1: %\documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib,usegraphicx]{mn2e}
2: %\usepackage{epsf}
3: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \bibliographystyle{mn2e}
6: \citestyle{mn2e}
7: \input{macro1}
8:
9: \title[Shear-galaxy property relation]
10: {Connecting the physical properties of galaxies with the overdensity
11: and tidal shear of the large-scale environment}
12:
13: \author[J. Lee \& C. Li]
14: {Jounghun Lee$^{1}$\thanks{E-mail:jounghun@astro.snu.ac.kr},
15: and Cheng Li$^{2,3}$\\
16: $^{1}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, FPRD, Seoul National
17: University, Seoul 151-747, Korea \\
18: $^{2}$Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics,
19: Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany \\
20: $^{3}$MPA/SHAO Joint Center for Astrophysical Cosmology at Shanghai
21: Astronomical Observatory, Nandan Road 80, Shanghai 200030, China
22: }
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \date{Accepted 2008 ???. Received 2008 ???; in
26: original form 2008 March 1}
27:
28: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2008}
29:
30: \maketitle
31:
32: \label{firstpage}
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35:
36: We have examined the correlations between the large-scale environment
37: of galaxies and their physical properties, using a sample of 28,354
38: nearby galaxies drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and the
39: large-scale tidal field reconstructed in real space from the 2Mass
40: Redshift Survey and smoothed over a radius of $\sim 6 h^{-1}$Mpc. The
41: large-scale environment is expressed in terms of the overdensity, the
42: ellipticity of the shear and the type of the large-scale structure.
43: The physical properties analyzed include $r$-band absolute magnitude
44: $M_{^{0.1}r}$, stellar mass $M_\ast$, $g-r$ colour, concentration
45: parameter $R_{90}/R_{50}$ and surface stellar mass density $\mu_\ast$.
46:
47: Both luminosity and stellar mass are found to be statistically linked
48: to the large-scale environment, regardless of how the environment is
49: quantified. More luminous (massive) galaxies reside preferentially in
50: the regions with higher densities, lower ellipticities and halo-like
51: structures. At fixed luminosity, the large-scale overdensity depends
52: strongly on parameters related to the recent star formation history,
53: that is colour and $D(4000)$, but is almost independent of the
54: structural parameters $R_{90}/R_{50}$ and $\mu_\ast$. All the physical
55: properties are statistically linked to the shear of the large-scale
56: environment even when the large-scale density is constrained to a
57: narrow range. This statistical link has been found to be most
58: significant in the quasi-linear regions where the large-scale density
59: approximates to an order of unity, but no longer significant in highly
60: nonlinear regimes with $\delta_{\rm LS}\gg 1$.
61:
62: Our results suggest that the initial conditions have made
63: nonnegligible contributions to establishing the environmental
64: dependence of galaxy properties. It is expected that our results may
65: give a new clue to the unknown physical mechanism of the
66: galaxy-environment relationships.
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \begin{keywords}
70: methods:statistical -- galaxies:clustering -- large-scale structure
71: of Universe -- cosmology:theory
72: \end{keywords}
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: The spatial distribution of galaxies as a function of their physical
77: properties provides important constrains on models of galaxy
78: formation. Our understanding of such distribution has come primarily
79: from large redshift surveys of nearby galaxies, for example the Sloan
80: Digital Sky Survey \citep[SDSS;][]{York-00}. These surveys have shown
81: that galaxies are not distributed homogeneously, but in filamentary
82: structures that surround large empty regions, or voids. More
83: importantly, galaxies of different properties are found to be
84: associated with different environments. Indeed, galaxy properties
85: such as morphology, luminosity, colour, surface brightness, gas
86: content, mean stellar age, star formation rate, and nuclear activity
87: are all correlated with the overdensity of the galaxy environment
88: \citep{Oemler-74, Dressler-80, Postman-Geller-84, Whitmore-93,
89: Balogh-01, Lewis-02, Martinez-02, Gomez-03, Goto-03, Hogg-03,
90: Kauffmann-04, Blanton-05, Rojas-05, Park-07}. Galaxy colour is found
91: to be the galaxy property most predictive of the local density
92: \citep{Kauffmann-04, Blanton-05}, while colour and luminosity jointly
93: comprise the most predictive pair of properties \citep{Blanton-05}.
94:
95: Studies of galaxy clustering, usually quantified by two-point
96: correlation function (2PCF), have also found different clustering
97: amplitudes for different types of galaxies
98: \citep[e.g.][]{Davis-Geller-76, Mo-McGaugh-Bothun-94, Park-94,
99: Norberg-01, Norberg-02, Budavari-03, Madgwick-03, Zehavi-02, Zehavi-05,
100: Li-06}. These studies have revealed that
101: the galaxies with higher luminosities, higher stellar masses, red
102: colours, bulge-dominated morphologies and spectral types indicative of
103: old stellar populations reside preferentially in the dense
104: regions.
105:
106: Although the physical mechanism for the environmental dependence of
107: galaxy properties has yet been fully understood, numerical simulations
108: and (semi-)analytical work have led us to bring up a standard picture,
109: according to which the nonlinear processes on small scales like
110: hierarchical merging, galaxy interactions, and tidal forces have
111: nurtured the environment-galaxy property relations. However, it has
112: been realized from recent observational studies that the large-scale
113: distribution of galaxies may be also correlated with their physical
114: properties. For instance, \citet{Li-06} found that, at {\em
115: fixed} stellar mass, the dependence of clustering on colour and
116: 4000-\AA\ break strength --- measures of mean stellar age --- extends
117: over very large physical scales up to 10 Mpc or more. This is rather
118: surprising, because these scales are significantly larger than those
119: of individual dark matter haloes over which different galaxies could
120: have exerted any influence on each other on a Hubble timescale. What
121: this implies is that, the star formation history of a galaxy is
122: somehow imprinted at birth. It is then natural to speculate that the
123: role of the initial cosmological conditions in establishing the
124: environmental variations of galaxy properties is a missing piece in
125: the standard picture \citep[see also,][]{Tanaka-04}.
126:
127: In order to find clear observational evidence in support of this
128: hypothesis, it is necessary to extend the previous studies not only by
129: going to large scales, but also by quantifying the galaxy environment
130: in a more explicit manner. In previous studies, the environment is
131: usually expressed in terms of overdensities in galaxy number that are
132: estimated in a fixed sphere/aperture centered on the galaxies being
133: studied. The radius of the sphere/aperture is chosen to be $\la$ a
134: few Mpc, as to probe the physical processes occurring inside individual
135: dark matter haloes. Compared to the local density, the 2PCF is more
136: powerful in the sense that it encapsulates information about how
137: galaxy properties depend on the overdensity of the galaxy environment
138: over a wide range of physical scales. However, it doesn't account for
139: the other aspects of the large-scale environment, such as the {\em
140: tidal shear}. This is important given the filamentary distribution of
141: galaxies on large scales, which is in fact a nonlinear manifestation
142: of the primordial tidal field \citep{Bond-Kofman-Pogosyan-96}.
143:
144: The morphology-density relation is one of the most fundamental
145: correlations between the properties galaxies and the local
146: environment. Recently, \citet{Lee-Lee-08} have extended the
147: quantification of this relation to large scales, using a sample of
148: 15,882 nearby galaxies from the Tully Catalogue that have been
149: well-determined in morphological type, and the overdensity and tidal
150: shear of the real-space linear density field reconstructed from the
151: 2Mass Redshift Survey (2MRS) and smoothed with a wiener filter on a
152: radius of $\approx 6 h^{-1}$Mpc. The authors found that the galaxy
153: morphological type is a strong function of not only the overdensity
154: but also the tidal shear of the large-scale environment.
155:
156: As pointed out by \citet{Li-06}, the standard morphological
157: classification scheme mixes elements that depend on the structure of a
158: galaxy with elements related to its recent star formation history, and
159: so it is by no means that these two elements should depend on
160: environment in the same way. In this paper, we extend the study of
161: \citet{Lee-Lee-08} by using a sample of galaxies drawn from the SDSS
162: and investigating the dependence of the large-scale overdensity and
163: tidal shear on a variety of physical properties, including colour
164: ($g-r$), 4000-\AA\ break strength ($D(4000)$), concentration
165: parameter ($R_{90}/R_{50}$) and stellar surface mass density
166: ($\mu_\ast$). The first two quantities, that is, $g-r$ and $D(4000)$,
167: are parameters associated with the recent star formation history of
168: the galaxy, whereas the other two are related to galaxy structure. We
169: also probe the dependence on luminosity and stellar mass. In future
170: studies, we plan to examine with more physical properties such as star
171: formation rate and nuclear activity.
172:
173: The structure of this paper is as follows. In Section~2 we give a
174: brief overview of the observational data, and explain how to define
175: the shear of large-scale environment at the positions of the SDSS
176: galaxies. We present the observed links of the galaxy properties to
177: the density and to the shear of the large-scale environment in
178: Sections~3 and 4, respectively. In Section~5 we show how the galaxy
179: properties vary with the types of the large-scale structures in which
180: they are found. In Section~6 we summarize the results and draw a final
181: conclusion.
182:
183: We assume a cosmological model with the density parameter
184: $\Omega_0=0.3$ and the cosmological constant $\Lambda_0=0.7$. To
185: avoid the $-5\log_{10}h$ factor, the Hubble's constant $h=1$, in units
186: of $100\kms{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, is assumed throughout this paper when
187: computing absolute magnitudes.
188:
189: \section{Data}
190:
191: \subsection{The SDSS galaxies and physical quantities}
192:
193: The galaxy sample analyzed in this study is constructed from the SDSS.
194: The survey goals are to obtain photometry of a quarter
195: of the sky and spectra of nearly one million objects. Imaging is
196: obtained in the {\em u, g, r, i, z} bands
197: \citep{Fukugita-96,Smith-02,Ivezic-04} with a special purpose drift
198: scan camera \citep{Gunn-98} mounted on the SDSS 2.5~meter telescope
199: \citep{Gunn-06} at Apache Point Observatory. The imaging data are
200: photometrically \citep{Hogg-01,Tucker-06} and astrometrically
201: \citep{Pier-03} calibrated, and used to select spectroscopic targets
202: for the main galaxy sample \citep{Strauss-02}, the luminous red galaxy
203: sample \citep{Eisenstein-01}, and the quasar sample
204: \citep{Richards-02}. Spectroscopic fibres are assigned to the targets
205: using an efficient tiling algorithm designed to optimise completeness
206: \citep{Blanton-03-tiling}. The details of the survey strategy can be
207: found in \citet{York-00} and an overview of the data pipelines and
208: products is provided in the Early Data Release paper
209: \citep{Stoughton-02}. More details on the photometric pipeline can be
210: found in \citet{Lupton-01}.
211:
212: Our parent sample for this study consists of 397,344 objects that are
213: spectroscopically classified as galaxies and have data publicly
214: available in the SDSS Data Release Four
215: \citep[DR4;][]{Adelman-McCarthy-06}. These galaxies have Petrosian
216: $r$-band magnitudes in the range $14.5<r<17.77$ after correction for
217: foreground galactic extinction using the reddening maps of
218: \citet{Schlegel-Finkbeiner-Davis-98} and have redshifts in the range
219: $0.005\la z<0.30$, with a median $z$ of 0.10. In order to have a
220: similar redshift distribution as the 2MRS, we have selected the
221: galaxies with $z\le 0.04$. We also restrict the galaxies to the
222: apparent magnitude range $14.5<r<17.6$, as to yield a uniform galaxy
223: sample that is complete over the entire area of the survey, as well as
224: to the absolute magnitude range $-23<M_{^{0.1}r}<-17$. Here,
225: $M_{^{0.1}r}$ is the $r$-band absolute magnitude corrected to its
226: $z=0.1$ value using the $K$-correction code of
227: \cite{Blanton-03-Kcorrection} and the luminosity evolution model of
228: \cite{Blanton-03-LF}. The resulting sample includes a total of 28,354
229: galaxies with a median redshift of $<z>\approx 0.02$.
230:
231: The galaxies are then divided into a variety of different subsamples
232: according to their physical parameters, including absolute magnitude
233: ($M_{^{0.1}r}$), stellar mass ($M_\ast$), colour [$(g-r)_{0.1}$],
234: 4000-\AA\ break strength ($D(4000)$), concentration ($R_{90}/R_{50}$)
235: and stellar surface mass density ($\mu_\ast$). Here, $(g-r)_{0.1}$ is
236: the $g-r$ colour corrected to its $z=0.1$ value using the
237: $K$-correction code of \cite{Blanton-03-Kcorrection}. $D(4000)$ is
238: the narrow version of the index defined in \citet{Balogh-99}. $R_{90}$
239: and $R_{50}$ are the radii enclosing 90 and 50 per cent of the galaxy
240: light in the $r$ band \citep[see][]{Stoughton-02}. The half-light
241: radius in the $z$ band and the stellar mass yield the effective stellar
242: surface mass density ($\mu_\ast=M_\ast/2\pi r^2_{50,z}$, in units of
243: $h^2M_\odot {\rm kpc}^{-2}$). The stellar masses of galaxies are
244: estimated using their spectra, and they are publicly available at
245: http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/SDSS. The reader is referred to
246: \citet{Kauffmann-03} and \citet{Brinchmann-04} for details.
247:
248: \subsection{The large-scale density and shear field}
249:
250: Now that the galaxy sample is constructed, we would like to measure
251: the large-scale shear at the locations of the sample
252: galaxies. \citet{Erdogdu-06} has reconstructed the real space density
253: and velocity fields smoothed on the scale of $\approx 6h^{-1}$Mpc, in
254: a cubic consisting of $64^{3}$ pixel points with linear size of
255: $400h^{-1}$Mpc, by applying the wiener filter technique to the galaxy
256: catalogs from the fully-sky 2Mass Redshift Survey
257: (2MRS). \citet{Lee-Erdogdu-07} have used this real-space 2MRS density
258: field to reconstruct the tidal shear field. Basically, they performed
259: the Fourier transformation of the real-space density field
260: $\delta({\bf x})$ calculated the Fourier space tidal field as
261: $T_{ij}({\bf k}) = k_{i}k_{j}\delta ({\bf k})/k^{2}$. Then, they
262: perform the inverse Fourier transformation of the Fourier space tidal
263: field to derive the real space tidal field, $T_{ij}({\bf x})$.
264:
265: By applying the cloud-in-cell method to the 2MRS tidal field
266: reconstructed by \citet{Lee-Erdogdu-07}, we calculate the tidal shear
267: tensor at the position of each selected SDSS galaxy. We determine the
268: three dimensional positions of the selected galaxies from the given
269: information on $z$, $\delta$ and $\alpha$, assuming a $\Lambda$CDM
270: cosmology of $\Omega_{m}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$ and $h=1$. After
271: measuring the tidal tensor at each galaxy position, we diagonalize it
272: to find its three eigenvalues,
273: $\{\lambda_{1},\lambda_{2},\lambda_{3}\}$, (with
274: $lambda_{1}\ge\lambda_{2}\ge\lambda_{3}$). The trace of the tidal
275: tensor at the position of a given galaxy equals the linear density
276: contrast of the large-scale environment ($\delta_{\rm LS}$) in which
277: the given galaxy is embedded:
278: \begin{equation}
279: \label{eqn:dls}
280: \delta_{\rm LS} \equiv \lambda_{1} + \lambda_{2} + \lambda_{3}.
281: \end{equation} The shear of the large scale environment is defined as
282: the ellipticity of the gravitational potential ($e_{\rm LS}$)
283: \citep{bar-etal86} as
284: \begin{equation}
285: \label{eqn:els}
286: e_{\rm LS} \equiv \frac{\lambda_{1}-\lambda_{3}}{2\delta_{\rm LS}}.
287: \end{equation} We calculate the large scale density ($\delta_{\rm
288: LS}$) and shear ($e_{\rm LS}$) at the positions of the selected SDSS
289: galaxies by eqs.~[\ref{eqn:dls}] and [\ref{eqn:els}].
290:
291: \section{Correlation of the large-scale overdensity with galaxy
292: properties}
293:
294: In this section we study how the overdensity of the large-scale
295: environment of galaxies depends on their physical properties.
296:
297: We first divide the SDSS galaxy sample described in \S~2.1 into four
298: subsamples according to absolute magnitude $M_{^{0.1}r}$, as well as
299: four subsamples according to stellar mass $\log(M_\ast/M_\odot)$.
300: Table~\ref{tab:sub1} lists the ranges of $M_{^{0.1}r}$ and
301: $\log(M_\ast/M_\odot)$ for these subsamples, which are chosen in such
302: a way that each subsample has approximately the same number of
303: galaxies. For each subsample, we then calculate the mean value of
304: $\delta_{\rm LS}$, the overdensity of the large-scale environment (see
305: \S~2.2). Fig.~\ref{fig:den1} plots $\delta_{\rm LS}$ as histograms, as
306: function of the mean absolute magnitude (upper panel) and stellar
307: mass (lower panel) of the subsamples. The errors are calculated as
308: $\sigma/\sqrt{N_{g}}$ where $\sigma$ is one standard deviation of
309: $\delta_{\rm LS}$ and $N_{g}$ is the number of the galaxies belonging
310: to a given subsample. The average result of the whole sample is
311: plotted as a dotted line in both panels.
312:
313: \begin{figure}
314: \begin{center}
315: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=true]{fig1.eps}
316: \end{center}
317: \caption{Mean of the large scale density ($\delta_{\rm LS}$)
318: averaged over four different samples of the SDSS galaxies divided by
319: their r-band absolute magnitude (upper) and stellar mass (lower).}
320: \label{fig:den1}
321: \end{figure}
322:
323: As can be seen from Fig.~\ref{fig:den1}, both luminosity and stellar
324: mass are statistically linked to the large-scale density, that is, the
325: mean value of the overdensity, $\langle\delta_{\rm LS}\rangle$, increases
326: with increasing luminosity and stellar mass. It is interesting to
327: notice that the trend of $\langle\delta_{\rm LS}\rangle$ with $\log
328: (M_{*}/M_{\odot})$ is stronger than the trend with $M_{0.1r}$. This
329: suggests that stellar mass is more susceptible to the effect of the
330: density of large-scale environment.
331:
332: Next, we study the dependence of $\langle\delta_{\rm LS}\rangle$ on the
333: other four physical quantities: $(g-r)_{0.1}$, $D(4000)$,
334: $R_{90}/R_{50}$ and $\mu_\ast$. Since all these quantities are
335: correlated with galaxy luminosity and stellar mass, we have
336: restricted this analysis to the third luminosity subsample (Sample
337: III) in Table~1. The results are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:den2}. Each
338: panel corresponds to one physical quantity, according to which all the
339: galaxies in Sample III are divided further into four subsamples in the
340: same way as described above. Details of these subsamples are given in
341: Table~\ref{tab:sub2}.
342:
343: It is seen that the large-scale overdensity $\langle\delta_{\rm
344: LS}\rangle$ depends strongly on parameters related to recent star
345: formation history, that is, $(g-r)_{0.1}$ and $D(4000)$, but very
346: weekly on structural parameters $R_{90}/R_{50}$ and
347: $\mu_\ast$. ``Old'' galaxies with redder colours and higher values of
348: $D(4000)$ are preferentially located in the large-scale environment
349: of higher densities, with the colour ($D(4000)$) dependence becoming
350: more remarkable for the galaxies with $(g-r)_{0.1}\ga 0.7$
351: ($D(4000)\ga 1.5$). These results are in good agreement with
352: \citet{Li-06}. We would like to point out that the week trends of
353: $\langle\delta_{\rm LS}\rangle$ with $R_{90}/R_{50}$ and $\mu_\ast$ seen
354: from the bottom panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:den2} probably follow from the
355: trends with luminosity and stellar mass as seen from
356: Fig.~\ref{fig:den1}, since the luminosity range of Sample III in
357: Table~1 may be not narrow enough. We would come back to this point in
358: future with larger samples.
359:
360: \begin{table}
361: \centering
362: %\begin{minipage}{140mm}
363: \caption{The range of the r-band absolute magnitude, the stellar mass,
364: the specific star formation rate, and the $H_{\alpha}$-emission line
365: of the SDSS galaxies belonging to each subsample \label{tab:sub1}}
366: \begin{tabular}{@{}ccc@{}}
367: \hline
368: Sample & $M_{0.1r}$ & $\log [M_{*}/M_{\odot}]$ \\ \hline
369: I & $> -17.5$ & $< 8.9$ \\
370: II & $[-18.2,-17.5]$ & $[8.9, 9.4]$ \\
371: III& $[-19.1,-18.2]$ & $[9.4, 10.0]$ \\
372: IV & $< -19.1$ & $> 10.0$ \\
373: \hline
374: \end{tabular}
375: %\end{minipage}
376: \end{table}
377:
378: \begin{figure}
379: \begin{center}
380: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=true]{fig2.eps}
381: \end{center}
382: \caption{Mean of the large scale density ($\delta_{\rm LS}$)
383: averaged over four different samples of the SDSS galaxies divided by
384: their $g-r$ color (top-left), 4000-\AA\ break strength (top-right),
385: concentration parameter (bottom-left) and surface stellar mass
386: density (bottom-right) from SDSS DR4.\label{fig:den2}}
387: \end{figure}
388:
389: \begin{table}
390: \centering
391: \caption{The range of
392: $(g-r)_{0.1}$, $D(4000)$, $R_{90}/R_{50}$, and $\log\mu_{*}$ of
393: the SDSS galaxies belonging to each subsample with the constraint of
394: $9.4\le\log (M_{*}/M_{\odot})\le 10.0$\label{tab:sub2}}
395: \begin{tabular}{@{}ccccc@{}}
396: \hline
397: Sample & $(g-r)_{0.1}$ & $D(4000)$ & $R_{90}/R_{50}$ & $\log\mu_{*}$\\ \hline
398: I & $< 0.42$ & $< 1.25$ & $< 2.18$ & $< 8.30$ \\
399: II & $[0.42, 0.53]$ & $[1.25, 1.34]$ & $[2.18, 2.40]$ & $[8.30, 8.57]$\\
400: III& $[0.53, 0.69]$ & $[1.34, 1.52]$ & $[2.40, 2.65]$ & $[8.57, 8.88]$\\
401: IV & $> 0.69$ & $> 1.52$ & $> 2.65$ & $>
402: 8.88$\\ \hline
403: \end{tabular}
404: \end{table}
405:
406: \section{Correlation of the large-scale tidal shear with galaxy
407: properties}
408:
409: In this section we explore the dependence of the large-scale {\em
410: tidal shear} on the same set of physical properties as in the previous
411: section. In order to normalize out the dependence of large-scale
412: overdensity on these properties, we have divided all the galaxies into
413: a number of subsamples with the large-scale overdensity limited to a
414: narrow range. Such density constrains can also break the degeneracy
415: between the trends with galaxy luminosity and stellar mass and the
416: trends with the other properties. Selecting only those galaxies which
417: are located in the regions whose large-scale density falls in a fixed
418: range, we divide these galaxies into four subsamples by binning
419: their galaxy properties in the same way as in \S~2, and calculate the
420: mean value of $\Delta e_{\rm LS}$ averaged over each subsample.
421: Here, $\Delta e_{\rm LS}$ is defined as $\Delta e_{\rm LS}\equiv e_{\rm
422: LS}-\bar{e}_{\rm LS}$ where $\bar{e}_{\rm LS}$ is the global mean of
423: $e_{\rm LS}$ averaged over all the selected galaxies. The results are
424: shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:shear1}-\ref{fig:shear3}.
425:
426: Fig~\ref{fig:shear1} plots as solid histograms the mean value of
427: $\Delta e_{\rm LS}$ for the subsamples selected according to
428: $M_{^{0.1}r}$ (left) and $\log(M_{*}/M_{\odot})$ (right), and for
429: overdensity constrained to the range of $0.24\le\delta_{LS}\le 0.67$
430: (top) and $0.67\le\delta\le 1.44$ (bottom). We consider only these two
431: ranges of $\delta_{\rm LS}$ since in the other ranges of $\delta_{\rm
432: LS} \le 0.67$ and $\delta_{\rm LS}\ge 1.14$, the number of the
433: galaxies are too small to yield reliable statistics. As can be seen,
434: the value of $\langle\Delta e_{\rm LS}\rangle$ also varies
435: significantly with $M_{0.1r}$ and $\log (M_{*}/M_{\odot})$ in the
436: density range of $0.24\le \delta_{\rm LS}\le 0.67$. In the other range
437: of $0.67\le \delta_{\rm LS}\le 1.14$, the variation of $\langle\Delta
438: e_{\rm LS}\rangle$ is weaker but still exists to a nonnegligible
439: degree, that is, more luminous galaxies are preferentially located in
440: the regions with lower ellipticity. To examine whether or not the
441: effect of the large-scale density has been removed from the signals,
442: the value of $\langle\Delta\delta_{\rm LS}\rangle$ is also plotted as
443: dashed histogram in each panel. As can be seen, the values of
444: $\langle\Delta\delta_{\rm LS}\rangle$ are close to zero for all
445: luminosities and all stellar masses, indicating that the observed
446: variations of $\langle\Delta e_{\rm LS}\rangle$ between the
447: subsamples are not due to the effect of the large-scale density.
448:
449: \begin{figure}
450: \begin{center}
451: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig3.eps}
452: \end{center}
453: \caption{Mean of the large-scale shear difference
454: ($\Delta e_{\rm LS}\equiv e_{\rm LS}-\bar{e}_{rm LS}$) averaged over
455: four different samples of the SDSS galaxies (solid histogram) divided by
456: their r-band absolute magnitude (left), stellar mass (right). The
457: errors are calculated as one standard deviation in the measurement of
458: the mean values. The large scale density is confined to a narrow range:
459: $0.24 <\delta_{\rm LS}<0.67$ (top) and $0.67<\delta_{\rm LS}<1.44$
460: (bottom). In each panel, the dashed histogram represents the mean of the
461: large-scale density difference averaged over the four subsamples
462: with the density constrained to the same range.\label{fig:shear1}}
463: \end{figure}
464:
465: \begin{figure}
466: \begin{center}
467: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig4.eps}
468: \end{center}
469: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:shear1} but the subsamples constructed
470: according to the $(g-r)$ color (left) and the 4000-\AA\ break strength
471: (right) \label{fig:shear2}}
472: \end{figure}
473:
474: Fig~\ref{fig:shear2} plots the same thing as Fig~\ref{fig:shear1} but
475: the four subsamples are selected to $(g-r)_{0.1}$ (left) and $D(4000)$
476: (right). As can be seen, the value of $\langle\Delta e_{\rm
477: LS}\rangle $ also varies significantly with $(g-r)_{0.1}$ when the
478: density range is limited to a narrow range of $0.24\le \delta_{\rm
479: LS}\le 0.67$. The dependence on $D(4000)$ is weaker than that on
480: clour, but is still significant. The galaxies with redder colour or
481: higher value of $D(4000)$ are preferentially located in the
482: large-scale environment with lower ellipticities. In the higher
483: density range of $0.67\le \delta_{\rm LS}\le 1.14$, the variation of
484: $\langle\Delta e_{\rm LS}\rangle$ is quite weak, almost negligible.
485:
486: \begin{figure}
487: \begin{center}
488: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig5.eps}
489: \end{center}
490: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:shear1} but the subsamples constructed
491: according to the concentration parameter (left) and the surface
492: stellar mass density (right)\label{fig:shear3}}
493: \end{figure}
494:
495: Fig~\ref{fig:shear3} shows the results for the four subsamples
496: selected according to concentration parameter $R_{90}/R_{50}$ (left)
497: and surface stellar mass density $\log\mu_{*}$ (right). As can be
498: seen, the value of $\langle\Delta e_{\rm LS}\rangle $ also varies
499: significantly with $\log\mu_{*}$ when the density range is given as
500: $0.24\le \delta_{\rm LS}\le 0.67$, whereas the dependence on
501: $R_{90}/R_{50}$ is much weaker. This indicates that the surface mass
502: density is more susceptible to the effect of the large-scale
503: shear. The galaxies with high surface stellar mass density are
504: preferentially located in the large-scale environment with low
505: ellipticities. In the higher density range of $0.67\le \delta_{\rm
506: LS}\le 1.14$, the variation of $\langle\Delta e_{\rm LS}\rangle$ is
507: almost negligible.
508:
509: \section{Variation with the Large Scale Structure}
510:
511: Another interesting issue to address is the dependence of the
512: properties of galaxies on the type of the large scale structure (LSS)
513: where the galaxies are found.To classify the type of LSS, we consider
514: the signs of the three eigenvalues, $\lambda_{1},\ \lambda_{2},\
515: \lambda_{3}$ of the tidal shear tensor at the location of a given
516: galaxy. We use the following criteria to classify the given region
517: into a void, a sheet, a filament and a halo.
518: \begin{eqnarray}
519: {\rm void}\quad &&{\rm if} \quad \lambda_{1} < 0, \\
520: {\rm sheet}\quad &&{\rm if} \quad \lambda_{1} > 0 \quad \& \quad \lambda_{2} < 0, \\
521: {\rm filament}\quad &&{\rm if} \quad \lambda_{2} > 0 \quad \& \quad \lambda_{3} < 0, \\
522: {\rm halo} \quad &&{\rm if} \quad \lambda_{3} > 0
523: \end{eqnarray}
524: Table~\ref{tab:vsfh} lists the mean value of the large-scale density
525: ($\bar{\delta}_{\rm LS}$) and the total number of the galaxies
526: ($N_{g}$) located in the void ($V$), sheet ($S$), filament ($F$) and
527: halo ($H$).
528:
529: In Fig.~\ref{fig:vsfh1}, we show the relative mean values of $r$-band
530: absolute magnitude (top) and stellar mass (bottom) for the galaxies
531: located in voids, sheets, filaments and haloes separately. Here,
532: $\Delta P$ is defined as $\Delta P\equiv P-\bar{P}$ where $P$
533: represents the value of the physical quantity and $\bar{P}$ is the
534: mean of $P$ averaged over the whole galaxy sample. We see that the
535: most luminous (massive) galaxies are found in halo-like structures,
536: whereas the least luminous galaxies are located in voids.
537:
538: \begin{figure}
539: \begin{center}
540: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig6.eps}
541: \end{center}
542: \caption{Mean values of the r-band absolute magnitude (top) and
543: stellar mass (bottom) of the SDSS galaxies located in the voids (V),
544: the sheets (S), the filaments (F) and the halos (H), relative to the
545: global mean values averaged over the whole galaxy sample.
546: \label{fig:vsfh1}}
547: \end{figure}
548:
549: \begin{table}
550: \centering
551: %\begin{minipage}{140mm}
552: \caption{The LSS type, the mean of the large scale density, and the total
553: number of the SDSS galaxies \label{tab:vsfh}}
554: \begin{tabular}{@{}cccc@{}}
555: \hline
556: Sample & LSS-Type & $\bar{\delta}_{LS}$ & $N_{\rm g}$\\ \hline
557: V & Void & $-0.846\pm 0.005$ & $1919$ \\
558: S & Sheet & $-0.395\pm 0.004$ & $8797$\\
559: F & Filament& $0.457\pm 0.005$ & $9892$ \\
560: H & Halo & $1.800\pm 0.013$ & $7746$ \\
561: \hline
562: \end{tabular}
563: %\end{minipage}
564: \end{table}
565:
566: \begin{figure}
567: \begin{center}
568: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig7.eps}
569: \end{center}
570: \caption{Relative mean values of the $(g-r)$ color (top-left), 4000-\AA\ break
571: strength (top-right), concentration parameter (bottom-left),
572: surface stellar mass density (bottom-right) of the SDSS galaxies
573: with absolute r-band magnitude in the range of $[-19.1,-18.2]$,
574: located in the voids (V), the sheets (S), the filaments (F)
575: and the halos (H). \label{fig:vsfh2}}
576: \end{figure}
577:
578: Fig.~\ref{fig:vsfh2} shows how the average of the other four physical
579: parameters, $(g-r)_{0.1}$, $D(4000)$, $R_{90}/R_{50}$ and $\mu_\ast$,
580: relative to their global means averaged over the whole galaxy sample
581: changes among different types of the surrounding LSS. The analysis is
582: performed only for the third luminosity subsample (Sample III) in
583: Table 1 to remove the effect of density-galaxy property relations. We
584: see that the variation of $D(4000)$ and $\mu_\ast$ with the type of
585: LSS is quite significant. The mean values of $D(4000)$ and $\mu_\ast$
586: are highest in halos and lowest in voids. Whereas the mean values of
587: $(g-r)_{0.1}$ and $R_{90}/R_{50}$ depend only weakly on the types of
588: LSS. It suggests that the quantities, $D(4000)$ and $\mu_\ast$ are
589: better indicators of the relation with the types of LSS.
590:
591: \section{Summary and Conclusion}
592:
593: By using a sample of low-$z$ galaxies drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky
594: Survey and the large-scale tidal field reconstructed in real space
595: from the 2Mass Redshift Survey, we have studied the relationships
596: between the large-scale environment of galaxies and their physical
597: properties. The large-scale environment is expressed in terms of the
598: overdensity, the ellipticity of the shear and the type of the
599: large-scale structure. The physical properties analyzed here include
600: the $r$-band absolute magnitude, the stellar mass, the concentration
601: parameter and the surface stellar mass density.
602:
603: Our results can be summarized as follows.
604: \begin{itemize}
605:
606: \item Both luminosity and stellar mass are found to be statistically
607: linked to the large-scale environment, regardless of how the
608: environment is quantified. More luminous (massive) galaxies reside
609: preferentially in the regions with higher densities, lower
610: ellipticities and halo-like structures.
611:
612: \item At fixed luminosity, the large-scale overdensity depends
613: strongly on parameters related to the recent star formation history,
614: that is colour and 4000-\AA\ break strength, but is almost independent
615: of the structural parameters, concentration and surface stellar mass
616: density. This is well consistent with the findings of \citet{Li-06}.
617:
618: \item All the physical properties considered here are statistically
619: linked to the shear of the large-scale environment even when the
620: large-scale density is constrained to a narrow range. Galaxies with
621: red colours, high values of $D(4000)$, concentrated morphology and
622: high surface stellar mass density tend to be located in
623: low-ellipticity regions. This statistical link has been found to be
624: most significant in the quasi-linear regions where the large-scale
625: density is approximately an order of unity: $\delta_{\rm LS}\sim 1$.In
626: highly nonlinear-regime with $\delta_{\rm LS}\gg 1$, the significance
627: of this link diminishes.
628:
629: \item The properties of the galaxies are also found to be linked to
630: the types of the large-scale structure where they are embedded, even
631: when the r-band absolute magnitude is constrained to a narrow
632: range. The halo galaxies tend to have highest mean values of $D(4000)$
633: and surface stellar mass density, while the void galaxies have lowest
634: mean values of $D(4000)$ and surface stellar mass density. For the
635: filament galaxies, the mean values are found to be similar to the
636: global mean averaged over the whole sample.
637: \end{itemize}
638:
639: Our results have suggested that the galaxy-environment correlations
640: are induced not only by the evolutionary processes like galaxy merging
641: and interactions, but also by the initial cosmological
642: conditions. Since galaxies are distributed on the largest scale in a
643: tidally induced filamentary cosmic web, the large-scale tidal field is
644: likely to affect the galaxy properties and link them to the shear of
645: large-scale environment. This initially induced galaxy-environment
646: link, however, is apt to be overwhelmed and superseded by the
647: small-scale nonlinear processes especially in rich environments.
648:
649: This work has had to be limited to low redshift galaxies ($z\leq
650: 0.04$), because of a similar redshift limit of the 2Mass Redshift
651: Survey from which the real-space tidal field was constructed. To
652: understand the true role of the large-scale shears in establishing the
653: variations of galaxy properties, it will be necessary to reconstruct
654: the tidal field at higher redshifts and investigate the evolution of
655: the variations of the galaxy properties with the large-scale
656: shears. Another limitation of the current work is that, because of the
657: small size of the sample, the subsamples at ``fixed'' luminosity or
658: overdensity still cover a relatively wide range of luminosity or
659: overdensity, and so the correlation of luminosity with overdensity can
660: not be completely removed when analyzing the other physical
661: properties. We plan to reconstruct the real-space density and shear
662: fields with the SDSS data, and hopefully we will be able to make
663: significant progress wit the new data.
664:
665: A final conclusion is that our results may provide a new insight into
666: the galaxy formation in a cosmic web, which is still shrouded in
667: mystery.
668:
669: \section*{Acknowledgments}
670: J.L. thank P. Erdogdu very much for providing the 2MRS density field.
671: J.L. is also very grateful to the warm hospitality of S.D.M. White and
672: the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (MPA) in Garching where this
673: work was initiated and performed. J.L. is supported by the visiting
674: scientist fellowship from MPA in Garching and the Korea Science and
675: Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korean Government
676: (MOST, NO. R01-2007-000-10246-0). C.L. is supported by the Joint
677: Postdoctoral Programme in Astrophysical Cosmology of Max Planck
678: Institute for Astrophysics and Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, and
679: by NSFC (10533030, 10643005, 10633020) and 973 Program
680: (No.2007CB815402).
681:
682: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P.
683: Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science
684: Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics
685: and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck
686: Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The
687: SDSS Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS is managed by the
688: Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating
689: Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American Museum
690: of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of
691: Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western Reserve University,
692: University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for
693: Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins
694: University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli
695: Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean
696: Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos
697: National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA),
698: the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State
699: University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh,
700: University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States
701: Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
702:
703:
704: \begin{thebibliography}{}
705:
706: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Adelman-McCarthy}, {Ag{\"u}eros},
707: {Allam}, {Anderson}, {Anderson}, {Annis}, {Bahcall}, {Baldry} \& {et
708: al.,}}{{Adelman-McCarthy} et~al.}{2006}]{Adelman-McCarthy-06}
709: {Adelman-McCarthy} J.~K., {Ag{\"u}eros} M.~A., {Allam} S.~S.,
710: {Anderson} K.~S.~J., {Anderson} S.~F., {Annis} J., {Bahcall} N.~A.,
711: {Baldry} I.~K., {et al.,} 2006, \apjs, 162, 38
712:
713: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Balogh et al.}{1999}]{Balogh-99}
714: Balogh M.~L., Morris S.~L., Yee H.~K.~C., Carlberg R.~G., Ellingson E.,
715: 1999, \apj, 527, 54
716:
717: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Balogh et al.}{2001}]{Balogh-01}
718: Balogh M.~L., Christlein D., Zabludoff A.~I., Zaritsky D., 2001, \apj, 557,
719: 117
720:
721: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bardeen et al.}{1986}]{bar-etal86}
722: Bardeen J.~M., Bond J.~R., Kaiser N., Szalay A.~S., 1986, \apj, 304,
723: 15
724:
725: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blanton}, {Brinkmann}, {Csabai},
726: {Doi}, {Eisenstein}, {Fukugita}, {Gunn}, {Hogg} \& {et
727: al.,}}{{Blanton} et~al.}{2003a}]{Blanton-03-Kcorrection} {Blanton}
728: M.~R., {Brinkmann} J., {Csabai} I., {Doi} M., {Eisenstein} D.,
729: {Fukugita} M., {Gunn} J.~E., {Hogg} D.~W., {et al.,} 2003a,
730: \aj, 125, 2348
731:
732: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blanton}, {Hogg}, {Bahcall},
733: {Brinkmann}, {Britton}, {Connolly}, {Csabai}, {Fukugita} \& {et
734: al.,}}{{Blanton} et~al.}{2003b}]{Blanton-03-LF} {Blanton} M.~R.,
735: {Hogg} D.~W., {Bahcall} N.~A., {Brinkmann} J., {Britton} M.,
736: {Connolly} A.~J., {Csabai} I., {Fukugita} M., {et al.,} 2003b,
737: \apj, 592, 819
738:
739: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blanton}, {Lin}, {Lupton}, {Maley},
740: {Young}, {Zehavi} \& {Loveday}}{{Blanton}
741: et~al.}{2003c}]{Blanton-03-tiling} {Blanton} M.~R., {Lin} H.,
742: {Lupton} R.~H., {Maley} F.~M., {Young} N., {Zehavi} I.,
743: {Loveday} J., 2003c, \aj, 125, 2276
744:
745: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blanton et
746: al.}{2005}]{Blanton-05} Blanton M.~R., Eisenstein D., Hogg D.~W.,
747: Schlegel D.~J., Brinkmann J., 2005, \apj, 629, 143
748:
749: \bibitem[Bond et~al. (1996)]{Bond-Kofman-Pogosyan-96}
750: Bond J. R., Kofman L., \& Pogosyan D., 1996, Nature, 380, 603
751:
752: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Brinchmann}, {Charlot}, {White},
753: {Tremonti}, {Kauffmann}, {Heckman} \& {Brinkmann}}{{Brinchmann}
754: et~al.}{2004}]{Brinchmann-04} {Brinchmann} J., {Charlot} S., {White}
755: S.~D.~M., {Tremonti} C., {Kauffmann} G., {Heckman} T., {Brinkmann} J.,
756: 2004, \mnras, 351, 1151
757:
758: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Budav{\' a}ri \etal }{2003}]{Budavari-03}
759: Budav{\' a}ri T., \etal, 2003, \apj, 595, 59
760:
761: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Davis \& Geller}{1976}]{Davis-Geller-76}
762: Davis M., Geller M.~J., 1976, \apj, 208, 13
763:
764: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Dressler}}{Dressler}{1980}]{Dressler-80}
765: {Dressler}, A., 1980, \apj, 236, 351
766:
767: \bibitem[{{Eisenstein} {et~al.}(2001){Eisenstein}, {Annis}, {Gunn},
768: {Szalay}, {Connolly}, {Nichol}, {Bahcall}, {Bernardi}, {Burles},
769: {Castander}, {Fukugita}, {Hogg}, {Ivezi{\' c}}, {Knapp}, {Lupton},
770: {Narayanan}, {Postman}, {Reichart}, {Richmond}, {Schneider},
771: {Schlegel}, {Strauss}, {SubbaRao}, {Tucker}, {Vanden Berk},
772: {Vogeley}, {Weinberg}, \& {Yanny}}]{Eisenstein-01} {Eisenstein},
773: D.~J. {et~al.} 2001, \aj, 122, 2267
774:
775: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Erdo{\u g}du}, {Lahav}, {Huchra}, {Colless}, {Cutri}, {Falco}, {George}, {Jarrett}, {Jones}, {Macri}, {Mader}, {Martimbeau}, {Pahre}, {Parker}, {Rassat}, {Saunders}}{{Erdo{\u g}du} et~al}{2006}]
776: {Erdogdu-06}
777: {Erdo{\u g}du} P., {Lahav} O., {Huchra} J.~P., {Colless} M., Cutri R.~M., {Falco} E., {George}, T., {Jarrett} T., {Jones} D.~H., {Macri} L.~M., {Mader} J., {Martimbeau} N., {Pahre} M.~A., {Parker} Q.~A.,{Rassat} A., {Saunders} W., 2006, \mnras, 373, 45
778:
779: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fukugita}, {Ichikawa}, {Gunn},
780: {Doi}, {Shimasaku} \& {Schneider}}{{Fukugita}
781: et~al.}{1996}]{Fukugita-96} {Fukugita} M., {Ichikawa} T., {Gunn}
782: J.~E., {Doi} M., {Shimasaku} K., {Schneider} D.~P., 1996, \aj, 111,
783: 1748
784:
785: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{G{\'o}mez}, {Nichol},, {Miller}, {Balogh}, {Goto}, {Zabludoff}, {Romer}, {Bernardi}, {Sheth}, {Hopkins}, {Castander}, {Connolly}, {Schneider}, {Brinkmann}, {Lamb}, {SubbaRao}, {York}}{{Gomez} et~al.}{2003}]{Gomez-03} {G{\'o}mez} P.~L., {Nichol} R.~C., {Miller} C.~J.,
786: {Balogh} M.~L., {Goto} T., {Zabludoff} A.~I., {Romer} A.~K.,
787: {Bernardi} M., {Sheth} R., {Hopkins} A.~M., {Castander} F.~J.,
788: {Connolly} A.~J., {Schneider} D.~P., {Brinkmann} J., {Lamb} D.~Q., {SubbaRao} M., {York} D.~G., 2003, \apj, 584, 210
789:
790: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Goto}, {Yamauchi}, {Fujita}, {Okamura}, {Sekiguchi}, {Smail}, {Bernardi}, \& {Gomez}}{{Goto}et~al.}{2003}]{Goto-03} {Goto} T., {Yamauchi} C., {Fujita} Y., {Okamura} S., {Sekiguchi} M., {Smail} I., {Bernardi} M., {Gomez} P.~L., 2003, \mnras, 346, 601
791:
792: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gunn}, {Carr}, {Rockosi},
793: {Sekiguchi}, {Berry}, {Elms}, {de Haas}, {Ivezi{\'c}} \& {et
794: al.,}}{{Gunn} et~al.}{1998}]{Gunn-98} {Gunn} J.~E., {Carr} M.,
795: {Rockosi} C., {Sekiguchi} M., {Berry} K., {Elms} B., {de Haas} E.,
796: {Ivezi{\'c}} {\v Z}., {et al.,} 1998, \aj, 116, 3040
797:
798: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gunn}, {Siegmund}, {Mannery},
799: {Owen}, {Hull}, {Leger}, {Carey}, {Knapp} \& {et al.,}}{{Gunn}
800: et~al.}{2006}]{Gunn-06} {Gunn} J.~E., {Siegmund} W.~A., {Mannery}
801: E.~J., {Owen} R.~E., {Hull} C.~L., {Leger} R.~F., {Carey} L.~N.,
802: {Knapp} G.~R., {et al.,} 2006, \aj, 131, 2332
803:
804: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Hogg}, {Finkbeiner}, {Schlegel} \&
805: {Gunn}}{{Hogg} et~al.}{2001}]{Hogg-01} {Hogg} D.~W., {Finkbeiner}
806: D.~P., {Schlegel} D.~J., {Gunn} J.~E., 2001, \aj, 122, 2129
807:
808: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hogg et al.}{2003}]{Hogg-03}
809: Hogg D.~W., et al., 2003, \apj, 585, L5
810:
811: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Ivezi{\'c}}, {Lupton}, {Schlegel},
812: {Boroski}, {Adelman-McCarthy}, {Yanny}, {Kent}, {Stoughton} \& {et
813: al.,}}{{Ivezi{\'c}} et~al.}{2004}]{Ivezic-04} {Ivezi{\'c}} {\v Z}.,
814: {Lupton} R.~H., {Schlegel} D., {Boroski} B., {Adelman-McCarthy} J.,
815: {Yanny} B., {Kent} S., {Stoughton} C., {et al.,} 2004, Astronomische
816: Nachrichten, 325, 583
817:
818: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kauffmann \etal}{2003}]{Kauffmann-03}
819: Kauffmann G., \etal, 2003, \mnras, 341, 54
820:
821: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kauffmann}, {White}, {Heckman},
822: {M{\'e}nard}, {Brinchmann}, {Charlot}, {Tremonti} \&
823: {Brinkmann}}{{Kauffmann} et~al.}{2004}]{Kauffmann-04} {Kauffmann} G.,
824: {White} S.~D.~M., {Heckman} T.~M., {M{\'e}nard} B., {Brinchmann} J.,
825: {Charlot} S., {Tremonti} C., {Brinkmann} J., 2004, \mnras, 353, 713
826:
827: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lee} \& {Erdogdu}}{{Lee} \&
828: {Erdogdu}}{2007}]{Lee-Erdogdu-07} {Lee} J., {Erdogdu} P.,
829: 2007, \apj, 671, 1248L
830:
831: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lee} \& {Lee}}{2008}]{Lee-Lee-08}
832: Lee J., Lee B. 2008, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
833:
834: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lewis}, {Balogh}, {De Propris}, {Couch}, {Bower}, {Offer}, {Bland-Hawthorn}, {Baldry}, {Baugh}, {Bridges}, {Cannon}, {Cole}, {Colless}, M. and {Collins}, {Cross}, {Dalton}, G. {Driver}, {Efstathiou}, {Ellis}, {Frenk}, {Glazebrook}, {Hawkins}, {Jackson}, {Lahav}, {Lumsden}, {Maddox}, {Madgwick}, {Norberg}, {Peacock}, {Percival}, {Peterson}, {Sutherland} \& {Taylor}}{{Lewis} \&
835: et~al.}{2002}]{Lewis-02} {Lewis} I., {Balogh} M., {De Propris} R. {Couch} W.,
836: {Bower} R., {Offer}, A., {Bland-Hawthorn} J., {Baldry} I.~K.,
837: {Baugh} C., {Bridges} T., {Cannon} R., {Cole}, S., {Colless} M., {Collins} C., {Cross} N., {Dalton} G., {Driver} S.~P., {Efstathiou} G. and {Ellis} R.~S. and
838: {Frenk} C.~S., {Glazebrook} K., {Hawkins} E., {Jackson} C., {Lahav} O., {Lumsden} S., {Maddox} S., {Madgwick} D., {Norberg} P., {Peacock} J.~A., {Percival} W., {Peterson} B.~A., {Sutherland} W. \& {Taylor}, K.2002, \mnras, 334, 673L
839:
840: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Li}, {Kauffmann}, {Jing}, {White},
841: {B{\"o}rner} \& {Cheng}}{{Li} et~al.}{2006}]{Li-06} {Li} C.,
842: {Kauffmann} G., {Jing} Y.~P., {White} S.~D.~M., {B{\"o}rner} G.,
843: {Cheng} F.~Z., 2006, \mnras, 368, 21
844:
845: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lupton}, {Gunn}, {Ivezi{\'c}},
846: {Knapp} \& {Kent}}{{Lupton} et~al.}{2001}]{Lupton-01} {Lupton} R.,
847: {Gunn} J.~E., {Ivezi{\'c}} Z., {Knapp} G.~R., {Kent} S., 2001, in
848: {Harnden} Jr. F.~R., {Primini} F.~A., {Payne} H., eds, Astronomical
849: Data Analysis Software and Systems X Vol.~238, {The SDSS Imaging
850: Pipelines}. pp 269--+
851:
852: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Madgwick \etal }{2003}]{Madgwick-03} Madgwick D.~S., \etal, 2003, \mnras, 344, 847 %clustering vs spectral type in 2dF
853:
854: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mart{\'{\i}}nez et al.}{2002}]
855: {Martinez-02} Mart{\'{\i}}nez H.~J., Zandivarez A.,
856: Dom{\'{\i}}nguez M., Merch{\'a}n M.~E., Lambas D.~G., 2002, \mnras, 333, L31
857:
858: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mo, McGaugh, \& Bothun}{1994}]
859: {Mo-McGaugh-Bothun-94} Mo H.~J., McGaugh S.~S., Bothun G.~D., 1994,
860: \mnras, 267, 129
861:
862: \bibitem[Norberg \etal (2001)]{Norberg-01} Norberg, P., \etal \ 2001, \mnras, 328, 64 %clustering vs luminosity in 2dF
863:
864: \bibitem[Norberg \etal (2002)]{Norberg-02} Norberg, P., \etal \ 2002, \mnras, 332, 827 %clustering vs luminosity/spectral type in 2dF
865:
866: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Oemler}{1974}]{Oemler-74} Oemler
867: A.~J., 1974, \apj, 194, 1
868:
869: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Park et al.}{1994}]{Park-94}
870: Park C., Vogeley M.~S., Geller M.~J., Huchra J.~P., 1994, \apj, 431, 569
871:
872: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Park}, {Choi}, {Vogeley}, {Gott},
873: {Blanton}}{{Park} et~al.}{2007}]{Park-07} {Park} C., {Choi} Y.-Y.,
874: {Vogeley} M.~S., {Gott} J.~R.~I., {Blanton} M.~R.,
875: 2007, \apj, 658, 898
876:
877: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Pier}, {Munn}, {Hindsley},
878: {Hennessy}, {Kent}, {Lupton} \& {Ivezi{\'c}}}{{Pier}
879: et~al.}{2003}]{Pier-03} {Pier} J.~R., {Munn} J.~A., {Hindsley} R.~B.,
880: {Hennessy} G.~S., {Kent} S.~M., {Lupton} R.~H., {Ivezi{\'c}} {\v Z}.,
881: 2003, \aj, 125, 1559
882:
883: \bibitem[Postman \& Geller (1984)]{Postman-Geller-84}
884: {Postman} M., \& {Geller} M. J., 1984, \apj, 281, 95
885:
886: \bibitem[{{Richards} {et~al.}(2002){Richards}, {Fan}, {Newberg},
887: {Strauss}, {Vanden Berk}, {Schneider}, {Yanny}, {Boucher}, {Burles},
888: {Frieman}, {Gunn}, {Hall}, {Ivezi{\' c}}, {Kent}, {Loveday},
889: {Lupton}, {Rockosi}, {Schlegel}, {Stoughton}, {SubbaRao}, \&
890: {York}}]{Richards-02} {Richards}, G.~T. {et~al.} 2002, \aj, 123, 2945
891:
892: \bibitem[Rojas et al.(2005)]{Rojas-05}
893: Rojas R. R., Vogeley M. S., Hoyle F., Brinkmann J., 2005, \apj, 624,
894: 571
895:
896: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner} \&
897: {Davis}}{{Schlegel} et~al.}{1998}]{Schlegel-Finkbeiner-Davis-98}
898: {Schlegel} D.~J., {Finkbeiner} D.~P., {Davis} M., 1998, \apj, 500, 525
899:
900: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Smith}, {Tucker}, {Kent},
901: {Richmond}, {Fukugita}, {Ichikawa}, {Ichikawa}, {Jorgensen} \& {et
902: al.,}}{{Smith} et~al.}{2002}]{Smith-02} {Smith} J.~A., {Tucker} D.~L.,
903: {Kent} S., {Richmond} M.~W., {Fukugita} M., {Ichikawa} T., {Ichikawa}
904: S.-i., {Jorgensen} A.~M., {et al.,} 2002, \aj, 123, 2121
905:
906: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Stoughton}, {Lupton}, {Bernardi},
907: {Blanton}, {Burles}, {Castander}, {Connolly}, {Eisenstein} \& {et
908: al.,}}{{Stoughton} et~al.}{2002}]{Stoughton-02} {Stoughton} C.,
909: {Lupton} R.~H., {Bernardi} M., {Blanton} M.~R., {Burles} S.,
910: {Castander} F.~J., {Connolly} A.~J., {Eisenstein} D.~J., {et al.,}
911: 2002, \aj, 123, 485
912:
913: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Strauss}, {Weinberg}, {Lupton},
914: {Narayanan}, {Annis}, {Bernardi}, {Blanton}, {Burles} \& {et
915: al.,}}{{Strauss} et~al.}{2002}]{Strauss-02} {Strauss} M.~A.,
916: {Weinberg} D.~H., {Lupton} R.~H., {Narayanan} V.~K., {Annis} J.,
917: {Bernardi} M., {Blanton} M., {Burles} S., {et al.,} 2002, \aj, 124,
918: 1810
919:
920: \bibitem[Tanaka et al.(2004)]{Tanaka-04}
921: Tanaka M., Goto T., Okamura S., Shimasaku K., \& Brinkman J., 2004,
922: \aj, 128, 2677
923:
924: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Tucker}, {Kent}, {Richmond},
925: {Annis}, {Smith}, {Allam}, {Rodgers}, {Stute} \& {et al.,}}{{Tucker}
926: et~al.}{2006}]{Tucker-06} {Tucker} D.~L., {Kent} S., {Richmond} M.~W.,
927: {Annis} J., {Smith} J.~A., {Allam} S.~S., {Rodgers} C.~T., {Stute}
928: J.~L., {et al.,} 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 821
929:
930: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Whitmore}, {Gilmore} \& {Jones}}{{Whitmore} et~al.}{1993}]{Whitmore-93} {Whitmore} B.~C. {Gilmore} D.~M. \& {Jones} C.,
931: 1993, \apj, 407, 489
932:
933: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{York}, {Adelman}, {Anderson} Jr.,
934: {Anderson}, {Annis}, {Bahcall}, {Bakken}, {Barkhouser} \& {et
935: al.,}}{{York} et~al.}{2000}]{York-00} {York} D.~G., {Adelman} J.,
936: {Anderson} Jr. J.~E., {Anderson} S.~F., {Annis} J., {Bahcall} N.~A.,
937: {Bakken} J.~A., {Barkhouser} R., {et al.,} 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
938:
939: \bibitem[Zehavi \etal (2002)]{Zehavi-02} Zehavi, I., \etal \ 2002, \apj, 571, 172 %clustering vs luminosity in SDSS EDR
940:
941: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zehavi et al.}{2005}]{Zehavi-05} Zehavi I., et al., 2005, \apj, 630, 1 %clustering vs luminosity/colour in SDSS
942:
943: \end{thebibliography}
944:
945: \bsp
946:
947: \label{lastpage}
948:
949: \end{document}
950:
951: