at the $>3\sigma$
467: level.
468:
469: \subsection{160\moo\ Reduction}
470: The longest wavelength {\it MIPS} band (160\moo) has the lowest effective
471: sensitivity and utilizes the same detector technology as 70\moo. The
472: spatial resolution of {\it Spitzer}/{\it MIPS} at 160\moo\ is 40$''$(FWHM). Integration
473: times for our targets at 160\moo\ were in the range 41.9 to 167.8
474: seconds, where over 90\% have the longer exposure time (see Table \ref{tbl-1}).
475:
476: In this case we mosaiked the images with the MOPEX software (final
477: image pixel size 7.9$''$) with no additional processing, as none of
478: the available tools appeared to provide any significant improvement to
479: the images.
480:
481: Aperture photometry proved impossible to use for extracting the
482: 160\moo\ flux, due to the difficulty in estimating the background
483: accurately. This is because the PSF at 160\moo\ is on the scale of the
484: image, and there is also the strong possibility of contamination by
485: other sources in the field. Therefore, we used the APEX program in the
486: MOPEX GUI software to extract the fluxes of detected sources using PSF
487: fitting. The standard PSF available with the software was used for
488: this task. Overall we detect 33\% of our sample at 160\moo\ at the
489: $>3\sigma$ level.
490:
491: The 1$\sigma$ errors were derived in an identical way to the other 2
492: wavebands, and the upper limits were derived in an identical way to
493: 70\moo\ . There is also an additional $\pm$20\% flux calibration
494: uncertainty as stated in the {\it MIPS} data handbook (available from the
495: SSC website). Upper limits were derived using the standard deviation
496: of background measurements to obtain $\sigma$ The values presented in
497: Table \ref{tbl-2} are the 3$\sigma$ upper limits, of which there are
498: 27. Note that a few objects undetected by the APEX software appear to
499: be detected in a visual inspection of the image. Also, overlapping PSF
500: from nearby objects has prevented the APEX detection of a point source
501: in at least one image. Therefore, we believe that the APEX software
502: underestimates the true detection rate of sources in our sample; in
503: this sense the detection rate is conservative. This conclusion is
504: consistent with the fact that the typical 3$\sigma$ detection limit
505: for the 160\moo\ data is 55mJy, which is somewhat lower than the lowest
506: measured flux of 84.6mJy.
507:
508:
509: \subsection{Notes on the MFIR observations}
510: \label{sec:MFIRnotes}
511: Due to an error in the acquisition file for the data, PKS2135-20 was
512: observed twice. This gave us an opportunity to investigate the
513: uncertainty derived from two identical observations of the same
514: source. We found that the fluxes measured for this source in the two
515: data sets were consistent within 10\% in all {\it MIPS} bands. Fluxes
516: presented in Table 2 are the mean fluxes of the two observations.
517:
518: It has also been possible to compare some of our flux values obtained
519: using {\it Spitzer} with those based on {\it IRAS} observations. Taking into account
520: BLRG/quasar objects that are potentially variable, we directly
521: compared the {\it IRAS} 25\moo\ and {\it Spitzer} 24\moo\ flux
522: measurement. However in order to make the comparison for the FIR
523: fluxes it was necessary to extrapolate the {\it IRAS} 60\moo\ fluxes to the
524: {\it Spitzer} 70\moo\ band using the {\it IRAS} 25 to 60\moo\ spectral index. We
525: find that the {\it Spitzer} and {\it IRAS} fluxes agree to within better than 20\%
526: at 24\moo\ and within better than 30\% at 70\moo. It is also worth
527: noting that our {\it Spitzer} measured flux values for sources in common
528: agree with published {\it Spitzer} fluxes in \citet{shi05} to within a few percent.
529:
530:
531: \section{Radio Observations and Reduction}
532:
533: \label{sec:radio}
534:
535:
536: \begin{deluxetable}{@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{0mm}}r@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{0mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{0mm}}r}
537: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
538: \tablecaption{{\it ATCA} Radio Core Data\label{tbl-3}}
539: \tablewidth{0pt}
540: \tablehead{
541: \colhead{PKS Name}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{Radio Class}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{z}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$S_{core}^{18Ghz}$(mJy)}{\hspace{0mm}} &\colhead{$\sigma$}{\hspace{0mm}} &\colhead{Beam($''$)}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$S_{core}^{24Ghz}$(mJy)}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{$\sigma$}{\hspace{0mm}} &\colhead{Beam($''$)}{\hspace{0mm}}& \colhead{Combined}{\hspace{0mm}}& \colhead{R}
542: }
543:
544: \startdata
545: 0039$-$44 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.346 & \phantom{aaa} $<1.1$ & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(-2.7) & \phantom{aaa} $<0.9$ & 0.3 & 0.4x0.2(-2.8) & - & $<$0.0059 \\
546: 0043$-$42 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.116 & \phantom{aaa} - & 0.3 & \phantom{a} 0.6x0.3(26.4) & \phantom{aaa} - & 0.3 & 0.5x0.2(31.5) & 1.4 & 0.0005 \\
547: 0252$-$71 & CSS \phantom{aaaa} & 0.566 & \phantom{aaa} 278.1* & 1.0 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(18.2) & \phantom{aaa} 187.7* & 1.0 & 0.3x0.2(-20.8) & - & $<$0.0260 \\
548: 0349$-$27 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.066 & \phantom{aaa} 20.0 & 0.1 & \phantom{a} 0.7x0.3(3.8) & \phantom{aaa} 21.7 & 0.3 & 0.6x0.2(4.7) & - & 0.0095 \\
549: 0409$-$75 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.693 & \phantom{aaa} $<10.0$ & 3.3 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(24.8) & \phantom{aaa} $<9.0$ & 3.0 & 0.3x0.2(21.6) & - & $<$0.0023 \\
550: 0442$-$28 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.147 & \phantom{aaa} 19.1 & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.9x0.3(19.2) & \phantom{aaa} 20.4 & 0.4 & 0.6x0.2(17.4) & - & 0.0090 \\
551: 0521$-$36 & C/J \phantom{aaaa} & 0.055 & \phantom{aaa} 2798* & 24.4 & \phantom{a} 0.6x0.4(11.5) & \phantom{aaa} 2654* & 14.8 & 0.4x0.3(14.5) & - & 0.4115 \\
552: 0620$-$52 & FRI \phantom{aaaa} & 0.051 & \phantom{aaa} 118.6 & 0.6 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(26.3) & \phantom{aaa} 101.2 & 0.7 & 0.4x0.2(28.6) & - & 0.0964 \\
553: 0625$-$35 & FRI \phantom{aaaa} & 0.055 & \phantom{aaa} 571.6 & 3.4 & \phantom{a} 0.7x0.3(6.2) & \phantom{aaa} 478.8 & 3.0 & 0.5x0.2(7.5) & - & 0.3293 \\
554: 0625$-$53 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.054 & \phantom{aaa} 20.4 & 0.2 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.2(7.0) & \phantom{aaa} 19.3 & 0.2 & 0.3x0.2(8.6) & - & 0.0130 \\
555: 0859$-$25 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.305 & \phantom{aaa} - & 0.5 & \phantom{a} 1.5x0.3(2.2) & \phantom{aaa} - & 0.5 & 1.1x0.2(3.6) & 2.5 & $<$0.0013 \\
556: 1151$-$34 & CSS \phantom{aaaa} & 0.258 & \phantom{aaa} 759.9* & 6.5 & \phantom{a} 1.0x0.3(-23.4) & \phantom{aaa} 598.2* & 6.3 & 0.7x0.2(-22.0) & - & $<$0.0072 \\
557: 1355$-$41 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.313 & \phantom{aaa} 102.7 & 0.8 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(0.2) & \phantom{aaa} 89.6 & 1.0 & 0.4x0.3(-0.8) & - & 0.0715 \\
558: 1547$-$79 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.483 & \phantom{aaa} - & 0.2 & \phantom{a} 0.6x0.3(-18.4) & \phantom{aaa} - & 0.2 & 0.5x0.2(-14.8) & 1.4 & 0.0010 \\
559: 1733$-$56 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.098 & \phantom{aaa} 293.6 & 0.9 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-34.1) & \phantom{aaa} 269.4 & 1.9 & 0.3x0.2(-32.5) & - & 0.0911 \\
560: 1814$-$63 & CSS \phantom{aaaa} & 0.063 & \phantom{aaa} 1909* & 6.5 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-5.3) & \phantom{aaa} 1626* & 7.3 & 0.3x0.2(-5.0) & - & 0.0265 \\
561: 1839$-$48 & FRI \phantom{aaaa} & 0.112 & \phantom{aaa} 108.2 & 0.5 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(-3.3) & \phantom{aaa} 100.9 & 0.6 & 0.4x0.2(-3.3) & - & 0.0889 \\
562: 1932$-$46 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.231 & \phantom{aaa} 16.4 & 0.7 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.4(-67.4) & \phantom{aaa} 21.5 & 0.5 & 0.4x0.3(-65) & - & 0.0050 \\
563: 1934$-$63 & GPS \phantom{aaaa} & 0.183 & \phantom{aaa} 1045* & 2.0 & \phantom{a} 0.6x0.3(68.9) & \phantom{aaa} 755.1* & 1.1 & 0.6x0.2(66.3) & - & - \\
564: 1954$-$55 & FRI \phantom{aaaa} & 0.060 & \phantom{aaa} 61.7 & 0.2 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(56.6) & \phantom{aaa} 61.6 & 0.3 & 0.3x0.3(63.8) & - & 0.0393 \\
565: 2250$-$41 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.310 & \phantom{aaa} $<1.9$ & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.7x0.3(-20.2) & \phantom{aaa} $<1.1$ & 0.4 & 0.5x0.3(-19.2) & - & $<$0.0012 \\
566: 2356$-$61 & FRII \phantom{aaaa} & 0.096 & \phantom{aaa} 59.7 & 0.3 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(76.6) & \phantom{aaa} 63.8 & 0.4 & 0.3x0.2(89.4) & - & 0.0137 \\
567:
568: \enddata
569:
570: \tablecomments{Table\ref{tbl-3}: Flux density results from the {\it ATCA} observations. Definitions for column 2 see Table\ref{tbl-1}. (*) denotes a total flux measurement as the resolution of the observations is not high enough to resolve the core in these compact objects. Column 11 gives the R parameter defined as $S_{core}/(S_{tot}-S_{core})$ where the total flux is taken at 5GHz assuming a flat spectrum.}
571:
572: \end{deluxetable}
573:
574:
575: \begin{deluxetable}{c@{\hspace{-3mm}}l@{\hspace{-3mm}}c@{\hspace{-3mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}r@{\hspace{1mm}}c@{\hspace{1mm}}l@{\hspace{-2mm}}r@{\hspace{1mm}}c@{\hspace{1mm}}l@{\hspace{0mm}}r}
576: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
577: \tablecaption{{\it VLA} Radio Core Data\label{tbl-4}}
578: \tablewidth{0pt}
579: \tablehead{
580: \colhead{PKS Name}{\hspace{-3mm}} & \colhead{Other Name}{\hspace{-3mm}} & \colhead{Radio Class}{\hspace{-3mm}} & \colhead{z}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{$S_{core}^{14.9Ghz}$(mJy)}{\hspace{-1mm}}&\colhead{$\sigma$}{\hspace{-1mm}} &
581: \colhead{Beam($''$)}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{$S_{core}^{?Ghz}$(mJy)}{\hspace{-1mm}}&\colhead{$\sigma$}{\hspace{-1mm}} & \colhead{Beam($''$)}{\hspace{-1mm}}& \colhead{R}
582: }
583: \startdata
584: 0023$-$26 & \phantom{aa} & CSS & 0.322 & 995.8* \phantom{aaaaa} & 7.0 & \phantom{a} 0.7x0.3(-7.1) & 820* \phantom{aaaa} & 9.0 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.2(-10.2) & $<$0.0059 \\
585: 0034$-$01 & \phantom{aa} 3C015 & FRII & 0.073 & 31.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.5 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(51.4) & 36.9 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.9 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(53.7) & 0.0218 \\
586: 0035$-$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C17 & (FRII) & 0.220 & 320.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.9 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.4(45.7) & 249.8 \phantom{aaaa} & 4.2 & \phantom{a} 0.2x0.2(-79.2) & 0.2870 \\
587: 0038$+$09 & \phantom{aa} 3C18 & FRII & 0.188 & 55.6 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.5 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.3(-51.1) & 68.2 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.9 & \phantom{a} 0.2x0.2(51.4) & 0.0387 \\
588: 0105$-$16 & \phantom{aa} 3C32 & FRII & 0.400 & $<1.1$ \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(4.8) & $<2.3$ \phantom{aaaa} & 0.8 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(5.9) & $<$0.0015 \\
589: 0117$-$15 & \phantom{aa} 3C38 & FRII & 0.565 & $<2.4$ \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.8 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(6.6) & $<2.8$ \phantom{aaaa} & 0.9 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(10.3) & 0.0019 \\
590: 0235$-$19 & \phantom{aa} OD-159 & FRII & 0.620 & $<1.7$ \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.6 & \phantom{a} 0.6x0.3(8.9) & $<2.8$ \phantom{aaaa} & 0.9 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.1(11.1) & $<$0.0016 \\
591: 0347$+$05 & \phantom{aa} & FRII & 0.339 & $<2.2$ \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.7 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-55.9) & $<2.5$ \phantom{aaaa} & 0.8 & \phantom{a} 0.2x0.2(-62) & $<$0.0019 \\
592: 0349$-$27 & \phantom{aa} & FRII & 0.066 & 17.5 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.8x0.3(15.4) & 17.4 \phantom{aaaa} & 1.1 & \phantom{a} 0.6x0.2(15.7) & 0.0095 \\
593: 0404$+$03 & \phantom{aa} 3C105 & FRII & 0.089 & 19.8 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.5 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-25.5) & ? \phantom{aaaa} & - & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(63.9) & 0.0083 \\
594: 0806$-$10 & \phantom{aa} 3C195 & FRII & 0.110 & 32.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-1.6) & 20.7 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(-4.0) & 0.0166 \\
595: 0859$-$25 & \phantom{aa} & FRII & 0.305 & $<1.9$ \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.6 & \phantom{a} 0.7x0.3(0.6) & $<2.5$ \phantom{aaaa} & 0.8 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.2(2.3) & $<$0.0013 \\
596: 0915$-$11 & \phantom{aa} Hydra A & FRI & 0.054 & 211.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 2.5 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(-1.8) & 184.5 \phantom{aaaa} & 1.7 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(-2.0) & 0.0146 \\
597: 0945$+$07 & \phantom{aa} 3C227 & FRII & 0.086 & 13.9 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-32.2) & 11.7 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.3 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.1(-23.3) & 0.0049 \\
598: 1136$-$13 & \phantom{aa} & FRII & 0.554 & 234.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.4 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(-0.5) & 230.4 \phantom{aaaa} & 1.6 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(-1.8) & 0.1395 \\
599: 1226$+$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C273 & C/J & 0.158 & 24060.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 102.0 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-46.7) & 19460 \phantom{aaaa} & 185 & \phantom{a} 0.2x0.2(-59.1) & 1.1884 \\
600: 1306$-$09 & \phantom{aa} & CSS & 0.464 & 505.4* \phantom{aaaaa} & 4.7 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(-2.5) & 397.9* \phantom{aaaa} & 3.8 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(2.8) & $<$0.0152 \\
601: 1559$+$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C327 & FRII & 0.104 & 15.2 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.3 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(44.3) & 11.2 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.3 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(53.8) & 0.0046 \\
602: 1602$+$01 & \phantom{aa} 3C327.1 & FRII & 0.462 & 63.7 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.6 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(50.9) & 65.5 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.7 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(58.3) & 0.0734 \\
603: 1648$+$05 & \phantom{aa} Herc A & FRI & 0.154 & $4.5^a$ \phantom{aaaaa} & - & \phantom{a} - & - \phantom{aaaa} & - & \phantom{a} - & 0.0004 \\
604: 1949$+$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C403 & FRII & 0.059 & 20.0 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.6 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.4(53.6) & 8.5 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(53.6) & 0.0060 \\
605: 2135$-$14 & \phantom{aa} & FRII & 0.200 & 106.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.1 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(-7.7) & 44.3 \phantom{aaaa} & 1.1 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(-14.1) & 0.0577 \\
606: 2135$-$20 & \phantom{aa} OX-258 & CSS & 0.635 & 416* \phantom{aaaaa} & 3.8 & \phantom{a} 0.6x0.3(-3.1) & 199.8* \phantom{aaaa} & 3.3 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.2(-7.1) & 0.0076 \\
607: 2211$-$17 & \phantom{aa} 3C444 & FRII & 0.153 & $<1.3$ \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.3(1.1) & $<1.8$ \phantom{aaaa} & 0.6 & \phantom{a} 0.5x0.29(-7.6) & $<$0.0007 \\
608: 2221$-$02 & \phantom{aa} 3C445 & FRII & 0.057 & 27.3 \phantom{aaaaa} & 0.4 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(46.6) & 16.1 \phantom{aaaa} & 0.5 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(14.5) & 0.0096 \\
609: 2314$+$03 & \phantom{aa} 3C459 & FRII & 0.220 & $<162.3^c$ \phantom{aaaaa} & 1.0 & \phantom{a} 0.4x0.3(49.9) & $<92.6^c$ \phantom{aaaa} & 0.9 & \phantom{a} 0.3x0.2(58.5) & $<$0.1060 \\
610: \cutinhead{VLBI core upper limits of compact objects in the sample from \cite{tzioumis02}}
611: 0023$-$26 & \phantom{aa} CSS & $<20 mJy$ & at 2.3GHz & \phantom{aaaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \phantom{aaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \\
612: 0252$-$71 & \phantom{aa} CSS & $<40 mJy$ & at 2.3GHz & \phantom{aaaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \phantom{aaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \\
613: 1151$-$34 & \phantom{aa} CSS & $<20 mJy$ & at 8.3GHz & \phantom{aaaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \phantom{aaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \\
614: 1306$-$09 & \phantom{aa} CSS & $<28.5 mJy$ & at 2.3GHz & \phantom{aaaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \phantom{aaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \\
615: 1814$-$63 & \phantom{aa} CSS & $87 mJy^b$ & at 2.3GHz & \phantom{aaaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \phantom{aaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \\
616: 2135$-$20 & \phantom{aa} CSS & $<11.5 mJy$ & at 5GHz & \phantom{aaaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \phantom{aaaa} & & \phantom{a} & \\
617:
618: \enddata
619:
620: \tablecomments{Table\ref{tbl-4}: Flux density results from {\it VLA} observations. (*) total flux measurement as the resolution of the observations is not high enough to resolve the core in these compact objects. }
621: \tablenotetext{a}{8.4Ghz flux taken from \citet{gizani03}}
622: \tablenotetext{b}{Possible detection at the 15$\sigma$ level. }
623: \tablenotetext{c}{VLBI radio maps of PKS2314+03 presented in \citet{tomasson03} resolve the central region of this object into two components of which it is unclear which is the true flat spectrum core. Our images cannot resolve this central structure and therefore the flux measurement presented here is likely to be an upper limit of the true flat spectrum core flux. }
624:
625: \end{deluxetable}
626:
627:
628: \subsection{Sample}
629: The radio sample is identical to that discussed in section
630: \ref{sec:sample}. The objects were divided between the {\it ATCA} and the
631: {\it VLA} observatories according to the declination of the source (cutoff
632: $\delta\approx-25\degree$). Four objects -- \object{PKS0023-26},
633: \object{PKS0349-27}, \object{PKS0442-28}, \object{PKS0859-25}-- were
634: observed with both {\it ATCA} and the {\it VLA}.
635:
636:
637: \begin{figure*}
638: \epsscale{1.4}
639: \plotone{f2.eps}
640: \caption{Example images from our high frequency radio
641: observations. Top: PKS1355$-$41, an FRII quasar. Bottom: PKS1932$-$46,
642: an FRII broad line radio galaxy. Contour level for the plots are as
643: follows: 2.4*-1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 32, 64, 128 mJy/beam. The core
644: and the lobes/hot spots are clearly seen in both objects. In PKS
645: 1932-46, residuals are seen on large scales due to extended, low
646: surface brightness structures that cannot be properly imaged due to
647: the poor uv coverage. \label{fig:rad_image}}
648: \end{figure*}
649:
650:
651: \subsection{{\it ATCA} Observations}
652:
653: We observed 23 objects (with $\delta < -25\degree$) from our sample
654: with {\it ATCA}. For one object (\object{PKS0023$-$26}) the quality of the {\it ATCA} data
655: turned out to be quite low, we have therefore excluded it from our {\it ATCA}
656: list and we will use only the {\it VLA} data.
657:
658: The sources were observed using the 6-km configuration --
659: the longest available for this radio telescope. These observations
660: were carried out between the 19th and 23rd of July 2006 in perfect
661: weather conditions. The total run comprised of a continuous 100h of observations.
662:
663: Data were taken simultaneously at 17.9 GHz and 24.1 GHz. These high
664: frequencies allow us to achieve a relatively high resolution. Each
665: source was observed for a period ranging from 30 to 60 min (depending
666: on scheduling constraints) in scans of 10 min spread over a period of
667: 12h in order to obtain a good enough {\sl uv}-coverage. In each scan
668: we swapped between the two frequencies. Furthermore, for each
669: frequency, we actually took data simultaneously at 17.47 and 18.50 GHz
670: in the first observation and at 23.62 and 24.64 GHz in the second,
671: with a bandwidth of 128 MHz for each of these frequencies. These
672: separate frequencies allowed us to improve (radially) the $uv$
673: coverage. The flux calibrator -- PKS1934-64 flux level at 12mm =
674: 1.03Jy -- was observed few times during the whole run. In addition, a
675: nearby phase calibrator was observed for 5 min before every scan on a
676: source. A reference pointing observation was also carried out before every source.
677:
678: The {\it ATCA} data were calibrated using the MIRIAD software package
679: \citep{sault95}. The final images were obtained using multi-frequency
680: synthesis option and adding together the two nearby frequencies (17.47
681: and 18.50 GHz; 23.62 and 24.64 GHz) to increase the sensitivity and
682: improve the {\sl uv}-coverage. Typically two cycles of
683: self-calibration were needed to obtain the final images. In these
684: images, we have used uniform weighting to achieve the highest possible
685: resolution.
686:
687: Table \ref{tbl-3} summarises the results of the {\it ATCA} observations,
688: including beam size and noise for each object and each frequency. We
689: have detected radio cores in 14 of the 22 sources (63\%; PKS~0023-26
690: is excluded from the {\it ATCA} list as discussed above). In a few cases,
691: in particular those for which the core was not detected, we have
692: combined both frequencies (17 and 24 GHz) in order to improve the
693: sensitivity (\object{PKS0043-42}, \object{PKS0859-25},
694: \object{PKS1547-79}). Upper limits to the flux and power of the
695: undetected cores, were estimated using $3\sigma$ of the noise level.
696: A few objects are known to be compact steep spectrum
697: (\object{PKS0252-71}, \object{PKS1151-34}, \object{PKS1814-63},
698: \object{PKS1934-63}). These sources are already part of the list of
699: {\it ATCA} calibrators and indeed the resolution of our observation is not good
700: enough to pinpoint a possible core. We have used these objects as a
701: check of on our measured flux level (they agree very well with the data
702: from the calibration archive and they show no indication of
703: variability). For these sources, core fluxes or upper limit have been
704: measured from VLBI maps in \cite{tzioumis02} (listed at
705: the end of Table \ref{tbl-4}).
706:
707:
708: Finally, in a number of objects (PKS0039-44, PKS0043-42, PKS0409-75,
709: PKS0442-28, PKS0859-25, PKS1355-41, PKS1547-79, PKS1932-46, PKS
710: 2250-41) we also detected radio emission from other regions of the
711: radio galaxy and, in particular, from the hot spots. Two examples of
712: this are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:rad_image}. These maps illustrate the
713: fact that at the high radio frequency and resolution of the
714: observations, the maps are dominated by the compact cores, hotspots
715: and knot features along the jets, and the diffuse lobe emission is
716: resolved out.
717:
718:
719: \subsection{{\it VLA} Observations}
720: We observed 27 objects with the {\it VLA} at frequencies of 14.9 and
721: 22.4~GHz. The observations were carried out between 4 Aug, 2-3 Sep
722: 2006 in B-array configuration. Due to servicing, 10 out of 27 dishes
723: were not operating during the observation period. For one object
724: (\object{PKS0442$-$28}) the quality of the {\it VLA} data turned out to be
725: quite low due to the declination of the source, we therefore have
726: excluded it from our {\it VLA} list and we will use only the {\it ATCA} data.
727:
728: Each source was observed for about 15 min per frequency, separated in
729: three scans of 5~min each. In addition, a reference pointing
730: observation was carried out before every source. The observations at
731: the two frequencies were interleaved, to provide a better {\sl
732: uv}-coverage. As flux calibrators we used PKS0713$+$438 for the
733: U-band (14.4-14.9GHz), and PKS1331$+$305 (3C286) for the K-band
734: (22.1-26.0GHz). These calibrators were observed a few times during
735: the run. Data splitting and opacity corrections were done inside
736: AIPS, while the rest of the data reduction was done using the MIRIAD
737: software package. Images of the separate frequencies were obtained
738: for each source and combined images were also made in order to attempt
739: to detect those objects with faint cores, to no avail. Table
740: \ref{tbl-4} summarises the results of the {\it VLA} observations.
741:
742: Overall, from the {\it VLA} observations, we detected cores in 58\% of the
743: sources (15 cores detected in the 26 successfully observed).
744:
745: Again, in 7 of the {\it VLA} objects (PKS0117-15, PKS0347-05,
746: PKS0859-25, PKS0915-11, PKS 1136$+$07, PKS1602-01, PKS2314-03)
747: we also detected radio emission from extended regions of the radio
748: galaxy and, in particular, from the hot spots.
749:
750: \subsection{Notes on the radio observations}
751: We chose a high resolution array configuration in order to try and
752: detect the high frequency radio cores. Due to this the resolution of
753: the images resolves out the extended structure of the
754: sources. Therefore it would be impossible to provide accurate
755: measurements for the total emission from our sources with these
756: observations at 15 to 22 GHz.
757:
758: Also, in the final column of the {\it ATCA} and {\it VLA} data tables we present
759: estimates of the orientation sensitive R parameter defined as
760: $S_{core}/(S_{tot}-S_{core})$. In order to determine this we have used
761: estimates of the total radio flux measured at 5GHz $S_{tot}$ taken from \citet{morganti93}, and the
762: core measurement is taken from the lower of the two observed frequency
763: core detections of either the {\it ATCA} (18 GHz) or {\it VLA} (15 GHz)
764: observations. Here we assume that the flat spectrum core flux remained
765: constant between 5 GHz and the higher frequencies. The analysis of
766: these data will be addressed in the detailed discussion paper to
767: follow.
768:
769:
770: \begin{deluxetable}{c@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{1mm}}c@{\hspace{0mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c@{\hspace{-2mm}}c}
771: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
772: \tablecaption{SED Truth Table\label{tbl-5}}
773: \tablewidth{0pt}
774: \tablehead{
775: \colhead{Name}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{Other}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Opt.Class}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Rad.Class}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Total}{\hspace{-2mm}} &\colhead{Core}{\hspace{1mm}}& \colhead{Name}{\hspace{0mm}} & \colhead{Other}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Opt.Class}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Rad.Class}{\hspace{-2mm}} & \colhead{Total}{\hspace{-2mm}} &\colhead{Core}
776: }
777:
778: \startdata
779: 0023$-$26 & & NLRG & CSS & $X$ & $X$ & 1151$-$34 & & Q & CSS & $X$ & $X$ \\
780: 0034$-$01 & 3C015 & WLRG & FRII & $X$ & \checkmark & 1226$+$02 & 3C273 & Q & C/J & - & - \\
781: 0035$-$02 & 3C17 & BLRG & (FRII) & \checkmark & \checkmark & 1306$-$09 & & NLRG & CSS & \checkmark & $X$ \\
782: 0038$+$09 & 3C18 & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & \checkmark & 1355$-$41 & & Q & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
783: 0039$-$44 & & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1547$-$79 & & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
784: 0043$-$42 & & WLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1549$-$79 & & NLRG & CFS & - & - \\
785: 0105$-$16 & 3C32 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1559$+$02 & 3C327 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
786: 0117$-$15 & 3C38 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1602$+$01 & 3C327.1 & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & \checkmark \\
787: 0213$-$13 & 3C62 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1648$+$05 & Herc A & WLRG & FRI & $X$ & $X$ \\
788: 0235$-$19 & OD-159 & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1733$-$56 & & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
789: 0252$-$71 & & NLRG & CSS & $X$ & $X$ & 1814$-$63 & & NLRG & CSS & $X$ & $X$ \\
790: 0347$+$05 & & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1839$-$48 & & WLRG & FRI & \checkmark & \checkmark \\
791: 0349$-$27 & & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1932$-$46 & & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & \checkmark \\
792: 0404$+$03 & 3C105 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1934$-$63 & & NLRG & GPS & $X$ & $X$ \\
793: 0409$-$75 & & NLRG & FRII & \checkmark & $X$ & 1938$-$15 & & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & - \\
794: 0442$-$28 & & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 1949$+$02 & 3C403 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
795: 0521$-$36 & & BLRG & C/J & - & - & 1954$-$55 & & WLRG & FRI & \checkmark & \checkmark \\
796: 0620$-$52 & & WLRG & FRI & $X$ & \checkmark & 2135$-$14 & & Q & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
797: 0625$-$35 & OH-342 & WLRG & FRI & $X$ & \checkmark & 2135$-$20 & O$X$-258 & BLRG & CSS & $X$ & $X$ \\
798: 0625$-$53 & & WLRG & FRII & $X$ & \checkmark & 2211$-$17 & 3C444 & WLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
799: 0806$-$10 & 3C195 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 2221$-$02 & 3C445 & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
800: 0859$-$25 & & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 2250$-$41 & & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
801: 0915$-$11 & Hydra A & WLRG & FRI & $X$ & $X$ & 2314$+$03 & 3C459 & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
802: 0945$+$07 & 3C227 & BLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ & 2356$-$61 & & NLRG & FRII & $X$ & $X$ \\
803: 1136$-$13 & & Q & FRII & \checkmark & \checkmark & & & & & & \\
804:
805: \enddata
806:
807: \tablecomments{Table\ref{tbl-5}: Truth table investigating the potential non-thermal contamination of the thermal MFIR emission, see \S \ref{sec:lobe} and \S \ref{sec:core}. }
808:
809: \end{deluxetable}
810:
811:
812: \section{Non-thermal Contamination}
813: \label{sec:sed}
814: MFIR emission can potentially have a thermal and/or non-thermal
815: origin in radio loud AGN: thermal emission from re-radiation of AGN
816: light by dust, and non-thermal synchrotron radiation. Therefore, in
817: order to investigate the MFIR dust emission we need to be aware of the
818: potential contamination by non-thermal sources. There are two important
819: components to consider when investigating the non-thermal
820: contamination in a sample of steep-spectrum radio-loud AGN.
821:
822: \begin{itemize}
823: \item{\bf Total steep spectrum emission:} Steep spectrum components
824: such as lobes and hotspots could be potential non-thermal
825: contaminants of the MFIR emission. Despite the fact that these components fall
826: in flux towards higher frequencies, they could still potentially
827: dominate the flux of an object at MFIR wavelengths. However, the
828: proportion of this non-thermal contamination also depends on how
829: much of the steep spectrum emission regions lies within the MFIR
830: instrument beam (in this case the {\it Spitzer} beam). Thus, the degree of
831: contamination by steep spectrum components for most of the nearby extended
832: sources in our sample will be insignificant because they have a high
833: proportion of their synchrotron emitting lobes/hotspots far outside
834: the beam. The contamination is likely to be most important for
835: compact objects such as CSS/GPS, and for extended FRII sources at
836: high redshift that appear small because of their large
837: distances. At the average redshift (z = 0.244) of our complete
838: sample, objects with diameter $<80$kpc would fit entirely within the
839: 18$''$ {\it Spitzer} beam at 70\moo.
840:
841:
842: \item{\bf Flat spectrum core/jet components:} Flat spectrum core/jet
843: component can also be a potential non-thermal contaminant of the
844: MFIR emission. We can detect strong non-thermal jet emission at
845: optical wavelengths in some objects (e.g. \object{3C273}), so it is
846: reasonable to assume that this emission may contribute to the
847: observed flux at MFIR wavelengths. Quasars and BLRG are known to
848: have strong non-thermal beamed core components \citep{morganti97},
849: with the strength of this contamination is dependent on the
850: orientation of the object to the line of sight.
851:
852: \end{itemize}
853:
854: Identifying the non-thermal contribution to the MFIR is not a trivial
855: task, because the spectral shape of radio-loud AGN is often poorly
856: sampled in key areas such as the sub-mm and far-infrared. Although
857: some flat spectrum quasars and BL Lac/Blazar objects are clearly
858: dominated by their non-thermal component at sub-mm and infrared
859: wavelength, our steep spectrum selected sample has been chosen to
860: avoid such objects, in order to investigate the thermal emission from
861: dust. Despite this, the contribution from non-thermal emission from
862: objects with relatively strong radio cores and from steep spectrum
863: lobe/hotspot components in the {\it Spitzer} beam, remains a possibility, and
864: should be carefully investigated.
865:
866: \subsection{Spectral Energy Distributions}
867:
868: In Figures \ref{sed1} to \ref{sed6} we present spectral energy
869: distributions for the entire sample described in section
870: \ref{sec:sample}. The data plotted includes the results of the
871: {\it Spitzer}, {\it ATCA} and {\it VLA} observations presented in this paper, along with
872: {\it IRAS} and {\it ISO} photometry total flux measurements and other total flux
873: data taken from NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). Additional
874: core radio data is taken from
875: \citet{morganti93,morganti97,morganti99}.
876:
877: Total flux observations from {\it ATCA} of a large proportion of the sample
878: have been made at 18.5 and 22 Ghz \citep{ricci06}, which would
879: complement our core measurements well. Unfortunately the atmospheric
880: phase stability during the latter observations was poor, which may
881: have contributed to the fact that, when plotted in the SEDs, many of
882: the values seemed unphysical compared to the other data sets. Thus
883: these results are not included in our SED plots.
884:
885: The solid line in each plot represents a single power-law fit to the
886: total radio flux data of the objects between $10^9$ to $10^{10}$ Hz. A
887: few objects have an additional dashed line fitted to the data between
888: $10^9$ and $10^{11}$ Hz, when good data above $10^{10}$ Hz is
889: available. Unfortunately this is a relatively under-sampled region in
890: our data set, and we can fit this extra line to only 6 of the objects
891: in our sample. In the following analysis this second fitted line,
892: which takes better account of any high frequency steepening/flattening
893: of the SED, is used in preference to the first solid line fit,
894: where applicable.
895:
896:
897: \begin{sidewaysfigure*}[h]
898: \begin{center}
899: \includegraphics[width =1\columnwidth]{f3.eps}
900: \caption{SEDs of all objects in our sample are presented here. Upper
901: limits are represented by downwards pointing arrows. The blue line
902: is fitted to the data from $10^9$ to $10^{10}$ Hz and the red dashed
903: line is fitted to the data points from $10^9$ to $10^{11}$ Hz. The {\it VLA}
904: data in CSS object PKS0023$-$26 is the total flux measurement
905: and an upper limit on the core,plotted as an open circle, is taken from
906: \citet{tzioumis02}. \label{sed1} }
907: \end{center}
908: \end{sidewaysfigure*}
909:
910: \begin{sidewaysfigure*}[h]
911: \begin{center}
912: \includegraphics[width =1\columnwidth]{f4.eps}
913: \caption{SEDs cont. The {\it ATCA}
914: data in the SEDS of CSS object PKS0252$-$71 is the total flux measurement and an
915: upper limit on the core, plotted as an open circle, is taken from
916: \citet{tzioumis02}. \label{sed2} }
917: \end{center}
918: \end{sidewaysfigure*}
919:
920: \begin{sidewaysfigure*}[h]
921: \begin{center}
922: \includegraphics[width =1\columnwidth]{f5.eps}
923: \caption{SEDs cont.\label{sed3} }
924: \end{center}
925: \end{sidewaysfigure*}
926:
927: \begin{sidewaysfigure*}[h]
928: \begin{center}
929: \includegraphics[width =1\columnwidth]{f6.eps}
930: \caption{SEDs cont. PKS1226$+$02 (3C273) clearly demonstrates its flat
931: spectrum dominant characteristics from the fitted power law. Note the
932: variability in the MFIR flux density of 3C273, where there is
933: approximately a decade between observations of {\it IRAS}, {\it ISO} and
934: {\it Spitzer}. This object is clearly in low synchrotron emission phase, see
935: section \ref{sec:var}. The {\it ATCA}/{\it VLA} data in the SEDs of CSS objects
936: PKS1151$-$34 and PKS1306$-$09 is the total flux
937: measurement and an upper limits on the cores, plotted as open circles, are taken from
938: \citet{tzioumis02}. \label{sed4} }
939: \end{center}
940: \end{sidewaysfigure*}
941:
942: \begin{sidewaysfigure*}[h]
943: \begin{center}
944: \includegraphics[width =1\columnwidth]{f7.eps}
945: \caption{SEDs cont. {\it ATCA}/{\it VLA} core measurement in PKS1648$+$05 from
946: \citet{gizani03}. PKS1938$-$15 was not observed in our high radio
947: frequency program. The {\it ATCA} data in the SED of CSS object PKS1814$-$63
948: is the total flux measurement and a possible detection of the core at
949: a 15 $\sigma$ level, plotted as an open circle, is taken from
950: \citet{tzioumis02}. We have included this PKS1938$-$15 as a candidate
951: for steep spectrum non-thermal contamination, despite the extrapolation
952: falling below the 70\moo. We believe that a jet component may be
953: contributing to the turn up in the high frequency radio region its
954: SED.\label{sed5}}
955: \end{center}
956: \end{sidewaysfigure*}
957:
958: \begin{sidewaysfigure*}[h]
959: \begin{center}
960: \includegraphics[width =1\columnwidth]{f8.eps}
961: \caption{SEDs cont. The {\it VLA}
962: data in the SED of CSS object PKS2135$-$20 is the total flux measurement and an
963: upper limit on the core, plotted as an open circle, is taken from
964: \citet{tzioumis02}.\label{sed6} }
965: \end{center}
966: \end{sidewaysfigure*}
967:
968:
969: \subsection{Lobe/hotspot synchrotron contamination}
970: \label{sec:lobe}
971: By using the fitted power laws to extrapolate the total synchrotron
972: radio emission through to the MFIR, it is possible to gain an
973: indication of whether a contribution to the MFIR flux is possible from
974: the non-beamed synchrotron emitting lobes and hotspots. However,
975: {\it Spitzer}'s beam size of 6, 18 and 40$''$ at 24, 70 and 160\moo\
976: respectively, means that for many targets in our sample most of the
977: extended steep spectrum emission lies well outside the beam. In Table
978: \ref{tbl-5} we address this issue, presenting a truth table from a
979: visual analysis of the SEDs, where we have used the 70\moo\ flux as a
980: reference point for the analysis.
981:
982: For an object to be considered as a candidate for possible steep
983: spectrum synchrotron contamination, a source was required to fulfil
984: two criteria. Firstly, the power law extrapolation of the total (steep
985: spectrum dominated) radio lobe/hot-spot flux was required to fall
986: close to or above the 70\moo\ flux. Secondly, a substantial fraction
987: of the total radio emission at 5 GHz ($>30$\%, as determined from visual inspection
988: of radio maps) was required to fall within the {\it Spitzer} beam at 70\moo. A tick in
989: columns 5 and 11 in Table \ref{tbl-5} indicates that an object fulfils
990: both of these criteria. We find that only 7 out of our complete sample
991: of 46 fulfil both these
992: criteria, therefore indicating that these objects have the potential
993: for contamination by their extended synchrotron components that fall
994: within the {\it Spitzer} beam. We emphasise that this is a conservative
995: estimate, given that the steep spectrum synchrotron component is
996: likely to fall quicker than the fitted power-law at higher frequencies
997: due to spectral aging of the electron population. Evidence for such
998: spectral steepening can be seen in the SEDs of \object{PKS0105$-$16},
999: \object{PKS0625$-$35} and \object{1549$-$79} (See Figures 5 and
1000: 6). Indeed, other authors (e.g. \citealt{shi05}, \citealt{cleary07})
1001: fit a parabola to the steep spectrum components in order to take this
1002: high frequency steepening into consideration. Therefore, our power-law
1003: extrapolation is likely to provide an over-estimate of the rate of
1004: steep spectrum contamination at MFIR wavelengths in our sample. We
1005: believe that more detailed parabolic or multiple power-law fits to the
1006: total radio flux spectra are unwarranted given the lack of
1007: sub-mm data for most of the objects.
1008:
1009: \subsection{Core/jet synchrotron contamination}
1010: \label{sec:core}
1011: The thermal dust contribution to the MFIR observed flux can be
1012: identified by extrapolating the slope of the total radio flux data to
1013: higher frequencies and interpreting everything above that slope as the
1014: thermal bump (e.g. \citealp{hughes97}; see previous section
1015: \ref{sec:lobe}). However, this does not take into account any
1016: contribution one might have from a flatter spectrum core/jet
1017: component.
1018:
1019: Using our high frequency radio core observations, and additional data
1020: from the literature, we have plotted the radio core fluxes and upper limits
1021: on the SEDs of most objects, in order to investigate their possible
1022: contribution to the MFIR flux. Again, using the 70\moo\ flux point as
1023: a reference and assuming the core spectral shape to be flat, we then
1024: deem non-thermal contamination to be possible for those objects whose
1025: high frequency radio core/jet fluxes lie level with or above the
1026: 70\moo\ flux.
1027:
1028: Note again that this criterion is conservative in the sense that the
1029: SEDs of flat spectrum radio core components may not remain flat up to
1030: MFIR wavelengths as we have assumed. Indeed, the 3 flat spectrum, core
1031: dominated objects in our sample (\object{3C273}, \object{PKS0521$-$36}
1032: and \object{PKS1549$-$79}) all show significant declines between the
1033: radio and the sub-mm/MFIR. In the case of \object{3C273} this decline
1034: is ~2 orders of magnitude between the radio and MFIR.
1035:
1036: We have also investigated the alternative of fitting a power-law to
1037: the core radio data and extrapolating this through to infrared
1038: frequencies. Unfortunately, due to the small number of core data points
1039: and relatively narrow wavelength range, there is relatively large
1040: uncertainty in the extrapolations of the core data to the MFIR.
1041: Future observations in the sub-mm region for the complete sample will
1042: allow us to constrain the possible contribution of the flat spectrum
1043: core-jet components to the MFIR more accurately.
1044:
1045: In columns 6 and 12 of Table \ref{tbl-5} we
1046: present the results, finding that 11 out of 46 objects in our complete
1047: sample have a possibility of contamination of their MFIR emission from
1048: flat spectrum core/jet components.
1049:
1050: \subsection{Level of potential non-thermal contamination}
1051: \label{sec:non}
1052:
1053: Overall, we have found that 15\% of our complete sample have potential
1054: contamination from the steep spectrum components (lobes/hotspots), and
1055: 24\% have potential contamination from a core/jet component. Out of
1056: the 46 objects in our full complete sample, a maximum of 30\% have the possibility
1057: of significant non-thermal contamination of their thermal MFIR
1058: emission from either steep spectrum components and/or a core/jet
1059: component. However, as discussed above (\S \ref{sec:lobe} \& \S
1060: \ref{sec:core}) these are likely to be conservative estimates, because
1061: the strength of both the flat core and steep spectrum components
1062: conceivably declines towards MFIR wavelengths faster than our simple
1063: analysis assumes.
1064:
1065: We stress to the reader that we have deliberately chosen a
1066: conservative approach to estimating the non-thermal contamination in
1067: this study. The results we present here are therefore likely to
1068: represent an upper limit to the true degree of non-thermal
1069: contamination in our sample.
1070:
1071: \subsection{Variability}
1072: \label{sec:var}
1073:
1074: The two core-dominated objects \object{3C273} and
1075: \object{PKS0521$-$36}, observed by {\it Spitzer}, were included in our
1076: observations and this study for comparative purposes, because of the
1077: large amount of previous data available. It is possible to identify
1078: their non-thermal core/jet component contribution at MFIR wavelengths
1079: if a relatively short timescale flux variation is observed, since the
1080: synchrotron beamed component is thought to originate from a very
1081: compact region.
1082:
1083: The MFIR emission from 3C273 has been noted to be variable, decreasing
1084: between {\it IRAS} (1983) and {\it ISO} (1995-98) observations in a way that is
1085: consistent with monitoring at other wavelengths
1086: \citep{meisenheimer01}. We can report that 3C273 has declined further
1087: still in MFIR emission since these previous observations, by a similar
1088: factor $\times$2 between the {\it IRAS} and {\it ISO} data (see Figure
1089: \ref{sed4}). Because of the time scale of this variation, it is most
1090: likely due to a change in core synchrotron emission, since the cool
1091: extended dust is unlikely to vary on the current observing timescales
1092: of decades. This implies that, claimed {\it ISO} detections of thermal emission from
1093: dust underlying the powerful non-thermal emission in 3C273, are unlikely to
1094: have been correct. The far-infrared emission now lies well below that
1095: of the supposed thermal bump. Our data provide no evidence for the
1096: detection of the thermal component in the MFIR SED of 3C273.
1097:
1098: The MFIR emission of the BL Lac object \object{PKS0521-36} is also known to be dominated by
1099: its non-thermal component, however we do not see such strong evidence
1100: for variability.
1101:
1102: \subsection{Comparison with previous studies}
1103: \label{sec:notes-non}
1104: Previous MFIR investigations have considered the relative
1105: contributions of thermal and non-thermal emission in radio galaxies
1106: and quasars (\citealp{hes95}, \citealp{vanbemmel98},
1107: \citealp{polletta00} \citealp{cleary07}, \citealp{shi05}). Studies
1108: such as those by \citet{polletta00}, \citet{cleary07} and
1109: \citet{shi05} fit radio to MFIR SEDs using various synchrotron and
1110: thermal infrared emission components. Our findings agree with the
1111: main conclusions from these studies that the proportion of objects
1112: with non-thermal contamination of the MFIR by synchrotron emitting
1113: components is small for an unbiased sample of radio-loud
1114: AGN.
1115:
1116: In the context of unified schemes, we can also investigate the optical
1117: classifications of those objects we believe have a possibility for
1118: core non-thermal contamination of the MFIR thermal emission. Out of
1119: the 11 objects with possible non-thermal contamination from the cores,
1120: 6 are classified as WLRG and 5 as BLRG/Quasars. A large proportion of
1121: BLRG/Quasars with non-thermal contamination is what we might expect if
1122: these objects have a beamed component orientated close to the line of sight.
1123: Overall our results our consistent with unified schemes that require a
1124: beamed component for the BLRG/Quasar objects (e.g. \citealp{barthel89}).
1125:
1126: For the WLRG -- some of which are FRI galaxies -- significant
1127: non-thermal contamination is consistent with the relatively stronger
1128: cores detected in FRI sources in general, as well as the detection of
1129: non-thermal cores in such sources at optical/IR wavelengths
1130: (\citealp{capetti07}, \citealp{chiaberge99}).
1131:
1132: \section{Summary}
1133: We have presented new MFIR and high frequency radio core data for a
1134: complete sample of powerful southern radio galaxies. We detect
1135: objects down to ~0.5mJy at 24\moo, ~8.4mJy at 70\moo\ and ~83.6mJy at
1136: 160\moo, obtaining a uniquely high detection rate at 24 and 70\moo.
1137:
1138: In addition, we have presented new high frequency radio core flux
1139: measurements, detecting radio cores for 59\% of our complete
1140: sample. With these data we have made a conservative estimate of the
1141: non-thermal contribution to the MFIR continuum. Careful analysis of
1142: the SEDs for our entire sample reveals that non-thermal contamination of the MFIR
1143: is possible for a maximum of 30\% of the sources in our sample.
1144:
1145: An in-depth analysis of these data will be presented in a second
1146: paper (Dicken et al. 2008, in preparation).
1147:
1148: \acknowledgments This work is based (in part) on observations made
1149: with the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet
1150: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a
1151: contract with NASA. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC
1152: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion
1153: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with
1154: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
1155:
1156: D.D., acknowledges support from the STFC.
1157:
1158: {\it Facilities:} \facility{{\it Spitzer} ({\it MIPS})}, \facility{{\it ATCA}}, \facility{{\it VLA}}.
1159:
1160: \bibliographystyle{apj.bst} \bibliography{bib_list}
1161:
1162: \end{document}
1163:
1164: \bibliography{bib_list}
1165:
1166: \end{document}
1167:
1168:
1169: