1: %\documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj} %Alice's original format

2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex} % v 5.0 preprint one-column, single-spaced

4: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} % style for ApJ submission

5: %\documentclass{aastex}	 % v 5.0 manuscript style, one-column, double-spaced

6: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}% v 5.0 preprint double-column, single-spaced

7: \newcommand\mone{$^{-1}$}

8: \def\gae{\mathrel{>\kern-1.0em\lower0.9ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}

9: 

10: % telescopes, computer programs, from Helen

11: \def\asca{{\it ASCA }}

12: \def\einstein{{\it Einstein }}

13: \def\chandra{{\it Chandra }}

14: \def\hst{{\it HST }}

15: \def\hubble{{\it Hubble }}

16: \def\hubblefull{{\it Hubble Space Telescope }}

17: \def\xmm{{\it XMM-Newton }}

18: \def\bepposax{{\it BeppoSAX }}

19: \def\rosat{{\it ROSAT }}

20: \def\spitzerfull{{\it Spitzer Space Telescope }}

21: \def\spitzer{{\it Spitzer }}

22: \def\xspec{\hbox{\it XSPEC }}

23: \def\xspecv{{\it XSPEC}{\rm\thinspace v\thinspace 11.3.2 }}

24: \def\ciao{\hbox{\rm CIAO }}

25: \def\ciaov{\hbox{\rm CIAO\thinspace v4.0 beta 2 }}

26: \def\caldb{\hbox{\rm CALDB\thinspace v3.4.1 }}

27: \def\sas{\hbox{\rm SAS\thinspace v7.1.0 }}

28: 

29: % energy and energy density

30: \def\ev{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace eV$}}

31: \def\kev{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace keV$}}

32: \def\ujy{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace \mu Jy$}}

33: \def\mjy{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace mJy$}}

34: \def\mjypb{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace mJy/beam$}}

35: \def\jy{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace Jy$}}

36: \def\jypb{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace Jy/beam$}}

37: \def\erg{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace erg$}}

38: \def\ergpcmc{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace erg~cm^{-3}$}}

39: \def\ergpcmcpkq{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace erg~cm^{-3}~K^{-4}$}}

40: \def\ergpcmcps{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace erg~cm^{-3}~s^{-1}$}}

41: % time, frequency

42: \def\s{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace s$}}

43: \def\ks{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace ks$}}

44: \def\ms{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace Ms$}}

45: \def\gs{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace Gs$}}

46: \def\yr{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace yr$}}

47: \def\myr{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace Myr$}}

48: \def\gyr{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace Gyr$}}

49: \def\hz{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace Hz$}}

50: \def\mhz{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace MHz$}}

51: \def\ghz{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace GHz$}}

52: 

53: 

54: \begin{document}

55: \title{An Infrared Survey of Brightest Cluster Galaxies. II: 

56: Why are Some Brightest Cluster Galaxies Forming Stars?}

57: \author{Christopher P. O'Dea, Stefi A. Baum, George Privon, Jacob Noel-Storr}

58: \affil{Department of Physics, Rochester Institute of Technology,

59:   84 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5603}

60: \email{odea@cis.rit.edu}

61: \email{baum@cis.rit.edu}

62: \email{gcp1035@cis.rit.edu}

63: \email{jake@cis.rit.edu}

64: \author{Alice C. Quillen, Nicholas Zufelt, Jaehong Park}

65: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy,

66:   University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627}

67: \email{zufelt72@potsdam.edu}

68: \email{jaehong@pas.rochester.edu}

69: \email{aquillen@pas.rochester.edu}

70: \author{Alastair Edge}

71: \affil{Institute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics,

72:   Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE}

73: \email{alastair.edge@durham.ac.uk}

74: \author{Helen Russell, Andrew C. Fabian}

75: \affil{Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Rd., Cambridge,

76:   CB3 0HA, UK}

77: \email{hrr27@ast.cam.ac.uk}

78: \email{acf@ast.cam.ac.uk}

79: \author{Megan Donahue}

80: \affil{Michigan State University, Physics and Astronomy Dept.,

81:   East Lansing, MI 48824-2320}

82: \email{donahue@pa.msu.edu}

83: \author{Craig L. Sarazin}

84: \affil{University of Virginia, Department of Astronomy,

85: P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325}

86: \email{cls7i@mail.astro.virginia.edu}

87: \author{Brian McNamara}

88: \affil{University of Waterloo, Department of Physics and Astronomy,

89: 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1}

90: \email{mcnamara@uwaterloo.ca}

91: \author{Joel N. Bregman}

92: \affil{University of Michigan, Physics  Dept.,

93: Ann Arbor, MI 48109}

94: \email{jbregman@umich.edu}

95: \author{Eiichi Egami}

96: \affil{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721 }

97: \email{eegami@as.arizona.edu}

98: 

99: 

100: \begin{abstract}

101: Quillen et al.(2007) presented an imaging survey with the  {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}

102: of 62 brightest cluster galaxies with optical line emission located in the cores of

103: X-ray luminous clusters.

104: They found that at least  half of these sources have signs of excess infrared emission.

105: Here we discuss the nature of the IR emission and its implications for cool core clusters.

106: The strength of the mid-IR excess emission correlates with the luminosity of the optical

107: emission lines.	 Excluding the four systems dominated by an AGN, the excess mid-infrared

108: emission in the remaining brightest cluster galaxies is likely related to star formation.

109: The mass of molecular gas (estimated from CO observations) is correlated with the IR

110: luminosity as found for normal star forming galaxies. The gas depletion time scale is

111: about 1 Gyr.

112: The physical extent of the infrared excess is consistent with that of  the optical emission

113: line nebulae. This supports the hypothesis that the star formation occurs in molecular

114: gas associated with the emission line nebulae and with evidence that the emission line

115: nebulae are mainly powered by ongoing star formation. We find a correlation between

116: mass deposition rates (${\dot M}_X$) estimated from the X-ray emission and the star

117: formation rate estimated from the infrared luminosity.	The star formation rates are

118: 1/10 to 1/100 of the mass deposition rates suggesting that the re-heating of the ICM

119: is generally very effective in reducing the amount of mass cooling from the hot phase

120: but not eliminating it completely.

121: \end{abstract}

122: 

123: \keywords{stars: formation -- galaxies: clusters: general -- galaxies: active -- 

124: galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, 

125: cD -- (galaxies:) cooling flows -- infrared: galaxies }

126: 

127: \section{Introduction}

128: 

129: The hot T$\sim 10^{7-8}$~K X-ray emitting gas is currently thought to

130: constitute the bulk of the baryonic mass in rich clusters of galaxies.

131: An important aspect of the overall physics of the intracluster medium (ICM)

132: concerns the central

133: regions of clusters ($r \lesssim 10 - 100$~kpc), where the inferred ICM

134: densities and pressures in some cases are sufficiently high that cooling to

135: $T \lesssim 10^4$~K can occur on time scales shorter than the cluster lifetime

136: 	(e.g., \citealt{cowie77, fabian77, edge92}).

137: These ``cooling core'' clusters often exhibit intense optical emission-line

138: nebulae associated with the centrally dominant (cD) galaxies at their centers,

139: together with blue continuum excess emission, and the strength of these effects

140: appears to correlate with the cooling rate or central pressure of the X-ray

141: emitting gas \citep{heckman81, johnstone87, romanishin87, mcnamara92, mcnamara93,

142: crawford92, crawford93, allen95}.

143: 

144: The previous paradigm pictured the ICM as a relatively simple place where gas

145: cooled and slumped in towards the center of the cluster in a cooling flow

146: with mass accretion rates of hundreds of solar masses per year (e.g., \citealt{fabian94b}).

147: However, X-ray spectroscopy with XMM-Newton and Chandra has failed to find evidence

148: for gas at temperatures below about one-third of the cluster virial

149: temperature (e.g., \citealt{kaastra01, tamura01, peterson01, peterson03, peterson06}).

150: The limits on the luminosity of the intermediate temperature

151: gas imply reductions in the inferred mass accretion rates by factors of 5-10.

152: Recent theoretical models indicate that intracluster conduction,

153: combined with an episodic heat source in the cluster core, such as an AGN

154: or star formation, are candidates for explaining both the X-ray emission

155: from cluster cores and the optical emission-line phenomena associated

156: with the cores with these rapid-cooling spectra (e.g., \citealt{ruszkowski02, 

157: voigt02, fabian02, narayan01}). 

158: One widely considered possibility is that an important source of

159: heat in the ICM are bubbles driven by radio galaxies (e.g., \citealt{baum91,

160: tucker97, soker02, bohringer02, kaiser03, omma04, dunn05, dunn06, birzan04, rafferty06}) 

161: which halts the cooling

162: of the gas.  The ICM now appears to be a very dynamic place where heating and cooling

163: processes vie for dominance and an uneasy balance is maintained.

164: Since these same processes may operate during the process of

165: galaxy formation, the centers of clusters of galaxies provide low redshift

166: laboratories for studying the critical processes involved in galaxy formation and

167: supermassive black hole growth. At the present time, the main questions are 

168: (1) How much gas is cooling out of the ICM? (2) How much star formation is ongoing? 

169: (3) What is the impact of the gas and star formation on the central BCG?

170: 

171: As little mass is needed to power the AGNs at the center

172: of bright cluster galaxies the only way to remove cooled

173: gas from the ICM is to form stars.  Measurements of the star formation

174: rate in cluster galaxies can therefore provide constraints

175: on the efficiency of cooling, the fraction of gas

176: that cools and so the needed energy input to prevent the remainder of the

177: gas from cooling.  It is also possible that the ICM in cluster galaxies is not

178: in a steady state or experiences periods of enhanced cooling and star formation

179: and periods of relative activity when cooling is prevented.

180: Star formation and associated

181: supernovae also provide a source of mechanical energy, though

182: this is not sufficient to match the X-ray radiative energy

183: losses \citep{mcnamara06}.

184: 

185: 

186: ISO observations detected the cluster S\`ersic 159-03 \citep{hansen00}.

187: Recent Spitzer observations have demonstrated that star formation is common

188: in cooling core BCGs \citep{egami06a,donahue07b,quillen07}. An infrared excess is found

189: in about half of the sample of 62 BCGs studied by \citet{quillen07} (Paper I). 

190: In this paper we discuss the results of \citet{quillen07}. We examine correlations

191: in the data and discuss the implications for star formation in BCGs and

192: the balance of heating and cooling in the ICM. 

193: Specifically we 

194: search for correlations between star formation rates,

195: radio, H$\alpha$, CO and X-ray luminosities and mass deposition rates estimated

196: from the X-ray observations.

197: In this paper all luminosities

198: have been corrected or computed to be consistent with a Hubble constant

199: $H_0 = 70$ Mpc$^{-1}$ km~s$^{-1}$ and a concordance cosmology

200: ($\Omega_M=0.3$ and flat).

201: 

202: 

203: \section{Comparison data}

204: 

205: The properties of the BCG sample are discussed by

206: \citet{quillen07}. 

207: Comparison data for the BCGs in our sample are listed

208: in Table 1 by \citet{quillen07}. 

209: When available, this Table lists 

210: X-ray (primarily ROSAT 0.1-2.4 keV), radio (1.4 GHz), 

211: and H$\alpha$ luminosities (from long-slit spectra and SDSS data)

212: and $[$OIII$]$(5007$\rm \AA$)/H$_\beta$ flux ratios.

213: Brightest cluster galaxies can host both star formation and an active

214: galactic nucleus.  X-ray luminosities

215: provide a constraint on the mass in and radiative losses

216: from the hot ICM.  The H$\alpha$ recombination

217: line is excited by emission from hot stars produced during

218: formation or from an AGN.  

219: We note emission lines are detected in $\sim 10-20\%$  of typical optically

220: selected BCGs, $\sim 30-40\%$ of X-ray selected BCGs, and almost  

221: $100\%$ for BCGs in cooling core clusters 

222: \citep{donahue92,crawford99,best07,edwards07}.

223: To discriminate between the presence of an

224: AGN and star formation we have sought a measure of the

225: hardness of the radiation

226: field through the $[$OIII$]$(5007$\rm \AA$)/H$\beta$ optical line ratio.  Fluxes in

227: the radio also provide a constraint on the properties of the AGN.

228: Below we discuss 

229: star formation rates estimated using infrared luminosities derived 

230: from aperture photometry also listed in Paper I, molecular gas

231: masses estimated from CO observations and mass deposition rates

232: measured from X-ray observations.

233: The statistical tests for correlations between

234: the various quantities are given in Table \ref{tab:corr}.

235: 

236: 

237: \section{Estimated star formation rates}

238: 

239: If the infrared luminosity is powered by star formation, we can use the IR luminosity

240: to estimate a star formation rate (SFR) (e.g., \citealt{bell03,calzetti08}). But first we need

241: to consider whether some sources have a contribution to the IR from a Type II AGN

242: with an optically bright accretion disk. 

243: \citet{quillen07} identified Z2089,A1068, A2146  as likely to have an AGN

244: contribution based on red 4.5/3.6 micron color, unresolved nucleus

245: seen in IRAC color maps and high [OIII]/H$\beta$ flux ratio.

246: R0821+07 was flagged as possibly similar as it has  an unresolved

247: nucleus in IRAC color map and a high [OIII]/H$\beta$. It also has

248: a remarkably red 8.0/5.6 micron color similar to a Seyfert 2 with an embedded dusty AGN. 

249: In Figure~\ref{fig:43redshift} we plot the ratio of  4.5$\mu$ and 3.6$\mu$m fluxes 

250: against redshift (data from Paper I).

251: The clear trend seen is as expected for a passive stellar population

252: but with a few notable exceptions. The sources with strong [OIII]

253: (Z2089, A1068, and A2146) lie above the trend as do A2055

254: and A2627, that show evidence for a BLLac continuum in optical spectra

255: \citep{crawford99}. The two galaxies that lie below the trend are Z2072 and Z9077 and

256: are among the fainter objects in our sample. Z9077 was the only

257: object not detected at 24 microns.

258: The four that are between z=0.09 and  and z=0.15 and lie slightly above the trend are 

259: A1885, A2055, A2627 and R0352+19.  It's not obvious why these 4 sources lie above 

260: the trend or if this is significant R0352+19 and R0821+07 are quite red in the 

261: 8/5.8 micron color,   and  R1532+30 and Z348 are pretty red in 8/5.8 but do not stand out in the 

262: 4.5/3.6 color vs. z plot.  Thus, the combination of diagnostics (4.5/3.6 micron color,

263: red unresolved nuclear source, and high [OIII]/H$\beta$ ratio) identifies some sources

264: with a strong AGN contribution. The remaining objects are likely to be free of strong 

265: AGN contamination. 

266: 

267: Previous optical and  UV observations have found evidence for significant

268: star formation in the BCGs in cool core clusters \citep{johnstone87,romanishin87, mcnamara89, 

269: mcnamara93, mcnamara04, mcnamara04b, hu92, crawford93, hansen95, allen95, smith97, 

270: cardiel98, hutchings00, oegerle01, mittaz01, odea04,hicks05,rafferty06}.

271: Table 1 of \citet{quillen07} lists [OIII]/H$\beta$ ratios for most of the 

272: BCGs. Except for the few which may host an AGN, the ratios are consistent with 

273: the gas being ionized by hot stars. 

274: 

275: In Table \ref{tab:selected} we present the estimated infrared

276: luminosities from \citet{quillen07} and the estimated star formation

277: rates.

278: The SFR rate can be estimated from the infrared luminosity with

279: equation 5 by \citet{bell03};

280: \begin{equation}

281: \psi(M_\odot \ {\rm yr}^{-1})

282: =      A \left({ L_{\rm IR}\over L_\odot}\right) ( 1 + \sqrt{10^9 L_\odot/L_{\rm IR}}).

283: \label{eqn:SFR}

284: \end{equation}

285: Here the constant $A = 1.57\times 10^{-10}$

286: for $L_{\rm IR} > 10^{11}L_\odot$ 

287: and $A=1.17\times 10^{-10}$ at lower luminosities. 

288: The SFRs  are in the range of about 1 to a few tens of

289: $M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$.  

290: The objects with SFR above about 50 $M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ are

291: likely AGN dominated. 

292: 

293: In Table~\ref{tab:SFR_comp} we list available SFRs in different

294: wavebands. We see that there is dispersion in the estimated SFRs.

295: However because of the effects of dust and geometry we do not necessarily expect

296: agreement between SFRs estimated in the IR vs. the UV/optical. 

297: Much of the variation can be accounted for by aperture

298: mismatch, differences in assumptions about star formation history

299: i.e., burst vs. constant star formation, extinction, and perhaps differences in the

300: amount of dust available to re-radiate in the FIR.  Note that Abell 1068 

301: and A2146 show large discrepancies between our FIR SFR and the U-band SFR and both

302: are flagged as possible AGN. Given the expected dispersion, the rough agreement 

303: between the star formation rates is consistent with the IR emission being dominated

304: by star formation.  

305: 

306: %blah 

307: 

308: \subsection{Caveat - the Dust-to-Gas Ratio}

309: 

310: The derived SFR might be underestimated if the cold gas  in

311: the BCGs has a low dust-to-gas ratio. This might be the case if the gas has cooled from

312: the hot ICM and if the dust was destroyed while in the hot phase and there has 

313: not been sufficient time to form dust at the levels typically seen in normal star forming galaxies. 

314: However, there are several arguments against a low gas-to-dust ratio. (1) The observations of 

315: H$_2$ (e.g., \citealt{donahue00, edge02, hatch05, jaffe05, egami06b, johnstone07}) 

316: and CO \citep{edge01, salome03, salome04} associated with the BCG optical emission line

317: nebulae require the presence of significant amounts of dust to shield

318: the molecular gas. (2)  Dust is clearly seen in the optical emission line nebulae in cool

319: core clusters (e.g., \citealt{sparks89, sparks93, mcnamara92, donahue93, koekemoer99}).

320: (3) Studies of the nebulae in the BCGs of cool core clusters

321: suggest the presence of  dust-to-gas ratios consistent with Galactic values

322: \citep{sparks89, sparks93, donahue93}. (4)  Theoretical arguments suggest that

323: dust could form quickly inside cool clouds \citep{fabian94a, voit95}.  

324: 

325: 

326: 

327: \section{ Comparison between infrared luminosity and X-ray luminosity }

328: 

329: The integrated X-ray luminosity of a cluster is dependent on the combination

330: of its core and larger scale structure. As such any correlation between

331: this global property and the properties of the BCG may indicate

332: an underlying link, particularly as our sample from its selection will

333: favor cool cores. Therefore we plot the X-ray luminosity of the host cluster 

334: (listed in Table 1 of Paper I) 

335: against estimated infrared luminosities for all BCGs with color

336: ratio $F_{8 \mu{\rm m}}/ F_{5.8\mu {\rm m}} > 0.75$ in Figure \ref{fig:lxvslir}.

337: In Figure \ref{fig:lxvs85}

338: we show X-ray luminosities compared to the color

339: $F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}}$.

340: This study covers a much larger range in X-ray luminosity

341: than \citet{egami06a}. 

342: We see that BCGs with higher IR luminosity and redder 8 to 5.8$\mu$m colors 

343: (indicating an IR excess)  tend to have higher X-ray luminosities.

344: Though, there are many objects with high X-ray luminosity ($L_X > 10^{44}$ erg/s), 

345: which do not have an IR excess. 

346: 

347: It is interesting to compare the kinetic energy injected by supernovae

348: (from a star formation rate consistent with the infrared luminosity) to

349: the energy radiated in X-rays.  

350: \citet{leitherer99} estimate

351: a mechanical energy of about $10^{42}$erg~s$^{-1}$

352: normalized for a star formation rate of $1M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.

353: These conversion factors have been used to estimate the mechanical

354: energy due to supernovae as a function of infrared luminosity.

355: This relation is shown as a dashed line in Figure \ref{fig:lxvslir}.  

356: We see that there are a few BCGs for which there may be sufficient mechanical energy

357: to resupply the X-ray luminosity. 

358: However, in general, for the sample as a whole, we confirm the finding of 

359: previous studies (e.g., \citealt{mcnamara06}) that mechanical energy input 

360: from supernovae is not sufficient (by a few orders of magnitude)

361: to account for the current radiative energy losses of the intracluster

362: medium as a whole or in the core.

363: 

364: \section{Comparison to radio luminosity}

365: 

366: We find a modest (almost 3$\sigma$)  correlation between the infrared luminosity

367: and the radio luminosity at 1.4 GHz (as we show in Figure \ref{fig:lradiolir}).

368: We compare the radio fluxes to those appropriate for star forming objects with

369: a solid line on the lower right in Figure \ref{fig:lradiolir}.

370: The radio-IR relation for star forming objects

371: (equation 3; \citealt{bell03})

372: \begin{equation}

373: \left({ L_{1.4 \rm GHz}\over {\rm erg~cm^{-2}~s^{-1} Hz^{-1}}}\right)

374:   =

375: \left({L_{\rm IR} \over   3.75\times10^{12+q}

376: \ {\rm erg~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~Hz^{-1}}}\right)

377: \label{eqn:rir}

378: \end{equation}

379: where $q$ is a logarithmic index.

380: We have used the mean value $q=2.34$ by \citet{yun01}.

381: 

382: On Figure \ref{fig:lradiolir},

383: the majority of radio fluxes are well above this relation.

384: The three objects below the line are (from left to right)

385: NGC4104, R0821$+$07, A1068.  NGC4104 is nearer than the other objects 

386: in the survey and it is possible that the  H$\alpha$ flux and radio flux density have

387: been underestimated. 

388: The other two clusters (Abell 1068, R0821$+$07) have

389: $F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}}>1.3$ and have

390: unresolved red sources seen in the IRAC color maps and so

391: are likely to be dominated by an AGN.

392: 

393: Thus, the BCGs (independent of whether they have an IR excess) tend to have  

394: radio emission which  is dominated 

395: by that produced by an AGN. Based on hot IR colors and high [OIII]/H$\beta$ ratios it appears

396: that only 4 of the BCGs host a  Type II AGN with a luminous accretion disk \citep{quillen07}.

397: Thus, either the  AGN in most of the BCGs are currently turned off, or 

398: they are accreting in a low luminosity mode. The (weak) correlation between

399: radio and IR luminosity may be a consequence of the correlation between

400: mass accretion rate and SFR \S~\ref{sec:mdot}; i.e., the cooling gas 

401: feeds the AGN and makes gas available for star formation. In addition,

402: the ratio of mechanical energy in the radio source outflow to  the radio luminosity

403: can vary by about 3 orders of magnitude \citet{birzan04}. Thus, the radio luminosity

404: can be a poor measure of the impact of the radio source on its environment. 

405: 

406: \section{Comparison to H$\alpha$ luminosity}

407: 

408: We compare the H$\alpha$ luminosities from limited aperture spectroscopy 

409: to the infrared luminosities in Figure \ref{fig:lalphalir} finding a strong 

410: correlation between the two.

411: We also see a correlation in H$\alpha$ flux vs. 24 micron flux density (Figure

412: \ref{fig:havs24}). 

413: These correlations show that the H$\alpha$ and infrared emission arises from

414: the same or a related power source. We suggest that the dominant power source for

415: the H$\alpha$ and infrared emission is star formation.

416: This is consistent with previous evidence that the optical emission line  nebulae

417: are mostly powered by UV photons from young stars with a possible secondary

418: contribution from another mechanism  (e.g., \citealt{johnstone88, allen95, voit97, crawford99,

419: odea04, wilman06, hatch07}).

420: The H$\alpha$-SFR law relating the star formation rate

421: to the H$\alpha$ luminosity

422: \begin{equation}

423: SFR \ (M_\odot~{\rm yr}^{-1}) = { L({\rm H}\alpha) \over 1.26 \times 10^{41} {\rm erg~s^{-1}}}

424: \end{equation}

425: % equation 2

426: \citep{kennicutt98} is shown as a dashed line on the plot.

427: We have scaled the line down by a factor of

428: 2.8 because our H$\alpha$ luminosities are uncorrected for reddening.

429: We see in Figure \ref{fig:lalphalir} that the points tend to lie

430: a factor of a few below this line, i.e., the

431: observed luminosity in H$\alpha$ is lower than that expected

432: from the estimated infrared luminosity. The discrepancy is larger at lower X-ray luminosity

433: $L_X < 10^{44}$ ergs/s. Our H$\alpha$ luminosities are taken mainly from

434: spectroscopy with a long slit of width $1\farcs 3$ \citep{crawford99} or the 3\arcsec\  diameter

435: fibers of the SDSS. Narrow band H$\alpha$+[NII] images and IFU observations

436: give angular sizes for 11 of our BCGs and calibrated H$\alpha$+[NII] fluxes for 6 sources

437: \citep{heckman81,heckman89,cowie83,baum88,mcnamara04b,wilman06,donahue07a,hatch07}.

438: We find that the nebulae are all larger than the spectroscopic apertures, with a median

439: size of $7\farcs 1$ (geometric mean of major and minor axes).

440: The total fluxes determined from the narrow band images and IFU spectroscopy 

441: are larger than

442: those from \citet{crawford99} or SDSS, with a median ratio of 1.4. Thus, it seems likely

443: that aperture effects contribute to the H$\alpha$ deficit, though larger samples

444: with narrow band imaging are needed to determine whether this can explain the 

445: whole effect.

446: Additionally, strong absorption of the	H$\alpha$ (relative to normal star forming

447: galaxies) could also contribute to the H$\alpha$ deficit.

448: However, the possibility remains that star formation is not the only power source

449: for the H$\alpha$ and IR emission. If this turns out to be the case, it would suggest 

450: that there is an additional  source of energy which heats the dust, but does not ionize the gas.

451: Such an energy source would help to explain the observed optical line ratios

452: \citep{voit97} and bright H$_2$ emission \citep{edge02, jaffe01,jaffe05}.

453: 

454: 

455: \section{Comparison to molecular gas mass }

456: \label{sec:co}

457: 

458: We have compiled  molecular mass data from

459: \citet{edge01},	 \citet{salome03},

460: and Edge, in preparation.

461: This subsample consists only

462: of objects that have been surveyed for	and detected in CO (1-0).

463: The inferred molecular gas masses range from $\sim 10^9$ to $\sim 10^{11}$ M$_\odot$.

464: Spitzer IRS spectra of the star forming BCG in Z3146 detect strong molecular 

465: hydrogen lines from warm H$_2$ with an estimated  mass of $\sim 10^{10}$ 

466: M$_\odot$ \citep{egami06b}.  This provides confirmation that the molecular gas 

467: masses can be very large in these BCGs.

468: 

469: We note that a correlation between integrated molecular gas mass and H$\alpha$

470: luminosity in BCGs has been found by \citet{edge01} and \citet{salome03}.

471: In Figures \ref{fig:coplots1} and \ref{fig:coplots2}, we plot the molecular mass against

472: our estimated infrared luminosity and star formation rate

473: (listed in Table \ref{tab:selected}).

474: As found in normal star forming galaxies (e.g., \citealt{young86, kennicutt98}),

475: we see a correlation between measured molecular gas mass and both

476: the IR luminosity and the star formation rate in the BCGs.

477: The ratio of molecular gas mass to SFR gives a gas depletion time scale which is

478: roughly 1 Gyr. The gas depletion time scale is roughly constant over a range of

479: two orders of magnitude in molecular gas mass and SFR.

480: Our value of $\sim 1$ Gyr is in good agreement with the mean value of $\sim 2$ Gyr

481: found in normal star forming galaxies  by \citet{young86} which have molecular

482: gas masses in the range ($\sim 10^9$ to $10^{10}$ M$_\odot$).

483: The long life time of the molecular gas in these BCGs is in contrast to the much shorter

484: cooling times for the gas over a range of temperatures. The hotter phases cool on 

485: times of $\sim 10^6 - 10^8$ yrs \citep{peterson06}, while the molecular gas cools on even

486: shorter time scales \citep[e.g.,][]{jaffe01}. 

487: Given that clusters are relatively young (perhaps 4-6 Gyr since

488: last major merger) it is possible that there may have been insufficient time for a

489: complete  steady-state (cooling leads to cold gas leads to star formation) to be set up.

490: 

491: 

492: \subsection{The Size Scale of the Star Formation and its Relation to the

493: Optical Emission Line Nebulae}

494: \label{sec:co2}

495: 

496: In nearby galaxies there is an empirical relation

497: between star formation rate per unit area

498: and molecular gas surface density.  This relation can be

499: described in terms of a Schmidt-Kennicutt law

500: \citep{kennicutt98}

501: \begin{equation}

502: \left({\dot{\Sigma}_{\rm SFR}  \over

503:     M_\odot~{\rm yr}^{-1}~{\rm kpc}^{-2} }\right)

504:   =   2.5\times 10^{-4}

505: \left({\Sigma_{\rm gas} \over M_\odot~{\rm pc}^{-2}}\right)^{1.4}

506: , \label{eqn:schmidt}

507: \end{equation}

508: where $\Sigma_{\rm gas}$ is the surface density of molecular and atomic

509: gas and $\dot{\Sigma}_{\rm SFR}$ is the star formation rate per unit area.

510: We can use this relation to estimate the size scale of the star forming

511: region.

512: We make the assumption that the star formation is 

513: distributed in a region of area $d_{\rm kpc}^2$ where $d_{\rm kpc}$ is a diameter

514: in kpc and

515: the surface density $\Sigma_{\rm gas} ={M_{\rm H_2} / d_{\rm kpc}^2}$ and

516: where $M_{\rm H_2}$ is the molecular gas mass.

517: Applying this to equation \ref{eqn:schmidt},

518: we find a relation between molecular mass and star formation rate;

519: \begin{equation}

520: \left({M_{\rm H_2} \over M_\odot}\right)

521: =3.7 \times 10^8 ~ d_{\rm kpc}^{0.57}~

522: \left({SFR \over M_\odot \ {\rm yr}^{-1}}\right)^{0.71}.

523: \label{eqn:cosfr}

524: \end{equation}

525: We have shown this line

526: in Figure \ref{fig:coplots2} computed for diameters

527: $d_{\rm kpc}=5$, 15, and 50.

528: We see that the data are consistent with a Schmidt-Kennicutt law,

529: but the diameter of the star forming region is not well constrained. 

530: The diameter of the star forming region tends to be larger for more

531: luminous objects as expected if the diameter is proportional to 

532: $L_X$/${\dot M}_X$. 

533: Previous studies have shown that the Schmidt law

534: predicts the star formation rates within a factor of a few for galaxies

535: over a wide range of morphologies and star formation rates,  including

536: starbursts galaxies \citep{kennicutt98}.

537: The previous study of 2 BCGs by \citep{mcnamara06} suggested

538: that the star formation law holds even in BCGs. However, Figure~\ref{fig:coplots1}

539: shows that at high  molecular gas masses $M_{\rm H_2} > 10^{10}$ M$_\odot$, some

540: BCGs show inferred diameters $\gae 50$ kpc which are much larger than suggested

541: by the sizes of the emission line nebulae. 

542: 

543: 

544: The sources with the largest estimated star formation regions are R1532+30,

545: A1664, and Z8197 with estimated star formation region size scales of 70, 50 and 30 kpc,

546: respectively, estimated using the Schmidt type star formation law.

547: None of these is well resolved, all have FWHM near the diffraction

548: limit of 7\arcsec\ at 24 microns.

549: For R1532+30 at z = 0.36, the FWHM corresponds to a size of 35 kpc.

550: This is below the estimated size of the star forming region, $R\sim 70$kpc.

551: Likewise for A1664, and Z8197, with redshifts of 0.128,	 and 0.114,

552: the FWHM corresponds to about 15 kpc and again this exceeds the estimated

553: size scale by a factor of 2-3.	The size scale estimates using the star

554: formation law are probably a factor of a 2-3 too large for these objects.

555: Those with the smallest estimated star formation regions are A85, A262, A2052,

556: and NGC4325  with estimated regions of	smaller than 5 kpc.

557: At a redshift of 0.0551,0.0166,	 0.0351, 0.0259, 7\arcsec\

558: (diffraction limit at 24 microns) corresponds to 7, 2.3, 5 and 3.6 kpcs, respectively.

559: The objects with the smallest estimated regions are the nearest

560: and so can be resolved in the IRAC images.

561: For A85, the star forming region could be the unresolved source at 8 microns

562: that is south east of the brightest cluster galaxy nucleus.

563: The brightest cluster galaxy is resolved at 8 microns.

564: For A262 and NGC4235, the brightest cluster galaxy is the source

565: of the 24 micron emission and is resolved both at 24 and 8 microns,

566: consistent with the estimate for the star forming region size of a few kpc.

567: For A2052 the brightest cluster galaxy also hosts star formation in

568: its nucleus. The emission is unresolved at 24 microns but resolved at 8 microns.

569: This is consistent with the estimated size of the star forming region

570: of a few kpc.

571: Except for the case of A85 the estimated sizes of the star forming

572: regions of a few kpc are consistent with the sizes estimated from

573: the images. In summary, the Kennicutt-Schmidt law gives sizes which are  generally 

574: consistent with those estimated from the images for the small and average sizes, 

575: though the largest sizes seem to be too large by factors of 2-3. 

576: 

577: 

578: We note that the emission line nebula in cool cores tend to have a bright 

579: central region with a diameter of order 10 kpc (e.g., \citealt{heckman89}),

580: with fainter gas extending to  larger scales (e.g., \citealt{jaffe05}) which is comparable

581: to the inferred size of the star formation region. 

582: Observations of extended HI absorption in the emission line nebula of 

583: A2597 suggests that the optical nebulae are photon bounded and are the 

584: ionized skins of cold atomic and molecular clouds \citep{odea94}.

585: In addition, molecular hydrogen has been found associated with emission line

586: filaments in some BCGs 

587: (e.g., \citealt{donahue00,  edge02, hatch05, jaffe05, egami06b, johnstone07}).

588: Interferometric CO observations show molecular gas associated with 

589: the emission line nebula in A1795 (e.g., \citealt{salome04}).

590: Also, HST FUV images show FUV continuum from young stars

591: associated with the emission line nebulae in A1795 and A2597 \citep{odea04}. 

592: Thus, the spatial association of the FUV, the CO, the H$_2$, and the optical  emission

593: line nebulae suggest that the star formation occurs in molecular gas which lies

594: in the optical emission line nebulae.

595: 

596: Our estimated size scale of $d\sim 15$ kpc for the star formation

597: region could be biased.   Objects that have larger and more diffuse

598: star formation regions would have had larger molecular gas masses

599: and so would have been detected.  Similarly, BCGs with lower and more concentrated

600: star formation regions might have been missed.

601: 

602: \section{The Connection between Star Formation and the Properties of the Hot ICM}\label{sec:mdot}

603: 

604: We use archival \chandra and \xmm observations to calculate X-ray

605: inferred mass deposition rates and cooling times for 14 of the selected clusters. 

606: We required at least 15,000 counts from the source in each observation to generate

607: reliable deprojected spectra.  This restricted the cluster sample to

608: 11 with suitable \chandra archive data and 3 with \xmm archive data 

609: (R0338+09, R2129+00 and Abell 115).

610: 

611: The \chandra data were analyzed using \ciaov with \caldb provided by

612: the \chandra X-ray Center (CXC).  The level 1 event files were

613: reprocessed to apply the latest gain and charge transfer inefficiency

614: correction and filtered for bad grades.	 Where available, the

615: improved background screening provided by VFAINT mode was applied.  The background light curves

616: of the resulting level 2 event files were then filtered for periods

617: affected by flares.  For the nearer clusters ($z<0.3$), background

618: spectra were extracted from blank-sky background

619: data sets available from the CXC and cleaned in the same way as the

620: source observations. The normalizations of these cleaned background files were 

621: scaled to the count rate of the

622: source observations in the 9--12\kev\ band.  For more distant clusters,

623: background spectra were extracted from suitable, source-free regions

624: of the source data sets.

625: 

626: The \xmm MOS data were reprocessed using the \texttt{emchain} task from

627: \xmm \sas to generate calibrated event files from the raw

628: data.  Cosmic ray filtering was applied by selecting only PATTERNs 0--12 and 

629: bright pixels and hot columns

630: were removed by setting FLAG$==$0.  Soft proton flares were removed by

631: generating a light curve for photons of energy $>10$\kev, where the

632: emission is dominated by the particle-induced background, and

633: rejecting high background periods.  Blank-sky background spectra were

634: produced using the blank-sky background event files available from

635: the \xmm Science Operations Center and

636: calibrated according to \citet{read03}.

637: 

638: Spectra were extracted in concentric annuli centered on the X-ray surface

639: brightness peak with a minimum of 3000 counts in each annulus.

640: \chandra spectra were analyzed in the energy range 0.5--7.0\kev and

641: \xmm spectra in the range 0.3--10 keV.	Suitable response files (ARFs

642: and RMFs) were calculated and grouped together with the source

643: spectrum, binned with a minimum of 30 counts.

644: 

645: Deprojected temperature and density profiles were calculated using a

646: Direct Spectral Deprojection method \citep{sanders07,sanders07b},

647: which creates 'deprojected spectra' using a model independent

648: approach, assuming only spherical geometry.  Instead of correcting for

649: projection by combining a series of models, this new method subtracts

650: the projected spectra from each successive annulus to produce a set of

651: deprojected spectra.

652: 

653: The resulting deprojected spectra were analyzed in XSPEC 11.3.2

654: \citep{arnaud96}. Gas temperatures and densities were found by fitting

655: each spectrum with an absorbed single-temperature plasma model

656: (\texttt{phabs(mekal)}).  The redshift was fixed to the value given in

657: Table 1 of Paper I and the absorbing column density was fixed to the

658: Galactic values given by \citet{kalberla05}. The temperature, abundance and model

659: normalization were allowed to vary.  We used the deprojected

660: temperature and density to determine the cooling time of the gas at

661: each radius.  The cooling radius was defined to be the radius within

662: which the gas has a cooling time less than $7.7\times10^9\yr$,

663: corresponding to the time since $z=1$.

664: 

665: In Figure \ref{fig:tcool} we plot the Infrared Luminosity vs. the cooling time

666: at a radius of 30 kpc. We see that BCGs with shorter cooling times have higher

667: IR luminosities consistent with the results of \citet{egami06a}. This is

668: consistent with the hypothesis that the clusters with shorter cooling times

669: have higher star formation rates which result in higher IR luminosity.  

670: 

671: We calculate two different measures of the mass deposition rate.

672: $\dot{M}_I$ is a maximum mass deposition rate, calculated from

673: 

674: \begin{equation}

675: \dot{M}_I=\frac{2{\mu}m_H}{5k_B}\frac{L(<r_{cool})}{T(r_{cool})}

676: \end{equation}

677: 

678: \noindent where ${\mu}m_H$ is the mean gas mass per particle and the luminosity

679: was determined over the energy range 0.01--50 keV.  L($<r_{cool}$) is directly proportional to the

680: energy required to offset

681: the cooling and $\dot{M}_I$ is a measure of the mass deposition rate

682: if heating is absent.

683: 

684: $\dot{M}_S$ was calculated by repeating the spectral

685: fitting to the annuli within the cooling radius but now adding a cooling flow

686: model (\texttt{mkcflow}) to the absorbed single-temperature model

687: (\texttt{phabs(mekal+mkcflow)}).  The XSPEC model \texttt{mkcflow}

688: models gas cooling between two temperatures and gives the

689: normalization as a mass deposition rate, $\dot{M}_S$.  For each spectrum, the temperature

690: of the \texttt{mekal} component was tied to the high temperature of

691: the \texttt{mkcflow} component and the abundances of the two

692: components were tied together.	The low temperature of the cooling

693: flow model was fixed to 0.1 keV.   $\dot{M}_S$ is a measure of the maximum

694: rate (upper limit) that  gas can be cooling below X-ray temperatures and be consistent 

695: with  the X-ray spectra.  Detailed spectra

696: of nearby bright clusters \citep{peterson03,fabian06} tend to show 

697: an absence of the X-ray coolest gas and indeed

698: for the inferred $\dot{M}$ to be a function of temperature within a

699: cluster.  Better quality data for the objects here may lead in some

700: cases to lower estimates of $\dot{M}_S$.  We have listed the mass deposition

701: rates for each cluster in Table~\ref{tab:mdot} and plotted these values against star formation 

702: rates estimated from the infrared luminosity in Figure~\ref{fig:mdot}.

703: 

704: 

705: %blah

706: 

707: \subsection{Implications}

708: 

709: We see that the SFR is proportional to (but significantly less than) the two estimates 

710: of mass accretion rate.

711: The results show that the star formation rate is about 30--100 times

712: smaller than $\dot{M}_I$, and 3--10 times smaller than $\dot{M}_S$.

713: The observed trends  between cooling time and the IR luminosity and between

714: $\dot{M}_S$ and the infrared star formation rates are consistent

715: with the hypothesis that the cooling ICM is the source of the gas which is forming stars.  

716: Using a nearly identical approach

717: to the X-ray  analysis,  \citet{rafferty06} found a similar trend using optical-UV 

718: star formation rates.   Star formation in these systems

719: is generally not heavily obscured, and the star formation rates are 

720: approaching and in some cases agree with the

721: the cooling upper limits, $\dot{M}_S$.  This is consistent with the

722: results from X-ray spectroscopy (e.g., \citealt{kaastra01, tamura01, peterson01, peterson03,

723: peterson06}) which suggests that

724: most of the gas with short cooling time at a few keV does not cool further. 

725: Sensitive, high resolution X-ray spectroscopy should soon detect the cooling at the level of

726: star formation in the Fe XVII lines if this

727: picture is correct (e.g., \citealt{sanders07b}).  

728: Our fraction of gas which does cool is a mean number and could be affected

729: by our  H$\alpha$ selection but we believe the use of a complete X-ray

730: sample will allow this effect to be quantified.

731: Nevertheless this number could provide a constraint on the efficiency of

732: feedback models that prevent the bulk of the ICM from cooling.

733: If star formation is the ultimate sink for the cooling gas, then the fraction of the 

734: few keV gas which does cool all the way down should be comparable to the ratio 

735: SFR/${\dot M}_X$ - which we find to be roughly a few percent. This fraction is comparable

736: for all the clusters. This suggests that the re-heating mechanism (whatever it is) is very effective 

737: over a range of size scales and operates nearly all the time (i.e., with a short duty cycle) 

738: (see \citealt{mcnamara07,peterson06} for reviews).

739: 

740: \subsection{Alternative Energy Sources}

741: 

742: We have proceeded with the assumption that the infrared emission is

743: solely due to star formation. Here we examine whether there are

744: reasonable alternative sources of energy for this emission. First we

745: consider the hot gas, since dust mixing with the gas can be heated and

746: become a source of mid infrared radiation \citep{dwek86, dwek90}. 

747: We then consider cosmic ray and other heat sources. 

748: 

749: The hot gas is potentially a rich energy source which could heat the

750: dust.  A consequence of such heating is the the energy loss from the

751: gas which means the gas will cool, perhaps even exacerbating the

752: cooling flow problem. It offers a solution to the problem seen in the

753: X-ray spectra of cool core clusters in which gas is observed to cool

754: down to only about 1 keV but no lower \citep{peterson01, tamura01, peterson03}.

755: The temperature profiles in clusters

756: mean that the coolest gas is at the smallest radii so if there is {\em

757: non-radiative} cooling of gas at those radii, say due to mixing with

758: cold dusty gas, X-ray spectra of the whole core would imply a cooling

759: flow going down to just 1 keV and appearing to stop, more or less as

760: observed. This can be seen as 'the missing soft X-ray luminosity'

761: problem \citep{fabian02}. What is meant by missing soft X-ray

762: luminosity is the emission missing from a complete cooling flow when

763: it appears from X-ray spectra to stop at say 1 keV.

764: 

765: Figure \ref{fig:alt} shows the missing soft X-ray luminosity for our objects

766: plotted against the IR luminosity as open circles.

767: This was obtained by fitting the spectra with a cooling flow model which has a 

768: lower temperature limit of 1~keV.  The missing soft X-ray luminosity is then the 

769: rate of energy release as that gas cools further to zero K in some non-radiative manner.

770: There is a correlation, but the normalization misses by about a factor of

771: 5. This means that on average there's 5 times more $L_{\rm IR}$ than needed to

772: account for non-radiative cooling of the gas below 1~keV.

773: 

774: Better agreement can be obtained by increasing the lower fitted

775: temperature above 1~keV, but in that case the mass cooling rates rise

776: from the more modest rates comparable to $\dot M_{\rm S}$ in Fig. ~\ref{fig:mdot} to

777: the higher, pre-XMM/Chandra values of $\dot M_{\rm I}$.  This is just

778: because $L_{\rm IR}$ is similar to $L_{\rm cool}$, the luminosity of

779: the cooling region in the core (i.e.,  where the radiative cooling time is

780: less than say 5 Gyr), which is shown by the filled circles in Fig.~\ref{fig:alt}.

781: 

782: The result is that if dust mixing in hot gas is the only source of infrared 

783: emission then we have to face cooling rates much higher than can be 

784: accommodated in terms of the observed molecular gas \citep{edge01} 

785: or observed star formation rates (Table ~\ref{tab:SFR_comp}). 

786: More plausibly, hot gas mixing with 

787: dusty cold gas is the  source of 10--20 per cent of the infrared emission. 

788: In this case our results allow for modest rates mass cooling rates of up 

789: to tens to hundreds $M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$ comparable to the range shown in 

790: Table ~\ref{tab:SFR_comp}.

791: 

792: Cosmic rays also fail as an energy source, unless they are recycled.

793: Since $L_{\rm IR}\sim L_{\rm cool}$ (to within about a factor of 3,

794: see Fig.\ref{fig:alt}), then the energy required for the infrared is comparable

795: with the thermal energy within $r_{\rm cool}$. Consequently the cosmic

796: ray pressure would need to be high with a pressure $P_{\rm CR}=f_{\rm

797: CR} P_{\rm Th}$ with $f_{\rm CR}>0.3$ and thermal pressure $P_{\rm

798: Th}$. This is contrary to the quasi-hydrostatic appearance of the

799: intracluster medium in cluster cores.

800: 

801: Only if there is some efficient mechanism for energy to flow from the

802: central accretion flow / AGN to the dust can an alternative be viable.

803: In the absence of any such mechanism, we conclude that the UV

804: radiation from massive star formation must be the energy source for

805: the mid-infrared emission measured by Spitzer.

806: 

807: %blah

808: 

809: \section{Summary}

810: 

811: \citet{quillen07}  obtained Spitzer photometry of a sample of  62 BCGs in

812: X-ray bright clusters selected on the basis of BCG H$\alpha$ flux which tends

813: to favor cool core clusters. They showed that at least half of the BCGs

814: exhibit an infrared excess with a luminosity $L_{\rm IR} \sim 10^{43} - $ 

815: few $\times 10^{45}$ ergs/s.  In this paper we examined correlations in the 

816: data  and discussed implications for cool core clusters. 

817: 

818: BCGs with an IR excess are found mainly in clusters at high X-ray luminosity 

819: ($L_{\rm X} > 10^{44}$
ergs s\mone). But not all high $L_{\rm X}$ clusters have 

820: a BCG with an IR excess. 

821: 

822: The IR luminosity is proportional to the H$\alpha$ luminosity, suggesting that they

823: are powered by the same or a related source of energy. We suggest that star formation

824: is the dominant power source for the the IR and H$\alpha$ emission.

825: The H$\alpha$ luminosity falls below the \citet{kennicutt98} relation probably because

826: the spectroscopic apertures exclude much of the extended emission line nebulae. 

827: The inferred star formation rates estimated from the IR luminosity are in the range 

828: about 1 to 50 

829: $M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$. 

830: In most BCGs, supernovae produced by star 

831: formation with this SFR cannot account for the X-ray luminosity and so cannot 

832: be responsible for re-heating the ICM. 

833: 

834: The radio emission in the BCG is dominated by that produced by an AGN rather than 

835: star formation.  However, there is a modest correlation between radio and IR 

836: emission. This suggests the feeding of the AGN and the fueling of the star 

837: formation may have a common origin, perhaps gas cooling from the hot ICM. 

838: 

839: The mass of molecular gas (estimated from CO observations) is correlated with the IR 

840: luminosity as found for normal star forming galaxies. The gas depletion time scale is about

841: 1 Gyr. Given that clusters are relatively young (perhaps 4-6 Gyr since

842: last major merger) then it is possible that there may have been insufficient time for a

843: complete  steady-state (cooling leads to cold gas leads to star formation) to be set up.

844: 

845: We fit a Schmitt-Kennicutt relation to the molecular gas mass vs. SFR and estimate a 

846: rough star forming region diameter. For most BCGs the implied sizes of 10-20 kpc is 

847: comparable to that of the color variations seen in the IRAC data and to

848: the optical emission line nebulae. This is  consistent with the hypothesis that the star 

849: formation occurs in molecular gas associated with the emission line nebulae and with

850: evidence that the emission line nebulae are mainly powered by ongoing star formation. 

851: 

852: BCGs in clusters with shorter cooling times for the hot ICM have higher IR luminosities. 

853: We find a strong correlation between mass deposition rates (${\dot M}_X$) estimated from

854: the X-ray emission and the SFR.  

855: The star formation rate is about 30--100 times

856: smaller than $\dot{M}_I$ - the mass accretion rate derived from imaging, and 3--10 

857: times smaller than $\dot{M}_S$ - the rate derived from spectroscopy.

858: The observed trends  between cooling time and the IR luminosity and between

859: $\dot{M}_S$ and the infrared star formation rates are consistent

860: with the hypothesis that the cooling ICM is the source of the gas which is forming stars.  

861: The correlation between mass deposition rates estimated

862: from the X-ray radiative losses and the star formation rates

863: suggest that the fraction of gas that does cool is set

864: by the balance of heating and cooling by the cooling flow. The low value of

865: SFR/(${\dot M}_X$) suggests that heating is likely to be very efficient in

866: preventing most of the gas a temperatures of a few keV from

867: cooling further. 

868: 

869: 

870: \acknowledgments

871: This work is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space 

872: Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California 

873: Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work 

874: at University of Rochester and Rochester Institute of Technology was provided 

875: by NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech. We are grateful to the 

876: referee for helpful comments. 

877: 

878: \begin{thebibliography}{}

879: 

880: %A CATALOG OF RICH CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES

881: \bibitem[Abell et al.(1989)]{abell89}

882: Abell, G. O., Corwin, H. G., \& Olowin, R. P. 1989, ApJS, 70, 1

883: 

884: %Starbursts in cooling flows: blue continua and emission-line nebulae in central cluster galaxies

885: \bibitem[Allen(1995)]{allen95}

886: Allen, S. W. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 947 

887: 

888: %	The properties of cooling flows in X-ray luminous clusters of galaxies

889: \bibitem[Allen(2000)]{allen00}

890: Allen, S. W. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 269

891: 

892: %Spectral Energy Distributions of Seyfert Nuclei

893: \bibitem[Alonso-Herrero et al.(2003)]{alonso03}

894: Alonso-Herrero, A., Quillen, A. C., Rieke, G. H., Ivanov, V.D., \&

895: Efstathiou, A.  2003, AJ, 126, 81	

896: 

897: %Observations of ULIRGS with IRS, the IRAS bright galaxy sample

898: %\bibitem[Armus et al.(2007)]{armus07}

899: %Armus, L. et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 148

900: 

901: \bibitem[Arnaud (1996)]{arnaud96} Arnaud, K., 1996, ASP Conf. Series,

902: 101, 17

903: 

904: %Extended optical-line-emitting gas in radio galaxies

905: \bibitem[Baum et al.(1998)]{baum88}

906: Baum, S. A., Heckman, T. M., Bridle, A., van Breugel, W. J. M., \&

907: Miley, G. K., 1988, ApJS, 68, 643

908: 

909: 

910: %Multifrequency VLA observations of PKS 0745 - 191 - The archetypal 'cooling flow' radio source?

911: \bibitem[Baum \& O'Dea(1991)]{baum91}

912: Baum, S. A., \& O'Dea, C. P. 1991, MNRAS, 250, 737

913: 

914: %``The FIRST Survey: Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-cm''

915: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1995)]{becker95}

916: Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Helfand, D. J. 1995,

917: ApJ, 450, 559

918: 

919: %Estimating Star Formation Rates from Infrared and Radio Luminosities: 

920: %The Origin of the Radio-Infrared Correlation

921: \bibitem[Bell(2003)]{bell03}

922: Bell, E. F. 2003, ApJ, 586, 794

923: 

924: %AGN Feedback Mechanisms

925: \bibitem[Begelman(2004)]{begelman04}

926: Begelman, M. C. 2004, in Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies, 

927: ed. L. C. Ho (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 374

928: 

929: %AGN controlled cooling in elliptical galaxies

930: \bibitem[Best et al.(2006)]{best06}

931: Best, P. N., Kaiser, C. R., Heckman, T. M. \& Kauffmann, G. 2006,

932: MNRAS, 368, L67

933: 

934: %On the prevalence of radio-loud AGN in brightest cluster galaxies: 

935: %implications for AGN heating of cooling flows

936: \bibitem[Best et al.(2007)]{best07}

937: Best, P. N., von der Linden, A., Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M.,

938: Kaiser, C. R. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 849

939: 

940: %A Systematic Study of Radio-induced X-Ray Cavities in Clusters, Groups, and Galaxies

941: \bibitem[Birzan et al.(2004)]{birzan04}

942: Birzan, L., Rafferty, D. A., McNamara, B. R., Wise, M. W., \& Nulsen, P. E. J.	

943:  2004, ApJ, 607, 800

944: 

945: %The Northern ROSAT All-Sky (NORAS) Galaxy Cluster Survey. I. X-Ray Properties of 

946: %Clusters Detected as Extended X-Ray Sources

947: \bibitem[B\"ohringer et al.(2000)]{bohringer00}

948: B\"ohringer, H., et al. 2000, ApJS, 129, 435

949: 

950: %The new emerging model for the structure of cooling cores in clusters of galaxies

951: \bibitem[B\"ohringer et al.(2002)]{bohringer02}

952: B\"ohringer, H., Matsushita, K., Churazov, E., Ikebe, Y.,

953: \& Chen, Y., 2002, A\&A, 382, 804

954: 

955: %The ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray (REFLEX) Galaxy cluster survey. V. The cluster catalogue

956: \bibitem[Bohringer et al.(2004)]{bohringer04}

957: Bohringer, H., et al. 2004, A\&A, 425, 367

958: 

959: %O VI Observations of Galaxy Clusters: Evidence for Modest Cooling Flows

960: %\bibitem[Bregman et al.(2006)]{bregman06}

961: %Bregman, J. N., Fabian, A. C., Miller, E. D., \& Irwin, J. A.	2006, ApJ, 642, 746

962: 

963: %Heated cooling flows

964: \bibitem[Brighenti \& Mathews(2002)]{brighenti02}

965: Brighenti, F. \& Mathews, W. G. 2002, ApJ, 573, 542

966: 

967: %The ROSAT AGN content of the 87GB 5 GHz survey: bulk properties of previously optically 

968: %identified sources.

969: \bibitem[Brinkmann et al.(1995)]{brinkmann95}

970: Brinkmann, W., Siebert, J., Reich, W., Fuerst, E., Reich, P., Voges, W., Truemper, J., 

971: \& Wielebinski, R.  1995, A\&AS, 109, 147

972: 

973: %Measuring Star Formation in Local and Distant Galaxies

974: \bibitem[Calzetti (2008)]{calzetti08}

975: Calzetti, D., 2008, astro-ph/0801.2558

976: 

977: %The Role of Cooling Flows in the Star Formation History of Central Cluster Galaxies

978: \bibitem[Cardiel et al.(1998)]{cardiel98}

979: Cardiel, N., Gorgas, J., \& Aragon-Salamanca, A.  1998, Ap\&SS, 263, 83	

980: 

981: %NVSS

982: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{condon98}

983: Condon, J. J., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693

984: 

985: %Radiative regulation of  gas flow within clusters of galaxies:

986: %a model for cluster X-ray sources

987: \bibitem[Cowie \& Binney(1977)]{cowie77}

988: Cowie, L. L., \& Binney, J. 1977, ApJ, 215,  723

989: 

990: % Two-dimensional spectrophotometry of the cores of X-ray luminous clusters

991: \bibitem[Cowie et al.(1983)]{cowie83}

992: Cowie, L. L., Hu, E. M., Jenkins, E. B., \& York, D. G., 1983, ApJ, 272, 29

993: 

994: 

995: %Emission-line nebulae around central cluster galaxies in cooling flows

996: \bibitem[Crawford  \& Fabian(1992)]{crawford92}

997: Crawford, C. S., \& Fabian, A. C. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 265

998: 

999: %On the nature of the blue light in central cluster galaxies

1000: \bibitem[Crawford  \& Fabian(1993)]{crawford93}

1001: Crawford, C. S., \& Fabian, A. C. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 431 

1002: 

1003: 

1004: %The ROSAT Brightest Cluster Sample - III. Optical spectra of the central cluster galaxies

1005: \bibitem[Crawford et al.(1999)]{crawford99}

1006: Crawford, C. S., Allen, S. W., Ebeling, H., Edge, A. C., \& Fabian, A. C.

1007:  1999, MNRAS, 306, 857

1008: 

1009: %ROSAT PSPC OBSERVATIONS OF THE RICHEST (R>=2) ACO CLUSTERS

1010: \bibitem[David et al.(1999)]{david99}

1011: David, L.P., Forman, W., \& Jones, C. 1999, ApJ, 519, 533

1012: 

1013: %Turbulent heating of galaxy-cluster plasmas

1014: \bibitem[Dennis \& Chandran(2005)]{dennis05}

1015: Dennis, T. J., \& Chandran, B. D. G. 2005, ApJ,  622, 205

1016: 

1017: %H I in the Galaxy

1018: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{dickey90}

1019: Dickey, J. M., \& Lockman, F. J., 1990, ARA\&Ap, 28, 215

1020: 

1021: %Distant cooling flows. H-alpha imaging of EMSS clusters

1022: \bibitem[Donahue et al.(1992)]{donahue92}

1023: Donahue, M., Stocke, J. T., \& Gioia, I., 1992, ApJ, 385, 49

1024: 

1025: %Calcium depletion in cooling-flow nebulae and the origin of the line-emitting gas

1026: \bibitem[Donahue \& Voit(1993)]{donahue93}

1027: Donahue, M., \& Voit, G. M., 1993, ApJ, 414, L17

1028: 

1029: %Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Vibrationally Excited Molecular 

1030: %Hydrogen in Cluster Cooling Flow Nebulae

1031: \bibitem[Donahue et al.(2000)]{donahue00}

1032: Donahue, M., Mack, J.,  Voit, G. M., Sparks, W.,  Elston, R., \&  

1033: Maloney, P. R., 2000, ApJ, 545, 670 

1034: 

1035: %Star Formation, Radio Sources, Cooling X-Ray Gas, and Galaxy Interactions in

1036: %the Brightest Cluster Galaxy in 2A0335+096

1037: \bibitem[Donahue et al.(2007a)]{donahue07a}

1038: Donahue, M., Sun, M., O'Dea, C. P., Voit, G. M., \& Cavagnolo, K. W.,

1039: 2007, AJ, 134, 14

1040: 

1041: 

1042: 

1043: %INFRARED SIGNATURES OF STAR FORMATION FROM A NEARBY COOL CORE CLUSTER ABELL 2597

1044: \bibitem[Donahue et al.(2007b)]{donahue07b}

1045: Donahue, M., Baum, S., Cote, P., Ferrarese, L., Goudfrooij, P.,

1046: Jordan, A., Macchetto, D., Malhotra, S., O'Dea, C. P.,

1047: Pringle, J., Rhoads, J., Sparks, W., \& G. M. Voit, G. M.

1048: 2007, ApJ, in press

1049: 

1050: %Radio bubbles in clusters of galaxies

1051: \bibitem[Dunn et al.(2005)]{dunn05}

1052: Dunn, R. J. H., Fabian, A. C., \& Taylor, G. B. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1343

1053: 

1054: \bibitem[Dunn \& Fabian(2006)]{dunn06}

1055: Dunn, R. J. H., \& Fabian, A. C. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 959

1056: 

1057: \bibitem[Dwek (1986)]{dwek86}

1058: Dwek, E., 1986, ApJ, 302, 363

1059: 

1060: \bibitem[Dwek et al. (1990)]{dwek90}

1061: Dwek, E., Rephaeli, Y., \& Mather, J. C., 1990, ApJ, 350, 104

1062: 

1063: %The ROSAT Brightest Cluster Sample - I. The compilation of the sample and the 

1064: %cluster log N-log S distribution

1065: \bibitem[Ebeling et al.(1998)]{ebeling98}

1066: Ebeling, H., Edge, A. C., Bohringer, H., Allen, S. W.,

1067: Crawford, C. S., Fabian, A. C., Voges, W., \& Huchra, J. P. 1998,

1068: MNRAS, 301, 881

1069: 

1070: %The ROSAT Brightest Cluster Sample - IV. The extended sample

1071: \bibitem[Ebeling et al.(2000)]{ebeling00}

1072: Ebeling, H., Edge, A. C., Allen, S. W., Crawford, C. S., Fabian, A. C., \&

1073: Huchra, J. P.   2000, MNRAS, 318, 333

1074: %http://vizier.cfa.harvard.edu/viz-bin/VizieR?-source=J/MNRAS/318/333

1075: %H0=50 is used here!

1076: 

1077: %An X-Ray Flux-Limited Sample of Clusters of Galaxies - Evidence for Evolution of 

1078: %the Luminosity Function

1079: %Edge90

1080: \bibitem[Edge et al.(1990)]{edge90}

1081: Edge, A. C., Stewart, G. C., Fabian, A. C., \& 

1082: Arnaud, K. A.  1990, MNRAS, 245, 559

1083: 

1084: %Properties of cooling flows in a flux-limited sample of clusters of galaxies

1085: \bibitem[Edge et al.(1992)]{edge92}

1086: Edge, A. C., Stewart, G. C. \& Fabian, A. C. 1992, MNRAS 258, 177

1087: 

1088: %The detection of molecular gas in the central galaxies of cooling flow clusters

1089: \bibitem[Edge(2001)]{edge01}

1090: Edge, A. C. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 762

1091: 

1092: %A survey of molecular hydrogen in the central galaxies of cooling flows

1093: \bibitem[Edge et al.(2002)]{edge02}

1094: Edge, A. C., Wilman, R. J., Johnstone, R. M., Crawford, C. S.,

1095: Fabian, A. C., \& Allen, S. W.	2002, MNRAS, 337, 49	

1096: 

1097: %Line emission in the brightest cluster galaxies of the NOAO Fundamental 

1098: %Plane and Sloan Digital Sky Surveys

1099: \bibitem[Edwards et al.(2007)]{edwards07}

1100: Edwards, L. O. V., Hudson, M. J.,  Balogh, M. L., \& Smith, R. J. 2007,

1101: MNRAS, 379, 100

1102: 

1103: %SPITZER OBSERVATIONS OF THE BRIGHTEST GALAXIES IN X-RAY-LUMINOUS CLUSTERS

1104: \bibitem[Egami et al.(2006a)]{egami06a}

1105: Egami, E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 922

1106: 

1107: %A Large Mass of H2 in the Brightest Cluster Galaxy in Zwicky 3146

1108: \bibitem[Egami et al.(2006b)]{egami06b}

1109: Egami, E., Rieke, G. H., Fadda, D., \&  Hines, D. C. 2006,

1110: ApJ, 652, L21 

1111: 

1112: 

1113: %Radio Galaxies in Cooling Cores

1114: %almost all cooling flow cores contain radio sources

1115: \bibitem[Eilek(2004)]{eilek04}

1116: Eilek, J. A. 2004,

1117: Proceedings of The Riddle of Cooling Flows in Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies, 

1118: held in Charlottesville, VA, May 31 - June 4, 2003, Eds. T. Reiprich, J. 

1119: Kempner, and N. Soker, published electronically at 

1120: http://www.astro.virginia.edu/coolflow/

1121: 

1122: %Churazov et al. 2004 turbulence 1/2 $c_s$

1123: %The bulk of the cosmic infrared background resolved by ISOCAM

1124: \bibitem[Elbaz et al.(2002)]{elbaz02}

1125: Elbaz, D., Cesarsky, C. J., Chanial, P., Aussel, H., Franceschini, A.,

1126: Fadda, D., \& Chary, R. R. 2002, A\&A, 384, 848

1127: 

1128: %Subsonic accretion of cooling gas in clusters of galaxies

1129: \bibitem[Fabian \& Nulsen(1977)]{fabian77}

1130: Fabian, A. C., \& Nulsen, P. E. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 479

1131: 

1132: %The Effects of Dust in Cold Clouds Embedded in Cooling Flows

1133: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(1994)]{fabian94a}

1134: Fabian, A. C., Johnstone, R. M., \& Daines, S. J. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 737

1135: 

1136: % Review

1137: \bibitem[Fabian(1994)]{fabian94b}

1138: Fabian, A. C. 1994, ARA\&A 32, 277

1139: 

1140: %ROSAT HRI observations of IRAS P09104+4109: a massive cooling flow

1141: \bibitem[Fabian \& Crawford(1995)]{fabian95}

1142: Fabian, A. C., \& Crawford, C. S. 1995, MNRAS, 274, L63

1143: 

1144: %On conduction, cooling flows and galaxy formation

1145: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2002)]{fabian02}

1146: Fabian, A., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 335, L71

1147: 

1148: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(2006)]{fabian06}

1149: Fabian, A.C., et al. 2006, \mnras, 366, 417

1150: 

1151: %IRAC camera

1152: %\bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio04}

1153: %Fazio, G. G. et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10

1154: 

1155: %HydraA

1156: \bibitem[Hansen et al.(1995)]{hansen95}

1157: Hansen, L., Jorgensen, H.E., Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U., 1995, \aap, 297, 13

1158: 

1159: %ISO Sercis 159-03

1160: \bibitem[Hansen et al.(2000)]{hansen00}

1161: Hansen, L., Jorgensen, H.E., Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U., Pedersen, K., Goudfrooij, P.,

1162: \& Linden-Vornle, M. J. D., 2000, \aap, 356, 83

1163: 

1164: %Detections of molecular hydrogen in the outer filaments of NGC1275

1165: \bibitem[Hatch et al.(2005)]{hatch05}

1166: Hatch, N. A., Crawford, C. S., Fabian, A. C., \& Johnstone, R. M., 2005,

1167: MNRAS, 358, 765

1168: 

1169: %Ionized nebulae surrounding brightest cluster galaxies

1170: \bibitem[Hatch et al.(2007)]{hatch07}

1171: Hatch, N. A., Crawford, C. S., \& Fabian, A. C.,  2007,

1172: MNRAS, 380, 33 

1173: 

1174: %Optical emission-line gas associated with dominant cluster galaxies

1175: \bibitem[Heckman(1981)]{heckman81}

1176: Heckman, T. M. 1981, ApJ 250, L59

1177: 

1178: %Dynamical, physical, and chemical properties of emission-line nebulae in cooling flows

1179: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1989)]{heckman89}

1180: Heckman, T. M., Baum, S. A., van Breugel, W. J. M., \& 

1181: McCarthy, P. 1989, ApJ, 338, 48

1182: 

1183: %Star Formation Rates in Cooling Flow Clusters: A UV Pilot Study with Archival XMM-Newton 

1184: %Optical Monitor Data

1185: \bibitem[Hicks \& Mushotzky(2005)]{hicks05}

1186: Hicks, A. K., \& Mushotzky, R.	2005, ApJ, 635, L9	

1187: 

1188: %Ly-alpha emission from cooling flows and measures of the dust content of rich clusters of galaxies

1189: \bibitem[Hu(1992)]{hu92}

1190: Hu, E. M. 1992, ApJ, 391, 608

1191: 

1192: %complex extended line emission in the cD galaxy in Abell 2390

1193: \bibitem[Hutchings \& Balogh(2000)]{hutchings00}

1194: Hutchings, J. B., \& Balogh, M. L. 2000, AJ, 119, 1123

1195: 

1196: %Infrared spectra of cooling flow galaxies

1197: \bibitem[Jaffe et al.(2001)]{jaffe01}

1198: Jaffe, W., Bremer, M. N., van der Werf, P. P., 2001, MNRAS, 324, 443

1199: 

1200: %Hii and H2 in the Envelopes of Cooling Flow Central Galaxies

1201: \bibitem[Jaffe et al.(2005)]{jaffe05}

1202: Jaffe, W., Bremer, M. N., \& Baker, K. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 748

1203: 

1204: %The optical spectra of central galaxies in southern clusters Evidence for star formation

1205: \bibitem[Johnstone \& Fabian(1987)]{johnstone87}

1206: Johnstone, R. M.,  Fabian, A. C., \& Nulsen, P. E. J. 1987, MNRAS, 224, 75 

1207: 

1208: 

1209: %Extended emission-line gas in NGC 1275 and the central galaxy in A1795 - 

1210: %Evidence for a distributed rather than a central source of ionization

1211: \bibitem[Johnstone \& Fabian(1988)]{johnstone88}

1212: Johnstone, R. M., \& Fabian, A. C. 1988, MNRAS, 233, 581

1213: 

1214: 

1215: %Discovery of atomic and molecular mid infra-red emission lines in off-nuclear 

1216: %regions of NGC 1275 and NGC 4696 with the Spitzer Space Telescope

1217: \bibitem[Johnstone et al.(2007)]{johnstone07}

1218: Johnstone, R., Hatch, N., Ferland, G., Fabian, A., Crawford, C.,  \& Wilman, R.,

1219: 2007, MNRAS, in press, astro-ph/0702431

1220: 

1221: %XMM-Newton observations of the cluster of galaxies Sérsic 159-03

1222: \bibitem[Kaastra et al.(2001)]{kaastra01}

1223: Kaastra, J. S.,. Ferrigno, C., Tamura, T., Paerels, F. B. S., Peterson, J. R., 

1224: \& Mittaz, J. P. D. 2001, A\&Ap, 365, 99L 

1225: 

1226: %Simple models of cooling flows

1227: \bibitem[Kaiser \& Binney(2003)]{kaiser03}

1228: Kaiser, C. R. \& Binney, J. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 837

1229: 

1230: \bibitem[Kalberla et al.(2005)]{kalberla05}

1231: Kalberla, P.M.W., Burton, W.B., Hartmann, Dap, Arnal, E.M.,

1232: Bajaja, E., Morras, R., \& Poppel, W.G.L. 2005, \aap, 440, 775

1233: 

1234: % Global schmidt law

1235: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{kennicutt98}

1236: Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, ApJ,  498, 541

1237: 

1238: %Turbulent mixing in clusters of galaxies

1239: 

1240: \bibitem[Kim \& Narayan(2003)]{kim03}

1241: Kim, W.-T., \& Narayan, R. 2003,  ApJ, 596,  L139

1242: % also relevant Voit \& Fabian 2003

1243: 

1244: %The Extended Blue Continuum and Line Emission around the Central Radio Galaxy in Abell 2597

1245: \bibitem[Koekemoer et al.(1999)]{koekemoer99}

1246: Koekemoer, A. M., O'Dea, C. P., Sarazin, C. L., McNamara, B. R., 

1247: Donahue, M., Voit, G. M., 

1248: Baum, S. A., \& Gallimore, J. F. 1999, ApJ, 525, 621

1249: 

1250: % Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation

1251: 

1252: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1999)]{leitherer99}

1253: Leitherer, C., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3  %-40

1254: %Schaerer, D., Goldader, J.D., Delgado, R. M. G.,

1255: %Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D,  \& Heckman, T. M.

1256: 

1257: %\bibitem[Makovoz \& Khan (2004)]{makovoz04}

1258: %Makovoz, D., \& Khan, I. 2004 in ASP Conf. Ser., Astronomical Data

1259: %Analysis Software and System VI(San Francisco: ASP), in press

1260: 

1261: %Star formation in cooling flows in clusters of galaxies

1262: \bibitem[McNamara \& O'Connell(1989)]{mcnamara89}

1263: McNamara, B. R., \& O'Connell, R. W. 1989, AJ, 98, 2018

1264: 

1265: %Color gradients in cooling flows in clusters of galaxies

1266: \bibitem[McNamara \& O'Connell(1992)]{mcnamara92}

1267: McNamara, B. R., \& O'Connell, R. W. 1992, ApJ, 393, 579

1268: 

1269: %Blue lobe galaxies in the cooling flow clusters Abell 1795 and Abell 2597

1270: \bibitem[McNamara \& O'Connell(1993)]{mcnamara93}

1271: McNamara, B. R. \& O'Connell, R. W. 1993, AJ, 105, 417

1272: 

1273: %Star Formation in Cluster Cooling Flows

1274: \bibitem[McNamara (2004)]{mcnamara04}

1275: McNamara, B. R., 2004, Proceedings of The Riddle of Cooling Flows in Galaxies

1276: and Clusters of Galaxies, held in Charlottesville, VA, May 31 -

1277: June 4, 2003, Eds. T. Reiprich, J. Kempner, and N. Soker., page 177

1278: 

1279: %The Insignificance of Global Reheating in the A1068 Cluster: Multiwavelength Analysis

1280: \bibitem[McNamara et al.(2004)]{mcnamara04b}

1281: McNamara, B. R., Wise, M. W., \& Murray, S. S. 2004, ApJ, 601, 173

1282: 

1283: %The Starburst in the Abell 1835 Cluster Central Galaxy: A Case Study of Galaxy

1284: %Formation Regulated by an Outburst from a Supermassive Black Hole

1285: \bibitem[McNamara et al.(2006)]{mcnamara06}

1286: McNamara, B. R., Rafferty, D. A., Birzan, L., Steiner, J., Wise, M. W.,

1287: Nulsen, P. E. J., Carilli, C. L., Ryan, R., \& Sharma, M. 2006, ApJ, 648, 164

1288: 

1289: \bibitem[McNamara \& Nulsen (2007)]{mcnamara07}

1290: McNamara, B.R., Nulsen, P.E.J., 2007, ARAA, 45, 117

1291: 

1292: %UV observations of the galaxy cluster Abell 1795 with the optical monitor on XMM-Newton

1293: \bibitem[Mittaz et al.(2001)]{mittaz01}

1294: Mittaz, J. P. D., et al., 2001, \aap, 365, L93

1295: 

1296: \bibitem[Narayan \& Medvedev (2001)]{narayan01}

1297: Narayan, R., \& Medvedev, M. 2001, ApJ, 562, L129

1298: 

1299: %Detection of extended H I absorption toward PKS 2322-123 in Abell 2597

1300: \bibitem[O'Dea et al.(1994)]{odea94}

1301: O'Dea, C. P., Baum, S. A., \& Gallimore, J. F. 1994, ApJ, 436, 669

1302: 

1303: %Hubble Space Telescope STIS Far-Ultraviolet Observations of the Central Nebulae 

1304: %in the Cooling-Core Clusters A1795 and A2597

1305: \bibitem[O'Dea et al.(2004)]{odea04}

1306: O'Dea, C.P., Baum, S. A., Mack, J., Koekemoer, A.M., \& 

1307: Laor, A.  2004, ApJ, 612, 131O	

1308: 

1309: %FUSE Observations of Cooling-Flow Gas in the Galaxy Clusters A1795 and A2597

1310: \bibitem[Oegerle et al.(2001)]{oegerle01}

1311: Oegerle, W. R., et al., 2001, \apj, 560, 187

1312: 

1313: %Heating cooling flows with jets

1314: \bibitem[Omma et al.(2004)]{omma04}

1315: Omma, H., Binney, J.,  Bryan, G., \&  Slyz, A. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 1105

1316: 

1317: %X-ray imaging-spectroscopy of Abell 1835

1318: \bibitem[Peterson et al.(2001)]{peterson01}

1319: Peterson, J. R., et al. 2001, A\&Ap, 365, 104L

1320: 

1321: %cooling gas 10\% of what expected, shortage of gas below T=3kev

1322: 

1323: %High-Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopic Constraints on Cooling-Flow Models for Clusters of Galaxies

1324: 

1325: \bibitem[Peterson et al.(2003)]{peterson03}

1326: Peterson, J. R., Kahn, S. M., Paerels, F. B. S., Kaastra, J. S.,

1327: Tamura, T., Bleeker, J. A. M., Ferrigno, C., \& Jernigan, J. G.	

1328:  2003, ApJ, 590, 207

1329: 

1330: %X-ray spectroscopy of cooling clusters

1331: \bibitem[Peterson \& Fabian(2006)]{peterson06}

1332: Peterson, J. R.,  \& Fabian, A. C., 2006, Physics Reports, 427, 1

1333: 

1334: %paperI

1335: \bibitem[Quillen et al.(2007)]{quillen07}

1336: Quillen, A., et al. 2007, ApJS, submitted, Paper I.

1337: 

1338: %The Feedback-Regulated Growth of Black Holes and Bulges through Gas Accretion 

1339: %and Starbursts in Cluster Central Dominant Galaxies

1340: \bibitem[Rafferty et al.(2006)]{rafferty06}

1341: Rafferty, D. A., McNamara, B. R., Nulsen, P. E. J., \& Wise, M. W.

1342: 2006, astro.ph..5323, ApJ, 652, 216

1343: 

1344: \bibitem[Read \& Ponman (2003)]{read03} Read, A.M., \& Ponman, T.J., 

1345: 2003, \aap, 409, 395

1346: 

1347: %The Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer(MIPS

1348: %\bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rieke04}

1349: %Rieke, G. H. et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 25

1350: 

1351: %An imaging study of NGC 1275 and PKS 0745-191 - Vigorous star formation 

1352: %in cooling flow cluster dominant galaxies

1353: \bibitem[Romanishin(1987)]{romanishin87}

1354: Romanishin, W. 1987, ApJ 323, L113

1355: 

1356: \bibitem[Ruszkowski \& Begelman(2002)]{ruszkowski02}

1357: Ruszkowski, M., \& Begelman, M. 2002, ApJ, 581, 223 

1358: 

1359: %Cold molecular gas in cooling flow clusters of galaxies

1360: \bibitem[Salom\'e \& Combes(2003)]{salome03}

1361: Salom\'e, P., \& Combes, F., 2003, A\&A, 412, 657 

1362: 

1363: %Mapping the cold molecular gas in a cooling flow cluster: Abell 1795

1364: \bibitem[Salom\'e \& Combes(2004)]{salome04}

1365: Salom\'e, P., \&  Combes, F., 2004, A\&A, 425, L1

1366: 

1367: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988)]{sanders88}

1368: Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias J. H., Neugebauer, G.,

1369: \& Matthews, K. 1988, ApJ, 328, L35

1370: 

1371: \bibitem[Sanders \& Fabian (2007)]{sanders07}

1372: Sanders, J.S., \& Fabian, A.C., 2007, \mnras, 951

1373: 

1374: \bibitem[Sanders et al., in preparation]{sanders07b}

1375: Sanders, J.S., Fabian, A.C., Allen, S.W., Morris, R.G., Graham, J., Johnstone, R.M.,

1376: 2007, MNRAS, submitted.

1377: 

1378: %Ultraviolet Imaging Observations of the cD Galaxy in Abell 1795: Further 

1379: %Evidence for Massive Star Formation in a Cooling Flow

1380: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1997)]{smith97}

1381: Smith, E. P., Bohlin, R. C., Bothum, G. D., O'Connell, R. W.,

1382: Roberts, M. S., Neff, S. G., Smith, A. M., \& Stecher, T. P. 1997,

1383: \apj, 478, 516

1384: 

1385: 

1386: %Hot Bubbles in Cooling Flow Clusters

1387: \bibitem[Soker et al.(2002)]{soker02}

1388: Soker, N., Blanton, E. L., Sarazin, C. L., 2002, ApJ, 573, 533

1389: 

1390: %The dusty emission filaments of M87

1391: \bibitem[Sparks et al.(1993)]{sparks93}

1392: Sparks, W. B., Ford, H. C., \& Kinney, A. L. 1993, ApJ, 413, 531

1393: 

1394: %Imaging observations of gas and dust in NGC 4696 and implications for cooling flow models

1395: \bibitem[Sparks et al.(1989)]{sparks89}

1396: Sparks, W. B., Macchetto, F., \& Golombek, D. 1989, ApJ, 345, 153

1397: 

1398: %X-ray spectroscopy of the cluster of galaxies Abell 1795 with XMM-Newton

1399: \bibitem[Tamura et al.(2001)]{tamura01}

1400: Tamura, T., et al. 2001, A\&Ap, 365, L87

1401: 

1402: %A Feedback Model for Radio Sources Fueled by Cooling Flows

1403: \bibitem[Tucker \& David(1997)]{tucker97}

1404: Tucker, W. H., \& David, L. P. 1997, ApJ, 484, 602

1405: 

1406: %Conduction and cooling flows

1407: \bibitem[Voigt et al.(2002)]{voigt02}

1408: Voigt, L. M., Schmidt, R. W., Fabian, A. C., Allen, S. W., \& Johnstone, R. M.

1409:  2002, MNRAS, 335, L7

1410: 

1411: %Problems with Cold Clouds and Cooling Flows

1412: \bibitem[Voit \& Donahue(1995)]{voit95}

1413: Voit, G.M., \& Donahue, M. 1995, ApJ, 452, 164

1414: 

1415: \bibitem[Voit \& Donahue(1997)]{voit97}

1416: Voit, G.M., \& Donahue, M. 1997, ApJ, 482, 242

1417: 

1418: %``A Catalog of 1.4 GHz Radio Sources from the FIRST Survey''

1419: 

1420: \bibitem[White et al.(1997)]{white97}

1421: White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., \&

1422: Gregg, M. D. 1997, ApJ, 475, 479

1423: 

1424: %Integral field spectroscopy of H? emission in cooling flow cluster cores: disturbing 

1425: %the molecular gas reservoir

1426: \bibitem[Wilman et al.(2006)]{wilman06}

1427: Wilman, R. J., Edge, A. C., \& Swinbank, A. M. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 93

1428: 

1429: %CO observations of infrared bright galaxies - The efficiency of star formation

1430: \bibitem[Young et al.(1986)]{young86}

1431: Young, J. S., Schloerb, F. P., Kenney, J. D., \& Lord, S. D.,

1432: 1986, ApJ, 304, 443

1433: 

1434: %Radio Properties of Infrared-selected Galaxies in the IRAS 2 Jy Sample

1435: 

1436: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2001)]{yun01}

1437: Yun, M.S., Reddy, N.A.,\& Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803

1438: 

1439: %models of galaxy clusters with thermal conduction

1440: 

1441: \bibitem[Zakamska \& Narayan(2003)]{zakamska03}

1442: Zakamska, N. L., \& Narayan, R. 2003, ApJ, 582,  162

1443: 

1444: 

1445: \end{thebibliography}{}

1446: \clearpage

1447: 

1448: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrr}

1449: \tablewidth{0pt}

1450: \tablecaption{Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficients\label{tab:corr}}

1451: \tablehead{

1452: \colhead{Plot name} &

1453: \colhead{Figure number} &

1454: \colhead{Correlation Coefficient} &

1455: \colhead{Two-sided significance }

1456: }

1457: \startdata

1458: %	

1459: $L_X$ vs $L_{\rm IR}$  & \ref{fig:lxvslir}	&  0.63 & $5.0\times10^{-5}$ \\

1460: $F_X$ vs $F_{\rm IR}$  &                  	&  0.14 & 0.40 \\

1461: %

1462: $L_X$ vs 8/5 & \ref{fig:lxvs85} &   0.38 & $3\times10^{-3}$ \\

1463: %

1464: $L_{1.4 \rm GHz}$ vs $L_{\rm IR}$ & \ref{fig:lradiolir} & 0.41	& 0.02    \\

1465: F$_{1.4 \rm GHz}$ vs $F_{\rm IR}$ &                    & -0.09	& 0.61    \\

1466: %

1467: $L_{\rm H\alpha}$ vs $L_{\rm IR}$ & \ref{fig:lalphalir} & 0.91 & $3.6\times10^{-12}$ \\

1468: $F_{\rm H\alpha}$ vs $F_{\rm IR}$ &                     & 0.65 & $1.1\times10^{-4}$ \\

1469: %

1470: $L({\rm H}\alpha)$ vs $L(24\mu {\rm m})$ &                  & 0.84 & $2 \times 10^{-15}$ \\

1471: $F({\rm H}\alpha)$ vs $F(24\mu {\rm m})$ & \ref{fig:havs24} & 0.67 & $4 \times 10^{-8}$ \\

1472: %

1473: M(H$_2$) vs $L_{\rm IR}$ & \ref{fig:coplots1} &  0.95  & $1.3\times10^{-10}$ \\

1474: F(CO)    vs $F_{\rm IR}$ &                    &  0.81  & $1.7\times10^{-5}$ \\

1475: %

1476: %${\dot M}_X$ vs SFR	& \ref{fig:mdot} &   0.778 & $1.12\times10^{-6}$

1477: \enddata

1478: \tablecomments{Col 1. Correlation being tested. 

1479: Col 2. Figure which plots the data. 

1480: Col 3. Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficients. 

1481: Col 4. Two-sided significance of the 

1482: correlation's deviation from zero. 

1483: The most signficant correlations are that between H$_\alpha$ and infrared luminosity

1484: and that between molecular gas mass and infrared luminosity.

1485: Most correlations are done both on fluxes and luminosities.

1486: % and between X-ray and IR fluxes. 

1487: }

1488: \end{deluxetable}

1489: 

1490: 

1491: 

1492: % table 3 of the selected photometry data for SFR dominated BCGs

1493: 

1494: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}

1495: \tablewidth{0pt}

1496: \tablecaption{Star Formation Rate(SFR) 

1497: \label{tab:selected}}

1498: \tablehead{

1499: \colhead{Cluster} &

1500: \colhead{L$_{IR}$} &

1501: \colhead{SFR}

1502: \\

1503: \colhead{}&

1504: \colhead{($10^{44}$erg s$^{-1}$)} &

1505: \colhead{($M_{\odot}$/yr)}

1506: }

1507: \startdata

1508: %

1509: Z2089*    & 64.68 & 271  \\

1510: A2146*    & 45.46 & 192  \\

1511: A1068*    & 44.61 & 188  \\ 

1512: R0821+07* & 8.47  & 37   \\ 

1513: \hline

1514: R1532+30* & 22.62 & 97   \\

1515: Z8193*    & 13.70 & 59   \\

1516: Z0348*    & 11.92 & 52   \\

1517: A0011*    & 7.97  & 35   \\

1518: PKS0745-1 & 3.80  & 17.2 \\

1519: A1664     & 3.21 & 14.6  \\

1520: R0352+19  & 2.40 & 11.1  \\

1521: NGC4104   & 0.80 & 4.0   \\

1522: R0338+09  & 0.39 & 2.1   \\ 

1523: \hline

1524: R0439+05* & 4.17 & 18.7  \\

1525: A2204    & 3.23 & 14.7   \\

1526: A2627    & 1.59 & 7.5    \\

1527: A0115    & 1.30 & 6.2    \\

1528: Z8197    & 0.72 & 3.6    \\ 

1529: \hline

1530: R2129+00 & 2.93 & 13.4      \\

1531: A1204    & 1.73 & 8.1       \\

1532: A0646    & 1.49 & 7.1       \\

1533: A2055    & 1.46 & 7.0       \\

1534: A0291    & 1.30 & 6.3       \\

1535: A1885    & 1.04 & 5.1       \\

1536: A3112    & 0.84 & 4.2       \\

1537: A2292    & 0.80 & 4.0       \\

1538: A1930    & 0.75 & 3.8       \\

1539: Z8276    & 0.74 & 3.7       \\

1540: A4095    & 0.29 & 1.6       \\

1541: A0085    & 0.28 & 1.6       \\

1542: A2052    & 0.24 & 1.4       \\

1543: R0000+08 & 0.20 & 1.2       \\

1544: NGC6338  & 0.18 & 1.0       \\

1545: R0751+50 & 0.10 & 0.65      \\

1546: A0262   &  0.08 & 0.54    

1547: \enddata

1548: \tablecomments{

1549: Infrared luminosities are from \citet{quillen07} 

1550: estimated from the 15$\mu$m wavelength

1551: for BCGs that are detected at 70$\mu$m or have color ratio

1552: $F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}}>1.0$ or 

1553: $F_{24 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}>1.0$.

1554: The star formation rate was estimated using Equation \ref{eqn:SFR}.

1555: The top section contains four BCGs that are suspected

1556: to harbor dusty Type II AGNs. Z2089, A2146 and A1068 exhibit a

1557: red $F_{4.5 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{3.6\mu {\rm m}} $ color and all four

1558: exhibit high $[$OIII$]$(5007)/H$\beta$ flux ratios.

1559: Note that if there is an AGN present in one of these clusters,

1560: the SFR may be overestimated. 

1561: The second set is

1562: the remaining 10 BCGs with $F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}}>1.3$.

1563: The third section is the set of 6 clusters with

1564: $1.0<F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}}<1.3$.

1565: The fourth set is the remaining BCGs with IR excesses.

1566: Specifically they have ratios

1567: $F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}}>1.0$,

1568: $F_{24 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{8.0 \mu {\rm m}}>1.0$,

1569: or a detected 70$\mu$m flux.

1570: The BCGs marked with a $*$ can be classified as LIRGs

1571: since they have L$_{IR}$ greater than $10^{11}L_\odot$.

1572: Objects with $F_{8 \mu {\rm m}}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}}<1.0$ or 

1573: $F_{24\mu{\rm m}}/F_{8\mu {\rm m}} < 1$ and lacking a $70\mu$m detection 

1574: are listed in Table 3 of paper I \citep{quillen07}  with upper limits

1575: on $L_{IR}$.  For these

1576: objects $L_{IR} \la 0.3 \times 10^{44}$erg~s$^{-1}$ and 

1577: corresponding star formation

1578: rates are lower than $\la 1 M_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$.

1579: }

1580: \end{deluxetable}

1581: 

1582: 

1583: 

1584: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrrrrrrrrrr}

1585: %\tablewidth{0pt}

1586: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1587: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.02in}

1588: \rotate

1589: \tablecaption{Comparison of Estimates of Star Formation Rate \label{tab:SFR_comp}}

1590: \tablehead{

1591: \colhead{BCG } &

1592: \colhead{OD07} &

1593: \colhead{C99} &

1594: \colhead{HM05 }& 

1595: \colhead{MO93} &

1596: \colhead{M95} &

1597: \colhead{M04 }& 

1598: \colhead{M05} &

1599: \colhead{B03} &

1600: \colhead{MO89 }& 

1601: \colhead{OD04 }&

1602: \colhead{D07} 

1603: }

1604: \startdata

1605: %	

1606: %BCG   & OD07& C99& HM05 & MO93 & M95 & M04 & M05 & B03 & MO89 & OD04 & D07 \\

1607: A262   & 0.5 &    &      & 0.02 &     &     &     &     &      &      &     \\ 

1608: A2597  &     &    &      &  12  &     &     &     &     &      &  10  &  4   \\

1609: A1795  &     &  2 &   9  &  12  &     &     &     &     &  1.8 &  10  &      \\

1610: A1835  &     & 77-125& 123&     &     &     & 100 &     &      &      &      \\

1611:  "     &     &    &      &      &     &     & 138 (FIR) & &     &      &      \\

1612: HydA   &     &    &  9.5 &      & 1 (b)   &     &     &     &      &      &      \\

1613:  "     &     &    &      &      & 23-35 (c) &   &     &     &      &      &      \\  

1614: A2052  & 1.4 & 0.96 &    &      &     &     &     &0.4-0.6& 0.16&     &      \\   

1615: A1068  & 188 &  30 &     &      &     &16-40&    &     &      &      &      \\

1616:  "     &     &    &      &      &     & 68 (IR)&   &     &     &       &     \\ 

1617: A1664  &  14 &  23 &     &      &     &      &    &     &     &       &     \\

1618: R1532  &  97 &  12 &     &      &     &     &     &     &     &       &     \\

1619: A2146  & 192 &  5.6 &    &      &     &     &     &     &     &       &     \\          

1620: PKS0745 & 17 &    & 129  &      &     &     &     &     &     &       &     \\     

1621: \enddata

1622: \tablecomments{Comparison of star formation rates from this paper (Col 2) with estimates

1623: from the literature (Col 3-12) Values are in units of $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. References: 

1624: OD07 =  this paper, C99  =  Crawford et al. (1999), HM05    =  Hicks \& Mushotzky (2005),

1625:        MO93    =  McNamara \& O'Connell (1993), M95     =  McNamara (1995), 

1626:        M04     =  McNamara et al. (2004), M05     =  McNamara et al. (2005),

1627:        B03     =  Blanton et al. (2003), MO89    =  McNamara \& O'Connell (1989),

1628:        OD04 =  O'Dea et al. (2004), D07   =  Donahue et al. (2007).

1629: For Hydra A, (b) and (c) refer to short duration burst and continuous 

1630: star formation models, respectively. 

1631: }

1632: \end{deluxetable}

1633: 

1634: 

1635: 

1636: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrr}

1637: \tablewidth{0pt}

1638: \tablecaption{Mass Deposition Rates\label{tab:mdot}}

1639: \tablehead{

1640: \colhead{Cluster} &

1641: \colhead{$\dot{M}_S$} & 

1642: \colhead{$\dot{M}_I$} \\

1643: \colhead{} &

1644: \colhead{($M_\odot$/yr)} &

1645: \colhead{($M_\odot$/yr)}

1646: }

1647: \startdata

1648: %Targets	mdot

1649: %		msol/yr

1650: A1068     & 30$^{+20}_{-10}$    & 440$^{+10}_{-10}$ \\

1651: R1532+30  & 400$^{+200}_{-200}$ & 1900$^{+100}_{-100}$ \\

1652: PKS0745-1 & 200$^{+40}_{-30}$   & 1080$^{+50}_{-40}$ \\

1653: A1664     & 60$^{+20}_{-20}$    & 330$^{+20}_{-20}$ \\

1654: R0338+09  & 17$^{+5}_{-3}$      & 270$^{+6}_{-6}$ \\

1655: A2204     & 70$^{+40}_{-40}$    & 860$^{+60}_{-60}$ \\

1656: A115      & 6$^{+11}_{-6}$      & 190$^{+10}_{-10}$ \\

1657: R2129+00  & 6$^{+30}_{-6}$      & 380$^{+30}_{-20}$ \\

1658: A1204     & 50$^{+40}_{-30}$    & 620$^{+30}_{-30}$ \\

1659: A3112     & 10$^{+7}_{-5}$      & 220$^{+10}_{-10}$ \\

1660: A4059     & 5$^{+2}_{-1}$       & 105$^{+2}_{-3}$ \\

1661: A0085     & 6$^{+8}_{-4}$       & 210$^{+10}_{-10}$ \\

1662: A2052     & 5$^{+1}_{-1}$       & 72$^{+1}_{-1}$ \\

1663: A0262     & 1.8$^{+0.4}_{-0.2}$  & 10$^{+1}_{-1}$ \\

1664: \enddata

1665: \tablecomments{Mass deposition rates calculated within $r_{cool}$ using Chandra

1666:   and XMM data.  $\dot{M}_S$ is a measure of the mass deposition rate

1667:   consistent with the X-ray spectra and $\dot{M}_I$ is a measure of the mass deposition rate

1668:   if heating is absent. Sources are listed in order of decreasing SFR. 

1669: }

1670: \end{deluxetable}

1671: 

1672: \begin{figure*} %Fig 1

1673: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=3.8in]{43z.eps}

1674: %\plotone{43z.eps}

1675: \plotone{f1.eps}

1676: \caption{Flux ratio $F_{4.5}/F_{3.6}$ vs. redshift. The labeled objects show 

1677: evidence for

1678: the presence of an optically luminous type 2 AGN. 

1679: \label{fig:43redshift}}

1680: \end{figure*}

1681: 

1682: \begin{figure*} %Fig 2

1683: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=3.8in]{LxvsLIR2.eps}

1684: %\plotone{LxvsLIR.eps}

1685: \plotone{f2.eps}

1686: \caption{X-ray luminosity vs. estimated infrared luminosity.

1687: X-ray and infrared luminosities are listed in Tables 1 and 3 of Paper I.  

1688: Solid squares are our reddest group with 8 to 5.8$\mu$m flux ratio  

1689: greater than $1.3$.

1690: The intermediate group with flux ratios between 1.0 and 1.3 are plotted

1691: as stars.   

1692: Solid triangles have 8 to 5.8 $\mu$m flux ratio less than 1 but

1693: 24 to 8 $\mu$m flux ratio above 1.  Solid diamonds are galaxies

1694: with both 24 to 8 and 8 to 5.8 $\mu$m flux ratios less than 1

1695: but have been detected at 70$\mu$m.

1696: Flux ratios are computed using photometry listed in Table 2 

1697: in Paper I. 

1698: Upper limits on the infrared luminosity are shown by arrows.

1699: We find a weak correlation between X-ray and infrared luminosity.

1700: The dashed line  is the kinetic energy injection rate predicted

1701: from a star forming population due to supernovae as a function of the infrared

1702: luminosity.   We confirm that kinetic energy from supernovae cannot

1703: account for the X-ray radiative energy losses in most cooling

1704: flows.

1705: \label{fig:lxvslir}}

1706: \end{figure*}

1707: 

1708: \begin{figure*} %Fig 3.

1709: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=3.8in]{Lxvs852.eps}

1710: %\plotone{Lxvs85.eps}

1711: \plotone{f3.eps}

1712: \caption{

1713: X-ray luminosity vs. 8 to 5.8$\mu$m flux ratio 

1714: (data taken from Tables 1 and 2 in Paper I).   

1715: Most red objects with $F_{8\mu}/F_{5.8 \mu {\rm m}} > 1$ 

1716: have X-ray luminosity $L_X > 10^{44} $ erg/s.

1717: \label{fig:lxvs85}}

1718: \end{figure*}

1719: 

1720: \begin{figure*} %Fig 4.

1721: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=3.8in]{LradiovsLIR2.eps}

1722: %\plotone{LradiovsLIR.eps}

1723: \plotone{f4.eps}

1724: \caption{Radio luminosity at 1.4 GHz (listed in Table 1 of Paper I)

1725: vs. estimated infrared luminosity (Table~\ref{tab:selected}.

1726: The radio-infrared correlation (equation \ref{eqn:rir})

1727: for star forming objects is shown as a line on the lower right.  The radio

1728: fluxes are much higher than expected from the radio-IR correlation appropriate

1729: for star forming late type galaxies.  This is not unexpected since many of these

1730: objects contain radio cores and in some cases even double lobed jets.

1731: We find a weak correlation between the radio luminosity at 1.4 GHz and the

1732: infrared luminosity. The point types are as given in Figure \ref{fig:lxvslir}.

1733: \label{fig:lradiolir}}

1734: \end{figure*}

1735: 

1736: 

1737: \begin{figure} %Fig 5. 

1738: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=3.8in]{LHAlphavsLIR_2.eps}

1739: %\plotone{LHAlphavsLIR.eps}

1740: \plotone{f5.eps}

1741: \caption{Observed H$\alpha$ Luminosity (listed in Table 1 of Paper I)

1742: vs Infrared Luminosity

1743: estimated from the 8$\mu$m and 24.4$\mu$m fluxes.

1744: The data for 2 BCGs from \citet{egami06a} are shown as open circles.

1745: The Kennicutt relation inferred from observations of star forming galaxies

1746: relating H$\alpha$ luminosity to star formation rate

1747: is plotted as a line.  

1748: We have divided the line by a factor of 2.8 

1749: to back-out the reddening correction since our H$\alpha$ luminosities are

1750: uncorrected for reddening. 

1751: The H$\alpha$ fluxes are consistent with

1752: the estimated infrared luminosities and star formation.  As is

1753: true for Figure \ref{fig:lxvslir} the point types depend on

1754: the 8 to 5.8$\mu$m color.

1755: We suspect that some of the H$\alpha$ luminosities are lower than expected

1756: because the apertures used to measure them were smaller than

1757: those used to measure the infrared fluxes.

1758: \label{fig:lalphalir}}

1759: \end{figure}

1760: 

1761: \begin{figure} %Fig 6.

1762: %\plotone{lhavs24.eps}

1763: \plotone{f6.eps}

1764: \caption{Observed H$\alpha$ flux vs 24 $\mu$m flux listed

1765: in Paper I. Arrows denote upper limits.

1766: \label{fig:havs24}}

1767: \end{figure}

1768: 

1769: \begin{figure*} %Fig 7.

1770: %\plotone{covslir.eps}

1771: \plotone{f7.eps}

1772: \caption{Correlation of H$_2$ mass from CO luminosity and $L_{\rm IR}$. 

1773:  A1835 and Z3146, discussed by \citet{egami06a}, and A2597 discussed

1774: by \citet{donahue07b} are shown as filled circles. 

1775: We find a strong correlation 

1776: and as such consider the relation between CO and star formation.  

1777: Upper limits are shown as arrows. 

1778: The 4 objects thought to host AGNs are labeled.

1779: Two of these have IR luminosity higher than expected from

1780: their molecular gas mass.

1781: \label{fig:coplots1}}

1782: \end{figure*}

1783: 

1784: \begin{figure*} %Fig 8

1785: %\plotone{covssfr.eps}

1786: \plotone{f8.eps}

1787: \caption{Correlation of H$_2$ mass from CO luminosity and SFR.

1788: 2 BCGs, A1835 and Z3146, discussed by \citet{egami06a}, are shown as filled

1789: circles. 

1790: The dotted lines are taken from Eq. 4 by \citet{kennicutt98} using different 

1791: values for the diameter of the star forming region. See the legend at the upper left.

1792: The diameter of the star forming region

1793: tends to be larger for more luminous objects.

1794: Solid lines are computed assuming gas depletion time scales

1795: of $10^{8.5}, 10^9$ and $10^{9.5}$ years. See the legend at the upper left.

1796: \label{fig:coplots2}}

1797: \end{figure*}

1798: 

1799: \begin{figure*} %Fig 9.

1800: %\plotone{tcool_30kpc.eps}

1801: \plotone{f9.eps}

1802: \caption{IR luminosity vs. X-ray derived cooling times at a radius of 30 kpc. 

1803: BCGs have higher IR luminosity in clusters with shorter cooling times. 

1804: \label{fig:tcool}}

1805: \end{figure*}

1806: 

1807: 

1808: \begin{figure*} %Fig 10.

1809: %\plotone{mdotslinev2.eps}

1810: \plotone{f10.eps}

1811: \caption{

1812: X-ray derived mass deposition rate upper limits against estimated star formation rates.

1813: The closed circles correspond to maximum mass deposition rates, ${\dot M}_I$ if

1814: heating is absent,

1815: and the open circles refer to ${\dot M}_S$, the mass deposition rate

1816: consistent with the X-ray spectra. The dashed line is for equal star

1817: 	formation and mass deposition rates.

1818: \label{fig:mdot}}

1819: \end{figure*}

1820: 

1821: \begin{figure*} %Fig 10.

1822: %\plotone{luminosity2.eps}

1823: \plotone{f11.eps}

1824: \caption{

1825: The X-ray luminosity emitted with the cooling radius (a fiducial

1826: radius where the radiative cooling time is 7.7~Gyr, corresponding to

1827: redshift one) is plotted in solid circles against the Spitzer infrared

1828: luminosity. The expected (missing) luminosity emitted below 1~keV by a

1829: continuous cooling flow operating from the cluster virial temperature

1830: to zero K is shown by the open circles. If mixing with dusty cold gas

1831: causes the rapid non-radiative cooling of the intracluster gas below

1832: 1~keV then this luminsoity could emerge in the mid-infrared.

1833: \label{fig:alt}}

1834: \end{figure*}

1835: 

1836: 

1837: \end{document}

1838: