1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %%\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47: %\usepackage{graphicx}
48: %\usepackage{amsmath}
49: %\input{epsf.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion
50: %\input{psfig.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion
51: \shorttitle{SiO masers around AH Sco} \shortauthors{Xi Chen et
52: al.}
53:
54: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
55: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
56: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
57: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
58: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
59: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
60:
61:
62:
63: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
64: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
69: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
70: %% you desire.
71:
72: \title {VLBI Observations of SiO Masers around AH Scorpii }
73: \author
74: {Xi ~Chen\altaffilmark{1} \& Zhi-Qiang ~Shen\altaffilmark{1}}
75:
76: \altaffiltext{1} {Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, 80 Nandan
77: Road, Shanghai 200030, P.R.China}
78: %\date{Accepted 1993 December 11. Received 1993 March 17}
79: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2004}
80:
81:
82: \label{firstpage}
83:
84: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
85: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
86: %% you desire.
87:
88: \begin{abstract}
89:
90: We report the first Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) observations
91: of 43 GHz $v$=1, $J$=1--0 SiO masers in the circumstellar envelope
92: of the M-type semi-regular supergiant variable star AH Sco at 2
93: epochs separated by 12 days in March 2004. These high-resolution
94: VLBA images reveal that the distribution of SiO masers is roughly
95: on a persistent elliptical ring with the lengths of the major and
96: minor axes of about 18.5 and 15.8 mas, respectively, along a
97: position angle of $150^{\circ}$. And the red-shifted masers are
98: found to be slightly closer to the central star than the
99: blue-shifted masers. The line-of-sight velocity structure of the
100: SiO masers shows that with respect to the systemic velocity of
101: $-6.8$ km s$^{-1}$ the higher velocity features are closer to the
102: star, which can be well explained by the simple outflow or infall
103: without rotation kinematics of SiO masers around AH Sco. Study of
104: proper motions of 59 matched features between two epochs clearly
105: indicates that the SiO maser shell around AH Sco was undergoing an
106: overall contraction to the star at a velocity of $\approx$13 km
107: s$^{-1}$ at a distance of 2.26 kpc to AH Sco. Our 3-dimensional
108: maser kinematics model further suggests that such an inward motion
109: is very likely due to the gravitation of the central star. The
110: distance to AH Sco of 2.26$\pm$0.19 kpc obtained from the
111: 3-dimensional kinematics model fitting is consistent with its
112: kinematic distance of 2.0 kpc.
113:
114: \end{abstract}
115:
116: \keywords{circumstellar matter --- masers --- stars:
117: \object{individual (AH Sco)}\ --- stars: \object{kinematics}}
118:
119: \section{Introduction}
120:
121: AH Scorpii (AH Sco) is a semi-regular variable with an optical
122: period of 714 days (Kukarkin et al. 1969) and a spectral type of
123: M5Ia-Iab (Humphreys 1974). The systemic velocity of AH Sco is
124: estimated to be about $-7$ and $-3$ km s$^{-1}$ based on the
125: observations of OH maser (Baudry, Le Squeren \& L\'{e}pine 1977)
126: and H$_{2}$O maser (L\'{e}pine, Pase de Barros \& Gammon 1976),
127: respectively. The distance to AH Sco remains uncertain. A
128: photometric distance of 4.6 kpc has been derived by Humphreys \&
129: Ney (1974) based on their infrared data. However, Baudry, Le
130: Squeren \& L\'{e}pine (1977) led to a photometric distance of 2.6
131: kpc under an assumption of an absolute visual magnitude of $-5.8$
132: for Iab stars, whereas its kinematic distance was about
133: $1.5\sim2.0$ kpc for its systemic velocity $-5.5\sim-7.5$ km
134: s$^{-1}$.
135:
136: Late type stars often exhibit circumstellar maser emission in
137: molecules OH, H$_{2}$O, and SiO. The supergiant variable AH Sco is
138: such a star that has been detected strong maser emission with
139: single-dish in all three species (e.g. L\'{e}pine, Pase de Barros
140: \& Gammon 1976; Baudry, Le Squeren \& L\'{e}pine 1977; Balister et
141: al. 1977, G\'{o}mez Balboa \& L\'{e}pine 1986). The
142: interferometric observations of these masers would be useful in
143: determining the structure and kinematics of the circumstellar
144: envelop (CSE) and understanding the physical circumstance and mass
145: loss procedure for this supergiant variable. Unfortunately, there
146: has been so far no any published interferometric map of OH,
147: H$_{2}$O and SiO masers toward this source.
148:
149: Especially, SiO masers provide a good probe of the morphology of
150: CSE and kinematics of gas in the extended atmosphere which is a
151: complex region located between the photosphere and the inner dust
152: formation shell. Previous VLBI experiments have demonstrated
153: ringlike configurations (e.g. Diamond et al. 1994; Greenhill et
154: al. 1995; Boboltz, Diamond \& Kemball 1997; Yi et al. 2005, Chen
155: et al. 2006), or elliptical distributions (e.g. Boboltz \& Marvel
156: 2000; S\'{a}nchez et al. 2002; Boboltz \& Diamond 2005) of SiO
157: masers, and also revealed complex kinematics in SiO maser regions,
158: e.g. contraction and expansion at the different phase of stellar
159: pulsation (Boboltz, Diamond \& Kemball 1997; Diamond \& Kemball
160: 2003; Chen et al. 2006) and even rotation (Boboltz \& Marvel 2000;
161: Hollis et al. 2001; S\'{a}nchez et al. 2002; Cotton et al. 2004;
162: Boboltz \& Diamond 2005). The ringlike or elliptical distribution
163: that is assumed to be centered at the stellar position with a
164: radius of 2--4 R$_{\ast}$ suggests that SiO masers are amplified
165: in tangential rather than radial path.
166:
167: In this paper, we present the first VLBI maps of SiO maser
168: emission toward AH Sco observed at two epochs separated by 12 days
169: in March 2004. The observations and data reduction are described
170: in $\S$ 2; results and discussions are presented in $\S$ 3,
171: followed by conclusions in $\S$ 4.
172:
173:
174: \section{Observations and data reduction}
175:
176: The observations of the $v=$1, $J$=1--0 SiO maser emission toward
177: AH Sco ($\alpha=$17$^h$11$^m$16.98$^s$,
178: $\delta=-32\arcdeg19\arcmin31.2\arcsec$, J2000) were performed at
179: two epochs on March 8, 2004 (hereafter epoch A) and March 20, 2004
180: (hereafter epoch B) using the 10 stations of the Very Long
181: Baseline Array (VLBA) of the NRAO\footnote[1]{The National Radio
182: Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science
183: Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
184: Universities, Inc.}. A reference frequency of 43.122027 GHz was
185: adopted for the $v$=1, $J$=1--0 SiO transition. The data were
186: recorded in left circular polarization in an 8 MHz band and
187: correlated with the FX correlator in Socorro, New Mexico. The
188: correlator output data had 256 spectral channels, corresponding to
189: a velocity resolution of 0.22 km s$^{-1}$. The system temperatures
190: and sensitivities were on the order of 150 K and 11 Jy K$^{-1}$,
191: respectively, for both epochs.
192:
193:
194:
195: For the data reduction, we followed the standard procedure for
196: VLBA spectral line observations using the Astronomical Image
197: Processing System (AIPS) package. The bandpass response was
198: determined from scans on the continuum calibrator (NRAO530). The
199: amplitude calibration was achieved using the total-power spectra
200: of AH Sco based on the ``template spectrum'' method. The template
201: spectra at each epoch were obtained from the Mauna Kea (MK)
202: station at a high elevation. A zenith opacity of about 0.05 at MK
203: station estimated from the variation of system temperature with
204: zenith angle was applied to correct the atmosphere absorption for
205: each epoch. Residual group delays determined from a fringe fitting
206: to the continuum calibrator were applied to the spectral line
207: data. Residual fringe-rates were obtained by performing a
208: fringe-fitting on a reference channel (at V$_{\rm LSR}=-$9.4 km
209: s$^{-1}$), which has a relatively simple structure in the maser
210: emission. An iterative self-calibration on the reference channel
211: was performed to remove any structural phase. The solutions of
212: fringe-fitting and self-calibration were then applied to the whole
213: spectral line data. Image cubes were produced for all the velocity
214: channels between 14 and $-$18 km s$^{-1}$ with a synthesized beam
215: of 0.69 mas $\times$ 0.20 mas at a position angle $-6^\circ$.
216: Off-source rms noise ($\sigma_{\rm rms}$) in channel maps ranges
217: from 20 mJy beam$^{-1}$ in the maps with weak or no maser emission
218: to 50 mJy beam$^{-1}$ in the maps containing strong maser
219: emission. The flux densities, and positions in right ascension
220: (R.A.) and declination (Dec.) for all emission components with
221: intensity above 8 $\sigma_{\rm rms}$ in each channel maps were
222: determined by fitting a two-dimension Gaussian brightness
223: distribution using the AIPS task SAD. Errors in R.A. and Dec.
224: obtained from above fitting procedure range from 1 $\mu$as for
225: components with high SNR, to 168 $\mu$as for components with low
226: SNR, and the typical uncertainty of the fitted position of maser
227: components was smaller than 10 $\mu$as.
228:
229: The remaining analysis of the maser component identifications was
230: performed outside of the AIPS package. As described in our
231: previous work (Chen et al. 2006), a maser spot is a single
232: velocity component of the maser emission in each velocity channel
233: map; a maser feature is a group of the maser spots within a small
234: region in both space and Doppler velocity, typically 1 AU and 1 km
235: s$^{-1}$, and is expected to be a physical feature consisting of a
236: single gas clump. In order to study the characteristics of SiO
237: masers, it is necessary to identify maser features for each epoch.
238: The maser spots in different channels were deemed as the same
239: feature according to the criterion that these spots appear in at
240: least three adjacent channels and lie within an angular separation
241: of 0.5 mas. Finally, 82 and 87 maser features were identified for
242: epochs A and B, respectively.
243:
244:
245: \section{Results and Discussions}
246:
247: \subsection{The spatial structure of the SiO masers}
248:
249: The full lists of parameters for each identified feature are given
250: in Tables 1 and 2, for epochs A and B, respectively. We fit a
251: Gaussian curve to the velocity profile of a feature containing at
252: least four spots to determine V$_{\rm LSR}$ at the peak of
253: velocity profile. For some features which can not be well
254: represented by a Gaussian profile (labelled by a ``$\ast$'' in
255: Tables 1 and 2), intensity weighted mean V$_{\rm LSR}$ was
256: adopted. The velocity range across the feature $\Delta u$, is
257: defined to be the difference between the maximal and minimal
258: velocities of the spots in the feature. Feature positions ($x$,
259: $y$) in R.A. and Dec. were determined from an intensity weighted
260: average over maser spots in the feature. The uncertainty
261: ($\sigma_{x}, \sigma_{ y}$) of a feature position was defined as
262: squared root of the square sum of (1) the mean spot distance from
263: the defined feature position and (2) the mean measurement error of
264: the spot positions. The weights proportional to the intensity of
265: the spot were applied in the uncertainty estimation. The typical
266: position uncertainties of features are 0.01 mas and 0.02 mas for
267: R.A. and Dec., respectively. The positions are measured with
268: respect to the reference feature at (0, 0) for aligning the maps
269: in the two epochs (labelled by ``R'' in Tables 1 and 2; see Sect.
270: 3.2.2). The distance of a maser feature, $r$, is measured with
271: respect to the fitted center obtained from the ellipse model
272: fitting to the distribution of maser features (see below). The
273: flux density of the brightest spot in each feature was deemed as
274: its peak flux density, P.
275:
276: In two top panels of Figure 1, we compare the total power imaged
277: by the VLBA (open circle) to the total power (solid line) obtained
278: from the MK antenna for each epoch. The total power imaged by VLBA
279: is obtained by summing all fitted flux of spots belonging to
280: features. The fractional power representing the ratio of the total
281: flux imaged by VLBA to the total flux of maser emission is shown
282: in two bottom panels. The fraction is mostly between 0.4 and 0.8.
283: That is, on average about $\sim$60\% of the total luminosity of
284: masers was detected in our observations. Actually, such a
285: fractional power reflects the degree of extension of the maser
286: emission. If the apparent sizes of maser components are larger
287: than that of the interferometric beam, the maser would be partly
288: resolved (i.e. the fractional power is less than 1) and the
289: fractional power should decrease with the increase of apparent
290: size of masers. The typical size of maser spots estimated from
291: geometric mean of sizes of the major and minor axes of the spots,
292: which were obtained by fitting to an elliptical Gaussian
293: brightness distribution in the CLEAN map, is 0.5 mas. This typical
294: scale size is slightly larger than the geometric mean of the VLBA
295: beam of 0.4 mas. Thus $\sim$40\% missing flux in our map is mainly
296: due to the high spatial resolution of the interferometric array.
297:
298: Figure 2 shows the distributions of maser features toward AH Sco
299: for the two epochs. These high resolution VLBI images reveal a
300: persistent elliptical structure of SiO masers around AH Sco druing
301: an interval of 12 days. We characterized this morphology by
302: performing a least-squares fit of an ellipse to the distribution
303: of masers weighted by the flux density of each feature for each of
304: two epochs. The best-fitting ellipses and the ellipse centers are
305: also shown in Figure 2. The lengths of the major and minor axes
306: were found to be 18.6 and 15.7 mas for epoch A, and 18.4 and 15.9
307: mas for epoch B, respectively, with the major axis of the ellipse
308: oriented similarly at $\sim150^{\circ}$ at both epochs. And the
309: fitted centers of the elliptical distributions are almost the same
310: at both epochs of $-7.9$ and 5.8 mas in R.A. and Dec.,
311: respectively. At a distance to AH Sco of 2.26 kpc (see Sect.
312: 3.2.3), the distribution of SiO masers corresponds to about
313: $42\times35$ AU for both two epochs. However, an axial ratio of
314: 1.18 suggests that the distribution of maser features around AH
315: Sco can be viewed approximately as the ringlike structure with an
316: average diameter of about 17.2 mas (obtained from the geometric
317: average of the major and minor axes for both epochs).
318:
319: The simultaneous near-infrared interferometry and radio
320: interferometry imaging of circumstellar SiO maser for late type
321: stars have been done recently (e.g. Boboltz \& Wittkowski 2005;
322: Wittkowski et al. 2007; Cotton et al. 2004, 2006). These
323: observations reveal that the ratio of the maser ring radius to the
324: photospheric radius of the central star is about $1.5-4.0$.
325: Unfortunately, there has been no any published photospheric radius
326: measurement for AH Sco. Thus we can not directly compare SiO maser
327: ring radius with stellar radius for AH Sco.
328:
329: We also notice that the red-shifted SiO masers lie slightly closer
330: to the center than the blue-shifted masers (see Figure 2). This
331: can be seen more clearly in Figure 3, showing the maser feature
332: distance from the fitted center versus its line-of-sight (LOS)
333: velocity (see Sect. 3.2.1). This phenomenon seems to be explained
334: under the assumption that maser gas was undergoing infall to the
335: central star. This is because along the same LOS path the red- and
336: blue-shifted masers would appear in front of and behind the star,
337: respectively, as long as the coherence path lengths satisfy the
338: requirement of maser excitation, under the condition that the
339: maser gas was undergoing infall to the central star during our
340: observations. However the blue-shifted masers generated behind
341: star would be obscured by the stellar disc projected on the LOS,
342: while the red-shifted masers would not. Thus only red-shifted
343: maser emission will be seen closer to the center. Actually, we
344: have confirmed that the SiO maser shell contracts to the star
345: during our observations in Sect. 3.2.2. Moreover, from Figure 3,
346: some systemic masers with velocity $-7$ km s$^{-1}$ (see Sect.
347: 3.2.1) locate at the distance of 7 mas which can be viewed as an
348: upper limit to the photospheric radius, then the extreme
349: blue-shifted masers with the distance of less than 7 mas would be
350: obscured. This is consistent with our data (see Figure 3) showing
351: that all blue-shifted masers locate at the distance of larger than
352: 7 mas.
353:
354:
355: \subsection{The kinematics of the SiO masers}
356:
357: \subsubsection{The kinematics obtained from LOS velocities}
358:
359: From Figure 2, we notice that there appears a velocity
360: gradient at both epochs, with the bluest- and reddest-shifted
361: maser features lying closer to the center of the distribution than
362: those with intermediate velocities. To verify this, we plotted in
363: Figure 3 feature distance from the fitted center (marked by the
364: red star in Figure 2) versus its LOS velocity for both epochs.
365: Both epochs appear to have the same distribution with a peak near
366: the velocity of $-7$ km s$^{-1}$ and decreasing maser distance
367: with increasing deviation of velocity from this peak velocity.
368: This has also been seen in some OH maser sources (e.g. Reid et al.
369: 1977, Chapman \& Cohen 1986), H$_{2}$O maser sources (e.g. Yates
370: \& Cohen 1994) and SiO maser sources (e.g. Boboltz \& Marvel 2000;
371: Wittkowski et al. 2007). A widely used simple model to explain
372: this phenomenon is that of a uniformly expanding thin shell (e.g.
373: Reid et al. 1977; Yates \& Cohen 1994; Wittkowski et al. 2007). In
374: this model the projected distance $r$ (in the fourth column of
375: Tables 1 and 2) of a maser on the shell from the center is related
376: to its LOS velocity $V_{\rm LSR}$ by the expression
377:
378: \begin{equation}\label{13}
379: (\frac{r}{r_{s}})^2+(\frac{V_{\rm LSR}-V_{*}}{V_{exp}})^2=1,
380: \end{equation}
381: where $V_{*}$ is the systemic velocity of maser source, $r_{s}$ is
382: the shell radius and V$_{exp}$ is the expanding velocity.
383: Apparently, this model traces an ellipse on the $r-V_{\rm LSR}$
384: plot.
385:
386: The uniformly expanding thin shell model was used to characterize
387: the expansion or contraction kinematics of a circular maser
388: distribution. For the case of AH Sco, even though we characterize
389: the maser distribution as an ellipse, an axial ratio of $\sim$1.2
390: suggests that the distribution of maser features is approximately
391: a circular structure as discussed in Section 3.1. Thus, we can
392: also apply the uniformly expanding thin shell model to AH Sco.
393: Moreover, most maser features locate in the northwest and
394: southeast (i.e. the direction of major axis), and only few maser
395: features locate in the northeast and southwest (i.e. the direction
396: of minor axis). These make the assumption of uniformly
397: expansion/contraction in all directions of the uniformly expanding
398: thin shell model to be suitable for the case of AH Sco. We
399: performed a least-squares fit of the uniformly expanding thin
400: shell model to the distribution of epochs A and B. The LSR stellar
401: velocity of AH Sco, which is estimated to be about $-7$ and $-3$
402: km s$^{-1}$ based on the observations of OH maser (Baudry, Le
403: Squeren \& L\'{e}pine 1977) and H$_{2}$O maser (L\'{e}pine, Pase
404: de Barros \& Gammon 1976), has not been measured particularly well
405: yet. Thus the LSR stellar velocity $V_{*}$, together with the
406: shell radius $r$ and expansion velocity V$_{exp}$, is treated as a
407: free parameter in the fitting procedure. The values of $V_{*}$,
408: V$_{exp}$ and $r_s$ were found to be $-6.8\pm$0.5 km s$^{-1}$,
409: 18.8$\pm$2.0 km s$^{-1}$ and 9.3$\pm$0.1 mas, respectively, for
410: both epochs, where the uncertainties are their standard errors.
411: The best fitted $r-V_{\rm LSR}$ ellipse is also plotted in Figure
412: 3. The systemic velocity of AH Sco of $-6.8$ km s$^{-1}$ is
413: consistent with the value of $-7$ km s$^{-1}$ from the OH maser
414: observations. The shell radius of 9.3 mas determined from above
415: model fitting is larger than the radius of maser distribution of
416: 8.6 mas (see Sect. 3.1). A note is that the definition of the
417: shell radius determined from the uniformly expanding thin shell
418: model is different from that of the radius of the maser
419: distribution. The shell radius reflects the scale of a
420: 3-dimensional maser spherical shell, whereas the radius of maser
421: distribution reflects the scale of maser distribution in the sky
422: plane, and is the projected size on the sky plane of the
423: 3-dimensional spherical shell. Thus it is not surprising that the
424: shell radius is a bit larger than the radius of maser
425: distribution.
426:
427: For comparison, the escape velocity calculated at the shell
428: radius of 9.3 mas, assuming a typical mass of 10 $M_{\odot}$ for
429: supergiant and a distance to AH Sco of 2.26 kpc, is about 29 km
430: s$^{-1}$. Thus, the expansion/contraction velocity at the
431: location of SiO maser shell is less than the corresponding escape
432: velocity, suggesting that the maser gas is still gravitational
433: bound to the star. However, the current fitting can not tell the
434: sign of V$_{exp}$ term (as can be seen in Eq. (1)), and thus can
435: not differentiate between expansion and contraction of the maser
436: shell. The dominant expansion or contraction of maser shell can be
437: clarified by the SiO maser proper motion analysis to be discussed
438: below.
439:
440:
441:
442: \subsubsection{Maser Proper Motions}
443:
444: We can study proper motion and the kinematics of the CSE of AH Sco
445: by tracing the matched features that appeared in both epochs.
446: Because the absolute position of the phase center in each image is
447: not kept during the data reduction, we must align two-epoch maps
448: for studying the proper motion. The feature used for registration
449: is the one with a velocity V$_{\rm LSR}\approx-9.3$ km s$^{-1}$
450: (labelled by ``R'' in Tables 1 and 2) at both epochs. And then we
451: shift the coordinate frames for both epochs to align the origin
452: (0, 0) with this feature. At an assumed distance of 2.6 kpc
453: (Baudry et al. 1977) and a maximum expansion/contraction velocity
454: of 20 km s$^{-1}$ (see Sect. 3.2.1), the maser proper motion
455: should be less than 0.05 mas in an interval of 12 days. Thus we
456: can match these features from one epoch to another epoch using the
457: criterion that the angular separation of the matched features
458: between two epochs should not exceed 0.15 mas after allowing the
459: maximum position uncertainty of (0.05, 0.10) mas (see Tables 1 and
460: 2) and they have similar velocity profile and flux density. As a
461: result, we identified 59 commonly matched maser features between
462: two epochs (see Tables 1 and 2). Actually, using a reference
463: feature located on the maser shell to align maps for two epochs
464: could introduce a constant offset vector representing the motion
465: of the reference feature in the individual maser proper motions.
466: We assumed that the vector-average of the proper motions for all
467: the matched features represents the motion of the aligned feature.
468: In order to present a better representation of the real motions of
469: individual features, the mean proper motion was subtracted from
470: each of the determined proper motion vectors. The proper motions
471: of matched maser features are shown in Figure 4. Here we adopt the
472: distance to AH Sco of 2.26 kpc (see Sect. 3.2.3) for denoting the
473: velocity values of the proper motions.
474:
475: From Figure 4, we can clearly see that the maser shell shows an
476: overall contraction toward the central star. In order to better
477: characterize the net contraction of the masers, we computed the
478: separations between pairwise combinations of features. This
479: technique has previously been applied to analyse proper motions of
480: OH masers (Chapman, Cohen \& Saika 1991; Bloemhof, Reid \& Moran
481: 1992), H$_{2}$O masers (Boboltz \& Marvel 2007), and SiO masers
482: (Boboltz, Diamond \& Kemball 1997; Chen et al. 2006), and has no
483: dependence on the alignment of maps. The procedure involves
484: computing the angular separation between two features at the first epoch
485: and the separation between the corresponding two features at the
486: second epoch. The difference between the two values of separation
487: is referred to as the pairwise separation. The procedure is
488: repeated for all the possible pair combinations. However, the
489: inclusion of all possible pair combinations often results in
490: decreasing toward zero due to the bias caused by calculating pairs
491: of closely spaced maser features. For the sake of clarity, and to
492: determine representative values for the angular shifts due to the
493: contraction, we have included only those pairs separated by more
494: than 9 mas (corresponding to the radius of maser distribution). We
495: obtained the mean value of these pairwise separations of $-0.039\pm
496: 0.002$ mas, in an interval of 12 days, corresponding to a proper
497: motion of $-1.186\pm 0.061$ mas yr$^{-1}$ or a velocity of
498: $-12.7\pm 0.7$ km s$^{-1}$ at a distance of 2.26 kpc, where the
499: uncertainties are the standard errors. The negative
500: value of proper motion implies an overall contraction of the maser
501: shell. The contraction value of $1.186\pm 0.061$ mas yr$^{-1}$ of
502: maser shell derived from the pairwise separation is significantly
503: less than the scalar-averaged value of SiO proper motions of
504: $1.96\pm 0.15$ mas yr$^{-1}$ (where its uncertainty is the
505: standard error). This is because some of maser proper
506: motions do not completely point to the center or even a few proper
507: motions show outflow motion as can be seen in Figure 4.
508:
509: The contraction of SiO maser shell has been reported in two Mira
510: variables R Aqr (Boboltz, Diamond \& Kemball 1997) and TX Cam
511: (Diamond \& Kemball 2003) and one red supergiant VX Sgr (Chen et
512: al. 2006; 2007). Our observations provide an inward motion of SiO
513: maser shell around another red supergiant AH Sco. In Table 3 we
514: list these four sources. We also estimated the stellar optical
515: phase of AH Sco at our observation sessions to be $\phi\simeq$
516: 0.55 (i.e. at the optical minimum phase) based on the American
517: Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) data.
518: Interestingly, the optical phase at which the SiO maser shell
519: around the red supergiant AH Sco contracts is nearly the same as
520: that seen in other three sources: VX Sgr ($\phi=0.75-0.80$; Chen
521: et al. 2006), R Aqr ($\phi=0.78-0.04$; Boboltz, Diamond \& Kemball
522: 1997), TX Cam ($\phi=0.50-0.65$; Diamond \& Kemball 2003). This
523: infers that the contraction of the SiO maser shell would occur
524: during an optical stellar phase of $0.5-1$, which agrees with the
525: previous conclusion reported by Chen et al. (2006) and the
526: theoretical kinematical model results of Humphreys et al. (2002).
527: Moreover, from Table 3 we can find that the contraction velocity
528: of about 13 km s$^{-1}$ of maser shell around AH Sco is the
529: largest among the four sources.
530:
531: \subsubsection{3-dimensional kinematics model for SiO masers}
532:
533: In order to estimate further the kinematical parameters of SiO
534: masers and the distance to AH Sco, we made model-fitting to
535: analyze spatial distribution and proper motion of SiO maser
536: features as done by Gwinn, Moran \& Reid (1992) and Imai et al.
537: (2000; 2003). The model fitting requires to minimize the squared
538: sum of the differences between the observed and model velocities,
539: \begin{equation}\label{2}
540: \chi^2=\sum_i\{
541: \frac{[\mu_{ix}-V_{ix}/(a_{0}d)]^2}{\sigma_{ix}^2}+\frac{[\mu_{iy}-V_{iy}/(a_{0}d)]^2}{\sigma_{iy}^2}+\frac{[u_{iz}-V_{iz}]^2}{\sigma_{iz}^2}\},
542: \end{equation}
543: where, $\mu_{ix}$ and $\mu_{iy}$ are the observed proper motions
544: in R.A. and Dec., respectively, and $u_{iz}$ the observed velocity
545: along LOS, $d$ the distance to the maser source, $a_{0}\equiv4.74$
546: km s$^{-1}$ mas $^{-1}$ yr kpc$^{-1}$, ($\sigma_{ix}, \sigma_{iy},
547: \sigma_{iz}$) the standard deviations of the observed velocity
548: vectors which are determined in the similar manner of Imai et al.
549: (2002). In this work, we assume a spherically expanding flow in
550: SiO maser region, thus the model velocity vector $\textbf{V}_i$
551: (including $V_{ix}$, $V_{iy}$ in R.A. and Dec., and $V_{iz}$ in
552: LOS) for the $i$th maser feature can be expressed as
553:
554: \begin{equation}\label{01}
555: \mathbf{V}_i=\mathbf{V_{0}}+V_{exp}(i)\frac{\mathbf{r}_{i}}{r_{i}}\mathrm{,}
556: \end{equation}
557:
558: \begin{equation}\label{02}
559: \mathbf{r}_{i}=\mathbf{x}_{i}-\mathbf{x}_{0} \ (\mathrm{or}\ r_{ix}=x_{i}-x_{0}, r_{iy}=y_{i}-y_{0},
560: r_{iz}=z_{i}),
561: \end{equation}
562: where $\textbf{V}_0$ ($v_{0x}$, $v_{0y}$, $v_{0z}$) is a systemic
563: velocity vector of the stellar system, reflecting the motion of
564: the central star; $V_{exp}(i)$ is an expanding velocity as a
565: function of the distance from the origin of the flow, r$_{i}$;
566: \textbf{x}$_0$ ($x_{0}$, $y_{0}$, 0) is the position vector of the
567: flow origin with respect to the position of reference maser
568: feature (here, we assumed that the origin of the flow was at the
569: star, whose positions of $x_{0}=-7.94$ mas and $y_{0}=-5.83$ mas
570: have been derived from the least-squares fit of an ellipse to the
571: distribution of masers in Sect. 3.1.); and ($x_{i}$, $y_{i}$) is
572: an observed position of maser feature on the sky plane; the
573: position of a maser feature along the LOS, $z_{i}$ is estimated as
574: one of the free parameters too (Imai et al. 2000). In the model
575: fitting procedure, we adopted the expanding velocity as
576: $V_{exp}(i)=V_{1}(r_{i}/r_{0})^\alpha$, where $V_{1}$ is the
577: expansion velocity at a unit distance of $r_{0}\equiv 10$ mas, and
578: $\alpha$ a power-law index indicating the apparent acceleration or
579: deceleration of the flow. Moveover, we excluded those maser
580: features with large positive expansion velocities in the fitting.
581: Finally, we used 48 proper motion data and obtained the best
582: solutions with their standard errors, which are given in Table 4.
583:
584: From Table 4, we can see that a negative expansion velocity of
585: $-14.1\pm1.4$ km s$^{-1}$ at a shell radius of 10 mas was
586: estimated from the best-fit model, supporting the presence of a
587: real contracting flow in the SiO maser region around AH Sco. This
588: is consistent with the conclusion derived from the pairwise
589: separation calculation in Sect. 3.2.2. For comparison, we also
590: estimate the corresponding velocity of $-15.0\pm1.5$ km s$^{-1}$
591: at the mean SiO maser radius of 9 mas according to the power-law
592: index of the acceleration of the flow $\alpha$ obtained in our
593: model. However, the velocity of $-15.0\pm1.5$ km s$^{-1}$ seems
594: larger than that of $-12.7\pm0.7$ km s$^{-1}$ obtained from the
595: pairwise separation analysis, which is because that we excluded
596: maser features showing outflow motion in the 3-dimensional
597: kinematics model fitting procedure. And the velocity of
598: $15.0\pm1.5$ km s$^{-1}$ is slightly smaller than that of
599: 18.8$\pm$2.0 km s$^{-1}$ obtained from a least-squares fit of the
600: uniformly expanding thin shell model to SiO maser LOS velocity
601: structure (see Sect. 3.2.1), which is due to that some maser
602: proper motions used in model fitting still deviate from the
603: originating point of the inflow (i.e. the position of central
604: star; see Figure 4), whereas the model fitting method involves one
605: critical assumption that velocity vectors are in the radial
606: direction from the commonly originating point of the flow. The
607: systemic velocity along LOS of $v_{0z}=-5.2$ km s$^{-1}$ from the
608: 3-dimensional kinematics model is also roughly consistent with
609: that of $-6.8$ km s$^{-1}$ derived from the uniformly expanding
610: thin shell model in Sect. 3.2.1, suggesting that the assumption of
611: the origin of the flow located at the star is reasonable. More
612: interestingly, we obtain a negative power-law index of the
613: acceleration of the flow, $\alpha=-0.54\pm0.16$, indicating that
614: the contracting flow was accelerating in the SiO maser region with
615: a similar form of $v\sim r^{-0.5}$ of the gravitational
616: contraction. Thus the 3-dimensional maser kinematics model
617: suggests that the infall motions of SiO masers can be achieved
618: under the gravitational effect of the central star.
619:
620: The velocity gradient across the SiO maser region usually used in
621: the numerical simulation of SiO masers (e.g. Doel et al. 1995;
622: Humphreys et al. 2002) can be expressed by
623: \begin{equation}\label{14}
624: \rm \varepsilon=\frac{dlnV}{dlnr}=\frac{rdV}{Vdr}.
625: \end{equation}
626: A value of $\varepsilon=0$ corresponds to a constant velocity
627: expansion, while $\varepsilon\geq1$ corresponds to a velocity
628: field with large radial accelerations. A value of $\varepsilon=1$
629: was usually adopted in the SiO maser numerical simulations (e.g.
630: Doel et al. 1995). Chapman \& Cohen
631: (1986) estimated the velocity gradient $\varepsilon$ for the OH,
632: H$_{2}$O and SiO maser emission around VX Sgr and found that
633: $\varepsilon\approx0.2$ in the 1612 MHz OH maser region,
634: $\varepsilon\approx0.5$ in the region of the H$_{2}$O and mainline
635: OH masers, and $\varepsilon\approx1$ in SiO maser region. However,
636: the power-law index of the acceleration of the flow
637: ($\alpha=-0.54\pm0.16$) derived from our best-fit kinematic model
638: suggests a negative velocity gradient value of $\varepsilon=-0.54$
639: in SiO maser region around AH Sco. This is different from those
640: flows that apparently exhibit the accelerations in their SiO maser
641: kinematics (e.g. VX Sgr, Chapman \& Cohen 1986; S Ori, Wittkowski
642: et al. 2007) and the positive velocity gradient value used in the
643: maser simulations. The content of maser simulations is beyond this
644: work. However, we think that such a negative velocity gradient
645: $\varepsilon$ adpoted in maser simulation may be necessary for
646: understanding the SiO maser emission, especially during the infall
647: stage of the SiO maser shell.
648:
649: The 3-dimensional kinematics model fitting shows a best solution
650: for the distance to AH Sco of $2.26\pm0.19$ kpc. This distance
651: value seems reasonable. Firstly, this distance of AH Sco is in a
652: good agreement with its estimated `near' kinematic distance of
653: about 2.0 kpc at the systemic velocity of $-6.8$ km s$^{-1}$ with
654: the adopted galactic constants, R$_{\odot}=$ 8.5 kpc and
655: $\Theta_{\odot}=$ 220 km s$^{-1}$. Secondly, at the distance of
656: 2.26 kpc, the scalar-averaged value of $1.96\pm0.15$ mas yr$^{-1}$
657: of proper motions of matched features (shown in Figure 4) would
658: correspond to a velocity of $21.0\pm1.6$ km s$^{-1}$. This
659: velocity is consistent with the expansion/contraction velocity of
660: $18.8\pm2.0$ km s$^{-1}$ in SiO maser region obtained from a
661: least-squares fit of the uniformly expanding thin shell model to
662: LOS velocity structure. Thus we adopt the distance to AH Sco of
663: 2.26 kpc throughout this work.
664:
665:
666: \section{Conclusions}
667:
668: We summarize the main results obtained from 2-epoch (at an
669: interval of 12 days) monitoring observations of the 43 GHz $v=1,
670: J=1-0$ SiO maser emission toward AH Sco performed in March 2004,
671: corresponding to a stellar optical phase of $\sim$ 0.55.
672:
673: \begin{enumerate}
674: \renewcommand{\theenumi}{(\arabic{enumi})}
675:
676: \item
677: Our observations revealed a persistent elliptical structure of SiO
678: masers with the sizes of the major and minor axes of about 18.5
679: and 15.8 mas, respectively, along a position angle of
680: $150^{\circ}$. We notice that the red-shifted SiO maser
681: emission lies slightly closer to the center than the blue-shifted
682: one.
683: \item
684:
685: The LOS velocity structure of the SiO masers shows a velocity
686: gradient at both epochs, with masers towrad the blue- and
687: red-shifted ends of the spectrum lying closer to the center of the
688: maser distribution than masers at intermediate velocities, which
689: can be explained by the outflow or infall kinematics of SiO maser
690: shell. By analyzing the uniformly expanding thin shell model to
691: the LOS velocity of SiO masers, we estimated the
692: expansion/contraction velocity of about 19 km s$^{-1}$ in SiO
693: maser region around AH Sco.
694:
695: \item
696: The proper motions of 59 matched features between two epochs show
697: that the SiO maser shell around AH Sco was undergoing inward
698: motion to the central star. Computing pairwise separation of these
699: matched features, we obtained that the maser shell contracts
700: toward AH Sco with a velocity of about $13$ km s$^{-1}$ at a
701: distance to AH Sco of 2.26 kpc. The stellar optical phase of red
702: supergiant AH Sco is very close to that of Mira variables R Aqr
703: and TX Cam and red supergiant VX Sgr when the SiO maser shell
704: contracts. And the contraction velocity of about 13 km s$^{-1}$ of
705: maser shell around AH Sco is the largest one among the known four
706: sources showing contraction of SiO maser shell.
707:
708: \item
709:
710: We made a 3-dimensional kinematics model to analyze spatial
711: distribution and proper motion of SiO maser features. The
712: 3-dimensional maser kinematics model further suggested that the
713: contraction of SiO maser shell around AH Sco is mainly due to the
714: gravitation of the central star. And the distance to AH Sco of
715: $2.26\pm0.19$ kpc estimated from this kinematics model fitting is
716: consistent with the kinematic distance of 2.0 kpc at the systemic
717: velocity of AH Sco of $-7$ km s$^{-1}$.
718:
719:
720: \end{enumerate}
721:
722:
723:
724:
725: \acknowledgements
726:
727: We thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments that improved
728: the manuscript. We also acknowledge with thanks data from the
729: AAVSO International Database based on observations submitted to
730: the AAVSO by variable star observers worldwide.
731:
732: This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science
733: Foundation of China (grants 10573029, 10625314, and 10633010) and
734: the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of
735: Sciences (Grant No. KJCX2-YW-T03), and sponsored by the Program of
736: Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist (06XD14024) and the National Key
737: Basic Research Development Program of China (No. 2007CB815405).
738:
739: X. Chen thanks the support by the Knowledge Innovation Program of
740: the Chinese Academy of Sciences. ZQS acknowledges the support by
741: the One-Hundred-Talent Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences.
742:
743:
744:
745:
746: \begin{thebibliography}{}
747:
748: \bibitem {Ba_01} Balister, M., Batchelor, R. A., Haynes, R. F.,
749: Knowles, S. H., Mc Culloch, M. G., Robinson, B. J., Wellington, K.
750: J., \& Yabsley, D. E. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 415
751:
752: \bibitem{Ba_02} Baudry, A., Le Squeren, A. M., \& L\'{e}pine, J. R. D. 1977,
753: A\&A. 54,593
754:
755: \bibitem{Bl} Bloemhof, E. E., Reid, M. J., \& Moran, J. M. 1992, ApJ, 397,
756: 500
757:
758: \bibitem{Bo_01} Boboltz, D. A., Diamond, P. J., \& Kemball, A. J. 1997, ApJ, 487, L147
759:
760: \bibitem{Bo_02} Boboltz, D. A., \& Diamond, P. J. 2005, ApJ, 625, 978
761:
762: \bibitem{Bo_03} Boboltz, D. A., \& Marvel, K. B., 2007, ApJ, 665, 680
763:
764: \bibitem{Bo_04} Boboltz, D. A., \& Marvel, K. B. 2000, ApJ, 545, L149
765:
766: \bibitem{Bo_05} Boboltz, D. A., \& Wittkowski, M. 2005, ApJ, 618, 953
767:
768: \bibitem{Ch} Chapman, J. M., \& Cohen, R. J. 1986, MNRAS, 220, 513
769:
770: \bibitem{Cha} Chapman, J. M., Cohen, R. J., \& Saika, D. J. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 227
771:
772:
773:
774: \bibitem{Che_01} Chen, X., Shen, Z.-Q., Imai, H., \& Kamohara, R. 2006, ApJ, 640,
775: 982
776:
777: \bibitem{Che_02} Chen, X., Shen, Z.-Q., \& Xu, Y. 2007, ChJA\&A, 7, 531
778:
779: \bibitem{Co_01} Cotton, W. D., et al. 2006, A\&A 456, 339
780:
781: \bibitem{Co_02} Cotton, W. D., et al. 2004, A\&A, 414, 275
782:
783: \bibitem{di94} Diamond, P. J., Kemball, A. J., Junor, W., Zensus, A. Benson, J., \& Dhawan, V. 1994, ApJ, 430,
784: L61
785: \bibitem{di} Diamond, P. J., \& Kemball, A. J. 2003, ApJ, 599,
786: 1372
787:
788: \bibitem{do} Doel, R. C., Gray, M. D., Humphreys, E. M. L.,
789: Braithwaite, M. F., \& Field, D. 1995, A\&A, 302, 797
790:
791:
792: \bibitem{Go} G\'{o}mez Balboa, A. M., \& Lepine, J. R. D. 1986, A\&A,
793: 159, 166
794:
795:
796:
797: \bibitem{Gr} Greenhill, L. J., Colomer, F., Moran, J. M., Danchi, W. C., \& Bester, M. 1995, ApJ, 449, 365
798:
799: \bibitem{Gw} Gwinn, C. R., Moran, J. M., \& Reid, M. J. 1992, ApJ, 393, 149
800:
801: \bibitem{Ho} Hollis, J. M., Boboltz, D. A., Pedelty, J. A., White, S. M., \&
802: Forster, J. R. 2001, ApJ, 559, L37
803:
804: \bibitem{Hu_01} Humphreys, R. M. 1974, ApJ, 188, 75
805:
806: \bibitem{hu} Humphreys, E. M. L., \& Gray, M. D., Yates, J. A., Field,
807: D., Bowen, G. H., \& Diamond, P. J. 2002, A\&A, 386, 256
808:
809: \bibitem{Hu_02} Humphreys, R. M., Ney, E. P. 1974, ApJ, 194, 623
810:
811: \bibitem{Imai_01} Imai, H., Kameya, O., Sasao, T., Miyoshi, M., Deguchi, S., Horiuchi, S., \&
812: Asaki, Y. 2000, ApJ, 538, 751
813:
814: \bibitem{Imai_02} Imai, H., et al. 2003, ApJ, 590, 460
815:
816:
817: \bibitem{ku} Kukarkin, B. V., et al. 1969. General Catalogue of
818: Variable Stars, 3rd edn., Astronomical Council of the Academy of
819: Sciences in the USSR, Moscow.
820:
821:
822: \bibitem{Le} L\'{e}pine, J. R. D., Pase de Barros, M. H., \& Gammon, R.
823: H. 1976, A\&A, 48, 269
824:
825: %\bibitem{Lo} Lockett, P., \& Elitzur, M. 1992, ApJ, 399, 704
826:
827: \bibitem{Re} Reid, M. J., Muhleman, D. O., Moran, J. M., Johnston, K. J., \&
828: Schwartz, P. R. 1977, ApJ, 214, 60
829:
830: \bibitem{sa} S\'{a}nchez Contreras, C., Desmurs, J. F., Bujarrabal, V.,
831: Alcolea, J., \& Colomer, F. 2002, A\&A, 385, L1
832:
833:
834: \bibitem{Wi} Wittkowski, M., Boboltz, D. A., Ohnaka, K., Driebe, T., \& Scholz,
835: M. 2007, A\&A, 470, 191
836:
837: \bibitem{Ya} Yates, J. A., \& Cohen, R. J. 1994, MNRAS, 270, 958
838:
839: \bibitem{Yi} Yi, J., Booth, R. S., Conway, J. E., \& Diamond, P. J.
840: 2005, A\&A, 432, 531
841:
842: \end{thebibliography}
843:
844:
845: \clearpage
846:
847:
848: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrrrr}
849:
850: \tabletypesize{\tiny} \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.11in}
851: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablecaption{\footnotesize 43 GHz SiO maser
852: features around AH Sco observed by VLBA on March 8, 2004.}
853:
854: \tablehead{ID&\multicolumn{1}{r}{V$_{LSR}$}&$\Delta u$
855: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{r}&\multicolumn{1}{c}{$x$}&$\sigma_{x}$ &\multicolumn{1}{c}{$y$}&$\sigma_{y}$&P&S&Match ID\\
856: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(km s$^{-1}$)}& (mas) &\multicolumn{2}{c}{(mas)}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{(mas)}&(Jy)&(Jy km s$^{-1}$)&Epoch 2\\
857: (1)&(2)&(3)&\multicolumn{1}{c}{(4)}&(5)&\multicolumn{1}{c}{(6)}&(7)&(8)&(9)&(10)&(11)
858: }\startdata
859:
860:
861: 1& -17.28& 1.52& 8.10 & -2.862& 0.002& -0.452& 0.005& 11.7& 36.8& 1\\
862: 2$^{\ast}$& -16.32& 0.65& 6.96 & -1.356& 0.009& 7.974& 0.032& 0.7& 2.1& ... \\
863: 3& -15.16& 3.26& 8.31 & -1.637& 0.004& 0.448& 0.008& 19.7& 147.5& 2\\
864: 4$^{\ast}$& -14.94& 0.87& 8.76 & -1.679& 0.007& -0.250& 0.022& 1.5& 4.9& ... \\
865: 5& -14.54& 2.82& 8.42 & -1.304& 0.003& 0.686& 0.008& 16.6& 84.3& 6\\
866: 6$^{\ast}$& -14.16& 0.87& 8.56 & -1.724& 0.004& -0.018& 0.015& 8.2& 21.0& ... \\
867: 7& -13.23& 0.87& 8.34 & -3.051& 0.004& -0.909& 0.009& 3.1& 8.1& 8\\
868: 8& -12.56& 1.09& 8.45 & -1.228& 0.007& 0.738& 0.007& 10.3& 28.7& 11\\
869: 9& -12.22& 3.04& 8.87 & -0.792& 0.003& 0.621& 0.005& 25.5& 151.3& 9\\
870: 10& -11.98& 2.17& 8.38 & -1.790& 0.002& 0.176& 0.007& 9.4& 52.9& ...\\
871: 11& -10.94& 2.17& 9.47 & -0.330& 0.011& 0.243& 0.015& 9.8& 59.9& 13\\
872: 12& -9.97& 1.30& 9.04 & -1.329& 0.008& -0.305& 0.019& 4.5& 18.9& 14\\
873: 13& -9.77& 2.82& 9.30 & -0.957& 0.003& -0.280& 0.008& 15.9& 103.8& 16\\
874: 14& -9.57& 1.09& 8.39 & -16.011& 0.007& 8.277& 0.013& 5.2& 21.6& ...\\
875: 15$^{R}$& -9.31& 2.39& 9.88 & 0.000& 0.005& 0.000& 0.007& 35.9& 254.8& 18\\
876: 16& -9.20& 1.09& 9.58 & 0.030& 0.019& 0.567& 0.012& 1.9& 6.6& 19\\
877: 17$^{\ast}$& -9.05& 1.09& 8.95 & -15.261& 0.009& 11.052& 0.036& 3.5& 10.1& 20\\
878: 18$^{\ast}$& -9.04& 0.87& 8.93 & -15.099& 0.034& 11.227& 0.021& 5.1& 12.7& ... \\
879: 19& -8.96& 1.95& 9.39 & -15.667& 0.006& 11.237& 0.018& 6.2& 29.5& 21\\
880: 20& -8.68& 1.74& 10.21& 0.412& 0.008& 0.014& 0.026& 6.7& 23.3& 22\\
881: 21& -8.58& 1.09& 11.93& -16.001& 0.009& 14.662& 0.029& 1.4& 6.0& 23\\
882: 22& -8.33& 2.82& 8.37 & -15.791& 0.009& 8.848& 0.016& 5.3& 40.4& 27\\
883: 23$^{\ast}$& -8.32& 0.65& 11.59& -1.897& 0.012& -4.038& 0.028& 1.2& 3.1& ... \\
884: 24& -8.23& 1.52& 9.79 & -12.858& 0.006& 14.322& 0.019& 4.4& 19.2& 25\\
885: 25& -8.12& 1.09& 8.58 & -14.846& 0.005& 10.985& 0.014& 7.5& 26.2& 24\\
886: 26& -8.02& 2.82& 9.74 & 0.438& 0.009& 0.925& 0.018& 7.2& 45.9& 26\\
887: 27& -7.80& 1.74& 7.91 & -9.327& 0.007& 13.627& 0.013& 5.3& 29.1& 29\\
888: 28& -7.56& 1.09& 11.10& -15.678& 0.024& 13.829& 0.041& 1.5& 6.3& ... \\
889: 29& -7.55& 1.09& 7.13 & -7.390& 0.009& 12.937& 0.029& 1.9& 6.9& ... \\
890: 30& -7.07& 1.74& 11.44& -15.386& 0.006& 14.560& 0.015& 4.3& 22.1& 30\\
891: 31& -6.72& 1.09& 8.24 & -9.195& 0.010& 13.984& 0.025& 2.3& 8.6& 31\\
892: 32& -6.70& 2.39& 6.90 & -5.873& 0.003& 12.406& 0.014& 8.8& 53.1& ... \\
893: 33& -6.45& 1.74& 9.34 & -12.505& 0.012& 14.010& 0.018& 2.8& 14.8& ...\\
894: 34$^{\ast}$& -6.14& 0.65& 7.81 & -7.069& 0.011& 13.593& 0.032& 1.2& 2.8& ... \\
895: 35$^{\ast}$& -6.10& 0.65& 9.38 & -16.537& 0.015& 9.687& 0.032& 1.8& 4.9& 32\\
896: 36& -5.53& 1.52& 8.82 & -8.159& 0.005& 14.657& 0.003& 22.6& 92.2& 34\\
897: 37& -4.58& 1.74& 9.07 & -16.715& 0.003& 8.303& 0.006& 10.3& 48.5& 36\\
898: 38& -4.20& 1.09& 8.88 & -7.921& 0.006& 14.718& 0.003& 8.6& 41.4& 37\\
899: 39$^{\ast}$& -3.70& 0.65& 9.51 & -17.329& 0.024& 4.082& 0.039& 2.4& 6.4& 39\\
900: 40& -3.10& 2.39& 8.75 & -16.673& 0.007& 4.814& 0.016& 11.2& 67.2& 43\\
901: 41& -3.03& 1.96& 9.13 & -7.780& 0.006& 14.967& 0.008& 12.4& 75.7& 41\\
902: 42& -2.88& 2.17& 9.25 & -16.938& 0.008& 8.141& 0.009& 6.7& 44.6& 42\\
903: 43& -2.82& 1.74& 8.39 & -16.237& 0.013& 4.292& 0.024& 3.5& 13.5& 47\\
904: 44& -2.78& 1.52& 11.08& -14.008& 0.016& 15.137& 0.026& 2.2& 10.0& 46\\
905: 45& -2.32& 2.39& 9.17 & -16.406& 0.006& 9.461& 0.009& 12.9& 79.8& 45\\
906: 46& -1.72& 2.17& 8.03 & -15.938& 0.009& 4.691& 0.018& 7.2& 46.0& 48\\
907: 47$^{\ast}$& -1.50& 0.87& 8.27 & -16.227& 0.022& 5.114& 0.047& 4.6& 6.4& 50\\
908: 48$^{\ast}$& -0.92& 0.65& 7.73 & -15.366& 0.015& 3.546& 0.043& 2.0& 5.5& ... \\
909: 49& -0.73& 1.52& 8.66 & -15.946& 0.017& 9.235& 0.038& 3.8& 15.5& ...\\
910: 50& -0.64& 1.52& 9.15 & -11.534& 0.012& -2.610& 0.022& 4.2& 18.8& 52\\
911: 51& -0.57& 1.09& 9.96 & 1.832& 0.021& 7.554& 0.029& 1.6& 7.2& 53\\
912: 52& 0.25& 1.09& 7.10 & -14.770& 0.015& 3.747& 0.032& 2.1& 7.6& 54\\
913: 53& 1.08& 2.17& 8.67 & -11.042& 0.014& -2.283& 0.025& 5.4& 30.3& 57\\
914: 54$^{\ast}$& 1.30& 0.65& 8.07 & -11.478& 0.047& 13.113& 0.047& 4.8& 8.2& ... \\
915: 55& 1.43& 1.30& 10.73 & 2.032& 0.010& 1.950& 0.014& 3.5& 14.1& 56\\
916: 56& 1.44& 1.09& 8.50 & -10.621& 0.005& -2.252& 0.016& 3.5& 10.1& 55\\
917: 57$^{\ast}$& 1.48& 0.65& 8.23 & -11.841& 0.012& 13.107& 0.050& 1.8& 4.3& 58\\
918: 58& 2.34& 1.52& 7.57 & -11.300& 0.005& 12.637& 0.021& 8.4& 36.4& 61\\
919: 59& 2.65& 1.95& 8.11 & -12.171& 0.009& 12.774& 0.030& 3.1& 20.3& ... \\
920: 60& 2.87& 1.74& 7.72 & -2.150& 0.014& 0.760& 0.021& 1.8& 11.9& 65\\
921: 61& 3.19& 1.09& 7.08 & -11.118& 0.018& 12.181& 0.023& 7.4& 24.4& 64\\
922: 62& 3.77& 1.52& 6.84 & -10.486& 0.006& 12.202& 0.016& 4.0& 16.7& 66\\
923: 63& 3.86& 1.52& 7.73 & -12.410& 0.021& 12.175& 0.024& 3.1& 17.1& ...\\
924: 64$^{\ast}$& 3.86& 0.65& 7.38 & -10.185& 0.010& -1.221& 0.045& 1.6& 4.0& 68\\
925: 65& 4.04& 1.30& 7.43 & -1.074& 0.007& 3.081& 0.023& 1.2& 6.0& ... \\
926: 66& 4.10& 3.04& 8.66 & 0.508& 0.008& 4.077& 0.013& 2.8& 29.4& 70\\
927: 67& 4.70& 1.52& 7.40 & -12.565& 0.009& 11.650& 0.020& 5.8& 30.0& 71\\
928: 68& 4.83& 1.30& 6.67 & -9.377& 0.012& -0.696& 0.033& 2.3& 10.2& ... \\
929: 69& 5.20& 1.95& 7.22 & -3.566& 0.014& 0.108& 0.027& 2.4& 14.6& ...\\
930: 70& 5.43& 1.30& 6.05 & -10.355& 0.003& 11.399& 0.012& 5.5& 19.7& 75\\
931: 71$^{\ast}$& 5.59& 0.65& 6.82 & -4.651& 0.008& -0.124& 0.023& 1.2& 3.2& 76\\
932: 72& 5.97& 1.52& 5.75 & -13.283& 0.009& 3.593& 0.016& 2.5& 15.5& 74\\
933: 73& 7.00& 1.30& 6.21 & -7.430& 0.011& 12.023& 0.025& 1.9& 8.1& 79\\
934: 74& 7.33& 3.04& 6.39 & -9.017& 0.006& -0.477& 0.013& 4.0& 41.0& 78\\
935: 75& 7.42& 1.74& 6.51 & -8.278& 0.008& 12.338& 0.022& 2.9& 16.6& ...\\
936: 76& 7.73& 2.17& 5.08 & -12.707& 0.005& 3.946& 0.008& 4.0& 27.5& 82\\
937: 77$^{\ast}$& 7.99& 0.65& 7.79 & -0.359& 0.017& 4.208& 0.034& 1.3& 3.5& ... \\
938: 78$^{\ast}$& 8.01& 1.09& 6.16 & -8.120& 0.008& 11.995& 0.023& 2.3& 7.8& 83\\
939: 79$^{\ast}$& 8.35& 1.09& 3.98 & -4.070& 0.014& 6.607& 0.026& 1.5& 6.5& ... \\
940: 80& 8.92& 1.95& 5.85 & -8.965& 0.006& 0.059& 0.023& 4.9& 31.9& 84\\
941: 81& 9.17& 1.30& 5.85 & -8.289& 0.007& 11.678& 0.013& 3.9& 17.9& 85\\
942: 82& 12.62& 0.87& 2.50 & -5.479& 0.009& 5.706& 0.017& 2.2& 7.4& 86\\
943:
944: \enddata
945: \tablecomments{column (1): ID number; columns (2): V$_{LSR}$ at
946: the peak of velocity profile of feature; column (3): the velocity
947: range across the feature $\Delta u$; column (4): distance of maser
948: feature, $r$, from the fitted position of central star; columns
949: (5) and (7): the intensity weighted centroid of each feature ($x,
950: y$); columns (6) and (8): the corresponding uncertainties
951: ($\sigma_{x}, \sigma_{y}$); column (9): the peak flux density of
952: each feature $P$; column (10): the integrated flux density of all
953: spots in the feature S; and column (11): the ID numbers of matched
954: features at another epoch.}
955:
956: \tablenotetext{*}{Feature which can not be well
957: represented by a Gaussian curve.}
958:
959: \tablenotetext{R} {Reference feature.}
960: \end{deluxetable}
961:
962: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrrrrrrr}
963: \tabletypesize{\tiny} \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.11in}
964:
965: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablecaption{\footnotesize 43 GHz SiO maser
966: features around AH Sco observed by VLBA on March 20, 2004.}
967:
968:
969: \tablehead{ID&\multicolumn{1}{r}{V$_{LSR}$}&$\Delta u$
970: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{r}&\multicolumn{1}{c}{$x$}&$\sigma_{x}$ &\multicolumn{1}{c}{$y$}&$\sigma_{y}$&P&S&Match ID\\
971: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(km s$^{-1}$)}& (mas) &\multicolumn{2}{c}{(mas)}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{(mas)}&(Jy)&(Jy km s$^{-1}$)&Epoch 2\\
972: (1)&(2)&(3)&\multicolumn{1}{c}{(4)}&(5)&\multicolumn{1}{c}{(6)}&(7)&(8)&(9)&(10)&(11)
973: }\startdata
974:
975: 1& -17.23& 1.09& 8.14 & -2.861& 0.003& -0.509& 0.014& 5.8& 16.0& 1\\
976: 2& -15.14& 2.39& 8.33 & -1.650& 0.004& 0.385& 0.009& 14.1& 90.0& 3\\
977: 3$^{\ast}$& -14.73& 0.87& 7.97 & -1.642& 0.012& 0.953& 0.021& 2.5& 3.8& ... \\
978: 4$^{\ast}$& -14.60& 0.87& 8.03 & -1.351& 0.018& 1.243& 0.011& 1.3& 3.4& ... \\
979: 5$^{\ast}$& -14.59& 0.65& 8.90 & -1.271& 0.010& -0.055& 0.011& 1.2& 3.1& ... \\
980: 6& -14.50& 2.39& 8.39 & -1.351& 0.003& 0.642& 0.009& 21.7& 121.4& 5\\
981: 7$^{\ast}$& -13.74& 0.65& 9.04 & -0.905& 0.052& 0.159& 0.091& 2.1& 5.5& ... \\
982: 8$^{\ast}$& -13.31& 0.65& 8.37 & -3.046& 0.005& -0.946& 0.017& 2.0& 4.4& 7\\
983: 9& -12.41& 4.13& 8.85 & -0.813& 0.006& 0.591& 0.015& 18.9& 144.1& 9\\
984: 10& -12.17& 2.82& 8.44 & -1.777& 0.004& 0.080& 0.016& 6.6& 42.7& ...\\
985: 11& -12.14& 1.52& 8.56 & -1.139& 0.016& 0.640& 0.012& 15.4& 61.6& 8\\
986: 12& -11.07& 0.87& 9.09 & -0.930& 0.010& 0.054& 0.018& 7.9& 24.6& ... \\
987: 13& -10.89& 1.74& 9.33 & -0.423& 0.021& 0.318& 0.014& 11.1& 53.6& 11\\
988: 14& -10.08& 1.52& 8.99 & -1.366& 0.006& -0.296& 0.022& 5.8& 20.6& 12\\
989: 15$^{\ast}$& -9.88& 0.87& 9.80 & -0.906& 0.017& -0.988& 0.021& 1.4& 3.6& ... \\
990: 16& -9.72& 3.48& 9.27 & -1.002& 0.005& -0.301& 0.010& 14.7& 109.9& 13\\
991: 17& -9.50& 1.30& 8.36 & -15.994& 0.010& 8.099& 0.029& 3.6& 18.3& ...\\
992: 18$^{R}$& -9.36& 3.04& 9.86 & 0.000& 0.005& 0.000& 0.008& 32.0& 218.4& 15\\
993: 19& -9.16& 1.52& 9.54 & -0.015& 0.007& 0.519& 0.017& 1.9& 7.4& 16\\
994: 20& -8.98& 1.30& 8.97 & -15.241& 0.007& 11.070& 0.021& 5.5& 21.6& 17\\
995: 21& -8.83& 2.61& 9.35 & -15.673& 0.007& 11.118& 0.029& 7.5& 38.1& 19\\
996: 22$^{\ast}$& -8.55& 0.65& 10.21& 0.354& 0.006& -0.109& 0.026& 5.9& 11.4& 20\\
997: 23& -8.11& 1.09& 11.85& -16.001& 0.006& 14.542& 0.021& 2.6& 11.5& 21\\
998: 24& -8.09& 1.52& 8.60 & -14.867& 0.006& 10.958& 0.016& 8.8& 36.0& 25\\
999: 25& -8.08& 1.52& 9.75 & -12.873& 0.009& 14.265& 0.026& 3.1& 15.2& 24\\
1000: 26& -8.07& 1.96& 9.72 & 0.428& 0.012& 0.887& 0.027& 6.7& 37.0& 26\\
1001: 27& -8.00& 2.17& 8.39 & -15.780& 0.009& 8.829& 0.017& 9.6& 49.4& 22\\
1002: 28& -7.75& 1.96& 6.78 & -5.908& 0.005& 12.333& 0.017& 4.2& 22.0& ...\\
1003: 29& -7.41& 2.17& 7.81 & -9.290& 0.009& 13.558& 0.024& 3.8& 21.6& 27\\
1004: 30& -7.09& 1.30& 11.35& -15.398& 0.011& 14.414& 0.031& 3.2& 17.1& 30\\
1005: 31$^{\ast}$& -6.99& 1.30& 8.21 & -9.175& 0.012& 13.978& 0.033& 3.2& 7.1& 31\\
1006: 32& -6.34& 1.52& 9.39 & -16.524& 0.017& 9.659& 0.045& 2.2& 11.9& 35\\
1007: 33& -6.31& 1.52& 9.17 & -12.445& 0.012& 13.846& 0.027& 2.4& 12.8& ...\\
1008: 34& -5.74& 1.30& 8.74 & -8.193& 0.002& 14.598& 0.007& 18.7& 55.1& 36\\
1009: 35$^{\ast}$& -5.51& 0.65& 8.24 & -8.555& 0.022& 14.083& 0.071& 1.8& 4.8& ...\\
1010: 36& -4.62& 1.74& 9.12 & -16.734& 0.004& 8.241& 0.011& 6.2& 33.0& 37\\
1011: 37& -4.30& 1.74& 8.76 & -7.981& 0.010& 14.622& 0.009& 12.4& 69.8& 38\\
1012: 38& -4.08& 1.52& 9.47 & -7.822& 0.014& -3.618& 0.048& 2.1& 11.2& ...\\
1013: 39$^{\ast}$& -3.72& 0.65& 9.58 & -17.347& 0.037& 4.073& 0.048& 2.8& 7.5& 39\\
1014: 40$^{\ast}$& -3.30& 0.65& 10.93& -13.892& 0.019& 15.022& 0.059& 1.2& 3.0& ... \\
1015: 41& -3.16& 2.61& 9.03 & -7.811& 0.009& 14.892& 0.019& 9.4& 62.0& 41\\
1016: 42& -3.09& 2.39& 9.26 & -16.914& 0.011& 8.125& 0.023& 3.9& 26.3& 42\\
1017: 43& -3.05& 2.17& 8.75 & -16.624& 0.011& 4.791& 0.021& 9.0& 60.1& 40\\
1018: 44$^{\ast}$& -2.67& 0.65& 8.33 & -7.722& 0.033& 14.190& 0.027& 1.2& 2.9& ... \\
1019: 45& -2.40& 2.61& 9.14 & -16.370& 0.008& 9.381& 0.023& 13.2& 95.3& 45\\
1020: 46$^{\ast}$& -2.40& 0.87& 11.11& -14.067& 0.013& 15.123& 0.049& 1.4& 3.6& 44\\
1021: 47$^{\ast}$& -2.36& 1.09& 8.42 & -16.199& 0.033& 4.248& 0.097& 4.6& 14.1& 43\\
1022: 48& -1.83& 1.96& 8.08 & -15.931& 0.013& 4.670& 0.034& 5.2& 38.6& 46\\
1023: 49$^{\ast}$& -1.61& 0.65& 8.63 & -16.528& 0.012& 5.067& 0.036& 2.2& 6.0& ... \\
1024: 50$^{\ast}$& -1.16& 0.65& 8.27 & -16.157& 0.011& 5.014& 0.022& 2.0& 5.1& 47\\
1025: 51& -0.54& 1.30& 8.48 & -15.780& 0.019& 9.080& 0.040& 1.7& 12.6& ...\\
1026: 52& -0.47& 1.74& 9.27 & -11.556& 0.008& -2.679& 0.026& 3.0& 18.7& 50\\
1027: 53& -0.33& 0.87& 9.83 & 1.767& 0.033& 7.487& 0.068& 2.2& 6.2& 51\\
1028: 54$^{\ast}$& 0.39& 0.65& 7.12 & -14.744& 0.034& 3.762& 0.065& 1.8& 4.1& 52\\
1029: 55& 1.49& 1.30& 8.52 & -10.627& 0.009& -2.226& 0.030& 3.6& 14.6& 56\\
1030: 56& 1.49& 1.30& 10.65& 1.969& 0.011& 1.927& 0.019& 2.7& 12.1& 55\\
1031: 57& 1.55& 1.96& 8.71 & -11.052& 0.013& -2.276& 0.033& 3.4& 24.7& 53\\
1032: 58& 1.58& 1.30& 8.10 & -11.766& 0.013& 12.997& 0.035& 3.7& 13.7& 57\\
1033: 59$^{\ast}$& 1.70& 0.65& 9.30 & -1.642& 0.023& 12.725& 0.052& 1.3& 3.1& ... \\
1034: 60& 1.85& 0.87& 8.33 & -12.225& 0.033& 13.001& 0.036& 5.3& 9.5& ...\\
1035: 61& 2.30& 1.95& 7.55 & -11.316& 0.010& 12.614& 0.023& 8.0& 52.1& 58\\
1036: 62& 2.85& 1.74& 8.01 & -12.161& 0.008& 12.666& 0.029& 2.5& 13.7& ...\\
1037: 63& 3.07& 1.09& 8.78 & 0.646& 0.006& 3.962& 0.020& 2.3& 8.7& ...\\
1038: 64& 3.19& 1.74& 7.03 & -11.131& 0.017& 12.125& 0.029& 10.8& 34.3& 61\\
1039: 65& 3.35& 1.30& 7.68 & -2.163& 0.020& 0.787& 0.047& 1.3& 6.8& 60\\
1040: 66& 3.50& 1.52& 6.85 & -10.396& 0.011& 12.258& 0.025& 5.1& 23.6& 62\\
1041: 67& 4.13& 1.95& 7.66 & -12.283& 0.017& 12.167& 0.028& 2.9& 12.7& ...\\
1042: 68& 4.17& 0.87& 7.46 & -10.183& 0.011& -1.255& 0.053& 1.7& 5.5& 64\\
1043: 69& 4.27& 1.09& 7.42 & -3.501& 0.016& -0.097& 0.053& 1.4& 5.1& ... \\
1044: 70& 4.29& 1.74& 8.55 & 0.434& 0.010& 4.042& 0.026& 2.5& 14.7& 66\\
1045: 71& 4.78& 1.52& 7.37 & -12.552& 0.013& 11.604& 0.020& 8.0& 35.3& 67\\
1046: 72& 5.04& 1.74& 6.40 & -1.921& 0.007& 8.073& 0.026& 2.5& 13.7& ... \\
1047: 73$^{\ast}$& 5.44& 0.87& 6.93 & -3.062& 0.011& 0.916& 0.038& 1.2& 3.6& ... \\
1048: 74& 5.56& 1.30& 5.79 & -13.234& 0.012& 3.534& 0.023& 2.9& 12.2& 72\\
1049: 75& 5.67& 1.52& 5.94 & -10.333& 0.004& 11.302& 0.014& 5.5& 22.0& 70\\
1050: 76$^{\ast}$& 5.72& 0.87& 6.84 & -4.629& 0.011& -0.132& 0.038& 1.5& 5.7& 71\\
1051: 77& 6.06& 0.87& 7.13 & -3.665& 0.008& 0.137& 0.026& 1.7& 5.4& ...\\
1052: 78& 7.05& 1.74& 6.46 & -8.987& 0.013& -0.517& 0.027& 5.3& 25.7& 74\\
1053: 79& 7.23& 1.30& 6.08 & -7.467& 0.014& 11.923& 0.042& 1.4& 6.3& 73\\
1054: 80& 7.51& 1.09& 7.87 & -0.253& 0.016& 4.125& 0.048& 1.9& 6.6& ... \\
1055: 81& 7.91& 1.74& 6.48 & -9.070& 0.010& -0.522& 0.033& 4.7& 26.1& ... \\
1056: 82& 7.92& 2.39& 5.13 & -12.679& 0.008& 3.906& 0.022& 2.8& 19.6& 76\\
1057: 83& 8.09& 2.39& 6.21 & -8.201& 0.013& 12.065& 0.036& 3.7& 25.2& 78\\
1058: 84& 9.15& 1.96& 5.89 & -8.943& 0.006& 0.052& 0.020& 5.1& 31.3& 80\\
1059: 85& 9.31& 1.30& 5.73 & -8.309& 0.008& 11.587& 0.017& 3.5& 16.1& 81\\
1060: 86& 12.98& 1.09& 2.41 & -5.522& 0.008& 5.632& 0.026& 2.9& 10.8& 82\\
1061: 87& 12.99& 1.09& 4.44 & -6.258& 0.007& 9.977& 0.029& 1.8& 6.4& ...\\
1062:
1063: \enddata
1064:
1065: \tablecomments{The representations of columns (1)-(11) are the
1066: same as in Table 1.}
1067: \tablenotetext{*}{Feature which can not be well
1068: represented by a Gaussian curve.}
1069:
1070: \tablenotetext{R} {Reference feature.}
1071:
1072: \end{deluxetable}
1073:
1074: \clearpage
1075:
1076: %table 3
1077:
1078: \begin{deluxetable}{lccl}
1079: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
1080: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.10in}
1081:
1082: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablecaption{Sources with the detected
1083: contraction of SiO maser shell.}
1084:
1085: \tablehead{Source & stellar phase & Contraction velocity &
1086: Reference\\
1087: & $\phi$ & km s$^{-1}$ &}
1088: \startdata
1089:
1090: R Aqr & $0.78-1.04$ & 4.2$\pm$0.9 & Boboltz et al. (1997)\\
1091: TX Cam & $0.50-0.65$ & $5-10$ & Diamond \& Kemball (2003)\\
1092: VX Sgr & $0.75-0.80$ & 4.1$\pm$0.6 & Chen et al. (2006)\\
1093: AH Sco & $\sim$ 0.55 & 12.7$\pm$0.7 & this work \\
1094:
1095: \enddata
1096: \end{deluxetable}
1097:
1098:
1099: %table 4
1100:
1101: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
1102: \tabletypesize{\small} \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.06in}
1103: \tablewidth{0pt} \tablecaption{Best-fit model for the SiO maser
1104: kinematics in AH Sco.}
1105: \tablehead{$v_{0x}$ & $v_{0y}$ & $v_{0z}$ & $V_1$ & $\alpha$ & d & Reduced $\chi^2$\\
1106: (km s$^{-1}$)&(km s$^{-1}$)&(km s$^{-1}$) &(km s$^{-1}$)& &(kpc)&}
1107:
1108: \startdata
1109: $3.8\pm0.3$ & $-0.9\pm0.4$ & $-5.2\pm0.4$ & $-14.1\pm1.4$ & $-0.54\pm0.16$ & $2.26\pm0.19$& 3.58 \\
1110:
1111:
1112: \enddata
1113:
1114:
1115: \end{deluxetable}
1116:
1117:
1118:
1119:
1120:
1121: \clearpage
1122:
1123: %fig1
1124: \begin{figure*}
1125: \begin{center}
1126: \includegraphics[scale=1.2]{f1.EPS}
1127:
1128: \caption{Top: Comparison of total power (solid line) to cross
1129: power (open circle) of 43 GHz {\it v}=1, {\it J}=1--0 SiO maser
1130: emission toward AH Sco obtained on (a) March 8, 2004 and (b) March
1131: 20, 2004. Bottom: The corresponding fraction power (cross/total)
1132: detected by the high-resolution VLBA observations. }
1133: \end{center}
1134: \end{figure*}
1135:
1136:
1137: % fig 3
1138: \begin{figure*}
1139: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{f2.eps}
1140:
1141: \caption{VLBI images of 43 GHz {\it v}=1, {\it J}=1--0 SiO maser
1142: emission toward AH Sco obtained on (a) March 8, 2004 and (b) March
1143: 20, 2004. Each maser feature is represented by a filled circle
1144: whose area is proportional to the logarithm of the flux density,
1145: and the color indicates its Doppler velocity with respect to the
1146: local standard of rest. Its stellar velocity is about $-7$ km
1147: s$^{-1}$. Errors in the positions of the features are smaller than
1148: the data points. The ellipse indicates the least-squares fit to
1149: the maser distribution for each epoch. The fitted center of
1150: ellipse model is marked by the red star.}
1151:
1152: \end{figure*}
1153:
1154: \begin{figure*}
1155: \begin{center}
1156: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{f3.eps}
1157:
1158: \caption{Distance of maser features from the fitted position of
1159: central star (in Fig. 2) versus their LOS velocity for epochs A
1160: and B. Maser features of the different epochs are denoted by
1161: different color symbols whose area is proportional to the
1162: logarithm of the flux density. The plot suggests that the
1163: higher-velocity maser features lie closer to the central star,
1164: which can be well explained by the uniformly expanding thin shell
1165: model. Indicated by the downward arrow is the systemic velocity of
1166: AH Sco of $-6.8$ km s$^{-1}$, obtained from the best-fitting
1167: thin-shell model (shown by the curve).}
1168: \end{center}
1169: \end{figure*}
1170:
1171:
1172: \begin{figure*}
1173: \begin{center}
1174: \includegraphics[scale=1]{f4.eps}
1175:
1176: \caption{Distribution of proper motion velocity vectors of the
1177: matched maser features at an assumed distance of 2.26 kpc. The
1178: length of the vector is proportional to the velocity. The mean
1179: proper motion vector has been subtracted from each of the
1180: determined proper motion vectors. The color and size of symbols
1181: are the same as that shown in Fig. 2. Red star represents the
1182: fitted center of ellipse model to maser distribution (see Sect.
1183: 3.1).}
1184: \end{center}
1185: \end{figure*}
1186:
1187:
1188: \end{document}
1189: